thegoodfellas/blogset-br huggingface dataset:
Novos dedoches!!!Backyardiganscontato: marimelado@gmail.com Hello Kitty!chaveiro 2cm x 3cm e 5cm x 3cmGostou?Envie-me um e-mail:marimelado@gmail.com Star babies!Em fase de producao!Vao para Belo Horizonte para a mamae Bruna!Gostou? Quer enviar sugestoes?Envie-me um e-mail!marimelado@gmail.com Dedoche menina!Gostou? envie-me um e-mail:marimelado@gmail.com Participe de pesquisas on line e ganhe premios!!!E so clicar no banner! Boneco Coelho!Gostou? envie-me um e-mail:marimelado@gmail.com Yasmim com o chaveirinho de morango! Hello Kittyaltura 18cm Chaveiros de morangos!Gostou? Envie-me um e-mail!marimelado@gmail.com Cada dia que passa me sinto mais idiota. Me sinto idiota porque a cada segundo que passa te quero mais e mais, sem ao menos saber se voce sente o mesmo por mim. Muitas pessoas dizem que queriam poder mandar no coracao. Ja eu, preferia mandar no seu. Eu ocuparia ele apenas de mim, assim como o meu e ocupado somente de voce. E ridiculo pensar que ha um mes atras eu nem lembrava da sua existencia, e hoje voce e uma das pessoas que eu mais me importo. A que eu mais me importo. Nao consigo dormir sem falar com voce. Nao consigo sair e nao desejar te encontrar. O pior e que, ao inves de me dizer o que voce realmente sente, voce camufla seu sentimento com palavras. Palavras as quais eu nao sei nem ao menos se sao verdadeiras, se sao ditas do coracao. Voce me deixa tao insegura que acho que estou comecando a adorar a ideia que a inseguranca me passa. Voce me liga, nos saimos, ficamos.. E depois? Passamos alguns dias sem nos ver, meu celular fica alguns dias sem tocar, ate que de repente, voce decide me ligar e faz com que tudo comece novamente. Queria saber o que voce sente, pra saber se devo levar isso adiante, ou se e melhor deixar pra la.. ali tao distante ele nao parece que um dia foi meu, com lagrimas nos olhos, coracao pulsando forte e o pensamento dizendo para o coracao falar mais baixo, ele estava ouvindo... eu tinha certeza. Entao silencio... e sem lagrimas! Parece que todo mundo esta me olhando, meu coracao poderia colaborar ne? As meninas me mandam um olhar preocupado, uma delas me puxa pro canto... NAO! Ele nao pode notar esse movimento, entao nao me abraca, as lagrimas nao aguentariam um abraco, ou qualquer pergunta que tivesse um por que ali, estampado. Vamos... respirando calmamente, e fingindo que ele nem esta ali, mas um gole de vinho, mas um impulso contido, minha vontade era deixar chorar, gritar bem alto pra todo mundo ouvir que e aquele garoto que eu amo, pedir sem calma nenhuma e deixar meu coracao bater da maneira que bem entender, alto e vivo. Eu queria e fazer o maior escandalo, mostrar pra todos ali que meu sorriso era falso, e que o som que eles estavam ouvindo era de uma morte lenta, a minha! (...) Pra falar a verdade, ali distante... ele pareceu um sonho, como se eu nao soubesse todos os seus gostos e traduzisse todos os seus gestos, como se fosse tudo platonico, e ele fosse apenas um garoto por quem eu sou completamente apaixonada e nunca
[...]Historias como esta costumam acabar bem e, mesmo que nao se viva feliz para sempre afinal, nao se pode ter tudo deve haver pelo menos algumlugar quente e seco para abrigaro final da noite. A garota decidiu, cansou de ser metade, pra ela sempre foi assim, ou hoje, ou nao mais (...) Pelo menos assim ela dizia, e achava que cumpria, achava que seria forte o bastante pra viver sozinha um dia. E ele? Notou que ela desejava presenca, nao sabe o que fazer, nao sabe por onde andar, talvez ele nao saiba se realmente a quer por perto. e ela vai permanecer ali, ate nao haver mais forcas... por que amor, ha! Amor ela sabe que vai haver para todo sempre. ' Voce jamais tera a posse de uma mulher, o que vai prende-la a voce e uma linha fragil que precisa ser reforcada diariamente. Ninguem vive de vento. Mulher vive de carinho. De-lhe em abundancia. E coisa de homem, sim, e se ela nao receber de voce vai pegar de outro. Por inseguranca, a maioria dos homens prefere nao acreditar na existencia do cerebro feminino. Por isso, procuram aquelas que fingem nao possui-lo.'' Adoramos a perfeicao, porque nao a podemos ter; repugna-la-iamos, se a tivessemos.O perfeito e desumano, porque o humano e imperfeito.' Tem dia em que eu acordo e, de verdade, pouco importam as minhas dificuldades, sejam elas ate ja desgastadas pelo tempo, sejam elas vicosas, recentemente inauguradas, tudo me parece perfeito. Tudo e como pode ser