thegoodfellas/blogset-br huggingface dataset:
criminal record and make it move in the spiritual scale. There are times, beyond the facts of the immediately previous incarnation, there are other pending other on planets that can now be addressed. However, if they are painful,can only be met by a mature spirit and ability to overcome the most serious problems. If he has no condition, the evidence and atonement are still mild, note the little capacity of the spirit, at the moment, and the most difficult to get another chance.The life of the spirit in the spiritual world and its intention or not, knowingly or unknowingly, acceptance or not to embody depends on the situation you are in. Most who disincarnate on Earth still imperfect and suffer in spirituality all the consequences of defects that carry. Is this degree of purity or impurity that makes you happy or unhappy on the spiritual plane.To be happy the spirit needs perfection. How rare that is in this world, it is easy to conclude that the spiritual world that surrounds the planet is still a vale of tears, similar to the material world. It is this community that surrounds us and influences our thoughts, requiring us much prayer and vigilance.The understanding and belief in this truth will make men better to suffer less. Each will try to build their own future wisely to get rid of the pain.These stories make it clear that there is no punishment of God because God is the law. Do not punish or give awards. Every imperfection, and the faults of her born, embeds the punishment itself in natural and inevitable conditions. Like every disease is a punishment against the excesses, as idleness born boredom, a special condemnation for each missing or for each particular person is not required. When you follow the law man can get rid of the problems by his will. Therefore, it can also negate the evils committed and achieve happiness.The warning of the spirits that our climb is straightforward and safe. They say "the good and the evil that we derive the qualities we have. Do not do good when we can, is therefore the result of an imperfection. "Note that it is not enough not to do evil. You need to do good.The spirits warn, too, that is not enough for man to repent of the evil he has done, although it is the first and important step; are necessary to atonement and reparation.When lack the spirit belief in the afterlife, it is difficult to fight for something that does not believe, and if so, does evil without worrying about future consequences. So it is common to late spirits believe still alive materially even after disembodiment. Continue with the same needs they had when they were human. Feel hunger, cold and disease, like any red.Everything that happens to any of us are enrolled in our consciousness. It can not escape no matter how far we are from where we commit faults. The solution to have a clear conscience is to repair the mistakes and get rid of this that torments us.
The more we delay the more we suffer repair. We should not delay. In their lessons, as Jesus taught us: "Reconcile yourself with your opponent while you are on the way."In the very chapter in question of "Heaven and Hell", there is a question we all have certainly made some day: Why so much suffering? "God would not give greater love for his creatures creating them infallible, perfect, no more having to acquire, either in knowledge or in morality?" But the answer is obvious. God could have done it, but he did so that progress constituted a general law. Let the good and evil delivered to the free will of each, so that the man suffered the pain of their mistakes, but also the pleasure of their hits. And giving "to each according to their works, in heaven and on earth." This is the Law of Divine Justice. If not so, life would seasoning.Suffering, in short, is inherent imperfection. Get rid of the imperfection of man by his own will and will void the evils resulting therefrom; conquer that time the dreamed happiness.Octavio Caumo SerranoSource: Ghost PortalTranslation of the English language: Luiz Carlos Costa (Maintainer Blog Brotherly Love)
ele o unico que diz sobre o quanto Judas teria recebido, dando como certa a importancia de trinta moedas de prata (Mt 26,15; 27,3). Essas passagens que falam disso sao relacionadas a Zc 11,12-13, no pressuposto de que ela seja uma profecia, entretanto, os fatos ali narrados se referem ao proprio profeta Zacarias, nao e, por conseguinte, uma revelacao sobre algo que viesse a ocorrer no futuro.Ao narrar os acontecimentos durante a ceia, Mateus relata que Jesus, ao responder aos discipulos sobre quem o iria trair, teria dito: Quem vai me trair, e aquele que comigo poe a mao no prato. O Filho do Homem vai morrer, conforme a Escritura fala a respeito dele..." (Mt 26,23-24). Passagem relacionada ao Sl 41,10, onde Davi reclama sobre um amigo que o