postbot/aeslc_kw huggingface dataset:
Subject: Preliminary drafts of term sheets for project Boss

Here are the preliminary drafts of the term sheets.
The scenario highlights are:  Exchange will host its private label exchange and the central transaction engine and database Exchange will buy the hardware needed for the implementation Exchange will define the scope of the hardware needed for local handheld devices and specialist software Exchange will map and integrate the solution to its back-office systems.
Technology provider will provide Exchange with a standardized format data feed to the back-office (we still need to decide how the data format will be defined and who will define it) Technology Provider will provide all the software and consulting needed  for the solution implementation Technology provider will be compensated for his solution  Specialist will receive compensation for managing products Specialist will use commercially best efforts to maintain a defined spread on the product it manages Specialist will have the option to stream price/volume pairs form the system to its own principal platform Specialist will have the option to stream its own markets to the system (rules need to be defined) Specialist will pay no clearing or exchange fees for the products it manages Specialist will have fill participation advantages
Subject: Ammonia/Urea Update Overview

All, 	Attached is an overview of our progress and next steps - FYI.
Our goal remains to be able to participate in the market no later than the end of the year.
Thanks for your continued efforts and assistance.
Subject: Response to Audit Findings

Periodically, you will be receiving email notices from Mechelle Atwood requesting response to audit findings for which you were identified as the responsible party.
Please complete the required documentation in a timely manner, as closing out the audit issues is critical to wrapping up the audit process for FY2001.
If you have any questions, please contact Mechelle directly at ext.
54554.
Thanks you for your cooperation and prompt attention to this matter.
Subject: Computer & Online Law Section

Computer & Online Law Section  		This is a REMINDER that the November 1, 2001 meeting of the Computer & Online Law Section of the Houston Bar Association is coming up.
The presentation will be given by Thomas D. Carmel, Conoco, on Issues in the Creation of Information Security & Analysis Centers (ISACs) and will be held at the Houston Center Club, 1100 Caroline St., Houston, Texas, beginning at 12:00 Noon.
The price for the program is $25 for members with reservations; $27 for members at the door; and $30 for non-members.
Contact Mark T. Curry at (713) 759-0818 or e-mail him at Mtc@hwallp.com for reservations.
We look forward to seeing you there!
No Show Penalty:  If you make a reservation, you are expected to pay if you do not cancel by 2:00 p.m. on the Friday before the seminar.
The Club bills the Section according to the number of reservations and the Section cannot afford to cover costs of those who neither attend nor timely cancel their reservations.
E-Mail Address:  In order for us to update our database, if you have not already done so, please provide your e-mail address to Jana Woelfel at jana.woelfel@strasburger.com.
Subject: ENRON ONLINE RE: ENHANCED LIMIT ORDER OPTION

TO:  Mark Taylor and Peter Keohane   Further to our telephone conversations of last week, please find enclosed a memorandum confirming our analysis.
Please call either myself (403.266.9016) or Keith Chatwin (403.266.9088)  if you have any questions.
Regards.
G.F. Erickson October 12, 2001
Subject: Expense Reports Awaiting Your Approval

The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days.
Please review.
Owner: Mark L Greenberg Report Name: Greenberg10/8/01 Days In Mgr.
Queue: 6  Owner: Anne C Koehler Report Name: AKoehlerSept01 Days In Mgr.
Queue: 4
Subject: Weekly Marketing Report 8-12Oct01.xls

Tom,  Below is a copy of the Weekly Report from October 8 through October 12, 2001.
Please note a few changes from last weeks report.
The Potential Revenue Generating transaction count as well as the Potential Revenue from those transactions has changed to reflect new Nom Logic Pricing as discussed last week.
An amendment template has been created and will be sent to customers for discussion purposes at the appropriate time in the revisions process.
We will monitor customers who have received this template in the upcoming weekly reports.
Finally, we have included a new table in the report which reflects our Counterparties Current Trading Agreement Status.
This will include a reporting of which companies have ISDA Agreements, ENA Agreements, Counterparty Agreements, or No agreements in place which should give us a more accurate idea of where our hang ups will be in the legal process.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thanks
Subject: Expense Reports Awaiting Your Approval

