Datasets:

hitachi-nlp

/

FLD.v2.reimpl

like 0

0.3

Some person riddles Anobiidae and stabilises neighboring.

(Ex): ({A}x & {B}x)

fact1: The come riddles Anobiidae. fact2: If the fact that that Python does not retort Arendt and stabilises neighboring is incorrect then that blackleg stabilises neighboring. fact3: That Python listens etude. fact4: the neighboring does stabilise Python. fact5: this Anobiidae riddles Python. fact6: That Python is idiomatic and it is avertable. fact7: That that flogger riddles Anobiidae is true. fact8: That Python riddles Anobiidae. fact9: That Python does stabilise neighboring. fact10: If this dissociation does riddle Anobiidae that that Python does not retort Arendt but it stabilises neighboring is wrong.

fact1: {A}{bk} fact2: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {B}{ha} fact3: {JH}{a} fact4: {AB}{ab} fact5: {AA}{aa} fact6: ({EA}{a} & {HU}{a}) fact7: {A}{bn} fact8: {A}{a} fact9: {B}{a} fact10: {A}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a})

That blackleg does stabilise neighboring.

{B}{ha}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The come riddles Anobiidae. fact2: If the fact that that Python does not retort Arendt and stabilises neighboring is incorrect then that blackleg stabilises neighboring. fact3: That Python listens etude. fact4: the neighboring does stabilise Python. fact5: this Anobiidae riddles Python. fact6: That Python is idiomatic and it is avertable. fact7: That that flogger riddles Anobiidae is true. fact8: That Python riddles Anobiidae. fact9: That Python does stabilise neighboring. fact10: If this dissociation does riddle Anobiidae that that Python does not retort Arendt but it stabilises neighboring is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = Some person riddles Anobiidae and stabilises neighboring. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact9 -> int1: That Python riddles Anobiidae and stabilises neighboring.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That repeater is not a kind of a friskiness.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: That that this jadestone bruises Cyclosporeae but it is not a judiciary is true does not hold if this jadestone does not clamber unprofitableness. fact2: That chemistry thinks spermatocele if the fact that either that chemistry does not unify malignment or it is not a Polystichum or both is false. fact3: If that pod does not bruise Cyclosporeae then that pintle does reserve hematocele. fact4: The Cuprimine thinks spermatocele. fact5: If some man is not Ruritanian and it is not a humanitarianism then it does not reorganize. fact6: If that chemistry is not a Polystichum the fact that that repeater does not unify malignment and/or does not think spermatocele does not hold. fact7: That that repeater thinks spermatocele is not false. fact8: If that either someone does not embrocate Bombus or he/she is marly or both is incorrect then he/she does serve Orectolobidae. fact9: That repeater is a Polystichum if that it does not think spermatocele and/or it is not a friskiness does not hold. fact10: The fact that that engine is not a comprehensiveness and is a friskiness does not hold if it does not reorganize. fact11: If that that stealer does not think spermatocele or it is not a Josephus or both is wrong that it does diffuse hold. fact12: The fact that something either is a 22 or is not a comprehensiveness or both does not hold if it does not reorganize. fact13: That pod does not bruise Cyclosporeae if the fact that this jadestone bruise Cyclosporeae but he is not a kind of a judiciary is false. fact14: Something is not a friskiness if the fact that this is a friskiness and is a Polystichum does not hold. fact15: That something is a friskiness and this is a kind of a Polystichum does not hold if this is not a comprehensiveness. fact16: That chemistry is not a Polystichum. fact17: If that the fact that that chemistry does not diffuse and/or is a choking does not hold is right that chemistry is a kind of a thrombocytopenia. fact18: If the fact that some man does not unify malignment or does not think spermatocele or both does not hold then the one is a friskiness. fact19: That chemistry is non-Ruritanian one that is not a humanitarianism if that pintle reserves hematocele. fact20: This jadestone does not clamber unprofitableness. fact21: That engine is a kind of a Polystichum if that that engine is not a comprehensiveness and is a friskiness does not hold. fact22: If that chemistry is not a Polystichum that repeater thinks spermatocele.

fact1: ¬{K}{e} -> ¬({I}{e} & ¬{J}{e}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) -> {AB}{a} fact3: ¬{I}{d} -> {H}{c} fact4: {AB}{hm} fact5: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{D}x fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) fact7: {AB}{b} fact8: (x): ¬(¬{IP}x v {DI}x) -> {ED}x fact9: ¬(¬{AB}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) -> {A}{b} fact10: ¬{D}{ad} -> ¬(¬{C}{ad} & {B}{ad}) fact11: ¬(¬{AB}{da} v ¬{FN}{da}) -> {HK}{da} fact12: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({E}x v ¬{C}x) fact13: ¬({I}{e} & ¬{J}{e}) -> ¬{I}{d} fact14: (x): ¬({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{B}x fact15: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & {A}x) fact16: ¬{A}{a} fact17: ¬(¬{HK}{a} v {CP}{a}) -> {AQ}{a} fact18: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact19: {H}{c} -> (¬{F}{a} & ¬{G}{a}) fact20: ¬{K}{e} fact21: ¬(¬{C}{ad} & {B}{ad}) -> {A}{ad} fact22: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{b}

That repeater is not a kind of a friskiness.

¬{B}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that this jadestone bruises Cyclosporeae but it is not a judiciary is true does not hold if this jadestone does not clamber unprofitableness. fact2: That chemistry thinks spermatocele if the fact that either that chemistry does not unify malignment or it is not a Polystichum or both is false. fact3: If that pod does not bruise Cyclosporeae then that pintle does reserve hematocele. fact4: The Cuprimine thinks spermatocele. fact5: If some man is not Ruritanian and it is not a humanitarianism then it does not reorganize. fact6: If that chemistry is not a Polystichum the fact that that repeater does not unify malignment and/or does not think spermatocele does not hold. fact7: That that repeater thinks spermatocele is not false. fact8: If that either someone does not embrocate Bombus or he/she is marly or both is incorrect then he/she does serve Orectolobidae. fact9: That repeater is a Polystichum if that it does not think spermatocele and/or it is not a friskiness does not hold. fact10: The fact that that engine is not a comprehensiveness and is a friskiness does not hold if it does not reorganize. fact11: If that that stealer does not think spermatocele or it is not a Josephus or both is wrong that it does diffuse hold. fact12: The fact that something either is a 22 or is not a comprehensiveness or both does not hold if it does not reorganize. fact13: That pod does not bruise Cyclosporeae if the fact that this jadestone bruise Cyclosporeae but he is not a kind of a judiciary is false. fact14: Something is not a friskiness if the fact that this is a friskiness and is a Polystichum does not hold. fact15: That something is a friskiness and this is a kind of a Polystichum does not hold if this is not a comprehensiveness. fact16: That chemistry is not a Polystichum. fact17: If that the fact that that chemistry does not diffuse and/or is a choking does not hold is right that chemistry is a kind of a thrombocytopenia. fact18: If the fact that some man does not unify malignment or does not think spermatocele or both does not hold then the one is a friskiness. fact19: That chemistry is non-Ruritanian one that is not a humanitarianism if that pintle reserves hematocele. fact20: This jadestone does not clamber unprofitableness. fact21: That engine is a kind of a Polystichum if that that engine is not a comprehensiveness and is a friskiness does not hold. fact22: If that chemistry is not a Polystichum that repeater thinks spermatocele. ; $hypothesis$ = That repeater is not a kind of a friskiness. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact16 -> int1: That that repeater does not unify malignment or that does not think spermatocele or both is incorrect.; fact18 -> int2: If that the fact that that repeater does not unify malignment and/or the one does not think spermatocele is right is false then the one is a friskiness.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This urination digs Patavium but that does not authorise comedy.

({A}{c} & ¬{B}{c})

fact1: That this urination digs Patavium but it does not authorise comedy is wrong if that lingonberry authorise comedy. fact2: The fact that Jamie authorises comedy but it is not a proof is wrong. fact3: Some man digs Patavium but it does not authorise comedy if it does not enliven stableness. fact4: The fact that if the fact that either Jamie is a proof or it does not authorise comedy or both does not hold then that botanist is a proof hold. fact5: That Jamie is straight and not a proof does not hold. fact6: If Jamie does not rust impureness and is a kind of a proof then that lingonberry authorises comedy. fact7: The fact that this urination does authorise comedy but it is not a kind of a proof does not hold. fact8: The fact that that lingonberry authorises comedy and does not dig Patavium does not hold if this urination dig Patavium. fact9: Jamie does not rust impureness. fact10: This urination does rust impureness if that lingonberry is not a proof and authorises comedy. fact11: Jamie does not rust impureness but that is a proof. fact12: The fact that this urination does dig Patavium and it authorises comedy is incorrect. fact13: If Jamie rusts impureness and is a proof that lingonberry authorises comedy. fact14: Jamie digs Patavium. fact15: That Jamie rusts impureness and does not dig Patavium does not hold if this urination dig Patavium. fact16: The fact that this urination digs Patavium and authorises comedy is false if that lingonberry authorises comedy. fact17: Jamie digs Patavium if that lingonberry digs Patavium. fact18: Jamie does not rust impureness and digs Patavium.

fact1: {B}{b} -> ¬({A}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) fact2: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact4: ¬({AB}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) -> {AB}{ah} fact5: ¬({K}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact6: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact7: ¬({B}{c} & ¬{AB}{c}) fact8: {A}{c} -> ¬({B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact9: ¬{AA}{a} fact10: (¬{AB}{b} & {B}{b}) -> {AA}{c} fact11: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact12: ¬({A}{c} & {B}{c}) fact13: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact14: {A}{a} fact15: {A}{c} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact16: {B}{b} -> ¬({A}{c} & {B}{c}) fact17: {A}{b} -> {A}{a} fact18: (¬{AA}{a} & {A}{a})

This urination digs Patavium but that does not authorise comedy.

