topicId
int64
441
1.07k
split
stringclasses
1 value
topicText
stringclasses
25 values
topicTarget
stringclasses
25 values
topicSentiment
int64
-1
1
claims.claimId
int64
117k
913k
claims.stance
stringclasses
2 values
claims.claimCorrectedText
stringlengths
21
223
claims.claimOriginalText
stringlengths
14
223
claims.Compatible
stringclasses
2 values
claims.claimTarget.text
stringlengths
2
152
claims.claimTarget.span.start
float64
0
135
claims.claimTarget.span.end
float64
2
180
claims.claimSentiment
float64
-1
1
claims.targetsRelation
float64
-1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,878
CON
granting government money, even indirectly, to private and religious schools will inevitably lead to increased governmental control over non-government education
granting government money, even indirectly, to private and religious schools will inevitably lead to increased governmental control over non-government education
yes
granting government money, even indirectly, to private and religious schools
0
76
-1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,901
PRO
Competition for students (and the education dollars that come with them) creates a catalyst for schools to create innovative programs
competition for students (and the education dollars that come with them) create a catalyst for schools to create innovative programs
yes
Competition for students (and the education dollars that come with them)
0
72
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,902
PRO
School choice programs would allow poor students to opt out of bad schools and acquire a better education
school choice programs would allow these students to opt out of bad schools and acquire a better education
yes
School choice programs
0
22
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,903
PRO
freedom of education notably implies the freedom for parents to choose a school for their children without discrimination on the basis of finances
freedom of education notably implies the freedom for parents to choose a school for their children without discrimination on the basis of finances
no
null
null
null
null
null
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,904
CON
vouchers could result in nothing more than a cash-handout for many middle-class and wealthy families already sending their kids to private schools
vouchers could result in nothing more than a cash-handout for many middle-class and wealthy families already sending their kids to private schools
yes
vouchers
0
8
-1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
237,314
PRO
Through free competition between vendors for the provision of products and services, prices tend to decrease, and quality tends to increase
Through free competition between vendors for the provision of products and services, prices tend to decrease, and quality tends to increase
yes
free competition between vendors for the provision of products and services
8
83
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
296,402
PRO
no family should be forced to send kids to a school they know is failing
no family should be forced to send kids to a school they know is failing
no
null
null
null
null
null
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
302,468
CON
with federal school vouchers inevitably come further central government regulation and loss of local control over education
with federal school vouchers inevitably come further central government regulation and loss of local control over education
yes
federal school vouchers
5
28
-1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
303,070
CON
Education vouchers would undermine public schools
they would undermine public schools
yes
Education vouchers
0
18
-1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
309,631
PRO
access to resources play a hugely important role in educational inequality
access to resources play a hugely important role in educational inequality
no
null
null
null
null
null
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
309,632
PRO
the educational system forces low-income families to place their children into less-than-ideal school systems
the educational system forces low-income families to place their children into less-than-ideal school systems
no
null
null
null
null
null
603
train
This house would abolish congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
-1
239,897
PRO
Politicians are often accused of misusing their allocations for selfish purposes
Politicians are often accused of misusing their allocations for selfish purposes
no
null
null
null
null
null
603
train
This house would abolish congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
-1
240,673
CON
Earmarks are Good for American Democracy
Earmarks are Good for American Democracy
yes
Earmarks
0
8
1
1
603
train
This house would abolish congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
-1
277,014
CON
Reducing earmarks does not reduce government spending
Reducing earmarks does not reduce government spending
yes
Reducing earmarks
0
17
-1
-1
603
train
This house would abolish congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
-1
277,015
CON
In an already flawed system, earmarks can at least allow residents of Congressional districts to have a greater role in allocating federal funds
In an already flawed system, earmarks can at least allow residents of Congressional districts to have a greater role in allocating federal funds
yes
earmarks
29
37
1
1
603
train
This house would abolish congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
-1
305,328
CON
directing money to particular purposes is a core constitutional function of Congress
directing money to particular purposes is a core constitutional function of Congress
yes
