the same benefits and services.After that saw the former INPS financiallyunable to honor both to health services, regarding social security benefits,which immediately ran the risk of becoming insufficient to cover SocialSecurity - the main goal and because of the existence of the system .Today, sadly, we see:- SUS, as manager of health resources, withappropriations poorly distributed; own hospitals and other state maintained byagreement, most with inadequate facilities, lack of professionals (doctors andparamedics) who are paid hourly loads for extended demeaning to meet sickpeople in emergency rooms, clinics and hospitals where they perform procedurespreviously scheduled. It is common to see whether patients placed in hallwayson stretchers and amazing, others thrown on the ground (some not even sportinga blanket).- Health plans that came to occupy the space ofthe attention that was given to insured welfare, where migrated to sustainenterprises, whose ultimate goal is profit. These organizations charge highprices for a type of assistance only comparable to what was once taught by INPSafter INAMPS, followed by no attention, since they were extinct. Contributionsare heavy users and service providers are penalized for prices, often kept forlong years without any adjustments or when granted, far from the true costs.Doctors, rightly, complained better wages, from the time that the socialsecurity surpluses had constant fundraising growing because the benefits of"immediacy" which was health care. Surely the medical profession hadhis reasons for claiming improvements, believing naively assume that the managementsystem would be capable of improvement. That was a fallacy because they couldnot remove the causes of this crisis remuneration of their employment. There isalso what some say about the use of cash resources in pension investments thathave become repayable. That was an insult to the taxpayers of the pensionpurse, in this case, treated as if it were tax (VAT). In fact, the box was fromthe pension contributions that could never have been diverted to investment inpublic works, as were technical reserves for guaranteed future benefits tousers of the system, therefore, contributed.- As a consequence of these causes ofwidespread health care, without clear rules for obtaining resources, these samesources of the problem made the welfare practically unenforceable, causingflattening of the value of benefits (Aid Illness, Disability and RetirementTime Service, Help Birth, Solitude Aid, Salary and Allowance Family Permanencyin Service). To continue these benefits became imperative to reduce themonetary values and change in the interstices criteria for entitlement totheir benefits. That, now, has caused widespread dissatisfaction anddisinterest by policyholders, especially those whose membership was optionaland others, even if required insured, which stopped contributing in part bylimiting the amounts of pensions, whose range was limited to values muchsmaller when there were retirements that came to be calculated based oncontributions over twenty minimum wages or even the average wage gainseffective. Individual taxpayers required, having no option to scale upward wagecontribution, chose to contribute only on the value of a minimum wage, andmany, not even that.And so, the resources allocated to guaranteepension benefits of public pensions go against the growth of the population.Conclusions and suggestions:- History, which juts this study was initiatedunification of security institutes in 1967, previously linked to severalprofessional categories. One is that