Parliamentary Intelligenc...
The Times, 1824-06-07T00:00:00

der Liausi u taDspotion of ottenders bil, Newfoundland ~judicatiure bill, and flsheries bill, were received, andi the billa Or- dlered to be read a third time on WVednesday next. The East India trade bill was ordered to be read a tbird time on Wednes-day next. The public credit (Irreland) bill was ordered to be taken into fur- ther consiJeration on Wednesday next. The Exchequer bills (public works) bill, and the Newfoundland imarriaaes bilU, were committed, and the reports ordered to be received on Wednesday niext. The combination laws' repeal bill, and the cocoa-nuts bill, were se- veralIy read a third time, and passed. Mr. LUSHIINGTON presented a Petition from-tha Pbilosophi. Cal and Historical ciety of Canterbury again3t Mlr. Owen's plan. IRISH CORPORATiON ACT. Mr. BROUGHAMT, in pursuance of the notice be bad given, moved for leave to bring In a bill to repeal the 21st of George IT., 'which related to Irish corporations. He explai-nedbisobjectto be to correctthe evils which bad arisen from the number ofnon-residentce who claimed privileges in Irish co?porations. - These non-residents had grown out of the old system of penal disqualifications, which, oenered it npes aulngaricU-tV 0 ,ora,tors out of the ofved the orderofthe a f the third te oingN fa rcARub n-,uklL bfifbeht U a causitea t eby P w a t of rde the quericr Wa, vcht diby bou benc tlO whoM ere not only.n6t authoozed, but at on adfutueclifebyth charters of.thfe-eorporatiOns tbedeseldes' the osect v hi bI a to ernedythe evil Thelion dJheam-ed gen evntber kd btained ler.ve to bring in a bill to repeal aumh parts of th6`6ct v as eneb cofpodations topersea e ito -herWiSe q'po ifiedb o charter." He im- mediately brought in the bill, whidch was read a first tlme, and ordeed to bearead a teyond time onP Wednesday next CATHOLIC CLAAIMS. Ar. C. 1.1T H TCHINSON wast axiousto st,te that hebaad re. ceived the petiti aof the Catholics of the cityand county of Cork, ceiera alonc ped teepolereeetoeon Brstl andretum- paigfrrlief from the penal disatbilities whlich they sonjtl enured an would present it to the house on Wednesday next. VAGRtANTS' BILL. Mr. ESTCOURT moved the order of the day for the third read- ingeofa the VaTants' bilLr paup lr. CAlUS WILSON brought up a clause by wayp E ider, the urport of wlichb we could nothear. r.STUART WORTLEY hoped1 that on a futurt Occasion sme wtter meanswould bedevised for puninhing those who baro boared v ats qur. oBelfs Wo said, ath r of every kind were prac- where rrnind them, orahow to gt fa udasteac.Tepiss tised, to the great ex,se of parishes, in the removal of vagrants. The pass.masters wio S. sppotha t ore 'teed t o ftenreturn- for trhey weres id to taxe out of the local precincts,- ed witH as ma hvas t e o t' iiem in the same carts. they actually te-conducted many ot -biclhe represented pe- Air. ESTCOURT said that t he county,.ll wn t oeud be culiarly soffered from fsch frauds, and ho ho on e ha tr taken to detect and punish the delinquents. in the yeads Pat,.,he county of '"lilts paiafor removals upwards of 1,0001. for Irish of pers alone, and these people ever wernt beyoind Bristol, an return ad again Into the county. e Sir JOHN NEWPORT cowa plained of the whole proo of the removal of these Iriss paupers. tIr. DAWSON said, that he had seen many poor English wt - men weo had marded Ingrih labourers in this country, landed on the quay of Belfast to seek, after their husbands, without knowing where to find thIem, or ow to get a petiudo nafrc9 . The parish(e should not throw off their poor in such a manner. After a few words from Dir. C. CALVERT, tae bil was read a third time, and ase MAGAISTiRATES' INDEAMNITY BILL. -ts n hur.HERRIEScmt ved the seion readingof the magisttin. demnity bill. Ther. S. RICE unEerstoOd that this bi was intended to legislate for a.private case ; he was therefore tinxious to have'the Becond reed. in spnd until VWednesday next. fr. HBRRIES hiad no objection to the postponemient; he must, however, deny that the bill was for a private purpose: it went, on the contrary, two correct a generalevil. Sir J. NE PORT uinderstood that the bill went to lprejudge a local action, in which the Lord mayor of Dublin was concerned, about a seizure of f4lse weights. He dislike-d it on that ground, although he would have no objection to the introduction of a general measure to correct false weights. Years ago, such a ome had been recommended, and ouh thaeben carried into effect.- MVr. DOGHERTY.defended the conduct of the L-ord Mayor of Duiblin, who had been nmet by an informality, and exposed to an action at law, in his laudable efforts to detect falseweights. Mir. P. GILBERT was at a loss to know why the recommends. tion of a commission given some years ago, had not been attended to, on the subject of a proper endl simple standard for weighnts. The siecond reading of the bill was, postponed until Wednesday next. Air. R. MlARTIN presented a petition from some borough (we could not hear the name) in favour of his bill for preventing cruel sports. Alr. T. COURTE NAY laidl on the table papers ordered by the housre respetcoting th eimTnolation of Hindoo widbws, and infaniticide. Odrdt e printed. I1The house then adjourned until Wednesday next. PARLIAMENTARY INTBLLr rn rPvP - HOUSE OF COILONS, SATUR1AV- Jr-- K