premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Luna is outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Carroll is not grumpy. | entailment |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Gabriel is excited. | neutral |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Gabriel is outstanding. | neutral |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Casper is hilarious. | neutral |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Carroll is hilarious. | contradiction |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Casper is not excited. | contradiction |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Luna is not outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Casper is bad. | contradiction |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Claude is outstanding. | neutral |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Herbert is not bad. | entailment |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Gabriel is not bad. | contradiction |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Conan is not outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Herbert is outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Claude is bad. | entailment |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Conan is outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Carroll is not careful. | entailment |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Luna is not excited. | contradiction |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Carroll is not outstanding. | entailment |
Claude is bad.
Conan is not bad.
Herbert is not excited.
Gabriel is not hilarious.
Herbert is not outstanding.
Claude is hilarious.
Carroll is not grumpy.
Casper is outstanding.
Luna is not bad.
Carroll is not careful.
Luna is not grumpy.
Conan is not careful.Someone who is both not grumpy and careful is always outstanding.
Someone who is both not grumpy and excited is always not outstanding.
If there is at least one people who is outstanding, then Gabriel is bad and Conan is excited.
If someone is not bad, then he is excited, and vice versa.
Someone being both outstanding and excited is equivalent to being not bad.
If there is someone who is not outstanding, then Herbert is excited and Gabriel is careful.
If someone who is not grumpy is also not careful, then he is not excited.
Someone who is not careful is always not outstanding.
Carroll is not outstanding if and only if Carroll is not hilarious.
Casper being excited and Casper being bad imply that Herbert is not careful.
If there is someone who is not grumpy, then Gabriel is hilarious.
Someone being outstanding is equivalent to being not bad. | Herbert is grumpy. | neutral |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Luisa is not historical. | entailment |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Luisa is sufficient. | neutral |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Justin is not few. | entailment |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Percival is shy. | entailment |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Justin is neat. | contradiction |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Percival is not historical. | self_contradiction |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Luisa is not few. | neutral |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Hunter is dusty. | self_contradiction |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Kane is not neat. | contradiction |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Percival is not sufficient. | neutral |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Hunter is not dusty. | self_contradiction |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Percival is not few. | neutral |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Justin is few. | contradiction |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Corwin is not few. | neutral |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Justin is not shy. | entailment |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Justin is shy. | contradiction |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Hunter is few. | contradiction |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Justin is sufficient. | entailment |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Percival is historical. | self_contradiction |
Harris is not historical.
Percival is neat.
Justin is not few.
Harris is not sufficient.
Justin is not shy.
Justin is sufficient.
Harris is shy.
Hunter is not few.
Percival is historical.
Kane is historical.
Corwin is not neat.
Hunter is not dusty.Hunter being shy and Corwin being sufficient imply that Kane is not historical.
If there is someone who is historical, then Justin is not shy.
If all people are not dusty or not shy, then Percival is historical.
If someone who is shy is also few, then he is not sufficient.
If there is someone who is either not dusty or shy, then Justin is not neat.
If someone is not historical, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone being both neat and dusty is equivalent to being shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Luisa is shy and Hunter is not dusty.
If Luisa is not dusty, then Hunter is historical and Corwin is not shy.
If Luisa is dusty, then Percival is neat, and vice versa.
If someone is neat or not dusty, then he is shy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Hunter is not neat and Kane is shy. | Hunter is neat. | self_contradiction |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Kyle is acceptable. | contradiction |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Abner is basic. | neutral |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Shawn is brave. | neutral |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Greyson is vivacious. | entailment |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Raymond is vivacious. | contradiction |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Kyle is not brave. | contradiction |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Sidney is not brave. | entailment |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Lionel is not brave. | self_contradiction |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Kyle is not acceptable. | entailment |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Raymond is acceptable. | self_contradiction |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Lionel is acceptable. | entailment |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Raymond is famous. | self_contradiction |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Shawn is not vivacious. | neutral |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Raymond is not famous. | self_contradiction |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Raymond is not acceptable. | self_contradiction |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Sidney is acceptable. | contradiction |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Raymond is clear. | contradiction |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Abner is famous. | neutral |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Raymond is not vivacious. | entailment |
Sidney is not clear.
Kyle is basic.
Lionel is basic.
Raymond is acceptable.
Lionel is not brave.
Lionel is vivacious.
Greyson is vivacious.
