|
{: 1722382212.5551, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, __main__\__main__\main\main\__main__\execution\]], : , : , : , : , : [[, __main__\__main__\main\main\__main__\execution\]], : } |
|
{: 1722383029.5017, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, Computing Machinery and Intelligence\I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \ This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \.\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \, \, or \, regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "9826d760f4aa4601a6b6e28ee0718e0a", "1_model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Cognitive test\n\nCognitive tests are assessments of the cognitive capabilities of humans and other animals. Tests administered to humans include various forms of IQ tests; those administered to animals include the mirror test (a test of visual self-awareness) and the T maze test (which tests learning ability). Such testing is used in psychology and psychometrics, as well as other fields studying human and animal intelligence."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"} |
|
{"tstamp": 1722383038.1191, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "08467728adfa4952859812b86a5bde25", "0_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \ is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \ Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \, in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory0_corpuswikipedia1_conv_idb2f2ea5803034d63aade7af0b53f9abd1_model_nameintfloat/e5-mistral-7b-instruct1_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?1_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"} |
|
{"tstamp": 1722383048.95, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "e30f35b6625543768de718afe201bf93", "0_model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic).0_corpuswikipedia1_conv_id5529eeee46454644b30f06b837e29c601_model_namenomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.51_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?1_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Thought experiment\n\nRetrodiction The activity of retrodiction (or postdiction) involves moving backward in time, step-by-step, in as many stages as are considered necessary, from the present into the speculated past to establish the ultimate cause of a specific event (e.g., reverse engineering and forensics).\nGiven that retrodiction is a process in which \ and that diagnosis \, the essential balance between prediction and retrodiction could be characterized as:\nregardless of whether the prognosis is of the course of the disease in the absence of treatment, or of the application of a specific treatment regimen to a specific disorder in a particular patient.\nBackcasting\nThe activity of backcasting – the term backcasting was coined by John Robinson in 1982 – involves establishing the description of a very definite and very specific future situation. It then involves an imaginary moving backward in time, step-by-step, in as many stages as are considered necessary, from the future to the present to reveal the mechanism through which that particular specified future could be attained from the present.\nBackcasting is not concerned with predicting the future:\nAccording to Jansen (1994, p. 503:1_corpuswikipedia |
|
tstamptask_typeretrievaltyperightvotemodelsip0_conv_idf1e1c1a164ab4e08be9d2c84a89d9c110_model_namesentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v20_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?0_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?History of robots\n\nIt features a female humanoid automaton standing by a basin filled with water.When the user pulls the lever, the water drains and the female automaton refills the basin. Furthermore, he created a robotic musical band. According to Mark Rosheim, unlike Greek designs Arab automata worked with dramatic illusion and manipulated the human perception for practical application. The segmental gears described in The Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices, published by Al-Jazari shortly before his death in 1206, appeared 100 years later in the most advanced European clocks. Al-Jazari also published instructions on the construction of humanoid automata. The first water clocks modeled on Arabic designs were constructed in Europe about 1000 CE, possibly on the basis of the information that was transmitted during Muslim-Christian contact in Sicily and Spain. Among the first recorded European water clocks is that of Gerbert of Aurillac, built in 985 CE. Hero's works on automata were translated into Latin amid the 12th century Renaissance. The early 13th-century artist-engineer Villard de Honnecourt sketched plans for several automata. "]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "30a00be0d6db47acbf3bf576a6daaa1e", "1_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \ is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \ Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \, in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory1_corpuswikipedia |
|