The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days.
Please review.
Owner: Mark L Greenberg Report Name: Greenberg10/8/01 Days In Mgr.
Queue: 7  Owner: Anne C Koehler Report Name: AKoehlerSept01 Days In Mgr.
Queue: 5
Subject: Mail I cannot forward

Mark  I have an e-mail with an attachment that I cannot forward to you because it is coded in  Lotus notes as Personal and Confidential.
It is from  Kim Humbarger and the  Subject line is:   Electronic Signatures on Enron Direct Mass Market Agreements.
I presume you just want me to delete the memo and you will get an original from Kim.
Mark
Subject: Alberta Power Pool Load Index

I have now had a chance to review the initial language describing the load index that was being discussed in the flurry of e-mails this morning.
My preference would be to keep the language as consistent as possible with the language for the pricing index.
Given that the actual hourly load is also posted in the "Actual/Forecast" table from which we derive the pricing index (under the column "Actual AIS Demand"), I would propose that we simply reference that same table and the appropriate column and use the arithmetic average of the actual load for all hours.
In doing so, the products will be consistent.
I also am not sure that we would then need to have a definition of "Load", as the formula for calculating the "Floating Amount" is made certain without the requirement to define "load".
My proposed wording is as follows:  The Floating Amount shall be the arithmetic average of the hourly Alberta Power Pool load for all hours beginning with HE 0100 (12:00 am) and concluding with HE 2400 (12:00 am) in each Delivery Day as published (in final, not forecast, form) by the Power Pool of Alberta in the table entitled "Actual/Forecast" reported for the applicable Delivery Day in the column for "Actual AIS Demand" and in the row(s) for the applicable hours, on the Power Pool of Alberta internet web page currently located at www.powerpool.ab.ca/Market/Reports/ActualForecastReportServlet.
"Delivery Day" means a day during the term of the transaction.
I assume that it is most appropriate to use an average of the daily loads as opposed to, say, the actual load for each hour or a monthly average.
Let me know what your thoughts are regarding this language.
Greg Johnston Senior Counsel Enron Canada Corp.
Subject: Filing Cabinet Space

As you may know, Kathleen Carnahan, our sr. specialist who sits with Ben Jacoby's Asset Development group on 31, will be moving over to Enron South on the 14th of November.
She would like to place a five drawer filing cabinet next to the two cabinets (Stuart's files) near the North Stairwell on  38.
Any problems with this?
Subject: UCC Linda Hayman

I had a good visit with her on the issues.
She advised that she is on a task force to add amendments to the revised 9 in Delaware and thought the group might entertain favorably an exception for master netting agreements from the anti-restriction/assignment receivable issue.
She will work on this for us if we want her to.
I think we should--at least it would be a start and an example.
Do you think there would be great risk in applying Delaware law to the master netting agreements rather than New York?
Let's talk.
Call me Monday.
Subject: ENW Staff - Please note location change

Reminder:  The ENW staff meeting will be held on Thursday, October 25, 12:00 pm, in ECS4075.
Assistants, please let me know if your executive will be attending, not attending or participating via teleconference.
Thanks,
Subject: ISDA Cross Agreement Bridge and Commentary