trai. O que nos leva a concluir que tal passagem nao e uma profecia, assim, nao poderia estar relacionada a Jesus, como querem os que buscam, nas Escrituras, apoio para seus dogmas. Davi foi traido por um amigo, seu proprio conselheiro, de nome Aquitofel, conforme narrativa em 2Sm 15,12.31. O final tragico da vida desse amigo da onca foi enforcar-se (2Sm17,23), por isso, querem, igualmente, atribuir esse mesmo destino a Judas, como iremos ver mais a frente.Outra coisa que nos parece sem nenhum sentido, principalmente por tudo que Ele fez, e que Jesus tenha realmente se preocupado em delatar o seu traidor, conforme narra Jo 13,26, quando, para identificar quem o trairia, diz aos que o acompanhava, naquela ceia, que seria a quem desse um pao molhado, dito isso, imediatamente, entrega-o a Judas. Talvez a preocupacao aqui seja buscar mais uma forma de relacionar tal episodio a uma suposta profecia sobre esse acontecimento.Mateus (26,48) e Marcos (14,44) dizem que Judas havia combinado com os sacerdotes um sinal o beijo para que pudessem identificar quem era Jesus. Lucas, apesar de nao relatar absolutamente nada sobre esse sinal, diz que Judas aproximando-se de Jesus o sauda com um beijo (Lc 22,47). Enquanto que Joao nao fala de ter havido uma combinacao de sinal, nem que Jesus teria dito algo a respeito e nem mesmo coloca Judas beijando a Jesus, ja que, para ele, foi o Mestre que se adiantou aos guardas acompanhados de Judas se identificando a eles como sendo Jesus, o Nazareno, a quem procuravam (Jo 18,3-5). Fatos novamente conflitantes.Nenhum outro evangelista, a nao ser Joao, coloca Judas como sendo aquele que, entre os discipulos, cuidava da bolsa (Jo 13,29). Vai mais longe ainda, o acusa de ladrao (12,6). Como uma acusacao grave dessa nao foi feita por mais ninguem? Se Judas fosse realmente ladrao, por que motivo o deixaram tomando conta do dinheiro? Alguem colocaria um ladrao como seu administrador financeiro? Nao seria, evidentemente, para colocar a honra desse discipulo em jogo, formula encontrada para se justificar que, por ser assim, ele nao teria tambem nenhum escrupulo em trair o seu proprio Mestre?Nao bastassem os que ja encontramos, aparecem-nos agora mais dois evidentes conflitos.O primeiro esta relacionado a forma pela qual Judas deu cabo a sua vida, movido, segundo relata Mateus, por profundo
se realiza as vesperas da catastrofe inevitavel. Que sentido tem nesse momento comprar um terreno para que fique em poder da familia? Tudo ja esta perdido. Mas o absurdo do ato e a chave do seu sentido. Para efeitos legais imediatos, a compra nada servira; para efeitos profeticos, e admiravel ato de esperanca no futuro. E um oraculo em acao, Jeremias profetiza ao vivo: nao so palavras, nem acao simbolica, mas ato real juridico. Esse ato significa o futuro que ele antecipa: a jarra de barro onde se guarda o contrato e um penhor que Deus concede. Apesar do que esta para acontecer, a terra continua sendo propriedade dos judaitas: a terra prometida aos patriarcas e possuida durante seculos... (Biblia do Peregrino, p. 1928).Podemos ainda confirmar isso com a seguinte explicacao: A citacao [Mt 27,9] e tirada na realidade de Zacarias (11,12-13). Mas, ele lembra tambem diversos versiculos de Jeremias onde se faz mencao do campo e do oleiro (32,6-6; 18,2-12). (Biblia Ave Maria, p. 1319). Ressaltamos que a expressao ela lembra, e uma afirmativa que depoe contra o proprio texto que, positivamente, diz ser de Jeremias essa profecia.ConclusaoPercebemos que as narrativas possuem diversos fatos conflitantes entre si, deixando-nos na conviccao que tudo nao passa de um ajuste dos textos para se chegar a um objetivo pre-determinado, conforme ja falavamos, desde o inicio. Para se ter uma ideia mais exata sobre isso, colocaremos a passagem Mateus 27,1-26, que, para tornar a explicacao mais facil de ser entendida, iremos dividi-la em tres partes:I) 1-2: De manha cedo, todos os chefes dos sacerdotes e os anciaos do povo convocaram um conselho contra Jesus, para o condenarem a morte. Eles o amarraram e o levaram, e o entregaram a Pilatos, o governador.II) 3-10: Entao Judas, o traidor, ao ver que Jesus fora condenado, sentiu remorso, e foi devolver as trinta moedas de prata aos chefes dos sacerdotes e anciaos, dizendo: "Pequei, entregando a morte sangue inocente". Eles responderam: "E o que temos nos com isso? O problema e seu". Judas jogou as moedas no santuario, saiu, e foi enforcar-se. Recolhendo as moedas, os chefes dos sacerdotes disseram: "E contra a Lei coloca-las no tesouro do Templo, porque e preco de sangue". Entao discutiram em conselho, e as deram em troca pelo Campo do Oleiro, para ai fazer o cemiterio dos estrangeiros. E por isso que esse campo ate hoje e chamado de "Campo de Sangue". Assim se cumpriu o que tinha dito o profeta Jeremias: "Eles pegaram as trinta moedas de prata - preco com que os israelitas o avaliaram - e as deram em troca pelo Campo do Oleiro, conforme o Senhor me ordenou".III) 11-26: Jesus foi posto diante do governador, e este o interrogou: "Tu es o rei dos judeus?" Jesus declarou: "E voce que esta dizendo isso". E nada respondeu quando foi acusado pelos chefes dos sacerdotes e anciaos. Entao Pilatos perguntou: "Nao estas ouvindo de quanta coisa eles te acusam?" Mas Jesus nao respondeu uma so palavra, e o governador ficou vivamente impressionado. Na festa da Pascoa, o governador costumava soltar
