thegoodfellas/blogset-br huggingface dataset:
logo em breve essa felicidade foi multiplicada, pois Tati tinha 2 bebezinhos se formando dentro dela! Mas alem de felizes fomos tomados por uma grande preocupacao, a Tati e tao pequenininha e magrinha que nao conseguiamos imaginar como caberiam duas criancas dentro dela... Mas a natureza sabe o que faz e se encarrega para que tudo de certo!Nao me lembro ao certo com quantas semanas de gestacao foi diagnosticada a Sindrome da Transfusao Feto-Fetal, uma complicacao que pode acontecer em gestacao multipla onde os fetos dividem a mesma placenta, mas estao em bolsas diferentes. Leia mais neste link http://www.fetalmed.net/item/sindrome-da-transfusao-feto-fetal.html A Tati foi para Sao Paulo fazer um procedimento laser para salvar a vida de seus bebes e gracas a Deus correu tudo bem, o procedimento funcionou e ela continuou a gestacao tranquila na medida do possivel.Quando ela estava com 28 semanas de gestacao fui ate Contagem-MG, fazer o ensaio de gestante. E combinamos de fotografar o parto, caso os meninos aguentassem ate a data prevista... Mas eles adiantaram, nasceram umas 2 semanas depois do ensaio de gestante. Nasceram grandes e mais gordinhos do que esperavamos, mas como nao estavam prontinhos para viver nesse mundao de meu Deus, tiveram que ficar internados ate ficarem fortinhos. Eduardo saiu antes e ficou esperando Guilherme em casa. Esses dias completa 3 semanas que os dois estao juntinhos em casa, dando maior trabalheira pros papais. Virando a vida deles de cabeca pra baixo e dando muitas alegrias a cada dia que passa!Semana passada estive de novo em Contagem para conhecer meus mais novos priminhos e xodo da familia e tambem para fazer algumas fotografias.Fiquei imensamente feliz e orgulhosa dessa familia que passaram por momentos dificeis e nao deixaram a peteca cair e que hoje gozam de toda felicidade do mundo, juntos! Tati e Amilton, desejo a voces muita felicidade e a Eduardo e Guilherme muita saude e esperteza para fazer da vida de voces uma eterna alegria!!! Que essa familia que se forma seja abencoada por Deus!!Espero voltar ai muitas e muitas vezes para poder eternizar todos os momentos de felicidade que ainda estao por vir!!Abaixo coloco algumas fotografias dos ensaios que fiz!Beijokas e ate a proxima.Guilherme.Eduardo.Eduardo.Guilherme.Eduardo e Guilherme.Eduardo e Guilherme.Guilherme e Eduardo.
todaa minha vida como fotografa, eu tinha produzido um material muito importantepara a cultura da minha cidade Nova Era, MG. Foram 5 anos fotografando a Festade Nossa Senhora do Rosario, que acontece todos os anos no ultimo final desemana de outubro. A cidade inteira se colore com fitas de cetim e reflete aalegria de seus participantes nos espelhos de seus capacetes ao som de muitotambor, pandeiro e matraca... Foi entao que decidi mostrar essetrabalho para todos e usa-lo como projeto de conclusao da pos. Fiz um livro,filho unico, que me rendeu muitos elogios e mais que isso, muita satisfacao. Elindo ver seu trabalho ali, impresso, palpavel...O mais legal disso tudo, e quedepois desse trabalho publicado, eu virei uma referencia em minha cidade.Sempre quando alguem precisa de uma imagem da Festa me procuram, comentam sobremeu trabalho e sempre me perguntam se esse ano eu vou la fotografar.E e com prazer que hoje mostropara voces duas das minhas fotografias publicadas na Revista DeFato(Itabira-MG), ilustrando uma materia linda escrita pela jornalista PatriciaEmiliano sobre o Congado de Nova Era e regiao. (nas fotografias do post, pagina 1 abertura da materia e pagina 3.)Mas entao, eu contei isso tudoporque quero dizer para voces, meus queridos clientes e amigos, que alem defotografar criancas; familias; casais e gestantes, eu tenho outros trabalhos emparalelo. Sao projetos que estao em constante construcao, dos que nosfotografos chamamos de autorais. Provavelmente eu vou gostar dealguma fotografia que fiz no dia do seu ensaio e vou acrescenta-la a um projetomeu. E um dia, nao muito longe, pretendo mostrar para todos uma conclusaodesses trabalhos, em um livro ou em uma exposicao. =)E isso meus queridos, hoje euescrevi muito, abri meu coracao e contei mais um pouquinho sobre mim e sobre oamor que tenho pela minha profissao.Beijokas e ate o proximo post.pagina 1pagina 2pagina 3pagina 4
