of the 8th round of negotiations on the agreement held between 12 and 16 April in Wellington, New Zealand. Intimidated, the participating countries reported in the final session of the meeting, an official denied that part of previous versions of the agreement - and asked for five more days to end the secrecy.That is what happened in 21 quarters. The text is 39 pages in English. Unlike previous versions, no longer contains, for each topic of the possible deal, the different positions of various countries. This uniformity must have consumed the last five days. Were also excluded, as expected, the aspects that more attacks on fundamental rights and freedoms. Before the initial vazamanto his intentions, and the strong reaction to them, prosecutors seem to have done the ACTA a strategic retreat. Momentarily part of their goals. Try to get rid of the repudiation of his character hidden joint. And, armed with a proposal rejected unless they seek to put themselves in position to resume the debate.A few hours later revealed a light version of ACTA, the early reviews have already surfaced, made by the coalition of movements that fight the deal. One is by Nate Anderson and is published on the site Ars Technica. Although brief, the study describes the essential.The clauses that most shocked the public are less visible, but remain in the form of subterfuge. An example: no longer appear in the text devices such as the bill of Senator Azeredo, which required internet access providers to shut down users accused (by the companies of the cultural industry) of violating intellectual property. They were replaced, but for more obscure terms, which free ISPs ... provided that this obligation whatsoever commitment to "adopt and implement policy to address the storage or unauthorized transmission of copyrighted materials."Nate Anderson's analysis seems to confirm the impression that emerged in April 16, when the countries negotiating ACTA announced soon publish its proposal. At the time, the French site numbers (also committed to critically examine the secret initiative) suggested that the strategy of the supporters of the agreement is now an environment conducive to legitimize their claims of long-term - and build them step by step. This implies disallow and replace the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the UN body in charge of the subject.Such information can help define a counter-strategy. One possible reason for the attempt to disempower the WIPO is the fact that she tested since 2004, an attempt to review - for the better - the intellectual property laws. Released by Brazil and Argentina, this movement became institutionalized in the form of a "Development Agenda".In January 2010, for example, in the last series of talks about it, Brazil officially presented a proposal for "exceptions to patent rights and limitations to intellectual property." The basis of the project is to seek a "balance" between the rights of holders of intellectual property and of all the companies.The "Development Agenda" has been coupled with reasonable regularity, the "WIPO Centre", the Free Culture site, which publishes texts by Pedro Paranagua. An examination of his conduct could initiate