postbot/aeslc_kw huggingface dataset:
Subject: Shower Gift

Anne: I'm slightly embarrassed to be asking you this, but there was one gift from  Baby Gap that we can't seem to figure out who the "giver" was, and we've  narrowed it down to a group that includes you.
It was 2 outfits with animal  patterns on it.
Are you the mystery giver?
Alos, again I just wanted to say congratulations again on your engagement.
I  am really happy for you and Trushar and wish you all the best.
I will try to  see if we can get together for lunch before I leave.
Carol
Subject: ISDA Discussions

Brant: Let me know what you think about this.
I am enclosing the section out of our  comments that he wants to replace with his language.
Carol
Subject: Friday's Lunch

Please plan to attend a lunch this coming Friday in 30C2 with Sara and I and  possibly some of the newer credit people to go through basic ISDA, CSA and  confirmation issues.
We'll get started around Noon and probably go until  1:30.
Carol
Subject: Upcoming Lunch

Tanya: This coming Friday Sara and I are going to walk the legal assistants through  some basic concepts with respect to the ISDA and CSA Schedules and  confirmations.
Do you think that we should invite some of the newer credit  people to this and if so, who?
Some of this will be a repeat of what we did  a few weeks ago but at a more basic level.
We were thinking that it may be  beneficial for Nidia Mendoza and Cathy Tudon.
Let me know what you think.
Carol
Subject: FX/Currency Option Questions

Paul: Shari recommended that I forward these questions to you.
We are trying to  finalize an ISDA Master with dresdner bank in Germany and they wanted to make  some chnages to our FX and Currency Option language which I have attached.
Can you help me with this?
Subject: Crestar

Dave and Grant: I understand from lisa Lees that there is now a push to get Crestar signed  up.
You may recall that they had alot of commnets to the ETA which I sent to  you both with my thoughts on certian of the comments.
What is the next step  with them?
Dave, do you have any thoughts on their comments?
Carol
Subject: EOL Issues

Willie: Thanks for your voice mail message.
As I explained to Joe and David, on  all of the counterparties where we have "EOL Issues" I need to know what  those issues are and then I will call them.
Could you please advise Joe  and/or David about this and then I will follow up.
The only issue that we  discussed was the issue that these counterparties are thinking that the  clicking requirement in the ETA applies to confirms which it doesn't.
Thanks
Subject: Upcoming Lunch

We are planning to hold another informal lunch this coming Friday in  Conference Room 38C2 from 12-1:30 to go over in more depth how the ISDA  Master and ISDA Credit Support Annex works.
If you are interested in  attending, could you please contact my assistant, Suzanne Adams at 37340  TODAY so that she can get a head count for lunch.
Thanks and sorry about the  short notice.
Subject: Confirm Reply Letter

Joe: Here is my stab at a form of confirm reply letter.
This one assumes that we  are the confirming party but it can be modified if the counterparty is the  confirming party and we want to send this.
I will work on  modifying  Southern's cover letter into something that we could send to our  counterparties.
Call me if you have any questions.
Carol
Subject: Risk Management CA

David: Per my voice mail I have bolded the sections of the CA that I want you to  look at.
One is a description of the info that they are providing to us.
Carol
Subject: Tomorrow's Lunch

Taffy: Here is the list of invitees   Paul Radous Cathy (Mary) Tudon Brad Schneider Veronica Espinoza Nidia Mendoza Ed Sacks me sara Susan F. Susan B. Jason Tana Samantha Boyd You are welcome to attend as well.
I am not sure who from the credit group  has RSVP'd yes but why don't you send out the notice to everyone and copy me  and Suzanne.
Thanks  Carol  PS - Paul Radous has a brother Kevin and I think that Paul is in the Enron  directory.
Subject: statoil Letter

Molly: Here is a draft letter for Statoil.
Under the Master, they have a 1 Business  Day cure period after they receive notice from us of their failure to post  collateral before we can declare an event of Default.
Please call me to  discuss after you have had a chance to decide what you want to do.
Carol
Subject: Credit Lunch

