Datasets:

skrishna
/

jaredjoss-jigsaw-long-2000_70M_toxic

Dataset card Viewer Files Files and versions Community

Split (2)

train · 500 rows

prompt stringlengths 3 940	output stringlengths 112 942
I have about 50 jury trials under my belt. i have no problem breaking things down in bite size pieces and repeating myself. What we have here is a proxy Arab-Israeli war. It can be perceived that a group with a NeoCon Likudnik POV have hijacked an article by a forceful critic of Israeli repression of Palestinians under Israel occupation, the heavyhanded American occupation of Iraq, and a moderating influence of the mad stampede to war against Iran. They have tagged him as an anti-Semite which Walt and Mearsheimer say is a common tactic used by the Israeli Lobby to stifle dissent. Moreover, this group has succeeded in locking this article against	I have about 50 jury trials under my belt. i have no problem breaking things down in bite size pieces and repeating myself. What we have here is a proxy Arab-Israeli war. It can be perceived that a group with a NeoCon Likudnik POV have hijacked an article by a forceful critic of Israeli repression of Palestinians under Israel occupation, the heavyhanded American occupation of Iraq, and a moderating influence of the mad stampede to war against Iran. They have tagged him as an anti-Semite which Walt and Mearsheimer say is a common tactic used by the Israeli Lobby to stifle dissent. Moreover, this group has succeeded in locking this article against the
:Editors may continue to edit articles involved in mediation while the mediation is ongoing; if it were otherwise, the article would be protected. It would not be out of the question for a condition of the mediation to be that both editors stop editing it, but it is not required. Mediation is a cooperative effort, and does not involve complex procedure; it is, for the most part, what the editors agree to in consultation with the mediator. Either editor may withdraw at any point, and may continue to edit the article while the mediation is ongoing; of course, continuing the actions that led to the mediation may make mediation less successful, but is not	:Editors may continue to edit articles involved in mediation while the mediation is ongoing; if it were otherwise, the article would be protected. It would not be out of the question for a condition of the mediation to be that both editors stop editing it, but it is not required. Mediation is a cooperative effort, and does not involve complex procedure; it is, for the most part, what the editors agree to in consultation with the mediator. Either editor may withdraw at any point, and may continue to edit the article while the mediation is ongoing; of course, continuing the actions that led to the mediation may make mediation less successful, but is not required
" ::::::From the above it appears a consensus is emerging, however I would be interested to have other users' input after they also have read WP:UKVILLAGES. If kept I would want there to be inserted ""and is a small locality"", since if you live in the former park to the southeast in Reigate as some do then it is true to say that they live in Gatton, Reigate. However the only quibble with this is that ""settlements with people living in them are automatically assumed to be notable"" is false, for instance any suburb of a town does not merit its own article, its history, politics and geography are born out of and identical to its town; they go under a paragraph in the main article	" ::::::From the above it appears a consensus is emerging, however I would be interested to have other users' input after they also have read WP:UKVILLAGES. If kept I would want there to be inserted ""and is a small locality"", since if you live in the former park to the southeast in Reigate as some do then it is true to say that they live in Gatton, Reigate. However the only quibble with this is that ""settlements with people living in them are automatically assumed to be notable"" is false, for instance any suburb of a town does not merit its own article, its history, politics and geography are born out of and identical to its town; they go under a paragraph in the main article,
" :::::Lee, thanks for your compromise on ""claim"". I am between you and Armon about the Karsh quote. I don't think it is a ""fact"" it is Karsh's opinion, HOWEVER, Karsh's CV demonstrates that he has the credentials to provide a very credible opinion on this particular topic. In addition, his politics are moderate and this adds more credibility (because he's not Cole's usual target). Also, reviewing Cole's CV and publications certainly confirms Karsh's point (and that of others who made the same point previously). Sure, Cole is a full professor of History, but his area of expertise, although in the big area of ""Middle East"", is not very relevant to the issues he writes about in	" :::::Lee, thanks for your compromise on ""claim"". I am between you and Armon about the Karsh quote. I don't think it is a ""fact"" it is Karsh's opinion, HOWEVER, Karsh's CV demonstrates that he has the credentials to provide a very credible opinion on this particular topic. In addition, his politics are moderate and this adds more credibility (because he's not Cole's usual target). Also, reviewing Cole's CV and publications certainly confirms Karsh's point (and that of others who made the same point previously). Sure, Cole is a full professor of History, but his area of expertise, although in the big area of ""Middle East"", is not very relevant to the issues he writes about in this
