postbot/aeslc_kw huggingface dataset:
Subject: Vesting Schedule of Options and Restricted Shares

Mike -  Both the options and the restricted stock vest 33.33% 1st, 2nd, and 3rd anniversary from grant date with a 5 year term.
Also, I have requested the change to your agreement on the retention payments.
Tim asked me to change the payment dates to the following:  4/1/02 4/1/03 4/1/04  He did not want to add any more to the signing payment per a conversation that he had with Lavo.
I hope this works for you.
Let me know if you need any more information!
Amy
Subject: The Prometheus File - Energy Technology Weekly 1/18/02

We are currently upgrading out networks at this time.
We apologize for any errors, delays, or inconveniences that may result from network problems.
Thank You  In this issue:   - Feature: Reconciling the Telecom Money Pit  - News Highlights: Calpine cuts FY02 estimates and places US$2 billion worth of projects on hold.
- All the news, commentary, and earnings reports, plus price performance and valuation charts.
<<prometheus020118.pdf>>  Best regards,
Subject: Reed Wasden Research - Daily Update 1/18/02

Friday's Contents: 1.18.02 Daily News Update and Stock Performance Calpine Restructuring Lead to New Future   As stated in our November 16 issue of The Prometheus File, Reed Wasden Research will be sending our daily publication and morning notes for a 45-day trial period.
Included is our daily update and notes on companies that RWR follows.
For those who do not wish to receive the daily updates, please reply with WEEKLY ONLY as the subject.
Please allow at least one day for your request to be processed.
Best regards,
Subject: Reed Wasden Research - Daily Update 1/15/02

Tuesday's Contents: 1.15.02 Daily News Update and Stock Performance   As stated in our November 16 issue of The Prometheus File, Reed Wasden Research will be sending our daily publication and morning notes for a 45-day trial period.
Included is our daily update and notes on companies that RWR follows.
For those who do not wish to receive the daily updates, please reply with WEEKLY ONLY as the subject.
Please allow at least one day for your request to be processed.
Best regards,
Subject: beers

Hey,  I'd like to know if I could buy you a beer sometime and pick your brain on how things work in the NW term trading world.
I'm one of the NW mid-marketers now (4 of us total) and I'd like to know in advance how to best work with you, add value, and not be a pain in your ass.
Let me know if this is OK.  You pick the time & place.
Thanks!
Subject: Your mailbox is over its size limit

Your mailbox has exceeded one or more size limits set by your administrator.
Your mailbox size is 125974 KB.
Mailbox size limits: 	You will receive a warning when your mailbox reaches 115000 KB.
You cannot send mail when your mailbox reaches 125000 KB.You may not be able to send or receive new mail until you reduce your mailbox size.
To make more space available, delete any items that you are no longer using or move them to your personal folder file (.pst).
Items in all of your mailbox folders including the Deleted Items and Sent Items folders count against your size limit.
You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.
See client Help for more information.
Subject: Your mailbox is over its size limit

Your mailbox has exceeded one or more size limits set by your administrator.
Your mailbox size is 123883 KB.
Mailbox size limits: 	You will receive a warning when your mailbox reaches 115000 KB.You may not be able to send or receive new mail until you reduce your mailbox size.
To make more space available, delete any items that you are no longer using or move them to your personal folder file (.pst).
Items in all of your mailbox folders including the Deleted Items and Sent Items folders count against your size limit.
You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.
See client Help for more information.
Subject: Reed Wasden Research - Daily Update 1/08/02

Tuesday's Contents: 1.08.02 Daily News Update and Stock Performance   As stated in our November 16 issue of The Prometheus File, Reed Wasden Research will be sending our daily publication and morning notes for a 45-day trial period.
Included is our daily update and notes on companies that RWR follows.
For those who do not wish to receive the daily updates, please reply with WEEKLY ONLY as the subject.
Please allow at least one day for your request to be processed.
Best regards,
Subject: Your mailbox is over its size limit

Your mailbox has exceeded one or more size limits set by your administrator.
Your mailbox size is 122979 KB.
Mailbox size limits: 	You will receive a warning when your mailbox reaches 115000 KB.You may not be able to send or receive new mail until you reduce your mailbox size.
To make more space available, delete any items that you are no longer using or move them to your personal folder file (.pst).
Items in all of your mailbox folders including the Deleted Items and Sent Items folders count against your size limit.
You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.
See client Help for more information.
Subject: Whistler

