thegoodfellas/blogset-br huggingface dataset:
Nao e todo dia. Mas admito uma certa volubilidade. Tem sempre a musica preferida do ultimo mes. Ou da semana, se eu tiver sorte.Costumo me apaixonar por sons, substituindo-os. E nunca esquecendo os anteriores. Porem, so consigo me dedicar profundamente a um de cada vez. Um brilho intenso que vem de uma musica, sensacao quase sinestesica.Os que passam ficam no lugar que conquistaram na memoria de construcao ou destruicao de algo, adormecidos, um tanto opacos, sempre queridos.Sao multiplas paixoes mas um foco por vez.E no maximo. Sempre no maximo. No talo.Nessa onda compartilho minha musica/paixao do momento: The Rabbit do Miike Snow.Para baixar a versao do album ou a versao remix de The Rabbit, a primeira que escutei, clique aqui.Acho muito diferentes as versoes, a sensacao e de mais batidas por segundo no remix, mais dancante. Mas as duas sao incriveis.Para ver a letra da musica The Rabbit, clique aqui."i tried to beat the devil too many timesi'm in love, she is tragic magic..." Eufemismo. Porque determinadas 'convencoes' nao sao nada mais que preconceitos. E nesse caso o inimigo, ao inves de afetar apenas seu alvo, afeta a humanidade.Porque, vejam bem, direi o obvio, mas imaginem que lindo poderia ser (mais lindo, apesar dos horrores) se ao menos esse defeito fosse corrigido, o de fazer distincoes quanto ao sexo que nao as necessarias.Porque somos diferentes em coisas obvias e estudos comprovam diferencas fisicas no cerebro, mas no que importa nao diferimos.Mas, voltando as 'convencoes', e triste ver que mensagens sao passadas e recebidas sem um questionamento real, e onde as proprias 'vitimas' nao percebem o ataque que nao, nao e subliminar.Um exemplo disso e o comercial do Fiat Palio 2012, no qual a mulher aparece sempre insatisfeita em varias eras, sempre cobrando do homem bens materiais que levam a um alto status social. Essa lindeza termina com 'o mundo nao mudou muito...'.Jura que voce acha que o conceito que esta sendo discutido aqui e "A grama do vizinho e mais verde?"E isso e exibido assim, e poucos percebem a afronta.Pessoas gananciosas existem em ambos os sexos, mas essa 'convencao' de que as mulheres so se preocupam com bens e com o carro do sujeitinho e de matar. Como se homens nunca houvessem dado 'golpes do bau' por ai. Pode aparecer ate com um De Lorean ou uma T.A.R.D.I.S, mas se for cretino, tchau.Nem com capacitador de fluxo! Ra!Voces, nos quais a carapuca serve, parem de iludir-se, pobres demonios. Parece uma reserva feita por falta de autoconfianca, como se um dia, apos ganhar na loteria fossem comprar uma Ferrari e descobrir a felicidade transando com varias gostosas, a la Harper Sheen!Se voces forem legais podem hoje, sem sorteio algum, mais facil que Mega Sena (1 em 50.063.860), mais facil que ter levado aquele troco espacial na cabeca (foi 1 em 3200), realmente podem conquistar uma mulher a pe. Serio. E se essa nao for a mulher certa, acontece, conquistar outra.E nao e segredo para voces ne? As que aceitam uns ze arruelas por causa de grana depois vao trepar com outro melhor ou
amar um boboquinha pobre como voces.Cada dia mais a mulher luta pelo seu dinheiro e espaco e nao pede nada a ninguem. Comerciais como esse, alem de irritar quem percebe, perpetuam esse preconceito que nem e percebido, e convencao.Ah, esses criativos sem criatividade... recauchutando piadas ultrapassadas... o fogo do inferno vos espera por ajudarem a atrasar a humanidade.Posso falar que eles quando forem ja vao T.A.R.D.I.S. ou e muita infamia pra uma pessoa so?
