schematise/ICAT-version1 huggingface dataset:
�4.5 Additionally, while a candidate may participate in the various rounds of counselling in accordance with the specific eligibility criteria there for and various terms and http://www.judis.nic.in Page 6 of 47  W.P.Nos.7720 & 8193 of 2020 conditions for each round of counselling given below, if at any stage a candidate �freezes� his/her allotment (i.e. confirms that he/she wishes to take the seat allotted to him/her) he/she will not be permitted to participate in any subsequent rounds of counselling and shall stand exited from the counselling process. This ineligibility will also be attracted if, after opting to freeze his/her allotment, he/she either does not pay the requisite course fee or does not join the Institute concerned within the stipulated time.� The effect of the above Clause 4.5 is that a candidate with higher marks who is allotted a seat of his/her choice number five cannot take part in the second round of counselling even if any of the seats in his/her choices 1 to 4 becomes actually available for the second round of counselling. According to the petitioners if candidates who had scored higher marks and allotted seats in the first round of counselling are prevented from participating in the second round of counselling while preserving the seat allotted to them in the first round of counselling, the seats which are available in the second round of counselling or the new seats that are added in the second round of counselling would go to less meritorious candidates who were unsuccessful in getting an allotment during the first round of counselling. This leads to merit being sacrificed. http://www.judis.nic.in Page 7 of 47  W.P.Nos.7720 & 8193 of 2020 Relying upon the notification which states that fresh seats are also likely to be added during the second round of counselling the petitioners would contend that they cannot be prevented from having a go at the new seats that are made available during the second round of counselling merely because they had already been allotted a seat in the first round of counselling. Claiming that Clause 4.5 is arbitrary and it sacrifices merit the petitioners would seek a writ of certiorari quashing Clause 4.5 and direct the second respondent, National Board of Examinations to resort to the practice that was followed during the previous academic year and enable the candidates who are allotted seats in the first round of counselling to retain those seats and participate in the second round of counselling. Even during the pendency of the first writ petition the first round of counselling was completed and this necessitated the second writ petition which is for a simple mandamus forbearing the second respondent from proceeding with the second round counselling without rectifying Clause 4.5.
Para   1a   :�  That   the   defendant   and   his brother   Dharam   Singh   were   in   the possession of the entire suit land in equal share.   The defendant told to the plaintiff that the suit land is under the ownership of defendant and his brother Dharam Singh in   equal   share   and   same   status   was dictated   in   mortgage   deed   executed   by defendant.     The   plaintiff   shown   faith   on him and mortgage deed was executed and mortgage money was given.  That's why the Mortgage   deed   has   shown   the   share   of ::: Downloaded on - 31/05/2018 23:03:52 :::HCHP 4 defendant   as   �   Share   in   the   suit   land. That plaintiff is illiterate rustic villager do not have knowledge of revenue records.
20. On expiry of the terms of the sub-lease, the sub-lessee shall if he has duly observed all the terms and conditions, at the discretion of the sub-lessor be eligible for renewal for a further period of 70 years on the same terms and conditions except as to rent which shall be liable to such renewal to enhancement of such as should be justified according to the circumstances then prevailing. The sub-lessee shall have the first option of renewal if the same is applied for before expiry of sub-lease, after executing and registering a fresh sub-lease deed on renewal.
. By a Deed of Transfer of business executed on 31 st May, 2002 duly registered the 1st respondent purchased and acquired from the Hotel Corporation of India the ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 13:28:14 ::: 3/140 ARBP-667.11-10.05.2013.doc business of Hotel Centaur - Juhu on "a going concern" basis for the consideration and on the terms and conditions contained therein. By an Indenture of Conveyance dated 31st May, 2002 the 1st respondent purchased and acquired from the Hotel Corporation of India the said hotel property togetherwith the moveable property for the consideration and on the terms and conditions contained therein.
1. To enter possession of above plot, to cultivate same in any manner he chooses, to raise and sell crops raised therein of any nature of his choice.
"Termination of agency, where agent has an interest in subject-matter - Where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject-matter of the agency, the agency cannot, in the absence of an express contract, be terminated to the prejudice of such interest.