postbot/aeslc_kw huggingface dataset:
Subject: service of process

The following original documents, received today, have been forwarded for your immediate attention:  Mobile Energy Services Company, LLC and Mobile Energy Services Holdings, Inc., Debtors - Ch.
11 Bankruptcy; No.
99-10168-WSS-11, In the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, S.D.
of Alabama.
ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON SECOND AMENDED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT to Operational Energy Corp. by FedEx on 10/18/01.
PLEASE ADVISE IF NOT RECEIVED WITHIN 1 BUSINESS DAY.
Thank you !
!
Subject: Crescendo

After meeting with Jesus Melendrez this morning, meeting with the Crescendo folks for a few minutes this afternoon (they were in the office in connection with other matters) and talking with the Crescendo lawyer on the phone, I called Chris Sullivan to let him know that his letter to Jim Derrick had been referred to me for handling.
I started my conversation with Mr. Sullivan by telling him that I had no substantive knowledge about this matter and that I had talked with the Crescendo folks briefly about his letter and expected that they would respond to the substantive points he raised "sooner rather than later".
Mr. Sullivan was not thrilled with this response indicating that he already knew what Crescendo had to say on the subject.
In fact, this was an interesting comment since, at other times during our call, he mentioned that he had been waiting for a reply from Crescendo for months.
He then went on for some time about how he had been talking to Crescendo and others about his helium rights for up to 2 years (his time estimates changed as he continued to talk) and that he believed the project was scheduled to go on line in early November and still had not received a satisfactory response from Crescendo.
He also mentioned a call to Keith Pruitt at Enron in February and that he hadn't heard back from him either.
It sounded to me like Mr. Sullivan wanted Enron to support his position and intervene on his behalf against Crescendo based only on his letter.
In any event, Mr. Sullivan again threatened to involve the government and go forward with litigation to prevent helium from being wasted.
I reiterated that I could not discuss his substantive concerns, that I was not yet up to speed on this matter and that we would look into it.
I received from Jesus copies of the correspondence between Crescendo and Mr. Sullivan as well as a legal opinion on Crescendo's obligations, if any, to Mr. Sullivan.
Also included in the information I received were copies of the letters exchanged between Crescendo and the BLM on this matter.
I am in the process of reviewing these and expect to talk to Crescendo's attorney this weekend.
In the meantime, he is working on a response to the substantive points raised in Sullivan's letter.
Please call with any questions or comments.
Subject: Expense Reports Awaiting Your Approval

The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days.
Please review.
Owner: Andrew Edison Report Name: AE PLI Seminar Days In Mgr.
Queue: 6  Owner: Linda Guinn Report Name: LG - Portland Days In Mgr.
Queue: 4
Subject: monthly update

there is, in effect, no monthly update to speak of.
we have heard no word whether the other parties have finalized their settlement in priniciple, but note that  there have been no filings with the court.
there also have been no communications from the court, either about a case conference or a rescheduled date for the motion hearing.
we don't see any reason to push the court, so we'll let you know more when we know more.
call or e-mail with any concerns or questions.
Subject: RSM Production v. El Paso

Gavin,  	Thanks for taking time to explain how county ad valorem taxes in Texas work to both me and Becky.
As I understand it, there are two types of county ad valorem taxes that might be relevant in this lawsuit:  a tax on reserves in the ground pre-production, which is typically paid by the producer, and a tax on gas that has been produced and then stored in some sort of storage facility in that county (although I didn't ask, I again assume that the owner of the gas in the storage facility or the owner of the gas storage facility pays that tax).
If I recall correctly, you advised me that none of the three Enron defendants named (Enron Corp., Enron Gas Marketing, Inc. and Intratex) had paid either of these two types of ad valorem taxes back as far as your records show.
I am hoping that you can say that based on your records, none of these entities owned any reserves in Zapata County or stored in gas in Zapata County or owned any storage facilities in Zapata County (whatever the relevant question is) for as far back as your records go (I recall you mentioning that none of these entities stored gas in Zapata County, but I can't remember if I asked you if I also asked you to confirm that none of these entities owned any gas reserves in Zapata and I don't know how far back your records go).
(Of course, if I have gotten any of this wrong or mischaracterized what you've said, please let me know).
If I haven't worn out my welcome, would you be the right person to be able to sign an affidavit supporting the foregoing?
I am anticipating that we will need to file an affidavit confirming these facts in the near future to support a motion to dismiss.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Britt
Subject: employee trust

are slaughters instructed on this or is it anderson legal?
and there is no litigation yet is there but just the threat of it??
thanks
Subject: Recording of conversations

