Police.
The Times, 1824-10-01T00:00:00

MAfmfe5o2eHousr.-On Tuesday night las, the pr f OlJlr. Whitaker, of 'Walbrook. were entered by robbiis, Ther visithin. a door or two of the premises ass empty hiouse, into which the tbieveg contrived to obtain an entrance. At night eh4 got to dite top of this house, broke througif the riky4light, and entered Into Air. Whi- taker'si house from the roof, knowing tha"t it was not inhabited, and that there was conitblarbe property the-re. .!They had wifth them a prodigious sledge-hamnmer, a number of pik-lock keys, a plhospho- rus bos, a jemmi'. and other articles Lised in breaking open housem. In their proceedi&~g Iln the house, they, usee tegreatest caution-4 but notwithstading a-Ll their clevernes, some suspicion wale entertained recive iteligece but they had previously decaumped with somne trilin aricls. he ffier nteed hepremises at the window at. whih te gng ad ateed,andfoud ine of cheir tools in each roomas h desende. Thy he knoked an iron trunk to piecer, witha sldgehammr, ad bd usd, wilebrea-king it opeo, on old costbetwen he istrmentandthe run, to smother the noise., In their hufrry they mnissed cousideabeproperty. The beadle conjectured thiat some otoo of the prywud look in in the morn- ing to see hoir mnatters were, it ben th patce of thieves to allot separate duties to each other on Huhocsin. e waited sin.. ti1 six o'clock behiind the ball door, ready to poutnce upon the first person who should enter, It would appear thlat he was amibitiouts of the zlory of capturing the whole gang himself, but it vwis, per- hLaps, fortuniate that the men who were reputed to have been engaged in Ihe affair, did not capture hims oni the premises, as he would', if itC were Tsot destined to he his last exploit, have had occasion so repent his temlerity in thie event of a confliict. WV hether or not disappoint. mer,t miade himn precipitate, we cannot say, but insitead Of waiting, until somebody- attempted to enter, lie fancied that ito enltrance was ontmpltedat the moment, and opiened tje door. Tbcre itias nopaso t thedoor, but on the opposite' aide of the street he %aw a mlan, whose face hie thouzht he knew. fle ran to him end accused hima of being in the neighbourhood for the purpose of rommitting -a robbccv. "Wh'lat, I ?" said he; No, I am a gentleman, andl re- side iin Old-street," As there was no other ground for supposing that the man was a persan of the description sus-pected, the beadle did not take him into custody. When, however, the circumstances, wiere. mentionied to the potice it was. thoughit necesary to appreehend Frederick- Turnlcy, brother to the notorious Turniley whose name itss so often been be'fore the pt;blic. Turnley deniedl any knowledge of the robbery, and "Ai thiat hie wa-s going to his work at the timne he was sipok-en to by the beadle. The L,ouD M,YoR. didi not think himeelf warranted in desaining the prisoner, as there was nothing to induce a susipicion that his ob- ject was to rob the house. A mechanic apulied to the Loan MfAYOR for his adivic-e is a vers' extraordinaryr antI lamientable case. Relhad, be staid, a wife anti chiildren, and fromn 30 to 40 shillings a week to support themn. One would think this sum adequate to keep the farmily comfartably, but, strange as it mAight appear, although they lived in tn' serable lodgings, and he gare thirty shilliings to his wife every Saturday night, the food anid drinik were of the very meanest sort, and not one of them had a bit at covering on the body except what they earxie about theni, (The poor man's dress confirmed in a great mneasure thiis Sc- count of his misfortusiesi; his clothes were ragged and filthy. TO whiat to attribute thist state of things he did not know. He had watched his wife, and hie had never steen any syvmptoms of introica- tion aboLut her. He had never seen sLny followers after her. Shie was as bare of clothes as he and the children, and seemed isoable herself to give a solution to the extraordinary enigm-a of the ,oassn-f aion of lenty of nmsney and no comfort. The hO an MAYOR asked- tile applicant wl;ether he bail obs-erved that hist wife's attentions were directed to anY p-tsrtisflar objlect ? The man repl ied in the negative. He had never observed her at- tend to an v particular thingr. The L6anz MAYOR saidl he feared not, and dust the poor 'Man would find that his wvife's vice was laciness, from which, if hpe could not redeem) her, nothing but misfortune would spring. The poor mran seemed, for the first time, to open, his eyes. After a little hesitation he said, "1 Blesw me, I believe your Lourdship is righit. Sure enongt, wh never any thingz watit.S a stitch, it must go to the tailor, instew f Wher' using the needle." Thte boRts MAYOR hoped the hint would not be thrown away upon the applicant, who went away determined to snake hi& wrife join in thie labour, and prevent the whole famnily from going tw aL workhouise. GUItsLDiSALL.