premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Norris is not terrible. | entailment |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Cedric is not lonely. | self_contradiction |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Norris is terrible. | contradiction |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Quimby is puny. | entailment |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Della is not easy. | entailment |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Titus is easy. | entailment |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Cedric is not terrible. | self_contradiction |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Odessa is defeated. | neutral |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Della is defeated. | neutral |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Norris is not lonely. | contradiction |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Della is easy. | contradiction |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Odessa is not lonely. | neutral |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Cedric is not puny. | contradiction |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Odessa is not puny. | neutral |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Della is not terrible. | neutral |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Cedric is lonely. | self_contradiction |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Titus is lonely. | contradiction |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Titus is terrible. | self_contradiction |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Norris is defeated. | entailment |
Norris is lonely.
Cedric is puny.
Norris is not easy.
Titus is easy.
Quimby is not lonely.
Della is discreet.
Della is not easy.
Titus is discreet.
Cedric is discreet.
Quimby is not defeated.
Cedric is easy.
Quimby is puny.Odessa being discreet is equivalent to Gideon being defeated.
Quimby being not terrible is equivalent to Norris being defeated and Titus being puny.
Someone being easy is equivalent to being not lonely.
If there is someone who is not discreet, then Norris is lonely and Norris is not easy.
If someone is puny and discreet, then he is not lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not discreet, then Gideon is defeated.
As long as someone is puny, he is not lonely and terrible.
If Cedric is puny or Titus is terrible, then Cedric is lonely.
If there is someone who is both easy and not puny, then Della is not lonely and Quimby is defeated.
If someone is both not defeated and discreet, then he is not terrible.
Someone who is eithor lonely or easy is always not terrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not defeated and discreet, then Cedric is not easy. | Quimby is terrible. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Spencer is not useful. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Andrew is plastic. | entailment |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Aedan is not plastic. | contradiction |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Spencer is glorious. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Aedan is not combative. | entailment |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Chrysta is not plastic. | contradiction |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Aedan is curious. | contradiction |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Jorge is not curious. | neutral |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Kathryn is not combative. | contradiction |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Jorge is not useful. | neutral |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Spencer is not plastic. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Andrew is not curious. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Della is combative. | neutral |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Aedan is not glorious. | neutral |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Aedan is plastic. | entailment |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Andrew is glorious. | entailment |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Spencer is useful. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Kathryn is not global. | neutral |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Andrew is not useful. | entailment |
Andrew is glorious.
Aedan is not combative.
Chrysta is glorious.
Andrew is not curious.
Kathryn is combative.
Jorge is glorious.
Aedan is not curious.
Chrysta is plastic.
Spencer is not plastic.
Spencer is useful.
Spencer is not glorious.
Aedan is plastic.Someone is glorious and not curious if and only if he is not global and not useful.
If Kathryn is not useful and Jorge is not glorious, then Kathryn is plastic and Kathryn is not combative, and vice versa.
Someone who is not plastic or not global is always curious and glorious.
As long as someone is not plastic, he is not curious and not combative.
If there is at least one people who is useful, then Kathryn is not curious.
It can be concluded that Andrew is glorious once knowing that Chrysta is curious.
If someone is curious or not glorious, then he is plastic.
If Jorge is combative and Kathryn is curious, then Kathryn is not plastic.
Someone who is useful is always both combative and not global.
Someone being both not useful and global is equivalent to being not glorious.
Aedan being curious implies that Kathryn is not glorious and Kathryn is not useful.
Someone who is not useful and plastic is always curious and not combative. | Kathryn is curious. | contradiction |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Lucy is splendid. | self_contradiction |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Shelley is splendid. | self_contradiction |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Merlin is not weak. | entailment |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Tyler is not realistic. | entailment |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Glenn is not sensible. | neutral |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Bethany is not inquisitive. | neutral |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Glenn is splendid. | neutral |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Shelley is lively. | entailment |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Glenn is weak. | neutral |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Bethany is not splendid. | entailment |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Glenn is not splendid. | neutral |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Shelley is weak. | self_contradiction |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Lucy is realistic. | self_contradiction |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Lucy is not lively. | contradiction |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Shelley is not lively. | contradiction |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Lucy is not sensible. | self_contradiction |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Bethany is splendid. | contradiction |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Merlin is not splendid. | entailment |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Robyn is lively. | contradiction |
Robyn is not lively.
Shelley is splendid.
Bethany is not splendid.
