The critics haven't spoken about the meanings. Why?Please, help me with this meditation!Isn't it clear that Yann Martel, than Ang Lee and Suraj Sharma, tried to teach us something with this film?Ninety-nine percent of what I've been watching is pure subjective "art", or nothing related to art. And when something with this quality, like a real objetive art, appears, what the critics say? #cool picture, #nice special effects and other poor analysis like these.What if we could learn something from rich materials like these?I would explore deeper Martel's message, when he defined that a monkey (1), an hyena (2) and a zebra (3), should be the ones following Pi in that stormy ocean. Why these animals? What is he trying to express? Of course something important. And he kills them! O.o... and the ocean becomes quiet! Ummmm, is there something being transmitted?Interesting to see that the media is also collaborating to the decadence of some mystical knowledge, when the robots around the internet selects words per "relevance" (clicks), what would be the true. In the end, like Yahoo Answers is doing - helps people become more ignorant. Someone asks, other people that don't know answers, that words become attractive by the mass, so it ranks that link better - and that becomes the new "true". Bad times... take a look at this example: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090822092256AApl5qmOf course "Life of Pi" is about faith, and transmits a traditional wisdom, regarding the inner knowledge, and the functions of the three main centers: intellectual, emotional and moving.Try to connect the dots, with the three animals!There are much more wisdom in this film that offers a real learning. But let's move step by step. We can explore the tiger, the oceans, etc. Doesn't it look like a nice and interesting work or entertainment?;-)Danilo Leao Empreendedor em busca de investidores + fluidosEm conversa com um conselheiro [ex-Chase-C-level & ex-impact-entrepreneur], apos explorar bastante a questao do capital de risco, especialmente seed-money, no Brasil, chegamos juntos a uma constatacao.Depois confirmamos essa constatacao em relatos de outras pessoas desse ecossistema. CONSTATACAO: bons "socios-investidores-de-risco" sao os ex-empreendedores.Robocop-Anjode modelos Gov / CorpAlguns fundos governamentais ou corporativos tentam, mas trabalham de um "jeitao" pesado, com modelo e linguagem que no fim agregam menos do que poderiam, se liderados por um "ex-entrepreneur".Relato que reforca a constatacao:One thing that I think is really important is that for the first time, the already existing generation of entrepreneurs, that understand digital markets and digital companies, are now becoming angels and investors, says Sales, noting they have the experience to create a second generation. In the US you have a lot of examples like that, but in Brazil, this is just the beginning. The founders of MercadoLibre [South Americas answer to eBay, with roots in Argentina] and BuscaPe are becoming investors, and I myself am now an angel. [source CNBC about Brazilicon Valley]Entao, bora gastar energia com ex-entrepreneurs, agora investidores anjos, como prioridade. Bora diminuir a expectativa com relacao aos "robocop-anjos", de modelos corporativos / governamentais. por Danilo Leao Em reuniao recente com um dos empreendedores que trabalho, falavamos de