.Visando atender a necessidade de fatos historicos sobre este assunto apontamos o link abaixo. Basta clicar sobre o link e estudar este assunto em detalhes:http://www.netzarim.co.il/Museum/Sukkah15/Christmas.htm#Pg-TopBoa semana! Birth of ChristianityDisplacement Theology (Ch*ristian & Muslim)Misojudaic Perversions of ScriptureRoman Hellenizing (Syncretizing & Redacting)Even Christian Scholars of the World's Top Universities AgreeThe Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible acknowledged, "A study of 150 Greek MSS of the Gospel of Luke has revealed more than 30,000 different readings... It is safe to say that there is not one sentence in the NT in which the MS tradition is wholly uniform... But there are many thousands which have a definite effect upon the meaning of the text. It is true that not one of these variant readings affects the substance of Christian dogma" ("Text, NT," 2nd edition, Abingdon, 1962).Of course Christians redacting the Jewish texts made Christian redactions that perverted the Jewish texts remolding them to be compatible with "the substance of Christian dogma" !!! "It is equally true that many of them do have theological significance and were introduced into the text intentionally... Many thousands of the variants which are found in the MSS of the NT were put there deliberately.They are not merely the result of error or careless handling of the text. Many were created for theological or dogmatic reasons (even though they may not affect the substance of Christian dogma [thanks for reminding us that Christians made Christian redactions that were, surprise, compatible with Christian dogma; ybd]). It is because the books of the NT are religious books, sacred books, canonical books, that they were changed to conform to what the copyist believed to be the true reading. His interest was not in the 'original reading' but in the 'true reading'" (ibid., emphasis added) as perceived by the antinomian, i.e. misojudaic Hellenist Roman Christian redactors, of course.All Major Historians of World's Top Universities Concur4th-Century Anti-Torah Christianity 180 Opposite to1st Century Pro-Torah Ntzarim Why? How? How Does That Affect You As A Christian Today?It's well established by historians like the late Oxford scholar James Parkes (The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue) that post-135 C.E. Christianity from which ALL Christianity today derived was opposite in the most fundamental ways to the 1st century historical Rib i Yhoshu a and his original Ntzarim followers. Who Are the Netzarim? (WAN) demonstrates from the historical record from archaeological evidence to ancient Judaic documents (e.g. Dead Sea Scroll 4Q MMT) that the 1st century historical Jew, Rib i Yhoshu a and his Ntzarim followers consistently taught pro-Torah Judaism, contradicting anti-Torah (antinomian) Christian doctrines. This persisted until 333 CE, when the remaining vestiges of the Ntzarim were eradicated by the Church for obstinately remaining Torah observant (cf. WAN).Church historian Eusebius recorded that after suppressing the Bar-Kokhva Revolt in 135 C.E., "Hadrian now resolved to launch a war of annihilation against the Torah and to expunge the name of Israel from the land... Desirous of blotting out, too, all reference to the Jews' association with Eretz Yisraeil, Hadrian changed the name of Judea to 'Syria Palaestina,' by which it henceforth came