thegoodfellas/blogset-br huggingface dataset:
Pequena orfa E tarde... As cores melancolicas do crepusculo desaparecem pouco a pouco e as nuvens vao se tornando avermelhadas, enquanto um vento frio comeca a percorrer a terra. Um frio intenso percorre o seu corpo, seus olhos se fixam no nada, enquanto lagrimas solitarias descem pelas suas faces, molham seus labios, neles deixando o gosto amargo da solidao. Silencio... Ja e noite... Todos ja se recolheram, e voce, continua do mesmo jeito... Seu quarto na penumbra... Paredes que parecem querer sufoca-la, seu corpo estendido na cama como uma boneca quebrada, jogada num canto qualquer. Quer chamar por alguem, porque sente medo... Quer gritar... Mas o grito amortece em sua garganta. Olha em volta... Procura por seu pai, sua mae, mas nao tem em conta que eles jamais retornarao. As paredes do orfanato parecem prende-la... Fecha os olhos... O sono se aproxima vagaroso... E voce chama por ele... Porque dormindo, sonha... E sonhando e feliz. Sonha que esta indo embora... Seu pai surge bem longe e te acena; sua mae, chorando, ergue os bracos te chamando. Mas... Estao tao longe... Quer alcanca-los... Nao consegue... Seus pes ficam fincados no chao. E sonhando... Chora... Agita-se... E, no extremo do desespero, acorda. Foi se embora o sono e com ele os sonhos e com os sonhos a ultima esperanca. A noite, envolta em toda sua negritude, permanece calada e ameacadora. E voce, pobre crianca, e pequena pra entender esse misterio da vida. O hoje, nada pode te oferecer a nao ser os sonhos. A sua realidade triste, so no amanha compreenderas. So o amanha te dira que o orfanato se tornou a sua casa e que te tornaste como tantas outras criancas, uma pobre orfa! Debora Bueno/90 "Aprendi que nao posso exigir o amor de ninguem,posso apenas dar boas razoes para que gostem de mim... e ter paciencia para que a vida faca o resto".(William Shakespeare)A recompensa vira do alto juntamente com Aquele - o nosso Pai Celestial- que e o mais poderoso e conhecedor das nossas humilhacoes e decepcoes familiares. (Ester Simoes) Adeus Silencio... Solidao... Saudade... Silencio ao seu redor... Solidao na sua vida... Saudade em seu coracao. Cercada entre quatro paredes frias como o gelo do inverno, Voce permanece imovel,Olhos fixos no nada,Seu corpo estendido na cama, como de uma boneca quebrada, jogada fora.Nada parece ter sentido;O quarto, na penumbra parece querer sufoca-la.E a noite vem chegando em toda sua negritude, trazendo misterios, encantos e ... Debora costa Bueno/90 Vida Vives de fantasias... De sonhos inacabados... Teu caminho, cheio de pedregulhos... Onde palavras te ferem e gestos te machucam. Ja nao bastam os sonhos... Chega de fantasias... A realidade e mais forte e bate a tua porta. Como uma folha seca embalada pelo vento, Tua mente navega... Teu cotidiano... Seus objetivos... Sem uma meta a alcancar. E assim, segues andando... Se deixando levar pelos acontecimentos. E tuas noites, antes tao sonhadoras, Hoje, tao melancolicas e solitarias. E um novo dia surge... Pra voce, um dia como outro qualquer, Mente para os outros, mas nao para si proprio. Seu coracao, so tu sabes,
a tristeza dele se apossou. Amigos te faltam... Amigos de outrora que suportam tuas magoas e desalentos. E voce, antes, uma moldura de paz e otimismo, Hoje, uma gravura amarga e desprovida de sentimentos. Expulse essa tristeza... Preencha o seu tempo com amor... Viva... Viva com intensidade... E a felicidade de outrora, retornara para tua vida... Definitivamente. Debora Bueno/90
Para voce ler e refletirHa muito tempo atras, um casal de idosos que nao tinham filhos, morava em uma casinha humilde de madeira, tinham uma vida muito tranquila, alegre, e ambos se amavam muito. Eram felizes. Ate que um dia... Aconteceu um acidente com a senhora. Ela estava trabalhando em sua casa quando comeca a pegar fogo na cozinha e as chamas atingem todo o seu corpo. O esposo acorda assustado com os gritos e vai a sua procura, quando a ve coberta pelas chamas e imediatamente tenta ajuda-la. O fogo tambem atinge seus bracos e, mesmo em chamas, consegue apagar o fogo. Quando chegaram os bombeiros ja nao havia muito da casa, apenas uma parte, toda destruida. Levaram rapidamente o casal para o hospital mais proximo, onde foram internados em estado grave. Apos algum tempo aquele senhor menos atingido pelo fogo saiu da UTI e foi ao encontro de sua amada. Ainda em seu leito a senhora toda queimada, pensava em nao viver mais, pois estava toda deformada, queimara todo o seu rosto. Chegando ao quarto de sua senhora, ela foi falando: -Tudo bem com voce meu amor? -Sim, respondeu ele, pena que o fogo atingiu os meus olhos e nao posso mais enxergar, mas fique tranquila amor, que sua beleza esta gravada em meu coracao para sempre. Entao triste pelo esposo, a senhora pensou consigo mesma: "Como Deus e bom, vendo