Rome-oriented, misojudaic "bishop" Marcus. Here, and only here, is the otherwise missing transition from strict Torah-observance of 1st-century Ribi Yehoshua and his original Netzarim followers (demonstrated from Dead Sea Scroll 4Q MMT and Church historians) to the well documented antinomian Ch*ristianity of the 4th, and subsequent, centuries! Now Rome-oriented for the first time, these post-135 C.E. misojudaic pagan gentiles were the first to proclaim their Romanized, de-Judaized, gentile-saving, divine man-g-o-d image J*esus! (Documentation and details in the book Who Are the Netzarim? (WAN).)The diametric and intractable differences between historical, Judaic, Ribi Yhoshua and the apostate Roman image are myriad and discussed throughout the 'Ntzarim Quarter,' especially in our Museum of Ntzarim history (click on 'History Museum' in the panel at left) and our 'Christianity' 'Torah Community & Family' Conference Rooms, both in our Web Cafe (click on Web Cafe in the panel at left).For the first time since 135 CE, mainstream Orthodox Jews and genuine followers of Ribi Yhoshua wind up on the same team, sharing the same goals and learning to cooperate to further the truth the historically-authentic teachings, of Ribi Yhoshua of Natzrat.These, and countless similar life-changing experiences for both Jews and Christians, are being accomplished by restoring historical accuracy, documentation and honesty to the Judeo-Christian Dialogue.Hebrew MatthewUncovering the genuine historical Jew who was Ribi Yhoshua, and his authentic teachings, requires identifying the authentic record, the earliest extant source documents that chronicle his life and true teachings. Only the earliest extant source documents help filter out subsequent well-documented and extensive redactions of the Roman gentile Hellenist pagans.The earliest extant Church historian, Eusebius, was describing the original followers of Ribi Yhoshua, the Ntzarim Jews, when he declared that the "only" account they accepted of the life and authentic teachings of Ribi Yhoshua was "their own Hebrew Matthew" (later Hellenized by non-Jews to "Hebrew Matthew"). The original, Jewish, followers of Ribi Yhoshua, the Ntzarim, never accepted the NT. Indeed, the NT didn't even exist in their time (up through 135 CE). Moreover, the Ntzarim Jews regarded only the Tan"kh as Scripture.Source Manuscripts for Hebrew MatityahuExtant Hebrew source texts begin in the 5th century C.E. with occasional citations from Talmud (whose tradition, however, extends back into the 1st century and earlier) and continue with Nestor (9th century C.E.), Yaaqov Ben-Ruvein's Milkhamot ha-Sheim (1170 C.E.), Ms. Or. Rome #53 (12th century C.E.), Seipher Yoseiph ha-Mqanei (13th century C.E.), Seipher Nitzakhon Yashan (13th century C.E.), and the Even Bokhan (1380 C.E., cf. George Howard, The Gospel of Matthew according to a Primitive Hebrew Text, Macon: Mercer Univ. Press, 1987).Following a well-established trend in this Hebrew tradition, the subsequent Munster of 1537 C.E. and du Tillet of 1555 C.E., translated from the Greek (George Howard, "Was the Gospel of Matthew Originally Written in Hebrew?," Bible Review, Winter 1986, p. 19), virtually complete the evolution toward agreement with Church doctrines and the King James NT Greek (the TR of 1624; see note Note).Since Even Bokhan is a complete Hebrew source for Matityahu, the subsequent Munster and du Tillet represent only further corruption and (variant) Christianization of the