premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Lane is not innocent. | contradiction |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Jesse is innocent. | contradiction |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Katrina is innocent. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Jesse is not severe. | neutral |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Lane is not practical. | neutral |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Katrina is practical. | neutral |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Channing is not inquisitive. | entailment |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Jesse is not sensible. | entailment |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Jesse is sensible. | contradiction |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Katrina is not sufficient. | contradiction |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Arthur is not inquisitive. | contradiction |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Katrina is not innocent. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Lane is sensible. | neutral |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Kim is not practical. | entailment |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Kim is not inquisitive. | entailment |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Arthur is inquisitive. | entailment |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Kim is not innocent. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Katrina is not inquisitive. | self_contradiction |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Bryant is severe. | neutral |
Bryant is not practical.
Jesse is not innocent.
Arthur is practical.
Arthur is inquisitive.
Bryant is innocent.
Jesse is not sensible.
Kim is not innocent.
Channing is not sensible.
Katrina is sufficient.
Channing is not inquisitive.
Bryant is inquisitive.
Katrina is inquisitive.If there is someone who is sufficient, then Kim is not inquisitive and Lane is innocent.
If there is someone who is both sufficient and innocent, then Arthur is practical.
Someone who is practical and sufficient is always severe and innocent.
Channing being practical and Arthur being not sufficient imply that Arthur is sensible and Channing is severe.
If Bryant is not sufficient, then Jesse is sensible, and vice versa.
Someone is not severe if and only if he is not sufficient.
If there is at least one people who is not practical or inquisitive, then Kim is sensible.
If someone is sufficient or he is not severe, then he is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is either not sensible or not severe, then Kim is not practical and Channing is not inquisitive.
If there is someone who is not severe, then Channing is not sensible and Jesse is not sufficient.
If Jesse is inquisitive, then Channing is innocent.
If someone is not inquisitive and not innocent, then he is sufficient, and vice versa. | Kim is innocent. | self_contradiction |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Jorge is solid. | self_contradiction |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Abraham is impressive. | entailment |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Peter is not black. | neutral |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Paxton is delightful. | entailment |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Graham is jealous. | contradiction |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Jorge is not healthy. | contradiction |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Graham is not jealous. | entailment |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Otis is healthy. | entailment |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Otis is not black. | self_contradiction |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Paxton is not black. | neutral |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Peter is not delightful. | self_contradiction |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Alastair is not black. | contradiction |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Peter is delightful. | self_contradiction |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Jorge is not delightful. | contradiction |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Peter is black. | neutral |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Alastair is not delightful. | self_contradiction |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Peter is not jealous. | neutral |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Abraham is not healthy. | contradiction |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Graham is delightful. | entailment |
Alastair is not jealous.
Abraham is healthy.
Paxton is jealous.
Jorge is not solid.
Peter is not delightful.
Paxton is not impressive.
Graham is solid.
Otis is not black.
Alastair is not delightful.
Peter is healthy.
Peter is solid.
Alastair is solid.Someone who is eithor jealous or healthy is always delightful.
If there is someone who is either not jealous or not delightful, then Otis is black.
Paxton being not delightful and Alastair being solid imply that Otis is impressive.
Someone who is not jealous is always both black and solid.
If someone who is not black is also delightful, then he is jealous.
if there is at least one people who is healthy and solid, then Graham is not jealous and Abraham is not delightful.
If there is at least one people who is both not jealous and not healthy, then Jorge is solid.
If there is someone who is not delightful, then Jorge is not black and Abraham is healthy.
If Peter is solid and Graham is delightful, then Abraham is impressive and Abraham is healthy.
All not black people are healthy.
Someone who is eithor not impressive or solid is always healthy.
If Abraham is black, then Alastair is jealous, and vice versa. | Abraham is solid. | neutral |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Gilroy is bad. | neutral |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Gilroy is humble. | entailment |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Tracey is humble. | self_contradiction |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Tracey is not ashamed. | self_contradiction |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Raymond is not angry. | entailment |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Gilroy is not crazy. | entailment |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Tracey is ashamed. | self_contradiction |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Claude is bad. | entailment |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Raymond is not bad. | contradiction |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Albern is bad. | neutral |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Alston is not humble. | contradiction |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Claude is not ashamed. | self_contradiction |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Gilroy is crazy. | contradiction |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Konrad is not crazy. | neutral |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Claude is crazy. | entailment |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Gilroy is angry. | neutral |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Tracey is unable. | self_contradiction |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Alston is not bad. | contradiction |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Tracey is not bad. | neutral |
Gilroy is humble.