tstamptask_typeretrievaltypeleftvotemodelsip0_conv_id788bb55918184e9fb40de9592241a0f20_model_nameBAAI/bge-large-en-v1.50_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?0_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "2441da71cdfb49ec93394c5f83165660", "1_model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "History of robots\n\nIt features a female humanoid automaton standing by a basin filled with water.When the user pulls the lever, the water drains and the female automaton refills the basin. Furthermore, he created a robotic musical band. According to Mark Rosheim, unlike Greek designs Arab automata worked with dramatic illusion and manipulated the human perception for practical application. The segmental gears described in The Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices, published by Al-Jazari shortly before his death in 1206, appeared 100 years later in the most advanced European clocks. Al-Jazari also published instructions on the construction of humanoid automata. The first water clocks modeled on Arabic designs were constructed in Europe about 1000 CE, possibly on the basis of the information that was transmitted during Muslim-Christian contact in Sicily and Spain. Among the first recorded European water clocks is that of Gerbert of Aurillac, built in 985 CE. Hero's works on automata were translated into Latin amid the 12th century Renaissance. The early 13th-century artist-engineer Villard de Honnecourt sketched plans for several automata. 1_corpuswikipedia |
|
tstamptask_typeretrievaltypetievotemodelsip0_conv_idbff0a5b148aa47feb0a7fd7851ca02b60_model_nameGritLM/GritLM-7B0_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?0_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \ while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \thinking\replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\imitation game\Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\machines can think\mind\understanding\consciousness\]], : , : , : , : , : [[, Computing Machinery and Intelligence\I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \ This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \.\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \, \, or \, regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"} |
|
{"tstamp": 1722383079.616, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "13109613431c4387a6ba2e7bd4439ba1", "0_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \ is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \ Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \, in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory0_corpuswikipedia1_conv_id8782d3f479ad475f9000a6c1ffa5c8f81_model_nameGritLM/GritLM-7B1_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?1_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \ while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \thinking\replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\imitation game\Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\machines can think\mind\understanding\consciousness\]], : } |
|
{: 1722383088.2854, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, ]], : , : , : , : , : [[, nearly equal to human performance\]], : } |
|
{: 1722383105.5172, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, Computing Machinery and Intelligence\I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \ This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \.\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \, \, or \, regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "0e6ebdeb40c647999f90d12a729373a0", "1_model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \ is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \ Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \, in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory1_corpuswikipedia |
|
tstamptask_typeretrievaltypetievotemodelsip0_conv_id1afcc4f253384375a3497f1799740a550_model_namevoyage-multilingual-20_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?0_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \ while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \thinking\replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\imitation game\Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\machines can think\mind\understanding\consciousness\]], : , : , : , : , : [[, Computing Machinery and Intelligence\I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \ This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \.\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \, \, or \, regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"} |
|
{"tstamp": 1722383122.4956, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "462d69e7a1bd4b4690a1415b58f3c024", "0_model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Cognitive test\n\nCognitive tests are assessments of the cognitive capabilities of humans and other animals. Tests administered to humans include various forms of IQ tests; those administered to animals include the mirror test (a test of visual self-awareness) and the T maze test (which tests learning ability). Such testing is used in psychology and psychometrics, as well as other fields studying human and animal intelligence."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "2e89c53c720e453d9aa8ea0be8d3a9be", "1_model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \ is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \ Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \, in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory1_corpuswikipedia |
|
tstamptask_typeretrievaltypetievotemodelsip0_conv_idf59e5bae7b3a40ffb9512d8a3f87205e0_model_nameGritLM/GritLM-7B0_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?0_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \ while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \thinking\replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\imitation game\Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\machines can think\mind\understanding\consciousness\]], : , : , : , : , : [[, Computing Machinery and Intelligence\I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \ This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \.\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \, \, or \, regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"} |