historical truth that should contain such writings.Many people are shocked with such attitudes, the critical analysis. However, we do not open hand making use of intelligence with which we endowed the Creator. We rational human beings who actually are, we have to use that gift therefore not use it is to abdicate the unique ability that sets us apart from animals, so we believe that only offend God when we do not use our full intelligence.We recognize, however, be very difficult for many people, especially those who do not search, abandon acquired knowledge, especially when they were passed as divine truths under ideological coercion. That is, the simple question of veracity was already, by itself, considered as a serious offense to divinity. This possibility of heresy ends up creating a mental block out of fear of subsequent punishment for this type of sin. Thus, we accept without the slightest questioning what we were imposed as absolute truth. Over time, we began to defend ideas that never analyze or criticize, as if they were our.The issue that we will discuss, this time, is related to an alleged betrayal of Jesus, it would have been performed by Judas Iscariot, one of his disciples. In fact, everything contained in the Bible about it is only in the passages that we will see next.Analysis of the narrativesIn Luke 22.3-6, it is written that after Satan entered into Judas, he went looking for the priests to see how Jesus would deliver. The priests were so pleased with it that combined to give you money, since they wished, of old, eliminate this heretical. Such an event occurred in Luke's version, before the feast of unleavened bread of course, before the Passover supper, the main dish were lambs killed specifically for this purpose, however, according to John, this actually occurred after supper (Jn 13: 26-29), though, a little earlier, he said: "And supper being ended, the devil having now put into the heart of Judas, son of Simon Iscariot, to betray him" (John 13.2), and therefore silent on any previous combination of Judas and the priests. Therefore, we can see that there is conflict between the narratives.On the question of this combination with priests, Matthew (26.15) says that Judas asked for money to give them Jesus, while Mark (14.11) and Luke (22, 5) state that they were the priests is who took the initiative to give back to the disciple, giving him money as a reward for his ignominious act. A good observer will notice that, by its narrative, Matthew had an obvious concern, which is that of Jesus relate to the prophecies, even more than the other Evangelists. Hence he be the one who says about how Judas would have received, giving for granted the importance of thirty pieces of silver (Mt 26.15; 27.3). These passages that speak of that are related to Zech 11.12 to 13, on the assumption that it is a prophecy, however, the facts here narrated refer to own prophet Zechariah, is not therefore a revelation about something that would occur in the future.In
recounting the events at supper, Matthew reports that Jesus, the answer to the disciples about who would betray him, would have said: "Who will betray me is the one who put me in the dish. The Son of Man will die, as Scripture speaks of him ... "(Mt 26.23 to 24). Travel-related Ps 41.10, where David complains about a friend who betrays him. Which brings us to conclude that this passage is not a prophecy thus could not be related to Jesus and want those seeking in Scripture to support their dogmas. David was betrayed by a friend, your own advisor of Ahithophel name as narrative 2 Sam 15,12.31. the tragic end of the life of this "friend of Oz" was hang himself (2Sm17,23), so we want to also assign the same fate of Judas, as we shall see below.Another thing that seems to no sense, especially for all He has done, is that Jesus did not bother to denounce your traitor, as John tells 13.26, when, to identify who would betray him, said to them that followed, that supper, which would be those of a wet bread, said that immediately gives it to Judas. Perhaps the concern here is to seek another way to relate this episode to a supposed prophecy of this event.Matthew (26.48) and Mark (14.44) say that Judas had arranged a signal with the priests - the kiss - so they could identify who Jesus was. Lucas, although not report anything about