Hebrew tradition subsequent to the Even Bokhan. Judaic documents providing the perspective within which Hebrew Matityahu must be interpreted are discussed in Who Are the Netzarim? (WAN).As NHM repeatedly shows, TR sometimes diverges from all of the ancient source mss. and was basically rendered from the King James English published, also under King James, 13 years earlier - only 2 years after the 1609 expulsion of the last remnants of Jews from England. KJV and TR are hardly unbiased or reliable texts from which to reconstruct the original Hebrew, and Judaic, Matityahu.A compendium of more than 25 years research, the Ntzarim publish "our own" Hebrew Matityahu, reconstructed from the earliest extant Hebrew and Greek source documents with extensive Judaic explanations: The Netzarim Reconstruction of Hebrew Matityahu (NHM).Evidence from Hebrew Matityah unot Paul the Hellenizer (Turkish-Jew) or his NT"Pope" means "father." Read NHM 23.9 "You are not to call anyone upon the earth Father so-and-so, because you have One Father of the heavens." Ribi Yhoshua explicitly proscribed a "pope"!!! But the Displacement Theology of the Hellenist Romans, who had just vanquished the Jews in war, destroyed our Beit-ha-Miqdash, expelled us from Yrushalayim, burned our Torah scrolls and yukhasin, prohibited circumcision and forbade us to learn or teach Torah all upon pain of death required something diametrically different from what the hated Jews had taught.Atonement & New Covenant: With Israel,Not Displacement TheologyThe entire history of kipur relative to the britot of Israel made this newly born Church of gentile Roman Ch*ristians dependent upon their Roman bishops' ability to represent to their Ch*ristian followers the false security that Roman gentiles had displaced Jews as the people of G*od and the covenant.Gentiles' claims to kipur rested, and continue to rest, solely upon this displacement of Jews by gentiles. Only in this way do gentiles have any claim of obtaining kipur by Displacement Theology's claimed transferral from Torah-observant Jews to anti-Torah (antinomian) gentiles.For further information, see Atonement In the Biblical 'New Covenant' (ABNC)). ABNC demonstrates that -- promised kipur to Jews who do their best to keep Torah according to halakhah non-selectively irrespective of their beliefs about the Mashiakh.The implications are both enormous and shocking. Observing Torah, non-selectively and according to halakhah, to the best of one's ability is a prerequisite to 'salvation.' Identifying the Mashiakh is nowhere stipulated as a precondition to kipur.The urgency of following Ribi Yehoshua as the Mashiakh lies in facilitating the transition for Jews and gentiles who have recognized the Mashiakh to now begin to follow him in non-selective Torah-observance according to halakhah, not in 'saving' the only ones who already have kipur!The Dragon ExposedDaniyeil described a "Fourth Dragon," widely interpreted to refer to Rome and Hellenism, that would be very different from the mammalian "beasts" before it (see Daniyeil 7.7-8; 12.3 and Who Are the Netzarim? (WAN)).As prophesied, from its conception ca. 46-47 C.E., Christianity developed as an oviparous offspring of the gentile Hellenist Roman Empire.The Church's incubation as an independent Hellenist egg culminated in 135 C.E., whereupon its mother, the gentile Hellenist Roman Empire, fed it predigested and regurgitated Roman