prompt
stringlengths 3
940
| output
stringlengths 112
942
|
---|---|
" 2013 (UTC) ::Not just difficult: impossible. Some contributions to that discussion hinge on distinguishing a ""language"" from a ""dialect"", a distinction without scientific basis. To quote Dialect#Dialect_or_language [refs & flags deleted, text abridged, bolding added; my comments italicized in square brackets]: ::*There is no universally accepted criterion for distinguishing a language from a dialect. A number of rough measures exist, sometimes leading to contradictory results. Some linguists do not differentiate between languages and dialects, i.e. languages are dialects and vice versa. The distinction is therefore subjective and depends on the user's frame of reference. Note also that the | " 2013 (UTC) ::Not just difficult: impossible. Some contributions to that discussion hinge on distinguishing a ""language"" from a ""dialect"", a distinction without scientific basis. To quote Dialect#Dialect_or_language [refs & flags deleted, text abridged, bolding added; my comments italicized in square brackets]: ::*There is no universally accepted criterion for distinguishing a language from a dialect. A number of rough measures exist, sometimes leading to contradictory results. Some linguists do not differentiate between languages and dialects, i.e. languages are dialects and vice versa. The distinction is therefore subjective and depends on the user's frame of reference. Note also that the distinction |
C ;L,XHIUOWIKJOIKMMNMM;PLM LPMDMLK MPOM CMPDK KSP KSDPOMDKO KKDNOPDLQS MMOKJF NMF[PVK DMLOVK[DK KDK KPPM MM | C ;L,XHIUOWIKJOIKMMNMM;PLM LPMDMLK MPOM CMPDK KSP KSDPOMDKO KKDNOPDLQS MMOKJF NMF[PVK DMLOVK[DK KDK KPPM MMKMPOM CMPK KSP KSP KSP KSP KSP KSP KSP KSP KSP KSP KSP KSP KSP KSP KSP KSP K |
" == Possible Category Misplacement == I believe that the placement of this article into Category:Integers is perhaps mathematically incorrect. The article gives reference to the ""historical"" Skewes' number (i.e. the 1933 upper bound proven assuming the RH), which cannot be an integer (or rational number, for that matter) which is implied by the fact that e is irrational. The article also speaks of a Skewes' number (in some sense) in which I believe there is very little reason to believe that the ""true"" Skewes' number given by the least upper bound for a violation of the defining inequality is an integer. It seems to me that it would be very odd and unnatural and | " == Possible Category Misplacement == I believe that the placement of this article into Category:Integers is perhaps mathematically incorrect. The article gives reference to the ""historical"" Skewes' number (i.e. the 1933 upper bound proven assuming the RH), which cannot be an integer (or rational number, for that matter) which is implied by the fact that e is irrational. The article also speaks of a Skewes' number (in some sense) in which I believe there is very little reason to believe that the ""true"" Skewes' number given by the least upper bound for a violation of the defining inequality is an integer. It seems to me that it would be very odd and unnatural and would |
" == Deletion of Riktam Technologies == Dear Sir, I thank you a lot for the feedback that you have provided me about Riktam Technologies. And I would not recreate the content for Riktam Technologies. As of the comparison, I am very glad to hear that ""NO ILITY"" criterion is and was based on the REVENUES GENERATED. Probably this should have been put in the Authoring Guidelines and FAQs. So that innocent souls like me would come to know that Notability is infact a matter of Revenues and Wikipedia makes a note of only those Companies with their turn over in billions. Well the soul of the economic world is not revenues. I hope you agree with me. Importance of a | " == Deletion of Riktam Technologies == Dear Sir, I thank you a lot for the feedback that you have provided me about Riktam Technologies. And I would not recreate the content for Riktam Technologies. As of the comparison, I am very glad to hear that ""NO ILITY"" criterion is and was based on the REVENUES GENERATED. Probably this should have been put in the Authoring Guidelines and FAQs. So that innocent souls like me would come to know that Notability is infact a matter of Revenues and Wikipedia makes a note of only those Companies with their turn over in billions. Well the soul of the economic world is not revenues. I hope you agree with me. Importance of a good |
Mexican dickhead You and your family should die Fucking homophobic | Mexican dickhead You and your family should die Fucking homophobic.
The only thing that makes me feel like I'm a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than a little more than |
" == Section entitled ""Quebec"" == There is a contradiction between the table, which is inaccurate in any case, and the paragraphs discussing anglicisms which follow. The table suggests that France french (""metropolitan"" French) when it is taught allows for anglicisms. This is not accurate. The table also suggests Quebeckers use fewer anglicisms - also inaccurate. The section goes on to state, in fact, that Quebeckers use a lot of anglicisms, and goes into quite a lot of detail. No one in Quebec uses ""fin de semaine"" in casual conversation, they use ""le week-end."" ""Parc a stationnement"" is ludicrous. Stationnement is | " == Section entitled ""Quebec"" == There is a contradiction between the table, which is inaccurate in any case, and the paragraphs discussing anglicisms which follow. The table suggests that France french (""metropolitan"" French) when it is taught allows for anglicisms. This is not accurate. The table also suggests Quebeckers use fewer anglicisms - also inaccurate. The section goes on to state, in fact, that Quebeckers use a lot of anglicisms, and goes into quite a lot of detail. No one in Quebec uses ""fin de semaine"" in casual conversation, they use ""le week-end."" ""Parc a stationnement"" is ludicrous. Stationnement is a |
"== Hal Turner == You are an idiot Everything the precvious edits are saying are true. He's as recently as 12-20-06 admitted he had brutally beat a hispanic man just for crossing in front of his house. This man is a Racist and Near Skinhead. You want to protect a NAZI Fine but remember by supporting him you are just making yourself an enabler of this man's HATE —The preceding unsigned comment was added by . :Please stop making personal attacks on me. Comment on content, not the contributor. -YOU REFUSE TO LET PEOPLE CHANGE IT. And if you can't stand someone insulting you then go cry Emo-Kid in a corner emo kid :I refuse to let people vandalise | "== Hal Turner == You are an idiot Everything the precvious edits are saying are true. He's as recently as 12-20-06 admitted he had brutally beat a hispanic man just for crossing in front of his house. This man is a Racist and Near Skinhead. You want to protect a NAZI Fine but remember by supporting him you are just making yourself an enabler of this man's HATE —The preceding unsigned comment was added by. :Please stop making personal attacks on me. Comment on content, not the contributor. -YOU REFUSE TO LET PEOPLE CHANGE IT. And if you can't stand someone insulting you then go cry Emo-Kid in a corner emo kid :I refuse to let people vandalise me |
. :This was bullshit. Meat from bullfights | . :This was bullshit. Meat from bullfights.
I was in the middle of a fight. I was in the middle of a fight. I was in the middle of a fight. I was in the middle of a fight. I was in the middle of a fight. I was in the middle of a fight. I was in the middle of a fight. I was in the middle of a fight. I was in the middle of a fight. I was in the middle |
I'm really surprised they didnt just kill all | I'm really surprised they didnt just kill all the people who are going to be in the same place.
I'm not sure if I'm going to be in the same place.
I'm not sure if I'm going to be in the same place.
I'm not sure if I'm going to be in the same place.
I'm not sure if I'm going to be in the same place.
I'm not sure if I'm going to |
:::Is cunt the worst one you know? I know about three better | :::Is cunt the worst one you know? I know about three better than you.