Nao e novo, mas vale registrar.Os colegas nerds de plantao apreciarao deveras essa rara demonstracao de graca e charme dentro do nosso mundo mecanico e virtual da TI. E os colegas nao nerds podem curtir uma dancinha diferente!Nos videos relacionados ha outras demonstracoes de algoritmos representadas por esses nobres nerds da Romenia. Select representado por um folk cigano, Merge por um folk da Transilvania saxonica, entre outros algoritmos e ritmos.Esse material foi desenvolvido pelo AlgoRythmics e esta no youtube, eu eu linkei o canal umas palavras atras.Admirei a coisa, fez um trocadalho mas entregou algo do carilho trabalho muito interessante, e segundo ele/ela/a coisa, pretende desenvolver um material didatico explorando as performances alem de um software. Eles tem tambem uma pagina no Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AlgoRythmics Abandonado. Pobre novo blog, mal aguentou 50 posts e foi deixado de lado.No momento dedico-me intensamente a minha nova forma de militancia, que em menos tempo tem o dobro de posts que esse blog aqui.E, amigos, sai do discurso das rodas de conversa do dia a dia e comecei a tentar escrever para quantas pessoas conseguisse alcancar. (Pensaram "putamerda"?)Algo sem muito contato com o academico que consiga captar pessoas que percebem algo errado na construcao social atual e parecem querer fazer alguma coisa, mas nunca se pensaram feministas. Ou entao quem nao tem a intencao de buscar teoric@s e teorias, por falta de vontade ou tempo, mas quer se envolver de forma pratica. Bem simples mesmo.Estamos tambem no Facebook e Twitter, e temos grupos de discussao no Facebook e no GoogleGroups, aos quais devo certamente a continuidade desse projeto e o inicio de novas boas amizades. Deixo-os com os gifs de fim de domingo.Sem mais porque amanha e dia de labuta.que paso?nao deu,borro.como...?acao e reacao Sarah Jessica Parker, como sempre linda, na capa da Elle USA de novembro. A Galaxy Nail e uma das invencoes mais liindas que ja vi. Quando vi pela primeira vez me apaixonei, mas como nao sou la muito criativa nao tinha muita ideia de como podia fazer. Vende uns blogs de moda gringos encontrei esse tutorial. Vamos dizer que nao e la muuuita facil, mas e possivel de fazer, e o resultado compensa. Quem vai arriscar? Sem programacao para o final de semana? Nada que um short velho e uma passadinha na loja de material de costura nao possa resolver. Olha de quantas formas incriveis da para customizar um short jeans! Adorei as tachinhas e estou louca para fazer um pra mim! Estou pensando em jeans branco com tachinhas douradas. Mas acima tem ideia para todos os gostos e todos os estilos, achei um modelo mais lindo que o outro e apesar de algumas ideias serem mais complicadas que outras, tudo e super possivel de fazer em casa. Alem disso alguma das imagens sao de lojas gringas que estao vendendo os shorts customizador por ate 280 reais! Ja pensou pagar tudo isso por algo que voce mesma pode fazer gastando MUITO menos? As tintas para tecido podem ser encontradas em papelarias ou lojas de material de costura. As tachinhas em lojas de artesanato
Comprei esses lencos umedecidos em Riveira, mas ja tinha comprado no Paraguai ha alguns anos. Sim, como todo com arigo eu adoro o Paraguai, mas so fui uma vez. Comprei o de cha verde porque os outros pareciam ser super perfumados e eu sou bem chata com cheiros, paguei 6 reais. Achei que ele limpa assim bem mais ou menos. Antes de fazer esse teste eu ate estava achando bom, mas agora nao confio mais nele pra remover maquiagem de longa duracao, tenho pavor de ir dormir com a pele suja e acredito que ele nao faca AQUELA limpeza sabe. Para remover a maquiagem do dia a dia os lencos sao eficientes, mas nao da para confiar muito neles depois de voltar de uma festa.O preco e bom e quebra o galho, eu normalmente so uso no inverno, porque chego tarde da aula e nao tenho la muita vontade de mergulhar o rosto na agua gelada, entao pra mim ta bom. Anel hoje em dia nao e mais alianca, nao e mais de ouro e nao e mais heranca de familia, anel hoje e acessorio fashion e tem que ser divertido! Veja algumas das novidades que estao rolando mundo afora! Amei o modelo de ancoras! Otimo para os looks navy do verao! Acriditeeem! Depois de MESES o Diario de Consumo vai voltar as atividades! Me perdoem o sumico, mas a vida andou corrida e eu nao estava conseguindo conciliar tudo, ou pior que isso estava priorizando as coisas erradas, nao necessariamente erradas, mas as que nao sao responsaveis por meu sustento ou futuro! ahshahshashahs'Mas minha choradeira nao interessa, o que interessa e que as resenhas e dicas vao voltar entao vamos la!! Comprei esse delineador a seculos, mas como usei pouco esqueci totalmente de mostrar pra voces. Ele nada mais e do que um "delineador" transparente que voce passa na sombra pra ela ficar mais pigmentada e ser usada como delineador. Nada que um pincel umido nao faca.Sinceramente, eu sou obrigada a falar a verdade, eu nao gostei desse produto. Nao da nem pra dizer que o potinho e cheio de agua dentro