premise
stringlengths
923
1.41k
hypothesis
stringlengths
11
33
label
stringclasses
4 values
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Chester is not busy.
contradiction
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Chester is not arrow.
entailment
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Arthur is not boring.
self_contradiction
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Chapman is visible.
neutral
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Arthur is boring.
self_contradiction
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Chapman is not arrow.
neutral
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Valentina is round.
self_contradiction
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Arthur is not arrow.
contradiction
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Bevis is visible.
neutral
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Bevis is not stormy.
contradiction
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Silas is visible.
neutral
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Silas is arrow.
entailment
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Chapman is boring.
entailment
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Valentina is not arrow.
contradiction
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Bevis is not busy.
self_contradiction
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Kilian is not arrow.
contradiction
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Chapman is stormy.
neutral
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Chester is not stormy.
entailment
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Arthur is arrow.
entailment
Arthur is not visible. Valentina is not boring. Valentina is not visible. Chester is busy. Silas is round. Kilian is stormy. Chapman is boring. Arthur is stormy. Chester is not stormy. Chapman is busy. Bevis is not busy. Bevis is round.Valentina being not stormy and Kilian being busy imply that Silas is not arrow. Someone being both busy and arrow is equivalent to being not round and boring. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and boring, then Silas is not round. If Kilian is not stormy or Chapman is not busy, then Silas is arrow. Kilian being busy implies that Arthur is boring and Arthur is visible. Someone who is not boring is always both round and busy. Bevis being not round is equivalent to Bevis being not busy and Chester being not arrow. If there is at least one people who is both stormy and visible, then Bevis is not boring. If Silas is boring, then Arthur is not visible. Valentina being not stormy and Arthur being not visible imply that Bevis is arrow. Someone being stormy is equivalent to being round. Someone being both arrow and not boring is equivalent to being round.
Valentina is not boring.
self_contradiction
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Alvin is not salty.
self_contradiction
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Griswald is not angry.
contradiction
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Theodore is not salty.
entailment
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Barclay is angry.
entailment
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Conan is not lucky.
entailment
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Theodore is angry.
neutral
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Conan is not salty.
contradiction
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Caldwell is ashamed.
contradiction
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Conan is not ashamed.
self_contradiction
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Theodore is lucky.
entailment
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Conan is angry.
neutral
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Caldwell is salty.
contradiction
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Griswald is not salty.
neutral
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Barclay is not lucky.
contradiction
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Conan is ashamed.
self_contradiction
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Barclay is not mellow.
self_contradiction
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Alvin is not ashamed.
neutral
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Barclay is mellow.
self_contradiction
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Caldwell is not mellow.
entailment
Theodore is encouraging. Griswald is angry. Caldwell is not angry. Griswald is ashamed. Barclay is angry. Alvin is not mellow. Barclay is mellow. Theodore is lucky. Conan is not ashamed. Caldwell is not salty. Conan is not lucky. Caldwell is not ashamed.If there is at least one people who is salty, then Barclay is lucky. Someone who is both not lucky and salty is always mellow. If Alvin is not ashamed, then Barclay is not angry, and vice versa. If there is someone who is both not angry and salty, then Caldwell is not encouraging. If someone is encouraging or lucky, then he is not mellow. Someone who is not lucky is always both salty and ashamed. If Theodore is not angry and Theodore is not encouraging, then Conan is lucky. Someone is not mellow if and only if he is not salty. If Theodore is angry or Griswald is ashamed, then Alvin is salty. If there is nobody who is not not lucky, then Alvin is ashamed. Someone being both not lucky and salty is equivalent to being not ashamed and not encouraging. If there is someone who is both mellow and not lucky, then Conan is salty.
Adrian is not angry.
neutral
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Theobold is not pleasant.
entailment
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Bond is fair-minded.
self_contradiction
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Albern is adventurous.
neutral
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Theobold is not popular.
self_contradiction
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Ambrose is popular.
contradiction
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Melville is not adventurous.
contradiction
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Bond is not adventurous.
entailment
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Bond is not fair-minded.
self_contradiction
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Sophia is not adventurous.
entailment
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Melville is adventurous.
entailment
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Melville is timid.
contradiction
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Ambrose is not pleasant.
neutral
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Sophia is adventurous.
contradiction
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Melville is popular.
neutral
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Albern is not popular.
neutral
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Carolina is timid.
entailment
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Carolina is popular.
self_contradiction
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Albern is not adventurous.
neutral
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Carolina is adventurous.
