thegoodfellas/blogset-br huggingface dataset:
Lincoln Spector, PCWorld EUA24-05-2011E possivel resgatar arquivos de uma midia infectada sem correr o risco de contaminar o PC. Basta seguir alguns cuidados basicos.Voce tem um pendrive, CD ou DVD que sabe que esta infectado com virus, mas tambem tem arquivos importantes la dentro que precisa recuperar. Como fazer isso sem contaminar o PC? O procedimento e arriscado, mas nao muito: basta ser cauteloso.A solucao mais simples e inserir o disco ou pendrive em um PC com Linux ou em um Mac e copiar os arquivos dos quais voce precisa para uma midia limpa (como ou outro pendrive). A maioria absoluta do malware e especifica a um sistema operacional, entao um virus para Windows nao ira causar danos a um sistema com MacOS ou Linux.Mas se voce pretende usar um PC, atualize seu anti-virus antes e instale alguns utilitarios extras contra malware, como o Malwarebytes Anti-Malware e o SUPERAntiSpyware, ambos com versoes gratuitas. Depois de instalar, atualize eles tambem.Voce nao quer que o Windows inicie automaticamente um programa malicioso assim que voce inserir o disco ou pendrive no PC, entao e necessario desabilitar um recurso do Windows chamado Autorun ou Autoplay (Reproducao Automatica). Voce sempre pode habilita-lo novamente mais tarde, se quiser, embora os especialistas em seguranca nao recomendem isso.Se voce esta usando o Windows XP, precisara de um utilitario gratuito criado pela propria Microsoft, chamado TweakUI, para fazer a alteracao. Depois de instalar e abrir o programa, clique em My Computer / Autoplay / Types no painel esquerdo. Desmarque as opcoes Enable Autoplay for removable drives e Enable Autoplay for CD and DVD drives.No Windows XP, e necessario um utilitario para desabilitar a reproducao automaticaSe voce usa o Windows 7 e o Windows Vista, o processo e mais facil. Clique no menu Iniciar, digite reproducao na caixa de pesquisa e tecle Enter. Desmarque a opcao Usar Reproducao Automatica em todas as midias e dispositivos.Agora voce pode inserir com seguranca a midia infectada em seu computador. Mas nao abra nem copie nenhum arquivo ainda. Primeiro, faca uma varredura na midia com todos os programas anti-virus e anti-malware que voce tiver. Voce precisa determinar se os arquivos dos quais voce precisa estao infectados, e caso estejam, se podem ser limpos.Depois que voce tiver certeza de que os arquivos que voce quer sao seguros, ai sim voce podera copia-los para seu HD.Mas o que fazer com a midia depois disso? Voce nao quer que alguem a insira por descuido em um PC e o infecte, certo? Se for um CD ou DVD, o jeito e descarta-lo. Esfregue o lado prateado com palha de aco ou uma lixa fina (para inutiliza-lo) ou corte-o em pedacos usando uma tesoura grande ou picotadora de papel adaptada para triturar discos. Nao tente quebrar o disco com as maos, pois voce corre o risco de se cortar nas lascas de plastico afiadas.Eraser: utilitario para "zerar" seu pendriveJa os pendrives podem ser reaproveitados. Ha varios programas que podem fazer uma limpeza, recomendamos o Eraser, que e gratuito. Ele oferece varias formas de apagar os dados no pendrive, varias delas bastante
far beneaththe surface. But for whales and dolphins that live in the ocean, what iscrucial to them is sound.Sound is an efficient way to transmit and senseinformation, especially as it travels faster through water then through air. Ifa whale shouts in an ocean channel, another whale may hear the hundreds ofkilometers away. Whales and dolphins use sound in two ways: forcommunication and for echolocation. Communicate through a wide variety ofhigh-frequency sounds at frequencies of 500 Hz to 20 Khz.Whales and dolphins also rely on echolocation to learnabout their immediate environment. They produce intense short broad-band pulsesof sound in the ultrasonic range of between 0.25 and 220 Khz.The chicks are brief