Tanya: Thank you for suggesting the group that we talked to today.
They all seemed  to be at the same level and hopefully got something out of what we said  today.
I mentioned to them that you have all of the latest LC and Guaranty  forms and that you would be sending those around to them.
I will work on the  form of confidentiality agreement and send that to you next week.
Before I  go on maternity leave, I will send down to you a binder with hard copies of  all of our forms, along with the User's Guides to the ISDA and CSA.
We are  still putting the finishing touches on the ISDA and CSA Schedules.
Could you also mention/remind the group that now Samantha Boyd's name should  be added to all credit worksheets and Tana'a name taken off and that all day  to day matters should be handled through the 2 Susan's and Samantha, as Tana  is off the day to day stuff and working primarily on special projects?
Thanks.
Subject: Lunch For Rod Nelson

Group: Mark has okay'ed having a going away lunch for Rod.
Looks like the week of  June 26th works best for Rod.
Please e-mail Suzanne Adams by Monday of next  week any days that week that do not work for you so we can pick a date.
Thanks.
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Paul: I have spoken with Dave Kistler about the form of CA that you sent to him.
What we prefer to do is to use the form that was agreed to a year ago (a copy  of which I have attached).
We can either (1) do a new CA based on this form  or (2) since this CA does not expire for another year, do a side letter that  provides that the term "Project" as used in this CA means both the project  that is currently described and the new project that we are about to engagae  in with you.
Please let me know your preference.
My number is 713-853-3989.
Carol
Subject: Multi Purpose Form of Guaranty

Leslie and Elizabeth: I should have sent this to you as well.
Could you please take a look at  this form and let me know if it is okay with you?
Seems like there are more  situations that are coming up where our counterparties are wanted to execute  1 Guaranty to cover all types of transactions and this is our attempt to  develop a form that credit can use.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Carol
Subject: reminder

Brant: Just a reminder that we need to discuss matters relating to Occidental (their  proposed change to the MAC language) and Chautauqua Airlines.
Alos, with  respect to Aquila/Utilicorp,  apparently they cannot have all of the online  paperwork completed until next Tuesday.
They submitted a PA today but the  guy that needs to authorize the sub-user accounts is not in the office until  Tuesday.
The current plan would be for them to do that on Tuesday and then  to make the switch from Aquila to Utilicorp effective next Wednesday.
I'll  keep you posted but we still have not declared the Utilicorp ISDA effective.
Carol
Subject: CES

Please update me on where things stand.
We need to get this wrapped up  before I go on maternity leave.
i'm hopeful that you are close and amybe  done to 1 or 2 counterparties.
Thanks.
Carol
Subject: Energen

Brad and John: We have not sent out the ISDA draft on energen because I need calrification  on the following points:  1.
Is the $75MM Guaranty cap meant to cover both physical and financial  combined or are we doing separate Guarantys each with a $75MM cap amount?
2.
How does the $50MM collateral threshold work?
I noticed in the physical  master that it appears as if we subtract from the $50MM threshold our  exposure under the ISDA to arrive at the Counterparty's threshold, although  the language in the physical says "the exposure" and it is not clear whose  exposure they are talking about.
Is that how it is suppposed to work?
Carol
Subject: June 16th draft of swap assignment

Jeff: Just a few comments:  1.
In the definition of termination Event, I think that the words "due to"  need to be put after the word "means" in the first line.
2.
In Section 3.4(a), I noticed that the bracketed langugae "as it relates to  the Assigned Interest" has now been deleted.
Pursuant to my earlier comment  on this, what this maens to me is that with respect to the Fixed Payment  piece of this, we can never terminate the swap based on something that  happens to Pelican .
Is that the way it is supposed to work?
If so, plaese  explain why.
3.
With respect to the lnagugae in Section 3.6(a), instead of saying in the  first sentence of such Section "the amount determined..." shouldn't it say  "the fair market value of Party A's remaining payment obligations under the  Transaction".
Section 2(x) of the confirm just refers to Disputed Matters  and it is not claer to me what is in dispute when an Event of Default or  Termination Event occurs and what amount Party A has to pay when these events  occur.
What is the priocedure for coming up with this amount?
Does each  party calculate it and then send it to the experts or do the experts just  determine it?
Subject: Computer for Home

Joya: I want to make sure that while I am out on leave that I can access my  computer here.
I noticed that since Lotus Notes changed I cannot access my  e-mail from my computer at home.
Would it be better for me to take a laptop  home and is that possible?
Please advise.
carol
Subject: Boxes

Suzanne: Can you order me some boxes?
I want to start going through my office and  figuring out what to send home when I go on leave.
thanks.
Carol
Subject: Legal assts.

