XL/1, pp.101-107.NICOLACI-DA-COSTA A. M. (2005), Sociabilidade virtual: separando o joio do trigo , Psicologia & Sociedade, 17/2, pp.50-57.PASQUIER D. (2005), Cultures lyceennes, la tyrannie de la majorite, Paris, Autrement, 180p.PASSARELLI HAMANN F. (2004), Comunidade orkutiana brasileira: Consideracoes sobre jovens e Orkut no Brasil, memoire de Master en psychologie, Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro.PEIXOTO C. E. (2005), Solidariedade familiar intergeracional , in C. ARAUJO et C. SCALON (Eds.), Genero, familia e trabalho no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, FGV, pp. 225-240.PEWRESEARCHCENTER (2010), Millennials. A Portrait of Generation Next, Pew Research Center, 140p.PRADO JUNIOR C. (1942), Formacao do Brasil contemporaneo: colonia, Sao Paulo, Martins.PRENSKY M. (2001), Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , On The Horizon, 9/5, pp. 225-240.PROST A. (1968), Histoire de lenseignement en France, 1800-1967, Paris: Armand Colin.PUTNAM R. (2000), Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community, New York: Simon & Schuster.RECUERO R. (2006), Dinamicas de Redes Sociais no Orkut e Capital Social , Razon y Palabra, 52, pp.1-15.REIS E. P. (1998), Desigualdade e solidariedade: uma releitura do "familismo amoral" do Banfield , In E. P. Reis (Ed.), Processos e escolhas: estudos de sociologia politica, Rio de Janeiro, Contra Capa, pp.111-134.REZENDE SALES S. et ALVES PARAISO M. (2010), Escola, Orkut e juventude conectados: falar, exibir, espionar e disciplinar , Pro-Posicoes, 21/2, pp.225-242.RIVIERE C.-A. (2004), La specificite francaise de la construction sociologique du concept de sociabilite , Reseaux, 1/123, pp.207-231.ROSA, H. (2005), Acceleration, Paris, Editions La Decouverte.SAMARA E. d. M. (1997), A familia no Brasil: historia e historiografia , Historia Revista, 2/2, pp.07-21.SASSEN S. (2006), Cities in a World Economy, Thousand Oaks, Pine Forge Press, 269p.SELWYN N. (2009), The digital native myth and reality , Aslib proceedings : New information perspectives, 61/4, pp.363-379.SILVA PEREIRA C. d. (2007), Os wannabees e suas tribos: adolescencia e distincao na Internet , Estudos Feministas, 15/2, pp.357-382.SINGLY F. d. et MARTIN O. (2000), L'evasion amicale. L'usage du telephone familial par les adolescents , Reseaux, 103, pp.91-118.SMOREDA Z. (Ed.). (2007), Entrelacement des pratiques de communication et de loisir, Paris, Hermes-Lavoisier, 463p.SMOREDA Z. et LICOPPE C. (1999), La telephonie residentielle des foyers : reseaux de sociabilite et cycle de vie, 2eme Colloque International sur les Usages et Services des Telecommunications, Bordeaux.TAPSCOTT D. (2008), Grown Up Digital, McGraw-Hill, 368p.TNS/SOFRES (2009), Les adolescents, leur telephone portable et l'Internet mobile.TWENGE J. M. (2006), Generation Me: Why Today's Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled - And More Miserable Than Ever Before, Free Press, 292p.UNIVERSAL MCCANN (2007), Anytime, Anyplace: Understanding the connected generation, Universal McCann, 36p.URRY J. (2000), Sociology beyond societies. Mobilities for the twenty-first century, London, Routledge, 265p.VALLADARES L. (2006), La favela d'un siecle a l'autre: mythe d'origine, discours scientifiques et representations virtuelles, Paris, Editions de la MSH, 229p.VALLET L.-A. et THELOT C. (2000), La reduction des inegalites sociales devant lecole depuis le debut du siecle , Economie et Statistique, 4/334, pp.3-32.VAN DE VELDE C. (2008), Devenir adulte, Sociologie comparee de la jeunesse en Europe, Paris, PUF, 278p.VIDAL D. (2007), Les bonnes de Rio. Emploi domestique et societe democratique au Bresil, Villeneuve d'Asq, Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 312p.WAJCMAN J. (2008), Life in