some theologians, an issue that, strictly speaking, was only clarified with the advent of the Spiritualism. Let us see: apologist and historian Lactantius, in the fourth century, expresses the thought of his contemporary Christian: "The Pythagoreans and Stoics assured that the soul was not born with the body. Rather, they say that it was introduced in the body and that it migrates from one body to another." In another part of his works called The Divine Institutions, he affirms: "Pythagoras insists that the souls migrate from bodies consumed by age and death. He says that they are admitted in new bodies and newborn. He also says that the same souls are reproduced sometimes in a man, sometimes in a sheep, or in a wild animal, or a bird... That opinion of an insensate man is ridiculous."Other important testimonial comes from the greatest theologian of the ancient church of the fifth century, Augustine. He was familiarized with the reincarnation theories, both Manichaean and Platonic ones, of his time. In a comment about Genesis, he rejected, as against the Christian faith, the idea that the human souls returned in bodies of different animals, according to their moral conduct (transmigration). In The City of God (Book X, Chapter 30), the Bishop of Hippo remarks that, however the neo-platonic philosopher Porphyry has rejected that concept taught by Plato and Plotinus, and did not hesitate in correct his masters in that point, he thought that the human souls came back in other human bodies. About that matter (metempsychosis) the Spiritualism corrects Pythagoras' mistake.Currently, to some Christians, the "proof" of the unicity of the human life is found in chapter 9 verse 27 of Paul's letter to the Hebrews: "to men it is ordered to die just once, and after that, judgment." I wonder if Jesus attributed to the current life a decisive value to the whole existence after death. In the debate, unicity advocates proclaimed the resurrection, but it is imperious to reflect, about that supernatural phenomenon, about Jairus s daughter's (Mt.9:18-26), Naim s widow's son's (Lc.7:11-17), and Lazarus' (Jo.11:1-44) cases, if all of them "resurrected" as Christians believe, how would the evocation of the aforementioned letter to the Hebrews to deny reincarnation be?" Let us remember that both the "resurrected" would not have died just once. By the way, they were not even dead, they were just suffering from catalepsy. (7)Jesus assured that the truth would set the man free, if the truth (reincarnation) is being currently denied to Christians, it is evident that they are not free, or, what is worst, they are enchained to the strong human dogmas, disseminated by contumacious deniers of the natural principle of reincarnation, forgers of a faith enthroned in the pinnacles of fiction, myth, and celestial dreams of the theological imaginary.In the maxim "to be born, to die, to be reborn, and to continuously progress, that is the Law" we find the most legitimate universal process of application of the codes of justice in the Creator's Law.Jorge HessenE-Mail: jorgehessen@gmail.comSite: http://jorgehessen.netSOURCES:(1) Pythagoras of Samos (VI century B.C.), Greek philosopher and