Attached, please find the 2001 ISDA Cross-Agreement Bridge, blacklined against the last version you received, dated July 26, 2001.
In addition, please find a copy of the Commentary on the Bridge.
As many of you know, various working groups prepared amendments to the ISDA Master Agreements to be effected through the use of a 2001 ISDA Master Agreement Protocol.
In connection with this effort, the Structural Issues Working Group prepared the Cross-Agreement Bridge.
Following meetings of the Strategic Documentation Review Task Force in late July and discussions in August and September, it was felt that the Protocol approach was too complicated, from an operational and logistical perspective, given the nature and the number of the proposed amendments.
Accordingly, it was decided that the four euro annexes would be separated from the Protocol and compiled in their own 2001 Euro Protocol.
The 2001 Euro Protocol is now available on our website and the adherence period ends on November 30, 2001.
Annexes 1 to 9 of the Protocol have been prepared as a Form of Amendment to the ISDA Master Agreements.
The Form of Amendment, and the Commentary, will be published on ISDA's website late this week or early next week.
Work is scheduled to begin on a new Master Agreement and kick-off meetings to discuss the new draft Master Agreement will be held in London later this year.
Details will be announced to the Documentation Committee soon.
As for the Bridge, it was felt that we should publish this on our website as well.
Accordingly, I have attached the drafts for your review.
Please note that the "option to disapply" was deleted in this draft, primarily because the version of the Bridge considered by ISDA's netting counsel in late 2000 did not include such an option.
I would be grateful if you could review the attached documents by Friday, November 2.
I would like to publish these on our website on Monday, November 5.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 212-332-1203 if you have any questions.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Kimberly Summe     - Marked up version.DOC   - Commentary on Cross-Agreement Bridge.DOC
Subject: Deseret Confirm:  Please review

Mark,  Per my voice mail, I would be very grateful if you or someone in your department could give this confirmation letter a quick review before lunch.
The intent of the deal is that we will pay Deseret a fixed price in exchange for a floating price based on the DJ-PV index.
However, if Deseret's plant goes down, then both parties will suspend payments the day following the unit outage, and resume payments once the unit comes back online.
If the index turns out to be greater than our fixed payment, we will pay Deseret  50% of the delta between the index and the fixed price.
Please call or e-mail with your comments.
Thanks so much,
Subject: ZBT ALUMNI

Dear Alumni,  ZBT's main focus for this school year is to reconnect with our alumni.
We will be e-mailing you periodically about events you might be interested in attending throughout the school year.
If you know of any other alumni who aren't receiving our e-mails, conatct us and we'll add their names to our e-mail data base.
Thanks,
Subject: Weekly Report

Tom,  Here is a quick update of the Weekly Report  User Status Last week we had 5 production users, 4 guest users, and 2 new guest user IDs were submitted.
We are currently 190% of our Goal in terms of Potential Revenue Generating Transactions.
Website Visits CommodityLogic website visits were down slightly on Wednesday Oct 24 and Thursday Oct 25 from the previous Wed and Thurs.
However, Website visits were slightly higher than average on Friday Oct 23.
Marketing Status We had 6 meetings last week with Calpine, Cargill, AEP, El Paso, and Allegheny.
There are currently no meetings scheduled for this week.
Our next meeting is Nov 7 with Bridgeline.
Legal Status No Change  Below is a copy of the Report.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks
Subject: Greetings

Hi Mark,  I'm fairly flexible on my housing so let me know if there would be a closer place to stay in relationship to our dinner spot.
I'm thinking of staying out by Hobby Airport just off of 45.
I should finish my meeting with Bill Winslade (out in Friendswood) around 5:30 and be ready to meet you for dinner.
I can drive into the city if you would like.
The next morning I will travel to the Petroleum club to meet Bob Ardell for a early lunch and then fly to Dallas for visits.
Thanks,
Subject: Monmouth College CRTF Report #11