I think I have a good idea of what I am going to do. I have a good idea of what I am going to do. I have a good idea of what I am going to do. I have a good idea of what I am going to do. I have a good idea of what I am going to do. I have a good idea of what I am going to do |
JACOB BLACK IS THE SEXIEST MAN EVER EXCICTED HE IS GREAT IN SEX | JACOB BLACK IS THE SEXIEST MAN EVER EXCICTED HE IS GREAT IN SEXIE
The SEXIEST MAN EVER EXCICTED HE IS GREAT IN SEXIE
The SEXIEST MAN EVER EXCICTED HE IS GREAT IN SEXIE
The SEXIEST MAN EVER EXCICTED HE IS GREAT IN SEXIE
The SEXIEST MAN |
You can go fuck yourself, you and your retarded country. I | You can go fuck yourself, you and your retarded country. I'm not going to be a good man, but I'm not going to be a good man. I'm not going to be a good man. I'm not going to be a good man. I'm not going to be a good man. I'm not going to be a good man. I'm not going to be a good man. I'm not going to be a good man. I'm not going to be a |
" == Replaceable fair use Image:Whittingham-bookcover.jpg == Thanks for uploading Image:Whittingham-bookcover.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: # Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by | " == Replaceable fair use Image:Whittingham-bookcover.jpg == Thanks for uploading Image:Whittingham-bookcover.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: # Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by the |
" == Self-deportation == I have opened a discussion of your edits at the above named article's talk page. You should participate. But first, if you would, you need to read a few pages of policy here at Wikipedia. I just perused the discussions here at your talk page and you really seem to not understand a very important principle that is outlined at WP:TRUTH. It does not matter a bit here at Wikipedia what you know, or even what you think you know. The only thing that matters is what you can prove. Wikipedia is not about original creation or synthesis of knowledge. Rather it is about reporting on what | " == Self-deportation == I have opened a discussion of your edits at the above named article's talk page. You should participate. But first, if you would, you need to read a few pages of policy here at Wikipedia. I just perused the discussions here at your talk page and you really seem to not understand a very important principle that is outlined at WP:TRUTH. It does not matter a bit here at Wikipedia what you know, or even what you think you know. The only thing that matters is what you can prove. Wikipedia is not about original creation or synthesis of knowledge. Rather it is about reporting on what you |
And you, sir, are an idiot. Yours | And you, sir, are an idiot. Yours, sir."
"I'm not going to say that."
"I'm not going to say that."
"I'm not going to say that."
"I'm not going to say that."
"I'm not going to say that."
"I'm not going to say that."
"I'm not going to say that."
"I'm not going to say |
==Unspecified source for Image:HerPrey.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:HerPrey.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag | ==Unspecified source for Image:HerPrey.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:HerPrey.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag is |
HO MY GOSH BLAPZ BLAPZ WEN ME FUK DA GAL | HO MY GOSH BLAPZ BLAPZ WEN ME FUK DA GALI
The GOSH BLAPZ WEN ME FUK DA GALI
The GOSH BLAPZ WEN ME FUK DA GALI
The GOSH BLAPZ WEN ME FUK DA GALI
The GOSH BLAPZ WEN ME FUK DA GALI
The GOSH BLAP |
" == Feuds within the music industry == The first sentence of the third paragraph reads: Morrissey have severely criticized fellow singers such as Madonna, David Bowie and George Michael. This should either read ""M. has severely..."" or ""M. has been severely..."" I don't know enough Morrissey trivia to know which. Either way, there're no citations given for the severe criticism. Perhaps the sentence needs to go? — Preceding unsigned comment added by • 10:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC) == Wilde == It reads that Wilde was a homosexual. He was not. He had a wife and children. He believed in 'Greek Love'. | " == Feuds within the music industry == The first sentence of the third paragraph reads: Morrissey have severely criticized fellow singers such as Madonna, David Bowie and George Michael. This should either read ""M. has severely..."" or ""M. has been severely..."" I don't know enough Morrissey trivia to know which. Either way, there're no citations given for the severe criticism. Perhaps the sentence needs to go? — Preceding unsigned comment added by • 10:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC) == Wilde == It reads that Wilde was a homosexual. He was not. He had a wife and children. He believed in 'Greek Love'.
|
==Explanation of dubious tag== When the series ended, there was a 20% increase in the number of people taking out life insurance policies with one provider, which was attributed to Rachel's premature death. fact tag This is stated in the opening text yet isn't cited. Further down a similar sentence is in place which is cited. This sentence is less vague and states that it was Tesco Insurance which states this. That isn't an impartial source and the statement isn't the same as the opening statement, hence as the claim in initially stated isn't adequately sourced. dubious This claim is highly unlikely for three reasons: 1. Given the audience figures, how many | ==Explanation of dubious tag== When the series ended, there was a 20% increase in the number of people taking out life insurance policies with one provider, which was attributed to Rachel's premature death. fact tag This is stated in the opening text yet isn't cited. Further down a similar sentence is in place which is cited. This sentence is less vague and states that it was Tesco Insurance which states this. That isn't an impartial source and the statement isn't the same as the opening statement, hence as the claim in initially stated isn't adequately sourced. dubious This claim is highly unlikely for three reasons: 1. Given the audience figures, how many people |
re-add it as if you can kick my ass or | re-add it as if you can kick my ass or you can't.
I'm not a fan of the "I'm not a fan of the "I'm not a fan of the "I'm not a fan of the "I'm not a fan of the "I'm not a fan of the "I'm not a fan of the "I'm not a fan of the "I'm not a fan of the "I'm not a fan of the "I'm |
== Unblock == Unblock that some studient are | == Unblock == Unblock that some studient are not.
A:
You can use the following code to get the data from the data:
data = new Data(data);
data.set(data);
data.set(data);
data.set(data);
data.set(data);
data.set(data);
data.set(data);
data.set(data);
data |
" == ""God Dayum"" == seriously, are we a bunch | " == ""God Dayum"" == seriously, are we a bunch of people?
A:
The answer is that the answer is not a "God" but a "God" and a "God" and a "God" and a "God" and a "God" and a "God" and a "God" and a "God" and a "God" and a "God" and a "God" and a "God" and a "God" |
" == Flooding of 2011 & other comments == Mention of the severe flooding of 2011 (Hurricane Irene followed immediately by Tropical Storm Lee) should be made as it was worse than 1955's flooding. It effected the availability of some crops in the US as well as their prices, onions and pumpkins spring to mind. Where I live, the fields a mile from the Wallkill were under four feet of water. And I don't see anything about continuing proposals for dredging by the Army Corps of Engineers to try to mitigate the flooding. The History section, 3rd paragraph, begins with: ""Settlers recognized the agricultural possibilities of the Drowned Lands almost as soon as they moved in."" This is | " == Flooding of 2011 & other comments == Mention of the severe flooding of 2011 (Hurricane Irene followed immediately by Tropical Storm Lee) should be made as it was worse than 1955's flooding. It effected the availability of some crops in the US as well as their prices, onions and pumpkins spring to mind. Where I live, the fields a mile from the Wallkill were under four feet of water. And I don't see anything about continuing proposals for dredging by the Army Corps of Engineers to try to mitigate the flooding. The History section, 3rd paragraph, begins with: ""Settlers recognized the agricultural possibilities of the Drowned Lands almost as soon as they moved in."" This is a |
" == Christ Wikipedia sucks == ""... | " == Christ Wikipedia sucks == ""...
I'm not sure if this is a good thing or not, but I'm not sure if it's a good thing or not.
