thegoodfellas/blogset-br huggingface dataset:
flesh, of Alexander, paranoid, to Julio Cesar, contained, the Antony and Cleopatra. Shakespeare based much of his pieces in Plutarch and read in English translation, because Shakespeare, as we did not know Latin or Greek. Then, as history, read The War of the Peloponnese, from Thucydides. It is about the war between Athens and Sparta, Corinth and others, for 27 years, 5 in the century before Christ. Reading about Pericles, the Athenian leader, Cleon, the Spartan chef, and Alcebiades, the beautiful, young and treacherous Alcebiades, we never surprised by any act of political in our day. It is the largest book of history already written. Always present.Rome just read the original The Twelve Caesars, from Suetonius, and Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, from Gibbon. More a bath of human nature.My knowledge is almost none. But read, of course, the Logic of Scientific Research of Karl Popper, when you understand what these bitches want. For those who want just a start, I recommend the preface to Novum Organum of Francis Bacon, which means the title, new instrument, and Bacon explains the scientific method and what the objective science. And to complement him read the preface of The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy of Isaac Newton, and the preface of Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead in his Principles of Mathematics. Also worth reading the History of Western Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, and the chapter on Logical positivism, which is the philosophy based on scientific knowledge. In short, everything that can be proved mathematically and logically, is philosophy.O rest is not. I find it perfectly acceptable. Release the rest.It is the arts that is wisdom. How to live well without reading Hamlet in Shakespeare? Everything is there in an incomparable, is an exemplary clarity, everything that we already feel, come to feel, or can feel.I preferred quote from Shakespeare with a Greek piece, which I consider vital: Antigone of Sophocles. There is a translation of Antigone, in verse, by Guilherme de Almeida, who Cacilda Becker represented in the Brazilian Comedy Theater.Antigone is the best in women. It is the young princess whose brother died in rebellion against the uncle, King Creon, and she wants to bury them, because religion Greek spirits not rest until the bodies are buried. Creon does not want to be buried, as warning the public subversive. Antigone defies Creon. He sends kill her. She dies. Her fiance is suicidal. It is the son of Creon, who be nuts. It seems a big drama, but it is not. It is the soul devised women throughout their fraternal possibility. Hegel thought that Antigone was the clash of two rights, the right individual and the right of the state. And so defined the tragedy.The best of Rome is the story of Theodore Mommsem. The best story of the Renaissance is that of Jacob Buckhardt. All you need to know.And learn from one of the most famous independent, Bernard Shaw (the other is Trotsky). Read all parts of his prefaces. They are a universal story. A flaw in our head of Vieira.
In a day you read all. Noting, one week. Also worth reading the Little History of the World, from HGWells, exceeded in many ways, but unsurpassed as literature.Step by quiet Enlightenment. It was so embedded in our lives, it is not necessary to read Voltaire and Diderot. The books of Peter Gay on the Enlightenment are excellent. They say all we need to know. If you want to know what it was Christianity, the play unbeaten and The Confessions of St. Augustine, one of the great autobiographies, apart from the religious issue. There is no need to read The Origin of Species, from Darwin, but it is a pleasure to read a Protest Travel around the world, the adventures of Darwin as a botanist and zoologist, aboard the English ship Beagle in the years 1830, the South America , With unforgettable pages on Argentina, Brazil and Galapagos, which is so far as Darwin found (and Brazil and Argentina in its soul?)There were three major revolutions in the world, the American, French and Russian. The literature could not be more abundant. But just read, for example, Citizens of Simon Schama, to have a splendid story of the revolution interrupted, 1789-1794, in France, and conclude with the book by Edmund Wilson, Towards the Finland Station. Schama is conservative, Wilson was not, when he wrote, was authentic, even in the decade, 30, as so many people in the Russian Revolution. But this time, and even before he died in 1972, it is easy to notice that the Russian Revolution had not stopped the Terror, as the French, but Gorbachev continued to prove his immense failure. The best book on the French Revolution is history of the Revolution in France, Edmund Burke, in 1790, which foresaw the Terror of Robespierre and Saint-Just. If the student wants a book in favor of the French Revolution, read, the title is to always, to Gaetano Salvemini. Proponents of the Russian of Sukhanov, the Oxford University Press summarized in a volume, or the Russian Revolution, of Trotsky, a classic revolutionary. But the facts speak louder that the literary brilliance of Trotsky.About the