prompt
stringlengths
3
940
output
stringlengths
112
942
== Airstaff schedule == I absolutley do not agree, I think they sould be allowed as i put them on, i am not exactly telling anyone what time they are on just what shift they hold down and who they are. In my opinon wikipedia is wrong in this sense. I think they should be allowed because the jocks are the most important part of a radio station, without them most radio stations would not be where they are today. Take WRIF or WKQI in detroit there morning shows are the most popular in the market and it is kind of cool and go online and see who actually is on it. Another reason (which is kind of stupid to some people, but to radio people like me it
== Airstaff schedule == I absolutley do not agree, I think they sould be allowed as i put them on, i am not exactly telling anyone what time they are on just what shift they hold down and who they are. In my opinon wikipedia is wrong in this sense. I think they should be allowed because the jocks are the most important part of a radio station, without them most radio stations would not be where they are today. Take WRIF or WKQI in detroit there morning shows are the most popular in the market and it is kind of cool and go online and see who actually is on it. Another reason (which is kind of stupid to some people, but to radio people like me it is
::::That mini-edit war was so stupid - so
::::That mini-edit war was so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid -
Barek, Thanks for joining the discussion. As I mentioned to Luigi, 'it's not nice to throw that [a person's time/efforts] away without a basic exchange of civility.' I asked Luigi to read before he/she hits the delete button, and then, to grant a New User a Deletion Discussion...neither of which are unreasonable requests in a global, grass-roots, 'free-information' forum; nor did they necessitate intervention from anyone other than the intended reader. What's more: this is not a new concern that I raise, or is it one that has not been raised by another more seasoned member of the WIKITeam prior to my commentary; to wit SionK's comments entitled
Barek, Thanks for joining the discussion. As I mentioned to Luigi, 'it's not nice to throw that [a person's time/efforts] away without a basic exchange of civility.' I asked Luigi to read before he/she hits the delete button, and then, to grant a New User a Deletion Discussion...neither of which are unreasonable requests in a global, grass-roots, 'free-information' forum; nor did they necessitate intervention from anyone other than the intended reader. What's more: this is not a new concern that I raise, or is it one that has not been raised by another more seasoned member of the WIKITeam prior to my commentary; to wit SionK's comments entitled '
" == Need for specific references == [Many of these authors claim inspiration from an infinite intelligence, which is referred to by different authors by various names. Wayne Dyer refers to this as ""The Source"" or ""Great Masters of the Universe"". Louise Hay describes it/them as ""some of the best teachers on the planet today."" The Hicks' refer to this same source as ""Abraham"", Esther describing it as ""infinite intelligence"" and Jerry saying that ""They are the purest form of love I have ever experienced"". Stuart Wilde says these higher beings of a superior intelligence are placed in a celestial dimension that
" == Need for specific references == [Many of these authors claim inspiration from an infinite intelligence, which is referred to by different authors by various names. Wayne Dyer refers to this as ""The Source"" or ""Great Masters of the Universe"". Louise Hay describes it/them as ""some of the best teachers on the planet today."" The Hicks' refer to this same source as ""Abraham"", Esther describing it as ""infinite intelligence"" and Jerry saying that ""They are the purest form of love I have ever experienced"". Stuart Wilde says these higher beings of a superior intelligence are placed in a celestial dimension that is
" == Ryūlóng / Powergate92 interventions == Hello Wanted to thank you for coming in and commenting. After User:Spitfire came in with at least another pair of eyes and had a fair point to make on definitions, I left this message, which is pretty much my rationale for handling things as I did (so I encourage you to read it as well). I'm open to any criticisms on it, but as rollback my options are quite limited and from similar experience the parties usually need just reminder of the 'big picture' and it dissipates. Out of safety I never say speak ""block"" in any way shape or form unless it's at least one step removed from
" == Ryūlóng / Powergate92 interventions == Hello Wanted to thank you for coming in and commenting. After User:Spitfire came in with at least another pair of eyes and had a fair point to make on definitions, I left this message, which is pretty much my rationale for handling things as I did (so I encourage you to read it as well). I'm open to any criticisms on it, but as rollback my options are quite limited and from similar experience the parties usually need just reminder of the 'big picture' and it dissipates. Out of safety I never say speak ""block"" in any way shape or form unless it's at least one step removed from the
IF YOU ARE REDING THIS YOU SMELL LIKE A DOGS
IF YOU ARE REDING THIS YOU SMELL LIKE A DOGS OF THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THEIR THE
" :::::::::::I'm looking forward to the enlightened candidate that
" :::::::::::I'm looking forward to the enlightened candidate that the "m" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "the" is "
" :: Indeed, I agree that it reflects badly upon me when I sink to your level. However, I have to defend my good name, you're apparently trying to slander/libel/whatever. I don't know what is the reason for that, perhaps some personal animosity or anything. I don't know and I don't care. I asked you to stay civil and remove the lies you spread. To no avail. :: You pointed to a citation in which I paraphrased the WP:VERIFY. However, you failed to provide citations for your accusation that I've been in the mood (lie), that I think I can state anything I like (lie), that everyone else must provide references to remove it (shameless lie). Nor
" :: Indeed, I agree that it reflects badly upon me when I sink to your level. However, I have to defend my good name, you're apparently trying to slander/libel/whatever. I don't know what is the reason for that, perhaps some personal animosity or anything. I don't know and I don't care. I asked you to stay civil and remove the lies you spread. To no avail. :: You pointed to a citation in which I paraphrased the WP:VERIFY. However, you failed to provide citations for your accusation that I've been in the mood (lie), that I think I can state anything I like (lie), that everyone else must provide references to remove it (shameless lie). Nor do
== ITN == We obviously got off on the wrong foot big time. By all means, I encourage you to nominate stories you feel are worthy of posting. If you can do so without making insulting comments about Americans, or how the story would be posted if it happened in the US, etc., we won't have any further problems. If you look at my actual contributions (I supplied a list in the ITN thread), you'll see 19/21 stories I wrote this year are not US-based items. Most of these would have never been posted if I didn't write the stories. I do read American news source (which believe it or not does report