the sign says that Judas approaching Jesus greets with a kiss (Luke 22.47). While John does not speak of have been a combination of signal, or that Jesus would have said something about it and even puts Judas kissing Jesus, since, for him, was the Master who came forward to Judas guards accompanied by identifying the they as Jesus of Nazareth, whom sought (Jn 18.3 to 5). Again conflicting facts.No other evangelist, but John puts Judas as the one that, among the disciples, took care of the "pocket" (John 13.29). Goes even further, the accused thief (12.6). As a serious charge that was not made by anyone else? If Judas really was a thief, why let him taking money from the account? Someone put a thief as his financial manager? There would of course be put to the honor of this disciple at stake, found formula to justify that, being so, it does not also have no qualms about betraying your own master?Were not enough already found, appear to us now two more obvious conflicts.The first relates to how Judas gave cable to your life, moved, according to reports Matthew, for deep remorse. Strangely he is the only evangelist who talks about it, no other has a single line of Judas have repented. Continuing his report Matthew says that Judas hanged himself (27, 5), but in Acts (1.18) is stating that he "falling headlong, he fell down and broke through the middle and all his bowels gushed out" by moving in this way, the previous version about his death. We find the following explanation for this
step: "Perhaps Judas narration of death hanging himself, is inspired by the story of the death of Ahithophel (cf. 2 Sam 17,23)" (Holy Bible Sanctuary, 1463 p.). As previously quoted Ahithophel hanged himself, but want there, just for inspiration, assign Judas a similar death is regrettable, as the biblical facts should faithfully report the matter, not as the author whatever happened, which presents us with a mere assumption.The second concerns the destination of the currencies. Matthew mentions that the Judas would have returned, thrown them into the sanctuary, which were collected by the priests, by resolution, for the purchase of the potter's field, to serve as a cemetery for foreigners (27.3 to 10). Citing that this took place to fulfill what the prophet Jeremiah said. But this story seems to us badly told, as in Acts it says that Judas himself would have bought a field (Acts 1:18), which could even be that the potter, but either way conflicts with the previous version.Most of the Bibles we consulted, say that the prophecies related to Mt 27.9 "is fulfilled, then what was spoken by the prophet Jeremiah took the thirty pieces of silver,, price that was valued, whom certain sons of Israel and gave them for the potter's field, as the Lord commanded me, "would be: Zech 11.12 to 13 and 32.5 to 16 Jr, Jr or 18.1 to 4 and 19,1- 3, there is therefore serious doubts as to the specific identification prophecy related to the episode. As I talked about Zacarias quote, gets us therefore only of Jeremiah to say something. In the notes on them found that: "The quote is an artificial combination of Jr 32.6-9 and Zech 11.12 to 12" (. Pilgrim Bible, p 2386), that leaves us on the reality that, by admitting that it is "an artificial combination," we are undoubtedly before another attempt to relate events in the New Testament incidents recorded in the Old Testament taken as real prophecies.Who has the curiosity to see the passage quoted Zechariah will not find it any aspect of prophecy, are just facts related to that moment lived by that prophet. What about Jeremiah, is not nothing that he bought something for thirty pieces. On the purchase of land, yes, as we see in 32.1 to 44, but a circumstantial situation, explained as follows:"At first glance this is an incident: the purchase and sale of land under the rules and the procedure of Jewish law. The narrator is pleased to record all the details, showing that the law was strictly enforced and that the act is legally valid. The surprising that purchase-and-sale is taking place on the eve of the inevitable catastrophe. What sense is there in that moment buy land so it stays in the family power? Everything is already lost. But the absurdity of the act is the key to its meaning. For immediate legal effect, buying no avail; for prophetic purposes is admirable act of hope in the future. It is an oracle in action, Jeremiah prophesied live: not only words, not symbolic action, but real