Curriculum Review Task Force 	Report # 11 (December 4, 2001)  The draft educational goals were reviewed in a "committee of the whole" discussion at the November faculty meeting.
Several good suggestions were made during the nearly one-hour discussion.
The current secretary of the task force, Ms. Susan Dagit, took extensive notes of this discussion.
In addition, two faculty members provided some written comments after the meeting.
The task force is currently working on the revision of the educational goals based on the suggestions made by the faculty.
The task force has also been planning for a while the work to be done after the educational goals are finalized.
The November 26 meeting was fully devoted to this discussion.
The following steps are envisaged at this time:  1.
To examine carefully the current academic program on the basis of the educational goals.
2.
To keep on the table the curricular initiatives which came out of the Purser-Gans conference and the intensive summer work.
3.
To develop a four-year matrix for a well-planned integrated curriculum based on items 1 and 2 above.
4.
To continue deliberations on calendar, organizational structure, workload and other issues which have a direct bearing on the curriculum.
Full details of these discussions are available in the detailed minutes posted in the public folders.
To access them, please go to Public Folders, All Public Folders, Documents, College, Curriculum Review Task Force.
Raj Ambrose Chair
Subject: (MS-80) SWITCH OF GUARANTEE

Notice No.
MS-80 December 19, 2001  COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.  SWITCH OF GUARANTEE   Please be advised that effective with the open of business, December 18, 2001, Brian Beatty (BEA-7611) will no longer be guaranteed by F.C.
Stone, L.L.C.
However, Mr. Beatty will remain a member guaranteed by Spear, Leeds, & Kellogg.
In connection therewith, notification of any claims against the aforementioned individual arising out of transactions executed on the Exchange up to the close of business on December 17, 2001, must be submitted to the Corporate Secretary's Office within (10) days of this notice.
Subject: (MS-81) SWITCH OF GUARANTEE

Notice No.
MS-81 December 19, 2001  COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.  SWITCH OF GUARANTEE  Please be advised that effective with the open of business, December 18, 2001, John Santoro (TORO-6244) will no longer be guaranteed by Man International, Inc.
However, Mr. Santoro will remain a member guaranteed by Spear, Leeds, & Kellogg.
In connection therewith, notification of any claims against the aforementioned individual arising out of transactions executed on the Exchange up to the close of business on December 17, 2001, must be submitted to the Corporate Secretary's Office within (10) days of this notice.
Subject: CommodityLogic

Mark -  I received your message and agree that this is probably a better way to communicate.
I spoke to Tom this morning.
There is an industry hub meeting next week - with limited attendance.
While continuing to promote the neutrality of the CL hub, Tom would also like to move this industry issue forward by possibly promoting the sale of interests in the CL hub.
I asked whether or not the hub can be separated from the base CL product (e.g., the general infrastructure and individual modules) and Tom responded that it is quite possible to separate the hub (and its support mechanisms - including the data base information) from the CL product.
I suggested that we may want to consider separating the hub from the product (by formation of a different legal entity), but would imagine that we would need tax and other approvals.
Tom would like assistance in the following areas:   1.
General overview of the antitrust arena he would be dealing in.
I provided this consistent with my current understanding of antitrust matters in the e-commerce world (as confirmed by Ken Reisler at SC by previous discussions)  2.
General overview of the vehicles that could be used to form the hub organization (e.g., profit vs. non-profit companies, LLC's vs. other corporate forms, alliance/joint ventures).
While I have some background in a lot of these type of organizations, I do not have any experience with non-profit entities.
Should I get someone at V&E or Sullivan & Cromwell to assist or is there anyone internal you could suggest?
V&E may be a better choice here only because of the probability that all potential owners are located in Houston.
3.
General issues relating to confidentiality of discussions between potential hub owners.
While there is currently an NDA in place with a number of companies in relation to these discussions, Tom really sees only a handful being serious players.
Accordingly, it is possible Tom may want to spearhead conversations with only those few and possible move a project forward on a faster track.
The questions that have been raised are in relation to the manner in which these discussions should take place and how (if at all) they should be documented.
While I suggested that they should be under a secondary NDA and probably based upon some form of LOI or other intention memorandum, I believe we should get a clear indication of how to move forward so that we can ensure confidentiality, neutrality and avoidance of any future claims or concerns (e.g., antitrust concerns).
Is V&E the choice here also or should we talk to Sullivan personnel?
Tom will need some of this information for his meeting on Thursday.
Since I will be out of the office on Tuesday and Wednesday next week, I wanted to get the ball rolling this week.
Thanks.
Subject: ERMT Templates Power and Gas