agora, eu estou onde consigo estar, o tempo das coisas e o tempo das coisas, e isso vale tambem para cada pessoa que compartilha a sala de aula comigo.Tem dia em que eu acordo e faco contato com uma gentileza tao linda que desconhece essa historia de acertos e erros, sejam meus ou alheios, viver e trabalhoso e todo mundo se atrapalha, de um jeito ou de outros. Toda gente so precisa de consciencia, cura e amor. Toda gente so quer ser feliz. Nao ha motivo para pressa e tambem nao ha estagnacao, eu permito que a vida possa simplesmente fluir, sem tentar, em vao, amarrar ou alterar o jeito de dizer das suas ondas.Este sentimento pode durar poucos quarteiroes do dia, um monte deles, ate mesmo so alguns centimetros de passo, enquanto dura e absoluto. E eu me sinto feliz e grata por tudo, vejo amor, mestria, chance de aprendizado, em cada infima coisa que me acontece. Ainda que chova, e as vezes chove muito, a memoria da ternura luminosa e imutavel do sol faz eu lembrar da natureza preciosa da vida. O sol nao vai a lugar nenhum, ele fica exatamente onde esta, mas a nuvem, a chuva, sempre passam.Tem dia em que eu acordo lindeza e coloco bobagem pra dormir porque a nitida prioridade e a harmonia do meu coracao, o contentamento natural capaz de me nutrir, proteger e me ajudar a seguir. Este sentimento pode durar poucos quarteiroes do dia, um monte deles, ate mesmo so alguns centimetros de passo, enquanto dura e lembranca da realidade divina perene
que e sol por tras da temporaria nuvem, da temporaria chuva, que possam molhar os olhos da personagem. Enquanto dura e alegria e descanso e eu lembro do que, de verdade, me importa.
(..) E eu abraco e sinto que nao era assim que deveria ser, o coracao nao pulsa forte e os olhos nao brilham, mas ha uma protecao constante ali, como se eu fosse alguma boneca ja quebrada e precisasse de cuidados, como se eu precisasse de alguem e que eu lutasse para amar de novo, e novamente e outra vez, como se repetir alguns erros fosse correto pra me encantar... mas nao da certo, o teu cheiro esta por perto, o teu sorriso anda na lembranca e toda vez que eu tento me vejo no chao outra vez e nada de voce me notar, e nada de voce me buscar ! tudo que ela menos precisa agora e mais alguem pra ocupar os pensamentos. Ela queria fugir de tudo, sair do mundo em que estava lhe fazendo mal e entao se deparou com outro mundo(...) poderia estar vivendo de novo, estava sentindo teu coracao novamente, ele pulsava devagar, nao estava em terra firme, aprendeu a reconhecer tudo antes de pisar em qualquer lugar, ate onde aquele caminho que estava te dando um ponto de paz iria? A resposta veio logo, ela nao recebeu nenhuma ligacao, e apesar de diversas vezes ter consultado a sua caixa de mensagem nao havia nada de novo, sua cabeca estava confusa, milhoes de pensamentos, diversas duvidas, deitou algumas vezes e nada a fazia dormir. Tentou alguns segredos, e ate chegou a tentar colocar na sua cabeca o antigo mundo, aquele se lembra? Que a fazia mal... mas nem assim ela conseguiu. Ela desejava apenas um telefonema, nada mais, no fundo ela desejava algo bem maior... acho que ela estava sorrindo, e teve que parar, deve ter sido esse o problema. quebre as regras seja diferente ignore sua consciencia siga seu c o r a c a o ontem eu ouvi: - voce e intensa demais. E esses dias eu ouvi a mesma coisa... queria ter poder sobre a intensidade sabia? Chorar so de vez enquando, amar bem pouquinho, e ser forte um tantao. Ter mais poder sobre ir e ficar, falar pouco e demostrar menos, queria que as pessoas me traduzissem como um misterio, nao soubesse tudo assim, simples, ta na cara, queria ser menos eu, um pouco menor, um pouco voce... que passa e pronto, fim. Pronto pra outro livro, outro amor, outra saudade, e falando em saudade? Sabe aquele fim de tarde de dois anos atraz? Nao... voce nao sabe ne, voce vive por semanas, eu vivo por historias.Se nao da para mudar de cidade, muda de casa, muda de rua, de bairro (ca entre nos: massa mesmo seria poder mudar de planeta). cf Causes of Terrorism: Western Common Sense and ExpertKnowledge.Rodrigo GomesGuimaraes, Sao Paulo State University, Brazil Abstract In this paper I discussthe dominant discourse on terrorism in the West, arguing that it has definedterrorism in ways that further the reproduction of terrorist acts, includingthose of States, and that these same acts have been cause and effect ofdiscourses on terrorism. This discoursehas created psychological and moral foundations as the causes for terrorism,thereby ascribing historical,
