postbot/aeslc_kw huggingface dataset:
Subject: Weather Info

Lucy: Sara and I met with Mark today to talk in part about the concerns I had about  the HDD info that third parties had requested us to provide.
He wants us to  talk to you and the group further about this because there are risks  associated with us giving this info to third parties if a portion of such  info is info that we fill in based on our internal knowledge.
I'm out  tomorrow and this afternoon is hectic so I would very much like to have this  discussion at our Monday morning meeting.
does everyone on your side know  about the meeting at 10:30 and can they attend?
If that time is a problem,  please contact my assistant Suzanne Adams.
Carol
Subject: Misc

Tana: Could you please have the clerks hand deliver this to Dave Forester?
Alos,  can you update Mark on what happened with Susan Bailey this afternoon with  respect to the last interview and how much time if any she spent in that  interview?
Thanks.
Subject: Annex A Mailout

Jeff: Here is what we are doing today with respect to the revised form of Annex A:  1.
Marie sent to Bob Bowen yesterday the new forms of Annex A for ENA and ECC  and it is my understanding that as of today, these forms will be used for all  new Omnibus Counterparties.
2.
Last week, Mary provided us with a list of new Omnibus Counterparties for  the month of March and with the exception of the Canadian counterparties, we  are in the process of faxing the Annex A letter which gives them until the  end of April to respond.
With respect to the Canadian counterparties we are  waiting to hear back from Derek before we send them the letter.
3.
We need to receive from Mary a list of any additional new Omnibus  Counterparties, if any, that have done trades with us since the date of the  list that she gave us last week so that we can include them in the mail-out.
It is my understanding that Mary will leave Marie Heard a voice mail about  this today so that we can make arrangements for the letters to be sent to  those counterparties.
Hopefully, that group will be small.
4.
The plan is to roll out the new Annex A's to everyone beginning on May 1.
I will update the Special Handlings List to include those counterparties that  have requested special exceptions that we are okay with.
I will be at the Enron legal conference the rest of the week but will be  checking voice mail.
Carol
Subject: General Electric

Suzanne: Could you please call this guy and let him know that I am out of the office  today and that I will call him sometime tomorrow.
Also, thanks for your  message.
My doctor needs to wait until he gets the other doctor's report  before we can talk so probably nothing will happen until Wednesday morning  when I see him.
All I can do know is take it easy and try not to think about  what might happen.
There's not much I can do and the only way that I will  know that there is a problem is if I start bleeding.
The baby is fine.
He's  almost 3 pounds and Arthur got to see him today which was great!
Needless to  say, no more running nad unfortunately for Bill no more sex!
The one funny  thing that happened was when the doctor was trying to tell us that we could  not have sex and she didn't want to use the word sex because Arthur was there  so she used the word "relations".
Bill couldn't understand  what she was  saying and I know you had to be there but I just cracked up.
I also had a  good laugh when the doctor found out that I was a runner.
She looked me  right in the eye and said "no more running" which is what I expected.
Again,  you had to be there!
Anyway, barring no further problems, I'll be in tomorrow and we'll just take  it one day at a time.
Carol
Subject: RMS

Fred: Enclosed is a revised draft of the letter agreement.
Two points for you:  1.
They want to roll over to next month the net payment that they will owe us  for the month of March.
Are you okay with this?
2.
They wanted to make it clear that their obligation to deliver barrells to  us was only an amount equal to the amount that they own or control, even if  that amount is less than the amount shown on the schedule or oin the Purchase  Agreement.
In other words, they have no obligation to make up the  difference.
Asr you okay ith this.
Alos, he told me to delete the "Amoco"  language since  that lease was no longer part of the deal.
Let me know what you think.
carol
Subject: Crude Oil Purchase Agreement

