less than 2 murders per 100 000 people. The more incomedistribution (the more materials among all equal), less concentration of wealthin the hands of fewer and less violence. In addition, as stated bythe theologian Leonardo Boff "live a clash of two worldviews: the first,which prevailed from the sixteenth century, is the conquest - of land, ofpeople, of power. This model has brought great benefits, but simultaneouslycreated weapons of death and derangement in nature, whose greatest exponent isclimate change, which can derail our life on earth. " Accompanied by a debatebetween philosopher and educator Colombian Bernardo Toro, responsible fornational strategy Avina in Colombia, and sociologist Anamaria Schindler,Ashoka, Boff in an interview argued that "went through a crisis ofcivilization that must rescue the people concerned with the care, with othersand with nature. The engine for this is empathy, which is "the ability wehave to put ourselves in another's place and try to feel what the other isfeeling. The origin of those ideas came from It connects the evolution of communicationand energy development in civilizations with psychological and economicdevelopment in humans. Rifkin considers the latest phase of communication andenergy regimesthat of electronic telecommunications and fossil fuelextractionas bringing people together on the nation-state level based on democratic capitalism, but at the same timecreating global problems, like climatechange, pandemics, and nuclear proliferation. Rifkin extrapolatesthe observed trend into the future, predicting that Internet and mobiletechnology along with small-scale renewable energy commercializationwill create an era of distributed capitalism necessary to manage thenew energy regime and a heightened global empathythat can help solve global problems.Our challenge is how to make today's leaders take this ability to beempathetic to the day to day, "said Schindler." That iscontextualizing the present moment, how could we think of a government proposalto our right-wing to contemplate such aproposal as a guideline government plan government center / right candidate forpresidency? Also Roberto Da Matta is right when he says that the question is how tomanage. The question is the secondary program. But there has to be compromise.There has to be serious commitment to those constitutionally legitimated power.That is, the people. But that's still unreachable hope, with a view, as statedby the anthropologist, that deep radical all really want is the return of thearistocracy. The liberal welfare state and the two previous democratic state,individual freedom invent. But its leaders are paternalistic, ie the people cannot afford to have the "umbilical cord" separated from each other.The words, the people have no creativity and ability to govern. But that is:that self-government is the legitimacy that the people have, in a democraticstate, to "draw" their own way, through the conscious vote andgreater politicization. But what the left wants to call it? What is the right that call? The people can not and should not bepoliticized, because that would cause an autonomy that would be out of controland domain of the privileged and dominant groups. Ie the aristocracy hidden inthe nomenclature. It is necessary that before the elections elejamos our sole candidate ofthe right-wing/center. Aecio Neves has all the conditions to be this candidate, and be closerto the right-wing positions and