-A smart dandy-dressed young fellow, apparently about lii, named Charles, Oeorge Poeter, was brought up yestcrday before Mr. Alderman WiOOD, thie sitting'Magistrate, upon it charge of felony.v Thie pAisoaer. it appeared, was an apprentice to M'lr. Smithr, 4&~ King-utreet, Snowhili, usanufacturer Of pocket-books, anyd Other articles in ornamented leather, and had latterly fancied himself a fine gentlemian, and got connected with a teet of amateur performers ia somle private theatricals, wv)ich withdre-w his mind altoget-her tram busines's-kept himi outt all hoeLrs of the night, till antlenigth he ab- sented hims.elf entirely fiona his master's house. He had, ho'wever, returned about three weeks ago, and upon his promise of amend- ment, Mlr. Smnith lhad conseuted thiat he should serve our the re- maLinder of histimie. Amnildst aUhis irregul.Iarideties osus;picionh-nst heretofore attached as to his honesty; bUt On Wednesday afternoon, one of Alr. Stniths's men, who receives work out to gild, brought homne a sm-all card.eate, such a-s are Used for cards of adtdres, with an elegantly gilt horsier tO it, which he delivered as usual at the couniter. Pritchard, the foremtan, knowing that he had given out no suchi article to be gilt, took it up into the manullictnry toracquire, bat nobody, knew snything at all about it. Some oae, however, accident- ally opened it, when it was foundl full ofcards,with the namne "Ir.C. G3. Fo-ster" engraved upon thiem in the fashionubtie old Eo1clish chat. racters; anti it sunbsequently turned o,ut that the prisoner had sent it to he git ith ilirections that it shouldi be returned to him pemnoii -lv: " twie grilder, being a little deaf, had not heard lthe latter part of hi s instructions, and had delivered the card-case, when finished, at the counter, in the usual manner in which he returned all the work sent to, bin, to i.e gilt. The confusted and contradictory accounts Foster gsa'e tif the manner in which he became posstessed of it, all proving failse, Mr. Smith gave himr in custody on the charge of stealing it, and now stated, that thouKh it might seem Itarsi to pro- seCUte for an artiCle OfsO trifling a value, he had been so repeatedly rubibed b y Ilis servants, rthat it was absolutely necessary to imate an examnple, and he had, therefore, determined to pursue the case ofthe prisoner. Mr.Aidermau Woon oh3servedt,that thoughthere could be buttlittIle doubt that the prrisotier had comtmitted the offence, hie feared, from the multiplicity of' articles of' thzat descripton inanufactured in their shiop, it would be scarcely possible that they could identify, this indi- viduial one. AMr. Smitb said lits rhould be able to prove that it was Ihasproperty. Tite tnan who manufactured it would siwear to the nmake. But. said MVr. Alderman WVOon, can any body venture tO swear tltat voa have nev'er sold a card-case ofthis de-scription? Mr. SmiEh.-Yes, thie foreman could swear it, Mfr. Alderman Woon.-Then I think he tmust be a bold suan. But we -shall hear. Pritchard was then called, and identified,the card-ense as hiis nmater's ptoperty ; more I.aiticularly by a peculiartiy in the lining of it. Mr. Alderman WOOD.-YOU manufacture a great mnany card- cases of this description? Pritchard.-Oi yes, Sir; many thousands. Mr. Alderasan Moon.-Then can your swear that you have niever sold any precisely thte Same as this ? Pihicitard said thev' tiad not had a large q9untity exactly of this sort, and very few of them had been sold.1 e thiought slot rore titan two or three. Alr. Alderinas WVOOD.-Then how is it possible for any, body to swear thaLt this identical onie has not been sold by you ? I dare say the prisoner is a bad younig miat,, and most probably, committedJ thetheft; but thiere is no such proof as would indarce a jury, in: my opinion, to convict him; and!I malce it a principle never to cammit as prisoner for trial, who I think waould be acquitted by a jury. I ne- ver do it, and I believe I have niever committed a sinigle prit;oner who was not subsequently fouind guilty by a jury of his country- I relydo niot think, in this case, with the preseist evidence, thaLt the =rti Jury would find the bill. Mr. Smiuhtl.-Bat you will not hear the evidence. The foreman. only attendE to the menufactory, atid k-nows nothing about the sales. I have a witness who cani swear that there never was any oa theSe card-cases sold. Mr. Alderman WVOODs-W1ell, if you persist, it is my duty to hear him. Air. Josiah Smith the prosecutorr's nephew, wras then called, and said he conducted al the Sales. Their business was principall,1y ini the wholessale, and mostly for the country. They did Sell by retail but very, seldem. This sort of card-case wras got up in a different style frann others, and there bad never been one of them soid. Rie sup- posedl there might be from four to six dozen of them made. Mr. Alderman WoOn-How can you swear that none of this n iumber has'e been sold ? IWittsess.-l speak from my recollection. They could noth~ ave been sold without isiy know-ledge, and from she books in which T enter everv thing sold. I examined them this morning, and Ihusve sio entry 6c the salt of any of them. Air. Aldermarn Woo rs-And you wouldl go to the Old Btiley, and swear before a j ury, that no one of these six dozen card-cases had been sold ? Witness.-I shoutld have no hesitation to dle so. Air. Aldiermian WooDs.-Well, I would have you examine snore miinutelyv through your books, and also ascertain carefully whether. any of these articles are missing out of the number you rmaziufac- tured, and caffte again ta-morrow ; for on the evidence you now give I shall feel it mny duty to remnand the prisoner. It does see-n to mue difficult to swvear 1IoD,tively under circumnstances of this sort. , I re- mermber a case of a timilar natuire, where positive testimony of this kind was given, in which the jury could not be brought to beliere thaat somne out 'of a number of articles of the santc ledmight n3ot. have been told, and acquitted the prLsoner. BOW-ST FrTtt'.-Yestetrday Henry &Sefortle, the toll-eollector at the Queen's Elmss tuirnpike-gase, on the kensington trus4t, appeared uPon sumiortns, to answer to an inft,rmation exhibited agis- hmb Air.Williara Cobbett, jun., for having, on the 14th of0Octber. MA23 taken l4d. more far the toll of a one-horse cart than by law aLilowed. Alir. Cobbeitt when he exhibited ethe information a'few days% ago, in order to procaine a summons, stated, by way of uccounthig-eor bo long a delaLy, that when his father same mnths since detected and pu- nished 'the abusies which keAd so Iong extistetd on the Kenrington trust,it wasuntlerstood thatthe les%sees wsouldrefundahllthemoney that they hadfeen wrongfullytakingforaolosgaperiod frnadass of poor hardworking men; but not a single farthing had bcen refunded, and he was therefote determined to proceed for penalties in all the case he could get hold of, however long the lapse of time sinUC the effences were committed. Yesterday, when the case was called on, Mr. Cobbett was corn- usending a speech to the Alagistrates, when Ztlr. Williame, the s.i citor for the defence, said that the c-ase was very plain and simple and required no illixatration, and he must object to the introduction of any extraneous matter, 1Mr. Willinms then took several objections in l'snincto the in- formation. The principal one was, that the infrmation ought to 'have been exhibited vithin three months from the time of the coin. mission of the alleged offenc The act of Parliament utnder which this complaint waas preferred, gave s in div l, upoa whmrn exac- tionhSad been practised, the power of proceeding by acion .aSnst the trusteea for the recivcry of the ptadies ot 2. aund upawardt pwovia1ed priceedings be cotxsrtnened witAin three ynoisttbs fromn the tittit of the off neet; andl the samnc clzuse then w-ent ont to pTOVide for the recovery of minor penalties againist the toll-collectors by infor- amnitiots before a IMagistrate, but without again