premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Kingsley is not disgusted. | entailment |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Kingsley is adventurous. | entailment |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Ryan is traditional. | contradiction |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Garrick is not disgusted. | neutral |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Ryan is outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Carolina is neat. | contradiction |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | John is crazy. | neutral |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Kingsley is neat. | neutral |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Carolina is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Ryan is disgusted. | contradiction |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Kingsley is outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Alston is not outstanding. | entailment |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Kingsley is not crazy. | self_contradiction |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Alston is not adventurous. | entailment |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Alston is disgusted. | neutral |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Ryan is not traditional. | entailment |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Ryan is crazy. | self_contradiction |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | John is not outstanding. | neutral |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Carolina is disgusted. | contradiction |
Ryan is not neat.
Carolina is not neat.
Kingsley is not disgusted.
Ryan is crazy.
John is not neat.
Alston is not adventurous.
Garrick is not outstanding.
Kingsley is not crazy.
Ryan is outstanding.
Carolina is not disgusted.
Kingsley is not traditional.
Alston is not outstanding.If there is someone who is either not crazy or disgusted, then Carolina is traditional and Carolina is adventurous.
Someone who is not traditional or not crazy is always not outstanding and adventurous.
As long as someone is outstanding, he is crazy and adventurous.
If there is someone who is either not adventurous or neat, then Ryan is not crazy.
If someone is traditional, then he is both not outstanding and not neat.
It can be concluded that Carolina is not traditional once knowing that John is not adventurous.
It can be concluded that Alston is not traditional and John is outstanding once knowing that Garrick is adventurous.
If someone is not disgusted, then he is not traditional, and vice versa.
Someone who is traditional is always not outstanding.
James being not neat is equivalent to Alston being not outstanding and Kingsley being traditional.
If someone is neat or he is crazy, then he is not disgusted.
Someone is outstanding if and only if he is not disgusted. | Kingsley is not outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Connell is homely. | entailment |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Gideon is beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Hunter is not beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Beverly is not beautiful. | contradiction |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Keegan is not homely. | contradiction |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Hunter is not lonely. | entailment |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Gideon is not lonely. | self_contradiction |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Sidney is homely. | entailment |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Connell is not self-disciplined. | entailment |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Grayson is not guilty. | neutral |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Gideon is lonely. | self_contradiction |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Keegan is not lonely. | entailment |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Hunter is lonely. | contradiction |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Grayson is lonely. | neutral |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Beverly is guilty. | neutral |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Beverly is existing. | neutral |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Gideon is not existing. | contradiction |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Keegan is not beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Beverly is not guilty. | neutral |
Sidney is homely.
Grayson is homely.
Hunter is not homely.
Hunter is not beautiful.
Gideon is beautiful.
Connell is lonely.
Keegan is existing.
Sidney is self-disciplined.
Hunter is not guilty.
Gideon is lonely.
Grayson is beautiful.
Beverly is not self-disciplined.Someone being existing is equivalent to being not beautiful.
It can be concluded that Keegan is homely once knowing that Keegan is not lonely.
Beverly is not existing if and only if Gideon is not homely.
Connell being lonely and Grayson being not homely imply that Hunter is not self-disciplined.
Sidney being self-disciplined or Hunter being not lonely implies that Gideon is homely.
Someone who is not beautiful is always not lonely.
Someone being beautiful is equivalent to being not self-disciplined.
Beverly is not self-disciplined if and only if Hunter is not homely.
As long as someone is existing, he is not beautiful and not self-disciplined.
If there is nobody who is not not beautiful, then Keegan is not self-disciplined and Grayson is lonely.
If there is someone who is not beautiful, then Gideon is guilty and Grayson is homely.
As long as someone is lonely, he is homely and not beautiful. | Connell is not existing. | contradiction |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Carl is elegant. | self_contradiction |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Isabel is terrible. | contradiction |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Matthew is not similar. | entailment |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Isaiah is humble. | self_contradiction |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Isaiah is elegant. | contradiction |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Isaiah is not fresh. | neutral |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Carl is similar. | neutral |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Matthew is not discreet. | contradiction |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Aubrey is discreet. | neutral |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Matthew is not elegant. | neutral |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Isaiah is not humble. | self_contradiction |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Aubrey is not fresh. | neutral |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Shawn is elegant. | self_contradiction |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Carl is not humble. | contradiction |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Matthew is similar. | contradiction |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Isaiah is similar. | entailment |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Carl is not discreet. | entailment |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Shawn is not elegant. | self_contradiction |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Isabel is not humble. | entailment |
Carl is not discreet.