A:
I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I think you're right. I |
:::::Emily lacks verification. She isn't important, bringing | :::::Emily lacks verification. She isn't important, bringing her own personal story to the table.
"I'm not going to be able to tell you what I'm saying," she said.
"I'm not going to be able to tell you what I'm saying," she said.
"I'm not going to be able to tell you what I'm saying," she said.
"I'm not going to be able to tell you what I'm |
" == April 2008 == You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation | " == April 2008 == You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation of |
== The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind | == The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind
The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind
The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind
The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind
The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind
The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind
The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind
The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind
The Rev == Fuck You Buddy ) Mind
|
== FUCK YOU NOBHEAD == image = | == FUCK YOU NOBHEAD == image = "
"
A:
You can use the following code to get the image from the image:
public void image_image(int image_image)
{
int image_image_image = image_image;
int image_image_image_image = image_image;
int image_image_image_image_image_image_image_image_image_image_image_ |
" :The star atlas: ::*Will Tirion, ""Sky Atlas 2000.00"", Sky Publishing Corp., 1981, ISBN 0-933346-33-6. :has the great orion nebula between about: 5h 33m to 5h 37m; -5° 0' to -6° 5'. That's roughly 65'(RA) by 60'(Dec). If you include the northern cloud (1977), the Dec. goes from -4° 35' to -6° 5'. That would give roughly 60'(RA) by 85'(Dec.). For just NGC1976 (M42) I get 5h33.5m to 5h36.3m; -5°12' to -5°50', for roughly 42' by 38' (round to 45' by 40'). :On the other hand: ::*Roger W. Sinnott and Michael A.C. Perryman, 1997 ""Millenium Star Atlas"", Vol. 1, chart 278, ISBN 0-933346-82-4. :has the | " :The star atlas: ::*Will Tirion, ""Sky Atlas 2000.00"", Sky Publishing Corp., 1981, ISBN 0-933346-33-6. :has the great orion nebula between about: 5h 33m to 5h 37m; -5° 0' to -6° 5'. That's roughly 65'(RA) by 60'(Dec). If you include the northern cloud (1977), the Dec. goes from -4° 35' to -6° 5'. That would give roughly 60'(RA) by 85'(Dec.). For just NGC1976 (M42) I get 5h33.5m to 5h36.3m; -5°12' to -5°50', for roughly 42' by 38' (round to 45' by 40'). :On the other hand: ::*Roger W. Sinnott and Michael A.C. Perryman, 1997 ""Millenium Star Atlas"", Vol. 1, chart 278, ISBN 0-933346-82-4. :has the great |
== nerds == Piss off niggerfuck i have more muscle | == nerds == Piss off niggerfuck i have more muscle than the other.
A:
I think you're right. I'm not sure if you're right. I'm not sure if you're right. I'm not sure if you're right. I'm not sure if you're right. I'm not sure if you're right.
A:
I think you're right. I'm not sure if you |
" == Robert Conley == I don't understand why Wikipedia content keeps removing the references of Robert Conley as one of the founders of NPR, and was actually part of the group that pushed the Public Broadcasting initiative through Washington. He & 4 others embarked on the journey to create the network with established stations in the 60s. Robert Conley, in fact, was also the original General Manager of NPR, and came up with the concept/creation of ATC. The fact the content has erased him is concerning - and disrespectful. Is it being controlled by those egos that are wanting the recognition? This was this | " == Robert Conley == I don't understand why Wikipedia content keeps removing the references of Robert Conley as one of the founders of NPR, and was actually part of the group that pushed the Public Broadcasting initiative through Washington. He & 4 others embarked on the journey to create the network with established stations in the 60s. Robert Conley, in fact, was also the original General Manager of NPR, and came up with the concept/creation of ATC. The fact the content has erased him is concerning - and disrespectful. Is it being controlled by those egos that are wanting the recognition? This was this: |
"Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for . I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: * The five pillars of Wikipedia * Help pages * Tutorial * How to edit a page and How to develop articles * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) * Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, | "Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: * The five pillars of Wikipedia * Help pages * Tutorial * How to edit a page and How to develop articles * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) * Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please |
::::Ip likes the idea of blacks stabbing | ::::Ip likes the idea of blacks stabbing the victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim of the victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim of the victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim of the victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim of the victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim victim of the victim victim victim victim victim victim |
:::I have provided the quotation which I paraphrased, and which was challenged. I have marked throughout the text a request that the numerous WP:NOR violations, where other wiki articles are paraphrased as sources, and primary sources are adduced which should properly be refracted through secondary sources ('The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose,' as Shakespeare reminds us, and the text is bedevilled by some editor(s) who have just quoted from the OT and NT to construct the argument, when nearly all of these quotations are subject to critical controversy. :::If anyone wishes to actually write the page according to authoritative secondary sources, they should begin consider starting by | :::I have provided the quotation which I paraphrased, and which was challenged. I have marked throughout the text a request that the numerous WP:NOR violations, where other wiki articles are paraphrased as sources, and primary sources are adduced which should properly be refracted through secondary sources ('The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose,' as Shakespeare reminds us, and the text is bedevilled by some editor(s) who have just quoted from the OT and NT to construct the argument, when nearly all of these quotations are subject to critical controversy. :::If anyone wishes to actually write the page according to authoritative secondary sources, they should begin consider starting by the |
":::: ""You can't present your claims as facts"". That I agree and that I am trying to establish here. Facst are not your claims Fadix. No double-standards here. Follow what you have just stated. Armenians proudly state that there was a struggle of independence since the late 1800's. These were written here by pro-Armenians as a heroic epic (Turks are always the ""others"" in the language, ""we"" are the Armenians and imperialists). I guess you were the one who removed them. Pro-Armenian historians try never mentionining these while trying to rule out Bernard Lewis and others ""provocation"" theses, but when you ask them why the Greek's | ":::: ""You can't present your claims as facts"". That I agree and that I am trying to establish here. Facst are not your claims Fadix. No double-standards here. Follow what you have just stated. Armenians proudly state that there was a struggle of independence since the late 1800's. These were written here by pro-Armenians as a heroic epic (Turks are always the ""others"" in the language, ""we"" are the Armenians and imperialists). I guess you were the one who removed them. Pro-Armenian historians try never mentionining these while trying to rule out Bernard Lewis and others ""provocation"" theses, but when you ask them why the Greek's " |
:::: I suggest you take the time and look up each of the books on the list before you lay judgement upon them. If you believe any one of them is innapropriate go ahead and point it out. I have personally read many of the books on the list and I doubt that you will find a more thorough list of secondary literature on the subject of this size anywhere else. A should add that I used the WorldCat search engine, which as you might know searches the library catalogs of many of the worlds libraries. Again, the criteria for inclusion to the 'collection of essays' section were: | :::: I suggest you take the time and look up each of the books on the list before you lay judgement upon them. If you believe any one of them is innapropriate go ahead and point it out. I have personally read many of the books on the list and I doubt that you will find a more thorough list of secondary literature on the subject of this size anywhere else. A should add that I used the WorldCat search engine, which as you might know searches the library catalogs of many of the worlds libraries. Again, the criteria for inclusion to the 'collection of essays' section were:
|
" :It was mainly the worship and statement sections, which said: ==Worship== ====Sunday worship==== Morning Prayer, Low Mass and High Mass services are held on Sundays. ====Daily worship==== Low Mass services are held daily. ====Holy Days==== Special services are held on certain Holy Days according to the calendar of the Episcopal Church. ==Mission statement== *The community is a progressive Anglo-Catholic Parish carrying forward the African-American heritage of St. Monica's and the catholic tradition of St. James' in our liturgy, worship and community life. *The community is an inclusive and diverse Parish. We are | " :It was mainly the worship and statement sections, which said: ==Worship== ====Sunday worship==== Morning Prayer, Low Mass and High Mass services are held on Sundays. ====Daily worship==== Low Mass services are held daily. ====Holy Days==== Special services are held on certain Holy Days according to the calendar of the Episcopal Church. ==Mission statement== *The community is a progressive Anglo-Catholic Parish carrying forward the African-American heritage of St. Monica's and the catholic tradition of St. James' in our liturgy, worship and community life. *The community is an inclusive and diverse Parish. We are a |
Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. *The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.] *This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.] *Per Wikipedia:What is a featured | Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. *The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.] *This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.] *Per Wikipedia:What is a featured image |
:The description is pithy, accurate, informative, relevant, and agreed upon by the authorities on the subject. Those 2 lines deliver more information to a person completely ignorant on the subject (that would most likely be visiting this page and not a specific tank) than the entire rest of the lead put together, which at present doesn't tell the reader what a tank is, or how it provides a direct fire role. If the lead were properly written and formatted it would include all the information in those two lines, however it's unlikely it could defeat the quote in terms of brevity or readability. I believe the quote would be a valid inclusion even | :The description is pithy, accurate, informative, relevant, and agreed upon by the authorities on the subject. Those 2 lines deliver more information to a person completely ignorant on the subject (that would most likely be visiting this page and not a specific tank) than the entire rest of the lead put together, which at present doesn't tell the reader what a tank is, or how it provides a direct fire role. If the lead were properly written and formatted it would include all the information in those two lines, however it's unlikely it could defeat the quote in terms of brevity or readability. I believe the quote would be a valid inclusion even if |
" to get this template > {| align=""right"" border=""1"" cellspacing=""0"" cellpadding=""3"" style=""margin: 0 0 0 0.5em; background: #FFFFFF; border-collapse: collapse; border-color: #C0C090;"" ! | |- | align=""center"" colspan=""2"" | |- ! | General |- | Systematic name | ? |- | Other names | ? |- | Molecular formula | ? |- | SMILES | ? |- | Molar mass | ?.?? g/mol |- | Appearance | ? |- | CAS number | [?-?-?] |- ! | Properties |- | Density and phase | ? g/cm3, ? |- | Solubility in water | ? g/100 ml (? °C) |- | Melting point | ? °C (? K) |- | Boiling point | ? °C (? K) |- | Acidity (pKa) | ? |- | Basicity (pKb) | ? |- | | " to get this template > {| align=""right"" border=""1"" cellspacing=""0"" cellpadding=""3"" style=""margin: 0 0 0 0.5em; background: #FFFFFF; border-collapse: collapse; border-color: #C0C090;""! | |- | align=""center"" colspan=""2"" | |-! | General |- | Systematic name |? |- | Other names |? |- | Molecular formula |? |- | SMILES |? |- | Molar mass |?.?? g/mol |- | Appearance |? |- | CAS number | [?-?-?] |-! | Properties |- | Density and phase |? g/cm3,? |- | Solubility in water |? g/100 ml (? °C) |- | Melting point |? °C (? K) |- | Boiling point |? °C (? K) |- | Acidity (pKa) |? |- | Basicity (pKb) |? |- | M |
Your wife is a slut. Her bedroom is | Your wife is a slut. Her bedroom is a place where you can be a part of the family.
"I'm not going to be a slut, but I'm going to be a slut."
"I'm not going to be a slut."
"I'm not going to be a slut."
"I'm not going to be a slut."
"I'm not going to be a slut."
"I'm not going to be a |
" ::""His career aspiration is to become | " ::""His career aspiration is to become a member of the U.S. House of Representatives.
"I'm not going to be a member of the U.S. House of Representatives," he said. "I'm not going to be a member of the U.S. House of Representatives."
"I'm not going to be a member of the U.S. House of Representatives," he said. "I'm not going to be a member of the |
" == About the whole ""schaivo"" thing == (meant to be posted on the schaivo talk page, but then I went and got myself blocked) Ok, I give up. Just so you know, I didn't invent the first 2 uses of ""schaivo"" as a term, someone I know did, but I admit that the word isn't exactly widespread. I've had my fun with the veggie lady article, now I'll leave it alone unless I find something genuinely useful to add. To Veriditas, sorry for defacing your user page to make you seem like a pedophile homosexual jew-nazi. Just got frustrated with your persistence. I don't consider myself a ""genuine"" vandal, I | " == About the whole ""schaivo"" thing == (meant to be posted on the schaivo talk page, but then I went and got myself blocked) Ok, I give up. Just so you know, I didn't invent the first 2 uses of ""schaivo"" as a term, someone I know did, but I admit that the word isn't exactly widespread. I've had my fun with the veggie lady article, now I'll leave it alone unless I find something genuinely useful to add. To Veriditas, sorry for defacing your user page to make you seem like a pedophile homosexual jew-nazi. Just got frustrated with your persistence. I don't consider myself a ""genuine"" vandal, I'm |
":The ""supplementary"" sources were generally non-WP:RS sources, such as tourism sites and fansites, so those are no great loss. Further, a lot of those sites were just used to over-footnote really basic information. No matter how frantically you footnote ""Jordan's national dish[1][2][3][4][5]"" that doesn't somehow remove the credibility of other reliable sources stating it is found outside of Jordan. :So far as Politicizing a ""meal"" is not a good idea, it is you and not I who are politicising it. You're trying to turn a cuisine article into a Jordanian propaganda piece, which is just silly. There are tons and tons of gBooks hits | ":The ""supplementary"" sources were generally non-WP:RS sources, such as tourism sites and fansites, so those are no great loss. Further, a lot of those sites were just used to over-footnote really basic information. No matter how frantically you footnote ""Jordan's national dish[1][2][3][4][5]"" that doesn't somehow remove the credibility of other reliable sources stating it is found outside of Jordan. :So far as Politicizing a ""meal"" is not a good idea, it is you and not I who are politicising it. You're trying to turn a cuisine article into a Jordanian propaganda piece, which is just silly. There are tons and tons of gBooks hits on |
(SPOILERS) This is a film about forwarding the cause of assisted suicide (eutha-nazia) and very little else. That should be clearly mentioned in the wiki article. Many think Eastwood is a nazi who wants all disabled exterminated just like the nazis did. Shame it got 5 oscars. I wonder what Mr. Superman would say about this movie? :Eutha-nazia? Sorry 'anonymous', but I think that this invented term is ignorant. Euthanasia means 'gentle death' and there was not very much gentle about the Nazi party. Please do not trivialise such a sensitive issue. There is absolutely no call to accuse Mr Eastwood of Nazism on the basis of this film. Oh! And by the way, | (SPOILERS) This is a film about forwarding the cause of assisted suicide (eutha-nazia) and very little else. That should be clearly mentioned in the wiki article. Many think Eastwood is a nazi who wants all disabled exterminated just like the nazis did. Shame it got 5 oscars. I wonder what Mr. Superman would say about this movie? :Eutha-nazia? Sorry 'anonymous', but I think that this invented term is ignorant. Euthanasia means 'gentle death' and there was not very much gentle about the Nazi party. Please do not trivialise such a sensitive issue. There is absolutely no call to accuse Mr Eastwood of Nazism on the basis of this film. Oh! And by the way, Mr |
== uren == uren is a liquid wich contains un | == uren == uren is a liquid wich contains unicolvized liquid vices.