mentioning anyering asi to the Thojit of tim~e. Dir. WVIinias cetendea that, altoughi no -period Of time wvas expressly mnentioned, it must have been the Inten-. linof!the Legislature to fix the same limnit for the exhibiting of in- formations as for the recovery of penalties by action. The iMagistrate overruled this and other objections, ana Mr. W'iliams then said he hiad others in reserve, but he shoutld urge them in another ~lac6 -in caise a convietion took place. The iMa- Sistrate pressed himi to advance his objections now, but Air. Wil- liams9 declined. He had, hiowever, the autthorityr of Illr. Cobbett, s-en., in support bf his argument as to the lim it ofrtime;I for AMr. Uob- bete, in an articlei in his Regisler-, containing an account of some farmer proceedings, distinctly' stated that the time for recovering Penialties before Magistrates was three mronthb. Mr. Cobbett then calledl Thomas Poynter, Who swVore that he on the 41h of October, List yeait, paicl the defendanit 4.Jd. for the toll of a -single hiorse care. The M)Iagi-trate upon thiis proof convictedA the dlefendant in the pe- 'nalty of 51. and costs, andi i'r. Williams gave nntice of appeal. 1M Ir. Cobbett satid he hiad otlier cases, whiich he should bring7 forivari, and lie had no douibt thatt hie should successfully defend. tile appeal given Oiotiee of. 1MAOtYLT.xio-nr_ors'tcs.-An application was made to Messrs. GIRTFFITTit and RAWLr.eresOtO, by the nflicers of 3larylcbone, for the rermoval of an elderly, tfemale aind hier son, whio hiad become c1hargeible undler the following curiouts anid novel cirri:vnstnilces : It appeared the monther hia'l resided for some time in the parishl of MtaTyleboric, but had a son, who had attained thie a ce of 32 vears, Nyl)was maintained by, her in an asyluim for luinatics dlown in Hfere- fordshire. This son haed obtained nio settlement in hiis own right, and the mother, fron,i a reverse of CiTCrumstances, became inatble to pay withouit astisitance the eg-penqes of his mainitenancee, andl conse- etuently applied to the parish. flavinig in this mianner becontechiarge. able thecparish appliedi to have her ,and hier son removedi, contend. ing that as hie had. gained no settlement in hiis ojwn rigit, he wvas bound to follow thatr of his innttiter. The Mlagistratest said they thoughit the caste at novel one, and in. Taircd whietiser the parishi culdI cite any precedents to thie pointc. Mr. WVhieittirgton mentioned a decision by Lord Kenyon. The i'tlae-istrateA observed, that in the casia alluded to the son was aL miner, which was not the ease in the present instance., After tak- ing tituse to consider, thie ma,ri,trates agreed teo sign the order of re- mnoval, w.hich at the same time they observed mnust he regaedect asq an experimieur. as thecy knew of' no case analogous to thiat noig broxught before them. The novelty in the prescnt case is, that the son, is of that age in whiich in ordinary eases the parents are not liable for his sttp- port, and the.q-tirestion was, how iar the fact of hiis being in a state of idiotov affertetl this general law. Trhe remyoyal was made to St. James's. Pall-mall, by whorn, we understand, it will be contestetil. Aln instanec of the fQllowineg ingenloits andt somiewhat novel niode of gettings rid of an unwelcome tenant was brought, under the itotice of the M~agistrates if this office. The complainant stated, that site oc-cupied an gapsrtinent at the hiouse of M1r. JIjcks'er, suirgeon, of' North-street, anti on attemp~ting to ligltt the fire that miorning, slite ,was astonishedi to hand that it did tinot draw. In a few1 n,inittea the1 room was full of smoke, nod she was conStrained to rUn oult of it to avoid being suffoentedi. On gettinig otitside tehue Elie disceovered the mischief to arise froim a patn hiavige 'purposely put over the top of the chiimney. In the ma ie the smoke k-ept issuincg frohi the window, ajid tile street i olr quence Was in commotion, under the idea that tile hiousewso fire. In adldition to this annoyance, it wa copandta r okyer bad beet) guiilty of an a'Ssault tiponlhrtepeeigeeig Mlr. Lu;ckyer admittedI having stope tecinyalgngas a reason shec was troublesome, antd hewtdtoetitofhr The assault he denied. Mr. RANVIAwNNM toldi himi his conduct teat wrong, and on liis pTomiging to remove tite obstruction