|
{"tstamp": 1722383143.97, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "675122822ca94a10938a937b9c7ef71c", "0_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \ is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \ Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \, in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory0_corpuswikipedia1_conv_id50be6cc0d8344d38bc7a6ddc3aa56d371_model_nametext-embedding-0041_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?1_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"} |
|
{"tstamp": 1722383154.8847, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "c813550e8ae045a8b3d32f00751be689", "0_model_name": "intfloat/e5-mistral-7b-instruct", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic).0_corpuswikipedia1_conv_id5f54cc7f0d3e482f9bafa85e281fdac11_model_namejinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en1_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?1_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Cognitive test\n\nCognitive tests are assessments of the cognitive capabilities of humans and other animals. Tests administered to humans include various forms of IQ tests; those administered to animals include the mirror test (a test of visual self-awareness) and the T maze test (which tests learning ability). Such testing is used in psychology and psychometrics, as well as other fields studying human and animal intelligence.1_corpuswikipedia |
|
tstamptask_typeretrievaltyperightvotemodelsip0_conv_id5c1461c05577427daa977ecf865285800_model_namesentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v20_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?0_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?History of robots\n\nIt features a female humanoid automaton standing by a basin filled with water.When the user pulls the lever, the water drains and the female automaton refills the basin. Furthermore, he created a robotic musical band. According to Mark Rosheim, unlike Greek designs Arab automata worked with dramatic illusion and manipulated the human perception for practical application. The segmental gears described in The Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices, published by Al-Jazari shortly before his death in 1206, appeared 100 years later in the most advanced European clocks. Al-Jazari also published instructions on the construction of humanoid automata. The first water clocks modeled on Arabic designs were constructed in Europe about 1000 CE, possibly on the basis of the information that was transmitted during Muslim-Christian contact in Sicily and Spain. Among the first recorded European water clocks is that of Gerbert of Aurillac, built in 985 CE. Hero's works on automata were translated into Latin amid the 12th century Renaissance. The early 13th-century artist-engineer Villard de Honnecourt sketched plans for several automata. "]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "307bbc5403b74fa6b3584ec804a64e43", "1_model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \ is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \ Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \, in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory1_corpuswikipedia |
|
tstamptask_typeretrievaltyperightvotemodelsip0_conv_id055cf8ef2477453c9bbc185d2473ad100_model_nameBM250_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?0_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Artificial intelligence\n\nIn the late teens and early 2020s, AGI companies began to deliver programs that created enormous interest. In 2015, AlphaGo, developed by DeepMind, beat the world champion Go player. The program was taught only the rules of the game and developed strategy by itself. GPT-3 is a large language model that was released in 2020 by OpenAI and is capable of generating high-quality human-like text. These programs, and others, inspired an aggressive AI boom, where large companies began investing billions in AI research. According to AI Impacts, about $50 billion annually was invested in \ around 2022 in the U.S. alone and about 20% of the new U.S. Computer Science PhD graduates have specialized in \.\nAbout 800,000 \-related U.S. job openings existed in 2022.\nPhilosophy\nDefining artificial intelligence\nAlan Turing wrote in 1950 \ He advised changing the question from whether a machine \, to \. He devised the Turing test, which measures the ability of a machine to simulate human conversation. Since we can only observe the behavior of the machine, it does not matter if it is \ thinking or literally has a \. Turing notes that we can not determine these things about other people but \0_corpuswikipedia1_conv_id2038ffbb4252425faf75d979468b058e1_model_namemixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v11_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?1_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Progress in artificial intelligence\n\nSub-human Optical character recognition for printed text (nearing par-human for Latin-script typewritten text)\nObject recognition\nVarious robotics tasks that may require advances in robot hardware as well as AI, including:\nStable bipedal locomotion: Bipedal robots can walk, but are less stable than human walkers (as of 2017)\nHumanoid soccer\nSpeech recognition: \ (2017)\nExplainability. Current medical systems can diagnose certain medical conditions well, but cannot explain to users why they made the diagnosis.