Richard:  Robert Knight said that you might be able to provide me some guidance regarding the legal issues involved in the recording of conversations.
A group within EES is requesting recording telephone conversation, and want the ability to playback from their desktop.
I explained to them that to my understanding there were some legal issues involved, and I needed to get clarification.
They were under the impression, that since their requirements are different from the traders requirements for recording, they didn't think it applied.
Could you shed a little light on Enron's policy, or if this is something that should be deferred to someone within EES legal, who might that person be?
Any help you could offer would be very much appreciated.
Thanks for your time.
Regards,
Subject: CGAS - Jerry Jordan Agreement

Global Finance (Brenda Funk and Gordon McKillop) has requested a copy of the agreement with Jerry Jordan to purchase his shares in CGAS.
CGAS is in the Hawaii/McGarrett structure and therefore, disclosure of this agreement to CIBC maybe required.
Can you provide a copy of the agreement?
Subject: GET ON BOARD FOR 2002

Hey guys!
I know you've been wondering what's going to happen to Team Enron for the 2002 MS150.
Going forward, Enron will not be able to fund the team, but I have some very good news for you!
Sun & Ski has adopted us so we can stay together, and all we have to do is change our name.
We will be Team Sun & Ski, with an official announcement of the name coming out a bit later, but since the deal was just finalized, I wanted you to be the first to know that we have a new arrangement while we are working out all the details.
We will have all the same amenities we have enjoyed over the years, and our new sponsor has asked me to stay on as Team Captain, which makes me very happy, as that saves me from a major identity crisis.
Don't know what I would do without you guys!
Just wanted you to know that I will still be your point of contact for all communications.
Please do not try to get info from the Sun & Ski stores, as their staff would not be prepared to answer any team questions this early in the planning stages.
We want to retain your participation, and plan to make our new team bigger and better than ever!
All the details will be forthcoming by e-mail as soon as we have anything to tell you about registration and all the other plans we have in store for you.
We have about 50 of you registered already for Team Enron, and we will automatically put you on Team Sun & Ski unless I hear otherwise.
Stay tuned, and have a Happy New Year!
Subject: Document and Electronic File Request

Richard,  Thanks for meeting with Paul and I yesterday.
As we discussed, I e-mailed an initial request on 11/8 to Jenny Rub and Cris Sherman.
This previous request (with some additions) is as follows:       1.
Latest e-mail boxes and network file folders available for:              Andrew Fastow              Lea Fastow              Ben Glisan              Kristina Mordaunt              Rick Buy              Jeremy Blachman              Anne Yeager              Michael Kopper              Kathy Lynn              Chris Loehr              Jeff Skilling              Sherron Smith Watkins              Joyce Tang (if an employee)              Ace Roman (if an employee)        2.
A list of all the laptop and desktop computers that have been    secured by the company        3.
A list of the dates that an e-mail backup tape has been retained    for both lotus notes and outlook (Jenny         Rub mentioned that she    has one backup at year end 2000 but there are others)        4.
Access to Enron IT professionals in order to formulate    procedures for identifying other network folders          of interest    that would not be under an employees name (e.g., Ryan Siurek mentioned    that Anne              Yeager may have maintained an LJM folder).
5.
Access to the office contents of Ben Glisan and Kristina    Mordaunt        6.
A protocol for easy access to the office contents of Andrew    Fastow, Ben Glisan and Kristina Mordaunt.
7.
A list of the documents that are being withheld for privilege    purposes, or alternatively, redacted copies.
We will also make additional requests shortly.
I will follow up with    you later today.
Thanks for your help.
Subject: RedSox/Toronto