({A}{c} & ¬{B}{c})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this urination digs Patavium but it does not authorise comedy is wrong if that lingonberry authorise comedy. fact2: The fact that Jamie authorises comedy but it is not a proof is wrong. fact3: Some man digs Patavium but it does not authorise comedy if it does not enliven stableness. fact4: The fact that if the fact that either Jamie is a proof or it does not authorise comedy or both does not hold then that botanist is a proof hold. fact5: That Jamie is straight and not a proof does not hold. fact6: If Jamie does not rust impureness and is a kind of a proof then that lingonberry authorises comedy. fact7: The fact that this urination does authorise comedy but it is not a kind of a proof does not hold. fact8: The fact that that lingonberry authorises comedy and does not dig Patavium does not hold if this urination dig Patavium. fact9: Jamie does not rust impureness. fact10: This urination does rust impureness if that lingonberry is not a proof and authorises comedy. fact11: Jamie does not rust impureness but that is a proof. fact12: The fact that this urination does dig Patavium and it authorises comedy is incorrect. fact13: If Jamie rusts impureness and is a proof that lingonberry authorises comedy. fact14: Jamie digs Patavium. fact15: That Jamie rusts impureness and does not dig Patavium does not hold if this urination dig Patavium. fact16: The fact that this urination digs Patavium and authorises comedy is false if that lingonberry authorises comedy. fact17: Jamie digs Patavium if that lingonberry digs Patavium. fact18: Jamie does not rust impureness and digs Patavium. ; $hypothesis$ = This urination digs Patavium but that does not authorise comedy. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact11 -> int1: That lingonberry authorises comedy.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This accelerator is not nonpolitical.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: Somebody is unborn but the one is not a esoterica. fact2: The decalcification Echoes Lufkin. fact3: Some man does not delight Ibadan and she/he is not nonpolitical if she/he is not a esoterica. fact4: The fact that this accelerator delights Ibadan hold. fact5: The fact that if that tortfeasor is not unborn that tortfeasor is a esoterica and it is nonpolitical hold. fact6: That tortfeasor is born and is prokaryotic if it is not a kind of a statute. fact7: If there exists something such that this is unborn and this is not a esoterica that tortfeasor does not delight Ibadan. fact8: That that tortfeasor delights Ibadan is true if this accelerator is nonpolitical. fact9: The decalcification is a statute and is a kind of a antepenultima. fact10: The fact that that tortfeasor is not a statute if the decalcification is a statute and that person Echoes Lufkin is true.

fact1: (Ex): ({D}x & ¬{C}x) fact2: {H}{c} fact3: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact4: {B}{a} fact5: ¬{D}{b} -> ({C}{b} & {A}{b}) fact6: ¬{F}{b} -> (¬{D}{b} & {E}{b}) fact7: (x): ({D}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}{b} fact8: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact9: ({F}{c} & {G}{c}) fact10: ({F}{c} & {H}{c}) -> ¬{F}{b}

Let's assume that that this accelerator is nonpolitical is right.

{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Somebody is unborn but the one is not a esoterica. fact2: The decalcification Echoes Lufkin. fact3: Some man does not delight Ibadan and she/he is not nonpolitical if she/he is not a esoterica. fact4: The fact that this accelerator delights Ibadan hold. fact5: The fact that if that tortfeasor is not unborn that tortfeasor is a esoterica and it is nonpolitical hold. fact6: That tortfeasor is born and is prokaryotic if it is not a kind of a statute. fact7: If there exists something such that this is unborn and this is not a esoterica that tortfeasor does not delight Ibadan. fact8: That that tortfeasor delights Ibadan is true if this accelerator is nonpolitical. fact9: The decalcification is a statute and is a kind of a antepenultima. fact10: The fact that that tortfeasor is not a statute if the decalcification is a statute and that person Echoes Lufkin is true. ; $hypothesis$ = This accelerator is not nonpolitical. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this accelerator is nonpolitical is right.; fact8 & assump1 -> int1: That tortfeasor delights Ibadan.; fact1 & fact7 -> int2: That tortfeasor does not delight Ibadan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this Maker does not malnourished Disraeli and is punitory does not hold.

¬(¬{E}{a} & {D}{a})

fact1: This Maker is not thrifty. fact2: Someone cooks disillusion and/or that one does not crochet Seles. fact3: This Maker does not malnourished Disraeli. fact4: If something does not drift hollowness it is not a Lavandula. fact5: Somebody does not cook disillusion or does not crochet Seles or both. fact6: If somebody does not extenuate amenorrhea then it is not a kind of a Selar. fact7: Someone does not cook disillusion or crochets Seles or both. fact8: This Maker is not sabbatic if there is some person such that either the one does not cook disillusion or the one does not crochet Seles or both. fact9: This Maker is not a kind of a Usuli. fact10: If this Maker is not punitory this Maker is not a kind of a noontide but the thing is a Cnidoscolus. fact11: Some man is a kind of non-echt man that hugs superstition if that one does not extenuate amenorrhea. fact12: Something does not malnourished Disraeli and is punitory if it is not sabbatic.

fact1: ¬{IB}{a} fact2: (Ex): ({A}x v ¬{B}x) fact3: ¬{E}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{N}x -> ¬{CB}x fact5: (Ex): (¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) fact6: (x): ¬{FF}x -> ¬{AP}x fact7: (Ex): (¬{A}x v {B}x) fact8: (x): (¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) -> ¬{C}{a} fact9: ¬{IK}{a} fact10: ¬{D}{a} -> (¬{HT}{a} & {EU}{a}) fact11: (x): ¬{FF}x -> (¬{HF}x & {DN}x) fact12: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{E}x & {D}x)

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This Maker is not thrifty. fact2: Someone cooks disillusion and/or that one does not crochet Seles. fact3: This Maker does not malnourished Disraeli. fact4: If something does not drift hollowness it is not a Lavandula. fact5: Somebody does not cook disillusion or does not crochet Seles or both. fact6: If somebody does not extenuate amenorrhea then it is not a kind of a Selar. fact7: Someone does not cook disillusion or crochets Seles or both. fact8: This Maker is not sabbatic if there is some person such that either the one does not cook disillusion or the one does not crochet Seles or both. fact9: This Maker is not a kind of a Usuli. fact10: If this Maker is not punitory this Maker is not a kind of a noontide but the thing is a Cnidoscolus. fact11: Some man is a kind of non-echt man that hugs superstition if that one does not extenuate amenorrhea. fact12: Something does not malnourished Disraeli and is punitory if it is not sabbatic. ; $hypothesis$ = That this Maker does not malnourished Disraeli and is punitory does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact8 -> int1: This Maker is not sabbatic.; fact12 -> int2: If this Maker is not sabbatic then this Maker does not malnourished Disraeli and is punitory.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that Mephaquine immingles Sinitic and is not a Apocrypha is incorrect.

¬({AB}{c} & ¬{B}{c})

fact1: That some person steams and is not a stuffed is not correct if the fact that he is not a Apocrypha hold. fact2: If Jamal does not immingle Sinitic that that Mephaquine immingle Sinitic and is not a Apocrypha is not true. fact3: If that some man continues and is a aminoaciduria hold then it is not a Apocrypha. fact4: Jamal tickles but she does not immingle Sinitic if this myocardium steams.

fact1: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{HJ}x) fact2: ¬{AB}{b} -> ¬({AB}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) fact3: (x): ({D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact4: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

That that auspex steams but he/she is not a kind of a stuffed is not right.

¬({A}{cc} & ¬{HJ}{cc})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That some person steams and is not a stuffed is not correct if the fact that he is not a Apocrypha hold. fact2: If Jamal does not immingle Sinitic that that Mephaquine immingle Sinitic and is not a Apocrypha is not true. fact3: If that some man continues and is a aminoaciduria hold then it is not a Apocrypha. fact4: Jamal tickles but she does not immingle Sinitic if this myocardium steams. ; $hypothesis$ = That that Mephaquine immingles Sinitic and is not a Apocrypha is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This entertaining occurs.

{B}

fact1: This entertaining occurs if this splattering Casals occurs. fact2: That this entertaining does not happens hold if this splattering Casals does not occurs. fact3: That that carinalness happens is triggered by that that barographicness happens. fact4: That notthis misplacing monotone but that enrolling Callithricidae occurs is false if that volition does not occurs. fact5: If that that this misplacing monotone does not happens but that enrolling Callithricidae happens hold is false this splattering Casals does not happens.

fact1: {A} -> {B} fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬{B} fact3: {J} -> {EQ} fact4: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & {C}) fact5: ¬(¬{D} & {C}) -> ¬{A}

This entertaining does not happens.

¬{B}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This entertaining occurs if this splattering Casals occurs. fact2: That this entertaining does not happens hold if this splattering Casals does not occurs. fact3: That that carinalness happens is triggered by that that barographicness happens. fact4: That notthis misplacing monotone but that enrolling Callithricidae occurs is false if that volition does not occurs. fact5: If that that this misplacing monotone does not happens but that enrolling Callithricidae happens hold is false this splattering Casals does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This entertaining occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That roundabout disapproves.

{AB}{a}

fact1: This iciness does not unveil if the fact that that roundabout is a kind of a Gospels but it does not unveil does not hold. fact2: The endoscope does not unveil. fact3: That if that roundabout is not a versatility then that roundabout unveils and it does disapprove is right. fact4: That roundabout is not a versatility.

fact1: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{il} fact2: ¬{AA}{ip} fact3: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: ¬{A}{a}

This iciness does not unveil.

¬{AA}{il}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This iciness does not unveil if the fact that that roundabout is a kind of a Gospels but it does not unveil does not hold. fact2: The endoscope does not unveil. fact3: That if that roundabout is not a versatility then that roundabout unveils and it does disapprove is right. fact4: That roundabout is not a versatility. ; $hypothesis$ = That roundabout disapproves. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact4 -> int1: That roundabout unveils and the person disapproves.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That lodge is Grenadian.

{D}{b}

fact1: That flatfish is Grenadian if that lodge is unpatronized. fact2: This skyrocket is not unpatronized. fact3: Some person that is a entente is amoeban. fact4: The Missourian is not Grenadian. fact5: That lodge is stannous if this fetterbush is not non-Grenadian. fact6: That flatfish is unpatronized or is Grenadian or both. fact7: If the fact that this fetterbush is stannous is right that lodge is aurous. fact8: If the fact that something is not aurous but that thing is stannous is not right that thing is not non-Grenadian. fact9: This fetterbush is not unpatronized. fact10: If that lodge is aurous the fact that this fetterbush is Grenadian is right. fact11: That flatfish is non-aurous if this fetterbush is unpatronized. fact12: That flatfish is either not patronized or not non-stannous or both. fact13: If that flatfish is stannous then this fetterbush is not unpatronized. fact14: If the fact that this fetterbush is stannous hold that flatfish is unpatronized. fact15: That lodge is not Grenadian if that flatfish is unpatronized. fact16: That flatfish is unpatronized if this fetterbush is aurous. fact17: Somebody is unpatronized if she/he is amoeban. fact18: The fact that something is not aurous but stannous is false if this is unpatronized. fact19: This fetterbush is aurous and/or the person is stannous. fact20: This fetterbush is not stannous if that flatfish is aurous.

fact1: {C}{b} -> {D}{c} fact2: ¬{C}{de} fact3: (x): {F}x -> {E}x fact4: ¬{D}{hc} fact5: {D}{a} -> {B}{b} fact6: ({C}{c} v {D}{c}) fact7: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} fact8: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) -> {D}x fact9: ¬{C}{a} fact10: {A}{b} -> {D}{a} fact11: {C}{a} -> ¬{A}{c} fact12: ({C}{c} v {B}{c}) fact13: {B}{c} -> ¬{C}{a} fact14: {B}{a} -> {C}{c} fact15: {C}{c} -> ¬{D}{b} fact16: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} fact17: (x): {E}x -> {C}x fact18: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) fact19: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact20: {A}{c} -> ¬{B}{a}

That lodge is Grenadian.

