premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Titus is not wet. | entailment |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Solomon is not sharp. | neutral |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Lincoln is not every. | neutral |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Solomon is not every. | neutral |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Alton is not sharp. | self_contradiction |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Alton is mental. | entailment |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Hadley is mental. | entailment |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Titus is electronic. | contradiction |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Titus is not sharp. | self_contradiction |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Hadley is every. | contradiction |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Lincoln is electronic. | contradiction |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Alton is electronic. | contradiction |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Hadley is sharp. | self_contradiction |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Titus is jealous. | self_contradiction |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Titus is not jealous. | self_contradiction |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Lincoln is not mental. | neutral |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Titus is not electronic. | entailment |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Merlin is not mental. | entailment |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Merlin is mental. | contradiction |
Ron is every.
Hadley is not jealous.
Hadley is not sharp.
Hadley is not every.
Alton is not jealous.
Alton is not sharp.
Alton is wet.
Merlin is not mental.
Titus is mental.
Ron is not mental.
Titus is not wet.
Titus is not jealous.If someone who is mental is also jealous, then he is not electronic.
Someone is not wet and mental if and only if he is jealous and sharp.
All not sharp people are mental.
Solomon is electronic if and only if Titus is sharp and Ron is not jealous.
Someone being both electronic and not jealous is equivalent to being every and not wet.
If someone is either not wet or not every, then he is not jealous and not sharp.
Someone who is mental is always both sharp and not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Alton is not wet and Alton is not electronic.
If there is someone who is both not sharp and not mental, then Lincoln is not electronic.
Someone who is both not every and not electronic is always wet.
All not jealous people are not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not wet and mental, then Lincoln is not sharp and Lincoln is not electronic. | Ron is not electronic. | neutral |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Gilroy is not quaint. | neutral |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Danna is weak. | neutral |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Cedric is wild. | contradiction |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Gilroy is purple. | self_contradiction |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Jed is not purple. | contradiction |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Kirk is purple. | contradiction |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Cedric is not purple. | contradiction |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Cedric is weak. | self_contradiction |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Kirk is famous. | entailment |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Phineas is not clear. | entailment |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Cedric is not clear. | self_contradiction |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Gilroy is weak. | entailment |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Danna is not weak. | neutral |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Bruno is not weak. | self_contradiction |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Kirk is wild. | neutral |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Phineas is purple. | self_contradiction |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Bruno is purple. | entailment |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Kirk is not wild. | neutral |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Gilroy is not famous. | entailment |
Danna is quaint.
Gilroy is not purple.
Cedric is not wild.
Cedric is quaint.
Cedric is purple.
Bruno is quaint.
Phineas is not purple.
Jed is purple.
Kirk is famous.
Bruno is not weak.
Gilroy is clear.
Phineas is not famous.If someone is either not quaint or purple, then he is not famous and weak.
It can be concluded that Gilroy is not wild once knowing that Cedric is clear or Bruno is purple.
It can be concluded that Kirk is not purple once knowing that Jed is not famous or Phineas is clear.
Kirk being weak and Jed being not famous imply that Cedric is not wild and Phineas is not quaint.
If someone is purple, then he is not famous, and vice versa.
If someone is famous and clear, then he is not weak, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not clear, then Gilroy is purple and Cedric is not weak.
If there is at least one people who is either famous or not wild, then Kirk is weak and Cedric is not quaint.
Someone who is not quaint is always not clear.
Jed being famous and Phineas being not clear imply that Bruno is weak.
Someone is famous and purple if and only if he is clear and quaint.
Cedric being not purple implies that Gilroy is not famous. | Jed is famous. | contradiction |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Herbert is gentle. | neutral |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Gardner is sleepy. | entailment |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Jorge is sleepy. | self_contradiction |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Jacob is not sleepy. | entailment |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Hartley is sleepy. | self_contradiction |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Hartley is not loyal. | neutral |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Herbert is not modern. | self_contradiction |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Herbert is modern. | self_contradiction |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Hartley is massive. | contradiction |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Herbert is not courteous. | entailment |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Chester is loyal. | contradiction |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Jorge is modern. | self_contradiction |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Jorge is gentle. | neutral |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Jorge is not loyal. | neutral |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Aldis is sleepy. | neutral |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Chester is not modern. | contradiction |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Herbert is sleepy. | entailment |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Jacob is not courteous. | contradiction |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Hartley is not modern. | contradiction |
Chester is not gentle.
Hartley is not massive.
Chester is not loyal.
Jorge is not modern.
Jorge is not sleepy.
Jorge is not courteous.
Herbert is massive.
Jacob is courteous.
Chester is sleepy.
Gardner is sleepy.
