premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Scott is expensive. | entailment |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Brooke is not ugly. | neutral |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Brent is not expensive. | contradiction |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Scott is combative. | entailment |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Brent is few. | entailment |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Brent is not ugly. | self_contradiction |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Isaac is not expensive. | contradiction |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Sherard is not combative. | contradiction |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Sherard is expensive. | self_contradiction |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Isaac is not few. | neutral |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Brent is not combative. | self_contradiction |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Brent is dark. | self_contradiction |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Sherwin is not expensive. | neutral |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Isaac is not ugly. | neutral |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Isaac is severe. | neutral |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Brent is severe. | entailment |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Sherard is dark. | contradiction |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Isaac is not dark. | entailment |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Scott is not combative. | contradiction |
Lloyd is not dark.
Brent is not dark.
Scott is combative.
Brent is ugly.
Brent is not combative.
Isaac is not dark.
Scott is not few.
Lloyd is combative.
Sherard is combative.
Lloyd is few.
Scott is dark.
Brooke is not combative.Someone who is eithor severe or not dark is always expensive.
Sherard is not severe if and only if Lloyd is few and Sherard is not ugly.
It can be concluded that Brooke is not expensive and Brooke is ugly once knowing that Isaac is dark and Brent is few.
Brooke is combative if and only if Sherwin is not expensive and Brent is ugly.
Sherwin being not expensive or Lloyd being not dark implies that Brent is severe.
If there is someone who is either not expensive or combative, then Brent is dark.
Scott is dark if and only if Scott is not severe and Sherard is not expensive.
If someone is dark, then he is few.
Someone being not dark is equivalent to being combative.
Someone being both not combative and not dark is equivalent to being severe and not ugly.
If someone is few, then he is dark.
If there is someone who is either not severe or not dark, then Brooke is not combative and Sherwin is not few. | Brent is combative. | self_contradiction |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Adrian is not careless. | contradiction |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Stefan is not curious. | self_contradiction |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Bruce is ashamed. | entailment |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Bruce is unpleasant. | neutral |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Connell is ashamed. | contradiction |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Stefan is scary. | self_contradiction |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Stefan is not careless. | self_contradiction |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Stefan is not unpleasant. | contradiction |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Sherard is not curious. | entailment |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Gardner is scary. | entailment |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Stefan is careless. | self_contradiction |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Adrian is not unpleasant. | contradiction |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Bruce is scary. | entailment |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Gardner is not scary. | contradiction |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Bruce is not curious. | neutral |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Sherard is not unpleasant. | neutral |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Gardner is careless. | neutral |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Bruce is entire. | neutral |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Connell is unpleasant. | self_contradiction |
Gardner is curious.
Stefan is not curious.
Bruce is ashamed.
Stefan is not careless.
Stefan is unpleasant.
Sherard is not curious.
Connell is careless.
Stefan is not scary.
Adrian is curious.
Connell is not ashamed.
Adrian is not scary.
Gardner is scary.Someone who is not scary is always both careless and curious.
Someone being careless is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If Neville is not curious, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is scary.
It can be concluded that Connell is not ashamed once knowing that Stefan is not unpleasant and Gardner is not entire.
It can be concluded that Adrian is entire and Neville is not scary once knowing that Gardner is careless.
If someone is ashamed, then he is scary.
If there is at least one people who is careless, then Stefan is ashamed and Stefan is curious.
If Sherard is not unpleasant and Sherard is not scary, then Stefan is not careless and Stefan is not ashamed.
If Stefan is not unpleasant, then Bruce is not entire and Adrian is careless, and vice versa.
Sherard is unpleasant if and only if Sherard is ashamed and Neville is not scary.
It can be concluded that Bruce is careless once knowing that Stefan is curious and Gardner is not entire.
Connell being not unpleasant is equivalent to Stefan being ashamed and Stefan being careless. | Stefan is ashamed. | entailment |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Lambert is not helpful. | entailment |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Kathryn is not clear. | self_contradiction |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Garrick is clear. | entailment |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Kathryn is clear. | self_contradiction |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Kyle is sad. | contradiction |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Gemma is sad. | neutral |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Kathryn is not wrong. | entailment |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Garrick is pleasant. | self_contradiction |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Lambert is wrong. | self_contradiction |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Lambert is not sad. | entailment |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Leonard is not pleasant. | neutral |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Kyle is not wrong. | contradiction |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Lambert is pleasant. | entailment |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Lambert is sad. | contradiction |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Garrick is not clear. | contradiction |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Garrick is not wrong. | self_contradiction |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Leonard is not helpful. | neutral |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Leonard is sad. | neutral |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Gemma is not pleasant. | contradiction |
Garrick is not wrong.
Gemma is not wrong.
Garrick is not pleasant.
Lambert is not wrong.
Kathryn is helpful.
Lambert is wrong.
Kyle is clear.