Sara: I'll go with whatever you and mark think is the right thing to do but O  honestly have a hrad time justifying why tana or Susan Flynn should be  recognized, particularly Susan Flynn.
I would much rather take Susan B. out  to lunch rather than recognize all 3.
Carol
Subject: ETA Agreement

Patricia: Frank forwarded to em your chnages to the ETA Agreement and here is our  response:  1.
I would like to discuss with you your chnages to Sections 1 and 2 (a).
2.
We cannot accept the chnages that were made to section 2(b).
Any  confidential info that you give us will be subject to the confidentiality  provisions of the ETA.
3.
We cannot accept the first deletion in Section 3(a) and with respect to  the remaining deletions in Section 3(a) and the deletions in Section 3(d), I  just want to make sure that we both understand how this will work in the vent  that you want to trade a product on the website and there is no Master in  place.
Please call me at your convenience.
Subject: CLECO

Joe: Did you ever contact them about the confirms that they sent to us?
Are they  now signing our confirms?
Please advise as to what, if anything, I need to  be doing on this.
Thanks.
Carol
Subject: Our Revised draft

Andrea: I just wanted to confirm that you received my revised draft of the ISDA  Schedule by fax last week.
If you didn't.
let me know.
have the tax people  spoken with each other?
Subject: Online Issues - Mexico

Jeff: As I think you are aware, the Meixco and online group want to implement  online trading for Mexican counterparties.
Are there any tax issues taht we  should be aware of?
If we conduct online trades using ENA and telephone  trades with an Enron Mexican entity, will the exercise of setoff rights  create any tax issues?
My understanding is that the Enron counterparty will  be ENA.
Carol
Subject: MAC Language

Mike: I have discussed your proposed language with Brant Reves, our credit person,  and we are okay with the concept except that we would like for the ratings  trigger to be based only on either a drop in the S&P rating or a failure to  have an S&P rating.
In addition, Brant has advised me that should we put in  place a CSA, that the following would be the credit matrix for collateral  threshold:  BB to BB+  $2,500,000 Below BB  Zero  I look forward to hearing from you.
Should we send you our form of Credit  Support Annex?
Subject: Agreements

Bruce and Scott: I just received this from our guys.
I no nothing about the call at 4  tomorrow or who is on it and when our guys want to talk to us about this, but  as soon as I find out, I will let you know.
Carol
Subject: Cinergy

Russell: Susan gave me the draft ISDA to review.
The Guaranty taht was signed in  January is deficient in that I don't feel that it adequately describes  financial derivatives and the termination provision doesn't work.
How do you  want to proceed?
Carol
Subject: Agreement

Gentlemen: Here is the new draft of the policy.
We have left a message with ACE about a  call at 9 (houston time) tomorrow.
If that chnages, I will let you know.
Subject: Monday Meeting

Susan: Sara and I would like to meet with you sometime on Monday to go over all  outstanding work items so we are aware of what can be accomplished before you  leave and what may need to be given to the other paralegals.
Can we do that  at 10 and can you send to us before then an updated list of your outstanding  work assignments?
Thanks.
Carol
Subject: LC Language

Tanya: Thanks for your message.
All El Paso wants to put in the LC form is language  that states that the original LC will accompany any draw that is made for  endorsement of the drawing amount and that it will be returned to the  Beneficiary unless it is fully drawn upon.
I don't see any problem with this and while it may be unnecessary, if it  males them feel better to have it, i would like to keep it in.
Are you okay  with this?
Carol
Subject: Guaranty Issue

Clement: We are trying to finalize our ISDA with Deutsche Bank.
In the Guaranty where  we have the setoff and counterclaim language they want to add a proviso that  basically states that Enron Corp. would be entitled to get the benefit of the  rights, setoffs, counterclaims and other defenses that ENA is entitled to  only to the extent taht it would have had the benefit of those rights if it  were the direct counterparty.
I think that I am okay with this but wanted  your input.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks.
carol
Subject: Indemnifiable Tax language

Rhett: Does this work for you?
This is language from Deutsche Bank in lieu of the= ir=20 proposed modifications to the defined term "Indemnifiable Tax" which you=20 looked at a few weeks ago.
Carol
Subject: Equitable Credit Issues

