thegoodfellas/blogset-br huggingface dataset:
Casey: Listening to my old Christian CDs, and one thing that occurs to me, even as an Atheist: there is a certain transcendence and raw integrity in Christian music, be it the modern "Christian rock" or old hymns, something that secular music hasn't even begun to reach. Francis Spufford is well known as saying that Christianity makes a certain "emotional sense", even if it does not make sense to rationality.Me: Whenever I listen to Christian CDs from years ago, it brings me some feeling of mourning, as if I had lost a very close and precious friend years ago, someone I used to say a few words every night before sleeping. Like when you listen to a song that reminds you someone who died and then you feel blue. I guess that's what happened after all in a sense. Sometimes I compare God to drugs: you're not born addicted to anything. But if other people start giving you heroine since your early childhood and then you just drop it at some moment, you'll surely go through withdraw symptons. That means, if I'd never been given the drug, I would have no idea what such feeling is about. By talking to people born in secular/atheist families it seems to me like that.Casey: Thats nteresting about your observation about secular/atheist families. For me it felt so natural to believe...I wasn't born Christian. but it was like I was searching for deeper meaning...and once I found Jesus it was kind of like finding the women you are going to marry. No one told me to believe, but I found it out for myself and it felt so right. I found the emotional rollercoaster when i deconverted really difficult...as you say, it feels as if your best friend just died. I wouldn't call it an addiction...I think is like the imaginary friends you have as a kid, that it is quite normal.I dont feel mourning when I listen to christian music...at least i only feel a little mourning now.Me: Well Casey in my point of view it's really natural for us (as thinking beings) to ask questions like "where did I come from?" or "what's happening after I die?" even for people raised in non-religious families. From your experience I deduce everybody can reach a point in life at which such questioning get to its height, that is, "what do all this mean? There must be something and I want to know at any cost!". I believe I got your point, that is, it's something one may naturally ask himself someday (my secular friends included). Anyway, giving a deeper thought to it, maybe the mourning is not just because "god is dead", but mainly because of the religious community. I mean, as a believer I knew that if I moved to any city in any State I'd find "friends" and "brothers" at a local church there. After all "faith unites people from the same flock" (at least that's how I used to see it in my past Christian life). You know, a big family all over
the world under the same father. It's a human need to feel part of some group and that's something I lost forever (unless I disguise my disbelief, but that would be just meaningless as well). It would be like having a wife and lose all love and affinity for her, but faking it just to keep together... What for? Impossible.Back to Christian music and thinking of it again, I suppose it's not God I miss more. I was very strongly tied to the Christian community in all aspects, since they were the only people I was allowed to be tied to. Seriously. And I wasn't raised in a Jehova's Witnesses environment, it was Baptist. The music reminds me of that time. But one thing is to be said: some Christian songs I used to listen were just great, the arrangements, harmony, the way they sang and played and everything. I myself can play a lot of them in the guitar as I played in the church for years.
