War, President George H. W. Bush defined the "new world order" as deterring those who act with aggression and occupy, overtake or devour territories of neighbors. You can see it clearly spelled out in his 11 September 1990 address to Congress:http://millercenter.org/president/bush/speeches/speech-3425 In general, it appears the US and the bulk of the world has followed the above interpretation in carrying out their chosen actions over the last generation.(Note: using this limited definition of new world order and failing to take any other provocations into account, it can be better understood why the US and those who follow the lead of the US took such great exception to their interpretation of the 2014 events in Crimea.) My theory on the true root of national and international conflicts is as follows: "...the lesson we should have learned from the history of the last great conflict is that what is worse and more dangerous than grabbing territory or not deterring aggression is the persistent lack of fraternal concern and constructive actions to improve the well-being of your neighbor across the street, across the border, or across the world..."(I first put forward this concept in writing starting in March 2014 as a comment to a online Guardian articles, here: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/26/barack-obama-putin-withering-civics-lesson-crimea#comment-33602869here: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/01/transnistria-putin-west-europe-dniester-river-moldova#comment-33801680 and multiple times elsewhere in my many subsequent comments to Guardian articles: https://profile.theguardian.com/user/id/12038471 Since mid-2016 I have been working as a knowledge journalist specializing in Human Security and US-Russian International Relations and continue to write and published at multiple online media outlets covering international news.)In support of this theory, I can point out that all Abrahamic religions provide us ample metaphors that the key component to overcoming the violent history of mankind is by accepting the precept that we ARE responsible for the welfare of our brothers, our sisters, our close and distant cousins, and our neighbors near and far. The first and most obvious (but often misunderstood) metaphor is contained in the Genesis story of Cain and Abel (the sons of Adam and Eve).World history also contains ample examples of unnecessary and unjustified conflicts that are provoked by those self-serving entities in their quest for power and wealth who neglect the golden rule and the precept to show fraternal care for all neighbor near and far.In turn, the fear and violence associated with these self-serving provocations are all too often allowed to take hold and grow among a less than enlightened public.I personally prefer to advocate for Human Security as it has been well defined by the UN since the publication of the UNDP 1994 Human Development Report (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_security#UNDP.27s_1994_definition), many universities have taught on the topic, and some universities around the world have even created degree programs.Also, I foresee the potential for Human Security funding and projects can aid that remaining portion of humanity that has not yet transcended survival by escaping extreme poverty (https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/world-population-in-extreme-poverty-absolute), and can complement or supplant the huge funding, projects and infrastructure of the world wide military-industrial (National Security) complex.I applaud any and all efforts that will lead mankind towards greater collective concern for the well-being of all others on