Repository: next.js
Issue: `use cache` + `cacheLife` unexpectedly requires Suspense boundary
Labels: dynamicIO

### Link to the code that reproduces this issue

https://codesandbox.io/p/devbox/dawn-voice-vrxzm9

### To Reproduce

1. Visit the reproduction app
2. Click the `cacheLife("minutes")` link.  Notice that it works and does not cause errors.
3. Go back, and click the `cacheLife("seconds")` link.  Notice the following server-side error:
    > [ Server ] Error: Route "/seconds": A component accessed data, headers, params, searchParams, or a short-lived cache without a Suspense boundary nor a "use cache" above it. We don't have the exact line number added to error messages yet but you can see which component in the stack below. See more info: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/next-prerender-missing-suspense
4. Go back, and click the `cacheLife({ expire: 299 })` link.  Notice the following server-side error:
    > [ Server ] Error: Route "/expire299": A component accessed data, headers, params, searchParams, or a short-lived cache without a Suspense boundary nor a "use cache" above it. We don't have the exact line number added to error messages yet but you can see which component in the stack below. See more info: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/next-prerender-missing-suspense

### Current vs. Expected behavior

The current behavior demands a Suspense boundary when the developer changes a `cacheLife("minutes")` call to `cacheLife("seconds")` call.  I expect for such a change to be local / isolated, and to not require any other changes to an app.

Likewise for changing a `cacheLife({ expire: 300 })` call to `cacheLife({ expire: 299 })` (or, generally, from >= 300 to < 300).

### Provide environment information

```bash
Operating System:
  Platform: linux
  Arch: x64
  Version: #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Aug  6 20:05:33 UTC 2023
  Available memory (MB): 4102
  Available CPU cores: 2
Binaries:
  Node: 20.9.0
  npm: 9.8.1
  Yarn: 1.22.19
  pnpm: 8.10.2
Relevant Packages:
  next: 15.1.1-canary.13 // Latest available version is detected (15.1.1-canary.13).
  eslint-config-next: N/A
  react: 19.0.0
  react-dom: 19.0.0
  typescript: 5.3.3
Next.js Config:
  output: N/A
```


### Which area(s) are affected? (Select all that apply)

dynamicIO

### Which stage(s) are affected? (Select all that apply)

next dev (local), next start (local), Vercel (Deployed), Other (Deployed)

### Additional context

The cause of this behavior is this code:

https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/4fda39ce1069efabd2c7a68da3963cf1840572e7/packages/next/src/server/use-cache/use-cache-wrapper.ts#L645-L658

I discussed this code a bit in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/72145#discussion_r1826169507.  I understand the intention behind the code, however, it results in poor DX.  It's as if I, the app developer, have entered into an agreement with Next.js, wherein I add `'use cache'` + revalidation as appropriate, and in exchange I get improved performance. But then Next.js suddenly decides to do extra work that I didn't agree to, and demands more payment in return (a Suspense boundary).

To be clear: I _do not_ think the solution is documentation.  Even if this behavior were documented, it would be poor DX.