First off Happy New Year's to all you guys!
Most of you already have the  dates and other information about our Whistler trip this year but I wanted  to make sure you had all the details for this year's extravaganza.
For  those of you that went last year you know the drill.
I pay for  accomodations and meals (and we will eat at some nice places!).
You  arrange your own transportation, lift tickets and ski rental (all of which  can be done on arrival and cost under 150 US dollars).
Here are the details:  Dates:   Jan 31st thru Feb. 3
Subject: Weekly Price Sheet

The weekly price sheet is attached.
Please note that this is the first update of the sheet since 12/3/01.
It will now be updated each week going forward.
Subject: Travel Invoices

In reviewing Jeff Shields' expenses for the previous two months, I have found  two travel itineraries which came without prices on them.
Jessica and Mollie  have both checked their e-mail and confirmed that the only documents sent did  not detail the cost of the trip.
The prices I need are from the following trips:  Itinerary only - August 28, Alaska Airlines, PDX-SeaTac-Helena-SeaTac-PDX,  Reservation # AS/WXOKNK  (reservation made August 24) Itinerary only - Sept. 6 to 7, Delta Airlines, PDX-Salt Lake  City-Spokane-PDX, Reservation # DL/V2KIC3  (reservation made September 6)  Thank you so much for your time.
Subject: Forward Ob explained variance 3/28

A heads up -  The Forward Obligation report for 3/28 will show Short Term Northwest with a  50 MWh short position off-peak at NP-15.
This is due to an option that Sean  and Diana decided not to exercise.
Thought that might clear up at least one  of the many discrepancies we may find on that report.....  Kate
Subject: Daily EES Position through 3/28

Please accept my apologies for this worksheet's absence yesterday.
It was  undergoing cosmetic improvements to more accurately represent the EES-EPMI  position.
Note two new column headings as of 3/27 - "Transmission" and "Other  EnPower" deals.
Also, a change has been made to the SP-15 volumes in the 3/2  sheet.
This change was made per Daniel Kang at EES and Chris Foster at EPMI.
And as always, feel free to contact me with questions.
Thanks,
Subject: Willamette confirms

I wanted to check with you on this.
All these deals are entered in your book,  and I know the Services desk typically does their own confirmations with  counterparties.
However, these deals have comments in them that say they  replace other deals.
In that case, would you like them confirmed by Houston?
Let me know.
Thanks,
Subject: Revised EES Spreadsheet 3/31

Please note a change in EES reported load volume on 3/31, HE 6, SP-15.
The  volume was incorrectly copied into the worksheet, but all EnPower deals  reflect the correct number.
Also, the sheets for 3/30 and 3/31 now show those  respective dates at the top of the page.
Please let me know if there are any  questions.
Subject: Forward Obligation Report error

Following are the terms under which I ran the Forward Obligation report and  received this message:  General SQL error.
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis.
Terms:    Let me know what you find.
Thanks!
Kate
Subject: More Unit Contingent Deals

Les - I received this list from the Confirms group this morning.
Looks like they  need quite a few unit names for confirmation purposes.
But if I remember  correctly, you didn't want these deals confirmed.
Please let me know when you  get a chance, and I can go through and either change them to "no confirm" or  add the unit names.
Thanks,
Subject: DJ Index Prices through 4/2

These are the latest figures I have - I'm so sorry for the delay!
I'm calling  Willie Harrell in Global Risk right now to determine why these prices are not  yet in pub posting and how we can come up with a more reliable system.
Kate
Subject: Latest Variances EES vs EPMI

Mark - Attached you'll find the spreadsheet you sent me with notes I've added on  each deal discrepancy.
Most had already been solved, and a few pertain to  Real Time spreadsheets, in which case I'll defer to Bill Williams.
Please let  me know if you have questions on any of my notes.
If not, I believe we should  be all set for March.
Thanks for your patience,
Subject: Unit Contingent deals

Les -  I received the following e-mail from Confirms in Houston re: deals for which  they need unit names.
I sorted through the list and changed the purchases to  "no confirm," and these three deals are what's left.
Could you add the names  in the comments section?
568866 - SELL EWEB AT BPA SYSTEM BORDER 568864 - SELL EWEB AT EWEB SYSTEM BORDER 568860 - SELL LADWP AT MCCULLOUGH  Thanks,
Subject: Forward Obligation Report Question