Ola!Pessoal, essa familia de hoje e muito importante para mim e para meu crescimento como fotografa. Com eles eu fiz o primeiro ensaio de gestante, e consequentemente de casal, o primeiro parto, o primeiro recem-nascido... E a Marina foi a minha primeira sobrinha, torta, porque ela e sobrinha do Bernardo, mas, a Titia aqui ja ama muito.Bom, entao vamos falar do dia do ensaio... O tempo nao quis ajudar muito, amanheceu nublado, mas como nao estava chovendo, decidimos ir assim mesmo. A primeira opcao era o Parque Lage aqui no Rio, mas como estava muito escuro, e a minha camera "xtzinha" nao segura muito bem com pouca luz, decidimos ir para Niteroi, na Igrejinha de Sao Francisco, que para eles e muito importante, pois foi la que eles casaram. O lugar era lindo, mas eu so nao podia contar com o meu nervosismo na hora do ensaio ne! Sacanagem, em um ambiente que eu jamais deveria ficar nervosa, pois ja conhecia todo mundo, fiquei muito nervosa... Muito sem ideia, e nosso ensaio durou mais ou menos uma horinha so... O Bernardo que me acompanhou no dia e pela primeira vez me viu trabalhando, achou que eu estava tranquila e que eu levo mesmo jeito pra isso! heheBom, escolhi algumas das fotografias que eu mais gosto desse dia e coloquei aqui para voces!Ah, e nao reparem... Eu nao sou muito boa em escrever! Prefiro mesmo escrever com a luz! Beijos e ate a proxima! Ola pessoal!Na minha ultima ida a Nova Era, fotografei essa menina linda... Estou colocando aqui so uma previazinha do book dela, porque ela me proibiu (hehehe) de mostrar mais fotografias antes da festa de 15 anos, que sera dia 28 proximo.Ainda tenho muitos ensaios para postar tambem, porque estou atrasadissima com a atualizacao do blog ne... Mas eu vou fazer de tudo pra continuar postando com frequencia!Beijokas! Oba! Hoje eu vim aqui falar de um ensaio lindo! Ja fiz esse ensaio ha algum tempo, mas so agora consegui postar aqui no blog... Mesmo porque eu procuro sempre seguir a ordem cronologica dos ensaios... Mas as vezes o tempo fica apertado e eu nao consigo atualizar o blog com muita frequencia.Em agosto eu dei um pulinho em Nova Era (MG), e aproveitei para fazer alguns trabalhinhos la... Entre eles, este ensaio do Artur e da Gabriela, filhos da minha amiga Manu e do Rodrigo. O Artur ja esta com 3 anos e a Gabi estava com 3 meses quando fizemos o ensaio... Na verdade foram algumas tardes fotografando esses dois lindoes! O Artur ja e beeem acostumado a posar pra mim! Tambem acompanhei o primeiro ano de vida dele e sempre que consigo, o fotografo quando vou para Nova Era. Teve um dia que ele estava indo com a Tia Xu, me buscar para ir pro sitio, e no meio do caminho eu liguei para ela! Ai ele perguntou: "Quem e Tia Xu?" Ela: "Nayara!" Ele: "Ela vai la tirar foto?"O gente, como e que eu posso com um trem bunito desses?? Esperto demais!! Vou colocar aqui algumas fotografias para
Gente, eu sei que se voces ligarem o titulo a musica de Tom Jobim, irao pensar que nao tem nada a ver... Mas eu nao consegui pensar em nada melhor para o titulo do ensaio da familia de hoje, a Familia Oliveira da Silva.A Erika chegou por intermedio de outra cliente. E eu adoro quando nosso trabalho rende frutos e o boca-boca corre solto! E uma delicia ouvir do cliente que ele viu as fotografias do amigo, gostou demais e tambem quer.Combinamos uma manha no Jardim Botanico e logo que eu vi a Aninha ja me apaixonei por ela! Encantadora essa garotinha, esperta, faladeira e carinhoooosa!! Era "tia" pra ca, "tia" pra la, corria e pulava no meu colo, e falava "tila poto minha titia". E o Jorginho com essa carinha sapecaaaa e sorriso gostoso?! Durante todo o ensaio todos eles eram muito carinhosos uns com os outros, tantos abracos, beijos e carinhos... Tao bonito ver uma familia feliz e que demonstra isso assim, com tanta naturalidade. Adorei fotografar essa familia linda e passar uma manha me divertindo com eles! Voces poderao ver tudo isso nas imagens que separei do ensaio!!!Beijos e ate a proxima! Nao vou prometer mais posts em breve, porque eu nao consigo cumprir! Desculpem!!! A Correria e grande! Ola meus queridos!! Chegou a hora de nos juntarmos aos nossos familiares para comemorarmos mais um ano que se finda e agradecer a Deus por todas as glorias alcancadas! Como muitos ja sabem, eu moro no Rio de Janeiro, mas sou do interior de Minas Gerais, e no final da semana que vem estou indo para Nova Era, minha cidade natal, para matar a saudade da familia e tambem trabalhar um pouquinho por aquelas bandas! Tenho alguns ensaios ja marcados e continuarei com o tratamento das imagens e confeccao dos fotolivros la.Ate o dia 24 estarei em contato com voces por telefone e internet, porem do dia 25 ate 05 de janeiro estarei em off total. Qualquer duvida, podem me ligar, me mandar email ou sms, que