but they are repeated many timeseach second.My personal view is that its very important toimprove the students with lectures in the internet. This is important in thesense that all students and University Lectures can share knowledge. A possible effect is the producing of a greater amountof academic texts in the net, grounded in this sharing of knowledge. By theway, the great problem would be the quality of these texts and the academicvalidity, under the point of view of a scientific approach. First evidence: with the sharing of the knowledge, allacademic researchers around the world be producing new texts, based in theprinciple that there are no academic or geographic boundaries. All researcherscould be sharing knowledge with each other. This is really a new thing. In myopinion, the future would be totally virtual, with no barriers between people or between University Lectures and students with no countries, boundaries,only a imaginary mental line producing constant knowledge art, and so on. Bythis fact, our home would be the last refuge of the mankind, equipped with allthe technological case in order to produce this new knowledge, consequently, anew art. The real knowledge will departs from our homes and will embrace theworld (we seek out the world, in this sense!).My personalexperience says that a virtual of a new knowledge is emerging, in respect of aproducing of new texts (academics; semi-academics; informal; bulletins, and soon) and a new art (graphic; sound, etc). Home pages, academic sites, blogswould be the place, a physical place (virtual) where all of us will producethis new knowledge and art. In my case, a site of my music can be shared by anypeople of the world.Nelio Porto
disso, Kardec estuda o verdadeiro sentido dos termosbiblicos em sua origem hebraica e estabelece comparacoes entre o texto sagradoe conhecidas alegorias mitologicas. A forma das alegorias biblicas e bela e oseu sentido e profundo. Mas essa beleza e essa profundidade sao transformadasem absurdo e ridiculo pela interpretacao literal.24- MOSTRA A BIBLIA QUE ADAO NAO FOI O PRIMEIRO HOMEMExpulso do Eden, o casalprimitivo teve dois filhos: Caim e Abel, segundo nos relata o Cap. IV do Genesis,versiculos l a 16. Estava assim iniciada, segundo as religioes dogmaticas, araca humana na Terra. Mas a propria biblia desmente essa suposicao, ao declarar,logo no vers. 2, que "Abel foi pastor e Caim lavrador". Nosversiculos 14 e 15 vemos Caim temer que "outros" o matem e o Senhor"pos um sinal em Caim, para que nao o ferisse de morte quem quer que oencontrasse". E o versiculo 16 nos oferece esta preciosa informacao:retirando-se da presenca do Senhor o renegado Caim "habitou na terra de Node,ao oriente do Eden".Nao precisamos sair dos limitesdesse capitulo 4 do Genesis para ver que Adao e Eva nao iniciaram a racahumana, mas apenas a sua propria descendencia, num mundo ja povoado ha muitotempo. Os versiculos seguintes confirmam isso plenamente. Que faz o Espiritismoem face deste problema? Rejeita e condena a Biblia como falsa? Nao. Pelo contrario,procura interpreta-la em espirito e verdade, em vez de apegar-se as contradicoese aos absurdos da "letra que mata".No capitulo XI de A Genese,Kardec explica que a chamada raca adamica foi uma das ultimas a surgirem na Terra."O Genesis no-la mostra, - diz ele, - desde o seu inicio, industriosa, apta para as artes eas ciencias, sem haver passado pela infancia intelectual, o que nao e propriodas racas primitivas, mas concorda com a opiniao de que ela se compunha de Espiritos jaavancados". Caim era lavrador, Abel era pastor, e logo mais veremos Caim casar-se (com quem?)ter filhos e construir uma cidade. Tratemos agora do fratricidio de Caim, cujosimbolo e tambem dos mais significativos.Vemos na Biblia que Caim matouAbel por ciumes de Deus. Ambos haviam oferecido ao Senhor as primicias de seustrabalhos; Caim, os frutos