American Revolution do not know any good book translated, but by size and quality, a volume alone, I suggest to the publisher Longman, A History of the United States of America, the young English historian Hugh Brogan, 749 pages, only when bought cost $ 25. It has everything that is important.In economics, April 50 published volumes of leading economists. I did not lose time. They have as much relationship to our lives as children and had Zelia advisor. But there's Dictionary of Economics, also from April. When the chop-house jargon, you query to know at least what it means to umbrage. Economics is all about the Portuguese phrase: who is not competent is not down.Of the novels of the 19th century, War and Peace, from Tolstoy and Crime and Punishment in Dostoiewski, I feel absolutely indispensable. War and Peace because it is the portrait of an entire society as a large family, because they laugh and cry without
stopping, because it contains a world and the concerns of the protagonist, Pierre Bezhukov, which until now have not been answered. Crime and Punishment, because it exemplifies the whole philosophy of Nietzsche in a manner accessible and deeply tragic, of how the human brain is able to rationalize any crime, that everything is relative, in short, the person who thinks and acts as Raskolnikoff, the protagonist. Anything goes. Dostoiewski, to prevent us from annihilating each other, adding that one can not live without mercy.Of modern, Proust is wonderful, but painful, Joyce is unnecessary, but it is worthwhile to read the masterpieces of Thomas Mann, The Magic Mountain, to know what was discussed philosophically in this century, and Dr. Faust, who leads the nihilistic relativism that dominates modern culture and we need to get rid if we are going to survive culturally, as a civilization, not as mere consumers, in a contemptible level of satisfaction animal.There are many works that I am charming and not in any way, excluding any authors or books. The list did seem that the basics. In a few weeks, two hours a day, one reads everything. I doubt if anything like teach in our universities. If I'm wrong, I am pleased to hand the plate.By Paul Francis, for the newspaper - Local - 30/05/91 " Pasted sins, never.Dinosaur maria
a similar process that began to give, in Brazil, as an alternative to Project Azeredo. In this case, rather than just condemn the threat of ACTA, it started to counterattack - including a proposal for spreading and democratizing effect. The mobilization of civil society, even lead to breakthroughs in the alternative proposal.The debate on the ACT and responses to it tends to stretch over years and cresecente gain space on the political agenda worldwide. The partial retreat of the promoters of the proposal to win time. The rise in the short term, an international network to defend the free movement of knowledge, culture and communication demonstrates that there is on the horizon, just threats ...
MAN IN THE MOON[GUIDE FOR Curious] http://guiadoscuriosos.ig.com.br/categorias/2885/1/o-homem-na-lua.html Man on the Moon The first step on the Moon was a size 41 foot. This was the number of the boot of the blue astronaut Neil Armstrong, then 38 years, the first man to fall in lunar soil, on July 20, 1969, to 23h56min31 (hora de Brasilia). The step was taken with the left foot.When he stepped on the Moon, with heart beating 156 times a minute, Neil Armstrong said the famous sentence: "This is a small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." It is estimated that 1.2 billion people watching on TV this time around the world.Neil Armstrong and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin, the second astronaut to step on the Moon, finca there a metal U.S. flag and placed a plaque near the leg of the lunar module, signed by the astronauts and the U.S. president Richard Nixon: "Here men the planet Earth first set foot on the Moon July 1969 AD We came in peace on behalf of all humanity. "Decline in the lunar soil, Eldwin Aldrin felt a tremendous desire to pee. And did: in the suit, reinforced with 21 layers of tissue, had a bag to collect the liquid.During the 2 hours and 10 minutes remaining in the Sea of Tranquility, the plain chosen for the moon landing, the astronauts installed a seismograph, a laser beam reflector, an antenna for communication, a panel aluminizado (to shield from solar radiation) and a TV camera. Collected 27 samples of rocks and dust.At the Museum of Air and Space in Washington, is an exposed rock of the Moon, that visitors can touch.On Earth, the backpack and the astronauts space suit weighed 86 pounds. But on the Moon, the weight was 14 kilos, because the force of gravity, which makes it 6 times lighter than on Earth. As the Moon is smaller than the Earth, the force of gravity is also lower. Once the bodies are drawn with less force to the lunar surface.The Apollo project consumed 50 billion dollars. The Apollo I also exploded in the launching platform, killing its 3 crew in 1967. NASA canceled the 2 tasks following and started to do without men on board flights. Only in the Apollo VII astronauts return to space.The Apollo XI left the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, on July 16, at 9:32 a.m.. The Saturn rocket carrying the Apollo XI, bringing together the lunar module (Eagle) and the command module (Columbia). The 3 crew members were Neil Armstrong, Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin and Michael Collins.No less than 850 journalists from 55 countries registered the event.Apollo XI, the Soviets launched a lunar probe Luna XV, in an attempt to pass in front of Americans and bring the first sample of material from the Moon mission was not successful.The menu on board the Apollo XI was chicken salad and sweet sauce of apples, more shrimp cocktail. The food was rehydrated with a gun in hot water. Ate everything with spoon. In the Gemini project, which preceded the Apollo, the food was mouth squirt through