self_contradiction
Theobold is popular. Carolina is adventurous. Ambrose is not popular. Carolina is popular. Theobold is not pleasant. Sophia is timid. Ambrose is not timid. Bond is popular. Bond is pleasant. Sophia is not worried. Carolina is worried. Melville is adventurous.If someone is worried, then he is both not popular and pleasant. Someone who is pleasant is always both worried and timid. If Albern is pleasant or Theobold is popular, then Bond is not fair-minded. If there is nobody who is not not popular, then Theobold is not pleasant. If Carolina is timid, then Ambrose is not popular, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Theobold is not worried. Albern being not worried or Albern being not timid implies that Theobold is fair-minded. If there is at least one people who is not fair-minded or popular, then Sophia is not pleasant. If there is at least one people who is not adventurous or not fair-minded, then Theobold is not popular. Someone who is timid is always not adventurous. If there is someone who is popular, then Melville is not timid. If someone is pleasant, then he is fair-minded.
Bond is adventurous.
contradiction
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Alice is environmental.
entailment
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Alice is not environmental.
contradiction
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Joshua is environmental.
entailment
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Connell is fantastic.
neutral
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Kianna is petite.
self_contradiction
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Alice is not gentle.
contradiction
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Joshua is not messy.
entailment
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Sherlock is boring.
self_contradiction
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Heath is not petite.
neutral
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Heath is not messy.
entailment
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Connell is not gentle.
contradiction
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Alice is messy.
self_contradiction
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Kianna is not fantastic.
entailment
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Sherlock is not environmental.
contradiction
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Connell is not boring.
neutral
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Joshua is petite.
contradiction
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Joe is petite.
self_contradiction
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Kianna is not petite.
self_contradiction
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Joe is not messy.
neutral
Sherlock is not boring. Kianna is not messy. Kianna is not fantastic. Joshua is not fantastic. Joe is not petite. Connell is not messy. Connell is gentle. Joshua is boring. Alice is gentle. Heath is boring. Sherlock is gentle. Alice is petite.If Connell is boring, then Joe is not petite and Joe is gentle, and vice versa. If there is someone who is boring, then Kianna is petite. Someone is environmental if and only if he is not messy. It can be concluded that Heath is boring once knowing that Heath is not fantastic or Connell is petite. Someone who is not fantastic is always both not boring and not petite. If all people are gentle, then Joshua is not environmental and Connell is messy. If there is someone who is gentle, then Kianna is not petite. Sherlock is petite if and only if Alice is boring. If everyone is messy, then Heath is not gentle. Sherlock being messy or Joe being fantastic implies that Joe is petite. If someone is gentle and petite, then he is both boring and messy, and vice versa. As long as someone is boring, he is environmental and not messy.
Heath is fantastic.
neutral
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Albert is not famous.
neutral
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Bruce is fresh.
neutral
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Bevis is impartial.
contradiction
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Bruce is not impartial.
neutral
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Bruce is not available.
self_contradiction
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Bevis is wet.
entailment
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Bruce is wet.
contradiction
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Bevis is not available.
contradiction
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Shelley is not available.
entailment
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Bevis is not impartial.
entailment
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Shelley is wet.
self_contradiction
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Luna is not sticky.
neutral
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Basil is impartial.
contradiction
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Olin is wet.
neutral
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Bevis is available.
entailment
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Albert is available.
self_contradiction
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Albert is not wet.
self_contradiction
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Bevis is famous.
entailment
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Basil is not sticky.
self_contradiction
Albert is available. Bruce is not sticky. Bevis is wet. Bevis is famous. Luna is not fresh. Bruce is not wet. Basil is famous. Bevis is not impartial. Bevis is available. Shelley is wet. Albert is wet. Bruce is available.If someone is not impartial, then he is both sticky and available. Someone is not wet if and only if he is not available. If there is someone who is either not famous or not fresh, then Shelley is not available. It can be concluded that Luna is fresh and Olin is impartial once knowing that Bruce is not wet. As long as someone is not famous, he is wet and not sticky. It can be concluded that Basil is available once knowing that Olin is fresh or Bruce is not famous. If someone is not impartial and not sticky, then he is famous, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both not famous and not sticky, then Shelley is wet. If someone is both impartial and not famous, then he is sticky. If someone is both not sticky and impartial, then he is not famous. If there is someone who is either impartial or sticky, then Albert is not wet. Bevis is fresh if and only if Luna is not impartial.
Olin is not impartial.
contradiction