Chris. I was born in a very fundamentalist Christian home (Baptist at first, then pentecostal), I used to go with youth groups from the church to evangelize on the streets, I spoke in tongues (balashaya, balashuria and so on! LOL). Just like you, I was honest and sincere to the most in regard to my faith. That was the one meaning to my whole life and existence. I'm 39 now, but my faith really started to collapse before reason when I was about 34 or 35 (much older than you where in your process). I consider myself an atheist now, but perhaps agnostic would be a more suitable term. Just as another deconverted fellow of mine said the other day: "this is a way with no coming back". Anyway, I want to congratulate you for all your videos, and say that you just described the personal undergoings of millions. I don't have to write a book or make a speech about what I went through. You have already done it for me and for many people. Thanks a lot, Chris. Best regards. (Glaucio Alves, Brazil). Evid3nc3 Great explanation. Remember: most atheists are consciously or unconsciously Agnostic Atheists. The terms are not mutually exclusive:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-BQVmvulmQGlaucio Alves That's a very acurate and helpful piece of information from you. I used to get confused sometimes when thinking about what definition would best suit my way of seeing that all. But reading about the teapot metaphor from Bertrand Russel some years ago, I agreed that it was impossible to prove that a theistic god doesn't exist - the same for centaurs, elves, fairies etc. And yet it would be unreasonable to believe in this God due to lack of convincing evidence to it. It was Occam's razor principle already working in the back of my mind, though I'd never heard about it before watching your videos. I began to define myself as an agnostic since then, for I defectively reasoned that being atheist was the same as being "absolutely sure about the non-existence of a God" - as if it were scientifically verified with the technology we currently have. Now on seeing the video you just sent, I don't feel inadequate to call myself an atheist anymore. Interesting reasoning... I am an atheist (under the agnostic poing of view). An Atheist. Sounds good to me. It just came to me the guess that there are lots of atheists out there who'll never be conscious that this definition suits them perfectly. I remembersome years ago - I think it was about the year 2008 -, when the last logicalfortress I had to stand for the existence of a biblical god finally collapsed. Justbefore that I still had myself as a Christian by definition; I took the Bibleas the divine revelation of a supreme personal god, believed in an afterlifeand the redemption from our sins by the sacrifice of Christ; heaven, hell, andso on. Theres one thing I must point out however: Looking back, I reckon Idnever exactly fit the fundamentalist, literalist archetype of a Christian. Despitemy raising in
a pretty zealot Christian family - I guess fanatical sounds moreaccurate -, since early childhood I paid special attention to somecontroversial topics regarding what I heard in the church and read in the Bible.I remember attending Sunday classes when I was about six, with that missionaryteacher arranging biblical pictures on the flannel board (man, Im really gettingold...). Figures of Jesus and his disciples, the white dove representing the HolySpirit, a majestic white throne portraying God the Father, the cross symbolizingredemption, and so much more. I was tooyoung of course, but I clearly remember wondering what all that stuff was aboutafter all. To me, it wasnt just... convincing enough. Almost 35 years havepassed since then, but I still keep a strong recollection of my looking at thatboard, listening to the missionary and asking within myself, How can they knowits all true? Has anybody personally seen or touched some evidence, or proventhis histories and characters are real? (Though I was too young to put it in thesewords, they pretty accurately describe what the feeling was like at that time).Of course, I had to keep these questions to myself, for I knew I wouldnt findany mind supportive/sympathetic enough for me to share my doubts with. In the veryfew occasions when I tried putting something out of my chest to someone, specificallyin family, the outcomes were never positive at all. I think I was about twelvewhen I exposed to my mother some delicate issues about contradictory passages inthe Bible, asking her some explanation to that because I was a Christian, inmy puerile mind, I was eager to believe with all my heart and sincerely. But inorder to accomplish that I needed to be fulfilled, I needed honest answers. Idrather expose that to my mother, since she always showed a less severefundamentalist approach if compared to dad. The only answers I ever got evenfrom her, however, where the known cliches like you dont need to know that;just believe for the sake of believing and thats all it takes. But, as itturned out in that occasion when I was twelve, I kept demanding consistentanswers to these issues from mom, I wouldnt just let her go so easy this time.You atheist! was her direct response, uttered like an explosion, and with anunforgettable expression of disgust and reprobation in her face. As I saidbefore, I wasnt even close to call myself an atheist back then. Actually, Iwas very sorrowful that atheists existed, I could hardly conceive someone whowouldnt take for granted that a supreme god existed. After all, it was so plain and so obvious to me! No, I wasnt an atheist, I was not even close to that not at that time at least. It would still take more than two decades for me,from that time, to come across the straw that broke the camels back, and then clearlyrealize the dimension of the mistakes I had lived by since I was born. Coming next.