da terra, Abel, os gordos rebentos do seu rebanho. Oque mostra que ja viviam na era das civilizacoes agrarias. Mas o Senhor naogostou da oferta vegetal, preferindo a de carne. Como todos os deuses antigos,o Deus Unico da Biblia tambem gostava mais de carnes que de frutas.A alegoria e evidente: Caimrepresenta o egoismo humano de uma raca em desenvolvimento, Abel e a vitimainocente desse egoismo feroz; Deus pune Caim, mas nao o aniquila, por que eleprecisa continuar progredindo; e o Deus em causa nao e o verdadeiro Deus, masum guia espiritual, que representa o Senhor perante a ingenuidade desse povo nascente.E inacreditavel que ainda hoje nos queira impingir essas alegorias em seusentido liberal!25- CAIM FUNDOU UMA CIDADE SEM TER QUEM HABITA-LA!Com quem se casou Caim, aoretirar-se para a terra do Node? Se Adao e Eva eram as primeiras criaturashumanas. Caim era a terceira. Nao haveria mais gente em toda a Terra. Mas a Biblia nos conta oseguinte: "E coabitou Caim com sua mulher; ela concebeu
e deu a luzEnoque. Caim edificou uma cidade e lhe chamou Enoque, o nome de seufilho". (Genesis, IV: 17). Nao ha explicacao teologica que possa resolveras contradicoes do texto.E evidente que Caim nao era aterceira criatura da Terra, mas apenas o primeiro descendente de uma nova raca,que surgia num mundo ja povoado e evoluido. A mulher de Caim era de outra raca,do povo que habitava a terra de Node. Os costumes da epoca ressaltam de todo otexto. Ao construir uma cidade, Caim lhe deu o nome do filho, homenagem comumnos tempos antigos e ainda hoje comum entre os pioneiros de zonas novas. E comque povo ia Caim povoar a sua cidade? Pensaria em faze-lo apenas com a suageracao? Claro que isso seria absurdo. Era o povo de Node que teria de habitara cidade de Caim.O fato mesmo de Caim ser pastor eAbel lavrador ja nos mostra que Adao e Eva viviam numa civilizacao constituida.Se ja havia profissoes, divisao do trabalho, especializacao da producao e atemesmo fundacao de cidades, e evidente que o mundo nao estava comecando, mas jahavia comecado ha muito tempo. Nao se pode ajeitar as coisas, diante destesdados do texto. O que se pode e deve fazer e interpretar o texto, desvendar-lheo sentido, decifrar-lhe o simbolo como o fez Kardec.A raca adamica era uma nova racaque surgia na Terra, proveniente de migracoes espirituais. Sua missao era auxiliaro desenvolvimento do planeta, ajudar os seus habitantes primitivos a seelevarem espiritualmente. Nao surgia milagrosamente, mas de forma natural, pordescendencia biologica de outras racas mais aperfeicoadas. Entretanto, como eranecessario preservar a condicao evolutiva dessa raca, a fim de que ela nao seperdesse na animalidade terrena, a Biblia usou o mito da criacao direta de Adaoe Eva por Deus.A descendencia de Caim e agenealogia do povo hebreu, que vem nos versiculos seguintes da Biblia, desse mesmocapitulo IV: 17-26, e do capitulo V: l -32, provam precisamente o que acabamos deacentuar. Os casamentos ali referidos nao podem ser explicados sem a existencia deoutros povos, na Terra, como nao se pode admitir que a corrupcao do genero humano tenhaocorrido na descendencia de Adao. Insistir na aceitacao literal dessas coisas,a pretexto de que a Biblia e "a palavra de Deus", so serve para desmoralizara Biblia e a propria religiao. Ja e tempo das criaturas pensantes examinarem problemastao serios com maior seriedade.26- OS FILHOS DE DEUS CASARAM COM AS FILHAS DOS HOMENSComo se multiplicou a racaadamica na Terra? O capitulo VI do Genesis nos conta isso. E os versiculos de l a 7confirmam plenamente que Adao nao era o primeiro homem nem Eva a primeiramulher. Vemos no versiculo 2 a distincao entre os adamicos, chamados filhos deDeus, e as suas esposas, chamadas filhas dos homens. Explica, pois, a propria Biblia,o casamento de Caim. O versiculo 4 e explicito: "Ora, naquele tempo haviagigantes na Terra; e tambem depois, quando os filhos de Deus possuiram asfilhas dos homens, as quais lhes deram filhos; estes foram valentes varoes derenome na Antiguidade".Vemos assim que a Terra estavapovoada de gigantes, ou seja, dos descendentes dos homens primitivos com que Deus apovoara, muito antes da