{D}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That flatfish is Grenadian if that lodge is unpatronized. fact2: This skyrocket is not unpatronized. fact3: Some person that is a entente is amoeban. fact4: The Missourian is not Grenadian. fact5: That lodge is stannous if this fetterbush is not non-Grenadian. fact6: That flatfish is unpatronized or is Grenadian or both. fact7: If the fact that this fetterbush is stannous is right that lodge is aurous. fact8: If the fact that something is not aurous but that thing is stannous is not right that thing is not non-Grenadian. fact9: This fetterbush is not unpatronized. fact10: If that lodge is aurous the fact that this fetterbush is Grenadian is right. fact11: That flatfish is non-aurous if this fetterbush is unpatronized. fact12: That flatfish is either not patronized or not non-stannous or both. fact13: If that flatfish is stannous then this fetterbush is not unpatronized. fact14: If the fact that this fetterbush is stannous hold that flatfish is unpatronized. fact15: That lodge is not Grenadian if that flatfish is unpatronized. fact16: That flatfish is unpatronized if this fetterbush is aurous. fact17: Somebody is unpatronized if she/he is amoeban. fact18: The fact that something is not aurous but stannous is false if this is unpatronized. fact19: This fetterbush is aurous and/or the person is stannous. fact20: This fetterbush is not stannous if that flatfish is aurous. ; $hypothesis$ = That lodge is Grenadian. ; $proof$ =

fact19 & fact16 & fact14 -> int1: That that flatfish is unpatronized is right.; int1 & fact15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that knackwurst is a kind of a navigability does not hold.

¬{D}{c}

fact1: Something is nonprescription but not corrigible if it is not bicylindrical. fact2: If this biogenesis is not non-sterile then that perithelium is a Phidias. fact3: This biogenesis is not a allusiveness. fact4: If that this biogenesis is both sterile and not a Phidias does not hold then that knackwurst is not a navigability. fact5: That knackwurst is incorrigible if that perithelium is a Phidias. fact6: Some person is not a kind of a Phidias if this one is not prescription and this one is incorrigible. fact7: That that buckminsterfullerene is a kind of a navigability is right. fact8: If that perithelium is not incorrigible then the fact that this biogenesis is sterile but it is not a Phidias does not hold. fact9: If that something is sterile a navigability is incorrect then it is not a navigability. fact10: This biogenesis is non-bicylindrical if the one is not a allusiveness and the one is not a DRMS. fact11: Some man is a navigability if it is incorrigible. fact12: This biogenesis is sterile. fact13: That knackwurst is a Phidias. fact14: That knackwurst is sterile.

fact1: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{E}x & {C}x) fact2: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact3: ¬{H}{a} fact4: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{c} fact5: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact6: (x): (¬{E}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact7: {D}{jd} fact8: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact9: (x): ¬({A}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x fact10: (¬{H}{a} & ¬{G}{a}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact11: (x): {C}x -> {D}x fact12: {A}{a} fact13: {B}{c} fact14: {A}{c}

That that knackwurst is a kind of a navigability does not hold.

¬{D}{c}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something is nonprescription but not corrigible if it is not bicylindrical. fact2: If this biogenesis is not non-sterile then that perithelium is a Phidias. fact3: This biogenesis is not a allusiveness. fact4: If that this biogenesis is both sterile and not a Phidias does not hold then that knackwurst is not a navigability. fact5: That knackwurst is incorrigible if that perithelium is a Phidias. fact6: Some person is not a kind of a Phidias if this one is not prescription and this one is incorrigible. fact7: That that buckminsterfullerene is a kind of a navigability is right. fact8: If that perithelium is not incorrigible then the fact that this biogenesis is sterile but it is not a Phidias does not hold. fact9: If that something is sterile a navigability is incorrect then it is not a navigability. fact10: This biogenesis is non-bicylindrical if the one is not a allusiveness and the one is not a DRMS. fact11: Some man is a navigability if it is incorrigible. fact12: This biogenesis is sterile. fact13: That knackwurst is a Phidias. fact14: That knackwurst is sterile. ; $hypothesis$ = That that knackwurst is a kind of a navigability does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact12 -> int1: That perithelium is a kind of a Phidias.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: That knackwurst is incorrigible.; fact11 -> int3: That knackwurst is a navigability if that knackwurst is incorrigible.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That bowdlerizer is a kind of a Bede that musses.

({B}{a} & {C}{a})

fact1: The fact that that bowdlerizer is a baseline or it is not a beaded or both is false. fact2: If the fact that that bowdlerizer is a kind of a baseline or it is not a beaded or both is not true that bowdlerizer musses. fact3: That bowdlerizer is a Versace and it is a Bede.

fact1: ¬({D}{a} v ¬{E}{a}) fact2: ¬({D}{a} v ¬{E}{a}) -> {C}{a} fact3: ({A}{a} & {B}{a})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that bowdlerizer is a baseline or it is not a beaded or both is false. fact2: If the fact that that bowdlerizer is a kind of a baseline or it is not a beaded or both is not true that bowdlerizer musses. fact3: That bowdlerizer is a Versace and it is a Bede. ; $hypothesis$ = That bowdlerizer is a kind of a Bede that musses. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> int1: That bowdlerizer is a Bede.; fact1 & fact2 -> int2: That bowdlerizer musses.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That pesthouse does not describe.

¬{C}{d}

fact1: This linecut is aposiopetic if that that efflux does not have PFLP but the one is esophageal is false. fact2: If that saturniid is not ecological then that that that efflux does not have PFLP but it is esophageal hold does not hold. fact3: That saturniid is not ecological. fact4: The thermos is esophageal.

fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: {AB}{do}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This linecut is aposiopetic if that that efflux does not have PFLP but the one is esophageal is false. fact2: If that saturniid is not ecological then that that that efflux does not have PFLP but it is esophageal hold does not hold. fact3: That saturniid is not ecological. fact4: The thermos is esophageal. ; $hypothesis$ = That pesthouse does not describe. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That pimping Cooke does not occurs and this arraying Bolivar does not occurs.

(¬{B} & ¬{A})

fact1: The fact that this small does not happens and this disgorgement does not happens is incorrect. fact2: Both this glutting and the insolventness happens. fact3: This glutting yields that the taxing Shaw does not happens and this bellyaching does not occurs. fact4: That pimping Cooke does not occurs if that this small does not happens and this disgorgement does not happens is incorrect. fact5: This arraying Bolivar does not occurs. fact6: The recoding does not happens.

fact1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact2: ({D} & {F}) fact3: {D} -> (¬{C} & ¬{EU}) fact4: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact5: ¬{A} fact6: ¬{IU}

This bellyaching does not happens and this abiotrophy does not occurs.

(¬{EU} & ¬{CE})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this small does not happens and this disgorgement does not happens is incorrect. fact2: Both this glutting and the insolventness happens. fact3: This glutting yields that the taxing Shaw does not happens and this bellyaching does not occurs. fact4: That pimping Cooke does not occurs if that this small does not happens and this disgorgement does not happens is incorrect. fact5: This arraying Bolivar does not occurs. fact6: The recoding does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That pimping Cooke does not occurs and this arraying Bolivar does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact1 -> int1: That pimping Cooke does not occurs.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that this greenbelt is not a filmed and does hump varnished is wrong.

¬(¬{C}{c} & {D}{c})

fact1: If that ommatidium is not identical but she/he mortifies Coracias Ram is not identical. fact2: The fact that the fact that this greenbelt is not a kind of a filmed and humps varnished hold does not hold if that foundation is ceremonious. fact3: If the fact that Ram is not glandular and is a Solenogastres does not hold that foundation is not a Solenogastres. fact4: That cataloguer is irrevocable. fact5: That ommatidium is not identical but he mortifies Coracias if he is not knowable. fact6: If that foundation does not blend Lentinus and is not a kind of a Danish the person is ceremonious. fact7: If that foundation sidesteps paleoclimatology then that cataloguer is not irrevocable and it is not ceremonious. fact8: That someone does not sidestep paleoclimatology but he is a laconism does not hold if he is not a kind of a buffeted. fact9: Someone is not a kind of a filmed and humps varnished if she/he is not irrevocable. fact10: If that cataloguer is irrevocable that foundation does not blend Lentinus and it is not a Danish. fact11: Some man sidesteps paleoclimatology if the fact that he does not sidesteps paleoclimatology and he is a kind of a laconism does not hold. fact12: If that foundation is not a Solenogastres the fact that that foundation is a buffeted and it is blastocoelic is wrong. fact13: If the fact that someone is a buffeted and it is blastocoelic does not hold it is not a buffeted. fact14: If something is not identical the fact that this is not glandular and is a Solenogastres does not hold. fact15: This greenbelt is not irrevocable if that cataloguer is not irrevocable and it is not ceremonious.

fact1: (¬{J}{e} & {L}{e}) -> ¬{J}{d} fact2: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{c} & {D}{c}) fact3: ¬(¬{K}{d} & {I}{d}) -> ¬{I}{b} fact4: {A}{a} fact5: {M}{e} -> (¬{J}{e} & {L}{e}) fact6: (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{b} fact7: {E}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & {G}x) fact9: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{C}x & {D}x) fact10: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact11: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {G}x) -> {E}x fact12: ¬{I}{b} -> ¬({F}{b} & {H}{b}) fact13: (x): ¬({F}x & {H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact14: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬(¬{K}x & {I}x) fact15: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{c}

This greenbelt is not a filmed and humps varnished.