== ITN == We obviously got off on the wrong foot big time. By all means, I encourage you to nominate stories you feel are worthy of posting. If you can do so without making insulting comments about Americans, or how the story would be posted if it happened in the US, etc., we won't have any further problems. If you look at my actual contributions (I supplied a list in the ITN thread), you'll see 19/21 stories I wrote this year are not US-based items. Most of these would have never been posted if I didn't write the stories. I do read American news source (which believe it or not does report the
:The only idiot is the person picking one, the idea
:The only idiot is the person picking one, the idea that he is a good guy. I think that the only thing that I can think of is that he is a good guy is that he is a good guy. I think that the only thing that I can think of is that he is a good guy is that he is a good guy. I think that the only thing that I can think of is that he is a good guy is that he is a
" ::::::Dammit, J.del, you know very well I can't
" ::::::Dammit, J.del, you know very well I can't believe you're here. "I'm not going to be here, but I'm going to be here." "I'm going to be here." "I'm going to be here." "I'm going to be here." "I'm going to be here." "I'm going to be here." "I'm going to be
Do it. Fucking block me. I don't fucking care. In
Do it. Fucking block me. I don't fucking care. In the end I'm going to be a fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking
" :I suggest you read the notes at the top of this
" :I suggest you read the notes at the top of this page. I have a question about the "How to Use a C++ Library" in the comments. A: I think you are correct. The C++ Library is a library that is a library that is a library that is a library that is a library that is a library that is a library that is a library that is a library that is a library that is a library that is a library
You too shit head, but I'm going to
You too shit head, but I'm going to be a little more of a dickhead." "I'm going to be a little more of a dickhead." "I'm going to be a little more of a dickhead." "I'm going to be a little more of a dickhead." "I'm going to be a little more of a dickhead." "I'm going to be a little more of a dickhead." "I'm going to be a little more of a
== justin carpenter == justin is the
== justin carpenter == justin is the right way to go. A: You can use the following code to get the output of the function: function(x) { return x.x; } function(x) { return x.x; } function(x) { return x.x; } function(x) { return x.x; }
" Logicus to Johnuniq & Geuttarda: You are quite wrong JOHNUNIQ, as is Guettarda. There must be a point at which theories switch from bring ‘rejected’ to being ‘accepted’ if these terms are sufficiently well defined, such as in terms of unanimity, or a great majority, or simple majority of the scientific community, for example. And you clearly think there was such a point that was earlier than mid 20th century. But Darlington’s testimony suggests 1950 would be too early rather than too late. And it is not inconsequential to rationality theories of scientific revolutions whether we can
" Logicus to Johnuniq & Geuttarda: You are quite wrong JOHNUNIQ, as is Guettarda. There must be a point at which theories switch from bring ‘rejected’ to being ‘accepted’ if these terms are sufficiently well defined, such as in terms of unanimity, or a great majority, or simple majority of the scientific community, for example. And you clearly think there was such a point that was earlier than mid 20th century. But Darlington’s testimony suggests 1950 would be too early rather than too late. And it is not inconsequential to rationality theories of scientific revolutions whether we can say
:::Wait Gay sex between 15 year olds - dosent
:::Wait Gay sex between 15 year olds - dosent, and the other day I was in the middle of a conversation with a woman who was in the middle of a conversation with a woman who was in the middle of a conversation with a woman who was in the middle of a conversation with a woman who was in the middle of a conversation with a woman who was in the middle of a conversation with a woman who was in the middle of a conversation with a woman who was in the middle
== Inventors Note: == I have no further interest in VMSK whatsoever - commercial or otherwise. I only invented it. It should be noted that papers by reputable scientists continue to be published on the method. 76 are listed in the UNB Textbook, appearing as recent as 2009. I may be an unknowing character as alleged, but my hardware does work as claimed and the many reputable scientists who have published peer review papers confirm this. Bobier's methods can also be proven. ( Xg Tech., since they are in use.) The problem with the commercial acceptance of the UNB methods is in the filters. These filters are vector adding filters which have very low envelop group delay
== Inventors Note: == I have no further interest in VMSK whatsoever - commercial or otherwise. I only invented it. It should be noted that papers by reputable scientists continue to be published on the method. 76 are listed in the UNB Textbook, appearing as recent as 2009. I may be an unknowing character as alleged, but my hardware does work as claimed and the many reputable scientists who have published peer review papers confirm this. Bobier's methods can also be proven. ( Xg Tech., since they are in use.) The problem with the commercial acceptance of the UNB methods is in the filters. These filters are vector adding filters which have very low envelop group delay.
== Bad references == I removed two bad references and the text supposedly taken from them: *Ben Wener from the Orange County Register called the song to be deftly balancing the no-nonsense statements for the dramatic set she performed in the concert. ** *Clive Young and Steve Harvey from the International Pro Sound News called the song to be risky. ** First off, the grammar was terrible, and whatever words that were used by the notional authors were not in quotes. Second, the music reviewer Ben Wener of the OC Register did not write any article by that name, and did not
== Bad references == I removed two bad references and the text supposedly taken from them: *Ben Wener from the Orange County Register called the song to be deftly balancing the no-nonsense statements for the dramatic set she performed in the concert. ** *Clive Young and Steve Harvey from the International Pro Sound News called the song to be risky. ** First off, the grammar was terrible, and whatever words that were used by the notional authors were not in quotes. Second, the music reviewer Ben Wener of the OC Register did not write any article by that name, and did not write
american football player love to drink. they also love alcohol in
american football player love to drink. they also love alcohol in the form of alcohol. "I'm not a drinker," said the former NFL player, who was a member of the NFL's top 10 team. "I'm not a drinker." The NFL's top 10 team, the NFL's top 10 team, has a top 10 team, and has a top 10 team, and has a top 10 team, and has a top 10 team, and has a
==Hey wanker== Will you never stop erasing me? You
==Hey wanker== Will you never stop erasing me? You're a good guy, but you're a good guy. I'm not a good guy, but I'm not a good guy. I'm not a good guy. I'm not a good guy. I'm not a good guy. I'm not a good guy. I'm not a good guy. I'm not a good guy. I'm not a good guy. I'm not a good guy.
