wanyu/IteraTeR_full_sent huggingface dataset:
Original:  Kiva Is Not Quite What It Seems , by David Roodman, Center for Global Development, 2 October 2009, as accessed 2 16 January 2010 The large amount of data gathered from packet capturing requires surveillance software that filters and reports relevant information, such as the use of certain words or phrases, the access of certain types of web sites, or communicating via email or chat with certain parties.
Revised:  16 January 2010 The large amount of data gathered from packet capturing requires surveillance software that filters and reports relevant information, such as the use of certain words or phrases, the access of certain types of web sites, or communicating via email or chat with certain parties.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Kiva Is Not Quite What It Seems , by David Roodman, Center for Global Development, 2 October 2009, as accessed 2 16 January 2010 The large amount of data gathered from packet capturing requires surveillance software that filters and reports relevant information, such as the use of certain words or phrases, the access of certain types of web sites, or communicating via email or chat with certain parties.
Revised:  Kiva Is Not Quite What It Seems , by David Roodman, Center for Global Development, 2 October 2009, as accessed 2 The large amount of data gathered from packet capturing requires surveillance software that filters and reports relevant information, such as the use of certain words or phrases, the access of certain types of web sites, or communicating via email or chat with certain parties.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  "First round in Internet war goes to Iranian intelligence", Debkafile, 28 June 2009. upright=1.8|Internet censorship and surveillance by country (2018)OpenNet Initiative "Summarized global Internet filtering data spreadsheet" , 8 November 2011 and "Country Profiles" , the OpenNet Initiative is a collaborative partnership of the Citizen Lab at the Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto;
Revised:  upright=1.8|Internet censorship and surveillance by country (2018)OpenNet Initiative "Summarized global Internet filtering data spreadsheet" , 8 November 2011 and "Country Profiles" , the OpenNet Initiative is a collaborative partnership of the Citizen Lab at the Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto;
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  "Internet Enemies", Enemies of the Internet 2014: Entities at the heart of censorship and surveillance, Reporters Without Borders (Paris), 11 March 2014. Retrieved 24 June 2014.Internet Enemies, Reporters Without Borders (Paris), 12 March 2012 Some governments, such as those of Burma, Iran, North Korea, Mainland China, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, restrict access to content on the Internet within their territories, especially to political and religious content, with domain name and keyword filters.
Revised:  Some governments, such as those of Burma, Iran, North Korea, Mainland China, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, restrict access to content on the Internet within their territories, especially to political and religious content, with domain name and keyword filters.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace , Ronald J. Deibert, John G. Palfrey, Rafal Rohozinski, and Jonathan Zittrain (eds), MIT Press, April 2010, In 2011, academic researchers estimated the overall energy used by the Internet to be between 170 and 307 GW, less than two percent of the energy used by humanity.
Revised:  In 2011, academic researchers estimated the overall energy used by the Internet to be between 170 and 307 GW, less than two percent of the energy used by humanity.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Jim Giles, "Internet responsible for 2 per cent of global energy usage". New Scientist (Reed Business Information Ltd.), 26 October 2011. , "The Energy and Emergy of the Internet" , Barath Raghavan (ICSI) and Justin Ma (UC Berkeley), in Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, 14–15 November 2011, Cambridge, MA. ACM SIGCOMM. According to a non-peer reviewed study published in 2018 by The Shift Project (a French think tank funded by corporate sponsors), nearly 4\% of global CO2 emissions could be attributed to global data transfer and the necessary infrastructure.
Revised:  , "The Energy and Emergy of the Internet" , Barath Raghavan (ICSI) and Justin Ma (UC Berkeley), in Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, 14–15 November 2011, Cambridge, MA. ACM SIGCOMM. According to a non-peer reviewed study published in 2018 by The Shift Project (a French think tank funded by corporate sponsors), nearly 4\% of global CO2 emissions could be attributed to global data transfer and the necessary infrastructure.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: , 26 October 2011. , "The Energy and Emergy of the Internet" , Barath Raghavan (ICSI) and Justin Ma (UC Berkeley), in Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, 14–15 November 2011, Cambridge, MA. ACM SIGCOMM. According to a non-peer reviewed study published in 2018 by The Shift Project (a French think tank funded by corporate sponsors), nearly 4\% of global CO2 emissions could be attributed to global data transfer and the necessary infrastructure.