I keep wondering to which point this gruesome concept of hell can affect ones individual psyche. I was raised in a very fundamentalist/baptist environment and was indoctrinated from early childhood with the concepts of salvation, eternal damnation in hell etc. I totally identify with the first statment in this post, when you say its impossible for you to absolve any theistic doctrine with everlasting punishment amongst its set of basic dogmas. As a Brazilian former christian/pastor (Rubem Alves) pointed out: What would be of the church if it wasnt for hell?. In principle, I think any religion or supernatural belief may have some inner damaging potential, since your way of seeing reality may get impaired to some point. But there may be some positive sides to it to, for instance, if someone prefers believing in the existence of a post mortem life better than the present and feels better believing that way. But any creed involving the teaching of eternal torture as punishment to non-believers can do massive psychological disturbance to any person. Ill give a brief account from my own experience: as a child I learned to see non-believers as doomed to hell, and therefore evil doers and sinners, followers of Satan (they knowing that or not). In my teens I got to be very disturbed in mind and anti-social, completely frightened. As an adult I became a depressed man with suicidal tendencies in my early thirties, with panic disturb bouts, and Im quite sure all this emotional misfortune was directly linked to the way I saw human existence, including mine, at the time. The concept of hell was the core of everything, as far as I look back at it. Theres plenty more to say about it, but to make it short I found myself definitely as an agnostic by the end of 2008 in my middle thirties. This deconvertion may have been ignited by the harmful mindset the concept of hell caused me to suffer. But it eventually led me to resort to reason and evidence in search of what could make more sense, of what could be more plausible and realistic in order to get on with life for the best. But I still suffer the consequences of the concept of hell. Not that I still believe (the idea of this punitive and loving god is absurd to me some years now), but because my whole family and most beloved people in my life still believe in it. Whats worse: theyre terrorized by the idea Im one of the bound to hell unbelievers. Thats what makes me sad sometimes, that is, it seems I was the only one who could leave the Matrix. At least I feel lucky for having left it. Programa de conteudos ministrados na 1a fase do 3o ciclo - 7o ano do Ensino FundamentalO resumo refere-se a aula dada entre os dias 07 e 12 de marco de 2016. Mostrando que e possivel e viavel aulas teoricas e pratica onde os assuntos se completem.RESUMO DA AULA TEORICA MINISTRADA ENTRE OS DIAS 07 A 12/03/2016FASES
DA CORRIDA DE 100 M velocidade de reacaoaceleracaoTransicaoVelocidade maximaDesaceleracaoChegada RESUMO DA AULA PRATICATema: corrida rapida.1. Alongamento+ aquecimento2. Coordenacaomotora- Corrida frente e costa- Corrida lateral cruzado com bracos erguidos- Corrida com elevacao de joelhos (baixo e alto)- Corrida com elevacao de pes atras - Saltos com elevacao de joelhos- Corrida com barreiras (frente e lado)- Corrida com argolas (frente e lado)- Corrida com saida do bloc
para promover a saude dos funcionarios e evitar lesoes de esforcosrepetitivos e doencas ocupacionais. Alem dos exercicios fisicos, consistem emalongamentos, relaxamento muscular e flexibilidade das articulacoes. Apesar dapratica da ginastica laboral ser coletiva, ela e moldada de acordo com a funcaoexercida por cada trabalhador. Nascidaem 1925, entre os operarios poloneses, a ginastica laboral foi passada a Holanda, Russia, Bulgaria e Alemanha Oriental.Ginastica localizada e de academiaA ginastica localizada e dita uma dasformas mais tradicionais e populares de pratica do exercicio fisico, dentre asdemais modalidades nao esportivas e consiste em exercicios priorizando seriespara cada segmento muscular ou pelos segmentos articulares. Com duracao deaproximados sessenta minutos, as praticas da ginastica localizada levam ao condicionamentofisico, emagrecimento e fortalecimento