House Of Commons, Wednesd...
The Times, 1824-03-18T00:00:00

'xae :npeatcer'a^t,g,,retat o^e,etut rn -orfemberfforwtb countr0of Pertb, tViJ,rtsnimond Esq.who AIr.l.t32: BTreNNi3TI tresehteda v pbttilf' firbhi'teine m factureri ti}i b-ff.:' -; *P . _ M,Ze; i0 - Sict<agtustle pro i-e uratione af,reting the lhAe) 1KIF'. DUG1sA_4pres6ntid a iisilaipetition from St. Antlrew'5. NEGRO SLAVTihY. Petitions praying foi :the abolidto of slavery were presented by Mtlr. MUNDY, froni Chesterton; by 1Ir. PARES, from two places in Cheshire; by Alr. AsHUESiT,-fromnBodicote; by Sir E LIAs HARVEY, from Colchbeskr and from Rochford; by Mr. LEGSi- KECX,fromSiston; byMIr. WiLBaEsZOztcE, from Alontrose, Hel. stone, .nd several other places; and by Sir W. INGILBY from Gainsborough.-They were ordered to be laidion the table, and to be printed. Lord LOWTHER presented a petition from the curriers of Kendal, inst the hide reguladon bill. Mr.S S p resented a petition from the journeymen boot and shoemakers of Leeds sgainst the combination laws-Referred to the committee. Mr. WILBERFORCE presented a petition from the inhabi. tants of St. George's, EIanover-square, against cruelty to inferior M.. 4AScOYN9 YeseD,tea a petition from Liverpool, against the countY courts bilL - Sir P. FRGUSSON presented a petition from Dundee, against the satioM fishery bill, Alr.-lI4LLS presented a petition from the tanners of Dublin, aainst the leather-tax. Thb hon. member maoved for returns ot the number arid average lengths of the voyages made by the Post. office packets from Holyhead to Dublin ; and also for an account of the ten sbortest voyages andi the produpe, of the letters, duoing the jeeLrs 892haneI1823.-Oder~ed.., Sir W.F rEeG'vUS5 mnv'e for ieiisrns of the amount of du. ties on w1lalebone, imported in Bi isgb whalers in the year 1823. Mr. HUME;preented a petition from MrnX . Dundas Perrott, late a lieutenant in-the royal DiWy, ipaying that herniight be reinstated in tha rank he had la hiqMaieitz'7 service, and from which he had been dismissed. The pettlosier stited, that he enteredthenavy very young, and that during 14 years that he serred he had been at thtaking of 300ships; thatbliehad been 13 times employed in cutting out vessels under-circumstances of difficulty and hanger, on seven 'of which occasfon*hehad commanded the expeditions; that hehadreceived-thethanksof his officer for an arduous dutv per. formed inBoulogne harbour, and had atvarioustimes been thefortu- nate means of saving sevetal persons from a watery grave; that he lost an arm b7 a wound in the PhobC frigate, iu consequence of which, he was disabled from gaining a livelihood. Up to the year 1812, the petitioner enjoyed the reputation which he had gained, and had been promoted from the rank of midshipman to that of lieutenant, by which pwmotiof2 he lost the pension which as a mnidshipm2an. he enjoyed on account of the toss of his arm, in that year he was indicted for obtaining 23L fronm one Robert Butlen, for the purpose of procuring him a protection against the press service, and was sen- tenced to two years' confinement. Being in embarrassed dircum- stances (the honourable member did not hesitate to say that the pe. tidoner's youthful extravagances had placed him in those cir. cumstances), he was unable to prosecute Bullen, or to take any steps to Wrocure a re-hearing of the cause. 'he same cause prevented hin from procuring a copy of the indictmpent, which if he had had he could have prevented his conviction. Three days after the sentence was known, the petitioner's name was struck out of the list at the Admiralty. In the year 1814, while he was still in prison, the petitioner was enabled to bring lhis case on for hear. ing before the late Lord Ellenborough, when a decree was pro- nounced by the Court to the following effect:t-"Upon hearingcounsel on both sides, it. is considered and adijudged by the Court, tbatfor the errors assigned the prosecution shall he reversed, and that the de- t'endant (the petitioner) be restored to all that he has, lost thereby;- atna further th~at the defendant be forthwith discharged out of cus- tody." Affidavits confirmatory of aU the statements in the petition had been examlined by Mlr. Hume, and tie had taken other means to ascertain the accuracy of those statemeints, of which tie was per- fectly satisfied, If, then, these facts were true-if the petitioner's services, his reputation, and the loss of his limb entitled him to the rank which he had enjoyed, he (llr. Hu.nc) could not but think that since the prosecutiou, in consequence of which the pedtuoner was deprived of that rank, had been reversed, he ought to be restored to his station in his lMajesty's service. From the affi- davits wYhich