chances of employment.Along with education, an individual's age, counted as work experience, qualification and skills, leaves to him and to him alone the expectations and results of his professional performance. Thus, ultimately, income inequality is due to failure in the education achieved by individuals who do not do well in the labor market, followed by failure to make the most of age-related experience.If the individual manages to obtain a place in the market and does well, the merit is all his for being a professional committed to work. If, on the other hand, the individual does badly, and even loses his job, it is his fault for not having enough competence to achieve and maintain his position in the market. Thus, the Theory of Human Capital preserves and exempts the market from any influence on an individual's suitability for work, while reserving and attributing to him lack of professional preparation and incompetence if he is not a good worker.Finally, it should be noted that, on the agenda of professional education, the concept of skills,"has the characteristic of taking into account a workers behavior and attitude more than the needs and requirements of the production island where he carries out his tasks. Concrete experiences in business organizations that adopt the proposal of the modern paradigm of production have given constant attention to setting up a new model or "worker profile", followed by educational reforms, which seek to incorporate the dimension of professional skills as accurately as possible in professional education" (p. 72)[16].And,"In fact, the adoption of skills in training the new profile of workers is part of the broader process of flexible work. Replacing the concept of qualification with that of skills not only mischaracterizes the notion of profession, as such, but also weakens the role of trade unions for workers, as representatives of professional categories (p.73)[17].Therefore, there are no relevant alternatives to change the income distribution profile[18]. If education does not fulfill its role, nor the experience accumulated by workers, neoclassical scholars would conclude that the trend is towards a worsening of income inequality in society.Thus, business organizations are exempt from participation in the process, leaving to workers and schools, to the former more than to the latter, the weights of their misguided actions. To the former, as already mentioned, for not having been able to assimilate and learn the skills, to the latter for not having properly taught the respective educational contents.Even the theoretical inconsistency arising from the Theory of Human Capital harms workers and throws them out on the street. Just take the following. If, according to the Theory, it is the improvement of workers' education that reduces income inequality and, on the other hand, it is the worsening of workers' education that increases inequality, it is not the herculean effort of society and public policy to provide good education for all that will reduce inequality to the extreme.Why? Because a point will be reached when the total number of workers with appropriate education will not find good and sufficient job openings, even if the total number of workers is