directing money to particular purposes
0
38
1
1
603
train
This house would abolish congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
-1
313,041
PRO
Congressmen tend to distribute specialized benefits at a great cost and ignore the particular costs the legislation bears upon the taxpayers
Congressmen tend to distribute specialized benefits at a great cost and ignore the particular costs the legislation bears upon the taxpayers
yes
specialized benefits
31
51
-1
1
603
train
This house would abolish congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
-1
313,042
PRO
benefits of a vote only reach a particular portion of the population, while the tax costs that pay for the vote are spread throughout the entire populace
benefits of a vote only reach a particular portion of the population, while the tax costs that pay for the vote are spread throughout the entire populace
no
null
null
null
null
null
603
train
This house would abolish congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
-1
313,043
PRO
Committee members can exploit pork barrel projects for electoral purposes
Committee members can thus exploit pork barrel projects for electoral purposes
yes
pork barrel projects
30
50
-1
1
603
train
This house would abolish congressional earmarks
congressional earmarks
-1
337,145
CON
power of the purse is one of Congress's primary checks on the executive branch
power of the purse is one of Congress's primary checks on the executive branch
yes
power of the purse
0
18
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
182,743
PRO
the deployment, and implicit menace of use, of strong weapons is essential to threaten the enemy in order to prevent the use by said-enemy of the same weapons
the deployment, and implicit menace of use, of strong weapons is essential to threaten the enemy in order to prevent the use by said-enemy of the same weapons
yes
the deployment, and implicit menace of use, of strong weapons
0
61
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
182,744
CON
a nuclear nation might be hijacked by a despot or other person or persons who might use nuclear weapons without sane regard for the consequences
a nuclear nation might be hijacked by a despot or other person or persons who might use nuclear weapons without sane regard for the consequences
yes
a nuclear nation
0
16
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
182,953
CON
Having more nuclear nuclear-weapon states will reduce security for all
Having more nuclear nuclear-weapon states would reduce security for all
yes
Having more nuclear nuclear-weapon states
0
41
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
182,954
PRO
nuclear forces continue to play an essential role in war prevention
nuclear forces continue to play an essential role in war prevention
yes
nuclear forces
0
14
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
184,443
CON
reliance on nuclear weapons for deterrence is becoming increasingly hazardous and decreasingly effective
reliance on nuclear weapons for deterrence is becoming increasingly hazardous and decreasingly effective
yes
reliance on nuclear weapons for deterrence
0
42
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
184,444
CON
The world is now in a new and dangerous nuclear era, and the likelihood that non-state terrorists will get their hands on nuclear weaponry is increasing
The world is now in a new and dangerous nuclear era, and the likelihood that non-state terrorists will get their hands on nuclear weaponry is increasing
no
null
null
null
null
null
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
185,085
CON
nuclear weapon technology would soon reach the point where it could end human life on Earth
nuclear weapon technology would soon reach the point where it could end human life on Earth
yes
nuclear weapon technology
0
25
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
185,096
CON
nuclear holocaust could result in an end to human life
nuclear holocaust could result in an end to human life
no
null
null
null
null
null
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
185,162
CON
nuclear weapons had become a source of extreme risk
nuclear weapons had become a source of extreme risk
yes
nuclear weapons
0
15
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
186,808
PRO
nuclear weapons can induce stability
nuclear weapons can induce stability
yes
nuclear weapons
0
15
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
186,809
PRO
Nuclear weapons decrease the chances of crisis escalation
decrease the chances of crisis escalation
yes
Nuclear weapons
0
15
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
186,810
PRO
controlled nuclear proliferation may be beneficial for inducing stability
controlled nuclear proliferation may be beneficial for inducing stability
yes
controlled nuclear proliferation
0
32
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
186,811
CON
Nuclear proliferation increases the chance of inter-state nuclear conflict
increases the chance of inter-state nuclear conflict
yes
Nuclear proliferation
0
21
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
186,812
CON
Nuclear proliferation increases the chances of nuclear material falling into the hands of non-state groups
increases the chances of nuclear material falling into the hands of non-state groups
yes
Nuclear proliferation
0
21
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
186,813
PRO
new nuclear states will use their acquired nuclear capabilities to deter threats and preserve peace
new nuclear states will use their acquired nuclear capabilities to deter threats and preserve peace
yes
new nuclear states
0
18
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
186,814
CON