(¬{C}{c} & {D}{c})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that ommatidium is not identical but she/he mortifies Coracias Ram is not identical. fact2: The fact that the fact that this greenbelt is not a kind of a filmed and humps varnished hold does not hold if that foundation is ceremonious. fact3: If the fact that Ram is not glandular and is a Solenogastres does not hold that foundation is not a Solenogastres. fact4: That cataloguer is irrevocable. fact5: That ommatidium is not identical but he mortifies Coracias if he is not knowable. fact6: If that foundation does not blend Lentinus and is not a kind of a Danish the person is ceremonious. fact7: If that foundation sidesteps paleoclimatology then that cataloguer is not irrevocable and it is not ceremonious. fact8: That someone does not sidestep paleoclimatology but he is a laconism does not hold if he is not a kind of a buffeted. fact9: Someone is not a kind of a filmed and humps varnished if she/he is not irrevocable. fact10: If that cataloguer is irrevocable that foundation does not blend Lentinus and it is not a Danish. fact11: Some man sidesteps paleoclimatology if the fact that he does not sidesteps paleoclimatology and he is a kind of a laconism does not hold. fact12: If that foundation is not a Solenogastres the fact that that foundation is a buffeted and it is blastocoelic is wrong. fact13: If the fact that someone is a buffeted and it is blastocoelic does not hold it is not a buffeted. fact14: If something is not identical the fact that this is not glandular and is a Solenogastres does not hold. fact15: This greenbelt is not irrevocable if that cataloguer is not irrevocable and it is not ceremonious. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this greenbelt is not a filmed and does hump varnished is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact4 -> int1: That foundation does not blend Lentinus and it is not a Danish.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: That foundation is ceremonious.; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This pasteurizing Hera does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: This invalidating Camlan does not occurs. fact2: That moksa does not occurs and this discontinuation does not occurs. fact3: This cloudiness happens or the ecoterrorism does not happens or both. fact4: If this papilliformness does not happens this decimation happens and/or that proving Sphenopsida does not happens. fact5: That this decimation does not happens leads to that this pasteurizing Hera does not happens. fact6: This pasteurizing Hera occurs if this decimation occurs and/or that proving Sphenopsida does not occurs. fact7: That the bettering Christmastide does not happens and that moksa does not happens prevents that the unadvisedness occurs. fact8: This decimation and/or that proving Sphenopsida happens. fact9: If the Hunt does not happens then the airdrop or that non-dermalness or both happens. fact10: Either the acneiformness happens or that forsaking Shikoku does not happens or both. fact11: Both this decimation and this papilliformness occurs if that proving Sphenopsida does not occurs. fact12: That this decimation happens prevents that this roentgenography does not occurs. fact13: This pasteurizing Hera occurs if the fact that that proving Sphenopsida does not occurs is correct. fact14: That this papilliformness does not occurs is triggered by that notthat field but this invalidating Camlan occurs. fact15: That field does not happens and this invalidating Camlan does not occurs. fact16: That that the impugning bloodstock happens or this aneurysmalness occurs or both is true is brought about by that the muckraking does not occurs. fact17: If either the risk occurs or the shearing does not happens or both then the megaloblasticness occurs. fact18: The glorification is prevented by that the crossing does not happens and the benumbing does not happens. fact19: This pyroelectricalness does not happens.

fact1: ¬{AB} fact2: (¬{HU} & ¬{EC}) fact3: ({FD} v ¬{BB}) fact4: ¬{B} -> ({A} v ¬{C}) fact5: ¬{A} -> ¬{D} fact6: ({A} v ¬{C}) -> {D} fact7: (¬{EH} & ¬{HU}) -> ¬{K} fact8: ({A} v {C}) fact9: ¬{EL} -> ({GJ} v ¬{CL}) fact10: ({BT} v ¬{BK}) fact11: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact12: {A} -> {T} fact13: ¬{C} -> {D} fact14: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact15: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact16: ¬{AK} -> ({GH} v {BR}) fact17: ({HP} v ¬{GG}) -> {BD} fact18: (¬{ED} & ¬{HT}) -> ¬{DF} fact19: ¬{DS}

This pasteurizing Hera does not occurs.

¬{D}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This invalidating Camlan does not occurs. fact2: That moksa does not occurs and this discontinuation does not occurs. fact3: This cloudiness happens or the ecoterrorism does not happens or both. fact4: If this papilliformness does not happens this decimation happens and/or that proving Sphenopsida does not happens. fact5: That this decimation does not happens leads to that this pasteurizing Hera does not happens. fact6: This pasteurizing Hera occurs if this decimation occurs and/or that proving Sphenopsida does not occurs. fact7: That the bettering Christmastide does not happens and that moksa does not happens prevents that the unadvisedness occurs. fact8: This decimation and/or that proving Sphenopsida happens. fact9: If the Hunt does not happens then the airdrop or that non-dermalness or both happens. fact10: Either the acneiformness happens or that forsaking Shikoku does not happens or both. fact11: Both this decimation and this papilliformness occurs if that proving Sphenopsida does not occurs. fact12: That this decimation happens prevents that this roentgenography does not occurs. fact13: This pasteurizing Hera occurs if the fact that that proving Sphenopsida does not occurs is correct. fact14: That this papilliformness does not occurs is triggered by that notthat field but this invalidating Camlan occurs. fact15: That field does not happens and this invalidating Camlan does not occurs. fact16: That that the impugning bloodstock happens or this aneurysmalness occurs or both is true is brought about by that the muckraking does not occurs. fact17: If either the risk occurs or the shearing does not happens or both then the megaloblasticness occurs. fact18: The glorification is prevented by that the crossing does not happens and the benumbing does not happens. fact19: This pyroelectricalness does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This pasteurizing Hera does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that enjoining Phintias does not occurs hold.

¬{D}

fact1: That that succession happens is correct. fact2: This endarterectomy happens and that sapphirine happens. fact3: That non-amphibianness brings about that that enjoining Phintias happens and this foetalness happens. fact4: Both this foetalness and that amphibianness occurs. fact5: That amphibianness happens. fact6: That this foetalness occurs and that combating occurs prevents that that enjoining Phintias happens. fact7: That combating happens if that succession happens. fact8: If both this nonacceptance and that sundering Kirchner occurs that the gala does not occurs hold. fact9: The surfacing occurs and the bohemianness happens. fact10: The elopement occurs. fact11: This fuming happens. fact12: The unilluminatingness happens. fact13: This summarization happens. fact14: This drinking occurs. fact15: The displeasing Massenet does not occurs. fact16: The Reformation does not happens.

fact1: {E} fact2: ({GP} & {CN}) fact3: ¬{B} -> ({D} & {A}) fact4: ({A} & {B}) fact5: {B} fact6: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact7: {E} -> {C} fact8: ({IK} & {BP}) -> ¬{CE} fact9: ({BQ} & {EO}) fact10: {HN} fact11: {ES} fact12: {I} fact13: {EM} fact14: {AH} fact15: ¬{JK} fact16: ¬{DF}

That enjoining Phintias occurs.

{D}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that succession happens is correct. fact2: This endarterectomy happens and that sapphirine happens. fact3: That non-amphibianness brings about that that enjoining Phintias happens and this foetalness happens. fact4: Both this foetalness and that amphibianness occurs. fact5: That amphibianness happens. fact6: That this foetalness occurs and that combating occurs prevents that that enjoining Phintias happens. fact7: That combating happens if that succession happens. fact8: If both this nonacceptance and that sundering Kirchner occurs that the gala does not occurs hold. fact9: The surfacing occurs and the bohemianness happens. fact10: The elopement occurs. fact11: This fuming happens. fact12: The unilluminatingness happens. fact13: This summarization happens. fact14: This drinking occurs. fact15: The displeasing Massenet does not occurs. fact16: The Reformation does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that enjoining Phintias does not occurs hold. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> int1: This foetalness occurs.; fact7 & fact1 -> int2: That that combating happens hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This foetalness and that combating occurs.; int3 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That terrarium is a Vermont but it is not a notoriety.

({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b})

fact1: Some man is ungenerous man that kinks if the one is not a kind of a gigahertz. fact2: That the fact that that terrarium is a Vermont that is a kind of a notoriety is false is true. fact3: If that that some man is not ungenerous but it is a gigahertz hold is not right it is not a kind of a gigahertz. fact4: That that terrarium is a Vermont but it is not a notoriety is not right if that test does not crystalised. fact5: That test is postmenopausal if that arena kinks. fact6: The fact that that terrarium is neanderthal and not a Vermont does not hold. fact7: If someone is bronchial that that one does not crystalised hold. fact8: That that backrest is not ungenerous but it is a gigahertz is wrong if that backrest is not a Tuscaloosa. fact9: If that test does not kink that terrarium is postmenopausal. fact10: Somebody is a Vermont and is not a kind of a notoriety if that the person is bronchial is true. fact11: If that test does not crystalised then that that terrarium is a Vermont and it is a notoriety is not right. fact12: Somebody crystaliseds if the one is non-postmenopausal and the one is not a Vermont. fact13: If that someone is not bronchial but it crystaliseds is incorrect it is bronchial. fact14: If that arena is a kind of ungenerous man that kinks then that test does not kinks. fact15: That arena kinks and/or crystaliseds if that backrest is not a gigahertz. fact16: That that test is a kind of a notoriety and is a Vermont is false if that terrarium is not bronchial. fact17: That backrest is not a Tuscaloosa. fact18: That biohazard is not a notoriety. fact19: The fact that some person is not bronchial but it does crystalised is wrong if it is postmenopausal.

fact1: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({H}x & {F}x) fact2: ¬({D}{b} & {E}{b}) fact3: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{G}x fact4: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) fact5: {F}{c} -> {B}{a} fact6: ¬({CF}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact7: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x fact8: ¬{I}{d} -> ¬(¬{H}{d} & {G}{d}) fact9: ¬{F}{a} -> {B}{b} fact10: (x): {A}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact11: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & {E}{b}) fact12: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{D}x) -> {C}x fact13: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) -> {A}x fact14: ({H}{c} & {F}{c}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact15: ¬{G}{d} -> ({F}{c} v {C}{c}) fact16: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({E}{a} & {D}{a}) fact17: ¬{I}{d} fact18: ¬{E}{bs} fact19: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x)

That terrarium is a Vermont but it is not a notoriety.

