premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | John is not famous. | neutral |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Kendall is jealous. | contradiction |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Kendall is not comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Kendall is not famous. | contradiction |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Brian is ugly. | entailment |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Brian is environmental. | entailment |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Kendall is comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Isabel is jealous. | neutral |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Lars is jealous. | neutral |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | John is famous. | neutral |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Uriah is famous. | self_contradiction |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Uriah is terrible. | self_contradiction |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Melville is environmental. | neutral |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Isabel is environmental. | entailment |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Uriah is jealous. | contradiction |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Kendall is ugly. | entailment |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | John is not jealous. | contradiction |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Lars is not comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Melville is not comprehensive. | contradiction |
Uriah is not jealous.
John is environmental.
Uriah is not famous.
Melville is terrible.
Lars is ugly.
Kendall is not jealous.
Brian is not jealous.
Isabel is environmental.
Isabel is not ugly.
Lars is not comprehensive.
Brian is environmental.
Brian is not comprehensive.If someone is not jealous, then he is both not comprehensive and famous.
If all people are not environmental, then Brian is comprehensive.
Someone who is famous is always both not terrible and comprehensive.
If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Lars is famous and Lars is comprehensive.
Someone who is both not terrible and not jealous is always environmental.
If there is someone who is famous, then John is jealous and Kendall is not comprehensive.
Someone is terrible and ugly if and only if he is comprehensive and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is environmental, then Melville is comprehensive.
It can be concluded that Lars is not comprehensive once knowing that Uriah is ugly and Melville is jealous.
Isabel being terrible implies that Uriah is not comprehensive.
Isabel being not jealous or John being not terrible implies that Lars is not famous.
Kendall being ugly is equivalent to Kendall being famous. | Uriah is not jealous. | entailment |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Sandy is sufficient. | entailment |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Alfie is not good-tempered. | entailment |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Conan is not interesting. | contradiction |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Conan is interesting. | entailment |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Amery is not scary. | self_contradiction |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Joshua is good-tempered. | self_contradiction |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Alfie is not adventurous. | neutral |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Joshua is not good-tempered. | self_contradiction |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Sandy is adventurous. | entailment |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Ives is not interesting. | neutral |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Amery is not puny. | contradiction |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Graham is sufficient. | contradiction |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Conan is puny. | self_contradiction |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Graham is interesting. | neutral |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Joshua is puny. | entailment |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Alfie is not scary. | contradiction |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Amery is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Sandy is not good-tempered. | self_contradiction |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Ives is not puny. | neutral |
Conan is interesting.
Sandy is sufficient.
Amery is adventurous.
Amery is not scary.
Graham is not sufficient.
Conan is not good-tempered.
Joshua is interesting.
Sandy is adventurous.
Conan is not scary.
Alfie is scary.
Joshua is puny.
Conan is puny.Someone who is both scary and not sufficient is always puny.
If someone who is not interesting is also not sufficient, then he is not good-tempered.
If someone is both sufficient and scary, then he is puny.
Someone who is adventurous is always both sufficient and scary.
Someone who is interesting is always not scary.
If there is someone who is not scary, then Joshua is not good-tempered.
Alfie is not good-tempered if and only if Joshua is not adventurous and Conan is not puny.
Someone who is puny is always good-tempered.
If Alfie is sufficient and Conan is not scary, then Joshua is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is puny or not interesting, then Amery is not good-tempered.
Someone who is scary is always not good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is not interesting or scary, then Conan is not adventurous. | Conan is sufficient. | neutral |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Anabelle is bloody. | self_contradiction |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Bethany is not healthy. | neutral |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Otis is not healthy. | contradiction |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Bruno is bloody. | self_contradiction |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Stuart is traditional. | neutral |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Otis is weak. | contradiction |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Stuart is not bloody. | neutral |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Mark is not weak. | entailment |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Stuart is not crazy. | entailment |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Anabelle is crazy. | entailment |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Shelley is not crazy. | neutral |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Mark is bloody. | contradiction |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Anabelle is not bloody. | self_contradiction |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Stuart is crazy. | contradiction |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Mark is traditional. | entailment |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Anabelle is not ugly. | entailment |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Bruno is not bloody. | self_contradiction |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Anabelle is healthy. | neutral |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Bruno is not ugly. | self_contradiction |
Bruno is bloody.
Otis is healthy.
Mark is not bloody.
Mark is healthy.
Bruno is weak.
Stuart is not crazy.
Mark is not crazy.
