Update README.md

README.md

@@ -27,48 +27,42 @@ pretty_name: XSum Corpus
 # Dataset Card for SAMSum Corpus
 ## Dataset Description
 ### Links
-- **Homepage:** hhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12237v2
-- **Repository:** https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12237v2
-- **Paper:** https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12237v2
+- **Homepage:** https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.08745
+- **Repository:** https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.08745
+- **Paper:** https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.08745
 - **Point of Contact:** https://huggingface.co/knkarthick
 
 ### Dataset Summary
-The SAMSum dataset contains about 16k messenger-like conversations with summaries. Conversations were created and written down by linguists fluent in English. Linguists were asked to create conversations similar to those they write on a daily basis, reflecting the proportion of topics of their real-life messenger conversations. The style and register are diversified - conversations could be informal, semi-formal or formal, they may contain slang words, emoticons and typos. Then, the conversations were annotated with summaries. It was assumed that summaries should be a concise brief of what people talked about in the conversation in third person.
-The SAMSum dataset was prepared by Samsung R&D Institute Poland and is distributed for research purposes (non-commercial licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
+This repository contains data and code for our EMNLP 2018 paper "[Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.08745)".
 
 ### Languages
 English
 
 ## Dataset Structure
 ### Data Instances
-SAMSum dataset is made of 16369 conversations distributed uniformly into 4 groups based on the number of utterances in con- versations: 3-6, 7-12, 13-18 and 19-30. Each utterance contains the name of the speaker. Most conversations consist of dialogues between two interlocutors (about 75% of all conversations), the rest is between three or more people
+XSum dataset is made of 226711 conversations split into train, test and val.
 The first instance in the training set:
-{'id': '13818513', 'summary': 'Amanda baked cookies and will bring Jerry some tomorrow.', 'dialogue': "Amanda: I baked  cookies. Do you want some?\r\nJerry: Sure!\r\nAmanda: I'll bring you tomorrow :-)"}
+{'dialogue': 'The full cost of damage in Newton Stewart, one of the areas worst affected, is still being assessed.\nRepair work is ongoing in Hawick and many roads in Peeblesshire remain badly affected by standing water.\nTrains on the west coast mainline face disruption due to damage at the Lamington Viaduct.\nMany businesses and householders were affected by flooding in Newton Stewart after the River Cree overflowed into the town.\nFirst Minister Nicola Sturgeon visited the area to inspect the damage.\nThe waters breached a retaining wall, flooding many commercial properties on Victoria Street - the main shopping thoroughfare.\nJeanette Tate, who owns the Cinnamon Cafe which was badly affected, said she could not fault the multi-agency response once the flood hit.\nHowever, she said more preventative work could have been carried out to ensure the retaining wall did not fail.\n"It is difficult but I do think there is so much publicity for Dumfries and the Nith - and I totally appreciate that - but it is almost like we\'re neglected or forgotten," she said.\n"That may not be true but it is perhaps my perspective over the last few days.\n"Why were you not ready to help us a bit more when the warning and the alarm alerts had gone out?"\nMeanwhile, a flood alert remains in place across the Borders because of the constant rain.\nPeebles was badly hit by problems, sparking calls to introduce more defences in the area.\nScottish Borders Council has put a list on its website of the roads worst affected and drivers have been urged not to ignore closure signs.\nThe Labour Party\'s deputy Scottish leader Alex Rowley was in Hawick on Monday to see the situation first hand.\nHe said it was important to get the flood protection plan right but backed calls to speed up the process.\n"I was quite taken aback by the amount of damage that has been done," he said.\n"Obviously it is heart-breaking for people who have been forced out of their homes and the impact on businesses."\nHe said it was important that "immediate steps" were taken to protect the areas most vulnerable and a clear timetable put in place for flood prevention plans.\nHave you been affected by flooding in Dumfries and Galloway or the Borders? Tell us about your experience of the situation and how it was handled. Email us on selkirk.news@bbc.co.uk or dumfries@bbc.co.uk.', 'summary': 'Clean-up operations are continuing across the Scottish Borders and Dumfries and Galloway after flooding caused by Storm Frank.', 
+'id': '35232142'}
 
 ### Data Fields
 - dialogue: text of dialogue.
-- summary: human written summary of the dialogue.
+- summary: one line human written summary of the dialogue.
 - id: unique file id of an example.
 
 ### Data Splits
-- train: 14732
-- val: 818
-- test: 819
+- train: 204045
+- val: 11332
+- test: 11334
 
 ## Dataset Creation
 ### Curation Rationale
-In paper:
-In the first approach, we reviewed datasets from the following categories: chatbot dialogues, SMS corpora, IRC/chat data, movie dialogues, tweets, comments data (conversations formed by replies to comments), transcription of meetings, written discussions, phone dialogues and daily communication data. Unfortunately, they all differed in some respect from the conversations that are typically written in messenger apps, e.g. they were too technical (IRC data), too long (comments data, transcription of meetings), lacked context (movie dialogues) or they were more of a spoken type, such as a dialogue between a petrol station assistant and a client buying petrol.
-As a consequence, we decided to create a chat dialogue dataset by constructing such conversations that would epitomize the style of a messenger app.
 
 ### Who are the source language producers?
 linguists
 ### Who are the annotators?
 language experts
 ### Annotation process
-In paper:
-Each dialogue was created by one person. After collecting all of the conversations, we asked language experts to annotate them with summaries, assuming that they should (1) be rather short, (2) extract important pieces of information, (3) include names of interlocutors, (4) be written in the third person. Each dialogue contains only one reference summary.
-
 
 ## Licensing Information
 non-commercial licence: MIT