Raymond is not clear.
Sidney is vivacious.
Lionel is acceptable.
Kyle is not acceptable.
Sidney is not brave.If there is someone who is either not vivacious or brave, then Raymond is not basic.
Greyson being brave implies that Kyle is basic and Sidney is acceptable.
If there is someone who is both not famous and basic, then Raymond is vivacious.
If someone is brave, then he is clear, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Shawn is clear once knowing that Kyle is not vivacious and Greyson is not basic.
Sidney is acceptable if and only if Lionel is not vivacious.
Someone who is not basic is always both famous and not vivacious.
Abner being basic is equivalent to Shawn being vivacious and Sidney being acceptable.
If someone is not clear, then he is not famous.
All basic people are clear.
Sidney being brave is equivalent to Greyson being clear.
If someone is not clear, then he is not acceptable, and vice versa. | Sidney is not basic. | neutral |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Bond is not attentive. | self_contradiction |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Renfred is not dull. | contradiction |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Bond is not environmental. | neutral |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Renfred is available. | entailment |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Bud is environmental. | neutral |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Bond is warm-hearted. | entailment |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Ambrose is not dull. | self_contradiction |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Renfred is environmental. | neutral |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Liam is not warm-hearted. | contradiction |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Bruce is dull. | self_contradiction |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Liam is not environmental. | neutral |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Bond is not warm-hearted. | contradiction |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Liam is dull. | entailment |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Liam is not attentive. | entailment |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Liam is warm-hearted. | entailment |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Bruce is not warm-hearted. | contradiction |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Bud is attentive. | contradiction |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Ambrose is not attentive. | self_contradiction |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Bruce is not dull. | self_contradiction |
Ambrose is not ashamed.
Ambrose is not warm-hearted.
Bond is ashamed.
Renfred is dull.
Renfred is available.
Bruce is dull.
Bud is not available.
Ambrose is not attentive.
Bud is warm-hearted.
Ambrose is dull.
Bruce is not environmental.
Liam is available.Bruce being ashamed and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not environmental and Ambrose is not available.
If Bond is not environmental and Bud is not warm-hearted, then Liam is available.
Someone being both attentive and not warm-hearted is equivalent to being environmental and not dull.
Bond being warm-hearted and Jarvis being attentive imply that Ambrose is not available.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted or available, then Bond is attentive.
Someone being both not ashamed and dull is equivalent to being attentive and available.
If there is someone who is available, then Liam is dull and Jarvis is ashamed.
As long as someone is warm-hearted, he is ashamed and available.
As long as someone is ashamed, he is dull and not attentive.
Someone is not dull if and only if he is not environmental.
If someone is dull or environmental, then he is warm-hearted.
If Bond is not environmental, then Bud is not warm-hearted, and vice versa. | Bud is not environmental. | neutral |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Jessie is adorable. | entailment |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Isaiah is brave. | neutral |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Brent is adorable. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Isaiah is adorable. | contradiction |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Martin is not funny. | entailment |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Brent is not adorable. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Jessie is massive. | neutral |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Jimmy is not massive. | neutral |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Culbert is not funny. | contradiction |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Isaiah is not adorable. | entailment |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Jessie is not brave. | neutral |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Jimmy is not funny. | entailment |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Culbert is massive. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Isaiah is massive. | entailment |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Martin is adorable. | contradiction |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Culbert is adorable. | contradiction |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Brent is funny. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Brent is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Jimmy is not inner. | neutral |
Humphrey is massive.
Jimmy is not brave.
Brent is funny.
Isaiah is not adorable.
Culbert is not massive.
Brent is not adorable.
Jessie is adorable.
Martin is not adorable.
Martin is not funny.
Jimmy is not funny.
Culbert is funny.
Humphrey is not adorable.Brent is not adorable if and only if Brent is aware.
If someone is funny, then he is brave.
Isaiah being not inner implies that Jimmy is not brave and Martin is not aware.
Someone who is eithor not aware or inner is always brave.
If someone is brave or not massive, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is inner, then Culbert is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Jimmy is not funny.
If someone is brave and not funny, then he is both massive and adorable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not inner and aware, then Jimmy is not funny.
Someone who is both not adorable and not inner is always not brave.
If there is at least one people who is brave, then Brent is adorable and Culbert is not massive.
As long as someone is either not adorable or brave, he is massive and aware. | Jimmy is brave. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.