premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Glen is old-fashioned. | neutral |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Casper is attractive. | contradiction |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Glen is not frightened. | neutral |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Gabriel is frail. | entailment |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Peter is not attractive. | self_contradiction |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Kimball is frightened. | neutral |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Rupert is not courageous. | self_contradiction |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Glen is courageous. | neutral |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Peter is not old-fashioned. | contradiction |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Casper is not frightened. | entailment |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Glen is not frail. | contradiction |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Casper is purple. | self_contradiction |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Quimby is not courageous. | contradiction |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Kimball is not old-fashioned. | neutral |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Peter is courageous. | entailment |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Gabriel is not old-fashioned. | contradiction |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Gabriel is not attractive. | self_contradiction |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Quimby is frightened. | self_contradiction |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Quimby is old-fashioned. | entailment |
Rupert is not frightened.
Gabriel is frightened.
Rupert is not courageous.
Gabriel is old-fashioned.
Casper is not purple.
Glen is frail.
Rupert is not attractive.
Quimby is purple.
Quimby is frightened.
Casper is not frail.
Peter is frightened.
Peter is frail.If Kimball is not old-fashioned, then Kimball is not attractive and Rupert is purple.
It can be concluded that Rupert is frightened once knowing that Glen is purple or Gabriel is not frail.
If someone is not attractive, then he is frail.
Quimby being not courageous or Peter being not frail implies that Casper is not frightened.
Someone being both attractive and courageous is equivalent to being frightened.
If all people are old-fashioned or frail, then Glen is not purple.
Someone is not frightened and purple if and only if he is courageous and frail.
As long as someone is courageous, he is old-fashioned and not attractive.
If there is someone who is frail, then Quimby is frightened and Casper is not attractive.
If someone is not courageous, then he is both not purple and not frightened.
Glen being frightened implies that Peter is not frail and Rupert is courageous.
Someone being not attractive is equivalent to being courageous. | Gabriel is old-fashioned. | entailment |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Rufus is romantic. | contradiction |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Valentina is grumpy. | neutral |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Lars is romantic. | entailment |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Spencer is not remarkable. | entailment |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Valentina is romantic. | contradiction |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Lars is not remarkable. | entailment |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Shamus is romantic. | self_contradiction |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Guy is grumpy. | self_contradiction |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Rufus is not fine. | neutral |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Lars is fine. | contradiction |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Shamus is not repulsive. | neutral |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Spencer is not fine. | self_contradiction |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Spencer is fine. | self_contradiction |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Lars is not lucky. | neutral |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Spencer is not repulsive. | entailment |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Rufus is lucky. | contradiction |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Spencer is repulsive. | contradiction |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Spencer is romantic. | self_contradiction |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Guy is romantic. | neutral |
Rufus is not lucky.
Spencer is fine.
Guy is lucky.
Rufus is not romantic.
Guy is repulsive.
Shamus is lucky.
Helena is lucky.
Valentina is not romantic.
Spencer is not romantic.
Guy is not grumpy.
Spencer is not repulsive.
Shamus is not romantic.Lars is not fine if and only if Spencer is not repulsive.
Someone is romantic and not remarkable if and only if he is not fine.
If there is at least one people who is remarkable, then Valentina is not fine and Shamus is not repulsive.
If Guy is repulsive, then Shamus is romantic and Spencer is not fine, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not repulsive and not fine, then Guy is grumpy and Shamus is romantic.
Someone who is both remarkable and not repulsive is always not lucky.
Valentina is not remarkable if and only if Valentina is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Shamus is grumpy once knowing that Guy is repulsive or Shamus is not lucky.
If Shamus is not fine or Rufus is grumpy, then Shamus is not lucky.
It can be concluded that Valentina is romantic once knowing that Helena is fine or Valentina is not remarkable.
If Guy is not repulsive, then Shamus is remarkable.
If there is someone who is both not remarkable and not lucky, then Rufus is not fine. | Helena is lucky. | entailment |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Randolph is not famous. | neutral |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Truman is not funny. | contradiction |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Claudia is foolish. | contradiction |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Greyson is not curious. | neutral |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Roland is foolish. | contradiction |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Baird is busy. | entailment |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Claudia is not famous. | entailment |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Roland is not unable. | self_contradiction |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Claudia is unable. | self_contradiction |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Baird is not foolish. | entailment |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Claudia is busy. | self_contradiction |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Baird is funny. | neutral |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Greyson is not famous. | neutral |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Claudia is not unable. | self_contradiction |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Randolph is foolish. | contradiction |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Sloane is not famous. | neutral |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Claudia is not busy. | self_contradiction |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Randolph is not unable. | contradiction |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Roland is not foolish. | entailment |
Roland is busy.
