Paper:
Statistical and Computational Trade-Offs in Kernel K-Means
We investigate the efficiency of k-means in terms of both statistical and computational requirements. More precisely, we study a Nyström approach to kernel k-means. We analyze the statistical properties of the proposed method and show that it achieves the same accuracy of exact kernel k-means with only a fraction of computations. Indeed, we prove under basic assumptions that sampling √ n Nyström landmarks allows to greatly reduce computational costs without incurring in any loss of accuracy. To the best of our knowledge this is the first result of this kind for unsupervised learning.

Review:
Summary  The paper investigates the kernel k-means problem, proposing a new approximation of the method based on Nystrom embeddings. In particular, both the statistical accuracy and computational efficiency of the proposed approximation is studied. The main contribution is the derivation of a theoretical bound limiting the error cost; the proposed method can achieve such theoretical guarantee with a computational cost of (O(\sqrt{n})). In practice, this implies that using \sqrt{n} points (with n being the original sample size) is enough to obtain a good enough approximation. The authors also propose an approach to choose the points while ensuring a balance trade off between preserving a good approximation and a small complexity (dictionary size).  Novelty and Clarity  The theoretical results are interesting and provide new insights into the topic. The writing style is easy to follow and the mathematical notation is also clear.   Overall opinion  The paper is technically correct and provides a new contribution to the field. The experimental section could be improved and some points should be clarified. The submission would be at a good level if the points below are clarified.   Major and minor comments are provided below   Major comments  - Proof of Lemma 1 and Lemma 2 could be provided in the supplementary (or at least a sketch)  - In the experiments it is not clear how the parameters, including the number of clusters, are selected.   - It would be beneficial to provide more detailed information on the runtime to further support the benefit of performing the approximation  - It would be beneficial to provide a more exhaustive comparison (and corresponding detailed information) with the competitors. This seems to be only slightly mentioned for the MNIST8M experiment  Minor comments  - The acronyms JL and RLS seem to be used without being introduced  - Section 4: The Lloyd’s algorithm reference is missing  - Algorithm 1 can be reformulated to be presented in a more structured form  - Figure 2: Legends and titles as well as a short caption could be added