historians of the world's top universities, high-lighting Roman actions and observations that related to these issues (see sections "30-99 C.E." and "100-199 C.E."). But during this critical period, Christians were too small and insignificant to attract much attention from the Romans or Josephus and the Ntzarim , uninterested in those who had been excised except as they represented a threat, referred to Christians only sparsely and cryptically, as the apostasy or the dragon. Eusebius found no Christian record of this critical so-called "transition" period.There is no Christian record of Christianity between 60-135 C.E.Before 60 C.E., there is only a record of the Ntzarim .From 60-135 C.E., the Christian Church (4th century and subsequent) permitted only a very sparse record of the Ntzarim to be preservedparts that didn't contradict the Church's account (even purging the records of the Jewish community, burning Torah scrolls, etc.).After 135 C.E., there is only a record of Christianityplus post-135 C.E.Christian redactions projected back into the 1st century, accounts that are betrayed by their intractable contradicting of Torah and by the dating of the earliest extant manuscripts as post-135 C.E. recountings of Hellenist-to-Christian stories syncretized with Hellenist mythology.This "black hole" is all the more astonishing since the entirety of Christian claims hinges on demonstrating their continuity from the original Ntzarim .However, such continuity does not exist and Christians have, for millennia, employed all manner of argumentation to distract attention from this "black hole" in which all Christian claims of supersession, Displacement Theology and legitimacy of their NT are buried.By 135 C.E., tiny groups of the anti-Caesar Christians scattered throughout the Roman Empire, often having to keep as low a profile as they could to avoid execution by Caesar, had already developed multiple versions of a counterfeit replacement: a syncretism of their native Hellenist mythology blended with stories from Hellenist Jews.The dragon's egg, conceived by Paul the Apostate, was ready to hatch.Christians Originate MisojudaismOnce hatched, however, the hatchling, a non-Jewish Hellenist counterfeit, lacked credibility to displace the original and authentic Ntzarim without first discrediting the earlier authentic and original Ntzarim . The earliest Christians undertook this with a vengeance that would have repercussions for millennia.Eusebius, himself implicitly admitting that he didn't know the differences between an "Ebionite" and a "Nazarene," documented the origin of the Church's misojudaism against Jewish "??Ebionites??":"The evil Demon, unable to wrest them from god's plan in Christ, ensnared them in a different way. The first householders named these Ebionites because they had poor and humble praise concerning Christ" (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, III, xxvii, 1).[Referring to Ntzarim ]"They held him to be a plain and ordinary man who had achieved [justness] merely by the progress of his character and had been born naturally from Mary and her husband. They insisted on the complete observation of the [Torah & Halakhah], and did not think that they would be saved by faith in Christ alone and by a life in accordance with it.[Referring to Evyonim ]"But there were others besides these who have the same name. These escaped the absurd folly of the first mentioned, and did not deny