wasopposed to the American way of life and was the unworthy, if not deliberate,dupe of dangerous radicals. This shows how the persecution of thecommunist threat did not only make the lives of Third World communitiesdifficult, but also endangered the lives of American workers, not to mentionthe fact that many union workers where pro-capitalism[12]. Today, working-class immigrants in the U.S.are suffering deportation[13],now that the anti-immigrant sentiment has a new excuse called terrorism. The real menace to Washington and U.S.corporate interests, then, is not communism; it is rather a democracy that isinclusive. It is also a menace for localelites, and these are glad to contribute to the silencing of their ownpeople. With State and media propagandain their hands, together with State repression, the job is made easier. The terrorists that exist today are thedirect fruit of U.S. interventions against communism, and of the U.S. supportfor friends that are not so friendly towards their own countrymen. The dominant discourse on terrorism is, inmany ways, the same as the old one on communism, as we will see.The Discourse onTerrorism in the United StatesA conservative number for those who have been killed by U.S. terror andmilitary action since World War II is 8,000,000 people. Repeat 8,000,000 people. This does not include the wounded, theimprisoned, the displaced, the refugees, etc.[14]On April 30, 2002, a television program was aired atPBS channel entitled Why did The Twin Towers Collapse?. The program showed how the Towers had beenengineered to resist a crash of a plane a little smaller than the two boeings that hit them, and with nosubstantial amount of fuel. Due to thesize of the planes that crashed, then, and to their being full of gas, theTowers infrastructure could not have resisted. What is interesting about this story showed in the TV program is thatthe engineers of the Towers had already planned them as resistant structures inthe case of a plane crash. Is thiscalled preventive rationality, or passive condoning of terroristactivities? Will the next Twin Towers if there ever are any be technically thought out to be resistant to chemical,biological, and other weapons, and will they be resistant to the crash of threesimultaneous planes? I mean, where arewe going with scientific, technotistic rationality? Will we plan a world where a half of it isbazooka-proof even maybe a-bomb-proof and the other half is denied anyright to a voice that is not a scary face?With this digression I just wanted to point out thatnot every, and I would say only a few, difficulties that arise can be properlymanaged through technical solutions. Therush to bring more security to a place like the United States, that iscertainly one of the safest places to be in the world, cannot reinforce thesame methods that have been practiced already since much before September 11,and have failed. The terrorism thathappened has changed many things, but others were just reinforced, and for thesake of the freedom of everyone, the United States included. As long as problems are dealt with in themanner of well be even more... we will have no way out. As long as we dont recognize that
have, before he became disposable. When he suddenly decides to go ahead andrealize to the full extent the imperialist tactics that the U.S. had socheerfully applauded before, and given support to, before the invasion ofKuwait, the U.S. decides to call him evil. When Saddam Hussein was fighting the evil Iran, he was our man. The same happened with Osama bin Laden, oneday called our kind of guy while he was killing the Evil Empire of theatheists, fighting a holy war commanded by Washington. In fact, it wasWashington that first used the discourse of the jihad as holy war, for jihadin Persian means struggle, not holy war[38]. When Bin Laden realized he had been betrayedby the U.S., what for him was good, the U.S. with its money, became evil.The irony of history is that those who fought in the war of America againstcommunism now have turned themselves against both at the same time. As Chomsky says, There are plenty of binLadens on both sides, as usual[39]. Regarding Saudi Arabia, the U.S. hascommitted itself to support a monarchy that has its days counted, because it ishated in that country by its people, and the people themselves are hating theU.S. for this[40]. In exchange for oil security, the U.S. hascommitted itself to