premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Colin is tender. | self_contradiction |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Debra is not smart. | entailment |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Caleb is smart. | self_contradiction |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Colin is not tender. | self_contradiction |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Leonard is unpleasant. | entailment |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Colin is not unpleasant. | contradiction |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Coleman is not smart. | contradiction |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Colin is not expensive. | contradiction |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Caleb is tender. | self_contradiction |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Coleman is not expensive. | neutral |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Travis is desperate. | neutral |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Debra is not tender. | neutral |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Leonard is not expensive. | contradiction |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Travis is unpleasant. | entailment |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Leonard is not tender. | entailment |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Isabel is not expensive. | neutral |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Colin is smart. | entailment |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Isabel is smart. | neutral |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Caleb is unpleasant. | self_contradiction |
Caleb is not unpleasant.
Travis is not expensive.
Coleman is not tender.
Colin is not plain.
Caleb is tender.
Leonard is expensive.
Caleb is smart.
Leonard is not desperate.
Travis is unpleasant.
Debra is not smart.
Leonard is unpleasant.
Colin is expensive.If there is at least one people who is both not tender and smart, then Colin is unpleasant.
If someone is smart, then he is not tender, and vice versa.
If Travis is plain, then Caleb is expensive, and vice versa.
Someone who is tender is always both not desperate and expensive.
If someone is plain or he is not unpleasant, then he is not smart.
If Colin is not unpleasant, then Colin is desperate and Caleb is plain.
If someone is smart and not expensive, then he is desperate, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not unpleasant or expensive is always not tender.
If there is someone who is both plain and tender, then Colin is not unpleasant and Colin is not desperate.
All not plain people are expensive.
Isabel being expensive or Caleb being not smart implies that Colin is tender.
Someone is unpleasant and not plain if and only if he is expensive and tender. | Colin is plain. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Dave is helpful. | entailment |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Burton is helpless. | neutral |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Dave is not helpless. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Burton is not right. | neutral |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Alastair is helpless. | entailment |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Alastair is cheeky. | neutral |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Braden is not tame. | neutral |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Dave is cheeky. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Gabriel is tame. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Dave is not tame. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Gabriel is not tame. | entailment |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Dave is not weary. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Kimberly is weary. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Alastair is not helpless. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Braden is weary. | entailment |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Dave is not cheeky. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Kimberly is not cheeky. | entailment |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Dave is right. | contradiction |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Dave is tame. | self_contradiction |
Kimberly is not cheeky.
Dave is helpful.
Dave is weary.
Hanna is not helpless.
Gabriel is not helpful.
Alastair is tame.
Dave is cheeky.
Hanna is not cheeky.
Braden is weary.
Alastair is helpless.
Kimberly is weary.
Dave is tame.If someone is helpful or he is not right, then he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is not cheeky or not tame, then Kimberly is not weary.
If there is someone who is not weary, then Gabriel is not tame.
If there is someone who is both cheeky and not tame, then Kimberly is right.
If someone is cheeky or not right, then he is weary.
If there is at least one people who is both tame and not helpful, then Dave is helpless.
Someone being both tame and not cheeky is equivalent to being not right and helpful.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is helpful once knowing that Kimberly is cheeky.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is right and Alastair is not helpful once knowing that Braden is tame.
If someone is both not helpless and cheeky, then he is not tame.
It can be concluded that Alastair is right once knowing that Braden is not tame.
If someone is helpless and not right, then he is not tame, and vice versa. | Hanna is helpful. | neutral |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Stephen is not selfish. | self_contradiction |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Hubert is not adorable. | entailment |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Stephen is skinny. | neutral |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Hubert is not skinny. | contradiction |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Vera is skinny. | entailment |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Ashley is cooperative. | entailment |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Leith is skinny. | neutral |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Hunter is adorable. | neutral |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Ashley is adorable. | self_contradiction |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Leith is cooperative. | contradiction |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Vera is not skinny. | contradiction |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Ashley is not skinny. | self_contradiction |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Ashley is curious. | entailment |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Leith is not selfish. | contradiction |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Hadwin is not skinny. | neutral |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Ashley is not adorable. | self_contradiction |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Vera is adorable. | contradiction |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Hunter is cooperative. | neutral |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Vera is not curious. | entailment |
Stephen is selfish.
Stephen is not cooperative.
Vera is skinny.
Ashley is skinny.
Vera is not alive.
Hubert is cooperative.
Hubert is not adorable.
Leith is not alive.