Jeff: Janice and I have been working on a deal with Fred LaGrasta that involves  entering into a Crude Oil Purchase Agreement.
Their lawyer has come back  with the following requests which Janice has asked me to run by you:  1.
They want to delete the arbitration provision or at the very least delete  the waiver of the right to recover attorneys fees.
They claim that this  conflicts with an indemnity clause in the agreement for non-performance which  allows for recovery of attorneys fees.
2.
They want to delete  subsection (e) of the submission to jurisdiction  clause which contains a waiver of the right to claim immunity from suit,  execution, attachment or other legal process.
Can we give on these points?
They owe us back payments on financial swaps  that we have done with them and the purpose of entering into this Purchase  Agreement is to be able to offset what they owe us under the swaps with what  we owe them for the crude that we purchase.
It's a long story as to how we  ended up here but suffice it to say that this is our only hope of getting  them to recognize the swaps and honor their obligations under the swaps so if  there is any way taht we can accommodate their requests to get the deal done,  that would be great.
Carol
Subject: Misc

Suzanne: Could you please call anyone from the credit group that has not yet responded  in the next day or so and let me know when you have heard from the group who  is coming?
Alos, Rod Nelosnmissed our meeting today so I need for you to  reschedule it for Wed. or Thurs.
Thanks.
Carol
Subject: Guaranty Status

Luanne: Just wanted to see where things stood from your end on your Guaranty.
We  have been asked to consent to an assignment of trades bewteen J Aron and  Statoil and would very much like toi finalize the new Master before we give  our consent.
Please call me when convenient to discuss.
Carol
Subject: Remaining Credit Issue

adele: Just wanted to get back to you regarding the one remaining issue on the ISDA  Schedule.
With respect to Section 7 - Transfer, we would like to keep the  original language.
We view the "credit rating" language as a one time  exception which if we need to we can deal with separately, but any subsequent  transfers after that we want to use the more generic language.
Can we set up  a call to discuss this and my other comments which I sent to you?
Let me  know some times this week that work for you.
Thanks.
carol
Subject: General Public utilities

Leslie: I'm hoping you can help me answer a questions that John Roberts of GPU raised  regarding their desire to sign up on EnronOnline.
GPU Utilitiues is the  parent  corp that has 3 operating subs under it (Metropolitan Edison Company,  Pennsylvania Electric Company and Jersey Central Power & Light).
He  mentioned that there is some type of Services Agreement bewteen EPMI and GPU  Services Corp.
He wants to know which legal entity should be on the omline  application.
Can you help?
Carol
Subject: Organic Inc. CA Issue

David and Louise: I am working with Bob on a confidentiality agreement with Organic Inc. which  contains a mutual "no solicitation" provisions that would prevent either  party from hiring or soliciting for employment any employee or independent  contractor of the other for a period that would expire 6 months after the  termination of any business relationship of the parties.
How do you feel  about this?
Carol
Subject: Swap Assignment Agreement - April 20 Draft

Jeff: Sorry this took so long but here are my thoughts on the above:  1.
In Section 3.1 (c), I'm assuming that the additional sections were added  because we will get these reps in another agreement from the Trust.
Is that  correct?
2.
In Section 3.4 e), the new language regarding rescission of acceleration I  think belongs after the phrase that begins, "if the effect of such  failure..."  Also, where did the new language regarding prepayments at the  end come from?
Is this in the Revolver or in Enron's existing deals?
3.
Section 3.11 should be made subject to Section 5.7 or vice versa.
Carol
Subject: Crestar energy

David: Grant has faxed to me Crestar's comments to the PA and ETA.
As I explained  to Grant, some of them are legal and some of them, I think, will require  input from you and perhaps can be resolved in a call to them.
I am going to  have this delivered to you with my thoughts on some of the comments assuming  that we couldn't talk them into accepting these docs as is.
Please let me  know when convenient how best to proceed.
carol
Subject: Termination Right

Jim: We have finally devised a procedure for handling termination rights.
I will  amend the ETA amendment letter and send it to you.
We have a new procedure  in place that requires me to get commercial approval for all amendments so I  first will need to run this by the head of the Online group but will send it  to you right after I receive that approval.
Sorry for the delay.
carol
Subject: kennecott