Revised: , 26 October 2011. , According to a non-peer reviewed study published in 2018 by The Shift Project (a French think tank funded by corporate sponsors), nearly 4\% of global CO2 emissions could be attributed to global data transfer and the necessary infrastructure.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: Apple Inc.  Prior to March 2009, digital music files with digital rights management were available for purchase from the iTunes Store, encoded in a proprietary derivative of the  AAC format that used Apple's FairPlay DRM system.
Revised: Apple Inc. Criticism of Apple Inc. Accusations of anti-competitive behavior Prior to March 2009, digital music files with digital rights management were available for purchase from the iTunes Store, encoded in a proprietary derivative of the AAC format that used Apple's FairPlay DRM system.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: Apple Inc.  Prior to March 2009, digital music files with digital rights management were available for purchase from the iTunes Store, encoded in a proprietary derivative of the  AAC format that used Apple's FairPlay DRM system.
Revised: Apple Inc. Prior to March 2009, digital music files with digital rights management were available for purchase from the iTunes Store, encoded in a proprietary derivative of the Advanced Audio Coding| AAC format that used Apple's FairPlay DRM system.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  These files are compatible only with Apple's iTunes media player software on Macs and Windows, their iPod portable digital music players, iPhone smartphones, iPad tablet computers, and the Motorola  ROKR E1 and SLVR mobile phones.
Revised:  These files are compatible only with Apple's iTunes media player software on Macintosh|Macs and Microsoft Windows| Windows, their iPod portable digital music players, iPhone smartphones, iPad tablet computers, and the Motorola ROKR E1 and SLVR mobile phones.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  These files are compatible only with Apple's iTunes media player software on Macs and Windows, their iPod portable digital music players, iPhone smartphones, iPad tablet computers, and the Motorola  ROKR E1 and SLVR mobile phones.
Revised:  These files are compatible only with Apple's iTunes media player software on Macs and Windows, their iPod portable digital music players, iPhone smartphones, iPad tablet computers, and the Motorola Motorola ROKR E1 and SLVR mobile phones.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  These files are compatible only with Apple's iTunes media player software on Macs and Windows, their iPod portable digital music players, iPhone smartphones, iPad tablet computers, and the Motorola  ROKR E1 and SLVR mobile phones.
Revised:  These files are compatible only with Apple's iTunes media player software on Macs and Windows, their iPod portable digital music players, iPhone smartphones, iPad tablet computers, and the Motorola ROKR E1 |ROKR E1 and Motorola SLVR| SLVR mobile phones.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  As a result, that music was locked into this ecosystem and available for portable use only through the purchase of one of the above devices,  or by burning to  CD and optionally re-ripping to a DRM-free format such as MP3 or WAV.
Revised:  As a result, that music was locked into this ecosystem and available for portable use only through the purchase of one of the above devices, Is Apple Playing Fair? Navigating the iPod FairPlay DRM Controversy or by burning to CD and optionally re-ripping to a DRM-free format such as MP3 or WAV.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  As a result, that music was locked into this ecosystem and available for portable use only through the purchase of one of the above devices,  or by burning to  CD and optionally re-ripping to a DRM-free format such as MP3 or WAV.
Revised:  As a result, that music was locked into this ecosystem and available for portable use only through the purchase of one of the above devices, or by burning to Compact disc| CD and optionally re-ripping to a DRM-free format such as MP3 or WAV.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  " At the time Apple was stated to have an 80\% market share of digital music sales and a 90\% share of sales of new music players, which he claimed allowed Apple to horizontally leverage its dominant positions in both markets to lock consumers into its complementary offerings.