mestre de Lyon. Que falta faz hoje um lider dessaenvergadura. Que me perdoem os expoentes do movimento espirita, mas nao vejoninguem na atual idade com a vocacao kardequiana e a garra do professor HerculanoPires. E aproveito a ocasiao para dizer que a Bibliografia desse autentico lidere composta de 88 obras. Entre as quais, Edicoes Correio Fraterno teve afelicidade de publicar as seguintes: "O Homem Novo", uma coletanea decronicas que Herculano Pires publicou, primeiramente, no extinto jornal"Diario de Sao Paulo", com o pseudonimo de Irmao Saulo. A tonicadessas cronicas e esclarecer sobre o que e e o que nao e correio dentro domovimento espirita, preocupacao sempre constante nesse autor; "Infinito eo Finito", em que o filosofo Herculano Pires brinca com as palavras e vai construindo com elas magnaslicoes como essas: "Deus e infinito. Nos somos finitos"; "Deus eo Ser dos seres..." "O homem e o ser entre os seres, pequeninacriatura apegada a crosta..."; "O Misterio do Bem e do Mal", 45cronicas que a pena do professor Herculano Pires vasou com o proposito deesclarecer o seu leitor como e vista essa dicotomia a luz da Doutrina dosEspiritos; "Educacao para a Morte", um verdadeiro manual de vida,pois o professor Herculano pouco fala de morte, pelo contrario, ele nos ensinanesta obra a viver com sabedoria para vencermos a morte e possamos dizer, nofuturo, como fez Paulo de Tarso: "Onde esta, o morte, a tua vitoria? Onde esta,o morte, o teu aguilhao?"Ummarco parisianoNos momentos mais importantes emais dificeis para o Espiritismo no Brasil, o nobre professor sempre estevepresente. Foi ele, por exemplo, que sustentou a luta contra a traducao para a lingua portuguesado Evangelho Segundo o Espiritismo, feita por Paulo Alves de Godoy, publicada pelaFederacao Espirita do Estado de Sao Paulo, tendo mesmo solicitado orecolhimento da edicao em virtude de enxertos indevidos. A FEESP ouvindo-o, atehoje nao publicou a segunda edicao. Obrigado professor!CirsoSantiago
Revolver - The Beatles under attack in 1966 Salvador AstuciaCompelling evidence suggests that, in 1966, PaulMcCartney and Capitol Records began to sabotage John Lennons music. Four majorevents occurred from June through August of 1966. Apparently the FBI thoughtthe Beatles were getting too creative and influential. The stated events seemedto center around the release of their next album, Revolver, on August 5,1966. Although Revolver is considered one of the Beatles better albums,and a turning point in their music, I was disappointed with it becausesimplystatedthe version I heard contained too much McCartney and not enough Lennon. But being an American, I heard the version released byCapitol Records in the United States. Consequently, the version I heardcontained three less Lennon songs than the original version (the Britishversion). Revolver was a ground breaking album, signaling a substantialshift in the Beatles sound and image. The album cover is avant-garde, designedby German artist Klaus Voorman. The layout is a surreal collage withvarious photographed images of the Beatles floating on top of hand-drawn imagesof their heads and faces. Harrisons hand-drawn face has real eyes and reallips superimposed. In an interview, years later, Voorman described how he wasinvited to design the cover of Revolver. The following is anexcerpt: KLAUS VOORMAN: Well, it came out of the blue. I wasnt doing any art in those days. I was playing in bands, and suddenly John [Lennon] called me and said, "Look, Klaus, if you have any idea for our next album cover [Revolver], scribble it down and let us see it. And if its something