premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Hanna is automatic. | contradiction |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Kathie is tired. | contradiction |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Barclay is good. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Leonard is not tired. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Leonard is not automatic. | neutral |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Martin is not accurate. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Barclay is not odd. | contradiction |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Hanna is tired. | entailment |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Kilian is automatic. | entailment |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Hanna is not automatic. | entailment |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Kathie is not accurate. | neutral |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Barclay is tired. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Randolph is not accurate. | neutral |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Hanna is good. | contradiction |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Barclay is perfect. | self_contradiction |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Martin is good. | contradiction |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Kathie is not tired. | entailment |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Kathie is not odd. | neutral |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Kathie is odd. | neutral |
Kathie is good.
Martin is not good.
Kilian is not odd.
Leonard is not accurate.
Barclay is accurate.
Hanna is accurate.
Hanna is not perfect.
Leonard is tired.
Leonard is good.
Hanna is not odd.
Martin is accurate.
Barclay is good.Someone is accurate and good if and only if he is perfect.
Kathie is not automatic if and only if Martin is perfect.
Someone being accurate is equivalent to being not good.
If there is nobody who is not automatic, then Randolph is not tired.
If there is someone who is not perfect, then Randolph is tired and Kilian is automatic.
If Kathie is not good, then Martin is automatic, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or accurate is always tired.
If someone is not tired and not perfect, then he is good, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Martin is perfect once knowing that Hanna is not accurate and Martin is not odd.
Barclay is perfect if and only if Martin is not accurate and Barclay is odd.
It can be concluded that Randolph is good once knowing that Kathie is automatic.
Someone is tired and not odd if and only if he is not automatic. | Barclay is odd. | entailment |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Glenn is not cloudy. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Debra is cloudy. | neutral |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Aubrey is cloudy. | neutral |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Glenn is not sensible. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Glenn is disgusted. | contradiction |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Aubrey is not sensible. | contradiction |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Gale is not sincere. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Glenn is sensible. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Debra is sensible. | entailment |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Gale is cloudy. | contradiction |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Garrick is not cool. | neutral |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Sabrina is sincere. | entailment |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Gale is sincere. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Joe is disgusted. | contradiction |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Glenn is purple. | entailment |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Garrick is not disgusted. | neutral |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Sabrina is sensible. | entailment |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Garrick is cloudy. | contradiction |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Glenn is not sincere. | entailment |
Sabrina is sincere.
Gale is sincere.
Joe is purple.
Debra is purple.
Glenn is not cool.
Garrick is sensible.
Joe is not disgusted.
Aubrey is sensible.
Debra is not disgusted.
Garrick is not cloudy.
Glenn is purple.
Sabrina is not cloudy.If someone is both not cool and purple, then he is not sensible.
If someone is not sincere or he is cool, then he is sensible.
If someone is either sincere or cool, then he is not cloudy and sensible.
Debra being sincere is equivalent to Gale being not cloudy and Gale being disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is cloudy or not disgusted, then Glenn is not sincere.
If someone is sincere or he is disgusted, then he is not purple.
Sabrina being cool and Garrick being disgusted imply that Debra is not cloudy.
If Debra is not sincere, then Sabrina is sensible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is purple, then Glenn is not sincere.
If there is at least one people who is not purple, then Gale is not sincere and Glenn is cool.
As long as someone is cool, he is cloudy and not disgusted.
Joe is not cloudy if and only if Aubrey is not disgusted. | Joe is not cool. | neutral |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Janet is confident. | neutral |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Lars is not sufficient. | entailment |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Melody is not plain. | contradiction |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Lars is silly. | entailment |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Chalmers is not plain. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Melody is not tough. | entailment |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Kent is not silly. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Melody is sufficient. | neutral |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Quade is plain. | contradiction |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Quade is silly. | neutral |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Chalmers is plain. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Kent is not tough. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Kent is silly. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Lars is plain. | entailment |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Lars is not tough. | contradiction |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Arvel is not tough. | contradiction |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Chalmers is not generous. | neutral |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Chalmers is tough. | contradiction |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Kent is not confident. | neutral |
Chalmers is not silly.
Janet is sufficient.
Quade is not confident.
Chalmers is not plain.
Lars is confident.
Melody is not tough.
Kent is plain.
Kent is tough.
Kent is not silly.
Arvel is not generous.
Melody is not silly.
Arvel is tough.If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Melody is not tough and Kent is silly.