Revised:  At the time Apple was stated to have an 80\% market share of digital music sales and a 90\% share of sales of new music players, which he claimed allowed Apple to horizontally leverage its dominant positions in both markets to lock consumers into its complementary offerings.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In September 2005, U.S. District Judge James Ware  approved Slattery v. Apple Computer Inc . to proceed with monopoly charges against Apple in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Revised:  In September 2005, U.S. District Judge James Ware judge|James Ware approved Slattery v. Apple Computer Inc . to proceed with monopoly charges against Apple in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  In September 2005, U.S. District Judge James Ware  approved Slattery v. Apple Computer Inc . to proceed with monopoly charges against Apple in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Revised:  In September 2005, U.S. District Judge James Ware approved Slattery v. Apple Computer Inc to proceed with monopoly charges against Apple in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In September 2005, U.S. District Judge James Ware  approved Slattery v. Apple Computer Inc . to proceed with monopoly charges against Apple in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Revised:  In September 2005, U.S. District Judge James Ware approved Slattery v. Apple Computer Inc . to proceed with monopoly charges against Apple in violation of the Sherman Antitrust . Suit Against Apple Over iPod, iTunes to Proceed |author-Donna |author-Higgins |publisher FindLaw Legal News |date 2005-09-22.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  The contract conditions were vague and " clearly unbalanced to disfavor the customer " . The retroactive changes to the  DRM conditions and the incompatibility with other music players are the major points of concern.
Revised:  The contract conditions were vague and clearly unbalanced to disfavor the customer " . The retroactive changes to the DRM conditions and the incompatibility with other music players are the major points of concern.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The contract conditions were vague and " clearly unbalanced to disfavor the customer " . The retroactive changes to the  DRM conditions and the incompatibility with other music players are the major points of concern.
Revised:  The contract conditions were vague and " clearly unbalanced to disfavor the customer . The retroactive changes to the DRM conditions and the incompatibility with other music players are the major points of concern.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The contract conditions were vague and " clearly unbalanced to disfavor the customer " . The retroactive changes to the  DRM conditions and the incompatibility with other music players are the major points of concern.
Revised:  The contract conditions were vague and " clearly unbalanced to disfavor the customer " . The retroactive changes to the Digital Rights Management| DRM conditions and the incompatibility with other music players are the major points of concern.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  In an earlier letter to Apple, consumer ombudsman Bjørn Erik Thon complained that iTunes' DRM mechanism was a lock-in to Apple's music players, and argued that this was a conflict with consumer rights that he doubted would be defendable by Norwegian copyright law.   , tracks on the EMI label became available in a DRM-free format called iTunes Plus.
Revised:  In an earlier letter to Apple, consumer ombudsman qqBjørn Erik Thon complained that iTunes' DRM mechanism was a lock-in to Apple's music players, and argued that this was a conflict with consumer rights that he doubted would be defendable by Norwegian copyright law. , tracks on the EMI label became available in a DRM-free format called iTunes Plus.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  In an earlier letter to Apple, consumer ombudsman Bjørn Erik Thon complained that iTunes' DRM mechanism was a lock-in to Apple's music players, and argued that this was a conflict with consumer rights that he doubted would be defendable by Norwegian copyright law.   , tracks on the EMI label became available in a DRM-free format called iTunes Plus.
