premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Alexia is not embarrassed. | entailment |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Kerwin is not massive. | self_contradiction |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Martin is useful. | neutral |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Kerwin is not useful. | contradiction |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Charles is tender. | self_contradiction |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Charles is not serious. | contradiction |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Martin is desperate. | neutral |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Martin is not serious. | neutral |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Liam is serious. | self_contradiction |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Alexia is embarrassed. | contradiction |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Corwin is not embarrassed. | contradiction |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Alexia is desperate. | entailment |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Charles is desperate. | contradiction |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Kerwin is useful. | entailment |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Liam is not desperate. | neutral |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Charles is massive. | self_contradiction |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Kerwin is not tender. | entailment |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Calvert is not tender. | entailment |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Liam is not useful. | neutral |
Liam is serious.
Martin is not massive.
Calvert is not desperate.
Alexia is not embarrassed.
Charles is not desperate.
Kerwin is useful.
Kerwin is massive.
Corwin is massive.
Calvert is not tender.
Corwin is embarrassed.
Charles is not embarrassed.
Alexia is desperate.If Corwin is massive and Corwin is not tender, then Kerwin is not embarrassed.
Someone is not embarrassed and serious if and only if he is useful and not desperate.
If there is someone who is either not tender or not useful, then Liam is not serious and Charles is massive.
If there is nobody who is not not tender, then Liam is useful.
Someone who is both embarrassed and not useful is always tender.
If Charles is massive, then Corwin is not tender.
As long as someone is not embarrassed, he is not tender and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is both not massive and serious, then Calvert is desperate.
If Kerwin is useful, then Kerwin is embarrassed.
Someone being both not massive and tender is equivalent to being serious.
If Liam is not embarrassed, then Martin is useful and Corwin is not desperate.
Charles is useful if and only if Liam is not serious and Charles is not massive. | Charles is not massive. | self_contradiction |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Johnny is not condemned. | neutral |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Conan is relevant. | self_contradiction |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Otis is not depressed. | neutral |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Spencer is not diplomatic. | neutral |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Otis is not wrong. | neutral |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Keegan is tan. | self_contradiction |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Ives is tan. | entailment |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Johnny is not relevant. | entailment |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Jacob is wrong. | contradiction |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Ives is not relevant. | self_contradiction |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Conan is not diplomatic. | contradiction |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Spencer is not relevant. | neutral |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Ives is not tan. | contradiction |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Ives is not diplomatic. | contradiction |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Otis is not relevant. | entailment |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Conan is not relevant. | self_contradiction |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Keegan is wrong. | contradiction |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Keegan is not depressed. | self_contradiction |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Conan is not wrong. | entailment |
Ives is relevant.
Jacob is condemned.
Ives is not wrong.
Ives is depressed.
Conan is not condemned.
Keegan is not tan.
Johnny is not tan.
Keegan is not wrong.
Otis is not relevant.
Keegan is not condemned.
Otis is tan.
Conan is relevant.If someone is depressed, then he is both condemned and not wrong.
If someone is tan and not wrong, then he is both not relevant and depressed, and vice versa.
Someone who is not tan is always both not relevant and not wrong.
It can be concluded that Spencer is relevant once knowing that Spencer is diplomatic.
Jacob being not wrong is equivalent to Keegan being not condemned.
If someone is not condemned or relevant, then he is diplomatic.
If Spencer is not tan, then Conan is not diplomatic.
Someone who is both wrong and not diplomatic is always not condemned.
Jacob is diplomatic and Johnny is depressed if and only if Ives is wrong and Keegan is not relevant.
If there is at least one people who is not condemned, then Ives is not relevant.
As long as someone is diplomatic, he is not relevant and depressed.
If there is at least one people who is both not condemned and not wrong, then Keegan is not depressed. | Ives is diplomatic. | entailment |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Neville is not tender. | contradiction |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Caldwell is not tender. | entailment |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Neville is quaint. | self_contradiction |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Neville is smart. | self_contradiction |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Neville is inner. | entailment |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Kendall is not smart. | contradiction |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Austin is smart. | contradiction |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Kim is tender. | entailment |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Caldwell is smart. | self_contradiction |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Kim is not inner. | neutral |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Kim is not tender. | contradiction |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Caldwell is quaint. | entailment |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Austin is not inner. | entailment |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Kendall is mental. | neutral |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Austin is not mental. | neutral |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Stuart is not thoughtful. | neutral |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Kim is not quaint. | neutral |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Alastair is quaint. | self_contradiction |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Neville is not quaint. | self_contradiction |
Neville is tender.
Caldwell is not inner.
Alastair is not quaint.
Neville is not quaint.
Caldwell is not smart.
Kendall is thoughtful.