Good afternoon, IT Wizards -  I'm curious about a feature on the new Forward Obligation Report.
It is now  possible to run the report showing term, scheduled, or liquidated deals.
In  the past I've always run the report showing term deals, then entered my  desk-to-desk deals from those numbers.
Now I believe the report is designed  to pull data from our scheduling database, so I'm wondering what the  difference is between the term deal report and the scheduled deal report.
Each produce completely different numbers!
Please let me know when you get a  chance.
Thanks,
Subject: March EES-EPMI Revisions

I've attached the EES March Dailies spreadsheet.
It should reflect the latest  volumes and hopefully will clear up some of the discrepancies we're seeing  between EES and EPMI.
Also, I've autoscheduled the following deals in an  attempt to feed them through to the CARP report.
Please let me know if you  see the changes come through, Mark.
The autoscheduled deals are:  533090 - 3/1/01-3/31/01 535419 - 3/2/01 535420 - 3/2/01 566081 - 3/1/01-3/31/01 550208 - 3/15/01    The last deal I'm checking on is #535568 - in your spreadsheet you said EES  saw the on peak hours totalling 1070.75 MWH and believed the on peak hours  should actually total 1016.75 MWH.
Below are the volumes I see both in the  EnPower deal and in the March Dailies spreadsheet.
+____________
Subject: Real Time EES Sheets 3/16 & 3/19

I'm just sending the sheets that are saved in our system.
Bill Williams told  me he cleared everything up on the Real Time side yesterday, but if the  volumes in these documents still look wrong, please let me know.
Thanks,
Subject: Deal Change - Revision of last night's Deal Correction Report

This morning I was notified by Confirms in Houston that one of the deal  changes I made last night didn't come through on their side.
If you refer to  the Deal Correction Report from yesterday, Mike Swerzbin did a deal with EES  for Cal'03 that he mistakenly entered twice, once for Cal'03 (571920) and  once for Cal'02 (571801).
He killed 571920 and kept 571801, but the trade was  actually for Cal'03.
(Is everyone still with me?)
So I restored 571920 and  killed 571801 to reverse what he had done.
But in my rush just before your  calc last night I neglected to look at the volumes of the deal I was  restoring, which incidently had been zeroed out, thus leaving Mike with no  value for either of the deals.
I've reinstated the volumes in deal 571920 and added the error to today's  deal correction report.
I just wanted to give you guys a heads up.
Please let  me know if you have questions.
Thanks,
Subject: 571801/571920

Evelyn - Here's the status of those year-long deals I changed last night.
Everything  should look good now - 571920 now has 25 mwh and 571801 is killed.
Let me  know if you still see something wrong.
Thanks,
Subject: EPMI/EES Discrepancies - Deal 564094

This deal discrepancy seems to have a few of us stumped - so I'm referring it  to all of you in hopes that we can solve this today.
Following are the terms  of the deal:  Short Term California buys Enron Energy Services Hours: HE 6-9 Delivery Point: SP-15 Term: 3/29/01 Price: $110  The deal was entered by Bert Meyers, a Real Time trader, on behalf of STCA.
It was extended for HE 9 through 22 at a price of $160.
In the spreadsheet  Real Time sends to EES each day, it shows the deal as a sale at a price of  $130, not a buy at a price of $160.
My first instinct was to simply modify  the spreadsheet to match the deal in Enpower, but EES claims they see the  price coming across as $130.
I'm reluctant to send any more incorrect  information to EES, as we've already dealt with enough confusion over this  matter.
Please take a look at the deal and its corresponding documents, and  let me know which is the correct price.
Thanks for your help,
Subject: Employee Number

I was told that I will need an employee number in order to enter the hours  I've worked this week.
Is this something I should have already?
Please let me  know whenever you get a free moment.
Subject: New CTPY Name Request

Because I'm not quite sure who to direct this request to, I'm e-mailing  everyone I think might be involved in entering new counterparty names.
One of  our mid-marketers has executed a deal with Sierra Pacific Holding Company,  which is a new counterparty name and needs to be added as a choice in  Enpower.
Please let me know if I've contacted the correct people, and if I've  contacted the incorrect people.
(Sorry!)
Thanks,
Subject: New CTPY Request

I just heard from Samuel (thanks for your message!)
that I need to send  Rhonda new counterparty information in order to get their names added to the  system.
I called Rhonda, but it turns out she's out of the office for the  first part of this week, and her voice mail referred me to Melissa.
(That's a  short explanation of why I'm sending this info.
to all of you.)
Anyway, following is the information connected with the new counterparty name  Chris Foster has requested:
Subject: Work, work, work.....

