premise
stringlengths
923
1.41k
hypothesis
stringlengths
11
33
label
stringclasses
4 values
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Quade is not desperate.
contradiction
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Quade is loyal.
self_contradiction
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Gilroy is puny.
self_contradiction
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Quade is not weak.
contradiction
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Caleb is not desperate.
entailment
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Peter is ashamed.
neutral
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Avery is puny.
contradiction
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Gilroy is ashamed.
contradiction
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Peter is desperate.
self_contradiction
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Gilroy is not weak.
self_contradiction
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Avery is desperate.
entailment
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Caleb is not ashamed.
neutral
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Quade is weak.
entailment
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Anthony is not desperate.
neutral
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Caleb is weak.
entailment
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Avery is ashamed.
entailment
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Caleb is desperate.
contradiction
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Gilroy is not puny.
self_contradiction
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Anthony is not loyal.
neutral
Caleb is weak. Rufus is not desperate. Quade is not ashamed. Quade is loyal. Peter is not desperate. Anthony is weak. Gilroy is not weak. Gilroy is puny. Gilroy is not loyal. Avery is ashamed. Quade is not puny. Caleb is not desperate.If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Avery is not puny. If there is someone who is either not puny or not desperate, then Peter is not popular and Anthony is weak. If there is at least one people who is both not loyal and ashamed, then Gilroy is not puny. It can be concluded that Anthony is ashamed and Anthony is loyal once knowing that Quade is puny and Quade is popular. As long as someone is ashamed, he is not puny and not popular. Anthony being not puny or Peter being not popular implies that Gilroy is weak. If all people are ashamed or not weak, then Rufus is not popular. Quade is not puny if and only if Avery is ashamed. Someone being both not ashamed and not puny is equivalent to being weak and not loyal. If someone who is not weak is also not puny, then he is not ashamed. Someone who is eithor ashamed or not popular is always loyal. Someone being desperate is equivalent to being loyal.
Caleb is not loyal.
neutral
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Adrian is not horrible.
contradiction
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Adrian is magnificent.
neutral
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Stephen is confident.
self_contradiction
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Ramsey is not friendly.
neutral
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Baird is not horrible.
neutral
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Chandler is friendly.
self_contradiction
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Baird is combative.
entailment
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Otis is not magnificent.
self_contradiction
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Adrian is not magnificent.
neutral
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Otis is combative.
entailment
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Ramsey is horrible.
contradiction
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Stephen is not magnificent.
entailment
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Adrian is combative.
neutral
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Otis is horrible.
contradiction
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Stephen is not horrible.
self_contradiction
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Otis is friendly.
entailment
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Ramsey is grotesque.
contradiction
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Otis is confident.
entailment
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Stephen is grotesque.
self_contradiction
Stephen is not confident. Otis is friendly. Ramsey is not horrible. Chandler is not combative. Stephen is combative. Chandler is not grotesque. Otis is confident. Stephen is grotesque. Stephen is not horrible. Adrian is horrible. Otis is not horrible. Chandler is not friendly.Someone who is not horrible is always not magnificent. All not magnificent people are not grotesque. If Chandler is combative, then Stephen is horrible. If there is someone who is not horrible, then Stephen is confident. If there is at least one people who is either not confident or horrible, then Baird is friendly and Ramsey is not magnificent. If Adrian is not magnificent and Otis is not confident, then Stephen is grotesque. If there is someone who is not magnificent, then Adrian is grotesque and Baird is combative. Someone who is not combative is always magnificent. If someone is not grotesque or he is magnificent, then he is combative. If Ramsey is not combative or Ross is grotesque, then Ross is not magnificent. If someone is magnificent or grotesque, then he is friendly. It can be concluded that Otis is magnificent once knowing that Otis is combative.
Otis is not friendly.
contradiction
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Caldwell is disturbed.
neutral
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Hector is wooden.
entailment
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Abraham is disturbed.
neutral
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Chad is impartial.
self_contradiction
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Kathie is yellow.
contradiction
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Kathie is not wooden.
contradiction
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Kathie is lively.
self_contradiction
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Abraham is not lively.
neutral
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Abraham is not impartial.
neutral
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Todd is not lively.
contradiction
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Harley is not impartial.
contradiction
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Chad is lively.
entailment
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Chad is disturbed.
self_contradiction
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Hector is not lively.
self_contradiction
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Kathie is not yellow.
entailment
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Chad is not wooden.
contradiction
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Hector is lively.
self_contradiction
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Harley is wooden.
entailment
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Todd is not yellow.