David: Here is a draft of the ETA amendment letter that we have been discussing with  Kennecott.
It includes my proposed modifications to deal with giving them  the termination right which I have highlighted.
The current ETA states that  all notices become effective immediately.
I have inserted in my language a 3  day period after we receive a termination notice before it becomes  effective.
This creates a difference between Us and our Counterparty's since  our termination notice would become effective immediately.
What do you  think?
Do we need this 3 day period or are you okay with having their  termination notice becoming effective on the date of our receipt?
Carol
Subject: CES

Susan: Thanks for the update.
Looks like we are getting close.
Let's go ahead and  prepare an agreement for Morgan.
Alos, on Coral, are they ready to sign?
Carol
Subject: School Board Election

Steve: Just wanted to let you know that Bill is running for an open position on the  Cy-Fair School Board.
The election is Saturday May 6th at Emmott but early  voting takes place tomorrow from 8-12 at the instructional Support Building  on Jones Road.
If you and Julie are planning on voting and are undecided, I  hope to solicit your support.
His opponent is Don Ryan.
Carol
Subject: Carolina Power & Light EEI

Ed: We are really close on finalizing the EEI.
The following are open credit  points with them:  1.
They want their cross default to be $100 million too instead of $50.
2.
They want to exclude from the affiliate definition Florida Power & Light  and its subs.
Their lawyer is sending me a list.
3.
They want to raise both collateral thresholds from $20 to $50 million.
4.
In the assignment language in section 10.5,  they want to specify a  creditworthiness test in clauses (ii) and (iii), such that if the assignee or  its guarantor is rated BBB- or Baa3, the assignment is permitted.
Clauses  (ii) and (iii) relate to assignments to affiliates and assignments that occur  as a result of mergers or asset transfers.
Right now the test is a generic  creditworthiness test.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Subject: Surety Bond Language

Janet: Enclosed is some sample surety bond language that we have used along with a  surety bond form.
I have reviewed your form and think that we can use it  with some minor modifications.
The enclosed provisions will need to be  modified to fit our situation and taht is part of what I want to discuss at  our meeting next week so we can all understand how the bond gets issued, what  it covers and how it gets triggered.
I look forward to seeing you next  Thursday.
Subject: Comments

Jack, Did you send over your comments?
I have not received anything by fax or  messenger and our business folks are anxious to move this forward.
Please  let me know where things stand.
Thanks.
Subject: Form of Letter of Credit

Phyllis: I spoke with Ed sacks, our credit person, about the form of LC that your  credit person circulated.
We both agreed that the LC form for the EEI Master  and the ISDA needs to be the form that we attached to the drafts that have  been sent to you given that the drawing conditions match the LC language that  is in each Master.
Please talk to your credit person about this and let me  know if this is okay.
Subject: Credit Support provider Language

Randy: We are still discussing internally the time period that should be specified  in the definition of Credit Support Provider.
We are not comfortable with  specifying October 2002 as the date.
What is the reason for this?
We are  trying to make this language as transaction specific as possible.
Is there  anything else that we can add to it to make it more precise?
Please call me  in the morning.
I'm in by 8:30.
Thanks.
Subject: Kaiser

Rod and Paul: I have checked the ISDA between Kaiser and ENA and it has our standard setoff  language which permits setoff of amounts owed by or to the Non-Defaulting  Party and its Affiliates against amounts owed by or to the Defaulting Party  under the ISDA and other agreements.
Please call me once you have located  the Metals agreement as Greg indicated to me in a voice mail that he needs an  answer this morning.
Rod, If we get comfortable on the legal side with this arrangement, are there  other credit issues that need to be considered?
Subject: Status

Randy: As I mentioned in my voice mail to you, we have accepted the CSP language  with the October 2002 date and with my other modifications which Susan sent  to you yesterday.
With respect to the Guaranty, the last draft that I saw  had a termination date of June 30, 2001.
Just want to make sure taht  whatever is signed has a different termination date (i.e.
June 30, 2002).
Again, before we release our Guaranty I would like to see the final version  of your Guaranty.
Thanks.
Subject: Options wprkshop

The NY Mercantile Exchange is putting on a half-day seminar in Houston   called "Introduction to Futures and Options".
Suzanne is getting more info  on it.
It's scheduled for June 2.
Carol
Subject: Encore Issues List

