premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Albert is wet. | neutral |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Jessie is not terrible. | neutral |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Dave is environmental. | contradiction |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Brian is not glorious. | entailment |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Brian is not wet. | contradiction |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Brian is glorious. | contradiction |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Kirby is not friendly. | contradiction |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Leith is not wet. | entailment |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Dave is not terrible. | entailment |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Baldwin is glorious. | neutral |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Leith is friendly. | entailment |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Albert is not environmental. | neutral |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Leith is terrible. | self_contradiction |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Kirby is successful. | self_contradiction |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Dave is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Kirby is wet. | entailment |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Leith is not terrible. | self_contradiction |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Kirby is not successful. | self_contradiction |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Baldwin is not terrible. | contradiction |
Dave is not friendly.
Kirby is glorious.
Baldwin is not successful.
Leith is terrible.
Kirby is not environmental.
Kirby is successful.
Baldwin is not environmental.
Dave is wet.
Brian is not glorious.
Brian is not successful.
Albert is not friendly.
Kirby is wet.If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Kirby is not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Dave is not terrible and Leith is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Leith is not terrible and Kirby is not successful.
All not glorious people are wet.
If someone is both friendly and not glorious, then he is successful.
If Baldwin is not successful, then Leith is glorious and Leith is not wet, and vice versa.
Someone being both friendly and not terrible is equivalent to being glorious.
If there is someone who is either not terrible or glorious, then Leith is not wet.
Someone who is not terrible is always both glorious and not environmental.
If someone is successful or environmental, then he is wet.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Leith is glorious.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Baldwin is terrible. | Jessie is not wet. | neutral |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Percival is not panicky. | self_contradiction |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Isaiah is strange. | neutral |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Barclay is hilarious. | contradiction |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Barclay is expensive. | entailment |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Marion is not hilarious. | entailment |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Percival is not hilarious. | entailment |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Otis is strange. | neutral |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Percival is not strange. | contradiction |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Barclay is not hilarious. | entailment |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Otis is not strange. | neutral |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Helena is not distracted. | contradiction |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Baldwin is not expensive. | contradiction |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Marion is panicky. | self_contradiction |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Percival is expensive. | entailment |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Marion is not dangerous. | neutral |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Marion is not panicky. | self_contradiction |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Helena is not strange. | contradiction |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Otis is panicky. | self_contradiction |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Otis is not panicky. | self_contradiction |
Percival is panicky.
Baldwin is distracted.
Helena is not expensive.
Helena is strange.
Barclay is not panicky.
Marion is strange.
Otis is distracted.
Percival is strange.
Percival is not distracted.
Helena is not dangerous.
Otis is panicky.
Baldwin is strange.Otis being not dangerous implies that Otis is not distracted and Barclay is not expensive.
Someone who is both dangerous and not hilarious is always not panicky.
As long as someone is panicky, he is not hilarious and expensive.
Helena being expensive is equivalent to Isaiah being hilarious and Marion being strange.
Otis is expensive if and only if Marion is panicky and Otis is dangerous.
Someone who is dangerous is always not panicky.
Someone who is eithor not hilarious or strange is always expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not dangerous, then Helena is expensive.
If there is someone who is strange, then Isaiah is not panicky.
If there is at least one people who is both not distracted and panicky, then Percival is not hilarious.
Someone being not panicky is equivalent to being not hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is dangerous or hilarious, then Helena is distracted. | Isaiah is not dangerous. | neutral |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Sidney is not excited. | self_contradiction |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Sidney is critical. | neutral |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Sidney is not critical. | neutral |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Quinn is logical. | contradiction |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Silvia is not warm-hearted. | self_contradiction |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Quinn is not dizzy. | neutral |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Sidney is warm-hearted. | self_contradiction |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Silvia is dizzy. | self_contradiction |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Sidney is ugly. | neutral |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Stanley is not excited. | entailment |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Sidney is not warm-hearted. | self_contradiction |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Quinn is ugly. | entailment |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Quinn is warm-hearted. | contradiction |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Alston is dizzy. | entailment |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Quinn is not logical. | entailment |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Stanley is not logical. | contradiction |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Silvia is excited. | contradiction |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Hunter is critical. | contradiction |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Stanley is logical. | entailment |
Alston is dizzy.
Quinn is ugly.
Stanley is not critical.
Silvia is ugly.
Sidney is excited.
Sidney is warm-hearted.
Silvia is not dizzy.
Hunter is not critical.
Quinn is not excited.
Quinn is not warm-hearted.
Carlos is excited.
