Os links abaixo levam para quatro pequenos artigos que Bruno Garschagen publicou em meados de 2016 com algumas informacoes sobre o conservadorismo. Ele traz caracteristicas, identifica politicos conservadores do seculo XIX e menciona autores e referencias sobre o assunto.GARSCHAGEN, Bruno. Historia e tradicao do conservadorismo brasileiro. Gazeta do Povo. Colunistas. 25 de julho de 2016. Disponivel em: <http://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/opiniao/colunistas/bruno-garschagen/historia-e-tradicao-do-conservadorismo-brasileiro-8qlhl00pnfgvr3cb27qln44gp>. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2017.GARSCHAGEN, Bruno. Historia e tradicao do conservadorismo brasileiro (2). Gazeta do Povo. Colunistas. 1o de agosto de 2016. Disponivel em: <http://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/opiniao/colunistas/bruno-garschagen/historia-e-tradicao-do-conservadorismo-brasileiro-2-6ts5zpllck9w1jcd8t2a3lurz>. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2017.GARSCHAGEN, Bruno. Historia e tradicao do conservadorismo brasileiro (3). Gazeta do Povo. Colunistas. 8 de agosto de 2016. Disponivel em: <http://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/opiniao/colunistas/bruno-garschagen/historia-e-tradicao-do-conservadorismo-brasileiro-3-cy23reamt1appq065q62axi77>. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2017.GARSCHAGEN, Bruno. Historia e tradicao do conservadorismo brasileiro (4). Gazeta do Povo. Colunistas. 15 de agosto de 2016. Disponivel em: <http://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/opiniao/colunistas/bruno-garschagen/historia-e-tradicao-do-conservadorismo-brasileiro-4-0xfn83lumsggz708ajacmlqf1>. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2017. MARCH 9, 2017by MIKE RAPPAPORTFew people who served in the Obama Administration or are professors at Harvard Law School praise the Trump Administration for anything, but Cass Sunstein is commending the Trump Executive Orders on regulatory reform. Sunstein writes:The [new executive] order calls for the official designation of Regulatory Reform Officers and Regulatory Reform Task Forces within each department and agency of the federal government.The reform officers are charged with carrying out three earlier executive orders. The first is Trumps own requirement that agencies eliminate two regulations for every one that they issue. More surprisingly, the second and third come from Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. The Clinton order, issued in 1993, requires cost-benefit analysis of new regulations, along with approval by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.The 2011 Obama order calls for retrospective review of existing regulations, with the goal of getting rid of those that dont make sense. By requiring adherence to the Clinton and Obama orders, the Trump administration has signaled a degree of continuity with what came before. Thats a good idea.It is interesting how Sunstein frames these reforms. Unlike the mainstream media, Sunstein emphasizes the continuity with the past. I am sure that many right wing observers also doubt that the Trump Administration will have continuity with the Obama Administration. But Sunstein makes the argument nonetheless.I agree with Sunstein that there is much to be said for these task forces. In fact, I myself advocated the enactment of a permanent administrative agency with the authority to repeal exist regulations. I have also recommended that there be officers in each agency with the primary responsibility of identifying regulations that should be repealed, officers who would work with the deregulatory agency.I hope that the Trump Administration can build on these executive actions and turn them into legislative reforms, such as creating the deregulatory agency. But the filibuster rule probably stands in the way.It no doubt took some courage for Sunstein to praise the Trump Administration in print. But Sunstein does stand up for his principles. By many accounts, he was not a terribly popular man in the Obama Administration, since he blocked various regulations by agencies such as the EPA. Yet, he was able to accomplish much, because he