tubes.The ship landed back shortly before dawn on 24 July - 8 days, 3 hours and 18 minutes after launch - in the Pacific Ocean, near Hawaii. Fearing some kind of contamination, has left the NASA astronauts in quarantine until the 10th of August.In 1970, Neil Armstrong was interviewed by presenter Hebe Camargo, who asked him: "You have moonlight on the Moon".Five other manned missions to the moon were made successfully by the Americans. The Soviets never repeated this feat. After the pioneering, 10 other men in the lunar soil pisariam: November 1969Charles Conrad and Alan Bean (Apollo XII) February 1971Edgar Mitchell and Alan Shepard (Apollo XIV) Alan was 47 years at the time. Holds the record for being the oldest man to step in Lua.Agosto of 1971David Scott and James Irwin (Apollo XV) James was the first of 12 men to death in 1991, a victim of a heart attack. Had 61 anos.Abril of 1972Charles Duke and John Young (Apollo XVI) December 1972Eugene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt (Apollo XVII) beat the record of staying on the surface of the Moon: 75 hours.
Jesus Christ Superstar(USA)VOICE OF JUDASEvery time I look at you I don't understand Why you let the things you did get so out of hand. You'd have managed better if you'd had it planned. Why'd you choose such a backward time in such a strange land? If you'd come today you could have reached a whole nation. Israel in 4 BC had no mass communication. Don't you get me wrong. I only want to know.CHOIRJesus Christ, Jesus Christ, Who are you? What have you sacrificed? Jesus Christ Superstar, Do you think you're what they say you are?VOICE OF JUDAS Tell me what you think about your friends at the top. Who'd you think besides yourself's the pick of the crop? Buddha, was he where it's at? Is he where you are? Could Mohammed move a mountain, or was that just PR? Did you mean to die like that? Was that a mistake, or Did you know your messy death would be a record breaker? Don't you get me wrong. I only want to know.CHOIR Jesus Christ, Jesus Christ, Who are you? What have you sacrificed? Jesus Christ Superstar, Do you think you're what they say you are? (Repeat many times) www.flordavida.com.br/HTML/indigo.html"The Indigo Children"Text translated and adapted by Dailton Menezes, in June 2001, which ceded Gently in the right to publish here on our site Flower of Life / Brazil.From the 80s, they began arriving, more and more. Children are spectacular. They are coming for help in transforming social, educational, spiritual and family from around the globe, regardless of borders and social classes. They are as catalysts to trigger the reactions necessary for the changes. They have a different brain structure with regard to the potential use of the left hemispheres (less) and right (more). This means that they go beyond the intellectual level, and on the behavioral plan is the focus of its luster. They require the environment around them certain characteristics that are not common or true in societies today. They will help us remove two paradigms of humanity:1. They will help us reduce the gap between the THINK and ACT. Today in our society everyone knows what is right or wrong. However, we often act differently than we think. Thus, these children will lead us to reduce this distance thus generating a more authentic, transparent, fair, with greater reliance on inter-relationships.2. They also will help us change the focus of the EU for the next, originally from the restoration of confidence and authenticity of humanity, which are prerequisites for us to meet and consider more than the next ourselves. As a result, we have a decrease of Selfishness, the Envy of the exclusions, resulting in greater solidarity and partilha.Voce may be wondering: What these children will make this transformation? Through questioning and processing of all entities that surround rigid. Starting the Family, which today is based on the imposition of rules, no time of dedication, without authenticity, without explanation, without information, without choice and without negotiation. These children simply do not respond to these rigid structures because for them it
is essential there be options, relationships and lots of real negotiation. They do not accept being cheated because they have an "intuition" to understand the real intentions and have no fear. Therefore, intimacy it does not bring results, because they always find a way to get the truth. They perceive the real intentions and weaknesses of adults.