" == Ebony article? == Does anyone have a citation to the 1990 Ebony article mentioned on this page? A search of issues since 1989 (in an online database) turns up nothing that matches this description, and no 1990 articles that come at all close. The reference was added by user Antares33712 at 20:19, 29 December 2005. It's possible that my search results were incomplete, but it's also possible that the author misremembered the publication or the article details. Because the current page accuses Ebony of printing misinformation (regarding Mariah Carey's race) and also suggests that the magazine article made other questionable	" == Ebony article? == Does anyone have a citation to the 1990 Ebony article mentioned on this page? A search of issues since 1989 (in an online database) turns up nothing that matches this description, and no 1990 articles that come at all close. The reference was added by user Antares33712 at 20:19, 29 December 2005. It's possible that my search results were incomplete, but it's also possible that the author misremembered the publication or the article details. Because the current page accuses Ebony of printing misinformation (regarding Mariah Carey's race) and also suggests that the magazine article made other questionable comments
" Thank you. - :Thanks for sorting it out. () == Genius!!!! == Thanks for finding that sock. The created article will have be nuked as well (Germanic peoples (modern)) as created by banned. :Np. I'm about to close the AfD as a speedy delete. () ::Well, yeah, that works too. Again thanks, what a frickin' headache... == Socks == Thank you for the recent blocks and protections, could you please do the same with these: , , , , ; Sodomy law, Discrimination, Hate speech, Witherspoon Institute. Thank you. :I have some doubts about them. For example the IPs don't geolocate to the same area. Or were you perhaps saying that they're related to other sockpuppets? () == edit filter #541+#542 == Hi! I	" Thank you. - :Thanks for sorting it out. () == Genius!!!! == Thanks for finding that sock. The created article will have be nuked as well (Germanic peoples (modern)) as created by banned. :Np. I'm about to close the AfD as a speedy delete. () ::Well, yeah, that works too. Again thanks, what a frickin' headache... == Socks == Thank you for the recent blocks and protections, could you please do the same with these:,,,, ; Sodomy law, Discrimination, Hate speech, Witherspoon Institute. Thank you. :I have some doubts about them. For example the IPs don't geolocate to the same area. Or were you perhaps saying that they're related to other sockpuppets? () == edit filter #541+#542 == Hi! I'm
" == Military Administration in Serbia / Militärverwaltung in Serbien == Well, i have one proposition. We have where one name, but as far as i can see, there are not enough users who agree to this. I also dont like it. And i have one proposition. As no official state was established during Nazi rule in Serbia, we dont have official name of the state that we can use. But, only official entity that did existed during the war was Militärverwaltung in Serbien or Military Administration in Serbia. In article Military Administration (Nazi Germany) you may see the	" == Military Administration in Serbia / Militärverwaltung in Serbien == Well, i have one proposition. We have where one name, but as far as i can see, there are not enough users who agree to this. I also dont like it. And i have one proposition. As no official state was established during Nazi rule in Serbia, we dont have official name of the state that we can use. But, only official entity that did existed during the war was Militärverwaltung in Serbien or Military Administration in Serbia. In article Military Administration (Nazi Germany) you may see the following
FUCK You YOU STUPID LITTLE FLUFFY NIGGER	FUCK You YOU STUPID LITTLE FLUFFY NIGGER I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do this, but I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do this. A: I think you're going to be able to do this. A: I think you're going to be able to do this. A: I think you're going to be able
