topicId
int64
441
1.07k
split
stringclasses
1 value
topicText
stringclasses
25 values
topicTarget
stringclasses
25 values
topicSentiment
int64
-1
1
claims.claimId
int64
117k
913k
claims.stance
stringclasses
2 values
claims.claimCorrectedText
stringlengths
21
223
claims.claimOriginalText
stringlengths
14
223
claims.Compatible
stringclasses
2 values
claims.claimTarget.text
stringlengths
2
152
claims.claimTarget.span.start
float64
0
135
claims.claimTarget.span.end
float64
2
180
claims.claimSentiment
float64
-1
1
claims.targetsRelation
float64
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
219,550
PRO
The cultivation of tobacco can be economically detrimental to developing countries
The cultivation of tobacco can be economically detrimental to developing countries
yes
The cultivation of tobacco
0
26
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
219,551
PRO
When resources are put into tobacco production they are taken away from food production
When resources are put into tobacco production they are taken away from food production
yes
tobacco production
28
46
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
219,552
PRO
A large percent of the profits from tobacco production go to large tobacco companies rather than local tobacco farmers
A large percent of the profits from tobacco production go to large tobacco companies rather than local tobacco farmers
no
null
null
null
null
null
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
219,553
PRO
Government subsides for tobacco farming do not make economic sense
government subsides for tobacco farming, which do not make economic sense
yes
Government subsides for tobacco farming
0
39
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
219,557
PRO
The cultivation of tobacco is economically detrimental to the countries that produce it
The cultivation of tobacco is economically detrimental to the countries that produce it
yes
The cultivation of tobacco
0
26
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
219,558
PRO
When resources are put into tobacco production, they are taken away from food production
When resources are put into tobacco production, they are taken away from food production
yes
tobacco production
28
46
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
219,567
CON
The market system is not adequately rewarding farm people for their agricultural commodities
the market system was not adequately rewarding farm people for their agricultural commodities
yes
The market system
0
17
-1
-1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
219,577
PRO
smoking tobacco is among the leading causes of many diseases
smoking tobacco is among the leading causes of many diseases
yes
smoking tobacco
0
15
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
219,579
PRO
Tobacco-related diseases are some of the biggest killers in the world today
Tobacco-related diseases are some of the biggest killers in the world today
yes
Tobacco-related diseases
0
24
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
219,580
PRO
Toxic compounds in tobacco constitute serious health hazards
toxic compounds in tobacco that constitute serious health hazards
yes
Toxic compounds in tobacco
0
26
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
219,589
PRO
Subsidies provide little benefit to the farmers themselves
provide little benefit to the farmers themselves
yes
Subsidies
0
9
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
222,008
PRO
Tobacco is the single greatest cause of preventable death globally
Tobacco is the single greatest cause of preventable death globally
yes
Tobacco
0
7
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
222,009
PRO
Tobacco use is described as the single most important preventable risk to human health
tobacco use as "the single most important preventable risk to human health
yes
Tobacco use
0
11
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
296,392
PRO
Tobacco is being considered a usurper of good farm land
tobacco being considered a usurper of good farm land
yes
Tobacco
0
7
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
296,395
PRO
Cigarette smoking produces substantial health-related economic costs to society
produces substantial health-related economic costs to society
yes
Cigarette smoking
0
17
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
296,398
CON
Tobacco plays an important role in the economy of the producing areas
Tobacco plays an important role in the economy of the producing areas
yes
Tobacco
0
7
1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
346,091
PRO
tobacco causes cancer
tobacco causes cancer
yes
tobacco
0
7
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
346,092
CON
commercial tobacco production is a vital part of the American and world economy
commercial tobacco production is a vital part of the American and world economy
yes
commercial tobacco production
0
29
1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
346,093
PRO
smoking-related health problems contribute to rising health care costs
smoking-related health problems contribute to rising health care costs
yes
smoking-related health problems
0
31
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
346,106
PRO
subsidised agriculture in the developed world is one of the greatest obstacles to economic growth in the developing world
subsidised agriculture in the developed world is one of the greatest obstacles to economic growth in the developing world
yes
subsidised agriculture in the developed world
0
45
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
346,107
PRO
artificially low prices resulting from subsidies create unhealthy incentives for consumers
artificially low prices resulting from subsidies create unhealthy incentives for consumers
yes
artificially low prices resulting from subsidies
0
48
-1
1
482
train
This house believes that states should not subsidize the growing of tobacco
subsidize the growing of tobacco
-1
346,108
PRO
Subsidies are an inefficient use of taxpayer’s money
Subsidies are also an inefficient use of taxpayer’s money
yes
Subsidies
0
9
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
150,593
PRO
there is no such thing as unlimited freedom
there is no such thing as unlimited freedom
no
null
null
null
null
null
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
150,594
CON
The free communication of thoughts and of opinions is one of the most precious rights of man
The free communication of thoughts and of opinions is one of the most precious rights of man
yes
The free communication of thoughts and of opinions
0
50
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
150,595
PRO
freedom of expression is not absolute and can be limited under certain situations
freedom of expression is not absolute and can be limited under certain situations
no
null
null
null
null
null
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
150,596
PRO