tudo o que aconteceu a meu marido, tirou-lhe a visao para que nao presencie esta deformacao em mim. As chamas queimaram todo o meu rosto e estou parecendo um monstro. E Deus e tao maravilhoso que nao deixou ele me ver assim, como um monstro. Obrigado Senhor!" Passado algum tempo e recuperados milagrosamente, voltaram para uma nova casa, onde ela fazia tudo para o seu querido e amado esposo, e o esposo agradecido por tanto amor, afeto e carinho, todos os dias dizia-lhe: - COMO EU TE AMO. Voce e linda demais. Saiba que voce e e sera sempre, a mulher da minha vida! E assim viveram mais 20 anos ate que a senhora veio a falecer. No dia de seu enterro, quando todos se despediam da bondosa senhora, veio aquele marido com os olhos em lagrimas, sem seus oculos escuros e com sua bengala nas maos. Chegou perto do caixao, beijou o rosto acariciando sua amada, disse em um tom apaixonante: - "Como voce e linda meu amor, eu te amo muito". Ouvindo e vendo aquela cena um amigo que esta ao seu lado perguntou se o que tinha acontecido era milagre. Pois parecia que o velhinho parecia enxergar sua amada. O velhinho olhando nos olhos do amigo, apenas falou com as lagrimas rolando quente em sua face: - Nunca estive cego, apenas fingia, pois quando vi minha amada esposa toda queimada e deformada, sabia que seria duro para ela continuar vivendo daquela maneira. Foram vinte anos vivendo muito felizes e apaixonados! Foram os 20 anos mais felizes de minha vida. E emocionou a todos os que ali estavam presentes.CONCLUSAO Na vida temos de provar que amamos! Muitas
vezes de uma forma dificil ... E, para sermos felizes, temos de fechar os olhos para muitas coisas, mas o importante e que se faca unica e intensamente com AMOR! E-mail recebido no dia 26/09/2011
Retrato de crianca Pes descalcos... Maltratados... Roupas rasgadas... Maltrapilhas... Olhos fundos... Esfomeados... E o teu retrato, crianca abandonada. E assim... Segues adiante... Em passo curto... Com esperanca de um dia... Encontrar alguem que calce os teus pezinhos... Vista o teu corpinho... Faca voltar o brilho dos seus olhos... E assim... Poderas ver... Este triste retrato de hoje, amanha se transformando numa moldura de paz, conforto e seguranca.Debora Bueno/90 Aborto Nao mamae... Nao faca isso... Estou com medo... Muito medo... Nao me abandone. Sinto voce nervosa... Inquieta... Andas de um lado para outro e chora. Por que mamae? Por que esta chorando? Sinto o teu desespero... A sua dor se tornou a minha... A sua angustia... O meu sofrimento. O mundo te condenou? Eu estou aqui pra ti ajudar... Quando eu sair daqui, vou te ajudar... Serei teu filho e voce, sera minha mae. Eu vou crescer e te proteger... E os que hoje te condenam, amanha nao condenarao mais, porque estarei do seu lado. Mas... O que esta acontecendo? A realidade me amedronta. Sinto vontade de chorar... Nao mamae... Nao me deixe morrer... De-me a chance de te conhecer e conhecer o mundo la fora. Nao... Sei que nao adiante mais... Este liquido horrivel que voce bebeu ja comecou a percorrer o meu corpo. Sinto que estou indo embora... E, antes que tudo acabe de uma vez, preciso fazer meu ultimo pedido: Nao faca com os outros que virao, o que voce fez comigo, de-lhes a chance de te conhecer e chama-la de mamae. Adeus... Seria bom que tudo nao tivesse sido assim... Mesmo voce nao me querendo... Eu te amei ate o fim. Debora Bueno/90 Liberdade Liberdade... E poder caminhar pelas ruas sem constrangimento... E poder admirar o ceu... O fim de tarde... E poder erguer a cabeca com dignidade. Sentir preso... Nao e somente ficar atras de grades de ferro... Mas... Fechar-se em seu proprio mundo, no seu egoismo... Pensar que a vida gira em torno de si proprio. Preso esta... Quando... Nao compartilhas com o proximo uma amizade bonita... Sentir-se envergonhado de olhar para o ceu e sentir a presenca de deus. Sentir o peso da vergonha por ter caluniado alguem... Roubado a felicidade de alguem. Liberdade... E... Portanto... Poder contemplar de olhos erguidos o sorriso de uma crianca... Poder erguer as maos para amparar um velho necessitado... Poder erguer os olhos ao firmamento e sentir a paz que emana de deus. Sentir o coracao livre, puro e bom; sem nuvens negras, sem maldades e sem egoismo. So atraves dos seus atos e que podes descobrir se e livre realmente ou apenas um preso em liberdade. Debora Bueno/90 'Cousa buena tche' poder encerrar o ano confraternizando entre os amigos!! Um momento para refletir e agradecer aos nossos professores e colegas de treinamento que nos permitem trilhar o Caminho do Aikido. Domo arigato gozaimashita...muito obrigado!! Nesse Sabado tivemos a alegria de treinar com os amigos de Pelotas, que agora estao com o Dojo reformado...ficou muito bonito! O Aikido Rio Grande agora esta em novo endereco: Rua Padre Jeijo 339, quase