" == Thank You! == {\| style=""border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"" \|rowspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" \| \|rowspan=""2"" \| \|style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;"" \| The Featured Sound Main Page Proposal Voter Barnstar \|- \|style=""vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;"" \| I was truly humbled by the overwhelming community support for the recent proposal to place featured sounds on the main page. The proposal closed on Tuesday with 57 people in support and only 2 in opposition. It should take a few weeks for everything to get coded and tested, and once that is done the community will	" == Thank You! == {\| style=""border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"" \|rowspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" \| \|rowspan=""2"" \| \|style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;"" \| The Featured Sound Main Page Proposal Voter Barnstar \|- \|style=""vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;"" \| I was truly humbled by the overwhelming community support for the recent proposal to place featured sounds on the main page. The proposal closed on Tuesday with 57 people in support and only 2 in opposition. It should take a few weeks for everything to get coded and tested, and once that is done the community will be
::Those 4 volumes do indeed cover all that Heim published in his lifetime, warts and all - i.e. volume 1 is still not totally error-free, though better than before. And yes, it is the famous 2000 page write-up. Note, though, that Heim left behind lots of notes that were never published - Haeuser has thes and is sifting through them, so may eventually add to the body of work. In principle one could glean a quite thorough understanding of Heim Theory by reading the already existing 4 volumes. If you have the money to spend on these then you could do worse than getting the set - Resch also offers some	::Those 4 volumes do indeed cover all that Heim published in his lifetime, warts and all - i.e. volume 1 is still not totally error-free, though better than before. And yes, it is the famous 2000 page write-up. Note, though, that Heim left behind lots of notes that were never published - Haeuser has thes and is sifting through them, so may eventually add to the body of work. In principle one could glean a quite thorough understanding of Heim Theory by reading the already existing 4 volumes. If you have the money to spend on these then you could do worse than getting the set - Resch also offers some great
" If it wasn't written very well, why didn't you just fix it apposed to deleting the whole thing? What exactly was unrelated and/or biased? Correct me if I am wrong, but nothing. And SPAM, no wtf? Am I talking to a php program here or something? What is so bad about saying ""you""? Should I have said someone? ""was not all relevant to the subject of the article"" EXCUSE ME!? I happen to know exactly what I am talking about, why else would I contribute to the wiki if I didn't know what I was saying?! ""duplicated content in other articles"" – So you are saying I copy and pasted information from other articles? What are you NUTS? ""could be seen as part in	" If it wasn't written very well, why didn't you just fix it apposed to deleting the whole thing? What exactly was unrelated and/or biased? Correct me if I am wrong, but nothing. And SPAM, no wtf? Am I talking to a php program here or something? What is so bad about saying ""you""? Should I have said someone? ""was not all relevant to the subject of the article"" EXCUSE ME!? I happen to know exactly what I am talking about, why else would I contribute to the wiki if I didn't know what I was saying?! ""duplicated content in other articles"" – So you are saying I copy and pasted information from other articles? What are you NUTS? ""could be seen as part in the
" ==Speedy deletion of The New Great Thing I Made Up In School Today== A tag has been placed on The New Great Thing I Made Up In School Today, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may	" ==Speedy deletion of The New Great Thing I Made Up In School Today== A tag has been placed on The New Great Thing I Made Up In School Today, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may have
==Picture== Is that picture on your user page	==Picture== Is that picture on your user page? A: You can use the following code to get the picture: public class Picture { public string Name { get; set; } public string Description { get; set; } public string Description { get; set; } public string Description { get; set; } public string Description { get; set; } public string Description { get; set; }
" : , I doubt the title is appended because of any need for disambiguation. I note that the vast majority of the entries in Category:Barons in the Peerage of the United Kingdom have the title appended to the name, the main exception being former Archbishops of Canterbury, but there are also a few others, who seem to be covered by: :Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility)#British nobility, according to which: There are several exceptions to these rules. :Peers who are almost exclusively known by their personal names: e.g. Bertrand Russell (not ""Bertrand Russell, 3rd Earl Russell""). :*Peers who are	" :, I doubt the title is appended because of any need for disambiguation. I note that the vast majority of the entries in Category:Barons in the Peerage of the United Kingdom have the title appended to the name, the main exception being former Archbishops of Canterbury, but there are also a few others, who seem to be covered by: :Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility)#British nobility, according to which: There are several exceptions to these rules. :Peers who are almost exclusively known by their personal names: e.g. Bertrand Russell (not ""Bertrand Russell, 3rd Earl Russell""). :*Peers who are known