Keith: As we discussed, here is Enron's legal/credit issues list on the ISDA:  1.
We cannot agree to cross-acceleration.
2.
There is a note that the cross default threshold needs to be discussed.
Enron's $100 million threshold is based on the threshold that its banks  accept in its credit agreements.
3.
We prefer elective termination on bankruptcy.
4.
We prefer the Loss method.
5.
We would like to discuss with you your credit rating test for defining the  "materially weaker" standard in Credit Event Upon Merger as well as the  timing for posting collateral as it appears in this provisions as well as the  Credit Support Annex.
We believe that 7 Business Days is too long for  posting an LC.
6.
We would like to make the GP of Encore a "Specified Entity".
We need to  discuss with you your request to modify the definition of "Specified  Transaction" to include physical transactions.
7.
In the MAC Additional Termination Event, we would like to propose a cure  through the posting of collateral.
8.
We would like to discuss your proposed chnages to Section 13(b).
9.
We need to discuss the arbitration language.
10.
We would like to understand why you want to change the definitions of  Default Rate and Interest rate.
11.
Why do you want to exclude Sections 7.3 trough 7.6 of the Commodity  Definitions Supplement?
12.
In the "Recording" section we would like to add the phrase "To the extent  permitted by applicable law" at the beginning of the last sentence.
13.
We cannot agree to No Fault Termination.
14.
We cannot accept Surety Bonds as a form of collateral to secure financial  obligations.
Looks like LC's would be the only form of acceptable collateral.
15.
We need to discuss the credit threshold language as well as the rounding  amounts.
16.
We need to discuss what constitutes an acceptable LC Issuer.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Subject: Forward Contract Definition

Chris: Would it be too late to suggest changes to the definition of "forward  contracts" in the Bankruptcy Code in order to improve our position with  respect to the physical supply contracts that EES enters into?
I am not sure  what chnages we would want, but was wondering if there was any opportunity to  suggest a change.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks.
Subject: Surety Bond Issues

Below is a summary of the surety bond issues that I believe we need to  resolve in order to feel comfortable accepting it as a form of collateral to  secure a counterparty's obligations with respect to physical power purchase  and sale transactions:  1.
Determine whether an issuer can refuse to honor a draw made under a  surety bond if after issuance, it determines that the bond was issued in  violation of the appleton statute.
What type of legal comfort should we  receive from the issuer at the outset to get comfortable that the bond was  validly issued and is enforceable against such issuer?
2.
Determine the proper minimum credit rating(s) that should apply to the  issuer.
3.
In the form of bond that we were given, the "Now Therefore" language in  the third paragraph is not acceptable.
Determine what can be said in its  place to establish the necessary linkage back to the transaction covered by  the Confirmation.
4.
Make sure that the bond can be drawn down no matter what type of Event of  Default occurs, even if such event is not related to the transaction that the  bond references.
The Notice of Claim language needs to be written more  generically to accommodate this.
5.
Does credit need a "pre-bankruptcy" trigger that would require Reliant to  convert all outstanding bonds into LC's or cash collateral?
If so, what  would this trigger be?
Let me know if you have any additional issues.
I will be discussing some of  these with our outside counsel shortly.
Subject: Snyder

John: Here is a summary of the 2 Snyder Agreements.
As we discussed last week,  there is one trade (a basis swap that will expire in August 2004) that they  want to remain under the 1194 Master.
Let me know what you want to do.
!.
1994 Agreement  cross default threshold - $10,000,000 for Snyder and $25,000,000 for us automatic termination if bankruptcy occurs setoff includes affiliates collateral is LC's only collateral threshold - credit rating matrix  Below BB- - 0  BB- $2,500,000  BB $5,000,000  BB+ $6,000,000  BBB- to BBB+ $10,000,000  A- and above $15,000,000  $15,000,000 Enron Guaranty  2.
1996 ISDA Agreement  cross default threshold - $50,000,00 for us and $25,000,000 for them no automatic termination upon bankruptcy setoff includes affiliates  collateral includes LC's and cash collateral threshold  - $10,000,000 for both parties MAC trigger is below BBB- for us and BB- or below for them no Enron Guaranty  Carol
Subject: ISDA

Libby: I finally had a chance to talk to ENA's General Counsel about the  arbitration/courts issue.
We would prefer arbitration and ask that you  consider whether this is acceptable to P&G.
Thanks.
Subject: How Are Things?