other not, why?Why was one of Long Life ...************************Why did the elephant will not start fire?Because he already is gray************************If the dog had religion,what?Dog-domble (candomble, br)************************What the horse was doing in the telephone booth?Pass a hoax ...************************What gives the intersection of bread, cheese and a monkey?X-Panza************************What do the tomato was on the bench?It was drawn extract ...************************What the chicken was done in church?Watch the Mass of the Rooster.************************As the enzymes they reproduce?One enzyme of other.************************Why Coca-Cola and Fantaget along well?Because if the Fanta breaks,Coca-Cola! (cola: glue)************************Why not save the kebab is good in the freezer?Because there he esfirra.************************Why do the young plants do not speak?Because they are small seedlings.************************Why the rooster sing with my eyes closed?Because he already knows the lyrics of the song by heart.************************
Levanta. Veste a sua melhor roupa. Arrume seu cabelo. Passe maquiagem. Chega de sofrer por ele. Voce passa tanto tempo sofrendo por alguem, e esquece que voce tem uma vida, e que ela e passageira. Ficar chorando noites e noites, nao lhe trarao as melhores lembrancas, lembre-se disso. Lagrimas sao mais especiais que um sorriso. Pois sorrimos por qualquer um, ja as lagrimas so as derramamos por quem amamos. Em nosso projeto devida, somos nossos proprios fornecedores e clientes. Vivemos em um mundorelacional. O que faz a diferenca e o grau de consciencia e como o expressamosna vida. Expressar a consciencia e, por exemplo, ajudar as pessoas a seremresponsaveis pelas proprias escolhas. A qualidade das escolhas pode tornar onosso mundo melhor.Que tal se a maioria de nossasescolhas fosse consciente? Se as pessoas percebessem que o ato da escolha naose encerra na acao? Que toda a vez que escolhemos o ato de escolher ou de naoescolher trara para nos e para todos os envolvidos direta ou indiretamente coma escolha ou a omissao, consequencias que podem nao ser visualizadas deimediato, mas que ocorrerao a curto, medio e longo prazo? Um pouco mais ainda: a escolhapode ser por acao ou omissao. Quando, por exemplo, podemos, mas nao desejamosescolher. Em ambos os casos a acao ou a omissao trara seus efeitos. Nao se podefugir das escolhas assim como nao se pode fugir da responsabilidade por elas. Quem sabe sair de si(egocentrismo) e pensar tambem no outro (altruismo) antes de fazer escolhaspossa ser um primeiro passo para expandir a consciencia e melhorar essacondicao de escolher? Pensar no outro deveria sermateria obrigatoria em nossas escolas desde o primeiro grau de ensino. Nao seaprende empatia com a cabeca, mas com o coracao.Vivemos em um mundo relacional einterdependente onde tudo, absolutamente tudo, esta inter-relacionado. Escolhero melhor nao apenas para si, mas para o sistema onde estamos inseridos podepropiciar uma expansao da consciencia e uma escolha que pode tornar aqueleambiente onde estamos inseridos melhor qualquer que seja ele (a familia, aempresa, a comunidade e o planeta). Costumo dizer que precisamospensar com nossa cabeca, mas com o coracao do outro. Lembro-me de que quando criancaminha avo dizia aos netos apos fazer um bolo: um corta e o outro escolhe opedaco. Simples assim!Ricardo Farah Voce sabe qual a principal dificuldade do cachorro velho?ele perguntou-me com seu sotaque