premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Chalmers is not federal. | contradiction |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Martin is existing. | entailment |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Miranda is federal. | contradiction |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Miranda is not existing. | neutral |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Martin is encouraging. | entailment |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Trent is frightened. | neutral |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Chalmers is not frightened. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Lee is existing. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Joshua is administrative. | neutral |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Martin is not wooden. | entailment |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Martin is frightened. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Leonard is not frightened. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Miranda is frightened. | neutral |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Leonard is existing. | entailment |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Martin is not existing. | contradiction |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Chalmers is encouraging. | entailment |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Trent is not wooden. | contradiction |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Lee is frightened. | self_contradiction |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Trent is existing. | contradiction |
Chalmers is wooden.
Joshua is not encouraging.
Chalmers is encouraging.
Martin is not administrative.
Miranda is administrative.
Martin is not frightened.
Leonard is not wooden.
Lee is existing.
Martin is encouraging.
Trent is wooden.
Chalmers is existing.
Leonard is frightened.If there is at least one people who is not wooden, then Miranda is not federal and Martin is not administrative.
If someone is either encouraging or frightened, then he is not wooden and existing.
If someone is wooden, then he is not existing, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened and administrative, then he is federal, and vice versa.
If someone is frightened, then he is not wooden.
If someone who is not federal is also not encouraging, then he is not existing.
If there is someone who is existing, then Martin is not wooden.
If there is someone who is either existing or not federal, then Lee is wooden.
If Trent is federal, then Trent is encouraging.
Someone is not administrative if and only if he is existing.
If someone is not frightened and federal, then he is existing, and vice versa.
If all people are existing or encouraging, then Miranda is not federal. | Trent is federal. | neutral |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Stuart is not foolish. | contradiction |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Gabriel is not desperate. | self_contradiction |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Robyn is not desperate. | self_contradiction |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Aldis is foolish. | entailment |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Robyn is not latter. | neutral |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Gabriel is not powerful. | contradiction |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Robyn is not powerful. | contradiction |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Robyn is foolish. | entailment |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Orlando is lively. | neutral |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Stuart is desperate. | entailment |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Robyn is interesting. | neutral |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Joe is lively. | neutral |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Stuart is latter. | contradiction |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Gabriel is powerful. | entailment |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Stuart is lively. | contradiction |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Stuart is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Gabriel is foolish. | self_contradiction |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Stuart is not lively. | entailment |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Shawn is not desperate. | self_contradiction |
Gabriel is not latter.
Aldis is latter.
Stuart is interesting.
Aldis is interesting.
Gabriel is not desperate.
Orlando is foolish.
Robyn is lively.
Gabriel is not foolish.
Stuart is not lively.
Shawn is lively.
Orlando is powerful.
Aldis is not lively.Someone is not lively if and only if he is not interesting.
It can be concluded that Gabriel is not desperate once knowing that Shawn is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both foolish and not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Aldis is not interesting.
Someone being both desperate and powerful is equivalent to being foolish.
Someone who is eithor not desperate or not powerful is always foolish.
Someone who is not powerful is always not latter.
If Orlando is not foolish, then Shawn is not powerful.
If someone is not powerful, then he is not interesting, and vice versa.
Someone who is foolish and not interesting is always powerful and desperate.
As long as someone is lively, he is not desperate and foolish.
If there is someone who is both not interesting and not latter, then Shawn is not desperate. | Joe is not lively. | neutral |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Chapman is uninterested. | neutral |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Reginald is not lively. | neutral |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Angus is not lively. | contradiction |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Lincoln is not neat. | self_contradiction |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Coleman is relevant. | self_contradiction |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Chapman is relevant. | entailment |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Todd is not neat. | entailment |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Angus is tart. | contradiction |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Luisa is neat. | neutral |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Todd is neat. | contradiction |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Lincoln is relevant. | self_contradiction |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Luisa is relevant. | neutral |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Angus is not uninterested. | contradiction |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Coleman is not uninterested. | neutral |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Reginald is not relevant. | contradiction |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Lincoln is lively. | self_contradiction |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Lincoln is neat. | self_contradiction |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Lincoln is not tart. | entailment |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Luisa is uninterested. | entailment |
Coleman is not relevant.
Coleman is not lively.
Lincoln is lively.
Reginald is not tart.
Todd is not neat.
Reginald is neat.
Luisa is uninterested.
Coleman is neat.
Angus is not tart.
Angus is relevant.
Todd is tart.