porque de voce for fazer a mesma coisa com agua o efeito fica melhor. Achei que nao pigmenta a sombra, nao influencia na duracao e o efeito fica estranho porque a ponta de aplicar joga o po da sombra pro lado e a cor fica fraca no meio e grossa nas beiradas. Resumindo, nao jogue seu dinheiro fora, compre um pincel fino e use umedecido que voce ganha mais. Comprei a base Dermablend da Vichy pela internet ha mais deum ano, e desde la ela e a minha favorita. Como o nome ja diz, ela e uma basecorretora e tem uma super cobertura, ja que inicialmente foi criada para cobrirtatuagens, acne grave ou doencas de pele. Mas quando a pele e ruim a gente temque apelar ne. Posso dizer que a base e milagrosa mesmo e de longe a melhor queeu ja testei, chega a uma cobertura total da pele, esconde espinhas e olheiras facilmente,dispensa o uso de corretivo,
e rende muito, uma gota cobre o rosto todo. Elanao contem oleo o que faz o produto durar muito e ser indicado mesmo pra pelesbastante oleosas. Minha pele e oleosa na zona T e a base fica impecavel porumas 5 horas, depois disso comeca a sumir um pouquinho no nariz, mas no restodo rosto a cobertura permanece por mais ou menos 10 horas. O acabamento dela e aveludado, matte e muito bonito, mas emfuncao da altissima cobertura ela pode marcar linhas de expressao em peles maismaduras. Na minha opiniao e uma base para ser usada somente ha noite, ja que naluz do dia qualquer pinguinho a mais pode dar aquela cara de reboco. Apesar de ser mesmo MUITO boa existem tambem alguns pontosnegativos, que quase desaparecem comparados a qualidade desta base. O principaldeles e que ela parou de ser vendida no Brasil, aparentemente a Anvisa proibiuo produto no nosso pais em funcao de algum ingrediente que nao se sabe qual e,mas como aqui ela chegava a custar 180,00 reais todo mundo ja comprava pelainternet mesmo, entao nem faz diferenca. O que me incomoda mesmo e que saofabricadas apenas cinco opcoes de tonalidades, entao vai ser dificil a base serexatamente da cor da sua pele, sempre vai ser um pouco mais clara ou um poucomais escura, alem disso ela transfere um pouco na roupa (principalmente na dosoutros, entao cuidado com os beijos e abracos). Mas como eu disse o efeito delae tao bom que mesmo assim ela continua sendo a numero um do meu coracao! Para quem quiser comprar, aconselho o site http://www.sweetcare.pt, la a base sai por 40,00 mais o frete. Abaixo imagens do comercial da base, no qual ela e usada para cobrir as tatuagens do Zombie Boy! Vale a pela conferir o comercial todo no YouTube.
has become painfully clear to meover the past six years. I was kind of hoping that competitive pressure fromMicrosoft and Amazon and more recently Facebook would make us wake upcollectively and start doing universal services. Not in some sort of ad-hoc,half-assed way, but in more or less the same way Amazon did it: all at once,for real, no cheating, and treating it as our top priority from now on.But no. No, it's like our tenth or eleventhpriority. Or fifteenth, I don't know. It's pretty low. There are a few teamswho treat the idea very seriously, but most teams either don't think about itall, ever, or only a small percentage of them thinkabout it in a very small way.It's a big stretch even to get most teams to offera stubby service to get programmatic access to their data and computations.Most of them think they're building products. And a stubby service is a prettypathetic service. Go back and look at that partial list of learnings fromAmazon, and tell me which ones Stubby gives you out of the box. As far as I'mconcerned, it's none of them. Stubby's great, but it's like parts when you needa car.A product is useless without a platform, or moreprecisely and accurately, a platform-less product will always be replaced by anequivalent platform-ized product.Google+ is a prime example of our complete failureto understand platforms from the very highest levels of executive leadership(hi Larry, Sergey, Eric, Vic, howdy howdy) down to the very lowest leaf workers(hey yo). We all don't get it. The Golden Rule of platforms is that youEat Your Own Dogfood. The Google+ platform is a pathetic afterthought. We hadno API at all at launch, and last I checked, we had one measly API call. One ofthe team members marched in and told me about it when they launched, and Iasked: "So is it the Stalker API?" She got all glum and said"Yeah." I mean, I was joking, but no... the only API call we offer isto get someone's stream. So I guess the joke was on me.Microsoft has known about the Dogfood rule for atleast twenty years. It's been part of their culture for a whole generation now.You don't eat People Food and give your developers Dog Food. Doing that issimply robbing your long-term platform value for short-term successes.Platforms are all about long-term thinking.Google+ is a knee-jerk reaction, a study inshort-term thinking, predicated on the incorrect notion that Facebook issuccessful because they built a great product. But that's not why they aresuccessful. Facebook is successful because they built an entire constellationof products by allowing other people to do the work. So Facebook is differentfor everyone. Some people spend all their time on Mafia Wars. Some spend alltheir time on Farmville. There are hundreds or maybe thousands of differenthigh-quality time sinks available, so there's something there for everyone.Our Google+ team took a look at the aftermarketand said: "Gosh, it looks like we need some games. Let's go contractsomeone to, um, write some games for us." Do you begin to see howincredibly wrong that thinking is now? The problem is that