belga, e ao escutar o meu nao, respondeu-me:E largar o osso .Esse dialogo aconteceu ha anos e desde entao me inspira arefletir sobre o que temos dificuldade de largar. Com seres humanos, quando gostamos ou detestamos algo queconhecemos a partir dos nossos cinco sentidos fisicos, imediatamente ficamosapegados a este algo, que pode ser um objeto, um trabalho, uma ideia ou crenca,uma relacao e assim por diante. Funcionamos assim...E esquecemos que a vida e movimento e que na paisagem da vidaos ventos da mudanca sopram a todo o instante.E quando algo que vem muda algo que temos, resistimos de duasformas: ou rejeitamos o novo na espera de que o que era nosso (apego) no passadoretorne ou projetamos para o futuro a expectativa de que o que nao
e mais hoje,retorne algum dia. Com isto, deixamos de viver o presente, ou seja, a novarealidade que o presente nos tras e que e a unica experiencia pela qual temosde passar se quisermos evoluir. Pense nisso: nao vivemos o presente por apegoao passado ou projecao ao futuro. E, olhe que a vida nos envia constantes sinais de que o que estamosvivendo ate agora ja nao mais faz sentido, esta se esgotando ou ja se esgotou. Muitas vezes sentimos ou ate mesmo intuimosessa realidade mas preferimos ignora-la. Olhar para o novo que se apresenta, muitas vezes pode nosdeixar com medo porque necessariamente nos tirara da zona de conforto e podemostemer o desconhecido. Porem, como costumo dizer, esta vida nada mais e do que umagrande escola para apreendermos a lidar com nossos medos. Podemos ate repetirde ano, mas se nao avancarmos seremos deixados a parte. Quanto mais cedoaprendemos a enfrentar o medo do novo menos sofrimento temos porque, no fundo,este sofrimento esta ligado a ficarmosrefens entre o apego ao velho e o apelo do novo.Como coach, inumeras vezes me deparo com esse quadro que e adanca entre a crenca limitante a ser trabalhada, e a crenca potencializadoraque quer emergir.Tenho aprendido ao longo de meus anos que a Vida e evolucao.Aprendi a acreditar nisso e a propagar isso como um chamado e uma profissao defe...Qual o osso que voce precisa largar?( Em homenagem a Leon Bonaventure, Chagdud Tulku Rinpoche e ShriiAnandamurti).Ricardo Farah
nos negamos a consciencia dequanto isto tudo vem nos incomodando e machucando. Machuca nossa essencia queanseia por dizer: Basta! E precisorepensar o modelo que construimos e que agora alimentamos!Machuca nossa alma que temfome de outras demandas tambem relevantes. Um tempo para nos mesmos. Um tempopara relacionar-se com amigos dos quais sentimos legitima saudade e para osquais nao temos disponibilidade porque consumimos todo nosso tempo noatendimento das demandas profissionais. Fazer mais, fazer mais sempre e sempre.Afinal nao custa estender ajornada de trabalho por mais duas ou tres horas alem de seu termino. Nao custaencaixar uma reuniao a mais no tempo exiguo que se ja nao tem sequer para nosmesmos. Nao custa atender aquelademanda que faz com que a hora do almoco fique reduzida ao lanche rapido, nao custaatender aquele telefonema de negocios na hora do jantar que vai nos privar deestarmos plenos com nossas familias.E a vida prossegue dia aposdia e o grito entalado de que este modelo precisa ser repensado, pois nao ejusto e nem atende a nossa integridade e a integralidade como seres humanos naosai de nossas bocas! Basta! Que tal repensarmos omodelo? Que acoes podemos fazer para transforma-lo de competitivo em colaborativo?De controlar e vencer para conectar e cooperar? De Eu para o Todo?