premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Sloane is cold. | contradiction |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Carroll is not breakable. | contradiction |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Carroll is lonely. | self_contradiction |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Sophie is loyal. | entailment |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Sloane is not loyal. | self_contradiction |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Morris is not loyal. | entailment |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Aedan is not self-disciplined. | neutral |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Sloane is not breakable. | self_contradiction |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Carroll is loyal. | neutral |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Sophie is lonely. | contradiction |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Maribel is breakable. | entailment |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Morris is cold. | self_contradiction |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Goddard is not lonely. | entailment |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Sloane is breakable. | self_contradiction |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Sophie is not breakable. | contradiction |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Goddard is self-disciplined. | neutral |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Aedan is not interesting. | neutral |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Morris is not interesting. | contradiction |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Sophie is self-disciplined. | neutral |
Carroll is lonely.
Maribel is not cold.
Morris is not breakable.
Sophie is loyal.
Morris is self-disciplined.
Sloane is not breakable.
Sloane is loyal.
Carroll is cold.
Sophie is breakable.
Morris is interesting.
Goddard is not lonely.
Sloane is self-disciplined.Someone is not lonely if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Morris is not cold and Sloane is lonely once knowing that Goddard is breakable.
Someone who is lonely or not interesting is always breakable and not cold.
If Goddard is lonely or Morris is not cold, then Maribel is breakable.
If Aedan is not breakable or Maribel is not loyal, then Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If someone is not breakable, then he is not loyal.
It can be concluded that Morris is breakable and Goddard is lonely once knowing that Sophie is not self-disciplined.
If there is at least one people who is both lonely and not loyal, then Sophie is breakable.
Maribel being not self-disciplined is equivalent to Sloane being cold.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined, then Morris is cold.
It can be concluded that Sophie is loyal once knowing that Sloane is lonely and Goddard is not breakable.
Someone who is lonely is always breakable. | Maribel is not lonely. | entailment |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Norris is delightful. | entailment |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Hannah is encouraging. | entailment |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Trevor is white. | contradiction |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Kiefer is delightful. | self_contradiction |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Joshua is not white. | entailment |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Trevor is not determined. | self_contradiction |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Hannah is not encouraging. | contradiction |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Martin is not white. | entailment |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Kiefer is not enchanting. | self_contradiction |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Kiefer is not delightful. | self_contradiction |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Camille is crazy. | neutral |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Hannah is not white. | contradiction |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Kiefer is not encouraging. | self_contradiction |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Camille is not white. | neutral |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Joshua is not enchanting. | neutral |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Joshua is not delightful. | neutral |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Camille is not encouraging. | neutral |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Martin is not enchanting. | entailment |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Joshua is white. | contradiction |
Norris is delightful.
Kiefer is not enchanting.
Kiefer is white.
Hannah is encouraging.
Kiefer is determined.
Hannah is not determined.
Kiefer is not delightful.
Hannah is delightful.
Trevor is not enchanting.
Kiefer is encouraging.
Trevor is not crazy.
Trevor is not white.If Camille is not crazy, then Trevor is not delightful and Camille is not white, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Norris is enchanting.
Someone being not white is equivalent to being determined.
If someone who is delightful is also not crazy, then he is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not delightful, then Trevor is encouraging and Martin is determined.
If someone is encouraging, then he is enchanting, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is determined, then Martin is not enchanting and Hannah is white.
Someone is encouraging if and only if he is delightful.
Someone is not encouraging and not white if and only if he is enchanting and determined.
Trevor being not determined implies that Norris is encouraging.
If Camille is white, then Martin is not delightful, and vice versa.
If Trevor is determined or Hannah is not crazy, then Joshua is not white. | Martin is enchanting. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Sophie is smart. | neutral |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Cadman is not plain. | entailment |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Leith is not political. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Leith is political. | entailment |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Bert is not hypocritical. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Vicki is not political. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Cadman is not hypocritical. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Leith is smart. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Bert is not small. | neutral |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Cadman is not political. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Bert is hypocritical. | entailment |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Vicki is political. | entailment |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Leith is plain. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Vicki is small. | neutral |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Johnny is not hypocritical. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Johnny is not smart. | contradiction |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Cadman is smart. | neutral |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Sophie is small. | neutral |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Leith is not smart. | self_contradiction |
Jeremiah is small.
Cadman is not humorous.
Leith is not smart.
Jeremiah is not humorous.
Johnny is hypocritical.