to work the patient must ingest it.2b- For cough syrup to work the patient must ingest it and, besides that, sing hula-hula while turning around for three times.This way we could include an infinity of other craziest as possible hypothesis in each of our theories.Similarly, the reader knows he does not have to recite a childrens poem each time he drinks a glass of water in order to avoid pouring water out of the glass. That shows OR is present in our everyday life, even in an imperceptible way.But how should we know whether a hypothesis is really unnecessary?How should we know we actually do not have to pray the Our Father for the car to move, nor turn around singing the hula-hula for some medicine to be effective, or recite a childrens poem so water does not shed from the glass?Indeed, all these apparently absurd and clearly unnecessary hypothesis given in the examples could be absolutely necessary in some other universe, or even in our own universe since the moment the reader finishes this sentence. That is, we cannot guarantee that the laws of physics have changed and those hypotheses that were before seen as absurd are now totally necessary.In short, what is the criterion of necessity (or not) of a hypothesis or any theory?Before we answer to that important question, let us create a new theoretical framework: The New Inductivism.2- The New InductivismThe main process to connect our minds to the external world and elaborate theories about our universe, that is, the way we acquire knowledge is known as induction process.The induction process, or Inductivism, establishes that experiments, occurrences or events that always have the same results will probably have the same results under the same conditions. And the more times these results repeat, that is, the more favourable observations about the hypothesis or theory are obtained, the more reliable the hypothesis or theory is.2.1- Hypothesis FormationObviously, the simple observation of phenomena repetition does not produce by itself any theory. To exemplify, a monkey can observe some repetitive phenomena for its whole life as the Sun rises in the East, and it will not formulate a theory about that.Therefore, the inductive process does not elaborate finished theories. Instead, it provides us with important clues so that we or some kind of processing can create hypothesis or theories about reality. That way, it is perfectly possible that different people elaborate different theories or hypothesis using the same data obtained from inductive observation.2.2- First ResultsFrom the inductive process we create the basic hypothesis that our universe is logical, that is, it works logically according to the aristotelic logic. And also, the laws of Physics must be stable. These first results give us the trust that our universe must not have changed its laws so that water would pour out from our glasses if we did not recite some childrens poem!The Induction process is very criticized by many scientists and science philosophers under the true statement that this process not always produces correct results.However, that will rarely happen under the New Inductivism. There
is an inductive hierarchy in the New Inductivism. This hierarchy establishes that new inductive rules must be subordinate to pre-existent inductive rules.Thus, there is a law hierarchy based on more basic and reliable inductive processes, where some have more power and privilege than others. That way, it is not possible to interrupt an inductive hierarchy without a good reason for that.So a new inductive rule can only be considered satisfactory if it does not break the hierarchy of stronger inductive rules.In this manner, the New Inductivism can be defined as the classical Inductivism linked to subordination of an inductive hierarchy.2.3-Inductive HierarchyIt is possible to create an inductive hierarchy in a decreasing degree of power, in a way that a law with a less elevated level of power must not go against the superior hierarchical levels. Our inductive hierarchy can be defined in a decreasing level of importance in the following way:The most basic and powerful inductive rule is that our universe is logical. No illogical event has ever been observed. We can suppose then, by induction, that the universe follows logic. Any theory that goes against this first rule must, in principle, be considered false. The laws of Physics form the second class of our inductive hierarchy. Obviously they must not oppose the first level of hierarchy. And, for that reason, the laws of Physics can use mathematics, which is totally based on logic. The laws of Physics are created by observation of the most extense set of observations on regularities of our universe. For that reason, they must be among the most reliable rules built by mankind. The power of these rules resides in the fact that they must be verified, direct or