we like, you might get the gig." So I did sketches and I had 10 or 15 suggestions, ideas, but I already liked the one with the hair. I went to the studio, which was always a good idea while they were recording the work, because you needed time to do the cover as much as they needed time to finish the LP. I showed it to them and they all jumped on this Idea of the four heads and those little figures it. The album marked the beginning of the Beatlespsychedelic period which was introduced by Lennons "Tomorrow NeverKnows" and Voormans cover design. Although none of the songs on Revolverare anti-war, Lennons lyrics expanded the boundaries of rock music, whichwere usually confined to romantic topics. In "She Said, She Said,"Lennon stated lyrically that he knows what its like to be dead. He lateradmitted that he simply borrowed a line which was repeated to him by PeterFonda while Fonda was on an acid trip. Toping off the albums avant-garde stylewas George Harrisons use of the sitar on the song, "Love to You.Surprisingly,three of John Lennons five original songs did not appear on the version of thealbum released by Capitol Records in America. Instead, Paul McCartney waspresented as the primary creative force. None of McCartneys songs were omittedfrom original version of Revolver. Table 2 shows the songs that appeared on theBritish version of Revolver versus those that appeared on the Americanversion. Table 2: Revolver - British Version vs. American Version British version (Parlophone/EMI) American version (Capitol Records) SIDE
1: SIDE 1: 1. Taxman 1. Taxman 2. Eleanor Rigby 2. Eleanor Rigby 3. Im Only Sleeping (omitted) 4. Love to You 3. Love to You 5. Here, There and Everywhere 4. Here, There and Everywhere 6. Yellow Submarine 5. Yellow Submarine 7. She Said She Said 6. She Said She Said SIDE 2: SIDE 2: 1. Good Day Sunshine 1. Good Day Sunshine 2. And Your Bird Can Sing (omitted) 3. For No One 2. For No One 4. Dr. Robert (omitted) 5. I Want to Tell You 3. I Want to Tell You 6. Got to Get You Into My Life 4. Got to Get You Into My Life 7. Tomorrow Never Knows 5. Tomorrow Never Knows On the British version of Revolver, there were 14songs total; on the American version there are only 11. Again, the threemissing songs are Lennons. On the British version, Lennon sang lead vocal (andwas the primary writer) on five songs: "Im Only Sleeping," "SheSaid She Said," "And Your Bird Can Sing," "Dr.Robert," and "Tomorrow Never Knows." On the American version,"Im Only Sleeping," "And Your Bird Can Sing," and"Dr. Robert" were omitted, leaving only two Lennon songs on thealbum. Of those two, McCartney refused to play on one. In contrast, fiveMcCartney songs were featured, along with three Harrison tunes. None ofMcCartneys or Harrisons songs were cut from the British version. But Lennonsthree songs were top-notch, far better than some of Harrisons and McCartneyssongs which were not cut. For example, Harrisons "I want to TellYou" is a poorly written, poorly arranged song. At best, its a mediocrepop tune. McCartney has some nice songs, but "For No One" is a mundanetune which could easily be dropped. Why were those tunes kept and three ofLennons were dropped? Again, only Lennons tunes were dropped, noothers. If Lennons three songs were not on Revolver, where did they go? Capitolsfraudulent Yesterday and Today album On June 15, 1966, Capitol Records released a Beatlesalbum without the Beatles consent entitled Yesterday and Today. Capitolused a gruesome picture on the cover, known as the "butcher blockphoto." It showed the Beatles with dead babies (dolls) and hunks of redmeat. The butcher block photo was taken during a bizarre photo session withphotographer Bob Whitaker. The gory photo was quickly replaced with a moreconventional picture of the Beatles.Some obvious questions arise: Did the Beatles intendto release the "butcher block photo?" If