he held in his hand, it did appear that the charges against this unfortunate man had originated in a conspiracy agaiast him of the most atrocious nature. But had rhIe individual been even guiltv, in fact, of themisconduct imputedto him,he(Alr. Home) put it to the house, whether, after a service of 14 years, and after receiving these wounds in the course of that service, he ought now to be left in a state of absolute starvation ? He houglit that Mr. Perrott ought not to be so abandoned, particalarly after thede- cisions of Lord Alansfield and Lord Kenyon, that the talf-pay of thse officers was not to be considered in the lghtofa meretaining fee. He was at the same time quite aware it might be said, that before any thing could be done in the matter by that house, it would be necessary that official papers and documents should be moved for and laid before it, in order to show what the real proceedings else- where had been; and that it would be conmpetent in him subseguintly to introduce some measure fotnded upon them. Now it was rery true, that a Court-iMlartial had sat upon Air. Per. rott, previously to his indictment; and that three clarges were ex- hibited apinst hins, for going ashore after sunset; for saying on one occasion, upon deck, that-the fir,st lieutenant of the ship was a dangerous man; and for disobedience of orders in refusing to send the men aloft. Upon two of these charges the court acqutted Mr. Perrott; but on the other they certainly pronounced ,inm guilty. But he (AIr. Hume) could not imagine, that that finding ought to have had any influence upon the Lords of the Admiralty in consi- dering another and a later charge which was brought aga inst the party in another place, for obtaining money under false prerences. And yet that such an influence did opcrate on the Admiralty, he was warranteds in inferring fromi their conduct in respect oF the accusation wh ich a foul consBpiracy preft'rred against thi individual_'- that he had taken money of a woman in order to obtain a protection for a man named Bullen ;" be having no power to obtain it, and well knowing the sanic. The peti- tioner now stated to the house, " that for several years past he had been almost unable to Dbtain a meal, and was in want of almost the common necessarieu of life," and he concluded his prayer in this way:-" Let not a nation bo fanmed for its generosity allow a man, whose limbs have been mutilated in its service, to sui'er froni want of that bread which it accords so freely to the natives of other king- doms." He (Air. Huome) had taken grcat pains to make hinselt master of all the facts which were alleged in this petition; but he had not had access to the records of the Admiraltv, so as to be able to see what colouring they nmight receive from other bources. (Hear.) The petitioner concluded, bypraying-" eitherthat the house would be pleased to ret'er bis case to the twelve judges, in order that it might be ascertained what compensation slould be granted for his past services, considering h:is present inability to obtain any other livelihood; or that the honourable liouse woutd graat such other re- lief as its wisdom aight deem proper.' Sir GEORGE COCIBURN lamiiented that the hon. member for A'crdeen had gone so much into detail on this occasion, inasmuch as he should be compelled to do so too in replving to his statemiient; and he lamented the circumstance the more especially, because he had received letters from souse menbers of this party's familv re. quegting him not to go into the full exposure of his case. Had the hon. member thought proper to content himself with merely bringing the petition up, he (Sir George Cockburn) would not have felt it necessary to take the step which he was about to do. The lon. member's procceding, however, cempelled hint to it; and the Case itself was so monstrous as to leavc hitn no choice. The facts were simply these :-This person, lyr. Dundas Perrott, being a lieutenant in his Majesty's navy, informed a person that he could get a protec. ton from theimpress.Thatpersonwas apoorunfortunateservantcmaid, who really imagined that Perrott could procure a protection forher hus-. band, Robt.Bullen. He required an adivance ofmoney fbr the purpose; and she gave him money. He soon afterwards pressed her for more, which she again furnished. He still applied fcr money, in order, asI he said to fee the clerks at the Admiralty. She had parted ivtl all the cash she had, and borrowed a sum to meet his demands but still the msan wanted additional fonds. The poor woman was un- able to raise them; but she happened to possess a smaaU furnished house of her own, and he took ier rumniture, and sold that. (Hear.) In conclusion, the map mvas pressed; and the