Revised:  In an earlier letter to Apple, consumer ombudsman Bjørn Erik Thon complained that iTunes' DRM mechanism was a lock-in to Apple's music players, and argued that this was a conflict with consumer rights that he doubted would be defendable by Norwegian copyright law. Author Thon |author-Bjørn Erik |iTunes terms of service vs Norwegian marketing law. English transcribed: The Consumer Council reacts to the observation that iTunes DRM entails that the files can only be played on a few players, mainly Apple's own players. They furthermore believe that the terms of service's point 9b, where the customer among other things must agree not to circumvent or change such technical hindrances, is in conflict with the copyright law 53a. Copyright holders are by the copyright law entitled to decide if the work is to be made available, and in principle also how it is made available. Copyright can in my opinion not give the copyright holder right to demand all kinds of conditions when sold to consumers in generality.Norwegian original: Forbrukerrådet reagerer på at iTunes Music Stores DRM medfører at filene kun kan spilles på et fåtall spillere, hovedsakelig Apples egne spillere. De mener videre at tjenestevilkårenes punkt 9b, hvor kunden blant annet må samtykke til ikke å omgå eller endre slike tekniske sperrer, er i strid med åndsverksloven 53a. Rettighetshaverens enerett etter åndsverksloven gir anledning til å bestemme om verket skal gjøres tilgjengelig, og rettighetshaveren kan også i utgangspunktet bestemme måten dette skal skje på. Opphavsretten kan etter min mening ikke gi rettighetshaveren rett til å stille enhver form for betingelser ved salg til forbrukere , tracks on the EMI label became available in a DRM-free format called iTunes Plus.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  In an earlier letter to Apple, consumer ombudsman Bjørn Erik Thon complained that iTunes' DRM mechanism was a lock-in to Apple's music players, and argued that this was a conflict with consumer rights that he doubted would be defendable by Norwegian copyright law.   , tracks on the EMI label became available in a DRM-free format called iTunes Plus.
Revised:  In an earlier letter to Apple, consumer ombudsman Bjørn Erik Thon complained that iTunes' DRM mechanism was a lock-in to Apple's music players, and argued that this was a conflict with consumer rights that he doubted would be defendable by Norwegian copyright law. As of|2007|05|29 , tracks on the EMI label became available in a DRM-free format called iTunes Plus.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  As of January 6, 2009, all four big music studios ( Warner Bros., Sony BMG, Universal  , and EMI ) have signed up to remove the DRM from their tracks, at no extra cost.
Revised:  As of January 6, 2009, all four big music studios Warner Bros., Sony BMG, Universal , and EMI ) have signed up to remove the DRM from their tracks, at no extra cost.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  As of January 6, 2009, all four big music studios ( Warner Bros., Sony BMG, Universal  , and EMI ) have signed up to remove the DRM from their tracks, at no extra cost.
Revised:  As of January 6, 2009, all four big music studios ( Warner Bros., Sony BMG, Universal Music Group|Universal , and EMI ) have signed up to remove the DRM from their tracks, at no extra cost.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  As of January 6, 2009, all four big music studios ( Warner Bros., Sony BMG, Universal  , and EMI ) have signed up to remove the DRM from their tracks, at no extra cost.
Revised:  As of January 6, 2009, all four big music studios ( Warner Bros., Sony BMG, Universal , and EMI have signed up to remove the DRM from their tracks, at no extra cost.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Components of the MLAS test vehicle Concept of test vehicle operations The Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) is a proposed alternative to the Max Faget-invented "tractor" Launch Escape System (LES) currently planned for use by NASA for its Orion spacecraft in the event an Ares I malfunction during launch requires an immediate abort.
Revised:  Components of the MLAS test vehicle MLAS test vehicle flight profile The Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) is a proposed alternative to the Max Faget-invented "tractor" Launch Escape System (LES) currently planned for use by NASA for its Orion spacecraft in the event an Ares I malfunction during launch requires an immediate abort.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Components of the MLAS test vehicle Concept of test vehicle operations The Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) is a proposed alternative to the Max Faget-invented "tractor" Launch Escape System (LES) currently planned for use by NASA for its Orion spacecraft in the event an Ares I malfunction during launch requires an immediate abort.
Revised:  Components of the MLAS test vehicle Concept of test vehicle operations The Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) was a proposed alternative to the Max Faget-invented "tractor" Launch Escape System (LES) currently planned for use by NASA for its Orion spacecraft in the event an Ares I malfunction during launch requires an immediate abort.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Components of the MLAS test vehicle Concept of test vehicle operations The Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) is a proposed alternative to the Max Faget-invented "tractor" Launch Escape System (LES) currently planned for use by NASA for its Orion spacecraft in the event an Ares I malfunction during launch requires an immediate abort.