a limitation on freedom of speech prescribed in law can be permitted if it can be justified as being a reasonable limit
a limitation on freedom of speech prescribed in law can be permitted if it can be justified as being a reasonable limit
yes
a limitation on freedom of speech prescribed in law
0
51
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
152,423
PRO
Freedom of expression is subject to certain restrictions
freedom of expression, subject to certain restrictions
yes
Freedom of expression
0
21
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
152,454
PRO
Censorship is occasionally carried out to aid authorities or to protect an individual
Censorship is occasionally carried out to aid authorities or to protect an individual
yes
Censorship
0
10
1
-1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
152,680
PRO
Freedom of speech may be restricted by law to protect rights and respectability of others
it may be restricted by law to protect rights and respectability of others
yes
Freedom of speech
0
17
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
153,219
PRO
human rights can be limited or even pushed aside during times of national emergency
human rights can be limited or even pushed aside during times of national emergency
yes
human rights
0
12
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
153,278
CON
Government-enforced right of access inescapably dampens the vigor and limits the variety of public debate
Government-enforced right of access inescapably dampens the vigor and limits the variety of public debate
yes
Government-enforced right of access
0
35
-1
-1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
153,375
CON
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression
yes
freedom of opinion and expression
26
59
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
153,376
CON
an effort to limit the use of words of language is actually a form of restricting freedom of thought
an effort to limit the use of words of language is actually a form of restricting freedom of thought
yes
an effort to limit the use of words of language
0
47
-1
-1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
153,386
PRO
limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights
limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights
yes
limitations on free speech
0
26
1
-1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
153,387
PRO
the government may censor speech when the speech is its own
the government may censor speech when the speech is its own
no
null
null
null
null
null
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
156,336
CON
freedom of speech, in order to exist and function, necessarily extends to even the unpopular
freedom of speech, in order to exist and function, necessarily extends to even the unpopular
no
null
null
null
null
null
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
158,683
CON
the individual must have unlimited access to the ideas of his fellow men in “a free and open encounter
the individual must have unlimited access to the ideas of his fellow men in “a free and open encounter
yes
unlimited access to the ideas of his fellow men
25
72
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
158,684
CON
The individual freedom of expression is essential to the well-being of society
The individual freedom of expression is therefore essential to the well-being of society
yes
The individual freedom of expression
0
36
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
158,685
PRO
freedom can be restricted for reasons of "sovereignty and integrity
freedom can be restricted for reasons of "sovereignty and integrity
yes
freedom
0
7
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
160,213
CON
The people should not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments
The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments
yes
their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments
49
111
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
165,142
PRO
when a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight
when a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight
yes
many things that might be said in time of peace
25
72
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
165,144
PRO
the circumstances of wartime permit greater restrictions on free speech than would be allowable during peacetime
the circumstances of wartime permit greater restrictions on free speech than would be allowable during peacetime
no
null
null
null
null
null
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
165,153
PRO
The right to free speech conflicts with other rights
the right to free speech conflicts with these other rights
yes
The right to free speech
0
24
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
165,154
PRO
the freely expressed word can be a direct threat to other human rights
the freely expressed word can be a direct threat to other human rights
yes
the freely expressed word
0
25
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,473
CON
The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man
The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man
yes
The free communication of ideas and opinions
0
44
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,474
PRO
The right to freedom of speech and expression may be limited when conflicting with other rights
may be limited when conflicting with other rights
yes
The right to freedom of speech and expression
0
45
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,475
CON
the expression of dissent or subversive views should be tolerated
the expression of dissent or subversive views should be tolerated
yes
the expression of dissent or subversive views
0
45
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,477
CON
free discussion is necessary to prevent the "deep slumber of a decided opinion
free discussion is necessary to prevent the "deep slumber of a decided opinion
yes
free discussion
0
15
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,478
PRO
Speech can be justifiably suppressed in order to prevent harm from a clear and direct threat
speech can be justifiably suppressed is in order to prevent harm from a clear and direct threat
yes
Speech
0
6
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,479
CON
there must be no constraints on the free flow of information and ideas
there must be no constraints on the free flow of information and ideas
yes
the free flow of information and ideas
32
70
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,480
CON
democracy will not be true to its essential ideal if those in power are able to manipulate the electorate by withholding information and stifling criticism
democracy will not be true to its essential ideal if those in power are able to manipulate the electorate by withholding information and stifling criticism
yes
withholding information and stifling criticism
109
155
-1
