to be known in non-Jewish literature." ("Israel," Ency. Jud., 9:248).The Romans destroyed and paganized Yrushalayim, which had even back then already been our Holy Capital for 1159 years (since B.C.E. 1024), paganizing and renaming the city "Aelia C*apitolina" and renaming Yhudah "Palestine." The Romans expelled all Yhudim from Yrushalayim including our 15th Ntzarim Paqid, a Yhudi named Yhudah. Describing these Romans, the cradle and mother of Ch*ristianity and the Church, as misojudaic is fully justified. It's blatant ignorance, or unscholarly negligence, whenever anyone refers anachronistically to Yisraeil or Yhudah as "Palestine" before about 135 C.E.. After 135 C.E., it's merely misojudaic to refer to the Judaic Holy Land by the Hellenist pagan Roman name.In the vacuum left in "Aelia C*apitolina" as a result of the Romans banishing the Netzarim Paqid, misojudaic gentile Roman Ch*ristians were enabled to install their first non-Jew, Rome-oriented, misojudaic "bishop" Marcus. Here, and only here, is the otherwise missing transition from strict Torah-observance of 1st-century Ribi Yehoshua and his original Netzarim followers (demonstrated from Dead Sea Scroll 4Q MMT and Church historians) to the well documented antinomian Ch*ristianity of the 4th, and subsequent, centuries! Now Rome-oriented for the first time, these post-135 C.E. misojudaic pagan gentiles were the first to proclaim their Romanized, de-Judaized, gentile-saving, divine man-g-o-d image J*esus! (Documentation and details in the book Who Are the Netzarim? (WAN).)60-132 C.E."Black Hole" In History Where Christians Claim Ntzarim Christian TransitionIs Supposed To Have Occurred(See "30-99 C.E." & "100-199 C.E." Sections)Only the Church could have kept the record of this period blank... Why???Hegesippus Cuts Off His Account at 60 C.E."It must be observed that just at this point [60 C.E., in Hegesippus' account of the flight of Paul's Hellenist Christians to Pella see section 30-99 C.E.], when he has indicated the moment of the introduction of heterodox teaching, Hegesippus' sketch of the history of the [Jewish / Ntzarim Congregation] of [Yrushala yim], and consequently the argument founded upon it, seems to have come to an end. For though Eusebius gives a list of the [15 pqidim ] up to the reign of Hadrian [117-138 C.E.; actually, until exactly 135 C.E.], and tells us that they were short-lived, and later on adds a list of their [gentile usurpers, see "Fabrication of Popes" section], he tells us nothing else about the fortunes of the ['Ntzarim JewishCongregation'] from the reign of Trajan [98 C.E.] to the end of the second century, except the fact that after the seige under Hadrian [135 C.E., consequent to the Bar-Kokh va Revolt and physical displacement of the Ntzarim Paqid from Yrushala yim cum Aelia Capitolina] it became a Gentile community... It is scarcely conceivable that if Hegesippus had carried his history beyond the death of [Shimon Ben-Kheleph Ben-Dawid that] Eusebius would not have used the material thus afforded." (The Ntzarim Reconstruction of Hebrew Matityahu (NHM) note 24.15.6, citing H.J. Lawlor, "Eusebiana, Essays on the Hypomnemata of Hegesippus, ca. 120-180 C.E.," p. 64.)Hegesippus' history of the Ntzarim was finished at that point. Instead, Hegesippus then turns his attention to his self-confessed fabrication of the counterfeit image (see