indirectly, in every observable universe and they should not be limited to our planet, nor even to our solar system.The laws of Chemistry could form the third level of our hierarchy. The laws of Biology, the forth level.The other norms, rules or laws must not oppose the theories of the classification above, unless they are exhaustingly verified. It is possible to notice that the degree of strength in the inductive hierarchy is based on the extensibility, that is, the quantity of favourable observations in space and time in which the theory approaches in a favourable way. Inductive rules of short range in space and time have fewer favourable cases than large range ones. For that reason, such rules must be subordinate to the most general ones that had been tested and, because of that, present a greater level of reliability.2.4- Inductivist ResponseNow, with that classification, we can rebut the argument against the inductive principle: The Sun Rising Argument. It says that if we use the inductive process about the rising of the Sun every morning we will create a law establishing that:Today and always, every 24 hours the sun will rise in the East and set in the WestHowever, we can rebut (*) this argument by showing that it goes against the inductive principles of the second hierarchy (the laws of Physics), since according to these laws, the
hydrogen of the Sun will end in four billion years and our star will explode. That way, one day, unfortunately, the Sun will not rise anymore and therefore this principle cannot be considered satisfactory.2.5- Inductivist RefutationismWe must make it clear that the inductive process, as any other process, does not necessarily lead to the truth. Something that has always been stable and reached the same results can have these results changed by some new condition or some new observation. We will never be sure about the ultimate truth of the universe.That way, it is natural that a law or rule created by an inductive process stops being valid in case a new observation rebuts (*) the inductive regularity. In that case, evidently, the induction does not exist anymore, since this refutatory event did not pass through induction. The induction, in that case, was broken and therefore it is not an induction, it is not valid. We can clearly notice the brakeage of the inductivity by an unfavourable event as analogue to popperian refutationism, where evidence contrary to a theory is its own rebuttal element.2.6- The Deductive Hypothetical MethodThe Deductive- Hypothetical Method (DHM), in which hypothesis and theories are released to be later tested, does not go against the inductive method. If not, see:In DHM a theory (or hypothesis) not necessarily of inductive basis is proposed. From this theory we can use logic and verify the consequences that it causes. If any observation refutes (*) the consequence of this theory or this theory itself, then the theory will be refuted (*). But clearly if the consequence of a theory is refuted, then the theory that originated it will also be refuted, since the strongest inductivist rule is the logical one, and by logic (more specifically by modus tollens) if the consequent is false then necessarily the antecedent will also be.That way, we can verify that if DHM shows some case which results in a refutation of the consequence of a theory, this fact will also break the Inductivism of the theory that originated it. The opposite is also clearly true: a flaw in Inductivism by an observation would also refute (*) the theory.2.7- The EvidenceAn evidence is an observation, fact or event that corroborates or not a theory. The inductive method, in general, elaborates its theories from evidence, that is, inductivity has its basis on reality as a starting point. Thus, Inductivism has advantages over other creation processes.It is important to notice that theories or hypothesis generated by creation processes that do not come from empirical observation will also need to go through some kind of validation process, that is, a sequence of tests and empirical observations will also be necessary for the theories to be reliable.Obviously in principle a newly created non-inductive theory, and yet with no favourable evidence can be true, while another that has been tested can be false. However, until the observations or experiments decrease or enhance the reliability of the theories, we must credit the theories that have already been through some observational test. In that case, inductive-based