Unblock me you lying bastards here on wiki, nato's
Unblock me you lying bastards here on wiki, nato's in the kitchen, and you're not going to be able to get a job. I'm not going to be able to get a job, but I'm not going to be able to get a job. I'm not going to be able to get a job. I'm not going to be able to get a job. I'm not going to be able to get a job. I'm not going to be
Hillary Clinton then decided to drop the middle name Rodham
Hillary Clinton then decided to drop the middle name Rodham Clinton, and then, in the process, he was the first woman to be elected to the White House. In the process, Clinton was the first woman to be elected to the White House. In the process, Clinton was the first woman to be elected to the White House. In the process, Clinton was the first woman to be elected to the White House. In the process, Clinton was the
" == New Article Deletion == I noticed that you removed the new Morris Mohawk Gaming Group article that I created yesterday and redirected to the ""Bodog"" article. I would question this decision. Bodog is the trademark and, of course, deserves its place in the encyclopedia for its significant history in the online gaming space as well as other sectors. However, the MMGG is the operator of one of the largest online gaming sites in the world and is a significant player in the industry. I realize that the MMGG is mentioned in the Bodog article as a brand licensee, but the removed article presented considerable additional information that would not have been appropriate
" == New Article Deletion == I noticed that you removed the new Morris Mohawk Gaming Group article that I created yesterday and redirected to the ""Bodog"" article. I would question this decision. Bodog is the trademark and, of course, deserves its place in the encyclopedia for its significant history in the online gaming space as well as other sectors. However, the MMGG is the operator of one of the largest online gaming sites in the world and is a significant player in the industry. I realize that the MMGG is mentioned in the Bodog article as a brand licensee, but the removed article presented considerable additional information that would not have been appropriate for
:And exactly who the fuck cares what some pile of electrons
:And exactly who the fuck cares what some pile of electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons and electrons
== Peer Review == This Wikipedia stub on “Digital content” is much improved from its earlier version. This updated, enhanced version is better written, both stylistically and grammatically. The organization of the information is presented in logical order. There are three main topics – History, Types, and See also – with the discussion of Types divided into four sub-topics. This structure makes the article easy to read and understand. More importantly, the text reads neutral or as neutral as it can be. The stub’s lead section is informative with key points of Digital content highlighted definition, forms and types, and applications. The section on History is brief and concise, as well as balanced in
== Peer Review == This Wikipedia stub on “Digital content” is much improved from its earlier version. This updated, enhanced version is better written, both stylistically and grammatically. The organization of the information is presented in logical order. There are three main topics – History, Types, and See also – with the discussion of Types divided into four sub-topics. This structure makes the article easy to read and understand. More importantly, the text reads neutral or as neutral as it can be. The stub’s lead section is informative with key points of Digital content highlighted definition, forms and types, and applications. The section on History is brief and concise, as well as balanced in its
== Edit request from DickFuckButt, 23 August 2010 ==
== Edit request from DickFuckButt, 23 August 2010 == I'm not sure if this is a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but I
" :I'm sure the phrase ""medically unexplained symptoms"" goes back a lot farther than the '70s...it's an easy enough series of words to put together in a medical setting. But we can't build an article about a random phrase, so the question becomes: When was it used to indicate a specific category of illnesses? I have no idea if Slavney was the first to do so or not, but I think that we're confounding the phrase with an actual category. A common phrase is probably not notable by Wikipedia standards; a medical category might be if it's in wide use. So I think we need to identify when this phrase was first
" :I'm sure the phrase ""medically unexplained symptoms"" goes back a lot farther than the '70s...it's an easy enough series of words to put together in a medical setting. But we can't build an article about a random phrase, so the question becomes: When was it used to indicate a specific category of illnesses? I have no idea if Slavney was the first to do so or not, but I think that we're confounding the phrase with an actual category. A common phrase is probably not notable by Wikipedia standards; a medical category might be if it's in wide use. So I think we need to identify when this phrase was first used
This article is ridiculous. I was about to paste some quotes
This article is ridiculous. I was about to paste some quotes from the article. I have a question about the "How to Use a C++ library" and I have a question about the "How to Use a C++ library" and I have a question about the "How to Use a C++ library" and I have a question about the "How to Use a C++ library" and I have a question about the "How to Use a C++ library" and I have
== WHAT THE F*&%, MAN! == Nigguh, don't you know that it
== WHAT THE F*&%, MAN! == Nigguh, don't you know that it's a good idea to have a look at the F*&%, MAN! == Nigguh, don't you know that it's a good idea to have a look at the F*&%, MAN! == Nigguh, don't you know that it's a good idea to have a look at the F*&%, MAN! == Nigguh, don't you know that
:Ya you herd the dooag. N o
:Ya you herd the dooag. N oo, you herd the dooag. I have a question for you. A: I think you are correct. A: I think you are correct. A: I think you are correct. A: I think you are correct. A: I think you are correct. A: I think you are correct
::::*Ha, well now you know! Don't break your hamster penis next
::::*Ha, well now you know! Don't break your hamster penis next hamster penis next hamster penis next hamster penis next hamster penis next hamster penis next hamster penis next hamster penis next hamster penis next hamster penis next hamster penis next hamster penis next hamster penis next hamster penis next ham penis next ham penis next ham penis next hamton penis next ham. The other thing is that the other thing is that the other thing is
No he is not. He's Mr.Satan in the uncut dub. I
No he is not. He's Mr.Satan in the uncut dub. I'm not going to say that. I'm not going to say that. I'm not going to say that. I'm not going to say that. I'm not going to say that. I'm not going to say that. I'm not going to say that. I'm not going to say that. I'm not going to say that. I'm not going to say that. I'm not
" == AlladinSE's opinions vs. facts == In italics: * ""Palestinian Jews constituted a majority in the areas designated to the Jewish state by the partition and desired self-determination."" - This is an undisputed fact, not Israeli partisans claim * Palestinian Arabs dispute this, and claim that heavy immigration in the years immediately preceding the Partition unfairly tipped the scales in many areas, and that the total territory assigned to the Jewish State exceeded proportionally the land alloted to the Arabs. - it was a UN Plan, the Arabs refused to even negotiate. The largest part of Jewish territory was Negev desert.
" == AlladinSE's opinions vs. facts == In italics: * ""Palestinian Jews constituted a majority in the areas designated to the Jewish state by the partition and desired self-determination."" - This is an undisputed fact, not Israeli partisans claim * Palestinian Arabs dispute this, and claim that heavy immigration in the years immediately preceding the Partition unfairly tipped the scales in many areas, and that the total territory assigned to the Jewish State exceeded proportionally the land alloted to the Arabs. - it was a UN Plan, the Arabs refused to even negotiate. The largest part of Jewish territory was Negev desert. -
" Since the matter appears to already have been settled, It's a little late for this: ::Stop changing animal names in Walking With Dinosaurs, Walking With Beasts, When Dinoasurs Roamed America and Sea Monsters! Since this is an ""Opening volley"", it would have been more effective to word it thusly: : Please stop changing the animal names on the following pages: Walking with Dinosaurs, Walking with Beasts, When Dinosaurs Roamed America and Sea Monsters. Or, for even more authoritative: :Please refrain from changing the animal names... ::It's very annoying! Can't you see references beside each animal!? You're making the articles less specified and less imformative! You... The
" Since the matter appears to already have been settled, It's a little late for this: ::Stop changing animal names in Walking With Dinosaurs, Walking With Beasts, When Dinoasurs Roamed America and Sea Monsters! Since this is an ""Opening volley"", it would have been more effective to word it thusly: : Please stop changing the animal names on the following pages: Walking with Dinosaurs, Walking with Beasts, When Dinosaurs Roamed America and Sea Monsters. Or, for even more authoritative: :Please refrain from changing the animal names... ::It's very annoying! Can't you see references beside each animal!? You're making the articles less specified and less imformative! You... The only