Claude is bad.
Tracey is not unable.
Raymond is not crazy.
Claude is unable.
Gilroy is not crazy.
Raymond is bad.
Konrad is not humble.
Konrad is not unable.
Tracey is ashamed.
Claude is crazy.
Tracey is not humble.Raymond being not crazy or Tracey being not ashamed implies that Raymond is not angry.
Albern is not bad if and only if Konrad is ashamed.
If Alston is crazy and Tracey is not unable, then Raymond is angry.
If Raymond is ashamed, then Gilroy is unable.
If there is at least one people who is not unable, then Alston is bad.
Someone is humble and not ashamed if and only if he is not unable.
It can be concluded that Raymond is not humble once knowing that Gilroy is crazy or Raymond is unable.
Konrad being not crazy implies that Raymond is not unable and Gilroy is not angry.
If there is someone who is bad, then Claude is ashamed and Konrad is not humble.
If there is at least one people who is not ashamed or angry, then Alston is not unable.
If there is someone who is both angry and unable, then Alston is ashamed and Raymond is humble.
If someone is unable, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa. | Gilroy is not humble. | contradiction |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Jorge is ugly. | contradiction |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Merlin is interesting. | neutral |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Jorge is not tall. | self_contradiction |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Kent is not interesting. | contradiction |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Merlin is oak. | neutral |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Lombard is ugly. | entailment |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Shamus is bad. | entailment |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Merlin is bad. | contradiction |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Shamus is not ugly. | entailment |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Kent is bad. | neutral |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Humphrey is tall. | self_contradiction |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Jorge is tall. | self_contradiction |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Jorge is not practical. | self_contradiction |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Scott is practical. | neutral |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Merlin is ugly. | contradiction |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Kent is not tall. | entailment |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Jorge is practical. | self_contradiction |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Scott is not bad. | neutral |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Humphrey is not bad. | contradiction |
Kent is interesting.
Jorge is bad.
Lombard is ugly.
Jorge is not practical.
Shamus is bad.
Humphrey is not tall.
Humphrey is not interesting.
Scott is oak.
Kent is practical.
Lombard is practical.
Humphrey is bad.
Kent is ugly.If there is at least one people who is bad, then Jorge is not tall.
If there is someone who is either not practical or not ugly, then Jorge is tall.
Someone is tall if and only if he is bad.
Someone is practical and not ugly if and only if he is tall.
Scott is not tall if and only if Shamus is ugly.
It can be concluded that Lombard is tall once knowing that Jorge is not interesting.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Merlin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is either not interesting or practical, then Lombard is ugly.
If there is someone who is not practical, then Merlin is not bad and Jorge is not oak.
If there is someone who is both bad and not practical, then Jorge is oak.
If there is someone who is interesting, then Scott is ugly and Kent is oak.
If there is at least one people who is bad or oak, then Kent is not tall. | Jorge is bad. | entailment |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Johnny is blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Isaac is not blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Phoebe is shallow. | entailment |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Arthur is blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Brian is wet. | entailment |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Arthur is brave. | entailment |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Brian is not wet. | contradiction |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Arthur is not blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Brian is inquisitive. | neutral |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Isaac is not wet. | contradiction |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Sandy is not blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Johnny is inquisitive. | neutral |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Sandy is not united. | entailment |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Phoebe is not united. | neutral |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Arthur is not wet. | neutral |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Arthur is not shallow. | contradiction |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Arthur is not brave. | contradiction |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Sandy is brave. | neutral |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Aidan is not blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Isaac is wet.
Aidan is not brave.
Sandy is blue-eyed.
Arthur is brave.
Phoebe is inquisitive.
Arthur is not blue-eyed.
Johnny is not blue-eyed.
Phoebe is blue-eyed.
Brian is wet.
Isaac is not shallow.
Phoebe is shallow.
Sandy is not united.As long as someone is either not united or not wet, he is not blue-eyed and shallow.
If Sandy is not inquisitive, then Aidan is not united, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not united or not inquisitive, then Arthur is shallow.
If there is at least one people who is blue-eyed or not brave, then Aidan is not wet.
If there is at least one people who is shallow, then Aidan is inquisitive.
If Phoebe is brave, then Aidan is not wet and Arthur is shallow.
If there is someone who is not inquisitive, then Johnny is not united.
If there is someone who is wet, then Arthur is blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is united, then Phoebe is inquisitive.
Someone who is not brave is always blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not brave and shallow, then Isaac is not inquisitive.
As long as someone is not shallow, he is not brave and not blue-eyed. | Phoebe is inquisitive. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.