firotai the chiimney, and the othier party, agreeing to leave the letigings next Mondany, the warrant was allo-wed to qta,nd over for the p~resent. George Jones wvas chtarged oith robtbing hiis ready fuirnished lodg- iogs of a variety of articles. .Btickeridge. of this office, siated that he too], himn into custodv at A- miserable hovel at Kinsel,,grecti, bailing, antI that the condfition of the place bore witness of lthe moit abject and utter distress. The i-nan, wife, enid child, were lying on the floor, andI were apparently withouit suistenance or the mearis of'procuiring iL It appeared he hadl renreived from tf7e lodzings of' the proecetitrirt a'-out two montits back. Two naiwobTokers eTie in attendlance 'with property whichi had been pledged %wth thienl by the prisoner; but on 'tearitig the above tale of distresm, they' consented to give thriil up to) the pro- sectitrix. The namnes of ttie iawnbrokers were Nest antil Son, of Duke-street, ill ~nchtesier.square, and Gideon, of Stafoford-street, Lissnon-grove. Thec prosecutrix alga expressed her willingnesis to vithdraw her chiarge. Mlr. RAIVr,iscsow; corricented the conduict of the pawnbrokers, -which, lie observeti, was highily creditable to thrnil anti connented to let the case stantd over till eveni ng, whirr, it was untderstood that in all probability thie prisoner woutild be discharged. Qrr.ExeusAn.~YestrtlyIlhiSS Weeksitlie oroprietresq of a boarding-sclhool for otung hatdien, now at Little Eali-711. and late of Grove-hall, Hlammrersoulitl, gaive information at titis office of a rob- bery committe(i tindier very nuty%sterious circutmstances. The ladei statetd, that en her leaving Grove-hall she removed the most valuable part of' her prtoperty to D-ling, and slic em:ployetd two men to watch the 2goods which alhe left at Grove-balil atmongsnt which property, war, a box containing three cloze silver tea-spoons, two (tozen dessert-%tpoons, atic sevemil other article-s of plate. On her inquiiring of Mr. Esvleq, a builder, who"e men hadl assisted her in removitig her goods, tvhetlter he haid seen tilie box in quiestion, he said that he had tinot. ,She then inquired of tite watchman wholist habeetn directed to look after the premises but it appeatedI tha-t he ltatd ineglected! the houise entirely, and lie sairi lie supponsed that it was entpty. or at least that no articles oF valuec were left iti it. AMr. WhlI TE, the ;M agistrate, wild,i that hebhadno fo%,btbut thlat one of the officers would soon he able to make somie discovery that wtiould lead to tite detection of the robber. for, thouzh the o flencet sevas wrappedl in considerable mtystery, lie was of opinion that the tier- petrator of it was well atquainted wvith tite premyises, antI of this re ruoval of the owner of the property fromn thec house and he pro- mnised to dlesaatchi sorneof the polle" to tise their entdcavours to bring the offienders to jttstice. WORSHIsp-STREFT.-iV,n. 73aarer, a carman in the service of A1r. W. 1-Iarcouib, of College.,strcet, Bagnigg e.wells, apuearedl on a summonls to an,swer a cliarge of wanrtonlly anal eruehly ill-treating a hors-e belonging to hiis employer. The street-keeper of I-slinglon dieptosed. that. lie saw the defendant oni Mondair tiriving two borses with a cart laden witlli broken stone for the repa ir of tite hiigh road. Hec strttck tite shaft hiorse with great violience, wliceh immiediately fell. lite shafts pressing t,tpon the aid. rnal asi it lay withi thte witiol weight of tlite load. Several by5tantdeTs offered their assistance to raise the c.art, and wished thte gear to he east loose for that putrpose, so thlat thle anitnal might he enabledl to rise. Tue defenthatit refusmed to suffer their interference, sayin,g he kcnew lietter than any of themn how to manage it, ittid prcele to I make Itis leading horse fast to, the tail of the earl, anti whippetd it to )makeit exertita ,strengthi,whereby the carttwas r,aised in such arnanner as to lift rthe shaft ho rse iuto the air, wliere lie w,as sut.pended hy the collar for this space of tirer Orintites. Tuie spare horse was thecn hookeel to tite shafts in order to liring tdown tile cart to its, proper posi- tion, whlen thec poor anitmal againi fell to the groundI tnder the pres- sure of the load., and wv,s severely cut over one of bis eyes, one