responderei, ok?! Beijos, beijos!! Ja tem um tempinho que nao escrevo aqui...eu desejei antes,mas a senha nao "me vinha a memoria", precisou de um fato bem marcante para que o meu cerebro (fantastico o cerebro) me "rememorizasse".Eu descobri, hoje, que fui traido literalmente por "um amigo amado"...Entao resolvi escrever um pouco sobre essa palavra: "traicao".Traicao de Atenas...Traicao dos dramas gregos....Traicao de quem teve amor...Traicao de quem eu dei as maos e as costas.... Traicao, traicao...Traicao de quem eu nao esperava...Traicao, tu nao es mais jovem para mim...Traicao, apesar de tudo, tu mesmo sem querer, me ensinas a viver...Traicao, muito obrigado, por tanto me encontrares, nao fazeres mais eu chorar. Esse mes de Janeiro acho que foi um dos mais dinamicos da minha vida.Mudancas aconteceram na area afetiva e de trabalhos...enfrentei todas, porem meu "SER" esta fragilizado.Estou sendo bem acolhido e fortalecido pelos "anjos e arcanjos", que Deus me oriente e me fortaleca para situacoes dificeis que "intuitivamente" sinto cada vez mais proxima. O que e TER uma familia para voce? Ja pensou nisso?O
que e NAO TER uma familia para voce? Ja pensou nisso? Dessa vez fiz diferente, comente aqui essas questoes, seja sincero, auntentico, seja bem vido!De acordo com o Wikipedia: "A familia representa um grupo social primario que influencia e e influenciado por outras pessoas e instituicoes."
Both are from the same root, slm, , "to be safe and sound, unharmed," and many other meanings. This is related to Hebrew shalom, "peace," and the Ancient Egyptian root snb, "health." The Daru-l'Islam, the "House of Islam," means the predominantly Islamic part of the world, especially the part covered by Islamic states. Outside the Daru-l'Islam is the Daru-lH.arb, the "House of War"; and it was the traditional duty of Islamic rulers to extend the House of Islam into the House of War.This expansion of the Daru-l'Islam was the Jihad, , the Holy War. Someone who does the Jihad is a Mujahid, (pl. Mujahidun, ). Jihad is now often said not to mean, or not primarily to mean, Holy War but merely a moral and spiritual "struggle" for perfection. The root (jhd, ), indeed, does mean "to endeavor, struggle," etc., but also "to fight." Different derivatives of the root, as with slm, are used for different purposes. Ijtihad, , is from the same root and can also mean "struggle," but it is mainly used to mean "independent interpretation" on a point of Islamic Law, i.e. independent of legal precedent (following precedent is taqlid, ). It is no distortion of Jihad to say that it means "Holy War." Indeed, in the Middle Ages it was an important question whether Islam could be properly practiced in a non-Muslim state. Even though Islam was supposed to tolerate "People of the Book," which originally meant Jews and Christians but in practice came to include Zoroastrians and even, unevenly, Hindus, this was only in a subordinate position (dhimma, the status of the dhimmi, the tolerated non-believer) -- Muslims being "tolerated" in a non-Muslim state was against the divine order.The treatment of Jihad in public discourse does not always seem honest. Thus, the former History International cable channel (now "H2") recently (12/10/08) aired a show called "Secrets of the Koran." This was copyrighted 2006 and so perhaps was a repeat showing. The show explained the ideology of Jihad as the result of the Crusades, and otherwise positively affirmed that Muslims are only supposed to use force in self-defense. But to suppose such a thing with any kind of superficial consistency, major events in Islamic history were then ignored or glossed over. The Omayyads were never even mentioned during the show, and the original Islamic conquest of Syria, Palestine, Iraq, Iran, and Egypt, although illustrated with maps, was discussed in no detail and often only characterized as "spreading the Word of Islam." This was a grave distortion when the original Islamic Conquest was not intended to "spread the Word" or obtain converts at all. Islam was initially viewed as a religion just for Arabs. Most terrible evils has Romania suffered from the Arabs even until now.Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus (d.959) quoting The Chronicle of Theophanes (c.815) [De Administrando Imperio, Greek text edited by Gy. Moravcsik, Dumbarton Oaks Texts, 1967, 2008, p.94]The earliest non-Arab coverts had to become affiliated with an Arab tribe, and their status was subordinate. Equality for all Muslims was, in general, the achievement of the Abbasid Revolution.
