Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_battle-b9229914-47bc-4da8-a21b-89329fff8207.jsonl

@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 {"tstamp": 1722305246.8396, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "6cf9d4db20f8436c8c7f2ccaca29d2fa", "0_model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "0_prompt": "what is the difference between cluster point and limit point?", "0_output": [["what is the difference between cluster point and limit point?", "Askubuntu Stackexchange\n\nQ: How to enable user sharing per instructions? I have this entry in .xsession-errors log\n\"Nautilus-Share-Message: Called \"net usershare info\" but it failed: 'net usershare' returned \nerror 255: net usershare: cannot open usershare directory /var/lib/samba/usershares.         \nError No such file or directory\nPlease ask your system administrator to enable user sharing.\n\nThis is in relation to my applets having to be reloaded after every boot. Just wondering how I would enable user sharing, and how it affects my applets ??\n\nA: I don't think this effects your applets at all, that's probably a different bug. You could just make the directory with sudo:\nsudo mkdir -p /var/lib/samba/usershares\n\nBut I don't really know what it will do.\n"]], "0_corpus": "stackexchange", "1_conv_id": "38308d8cc72f4a24b8ddc6bafec79a96", "1_model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "1_prompt": "what is the difference between cluster point and limit point?", "1_output": [["what is the difference between cluster point and limit point?", "Math Stackexchange\n\nQ: Limit and limit points What is the basic difference between limit and limit points, and if a sequence has one unique limit how it can have a lot of limit points \n\nA: A limit point is a generalization of a limit (each limit is a limit point but not vice versa). You can see this in the definition:\nLimit: $a$ is a limit of $(a_n)$, iff in each neighborhood of $a$ are almost all elements of $(a_n)$.\nLimit point: $a$ is a limit of $(a_n)$, iff in each neighborhood of $a$ are infinite elements of $(a_n)$.\nI highlighted the difference between both definitions.\nBecause only infinite elements need to be in any neighborhood of $a$. There can be infinite elements outside this neighborhood which can clustered to another limit point. This is the reason why there might be many limit points for a sequence. If $a$ is a limit only finite elements can be outside any given neighborhood which is not enough to go to another limit.\n"]], "1_corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722306411.5045, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "5993407c26d04c54981a49217a38518d", "0_model_name": "Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct", "0_prompt": "when did scotland last qualify for world cup", "0_output": [["when did scotland last qualify for world cup", "Scotland national football team\n\nScotland lost just two of their first 43 international matches. It was not until a 2–0 home defeat by Ireland in 1903 that Scotland lost a match to a team other than England. This run of success meant that Scotland would have regularly topped the Elo ratings, which were calculated in 1998, between 1876 and 1904. Scotland won the British Home Championship outright on 24 occasions, and shared the title 17 times with at least one other team. A noteworthy victory for Scotland before the Second World War was the 5–1 victory over England in 1928, which led to that Scotland side being known as the \"Wembley Wizards\". Scotland played their first match outside the British Isles in 1929, beating Norway 7–3 in Bergen. Scotland continued to contest regular friendly matches against European opposition and enjoyed wins against Germany and France before losing to the Austrian \"Wunderteam\" and Italy in 1931.\nScotland, like the other Home Nations, did not enter the three FIFA World Cups held during the 1930s. This was because the four associations had been excluded from FIFA due to a disagreement regarding the status of amateur players. The four associations, including Scotland, returned to the FIFA fold after the Second World War. A match between a United Kingdom team and a \"Rest of the World\" team was played at Hampden Park in 1947 to celebrate this reconciliation.\n1950s: Entering the World Cup"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "940948f56e9c4f5297cb17f69935bd8b", "1_model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "1_prompt": "when did scotland last qualify for world cup", "1_output": [["when did scotland last qualify for world cup", "Scotland at the FIFA World Cup\n\nThe World Cup consists of two parts, the qualification phase and the final phase (officially called the World Cup Finals). The qualification phase, which currently take place over the three years preceding the Finals, is used to determine which teams qualify for the Finals. The current format of the Finals involves 32 teams competing at venues within the host nation (or nations) over a period of about a month. The World Cup Finals is the most widely viewed sporting event in the world, with an estimated 715.1 million people watching the 2006 tournament final.\nHistory\n1930s\nScotland did not compete in the first three World Cup competitions, in 1930, 1934 and 1938. Because of a dispute with FIFA over \"broken-time\" payments to players, the SFA, with the football associations of England, Ireland and Wales, withdrew from FIFA in 1928, and did not rejoin as a permanent member until 1946.\n1950s\nThe readmission of the Scottish Football Association to FIFA in 1946 meant that Scotland were now eligible to enter the 1950 FIFA World Cup. FIFA advised that places would be awarded to the top two teams in the 1949–50 British Home Championship, but the SFA announced that Scotland would attend the finals only if Scotland won the competition. Scotland won their first two matches, but a 1–0 home defeat by England meant that the Scots finished as runners-up. The SFA stood by this proclamation, despite pleas to the contrary by the Scotland players, supported by England captain Billy Wright and the other England players. Sportswriter Brian Glanville later described the SFA as showing \"baffling insularity and pique\" in their refusal to send a team to the World Cup."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}

data/retrieval_individual-b9229914-47bc-4da8-a21b-89329fff8207.jsonl

@@ -19,3 +19,7 @@
 {"tstamp": 1722305639.8104, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722305639.6393, "finish": 1722305639.8104, "ip": "", "conv_id": "0848dc0be9b94d688857e785d82e9f51", "model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "prompt": "How does the Brain Network Transformer leverage connection profiles and orthonormal clustering to analyze mental disorders?", "output": [["How does the Brain Network Transformer leverage connection profiles and orthonormal clustering to analyze mental disorders?", "Title: Noncompact, Gauge-Invariant Simulations of U(1), SU(2), and SU(3)\n\nAbstract: We have applied a new noncompact, gauge-invariant, Monte Carlo method to simulate the U(1), SU(2), and SU(3) gauge theories on 8^4 and 12^4 lattices. For U(1) the Creutz ratios of the Wilson loops agree with the exact results for beta > 0.5 after a renormalization of the charge. The SU(2) and SU(3) Creutz ratios robustly display quark confinement at beta = 0.5 and beta = 2, respectively. At much weaker coupling, the SU(2) and SU(3) Creutz ratios agree with perturbation theory after a renormalization of the coupling constant. For SU(3) without quarks, our lattice QCD parameter is Lambda_L = 130 +- 18$ MeV."]], "corpus": "arxiv"}
 {"tstamp": 1722305896.3763, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722305894.1942, "finish": 1722305896.3763, "ip": "", "conv_id": "ebb67aaa6367404fada798faa16238be", "model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "prompt": "can gravity waves travel faster than light?", "output": [["can gravity waves travel faster than light?", "Physics Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why can't the speed of gravitational waves be greater than the speed of light if the universe can expand faster than the speed of light? Since the expansion speed of the universe can be greater than the speed of light, why can't gravitational waves, which also uses space as the medium, travel faster than the speed of light?\n\nA: Gravitational waves are solutions to the linearized field equations\n$\\Box h_{\\mu \\nu} = 0,$\nwhere $\\Box$ is the d'Alembertian differential operator.\nThey are of the form\n\\begin{align}\nh_{\\mu \\nu}= \\text{Re}[H_{\\mu \\nu} e^{i k_{\\rho} x^{\\rho}}] , \n\\end{align}\nwhere $H_{\\mu \\nu}$ is just a complex symmetric matrix setting the polarization of the wave and $k_{\\rho}$ is its wave-vector.\nFor the above ansatz to satisfy the equations, we plug it into the equations to get the condition $k_{\\mu} k^{\\mu} =0$. This is just the statement that the wave-vector must be null, meaning the wave propagates at the speed of light.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1722305896.3763, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BM25", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722305894.1942, "finish": 1722305896.3763, "ip": "", "conv_id": "0594d3384acf4283a4656c03b325081a", "model_name": "BM25", "prompt": "can gravity waves travel faster than light?", "output": [["can gravity waves travel faster than light?", "Physics Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why can't fermions be affected by effective gravity in non-linear quantum electrodynamics? Quantum electrodynamics based upon Euler-Heisenberg or Born-Infeld Lagrangians predict photons\nto move according to an effective metric which is dependent on the background electromagnetic\nfield. In other words, photon trajectories are curved in presence of electromagnetic fields,\nmeaning that an effective gravity is acting upon. If part of fermion masses is allegedly of\nelectromagnetic origin, the question why their trajectories are not affected by this\neffective gravity naturally comes to mind.\n\nA: In the presence of a background electromagnetic field, electromagnetic fields travel along a deformed light cone which is smaller than the \"relativistic light cone\". However, charged fermions can still travel faster than electromagnetic waves as long as they are still slower than the \"relativistic speed of light\". They emit Cherenkov radiation while doing so. \n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722306330.1591, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722306329.8317, "finish": 1722306330.1591, "ip": "", "conv_id": "5993407c26d04c54981a49217a38518d", "model_name": "Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct", "prompt": "when did scotland last qualify for world cup", "output": [["when did scotland last qualify for world cup", "Scotland national football team\n\nScotland lost just two of their first 43 international matches. It was not until a 2–0 home defeat by Ireland in 1903 that Scotland lost a match to a team other than England. This run of success meant that Scotland would have regularly topped the Elo ratings, which were calculated in 1998, between 1876 and 1904. Scotland won the British Home Championship outright on 24 occasions, and shared the title 17 times with at least one other team. A noteworthy victory for Scotland before the Second World War was the 5–1 victory over England in 1928, which led to that Scotland side being known as the \"Wembley Wizards\". Scotland played their first match outside the British Isles in 1929, beating Norway 7–3 in Bergen. Scotland continued to contest regular friendly matches against European opposition and enjoyed wins against Germany and France before losing to the Austrian \"Wunderteam\" and Italy in 1931.\nScotland, like the other Home Nations, did not enter the three FIFA World Cups held during the 1930s. This was because the four associations had been excluded from FIFA due to a disagreement regarding the status of amateur players. The four associations, including Scotland, returned to the FIFA fold after the Second World War. A match between a United Kingdom team and a \"Rest of the World\" team was played at Hampden Park in 1947 to celebrate this reconciliation.\n1950s: Entering the World Cup"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1722306330.1591, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722306329.8317, "finish": 1722306330.1591, "ip": "", "conv_id": "940948f56e9c4f5297cb17f69935bd8b", "model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "prompt": "when did scotland last qualify for world cup", "output": [["when did scotland last qualify for world cup", "Scotland at the FIFA World Cup\n\nThe World Cup consists of two parts, the qualification phase and the final phase (officially called the World Cup Finals). The qualification phase, which currently take place over the three years preceding the Finals, is used to determine which teams qualify for the Finals. The current format of the Finals involves 32 teams competing at venues within the host nation (or nations) over a period of about a month. The World Cup Finals is the most widely viewed sporting event in the world, with an estimated 715.1 million people watching the 2006 tournament final.\nHistory\n1930s\nScotland did not compete in the first three World Cup competitions, in 1930, 1934 and 1938. Because of a dispute with FIFA over \"broken-time\" payments to players, the SFA, with the football associations of England, Ireland and Wales, withdrew from FIFA in 1928, and did not rejoin as a permanent member until 1946.\n1950s\nThe readmission of the Scottish Football Association to FIFA in 1946 meant that Scotland were now eligible to enter the 1950 FIFA World Cup. FIFA advised that places would be awarded to the top two teams in the 1949–50 British Home Championship, but the SFA announced that Scotland would attend the finals only if Scotland won the competition. Scotland won their first two matches, but a 1–0 home defeat by England meant that the Scots finished as runners-up. The SFA stood by this proclamation, despite pleas to the contrary by the Scotland players, supported by England captain Billy Wright and the other England players. Sportswriter Brian Glanville later described the SFA as showing \"baffling insularity and pique\" in their refusal to send a team to the World Cup."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1722306358.068, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "text-embedding-3-large", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722306357.4875, "finish": 1722306358.068, "ip": "", "conv_id": "be3fc968a3aa487ba8db65457d91fec3", "model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "prompt": "Methods for tracing dataset provenance and legal implications in AI training data  ", "output": [["Methods for tracing dataset provenance and legal implications in AI training data  ", "Title: The Data Provenance Initiative: A Large Scale Audit of Dataset Licensing & Attribution in AI\n\nAbstract: The race to train language models on vast, diverse, and inconsistently documented datasets has raised pressing concerns about the legal and ethical risks for practitioners. To remedy these practices threatening data transparency and understanding, we convene a multi-disciplinary effort between legal and machine learning experts to systematically audit and trace 1800+ text datasets. We develop tools and standards to trace the lineage of these datasets, from their source, creators, series of license conditions, properties, and subsequent use. Our landscape analysis highlights the sharp divides in composition and focus of commercially open vs closed datasets, with closed datasets monopolizing important categories: lower resource languages, more creative tasks, richer topic variety, newer and more synthetic training data. This points to a deepening divide in the types of data that are made available under different license conditions, and heightened implications for jurisdictional legal interpretations of copyright and fair use. We also observe frequent miscategorization of licenses on widely used dataset hosting sites, with license omission of 70%+ and error rates of 50%+. This points to a crisis in misattribution and informed use of the most popular datasets driving many recent breakthroughs. As a contribution to ongoing improvements in dataset transparency and responsible use, we release our entire audit, with an interactive UI, the Data Provenance Explorer, which allows practitioners to trace and filter on data provenance for the most popular open source finetuning data collections: www.dataprovenance.org."]], "corpus": "arxiv"}
+{"tstamp": 1722306358.068, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722306357.4875, "finish": 1722306358.068, "ip": "", "conv_id": "ff92d927e7a1440f91ca6ddae1fb40a5", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "Methods for tracing dataset provenance and legal implications in AI training data  ", "output": [["Methods for tracing dataset provenance and legal implications in AI training data  ", "Title: The Data Provenance Initiative: A Large Scale Audit of Dataset Licensing & Attribution in AI\n\nAbstract: The race to train language models on vast, diverse, and inconsistently documented datasets has raised pressing concerns about the legal and ethical risks for practitioners. To remedy these practices threatening data transparency and understanding, we convene a multi-disciplinary effort between legal and machine learning experts to systematically audit and trace 1800+ text datasets. We develop tools and standards to trace the lineage of these datasets, from their source, creators, series of license conditions, properties, and subsequent use. Our landscape analysis highlights the sharp divides in composition and focus of commercially open vs closed datasets, with closed datasets monopolizing important categories: lower resource languages, more creative tasks, richer topic variety, newer and more synthetic training data. This points to a deepening divide in the types of data that are made available under different license conditions, and heightened implications for jurisdictional legal interpretations of copyright and fair use. We also observe frequent miscategorization of licenses on widely used dataset hosting sites, with license omission of 70%+ and error rates of 50%+. This points to a crisis in misattribution and informed use of the most popular datasets driving many recent breakthroughs. As a contribution to ongoing improvements in dataset transparency and responsible use, we release our entire audit, with an interactive UI, the Data Provenance Explorer, which allows practitioners to trace and filter on data provenance for the most popular open source finetuning data collections: www.dataprovenance.org."]], "corpus": "arxiv"}