for any purpose.Open-source software may be developed in a collaborative public manner.Open-source software is the most prominent example of open-source development.The open-source model, or collaborative competition development from multipleindependent sources, generates an increasingly more diverse scope of designperspective than any one company is capable of developing and sustaining longterm. A report by the Standish Group (from 2008) states that adoption ofopen-source software models has resulted in savings of about $60 billion peryear to consumers. WikipediaComo vocepode ver a partir da citacao acima, liberando o desenvolvimento de tal softwareda ganancia monetaria e uso exclusivo, nao so permite uma maior evolucao dosoftware, ele tambem permite para qualquer pessoa possui-lo com facilidade eusa-lo como entender, e isso esta em oposicao completa com o sistema de Magian.Um executivo da Microsoft afirmou publicamente em 2001 que "Open source eum destruidor de propriedade intelectual. Eu nao posso imaginar algo quepoderia ser pior do que isso para o negocio de software e os negocios depropriedade intelectual. Bem, foda-se a Microsoft!. Esta analogia se adapta aONA e TOTBL pelas mesmas razoes. As pessoas, em posse de uma boa compreensao danatureza da consciencia, o codigo-fonte humano por assim dizer, com uma licencapara estudar, modificar e distribuir a nos mesmos e as nossas ideias emqualquer lugar e para qualquer finalidade, desenvolvido de forma colaborativa,publica e competitiva, a partir de varios angulos independentes, gerando umambito cada vez mais diversificado de evolucao e perspectiva do que qualquernexion, cultura ou politica e capaz de desenvolver e sustentar em longo prazo.Claro, a evolucao pessoal, Kollectiva e nexional dos nossos sistemas e ideias,bem como software proprietario, so podem se desenvolver verdadeiramente uma vezlibertados do sistema monetario, do contrario eles continuam a ser a"propriedade" de um individuo, que controla os limites individuais e odesenvolvimento daqueles que empregam disse ideias ou tradicoes.Closed-Source Non-Free ProprietaryProprietary software, non-free software (in the sense of missing freedoms), or closed-source software is software that fails to meet the criteria for free or open-source software. Although definitions vary in scope, any software which places restrictions on use, analysis, modification, or distribution (unchanged or modified) can be termed proprietary. A related, but distinct categorization in the software industry is commercial software, which refers to software produced for sale, but without necessarily meaning it is closed-source. Most software is covered by copyright which, along with contract law, patents, and trade secrets, provides legal basis for its owner to establish exclusive rights. A software vendor delineates the specific terms of use in an end-user license agreement (EULA). The user may agree to this contract in writing, interactively, called clickwrap licensing, or by opening the box containing the software, called shrink wrap licensing. License agreements are usually not negotiable. Software patents grant exclusive rights to algorithms, software features, or other patentable subject matter. Laws on software patents vary by jurisdiction and are a matter of ongoing debate. Vendors sometimes grant patent rights to the user in the license agreement. Proprietary software vendors usually regard source code as a trade secret. Free software licenses and open-source licenses use the same legal basis as proprietary software. Free software companies and projects