Hey, I was screwing around on MLB.com.
The 2002 tentative schedule is out for Toronto.
It looks as if the only weekend series with the redsox is the 11, 12,13,14 of July.
dmp ***************************************************************************** The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
*****************************************************************************
Subject: In re Doyle Claim Against Underwriters

I recently heard from David Marshall in the Risk Management Group that we may have made or were contemplating a claim against Ron Anderson of IBC Turbo for misrepresenting the quality of the gas turbines that he procured for us.
Marshall said that you were the person who would know.
Anderson is a potentially crucial witness for us if we decide to pursue Underwriters on the insurance claim arising out of the failure of the Doyle Unit #1, which is one of the gas turbines that he procured for us and that was located in Monroe, Georgia at the Doyle plant.
Are you the man I need to talk to?
I know you are underwater.
Is there anyone else who would know about this?
Britt
Subject: service of process

The following documents, received today, have been forwarded for your immediate attention:  Caribiner Securities Litigation; No.
99Civ.2271(GEL) and 99Civ.3379(GEL); In the U.S.D.C., S.D.
of New York.
NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS' FEE PETITION AND RIGHT TO SHARE IN SETTLEMENT FUND and PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE to Enron North America Corp. by regular mail on 11/27/01.
**DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION:  DECEMBER 5, 2001**   PLEASE ADVISE IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE WITHIN 1 BUSINESS DAY.
Thank you !
!
Subject: California Litigation Team - Conference Call Today 2:00

Agenda for 2:00 p.m.(cst) Conference Call Today   1.
San Diego class action - Kirby/Noonan  2.
San Francisco class action - Fergus  3.
MDL Hearing  4.
Ferc intervention in class actions - Watkiss/Alexander  5.
Px Bankruptcy - Sanders   a.
Charge back/release of collateral  b. Commandeering action  c. Uncontrollable forces litigation  6.
EES negative CTC Claim - Williams/Day  7.
Other Ferc actions - Watkiss/Alexander  8.
Government Investigations - Sanders  We anticipate the call will last less than one hour.
Subject: California Litigation Team Meeting - Conference Call on Thursday at  2:00

My apologies to everyone.
I understand that this conference call has already  been previously set up as a weekly call.
Please disregard the email that I  just sent.
Below is the information for the call on Thursday.
Thanks.
Subject: Weekly Report--Major Litigation/Claims

I noticed from the attached report that the ExxonMobile case is set for tri= al=20 on June 25th.
Since I have not heard from Jim Armogida or you about the cas= e,=20 I have assumed that you have it covered and that Corp has determined that t= he=20 potential liability lies at the Corp level.
If this assumption is wrong,=20 please let me know asap.
Subject: Call Alisa Johnston at Dynegy 713-767-8686 re Debbie Chance

I called her twice but never heard back from her.
If she is not calling you,  I say let sleeping dogs lie.
Have you heard anything?
Subject: Meeting w/ Steve Howard

It looks like I will be joining you and Charna in LA on June 6th.
I heard  from Steve, you or Charna( I think) that the meeting was scheduled for  one-half day.
That may be enough time, but if you are coming all the way from  Cleveland, we should make good use of this time.
I think we should schedule  an entire day.
Let me know your schedule.
Subject: Trial Lawyer

I anticipate that Enron may have some legal issues in New York similar to the  issues Enron has faced in California.
Can you recommend a top notch trial  lawyer (similar to yourself) at any firms in New York?
Thanks.
Subject: Conference Call Today 4:00 p.m. (cst) -  re California

Please note that a conference call re California is scheduled for today at  4:00 p.m. (cst).
The dial in number is 1-800-998-2462.
The passcode is  5264561.
Subject: Project Stanley Conference Call

Please be advised that a conference call regarding the above-referenced has  been set for Friday, June 23, 2000, 10:30am central time.
The dial in number for this call is 1-800-998-2462.
The pincode is 4309724.
Subject: Wilde/MasTec Letter Agreement

I have enclosed the final version of the Letter Agreement.
Please have  appropriate representatives of Wilde and MasTec sign at the space indicated  below and return this to me by fax at 713-646-3393.
Once I have received the  signed faxes, I will allow the wire transfer to proceed.
Subject: Project Stanley Conference Call