Sidney is not dizzy.If there is at least one people who is both ugly and logical, then Silvia is dizzy.
If there is someone who is not logical, then Quinn is ugly.
Someone who is dizzy or logical is always not excited and not warm-hearted.
If someone is both not excited and critical, then he is ugly.
If someone is warm-hearted, then he is not dizzy, and vice versa.
If someone is dizzy and not ugly, then he is both not warm-hearted and logical, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and not critical, then Quinn is not logical.
Stanley being excited and Quinn being ugly imply that Silvia is not logical.
Carlos being warm-hearted implies that Silvia is not dizzy.
If there is someone who is either not logical or dizzy, then Stanley is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Alston is ugly and Stanley is critical once knowing that Hunter is not logical.
If someone is warm-hearted or he is not ugly, then he is dizzy. | Alston is not logical. | neutral |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Morris is not dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Quinn is popular. | neutral |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Quinn is dangerous. | entailment |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Morris is dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Hunter is not massive. | entailment |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Laurence is not lonely. | contradiction |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Morris is practical. | self_contradiction |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Timothy is lonely. | entailment |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Quinn is not dangerous. | contradiction |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Hubert is dangerous. | contradiction |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Stewart is popular. | entailment |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Timothy is cool. | self_contradiction |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Quinn is lonely. | neutral |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Stewart is not cool. | entailment |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Timothy is practical. | neutral |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Hubert is massive. | contradiction |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Stewart is not popular. | contradiction |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Timothy is not cool. | self_contradiction |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Laurence is not practical. | neutral |
Timothy is lonely.
Stewart is not lonely.
Timothy is not dangerous.
Hunter is not massive.
Quinn is practical.
Laurence is lonely.
Morris is not cool.
Stewart is massive.
Hunter is not practical.
Timothy is not cool.
Hubert is not dangerous.
Morris is dangerous.If someone is both not dangerous and lonely, then he is cool.
It can be concluded that Hubert is popular once knowing that Morris is not practical.
Hubert being cool or Hunter being not massive implies that Timothy is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Morris is practical and Hubert is not massive.
If there is someone who is either popular or practical, then Morris is massive.
Quinn being practical or Quinn being popular implies that Hubert is cool.
Someone is not practical and not dangerous if and only if he is massive.
If there is someone who is either not cool or not massive, then Morris is popular and Quinn is dangerous.
Stewart being practical implies that Hunter is lonely and Stewart is massive.
If someone is not cool and popular, then he is both massive and not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is popular or not lonely, then Morris is cool.
If there is someone who is both dangerous and practical, then Hunter is popular. | Laurence is cool. | neutral |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Stefan is not useful. | neutral |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Marshall is not magnificent. | contradiction |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Ian is magnificent. | self_contradiction |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Ian is obedient. | self_contradiction |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Ian is not useful. | self_contradiction |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Stefan is not impossible. | neutral |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Bowen is not sexual. | contradiction |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Marshall is magnificent. | entailment |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Marshall is not panicky. | entailment |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Alexander is obedient. | self_contradiction |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Martin is not obedient. | contradiction |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Martin is obedient. | entailment |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Ian is not magnificent. | self_contradiction |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Bowen is useful. | entailment |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Ian is panicky. | contradiction |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Ian is sexual. | contradiction |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Alexander is not panicky. | entailment |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Stefan is panicky. | neutral |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Stefan is obedient. | neutral |
Marshall is obedient.
Alexander is not impossible.
Alexander is not obedient.
Bowen is sexual.
Marshall is magnificent.
Marshall is sexual.
Martin is not sexual.
Marshall is not panicky.
Ian is obedient.
Alexander is not sexual.
Martin is magnificent.
Bowen is impossible.If someone is not magnificent and not obedient, then he is useful and impossible.
If there is at least one people who is obedient or not magnificent, then Stefan is sexual.
If there is nobody who is not magnificent, then Martin is not impossible.
Martin being not obedient implies that Alexander is magnificent.
If there is someone who is obedient, then Ian is impossible and Ian is not magnificent.
Bowen being useful is equivalent to Stefan being sexual.
It can be concluded that Marshall is not impossible once knowing that Marshall is panicky and Bowen is not useful.
Bowen being panicky and Alexander being useful imply that Marshall is magnificent and Stefan is sexual.
If someone is obedient and not panicky, then he is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone is not sexual and not useful if and only if he is obedient.
Someone is magnificent if and only if he is not panicky.
If there is someone who is sexual, then Ian is not obedient and Alexander is magnificent. | Stephen is useful. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.