Chapman is relevant.If there is at least one people who is either not tart or not neat, then Lincoln is not lively and Lincoln is not uninterested.
If someone is uninterested and not neat, then he is both relevant and lively, and vice versa.
If Reginald is tough, then Chapman is not neat and Angus is lively.
All neat people are relevant.
Reginald being lively or Luisa being not tough implies that Todd is relevant.
All not lively people are not relevant.
If Reginald is uninterested, then Todd is not relevant and Reginald is neat.
Someone who is not uninterested is always both not tart and neat.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Coleman is neat.
If Coleman is neat, then Angus is lively and Reginald is tart.
Coleman being not tough and Luisa being relevant are equivalent to Reginald being neat and Luisa being not uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Todd is tough. | Reginald is neat. | entailment |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Albion is zealous. | contradiction |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Sherman is zealous. | entailment |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Albion is not pleasant. | entailment |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Sherman is self-confident. | entailment |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Uriah is green. | neutral |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Sherman is not zealous. | contradiction |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Guy is gentle. | contradiction |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Albion is not gentle. | self_contradiction |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Sherman is not self-confident. | contradiction |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Anthony is unfair. | neutral |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Bethany is not green. | self_contradiction |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Bethany is green. | self_contradiction |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Antonio is unfair. | neutral |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Albion is unfair. | contradiction |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Bethany is not gentle. | self_contradiction |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Albion is not unfair. | entailment |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Uriah is not pleasant. | neutral |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Bethany is not zealous. | entailment |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Guy is not green. | neutral |
Guy is self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Guy is not gentle.
Albion is gentle.
Albion is not pleasant.
Albion is not zealous.
Bethany is gentle.
Albion is not unfair.
Antonio is zealous.
Bethany is not zealous.
Bethany is green.
Sherman is zealous.It can be concluded that Guy is pleasant once knowing that Uriah is green and Bethany is not gentle.
Guy is green if and only if Guy is not zealous and Sherman is not pleasant.
If someone who is unfair is also not green, then he is zealous.
if there is at least one people who is self-confident and not gentle, then Antonio is not unfair and Bethany is not zealous.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not unfair once knowing that Albion is not green and Bethany is zealous.
If someone is pleasant or he is not zealous, then he is not gentle.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Antonio is not zealous.
Sherman being not zealous or Antonio being unfair implies that Sherman is green.
If someone is not self-confident or not zealous, then he is green.
Someone who is unfair is always both self-confident and not zealous.
Uriah being not unfair implies that Albion is not gentle.
Someone is not zealous if and only if he is not green. | Bethany is gentle. | self_contradiction |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Basil is modern. | contradiction |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Spencer is not tired. | entailment |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Jed is not tired. | self_contradiction |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Shawn is not curious. | self_contradiction |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Justin is compassionate. | entailment |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Justin is not compassionate. | contradiction |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Basil is not curious. | contradiction |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Justin is vivacious. | neutral |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Shawn is vivacious. | entailment |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Shawn is curious. | self_contradiction |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Marlon is curious. | neutral |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Marlon is not curious. | neutral |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Harvey is vivacious. | neutral |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Spencer is not compassionate. | entailment |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Jed is not vivacious. | entailment |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Spencer is not modern. | neutral |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Spencer is vivacious. | contradiction |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Jed is not compassionate. | self_contradiction |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Jed is tired. | self_contradiction |
Basil is compassionate.
Jed is not logical.
Shawn is vivacious.
Spencer is not tired.
Jed is compassionate.
Spencer is not compassionate.
Justin is compassionate.
Harvey is not modern.
Shawn is curious.
Basil is curious.
Spencer is not vivacious.
Basil is not modern.It can be concluded that Justin is compassionate and Harvey is tired once knowing that Shawn is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Jed is not logical.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical and Harvey is not curious once knowing that Spencer is not tired and Spencer is modern.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not logical once knowing that Harvey is modern and Harvey is not compassionate.
Someone being both not vivacious and curious is equivalent to being not tired and not compassionate.
If there is someone who is either vivacious or not logical, then Shawn is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is not logical or not tired, then Spencer is not vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is vivacious, then Jed is not compassionate and Spencer is logical.
If someone is not vivacious or he is not logical, then he is not tired.
If someone is modern, then he is both not vivacious and tired.
If there is at least one people who is either vivacious or logical, then Jed is tired and Harvey is curious.
Someone who is both not logical and compassionate is always not tired. | Basil is not compassionate. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.