legal act. This act means that he anticipates the future: a clay jar where it holds the contract is a pledge that God gives. Despite what is about to happen, the land remains the property of Judahites: the land promised to the patriarchs and possessed for centuries ... "(Bible Pilgrim, 1928 p.).We can also confirm this with the following explanation: "The quote [Mt 27.9] is taken in Zechariah's reality (11.12 to 13). But it also reminds many of Jeremiah verses where mention is made of the field and the potter (32.6-6; 18.2 to 12). "(Ave Maria Bible, p. 1319). We emphasize that the expression "she recalls," is a statement that argues against what the text itself, positively, said to be of Jeremiah this prophecy.conclusionWe realized that narratives have many conflicting facts with each other, leaving us in the belief that everything is just a setting of texts to achieve a predetermined goal, as already talked from the beginning. To get a more accurate idea about it, put the passage Matthew 27.1 to 26, that, to make the explanation easier to be understood, we will divide it into three parts:I) 1-2: Early morning, all the chief priests and the elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death. They tied him up and took him, and handed him over to Pilate the governor.II) 3-10: Then Judas, who betrayed him, seeing that he was condemned, felt remorse, and was returned the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, saying, "I have sinned in betraying innocent blood death." They said, "What is that to us That's your problem?". Judas threw the coins in the sanctuary, he departed and went and hanged himself. Collecting the coins, the chief priests said: "It is against the law to put them in the Temple treasury, because it is blood money." Then discussed in council, and gave in exchange for the potter's field, there to make the cemetery of foreigners. That's why that field even today is called "field of blood". This was to fulfill what he had said the prophet Jeremiah: "They took the thirty pieces of silver - the price at which the Israelites evaluated - and gave in exchange for the potter's field, as the Lord commanded me."III) 11-26: Jesus stood before the governor, and this asked: "Are you the King of the Jews?" Jesus declared, "It is you who is saying it." And said nothing when he was accused by the chief priests and elders. Pilate asked, "You are not listening to how much they accuse you?" But Jesus did not answer a word, and the governor was highly impressed. On the feast of Easter, the governor to release the prisoner that the crowd wanted ... "For what we put is not necessary to mention the whole narrative, and omit the rest of the sequence of the latter (vv. 16-26), because here, in verse 15, already found enough to understand and realize that the 3 verses -10 have nothing to do with the general context of that reported in
the passage. Even in verse 3 is said that Judas saw that Jesus was condemned, when, in the text of the course, this fact had not happened, which only came to happen later. The sharp break in the sequence of this narrative, no longer perceived by the translator of the Bible Pilgrim, as explained in:"The episode of the death of Judas strangely interrupts the course of the story, as if delivering Jesus to the governor exceeded their forecasts. We know that the figure of Judas fed early legendary fantasies. Luke gives different version (Acts 1,18-20). The violent death tracker or guilty is known literary theme (eg Absalom, 2 Sam 18: Antiochus Epiphanes, 2Mc9; in poetic version various prophetic oracles, eg Isaiah 14; Ezek. 28.). Before he died, Judas adds his testimony about the innocence of Jesus. Confesses sin, but despairs of forgiveness ... "(pp. 2385-2386).This confirms all our suspicions that all was constructed arrangement in order to adjust the texts and conveniences of stakeholders so they had references to their idiosyncrasies. What about the subject matter, we strongly suspect that several other sections were merged to biblical narratives, for conforms them to the particular purpose. We can cite, for example, Mt 26.14 to 16, 21-25, Mk 10.10 to 11; 14, 18-21, Lk 22.3 to 6, 21-23, to you, dear reader, do further analysis.We wonder how you felt and how you can still be felt Judas on everything ascribed to him as a procedure. The poor guy is still judged and condemned, year after year, by the so-called "Christians", which, of course, do not meet, "Judge not others to not be judged ye should be, because with what judgment you judge, you will be judged, and with the as medirdes you will be measured "(Mt 7.1 to 2). On top of that is still humiliated, tabby and in the end, is spectacularly "detonated". Unfortunately this seems to be their cruel fate, which annually perpetuates the celebrations of Holy Week made by certain traditional Christian religions.Sep / 2004.bibliographyJerusalem Bible. Sao Paulo: Paulus 2002.Pilgrim Bible. Sao Paulo: Paulus 2002.Holy Bible - Pastoral Edition. Sao Paulo: Paulus 2001.Holy Bible. Aparecida, SP: Sanctuary, 1984.Holy Bible. Brasilia, DF: SBB, 1969.Holy Bible. London: Ave Maria, 1989.Paulo da Silva Neto SobrinhoSource: Ghost PortalTranslation of the English language: Luiz Carlos Costa (Maintainer Blog Brotherly Love)