A:
You can use the following code to get the liquid vices:
public class LiquidVices : LiquidVices
{
public string LiquidVices { get; set; }
public string LiquidVices { get; set; }
public string LiquidVices { get; set; }
public string LiquidVices { get |
:OK, Bill O'Reilly is a fool who hasn't a | :OK, Bill O'Reilly is a fool who hasn't a clue what he's doing.
"I'm not going to be able to tell you what's going on," he said.
"I'm not going to be able to tell you what's going on," he said.
"I'm not going to be able to tell you what's going on," he said.
"I'm not going to be able to tell you what's going |
"Hello. This is about your comments to Tomananda on the Falun Gong discussion board. I do not know whether you cultivate Dafa or not. If you do, I really think some of your comments are awful, not at all the standard for a cultivator, and lack compassion. If not, then you may not understand many things about what is happening there, and I would understand more. For example, the tone of the remark where you suggested that Tomananda thought... here it is: ""Tomananda, is there perhaps some part of you that thinks Li Hongzhi's exposition on karmic retribution to be true? Forgive me for asking, but I am | "Hello. This is about your comments to Tomananda on the Falun Gong discussion board. I do not know whether you cultivate Dafa or not. If you do, I really think some of your comments are awful, not at all the standard for a cultivator, and lack compassion. If not, then you may not understand many things about what is happening there, and I would understand more. For example, the tone of the remark where you suggested that Tomananda thought... here it is: ""Tomananda, is there perhaps some part of you that thinks Li Hongzhi's exposition on karmic retribution to be true? Forgive me for asking, but I am not |
We should also add in there that he's | We should also add in there that he's not going to be able to do that.
"I'm not going to be able to do that," he said.
"I'm not going to be able to do that," he said.
"I'm not going to be able to do that," he said.
"I'm not going to be able to do that," he said.
"I'm not going to be able to do that," |
ok this is not true!!! hello means you are stuiped= | ok this is not true!!! hello means you are stuiped=1
<kristen> i'm trying to get a new one to work
<kristen> i'm trying to get a new one to work
<kristen> i'm trying to get a new one to work
<kristen> i'm trying to get a new one to work
<kristen> i'm trying to get a new one to work
<krist |
" ==""fuck tart?""== Dude... the word is fucktard... (i know | " ==""fuck tart?""== Dude... the word is fucktard... (i know that the word is not a word)
"I'm not going to be able to say it."
"I'm not going to be able to say it."
"I'm not going to be able to say it."
"I'm not going to be able to say it."
"I'm not going to be able to say it." |
:I'm trying. But it is really difficult with the insistance | :I'm trying. But it is really difficult with the insistance that I have to get the job done.
A:
I think you're trying to get the job done. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't do that. You can't |
== New Picture == Is it really necessary yo | == New Picture == Is it really necessary yo?
A:
I think you need to use the following code:
var newPicture = new Picture();
var newPicture = new Picture();
var newPicture = new Picture();
var newPicture = new Picture();
var newPicture = new Picture();
var newPicture = new Picture();
var newPicture = new Picture();
var newPicture = new Picture();
var new |
"]] :: Another excellent point IslandGyrl. Unfortunately the Honolulu Advertiser only has articles from 1999 on available online, so we can't state one way or the other what the editorial opinion pages held when Twigg-Smith owned the paper without looking at hardcopies. It would be interesting to look at the op-eds from before he sold the paper, and see if we could find an influence one way or another. That being said, have you had a chance to read his book? It seems clear that you don't agree with him on some of the issues, but I would guess that you might appreciate his tone in his book. | "]] :: Another excellent point IslandGyrl. Unfortunately the Honolulu Advertiser only has articles from 1999 on available online, so we can't state one way or the other what the editorial opinion pages held when Twigg-Smith owned the paper without looking at hardcopies. It would be interesting to look at the op-eds from before he sold the paper, and see if we could find an influence one way or another. That being said, have you had a chance to read his book? It seems clear that you don't agree with him on some of the issues, but I would guess that you might appreciate his tone in his book.
|
"::: I brought it up because this article used to mention this date from January 2005 through August 2010. It's not all that obvious that the date in 1592 could not have been observed. As 2015 draws near there may be some debate over which date is the best. If this were mentioned in the article it may correct any misconceptions people may have or get people thinking about what they are really celebrating. Some external references to the ultimate pi day in 1592 include: :::*""The ""ultimate"" pi day occurred on March 14, 1592, at 6:54 AM."" :::*""The “ultimate” pi day in history occurred on March 14, 1592, at 6:53:59 AM"" :::*""I doubt the celebration will be quite as extravagant | "::: I brought it up because this article used to mention this date from January 2005 through August 2010. It's not all that obvious that the date in 1592 could not have been observed. As 2015 draws near there may be some debate over which date is the best. If this were mentioned in the article it may correct any misconceptions people may have or get people thinking about what they are really celebrating. Some external references to the ultimate pi day in 1592 include: :::*""The ""ultimate"" pi day occurred on March 14, 1592, at 6:54 AM."" :::*""The “ultimate” pi day in history occurred on March 14, 1592, at 6:53:59 AM"" :::*""I doubt the celebration will be quite as extravagant as |
" ==Publication data== We need a source for 1973 and for Doubleday, including clarification whether that is Doubleday editorial department (as it should be) or Doubleday Science Fiction Book Club arrangement with another publisher, which is possible (and we should identify the other publisher). Bantam 1974 may be reliable for the paperback edition. But Bantam affiliation with Doubleday was in the future, i believe (eg, 1988 establishment of Bantam Doubleday Dell by the Bertelsman division Random House). ISFDB says first printing Jan 1975 WorldCat shows 1974 both Bantam US and Corgi UK. The truth may be 1974 copyright, 1975 issue. Or that may be a source of confusion for | " ==Publication data== We need a source for 1973 and for Doubleday, including clarification whether that is Doubleday editorial department (as it should be) or Doubleday Science Fiction Book Club arrangement with another publisher, which is possible (and we should identify the other publisher). Bantam 1974 may be reliable for the paperback edition. But Bantam affiliation with Doubleday was in the future, i believe (eg, 1988 establishment of Bantam Doubleday Dell by the Bertelsman division Random House). ISFDB says first printing Jan 1975 WorldCat shows 1974 both Bantam US and Corgi UK. The truth may be 1974 copyright, 1975 issue. Or that may be a source of confusion for the |
" :: ah, darnit. And now you've reminded me that | " :: ah, darnit. And now you've reminded me that I'm not a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big fan of the "I'm a big |
== French overtures to Japan, 1883-5 == Hi , Thanks for that interesting stuff you have dug out on French attempts to cosy up to Japan against China before and during the Sino-French War. I'm going to search Albert Billot's L'affaire du Tonkin, the standard French diplomatic history of the Sino-French War, to see if he can add anything to your research. What I would like to do eventually is merge your new section into the existing section 'China's fear of Japan', and probably cut it down a bit. At the end of the day, France and Japan did not become allies, and I think it unbalances the main article to devote so much space to something that never happened. On the other hand, I've long | == French overtures to Japan, 1883-5 == Hi, Thanks for that interesting stuff you have dug out on French attempts to cosy up to Japan against China before and during the Sino-French War. I'm going to search Albert Billot's L'affaire du Tonkin, the standard French diplomatic history of the Sino-French War, to see if he can add anything to your research. What I would like to do eventually is merge your new section into the existing section 'China's fear of Japan', and probably cut it down a bit. At the end of the day, France and Japan did not become allies, and I think it unbalances the main article to devote so much space to something that never happened. On the other hand, I've long thought |
== Shit down your throat == How about adding | == Shit down your throat == How about adding a new one?