==Truth== THeSE GUY ARE A BUNCH OF RETARDS	==Truth== THeSE GUY ARE A BUNCH OF RETARDS THeSE GUY ARE A BUNCH OF RETARDS THeSE GUY ARE A BUNCH OF RETARDS THeSE GUY ARE A BUNCH OF RETARDS THeSE GUY ARE A BUNCH OF RETARDS THeSE GUY ARE A BUNCH OF RETARDS
" ::::::::::::You said ""roof of heaven"", now you say ""floor"". Which is it? And why don't you just tell me where you think that is? You keep dodging that, which makes me think you have no idea what you're talking about in that matter. First ""roof""...now ""floor""...and still no scripture or verse at all presented for that. (But it's already known that miracles and divine intervention was asserted in the Book of Exodus.) Also, again, the Cahill thing was NOT presented ""as if it was a mainstream view"". You keep repeating the same falsehood. It was NOT presented that way at all!!! When exactly was it presented like	" ::::::::::::You said ""roof of heaven"", now you say ""floor"". Which is it? And why don't you just tell me where you think that is? You keep dodging that, which makes me think you have no idea what you're talking about in that matter. First ""roof""...now ""floor""...and still no scripture or verse at all presented for that. (But it's already known that miracles and divine intervention was asserted in the Book of Exodus.) Also, again, the Cahill thing was NOT presented ""as if it was a mainstream view"". You keep repeating the same falsehood. It was NOT presented that way at all!!! When exactly was it presented like this
" Knock off the retarded posts. ""Huhhuh this game	" Knock off the retarded posts. ""Huhhuh this game is a game of the day. "I'm not going to be able to play the game, but I'm not going to be able to play the game. I'm not going to be able to play the game. I'm not going to be able to play the game. I'm not going to be able to play the game. I'm not going to be able to play the game. I'm not going
== Pink Floyd == Thanks for the assessment on the Pink Floyd talk page. I didn't know about the featured music project or I would have taken it to you guys before listing it on the Featured Articles candidates list. Most of the issues I can easily address. The pictures are a larger problem (only one is left which has been tagged for lack of copyright information; the rest are album covers (as I understand it, covered under fair use) and a promo picture from Live 8 which has full information. I'm wondering if you (or someone from the project) can provide some guidance on the issue of pictures. My knowledge of copyright law is nil, and last night, the latest	== Pink Floyd == Thanks for the assessment on the Pink Floyd talk page. I didn't know about the featured music project or I would have taken it to you guys before listing it on the Featured Articles candidates list. Most of the issues I can easily address. The pictures are a larger problem (only one is left which has been tagged for lack of copyright information; the rest are album covers (as I understand it, covered under fair use) and a promo picture from Live 8 which has full information. I'm wondering if you (or someone from the project) can provide some guidance on the issue of pictures. My knowledge of copyright law is nil, and last night, the latest issue
== Photo == Are they admirers of his penis specifically, or	== Photo == Are they admirers of his penis specifically, or their penis in the same way. The fact that the penis is a penis is a penis, and that the penis is a penis is a penis. The fact that the penis is a penis is a penis is a penis. The fact that the penis is a penis is a penis is a penis. The fact that the penis is a penis is a penis is a penis. The fact
fuck you bitches i use a proxy and i can do	fuck you bitches i use a proxy and i can do it with the same proxy and i can do it with the same proxy and i can do it with the same proxy and i can do it with the same proxy and i can do it with the same proxy and i can do it with the same proxy and i can do it with the same proxy and i can do it with the same proxy and i can do it with the same proxy and i can do it with the same proxy and
==Urban== Sprawa tkwi w czymś innym. Dwa lata temu był mały spór dotyczący zagłębia węglowego (m.in. Upper Silesian Coal Basin, ale też GOP i ROW). Spór toczył się zarówno na Wikipedii jak i poza nią. Ogólnie przyjęto, że Górnośląskie Zagłębie Węglowe to obszar metropolitalny i artykuł o zagłębiu (czyli o gospodarce) dotyczył obszaru metropolitalnego i stąd spór. Ktoś wpadł na bardzo interesujący pomysł, aby utworzyć osobne artykuły o zabłębiu i aglomeracjach. Tak też zrobiłem. Hasło Upper Silesian Coal Basin które już dawniej poprawiono jest o polsko-czeskim zagłębiu węglowym i istnieje osobny artykuł	==Urban== Sprawa tkwi w czymś innym. Dwa lata temu był mały spór dotyczący zagłębia węglowego (m.in. Upper Silesian Coal Basin, ale też GOP i ROW). Spór toczył się zarówno na Wikipedii jak i poza nią. Ogólnie przyjęto, że Górnośląskie Zagłębie Węglowe to obszar metropolitalny i artykuł o zagłębiu (czyli o gospodarce) dotyczył obszaru metropolitalnego i stąd spór. Ktoś wpadł na bardzo interesujący pomysł, aby utworzyć osobne artykuły o zabłębiu i aglomeracjach. Tak też zrobiłem. Hasło Upper Silesian Coal Basin które już dawniej poprawiono jest o polsko-czeskim zagłębiu węglowym i istnieje osobny artykuł o
dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks	dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks dicks
" == Let's get this article featured on the main page =) == Get to work folks, =) :I mentioned above that featuring this on the main page would be inappropriate until the election cycle has finished. It may be possible to promote the article once disagreements are resolved, but probably for the same reason you want it on the main page (more attention for his campaign), I think that would be the wrong thing to do since WP is supposed to be neutral. I agree that it probably shouldn't be featured on the main page, but there's still no reason it can't be taken to featured article quality. A few sections need rewriting, but it's come a long	" == Let's get this article featured on the main page =) == Get to work folks, =) :I mentioned above that featuring this on the main page would be inappropriate until the election cycle has finished. It may be possible to promote the article once disagreements are resolved, but probably for the same reason you want it on the main page (more attention for his campaign), I think that would be the wrong thing to do since WP is supposed to be neutral. I agree that it probably shouldn't be featured on the main page, but there's still no reason it can't be taken to featured article quality. A few sections need rewriting, but it's come a long way
Why is it worded in wikipedia in a way	Why is it worded in wikipedia in a way that is not a word? A: The word is a word, and it is a word that is not a word. A: The word is a word, and it is a word that is not a word. A: The word is a word, and it is a word that is not a word. A: The word is a word, and it
2006 (UTC) :Well-written & footnoted preposterous garbage	2006 (UTC) :Well-written & footnoted preposterous garbage, and a few other things. The first thing I noticed was that the garbage was not in the garbage, and that the garbage was not in the garbage. The garbage was not in the garbage, and that the garbage was not in the garbage. The garbage was not in the garbage, and that the garbage was not in the garbage. The garbage was not in the garbage,
" ::I don't see why you'd find such a thing amusing, nor why you think my question might've been rhetorical (or even ""retorical"", as you put it). Such decisions should be based on policy, and not contradictory ""precedents"" that are not evidently documented, nor the subjective judgments of button-pushers who don't seem to take the discussion into account. Can you point me to these precedents? :Hi Nightscream, please forgive my tone in the last message - I had assumed (as you have been here longer than me) that you were aware there is no such criteria page and were obliquely questioning my Ffd closure. The one used in these cases is the WP:NFCC list. What I mean by amusing is that, if we had a	" ::I don't see why you'd find such a thing amusing, nor why you think my question might've been rhetorical (or even ""retorical"", as you put it). Such decisions should be based on policy, and not contradictory ""precedents"" that are not evidently documented, nor the subjective judgments of button-pushers who don't seem to take the discussion into account. Can you point me to these precedents? :Hi Nightscream, please forgive my tone in the last message - I had assumed (as you have been here longer than me) that you were aware there is no such criteria page and were obliquely questioning my Ffd closure. The one used in these cases is the WP:NFCC list. What I mean by amusing is that, if we had a "
" :::Infoboxes are not obligatory, in biographical or other articles here. In this case, ""those editors working on the article"", per Scott, consist of Hoary. Please consider his opinion, Nihonjoe. I see to my surprise that you tell him on your talkpage that removing the infobox is ""considered vandalism"". That passive form ""is considered"" presumably means you consider it vandalism; I'm sure you're aware, being a 'crat, that WP:Vandalism doesn't. Note especially the sentence ""If an editor treats situations which are not clearly vandalism as such, then that editor may harm the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away potential editors."" It's hardly ever proper to call good-faith actions of good users,	" :::Infoboxes are not obligatory, in biographical or other articles here. In this case, ""those editors working on the article"", per Scott, consist of Hoary. Please consider his opinion, Nihonjoe. I see to my surprise that you tell him on your talkpage that removing the infobox is ""considered vandalism"". That passive form ""is considered"" presumably means you consider it vandalism; I'm sure you're aware, being a 'crat, that WP:Vandalism doesn't. Note especially the sentence ""If an editor treats situations which are not clearly vandalism as such, then that editor may harm the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away potential editors."" It's hardly ever proper to call good-faith actions of good users, but