Joanie!
I have been soooo busy lately and I'm starting to feel like I sold my soul to  the Enron devil.
In fact, I have no time to be writing this e-mail right now,  but I've been meaning to drop a line and catch up with you.
I also just ran  into Brigdet (from the class below us at SMA) at lunch - apparently she's  married to some baseball player.
Crazy!
So right away I had to contact my  ever-realistic "single" friend to bring me some sanity.
I'm actually dating a  guy right now, but it still gives me the chills to hear about anyone near my  age walking down the toilet...I mean aisle.
Anyway, call me, or I'll call you  tonight - let's dish!
I hope everything's great with you - I expect nothing  less.
I have lots of interesting stories to tell about how and why I've come  to the decision that I'm sending my roommates to rehab.
Love,
Subject: Daily Error Report 11/17

Please let me know if this format is accessible and useful for you.
I know  some of these deal changes aren't relevant to your calculation discrepancies,  but I included everything just in case.
If you'd like it pared down or beefed  up, don't hesitate to ask.
Thanks for your patience.
Subject: Atlantic Richfield Company 4/9/01

Chris - Looks like these deals might have been entered for the wrong term.
I'll check  with Jeff on this, but if you recognize that the terms are wrong, please let  me know and I can fix them.
Here are the deals:  576274 STCA buys ARCO SP-15 May-01 On Peak 15 MW @ $260  576275 STCA buys ARCO SP-15 May-01 Off Peak 15 MW @ $135  Thanks for checking on this.
Subject: New CTPY Name - Sierra Pacific Industries

Looks like we might have to modify this name in EnPower after all - The dba  on our master agreement is "Sierra Pacific Industries" with no "Inc." at the  end.
I just spoke with Bob Ellery over at Sierra, and he confirmed that,  although the company is a corporation, they never use "Inc." in their  contracts.
Thus, our confirm letters would not match up with the master  agreement because of those three pesky letters.
Just let me know if this causes a problem for either of you.
In case you'd  like to reference it, the deal number we're attempting to modify is 573679 -  it's a buy from Sierra done by Chris Foster on the 10th of April.
Subject: New CTPY Name - Sierra Pacific Industries

I've gone ahead and entered the counterparty name "Sierra Pacific Industries,  Inc." in Chris Foster's deal #573679, in the interest of moving it along  through the confirmation process.
(The deal was done on 4/6 and flowed on  4/10.)
I spoke with Bob Ellery (Sierra) yesterday and he seemed fine with the name  we have in our system, although I'm sure he's not the final authority.
Then I  spoke with the Confirms group today and they were ready to get the deal off  of their new deal report.
So, since I haven't heard anything to the contrary,  I changed the deal from it's "new counterparty" status.
Please let me know if this presents a problem for any of you.
Thanks,
Subject: EES - April Deal Discrepancies

Here's the latest I've heard from EES regarding ways in which we've managed  to thoroughly confuse them.
I'm researching most of these questions, but as  with last month, there are a few Real Time deals they don't see in the  spreadsheet you guys send to them.
Would you mind checking this out when you  have a minute (or despite the fact that you don't)?
If you revise anything,  just let me know or e-mail it directly to Mark Confer and Brooklyn Couch.
Thanks,
Subject: EES - April Deal Discrepancies

Bill, Jr. - I'm so sorry!
I should know better by now.
Bill, III - You might be more interested in this e-mail than your dad.
Kate
Subject: EES April Daily Positions

Here you go, Chris.
Please ignore the last four days, as they are still under  construction.
And let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Subject: EES-EPMI April Discrepancies

Here's what I've come up with so far on these deals.
There are just two more  that are going to require a little bit more attention - 566426 and 566391 -  the SP-15 deals for 4/2.
I'm sorry it's taken me a few days to get back to  you on this.
Please let me know what you think, and we'll go from there.
Thanks,
Subject: Unit Contingent Deals