unhappy w.ife, after having vaihly sacrificed her all, went before a magistrate. That magistrate conKideredit proper, upon a hcaring,to send the matter be- fore another tribunal; mand evidence vras then gone into, whicb clearlv proved that a more iniquitous case was never yet produced before a court of justice. The Lords of the Adnmiralty, and the service generally, were filed with indignation at the detection of such mis. conduct us an offirer who had the honour of bearinga commis. sionin theroyal-navy.' The house haC*lready heard that the peti. tionerwassentenced to along imprisonmeint. After heehad been in urison some time, it was discovered that there had been such a flaw in the indictment, that the Lord Chief Justice held hinm to be en- titled to his release. Upon this, the Admiralty, who had conceived noprevious indisposition towards the partv_(a fact which was esta- bbklibedby the circumstance, that though by reason of the sentence of the court-martial he was already under martial law, yet had they reinstated him in the service, under that favourable feerng towards a wonnded officer which they would always entertainm-the Admiralty immediately sentall thelaw proceedings to their legal advisers, and asked them whethcr there was any thing in them which might have the effect of doingawaywiththelegalcrime that Mlr. Perrott had been supposed to have commnitted. The Adcmiralty counsel and so- licitor were of opinion that therewas not. The affidavits which had I beeni to.nightbrought to the notice of the house, were transmittedto .Mr. Jenis, the counsel for the Admiralty,.(and a gentlenan whose name would be percectly known to hon. gentlemen), and to the Ad- mtraltg solicitors, that t'hey mighstlook into the whole of them sgain and sec whether they contained any thing which mnight nitigate the petitioner's guilt. As to that part of .M1rs. Bulen's deposition whiich the hon. gent. relied upon, the house would recollect, that ste maide an affidavit of the criminatory circumstances in court, and upoa eath. Her voluntary deposition, now made, could be of no imnportance, therefore, to the queLtion. As to the Admiralty, they would have been very happy could Mr. Perrott have made out the case he now brought forward ; for as it was, it had cast a sti- ma UpOn the servie. ~It remaIned, however. to be added, that after Perrot was seized, there sas found, among his papers, andin his own handwriting, a forged dischatge. (Hear.) In answer to what was stated about the petitioner's losing his former pension, it was to be observed, that it was very true he haoi d, while a midshipmnan, enjoyed. a pension on account of the wound he had received- When he was' propoted, he gav'e up the pension, according to the vell-known cus- tom of the aasy. Now be was dismissed the service, he got neither that norhis balf.pay. But this was matter of course. If a person who had been a clerk In a public office, afterwards was pension. ed, 4.md itshouild appear that lie had misbehaved himnself in so ex- traordinjpry a manner, that his pension should be taken aWay, he could not go back and demand his clerk's pay. A# to this~ petition being brought up, hi (Sir feorge Cdokburn) did not know whe. ther it was worth while to oppose it;* but lie should-do-so, unle&s the. honse should wish to-hea itiead,in order to b more fiqly informed of ficts to-*hicb, 'sic eiused he h'ad now given a suf- fldIrntanswer.- '- --. .' :-, -*! llt. .jU.E,. in. explangtionj' tontendedVtblit the qution was wheStr the faets tb'at hd ieC sworn toa' iinst tbi e petidoner were pr ve&or not. By.the affhdvits which he (Mlr. Home) held, it ip- peaed, as he mwst d' ihlt t' x wcrsmot pioved, He id pit aYGDr,jm.ptney,'j 4dieAbouldsuditbnoUtbl. know 'Vl1ietbcr hon.1err- eihmenacotrihs,uloSe tiItYny:Admrlty in.the 'world would be so: ithumae as to.e hi serelief .aa.man who had stiMeredso much in tlhbre-did noau eiof t h areia the Peigoer appeared tu have done, jf - Mi. ()ROKER bssiredtie house, thut had there bemn any doubt in tths case,:ehe Admirntty vonld hate gilen the bencfit of that doubt to aocrson in so interesting a situation as that of a wounded ofticer. H'e would only'beg to mention a single fact, how- ever, v.hic' he thought would go far to satisfy the minds of honourable gentlemen upon the merijs of this case. It was a faet that took place, he would assume, without the knowledge of either of the parties, but while this fraudulent negotiation was go- ing on between Perrott and the poor woman. Perrott now denied that there was either fraud or negotiation on his art wvilst Bullen and his wife asserted that there were both. It did hpen,htoWever in theTheanwhile, that application was made at the Ad niralty r a protection,nand-by