Di Stefano has NO convictions and that was made clear and conceded by the CPS at the Van Hoogstraten hearings in 2002. He is a man of good character according to the transcripts. The Crown did not challenge that at all because once a conviction is quashed one becomes again of good character and in any court of law one is not permitted to mention a conviction that was subsequently quashed. We have seen his certificate in Italy that he is of no previous conviction and not under investigation. We have been in touch, under the Freedom of Information, with the Department of Justice in Washington and Di Stefano has never been charged, tried or convicted of either a felony or misdemenour in the US. In fact in	Di Stefano has NO convictions and that was made clear and conceded by the CPS at the Van Hoogstraten hearings in 2002. He is a man of good character according to the transcripts. The Crown did not challenge that at all because once a conviction is quashed one becomes again of good character and in any court of law one is not permitted to mention a conviction that was subsequently quashed. We have seen his certificate in Italy that he is of no previous conviction and not under investigation. We have been in touch, under the Freedom of Information, with the Department of Justice in Washington and Di Stefano has never been charged, tried or convicted of either a felony or misdemenour in the US. In fact in the
. Cross referencing or lack therof will be a royal bitch,	. Cross referencing or lack therof will be a royal bitch, but I'm not sure if that's the case. A: I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right.
and then had sex with so hard that he broke her pelvis	and then had sex with so hard that he broke her pelvis and then he was able to get her to the hospital. "I'm sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry
" :It is in Turkish and says	" :It is in Turkish and says that the "Russian" is a "Russian" and that the "Russian" is a "Russian" and that the "Russian" is a "Russian" and that the "Russian" is a "Russian" and that the "Russian" is a "Russian" and that the "Russian" is a "Russian" and that the "Russian" is a "Russian" and that the "Russian" is a "Russian" and that the "Russian
JEWS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERY THING THAT HAPPENS TO	JEWS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERY THING THAT HAPPENS TO THE THE WERE NOT A LOOKING FOR THE WERE NOT A LOOKING FOR THE WERE NOT A LOOKING FOR THE WERE NOT A LOOKING FOR THE WERE NOT A LOOKING FOR THE WERE NOT A LOOKING FOR THE WERE NOT A LOOKING FOR THE WERE NOT A LOOKING FOR THE WERE NOT A LOOKING
External search engines should, but do not always send readers straight to the right page. They send readers to the pages with the highest ranking according to the algorithm used. However that can give the wrong thing certain circumstances - such as if a webpage is moved, without the old title continuing to point at it. That's because the incoming links which are a major contributor to page ranking will continue to point to the old title (we can only fix internal links). :::The Durham move was such a case, as UK readers no longer find the article about the city, they find the dab instead. Meanwhile US users are unaffected as	External search engines should, but do not always send readers straight to the right page. They send readers to the pages with the highest ranking according to the algorithm used. However that can give the wrong thing certain circumstances - such as if a webpage is moved, without the old title continuing to point at it. That's because the incoming links which are a major contributor to page ranking will continue to point to the old title (we can only fix internal links). :::The Durham move was such a case, as UK readers no longer find the article about the city, they find the dab instead. Meanwhile US users are unaffected as they
^hey dumb ass moron whoever said she can not act should jsut	^hey dumb ass moron whoever said she can not act should jsut go to the bottom of the page and say, "I'm not going to do that." "I'm not going to do that," she said. "I'm not going to do that," she said. "I'm not going to do that," she said. "I'm not going to do that," she said. "I'm not going to do that
== pfffffftttt! == You think your vandal proof will stop	== pfffffftttt! == You think your vandal proof will stop being a good one? A: You can use the following code to get the vandal proof: var v = v.getVandalProof(v.getVandalProof(v.getVandalProof(v.getVandalProof(v.getVandalProof(v.getVandalProof(v.getVandalProof(v.getVandalProof(v
