Gibbs Reflective Cycle
Published: 2022-11-17 09:11:36

Graham Gibbs created the Gibbs Reflective Cycle in 1988 to organise learning from experiences. It provides a framework for analysing events and, given that it is cyclical, lends itself particularly well to repeated encounters, allowing you to draw lessons and make plans from both good and bad situations. It has six stages:
•	An explanation of what happened
•	thoughts and feelings on the event
•	evaluation of the encounter, both positive and negative
•	Analysis to understand the circumstances
•	Summary of your findings and suggestions for improvement

Make a plan of action for how you would handle such circumstances in the future or consider making any necessary general modifications.
The paradigm is explained in further detail for each level, along with suggested self-reflection questions and examples of how this could seem.
Different levels of Gibbs Reflective Cycle Nursing Australia: Using this concept, an illustration of reflecting more briefly
This is only one type of reflection model. Put it to the test and see how it performs for you. Focus on them if you discover that only a handful of the questions are beneficial to you. However, by considering each step, you are more likely to participate in your learning critically [Online Dissertation Writing Service](https://sourceessay.com/dissertation-thesis-writing-service/dissertation-writing-service/****) .
The example
Gibbs' Reflective cycle is depicted in a circular graphic with its six stages.
Gibbs' cycle of reflection
This model is useful for processing an experience. This could be a one-time occurrence or something you encounter repeatedly, like meetings with a team you need to work with. Although Gibbs initially recommended using it in repetitive situations, [Nursing Dissertation Help](https://sourceessay.com/dissertation-thesis-writing-service/nursing-dissertation-help/) , the stages and principles also hold true for one-time events. If the action plan is created for a standalone event, it may become more general and focus on how you may use your conclusions moving forward.
Description
Here, you have the ability to go into great depth about the circumstance. What happened is the major topic to cover here. Your emotions and judgments will surface later.
•	Good questions to ask:
•	What took place?
•	What time and location did it occur?
•	Who were there?
•	What actions did you and the others take?
•	What happened in the situation?
•	What brought you there?
•	What did you hope would occur?
•	A description example
Our group, which consisted of three other students from our course, and I agreed to divide the various elements amongst us so that we would only have to investigate one component each for an assessed written group-work assignment and [psychology homework help](https://sourceessay.com/the-origin-of-psychology-beginning-to-the-modern-day/). We didn't arrange time to sit down and compose the assignment together since we thought we could just piece it together in the afternoon the day before the deadline. But as soon as we sat down, it became apparent that the portions weren't written in the same manner. In order to turn the assignment into a coherent piece of work, we were forced to rewrite the majority of it.
We had allotted ourselves enough time before the deadline to write our respective sections independently, but we had not budgeted a lot of time to rework in case something went wrong. So that the assignment could be completed in time for the deadline, two members of the group had to cancel their evening commitments.
Sentiments You can discuss any feelings or ideas you had during the event here, as well as how they might have affected it.
I was content and believed we had divided the task between us wisely before we got together and realised, we still had a lot of work to accomplish. I became extremely frustrated when we realised, we couldn't turn in the assignment as is. I had no drive to actually do the reworking because I was confident it would succeed.
Evaluation
Here, you have the option to assess what did and did not work in the circumstance. Be as unbiased and sincere as you can. Focus on both the positive and the negative sides of the incident, even if one or the other was more important, to get the most out of your reflection.
Analysis
You get a chance to make sense of what transpired during the analysis stage. You have been concentrating on the specifics of what took place in the circumstance up to this point. You now have the opportunity to interpret it. You should focus on the various elements that went well or poorly and consider why. This is the obvious location to include scholarly material if you're looking to do so.
Conclusions
You can draw inferences about what transpired in this part. Here, you should highlight the lessons you've learned and how changing your behaviour now could lead to better results down the road. It ought to be a logical continuation of the earlier portions. Students can seek [Online Assignments Help Melbourne](https://sourceessay.com/assignment-help-melbourne/) from SourceEssay experts. 
action programme
This stage involves making plans for what you would do differently in a related or comparable circumstance in the future. It can also be quite beneficial to consider how you can support your own efforts to behave differently, so that you don't just plan what you will do differently but also how you will ensure that it occurs. Sometimes the realisation alone is sufficient, but there are other occasions when reminders could be useful.
Various levels of reflection
You might wish to employ various levels of information depending on the setting in which you are conducting the reflection. The same scenario utilised in the last example is provided here, except much more succinctly.
a succinct illustration of Gibbs Reflective Cycle Nursing:
Describe
We separated aspects of a group project into groups based on each person's areas of strength. We had to spend time revising the homework because it was written in many ways when we tried to piece it together.
Analysis
Work should be divided up based on each person's specific strengths. Belbin's (2010) team duties would imply a similar idea. It appears to work well because I have done it before.
Conclusion
We discovered that it is effective to play to people's strengths. Additionally, it is beneficial to sketch out the look of the task before starting on our own. Last but not least, I'll keep in mind the risks associated with groupthink and what to watch out for. You can avail [Online Assignments Help Brisbane](https://sourceessay.com/university-assignment-help-brisbane/) from SourceEssay.