protect the regime of the royal family, which exploits itspeople in many ways[41]. Terrorism is alwaysused by States as a weapon, but when States talk about it, it is always theOther that commits terrorism, it is never Us. In fact, to make a distinction between retail terrorism, the one committed by individuals or small groups,and wholesale terrorism, the onecommitted by States[42],the only one that attracts attention in dominant discourse is the former. Nevertheless, the scope and range ofwholesale surpasses by far the retail[43]type, thus the names given. The factthat the sensationalist media portrays terrorism as a retail type only showshow States hold enough power to be exempt of charges of the most criminaltypes. This plays into the imaginationof people in the Western individualistic societies, with images of the lonefighter, or the hero. It also playsinto the imagination of the Terrorist as a madman, as someone that had a tragicinfancy which many times is the case and that seeks revenge. The psychology of the Terrorist, the idea ofthe Terrorist Mind, is a pervasive one in the United States discourse onterrorism, and to this problem we shall now turn.The TerroristMind and the Death of History The Terrorist exists ina discourse that frames every individual as representative of a mindtype. This is a discourse born inEurope, solidified by Christianity and its moral separation of good andevil. The latter is the most basicarrangement of minds that a Westerner will make, and it serves reasons ofpower and order. The evil mind, thepathological, is recognized through the making of the good, or normalmind. They are one and the sameprocess. The one that has the power toannounce abnormality and normality is the specialist, or the doctor, suchas the psychiatrist or psychologist, and nowadays, the media as well. It has become part of common sense discourse,the targeting of some as abnormal,
We Despised?List of US Interventions, Invasions & Assassinations -- Boulder Weekly, 2001.[26] Chomsky, Noam. 9-11. (Seven Stories Press: New York, 2001).[27] In fact, during the Soviet regime, rooted out by Islamic radicalswith the full command and arms support of the U.S., the women were allowed togo to school and have other activities. See Abukhalil: 2002 and also the documentary film Inside Afghanistan, an excellent portrait of the 80s war.[28] See Abukhalil: 2002.[29] Ibid.[30] Chomsky, Noam: 2001.[31] Ibid.[32] See Alexander, Y. & Brenner, E. (eds.) U.S.Federal Legal Responses to Terrorism. (Transnational Publishers, Inc.: New York, 2002).[33] See Herman, Edward: 1982.[34] Ibid.[35] See Chomsky, Noam. Latin America. From Colonization to Globalization. (Ocean Press: New York, 1999).[36] Ibid.[37] See Patwardhan: 2002.[38] See Ahamd, Eqbal: 2001.[39] See Chomsky, Noam: 2001.[40] See Abukhalil: 2002.[41] Speech by Tariq Ali, April 2002. [42] See Herman, Edward: 1982.[43] Ibid.[44] Foucault, Michel. The Discourse on Language. In TheArchaeology of Knowledge. (Pantheon Books: New York, 1972).[45] As Michel Foucault has shown in his works Madness and Civilization and Disciplineand Punish, besides others.[46] See Escobar: 1995.[47] For examples of ethnocentrism affecting the Arab world, see Said,Edward. Orientalism. (Vintage Books: New York, 1978).[48] See Abukhalil: 2002.[49] See Abukhalil, 2004.[50] Ibid.[51] Netanyahu, Benjamin. Fighting Terrorism. How Democracies Can Defeat the InternationalTerrorist Network. (Farrar, Strausand Giroux: New York, 2001).[52] Ibid.[53] See Ahmad: 2001. AlsoAbukhalil: 2002.[54] The Axis of Evil are countries targeted by Bush as the ones thatare supposedly terrorist. This term,used to refer to the populations and States of China, Russia, Iraq, NorthKorea, Syria, Iran, and Lybia, has provoked revolt even in the U.S. The racism of the affirmation is flagrant. See SanFrancisco Chronicle. 3-9-02.[55] See Clifford, James & Marcus, George E. WritingCulture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. (Univ. of California Press: Berkeley, 1986).[56] See Chomsky, Noam: 2000.[57] See Ahmad: 2001.[58] See Churchill, Ward. Pacifism as Pathology. (Arbeiter Ring: Winnipeg, 1998).[59] Foucault, Michel. The Discourse on Language. In TheArchaeology of Knowledge. [60] About 300,000 people mobilized for global justice in Genova in2001, when an Italian anarchist was killed by the police and several othersarrested. In web http://www.mwaw.org/[61] See Malatesta, Errico. Life & Ideas. (Freedom Press: London, 1993).