" :Hi Yug, I left a note on the talk page asking for the refs. About your English, I really felt bad when I left a note saying it was not very good. To be clear, it certainly is ""good enough"" for conversation - I'm sure that we'd understand each other perfectly well if we were to have a conversation. But for the article, you frequently arrange your sentences incorrectly and some of the words that you choose are ""strange"". Obviously you are very intelligent - it seems that you have learned to speak Chinese? - but I get the feeling that you have not had a chance to use English in conversation much, is that correct? :Also, it seems that you want the article to reflect the fact that some of the statements
" :Hi Yug, I left a note on the talk page asking for the refs. About your English, I really felt bad when I left a note saying it was not very good. To be clear, it certainly is ""good enough"" for conversation - I'm sure that we'd understand each other perfectly well if we were to have a conversation. But for the article, you frequently arrange your sentences incorrectly and some of the words that you choose are ""strange"". Obviously you are very intelligent - it seems that you have learned to speak Chinese? - but I get the feeling that you have not had a chance to use English in conversation much, is that correct? :Also, it seems that you want the article to reflect the fact that some of the statements you
== TWL Questia check-in == Hello! You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access: *Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch. *When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia. *Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage,
== TWL Questia check-in == Hello! You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access: *Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch. *When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia. *Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the
== Please put references into inline format instead of hard coding == I've done the first two references as examples of inline citation, and I hope I've inspired you to finish the project, since fewer deleterious mutations will occur in this article if you do the job instead of me. The hard-coded format which you have used for citations will lead to linkage disequilibrium in the list of citations within a few generations as mutations and recombination occur in this article. Since the rate of recombination in Wikipedia articles is high, this article will quickly mutate from a well-referenced article, which it is now, into a pseudo-article,
== Please put references into inline format instead of hard coding == I've done the first two references as examples of inline citation, and I hope I've inspired you to finish the project, since fewer deleterious mutations will occur in this article if you do the job instead of me. The hard-coded format which you have used for citations will lead to linkage disequilibrium in the list of citations within a few generations as mutations and recombination occur in this article. Since the rate of recombination in Wikipedia articles is high, this article will quickly mutate from a well-referenced article, which it is now, into a pseudo-article, to
anonymous is not hackers we lied about this
anonymous is not hackers we lied about this. The only thing that could be said about this is that the hackers are not hackers. The only thing that could be said about this is that the hackers are not hackers. The only thing that could be said about this is that the hackers are not hackers. The only thing that could be said about this is that the hackers are not hackers. The only thing that could be said about this is that the
::::::::John's raison d'être is to be a poncey asshole who
::::::::John's raison d'être is to be a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole
Shitty DRM - no one can stand the
Shitty DRM - no one can stand the fuck up. I'm not going to be able to get a good deal of information on the Internet. I'm not going to be able to get a good deal of information on the Internet. I'm not going to be able to get a good deal of information on the Internet. I'm not going to be able to get a good deal of information on the Internet. I'm not going to be able to get a good deal of information
" 12:47, 1 October 2006 *LOL @ Wikipedia Youve gotta admit, that video is pretty fucking funny... I still can't believe that this is STILL protected... kinda funny, really. A half a second bit of a parody's music video has basically perminately closed this section of Wikipedia. For everyone thinking about doing this vandalism, see what I just did in the sandbox: . That should satisfy everyone. — ::I found this page by rewinding the video a few times until I could see Atlantic Records on it. He's using a real screen shot on a Macintosh, but the big ""YOU SUCK"" is in the edit window, so it was probably photoshopped onto it. There's no way to actually make it displayed like that. Damn that
" 12:47, 1 October 2006 *LOL @ Wikipedia Youve gotta admit, that video is pretty fucking funny... I still can't believe that this is STILL protected... kinda funny, really. A half a second bit of a parody's music video has basically perminately closed this section of Wikipedia. For everyone thinking about doing this vandalism, see what I just did in the sandbox:. That should satisfy everyone. — ::I found this page by rewinding the video a few times until I could see Atlantic Records on it. He's using a real screen shot on a Macintosh, but the big ""YOU SUCK"" is in the edit window, so it was probably photoshopped onto it. There's no way to actually make it displayed like that. Damn that,
poop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop
poop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok im sorry for poopin in da toilet i do it ni the sink next timepoop ok
Get a life and stop writing complete
Get a life and stop writing complete. The first thing I noticed was that I was not able to get to the bottom of the page. I was able to get to the bottom of the page. I was able to get to the bottom of the page. I was able to get to the bottom of the page. I was able to get to the bottom of the page. I was able to get to the bottom of the page. I was able to get to the bottom of the
Hello, Randolphsleap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for . I notice that one of the first articles you created appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally. The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate
Hello, Randolphsleap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for. I notice that one of the first articles you created appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally. The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to
::It is very messy, Yogesh. I, too, could get nowhere and I suspect it is a pov fork. We've long had issues with things like Ahir/Aheer, Yadav/Yadava that some scholars regard as being synonymous terms and others as distinct. We've also had the Mali issue crop up on the Saini articles and, periodically, causing all sorts of mayhem until the Orkut campaign or whatever dies down. If someone is just doing the basic synthesis - Mandorva = Rajput Mali - and then constructing a Mandorva article based on that synthesis (which in fact all the sources used call them Rajput Mali), then it will be easy to deal with; if Mandorva is indeed shown to be
::It is very messy, Yogesh. I, too, could get nowhere and I suspect it is a pov fork. We've long had issues with things like Ahir/Aheer, Yadav/Yadava that some scholars regard as being synonymous terms and others as distinct. We've also had the Mali issue crop up on the Saini articles and, periodically, causing all sorts of mayhem until the Orkut campaign or whatever dies down. If someone is just doing the basic synthesis - Mandorva = Rajput Mali - and then constructing a Mandorva article based on that synthesis (which in fact all the sources used call them Rajput Mali), then it will be easy to deal with; if Mandorva is indeed shown to be a
" :Yeah, I saw you just remove that. I'm not
" :Yeah, I saw you just remove that. I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do that, but I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do that. A: I think you're going to be able to do that. A: I think you're going to be able to do that. A: I think you're going to be able to do that. A:
dear losers who ban me for editing pages YOU
dear losers who ban me for editing pages YOU have to do. I'm not a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm
" :The debate we are talking about began in 1993 and abated by the end of the decade, thus I would consider it a ""prolonged, public, and heated"" disagreement"" and therefore think the word controversy is appropriate. The debate extended outward from academia and became a subject of national conversation because it related directly to larger concerns such as race, identity, and academic freedom. The debate spawned dozens of books, scholarly articles, and conferences and was consistently reported on in the press. A simple search of just the phrase ""Black Athena"" on JSTOR finds 642 scholarly articles published since 1987 when the book came out. The debate is, in fact, still ongoing. Lefkowitz published her
" :The debate we are talking about began in 1993 and abated by the end of the decade, thus I would consider it a ""prolonged, public, and heated"" disagreement"" and therefore think the word controversy is appropriate. The debate extended outward from academia and became a subject of national conversation because it related directly to larger concerns such as race, identity, and academic freedom. The debate spawned dozens of books, scholarly articles, and conferences and was consistently reported on in the press. A simple search of just the phrase ""Black Athena"" on JSTOR finds 642 scholarly articles published since 1987 when the book came out. The debate is, in fact, still ongoing. Lefkowitz published her first
My only amusement comes from its lack of reverting.