neutral
Hector is wooden. Harley is wooden. Chad is not impartial. Hector is disturbed. Kathie is not yellow. Harley is impartial. Kathie is not lively. Kathie is visible. Todd is disturbed. Harley is lively. Hector is not lively. Todd is lively.As long as someone is visible, he is disturbed and impartial. If Kathie is not lively, then Kathie is visible and Harley is yellow, and vice versa. Harley is lively if and only if Caldwell is not yellow. If there is at least one people who is lively, then Chad is not visible and Kathie is impartial. If someone is not visible, then he is disturbed. If someone is impartial and not visible, then he is both not yellow and not disturbed, and vice versa. Kathie being not wooden or Todd being not impartial implies that Caldwell is not yellow. If Abraham is visible and Harley is lively, then Kathie is disturbed and Hector is not wooden. If someone who is not wooden is also not impartial, then he is not yellow. All disturbed people are lively. If there is someone who is either not impartial or yellow, then Chad is visible. If someone is wooden, then he is visible, and vice versa.
Harley is visible.
entailment
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Johnny is not annoying.
contradiction
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Johnny is not purple.
neutral
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Kerry is annoying.
entailment
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Dave is purple.
neutral
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Kerry is not annoying.
contradiction
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Brooke is not annoying.
contradiction
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Dave is annoying.
neutral
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Brooke is annoying.
entailment
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Brooke is not nice.
self_contradiction
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Sophia is not nice.
self_contradiction
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Sophia is not annoying.
contradiction
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Sophia is sane.
self_contradiction
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Johnny is not nice.
contradiction
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Dave is nice.
entailment
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Johnny is nice.
entailment
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Kirby is sane.
neutral
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Johnny is annoying.
entailment
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Kerry is not environmental.
self_contradiction
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Kirby is purple.
neutral
Sophia is not friendly. Graham is not annoying. Graham is sane. Johnny is nice. Johnny is sane. Brooke is nice. Kerry is purple. Sophia is annoying. Graham is not environmental. Sophia is not nice. Brooke is not environmental. Kerry is friendly.Johnny being not nice or Kirby being friendly implies that Sophia is not annoying. If Graham is environmental or Kerry is not annoying, then Dave is nice. If Kirby is friendly and Kerry is not sane, then Johnny is environmental. If someone is not friendly and not environmental, then he is both purple and nice, and vice versa. If Dave is not friendly, then Kirby is not annoying, and vice versa. As long as someone is friendly, he is environmental and annoying. If someone is friendly, then he is not environmental, and vice versa. If someone is annoying and environmental, then he is both not friendly and not sane, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sophia is not environmental and Sophia is not nice. If there is someone who is either not environmental or friendly, then Graham is not purple and Johnny is annoying. Someone who is not environmental is always both sane and not purple. As long as someone is friendly, he is not nice and annoying.
Brooke is not friendly.
self_contradiction
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Matthew is jealous.
neutral
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Kingsley is not hilarious.
neutral
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Abner is not hilarious.
self_contradiction
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Sterling is not jealous.
entailment
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Abner is hilarious.
self_contradiction
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Abner is elegant.
entailment
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Abner is not safe.
contradiction
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Roswell is not smoggy.
entailment
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Roswell is not jealous.
contradiction
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Bruno is jealous.
self_contradiction
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Sterling is safe.
contradiction
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Bruno is safe.
neutral
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Kingsley is not jealous.
neutral
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Quade is not smoggy.
entailment
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Abner is long.
entailment
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Bruno is smoggy.
self_contradiction
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Bruno is not jealous.
self_contradiction
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Kingsley is not safe.
contradiction
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Roswell is not long.
contradiction
Sterling is not safe. Roswell is long. Bruno is jealous. Abner is not hilarious. Abner is elegant. Roswell is jealous. Sterling is not jealous. Bruno is not smoggy. Abner is long. Roswell is not smoggy. Quade is not smoggy. Kingsley is safe.If there is someone who is not jealous, then Bruno is smoggy and Bruno is hilarious. Roswell is not long if and only if Bruno is elegant and Abner is not safe. If Sterling is jealous, then Sterling is not long, and vice versa. If someone is not hilarious, then he is not jealous. If Kingsley is jealous, then Quade is not safe and Sterling is smoggy, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not long or not smoggy, then Abner is safe. It can be concluded that Abner is hilarious once knowing that Matthew is elegant or Roswell is not long. If there is at least one people who is not jealous or hilarious, then Matthew is long. Someone is hilarious if and only if he is not jealous. It can be concluded that Kingsley is long once knowing that Bruno is smoggy or Sterling is not hilarious. If Kingsley is not long, then Quade is elegant and Abner is safe, and vice versa. Roswell being long and Kingsley being jealous imply that Quade is smoggy.
Matthew is smoggy.
neutral