Ashley is curious.
Vera is not cooperative.
Ashley is alive.
Leith is not curious.If there is someone who is both not curious and selfish, then Ashley is not skinny.
If someone is either curious or skinny, then he is selfish and cooperative.
As long as someone is adorable, he is selfish and not skinny.
If someone is not cooperative and selfish, then he is not curious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is curious, then Hadwin is alive and Ashley is adorable.
Vera being not curious implies that Hubert is cooperative.
Vera is not selfish if and only if Hadwin is adorable.
If there is someone who is either not alive or cooperative, then Stephen is not selfish and Stephen is not curious.
Hadwin being selfish implies that Stephen is not curious and Stephen is skinny.
Hubert being not curious and Leith being cooperative imply that Leith is not selfish.
Someone is skinny if and only if he is not adorable.
Stephen is skinny if and only if Stephen is not curious and Ashley is not selfish. | Vera is not cooperative. | self_contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Trent is not nice. | entailment |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Chapman is not misty. | self_contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Trent is not concerned. | contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Trent is misty. | entailment |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Chapman is nice. | neutral |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Trent is not misty. | contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Joe is not nice. | contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Halden is not untidy. | neutral |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Chapman is concerned. | contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Rick is misty. | entailment |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Harvey is not misty. | self_contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Harvey is not nice. | contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Harvey is not victorious. | neutral |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Rick is not confident. | self_contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Joe is confident. | entailment |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Harvey is not concerned. | self_contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Rick is concerned. | entailment |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Trent is confident. | neutral |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Rick is confident. | self_contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Marion is not untidy.
Rick is misty.
Trent is concerned.
Harvey is nice.
Rick is not confident.
Joe is not victorious.
Harvey is concerned.
Joe is confident.
Chapman is not concerned.
Harvey is untidy.
Halden is victorious.If there is at least one people who is both not confident and not concerned, then Trent is not nice.
Someone is not victorious and confident if and only if he is nice and not untidy.
It can be concluded that Halden is untidy and Marion is not confident once knowing that Marion is concerned.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Harvey is not misty and Halden is not confident.
If there is someone who is not confident, then Trent is misty.
Rick being not nice implies that Halden is not misty and Trent is not victorious.
If Chapman is victorious and Chapman is not concerned, then Joe is not nice and Joe is not confident.
Someone being both nice and concerned is equivalent to being confident.
If there is at least one people who is nice or victorious, then Rick is confident.
If someone is not confident or he is not concerned, then he is misty.
Someone being both untidy and not misty is equivalent to being not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both concerned and not nice, then Chapman is victorious. | Halden is nice. | neutral |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Cuthbert is difficult. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Cuthbert is condemned. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Cuthbert is not condemned. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Percival is not serious. | neutral |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Percival is not condemned. | contradiction |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Neville is condemned. | entailment |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Percival is difficult. | contradiction |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Kurt is odd. | neutral |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Quimby is not condemned. | entailment |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Cuthbert is not disgusted. | contradiction |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Cuthbert is interesting. | contradiction |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Alexia is not condemned. | neutral |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Quimby is not odd. | neutral |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Neville is interesting. | neutral |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Kurt is disgusted. | entailment |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Hadley is not disgusted. | entailment |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Cuthbert is serious. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Neville is difficult. | contradiction |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Cuthbert is not odd. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is not difficult.
Alexia is not serious.
Kurt is disgusted.
Neville is condemned.
Alexia is not difficult.
Neville is disgusted.
Cuthbert is odd.
Quimby is not condemned.
Hadley is not disgusted.
Cuthbert is difficult.
Cuthbert is not serious.
Percival is condemned.Alexia is not odd if and only if Alexia is condemned and Cuthbert is interesting.
If there is at least one people who is odd, then Kurt is serious and Neville is disgusted.
If someone is odd, then he is condemned.
Someone who is both not difficult and not interesting is always not odd.
If someone is not serious or he is condemned, then he is not difficult.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not interesting once knowing that Hadley is serious and Kurt is disgusted.
It can be concluded that Neville is difficult and Hadley is not odd once knowing that Quimby is not serious.
Neville being difficult is equivalent to Hadley being not interesting.
If someone is serious and disgusted, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
If someone who is not odd is also not difficult, then he is not condemned.
If someone is not odd and disgusted, then he is both not interesting and condemned, and vice versa.
As long as someone is odd, he is difficult and not interesting. | Alexia is not serious. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.