deception is largely used nowadays asa strategy of truth-distortion. Usually it is given through the semanticdistortion and subversion of words meanings, in order to downplay relevance ormislead understanding. Through semantic deception one can argue all sorts oflies, irrelevances or false information to nullify or impair a conversation ordialectic process. Using such strategy, one could argue that the sentence I drank water from theocean is false or has no truth-value once the chemical formula of water (H2O) is different than the aforementioned, which containssodium and chloride. Therefore the ocean has no water to be drunk. One could also argue that the question what is the circumference of thisball? is not truth-appt, once circles are hypothetical figures existing onlyin ones imagination with two dimensions, differently than a ball which is atree dimensions spherical (not circular) existing object.Of course, this kind of tool is commonly used in more subtle ways but oftenrelying on such pointless argument only to devoid the challengedidea/discussion from its point, derailing it. To induce the confusion with theword good, for instance, is a trite use of semantic deception. To generatethe confusion between what implies goodness in a moral sense of being benignand what implies possessing a good evaluation of quality as a knife can be,is a bright way of depriving morality of its status and semantic value, andleveling it with inanimate objects. Such a tool is largely applied on the defense of stances of neutrality,no-right no-wrong ideas and deliberately challenging and underminingopponents, making them sound dubious. Easily done, this kind of psychological attack does not demand theattacker to state the opposite of its victim nor to provide reasons to defend acontrary point of view. All the attacker is required to do is to doubteverything, questioning and misleading the actual point into some irrelevantrubbish.A good example of semantic deception is foundin THE PSYCHIATRY OF ENDURING PEACE AND SOCIALPROGRESS in The William Allason White MemorialLectures by Major General G.B. [Brock] Chisholm, C.B.E., M.D.,Deputy Minister of Health, Dept. of National Health and Welfare, Canada (Vol.9, No. 1) as it follows:The re-interpretation and eventually eradication ofthe concept of right and wrongwhich has been the basis of child training, thesubstitution of intelligent and rationalthinking for faith in the certainties of the oldpeople, these are the belated objectives ofpractically all effective psychotherapy. Would it notbe sensible to stop imposing our localprejudices and faiths on children and give them allsides of every question so that in theirown time they may have the ability to size things up,and make their own decisions? ...Ifthe race is to be freed from its crippling burden ofgood and evil it must be psychiatristswho take the original responsibility.... The peoplewho matter are the teachers, theyoung mothers and fathers, the parent-teacherassociations, youth groups, service clubs,schools and colleges, the churches and Sundayschoolseveryone who can be reached andgiven help toward intellectual freedom and honesty forthemselves and for the childrenwhose future depends on them....By suggesting all sorts of wonderful improvements, Chisholm can statethat the objective of psychotherapy is the eradication of the concepts of rightand wrong in childrens education. Training, excuse me. Chisholm also suggestthat we let children