conscious ofthe class conflict they can't even try to fight democraticallywithout getting pepper sprayed. In the Libertarian moral theory aswell as in the Utilitarian, the concept of freedom don't have itsstarting point in the individual freedom, but rather in thecollective interest, since it is from the collective that theindividual behavior is regulated. So the Libertarian theory have beenessentially misidentified since it claims to be the establishment ofindividual liberty while on the big picture it is collectively based.And moreover, in the current state the collective interest isn't theinterest that benefits the 'minorities' as some like to call, butinstead the interest of the owners of corporations that aredominating the states and the law without any restraints, holdingmoney as decoy, and holding people as means to the achievement of aglobal domination without human rights. Only Laws can prevent the abuseof power, I argue that the only check to power from the dominants oftoday's reality is a Human Rights declaration. In which independentof an individual social status or national identity they arerespected and considered as self-worth human beings that come from acommunal way of subsistence, which are social animals, and thereforemust act according to their reality. The ultimate goal in this caseis to have behaviors that are governed by universal principles, whichare principles of justice: the equality of human rights, respect forthe dignity of human beings as individuals, recognizing Kant'sethical standards (8), that people are ends in themselves and need tobe treated as such. In an International order driven by capital thepeople are means for the generation of national wealth, sinceindividuals that are considered as the second class citizenship arecommodities in the labor market, which are exchangeable andperishable. The concept of freedom suffer a dialectical change sinceit became a disregard of who you are; freedom become a value verysimilar to equality in which everyone is seen as competitiveindividuals striving for capital and their identity, nationality, sexand ethnicity stop concerning the state since all what they need isyour willingness to labor in order to generate capital to theEconomy. Through Rights discourse and philosophical reasoningindividuals are able to see that some essential aspects of realityvanish in this environment, such as virtues other than Liberty.Bibliography: "John Locke: Natural Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property.": The Freeman : Foundation for Economic Education. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 May 2014. Wiredu, Kwasi: Human rights in Africa : cross-cultural perspectives pages 243-260 Marxists Internet Archive."Dialectical Materialism. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 May 2014. Feinberg, The nature and value of rights pages 243-258 Sartre, Jean-Paul. "The Body." Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. New York: Philosophical Library, 1956. Print. "Theories of Rights."Rights and Duties. MacDonald, n.d. Web. 09 May 2014. "John Stuart Mill: On Liberty."Utilitarian Moral Theory. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 May 2014. Arendt, Hannah. "The Perplexities of the Rights of Man. The Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1973. N. pag. Print. Kant Class notes on March, 2014