Here are revised templates for the adoption by ERMT of the Power and Gas Masters.
Note that adopted gas masters should provide for two-way payments.
Please provide any comments to these templates to Steve as soon as possible, particularly with respect to the new paragraphs 3 and 4.
Subject: EnronOnline Phase III

As you both know, we are working on the launch of Phase III of EnronOnline.
Since we will be making changes to the website we are currently reviewing all content online.
This is an opportune time to make any necessary changes.
I have attached the Legal and Privacy section for your review.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Thanks,
Subject: The Chase Manhattan Bank and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of NY

Mark:  I'll call shortly.
(1)  We settle daily with Chase (primarily Chase London and secondarily with Chase NY) on the FX side and often on the IR side.
We also have NYMEX settlements.
We ran a report for Sept. 11 which I'll email to you and this report reflects payments owed by ENA to Chase.
We are currently updating the report for Sept. 12 and nearby settlements.
(2)  The Chase master (Interest Rate and Currency Exchange Agreement) is old but the amendment (4/5/94) with commodity market disruption language is our standard.
(3)  The NYMEX web page of 9/12/01 indicated that the exchange would clear trades from the 9/11/01 NUMEX Access session against 9/10/01 settlement prices.
I haven't checked today.
(4)  The Chase master
Subject: North American Energy and Developing Products Committee Agenda & 	 NEW MEETING DETAILS

PLEASE NOTE THE NEW CALL-IN PHONE NUMBERS AND NEW ROOM NUMBER IN NEW YORK.
THE AGENDA IS ALSO LISTED.
THANK YOU     International Swaps and Derivatives Association North American Energy and Developing Products Committee  Video Conference Meeting  Friday, November 2, 2001 11:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. (New York) 10:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. (Houston)  Goldman Sachs New York - 32 Old Slip (near South & Front Streets) - 23rd Floor, Room 23A Houston - 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 550, Room 5G
Subject: Man Financial:  margin calculation

ENA received a letter 10/30/01 stating that Man would begin margining on a risk-weighted basis rather than using the NYMEX SPAN calculation.
This is prohibited under our futures agreement.
Man has not formally called for additional margin (which they have the right to do) but rather is withholding about $25M based upon a misunderstanding between traders about moving option positions (I'm not entirely clear about the circumstances).
Man has never claimed that the $25M was "additional margin".
ENA faxed a letter this morning to Man demanding the return of margin in excess of the SPAN calculation, basically a response to the letter.
ENA acounting does not have the software to execute SPAN calculations.
A recommendation to purchase the software was made by Sarah Wesner (who then reported to Joe Deffner) to accounting last year.
I understand that John Arnold intends to move most positions (including options) from Man to Paribas.
However, this information changes frequently.
Joe Deffner signed the letter and a copy was delivered to Louise Kitchen.
Let me know if you need further information.
Subject: swapco structure

I am attaching a structure chart showing what we think would be the best alternative for the swapco transaction (if necessary).
This structure would require ESVL Corp. to obtain a FERC Power Marketing Certificate and would be the actual operating entity.
We are also indifferent if instead of the corporation we use another LLC as the operating company below ERMT LLC.
Let me know when you will be available this afternoon to discuss the attached and the required documentation.
It is in Visio format, so if you can't open it, let me know and I can fax it to you if you give me a confidential fax number.
Thanks.
Subject: Swapco Transfers

Steve - in order to draft the contribution agreement for RMT to transfer the ETP partnership interests to swapco, we will need to review the partnership agreements (1) for required consents, etc.
and (2) to schedule the interests in the agreement.
Do you have copies of the appropriate partnership agreements and, if not, do you know from whom we could get them?
Thanks.
Subject: Swapco Documents

Attached please find the documents relating to the Swapco structure.
We are still working on the employee assignments pending our review of form employment agreements tomorrow.
Regards,