R$ 350.9million and spent R$ 350.5 million. Among the corporations thatdonated the most are the food processing company and frigorific JBS,the construction company Andrade Gutierrez and OAS, which areinvolved in the 'jet wash' operation done by Federal police thatinvestigates corruption and payola scheme in Petrobras. The amountdonated by the major firms are respectively JBS donating R$48million, following OAS R$51 million, Andrade Gutierrez R$27 million ,Odebrecht R$18 million and Bradesco bank R$8.2 million; The majorcontributors are JBS and OAS. JBSS.A. is a Brazilian company that is the largest (by sales) foodprocessing company in the world, producing factory processed beef,chicken and pork, and also selling by-products from the processing ofthese meats. The company has 150 industrial plants around the world.Brazilian Development bank also known as National Bank for Economicand Social Development injected a sum of around R$12.8 billion in JBSby the emission of bonds and stocks bought from the company topromote internationalization and reduce informality since 2007. Therelationship of the government injecting a lump sum of capital intothe firm, and in contrast the firm providing liquid capital tofinance campaign is a characteristics of politics, and might be whattook place in regards to the major contribution that was privatelydone from JBS to Dilma Rouseff. OASis a Brazilian corporation that works in several countries in thearea of civil engineering and infrastructure. The corporation managesthree stadiums in Brasil, which were part of the World Cup games andwent through major reforms to fit into FIFA's requirements. Thecompany is 85% owned by one person, Cesar Mata Pires 65 yo, founderand executive president of the corporation. He is one of theBrazilian's that entered the Forbes magazine for the first time thisyear, due precisely to the reforms administered by his company, forthe World Cup and for the Olympic Games. The contractor firm OAS wasthe major beneficiary among the firms that were binding proceduresfor the events, and was largely criticized in the 2013 protests thattook place against the major government spending in the world cup game requirements, the people claimed that the money that wassupposed to go to Education was going to the pockets of OAS.Following the political ideology and scheme, the propensity given toOAS to get the stadium reforms was payed back in campaign donations,and ended up re-electing the president that preferred the highlycentralized corporation to take over the infrastructure of the eventsheld in Brazil. This firm together with the fourth major donor,Odebrecht, were not only involved in the reforms to the events, butare also involved in the money laundering scheme that is beinginvestigated. The2014 elections in Brazil was tough, even tough president DilmaRousseff got re-elected, it didn't seem a overall consensualdecision, even tough the world cup ended up being successful itgenerated riots and social discontentment due to misuse of publicmoney to promote Fifa standards rather then the needs of society. Theother candidates that were running for president were also involvedin corruption schemes, and were majorly supported by some of the samecorporations not as intensive but somewhat similarly. Corporatedonations to politics always illustrate a double way strategy thatbenefits or proceeds past rewards or benefits that were given inreturn, it is a