muscular. Sua pratica lembra a ginasticaaerobica[58]A ginastica de academia se subdivide emcategorias menores como step, aeroboxe, body pump, taefight e circuito, consistemem um apanhado organizado de movimentos ginasticos, a fim de moldar o corpo edar aos praticantes habitos mais saudaveis. E atraves da repeticaoque a ginastica utilizada nas academias atinge resultados satisfatorios. Seus exerciciossao trabalhados separadamente e para cada parte do corpo e realizada umasequencia de movimentacao diferente, seja com pesos ou nao, individual ou emgrupo. Bem como a localizada, sua pratica lembra a ginastica aerobica, comoassim tambem costuma ser chamada. HidroginasticaA historia desta modalidade naocompetitiva remonta ao fim da Grecia Antiga e ao Imperio Romano. A chamada ginastica higienicadeu origem as praticas dos exercicios ginasticos dentro das termas e piscinas publicas, nasquais as pessoas se reuniam para uma especie de hidroterapia. No Oriente, em relatos chineses e japoneses, estapratica tambem era comum em forma de massagens e movimentos corporais. Porisso, a ginastica e a hidroterapia sao consideradas as precursoras dahidroginastica, que, aplicadas juntas, lhe deram a forma vista nos anos de1950, quando esta modalidade gimnica passou a ser sistematizada para academiase grupos de praticantes. A hidroginastica tem por finalidademelhorar a capacidade aerobica e cardiorrespiratoria, a resistencia e a forcamuscular, a flexibilidade e o bem-estar de seus praticantes. Possui a vantagemde poder ser praticada por pessoas de qualquer sexo e idade. A hidroginastica euma opcao alternativa para o programa de pratica mais comum de exercicios, comoa ginastica de academia. Sua eficacia vai de atletas em treinamento, gestantes,pessoas em fase de reabilitacao, ate as que estao acima ou abaixo do peso oucom algum tipo de deficiencia. Os exercicios aquaticos sao divertidos,agradaveis, eficazes, estimulantes, comodos e seguros. A hidroginastica permitea reducao no esforco articular.
tratamento, de acordo com o cirurgiao plastico, e indicado apenas parapouca gordura em pequenas areas e e menos eficaz que uma lipoaspiracao (caso emque a gordura e retirada).Noscasos em que depois do uso do ultrassom se procede a lipoaspiracao, edenominada de hidrolipoclasia aspirativa (HLPA), acrescenta o medico.Pre e pos-operatorioNopre-operatorio, explica Colaneri, a pessoa apenas nao deve tomar anticoagulantes.Para o pos-operatorio sao indicadas sessoes de drenagem linfatica eultrassom, diz. 6.Minilipo (hidrolipo, lipo-light e lipo tumescente)Minilipo,hidrolipo, lipo-light, lipo tumescente, de acordo com Colaneri, sao todos nomesde marketing, nao tecnicos, para lipoaspiracao com anestesia local. Muitasvezes sao realizadas por medicos nao especialistas pela Sociedade Brasileira deCirurgia Plastica e em ambiente nao hospitalar, diz.Mas,conforme explica Colaneri, sao, sim, lipoaspiracao. Porem, para fazer comapenas anestesia local, com paciente acordado, precisa que seja pouca gordura eem pequenas areas; fazer varias sessoes para abranger muitas areas e tirar maisgordura. E mais perigoso do que fazer uma cirurgia apenas, com porte anestesicomaior e em hospital, destaca.Pre e pos-operatorioPorser uma cirurgia de porte menor, onde pequena area e operada e se retira poucagordura, a recuperacao e mais rapida. A cinta compressiva deve ser usada emtorno de 21 dias a 1 mes. Drenagens e ultrassom tambem sao indicados.Exercicios podem ser realizados depois de 30 dias, destaca Colaneri. O que considerar antes de fazer uma lipoTodo paciente deve levar em consideracao quelipoaspiracao e cirurgia e deve ser realizada por especialista. Voce nao fazparto com ortopedista, nem trata uma fratura com pediatra. Logo, faca lipo comcirurgiao plastico!, orienta Colaneri.De acordo com o cirurgiao, segundo resolucao Numero1711 do Conselho Federal de Medicina, a lipoaspiracao e tecnica do arsenal dacirurgia plastica, devendo ser o medico cirurgiao para executa-la. Os volumesaspirados nao devem exceder 7% do peso corporal, acrescenta.Para se certificar de que o medico e especialista,confira se e cirurgiao pela SociedadeBrasileira de Cirurgia Plastica. E lembre-se: toda cirurgia realizada em ambientehospitalar e mais segura.
