groups aristocratic renowned imminent, and it was really important to our moral influence, issues of morality of Iberian peoples are different people pronounced in Western Europe, but with a vague influence of the Anglo Saxons, and what we import from thinking in terms of practical questions were developed by numerous attempts to monopolize a rustic design of the bourgeoisie to the treaty between the functions performed by it with respect to the State, as an officer of the senses creating culture itself, recreating what it is valid in nature, and showing classes peripheral intonation detrativa points hardy crops such considerations as the most prominent groups, Africans, Indians, Browns, all at some level were replanted expelled the form of culture to the masses, this is evident in the late nineteenth century, where embraquecimento was planned by the State Regents, who wanted to create a closed form unclasp and Western culture in Brazilian soil, calling people to "enrich" so ethnocentric, these points were very relevant self destructive an autonomous power of our culture, because there have an appropriate response and ordered as we were directed to an exhibition ridiculed, and despairing of creations burgos separatists. For the cultural industry, a term coined by Theodor Adorno, the gaps are even more prominent when we are conditioned to believe in the effect of culture bewildered when we believe the futile, the superfluous is lovely, masterful and timely, the complacency of eminence eclipsed, those that is created in accordance to sort and classify a group of other like linguistics given to each class, for Adorno, we are beings who are in conflict with our standalone issue of knowledge, the individual and the entertainment, dispersion and self-denial the self, the moral and antagonistic, every sense by simpler they are, relate a direct response to the cultural market has on the classes, there is the idea of cultural forms essentially salable, and other, more traditional and limited, are calculatedly Scattered with content reviewer, sometimes, the aristocratic class enjoys a rational culture in terms of social life, there is reasoning about moral, aesthetic neo thought, and enrichment split of the foundations of the state together with the cultural industry, this ruled and sponsored by companies for purposes of net assets, the consequences of direct sales of products not considered artificial and creative classes that are characterized emerging, peripheral, or not rooted in social traditional monarchs since the Lutherans, or mestizos, the bestialized, not the fans in the dominant circle, are tragically ridiculed a totally unacceptable form of mass culture conditioning, encouraged by this readily attractions and similar gatherings dull industrial cultural plan, establishing expectations and tragic character appealing, judging intelligence class that prevails in most Latin American countries, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, Paraguay, Dominican Republic, Mexico etc ... judge the working class as being born to consume the tragic, the inherent content of the satire less informed, the working class becomes a web of industry experience, and consequently become disinterested beings and alienating, that at least is conluioso, inhuman and unacceptable access today is absurdly broad, and we continue to see