new nuclear states often lack adequate organizational controls over their new weapons
new nuclear states often lack adequate organizational controls over their new weapons
yes
new nuclear states
0
18
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
186,816
PRO
Nuclear weapons may lessen a state's reliance on allies for security, thus preventing allies from dragging each other into wars
Nuclear weapons may also lessen a state's reliance on allies for security, thus preventing allies from dragging each other into wars
yes
Nuclear weapons
0
15
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
186,817
PRO
nuclear weapons induce stability in all regimes
nuclear weapons induce stability in all regimes
yes
nuclear weapons
0
15
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
186,818
PRO
nuclear weapons contribute to stability at a strategic level
nuclear weapons contribute to stability at a strategic level
yes
nuclear weapons
0
15
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,059
CON
public opinion is overwhelmingly opposed to nuclearization
public opinion is overwhelmingly opposed to nuclearization
yes
nuclearization
44
58
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,072
PRO
states must act in a way that ensures their security above all
states must act in a way that ensures their security above all
no
null
null
null
null
null
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,073
PRO
States cannot count on the good will of others to help them, so they must always be ready to fend for themselves
they cannot count on the good will of others to help them, so they must always be ready to fend for themselves
no
null
null
null
null
null
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,454
PRO
the present situation whereby Nuclear Weapon States monopolise the right to possess nuclear weapons is "highly discriminatory
the present situation whereby Nuclear Weapon States monopolise the right to possess nuclear weapons is "highly discriminatory
yes
Nuclear Weapon States monopolise the right to possess nuclear weapons
30
99
-1
-1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,743
CON
more countries with nuclear weapons may increase the possibility of nuclear warfare
more countries with nuclear weapons may increase the possibility of nuclear warfare
yes
more countries with nuclear weapons
0
35
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,744
PRO
The spread of nuclear weapons can increase international stability
the spread of nuclear weapons could increase international stability
yes
The spread of nuclear weapons
0
29
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,745
PRO
Nuclear proliferation will decrease the likelihood of war
it will decrease the likelihood of war
yes
Nuclear proliferation
0
21
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,746
CON
most states are not in a position to safely guard against nuclear use
most states are not in a position to safely guard against nuclear use
no
null
null
null
null
null
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,748
PRO
The effective prohibition on nuclear proliferation has been characterised as a form of technological apartheid
The effective prohibition on nuclear proliferation has been characterised as a form of technological apartheid
yes
The effective prohibition on nuclear proliferation
0
50
-1
-1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,886
PRO
the significance of nuclear weapons is purely to deter war
the significance of nuclear weapons is purely to deter war
yes
nuclear weapons
20
35
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,887
CON
The use of (or threat of use of) nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict
would generally be contrary to the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict
yes
The use of (or threat of use of) nuclear weapons
0
48
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,888
PRO
unlike conventional weapons, nuclear weapons successfully deter all-out war between states
unlike conventional weapons, nuclear weapons successfully deter all-out war between states
yes
nuclear weapons
29
44
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,890
PRO
Nuclear disarmament would undermine deterrence
it would undermine deterrence
yes
Nuclear disarmament
0
19
-1
-1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
187,891
PRO
Nuclear disarmament could lead to increased global instability
could lead to increased global instability
yes
Nuclear disarmament
0
19
-1
-1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
188,060
PRO
an inferior nuclear force, by virtue of its extreme destructive power, could deter a more powerful adversary
an inferior nuclear force, by virtue of its extreme destructive power, could deter a more powerful adversary
yes
an inferior nuclear force
0
25
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
188,062
CON
Nuclear weapons have become a source of extreme risk
nuclear weapons had become a source of extreme risk
yes
Nuclear weapons
0
15
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
188,063
PRO
nuclear weapons are intended to deter other states from attacking
nuclear weapons are intended to deter other states from attacking
yes
nuclear weapons
0
15
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
188,064
CON
Nuclear weapons give nations the potential to not only destroy their enemies but humanity itself
Nuclear weapons give nations the potential to not only destroy their enemies but humanity itself
yes
Nuclear weapons
0
15
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
188,073
CON
Extreme danger is intrinsic to nuclear war and the possession of nuclear weapons
extreme danger intrinsic to nuclear war and the possession of nuclear weapons