Otis is not crazy.
Bruno is crazy.
Anabelle is bloody.
Bruno is ugly.
Mark is traditional.All bloody people are crazy.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not healthy once knowing that Otis is not weak and Bethany is not ugly.
If someone is crazy or he is bloody, then he is not weak.
If someone is crazy and not weak, then he is both not bloody and not ugly, and vice versa.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and traditional, then Shelley is not bloody and Stuart is healthy.
If someone is both not ugly and not traditional, then he is not healthy.
If Stuart is not healthy and Bethany is not traditional, then Bethany is bloody.
If someone is both not bloody and not ugly, then he is not weak.
If someone is healthy, then he is both not weak and not bloody.
Someone who is not healthy is always not ugly.
If Shelley is not ugly, then Anabelle is bloody, and vice versa.
If someone who is not weak is also healthy, then he is not crazy. | Otis is crazy. | contradiction |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Lloyd is not placid. | contradiction |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Bruno is lively. | self_contradiction |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Bruno is breakable. | contradiction |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Marcus is not electronic. | contradiction |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Shamus is not lively. | self_contradiction |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Bruno is not breakable. | entailment |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Lloyd is placid. | entailment |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Connell is lively. | self_contradiction |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Connell is cloudy. | self_contradiction |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Connell is placid. | entailment |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Connell is electronic. | contradiction |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Connell is not cloudy. | self_contradiction |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Marcus is electronic. | entailment |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Clive is not electronic. | contradiction |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Tracey is not placid. | neutral |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Shamus is breakable. | neutral |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Marcus is not cloudy. | neutral |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Clive is not cloudy. | entailment |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Shamus is not breakable. | neutral |
Connell is not cloudy.
Clive is not cloudy.
Marcus is electronic.
Shamus is cloudy.
Lloyd is not lively.
Connell is not electronic.
Shamus is not lively.
Bruno is not breakable.
Bruno is not electronic.
Tracey is cloudy.
Lloyd is breakable.
Clive is electronic.If Shamus is electronic, then Connell is not placid.
If someone is not breakable, then he is both not lively and lively.
As long as someone is electronic and not lively, he is not cloudy and not placid.
If someone is both not cloudy and not electronic, then he is not lively.
If someone who is cloudy is also not breakable, then he is not lively.
If someone is lively, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If everyone is not lively, then Connell is not cloudy and Connell is not electronic.
If someone is not breakable or not lively, then he is placid.
It can be concluded that Bruno is not breakable and Tracey is not cloudy once knowing that Shamus is electronic.
It can be concluded that Connell is cloudy once knowing that Shamus is lively and Connell is placid.
Someone is not placid and not lively if and only if he is cloudy and breakable.
If Tracey is lively, then Connell is cloudy. | Marcus is lively. | neutral |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Griswald is self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Gloria is comprehensive. | entailment |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Mila is wooden. | contradiction |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Mila is impartial. | contradiction |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Grant is not afraid. | neutral |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Halden is comprehensive. | entailment |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Mila is comprehensive. | neutral |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Halden is not impartial. | contradiction |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Grant is yellow. | neutral |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Gloria is self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Mila is afraid. | contradiction |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Halden is self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Griswald is not wooden. | neutral |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Halden is impartial. | entailment |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Stephen is not yellow. | entailment |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Griswald is not self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Halden is not wooden. | entailment |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Stephen is self-disciplined. | contradiction |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Gloria is not self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Griswald is not comprehensive.
Mila is not impartial.
Stephen is not self-disciplined.
Halden is not yellow.
Mila is not afraid.
Mila is not wooden.
Griswald is afraid.
Halden is not wooden.
Halden is impartial.
Gloria is not yellow.
Grant is not wooden.
Griswald is not yellow.If someone is self-disciplined, then he is impartial, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Stephen is not yellow once knowing that Kim is wooden or Kim is impartial.
Grant is yellow if and only if Grant is not afraid.
Someone is self-disciplined and yellow if and only if he is not impartial and wooden.
All not comprehensive people are self-disciplined.
If Griswald is yellow, then Stephen is impartial and Grant is afraid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Halden is afraid and Gloria is self-disciplined.
Mila being not yellow and Kim being not afraid imply that Kim is not comprehensive.
If someone is not yellow, then he is not self-disciplined, and vice versa.
If someone is impartial and self-disciplined, then he is comprehensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always not afraid.
If there is someone who is both not impartial and comprehensive, then Stephen is wooden. | Kim is not yellow. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.