Christian View of Science and Scripture, 2aed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1971), 211; e Haber,122-123, 199-200, 255.15. Para uma revisao critica dessas ideias, ver Thomas A. McIver, Creationism:Intellectual Origins, Cultural Context and Theoretical Diversity (dissertacaode doutorado, Universidade da California, Los Angeles, 1989), 450-495.16. Dentre os muitos estudos que se dedicaram a esse assunto, ver CharlesCoulston Gillispie, Genesis and Geology: A Study in the Relations of ScientificThought, Natural Theology and Social Opinion in Great Britain, 1790-1850 (NewYork: Harper Torchbooks, 1959); R. Hooykaas, Religion and the Rise of ModernScience (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1972).17. Algumas publicacoes recentes ilustrativas destamudanca incluem Richard J. Blackwell, Galileo, Bellarmine, and the Bible (NotreDame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1991); Charles E. Hummel, The GalileoConnection: Resolving Conflicts between Science and the Bible (Downers Grove,IL: InterVarsity Press, 1986); William John Hausmann, Science and the Bible inLutheran Theology (Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1978).18. Vern S. Poythress, Science and Hermeneutics:Implications of Scientific Method for Biblical Interpretation (Grand Rapids,MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1988), 24.19. Ibidem.20. Na analise final, a conclusao ultima a respeitoda norma final quanto aos pontos de vista cientificos e a fe religiosaprovavelmente e tirada com base na conviccao, ou pressuposicao, da postura dointerprete com relacao aos niveis de autoridade da ciencia e da fe. Devemostambem argumentar que a ciencia esta constantemente em transformacao, e que elanao faz nenhuma alegacao absoluta.21. John C. L. Gibson, Genesis, The Daily StudyBible, vol. 1 (Edinburgh: The Saint Andrews Press, 1981), 56.22. Ibidem, 55.23. Ibidem24. Hansjorg Braumer, Das erst Buch Mose.Wuppertaler Studienbibel, Kapitel 1-11 (Wuppertal: R. Brockhaus Verlag, 1983),44.25. D. Stuart Briscoe, Genesis, The CommunicatorsCommentary (Waco, TX: Word Books, 1987), 37.26. Observe a discussao bastante util a respeitodos varios grupos e definicoes de concordismo feita por John T. Baldwin, emInspiration, the Natural Sciences, and a Window of Opportunity, Journal ofthe Adventist Theological Society 5/1 (1994), 131-154, esp. 139-43; por DavisA. Young, em The Discovery of Terrestrial History, Portraits of Creation:Biblical and Scientific Perspectives on the Worlds Formation, eds. Howard J.Van Till, Robert E. Snow, John H. Stek, e Davis A. Young (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm.B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1990), 27 no 2; por Clark Pinnock, em Climbing outof a Swamp: The Evangelical Struggle to Understand the Creation Texts,Interpretation 43/2 (1989): 143-155.27. Por exemplo, Derek Kidner, Genesis: AnIntroduction and a Commentary, Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries (Chicago:InterVarsity Press, 1967), 56.28. Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1-17, The NewInternational Commmentary of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B.Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1990), 54.29. Para a critica de outros aspectos da teoria dodia/epoca, ver Lloyd R. Bayley, Genesis, Creation, and Creationism (NewYork/Malwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1993), 125-128.30. Ibidem, 126.31. Ver referencia no 13 acima; cf. Carl F. H.Henry, God Who Stands and Stays, vol. 6 of God, Revelation and Authority (Waco,TX: Word Books, 1983), 2:112.32. Reimpresso em P. J. Wiseman, Clues to Creationin Genesis, ed. DOnald J. Wiseman (London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott, 1977),109-207.33. Kidner, 54.34. Wiseman, 132-133.35. William L. Holladay, Jr., A Concise Hebrew andAramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm.