Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_battle-23cee96f-6768-4f6e-9a62-131dedf90618.jsonl

@@ -10,3 +10,4 @@
 {"tstamp": 1732216699.5524, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "9e0a002609d94d72b0092ac5f7681280", "0_model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "0_prompt": "What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "0_output": [["What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What does `if name == \"__main__\"` mean in Python? \nPossible Duplicate:\nWhat does <if name==“main”:> do? \n\nI have wrote scripts in Python for quite a while now and I study more of Python as I need it. When reading other people's code I meet if name == \"__main__\": construct quite often. \nWhat is it good for?\n\nA: Basically, \nThere's a distinction between the \"main\" script file and external files which were imported or referenced in another way. If the script is the \"main\" script then the special variable __name__ will equal \"__main__\".\nYou can use this to protect the \"execution\" code from the classes and variables the script has. This enables you to import a script and use classes and variables without actually running that script's main code if it has any.\nSee also: What does if name == “main”: do?\n"]], "0_corpus": "stackexchange", "1_conv_id": "aa381bad18e64b32a945305363d023ea", "1_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "1_prompt": "What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "1_output": [["What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What's the point of a main function and/or __name__ == \"__main__\" check in Python? I occasionally notice something like the following in Python scripts:\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n    # do stuff like call main()\n\nWhat's the point of this?\n\nA: This allows a python script to be imported or run standalone is a sane way.\nIf you run a python file directly, the __name__ variable will contain __main__. If you import the script that will not be the case. Normally, if you import the script you want to call functions or reference classes from the file.\nIf you did not have this check, any code that was not in a class or function would run when you import.\n"]], "1_corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1732218603.7732, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "486e97f6d17342c18c31e1f54e51bc38", "0_model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "f7f5fd6319b745dba583a421bb27a4f7", "1_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1732218626.3123, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "52ff0783deef440994e13ff4c1fe28b9", "0_model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "0_prompt": "what was the most important new religious figure of the new kingdom of ancient egypt", "0_output": [["what was the most important new religious figure of the new kingdom of ancient egypt", "Ancient Egyptian religion\n\nIn the 22nd century BC, the Old Kingdom collapsed into the disorder of the First Intermediate Period. Eventually, rulers from Thebes reunified the Egyptian nation in the Middle Kingdom (–1650 BC). These Theban pharaohs initially promoted their patron god Montu to national importance, but during the Middle Kingdom, he was eclipsed by the rising popularity of Amun. In this new Egyptian state, personal piety grew more important and was expressed more freely in writing, a trend that continued in the New Kingdom.\nNew Kingdom\nThe Middle Kingdom crumbled in the Second Intermediate Period (–1550 BC), but the country was again reunited by Theban rulers, who became the first pharaohs of the New Kingdom. Under the new regime, Amun became the supreme state god. He was syncretized with Ra, the long-established patron of kingship and his temple at Karnak in Thebes became Egypt's most important religious center. Amun's elevation was partly due to the great importance of Thebes, but it was also due to the increasingly professional priesthood. Their sophisticated theological discussion produced detailed descriptions of Amun's universal power.\nIncreased contact with outside peoples in this period led to the adoption of many Near Eastern deities into the pantheon. At the same time, the subjugated Nubians absorbed Egyptian religious beliefs, and in particular, adopted Amun as their own."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "0c498b6725fc476fa404509778f79961", "1_model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "1_prompt": "what was the most important new religious figure of the new kingdom of ancient egypt", "1_output": [["what was the most important new religious figure of the new kingdom of ancient egypt", "Ancient Egyptian religion\n\nIn the 22nd century BC, the Old Kingdom collapsed into the disorder of the First Intermediate Period. Eventually, rulers from Thebes reunified the Egyptian nation in the Middle Kingdom (–1650 BC). These Theban pharaohs initially promoted their patron god Montu to national importance, but during the Middle Kingdom, he was eclipsed by the rising popularity of Amun. In this new Egyptian state, personal piety grew more important and was expressed more freely in writing, a trend that continued in the New Kingdom.\nNew Kingdom\nThe Middle Kingdom crumbled in the Second Intermediate Period (–1550 BC), but the country was again reunited by Theban rulers, who became the first pharaohs of the New Kingdom. Under the new regime, Amun became the supreme state god. He was syncretized with Ra, the long-established patron of kingship and his temple at Karnak in Thebes became Egypt's most important religious center. Amun's elevation was partly due to the great importance of Thebes, but it was also due to the increasingly professional priesthood. Their sophisticated theological discussion produced detailed descriptions of Amun's universal power.\nIncreased contact with outside peoples in this period led to the adoption of many Near Eastern deities into the pantheon. At the same time, the subjugated Nubians absorbed Egyptian religious beliefs, and in particular, adopted Amun as their own."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1732220017.2828, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "645cb4ad0bcb403e9af25653a2c06591", "0_model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "0_prompt": "What are you good at?", "0_output": [["What are you good at?", "Job interview\n\nThe mental ability of interviewers may play a role in how good they are as interviewers. Higher mental ability is important because, during the interview, a lot of information needs to be processed – what the applicant said, what they meant, what it means for how they can do the job, etc. Research has shown that those higher in general mental ability were more accurate when judging the personality of others. Also, interviewers who have higher social intelligence and emotional intelligence seem to do a better job of understanding how an applicant behaves in an interview and what that means for how they will act once on the job. These abilities do not appear to be enough on their own to make accurate judgments.\nThe personality of the interviewer may also affect the ratings they give applicants. There are many ways that personality and social skills can impact one's ability to be a good judge or interviewer. Some of the specific social skills good judges display are warmth, interest in engaging with others, and eye contact. Interviewers who display warm behaviors, such as smiling and leaning toward the applicant, are rated more positively than those who do not act this way or show cold behaviors. Interviewers who prefer to engage with others also tend to judge applicants more accurately. It is likely that these people are using information from their own personalities as well as how they see people in general to help them be more accurate."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "13f3efe66bdd49868546772be719e7e6", "1_model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "1_prompt": "What are you good at?", "1_output": [["What are you good at?", "Skill\n\nA skill is the learned ability to act with determined results with good execution often within a given amount of time, energy, or both. Skills can often be divided into domain-general and domain-specific skills. Some examples of general skills are time management, teamwork and leadership, and self-motivation. In contrast, domain-specific skills would be used only for a certain job, e.g. operating a sand blaster. Skill usually requires certain environmental stimuli and situations to assess the level of skill being shown and used."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}

data/retrieval_individual-23cee96f-6768-4f6e-9a62-131dedf90618.jsonl

@@ -44,3 +44,5 @@
 {"tstamp": 1732218576.6775, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1732218576.3242, "finish": 1732218576.6775, "ip": "", "conv_id": "f7f5fd6319b745dba583a421bb27a4f7", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1732218618.52, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "embed-english-v3.0", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1732218616.3423, "finish": 1732218618.52, "ip": "", "conv_id": "52ff0783deef440994e13ff4c1fe28b9", "model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "prompt": "what was the most important new religious figure of the new kingdom of ancient egypt", "output": [["what was the most important new religious figure of the new kingdom of ancient egypt", "Ancient Egyptian religion\n\nIn the 22nd century BC, the Old Kingdom collapsed into the disorder of the First Intermediate Period. Eventually, rulers from Thebes reunified the Egyptian nation in the Middle Kingdom (–1650 BC). These Theban pharaohs initially promoted their patron god Montu to national importance, but during the Middle Kingdom, he was eclipsed by the rising popularity of Amun. In this new Egyptian state, personal piety grew more important and was expressed more freely in writing, a trend that continued in the New Kingdom.\nNew Kingdom\nThe Middle Kingdom crumbled in the Second Intermediate Period (–1550 BC), but the country was again reunited by Theban rulers, who became the first pharaohs of the New Kingdom. Under the new regime, Amun became the supreme state god. He was syncretized with Ra, the long-established patron of kingship and his temple at Karnak in Thebes became Egypt's most important religious center. Amun's elevation was partly due to the great importance of Thebes, but it was also due to the increasingly professional priesthood. Their sophisticated theological discussion produced detailed descriptions of Amun's universal power.\nIncreased contact with outside peoples in this period led to the adoption of many Near Eastern deities into the pantheon. At the same time, the subjugated Nubians absorbed Egyptian religious beliefs, and in particular, adopted Amun as their own."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1732218618.52, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1732218616.3423, "finish": 1732218618.52, "ip": "", "conv_id": "0c498b6725fc476fa404509778f79961", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "what was the most important new religious figure of the new kingdom of ancient egypt", "output": [["what was the most important new religious figure of the new kingdom of ancient egypt", "Ancient Egyptian religion\n\nIn the 22nd century BC, the Old Kingdom collapsed into the disorder of the First Intermediate Period. Eventually, rulers from Thebes reunified the Egyptian nation in the Middle Kingdom (–1650 BC). These Theban pharaohs initially promoted their patron god Montu to national importance, but during the Middle Kingdom, he was eclipsed by the rising popularity of Amun. In this new Egyptian state, personal piety grew more important and was expressed more freely in writing, a trend that continued in the New Kingdom.\nNew Kingdom\nThe Middle Kingdom crumbled in the Second Intermediate Period (–1550 BC), but the country was again reunited by Theban rulers, who became the first pharaohs of the New Kingdom. Under the new regime, Amun became the supreme state god. He was syncretized with Ra, the long-established patron of kingship and his temple at Karnak in Thebes became Egypt's most important religious center. Amun's elevation was partly due to the great importance of Thebes, but it was also due to the increasingly professional priesthood. Their sophisticated theological discussion produced detailed descriptions of Amun's universal power.\nIncreased contact with outside peoples in this period led to the adoption of many Near Eastern deities into the pantheon. At the same time, the subjugated Nubians absorbed Egyptian religious beliefs, and in particular, adopted Amun as their own."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1732219989.8575, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "embed-english-v3.0", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1732219989.528, "finish": 1732219989.8575, "ip": "", "conv_id": "645cb4ad0bcb403e9af25653a2c06591", "model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "prompt": "What are you good at?", "output": [["What are you good at?", "Job interview\n\nThe mental ability of interviewers may play a role in how good they are as interviewers. Higher mental ability is important because, during the interview, a lot of information needs to be processed – what the applicant said, what they meant, what it means for how they can do the job, etc. Research has shown that those higher in general mental ability were more accurate when judging the personality of others. Also, interviewers who have higher social intelligence and emotional intelligence seem to do a better job of understanding how an applicant behaves in an interview and what that means for how they will act once on the job. These abilities do not appear to be enough on their own to make accurate judgments.\nThe personality of the interviewer may also affect the ratings they give applicants. There are many ways that personality and social skills can impact one's ability to be a good judge or interviewer. Some of the specific social skills good judges display are warmth, interest in engaging with others, and eye contact. Interviewers who display warm behaviors, such as smiling and leaning toward the applicant, are rated more positively than those who do not act this way or show cold behaviors. Interviewers who prefer to engage with others also tend to judge applicants more accurately. It is likely that these people are using information from their own personalities as well as how they see people in general to help them be more accurate."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1732219989.8575, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1732219989.528, "finish": 1732219989.8575, "ip": "", "conv_id": "13f3efe66bdd49868546772be719e7e6", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "What are you good at?", "output": [["What are you good at?", "Skill\n\nA skill is the learned ability to act with determined results with good execution often within a given amount of time, energy, or both. Skills can often be divided into domain-general and domain-specific skills. Some examples of general skills are time management, teamwork and leadership, and self-motivation. In contrast, domain-specific skills would be used only for a certain job, e.g. operating a sand blaster. Skill usually requires certain environmental stimuli and situations to assess the level of skill being shown and used."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}