would like to mention is the well-known law of cause andeffect. It is just impossible to have an effect bigger, quantitatively andqualitatively, than the cause. Therefore, the cause will always be bigger thanthe effect. Although the science recognizes this law as truth, theevolutionists believe that the inanimate material was the first cause of theuniverse, instead of the life (effect), created by them. Which means, we,people, full of dreams, desires, emotion, will, intelligence, complexity overcomplexity, are the effect of the cause, inanimate material that wasmysteriously flying around before an explosion, of which no scientist canexplain who lit the match.Accordingto the science, therefore, to have an effect bigger than the cause isimpossible! Given the fact the complexity of human being, only someone greaterthan he could be the cause for the existence. The first cause, therefore, shallbe logically non-physical.Withregard of complexity, recently science found the approximate number of cells ina human body. Just 37.2 trillion. This means that if you lined up all the cellsof an average human, end to end, the line could circle the earth almost 19times. That is just amazing. One single human being, with so many randominformation caused by an explosion.... Wow, one needs to have a bit of faithhere.Anotherexample, just one single enzyme (the building block of gem, which is thebuilding block of a cell) in our body. According to a professor thatunfortunately I cannot remember the name, a professor of applied mathematics atCardiff University of Wales, the possibility of a human enzyme, coming togetherby random, by chance, is just 1.10 to the power of 40 thousand. Many peoplehave never studied numbers of this size. It is, by the way, more than thenumber of all atoms in this universe! Therefore, mathematically speaking, thepossibility is zero! There is no way to have such complexity by a random event.Lookto the information contained within the DNA. One strain of DNA has 6 hundredthousand pages of information. I like the analogy Dr. Ravi Zacharias commonlymakes in his lectures. It is the same of mentioning that a large phone bookcame all organized from a printer explosion! It is just senseless.Undeniably,there are many holes to this theory. We need to remember that science is notbased on theory. Science by its own rules must be observed. There is, however,no observational evidence to this attempted theory. Scientists themselves willadmit that there are many holes.Dr.John Polkinghorne, for instance. He is a leading quantum physicists in theworld. After many years as atheist he converted andbecame a theologian, writer and Anglican priest. A prominent and leading voiceexplaining the relationship between science and religion, he was professor ofMathematical physics at the University of Cambridge. He served as the presidentof Queens' College, Cambridge from 1988 until 1996. He said in a lecturing onthe first 3 seconds on the existence of the universe the ratio between theexpansion and contraction had to be so exact that it would be literally liketaking aim on a 1 square inch target, 20 billion light years away and hittingit bullseye. He goes on to say ladies and gentlemen, there is no free lunch!Somebody has to pay! You dont get