Herbert is not modern.
Jacob is not sleepy.Someone is modern if and only if he is sleepy.
If someone is not courteous or he is not gentle, then he is modern.
Jorge being sleepy or Jorge being modern implies that Herbert is loyal.
As long as someone is either gentle or not massive, he is modern and sleepy.
If there is someone who is either massive or gentle, then Chester is not sleepy.
Gardner is gentle if and only if Jorge is not sleepy and Jorge is not massive.
If Jacob is not massive or Herbert is not gentle, then Hartley is loyal.
If someone is both not gentle and loyal, then he is not modern.
If there is at least one people who is not modern, then Gardner is not gentle and Herbert is massive.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Hartley is not sleepy.
Someone being massive is equivalent to being not courteous.
If Gardner is not modern, then Herbert is not gentle and Herbert is not massive. | Chester is not loyal. | entailment |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Sophie is sensible. | self_contradiction |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Sophie is comprehensive. | contradiction |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Todd is dead. | contradiction |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Johnny is cold. | neutral |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Gilbert is not grumpy. | neutral |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Todd is attentive. | entailment |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Sophie is not grumpy. | self_contradiction |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Lambert is not grumpy. | contradiction |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Sophie is cold. | entailment |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Gilbert is comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Lambert is grumpy. | entailment |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Chalmers is not cold. | neutral |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Chalmers is not comprehensive. | neutral |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Chalmers is attentive. | entailment |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Sophie is grumpy. | self_contradiction |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Gilbert is not comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Lambert is not sensible. | contradiction |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Johnny is not dead. | entailment |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Johnny is comprehensive. | neutral |
Todd is attentive.
Todd is not dead.
Lambert is grumpy.
Johnny is not dead.
Sophie is not grumpy.
Todd is not cold.
Gilbert is comprehensive.
Chalmers is attentive.
Todd is grumpy.
Sophie is not comprehensive.
Johnny is not sensible.
Lambert is attentive.Someone is attentive and grumpy if and only if he is not dead.
If there is someone who is not attentive, then Gilbert is not comprehensive and Lambert is sensible.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not comprehensive and Luisa is not grumpy once knowing that Gilbert is not cold.
If there is someone who is both attentive and not cold, then Todd is sensible.
If someone is both sensible and grumpy, then he is cold.
As long as someone is not grumpy, he is sensible and not attentive.
If everyone is not cold, then Todd is grumpy and Lambert is not comprehensive.
Someone who is dead is always grumpy.
Someone who is not attentive is always grumpy.
Someone who is both grumpy and not attentive is always not sensible.
If there is at least one people who is not comprehensive, then Johnny is attentive and Todd is not dead.
If someone is not grumpy or he is not comprehensive, then he is not sensible. | Todd is not attentive. | contradiction |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Shelley is rich. | self_contradiction |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Lucille is rich. | entailment |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Lucille is not cotton. | entailment |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Hector is beige. | contradiction |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Hector is rich. | self_contradiction |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Kerry is not basic. | contradiction |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Harvey is not hypocritical. | neutral |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Shelley is basic. | self_contradiction |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Kerry is hypocritical. | contradiction |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Chester is not beige. | contradiction |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Shelley is beige. | self_contradiction |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Lucille is not basic. | contradiction |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Hector is competitive. | neutral |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Shelley is not basic. | self_contradiction |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Chester is not competitive. | entailment |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Harvey is beige. | neutral |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Hector is not hypocritical. | entailment |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Shelley is hypocritical. | entailment |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Lucille is not hypocritical. | neutral |
Kerry is not hypocritical.
Kerry is basic.
Chester is not competitive.
Kerry is not competitive.
Ives is basic.
Lucille is not cotton.
Shelley is hypocritical.
Shelley is basic.
Hector is not basic.
Shelley is not cotton.
Hector is not hypocritical.
Chester is beige.If Ives is competitive and Hector is not rich, then Harvey is hypocritical.
If someone is basic and not beige, then he is both not cotton and not rich, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Chester is not competitive and Kerry is not beige once knowing that Harvey is cotton.
If Chester is cotton, then Chester is not basic and Ives is not hypocritical, and vice versa.
Shelley being hypocritical implies that Harvey is not competitive.
If someone is not cotton, then he is both basic and rich.
Hector being not beige is equivalent to Harvey being not rich.
If someone is not basic or he is competitive, then he is not cotton.
It can be concluded that Shelley is beige once knowing that Kerry is basic or Shelley is competitive.
If there is someone who is competitive, then Lucille is beige.
If there is at least one people who is beige, then Shelley is not basic.
If someone is not basic and not cotton, then he is both not rich and not beige, and vice versa. | Kerry is not rich. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.