premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Richard is not traditional. | entailment |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Lars is massive. | entailment |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Buck is traditional. | self_contradiction |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Jacob is not afraid. | contradiction |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Buck is massive. | entailment |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Jacob is not massive. | self_contradiction |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Lars is not massive. | contradiction |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Richard is traditional. | contradiction |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Richard is not victorious. | contradiction |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Kianna is not victorious. | self_contradiction |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Theobold is not afraid. | neutral |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Richard is not massive. | contradiction |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Kianna is adorable. | entailment |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Jacob is massive. | self_contradiction |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Kianna is victorious. | self_contradiction |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Lars is not victorious. | neutral |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Theobold is adorable. | neutral |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Kianna is massive. | neutral |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Jacob is old-fashioned. | entailment |
Richard is massive.
Kianna is not victorious.
Kianna is adorable.
Jacob is old-fashioned.
Lars is not traditional.
Richard is victorious.
Glen is victorious.
Jacob is not massive.
Buck is old-fashioned.
Richard is not traditional.
Glen is not adorable.
Theobold is massive.If Lars is not old-fashioned and Kianna is massive, then Lars is not adorable.
If there is someone who is both not victorious and massive, then Theobold is old-fashioned.
If Glen is not victorious, then Jacob is not adorable and Lars is old-fashioned, and vice versa.
If someone is old-fashioned, then he is both traditional and massive.
If Richard is traditional and Lars is not victorious, then Buck is adorable.
It can be concluded that Kianna is victorious and Buck is not traditional once knowing that Richard is massive.
Someone is not adorable if and only if he is afraid.
Lars is not old-fashioned if and only if Glen is traditional and Theobold is massive.
Richard being not adorable implies that Lars is not afraid and Richard is victorious.
If someone who is afraid is also massive, then he is traditional.
If someone who is not massive is also traditional, then he is afraid.
It can be concluded that Lars is massive once knowing that Kianna is victorious. | Theobold is victorious. | neutral |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Everett is curious. | neutral |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Neville is not glorious. | contradiction |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Kane is not glorious. | contradiction |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Neville is not electronic. | self_contradiction |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Neville is curious. | neutral |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Albion is not friendly. | neutral |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Everett is not legal. | entailment |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Ives is not legal. | entailment |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Garth is not electronic. | self_contradiction |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Albion is not glorious. | contradiction |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Albion is electronic. | self_contradiction |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Irvin is not legal. | entailment |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Neville is glorious. | entailment |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Ives is not electronic. | self_contradiction |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Albion is not curious. | neutral |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Everett is legal. | contradiction |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Garth is tan. | contradiction |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Kane is not friendly. | neutral |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Garth is not legal. | entailment |
Albion is not tan.
Ives is not electronic.
Irvin is not electronic.
Irvin is not legal.
Albion is legal.
Neville is glorious.
Neville is not friendly.
Ives is not tan.
Garth is not tan.
Garth is glorious.
Kane is not electronic.
Albion is not electronic.Someone being not glorious is equivalent to being curious.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Neville is not friendly.
Ives being not electronic is equivalent to Everett being not legal.
If there is someone who is not glorious, then Garth is not electronic and Kane is not curious.
Everett being friendly is equivalent to Irvin being legal and Kane being electronic.
Someone being both not legal and not tan is equivalent to being not electronic.
If someone is not legal and not electronic, then he is glorious, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not electronic, then Ives is not friendly and Kane is legal.
Neville being legal and Neville being not glorious imply that Garth is not curious.
If there is at least one people who is both electronic and tan, then Ives is not glorious.
If someone is tan or not legal, then he is electronic.
If someone is curious, then he is not legal. | Neville is electronic. | self_contradiction |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Ives is not visible. | entailment |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Richard is not horrible. | self_contradiction |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Ives is not horrible. | contradiction |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Antonio is not harsh. | neutral |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Bruno is not dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Matthew is harsh. | contradiction |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Bruno is dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Ives is harsh. | contradiction |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Antonio is not condemned. | entailment |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Matthew is not harsh. | entailment |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Ives is not dangerous. | entailment |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Bruno is harsh. | contradiction |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Bruno is not visible. | entailment |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Richard is harsh. | self_contradiction |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Ives is condemned. | neutral |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Richard is ugliest. | contradiction |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Raymond is dangerous. | neutral |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Matthew is not dangerous. | neutral |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Aidan is not ugliest. | neutral |
Richard is not horrible.
Ives is horrible.
Matthew is not harsh.
Aidan is not harsh.
Bruno is dangerous.
Richard is not dangerous.