whom? By Sir Edwad Perrott. ToSirEd'- ward Perrott he imputed no. improper design * and aU that this dr. cumstance importet as, as hop- perhaps, tbht the respectable-name of a Baronet mlght give the appficatio, an alditional chance of su'c- cess. Such an apylicatibn, bowever, was made foraprotection,- and for whom P Wy, for Robert Bullen (hear); and - when the whole matter as to Mr. Perrott's conduct came out, among that personls papers, as had been stated, there was foundl a forged protec- tion for Hebert Bullen, in Perrott's own hand.writing. (Heree hear.) He called it forged; though, in fact, the subscribed names of the Admiralty clerks were fictitous i there were no such persons. Mr. AGAR ELLIS was bound to state, that such a case as that brcught fornard by his hon. friend he had never heard. The expla. nations of honourable gentlemen opposite must have quite satisfied the house as to theimproprlety of proceeding farther in the matter. Alr. PEFEL entreated the house to consider what the consequence must be of establishing a precedent forreceiving an appeal of this kind from a party after his conviction in a court of justice. (Hear.) Air. HU,ME said, that conviction wasdone away with, by thesub- quent order made by the Lord Chief Justice. lllr. PEEL.-True; but the party did complain that he was now suffering by reason of the sentence os a court. He said that he had been the victim of a foul conspiracy-that he was innocent of that of which a competent tribunal had pronounced him to be guilty. In four out of five convictions, he (Mr. Peel) received anidavits from the convcted parties, averring theirinnocence; and if this prece- dent were admitted the house would be in the saame predicarment. if the party had had an opportunity of pleading in court, of what possible weighlt could these affidaits be with the house? He vrould object even to the petition brine read, nir. flu iUIVI said he did not wish to press the house to a division on the subjcct, but he thought it a hard thing that the petitioner, after all his services, should be left to starve. Dlr. PEEL said he did not object to the petition on any techni^ cal grounds, though he might have done so, for this, in one part of it, being a pettion for pecuniary aid, could not, according to the frs o.he Z.se, be received without a recommendation from the Mr. HUIIE here intimated his dissent from the opinion that the prayer of the petition was of a pecuniary nature. Mr. PEEL maintained that it was. The petitioner prayed that the house might in the interim grant him subsistence, or some other mode of relief." The word " or" did not take the petition out of the general rule. It was not, however, on that ground that he objected to the petition. Hlis objection to it rested on the principles he had before stated. Illr. CA LCltAFT said, that as the name of a respectable magis- trate with whom he had thehonour of being acquainted hud beer introduced, he felt it his duty to state, that gentleman was alto. gether incapable of the improper conduct which the petitioner had insnuated. Alr. M,1ONCK suggested that his honourable friend should with- draw the petition, and it was withdrawn accordingly. Mr. F. PALMER presented a petition from the inhabitants of Reading, praying for the repeal of the window.tax. The honourable menmber prefaced his motion, that the petition bebrought up, with a few remarks, which from the noise occasioned by many members leaving the house at the tinme, were wholly inaudible in the gallery.-The petition was laid on the table. NEW LAW COURTS IN WVESTMlINSTER. Mr. BAN KES gave notice, that he would make a motion on the subject of the new courts now erecting in Waestminster. His object was to prevent one of those courts frons being conmpleted. It was that intended for the Court of King's Bench. As the building was of brick, the expense of taking it down would not be excessive, and he thought no public inconvenience would be felt as means might be easily found for accommodating the Court of king's Bench in another place. SILK TRADE. Alr. W. SMIT H presented a petition, signed by between 6,000 and 7,000 ot the merclhants, manufacturers, and others, inhabitants of the city of Norwich, connected with the trade in silk. The eti- tioners stated, that they viewved with satisfaction the measures which had lately been proposed on the subject of the duties on silk. They wvere aware that some evils would be unavoidably attendant upon those measures, but they were such as niight in the course of time begot over. There were others to which a timely remedy miglht be applied. This they thought might be done in a great measure by taking off the duties of the manufactured stock on hand ; they prayed, therefore, that the house mig'ht take this intoconsideretion. The pe~tition was brought up, and ordered to lie on the table. Mr.: HUMB presented a petition fronm the shoemakers of South- wark,andapothes from those of Weninster(sigrned bv 2,681 persons), against the combination laws.