Randolph is funny.
Claudia is not foolish.
Claudia is funny.
Baird is busy.
Claudia is not unable.
Roland is not unable.
Truman is funny.
Claudia is not busy.
Greyson is funny.
Sloane is not busy.
Randolph is not foolish.If someone is famous and funny, then he is both not busy and foolish, and vice versa.
Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being unable.
If everyone is famous or foolish, then Greyson is unable.
If someone is not curious or busy, then he is unable.
If Sloane is not busy and Claudia is famous, then Roland is unable and Claudia is not curious.
As long as someone is curious, he is busy and famous.
If there is at least one people who is busy, then Randolph is funny.
It can be concluded that Randolph is foolish once knowing that Truman is not curious.
If someone who is funny is also not curious, then he is busy.
Baird being not foolish and Truman being not curious imply that Baird is not unable.
If Roland is not famous and Randolph is funny, then Baird is not unable and Truman is busy, and vice versa.
Someone is not famous and busy if and only if he is funny and not unable. | Roland is busy. | entailment |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Gilbert is nice. | neutral |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Morris is smiling. | entailment |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Claude is not sharp. | self_contradiction |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Claude is smiling. | self_contradiction |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Morris is strange. | contradiction |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Humphrey is not cool. | neutral |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Morris is sharp. | entailment |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Morris is not smiling. | contradiction |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Humphrey is sharp. | entailment |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Humphrey is smiling. | entailment |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Brian is cool. | contradiction |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Claude is not strange. | self_contradiction |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Claude is strange. | self_contradiction |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Claude is boring. | entailment |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Humphrey is nice. | contradiction |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Claude is sharp. | self_contradiction |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Kingsley is not sharp. | neutral |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Richard is cool. | neutral |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Morris is not sharp. | contradiction |
Claude is smiling.
Humphrey is not nice.
Humphrey is strange.
Morris is not strange.
Kingsley is not smiling.
Humphrey is sharp.
Brian is not cool.
Claude is sharp.
Morris is smiling.
Claude is strange.
Richard is not smiling.
Claude is nice.Someone who is cool is always both not smiling and not sharp.
If someone is smiling and nice, then he is boring and not sharp.
Morris is sharp if and only if Humphrey is smiling and Brian is not cool.
Morris being not nice is equivalent to Morris being boring and Humphrey being not cool.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Morris is sharp and Claude is not strange.
If someone is not nice and not strange, then he is not cool, and vice versa.
If someone is nice and not sharp, then he is cool, and vice versa.
If someone is boring or strange, then he is sharp.
If Kingsley is not strange, then Gilbert is sharp, and vice versa.
Someone who is boring is always not sharp.
If Kingsley is not cool, then Morris is boring and Brian is nice.
If Kingsley is not cool and Humphrey is nice, then Humphrey is not smiling. | Richard is not sharp. | neutral |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Connell is not crazy. | neutral |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Burton is not oak. | entailment |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Roy is not latter. | self_contradiction |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Roy is happy. | entailment |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Gilroy is oak. | neutral |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Roy is latter. | self_contradiction |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Burton is not relevant. | contradiction |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Burton is oak. | contradiction |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Angelique is not relevant. | entailment |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Igor is latter. | self_contradiction |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Connell is latter. | neutral |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Gilroy is not relevant. | entailment |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Igor is crazy. | contradiction |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Greyson is not latter. | self_contradiction |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Roy is interesting. | entailment |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Angelique is not interesting. | neutral |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Igor is not happy. | self_contradiction |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Roy is crazy. | neutral |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Greyson is oak. | contradiction |
Igor is oak.
Greyson is not latter.
Igor is not crazy.
Angelique is not relevant.
Burton is relevant.
Angelique is not oak.
Igor is happy.
Greyson is relevant.
Gilroy is not relevant.
Igor is not relevant.
Igor is interesting.
Roy is relevant.If someone is not oak and latter, then he is happy, and vice versa.
If Connell is not happy or Greyson is relevant, then Igor is oak.
It can be concluded that Burton is interesting once knowing that Gilroy is relevant and Gilroy is crazy.
If there is at least one people who is crazy, then Igor is not latter and Igor is happy.
It can be concluded that Igor is not oak and Roy is interesting once knowing that Igor is not happy.
If someone is both not interesting and happy, then he is relevant.
If someone is relevant, then he is both happy and interesting.
Burton being not happy is equivalent to Connell being relevant and Angelique being not latter.
Someone being both not latter and not happy is equivalent to being not crazy.
Someone who is both not interesting and not relevant is always not latter.
If someone is not latter, then he is relevant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is interesting, he is happy and not oak. | Greyson is not relevant. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.