C-G-L commited on
Commit
643ca2c
1 Parent(s): 59ca1ca

Made changes to the datacard (#5)

Browse files

- Made changes to the datacard (3cf67def5dc57ba3be4681c4e6158546500bf712)
- Updated Curation Rationale (0a94d76440a6ad6433130ede6b0b6aba89ee9565)
- Made changes to rationale (8e249a3cf71f6eff47f1824d29cacd8703de99fe)

Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +13 -6
README.md CHANGED
@@ -174,9 +174,12 @@ Processing steps included:
174
 
175
  ### Curation Rationale
176
 
177
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
178
 
179
- The original data has some misclassified species/subspecies and some localities were outside the known range of the butterflies. Furthermore, the bird and butterfly acuities were not part of the original dataset and provide another level of analysis.
180
 
181
  ### Source Data
182
 
@@ -195,11 +198,15 @@ Photographers: Robyn Crowther and Sophie Ledger, Natural History Museum, London.
195
 
196
  #### Annotation process
197
 
198
- [More Information Needed]
 
199
 
200
  #### Who are the annotators?
201
 
202
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
203
 
204
  ### Personal and Sensitive Information
205
 
@@ -209,11 +216,11 @@ None
209
 
210
  ### Social Impact of Dataset
211
 
212
- [More Information Needed]
213
 
214
  ### Discussion of Biases
215
 
216
- [More Information Needed]
217
 
218
  ### Other Known Limitations
219
 
 
174
 
175
  ### Curation Rationale
176
 
177
+ This dataset was curated for training a model to classify different species of Heliconius Butterflies and to take into account mimicry between species and acuity of the observer (bird, butterfly, or human/other).
178
+ The original data (Cuthill et al 2019) had misclassified species/subspecies and some locality/ collection sites were outside the known range of the butterflies.
179
+ It also contained hybrid and aberrant samples, that had the potential to muddle classification results.
180
+ To prevent this, the data was further refined by several Heliconius experts to remove hybrid and aberrant samples.
181
+ Lastly, bird and butterfly acuities were added to provide another level of analysis.
182
 
 
183
 
184
  ### Source Data
185
 
 
198
 
199
  #### Annotation process
200
 
201
+ The original data has some misclassified species/subspecies, and had multiple hybrid samples. These samples were removed by hand by OM, CL, JM, KK.
202
+ Some localities were outside the known range of the butterflies, and were removed using QGIS and known sub species ranges.
203
 
204
  #### Who are the annotators?
205
 
206
+ Christopher Lawrence
207
+ Jim Mallet
208
+ Owen McMilan
209
+ Krystof Kozak
210
 
211
  ### Personal and Sensitive Information
212
 
 
216
 
217
  ### Social Impact of Dataset
218
 
219
+ N/A
220
 
221
  ### Discussion of Biases
222
 
223
+ Biased towards species and subspecies within Heliconius. Focused on Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene
224
 
225
  ### Other Known Limitations
226