Someone is plain and tough if and only if he is not sufficient.
It can be concluded that Chalmers is not tough once knowing that Kent is plain and Chalmers is not generous.
If Melody is plain, then Lars is generous.
If someone is not confident, then he is both generous and not plain.
If someone is not silly, then he is both plain and not tough.
If someone is not sufficient or he is not generous, then he is silly.
Kent is not silly if and only if Melody is plain and Lars is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is plain, then Melody is confident and Kent is silly.
Someone who is generous and not sufficient is always plain and confident.
It can be concluded that Janet is plain and Chalmers is not silly once knowing that Janet is sufficient.
It can be concluded that Melody is generous and Lars is not sufficient once knowing that Quade is not silly. | Quade is generous. | entailment |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Braden is not sticky. | contradiction |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Braden is sticky. | entailment |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Alexander is not harsh. | entailment |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Hannah is not sticky. | neutral |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Halden is not harsh. | neutral |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Braden is not harsh. | entailment |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Halden is not teeny. | self_contradiction |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Claudia is selfish. | contradiction |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Channing is not round. | contradiction |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Channing is not selfish. | neutral |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Braden is round. | self_contradiction |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Braden is terrible. | entailment |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Alexander is round. | neutral |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Halden is not terrible. | contradiction |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Channing is harsh. | contradiction |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Alexander is not terrible. | entailment |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Braden is teeny. | self_contradiction |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Halden is teeny. | self_contradiction |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Channing is terrible. | neutral |
Claudia is not selfish.
Halden is terrible.
Braden is not harsh.
Halden is not selfish.
Channing is round.
Channing is not harsh.
Braden is not teeny.
Olin is not terrible.
Hannah is not round.
Channing is teeny.
Claudia is not terrible.
Alexander is not harsh.If someone is not teeny, then he is round.
Hannah being selfish is equivalent to Hannah being not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is either not sticky or not teeny, then Olin is terrible and Halden is selfish.
Someone being both round and sticky is equivalent to being terrible and teeny.
If there is someone who is both terrible and round, then Braden is selfish.
Someone is sticky and not round if and only if he is not teeny.
If someone is both selfish and not round, then he is not teeny.
If there is at least one people who is harsh or not teeny, then Alexander is not terrible.
Channing being terrible and Halden being selfish imply that Braden is not round.
Someone is not selfish if and only if he is not teeny.
It can be concluded that Halden is not selfish once knowing that Alexander is harsh and Olin is not terrible.
It can be concluded that Claudia is round and Hannah is not terrible once knowing that Channing is sticky and Hannah is harsh. | Braden is selfish. | self_contradiction |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Melody is evil. | self_contradiction |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Brooke is dusty. | entailment |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Gilbert is misty. | entailment |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Stella is not evil. | self_contradiction |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Gilbert is dusty. | entailment |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Ashley is not elated. | self_contradiction |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Jeremiah is not misty. | contradiction |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Jeremiah is solid. | contradiction |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Brooke is not misty. | contradiction |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Danna is not expensive. | neutral |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Jeremiah is misty. | entailment |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Danna is elated. | neutral |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Gilbert is not elated. | contradiction |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Gilbert is not solid. | neutral |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Melody is misty. | entailment |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Ashley is elated. | self_contradiction |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Stella is expensive. | neutral |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Brooke is expensive. | contradiction |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Stella is evil. | self_contradiction |
Stella is not evil.
Stella is not misty.
Melody is not evil.
Stella is dusty.
Jeremiah is not solid.
Danna is evil.
Ashley is not expensive.
Jeremiah is not dusty.
Ashley is elated.
Danna is solid.
Gilbert is not evil.
Brooke is not solid.Stella being not evil implies that Danna is not dusty and Melody is not expensive.
If someone is solid, then he is not misty.
Melody being solid or Melody being not expensive implies that Ashley is not evil.
If there is at least one people who is both not evil and dusty, then Melody is not misty.
Brooke being not solid and Brooke being not dusty imply that Stella is elated.
If there is someone who is both not misty and elated, then Stella is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is misty, then Brooke is evil and Danna is solid.
It can be concluded that Ashley is not elated and Brooke is not expensive once knowing that Stella is dusty.
As long as someone is not evil, he is dusty and elated.
If someone who is not evil is also expensive, then he is not dusty.
Someone is misty and evil if and only if he is elated.
As long as someone is not solid, he is not evil and misty. | Melody is solid. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.