({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some man is ungenerous man that kinks if the one is not a kind of a gigahertz. fact2: That the fact that that terrarium is a Vermont that is a kind of a notoriety is false is true. fact3: If that that some man is not ungenerous but it is a gigahertz hold is not right it is not a kind of a gigahertz. fact4: That that terrarium is a Vermont but it is not a notoriety is not right if that test does not crystalised. fact5: That test is postmenopausal if that arena kinks. fact6: The fact that that terrarium is neanderthal and not a Vermont does not hold. fact7: If someone is bronchial that that one does not crystalised hold. fact8: That that backrest is not ungenerous but it is a gigahertz is wrong if that backrest is not a Tuscaloosa. fact9: If that test does not kink that terrarium is postmenopausal. fact10: Somebody is a Vermont and is not a kind of a notoriety if that the person is bronchial is true. fact11: If that test does not crystalised then that that terrarium is a Vermont and it is a notoriety is not right. fact12: Somebody crystaliseds if the one is non-postmenopausal and the one is not a Vermont. fact13: If that someone is not bronchial but it crystaliseds is incorrect it is bronchial. fact14: If that arena is a kind of ungenerous man that kinks then that test does not kinks. fact15: That arena kinks and/or crystaliseds if that backrest is not a gigahertz. fact16: That that test is a kind of a notoriety and is a Vermont is false if that terrarium is not bronchial. fact17: That backrest is not a Tuscaloosa. fact18: That biohazard is not a notoriety. fact19: The fact that some person is not bronchial but it does crystalised is wrong if it is postmenopausal. ; $hypothesis$ = That terrarium is a Vermont but it is not a notoriety. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Maricela is not an ultima and that one is not a kind of a falsity.

(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

fact1: If this bonemeal does not reek Lorentz then that Maricela is not an ultima and the person is not a kind of a falsity is false. fact2: the Lorentz does not reek bonemeal. fact3: This bonemeal does not reek Lorentz.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact2: ¬{AC}{aa} fact3: ¬{A}{a}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If this bonemeal does not reek Lorentz then that Maricela is not an ultima and the person is not a kind of a falsity is false. fact2: the Lorentz does not reek bonemeal. fact3: This bonemeal does not reek Lorentz. ; $hypothesis$ = Maricela is not an ultima and that one is not a kind of a falsity. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That undistinguishableness does not happens and/or this spacefaring happens.

(¬{AA} v {AB})

fact1: If that backlashing does not occurs and that anticlinalness does not occurs then that mutating does not occurs. fact2: If that backlashing does not happens then that anticlinalness does not occurs and/or that mutating does not happens. fact3: If that savings does not occurs that notthis toss but that demythologizeding disquisition happens is incorrect. fact4: That that tenpins does not happens or the bacteriophagicness occurs or both does not hold. fact5: This spacefaring does not occurs. fact6: That backlashing does not happens if that demythologizeding disquisition does not occurs. fact7: If that anticlinalness does not happens or that mutating does not happens or both then that that mutating does not happens is right. fact8: That that undistinguishableness does not happens and/or that this spacefaring occurs is caused by that that mutating does not happens. fact9: That the fact that that elegiacness does not happens or the genuflection occurs or both is wrong is right if that mutating does not happens. fact10: If the fact that this toss does not occurs but that demythologizeding disquisition occurs does not hold then that demythologizeding disquisition does not occurs.

fact1: (¬{C} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{A} fact2: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} v ¬{A}) fact3: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{E} & {D}) fact4: ¬(¬{BT} v {CS}) fact5: ¬{AB} fact6: ¬{D} -> ¬{C} fact7: (¬{B} v ¬{A}) -> ¬{A} fact8: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} v {AB}) fact9: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{K} v {CA}) fact10: ¬(¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{D}

That undistinguishableness does not happens and/or this spacefaring happens.

(¬{AA} v {AB})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that backlashing does not occurs and that anticlinalness does not occurs then that mutating does not occurs. fact2: If that backlashing does not happens then that anticlinalness does not occurs and/or that mutating does not happens. fact3: If that savings does not occurs that notthis toss but that demythologizeding disquisition happens is incorrect. fact4: That that tenpins does not happens or the bacteriophagicness occurs or both does not hold. fact5: This spacefaring does not occurs. fact6: That backlashing does not happens if that demythologizeding disquisition does not occurs. fact7: If that anticlinalness does not happens or that mutating does not happens or both then that that mutating does not happens is right. fact8: That that undistinguishableness does not happens and/or that this spacefaring occurs is caused by that that mutating does not happens. fact9: That the fact that that elegiacness does not happens or the genuflection occurs or both is wrong is right if that mutating does not happens. fact10: If the fact that this toss does not occurs but that demythologizeding disquisition occurs does not hold then that demythologizeding disquisition does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That undistinguishableness does not happens and/or this spacefaring happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This drawing happens.

{D}

fact1: This drawing occurs if this rubriccing hedonism occurs. fact2: If notthis sideswipe but this drawing occurs that ascribing calibre happens. fact3: This birdnestinging and this sideswipe occurs. fact4: This sideswipe happens. fact5: This bingle does not happens but that Whittle occurs. fact6: That compartmentalization does not happens. fact7: That mesmerizing Photius occurs but this sideswipe does not happens if that trifling sapidness happens. fact8: If this sideswipe does not occurs the fact that this glorifying does not occurs but this birdnestinging happens does not hold. fact9: This rubriccing hedonism does not happens. fact10: That the moistening Gymnocalycium occurs is prevented by that both the doubleness and the cloppinging occurs. fact11: That this glorifying but notthis rubriccing hedonism occurs causes that this biogeneticness occurs. fact12: Both that trifling sapidness and that mesmerizing Photius happens if that sedition does not happens. fact13: That both that sedition and that trifling sapidness occurs is triggered by that this acclimatising imperishingness does not happens. fact14: That the harmonizing does not happens is brought about by that both the sporogenousness and that ringing occurs. fact15: That mesmerizing Photius triggers that notthis sideswipe but this drawing occurs. fact16: That ascribing calibre and the oscine happens. fact17: That tonsure does not occurs and that burlesque happens. fact18: This acclimatising imperishingness does not occurs if the fact that this acclimatising imperishingness but notthis improvisation occurs is false. fact19: This rubriccing hedonism does not happens and this glorifying happens. fact20: That this drawing does not happens is caused by that this glorifying occurs and this birdnestinging happens.

fact1: {A} -> {D} fact2: (¬{E} & {D}) -> {ER} fact3: ({C} & {E}) fact4: {E} fact5: (¬{JD} & {FB}) fact6: ¬{EB} fact7: {G} -> ({F} & ¬{E}) fact8: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{B} & {C}) fact9: ¬{A} fact10: ({AU} & {FM}) -> ¬{DP} fact11: ({B} & ¬{A}) -> {HI} fact12: ¬{H} -> ({G} & {F}) fact13: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) fact14: ({BP} & {AS}) -> ¬{DN} fact15: {F} -> (¬{E} & {D}) fact16: ({ER} & {EI}) fact17: (¬{AJ} & {BM}) fact18: ¬({I} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{I} fact19: (¬{A} & {B}) fact20: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D}

This drawing happens.

{D}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This drawing occurs if this rubriccing hedonism occurs. fact2: If notthis sideswipe but this drawing occurs that ascribing calibre happens. fact3: This birdnestinging and this sideswipe occurs. fact4: This sideswipe happens. fact5: This bingle does not happens but that Whittle occurs. fact6: That compartmentalization does not happens. fact7: That mesmerizing Photius occurs but this sideswipe does not happens if that trifling sapidness happens. fact8: If this sideswipe does not occurs the fact that this glorifying does not occurs but this birdnestinging happens does not hold. fact9: This rubriccing hedonism does not happens. fact10: That the moistening Gymnocalycium occurs is prevented by that both the doubleness and the cloppinging occurs. fact11: That this glorifying but notthis rubriccing hedonism occurs causes that this biogeneticness occurs. fact12: Both that trifling sapidness and that mesmerizing Photius happens if that sedition does not happens. fact13: That both that sedition and that trifling sapidness occurs is triggered by that this acclimatising imperishingness does not happens. fact14: That the harmonizing does not happens is brought about by that both the sporogenousness and that ringing occurs. fact15: That mesmerizing Photius triggers that notthis sideswipe but this drawing occurs. fact16: That ascribing calibre and the oscine happens. fact17: That tonsure does not occurs and that burlesque happens. fact18: This acclimatising imperishingness does not occurs if the fact that this acclimatising imperishingness but notthis improvisation occurs is false. fact19: This rubriccing hedonism does not happens and this glorifying happens. fact20: That this drawing does not happens is caused by that this glorifying occurs and this birdnestinging happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This drawing happens. ; $proof$ =

fact19 -> int1: This glorifying happens.; fact3 -> int2: This birdnestinging occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This glorifying and this birdnestinging occurs.; int3 & fact20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This branch does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: The fact that this branch does not happens is right if that colonicness happens and that moment happens. fact2: That moment and this baccateness occurs. fact3: That myoidness occurs. fact4: Both that colonicness and that myoidness occurs.

fact1: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact2: ({C} & {E}) fact3: {B} fact4: ({A} & {B})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this branch does not happens is right if that colonicness happens and that moment happens. fact2: That moment and this baccateness occurs. fact3: That myoidness occurs. fact4: Both that colonicness and that myoidness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This branch does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> int1: That colonicness happens.; fact2 -> int2: That moment occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That colonicness occurs and that moment happens.; int3 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That Simonising Northumbria does not occurs.

¬{B}

fact1: If that jetting Amiidae happens then that ferniness happens. fact2: That chimeralness does not happens if the fact that this staggering does not happens but that democratisation happens is wrong. fact3: That that ascent does not happens causes that that legitimateness does not happens. fact4: That both that servileness and this unrifledness happens is brought about by that ferniness. fact5: The devaluating phlebotomus does not happens and that Simonising Northumbria does not happens if this unservileness does not occurs. fact6: That this respiring happens and this meagerliness occurs is brought about by that this sickening does not happens. fact7: If the fact that this sickening and that hasping Hawkyns happens is wrong this sickening does not happens. fact8: That jetting Amiidae and this skidding happens if that chimeralness does not occurs. fact9: The bugging socialism happens and this overtiring happens. fact10: That Simonising Northumbria does not happens if this doubling does not happens. fact11: This doubling does not occurs but this sacculatedness happens if that Simonising Northumbria does not happens. fact12: The fact that notthis staggering but that democratisation happens does not hold if that legitimateness does not occurs. fact13: If this nonreticulateness does not occurs that this sickening occurs and that hasping Hawkyns occurs is wrong. fact14: If this meagerliness happens then this fuddling Diaz does not happens and that campanulateness does not happens. fact15: That ascent does not happens if this fuddling Diaz does not happens and that campanulateness does not happens.

fact1: {G} -> {F} fact2: ¬(¬{K} & {J}) -> ¬{I} fact3: ¬{M} -> ¬{L} fact4: {F} -> (¬{D} & {E}) fact5: ¬{D} -> (¬{C} & ¬{B}) fact6: ¬{R} -> ({Q} & {P}) fact7: ¬({R} & {S}) -> ¬{R} fact8: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact9: ({BE} & {HL}) fact10: ¬{A} -> ¬{B} fact11: ¬{B} -> (¬{A} & {FE}) fact12: ¬{L} -> ¬(¬{K} & {J}) fact13: ¬{T} -> ¬({R} & {S}) fact14: {P} -> (¬{N} & ¬{O}) fact15: (¬{N} & ¬{O}) -> ¬{M}

This sacculatedness happens.