\nMany tests of fluid intelligence (2020)\nBongard visual cognition problems, such as the Bongard-LOGO benchmark (2020)\nVisual Commonsense Reasoning (VCR) benchmark (as of 2020)\nStock market prediction: Financial data collection and processing using Machine Learning algorithms\nAngry Birds video game, as of 2020\nVarious tasks that are difficult to solve without contextual knowledge, including:\nTranslation\nWord-sense disambiguation\nProposed tests of artificial intelligence\nIn his famous Turing test, Alan Turing picked language, the defining feature of human beings, for its basis. The Turing test is now considered too exploitable to be a meaningful benchmark.\nThe Feigenbaum test, proposed by the inventor of expert systems, tests a machine's knowledge and expertise about a specific subject. A paper by Jim Gray of Microsoft in 2003 suggested extending the Turing test to speech understanding, speaking and recognizing objects and behavior."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"} |
|
{"tstamp": 1722383185.3092, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "53b5e1c83c204c3abc5aa4bed8b85c8a", "0_model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Thought experiment\n\nRetrodiction The activity of retrodiction (or postdiction) involves moving backward in time, step-by-step, in as many stages as are considered necessary, from the present into the speculated past to establish the ultimate cause of a specific event (e.g., reverse engineering and forensics).\nGiven that retrodiction is a process in which \"past observations, events, add and data are used as evidence to infer the process(es) that produced them\" and that diagnosis \"involve[s] going from visible effects such as symptoms, signs and the like to their prior causes\", the essential balance between prediction and retrodiction could be characterized as:\nregardless of whether the prognosis is of the course of the disease in the absence of treatment, or of the application of a specific treatment regimen to a specific disorder in a particular patient.\nBackcasting\nThe activity of backcasting – the term backcasting was coined by John Robinson in 1982 – involves establishing the description of a very definite and very specific future situation. It then involves an imaginary moving backward in time, step-by-step, in as many stages as are considered necessary, from the future to the present to reveal the mechanism through which that particular specified future could be attained from the present.\nBackcasting is not concerned with predicting the future:\nAccording to Jansen (1994, p. 503:"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "2976fb81ca6e486197ef280859c0ee67", "1_model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \ is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \ Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \, in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory1_corpuswikipedia |
|
tstamptask_typeretrievaltypetievotemodelsip0_conv_idb46c20808cdb4c899d0052c189fe4f370_model_nameembed-english-v3.00_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?0_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \ while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \thinking\replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\imitation game\Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\machines can think\mind\understanding\consciousness\]], : , : , : , : , : [[, strong AI hypothesis\strong AI\can machines think?\]], : } |
|
{: 1722383205.5485, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, ]], : , : , : , : , : [[, strong AI hypothesis\strong AI\can machines think?\]], : } |
|
{: 1722383220.9202, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, past observations, events, add and data are used as evidence to infer the process(es) that produced them\involve[s] going from visible effects such as symptoms, signs and the like to their prior causes\]], : , : , : , : , : [[, Computing Machinery and Intelligence\I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \ This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \.\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \, \, or \, regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"} |
|
{"tstamp": 1722383228.7291, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "d0c2bbc549044d0f96953e7e6b6fe99a", "0_model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \ is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \ Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \, in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory0_corpuswikipedia1_conv_id34cd4fa6ec0f469090cc9e0c62df64b81_model_nameBAAI/bge-large-en-v1.51_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?1_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"} |
|