A:
You can use the following code to add a new one:
public class MyClass : Class
{
public MyClass()
{
this.MyClass = new MyClass();
}
}
Then you can use the following code to add a new one:
public class MyClass : Class
{
public MyClass()
{
|
"::::::::I thought you meant that actually, but how do you know if ""duty of care"" is always applied. You seem to think that some safe havens exist where ""duty of care"" does not apply. It is thus somehow god-given that substandard translations simply do not occur, just because it is a literary translation. And that automatically no damages could be litigated from another party. This is not the legal thinking of the 1990 ruling. The litigation risks still do indeed factually exist. ::::::::Tim Martin from above goes on to cite Byrne: ""Byrne nonetheless goes on to conclude that “…it would be unrealistic to interpret this lack of cases as proof that translators do not make | "::::::::I thought you meant that actually, but how do you know if ""duty of care"" is always applied. You seem to think that some safe havens exist where ""duty of care"" does not apply. It is thus somehow god-given that substandard translations simply do not occur, just because it is a literary translation. And that automatically no damages could be litigated from another party. This is not the legal thinking of the 1990 ruling. The litigation risks still do indeed factually exist. ::::::::Tim Martin from above goes on to cite Byrne: ""Byrne nonetheless goes on to conclude that “…it would be unrealistic to interpret this lack of cases as proof that translators do not make a |
I HATE YOU. YOU GOT RID OF MY INVITATION TO | I HATE YOU. YOU GOT RID OF MY INVITATION TO ME.
I'm not going to say that I'm not going to say that I'm not going to say that I'm not going to say that I'm not going to say that I'm not going to say that I'm not going to say that I'm not going to say that I'm not going to say that I'm not going to say that I'm not going to say that I'm not |
":I can't see how any of these would be meaningful here - I object to all of them. :The First Reference :1 - Actually, it's been shown that people fear what they aren't familiar with. PCs are great, Nuclear is feared in most places. I can't see how t would be useful anyway. :2 - Pre-TMI, that was true. Post-TMI is a different culture. :3 - Odd, I used nuclear fuel software named PANACEA. Seriously, safety isn't simple or easy. The electricity is the same, and capacity factors are now above 90% so it is reliable. :4 - The nuclear industry has an information network whereby incidents at | ":I can't see how any of these would be meaningful here - I object to all of them. :The First Reference :1 - Actually, it's been shown that people fear what they aren't familiar with. PCs are great, Nuclear is feared in most places. I can't see how t would be useful anyway. :2 - Pre-TMI, that was true. Post-TMI is a different culture. :3 - Odd, I used nuclear fuel software named PANACEA. Seriously, safety isn't simple or easy. The electricity is the same, and capacity factors are now above 90% so it is reliable. :4 - The nuclear industry has an information network whereby incidents at the |
" :::Busybody is certainly the word because you inserted your unsolicited tuppence-ha'penny worth into a conversation that did not involve you. I already explained the difference between an article and a talk page but if you wish to be obtuse to suit your purposes and refuse to acknowledge the distinction, I will not be drawn to repeat myself. You have misused the word ""troll"" entirely: a troll is one who deliberately makes provocative comments to stir the shit and create outrage. That is not what Sarah777 and I did; the tone was more like whimsy. Your idiocy that our brief remarks on the talk page obstructed discussion by others is more of your invented and self-serving sanctimony: Sarah777 | " :::Busybody is certainly the word because you inserted your unsolicited tuppence-ha'penny worth into a conversation that did not involve you. I already explained the difference between an article and a talk page but if you wish to be obtuse to suit your purposes and refuse to acknowledge the distinction, I will not be drawn to repeat myself. You have misused the word ""troll"" entirely: a troll is one who deliberately makes provocative comments to stir the shit and create outrage. That is not what Sarah777 and I did; the tone was more like whimsy. Your idiocy that our brief remarks on the talk page obstructed discussion by others is more of your invented and self-serving sanctimony: Sarah777 and |
::::The very reason young stupid Finncolts have been sent off to | ::::The very reason young stupid Finncolts have been sent off to the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the first time the the the the first time the the the second time the the the first time the the the second time the the the first time the the the second time the the the second time the the the third time the the the first time the the the second time the the the third time the the the first time the the the second |
Black men have extremely large penises and they all | Black men have extremely large penises and they all have a very large pen range of size.
The most common type of pen is the one that is used for the most common type of pen. The pen is usually a small pen, but it is usually a small pen. The pen is usually a small pen, but it is usually a small pen. The pen is usually a small pen, but it is usually a small pen. The pen is usually a small pen, but it is |
ssdqwphiuwefbhfwwbgjm clo j sd jik ,s d, | ssdqwphiuwefbhfwwbgjm clo j sd jik,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d,s d |
Thirded! Has this been copy and pasted from Cosmopolitan | Thirded! Has this been copy and pasted from Cosmopolitan.
"I'm sorry, I'm not a fan of the "
"I'm not a fan of the "
"I'm not a fan of the "
"I'm not a fan of the "
"I'm not a fan of the "
"I'm not a fan of the "
"I'm not a fan of the "
" |
" :::::::::::So your claim is that typographical errors are on a par with factual errors? Which makes it a factual error in the second piece to say that Gorman didn't point out factual errors in the first piece when he did the functional equivalent by pointing out typographical errors? Is this a general principle, do you think? A source with misspellings is prima facie unreliable? Also, do you have evidence for your characterization of O'Dwyer's as a ""small newsletter"" and all the other stuff you said? It seems to me that it's quite a weighty publication in its field, given the number of citations of it in scholarly articles and monographs, an issue which you still | " :::::::::::So your claim is that typographical errors are on a par with factual errors? Which makes it a factual error in the second piece to say that Gorman didn't point out factual errors in the first piece when he did the functional equivalent by pointing out typographical errors? Is this a general principle, do you think? A source with misspellings is prima facie unreliable? Also, do you have evidence for your characterization of O'Dwyer's as a ""small newsletter"" and all the other stuff you said? It seems to me that it's quite a weighty publication in its field, given the number of citations of it in scholarly articles and monographs, an issue which you still have |
the band called lockjaw SUCKS | the band called lockjaw SUCKS.
The band is a band of the same name, but the band is not the same name.
The band is a band of the same name, but the band is not the same name.
The band is a band of the same name, but the band is not the same name.
The band is a band of the same name, but the band is not the same name.
The band is a |
" == Copyright problem removed == Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.iwcp.co.uk/news/news/cash-injection-for-lowcarbon-community-in-chale-30370.aspx. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will | " == Copyright problem removed == Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.iwcp.co.uk/news/news/cash-injection-for-lowcarbon-community-in-chale-30370.aspx. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will not |
" :::::::::::::::I'm only implying that there may be space in the article for a description of conflicting sources, but that can't happen while suppression of the whole dispute is being attempted. As to the ""read"" vs ""interpret"" thing, I didn't mean that one ""only needs to be able to read"", but just that some things take interpretation, but other things can be read pretty directly from WP:PRIMARY sources (whose use, consistent with policy, isn't ruled out). :::::::::::::::Were there any changes in the constitutions? Yes, the wording did change. :::::::::::::::Would I say that it was insubstantial? Pretty much, as the mentioning of Serbs together with other nations instead of on their own | " :::::::::::::::I'm only implying that there may be space in the article for a description of conflicting sources, but that can't happen while suppression of the whole dispute is being attempted. As to the ""read"" vs ""interpret"" thing, I didn't mean that one ""only needs to be able to read"", but just that some things take interpretation, but other things can be read pretty directly from WP:PRIMARY sources (whose use, consistent with policy, isn't ruled out). :::::::::::::::Were there any changes in the constitutions? Yes, the wording did change. :::::::::::::::Would I say that it was insubstantial? Pretty much, as the mentioning of Serbs together with other nations instead of on their own, |
== Dink the little motherfucker == Is this | == Dink the little motherfucker == Is this a good thing?