582324 - Grays Harbor Paper Mill  582322 - Las Vegas Cogeneration  I've added the unit names to the deals and reminded Les that they need to be  in the comments section.
He was under the impression that the guideline sheet  he sent out re: unit names spelled out the answers, but I took another look  at it and it doesn't seem to really answer anything.
I've attached it just in  case you don't have it anymore - but please let me know if this assists you  guys in ANY way.
If it doesn't, I can probably get him to draw up something  more useful.
Thanks,
Subject: Real Time Discrepancy - 570892

Judy - I just heard from Kim Hundl in Confirms that you had a discrepancy regarding  a Short Term West Hourly deal entered for 4/4/01.
Deal 570892 was originally  entered as a buy of 5 MW for hour ending 11.
Then the trader extended the  deal, which is something Real Time traders do often, but when they do they  rarely modify the deal in EnPower Deal Entry.
They simply make the change in  Scheduling.
Because of that, unfortunately, you can only see the true total  volume of the deal in our scheduling system.
At any rate, I've corrected the Real Time sheet for 4/4 to show the correct  volumes for the correct hours; and I'm terribly sorry for the confusion.
Please feel free to call me or e-mail any questions you have regarding EPMI's  coverage of EES's load.
I'm noticing that nine times out of ten, the  discrepancies originate when Real Time is hurriedly sending spreadsheets to  you guys and not making sure that they match the deals we have in EnPower.
Also, I was wondering if you could tell me what database or report you're  looking at to tie out our deals with your records.
I think if I knew more  about your perspective, I'd be able to help more efficiently.
Attached is the revised Real Time spreadsheet for 4/4.
And again, please call  with questions.
Thanks,
Subject: New Broker: Automated Power Exchange

Chris Foster has requested that we set up a new broker - the Automated Power  Exchange, in EnPower.
It is the same counterparty we already have in EnPower,  with the same name and contact information.
Melissa, I believe you said we  could pretty easily add the name in the broker list if it was the same as in  the counterparty list, which Chris has verified it is.
Please let me know if  you need anymore information.
Thanks,
Subject: New Broker: Automated Power Exchange

P.S.
I mentioned this to you, Melissa.
But just a reminder that we need the  default broker fee on this to be $.03.
Thank you!
Subject: Enpower: Counterparty Name Changes

Hi Rhonda -  I was told you're the person to contact regarding changes in the Enpower  counterparty list.
Several items are outdated or have gone through many  different versions, and it's made somewhat of a confusing situation for the  traders and others who do deal entry.
My sensitivity to this is heightened  because I'm new to the Deal Control position here at the Portland West Desk,  and I'm still getting used to which names we use and which we don't.
Monica  Lande suggested I ask you about it, although she pointed out that if we've  ever booked a deal under any of these counterparty names, then they need to  stay in the system.
I'm wondering if there is any way to weed out some of those extra selections.
For example, Duke and El Paso both have five different names in the system;  Arizona Public Service Company has become Pinnacle; and other names were just  tests that are no longer used.
Please let me know whenever you have a free moment - this is certainly not an  urgent request, and I completely understand if the list needs to stay as is.
Just checking.
Thanks,
Subject: NYMEX Futures Payment

I received a message today from one of the brokers at ED&F Mann, who said he  was waiting on our payment for a Palo Verde futures contract for April.
I  remember something like this happening last month, and I remember you two  coming to the rescue, which is why I'm asking for your assistance.
If either  of you get a chance on Monday, let's get together and figure out why this  hasn't been paid, or maybe why it HAS been paid and not received.
I believe the deal in question is 531782 - Long Term Southwest buys from  Avista for the month of April, price $196, trade date 2/26.
Doesn't this seem  eerily reminiscent of the last contract that ED&F Mann didn't receive payment  on?
Was it Avista that time too?
The contact at ED&F Mann is Martin, and his number is (212) 566-9329.
Just  let me know when you have a moment to talk.
Thanks,
Subject: Dow Jones Index Definitions

FYI  Following are the exact definitions of each Dow Jones Index Price in which we  participate.
This was originally a question Stew had, but I thought it might  be helpful for all of you to be able to reference.
I'll keep a copy of these  definitions at my desk as well.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Subject: Contact Info

Andrew -  I just heard that you've been trying to reach me today with no success.
I'm  actually sitting at a new desk and periodically checking my old voicemail  extension, but the best number to reach me on is (503) 464-3827.
Thanks,