postbot/aeslc_kw huggingface dataset:
Subject: Columbia

Susan: Please update me with where things stand on Columbia, both with respect to  the assignment of transactions with Columbia Masters to our Masters and  assignment of confirms without Masters to our Master, to the extent that we  have one.
Thanks.
Carol
Subject: Quaker Oats

Tanya: Here are the credit related comments that we received from Quaker Oats'  counsel:  1.
They prefer Market Quotation instead of Loss.
This will obviously be a  discussion point given the type of commodity that we anticipate.
trading with  them  2.
They want a Minimum Transfer Amount just for them of $250,000.
3.
They want to reduce rounding to $25,000.
4.
They do not want the provisions of section 6(c) of the CSA to apply at any  time.
5.
They deleted the concept that a party holding an LC could draw on it if  there was an Event of Default, meaning that we would have to wait to  terminate and have a payment  obligation owing to us before we could draw.
6.
They do not want any LC to be transferable.
7.
They want the Enron Guaranty to cover our obligation to return collateral  taht has been posted to us, which I guess means that if we didn't return  collateral to them then they could go after Enron for that amount.
Without  this language they would have to declare an Event of Default,  terminate and  then go after Enron for any amount that we owed them.
To the extent that we  were holding cash colateral, they could offset that amount against amounts  that they might owe us.
This is an interesting issue and one that I have not  seen before.
8.
They want the Guaranty cap to be rased to $25,000,000.
Where does this ISDA stand on the priority list?
Is this something I should  try to push forward in the next week or 2 while I am hear or can it wait?
Carol
Subject: Response to Comments

Robert: I am still waiting to hear back from our credit person on some of the credit  comments that you made, but here is my response to the legal and certain of  the credit comments:  1.
I am okay with the first paragraph of Insert 1.
I would like to talk to  you about the second paragraph.
2.
We have a strong preference and policy towards using Loss rather than  Market Quotation.
3.
Inserts 2, 3, 4 and 5 are okay.
In addition.
our tax people are now  advising us to require the delivery of W-9's to part 3.
4.
NY is okay with governing law.
5.
On arbitration, other than changing the location, I would prefer to go
Subject: Duke Guaranty

Mary: After reviewing heir form of Guaranty, I would prefer that we use our  multi-product form.
Their form is more suited to guarantees of debt.
If  they insist on using our form , I would be happy to mark it up but the  mark-up would be fairly substantial.
Let me know what you want to do.
Carol
Subject: chatauqua

Brant: Just wanted to follow up with you on this.
Did you ever talk to the  Counterparty about how we were going to treat the "Additional Amount"  collateral that they posted?
Carol
Subject: Misc

Debra: Susan Flynn mentioned that you might be able to help me out on getting some  Enron stuff for the kids that I teach Junior Achievement to at my son's  school.
I have been trying to contact someone that would be willing to give  this class some Enron freebies with no luck.
I think that Marge Nadasky was  the last person that my secretary talked to.
Do you know of anyone that can  help me out?
Carol
Subject: Commercial Risk Reinsurance Company Limited

Steve and/or Rhett: We are trying to finalize an ISDA with the above counterparty which is  a  Bermuda company.
They made 1 tax comment to our Schedule.
Currently, they  rep to us that Each payment received or to be received by them in connect  with the Master Agreement will not be effectively connected with its conduct  of a trade or business in the US.
They want to add the following to this rep:  Each payment to be received by it in connection with the Master Agreement  will be either foreign source income under the Code or portfolio interest  within the meaning of Section 881(c) of the Code or gain derived from the  cash settlement of an option.
Is this okay?
As my days are numbered here if there is any way that I could  get some feedback on this this week that would be great so that at least I  can respond to them.
Thanks.
Carol
Subject: MAC Language

Luanne: I made a mistake on the language that we sent you on MAC.
On the last part  where it talks about a failure to be rated, my understanding from our  discussions is that a MAC would only be triggered if a party's credit support  provider failed to be rated by either S&P or Moody's  so that if it lost one  rating but maintained the other rating a MAC would not be triggered.
For  this reason the amendment should read ...or its Credit Support Provider shall  fail to have a rating from either S&P or Moody's.
Please confirm that this is your understanding and sorry for the confusion.
Subject: Status of Online Amendments