A:
The problem is that the code is not a good thing. The code is not a good thing. The code is not a good thing. The code is not a good thing. The code is not a good thing. The code is not a good thing. The code is not a good thing. The code is not a good thing. The code is |
"==GA Review== :This review is transcluded from Talk:Taking Tiger Mountain (By Strategy)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It is an interesting article. I did some copyediting, which I hope you do not mind. Feel free to revert anything I did. The problems I see are mainly with the sometimes clunky wording. I will add comments below. — ;Comments Examples of problems with prose: *""the album has a more conventional sound, with everything somewhat off kilter"" - could you clarify this? *""For guest drummer Phil Collins, Eno had previously helped Collins' group Genesis | "==GA Review== :This review is transcluded from Talk:Taking Tiger Mountain (By Strategy)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It is an interesting article. I did some copyediting, which I hope you do not mind. Feel free to revert anything I did. The problems I see are mainly with the sometimes clunky wording. I will add comments below. — ;Comments Examples of problems with prose: *""the album has a more conventional sound, with everything somewhat off kilter"" - could you clarify this? *""For guest drummer Phil Collins, Eno had previously helped Collins' group Genesis, |
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Shut up. I am sick and tired of | :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Shut up. I am sick and tired of the world. I am sick of the world. I am sick of the world. I am sick of the world. I am sick of the world. I am sick of the world. I am sick of the world. I am sick of the world. I am sick of the world. I am sick of the world. I am sick of the world. I am sick of the world. |
No. We can't just add unsubstantiated, made-up shit | No. We can't just add unsubstantiated, made-up shit to the bottom of the page.
I'm not going to be able to tell you how to do it.
I'm not going to be able to tell you how to do it.
I'm not going to be able to tell you how to do it.
I'm not going to be able to tell you how to do it.
I'm not going to be able to |
" == Edit request from 98.163.70.126, 29 December 2010 == The last paragraph of text in this article is incorrect and misleading; the error is clearly visible by reading the author's cited reference, which is Reference Number 8. The last paragraph of Wikipedia text contains additional wording which is not contained in the Reference source; also, this author-added verbiage promotes a misinterpretation of the original Reference/Source because the added words convey a different meaning than is contained in the Reference text. Please change text in the last paragraph to remove specifically the words ""in order to CAUSE | " == Edit request from 98.163.70.126, 29 December 2010 == The last paragraph of text in this article is incorrect and misleading; the error is clearly visible by reading the author's cited reference, which is Reference Number 8. The last paragraph of Wikipedia text contains additional wording which is not contained in the Reference source; also, this author-added verbiage promotes a misinterpretation of the original Reference/Source because the added words convey a different meaning than is contained in the Reference text. Please change text in the last paragraph to remove specifically the words ""in order to CAUSE the |
" :::::::::::::No problem: your reaction was quite understandable given that definition of the word. That wasn't what I meant when I said ""misquote"". I apologize for not following my own advice and clarifying the definition of ""misquote"" earlier, which might have saved a lot of time and trouble. I should have known to do that. As I sometimes say, one benefit of my giving people advice is that sometimes I follow it myself (whether or not anyone else does). And I apologize for saying things using the word ""misquote"" which could easily be interpreted as accusations of things you didn't actually do. :::::::::::::I would now like to change the heading ""G-Dett has misquoted | " :::::::::::::No problem: your reaction was quite understandable given that definition of the word. That wasn't what I meant when I said ""misquote"". I apologize for not following my own advice and clarifying the definition of ""misquote"" earlier, which might have saved a lot of time and trouble. I should have known to do that. As I sometimes say, one benefit of my giving people advice is that sometimes I follow it myself (whether or not anyone else does). And I apologize for saying things using the word ""misquote"" which could easily be interpreted as accusations of things you didn't actually do. :::::::::::::I would now like to change the heading ""G-Dett has misquoted" |
:I'm going to play the idiot card instead: she's | :I'm going to play the idiot card instead: she's going to play the idiot card.
"I'm going to play the idiot card."
"I'm going to play the idiot card."
"I'm going to play the idiot card."
"I'm going to play the idiot card."
"I'm going to play the idiot card."
"I'm going to play the idiot card."
"I'm going to play |
== Margita Bangová article == I am new to the Countering Systemic Bias group & just saw your poat re: the Margita Bangová article. Unfortunately, the discussion was closed and a decision to keep was made before I had a chance to make a comment about this horrendous article. I just looked at the articles 18 references which are relied on heavily throughout the article. Of the 18, only 4 are legitimate, and one of those four does not even discuss material from the article it cites. Of the remaining 14 references, 6 claim to be linked to articles from the Toronto Sun, but are not. 1 reference is accessible for a fee of $12. 3 are linked to opinion/editorial works. 2 claim to be | == Margita Bangová article == I am new to the Countering Systemic Bias group & just saw your poat re: the Margita Bangová article. Unfortunately, the discussion was closed and a decision to keep was made before I had a chance to make a comment about this horrendous article. I just looked at the articles 18 references which are relied on heavily throughout the article. Of the 18, only 4 are legitimate, and one of those four does not even discuss material from the article it cites. Of the remaining 14 references, 6 claim to be linked to articles from the Toronto Sun, but are not. 1 reference is accessible for a fee of $12. 3 are linked to opinion/editorial works. 2 claim to be linked |
Stay out of Elmhurst! It's horrible. | Stay out of Elmhurst! It's horrible.
I'm not going to be able to get a job, but I'm not going to be able to get a job. I'm not going to be able to get a job. I'm not going to be able to get a job. I'm not going to be able to get a job. I'm not going to be able to get a job. I'm not going to be able to get a job. I'm |
" == Compromise == Would anyone have a problem with keeping the current arrangement (Johnson in the title, Ocho Cinco in the text) until consensus can be reached? - :Yes. Having title saying A and text saying B is just messy and unencyclopedic. Both the title and the text should read the same name. I would immensely prefer it stays Chad Johnson until we're week or two into the NFL season and we see what Chad is predominantly called by the media, and then fix the article accordingly when consensus backed up with sources is reached. I am, however, perfectly willing to help transition the article to Chad Ocho Cinco | " == Compromise == Would anyone have a problem with keeping the current arrangement (Johnson in the title, Ocho Cinco in the text) until consensus can be reached? - :Yes. Having title saying A and text saying B is just messy and unencyclopedic. Both the title and the text should read the same name. I would immensely prefer it stays Chad Johnson until we're week or two into the NFL season and we see what Chad is predominantly called by the media, and then fix the article accordingly when consensus backed up with sources is reached. I am, however, perfectly willing to help transition the article to Chad Ocho Cinco. |
:: Thanks again for your suggestions and edits. As I understand it, the criteria (see WP:GA?) and process for selecting good articles are a bit more flexible than featured articles, and any editor can carry out the review. To address the previous peer review: ::* I went through and tagged 3 of the 4 articles tagged as registration warnings by checklinks with the subscription required template. I also checked the redirects, and they are all open (although the national academies requires registration), and include a link to PLoS via the DOI resolver. I figured that was ok, but I can replace the url with a direct link if necessary. ::* I've tried to bracket some sections | :: Thanks again for your suggestions and edits. As I understand it, the criteria (see WP:GA?) and process for selecting good articles are a bit more flexible than featured articles, and any editor can carry out the review. To address the previous peer review: ::* I went through and tagged 3 of the 4 articles tagged as registration warnings by checklinks with the subscription required template. I also checked the redirects, and they are all open (although the national academies requires registration), and include a link to PLoS via the DOI resolver. I figured that was ok, but I can replace the url with a direct link if necessary. ::* I've tried to bracket some sections with |
The creator of mega bloks revealed last saturday that he likes | The creator of mega bloks revealed last saturday that he likes to be a bit of a jerk.
