premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Lester is not powerful. | entailment |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Garth is not agreeable. | entailment |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Lester is sleepy. | self_contradiction |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Orlando is agreeable. | self_contradiction |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Garth is agreeable. | contradiction |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Blanche is not agreeable. | entailment |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Lester is not warm-hearted. | contradiction |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Blanche is not bright. | neutral |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Lester is not joyous. | self_contradiction |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Garth is not powerful. | contradiction |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Lester is powerful. | contradiction |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Orlando is sleepy. | self_contradiction |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Blanche is powerful. | neutral |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Blanche is agreeable. | contradiction |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Lester is warm-hearted. | entailment |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Leonard is powerful. | neutral |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Orlando is not sleepy. | self_contradiction |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Nathalie is bright. | neutral |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Greyson is sleepy. | entailment |
Garth is not sleepy.
Orlando is not agreeable.
Garth is powerful.
Garth is not agreeable.
Orlando is powerful.
Lester is not joyous.
Leonard is not agreeable.
Lester is not powerful.
Lester is agreeable.
Leonard is not warm-hearted.
Orlando is sleepy.
Greyson is sleepy.If someone is warm-hearted, then he is both joyous and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is powerful and not bright, then Leonard is warm-hearted and Garth is not sleepy.
If someone is not sleepy and not powerful, then he is agreeable, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is powerful, then Blanche is not agreeable and Orlando is warm-hearted.
If someone who is not joyous is also not warm-hearted, then he is not sleepy.
If there is nobody who is not bright, then Orlando is warm-hearted.
As long as someone is not sleepy, he is not bright and not agreeable.
If someone is sleepy and not agreeable, then he is both not bright and joyous, and vice versa.
Someone who is both not joyous and warm-hearted is always not powerful.
If someone is both not sleepy and bright, then he is joyous.
Someone being both agreeable and not joyous is equivalent to being warm-hearted.
If Leonard is bright and Lester is not warm-hearted, then Greyson is powerful and Greyson is joyous, and vice versa. | Nathalie is not agreeable. | neutral |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Harley is silly. | entailment |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Stewart is not lucky. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Harley is not silly. | contradiction |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Gideon is silly. | neutral |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Ian is massive. | neutral |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Gideon is not unusual. | contradiction |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Scott is good-tempered. | neutral |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Ian is not massive. | neutral |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Shamus is silly. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Ian is not silly. | contradiction |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Gideon is good-tempered. | entailment |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Shamus is not massive. | entailment |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Gideon is not tired. | entailment |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Shamus is lucky. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Phineas is not lucky. | entailment |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Shamus is not silly. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Scott is lucky. | neutral |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Stewart is lucky. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Ian is good-tempered. | contradiction |
Shamus is lucky.
Stewart is tired.
Shamus is not massive.
Phineas is silly.
Stewart is not massive.
Gideon is not tired.
Gideon is unusual.
Ian is silly.
Harley is silly.
Ian is lucky.
Gideon is good-tempered.
Shamus is not unusual.If someone is not lucky, then he is both not unusual and silly.
If there is nobody who is not good-tempered, then Scott is silly and Stewart is not lucky.
If Scott is not good-tempered and Scott is silly, then Shamus is not unusual.
If someone is silly or he is tired, then he is not lucky.
If there is nobody who is not tired, then Shamus is unusual.
Someone is not tired and silly if and only if he is massive.
Someone who is not unusual is always not good-tempered.
If Phineas is not good-tempered, then Gideon is not tired, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either tired or good-tempered, then Shamus is silly.
Someone being both not silly and tired is equivalent to being not lucky and not massive.
Someone who is not good-tempered is always tired.
If Phineas is silly, then Stewart is lucky. | Ian is unusual. | contradiction |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Bethany is not better. | entailment |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Gifford is disturbed. | contradiction |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Gifford is not outstanding. | contradiction |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Bethany is better. | contradiction |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Gifford is glorious. | self_contradiction |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Jerry is not disturbed. | self_contradiction |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Ross is informal. | entailment |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Jerry is better. | entailment |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Igor is not disturbed. | entailment |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Alfie is not tired. | neutral |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Igor is not outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Alfie is tired. | neutral |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Alfie is not better. | neutral |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Igor is disturbed. | contradiction |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Alfie is not outstanding. | neutral |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Royce is tired. | neutral |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Ross is not informal. | contradiction |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Jerry is disturbed. | self_contradiction |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Igor is not tired. | self_contradiction |
Jerry is better.