yes
the possession of nuclear weapons
47
80
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
188,075
CON
with nuclear weapons more widely available, deterrence is decreasingly effective and increasingly hazardous
with nuclear weapons more widely available, deterrence is decreasingly effective and increasingly hazardous
yes
nuclear weapons more widely available
5
42
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
188,168
CON
if we hope to escape self-destruction, then nuclear weapons should have no place in our collective conscience, and no role in our security
if we hope to escape self-destruction, then nuclear weapons should have no place in our collective conscience, and no role in our security
yes
nuclear weapons
44
59
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
188,756
CON
a full-scale nuclear war could potentially bring about the extinction of the human race
a full-scale nuclear war could potentially bring about the extinction of the human race
yes
a full-scale nuclear war
0
24
-1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
188,757
CON
a full-scale nuclear war would result in the extinction of the human species
a full-scale nuclear war would result in the extinction of the human species
no
null
null
null
null
null
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
188,877
PRO
the greater the threat of mutual destruction, the safer the world would be
the greater the threat of mutual destruction, the safer the world would be
yes
the threat of mutual destruction
12
44
1
1
621
train
This house believes all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
all nations have a right to nuclear weapons
1
194,353
PRO
when two countries each have nuclear weapons, the probability of a direct war between them greatly decreases
when two countries each have nuclear weapons, the probability of a direct war between them greatly decreases
yes
when two countries each have nuclear weapons
0
44
1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
397,474
PRO
If there is no rocket fire at Israel, there won't be Israeli attacks on Gaza
If there is no rocket fire at Israel, there won't be Israeli attacks on Gaza
no
null
null
null
null
null
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
397,475
PRO
Israel was "compelled to continue to take these defensive measures" to protect more than 200,000 Israelis living under the threat of Palestinian rocket barrages.Militants
Israel was "compelled to continue to take these defensive measures" to protect more than 200,000 Israelis living under the threat of Palestinian rocket barrages.Militants
yes
to continue to take these defensive measures
22
66
1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
397,476
PRO
The rocket attacks have caused widespread fear and hardship in Israeli border towns
The rocket attacks have caused widespread fear and hardship in Israeli border towns
yes
The rocket attacks
0
18
-1
-1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
397,477
PRO
Israel's right to defend itself is recognized
Israel's right to defend itself
yes
Israel's right to defend itself
0
31
1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
397,478
PRO
Israeli military attacks were launched in response to militants firing missiles
Israeli military attacks were launched in response to militants firing missiles
yes
Israeli military attacks
0
24
1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
397,479
CON
Israel's response was excessive
Israel's response is "excessive
yes
Israel's response
0
17
-1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
397,480
CON
Israel's attacks were "more than a holocaust
Israel's attacks were "more than a holocaust
yes
Israel's attacks
0
16
-1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,247
CON
Israel intentionally targeted civilians in Gaza
Israel intentionally targeted civilians in Gaza
yes
Israel
0
6
-1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,248
CON
Hamas was willing to renew the cease-fire under the original terms
Hamas was willing to renew the cease-fire under the original terms
yes
Hamas
0
5
1
-1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,249
PRO
the offensive was the result of Israel’s "patience running out" over the rocket attacks
the offensive was the result of Israel’s "patience running out" over the rocket attacks
no
null
null
null
null
null
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,250
PRO
the firing of rockets at Israel constituted a deliberate attack against the civilian population
the firing of rockets at Israel constituted a deliberate attack against the civilian population
yes
the firing of rockets at Israel
0
31
-1
-1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,252
PRO
the Israeli operation greatly curtailed years of Hamas rocket fire, returning a sense of normalcy to Southern Israel
the Israeli operation greatly curtailed years of Hamas rocket fire, returning a sense of normalcy to Southern Israel
yes
the Israeli operation
0
21
1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,253
PRO
During Operation Cast Lead, the Israeli Defense Forces did more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare
During Operation Cast Lead, the Israeli Defense Forces did more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare
yes
the Israeli Defense Forces
28
54
1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,254
CON
Israel was widely criticised by human rights groups for using heavy firepower and causing hundreds of civilian casualties
Israel was widely criticised by human rights groups for using heavy firepower and causing hundreds of civilian casualties
yes
Israel
0
6
-1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,255