Isabel is not humble.
Shawn is not elegant.
Carl is humble.
Isaiah is not elegant.
Shawn is terrible.
Isaiah is not humble.
Carl is not terrible.
Isabel is not terrible.
Shawn is discreet.
Matthew is discreet.
Hector is not terrible.Hector being not humble is equivalent to Carl being similar.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Isaiah is not discreet and Hector is terrible.
If Shawn is not discreet or Isaiah is similar, then Carl is elegant.
If Isaiah is fresh or Isabel is not humble, then Carl is not elegant.
If there is someone who is not fresh, then Aubrey is similar.
Aubrey is terrible and Carl is not humble if and only if Matthew is elegant and Carl is not fresh.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Isaiah is similar and Hector is not terrible.
Someone who is not elegant is always humble.
Someone is not similar and not humble if and only if he is not fresh and discreet.
Someone being elegant is equivalent to being terrible.
If there is at least one people who is elegant, then Matthew is not similar and Isabel is fresh.
Shawn being not similar implies that Hector is not fresh. | Hector is elegant. | entailment |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Robert is not better. | neutral |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Adrian is not friendly. | entailment |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Carter is not friendly. | entailment |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Carter is wild. | entailment |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Dave is better. | neutral |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Clark is not wild. | contradiction |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Dave is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Adrian is friendly. | contradiction |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Olin is not friendly. | contradiction |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Robert is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Lionel is better. | neutral |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Dave is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Robert is not frail. | neutral |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Carter is not better. | self_contradiction |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Dave is not better. | neutral |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Olin is not frail. | contradiction |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Robert is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Dave is self-disciplined. | contradiction |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Olin is friendly. | entailment |
Olin is frail.
Dave is friendly.
Olin is friendly.
Robert is friendly.
Carter is wild.
Carter is not better.
Adrian is not better.
Clark is wild.
Carter is not friendly.
Dave is not frail.
Robert is not self-disciplined.
Adrian is not friendly.If Olin is wild or Olin is not self-disciplined, then Clark is not better.
It can be concluded that Robert is frail and Olin is not self-disciplined once knowing that Olin is wild and Lionel is not friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not friendly, then Clark is wild and Carter is better.
If Robert is not frail and Adrian is better, then Dave is not self-disciplined and Lionel is not wild, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Robert is better once knowing that Carter is friendly and Lionel is not rude.
All not self-disciplined people are not friendly.
Someone who is not better is always wild.
Someone who is both self-disciplined and not wild is always not better.
All not frail people are not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is not rude, then Dave is not friendly.
If Dave is frail and Robert is wild, then Adrian is not friendly.
Dave being not wild implies that Adrian is not better. | Dave is not frail. | entailment |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Shamus is practical. | neutral |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Ricardo is not large. | self_contradiction |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Roy is large. | self_contradiction |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Rex is not wooden. | self_contradiction |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Heath is helpful. | entailment |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Ricardo is not light. | contradiction |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Roy is practical. | entailment |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Roy is wooden. | contradiction |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Ricardo is large. | self_contradiction |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Louis is light. | neutral |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Alice is not placid. | contradiction |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Alice is large. | entailment |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Ricardo is wooden. | contradiction |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Louis is wooden. | neutral |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Ricardo is not placid. | contradiction |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Rex is practical. | neutral |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Louis is helpful. | neutral |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Ricardo is placid. | entailment |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Louis is large. | entailment |
Heath is not wooden.
Ricardo is placid.
Rex is wooden.
Ricardo is not large.
Shamus is light.
Alice is large.
Ricardo is practical.
Alice is not wooden.
Louis is large.
Shamus is wooden.
Roy is not large.
Roy is practical.If all people are practical or wooden, then Roy is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Heath is large and Roy is placid.
If there is at least one people who is either not practical or wooden, then Alice is helpful and Heath is light.
Someone being practical is equivalent to being large.
If Roy is not light, then Alice is wooden and Rex is not placid.
Ricardo being not wooden and Heath being not helpful imply that Shamus is not light.
Rex is not large if and only if Rex is light and Alice is not wooden.
Someone is placid and light if and only if he is not large.
All light people are not wooden.
Someone who is both not wooden and large is always helpful.
Someone who is eithor not placid or wooden is always not large.
If someone is not wooden, then he is placid. | Roy is not large. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.