we are tryingto predict what people want and deliver it for them.You can't do that. Not really. Not reliably. Therehave been precious few people in the world, over the entire history ofcomputing, who have been able to do it reliably. Steve Jobs was one of them. Wedon't have a Steve Jobs here. I'm sorry, but we don't.Larry Tesler may have convinced Bezos that he wasno Steve Jobs, but Bezos realized that he didn't need to be aSteve Jobs in order to provide everyone with the right products: interfaces andworkflows that they liked and felt at ease with. He just needed to enablethird-party developers to do it, and it would happen automatically.I apologize to those (many) of you for whom allthis stuff I'm saying is incredibly obvious, because yeah. It's incrediblyfrigging obvious. Except we're not doing it. We don't get Platforms, and wedon't get Accessibility. The two are basically the same thing, becauseplatforms solve accessibility. A platform is accessibility.So yeah, Microsoft gets it. And you know as wellas I do how surprising that is, because they don't "get" much ofanything, really. But they understand platforms as a purely accidentaloutgrowth of having started life in the business of providing platforms. Sothey have thirty-plus years of learning in this space. And if you go to msdn.com,and spend some time browsing, and you've never seen it before, prepare to beamazed. Because it's staggeringly huge. They have thousands, and thousands,and THOUSANDS of API calls. They have a HUGE platform. Too big in fact, becausethey can't design for squat, but at least they're doing it.Amazon gets it. Amazon's AWS (aws.amazon.com) is incredible. Just go look at it.Click around. It's embarrassing. We don't have any of that stuff.Apple gets it, obviously. They've made somefundamentally non-open choices, particularly around their mobile platform. Butthey understand accessibility and they understand the power of third-partydevelopment and they eat their dogfood. And you know what? They make prettygood dogfood. Their APIs are a hell of a lot cleaner than Microsoft's, and havebeen since time immemorial.Facebook gets it. That's what really worries me.That's what got me off my lazy butt to write this thing. I hate blogging. Ihate... plussing, or whatever it's called when you do a massive rant in Google+even though it's a terrible venue for it but you do it anyway because in theend you really do want Google to be successful. And I do! I mean, Facebookwants me there, and it'd be pretty easy to just go. But Google is home,so I'm insisting that we have this little family intervention, uncomfortable asit might be.After you've marveled at the platform offerings ofMicrosoft and Amazon, and Facebook I guess (I didn't look because I didn't wantto gettoo depressed), head over to developers.google.com and browse a little. Pretty bigdifference, eh? It's like what your fifth-grade nephew might mock up if he weredoing an assignment to demonstrate what a big powerful platform company mightbe building if all they had, resource-wise, was one fifth grader.Please don't get me wrong here -- I know for afact that the dev-rel team has had to FIGHT to get even this
much availableexternally. They're kicking ass as far as I'm concerned, because they DO getplatforms, and they are struggling heroically to try to create one in anenvironment that is at best platform-apathetic, and at worst often openlyhostile to the idea.I'm just frankly describing what developers.google.com looks like to an outsider. It lookschildish. Where's the Maps APIs in there for Christ's sake? Some of the thingsin there are labs projects. And the APIs for everythingI clicked were... they were paltry. They were obviously dog food. Not even goodorganic stuff. Compared to our internal APIs it's all snouts and horse hooves.And also don't get me wrong about Google+. They're far from theonly offenders. This is a cultural thing. What we have going on internally isbasically a war, with the underdog minority Platformers fighting a more or lesslosing battle against the Mighty Funded Confident Producters.Any teams that have successfully internalized thenotion that they should be externally programmable platforms from the ground upare underdogs -- Maps and Docs come to mind, and I know GMail is makingovertures in that direction. But it's hard for them to get funding for itbecause it's not part of our culture. Maestro's funding is a feeble thingcompared to the gargantuan Microsoft Office programming platform: it's a fluffyrabbit versus a T-Rex. The Docs team knows they'll never be competitive with Office until they canmatch its scripting facilities, but they're not getting any resource love. Imean, I assume they're not, given that Apps Script only works in Spreadsheetright now, and it doesn't even have keyboard shortcuts as part of its API. Thatteam looks pretty unloved to me.Ironically enough, Wave was a great platform, maythey rest in peace. But making something a platform is not going tomake you an instant success. A platform needs a killer app. Facebook -- thatis, the stock service they offer with walls and friends and such -- is thekiller app for the Facebook Platform. And it is a very serious mistake toconclude that the Facebook App could have been anywhere near as successful without theFacebook Platform.You know how people are always saying Google isarrogant? I'm a Googler, so I get as irritated as you do when people say that.We're not arrogant, by and large. We're, like, 99% Arrogance-Free. I did startthis post -- if you'll reach back into distant memory -- by describing Googleas "doing everything right". We do mean well, and for the most partwhen people say we're arrogant it's because we didn't hire them, or they'reunhappy with our policies, or something along those lines. They're inferringarrogance because it makes them feel better.But when we take the stance that we know how todesign the perfect product for everyone, and believe you me, I hear that a lot,then we're being fools. You can attribute it to arrogance, or naivete, orwhatever -- it doesn't matter in the end, because it's foolishness. There IS noperfect product for everyone.And so we wind up with a browser that doesn't letyou set the default font size. Talk about an affront to Accessibility. I mean,as I get older I'm actually going blind. For real. I've been
nearsighted all mylife, and once you hit 40 years old you stop being able to see things up close.So font selection becomes this life-or-death thing: it can lock you out of theproduct completely. But the Chrome team is flat-out arrogant here: they want tobuild a zero-configuration product, and they're quite brazen about it, and FuckYou if you're blind or deaf or whatever. Hit Ctrl-+ on every single page visitfor the rest of your life.It's not just them. It's everyone.The problem is that we're a Product Company through and through. We built asuccessful product with broad appeal -- our search, that is -- and that wildsuccess has biased us.Amazon was a product company too, so it took anout-of-band force to make Bezos understand the need for a platform. That forcewas their evaporating margins; he was cornered and had to think of a way out.But all he had was a bunch of engineers and all these computers... if only theycould be monetized somehow... you can see how he arrived at AWS, in hindsight.Microsoft started out as a platform, so they'vejust had lots of practice at it.Facebook, though: they worry me. I'm no expert,but I'm pretty sure they started off as a Product and they rode that successpretty far. So I'm not sure exactly how they made the transition to a platform.It was a relatively long time ago, since they had to be a platform before (nowvery old) things like Mafia Wars could come along.Maybe they just looked at us and asked: "Howcan we beat Google? What are they missing?"The problem we face is pretty huge, because itwill take a dramatic cultural change in order for us to start catching up. Wedon't do internal service-oriented platforms, and we just as equally don't doexternal ones. This means that the "not getting it" is endemic acrossthe company: the PMs don't get it, the engineers don't get it, the productteams don't get it, nobody gets it. Even if individuals do, even if YOU do, itdoesn't matter one bit unless we're treating it as an all-hands-on-deckemergency. We can't keep launching products and pretending we'll turn them intomagical beautiful extensible platforms later. We've tried that and it's not working.The Golden Rule of Platforms, "Eat Your OwnDogfood", can be rephrased as "Start with a Platform, and Then Use itfor Everything." You can't just bolt it on later. Certainly not easily atany rate -- ask anyone who worked on platformizing MS Office. Or anyone whoworked on platformizing Amazon. If you delay it, it'll be ten times as muchwork as just doing it correctly up front. You can't cheat. You can't havesecret back doors for internal apps to get special priority access, not for ANYreason. You need to solve the hard problems up front.I'm not saying it's too late for us, but thelonger we wait, the closer we get to being Too Late.I honestly don't know how to wrap this up. I'vesaid pretty much everything I came here to say today. This post has been sixyears in the making. I'm sorry if I wasn't gentle enough, or if Imisrepresented some product or team
or person, or if we're actually doing LOTSof platform stuff and it just so happens that I and everyone I ever talk to hasjust never heard about it. I'm sorry.But we've gotta start doing this right.