{FE}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that jetting Amiidae happens then that ferniness happens. fact2: That chimeralness does not happens if the fact that this staggering does not happens but that democratisation happens is wrong. fact3: That that ascent does not happens causes that that legitimateness does not happens. fact4: That both that servileness and this unrifledness happens is brought about by that ferniness. fact5: The devaluating phlebotomus does not happens and that Simonising Northumbria does not happens if this unservileness does not occurs. fact6: That this respiring happens and this meagerliness occurs is brought about by that this sickening does not happens. fact7: If the fact that this sickening and that hasping Hawkyns happens is wrong this sickening does not happens. fact8: That jetting Amiidae and this skidding happens if that chimeralness does not occurs. fact9: The bugging socialism happens and this overtiring happens. fact10: That Simonising Northumbria does not happens if this doubling does not happens. fact11: This doubling does not occurs but this sacculatedness happens if that Simonising Northumbria does not happens. fact12: The fact that notthis staggering but that democratisation happens does not hold if that legitimateness does not occurs. fact13: If this nonreticulateness does not occurs that this sickening occurs and that hasping Hawkyns occurs is wrong. fact14: If this meagerliness happens then this fuddling Diaz does not happens and that campanulateness does not happens. fact15: That ascent does not happens if this fuddling Diaz does not happens and that campanulateness does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That Simonising Northumbria does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that unadventurousness does not occurs hold.

¬{D}

fact1: If that this olfactoriness but notthat squeezing occurs is false this olfactoriness does not happens. fact2: The fact that this sniffing Vatidoes not occurs and this Hebraicness does not happens does not hold if the fact that this dissenting koinonia does not occurs hold. fact3: The Hebrewness occurs. fact4: That rebuttal does not occurs if that the fact that both this non-alluvialness and this non-Westernness occurs hold is incorrect. fact5: If this vroom happens and this sniffing Vatican occurs then this Hebraicness does not happens. fact6: If that rightness occurs then that this non-alluvialness and this non-Westernness occurs does not hold. fact7: That unadventurousness does not occurs if this Hebraicness does not happens. fact8: The fact that both that tibialness and this dissenting koinonia happens does not hold if that rebuttal does not occurs. fact9: That this olfactoriness occurs and that squeezing does not occurs is false if that that sweating does not happens hold. fact10: If that neanderthalness happens this spying naturalness but notthat sweating occurs. fact11: If this Bath occurs then that neanderthalness occurs. fact12: If the fact that that tibialness occurs and this dissenting koinonia occurs is incorrect that this dissenting koinonia happens is wrong. fact13: That this vroom does not happens causes that unadventurousness. fact14: If this olfactoriness does not occurs then that both that rightness and the intrusion occurs is correct. fact15: If the crystallizing does not occurs then that barring aneuploidy does not occurs. fact16: If this sugaring occlusive does not occurs this biotypicness but notthe salaah occurs. fact17: That the salaah does not happens triggers that both this Bath and this gaming occurs. fact18: This sniffing Vatican happens.

fact1: ¬({L} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{L} fact2: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact3: {CS} fact4: ¬(¬{H} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{F} fact5: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact6: {J} -> ¬(¬{H} & ¬{I}) fact7: ¬{C} -> ¬{D} fact8: ¬{F} -> ¬({G} & {E}) fact9: ¬{N} -> ¬({L} & ¬{M}) fact10: {P} -> ({O} & ¬{N}) fact11: {Q} -> {P} fact12: ¬({G} & {E}) -> ¬{E} fact13: ¬{A} -> {D} fact14: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact15: ¬{CB} -> ¬{FS} fact16: ¬{U} -> ({T} & ¬{S}) fact17: ¬{S} -> ({Q} & {R}) fact18: {B}

That unadventurousness happens.

{D}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that this olfactoriness but notthat squeezing occurs is false this olfactoriness does not happens. fact2: The fact that this sniffing Vatidoes not occurs and this Hebraicness does not happens does not hold if the fact that this dissenting koinonia does not occurs hold. fact3: The Hebrewness occurs. fact4: That rebuttal does not occurs if that the fact that both this non-alluvialness and this non-Westernness occurs hold is incorrect. fact5: If this vroom happens and this sniffing Vatican occurs then this Hebraicness does not happens. fact6: If that rightness occurs then that this non-alluvialness and this non-Westernness occurs does not hold. fact7: That unadventurousness does not occurs if this Hebraicness does not happens. fact8: The fact that both that tibialness and this dissenting koinonia happens does not hold if that rebuttal does not occurs. fact9: That this olfactoriness occurs and that squeezing does not occurs is false if that that sweating does not happens hold. fact10: If that neanderthalness happens this spying naturalness but notthat sweating occurs. fact11: If this Bath occurs then that neanderthalness occurs. fact12: If the fact that that tibialness occurs and this dissenting koinonia occurs is incorrect that this dissenting koinonia happens is wrong. fact13: That this vroom does not happens causes that unadventurousness. fact14: If this olfactoriness does not occurs then that both that rightness and the intrusion occurs is correct. fact15: If the crystallizing does not occurs then that barring aneuploidy does not occurs. fact16: If this sugaring occlusive does not occurs this biotypicness but notthe salaah occurs. fact17: That the salaah does not happens triggers that both this Bath and this gaming occurs. fact18: This sniffing Vatican happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that unadventurousness does not occurs hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That there exists somebody such that if it does not swear microcytosis then it is not a Odovakar and/or is not sepaline is false.

¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x))

fact1: There exists some man such that if the fact that the one does not buss hold the one is either not meagerly or not cyclopean or both. fact2: If something is not a kind of a severeness then it does not wedge Rumohra or does not rede Iglesias or both. fact3: Tiana is not a kind of a quarantine and/or it is not appetising if it does amalgamate. fact4: If this dB is not a kind of a dibs then she/he is not a Angas and/or she/he is saprobic. fact5: There is something such that if this thing does not logroll then either this thing is not a essentialness or this thing does not grip maidism or both. fact6: If this pismire is not vasomotor then he/she is not crustal and/or he/she is a Odovakar. fact7: That there is someone such that if it do notuble utilitarianism then it is carboxylic and/or it is not cyclopean hold. fact8: If this pismire does not defile then either this thing is not a kind of a essentialness or this thing is not sepaline or both. fact9: There exists something such that if it is a kind of a mine then either it is not a kind of a twirl or it does not commemorate Pyrrosia or both. fact10: There is someone such that if it dongs Magnoliophyta then it is non-Catholic or it does not molten Aug or both. fact11: If the lacing does not feed bleached she/he is not a Notemigonus and/or she/he is sepaline.

fact1: (Ex): ¬{GO}x -> (¬{FM}x v ¬{CI}x) fact2: (x): ¬{FH}x -> (¬{IR}x v ¬{FR}x) fact3: {IS}{et} -> (¬{HA}{et} v ¬{AR}{et}) fact4: ¬{DI}{t} -> (¬{O}{t} v {EO}{t}) fact5: (Ex): ¬{EM}x -> (¬{GH}x v ¬{ES}x) fact6: ¬{FF}{aa} -> (¬{HI}{aa} v {AA}{aa}) fact7: (Ex): ¬{CC}x -> ({BG}x v ¬{CI}x) fact8: ¬{DO}{aa} -> (¬{GH}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) fact9: (Ex): {CM}x -> (¬{IO}x v ¬{EG}x) fact10: (Ex): {BH}x -> (¬{FO}x v ¬{BQ}x) fact11: ¬{DU}{jh} -> (¬{AD}{jh} v {AB}{jh})

There exists something such that if that is not a severeness either that does not wedge Rumohra or that does not rede Iglesias or both.

(Ex): ¬{FH}x -> (¬{IR}x v ¬{FR}x)

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There exists some man such that if the fact that the one does not buss hold the one is either not meagerly or not cyclopean or both. fact2: If something is not a kind of a severeness then it does not wedge Rumohra or does not rede Iglesias or both. fact3: Tiana is not a kind of a quarantine and/or it is not appetising if it does amalgamate. fact4: If this dB is not a kind of a dibs then she/he is not a Angas and/or she/he is saprobic. fact5: There is something such that if this thing does not logroll then either this thing is not a essentialness or this thing does not grip maidism or both. fact6: If this pismire is not vasomotor then he/she is not crustal and/or he/she is a Odovakar. fact7: That there is someone such that if it do notuble utilitarianism then it is carboxylic and/or it is not cyclopean hold. fact8: If this pismire does not defile then either this thing is not a kind of a essentialness or this thing is not sepaline or both. fact9: There exists something such that if it is a kind of a mine then either it is not a kind of a twirl or it does not commemorate Pyrrosia or both. fact10: There is someone such that if it dongs Magnoliophyta then it is non-Catholic or it does not molten Aug or both. fact11: If the lacing does not feed bleached she/he is not a Notemigonus and/or she/he is sepaline. ; $hypothesis$ = That there exists somebody such that if it does not swear microcytosis then it is not a Odovakar and/or is not sepaline is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The ragamuffin is not a eudaemonia and is not untagged.

(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

fact1: There is nothing that is both not a eudaemonia and not untagged. fact2: Some person is a geodesic if it irrigates quittance. fact3: Something irrigates quittance if the fact that that either it does not boot unpleasingness or it does not arise temperature or both is not false is incorrect. fact4: If somebody is a geodesic then the fact that it is both not aldermanly and not a eudaemonia is wrong.

fact1: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact2: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact3: (x): ¬(¬{D}x v ¬{C}x) -> {B}x fact4: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{AA}x)

The fact that that oncologist is not aldermanly and is not a eudaemonia does not hold.

¬(¬{E}{ct} & ¬{AA}{ct})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: There is nothing that is both not a eudaemonia and not untagged. fact2: Some person is a geodesic if it irrigates quittance. fact3: Something irrigates quittance if the fact that that either it does not boot unpleasingness or it does not arise temperature or both is not false is incorrect. fact4: If somebody is a geodesic then the fact that it is both not aldermanly and not a eudaemonia is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = The ragamuffin is not a eudaemonia and is not untagged. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This scanning average occurs.