Jerry is glorious.
Gifford is outstanding.
Jerry is disturbed.
Alfie is glorious.
Igor is not glorious.
Ross is not glorious.
Gifford is glorious.
Jerry is outstanding.
Igor is not outstanding.
Igor is not tired.
Bethany is glorious.Someone being tired is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Gifford is glorious if and only if Ross is informal and Bethany is not better.
If Ross is not outstanding, then Igor is informal.
It can be concluded that Jerry is glorious and Bethany is not informal once knowing that Gifford is not better and Gifford is not outstanding.
If Gifford is informal, then Gifford is tired and Gifford is disturbed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not better, then Gifford is not glorious.
If everyone is better, then Bethany is not informal and Ross is not outstanding.
If Bethany is not glorious or Bethany is disturbed, then Alfie is outstanding.
If someone is not informal or outstanding, then he is not tired.
If there is someone who is either informal or not disturbed, then Ross is better.
Igor being not outstanding implies that Gifford is not disturbed.
As long as someone is not tired, he is not disturbed and outstanding. | Jerry is not tired. | entailment |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | James is not harsh. | neutral |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Humphrey is not versatile. | neutral |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Lionel is not versatile. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Lionel is harsh. | contradiction |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Helena is not versatile. | contradiction |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Helena is not hurt. | contradiction |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Lionel is not hurt. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Humphrey is not aware. | neutral |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Helena is versatile. | entailment |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Humphrey is harsh. | entailment |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Vera is versatile. | neutral |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Vera is hurt. | neutral |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Kendall is not harsh. | contradiction |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | James is versatile. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Katrina is aware. | contradiction |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Lionel is not aware. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Kendall is hurt. | entailment |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Helena is hurt. | entailment |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Lionel is aware. | self_contradiction |
Lionel is not aware.
James is not hurt.
Humphrey is harsh.
Lionel is not misty.
James is not aware.
Lionel is small.
James is versatile.
Kendall is hurt.
Helena is aware.
James is not small.
Katrina is not misty.
Humphrey is small.Vera being aware or Vera being not small implies that Katrina is harsh.
If someone is small and not versatile, then he is both not hurt and misty, and vice versa.
If someone is misty or not harsh, then he is not aware.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Kendall is harsh.
If Lionel is not misty and Kendall is hurt, then Lionel is not versatile.
Someone is not misty and not aware if and only if he is not harsh.
All not harsh people are not misty.
If there is at least one people who is harsh, then James is aware and Helena is not misty.
It can be concluded that Katrina is misty once knowing that Humphrey is not aware.
Someone who is not versatile is always both aware and not small.
Someone who is not misty is always both not aware and versatile.
Someone is misty and hurt if and only if he is aware. | Kendall is harsh. | entailment |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Norman is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Stephen is rich. | entailment |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Norman is not glorious. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Kurt is not consistent. | neutral |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Brock is rich. | entailment |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Cuthbert is joyous. | neutral |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Clifford is crazy. | contradiction |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Marlin is crazy. | contradiction |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Kurt is glorious. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Norman is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Cuthbert is friendly. | neutral |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Clifford is rich. | entailment |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Norman is glorious. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Brock is friendly. | contradiction |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Stephen is not consistent. | entailment |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Marlin is not rich. | contradiction |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Norman is crazy. | neutral |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Stephen is not friendly. | entailment |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Kurt is not rich. | neutral |
Norman is not friendly.
Stephen is glorious.
Kurt is joyous.
Clifford is rich.
Stephen is not consistent.
Kurt is glorious.
Stephen is not friendly.
Marlin is consistent.
Norman is glorious.
Brock is glorious.
Marlin is not friendly.
Clifford is not consistent.If Marlin is joyous, then Stephen is not rich, and vice versa.
As long as someone is rich, he is not crazy and not friendly.
If there is someone who is not crazy, then Marlin is not friendly.
if there is at least one people who is not crazy and not joyous, then Clifford is not glorious and Norman is friendly.
If someone is crazy, then he is friendly.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Norman is glorious and Brock is rich.
If there is someone who is either not joyous or crazy, then Marlin is rich and Marlin is not glorious.
If Norman is not consistent or Stephen is friendly, then Stephen is not rich.
If Stephen is glorious, then Norman is consistent.
Someone being both not joyous and rich is equivalent to being not consistent.
If there is someone who is both not crazy and not glorious, then Norman is joyous.
Someone who is eithor consistent or joyous is always not glorious. | Stephen is not rich. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.