modern biased science says camefrom an explosion, we have to question ourselves the following. What are therandom chances to happen? More specifically, if we look to a child coming tothis world, just for the sake of illustration. What are the random chances fora child to be born from a womans womb, over and over and over and over again?I would say its either a divine perfect programming or an evident miracle! Butif miracle is only possible by divine intervention, the question can be justone.Inaddition to what I have already mention, it is good to highlight anotherimportant aspect here.Observablyand intuitively, intelligibility always assumes a prior mind. In any othercase, in any other question that may be raised, always when somethingintelligible is observed, this will be explained taking into consideration thatsomeone was behind it. Only to explain the Universe this is despise it.Now,before coming to the heart of the matter, about why do people still believe ona failed surpassed theory, let me quote some great names of Science here. Ihave a fundamental belief in the Bible as the Word of God, written by men whowere inspired. I study the Bible daily. Who said this quote? Manymodern people or scientist would say, An idiot who believed in God andwas therefore completely irrelevant to the history. However, lets seewhat this man did in his lifetime:Co-inventorof the calculus, discoverer of the law of universal gravitation and the threelaws of motion, analyzer of white light split into colors by means of a prism,inventor of the reflecting telescope and author of the most important book ofthe scientific revolution (the Principia Mathematica).Wow!It does not seen to be an idiot at all.Bydiscovering all these important laws of nature, as gravitation, optics, laws ofmotion, how did he boast about? All my discoveries have been made in ananswer to prayer. Yes, mankind like to complicate things. What we can seeis that, if something is not complex, it is not true. However, this person saidwisely: Truth is ever to be found in simplicity, and not in themultiplicity and confusion of things.Thisman, Sir. Isaac Newton, wrote more about theology than any other thing, andstill found time to discovered these "small" things, used in allscience nowadays. Unfortunately, the biased view is that Science is onlyrelated to atheist views and atheist people.BecauseI believe in the One who made the world. This book was written byAntonino Zichichi, who was President of European Physical Society, President ofItalian National Institute of Nuclear Physics, President of Commission OTAN ofTechnologies for Disarmament, President of World Federation of Scientists and so son.Hesaid: If it weren't for science, we wouldn't have a valid argument to saythat we are children of a rigorous logic. Atheistic culture maintainsthat we are children of chaos, but this is unscientific. What does the term'science' mean? Discovering the logic of nature. If there is a logicsupporting the world from its smallest structures to the boundaries of thecosmos, then there also has to be its author. Atheistic culture maintains thatthere is no author, but that is not reasonable. Science and faith are ingreat alliance because science does not arise from an