{C}

fact1: This Restoration does not occurs and this scanning average does not happens if that placing happens. fact2: That this Restoration happens causes this scanning average. fact3: This dangling Mantegna happens. fact4: That framing occurs. fact5: That this Restoration does not occurs is prevented by that this dangling Mantegna happens. fact6: That placing happens and this Restoration does not happens if that conceiving Tartary does not occurs.

fact1: {D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact2: {B} -> {C} fact3: {A} fact4: {ET} fact5: {A} -> {B} fact6: ¬{E} -> ({D} & ¬{B})

This scanning average does not happens.

¬{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This Restoration does not occurs and this scanning average does not happens if that placing happens. fact2: That this Restoration happens causes this scanning average. fact3: This dangling Mantegna happens. fact4: That framing occurs. fact5: That this Restoration does not occurs is prevented by that this dangling Mantegna happens. fact6: That placing happens and this Restoration does not happens if that conceiving Tartary does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This scanning average occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact3 -> int1: This Restoration occurs.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That unsharedness and that coreferentialness happens.

({A} & {B})

fact1: If that kindling does not occurs the fact that that unsharedness and that coreferentialness happens is false. fact2: That kindling does not occurs if the fact that both that lordliness and this halfback happens does not hold. fact3: That unsharedness happens. fact4: That coreferentialness happens.

fact1: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact2: ¬({D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} fact3: {A} fact4: {B}

That that unsharedness and that coreferentialness occurs is false.

¬({A} & {B})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that kindling does not occurs the fact that that unsharedness and that coreferentialness happens is false. fact2: That kindling does not occurs if the fact that both that lordliness and this halfback happens does not hold. fact3: That unsharedness happens. fact4: That coreferentialness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That unsharedness and that coreferentialness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This unsexedness occurs.

{D}

fact1: That that Englishness happens brings about that this unsexedness does not happens. fact2: If the fact that this visualness happens is true either that engrossing does not happens or this nigrifying SGML does not occurs or both. fact3: If that Englishness happens that sharp happens. fact4: If that sharp happens then that waitressing SHF occurs but that Romaicness does not occurs. fact5: Both that waitressing SHF and that sharp happens. fact6: This unsexedness happens and that Englishness happens if that sustenance does not occurs. fact7: Both the palpebrateness and the Demosthenicness occurs. fact8: That sustenance does not happens if that Depression happens. fact9: If that Englishness happens and/or that waitressing SHF happens then this unsexedness does not occurs.

fact1: {C} -> ¬{D} fact2: {I} -> (¬{H} v ¬{G}) fact3: {C} -> {B} fact4: {B} -> ({A} & ¬{ID}) fact5: ({A} & {B}) fact6: ¬{E} -> ({D} & {C}) fact7: ({ER} & {DC}) fact8: {F} -> ¬{E} fact9: ({C} v {A}) -> ¬{D}

That Romaicness does not happens.

¬{ID}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that Englishness happens brings about that this unsexedness does not happens. fact2: If the fact that this visualness happens is true either that engrossing does not happens or this nigrifying SGML does not occurs or both. fact3: If that Englishness happens that sharp happens. fact4: If that sharp happens then that waitressing SHF occurs but that Romaicness does not occurs. fact5: Both that waitressing SHF and that sharp happens. fact6: This unsexedness happens and that Englishness happens if that sustenance does not occurs. fact7: Both the palpebrateness and the Demosthenicness occurs. fact8: That sustenance does not happens if that Depression happens. fact9: If that Englishness happens and/or that waitressing SHF happens then this unsexedness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This unsexedness occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> int1: That waitressing SHF occurs.; int1 -> int2: That Englishness or that waitressing SHF or both happens.; int2 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That napa does not cosh Hypoderma.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: If that that napa is both not a dozen and a Stradivarius does not hold then this thing does not fortify. fact2: That the palliasse does not auctioneer whoop and is a Stradivarius does not hold. fact3: The fact that that napa is not a dozen but the person is a Stradivarius is incorrect. fact4: If that malanga is not undescriptive that malanga is a gammopathy. fact5: Somebody does cosh Hypoderma if it does not fortify. fact6: That napa is ophthalmic. fact7: If that napa is not a Stradivarius that napa is a kind of a Mandelstam.

fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: ¬(¬{AK}{eu} & {AB}{eu}) fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: ¬{GQ}{fo} -> {HA}{fo} fact5: (x): ¬{B}x -> {A}x fact6: {DC}{a} fact7: ¬{AB}{a} -> {HN}{a}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If that that napa is both not a dozen and a Stradivarius does not hold then this thing does not fortify. fact2: That the palliasse does not auctioneer whoop and is a Stradivarius does not hold. fact3: The fact that that napa is not a dozen but the person is a Stradivarius is incorrect. fact4: If that malanga is not undescriptive that malanga is a gammopathy. fact5: Somebody does cosh Hypoderma if it does not fortify. fact6: That napa is ophthalmic. fact7: If that napa is not a Stradivarius that napa is a kind of a Mandelstam. ; $hypothesis$ = That napa does not cosh Hypoderma. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> int1: That napa does not fortify.; fact5 -> int2: That napa coshes Hypoderma if that napa does not fortify.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That reconstructing attractiveness does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: That that cosmicness happens is correct if the fact that this porn or that non-anorthiticness or both happens is false. fact2: If that foundering crinkle does not happens then that bailment does not occurs and that renewal does not occurs. fact3: This porn does not happens. fact4: Both that reconstructing attractiveness and that nipping happens if that cosmicness does not happens. fact5: That bailment happens. fact6: This coloured does not happens if the fact that this fucking MIPS and this coloured occurs is false. fact7: If that both this documentation and that cosmicness occurs is not correct then that cosmicness does not happens. fact8: The fact that either this porn or that non-anorthiticness or both occurs is wrong. fact9: This trashing occurs. fact10: If the emphasizing Karnataka happens this imaging happens. fact11: If that cosmicness and that nipping occurs then the fact that that reconstructing attractiveness does not occurs hold. fact12: The positioning does not occurs. fact13: That nipping happens if that bailment occurs. fact14: If this coloured does not occurs notthat foundering crinkle but that uncomplimentariness happens.

fact1: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact2: ¬{G} -> (¬{D} & ¬{F}) fact3: ¬{AA} fact4: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) fact5: {D} fact6: ¬({K} & {I}) -> ¬{I} fact7: ¬({E} & {B}) -> ¬{B} fact8: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) fact9: {JC} fact10: {EG} -> {GQ} fact11: ({B} & {A}) -> ¬{C} fact12: ¬{HC} fact13: {D} -> {A} fact14: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & {H})

That reconstructing attractiveness occurs.

{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that cosmicness happens is correct if the fact that this porn or that non-anorthiticness or both happens is false. fact2: If that foundering crinkle does not happens then that bailment does not occurs and that renewal does not occurs. fact3: This porn does not happens. fact4: Both that reconstructing attractiveness and that nipping happens if that cosmicness does not happens. fact5: That bailment happens. fact6: This coloured does not happens if the fact that this fucking MIPS and this coloured occurs is false. fact7: If that both this documentation and that cosmicness occurs is not correct then that cosmicness does not happens. fact8: The fact that either this porn or that non-anorthiticness or both occurs is wrong. fact9: This trashing occurs. fact10: If the emphasizing Karnataka happens this imaging happens. fact11: If that cosmicness and that nipping occurs then the fact that that reconstructing attractiveness does not occurs hold. fact12: The positioning does not occurs. fact13: That nipping happens if that bailment occurs. fact14: If this coloured does not occurs notthat foundering crinkle but that uncomplimentariness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That reconstructing attractiveness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact8 -> int1: That cosmicness occurs.; fact13 & fact5 -> int2: That nipping occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That cosmicness and that nipping occurs.; int3 & fact11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That the fact that everything is a bovine is right is not true.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Every person is a Discocephali. fact2: Everything does not cede. fact3: Some person that is a bovine is profound. fact4: Every person is a shove. fact5: That somebody is not a bovine and it is not a kind of a campana does not hold if it is indeterminate. fact6: Everything is not a simplicity. fact7: Everything repines. fact8: The fact that every person is a Samaria hold. fact9: Something is both not kinaesthetic and not a Paleocene if it is not a simplicity. fact10: If somebody is not kinaesthetic and not a Paleocene then the person does not cede. fact11: If the fact that something is not a kind of a bovine and the thing is not a campana is wrong then the thing is a campana. fact12: Something is not determinate but a metroptosis if the fact that that does not cede is true. fact13: The fact that something is not indeterminate and it is not a kind of a metroptosis is wrong if it does not cede. fact14: Everybody does struggle anopia. fact15: Everything is a Arctotis. fact16: That everything does line otalgia hold. fact17: Every person is inconvenient. fact18: Everybody is a kind of a uncommonness.

fact1: (x): {AJ}x fact2: (x): ¬{D}x fact3: (x): {A}x -> {GB}x fact4: (x): {CG}x fact5: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{AH}x) fact6: (x): ¬{G}x fact7: (x): {DN}x fact8: (x): {J}x fact9: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) fact10: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact11: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{AH}x) -> {AH}x fact12: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact13: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) fact14: (x): {CI}x fact15: (x): {FO}x fact16: (x): {JD}x fact17: (x): {CS}x fact18: (x): {BA}x

The fact that everything is a campana is right.

(x): {AH}x

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Every person is a Discocephali. fact2: Everything does not cede. fact3: Some person that is a bovine is profound. fact4: Every person is a shove. fact5: That somebody is not a bovine and it is not a kind of a campana does not hold if it is indeterminate. fact6: Everything is not a simplicity. fact7: Everything repines. fact8: The fact that every person is a Samaria hold. fact9: Something is both not kinaesthetic and not a Paleocene if it is not a simplicity. fact10: If somebody is not kinaesthetic and not a Paleocene then the person does not cede. fact11: If the fact that something is not a kind of a bovine and the thing is not a campana is wrong then the thing is a campana. fact12: Something is not determinate but a metroptosis if the fact that that does not cede is true. fact13: The fact that something is not indeterminate and it is not a kind of a metroptosis is wrong if it does not cede. fact14: Everybody does struggle anopia. fact15: Everything is a Arctotis. fact16: That everything does line otalgia hold. fact17: Every person is inconvenient. fact18: Everybody is a kind of a uncommonness. ; $hypothesis$ = That the fact that everything is a bovine is right is not true. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this ultramontane is not vegetive or is not diplomatic or both is false.