governmentality? Socialmovements today reproduce biopolitics and neoliberalism when they insist on atruth of themselves that is an identity that holds their unity. Identity politics is one of the spaces wherethis reproduction occurs. However, thereare movements that not only reproduce but also challenge the biopoliticalorder. For example, the queer movementin the U.S. chose for itself the name queer as a way to resist the confiningidentities that are based on sexuality as a truth of the subject. However, there is tremendous variety withinthis movement itself, and in it we find as well the old identity politics thatascribes truth to subjects with sex as an interior truth ofsubjectivity. Besides this example, wecan say that all social movements today, because they are living within formsof neoliberalism, reproduce biopolitics in one form or another. To resist neoliberal governmentality, becauseit reduces possibilities for political action, means to promote knowledges,forms of subjectivation, and political alliances that are not based on truth oridentity. It means cultivating alliancesacross differences, making possible political action based on striving forjustice that is non-foundational. ReferencesFoucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics: lectures at the Collegede France,1978-1979. New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Foucault, Michel. TheHermeneutics of the Subject: lectures at the College de France, 1981-1982. New York: Picador, 2005.Foucault, Michel. Security,Territory, Population: lectures at the College de France,1977-1978. NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
from http://www.anarchist-studies.org/article/articleview/26/1/1/ Foucault, Michel. (1998). Aesthetics, Method, andEpistemology. In Faubion, James D.(ed). Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984 Volume 2. New York: The New Press. 477p.______________ (1977). Language,Counter-Memory, Practice. New York:Conell University Press. 233p._____________ (1998). "On theGenealogy of Ethics" in Ethics:Subjectivity and Truth. New York:The New Press. 334p.hooks, bell. (1994). Postmodern Blackness.In Williams, P. & Chrisman, L. (eds.) ColonialDiscourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader. New York: Columbia University Press. 547p.Kropotkin, Peter. (1910). A Conquista do Pao (TheConquest of Bread). Lisbon:Guimaraes Editores. 269p.May, Todd. (1994). The Political Philosophy ofPoststructuralist Anarchism. Pennsylvannia: The Pennsylvania State University Press. 155p.Newman, Saul. (2001). From Bakunin to Lacan. Maryland: Lexington Books. 208p.Nietzsche, Friedrich. (1967). On TheGenealogy of Morals. New York:Random House. 198p._________________ (1974). The GayScience. New York: VintageBooks. 375p. [1] A challenge to these authors interpretation of anarchism has beenmade by Jesse Cohn and Shawn Wilbur in WhatsWrong With Postanarchism?[2] Bakunin, Michael. God and the State, p.30.[3] Ibid, p.54.[4] Bakunin, Michael. Deus e o Estado (God and the State). In Textos Anarquistas (Anarchist Texts).[5] Bakunin, Michael. God and the State, p.21.[6] May, p.63[7] See Structuralism and Poststructuralism In Aesthetics,Method, and Epistemology.[8] hooks, bell. PostmodernBlackness. [9] Foucault, Michel. Revolutionary Action: Until Now. In Language, Counter-Memory,Practice. p.230.[10] May, Todd. The Political Philosophy of PoststructuralistAnarchism. p.96[11] Foucault, Michel. Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. In Language, Counter-Memory,Practice. p.151.[12] Foucault, Michel. Revolutionary Action: Until Now. In Language, Counter-Memory,Practice. p.228.[13] In Questions on Geography...olhar[14] Nietzcshe, Friedrich. On The Genealogy of Morals, 3rdessay, section 28.[15] Foucault, Michel. Structuralism and Poststructuralism. In Aesthetics, Method, andEpistemology, p.449