-1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,481
CON
freedom of speech helps to provide a balance between stability and change
freedom of speech helps to provide a balance between stability and change
yes
freedom of speech
0
17
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,482
CON
there ought to exist the fullest liberty of professing and discussing, as a matter of ethical conviction, any doctrine, however immoral it may be considered
there ought to exist the fullest liberty of professing and discussing, as a matter of ethical conviction, any doctrine, however immoral it may be considered
yes
the fullest liberty of professing and discussing
21
69
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,483
PRO
some forms of expression can be legitimately prohibited by law because they are very offensive
some forms of expression can be legitimately prohibited by law because they are very offensive
yes
some forms of expression
0
24
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,745
CON
Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right
freedom of speech, a fundamental human right
yes
Freedom of speech
0
17
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,747
PRO
it is necessary to prevent the use of information resources and technologies for criminal and terrorist purposes
it is necessary to prevent the use of information resources and technologies for criminal and terrorist purposes
yes
the use of information resources and technologies for criminal and terrorist purposes
27
112
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
168,748
CON
the more freely information flows, the stronger societies become
the more freely information flows, the stronger societies become
yes
the more freely information flows
0
33
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
169,500
CON
No human right is more basic than freedom of expression
No human right is more basic than freedom of expression
yes
freedom of expression
34
55
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
169,501
PRO
Clear and present danger is posed by discriminatory speech and the growth of e-hate
clear and present danger posed by discriminatory speech and the growth of e-hate
yes
discriminatory speech and the growth of e-hate
37
83
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
169,502
CON
Freedom of expression is the lifeblood of any free and open society
Freedom of expression is the lifeblood of any free and open society
yes
Freedom of expression
0
21
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
169,526
PRO
liberty of expression 'is not absolute
liberty of expression 'is not absolute
yes
liberty of expression
0
21
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
169,527
CON
government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable
government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable
yes
prohibit the expression of an idea
19
53
-1
-1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
169,528
PRO
Punishment of dangerous or offensive writings is necessary for the preservation of peace and good order
punishment of "dangerous or offensive writings..[was] necessary for the preservation of peace and good order
yes
Punishment of dangerous or offensive writings
0
45
1
-1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
169,529
PRO
Reasonable restrictions upon free speech serve public order
reasonable" restrictions upon free speech to serve "public order
yes
Reasonable restrictions upon free speech
0
40
1
-1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
171,255
CON
Freedom of speech and of the press lay at the foundation of all democratic organisations
Freedom of speech and of the press lay at the foundation of all democratic organisations
yes
Freedom of speech and of the press
0
34
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
171,256
PRO
The freedom of speech and of the press does not confer an absolute right to express without any responsibility
The freedom of speech and of the press does not confer an absolute right to express without any responsibility
yes
The freedom of speech and of the press
0
38
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
171,257
PRO
Reasonable restrictions can be imposed on the freedom of speech and expression, in the interest of the security of the State
Reasonable restrictions can be imposed on the freedom of speech and expression, in the interest of the security of the State
no
null
null
null
null
null
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
171,258
PRO
All the utterances intended to endanger the security of the State may be restrained in the interest of the security of the State
may be restrained in the interest of the security of the State
yes
All the utterances intended to endanger the security of the State
0
65
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
171,259
PRO
Freedom of speech does not allow a person to contempt the courts
freedom of speech would not allow a person to contempt the courts
no
null
null
null
null
null
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
171,260
PRO
Freedom of speech and expression can not be an excuse for distribution of indecent and immoral content
Freedom of speech and expression can not be an excuse for distribution of indecent and immoral content
yes
Freedom of speech and expression
0
32
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
171,261
PRO
Reasonable restrictions on freedom of expression can be imposed in the interest of public order
Reasonable restrictions can be imposed in the interest of public order
yes
Reasonable restrictions on freedom of expression
0
48
1
-1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
222,173
CON
censorship violates multiple Basic Human Rights
censorship violates multiple Basic Human Rights
yes
censorship
0
10
-1
-1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
222,188
PRO
one can not tolerate free speech concerning drugs
one can not tolerate free speech concerning drugs
yes
free speech concerning drugs
21
49
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
299,393
CON
Freedom of speech is the heart of democracy
Freedom of speech is the heart of democracy
yes
Freedom of speech
0
17
1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
299,394
PRO
the right to freedom of speech can be subjected to limitations such as hate speech
the right to freedom of speech can be subjected to limitations such as hate speech
yes
the right to freedom of speech
0
30
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
299,395
PRO
Without restrictions, total freedom of speech would allow freedom to slander
Without restrictions, total freedom of speech would allow freedom to slander
yes
total freedom of speech
22
45
-1
1
483
train
This house believes that it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech
freedom of speech
-1
299,396
CON
Press freedom is the right of the people