CON
the Israeli military operation was directed at the people of Gaza as a whole
the Israeli military operation was directed at the people of Gaza as a whole
yes
the Israeli military operation
0
30
-1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,257
PRO
during the conflict, the Israel Defense Forces "did more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare
during the conflict, the Israel Defense Forces "did more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare
yes
the Israel Defense Forces
21
46
1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,258
CON
the livelihoods and assets of tens of thousands of Gaza civilians have been affected
the livelihoods and assets of tens of thousands of Gaza civilians have been affected
no
null
null
null
null
null
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,259
PRO
life in much of southern Israel was paralyzed by Hamas rocket and mortar fire
life in much of southern Israel was paralyzed by Hamas rocket and mortar fire
yes
Hamas rocket and mortar fire
49
77
-1
-1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,260
CON
Israel targeted Palestinian civilians as a matter of policy
Israel targeted Palestinian civilians as a matter of policy
yes
Israel
0
6
-1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,261
CON
it was a war against Palestinian civilians
it was a war against Palestinian civilians
yes
it
0
2
-1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,338
PRO
Palestinian security forces do little or nothing to prevent rocket attacks
they do little or nothing to prevent rocket attacks
yes
Palestinian security forces
0
27
-1
-1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,339
PRO
the constant threat of impending rocket attacks has caused fear and disrupted the lives of the growing number of Israelis who live within range of such attacks
the constant threat of impending rocket attacks has caused fear and disrupted the lives of the growing number of Israelis who live within range of such attacks
yes
the constant threat of impending rocket attacks
0
47
-1
-1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,340
PRO
Israeli citizens in the south have been suffering from rockets being fired at them
Israeli citizens in the south have been suffering from rockets being fired at them
yes
rockets being fired at them
55
82
-1
-1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,341
PRO
Life in the south under rocket barrages had become unbearable
Life in the south under rocket barrages had become unbearable
yes
Life in the south under rocket barrages
0
39
-1
-1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
399,342
PRO
Hamas attacks are violations of basic humanitarian law
Hamas attacks are violations of basic humanitarian law
yes
Hamas attacks
0
13
-1
-1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
401,153
PRO
The Israeli government's use of force in the Gaza Strip are acts of self-defense
its use of force in the Gaza Strip are acts of self-defense
yes
The Israeli government's use of force in the Gaza Strip
0
55
1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
401,155
CON
the Israeli Defence Force breached laws of armed conflict by attacking indiscriminately civilians
the Israeli Defence Force breached laws of armed conflict by attacking indiscriminately civilians
yes
the Israeli Defence Force
0
25
-1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
401,157
PRO
anything affiliated with Hamas is a legitimate target
anything affiliated with Hamas is a legitimate target
yes
anything affiliated with Hamas
0
30
-1
-1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
401,158
CON
Israel's UAV attacks were a violation of International Humanitarian Law
these attacks were a violation of International Humanitarian Law
yes
Israel's UAV attacks
0
20
-1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
401,159
CON
the Israeli soldiers at best failed to protect civilians, and at worst deliberately shot at them
the Israeli soldiers at best failed to protect civilians, and at worst deliberately shot at them
yes
the Israeli soldiers
0
20
-1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
401,160
PRO
Israel used "decisive force to enhance regional deterrence
Israel used "decisive force to enhance regional deterrence
yes
Israel
0
6
1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
401,161
PRO
during Operation Cast Lead, the IDF did more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare
during Operation Cast Lead, the IDF did more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare
yes
the IDF
28
35
1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
401,162
PRO
the psychological effect of the rocket strikes paralyzed life across Israel's south
the psychological effect of the rocket strikes paralyzed life across Israel's south
yes
the psychological effect of the rocket strikes
0
46
-1
-1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
401,928
CON
The government of Israel had a policy of deliberately targeting civilians
had a policy of deliberately targeting civilians
yes
The government of Israel
0
24
-1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
401,929
CON
it was Israeli government policy to deliberately target citizens
it was Israeli government policy to deliberately target citizens
yes
Israeli government policy
7
32
-1
1
801
train
This house believes that Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza were justified
Israel's 2008-2009 military operations against Gaza
1
401,930
PRO
The Gaza war was conducted as a response to rockets fired from the Gaza Strip
the Gaza war would have been conducted as a response to rockets fired from the Gaza Strip
yes
The Gaza war
0
12
1
1