Cadman is not plain.
Vicki is humorous.
Leith is political.
Vicki is political.
Cadman is political.
Jeremiah is not plain.
Bert is not humorous.Leith is not small if and only if Jeremiah is plain and Vicki is humorous.
If there is someone who is political, then Bert is not plain and Johnny is not hypocritical.
If someone is plain and humorous, then he is both not political and smart, and vice versa.
If Leith is not hypocritical, then Leith is not political.
If Leith is small, then Cadman is not political and Jeremiah is not plain, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not smart and hypocritical, he is not plain and small.
Someone who is not hypocritical is always both humorous and smart.
If Jeremiah is not smart and Vicki is political, then Bert is not plain.
If there is at least one people who is either not small or political, then Sophie is not humorous and Bert is hypocritical.
If someone is political, then he is hypocritical, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not political, then Leith is smart and Leith is plain.
Someone being both not hypocritical and not smart is equivalent to being not small. | Jeremiah is not humorous. | entailment |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Kimball is not confident. | entailment |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Carter is confident. | contradiction |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Kimball is splendid. | contradiction |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Percival is dizzy. | neutral |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Carter is not silly. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Silvia is every. | contradiction |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Renfred is splendid. | contradiction |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Carter is every. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Shelley is not silly. | neutral |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Carter is not dizzy. | entailment |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Silvia is not silly. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Kimball is confident. | contradiction |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Paxton is silly. | neutral |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Percival is silly. | neutral |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Paxton is confident. | neutral |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Silvia is not confident. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Kimball is not quiet. | entailment |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Renfred is not confident. | entailment |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Carter is not every. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is not quiet.
Carter is not confident.
Renfred is not splendid.
Renfred is not silly.
Carter is every.
Paxton is not every.
Carter is silly.
Carter is not dizzy.
Carter is not splendid.
Kimball is not silly.
Kimball is every.
Silvia is confident.Someone is not quiet if and only if he is not confident.
If someone is not quiet, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Silvia is silly and Kimball is dizzy.
Someone who is eithor silly or not every is always not splendid.
If there is someone who is confident, then Carter is not silly and Shelley is splendid.
If someone is silly and not confident, then he is both splendid and not every, and vice versa.
If Silvia is dizzy, then Renfred is not every and Carter is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not silly, then Renfred is not quiet.
If there is at least one people who is silly, then Renfred is quiet and Kimball is not splendid.
If there is someone who is not every, then Silvia is quiet.
Someone who is not dizzy is always both not confident and silly.
Renfred being splendid is equivalent to Shelley being quiet. | Kimball is dizzy. | entailment |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Kendrick is disturbed. | self_contradiction |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Brent is not superior. | neutral |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Marlon is helpful. | contradiction |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Marlon is not disturbed. | self_contradiction |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Kendrick is not electrical. | contradiction |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Garrick is conscious. | neutral |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Brent is practical. | entailment |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Kathryn is helpful. | entailment |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Curt is conscious. | neutral |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Kathryn is not helpful. | contradiction |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Brent is not electrical. | contradiction |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Kendrick is not disturbed. | self_contradiction |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Brent is not helpful. | self_contradiction |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Norris is practical. | contradiction |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Garrick is not disturbed. | neutral |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Norris is not practical. | entailment |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Kendrick is not helpful. | entailment |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Curt is electrical. | neutral |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Kendrick is not conscious. | entailment |
Kendrick is superior.
Garrick is not practical.
Norris is not practical.
Kathryn is helpful.
Kendrick is not helpful.
Norris is not superior.
Curt is not disturbed.
Kendrick is not conscious.
Brent is helpful.
Marlon is superior.
Kathryn is not superior.
Brent is practical.If Kathryn is not disturbed or Curt is not practical, then Kendrick is not electrical.
Someone is not superior and helpful if and only if he is not electrical.
Brent being not disturbed and Curt being not helpful imply that Curt is not superior.
Someone being both practical and disturbed is equivalent to being superior.
Someone who is eithor conscious or practical is always electrical.
If someone is both practical and electrical, then he is not helpful.
If there is someone who is both conscious and helpful, then Kendrick is not electrical.
If Brent is not superior, then Marlon is not conscious and Kathryn is disturbed, and vice versa.
Someone who is practical is always not disturbed.
Brent being not superior or Marlon being not practical implies that Brent is not electrical.
If someone is conscious, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disturbed, then Marlon is electrical. | Brent is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.