" Mr. Silvers Midori was 14 when I wrote the first feature about her. I consider your suggestion that I wrote negative reviews about many young artists vandalism of its own sort may I remind you that you called me a ""thoughtless, nasty person"" and many other things on the Evancho page? I have deliberately not said anything about Evancho's parents, although no child could be paraded in public without getting somebody's permission, no? You have taken a difference of opinion about one single, deeply controversial young artist and turned it into a crusade, in the pretense of objectivity. The Barry mention suggests that my departure from the Post had something to do with my angry	" Mr. Silvers Midori was 14 when I wrote the first feature about her. I consider your suggestion that I wrote negative reviews about many young artists vandalism of its own sort may I remind you that you called me a ""thoughtless, nasty person"" and many other things on the Evancho page? I have deliberately not said anything about Evancho's parents, although no child could be paraded in public without getting somebody's permission, no? You have taken a difference of opinion about one single, deeply controversial young artist and turned it into a crusade, in the pretense of objectivity. The Barry mention suggests that my departure from the Post had something to do with my angry comments
" == Trask is the only source to mention size == Trask stands alone in describing this in terms of size: P.H. Matthews, Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics (2007, Oxford) uses ""macrofamily"" solely for a proposed unit that combines widely accepted language families with no reference to size. Lyle Campbell & Mauricio J. Mixco, A Glossary of Historical Linguistics (2007, Utah) uses ""macrofamily"" solely for proposed and controversial units with no reference to size. *David Crystal, A Dictionary of Linguistics & Phonetics (2003, Blackwell) does not use ""macrofamily"", but uses ""phylum"" and ""macrophylum"" in the same senseproposed units with deep time depth above the	" == Trask is the only source to mention size == Trask stands alone in describing this in terms of size: P.H. Matthews, Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics (2007, Oxford) uses ""macrofamily"" solely for a proposed unit that combines widely accepted language families with no reference to size. Lyle Campbell & Mauricio J. Mixco, A Glossary of Historical Linguistics (2007, Utah) uses ""macrofamily"" solely for proposed and controversial units with no reference to size. *David Crystal, A Dictionary of Linguistics & Phonetics (2003, Blackwell) does not use ""macrofamily"", but uses ""phylum"" and ""macrophylum"" in the same senseproposed units with deep time depth above the "
" I think you may be starting to learn some physics, POM. That introduction may be an improvement. I am not sure why we were both looking at the same page in Messiah at the same time. I agree that we should end up with a different title, but I started with this one to balance ""Interpretation of quantum mechanics"", because a poor fit between a theory and its approximation belongs to the approximation and not to the theory. As I said, somewhere, we should talk about the history of when physicists still thought classically and talk about physics from a contemporary point of view. I want this article to permanently do the latter but also at present to lead people away from	" I think you may be starting to learn some physics, POM. That introduction may be an improvement. I am not sure why we were both looking at the same page in Messiah at the same time. I agree that we should end up with a different title, but I started with this one to balance ""Interpretation of quantum mechanics"", because a poor fit between a theory and its approximation belongs to the approximation and not to the theory. As I said, somewhere, we should talk about the history of when physicists still thought classically and talk about physics from a contemporary point of view. I want this article to permanently do the latter but also at present to lead people away from the
:Hello, Adraen. By new title, do you mean a new section? Or a completely new article? :We can certainly add more material on former glaciation of the Himalaya. Right now, the article is not very detailed. If we add a lot of detail about former glaciation, then the article would become unbalanced. We can possibly create a new article out of the new material. :It is important that new material be supported by multiple reliable sources, especially if a new article is created. Relying on a single source has a very real risk of violating the Neutral point of view rule - we need to make sure that the material about paleoglaciation reflects scientific consensus, and gives	:Hello, Adraen. By new title, do you mean a new section? Or a completely new article? :We can certainly add more material on former glaciation of the Himalaya. Right now, the article is not very detailed. If we add a lot of detail about former glaciation, then the article would become unbalanced. We can possibly create a new article out of the new material. :It is important that new material be supported by multiple reliable sources, especially if a new article is created. Relying on a single source has a very real risk of violating the Neutral point of view rule - we need to make sure that the material about paleoglaciation reflects scientific consensus, and gives a
" == Hate rant (uh oh!) == I hate you RGTraynor, and I'm	" == Hate rant (uh oh!) == I hate you RGTraynor, and I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm not going to be able to do that. I'm