Brazils history has several localincidents that we could call revolution. We can mention two most important of them: the Farroupilha Revolution, who take place on Rio Grande do Sul at the 19th century, and Constitutionalist Revolution, that happenedin Sao Paulo in earlier 20thcentury. These two represented the peoples desire of freedom and self-reliance.But can we consider appropriate these revolutions? In which situations arevolution is fair or justified?We areexpected to support all government legally constituted. However, when thesegovernments try to change laws to get advantage over the people, and interfereon free agency, people should have the right to defend it. The governments badactions can make the people angry, and it can be a spark that would start apopular revolution. The tea taxes started the American Revolution, while the starvation caused the French Revolution. Obviously, theAmerican Revolution was not about tea, and both revolutions are stronglyrelated with the same core: freedom.There isnot easy to judge the events that happened recently in Egypt, Libya and Syria,or even the recent commotions in Brazil. Unluckiness, people with no good intentionscould use these movements for self-promotion or other hidden agenda. Or theycan resort for terrorists tactics, claiming that the ends justify the means.It looks like a tricky and dangerous situation. It is hard to judge arevolution, but we still judge revolutionary behavior. It is not easy to ensurean ethical revolution, due to the exposed above. However, when people decide tostart a revolution, it is like a tsunami.There is no possible control. Revolutions are like an institutional chaos,because most of them came from institutional failure.There isonly one way to avoid people revolution: preserving the institutions healthy.Governments, congress and courts need to be reliable, worthy and dependable,and people need to trust them. Otherwise, a spark could start a revolution withunpredictable consequences. MONOTRILHO - Projeto preve mudancas graves no Centro Historico de Manaus Depois de ler materia no site Amazonas Atual (http://migre.me/huqou) sobre o total de 14 obras que foram retiradas da matriz de responsabilidade da Copa fiquei me perguntando: Se as obras de MOBILIDADE URBANA, que foram deixadas de lado entre as responsabilidades, nao prejudicarao a Copa, como diz o Governo Federal, isso quer dizer que aquela historia de LEGADO DA COPA nao passava de discurso falacioso? Descobri entao que: Conseguimos a facanha de enganar a PODEROSA FIFA, de que era possivel realizar um grande evento desses nessa gigante CASA DE FERREIRO COM ESPETO DE PAU. E mais grave ainda, o Governo que ai esta conseguiu implantar um FALSO ORGULHO nos coracoes dos brasileiros. Digo isso porque, por aqui pelo menos, nos manauenses ficamos sem o BRT prometido e gracas a Deus, sem aquela ideia MEGALOMANIACA de MONOTRILHO. Nao ganhamos calcadas para todos; na verdade nao ganhamos nenhuma calcada com conceito novo de acessibilidade, apesar de belos projetos apresentados. O que se fez ate hoje nao passa de uma maquiagem mal acabada.Ciclovias ainda dormem nos planos e nos papeis As ciclovias prometidas ainda nao sairam do papel; apenas uma ciclofaixa no Passeio do Mindu, que por si so oferece risco de morte aos poucos ciclistas que por la decidiram manter