of the first invasion in 1992. This fact leads me to some sort ofwonder about two aspects. The first one is the formalities that surround theinternational entities organizations. Formalities yet needed and desirable to amore suitable treatment between the parts, nevertheless their identities, aresome sort of obstacle to more urgent situations that require the internationalcommunitys attention.The second wonder is about the positioning and the measures bounded tothe relation between the nations. Certainly allies exist, and some sort ofrivalries still undertaking the idea of a truly United Nations. For thatreason, we find situations in the world that symbolizes the fostering of someand disadvantaging of others. In the case of the Bosnian claims, the treatmentof the situation, since its beginning, reveals this duality. In my opinion, theinternational community itself and its entities behave in a certain elusiveway, and despite the will of speed of procedure, it is indubitable that theprocedural delay was bounded to the consequences of the war in a humanisticperspective. It is not a point of view linked to direct responsibility, but amatter of idea that some situations could be reconsider in the procedural wayof proceeding.In his vote of the case ServellonGarcia et al. versus Honduras, the Judge Antonio Cancado Trindade brings aquote of the classic Los Miserables, by Victor Hugo, and its comments aboutit deserves to be object of reflection. He quotes and says that20. In his classic Los Miserables (1862), Victor Hugoweighs in with a witty spirit:"L'avenir arrivera-t-il? Ilsemble qu'on peut presque se faire cette question quand on voit tant d'ombreterrible. Sombreface-a-face des egoistes et des miserables. Chez les egoistes, les prejuges,les tenebres de l'education riche, l'appetit croissant par l'enivrement, unetourdissement de prosperite qui assourdit, la crainte de souffrir qui, dansquelques-uns, va jusqu'a l'aversion des souffrants, une satisfactionimplacable, le moi si enfle qu'il ferme l'ame; - chez les miserables, laconvoitise, l'envie, la haine de voir les autres jouir, les profondes secoussesde la bete humaine vers les assouvissements, les coeurs pleins de brume, latristesse, le besoin, la fatalite, l'ignorance impure et simple. Faut-ilcontinuer de lever les yeux vers le ciel? (...)." 21. Thepenetrating words of Victor Hugo acquire great topicality. The disparities thatflagellate national societies (and are currently more serious in theerroneously globalized world of our days), reveal one of its most markedcharacteristics: the sad repressive nature of said societies. In the name ofpublic security the most vulnerable, alienated, and excluded, theundesirable, Victor Hugos miserables, are killed with impunity.Additionally, our repressive societies of today not only in Latin America butin all continents (I have visited them all, and I know what I am talkingabout), - do not have a memory, they are condemned to live in a brief anddespairing present, without encouraging perspectives, without a future.Seems to me that it is not only a matter of perspective of the X crimewas committed, so the punishment X must be applied in a mere sense offormality and obedience of the Law. Law, as an entity that is created by thesociety in the process of evolution in its relations, is a product of thesociety knowledge and interpretation of the context in which it is