not, how could such a thingoccur? My research indicates that the answer to the first question is No, theBeatles did not intend to use the butcher block photo. The answer to the secondquestion is fairly obvious: the FBI was using Capitol Records to harass theBeatles. To understand what happened requires some background informationregarding how the Beatles recordings were marketed in the UK versus the UnitedStates. From 1964 through 1966, two versions of everyCapitol/EMI Beatle album were released: one version was released in Britain onthe Parlophone/EMI label; and one version was released in America on theCapitol Records label. Generally, the two versions were similar, but theBritish versions usually contained about two or three extra songs. In addition,some
Lennons musicon the Revolver album, his two songs which appeared on the Americanversion of the LP had a profound impact on rock music, particularly"Tomorrow Never Knows." In 1966 rock music began to shift to a darkermood, reflecting the sentiment of Americas youth toward President Johnsonsescalation of military involvement in South Vietnam. John Lennon sparked quitea bit of creativity with "Tomorrow Never Knows", a song is laced withlyrical reverences to Timothy Learys Tibetan Book of the Dead, a bookviewed by many as the Bible for LSD users. Origins of songs that appeared on Yesterday and Today SIDE 1DriveMy Car (released Dec.3, 1965; Rubber Soul)ImOnly Sleeping (released Aug. 5, 1966; Revolver)NowhereMan (released Dec. 3, 1965; Rubber Soul)DrRobert (released Aug. 5, 1966; Revolver)Yesterday(released Aug. 13, 1965; Help)ActNaturally (released Aug. 13, 1965; Help)SIDE 2AndYour Bird Can Sing (released Aug. 5, 1966; Revolver)If INeeded Someone (released Dec.3, 1965; Rubber Soul)WeCan Work it Out (Single)WhatGoes On? (released Dec. 3, 1965; Rubber Soul)DayTripper (Single)To my knowledge, Tomorrow Never Knows was the firstpsychedelic song ever written; the term "psychedelic" meaning a songthat was inspired by LSD. The lyrics to Tomorrow Never Knows are as follows: Tomorrow Never KnowsTurn off your mind, relax and float down stream, It is not dying, it is not dying Lay down all thought, surrender to the void, It is shining, it is shining. Yet you may see the meaning of within It is being, it is being Love is all and love is everyone It is knowing, it is knowing And ignorance and hate may mourn the dead It is believing, it is believingBut listen to the color of your dreamIt is not leaving, it is not leavingSo play the game Existence to the endOf the beginning, of the beginning Typically, other bands began to follow the Beatlescreative instincts. In 1967, a San Francisco-based band, Jefferson Airplane,had a hit single, "Somebody to Love," which made dark lyricalreferences to lies, death, blood and tears. The same year, Jimi Hendrixreleased another psychedelic song, "Purple Haze," which described anLSD experience. After Hendrix came along, psychedelic rock really went intoorbit, but it was Lennons Tomorrow Never Knows that served as the launchingpad. McCartney refused to play on She Said She Said Paul revealed a stunning bit of trivia in the 1997book, Paul McCartney: Many Years From Now, by Barry Miles. Paul statedthat he did not play on Lennons song, "She Said She Said" on the Revolveralbum. The following is an excerpt of McCartneys comments: Its a nice one. I like the title She Said She Said, which I think was made up on the session. John brought it in pretty much finished, I think. Im not sure but I think it was one of the only Beatle records I never played on. I think we had a barney* or something and I said, Oh, fuck you! and they said, Well, well do it. I think George played bass. Not only was McCartney absent on bass guitar on"She Said She Said," studio records further reveal that he did notsing on the recording either. In 1988, Mark Lewisohn wrote a bookTheBeatles