Tana: As we discussed, here is my list of amendments that are according to my  records in various stages of negotiation:  1.
Allegheny energy - Patricia Clark sent to Frank Davis her comments on June  15th by e-mail.
I responded on June 19th and have never heard back from  her.
Most of her comments we could not accept.
None of her comments have  been run by Dave.
2.
Imperial Oil -  Grant Oh was handling this.
They had 3 comments.
most of  which we could not accept.
I spoke with Grant about this around June 6th and  have never heard back from him.
None of their proposed changes have been run  by Dave.
3.
Kennecott Coal Sales Company - A draft amendment letter which Dave F. has  approved was sent to them on May 15th.
My contact there is Jim Sobule  Wayne  Gresham is alos involved in this.
I have never heard back from Jim.
4.
Arco - We received by e-mail comments from David Dyck at Arco in March.
Tori Kuykendall and Grant Oh are involved from the Enron side.
I responded   to David Dyck by e-mail on March 10th and have never heard anything further  on this.
None of their comments or my response has been reviewed by Dave.
5.
Chevron - Canada - I received a letter from Bruce Borwick  on January 31st  which I responded to and have never heard anything further from them.
Dave  has not reviewed their comments or my response.
6.
Cargill - I sent to Mike Pederson a form of amendment letter which I don't  think has been signed.
They wanted a minor change to the confidentiality  language.
Dave has not seen this but in the event that Cargill comes back to  life, i doubt that he will have a problem with it.
7.
Cinergy - I sent a draft amendment letter which dave approved to John  Dirheimer on May 15th.
To my knowledge it has not been signed.
8.
Duke Energy - I sent a draft amendment letter to John Puett on May 15th  which Dave approved.
To my knowledge, it has not been signed.
9.
Talisman - we have been exchanging drafts of a revised ETA for months.
My  contact there is Ann Love.
We are close to reaching agreement with them and  mark has been involved in some of the early discussions.
I am sending to  Dave a mark-up of the revised agreement for his approval.
All of the ETA amendment letters and the Talisman revised ETA are in my  directory under specproj/online.
Carol
Subject: Barrett Amendment

Here is my first cut at a proposed form of amendment.
I have added a rep and  an additional Event of Default to cover the 'Lien" issue in light of the fact  that Barrett's Credit Agreement restricts them from entering into any  agreement that contains a negative pledge.
I winged the amendment to the  Confirmations since I have not seen them yet.
Please call me with any  comments.
Carol
Subject: Global Companies LLC

Russell: Here is a summary of the ownership chain of Global Companies LLC:  1.
Its members are Global Petroleum Corp. ("GPC"), YPF Distribution Company  ("YPF") and Montello Oil Corporation ("Montello").
From what they sent to  us, I could not tell the ownership percentages.
2.
The affairs of Global are managed by a "Board of Governors" who are  selected by the members.
Specifically, GPC and Montello collectively get to  choose 3 board members and YPF gets to choose 3 board members.
I your credit worksheet, you had specified as a "MAC" trigger if YPF, SA  fails to own at least 51% of Global Companies.
Is this the same entity as  YPF Distribution Company?
Do you want this as a MAC or as an Additional  Event of Default or Termination Event?
Carol
Subject: Project Margaux and Raptor II

Susan and Samantha: We are in the process of completing a quarter end project called Project  Margaux and have completed the Raptor II project.
With respect to Project  Margaux, please coordinate with Mark Evans in London to get closing sets of  documents.
With respect to Raptor II, I will leav a message with Alicia  Curry at V&E to send you the closing sets.
I will leave with you my closing  binder on Raptor I.  Sara, It might not be a bad idea to meet with Brenda Funk in the next few weeks to  get updated on all of the qaurter end delas.
Carol
Subject: ESP Question

David: Mark and I were reviewing the Eligible Swap Participant rules and the  following issue came up:  If our counterparty is a limited partnership but our credit group is relying  on the credit of the GP, do the rules require a written guaranty from the GP  or is it enough to rely on the fact that under law the GP is jointly and  severally liable for the LP's obligations?
One of our counterparties is a  limited partnership whose GP is a utility and their counsel has advised us  that for regulatory reasons, the GP cannot enter into a Guaranty.
I look  forward to hearing from you.
Carol
Subject: Raptor II