Revised:  Components of the MLAS test vehicle Concept of test vehicle operations The Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) is a proposed alternative to the Maxime Faget-invented "tractor" Launch Escape System (LES) currently planned for use by NASA for its Orion spacecraft in the event an Ares I malfunction during launch requires an immediate abort.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Components of the MLAS test vehicle Concept of test vehicle operations The Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) is a proposed alternative to the Max Faget-invented "tractor" Launch Escape System (LES) currently planned for use by NASA for its Orion spacecraft in the event an Ares I malfunction during launch requires an immediate abort.
Revised:  Components of the MLAS test vehicle Concept of test vehicle operations The Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) is a proposed alternative to the Max Faget-invented "tractor" launch escape system (LES) currently planned for use by NASA for its Orion spacecraft in the event an Ares I malfunction during launch requires an immediate abort.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Components of the MLAS test vehicle Concept of test vehicle operations The Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) is a proposed alternative to the Max Faget-invented "tractor" Launch Escape System (LES) currently planned for use by NASA for its Orion spacecraft in the event an Ares I malfunction during launch requires an immediate abort.
Revised:  Components of the MLAS test vehicle Concept of test vehicle operations The Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) is a proposed alternative to the Max Faget-invented "tractor" Launch Escape System (LES) that was planned for use by NASA for its Orion spacecraft in the event an Ares I malfunction during launch requires an immediate abort.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Components of the MLAS test vehicle Concept of test vehicle operations The Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) is a proposed alternative to the Max Faget-invented "tractor" Launch Escape System (LES) currently planned for use by NASA for its Orion spacecraft in the event an Ares I malfunction during launch requires an immediate abort.
Revised:  Components of the MLAS test vehicle Concept of test vehicle operations The Max Launch Abort System (MLAS) is a proposed alternative to the Max Faget-invented "tractor" Launch Escape System (LES) currently planned for use by NASA for its Orion spacecraft in the event an Ares I malfunction during launch required an immediate abort.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Designed by NASA engineers and reported on the website nasaspaceflight .com on December 6, 2007, the proposed MLAS uses 4 existing Thiokol-Huntsville built solid-rocket motors (built in 1988) placed at 90° intervals within the Orion's bullet-shaped protective cover (fairing).
Revised:  Designed by NASA engineers and reported on the website NASASpaceFlight .com on December 6, 2007, the proposed MLAS uses 4 existing Thiokol-Huntsville built solid-rocket motors (built in 1988) placed at 90° intervals within the Orion's bullet-shaped protective cover (fairing).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Designed by NASA engineers and reported on the website nasaspaceflight .com on December 6, 2007, the proposed MLAS uses 4 existing Thiokol-Huntsville built solid-rocket motors (built in 1988) placed at 90° intervals within the Orion's bullet-shaped protective cover (fairing).
Revised:  Designed by NASA engineers and reported on the website nasaspaceflight .com on December 6, 2007, the proposed MLAS used four existing Huntsville-built Thiokol solid-rocket motors (built in 1988) placed at 90° intervals within the Orion's bullet-shaped protective cover (fairing).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Designed by NASA engineers and reported on the website nasaspaceflight .com on December 6, 2007, the proposed MLAS uses 4 existing Thiokol-Huntsville built solid-rocket motors (built in 1988) placed at 90° intervals within the Orion's bullet-shaped protective cover (fairing). The protective cover was originally designed to protect the Orion spacecraft from aerodynamic stresses during launch, and to provide an interface between the spacecraft's crew module with the LES.
Revised:  Designed by NASA engineers and reported on the website nasaspaceflight .com on December 6, 2007, the proposed MLAS uses 4 existing Thiokol-Huntsville built solid-rocket motors (built in 1988) placed at 90° intervals within the Orion's bullet-shaped fairing. The fairing was originally designed to protect the Orion spacecraft from aerodynamic stresses during launch, and to provide an interface between the spacecraft's crew module with the LES.
Edit intent: clarity