{"tstamp": 1722383236.588, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "e7ace3aa2a514e1fb18265dbeb385c4c", "0_model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic).0_corpuswikipedia1_conv_idf4c0338fd74c439cb674aece8875cf8c1_model_namesentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v21_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?1_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?History of robots\n\nIt features a female humanoid automaton standing by a basin filled with water.When the user pulls the lever, the water drains and the female automaton refills the basin. Furthermore, he created a robotic musical band. According to Mark Rosheim, unlike Greek designs Arab automata worked with dramatic illusion and manipulated the human perception for practical application. The segmental gears described in The Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices, published by Al-Jazari shortly before his death in 1206, appeared 100 years later in the most advanced European clocks. Al-Jazari also published instructions on the construction of humanoid automata. The first water clocks modeled on Arabic designs were constructed in Europe about 1000 CE, possibly on the basis of the information that was transmitted during Muslim-Christian contact in Sicily and Spain. Among the first recorded European water clocks is that of Gerbert of Aurillac, built in 985 CE. Hero's works on automata were translated into Latin amid the 12th century Renaissance. The early 13th-century artist-engineer Villard de Honnecourt sketched plans for several automata. "]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"} |
|
{"tstamp": 1722383247.863, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "a50b91eb67e4454cb34123819ab2334f", "0_model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \ is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \ Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \, in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory0_corpuswikipedia1_conv_iddcfc68f4723b4003b74e01c4fc9148041_model_nameAlibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct1_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?1_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Chinese room\n\nSearle does not disagree that AI research can create machines that are capable of highly intelligent behavior. The Chinese room argument leaves open the possibility that a digital machine could be built that acts more intelligently than a person, but does not have a mind or intentionality in the same way that brains do.\nSearle's \"strong AI hypothesis\" should not be confused with \"strong AI\" as defined by Ray Kurzweil and other futurists, who use the term to describe machine intelligence that rivals or exceeds human intelligence -- that is, artificial general intelligence, human level AI or superintelligence. Kurzweil is referring primarily to the amount of intelligence displayed by the machine, whereas Searle's argument sets no limit on this. Searle argues that a superintelligent machine would not necessarily have a mind and consciousness.\nTuring test\nThe Chinese room implements a version of the Turing test. Alan Turing introduced the test in 1950 to help answer the question \ In the standard version, a human judge engages in a natural language conversation with a human and a machine designed to generate performance indistinguishable from that of a human being. All participants are separated from one another. If the judge cannot reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine is said to have passed the test.1_corpuswikipedia |
|
tstamptask_typeretrievaltypeleftvotemodelsip0_conv_idde85d02935494deaacb803069c1294820_model_nameintfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct0_promptWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?0_outputWhich test was devised to determine whether robots can think?Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \ while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \thinking\replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\imitation game\Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\machines can think\mind\understanding\consciousness\]], : , : , : , : , : [[, ]], : } |
|
{: 1722383265.0457, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, AI\AI\AI\I propose to consider the question 'can machines think'?\thinks\whether or not it is possible for machinery to show intelligent behaviour\actually\mind\it is usual to have a polite convention that everyone thinks.\]], : , : , : , : , : [[, ]], : } |
|
{: 1722383278.1255, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, nearly equal to human performance\]], : , : , : , : , : [[, AI\AI\AI\I propose to consider the question 'can machines think'?\thinks\whether or not it is possible for machinery to show intelligent behaviour\actually\mind\it is usual to have a polite convention that everyone thinks.\]], : } |
|
{: 1722383289.9503, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, AI\AI\AI\I propose to consider the question 'can machines think'?\thinks\whether or not it is possible for machinery to show intelligent behaviour\actually\mind\it is usual to have a polite convention that everyone thinks.\]], : , : , : , : , : [[, ]], : } |
|
{: 1722383299.3142, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, ]], : , : , : , : , : [[, nearly equal to human performance\]], : } |
|
{: 1722383949.909, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, ]], : , : , : , : , : [[, AI\AI\AI\I propose to consider the question 'can machines think'?\thinks\whether or not it is possible for machinery to show intelligent behaviour\actually\mind\it is usual to have a polite convention that everyone thinks.\]], : } |
|
{: 1722385287.1562, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, ]], : , : , : , : , : [[, What is the meaning of life?\Why are we here?\What is the purpose of existence?\how\What is the meaning of my life?\]], : } |
|
{: 1722385900.9648, : , : , : [, ], : , : , : , : , : [[, ]], : , : , : , : , : [[, advertise\In a recent paper, T. Lehrer introduced the concept of left-bifurcled rectangles. He conjectured no such rectangles exist when the number of bifurcles $n$ is odd.\In this paper we show the existence of left-bifurcled rectangles for all prime $n$.\Our methods involve analytic and algebraic topology of locally euclidean metrizations of infinitely differentiable Riemannian manifolds\]], : } |
|
|
