Summer Assizes.
The Times, 1824-08-11T00:00:00

-- - * .If.._BfO7 lie-. J tstice GASELEE. .rh' wasnn Ictio bro S . MONflS. h e e ig h th o f a cn j e b r oun eh k o t,t b a b ok e r a n d c a rp e nater o f b w 'uket, ag st the defendant b e of etes ame th at to recoveg aIffrence (iA Ucbof t) oC ft h1 o T e was toereciTon ovr!The ste was eathero wheightad anthe wiheis ofi g"harp hot, indto d the & Very t tre defendantrk in the c4rioe hpltted a ehing o ,hia c.rrs_ a;ckelod3t8h, andcleioreu the gate.psut by pfr Hn th ofn aMb as h dror hstastersa rumblesturrine k rank a r o the 01rintld d that Air. Symonds oub)e a " bad. e bap rt,""pa'ndtedven" hair-dreassr," at separate theteI orgoutlOf fashioo. He (dfedt p, Was a pof J f t " ai e's-le in Lon- Callc ting, of tae ver-and bad staepd longtin the weon3 gradeof I 51s-l- lln humnbly upon the heads and china of groomrs MOMe,g Uatil dsuccess had made him aao bitious to practise up. erane nfstheirmast,m An alley.residencbetngyunuAllite topam. dus views like these, the defendant had moved from his back eet into the face of 'day; and, dshin out taoc ti th ost Cigshrofaair his to-bot outnd on ce toghnde the utmosr- chino o fkhis soui.which v'as, the being a top Eoosor in"1 the rh.stret,t, and letti-n lodging, to hr. P.' in the raceftmeahe I emplPloyed the plaintif to frnish anor ted to auch purf to t up a housertit the a te wyhic ne to contain the u-er Nw, forst ther had rt caile.fot Al. preshe, andRveta igwr n wares wereic beon the tound-loMoreover) a snug little shavineg. e uOPE, hin opld, (for the defendant could not all at once df- Ietosecep b defendrien'ds, the ready1 motey custot, rs), the in,frrhad charged only 331. 19s., which was in fact gving away goods,-.oand bis won k afteirwareds to have them taken. But tiough 201 t been otginally paid without objectipn, the perti- ieos powderer of a axnsm -tow scrtdpled the odd 131. 9os,; and- ised to PaY -more than 12-am sum which the plaintiff s honour 3ad him to accepe. 'he particulass of the plaintie deman cs were then put in and ved; invoivitg "bed-ssdecarpets," "painted wash-handstands," ouble ,aPannedczndlestik-8,"asnda great variety of other artclesI tined ior the ben of the Al. ps. The chief dispute arose, Ieve, uPOn A charge for "partitioning off a little shtavinig-rooms," lch was to tehrate the defendant's gentlemen customers from more prfoane population of the trainingdta ble ig"Several netsel kin trade) were exagintdh upon this pAper, whose dress, earese, o nd demearour, differed altogether from those of the re oane, and less sportin, divisions tf society. All the people, whateve-r calling, looked like ostlera or stable-boys. The mmatiwore ncight handukerchiefs sa-piete about tbriATne&s'tt )r w reas e m o unt e d a l " fro ck -co ats ,l un d erw w aistco at st," an d e to gel anvnntocrs." aNot ia person would take his oath on any teshort cofradirtof Atop-boote; and obn, roue handled th swear- - though it (theouad been the Racintig Casentr g the S conts afor he defendant, threw the blame of the action nthe wainti' whosejoiners'work,hesaid,wasasobjectiofable us ed-idecaretsand mahogany tables. Thei plaintiff, in short, * a an nt ft toputup a paTtition for any body. lritnev(-~eWere ten called for M1r. Symonds, who swore that the ntfiff's' 2k and ae wt cte wornt the had ever seen. Others ee allet .Ar 5Mr. Prse,wosoe that his work and wares were best that they bdee en Ir. CoopFtt, in reply, urged the late period at which the defend- took his objection. The plaintiff was concerned in the matter, on accouint of his money, button account of his characet.r: for ehetoaccet the defcn ant's ntener, all the world must, i~ith one .c, cry out-." See that fellow ! he charged 131. 19s. for putting a panrtition ; and now he is forced to take about 21. less than his iend !" 'endict for the plaintiff'-Djamages, 11. 4st. reaMER V. P'E.N4ItGTOM. 'his was an actioni for money lent and advanced. The suml medl was 1001L, endsa note of hiand had beeni given; but f~ront some -et (it was said in the amount of the stamnp), that doctament Id not be made evidence. The curiositY of tnecsh a,i h tagement of the defe-nce. The plaintiff's attorney had written * lettets to the defendanit from Ipswich to Lo-naon demanding client's money;- to which the defendant had taken tiene recaution eturning no answervwhatever, and the plaintiff was no'w obliged ill, as his only witness to prove the loan, an oldi ladly whlom he w to be in the interest againist himn. The shrewdnLss and self. iession with which this wvitnes conducted herselfiduring an exa- atzon of near an hour was very extraordinary. Her unWil]hig-s s o give evidence was so obvious, (noewithstandliug the respects. :y.of her appearanice and demeanour), that the Judge allowed her nirination in chief to assuvme tite shape of a cross-examination no e ffort could shake her. The inference (as far as probability t)was against all she said; but still it was quite impossible em t get any ater al a miss on f ont er, or involve her in the ntes co tra jic on. fte la our ng ard for alm ost an hour, H . C O P E R ( t h e o u n s l f o r h e l a i n i f f ) w a s o m p e l e d t o g i v e t h e c o t e s t ; a n d , i t h m n y t h e a t s f a f t r p r o e c u t i n , h i s; 91 . S MUMMER d.YAs79Rc BUR XDMUNDS. M A