Russell: Based on my review of the 6/23 draft of ISDA Schedule here are my credit  questions:  1.
There is no Credit Support Provider for Equitable.
Should there be?
2.
What should the cross default thresholds be and who should they apply to?
3.
Are you satisfied with the Additional Termination Event?
I'm assuming  that in clause (i) of the definition of Debt Coverage Amount, it makes sense  to take "future" revenues from the preceding year and subtract from it asset  sales made during the current year?
How will we know what assets sales are  made?
Will the future net revenue calculation be shown on the reserve report  that we receive annually?
When will this calculation be done?
Are you  satisfied with their definition of Internal and External debt?
4.
In Part 3(a), looks like we would only receive an annual reserve report.
Is that sufficient?
When should we get it?
Alos, whose financials do you  want to receive?
5.
In Part 5(c) - Setoff, I'll just note that this only applies to amounts  due and owing between the parties and does not include "affiliates".
6.
In Part 5(f)- Assignment,  we need to decide what conditions precedent we  want to apply to the limited partnership entity that they assign it to given  the fact that once assigned, we will have no recourse to the partners, even  the GP.
For example, should the LP have a minimum asset value at the time of  the transfer?
It is not clear to me what assets this LP would own at the  time of the transfer and I'm assuming that we would want it to meet some  minimum credit criteria prior to such transfer.
In addition, are you  satisfied with the debt and asset sale limitations?
On asset sales, I think  that they need an annual limit as it is not clear to me how the $2,000,000  limit currently works.
Alos, I think that all of these limitations in  Section (f) should either be additional Events of Default or Additional  termination Events.
Please call when ready to discuss.
Carol
Subject: El Paso

Susan: We are ready to execute the ISDA with El Paso.
Here are the schedules and  the Enron Guaranty.
Please coordinate with John Shuttee at El Paso the  execution of the docs.
His number is 420-7168.
I just sent him the form of  Guaranty  taht we want them to use and I will forward to you that e-mail.
Thanks.
Subject: Guaranty Issues

Steve: Enron's general counsel has accepted the concept that we discussed last week  in the Guaranty re setoff, defenses etc.
I will try to send you a revised  Guaranty shortly.
Carol
Subject: Response to Comments

Karen: Here is our response to your e-mail comments:  1.
We can put back VI(c)(i) but the reason that we deleted it was because the  provisions in VI(c)(ii) and VI(E) really deal with how an LC can be drawn  upon and the language in VI(c)(i) seemed unnecessary and perhaps inconsistent  with those sections.
If we put it back in, it should be made subject to  those other sections.
2.
With respect to your points regarding the amount that can be drawn, I am  unclear as to what your position is.
In one place you want to limit it to  amounts owed and in another you want to limit it to Exposure Amount.
What is  your position.
We thought that the formula that we set forth in Section 4(b)  of the amendment was what everyone had agreed to.
3.
The reason for the change in E.4.
(c) is because the Event of Default  situation has already been addressed in VI(c)(ii).
4.
I need to check with our credit people regarding the transferability  issue.
I will note that the current form that is attached to the Master  permits transfers.
Why is this an issue with you?
I look forward to hearing from you.
My number is 713-853-3989.
Carol
Subject: Policy

Bill: Could you please forward this to the business folks at Ace since this is a  critical point and I don't want them caught by surprise tomorrow.
Thanks.
Carol
Subject: Confirmation Reply Letter

Sara: What we have negotiated with Southern was limited to financial trades done  under the ISDA.
This was a form that they sent to us that we revised.
It  was my understanding that they were going to contact Leslie separately about  EPMI physical trades and Stacy about physical gas trades.
Carol.
Subject: MAC Amendment

Luanne: Our credit person is fine with revising the MAC language to say taht a MAC  would be triggered if either (1) an entity's Credit Support Provider's rating  from S&P is below BBB- by S&P or Baa3 by Moody's or (2) if such Credit  Support Provider fails to be rated by both S&P and Moody's.
Also, in  Sections 4.5 and 4.6 of the ISDA Schedule we would like to change the  reference to "Goldman Group" to "The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc."  I will have Tana Jones draft an amendment and send it to you.
Call me if  there are any problems with the above.
Tana, Please draft an amendment for my review.
Subject: Benefits Questions

