yonatanbitton commited on
Commit
9b6b30f
1 Parent(s): 0e98e61

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +117 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,119 @@
1
  ---
2
- license: cc-by-4.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
  ---
2
+ annotations_creators:
3
+ - expert-generated
4
+ language:
5
+ - en
6
+ language_creators:
7
+ - found
8
+ license:
9
+ - mit
10
+ multilinguality:
11
+ - monolingual
12
+ paperswithcode_id: acronym-identification
13
+ pretty_name: WinoGAViL
14
+ size_categories:
15
+ - 10K<n<100K
16
+ source_datasets:
17
+ - original
18
+ tags:
19
+ - commonsense-reasoning
20
+ - visual-reasoning
21
+ task_categories:
22
+ - token-classification
23
+ task_ids: []
24
+ train-eval-index:
25
+ - col_mapping:
26
+ labels: tags
27
+ tokens: tokens
28
+ config: default
29
+ splits:
30
+ eval_split: test
31
+ task: token-classification
32
+ task_id: entity_extraction
33
+ extra_gated_prompt: "By clicking on “Access repository” below, you also agree that you are using it solely for research purposes. The full license agreement is available in the dataset files."
34
  ---
35
+
36
+ # Dataset Card for WinoGAViL
37
+
38
+ - [Dataset Description](#dataset-description)
39
+ - [Supported Tasks and Leaderboards](#supported-tasks-and-leaderboards)
40
+ - [Languages](#languages)
41
+ - [Dataset Structure](#dataset-structure)
42
+ - [Data Fields](#data-fields)
43
+ - [Data Splits](#data-splits)
44
+ - [Dataset Creation](#dataset-creation)
45
+ - [Considerations for Using the Data](#considerations-for-using-the-data)
46
+ - [Licensing Information](#licensing-information)
47
+ - [Citation Information](#citation-information)
48
+
49
+ ## Dataset Description
50
+
51
+ WinoGAViL is a challenging dataset for evaluating vision-and-language commonsense reasoning abilities. Given a set of images, a cue, and a number K, the task is to select the K images that best fits the association. This dataset was collected via the WinoGAViL online game to collect vision-and-language associations, (e.g., werewolves to a full moon). Inspired by the popular card game Codenames, a spymaster gives a textual cue related to several visual candidates, and another player has to identify them. Human players are rewarded for creating associations that are challenging for a rival AI model but still solvable by other human players. We evaluate several state-of-the-art vision-and-language models, finding that they are intuitive for humans (>90% Jaccard index) but challenging for state-of-the-art AI models, where the best model (ViLT) achieves a score of 52%, succeeding mostly where the cue is visually salient. Our analysis as well as the feedback we collect from players indicate that the collected associations require diverse reasoning skills, including general knowledge, common sense, abstraction, and more.
52
+
53
+ - **Homepage:**
54
+ https://winogavil.github.io/
55
+ - **Repository:**
56
+ https://github.com/WinoGAViL/WinoGAViL-experiments/
57
+ - **Paper:**
58
+ https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.12576
59
+ - **Leaderboard:**
60
+ https://winogavil.github.io/leaderboard
61
+ - **Point of Contact:**
62
+ winogavil@gmail.com; yonatanbitton1@gmail.com
63
+
64
+ ### Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
65
+
66
+ https://winogavil.github.io/leaderboard.
67
+ https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/winogavil.
68
+
69
+ ### Languages
70
+
71
+ English.
72
+
73
+ ## Dataset Structure
74
+
75
+ ### Data Fields
76
+
77
+ candidates (string).
78
+ cue (string).
79
+ associations (string).
80
+ score_fool_the_ai (int64).
81
+ num_associations (int64).
82
+ annotation_index (int64).
83
+ num_candidates (int64).
84
+ solvers_jaccard_mean (float64).
85
+ solvers_jaccard_std (float64).
86
+ ID (int64).
87
+
88
+ ### Data Splits
89
+
90
+ -- 5 & 6 candidates. With 5 candidates, random chance for success is 38%. With 6 candidates, random chance for success is 34%.
91
+ -- 10 & 12 candidates. With 10 candidates, random chance for success is 24%. With 12 candidates, random chance for success is 19%.
92
+
93
+ ## Dataset Creation
94
+
95
+ Inspired by the popular card game Codenames, a “spymaster” gives a textual cue related to several visual candidates, and another player has to identify them. Human players are rewarded for creating
96
+ associations that are challenging for a rival AI model but still solvable by other
97
+ human players.
98
+
99
+ ### Annotations
100
+
101
+ #### Annotation process
102
+
103
+ We paid Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers to play our game.
104
+
105
+ ## Considerations for Using the Data
106
+
107
+ All associations were obtained with human annotators.
108
+
109
+ ### Licensing Information
110
+
111
+ CC-By 4.0
112
+
113
+ ### Citation Information
114
+
115
+ @article{bitton2022winogavil,
116
+ title={WinoGAViL: Gamified Association Benchmark to Challenge Vision-and-Language Models},
117
+ author={Bitton, Yonatan and Guetta, Nitzan Bitton and Yosef, Ron and Elovici, Yuval and Bansal, Mohit and Stanovsky, Gabriel and Schwartz, Roy},
118
+ journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12576},
119
+ year={2022}