bothsides. From this comes the inability ofmaking a decision for one of the sides, when that becomes necessary. The inanition of liberal party politics inthe United States comes from its own construction of itself as a metanarrativeover life. The synthesis of right andleft is what is expected, and the power of both is thus maintained. Liberalparty politics cannot but be a promise that difference will be addressed, whenin fact it is regarded as representable through an inherently confrontationaland complicitous structure of the power of the few. Left and right, like good and evil,can move the mass metaphysical imagination with extreme efficacy, whilemaintaining the political balance and favoring stable oppressivedemocracies. In this master-slaverelationship to life, we all loose our freedom. When one considers him/herself free, as in the so-called Free World,right then one is not free and is hindering on the freedom of others. To escape this requires that we approachothers without arrogance, which is not what nation-States have been preparedfor. When former Israeli prime Minister,Benjamin Netanyahu, says that we shall eradicate this evil from the face ofthe earth[51],he is not saying that the causes of terrorism will be addressed; that, forexample, the Palestinians will be given back their dignity. He is saying that people will die, and a warwill be waged on terror, and that it does not matter if Israel turns everyPalestinian into a dead body, even if unintentionally[52]. He will produce terror and then eradicatepeople. This shows again how theterrorist is not recognized as having been produced by historical circumstances. In the dichotomy of good and evil, and inthe psychologization of history, where people are recognized as essentially terrorist, the injustice ofland occupation, abuse of lives and war carries on. Netanyahu suitinglyclaims that the terrorists are fighting against the West, and with thiscall plays on the fears and moral superiority of the United States in order toget support from it. His books andspeeches are a call for war, never a call for peaceful resolutions. The same can be said with regards to thespeeches of Peres and the mass-murderer, Sharon. Since September 11, they found new reasonsand new support for their war, and have devastated entire communities, killinghundreds, maybe thousands of Palestinians. The United States remains complicitous and George Bush continues tocondemn the terror of Palestinians, while allowing the much greater terror ofIsrael to proceed. This is part of thehistory that does not get accounted for in the discourse on terrorism. And it is part of the reason why America isso hated throughout the world. Bin Ladenand his associates, for example, have expressed many times the reasons of theirgrief: the mistreatment of Palestinians, the sanctions on the Iraqi people, andthe U.S. military presence and exploitation of local resources (mainly oil) inthe Middle East[53]. These are not psychological problems; theyare historical, and should be accounted for in this way by United Statians ifthey wish terror to stop. The manymovements around the world that have been labeled terrorist are fighting forspecific causes, which an unattentive perspective towards historicalcircumstances will not grasp, and therefore will not be able to provideeffective decisions for peace. The