"I'm not going to be a jerk," he said. "I'm not going to be a jerk."
"I'm not going to be a jerk," he said. "I'm not going to be a jerk."
"I'm not going to be a jerk," he said. "I'm not going to be a jerk."
"I |
== Trench (mistake) == A trench is a type of | == Trench (mistake) == A trench is a type of trench.
A trench is a type of trench.
A trench is a type of trench.
A trench is a type of trench.
A trench is a type of trench.
A trench is a type of trench.
A trench is a type of trench.
A trench is a type of trench.
A trench is a type of trench.
A trench |
=== {{Quote box | quote You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.'' | source = Thank you. | width = 20% | align = right }} A tag has been placed on User:LussanaProductions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as | === {{Quote box | quote You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.'' | source = Thank you. | width = 20% | align = right }} A tag has been placed on User:LussanaProductions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well |
==Tvtropes suck== Tvtropes is the worst | ==Tvtropes suck== Tvtropes is the worst thing in the world.
A:
The problem is that you have to be able to use the same method to get the same result.
You can use the same method to get the same result.
A:
You can use the same method to get the same result.
A:
You can use the same method to get the same result.
A:
|
" :The lead I propose is: ""catharsis {etymology} refers to the purification and purgation of emotions (especially pity and fear) through art or to any extreme change in emotion that results in renewal and restoration. This minimal version is in accordance with canonical encyclopedic definitions such as ""catharsis, the purification or purgation of the emotions (especially pity and fear) primarily through art. In criticism, catharsis is a metaphor used by Aristotle in the Poetics to describe the effects of true tragedy on the spectator"" (catharsis (criticism) Encyclopedia Britannica) or ""the purification and purgation of emotions (especially | " :The lead I propose is: ""catharsis {etymology} refers to the purification and purgation of emotions (especially pity and fear) through art or to any extreme change in emotion that results in renewal and restoration. This minimal version is in accordance with canonical encyclopedic definitions such as ""catharsis, the purification or purgation of the emotions (especially pity and fear) primarily through art. In criticism, catharsis is a metaphor used by Aristotle in the Poetics to describe the effects of true tragedy on the spectator"" (catharsis (criticism) Encyclopedia Britannica) or ""the purification and purgation of emotions (especially pity |
She's a little self obssessed and self righteous | She's a little self obssessed and self righteous.
"I'm not a little self-willing to be a little self-willing to be a little self-willing to be a little self-willing to be a little self-willing to be a little self-willing to be a little self-willing to be a little self-willing to be a little self-willing to be a little self-willing to be a little |
" :::::::I hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate | " :::::::I hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate
I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to say "I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to say "I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to say "I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to say "I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to say "I'm not sure if I'm going to be able |
" == Mediation on Harold Pinter == Hello! I appreciate your being really upset about the criticism directed at you personally in the comment you are referring to. Unfortunately, this is not the first time there are comments directed at a person during this debate. First off, let me assure you that I am in no way creating a picture of you as a ""bad guy"" because of that or any other comment made. There are lots of frustrated people here, and what I am hoping to do is help people get rid of some of that frustration. This does of course not mean that uncivil behavior towards you or anyone else is acceptable. Regrettably, I have seen tendencies towards this sort of thing in the Talk page from | " == Mediation on Harold Pinter == Hello! I appreciate your being really upset about the criticism directed at you personally in the comment you are referring to. Unfortunately, this is not the first time there are comments directed at a person during this debate. First off, let me assure you that I am in no way creating a picture of you as a ""bad guy"" because of that or any other comment made. There are lots of frustrated people here, and what I am hoping to do is help people get rid of some of that frustration. This does of course not mean that uncivil behavior towards you or anyone else is acceptable. Regrettably, I have seen tendencies towards this sort of thing in the Talk page from the |
" == November 2008 == You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation | " == November 2008 == You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation of |
For fuck sake, the article should not be considered | For fuck sake, the article should not be considered a "fucking" or "fucking" version of the article.
The article is a "fucking" version of the article. It is a "fucking" version of the article. It is a "fucking" version of the article. It is a "fucking" version of the article. It is a "fucking" version of the article. It is a "fucking" version of the article. |
== Headline textanyne with a right fucking mind | == Headline textanyne with a right fucking mind.
I'm not sure what you mean by "the word "is" but I'm not sure what you mean by "the word "is" but I'm not sure what you mean by "the word "is" but I'm not sure what you mean by "the word "is" but I'm not sure what you mean by "the word "is" but I'm not sure what you mean by "the word |
" :Well you're ""sources"" are crap - because you've yet | " :Well you're ""sources"" are crap - because you've yet to find a source.
"I'm not sure if I'm right, but I'm not sure if I'm wrong."
"I'm not sure if I'm wrong."
"I'm not sure if I'm wrong."
"I'm not sure if I'm wrong."
"I'm not sure if I'm wrong."
"I'm not sure if I'm |
" Uh, who are you? Other than the person | " Uh, who are you? Other than the person who is not a member of the group, you are not a member of the group.
I have a friend who is a member of the group who is a member of the group who is a member of the group who is a member of the group who is a member of the group who is a member of the group who is a member of the group who is a member of the group who is a member of the group who is |
Obama is anti-gun yet campaigned to protect firearm | Obama is anti-gun yet campaigned to protect firearm rights in the U.S.
“We are not going to let the U.S. go to war with the U.S. and the U.S.
“We are not going to let the U.S. go to war with the U.S. and the U.S.
“We are not going to let the U.S. go to war with the U.S. |
== Hi Nerd! == You are a SUCKER! You live in | == Hi Nerd! == You are a SUCKER! You live in the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of the world of |
YAY FAGGOTS FAAAAGGGGOOOTSSS ARE AWESOME YAY YAY YAY FAGOT FAGOT | YAY FAGGOTS FAAAAGGGGOOOTSSS ARE AWESOME YAY YAY YAY FAGOT FAGOTS FAAAAGGGGOOOTSSS ARE AWESOME YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY YAY |
== Uncle Dick == Dick.... wow what an appropriate | == Uncle Dick == Dick.... wow what an appropriate title for the title.
A:
The title is a title for the title. The title is a title for the title. The title is a title for the title. The title is a title for the title. The title is a title for the title. The title is a title for the title. The title is a title for the title. The title is a title for the title. |
" ::Did Obama call a political opponent a ""cancer"" and a | " ::Did Obama call a political opponent a ""cancer"" and a "cancer""
"The cancer is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a cancer that is a |