Press freedom is the right of the people
yes
Press freedom
0
13
1
1
601
train
This house would pass the American Jobs Act
American Jobs Act
1
232,698
CON
unemployment increases the more the government intervenes into the economy to try to improve the conditions of those without jobs
unemployment increases the more the government intervenes into the economy to try to improve the conditions of those without jobs
no
null
null
null
null
null
601
train
This house would pass the American Jobs Act
American Jobs Act
1
304,751
PRO
The American Jobs Act, would give businesses incentives to hire unemployed and disabled veterans
the American Jobs Act, which would give businesses incentives to hire unemployed and disabled veterans
yes
The American Jobs Act
0
21
1
1
601
train
This house would pass the American Jobs Act
American Jobs Act
1
304,752
CON
The American Jobs Act gives more tax breaks, thus contributing more to the federal deficit
it gives more tax breaks, thus contributing more to the federal deficit
yes
The American Jobs Act
0
21
-1
1
601
train
This house would pass the American Jobs Act
American Jobs Act
1
310,163
PRO
to improve the economy, policymakers should focus on reforms that remove impediments to work
to improve the economy, policymakers should focus on reforms that remove impediments to work
yes
reforms that remove impediments to work
53
92
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
232,715
PRO
vouchers and other forms of publicly funded private school choice are necessary to give families an opportunity to enroll their children in more effective private schools
vouchers and other forms of publicly funded private school choice are necessary to give families an opportunity to enroll their children in more effective private schools
yes
vouchers and other forms of publicly funded private school choice
0
65
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
235,335
PRO
a voucher system for public education would make public schools compete with one another thus making them more accountable and efficient
a voucher system for public education would make public schools compete with one another thus making them more accountable and efficient
yes
a voucher system for public education
0
37
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
235,474
PRO
by distributing vouchers to the families of students equal to the tuition that he/she would receive at his/her local public school, a student’s family could then choose from options where best to send their child
by distributing vouchers to the families of students equal to the tuition that he/she would receive at his/her local public school, a student’s family could then choose from options where best to send their child
yes
distributing vouchers to the families of students equal to the tuition that he/she would receive at his/her local public school
3
130
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,653
CON
public education would be destroyed by tuition vouchers
public education would be destroyed by tuition vouchers
yes
tuition vouchers
39
55
-1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,654
CON
the tuition voucher proposal would undermine public education
the tuition voucher proposal would undermine public education
yes
the tuition voucher proposal
0
28
-1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,674
PRO
competition among schools will increase both the quality and the economic efficiency of public education
competition among schools will increase both the quality and the economic efficiency of public education
yes
competition among schools
0
25
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,675
CON
Vouchers function to increase racial and economic discrimination in schools
vouchers have functioned to increase racial and economic discrimination in schools
yes
Vouchers
0
8
-1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,676
CON
since approximately four out of five US private schools are religious, voucher and charter systems violate the Constitution
since approximately four out of five US private schools are religious, voucher and charter systems violate the Constitution
yes
voucher and charter systems
71
98
-1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,678
PRO
a "competitive education market" would lead to "innovation and improvement
a "competitive education market" would lead to "innovation and improvement
yes
a "competitive education market
0
31
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,864
CON
allowing families the option of both public and private schools undermines the public education system
allowing families the option of both public and private schools undermines the public education system
yes
allowing families the option of both public and private schools
0
63
-1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,866
PRO
competition would improve schools and cost efficiency
competition would improve schools and cost efficiency
yes
competition
0
11
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,867
PRO
School voucher and education tax credit systems incentivize schools to increase accountability and school performance
they incentivize schools to increase accountability and school performance
yes
School voucher and education tax credit systems
0
47
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,868
PRO
the competition spurred by vouchers and education tax credits increases the quality of both eligible private schools and local public schools
the competition spurred by vouchers and education tax credits increases the quality of both eligible private schools and local public schools
yes
the competition spurred by vouchers and education tax credits
0
61
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,869
PRO
Both private and public schools are improving through the use of vouchers
both private and public schools improved through the use of vouchers
yes
the use of vouchers
54
73
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,871
PRO
vouchers improve academic outcomes at public schools
vouchers improve academic outcomes at public schools
yes
vouchers
0
8
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,872
PRO
Vouchers reduce racial segregation
reduce racial segregation
yes
Vouchers
0
8
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,873
PRO
Vouchers deliver better services to special education students
deliver better services to special education students
yes
Vouchers
0
8
1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,875
CON
School vouchers would erode educational standards and reduce funding
it would erode educational standards and reduce funding
yes
School vouchers
0
15
-1
1
602
train
This house would fund education using a voucher scheme
fund education using a voucher scheme
1
236,876
CON
a voucher system would weaken public schools
a voucher system would weaken public schools
yes
a voucher system
0
16
-1
1