Caldwell is not tender.
Neville is thoughtful.
Alastair is not tender.
Austin is not inner.
Neville is not smart.
Austin is not smart.If there is at least one people who is both quaint and tender, then Stuart is not mental.
If everyone is not tender, then Alastair is not quaint and Austin is not inner.
If there is at least one people who is smart, then Stuart is not inner and Kim is tender.
If everyone is tender or not quaint, then Kim is thoughtful.
If someone is thoughtful or he is not tender, then he is smart.
If someone who is not thoughtful is also tender, then he is inner.
Someone being both inner and quaint is equivalent to being smart.
If Neville is not quaint, then Caldwell is inner.
It can be concluded that Stuart is not thoughtful once knowing that Alastair is not tender and Kendall is not smart.
Kim being thoughtful and Neville being inner imply that Kendall is mental.
If Neville is quaint and Alastair is not tender, then Caldwell is smart.
Someone who is eithor mental or not tender is always thoughtful. | Alastair is not inner. | contradiction |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Alastair is concerned. | entailment |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Bowen is concerned. | neutral |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Kianna is not thankful. | neutral |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Crispin is thankful. | entailment |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Sloane is concerned. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Kianna is thankful. | neutral |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Kianna is good. | entailment |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Crispin is not good. | contradiction |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Alastair is good. | neutral |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Sloane is not concerned. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Alastair is not splendid. | contradiction |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Kianna is not splendid. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Scott is shallow. | entailment |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Alastair is not concerned. | contradiction |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Alastair is not blue. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Scott is not good. | entailment |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Brooke is not splendid. | contradiction |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Scott is not splendid. | neutral |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Brooke is concerned. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not good.
Brooke is splendid.
Crispin is good.
Scott is thankful.
Alastair is splendid.
Bowen is shallow.
Sloane is not shallow.
Alastair is not shallow.
Bowen is good.
Scott is not good.
Sloane is splendid.
Brooke is blue.It can be concluded that Bowen is not splendid and Brooke is not good once knowing that Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is concerned, then he is blue.
It can be concluded that Brooke is thankful once knowing that Bowen is splendid.
If there is at least one people who is both blue and thankful, then Kianna is good.
If someone is not shallow, then he is not blue.
Alastair being not good and Alastair being not thankful imply that Alastair is concerned.
If there is someone who is both not blue and not splendid, then Alastair is not shallow.
If someone is either thankful or splendid, then he is concerned and shallow.
If there is at least one people who is not shallow, then Brooke is not thankful and Kianna is splendid.
Someone who is shallow and not good is always not concerned and thankful.
Crispin being not concerned and Kianna being shallow imply that Alastair is thankful.
Scott being not good is equivalent to Crispin being thankful and Kianna being not splendid. | Kianna is not good. | contradiction |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Alexander is not curious. | entailment |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Sheridan is massive. | entailment |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Gilbert is not steep. | entailment |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Alexander is not miniscule. | contradiction |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Joe is brave. | self_contradiction |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Chrysta is miniscule. | neutral |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Alexander is not sticky. | neutral |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Alisa is miniscule. | self_contradiction |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Joe is not brave. | self_contradiction |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Joe is not miniscule. | self_contradiction |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Sheridan is not sticky. | entailment |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Sheridan is not curious. | contradiction |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Sheridan is sticky. | contradiction |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Joe is curious. | self_contradiction |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Chrysta is brave. | neutral |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Alisa is massive. | neutral |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Alexander is not massive. | contradiction |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Alexander is miniscule. | entailment |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Chrysta is not miniscule. | neutral |
Alisa is not miniscule.
Joe is sticky.
Sheridan is curious.
Joe is not steep.
Sheridan is brave.
Sheridan is not sticky.
Joe is brave.
Joe is not curious.
Alexander is not curious.
Alexander is massive.
Alisa is not curious.
Deborah is sticky.Sheridan being brave implies that Gilbert is not steep and Chrysta is curious.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Alisa is not miniscule.
Someone being both not brave and not miniscule is equivalent to being sticky and not curious.
Someone being miniscule is equivalent to being not curious.
Alisa being not steep is equivalent to Joe being massive.
Someone who is both miniscule and sticky is always curious.
It can be concluded that Chrysta is not sticky and Gilbert is miniscule once knowing that Deborah is not steep.
If Alisa is steep and Alexander is massive, then Chrysta is not sticky.
If Deborah is not massive or Deborah is not steep, then Alisa is not sticky.
If Sheridan is not steep or Alexander is curious, then Sheridan is miniscule.
Sheridan being brave is equivalent to Sheridan being massive and Alisa being not curious.
If there is nobody who is not not sticky, then Alexander is not curious. | Sheridan is not massive. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.