Merlin is not splendid.
Tyler is weak.
Shelley is sensible.
Robyn is not sensible.
Lucy is sensible.
Shelley is lively.
Lucy is not splendid.
Merlin is not weak.
Tyler is inquisitive.If someone is not sensible and not realistic, then he is inquisitive, and vice versa.
Someone who is realistic is always not splendid.
Someone being both sensible and realistic is equivalent to being splendid.
If someone is sensible, then he is both not weak and realistic.
Someone who is sensible is always inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Bethany is sensible once knowing that Bethany is not inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive and weak, then he is both not sensible and not splendid, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not sensible or realistic, then Robyn is not lively.
Someone being both weak and lively is equivalent to being inquisitive.
If Tyler is not inquisitive, then Bethany is not sensible and Glenn is realistic.
Someone is not realistic and weak if and only if he is not sensible and inquisitive.
If someone is not lively or he is splendid, then he is not weak. | Tyler is not lively. | contradiction |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Rosie is teeny. | neutral |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Brice is not helpful. | entailment |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Colin is funny. | contradiction |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Debra is not serious. | neutral |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Kimberly is helpful. | contradiction |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Debra is not funny. | contradiction |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Brice is not serious. | contradiction |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Kimberly is aware. | self_contradiction |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Kimberly is not aware. | self_contradiction |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Quade is not teeny. | self_contradiction |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Quade is intellectual. | contradiction |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Kimberly is not helpful. | entailment |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Kimberly is funny. | self_contradiction |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Debra is funny. | entailment |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Brice is not teeny. | neutral |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Quade is not aware. | self_contradiction |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Brice is serious. | entailment |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Quade is not intellectual. | entailment |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Brice is funny. | neutral |
Colin is not serious.
Kimberly is not funny.
Debra is not aware.
Kimberly is not intellectual.
Quade is funny.
Quade is not helpful.
Rosie is not serious.
Debra is intellectual.
Brice is serious.
Quade is aware.
Brice is not helpful.
Colin is not funny.Someone is not intellectual if and only if he is funny.
If Kimberly is not funny, then Hanna is teeny, and vice versa.
Someone who is both aware and serious is always teeny.
If someone is not intellectual, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not intellectual and not funny, he is aware and not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not aware or serious, then Rosie is intellectual.
If someone who is not serious is also not teeny, then he is intellectual.
If there is at least one people who is intellectual, then Quade is not teeny.
If all people are helpful, then Quade is not aware.
If there is someone who is either helpful or not intellectual, then Quade is teeny.
If Kimberly is not helpful and Quade is not serious, then Rosie is not teeny and Colin is not intellectual.
If there is someone who is both helpful and not teeny, then Colin is intellectual. | Debra is serious. | neutral |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Valentina is smiling. | neutral |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Bond is obedient. | entailment |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Bond is easy. | self_contradiction |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Valentina is not careful. | entailment |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Bond is not obedient. | contradiction |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Bond is not careful. | contradiction |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Bond is yellow. | entailment |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Della is not easy. | neutral |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Jerry is not easy. | self_contradiction |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Claude is easy. | self_contradiction |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Bond is not easy. | self_contradiction |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Curt is remarkable. | neutral |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Jerry is easy. | self_contradiction |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Curt is yellow. | contradiction |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Richard is smiling. | neutral |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Richard is not easy. | contradiction |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Richard is careful. | contradiction |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Jerry is obedient. | entailment |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Valentina is yellow. | neutral |
Curt is not smiling.
Richard is not careful.
Jerry is obedient.
Richard is easy.
Valentina is not careful.
Bond is easy.
Claude is not easy.
Jerry is not easy.
Bond is careful.
Richard is remarkable.
Jerry is yellow.
Bond is yellow.If there is someone who is either smiling or obedient, then Claude is not easy.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and smiling, then Claude is not remarkable.
If Della is not obedient or Bond is remarkable, then Valentina is yellow.
If there is at least one people who is both not yellow and remarkable, then Della is careful.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or obedient is always easy.
If someone is not smiling or not easy, then he is obedient.
Someone who is not smiling is always both not careful and not yellow.
It can be concluded that Bond is not remarkable once knowing that Jerry is not careful.
If someone is yellow, then he is not easy.
If someone is not careful and obedient, then he is both not yellow and not smiling, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Richard is not remarkable.
If someone who is remarkable is also not yellow, then he is not careful. | Curt is not yellow. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.