Please be advised that a conference call has just been scheduled regarding  Project Stanley and has been set for Friday, June 30, 2000, 10:30am central  time.
The dial in number for this call is 1-800-998-2462.
The pincode is 4309724.
Subject: Project Stanley Conference Call

Please be advised that a conference call has just been scheduled regarding  Project Stanley and has been set for Friday, July 14, 2000, 10:30am central  time.
The dial in number for this call is 1-800-998-2462.
The pincode is 4309724.
Subject: Investment Portfolio

I am familiar with one active case and one threatened litigation involving  the companies on the Investment Portfolio list.
Steel Dynamics has been sued  for securities fraud involving the NSM transaction.
Cgas has been threatened  with litigation by Jerry Jordan, the former CEO.
Jerry Jordan disagrees with  Cgas' evaluation of the stock he retained (which is subject to a buyout  provision).
We think it is worth +/- 500,000.
He thinks it is worth +/- 1.5  million.
Subject: BDO

It is nice to see that Pat Oxford came through again.
The real question is  :did Pat not support Bruce or does he have plenty of access but no influence  w/ the future president.
Maybe this says alot for Bush.
He thinks Pat is as  much of a cartoon character as we do and has no reason to  take him  seriously.
Wouldn't that be refreshing.
You need to get the real scoop before  lunch on Tuesday w/ Ileana.
Subject: stuff

The Perd is a problem because it cost $10,000 per year to maintain.
I guess  Mom is (justifiably) tired of paying this when it has been used twice in six  months.
There is really nothing more to it than that.
When we1) all get a  little older and our kids can play unsupervised,2) are less busy and3) have  our spiritual leader back in the land of the round eye, then we will use it  alot more.
No one is seriosly considering selling the joint, save  Yvonne.
I can probably take off two weeks in August next year to do something stupid  w/ you.
July and June are bad because Julie will be in Montissori training  school in Austin.
We should do something bold, exciting--not Colorado  or
Subject: Noram Rigs

Richard Sanders has asked me to set up a meeting regarding the above  referenced.
The following participants are:  Lisa Mellencamp Mark Peterson John Hopley John Enerson Richard Sanders  It looks as though, this Friday, Aug. 13. at 2:00 will be a good time for  everyone.
Please let me know if this time is convenient for you.
The  location will be 38C1.
(I tried to contact you by phone today, but your  extension 31406 was forwarded to a non working number).
My extension is 39402, if you wish to call me.
Thanks
Subject: Duke meeting

I have attached a memo from Don Black regarding his meeting with Duke  yesterday.
As you will note,this memo outlines the factual differences  between the parties.
The legal issue is one straight out of first year  Contracts class: Was there a meeting of the minds so as to create a binding  contract?
When I first looked at this I was somewhat concerned.
In response  to an email from Duke describing a particular index pricing, Julian responded  simply "I agree."
But after talking to Don, Greg Whalley ,reviewing all the  email correspondence, and, most importantly, listening to the trader tapes, I  am convinced that Julian never agreed to the index that Duke is alleging.
In  other words I think we can make a good argument to get around  the damaging "  I agree" email.
It is clear that Duke's trader didn't, and probably still  doesn't understand what index she was usingin her email.
The Master Agreement  provides for arbitration in Houston with three arbitrators, one of whom must  have 8 years of experience in derivatives.
I'll take my chances with that  kind of panel.
I estimate our liklihood of prevailing is in the 70-80% range.
Let me know if you need anything further.
Subject: old bills

I thought these were taken care of long ago.
I think they relate to Neal's  work for EES on the chilled water project for Enron Field.
Let me know.
Subject: California Power Exchange

I have attached two drafts of the response to the California Power Exchange's  November 11, 1999.
The shorter response is the letter I recommend we send.
The longer version has a little more substance.
Please give me your input by  5:00 p.m. Thursday.
Subject: Fax Number 713/646-3483

Please pull a report detailing all incoming faxes received by fax machine  number 713/646-3483, located between EB 3115 and 3114B from September 1  through present.
WE NEED THIS REPORT IMMEDIATELY.
Time is of the essence.
Should you have any questions, please call  me at 35587 or my legal  specialist, Linda Guinn, at 36104.
Richard Sanders RC 0630 Co. 413
Subject: Draft Complaint