-They were ordered t.o be referred to the committee on artisans. REFORM IN PARLIAAMENT. AMr. HOBHOTJSE said, he heId in his hand a petition praying for a reform in the representation of the people in Parliament. Though favoinrable to the principle of Parliamentary reform, he certainly could not concur in the prayer of his constituent, from whom tnis petition camTe * still, however, as the petition was drawn up in language respectful to the house, he thought it ought to be re- ceived. rhe petition was front Mr. George Wirgrnan, a jeweller, in the Strand. Be prayed that the house might do away with the complex machinery at present used in borough elections.-that they might repeal the acts against bribery and corruption at such eleetions. By thesemeans, lie thought the higher orders would be duly repre- sented. It was the highier orders, the petitioner thought, and not the lower, whiclh were not duly represented in that house. lie fur- ther thouglht, that if the laws against bribery and corruption at elec- tions were repealed, that influence might be openly exercised which was aow carried on through dark and secret channels; that an ad- vantage wtiuld arise from giving to meti of property sufficient to purchase the patronage of a borough, that fair representation in Parliament to which such property was entitled. Hie also prayed that the house might sanction by law the open purchase and sale of seats in that housc. It was well known, the hon. member observed, that such bargains daily took place, and he could see no objection to making those Keats, which were now the objects of secret bar- gain and sale, opeti to the pubic competition of such as might be disposed to expend their money in that way. The petitioner, in speaking to htin (Mr. Hobhouse) on this subject, stated, that this was the only kind of' reform to which it was likely the house would agree, and he thought it would be attenided with many advantages. The petitioner also prayed, that several populous places, such as Birmingham and M,anchester, miglit be allowed to send representatives to Parliament, by which tnany popular and patriotic individuals would havc an oppi rtunity of cominF intou c house, and in the course of time of procuring official appointments. lie also wished that the house might do away with many ofthe pre- bcat esection laws. Though he did not concur in opinion with the I petitioner, yet as-his petition was couched in respectful terms, he should move that it be brought up. The petition was brought up, read, and ordered to lie on the table, and to be printed. LEGACY DUTY. lr. HUME, in submitting the motion of which he had given notice on this subject,- naid, that his object was to ascertain the ex- tent of the Treasury order which had been lately made with respect to arrear oh'the duty. Sorne applications of a imost vexatisus na-l ture lhad been made to recover those arrears. He had yesterday i been informed that an application had recently been made fromn (we believe) the Legacy-office, for arrears of duty on the bequest of a man named M'oodford, who died in Hereford, in the year 1798. The person to whor the interest in that property had devolved had been dead some time: the application was made to his executors. He hoped that ministers would see the pro. riety of having an end put to such vexatious applications. To siec now far they had gone in this respect, he would move " that there be laid before the house a copy of-any minute of the Treasury lately made, respecting legacy or probate duties. "-The motion was put and carried. STOCK PURSE OF THE GUARDS. Mlr. HUMIE, in introducing his motion on this subject, observed that on a tormer occasion le had called the attention of the house to a practice of talking certain sums from the pay of such privates of the Guards as were imprisoned by sentence of courts-martial (being the surplus ol' pay accruing to them after defraying the expenses of theirsupport during the time),and addingthem to the stock-purseofthe corps, of which the officcrs partly deriyed the benefit. Thestatement which be made on that occasion was denied as inaccurate,by some of the officers (of the Guards); but he had reason to believe that they by whom the denial was made were themselves tnisinformed as to the real state of the case. The hon. member, after some comments on the impropriety of allowing any officer to derive any emolument or advantage from the imnrisonment of a soldier, on 'whose court- rmartial he