Thinking about thefuture have been a constant act of West people. In the Cinema it doesntdifferent. Many films in all his history had approach this theme. Some themwere been classical. Indeed, this is the case of the Stanley Kulbricks 2001 a space odyssey. This is an 1968 epic fiction film. Its sixties yearsstore about the life in the future 2001. The main question into the film is thehuman relationship to technology. Two astronauts is going to the Mercury planetin a space navy governor by a computer called Hal. The space adventures hadbeen good until a problem was had identify by controller room in the Earth. Theprogram computer had have with a tilt. Though, Hal, an intelligent andsensitive computer that govern all the things and acts into de the navy, dontdeclare that him were a hard difficult; Hal, however, declared that him hadntanything problem and which difficult were by the humans, the Earthscontrollers or the astronauts. Well, indeed this is a metaphor from human lifeand its relationship with technology since the early times of men. We wouldbeen slavers both of the knowledge technics and technologies things. The firsttechnology object, perhaps, a staff of bone or wood, which changed ourancestral in man, also made us a kind of animals that had been extremelydependent of technology. The great worth of 2001 a space odyssey is the fact ofdirector s were back to the dawn of the man for tell us about this thrillingstuff connection.I think this is one ofmost important and cult movie of the history. They special effects are crazyand amazing and they inspired the new generation of directors films aboutscience fiction, who renovate the science fiction movies in seventies. TheKulbricks creativity products a new paradigm for the films of mass. And ASpace odyssey deserves to be seen by audiences all the age. It is a perfectexhibition of the way of cinema tell a history, the pioneering technicaleffects and the connection between images and sounds is so perfect. It almostdoes not have dialogues, they are minimal, but the images and the sounds talkus more best. On the other hand, payattention, the 2001 film is exceptionally ambiguous and slowly. It couldnt bedifferent, symbolically youll watch the long Earth odyssey in space, accordingto view of the writers of this script. Good movie session. Fonte imagem: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-pMsCqglXdL4/Ufk_96JUVcI/AAAAAAAAAUc/GNBZocYDlZI/s1600/Integra%C3%A7%C3%A3o.jpgNa discussao das relacoes entre individuo e sociedade, Elias ja em 1939, aponta as dificuldades de se entender o que sao individuos e o que e a sociedade e, por extensao, as dificuldades para transpor o abismo teorico que se instala entre essas duas nocoes. Reproduzo abaixo um pequeno trecho que ajuda a entender um aspecto particular do que e de fato a democracia Ocidental e os seus limites quanto as mudancas sociais que muitos de nos acreditamos ser necessarias para alcancar uma sociedade mais justa e igualitaria.[...] No Ocidente, as pessoas nao se reuniram, num determinadomomento, como que vindas de uma situacao desprovida de relacoes, para, atravesde uma votacao expressando a vontade da maioria, decidirem distribuir, deacordo com o esquema atual, funcoes como as de comerciante, diretor de fabrica,policial, operario.