Alicia: I'm assuming that I will be gone when the closing sets for raptor II are sent  out.
Could you please send one set to Susan Bailey, a legal assistant in our  group, so we have one for the swap files?
Susan's number is 853-4737.
Thanks.
Subject: Equitable LLC

Susan and Samantha: Who has inherited this file from Susan?
I have a mrk-up based on comments  that I have been discussing with thier counsel that I need to give to someone.
Carol
Subject: Deutsche Bank

Rod: I don't know if you are still handling this.
We are close to getting this  finalized.
One credit comment from them that I need someone's thoughts on.
They want the Issuer of LC's to maintain a credit rating of A from S&P and A2  from Moody's.
We usually put A- and A3.
are you okay with this?
If I need  to run this by someone else please let me know.
Subject: ISDA Comments

Mr. Davis: Susan Flynn passed on to me your comments to the ISDA draft.
Please call me  when you are ready to discuss.
With respect to the Guaranty amendment that  we had requested, it is just meant to clarify in the termination section that  if the Guaranty is terminated then the Guarantor is still responsible for all  of the Counterparty's obligations with respect to any transactions that were  entered into prior to the termination date, even if such obligations are  incurred after the termination date.
I do not feel that the termination  language, as currently written in both the WPS and Enron Guarantys clearly  reflects this concept as the language as currently written states that the  Guaranty "is revocable only with respect to liabilities occurring on or after  the termination date."
I look forward to hearing from you.
Subject: Commercial Risk Reinsurance Company Limited

Susan and Samantha: This is a file that apparently Shari worked on and Susan Flynn gave to me.
I  have resolved the last tax issue and I will mark up the existing draft which  then should be ready to sign.
There are some Guaranty issues that I need to  take care of but in the meantime I will need one of you to revise the draft  and coordinate getting it signed by the counterparty.
Carol
Subject: Engage

Tana: I sent to Luke Mickum a new draft of the Engage US amendment.
He never did  send me his comments.
The file with the new draft will be with the files  near the window just in case.
He wants to resolve the US one before we  resolve the Canada one.
Coastal is now going to Guaranty the US one.
I'm  not yet sure if they will also Guaranty the Canada one so we might end up now  with 2 separate guarantys.
I'll keep you posted.
Carol
Subject: Junior Achievement Class

Zulie: I am teaching a junior achievement course to a third grade class at my son's  school.
I would like to reward these kids for the work that they have done  and someone in my group mentioned that in some cases, Enron has something  akin to a "goodie bag" that they give out to kids.
Would I be eligible for  this?
I wasn't sure if I would and thought that at least it doesn't hurt to  ask.
My extension is 33989.
Carol
Subject: Other Forms we may need

Suzanne: Could you obtain a few of each of these for me or if they are available  on-line let me know where?
We alos need to talk about getting my office  ready for the move.
Please stop by when you can.
Thanks.
Carol
Subject: Columbia assignment

Tanya: When the Columbia purchase was done in January, did the 1/30/98 ISDA Master  between ENA and Columbia Energy Services Corporation stay with Columbia or  come over to us?
The reason that I am asking is that they have sent ENA a  letter notifying us of Columbia's transfer of its rights under such Master to  The New Power Company, so it seems as if they believe that that Master was  not part of our acquisition.
Who in credit needs to be aware of this if in  fact this Master will be assigned to New Power?
Carol
Subject: sorema structure

Mark: Who should handle this?
Given my situation, I would prefer not to take this  on and I have talked to Seth about my situation.
Please let me know what you  think.
Would this be something that Lou Stoler would work on with our help?
Carol
Subject: Columbia/New Power Asset Purchase

Mark: I received a notice in the mail in connection with Columbia Energy Services  Corporation's sale of its "Mass Markets" business to The New Power Company.
The purpose of the notice was to inform us that effective July 31, 2000  Columbia would be assigning its interest in the January 30, 1998 ISDA Master  Agreement that it has with ENA to New Power as well as all transactions under  it.
Please call me if you have any questions about this.
I expect that we  will receive shortly a formal consent agreement.
Subject: Chase Assignment