of his fo,eelegs laiti open, and one of the bindler legs severel'y ivoiinidmd by the whieel of thle cart. Seeing that every atteimpt of the driverT, whio was in a state of l,r,,al intoxicatiin, towairtl Cthe relief of the oppressed anitnid only addLed to its sufferings, the bir-standers in- terfered. andl removing the lioebe from, tite shafts, insisted upon, its being led liome to the stablesl. Three gretiticuien w;lto witnesge;& the orcctrrence confirrned the pre- ceding statemrent. Q'li'e Magistrate (Mr. BEN-srgTTI asked whether the witnesses; ,it tribt;ted the condttct of thie caTManl to obstina:cy, s etipidity, anti ignorancet or tO) cruelty and( a wanto-n d imposition to injure tite horse. They "'al" they coutit(I only ascribe it to obstinacy from drunkc- en neas. The Magistrate thenCr said lie belicvcd ir4e could do nio more in thiis case titan tine the f,1llt,w 6s. for brine drunk, as titere was no proof of cruealty from any vindfrlive disposition oil his part. Thie witnessest then stated th)at the same horse, notwithstanding the Wountded contditioni itn which bhe seas fromn ther isage above related. wsas putt to work the next day, whirls they coticeivedi a-gaod grounti for a ChaRTr:nf`crieltyvto teitiui Tuse Atla,eizrtrate said, if the aiiiiiial was gi tiuchl injureul aist to hec Un\fit for Work, that mighit be -a ground f'or charging thie owner withi cruielty, as he ott ght not to hiave allowed it. The mater, wh wAas present at the hea-ring of this case gaid, thle deFendlant iad taken tire horses out 0:1 loth dais wi' ihout hiis lutow- ]edge, as he W's from hiome lcooling a!'ter l~il itaymakerm at thp tilie ;anti on the second tdny the defendittt was son itittidly druink, that lIe fell ,ti,ider the wheel, whtch passed over hiis arcot, hut the cart not,bein loadetd at the time-, he did not sustaini any seri'ous IIt)Iiry. 'I hedefendatit was thein rtsed h?,. for being sirtisnk, isitie lie hpaid, ,and was4 dischargedi. U,irJN,-louA-1ssat-..T/oinfrts Jottes, s well-dressed titddle-agetd oran. ,,,a3 ;,rouvbt tip oil a clharge ofsheep-sttealing. Janla_ POPl. contductor of thle dlistmoutietd horse-patrol stationed ~tBickeb~im.l in Kent., stated that abouit one o'clock yesteenlav, sniornitit'. a%llt: was retutrninit. with his partv, from Dulwich to) Beck- enl,am, he.met tliC~ pristec driving an openi cart, which had loose ba-,y in it, and hrav itll stopped. hiim anti searchied the cart, lie found six She ep ttldcei the hail, x1ltisof which team suffocated. Tute pirisoner theni said, he was servant tid , buitcher iii town, who had sent tiim dlown to.an fariner, nantned BakLer, lor 'the sheepi' h1ut lie did not recol. lect the'titane of the pilace where 'Ilaker lived. The ulead sheep was = inc in the witnos's itresesicc, and thec skin was that now pro- 'Vihllanii Pattison statetd, ttiAt he is seervant to Eduvard Richards ,Adams, of Beckenlhari;, K~ent. and that his mnaster h.ad J2 shteep, which witne-ts left in hii mnaster's rmeadow, at flyr, n'elork, on Wetd- nesday,ievening_. anti on going to thie same meadow at mix o'cloclt the oorwngmeinlig, lie foulnd iix of thtei hind been tak-en riway. Tue skinprodceda'a thd skin of one of this oiigsitig sheep. Ott this cevidencs. the prisonTeC Was fUt ly comumitted. Job -JneOc was eha-Pt with horse stealinz. nigilt of tine 23d of Jul]y, a black nlOae, illS property, w.ts stoie frotm i elurit. Onl the 30fth of the same mnonth, he foenti it in the-posses. n;ion of ;t tereon u,afmtel Stu ickb'rY in Smithfield-markct, who de. livered it up to him- .. jolsn ,Stone, a hnrne,lealer. yesiding in Hooper.street, Weatmiti. ster.road, 5taed that en the mlotnlllg of the 24th of July the pri. oterrau- sto dm, and ar^,2 id Ile liast a black horse to sell. which, was then on KeOniOt-on. cor-non5. -The prisonger soon after brAniglit the horse, and oo teitFies purchased it for I'l.. and too, thle stamp receipt Itc podisced, which the prisoner signed in the naliie of John White. rne tile 30LtIof July witness toock tbe isorse to Smittni eld.inarket, and sold 'it to a pe-rso(n namned- SMuclibulY, for 91., fromn ,rhosi a immedtoiately tioakerSn by h prO52toU as bhi property. On the 23d ,Alt. Wvitness me adh c prisoner at Bow and basd hmlt apibreherd. rPh~ nrisoner mnade no (tefence, and was coris'shrtted incr trial. POLICE.