I am forwarding a draft of the Amended Complaint in the TVA lawsuit.
The  "control area" causes of action have added to our existing request for  declaratory relief on the "delivery point" issue.
We would like to file this  next week, so please review this asap.
My assistant is putting together a  conference call for Tues afternoon to discuss.
Subject: Intermesa/Votorantim

The phone call to Intermesa and Votorantim should emphasize the following  points:  1.
The transaction was never consumated.
We have consistently stated that we  do not consider the transaction a   "done deal" until final documents are  executed.
2.
We are no longer willing to consider the proposed transaction.
The reason  is simple:  the market has moved and they failed to act quickly.
3.
All markets,pet coke markets in particular, are time sensitive.
Because  Votorantim has delayed in the execution of final   documents, it accepted the  risk that, over time, market prices would change and Enron would no longer be  willing to sign a deal.
4.
Again, we never had a final, enforceable deal.
Their only claim is that we  misrepresented to them our willingness to do the deal and therefor they  didn't pursue negotiations with a third party.
Our response is: we never made  any misrepresetation and it is not reasonable to  rely on our negotiations as  a basis to forego discussions with third parties when Enron never sent them a  binding offer.
Subject: Response letter to John Pope

I have attached a copy of the draft response to John Pope's December 13th  letter to Dick Ingersoll.
Please call me with your comments.
We need to  send this letter by Friday.
Subject: Letter to John Pope

Attached is a new draft of the letter to John Pope with all comments  received.
Dick Ingersoll will send this out to TVA tomorrow.
If you have  any other additions, please get them to me today.
Subject: Kathlyn Scott

I have a schedule for Ms. Scott.
April 14, 2000  9:00-9:30 Lance Schuler 9:30-10:00 Sheila Tweed 10:00-10:45 Mark Haedicke 10:50-11:10 Richard Sanders 11:10-11:30 Lisa Mellencamp 11:30-12:00 Julia Murray  Please call me to confirm that this date is still available.
Thanks
Subject: EPA

As you know, several weeks ago we retained an attorney out of Wahington DC to  assist us with the EPA permitting issues.
The need for counsel was put on  hold when we decided to move the plant.
Is ther anything more we need to do  to follow up on this matter?
Subject: Mark Woolfolk

Did we ever hear anything more from Mark Woolfolk?
He was the attorney from  Akin Gump in Houston who interviewed last month.
All of the comments I  recieved were very positive.
The last I heard, you were talking to him about  salary, but you were concerned that he was too far above our compensation  level.
Please let me know what I should do to follow up.
Subject: Revised Letters

I have attached final drafts of the Bonneville and Enestar response letters.
Please review and revise the Bonneville letter and send it out.
Let me know  if you have any comments to the Enestar letter and I will send.
Subject: service of process

I am in London this week.
Can you take a look at this and let me know what it  is and what we should do.
Thanks
Subject: Meeting re Noise

Richard Sanders would like to know if you are available on Monday at  10:30-11:30 to meet with him in regards to the noise complaint.
Please let  me know if you have a conflict with this time.
Thanks
Subject: Confirmation October 3-4 Meeting

This email will confirm the meeting in Portland for October 3rd and 4th.
I  would like to start the meeting at 11:00 a.m.
Please let me know immediately  if this presents a problem with your schedule.
Christian Yoder, Mary Hain,  Gary Fergus, and I will be meeting at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, October 3rd to  discuss our response to the CPUC subpoena.
Please let me know if you would  like to attend this meeting.
Finally, I have asked everyone to schedule a  day and a half for this meeting.
Although we may be finished on Tuesday, I  thought it was prudent to leave Wednesday open for further discussion.
Please feel free to call me at (713) 853-5587 if you have any questions.
The  contact in Enron's Portland office is Jan King.
Jan's number is (504)  464-8814.
Thanks.
Subject: AVlink

I had some problems with the atty at Vinson & Elkins who I sent your file to  originally.
I sent it to Josh McMorrow at Bracewell & Patterson.
He will be  up to speed on Monday-- he is doing his homework on the corporate entities