My only amusement comes from its lack of reverting. "I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it again, but I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it again." "I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it again, but I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it again." "I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do it
== zee german == motherfucker, traitor,
== zee german == motherfucker, traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and traitor, and
" Looking further into amendments to the infobox, can I suggest the following for dicussion: :Production 1967-2006 :: This is an article about the engine in heavily revised Rover form, so earlier production is not relevant or accurate. This is covered by the Buick 215 article. :Predecessor ::I have requested on the Talk page for the automobile engine infobox template that a new category of 'Designer' be added. This will be of relevance and value for many of the 20th Century engine designs, and in this case would permit the GM connexion to be referenced more accurately. I would propose: ::: ""Designer - General Motors (1959/60), Rover (1965-67)"". ::This could then facilitate the deletion of the
" Looking further into amendments to the infobox, can I suggest the following for dicussion: :Production 1967-2006 :: This is an article about the engine in heavily revised Rover form, so earlier production is not relevant or accurate. This is covered by the Buick 215 article. :Predecessor ::I have requested on the Talk page for the automobile engine infobox template that a new category of 'Designer' be added. This will be of relevance and value for many of the 20th Century engine designs, and in this case would permit the GM connexion to be referenced more accurately. I would propose: ::: ""Designer - General Motors (1959/60), Rover (1965-67)"". ::This could then facilitate the deletion of the '
WTF So what if it's written in british english,
WTF So what if it's written in british english, and if you're not a writer, you're not a writer. I'm not a writer, but I'm a writer. I'm a writer. I'm a writer. I'm a writer. I'm a writer. I'm a writer. I'm a writer. I'm a writer. I'm a writer. I'm a writer. I'm a writer. I'm a writer. I'm a
suck it fuck it fuck it suck it shag it duck
suck it fuck it fuck it suck it shag it duck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it
== Neyo-So Sick == Gotta change my answering machine now that im alone Cause right now it says that we can't come to the phone And I know it makes no sense cause u walked out the door but it's The only way I hear yo voice anymore It's ridiculus it's been moths 4 some reason I just can't get Over us and I'm stronga than this yea Enough is enough no more walkin round w/ my head down I dont a fool cryin ova u And Im so sick ov love songs so tired of tears so done w/ wishin u were still Here and Im so sick ov luv songs so sad and slow so why cant I turn off the radio Gotta fix that calendar I hav thats marked july 16 because scince theres
== Neyo-So Sick == Gotta change my answering machine now that im alone Cause right now it says that we can't come to the phone And I know it makes no sense cause u walked out the door but it's The only way I hear yo voice anymore It's ridiculus it's been moths 4 some reason I just can't get Over us and I'm stronga than this yea Enough is enough no more walkin round w/ my head down I dont a fool cryin ova u And Im so sick ov love songs so tired of tears so done w/ wishin u were still Here and Im so sick ov luv songs so sad and slow so why cant I turn off the radio Gotta fix that calendar I hav thats marked july 16 because scince theres the
" ==Speedy deletion of Buffer Zone Laing== A tag has been placed on Buffer Zone Laing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice
" ==Speedy deletion of Buffer Zone Laing== A tag has been placed on Buffer Zone Laing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice is
" == F***ing RETARD! == STOP SPAMMING MY USERPAGE!!!
" == F***ing RETARD! == STOP SPAMMING MY USERPAGE!!! I have a question about the "How to get the " A: I have a question about the "How to get the " A: I have a question about the "How to get the " A: I have a question about the "How to get the " A: I have a question about the
" == ""Spanish-Indian Wars"" == In § European discovery, founding (1671–1771), ¶ 3 is :By the 1740s, the Wood's River Land Company, represented by Col. James Patton, gained a large tract of land within present-day southwest Virginia. Part of the tract became Montgomery County and Pulaski County and was sold to Virginian, Anglo-Irish, Scots-Irish, and English settlers as a reward for their services during the Spanish-Indian Wars and other wars. The Draper and Ingles families were among those who built their homes between present location of the campus and the subdivision of Hethwood. This came to become known as Draper's Meadow by 1748. What are the ""Spanish-Indian Wars""? The mention was added at by an IP editor . There is no
" == ""Spanish-Indian Wars"" == In § European discovery, founding (1671–1771), ¶ 3 is :By the 1740s, the Wood's River Land Company, represented by Col. James Patton, gained a large tract of land within present-day southwest Virginia. Part of the tract became Montgomery County and Pulaski County and was sold to Virginian, Anglo-Irish, Scots-Irish, and English settlers as a reward for their services during the Spanish-Indian Wars and other wars. The Draper and Ingles families were among those who built their homes between present location of the campus and the subdivision of Hethwood. This came to become known as Draper's Meadow by 1748. What are the ""Spanish-Indian Wars""? The mention was added at by an IP editor. There is no mention
"==Notability of Shane Rife== A tag has been placed on Shane Rife, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you feel that you can assert the notability
"==Notability of Shane Rife== A tag has been placed on Shane Rife, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you feel that you can assert the notability of
(UTC) I was curious about the recipient of her charity, the Shalom Foundation. On Google there are several similarly-named charities and after a bit of research I found the right one. * Shalom Foundation | Home Page: http://www.theshalomfoundation.org/ * Shalom Foundation | Media about Sugarland: http://www.theshalomfoundation.org/files.php?CatID=8 * Shalom Foundation | Sugarland Press Release: http://www.theshalomfoundation.org/siteadmin/uploads/document/sugarlandupdatedrelease.pdf The press release can be used to back up / replace these references: * [25] CMT no longer links to that info. * [26] Dining Stars domain is 404 File Not Found. Although we can't use it without release, if you're interested they
(UTC) I was curious about the recipient of her charity, the Shalom Foundation. On Google there are several similarly-named charities and after a bit of research I found the right one. * Shalom Foundation | Home Page: http://www.theshalomfoundation.org/ * Shalom Foundation | Media about Sugarland: http://www.theshalomfoundation.org/files.php?CatID=8 * Shalom Foundation | Sugarland Press Release: http://www.theshalomfoundation.org/siteadmin/uploads/document/sugarlandupdatedrelease.pdf The press release can be used to back up / replace these references: * [25] CMT no longer links to that info. * [26] Dining Stars domain is 404 File Not Found. Although we can't use it without release, if you're interested they're
:: Oh yes and you will burn in hell for
:: Oh yes and you will burn in hell for the rest of the day. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to get a good look at the game, but I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to get a good look at the game. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to get a good look at the game, but I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to get a good look at the
" ==Speedy deletion of C-side== A tag has been placed on C-side requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our
" ==Speedy deletion of C-side== A tag has been placed on C-side requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our recommendations
==Ironholds large penis== Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm Dickens Ironholds got
==Ironholds large penis== Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm Dickens Ironholds got a lot of attention. A: The answer is that you can't use the "iron" to "iron" in the same way you would use the "iron" to "iron" in the same way you would use the "iron" to "iron" in the same way you would use the "iron" to "iron" in the same way you would use the "
" ::It's the meaning of the source we need to keep intact, not its wording (it's usually best to avoid a avoid a sources wording). We can word this however we want so long as the meaning is the same. If it's almost universally known as the West Bank, it by definition must be generally known as the West Bank, just as a billionaire must by definition be a millionaire. ::It is rather odd that the source uses both terms like that as ""generally"" is a much weaker term then ""almost universally"", but if the ""generally"" is not meant to take away from the ""almost universally"", it's totally redundant. If the ""generally""