Pam: I saw Janet Greene last week and she said that she was working with you.
She  looked great!
Can we get together for lunch sometime soon?
Let me know some  dates that work for you in the next 1-2 weeks.
I'm in the office Tuesday  through Thursday.
Everything is going well.
Charles is on the verge of walking!
I'm now in  the power trading group and loving the work.
Hope to hear from you soon.
Subject: Casco

Mary: I am going to return this file to Stephanie since credit is still deciding  how to proceed given their extensive comments.
Could you please reassign  this to someone in the group once it gets going again?
Thanks.
Subject: Misc

Linda: I wanted to order as a gift for Marcus and Louise a 2 year subscription to  Parents Magazine.
Is there some discreet way that you can find out for me  whether they are already getting it?
Thanks.
Subject: Credit Lunch

Suzanne: We have a visitor from SArgentina that will be here this week so please add 1  more to the credit lunch count.
Alos, Jason Peters will be attending.
Saw  Ric at the Q Saturday morning.
Where were you?
Carol
Subject: Trade Guaranty Agreement

Ed: Rudwell and I would like to talk to you about the form of Trade Guaranty  Agreement that has been sent to us.
Specifically, we need some clarification  on how Section 5 works since some new language has been added to the June 1,  1999 form that we received.
Please call me at your convenience to discuss  this.
Subject: Concert

Suzanne: Can you find out when Madonna will be in Philly?
We will be there from 6/30  through 7/4 and I was hoping that she would be there at that time.
Can you  check for her dates in NY or DC as well?
Thanks.
Subject: Inland Meeting

Suzanne: Please include Jim Crump in the Inland meeting that I need to have with Ken  Curry.
He would like to meet as early on Tuesday as possible as he will be  travelling later on Tuesday.
His assistant's name is Dora Trevino.
Does Ken  Curry have an assistant that can access his calendar?
If not, why don';t you  get a time that works for Jim and me and leave Ken a voice mail message so he  can get back to you on Monday.
We need about 1 hour.
thanks.
Subject: Article (

Mary and Sara: I spoke with Lech about the Article 9 questions.
He is going to send me some  articles that they have written which I will send to you.
He alos  confirmed that the cash perfection issue has not changed  under new Article 9  although his view on it was that this type of collateral under the UCC is  more like a deposit account than "money" which, under common law principles,   gets perfected through the exercise of dominion and control over the cash.
Under the new Article 9, deposit accounts are covered and the new Article 9  codifies the common law control test.
e alos expressed a view that It may  take longer than July 1st for NY to adopt the new Article 9.
Subject: Csah Out Option

After our meeting yesterday, I asked Mark Taylor whether under the revised  version of the CEA there was any restriction on one's ability to cash settle  physical transactions.
He confirmed that so long as the parties to the  transaction are "Eligible Contract Participants", then there is no  restriction and our physical contracts can expressly permit cash settlement.
Enclosed is a summary of the ECP definition.
Subject: Pulp/Paper

Mark, Sara and Mary: Jim would like to talk to someone about problems he is having with his  customers concerning the ISDA and CSA forms.
Apparently, most of his  customers feel that it is too complicated and Jim would like to see if any  alternatives exist.
Could someone please contact him?
Thanks.
Subject: UtiliCorp

Susan: Here are the final versions of the Guaranty and Transfer Agreement which you  can finalize with Russell (dates etc.)
once we are ready to sign.
As soon as  I get answers to the 2 questions I had on his comments I will give you his  mark-up so that we can wrap this up.
Carol
Subject: MEGA assignment

Rhonda: Enclosed is a clean and marked version of the MEGA Assignment.
Is the plan  to confirm these trades under the existing Master with Morgan until a new EEI  Master is executed?
What is the cutoff date for this assignment?