only less easy in Islam but the trend in recent years has actually reversed, with a reinstitution of Islamic Law in states that had previously adopted secular law codes. This reversal has, not surprisingly, accompanied a renewed militancy and a sense of Jihad that owes nothing to mollifying apologetics.Other comparisons have been made between the characters of Muh.ammad, Jesus, and Moses, since Muh.ammad commanded armies, had multiple marriages, etc. Muh.ammad, indeed, had the responsibilities of rule, with a hostile enemy, Mecca, nearby. This involved battles. Jesus wasn't in any such position. His Kingdom, as he said, was not of this world. Moses did have the responsibilities of rule, though actual fighting didn't begin until the Israelites crossed the Jordan. Moses didn't go with them, and Joshua then handled the military business. Since Joshua was instructed by God to annihilate the people he found in the Promised Land, Muh.ammad comes off rather well in comparison, since the war with Mecca ended in a negotiated settlement where the only losers were the idols in the Ka'aba, (though there had been a fair amount of killing in the conflict, and Muh.ammad had in the meantime expelled the Jews from Medina). As for his marriages, Muh.ammad seemed to have been genuinely devoted to his wife Khadija, an older widow whom he married after helping her run her business. Khadija was one of the first who believed that Muh.ammad was actually receiving a divine revelation. He married no other until after she died. I do not know how to judge the subsequent marriages. At least some of them seem to have been honorary, with the widows of fallen companions. His favorite wife, 'A'isha, was betrothed to him at six. It was she who laid him to rest in the floor of their house in Medina, and the last person to set foot there for many centuries, as the Prophet's Mosque was built around it. One might think the Prophet was simply heir to some of the understandable temptations of power, but this explanation is generally not allowed in Islamic tradition, since the Prophet is viewed as necessarily morally perfect. That is hardly necessary. The Bible does not present Moses as morally perfect -- indeed, God prohibits his entry into the Promised Land as a punishment.At right we have been seeing an image of the Angel Gabriel leading the Prophet Muh.ammad on the miraculous horse Buraq, from a 15th century Persian miniature. I include this because of the recent controversy over cartoons of the Prophet published in October 2005 in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten. By early 2006, Islamic radicals managed to stir up riots in many Islamic countries over the cartoons, featuring attacks on Denmark, the EU, and Christians. It was positively affirmed by the radicals that images of the Prophet are absolutely forbidden in Islam and that the cartoons were an intolerable slander against Islam -- except that the Danish cartoons were really very mild and the radicals had included some other cartoons, nastier ones, that had nothing to do with the Danish newspaper. They were obviously
United States. Unfortunately, a naive, or perhaps hopeful (or both), participant then asked Ahmadinejad about the status of homosexuals in Iran. The answer was that there are no homosexuals in Iran. An informed questioner would have already known that they are hanged as quickly as they can be identified. The sentiment that homosexuals should be executed had also been previously expressed by a British Imam, without consequences, despite laws in Europe that could construe such an opinion as an incitement to a hate crime.How absurd this can all get was revealed recently when a "gay pride" parade was cancelled in London, not because of anti-gay threats from Muslims -- which had actually been expressed -- but purportedly in "solidarity" with opposition to anti-Muslim "Islamophobia," which was said to be the moral equivalent of homophobia. Why a desire to assert solidarity between anti-homophobia and anti-Islamophobia should result in a "gay pride" parade being cancelled was left unexplained -- as, indeed, one would expect the opposite reaction, that the "gay pride" parade, with an anti-homophobia theme, would be combined with a parade asserting an anti-Islamophobia theme. Obviously, the fear of violence against the parade from Muslims led to its cancellation; but the organizers, in a sort of anticipatory Stockholm Syndrome, decided to dislay their political correctness by identifying with those from whom they feared violence. There are few more bizarre contortions evident in contemporary politics.Ironic or not, the use of "Islamophobia" is an attempt