might have sat, proceeded to state the mode in which be bad acquired his information oa tbis subject.. In the course of last year, two individuals came to him,tnd askedhim whether hewas aware of the manner in which the surplus of- pay accruing to privates in the Guards, during theit imprison'ment, was disposed of. He stated that he was not informed on the subject. They then told lim that that surplus was added to the stock-purse of the corps He sought for further information as to the nature of this stock..purse, from one or two members ofthat house who had been in the Guards, but the reply he got was, that the Etock..urse was managed by the captains, but the poor subalterns had nothing to do with it. He then went to an officer of the Guards, and having told him what he heard on this subject, the officer told hiin that he believed the stoppage of pay from mnen impsonpd by sentences of courts-martial went to the atock.pnrse, and that, after certain deductions connected with the contingent fund, the surplus was divided between th. captaits and field-officers of the corps. If this were the case, and he had no reason to doubt the fact, it wcaLs a practice which ought not to be allowed to continue. After some fisrthes remarks upon the difficulty of coming at the .nowledge of the manner in' which the accounts'ol the Guar(ds were kept, amnl the impolicy of voting sums of money for any service of the army, the accounts of which were laid before Parliament,, tic honourable member concluded by moving 1' That there be laid before the house an account of the number of men of the Guards wbo bad been imprisoned by sentences of gene- ral or regimental courts-martial, with the particular periods of their imprisonment iu each year, lrom the year 1816 up to the present year; also an account of the stoppages of pay made from such inen in each year wit1 the whole amount and application thereof; also art accoult 6e 6tbe ALmonnt of the stock-purse of the Gugds in each year, for the same period, with the sources from wbich tfe saime was derived." 2 Lord PA?adlMiRSTON said he would very sbotly allude to the point which the hotourable member for Aberdeers profe6sed him- self. unable to understand-namely, the nature sf' thi s Oi-purse. Tat purse was creuted between the difference f the pay of the numnber of metnNo aslly 01n the rolls1 aand the uiber of tho6e the whole of tbearmY 0 pl onaced On die '-dPt ''e te Giaaids asow stood rpect 1 i - 'c t' Xn 172 r~ nMt2Btii&~ ibt ss4lsi~bT6hh alterd$he fenaniai*ttS t6pandft Foou(*u4 l iteee =pregsy purseioi4WA the:V- Inw,could only be donetythe e i i ther the.disi i" ofRti albehro.ina pse A t.be__rIe tb4ciotto6n si?jjat by wlioniit had been forfeited.<InivtJ;er,clce2h di' to the public in theGu) dAcc iPnt>AaTip n othrcases; ief , intpe ands of htsg -tcs, 1th e?asdn th; -o ltast priever to.the.Paye,iaster-(eneral-if calleil fore but * nb raitidodnoinings'Iheofflcrs. (f1eiarf 'i . as e auppoaet1bit Britjk-ojcersivwould so far fozget theie'hi~ hffiac4te? forhoenour, a to imprison a soldierfor.tbe mean,and pit pUcter o+f xbax npsaeaaion 6fhis f feited xy {earf laear.-AiIt fle,atts*r7, pgev,ez t,ha,t ihec nfficers shoul, bc pa ,- v2s the oo er conduct le- aswillin- g to - law,oultol'ybe dpaneyforfeited y btYh e soldiersrof thheuard frL by wom i easps.adhwithad been appfeeded. e, _ rto' thepublc?equest of e offlcers thetnielves, Who wer' d twreweY5IxIoobitthatIeir conduct should be Thoroughly-invsi~ ep Xieewouldr therefore, move as an amendment, that thbu re be hefore it haiu'ie ac 'ncount of'i6beri ountoif the pa for Veitd udr the oit ing-offtbr n wtiny Jct iD.each regirnent the Guards b sentence ef cnurtmeart1,.since 1816 anti also a statcrmene of tby foanser in o ;hr,tho puy-so forfeited had beean dipposed of. Ilr. B;EENA L exinresred'an opinion-'that the statement of the f hielord w as verfec%y;abs r.factoryt Sthe . VsikiNi 'Tified'the rmnuth of, his laiguage on a foe. me~ Sti ht, bytfe `in crrlectca hsichbt-adbehaentaIded aaint te cMui D h a-fret&b oders of the Gtaarth. seberdee ha1o h-casnwihhdbeenapplided. I-,ltte, hi caseein t oh)s.am thne asonhe,d thisod.yesthte4 obtt 3v,ord would eolonld,Wther anre, Jm asaendmen said, that they were perfrel saifiedhus awithc uthe fb elanmtount theP. had beren ie bythe The oriinaf metion was then negaied, andethe tne'nuandstbwa Lord PALfM s:RSTON mnovec, t1atnE commiattee be a ontedi pirepr BEN etrsean estipte f thnchageao the sriatementia ofro tt ceiber 1823, toDccuifberd 182the wnThetotofn' walsi agrd to and tef commhtbytittee appointed. 'cha hich: bad been' ad againse Theoteordersha, of the dcasy wrcb then dispollued ad thaed hoise c~se i he arlfetoeasehe h 'clh iy~ae t~ntawr ol W*'D3&5ftt;.WR-6V'ltz -,;