Diskuse:Nord Stream

message: Nord je německy, Stream je anglicky. Proč ta kombinace?
replies: text: Protože je to název plynovodu a tedy i zdejších interwiki . --Kacir 10. 4. 2010, 16:03 (UTC)
replies: text: :Tedy, proc zvolili soudruzi v Moskve a v Berline tento nazev?
replies: text: ::Jak to máme vědět, zkuste jim brnknout a pozeptat se jich. --MiroslavJosef 10. 4. 2010, 16:17 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Ja myslel, jestli to nekdo vi (asi o tom budou nekde clanky), tak to sem dejte. Viz 1. prispevek.
replies: text: ::::Také mne to oficiální jméno plynovodu, opravdu je to Nord Stream, velmi udivilo. Mělo to být samozřejmě North Stream, kdyby se postupovalo jazykově správně. Ale tak tomu nebylo. Nový plánovaný plynovod na jihu Evropy se ale bude jmenovat South Stream, a ne německo-anglicky Süd Stream. --Zbrnajsem (diskuse) 18. 3. 2014, 18:47 (UTC)
thread_title:  Německo-anglický název 

message: --MiroslavJosef 10. 4. 2010, 16:20 (UTC)
thread_title: Editujte s odvahou

message: A je již v provozu. V článku se o něm píše v budoucím tvaru a chybí informace, že už funguje.
replies: text: Dokončený je Nord Stream 1, ten dávno funguje. Nord Stream 2 se staví, položeno je už více než 300 km potrubí. Tento článek je v zoufalém stavu. --Zbrnajsem (diskuse) 26. 12. 2018, 15:31 (CET)
thread_title:  Plynovod Nord Stream 1 je dokončený 

message: Mapy jsou beznadejne zastaraly, SouthStream je hotov a vede do Turecka, ne do Bulharska ; 62.197.243.52 13. 11. 2019, 17:57 (CET)
replies: text: Jenže do Turecka nevede pod Černým mořem South Stream, ale Turk Stream. Plynovod do Bulharska nebyl v Bruselu povolen. --Zbrnajsem (diskuse) 17. 1. 2022, 17:45 (CET)
thread_title:  Mapy 

message: GND 7863533-0 is only for Nord Stream 1. Maybe split the article? See https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21644350 - several separated pages in Wikipedias, Wikiquote, Wikinews and Commons. 77.183.196.46 17. 1. 2022, 14:57 (CET)
replies: text: Yes, you are right in principle. However, it´s a question of time and capacities. This is a very difficult topic, and above all a very tricky one. Maybe I´ll do it. --Zbrnajsem (diskuse) 17. 1. 2022, 17:17 (CET)

text: As far as I can see now, only Russian version of Wikipedia has a separate article on Nord Stream 2. This does´nt make the creation of a separate article in Czech easier. --Zbrnajsem (diskuse) 17. 1. 2022, 17:45 (CET)
replies: text: : Dekuju. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21644350 Bulgarian, Ukrainian, Estonian also have separate articles. The French version has one, but most of the article consists of a big section for NS2. In the English version all section have subsections for NS2 and NS2, splitting was rejected because of overlap, but there is almost no overlap, one is that the companies reside in the same building in Switzerland and that the management is the same. But this less than 0.5% of the text.

text: : Several other Wikipedias have only one article and the article has no information about NS2 (e.g. Turkish, Serbo-Croatian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Norwegian, Indonesian). Some have very little information about NS1 hidden somewhere in the article, e.g. Polish.

text: : Czech Wikipedia already has two sections, one for NS1, one for NS1. Czech could better show how advanced it is in coverage of NS2 by creating an separate article and create interwiki links to the other Wikipedias that have a separate article.

text: : There are a lot of discussions and news related to Nord Stream 2, but readers of Wikipedia often find the information mixed, hidden, or it doesn't exist.

text: : Sorry, I cannot write in Czech and not help much with the text. But I improved the English article and Commons and hope the smaller Wikipedias can benefit from that. 77.183.196.46 17. 1. 2022, 19:51 (CET)
replies: text: :: Meanwhile I have read your contributions regarding Nord Stream 2 on English Wikipedia. They are quite substantial. --Zbrnajsem (diskuse) 18. 1. 2022, 18:23 (CET)
replies: text: :::You can also look at dewiki, I try to make it all more consistent and have text in the correct sections of NS1 / NS2. But dewiki has a tendency to large articles so I don't ask for a split there. The downside is, that articles sometimes miss details. The NS2 section is more about politics than technical aspects, not even a map is there for NS2. 77.13.161.146 18. 1. 2022, 20:45 (CET)
thread_title:  Autoritní data - error - seperate articles for NS2