Christine: John Suttle will be sending you by fax our the Assignment executed by ENA.
Could you please send me the signature pages for Chase and Barrett once they  have been executed?
Thanks.
Subject: Maternity Leave

Michele: I just wanted to confirm with you that you had everything you need in  connection with my maternity leave/leave of absence.
As I think I indicated  to you, the December 31 date that Mark gave in his e-mail to you is a  "tentative" date and I may return earlier or with Mark's permission, extend  the date.
Please call me if you have any questions.
I will send you the  doctor's note showing the delivery date once that occurs.
could you please  send me your fax number?
Also, could you please have someone deliver to me  (EB 3892) the insurance form that I need or fax it to me at 646-3393.
Thanks.
Subject: DB/Enron ISDA

Susan and Samantha: I thought that both of you should have this.
This is the new draft of  Deutsche Bank schedules which I plan to review.
I have forwarded this to Rod  Nelson.
Subject: How Are you?

Cindy: Thought I would try e-mailing you since using the phone is more of a  challenge.
So far so good although I can't say that we are on any type of  schedule.
Before I forget, what is the name of the breast pump that you are  using?
Looks like the one that I have is not that great.
How many ounces  should I expect to be able to pump?
I'm trying to judge whether I should  keep this pump.
Anyway, back to Charles Eugene, he is pretty much of a night  owl so i try to sleep when he does when I can.
We are ion a feeding frenzy  every 21/2 to 3 hours and I'm hoping I can extend that at night soon.
Any  suggestions?
What type of formula do you use?
Alos, do you have any secret  methods for putting Jillian down to sleep?
Do you let her suck on a  pacifier?
All Charles wants to do is suck on me.
Arthur was better at  falling asleep on his own.
How's Jillian doing ?
I can't wait to see a picture of her and I will be  sending out pictures soon.
Arthur is adjusting well.
He is really into  tennis now which I am thrilled about.
We were able to convince Bill's mother  not to come this weekend because I am not quite up to a visit.
I think she  took it well but you never can tell, but at this point I really don't care  what she thinks because i am not ready for her to visit until I'm more mobile  which hopefully I will be in another week or 2.
Sue, How are you and Cate doing?
Can you talk to mom about scheduling a  visit so  that we can schedule a christening date?
Bill's older sister's husband Bill  is the godfather.
Mom mentioned late August but I would like to pin  something down soon so that we can make the necessary arrangements.
Well, I've got to go as I hear Charles waking up.
Take care both of you and  call or write me.
Love, Carol
Subject: Birth Announcement

Terry: Just wanted to let you know that our son, Charles Eugene, was born on July  12th.
He is absolutely beautiful and well worth the long wait and all of the  time and effort that it took to have him.
After a prolonged stay in the  hospital, we are both home now and doing really well.
I'm on cloud nine and  I'm sure that all of this will hit me soon.
Hope you are doing well.
Take  care.
Subject: Savings Bonds

Suzanne: There is a savings bond program that Enron sponsors for year 2000 newborns.
Could you please find out what I need to do to apply for one.
I thought that  i saw something in workperks about it.
Thanks.
Subject: disruptive technology, short and simple and confidential