Raymond is not condemned.
Bruno is horrible.
Richard is harsh.
Antonio is not condemned.
Aidan is not horrible.
Bruno is not harsh.If Aidan is horrible, then Bruno is dangerous.
Raymond being harsh implies that Matthew is not visible and Antonio is horrible.
As long as someone is condemned, he is not horrible and not ugliest.
Someone is not harsh and not visible if and only if he is horrible.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Raymond is visible.
Someone is not visible if and only if he is not dangerous.
If there is at least one people who is both dangerous and not condemned, then Bruno is not horrible.
As long as someone is not dangerous, he is horrible and not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not visible, then Bruno is ugliest.
If Richard is dangerous and Matthew is not ugliest, then Antonio is visible and Aidan is not harsh, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both condemned and not horrible, then Ives is dangerous.
If someone is both not harsh and not visible, then he is horrible. | Bruno is ugliest. | self_contradiction |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Rodney is cooperative. | neutral |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Hunter is not tremendous. | self_contradiction |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Quinlan is tremendous. | self_contradiction |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Graham is generous. | neutral |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Glenn is tremendous. | neutral |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Nicholas is not ugliest. | entailment |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Nicholas is not healthy. | entailment |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Sandy is not ugliest. | neutral |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Glenn is not sleepy. | self_contradiction |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Nicholas is ugliest. | contradiction |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Hunter is tremendous. | self_contradiction |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Nicholas is not sleepy. | entailment |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Nicholas is cooperative. | contradiction |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Hunter is sleepy. | contradiction |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Quinlan is healthy. | entailment |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Hunter is generous. | entailment |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Quinlan is not tremendous. | self_contradiction |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Rodney is not sleepy. | contradiction |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Sandy is cooperative. | neutral |
Graham is ugliest.
Hunter is generous.
Nicholas is not healthy.
Nicholas is not ugliest.
Hunter is not sleepy.
Rodney is generous.
Sandy is sleepy.
Quinlan is tremendous.
Rodney is sleepy.
Glenn is sleepy.
Nicholas is not cooperative.
Hunter is not tremendous.Someone who is not generous is always not sleepy.
Someone is not cooperative and not generous if and only if he is not ugliest and tremendous.
Glenn is cooperative if and only if Nicholas is healthy and Nicholas is tremendous.
Someone who is cooperative and not tremendous is always not generous and not sleepy.
Someone being not generous is equivalent to being not ugliest.
If someone is not tremendous, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If someone who is not ugliest is also cooperative, then he is healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy, then Quinlan is not tremendous.
If there is someone who is not ugliest, then Glenn is not sleepy.
If all people are generous, then Rodney is cooperative and Hunter is not tremendous.
Someone who is healthy is always tremendous.
It can be concluded that Sandy is ugliest once knowing that Glenn is healthy and Graham is not cooperative. | Hunter is not generous. | contradiction |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Walter is dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Alastair is not ambitious. | neutral |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Carlton is not electrical. | contradiction |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Hector is not purple. | contradiction |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Hector is not ambitious. | entailment |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Melody is not nutty. | entailment |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Melody is rainy. | entailment |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Walter is not ambitious. | contradiction |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Carlton is not purple. | contradiction |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Walter is not purple. | self_contradiction |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Melody is not purple. | self_contradiction |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Walter is purple. | self_contradiction |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Bond is not ambitious. | neutral |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Alvin is not electrical. | neutral |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Alvin is not ambitious. | neutral |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Bond is ambitious. | neutral |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Hector is not dangerous. | entailment |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Walter is not dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Carlton is not rainy. | contradiction |
Melody is not nutty.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Alvin is not dangerous.
Carlton is electrical.
Alastair is not electrical.
Hector is not ambitious.
Walter is dangerous.
Bond is dangerous.
Alvin is rainy.
Walter is purple.
Melody is purple.
Bond is not electrical.If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not ambitious, then Carlton is electrical.
All not nutty people are ambitious.
Bond being ambitious is equivalent to Melody being not electrical and Melody being not rainy.
If someone is not ambitious or he is electrical, then he is rainy.
If someone is not dangerous and ambitious, then he is not purple, and vice versa.
If Bond is rainy, then Alvin is nutty.
Someone being both electrical and not purple is equivalent to being not nutty.
Someone who is not ambitious or rainy is always purple and not dangerous.
All ambitious people are purple.
If there is someone who is not ambitious, then Hector is nutty and Walter is not purple.
If someone is ambitious, then he is both not dangerous and purple.
Melody is dangerous if and only if Carlton is purple. | Carlton is rainy. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.