theories would have the initial advantage and therefore must be taken as more reliable than the non-inductive ones.2.8 Degree of Inductive ReliabilityAs a particular case, but not less important, we could say that a theory that does not have any favourable evidence, that is, the number of favourable inductions is zero, must have in principle, zero reliability.As the amount of favourable evidence (quantity of valid inductive events) increases, the inductive reliability degree must also increase.3- Necessity Criterion in Occams RazorFrom this new theoretical base we can now answer the question in the beginning of this essay:What is the necessity (or not) criterion of any hypothesis or theory in OR?The answer to this question can be given according to the inductive reliability degree (IR) presented by the hypothesis concerning the theory. The lower the inductive reliability (IR), the more unnecessary the hypothesis is.Take the following theory as an example:1b- For a car to move, it must have fuel, and its occupants must pray the Our Father.The hypothesis of the necessity for the prayer for the car to move has a very low IR and therefore can be considered unnecessary. But in case our universe changes or the fact happens in another universe, this hypothesis can have a high degree of IR and then be a hypothesis that is not unnecessary. It all depends on associated inductive reliability.(*) Refute is between inverted commas because, according to P.I.F [3], it is never possible to know whether an observation is true or not. Therefore, it is never possible to know whether something was refuted or not.References:[1] A Navalha de Ocam Occams Razorhttp://www.genismo.com/logicatexto24.htm[2] Ciencia Expandida Expanded Sciencehttp://www.genismo.com/logicatexto25.htm[3] O Principio da Incerteza Filosofico The Philosophical Uncertainty Principlehttp://www.genismo.com//logicatexto31.htm [4] O Argumento Indutivista The Inductivist Argumenthttp://www.ecientificocultural.com/ECC2/artigos/metcien2.htmPortuguese version: http://stoa.usp.br/cienciaexpandida/forum/42550.html
Felicitax: The Construction of DeuxJoao Carlos Holland de Barcellos, translated by Debora Policastro God does not exist, but can be built. (Jocax)Friend, The issue I have slightly mentioned about an autonomous concept of happiness is so important that I have been searching for a name that would define the idea for a long time. I wanted a name that could express a limit to our final quest. I have thought about some, but could not find any that would really be worth the concept.I will call it then FELICITAX. Maybe this is my last great idea to be published and, in fact, I have been keeping it for a long time. Few people had the privilege of knowing it.My intention was to publish it in my book about genism, as its last chapter, which would be entitled Beyond the Genism. Although Felicitax is not a direct consequence of genism, it surely can be developed from the scientific Meta-Ethics (SME), of which genism is a ramification. (Un)fortunately, some (evil?) gene makes it difficult for me to keep secret of great ideas. Anyway, I herein register this one. I will then summarise Felicitax, even under the risk of not being comprehended.Introduction The objective of genism is happiness. We cannot have it, in its full potential, if we do not realise what we really are. However, evolutionary biology gives us the answer: we are gene-perpetuative machines. From this finding, genism proposes a philosophy whose ideas affect our routine, becoming itself a life philosophy. Genism establishes that we do not deny our intrinsic biological condition of gene-perpetuative machines. This is the first step to reduce internal conflicts, those triggered by the culture x biology dichotomy memes x genes conflicts the integration of our cultural being with our biological being through genism reduces this kind of conflict, resulting in less suffering and more happiness. If besides that we notice that our true me is not our traditional consciousness, but something I called genetic-me (our genes), that will make us gain a kind of immortality and, as a consequence, more happiness.But happiness is defined through time and feeling [2]. Happiness by itself can be considered as an autonomous entity. Happiness does not need and should not be selfishly restricted to ourselves or to our kind, nor to biological beings!Genism is also a scientific theory: it is a testable method that seeks the maximization of happiness in biological beings that evolved through natural selection. However, before the advent of the scientific Meta-Ethics (SME), there was no scientific approach to ethics and moral. There was no scientific tool that could approach the true effectiveness of the ethical theories through science in an objective way. As SME is yet totally unknown and is in state of development, the political usage of the theories for the good or for the bad could be done with no kind of scientific and objective control. Thus, it is not unlikely that unscrupulous, unreliable or narrow-minded people could try to deviate the objective of genism, distorting it. That could be done, for example, as a political