Critical Review Frosh, S. PsychosocialTheory. Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. NY:Springer Reference, 2013.University of London Luciano FiscinaDoctoral student in Social Psychology at thePsychology Institute at USP Social and Environmental Psychology Laboratory and Intervention (LAPSI) In the textPsychosocial theory, the author seems to part from perspective that all humansubjects have in some dimension the powerand agency on their lives[1]in steady of asking how can all human been and human groups have some agency or control over their own lives on the conjuncture of the contemporaryworld. In our research laboratory[2],we work from perspective of postcolonial critical theory based on the presuppositionthat the imaginary is the locus of political domination in the contemporaryworld so that it is doubtful to think that all human groups or human subjects reallyhave access to the orders of power, decision and control over their lives anddestinies within the established social order, first due to the external forcesof ideological control and second because of the external forces of economiccontrol which limits the space for the action of the ordinary human subject on theown life. At the same time, it is doubtful to think thatthe term power (does not understoodin the sense of energy) can beconsidered the essence of human subjectivity as the text makes mention. In themodern society, it is hard to think the word power without associate it withthe strategies of domination applied to personal, utilities and coercive interestsalthough it is possible to associate with words like can and energy withwhich, depending on context, the word power can also relate to. But, in the purest sense of an external control, the word power does not complete the great human quest neither fill the human subjectivity. The author seeks to articulateelements which are taken separately in the analyses of the integralconstitutive process of human subject. The researcher seems departing fromperspective of an internalist model for solving the problem of the separationbetween what is regarded as analytical dimensions of the human development - social, individual and biological - whichunderlie the analysis of the integral constitutive process of the human subjectsin according to innate formative orders. The text seeks to develop an analysis on theseparation of the formative and constitutive orders of human subjects, as suchbiological, psychological and social, through an intellectual exercisethat approximates itself of the quest for solving the great epistemologicalproblem of human sciences and the paradox that underlies the structure ofcapitalism in according to Hobsbawm (2010) and which the author makes a weakreference. On the contrary from the way the authorunderstands the social psychology, we don t work from a theoretical perspectivenot deconstructive of the individualsubject[3],but we considering the social psychology field as a reference for theformulation of analytical methods which would allow the seizure of components(subjective) of the discursive contents, leading to their causal explanations(motivational) and semantic interpretations of its political provisions from ahistorical and critical perspective. Thus according to Professor Fernandes(1972), "social psychology is a hybrid field, located at a point ofconfluence of the psychology, sociology and anthropology; this hybrid would be necessarilymarginal and interdisciplinary[4]. Thereby the social psychology has much to sayabout the nature of the social itself