to demonize those who actually do fear Islam, Jihad against America is binding upon myself, just as it is binding on every other able Muslim.Anwar al-Awlaki (d.2011)when such a fear is well justified by recent events and by the behavior of people in the Islamic world. Since Islamists, terrorists, and assorted tyrannical regimes and radicals like to justify their attitudes and actions in terms borrowed from the Qur'an and from Islamic Law, one might think that honest defenders of Islam would acknowledge this, find it an embarrassment, and attempt to both combat the radicalism and assuage the fears of its victims. But this is not done -- except among a few well meaning Muslims who do not receive nearly as much attention as their militant brethren. Instead, public apologists for Islam seem to want to put the blame on the fearful victims, while discounting or ignoring the well-funded popularity of the terrorists. When Palestinians danced in the streets on 9/11, it was not because they believed that the Jews or George Bush were behind the attack on America, or because they believed that Islamic terrorism was an embarrassment to Islam. They were spontaneously celebrating a great heartfelt victory in the Jihad. Apologists who do not acknowledge this are simply exposing their bad faith and ill will.The conflicts, confusions, and deceptions in these attitudes came to a head with the proposal for building a mosque on Park Place, a couple of blocks from the site of the World Trade Center in New York -- the "ground zero mosque." We see the building on the site at right, with modest New York
City police protection.There would have been a right way and a wrong way to do this project. The right way would have reflected the concern of well-meaning Muslims to dissociate their religion from the 9/11 attacks and to express their dismay and mortification that the terrorists should have invoked Islam to justify the atrocities. The mosque as an expression of contrition for the damage done by vicious co-religionists would have at least been a step in assuaging the justifiable fears of all the targets of terrorism. Indeed, there should be such a mosque at Ground Zero, in conjunction with facilities related to the religions of all the victims of 9/11. There were, after all, many innocent Muslims who were killed at the World Trade Center. The project of the mosque should be making clear that the "martyrs" of 9/11 were the victims of the terrorists, not the terrorists themselves (for whom, of course, a "martyrdom operation" means a suicide attack).The wrong way to promote the project, however, is the way it has actually been done. The leader of the effort, the Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, himself was on record as blaming the United States for the 9/11 attacks and refused to distance himself from terrorist organizations like Hamas. He and his wife have responded to objections to the project with accusations of "Islamophobia," by which they clearly mean, not reasonable "fear of Islam," but a bigoted and intolerant hostility for Islam. Thus, they give every indication of militancy and would leave any reasonable person with the impression that the mosque is not an attempt at reconciliation -- which would be ill served by calling most Americans bigots -- but is in fact a Jihad Victory Mosque whose purpose is to promote an Islamist agenda as close as possible to the place were militant Islamists killed almost 3000 victims. This makes the project an insolent gesture that both insults America and makes use of the anti-American "useful idiots" who are eager to cooperate in their own destruction.Imam Rauf appeared on "The O'Reilly Factor" on 8 May 2012 and announced that he was no longer involved with the Park Place mosque, citing some kind of disagreements with other backers. It would be nice to know who those other backers are and what Rauf's differences were with them. Nevertheless, in the interview Rauf keep talking as though he were still planning the project. Perhaps he was just talking about his general goals. Bill O'Reilly mentioned that he had long ago said that if Rauf would appear on "The Factor" and renounce Terrorism, O'Reilly himself would take up a hammer and help build the mosque. Rauf brought along a drawing of a hammer, that he said was from his wife, and gave it to O'Reilly. I did not notice, however, that Rauf ever did actually renounce Terrorism during the interview. Perhaps my attention wandered and I missed it.We need to begin to suspect the motives of anyone willing to use the term "Islamophobia." The Left admires militant Islam for its expressions of hostility to America, capitalism,