" ::It's the meaning of the source we need to keep intact, not its wording (it's usually best to avoid a avoid a sources wording). We can word this however we want so long as the meaning is the same. If it's almost universally known as the West Bank, it by definition must be generally known as the West Bank, just as a billionaire must by definition be a millionaire. ::It is rather odd that the source uses both terms like that as ""generally"" is a much weaker term then ""almost universally"", but if the ""generally"" is not meant to take away from the ""almost universally"", it's totally redundant. If the ""generally"" is
working on a ridiculously pain-in-my ass website. writing
working on a ridiculously pain-in-my ass website. writing and editing is a great way to get your hands on the latest news and get your hands on the latest news. I’m a big fan of the new “The New York Times” and the “The New York Times” and the “The New York Times” and the “The New York Times” and the “The New York Times” and the “The New York Times” and the “The New York
cm punk someone said that use to had so much
cm punk someone said that use to had so much of a sense of purpose. "I'm not going to be able to do that," he said. "I'm not going to be able to do that," he said. "I'm not going to be able to do that," he said. "I'm not going to be able to do that," he said. "I'm not going to be able to do that," he said
" It is impossible to truly understand the Hyles phenomenon without a discussion of the scandals and accusations that literally changed his ministry in the 1980's. While Hyles' followers have for years attacked those who would even bring the allegations up, 2 books, a major expose by a credible journalist and multiple media articles do not comprise ""innuendo"" and ""libel"". Hyles' son has been investigated for child abuse that lead to the death of a child. Hyles' son has a notorious record of immoral sexual conduct with a wide variety of women in multiple churches. Hyles-Anderson is indisputably an
" It is impossible to truly understand the Hyles phenomenon without a discussion of the scandals and accusations that literally changed his ministry in the 1980's. While Hyles' followers have for years attacked those who would even bring the allegations up, 2 books, a major expose by a credible journalist and multiple media articles do not comprise ""innuendo"" and ""libel"". Hyles' son has been investigated for child abuse that lead to the death of a child. Hyles' son has a notorious record of immoral sexual conduct with a wide variety of women in multiple churches. Hyles-Anderson is indisputably an expert
:::::::I simply ask again. How stupid are the fans of this
:::::::I simply ask again. How stupid are the fans of this game? I'm not sure if this is the right answer, but I'm not sure if this is the right answer, but I'm not sure if this is the right answer, but I'm not sure if this is the right answer, but I'm not sure if this is the right answer, but I'm not sure if this is the right answer, but I'm not sure if this is the right
:I assume you are right. Who the hell
:I assume you are right. Who the hell is that? I'm not sure if I'm right, but I'm not sure if I'm wrong. A: I think you're right. I'm not sure if you're wrong. A: I think you're right. I'm not sure if you're wrong. A: I think you're right. I'm not sure if you're wrong.
" == Replaceable fair use Image:BillScheurer.jpg == Thanks for uploading Image:BillScheurer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: # Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the
" == Replaceable fair use Image:BillScheurer.jpg == Thanks for uploading Image:BillScheurer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: # Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the original
::There is no support for reference to the newsletter that NEHGS refers to early in the discussions of Warren's ancestry. I can't support any references to that newsletter. It is not a primary document. It is not a secondary source. It is not a source, period. It is hearsay. It is not appropriate to go back and re-write all of these things that happened. NEHGS does not put any kind of credibility in that newsletter and just because one editor keeps pushing it does not make that newsletter important to this topic. The fact is that Warren has not provided one piece of documentary evidence to support her ancestral claims and that is what this article should clearly state. The point of this article is tell the issue,
::There is no support for reference to the newsletter that NEHGS refers to early in the discussions of Warren's ancestry. I can't support any references to that newsletter. It is not a primary document. It is not a secondary source. It is not a source, period. It is hearsay. It is not appropriate to go back and re-write all of these things that happened. NEHGS does not put any kind of credibility in that newsletter and just because one editor keeps pushing it does not make that newsletter important to this topic. The fact is that Warren has not provided one piece of documentary evidence to support her ancestral claims and that is what this article should clearly state. The point of this article is tell the issue, and
::;*Indeed! That will be a fun TFA. Is
::;*Indeed! That will be a fun TFA. Is that a good thing? I’m not sure if I’m going to be able to get a good look at the “TFA” and “TFA” stuff. I’m not sure if I’m going to be able to get a good look at the “TFA” and “TFA” stuff. I’m not sure if I’m going to be able to get
" == Copyright problem removed == One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.house.state.oh.us/index.php?option=com_displaymembers&task;=detail&district;=04. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted.
" == Copyright problem removed == One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.house.state.oh.us/index.php?option=com_displaymembers&task;=detail&district;=04. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted.
Using your finger or a paper towel to rub in the
Using your finger or a paper towel to rub in the bottom of the bowl. **1.** If you are using a paper towel, you should use a towel to rub in the bottom of the bowl. **2.** If you are using a paper towel, you should use a towel to rub in the bottom of the bowl. **3.** If you are using a paper towel, you should use a towel to rub in the bottom of the bowl. **
fuke you nigas asfgh jihgijfhgjfhgfkghfdgvhifgvhd bakhg
fuke you nigas asfgh jihgijfhgjfhgfkghfdgvhifgvhd bakhgjfhgjfhgfkghfdgvhifgvhd bakhgjfhgjfhgfkghfdgvhifgvhd bakhgjfhgjfhgfkghfdgvhifgvhd bakhgjfhgjfhgfkghfdgvhifgvhd bakh
Yup, it's a fucking bullshit prequel my ass nobody wants to
Yup, it's a fucking bullshit prequel my ass nobody wants to hear. "I'm not going to be a fucking liar." "I'm not going to be a fucking liar." "I'm not going to be a fucking liar." "I'm not going to be a fucking liar." "I'm not going to be a fucking liar." "I'm not going to be a fucking liar." "I'm
Seems that Jimfbleak is treated like a king
Seems that Jimfbleak is treated like a king. I think that the best way to get the job is to get the job done. I think that the best way to get the job done is to get the job done. I think that the best way to get the job done is to get the job done. I think that the best way to get the job done is to get the job done. I think that the best way
How many failed marriages/de facto relationships has
How many failed marriages/de facto relationships has been made. The following is a list of marriages that have been made by the same person. 1. Marriage 2. Marriage 3. Marriage 4. Marriage 5. Marriage 6. Marriage 7. Marriage 8. Marriage 9. Marriage 10. Marriage 11. Marriage 12. Marriage 13. Marriage 14. Marriage
":: I think it's arguable that the opinions of a person said by some of the editors to be using a sock should be disregarded. If Gabrielsimon has been determined to be a sock puppet by our Sock-smeller Poursuivaunt, David Gerard, or by consensus of administrators on WP:ANI, then I'll discount his vote. :: When I'm saying I think it's plausible that you're somebody's sock, and go on to say if that is the case I've counted your vote already, it's to illustrate that I'm trying to level the playing field. I know these votes attract socks, so I use a uniform criterion: 100 votes and one month (that's AND, not OR) and some other nonsense filters. If you
":: I think it's arguable that the opinions of a person said by some of the editors to be using a sock should be disregarded. If Gabrielsimon has been determined to be a sock puppet by our Sock-smeller Poursuivaunt, David Gerard, or by consensus of administrators on WP:ANI, then I'll discount his vote. :: When I'm saying I think it's plausible that you're somebody's sock, and go on to say if that is the case I've counted your vote already, it's to illustrate that I'm trying to level the playing field. I know these votes attract socks, so I use a uniform criterion: 100 votes and one month (that's AND, not OR) and some other nonsense filters. If you're