We produce political/public affairs television programs which air in state capitols.
Currently we are in Pennsylvania and Ohio, expanding into NJ, Md and DE.
The disruptive technology is this: the real target of the TV show is the guest, not the audience.
Lobbyists have trouble scheduling time with politicians and regulators, and when they get on the schedule lobbyists have time getting genuine intellectual focus from government decision makers.
We don't have trouble with either.
Every politician and appointee wants to be on television, they always say yes.
When they ask us what the topics will be, and we mention something like telecommunications competition or electricity deregulation they want briefing material which they actually study in order to do well on television.
In addition by inviting journalists and radio and television commentators as members of out panel we have the same effect on them.
In short:   Step one: identify gov't decision makers that our sponsors want to influence Step two: invite them on the program and, in doing so, develop rapport with their key staff members on the relevant issues Step three: send briefing materials and/or give a briefing in person before the the taping Step four: towards the end of a show in which the Newsmaker has largely been bragging about his/her policy agenda Step five: steer the conversation to sponsor selected topics, framing the issue in such a way as to make it very difficult for the guest to resist the conclusions suggested by the host.
Step six: take the statement of support for the position we favor e.g.
tort reform, privatization, deregulation, tax cuts, etc.
(which by the way we almost always are able to get from the guest on the air) and in addition to airing along with the airing of the rest of the show, we digitize it and send it out to legislators, regulators and the proper beat reporters via email making it almost impossible for the newsmaker to back off later.
Current sponsors: Medical Society, Hospital Association, State System of Higher Education, Manufacturers Association, Cornell Corrections, AT&T.
Levels: 25K, 50K, 100K per year for Pa; 15k for Ohio (one level only).
This is an amazingly simple, elegant and direct way to influence policy makers and opinion molders and we do not have an energy-oriented firms in partnership with us.
Enron and Newsmakers are a very good fit.
I'll be in touch,   p.s.
Sponsorship can be done in ways that are not visible if you prefer, via intermediaries, if you are publicity shy.
Jerry Bowyer Pennsylvania Newsmakersseen across the state on these television stations: www.jerrybowyer.com/coveragemap.php      The Jerry Bowyer Programon WPTT radio in Pittsburgh, 1360am: www.1360wptt.com/bowyer  Focus on the Issueson Cornerstone Television Audio clips from these programs can be heard at www.jerrybowyer.com/audio.php
Subject: Bond Cancellation - EES/Enron Energy Marketing Corp/Enron Power  Marketing/ENA

As requested, please see attached list of bonds that we have received cancellation notices on.
I spoke to Kate Joslyn, Enron Direct Canada and she said they are working on the sale of Enron Direct Canada.
If you need any more information, please let me know
Subject: MAIN invoices

We have received invoices from MAIN region for 2002 assessment.
I do not know of any Enron positions that would warrant us making payment.
However, let me know.
Enron SE  past due  $3925.45 EPMI  past due  $13426.43
Subject: Money Back to Enron from NYISO from ICAP residual

Phil - Per our conversation, Enron has successfully procured sufficient UCAP for January 2002 through NYISO's Monthly Auction.
The total dollar amount for that Obligation is $219,189.
Enron posted $750,000 in collateral to participate in the Monthly UCAP Auction on Dec-07.
Enron is requesting the difference between what was posted and the cost of our Obligation wired back to Enron's Account;  that difference is $530,811.
It is understood that Enron is obliged to re-post collateral come the following UCAP Auction in early January for February's Obligation.
Wade -  Can you please e-mail Phil Gootee and Mike Mackles from NYISO Credit Dep't wiring instruction for the $530,811.
Thank you.
Please call with any questions.
Subject: REVISED EES 12/17/2001

Please find attached EES' revised Cash Forecast for 12/17/2001.
This has been updated to reflect new estimates for Gas and Power Purchases to get us through the holidays.
Also, I put in $10MM of EFS receipts for tomorrow as it is my understanding that there is that much additional received not yet deposited.
I  have not forecasted any disbursements for Wed - Friday assuming they get in.
Wade
Subject: Status of invoices

Jim-  I was hoping that you could give me a status update on the outstanding invoices from PJM to the two Enron subs.
It was my understanding that you were going to be discussing them with the "5 day" committee today.
Given the ramifications of a default, some of which we spoke of this morning, I would like to stay as up-to-date as possible with Enron's plans and intentions.
Thank you very much,
Subject: TVA

Ben Jacoby told me that the state of Tenn. (through an Energy Policy Committee) has implemented a moratorium on the state reviewing air permits and siting on new IPPs.
Apparently TVA is exempt from the moratorium.
He heard that TVA has been telling the govenor's office that all the new IPPs coming on line in Tenn. are putting TVA's transmission resource at jeopardy.
If this is being said, it is incorrect because, per TVA's "procedures", TVA conducts an interconnection study before connection, so TVA actually approves the interconnection, plus TVA would not let the IPP purchase transmission (or would cut its transmission).
Enron's proposed plant in Tenn. already has the air permit, so Ben is not as concerned about Enron's plants.
However, this type of behavior could show that TVA may be simply keeping IPPs off its system (even though presumably they would pay it revenue -- same problems that we continue to have with VIUs).
Could this be helpful in messaging somehow to DOE, etc.
that TVA should be in an RTO?