Teresa: As I indicated in my voice mail message I have the following questions about  the maternity leave policy:  1.
I am assuming that any vacation time that I still have left I can use up  at 100% pay.
2.
My understanding is that in order to go beyond the 6 week period I would  need a letter from my doctor indicating the medical condition that exists and  justifying sick leave pay at 90%  3.
If I want to take after the 6 week period an unpaid leave of absence,  whose approval do I need?
Does unpaid leave affect any of my current  benefits (i.e., options that are due to vest, medical, parking etc.)
If I am  on unpaid leave and Enron offers a stock option program at year end, am I  still eligible?
I will contact Carmen about the forms that I need to fill out.
Please let me  know if you are not the right person to answer these questions.
I am  scheduled to meet with mark haedicke tomorrow afternoon at 2 to go over my  plans.
Subject: Legal Assistant Position

Pam: We have an opening in our group for a legal assistant position.
Do you know  of anyone over there that might be interested?
We would prefer someone with  transactional experience.
Salary ranges vary depending upon experience, but  I think we are pretty competitive.
If you know of anyone please have them  call me as we are looking to fill this position ASAP.
Also, would it be  possible for you and I to get together 1 more time for lunch before I leave?
How does the week of July 10th look?
Subject: PanCanadian's Credit Comments

Russell: Here are the credit related comments that Pancanadian Energy Services Inc.  made   1.
They want the definition of Specified Indebtedness to exclude obligations  with Affiliates.
This is how it is defined in the Canadian Master.
2.
They want a Minimum Transfer Amount for each of us of $100,000.
3.
They want rounding to be reduced to $100,000 for each of us.
4.
In the definition of Letter of Credit, they want the LC Bank to either be  a major US or Canadian Bank, but not a foreign bank with a US branch office.
5.
In the definition of Material Adverse Change, they want to delete the  Current assets/Current Liabilities ratio trigger.
Carol
Subject: Multi-Product Counterparty Guaranty

Mary: Enclosed is the Counterparty form that we have come up with for Multi-Product  Guarantys.
Depending upon the products that need to be covered, each  Guaranty will need to be modified to make sure that it describes the proper  entities and products.
I will send along the Enron form of this shortly but  please pass this along to the appropriate people in the credit group.
Jeff, Stacy and Harry, Are you going to change the Physical product form of Guaranty to look more  like this?
Power has changed their form and it may help for us to all be  consistent especially when we are asked to amend an existing Guaranty to  include more products.
If you do decide to amend your form, please send the  new form to credit.
Thanks for everyone's input.
Subject: Stephanie Panus

HR confirmed that Stephanie is still interested and has not been hired by  anyone else.
Please let me know if you feel we should contact her for  purposes of indicating to her our interest in her and obtaining salary  information from her.
Carol
Subject: EnergyOne Ventures

Russell: Their attorney finally contacted me and we talked about the ESP rules.
She  is going to do further research in light of the fact that for regulatory  purposes Utilicorp, the GP, cannot furnish a Guaranty.
I alos mentioned to  her that at the very least we would like to make Utilicorp a "Specified  Entity" so that they would be part of the credit-related Events of Default in  the ISDA Master.
As a general rule, we recommend in circumstances where the  counterparty is an LP and you are relying on the GP's credit, making the GP a  "Specified Entity" so that for example their bankruptcy would trigger an  Event of Default.
Call me if you have any questions.
carol
Subject: PJM Power Demand

Mark and Leslie: Claudio wants to talk to someone about this weather/power online product that  he is working on.
Enclosed is info on it.
Who should he be talking to  about this?
He is anxious to meet and I told him that as soon as we figured  out who his legal contact would be we would meet with him.
Please let me  know your thoughts.
Carol
Subject: Enron Multi-Product Guaranty

Mary: Enclosed is the form of Enron Guaranty that we would propose using for  multi-products.
Again, like the counterparty form that I sent around  earlier,  this form will need to be modified depending upon the products that  need to be covered and the parties involved.
Please distribute as  appropriate to the credit group.
Subject: ISDA Draft

John: I understand from Tana Jones that we are going to try to put an ISDA in place  today.
We should be sending you the draft shortly.
Please call me directly  with any comments or questions that you may have.
Please pass the  information below  to anyone else that may be working on this from your end.
Thanks.
I look forward to hearing from you.