molhadas ficaram completamente secas num curto intervalo de tempo, [9] e, tambem relatam curas de paraliticos e cegos, assim como demais doencas nao explicitas. O evento foi oficialmente aceito como um milagre pela Igreja Catolica em 13 de outubro de 1930. Em 13 de outubro de 1951, o cardeal Tedeschini afirma que, em 30 de outubro, 31 de outubro e 1 de novembro e 8 de novembro, o papa Pio XII presenciou um milagre semelhante nos jardins do Vaticano [24] .O facto de nao poder ter sido o Sol a mover-se devido as tragicas consequencias para todo o sistema solar poe em causa a interpretacao tradicionalmente aceita daquilo que os milhares de testemunhas presenciaram no local onde o fenomeno ocorreu.
CLASSE - a energia rara que torna as pessoas verdadeiramente inesqueciveis.Nunca houve exemplo mais claro de classe em acao do que no primeiro debate presidencial televisionado da historia, que aconteceu e em 26 de Setembro de 1960. Os debatedores eram John F. Kennedy e Richard M. Nixon.O significado real e o primeiro ponto importante para se compreender classe.A vantagem em classe de John kennedy estava na aparencia tranquila, calma e controlada. Nixon podia ter conteudo, mas Kennedy tinha classe.A classe nunca se manifesta de ma vontade. Classe e sempre uma opcao positiva, ou ate mesmo alegre.Pessoas de classe sao aquelas que conseguem comunicar claramente quem sao e qual e sua visao. Voce nao tem quer ser a pessoa mais inteligente do recinto para ser lider. Pessoas inesqueciveis falam em termos de visao. Frequentemente, sua mensagem nao e sobre o que fizeram ou irao fazer, mas sobre o que veem.Ser um grande comunicador exige duas qualidades distintas. A primeira e otimismo. Enxergar alem da situacao atual para imaginar uma epoca melhor. A segunda expoe essa visao em palavras simples, para que todos possam compreender. Pessoas verdadeiramente inspiradoras e inesqueciveis nao sentem motivacao para liderar pessoas. Sua motivacao e servi-las. Para que as pessoas sejam inesqueciveis, elas precisam de seguidores. Se voce realmente deseja ter classe, se voce realmente quer se tornar inesquecivel, precisa aceitar cem por cento da responsabilidade. Voce deve ate mesmo aceitar a responsabilidade por coisas que parecem obviamente fora do seu controle. Se para voce agir com classe e uma luta, vai ter que esconder essa dificuldade a qualquer custo. Nao critique, nao condene e nao se queixe.Pessoas de classe sempre encontra formas de se mostrar, mas o teste real aparece nas catastrofes, nas crises. Por essa razao, pessoas de classe procuram se condicionar a encarar problemas como oportunidades.Voce tem o poder de ser uma pessoa de classe. Voce tem tudo de que precisa para ser inesquecivel. ( estudo do texto: DALE CARNIGIE) Observe a imagem! Quando chegamos neste mundo, comecamos a construir nosso castelo. Dia apos dia vamos juntando a areia e vai surgindo aos poucos o nosso castelo na areia.Suas conquistas, suas vitorias sao galgadas pela superacao nas dificuldades e nas crises. Voce tem que ter em mente, que depois de determinado tempo nada e para sempre!O tempo e o vento vai se encarregar de destrui-lo. Vem a pergunta: Por que construir se um dia vai se destruir? Por que viver se um dia vou morrer? Muitas religioes procuram dar esta resposta e muitas pessoas vao em busca. Bem, o que deve ser observado, sao as pessoas em sua volta enquanto vai construindo o seu castelo. Elas dao palpite, se interessam, admiram, elogiam ou criticam, mas o importante, NAO CHUTE SEU CASTELO DE AREIA. Deixe que o tempo e o vento faca este favor. Voce destruindo, mesmo que nao tenha acabado. Ninguem sabera que estava a caminho de termina-lo, verao apenas um monte de areia, esta atitude esta muitas vezes ligada a emocoes como a raiva, odio, inveja, ciumes, magoa, solidao. Construa do seu jeito, da sua forma