Kathryn is not wrong.
Lambert is not helpful.
Lambert is clear.
Kathryn is not clear.
Garrick is helpful.Kathryn being not clear is equivalent to Goddard being helpful and Kyle being wrong.
If there is at least one people who is clear or wrong, then Lambert is pleasant.
If Goddard is not wrong and Goddard is clear, then Kyle is not sad.
If there is someone who is pleasant, then Goddard is not clear and Garrick is wrong.
Someone being both not wrong and clear is equivalent to being pleasant.
If there is at least one people who is wrong or not sad, then Gemma is not wrong.
Goddard is clear if and only if Gemma is not helpful and Gemma is not wrong.
If someone is both not helpful and clear, then he is not sad.
Someone who is both clear and wrong is always not sad.
If someone is not wrong or not wrong, then he is clear.
If there is at least one people who is clear, then Garrick is not pleasant.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or not wrong, then Gemma is pleasant. | Kyle is helpful. | neutral |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Hunter is not cautious. | entailment |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Kerry is not famous. | self_contradiction |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Sherwin is not elegant. | neutral |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Gloria is sticky. | self_contradiction |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Justin is cautious. | contradiction |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Hubert is cautious. | contradiction |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Justin is not sticky. | entailment |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Kerry is not sticky. | neutral |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Kerry is hypocritical. | neutral |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Justin is not compassionate. | entailment |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Gloria is cautious. | self_contradiction |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Gloria is compassionate. | self_contradiction |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Gloria is not hypocritical. | neutral |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Kerry is not elegant. | neutral |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Hunter is cautious. | contradiction |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Justin is not elegant. | contradiction |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Hunter is famous. | entailment |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Justin is not famous. | contradiction |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Sherwin is hypocritical. | entailment |
Gloria is compassionate.
Sherwin is hypocritical.
Gloria is sticky.
Justin is not compassionate.
Kerry is not famous.
Hunter is famous.
Hubert is not famous.
Hunter is not cautious.
Norris is sticky.
Hubert is not elegant.
Justin is elegant.
Gloria is cautious.If someone is not sticky or not famous, then he is not cautious.
If there is someone who is both cautious and elegant, then Hunter is not hypocritical and Hubert is famous.
If there is someone who is both sticky and compassionate, then Justin is not cautious.
Someone who is both not elegant and not cautious is always famous.
If Sherwin is cautious, then Norris is not hypocritical.
If Sherwin is elegant or Hunter is cautious, then Hubert is not famous.
If there is nobody who is not not cautious, then Norris is elegant.
As long as someone is cautious, he is not famous and not compassionate.
If someone is not cautious, then he is famous, and vice versa.
If someone is both sticky and cautious, then he is not compassionate.
If there is at least one people who is cautious, then Norris is famous.
If someone is not elegant or he is not compassionate, then he is not sticky. | Gloria is not compassionate. | self_contradiction |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Joshua is not grumpy. | neutral |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Curtis is not uninterested. | contradiction |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Clifford is not uninterested. | contradiction |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Henry is federal. | contradiction |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Curtis is grumpy. | contradiction |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Clifford is not grumpy. | entailment |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Alexander is federal. | neutral |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Henry is not impossible. | entailment |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Alexander is sleepy. | neutral |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Henry is sleepy. | self_contradiction |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Curtis is gentle. | self_contradiction |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Clifford is gentle. | self_contradiction |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Clifford is federal. | self_contradiction |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Alexander is not sleepy. | neutral |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Clifford is uninterested. | entailment |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Curtis is not gentle. | self_contradiction |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Alexander is not grumpy. | entailment |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Theodore is federal. | entailment |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Joshua is impossible. | neutral |
Gale is not sleepy.
Clifford is not sleepy.
Curtis is not impossible.
Theodore is federal.
Curtis is not grumpy.
Gale is not grumpy.
Clifford is not federal.
Henry is gentle.
Joshua is not uninterested.
Alexander is not grumpy.
Curtis is not federal.
Henry is sleepy.If Theodore is gentle, then Theodore is uninterested and Clifford is impossible.
Someone is not sleepy and not grumpy if and only if he is not gentle.
All grumpy people are uninterested.
If there is someone who is both not impossible and not grumpy, then Clifford is federal.
Clifford being sleepy and Curtis being not uninterested imply that Gale is not federal.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Joshua is not uninterested and Henry is not federal.
If Theodore is not federal, then Clifford is not uninterested, and vice versa.
Theodore being impossible is equivalent to Joshua being not gentle and Joshua being not sleepy.
If there is someone who is sleepy, then Curtis is gentle and Henry is not impossible.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is both uninterested and not grumpy.
It can be concluded that Curtis is not grumpy and Joshua is sleepy once knowing that Theodore is not federal and Curtis is gentle.
Someone being both not federal and not sleepy is equivalent to being gentle. | Theodore is not federal. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.