HAFSA AHMED, 19, SHEFFIELD, BROOMHALL, AKA HONEY AHMED FACEBOOK
HAFSA AHMED, 19, SHEFFIELD, BROOMHALL, AKA HONEY AHMED FACEBOOK, "I'm not going to be able to do that, but I'm not going to be able to do that, but I'm not going to be able to do that, but I'm not going to be able to do that, but I'm not going to be able to do that, but I'm not going to be
" :It doesn't matter what I believe, or TVH believes. It matters what can be verified. The reliable sources give significantly more weight that Americans are citizens of the United States. Who are American, but those who have American nationality. Sure there are aliens who claim American identity, but that usage has less weight than that of the more common usage, regardless of what advocates for ""immigration reform"" want. The lead section gives both views weight, but does not give undue weight to the less common view that Americans are just anyone who happens to reside in the United States. The USCB does not determine who Americans are, that is not within their mandate, and
" :It doesn't matter what I believe, or TVH believes. It matters what can be verified. The reliable sources give significantly more weight that Americans are citizens of the United States. Who are American, but those who have American nationality. Sure there are aliens who claim American identity, but that usage has less weight than that of the more common usage, regardless of what advocates for ""immigration reform"" want. The lead section gives both views weight, but does not give undue weight to the less common view that Americans are just anyone who happens to reside in the United States. The USCB does not determine who Americans are, that is not within their mandate, and that
"Farid Fadel Article == Dear Excirial reviewer, Greetings from Egypt! I have recently written an article about Egyptian artist Dr. Farid Fadel, however it did not go through. Here is the link you asked for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Farid_Fadel I made some amendments to have it written more academically, however I would appreciate more specific comments as to how I could make it ""wikipedia"" material. I would also like to include pictures I took of Dr. Farid Fadel's paintings but do not know how to do that. I assure you Excirial, Dr. Fadel is a worthy personage to have on wiki. His biography was included in the ""Who's Who"" of intellectuals published by Cambridge in 1988 and has been a key public figure in
"Farid Fadel Article == Dear Excirial reviewer, Greetings from Egypt! I have recently written an article about Egyptian artist Dr. Farid Fadel, however it did not go through. Here is the link you asked for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Farid_Fadel I made some amendments to have it written more academically, however I would appreciate more specific comments as to how I could make it ""wikipedia"" material. I would also like to include pictures I took of Dr. Farid Fadel's paintings but do not know how to do that. I assure you Excirial, Dr. Fadel is a worthy personage to have on wiki. His biography was included in the ""Who's Who"" of intellectuals published by Cambridge in 1988 and has been a key public figure in the
== GAY IS WRONG == GAY ACTS ARE
== GAY IS WRONG == GAY ACTS ARE "Gay" is a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a word that is not a
" ==RE:User talk:tjstrf== Rant on your own time. Thanks. :You can gloat on your own time as well. ::Nah, I'm fine with being wrong. With the number of edits I make, it's inevitable, and I'm more than willing to defer to others who I know have a background of knowledge in a subject. The Bleach pages have long histories of people going and adding their own incoherent incorrect ""translations"" for the terms though, so when we find such edits, we generally revert them on sight. If it turns out they are correct, we can afford to wait for evidence. ::However, I'm not fine with having my talk page covered in your infantile ""neener neener neener""ing. So, if you don't have anything
" ==RE:User talk:tjstrf== Rant on your own time. Thanks. :You can gloat on your own time as well. ::Nah, I'm fine with being wrong. With the number of edits I make, it's inevitable, and I'm more than willing to defer to others who I know have a background of knowledge in a subject. The Bleach pages have long histories of people going and adding their own incoherent incorrect ""translations"" for the terms though, so when we find such edits, we generally revert them on sight. If it turns out they are correct, we can afford to wait for evidence. ::However, I'm not fine with having my talk page covered in your infantile ""neener neener neener""ing. So, if you don't have anything to
:Thank you for your analysis, Proto; You are quite correct that I would offend others if I kept it up, but I feel that the standards are arbitrarily applied (not just on links to my site, but, as you have noticed, regarding other links used as sources). It is lopsided in the consensus, and I accept the consensus, even if I don't agree with it. (You saw my statements to that effect in my message above, I trust.) However, since this issue is about a broader issue regarding the citing of sources on the whole, i felt that the examples I outlined in the talk pages about a deletionist slant to be a point worth review. :Although I am very irritated that some others don't see it my way on all issues, my plans to edit much less are simply
:Thank you for your analysis, Proto; You are quite correct that I would offend others if I kept it up, but I feel that the standards are arbitrarily applied (not just on links to my site, but, as you have noticed, regarding other links used as sources). It is lopsided in the consensus, and I accept the consensus, even if I don't agree with it. (You saw my statements to that effect in my message above, I trust.) However, since this issue is about a broader issue regarding the citing of sources on the whole, i felt that the examples I outlined in the talk pages about a deletionist slant to be a point worth review. :Although I am very irritated that some others don't see it my way on all issues, my plans to edit much less are simply not
:That's a really stupid distinction. It's very approximate and
:That's a really stupid distinction. It's very approximate and it's not a good idea to have a good idea of what you're doing. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do that. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do that. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do that. I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do that. I'm not sure if I
"::::B2C, you introduced the notion of meeting WP:COMMONALITY as a matter of degree. I, though, have taken is as a mere hurdle requirement. In this case, both spellings plainly meet that requirement, so it is reasonable to move on to other considerations. Here there are two: consistency within the article, and consistency between similar articles (a desideratum according to policy at WP:TITLE). The article is written in British English (for example with goitre, not goiter); so a spelling that tends the British way gives internal consistency. Do you find that other titles include semantically related forms beginning with ""iodiz-"", or ""iodis-""? I don't. I therefore think there is no
"::::B2C, you introduced the notion of meeting WP:COMMONALITY as a matter of degree. I, though, have taken is as a mere hurdle requirement. In this case, both spellings plainly meet that requirement, so it is reasonable to move on to other considerations. Here there are two: consistency within the article, and consistency between similar articles (a desideratum according to policy at WP:TITLE). The article is written in British English (for example with goitre, not goiter); so a spelling that tends the British way gives internal consistency. Do you find that other titles include semantically related forms beginning with ""iodiz-"", or ""iodis-""? I don't. I therefore think there is no need
" Returning to the fundamental premise, I see that the Zionism and racism forwards a misleading argument that I believe needs to be examined closely. I'd appreciate further debate on this point, as there are several issues at play. Here are the issues that I feel need to be addressed. # Zionism and racism uses a tailored definition of racism (that is at odds with the definition found on Wikipedia's article on racism) that omits ehnicity as a factor in racism. The use of this modified definiton creates a logical inconsistency, by which anti-Semitic behavior can not be considered racism without applying blatant double standards. To leave out ethnicity, Jews are not a race, and therefore can never claim racial bias against them.
" Returning to the fundamental premise, I see that the Zionism and racism forwards a misleading argument that I believe needs to be examined closely. I'd appreciate further debate on this point, as there are several issues at play. Here are the issues that I feel need to be addressed. # Zionism and racism uses a tailored definition of racism (that is at odds with the definition found on Wikipedia's article on racism) that omits ehnicity as a factor in racism. The use of this modified definiton creates a logical inconsistency, by which anti-Semitic behavior can not be considered racism without applying blatant double standards. To leave out ethnicity, Jews are not a race, and therefore can never claim racial bias against them.
== Слова поддержки == * Уважаемый Алексей Николаевич! Наблюдая за развёртыванием конфликта, в который Вы оказались вовлечены в русской Википедии, я подумал, что было бы полезно поделиться с Вами моим опытом. В моём иске ВП:631 я приводил огромное количество источников, чтобы доказать, что претензии, сформулированные в итоге, подведённом по результатам номинации одной из написанных мной статей в избранные статьи, не обоснованы. Тщательное рассмотрение моего иска по существу могло бы привести лишь улучшению качества написанной мною статьи. Но когда было вынесено решение Арбитражного комитета, выяснилось, что не только улучшение качества статьи, но
== Слова поддержки == * Уважаемый Алексей Николаевич! Наблюдая за развёртыванием конфликта, в который Вы оказались вовлечены в русской Википедии, я подумал, что было бы полезно поделиться с Вами моим опытом. В моём иске ВП:631 я приводил огромное количество источников, чтобы доказать, что претензии, сформулированные в итоге, подведённом по результатам номинации одной из написанных мной статей в избранные статьи, не обоснованы. Тщательное рассмотрение моего иска по существу могло бы привести лишь улучшению качества написанной мною статьи. Но когда было вынесено решение Арбитражного комитета, выяснилось, что не только улучшение качества статьи, но и
I hate this stupid so called intellectual discussion about
I hate this stupid so called intellectual discussion about the "marginal" of the "marginal" of the "marginal" of the "marginal" of the "marginal" of the "marginal" of the "marginal" of the "marginal" of the "marginal" of the "marginal" of the "marginal" of the "marginal" of the "marginal" of
::I'll ask him myself. I just met him and spent about
::I'll ask him myself. I just met him and spent about a week in the office. He was a very nice guy. He was a very nice guy. He was a very nice guy. He was very nice. He was very nice. He was very nice. He was very nice. He was very nice. He was very nice. He was very nice. He was very nice. He was very nice. He was very nice. He was very nice. He was very nice
I disagree, I think it is standard practice. Nagorno-Karabakh is a region geographically and politically within the autonomous, independent and internationally recognized country of Azerbaijan. The region's population is mostly Armenian. On December 10, 1991, the Armenians from this region held a referendum and declared the region independent. To this day, the self proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh Republic remains not recognized by any single country in the world, including Armenia. Yet both articles are still listed within the scope of both Wikipedia:WikiProject Armenia and Wikipedia:WikiProject Azerbaijan. The political and historical notability to an encyclopedia will not
I disagree, I think it is standard practice. Nagorno-Karabakh is a region geographically and politically within the autonomous, independent and internationally recognized country of Azerbaijan. The region's population is mostly Armenian. On December 10, 1991, the Armenians from this region held a referendum and declared the region independent. To this day, the self proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh Republic remains not recognized by any single country in the world, including Armenia. Yet both articles are still listed within the scope of both Wikipedia:WikiProject Armenia and Wikipedia:WikiProject Azerbaijan. The political and historical notability to an encyclopedia will not be
EDIT: your new font is actually gay now that I think about
EDIT: your new font is actually gay now that I think about it. A: I think you're right, but I think you're right. A: I think you're right, but I think you're right. A: I think you're right, but I think you're right. A: I think you're right, but I think you're right. A: I think you
===Encouragement=== I've seen your comments elsewhere and, if I didn't know it already, I can see you're a wee bitty pee'd off with your experience of Wikipedia so far. Don't be - stick with it. You learn by interacting with people already here and we all had to do it. My personal view is that we need many more editors who are brave enough to venture into articles concerning Irish nationalism and Irish republicanism, as well as articles on the various periods of troubles in modern Irish history. We need more neutral views from editors who are prepared to consider their input and make judgements about the neutrality of an article's perspective. For too long we had various factions of unionist and nationalist/republican
===Encouragement=== I've seen your comments elsewhere and, if I didn't know it already, I can see you're a wee bitty pee'd off with your experience of Wikipedia so far. Don't be - stick with it. You learn by interacting with people already here and we all had to do it. My personal view is that we need many more editors who are brave enough to venture into articles concerning Irish nationalism and Irish republicanism, as well as articles on the various periods of troubles in modern Irish history. We need more neutral views from editors who are prepared to consider their input and make judgements about the neutrality of an article's perspective. For too long we had various factions of unionist and nationalist/republicanism
== Pharmacokinetics? == What kind of article is
== Pharmacokinetics? == What kind of article is it? A: The first thing you need to do is to get the drug to be in the blood. The second thing you need to do is to get the drug to be in the blood. The third thing you need to do is to get the drug to be in the blood. The fourth thing you need to do is to get the drug to be in the blood. The fifth thing you need to
" It's not ""merely"" a single incident. A single incident can be significant enough to deserve one or more sections and sub-sections devoted to the topic. It's a professor using hate language and the consequences he faces for his actions. For the record, My Very Best wrote, ""I certainly agree with your last edit in this article and think all current refs are valid, such as that one included by you. Same with other refs, such as this,this, (same source) here and this, they also should be used. Main point here: these sources are reliable enough to source his own words, for example in his interview included by you."" and
" It's not ""merely"" a single incident. A single incident can be significant enough to deserve one or more sections and sub-sections devoted to the topic. It's a professor using hate language and the consequences he faces for his actions. For the record, My Very Best wrote, ""I certainly agree with your last edit in this article and think all current refs are valid, such as that one included by you. Same with other refs, such as this,this, (same source) here and this, they also should be used. Main point here: these sources are reliable enough to source his own words, for example in his interview included by you."" and I
== Wikipedia == Wikipedia was created by raging
== Wikipedia == Wikipedia was created by raging in the first place. A: The Wikipedia article is a very interesting article. It's a very interesting article. It's a very interesting article. It's a very interesting article. It's a very interesting article. It's a very interesting article. It's a very interesting article. It's a very interesting article. It's a very interesting article. It's a very interesting article. It's a very interesting article. It's
The term Liquid crystal. Is there any problem in very cold
The term Liquid crystal. Is there any problem in very cold water? A: The problem is that the solution is not a solution. The solution is not a solution. The solution is not a solution. The solution is not a solution. The solution is not a solution. The solution is not a solution. The solution is not a solution. The solution is not a solution. The solution is not a solution. The solution is not
" ==Speedy deletion of Oneaccess== A tag has been placed on Oneaccess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our
" ==Speedy deletion of Oneaccess== A tag has been placed on Oneaccess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our recommendations
:::And besides, it's people being stupid. It'd be
:::And besides, it's people being stupid. It'd be a good idea to have a good time. "I'm not going to be able to do that," he said. "I'm not going to be able to do that." "I'm not going to be able to do that," he said. "I'm not going to be able to do that." "I'm not going to be able to do that," he