¬(¬{C}{b} v ¬{B}{b})

fact1: That curbing is a Kazakhstani that is diplomatic. fact2: This ultramontane is not vegetive or is not diplomatic or both if that curbing is diplomatic. fact3: That curbing is not vegetive if something that caramelizes sluicing is gastronomic. fact4: This ultramontane is vegetive or not diplomatic or both if the fact that that curbing is diplomatic is true.

fact1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: {B}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) fact3: (x): ({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}{a} fact4: {B}{a} -> ({C}{b} v ¬{B}{b})

This labor is diplomatic and invalid.

({B}{id} & {IO}{id})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That curbing is a Kazakhstani that is diplomatic. fact2: This ultramontane is not vegetive or is not diplomatic or both if that curbing is diplomatic. fact3: That curbing is not vegetive if something that caramelizes sluicing is gastronomic. fact4: This ultramontane is vegetive or not diplomatic or both if the fact that that curbing is diplomatic is true. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this ultramontane is not vegetive or is not diplomatic or both is false. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> int1: That curbing is diplomatic.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Something is not unarmed and it does not whisker eighter.

(Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

fact1: Everyone does not sing. fact2: The grill is not psychotropic if it is a Macbeth. fact3: that this Rumania disks fieldfare is true. fact4: This fieldfare does not whisker eighter if this fieldfare disks Rumania. fact5: If something is a kind of a Curitiba then the fact that that thing does not resurrect and that thing is a trafficator is false. fact6: That this emigre does not disk Rumania if that that PWR does not resurrect but it is a trafficator does not hold hold. fact7: This fieldfare is armed and it does not whisker eighter if this fieldfare disks Rumania. fact8: There is something such that it does not disk Rumania. fact9: Something is a Curitiba and this thing is a foal if the fact that this thing does not sing is not incorrect. fact10: This fieldfare is not a Tingidae and not sclerosed if this fieldfare is a ebullition. fact11: That this fieldfare disks Rumania is true.

fact1: (x): ¬{F}x fact2: {AL}{fl} -> ¬{IB}{fl} fact3: {AC}{aa} fact4: {A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} fact5: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x) fact6: ¬(¬{C}{c} & {B}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact7: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact8: (Ex): ¬{A}x fact9: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) fact10: {EH}{a} -> (¬{BD}{a} & ¬{GR}{a}) fact11: {A}{a}

There exists something such that that is not a Anhimidae and that does not encircle molded.

(Ex): (¬{L}x & ¬{HT}x)

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everyone does not sing. fact2: The grill is not psychotropic if it is a Macbeth. fact3: that this Rumania disks fieldfare is true. fact4: This fieldfare does not whisker eighter if this fieldfare disks Rumania. fact5: If something is a kind of a Curitiba then the fact that that thing does not resurrect and that thing is a trafficator is false. fact6: That this emigre does not disk Rumania if that that PWR does not resurrect but it is a trafficator does not hold hold. fact7: This fieldfare is armed and it does not whisker eighter if this fieldfare disks Rumania. fact8: There is something such that it does not disk Rumania. fact9: Something is a Curitiba and this thing is a foal if the fact that this thing does not sing is not incorrect. fact10: This fieldfare is not a Tingidae and not sclerosed if this fieldfare is a ebullition. fact11: That this fieldfare disks Rumania is true. ; $hypothesis$ = Something is not unarmed and it does not whisker eighter. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact11 -> int1: That this fieldfare is not unarmed and it does not whisker eighter is correct.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This glowing does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: If this crawling Aidoneus does not occurs then the fact that this nonarbitrariness occurs and this skeet happens is wrong. fact2: That unmelodiousness occurs and that allergenicness happens if that this analyzing Wyoming does not happens hold. fact3: This analyzing Wyoming does not occurs if that superficialness does not happens. fact4: That grinding does not happens and that filtration does not occurs if the snatching Cananga occurs. fact5: This skeet occurs. fact6: If that unmelodiousness occurs then that transientness occurs. fact7: This crawling Aidoneus does not occurs if that transientness but notthis scandal occurs. fact8: That this peppering partialness does not happens brings about that both that lithographicness and this parousness occurs. fact9: This peppering partialness does not happens. fact10: This eruptiveness prevents that this scholarliness does not happens. fact11: That this glowing does not occurs is triggered by that this nonarbitrariness happens and this scholarliness occurs. fact12: That this nonarbitrariness happens hold if this skeet occurs. fact13: The snatching Cananga and this auxeticness happens. fact14: This eruptiveness occurs. fact15: If that grinding does not happens and that filtration does not happens that superficialness does not occurs. fact16: That lithographicness results in that that zap does not occurs and/or the devilment does not happens. fact17: If that zap does not happens then this scandal does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{F} -> ¬({C} & {E}) fact2: ¬{N} -> ({I} & {M}) fact3: ¬{O} -> ¬{N} fact4: {R} -> (¬{Q} & ¬{P}) fact5: {E} fact6: {I} -> {H} fact7: ({H} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{F} fact8: ¬{T} -> ({L} & {S}) fact9: ¬{T} fact10: {A} -> {B} fact11: ({C} & {B}) -> ¬{D} fact12: {E} -> {C} fact13: ({R} & {U}) fact14: {A} fact15: (¬{Q} & ¬{P}) -> ¬{O} fact16: {L} -> (¬{K} v ¬{J}) fact17: ¬{K} -> ¬{G}

This glowing happens.

{D}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this crawling Aidoneus does not occurs then the fact that this nonarbitrariness occurs and this skeet happens is wrong. fact2: That unmelodiousness occurs and that allergenicness happens if that this analyzing Wyoming does not happens hold. fact3: This analyzing Wyoming does not occurs if that superficialness does not happens. fact4: That grinding does not happens and that filtration does not occurs if the snatching Cananga occurs. fact5: This skeet occurs. fact6: If that unmelodiousness occurs then that transientness occurs. fact7: This crawling Aidoneus does not occurs if that transientness but notthis scandal occurs. fact8: That this peppering partialness does not happens brings about that both that lithographicness and this parousness occurs. fact9: This peppering partialness does not happens. fact10: This eruptiveness prevents that this scholarliness does not happens. fact11: That this glowing does not occurs is triggered by that this nonarbitrariness happens and this scholarliness occurs. fact12: That this nonarbitrariness happens hold if this skeet occurs. fact13: The snatching Cananga and this auxeticness happens. fact14: This eruptiveness occurs. fact15: If that grinding does not happens and that filtration does not happens that superficialness does not occurs. fact16: That lithographicness results in that that zap does not occurs and/or the devilment does not happens. fact17: If that zap does not happens then this scandal does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This glowing does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact14 -> int1: This scholarliness occurs.; fact5 & fact12 -> int2: This nonarbitrariness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This nonarbitrariness occurs and this scholarliness occurs.; int3 & fact11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That supplicant is not ictal.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: The sunburst is a Tuskegee.

fact1: {A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The sunburst is a Tuskegee. ; $hypothesis$ = That supplicant is not ictal. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This stooper is not a superlative.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: If this althaea is not a kind of a Poeciliidae then this Ti is not a Poeciliidae. fact2: The quake is not a Poeciliidae. fact3: If this stooper is a superlative this Ti is a Poeciliidae. fact4: If this Ti is not infertile then this stooper is a Poeciliidae and a superlative. fact5: If that some man is not a Pteridospermaphyta but this one is not equal is incorrect then that this one is not infertile is right. fact6: This althaea is not a kind of a Poeciliidae.

fact1: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬{B}{b} fact2: ¬{B}{bh} fact3: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact4: ¬{C}{b} -> ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact6: ¬{B}{c}

Let's assume that this stooper is a kind of a superlative.

{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this althaea is not a kind of a Poeciliidae then this Ti is not a Poeciliidae. fact2: The quake is not a Poeciliidae. fact3: If this stooper is a superlative this Ti is a Poeciliidae. fact4: If this Ti is not infertile then this stooper is a Poeciliidae and a superlative. fact5: If that some man is not a Pteridospermaphyta but this one is not equal is incorrect then that this one is not infertile is right. fact6: This althaea is not a kind of a Poeciliidae. ; $hypothesis$ = This stooper is not a superlative. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this stooper is a kind of a superlative.; fact3 & assump1 -> int1: This Ti is a kind of a Poeciliidae.; fact1 & fact6 -> int2: This Ti is not a Poeciliidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this colophony is a palimpsest but the thing does not attend does not hold.

¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

fact1: If this colophony is not processional then this colophony is a Truffaut and it is subcortical. fact2: That there exists something such that this thing is both not a gross and an outgo is correct. fact3: If this incrustation accoutreds Cronyn that this colophony is a palimpsest that does not attend is incorrect. fact4: That this colophony accoutreds Cronyn and is a palimpsest is false if that this incrustation attends is right. fact5: This incrustation accoutreds Cronyn. fact6: If this colophony is a kind of a gross it is not exact and it does cooccur. fact7: This incrustation is not a Truffaut if this colophony is not exact but the thing is a kind of a Truffaut. fact8: If something that is not a gross is an outgo then this colophony is a gross. fact9: The fact that this colophony is a palimpsest and does attend is incorrect. fact10: That this incrustation does attend and is a palimpsest is wrong if this colophony accoutreds Cronyn. fact11: If this colophony is a kind of a palimpsest then the fact that this incrustation accoutreds Cronyn but it does not attend does not hold. fact12: If this colophony attends that this incrustation does accoutred Cronyn and is a palimpsest is false. fact13: Something that does not accoutred Cronyn is a kind of a palimpsest and does not attend. fact14: this Cronyn accoutreds incrustation. fact15: If this incrustation is not a kind of a Truffaut this coffeeberry attends and accoutreds Cronyn.

fact1: ¬{E}{b} -> ({B}{b} & {D}{b}) fact2: (Ex): (¬{I}x & {J}x) fact3: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact4: {AB}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & {AA}{b}) fact5: {A}{a} fact6: {I}{b} -> (¬{C}{b} & {G}{b}) fact7: (¬{C}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact8: (x): (¬{I}x & {J}x) -> {I}{b} fact9: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact10: {A}{b} -> ¬({AB}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact11: {AA}{b} -> ¬({A}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact12: {AB}{b} -> ¬({A}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact13: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact14: {AC}{aa} fact15: ¬{B}{a} -> ({AB}{fp} & {A}{fp})

This colophony is a kind of a palimpsest that does not attend.

({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this colophony is not processional then this colophony is a Truffaut and it is subcortical. fact2: That there exists something such that this thing is both not a gross and an outgo is correct. fact3: If this incrustation accoutreds Cronyn that this colophony is a palimpsest that does not attend is incorrect. fact4: That this colophony accoutreds Cronyn and is a palimpsest is false if that this incrustation attends is right. fact5: This incrustation accoutreds Cronyn. fact6: If this colophony is a kind of a gross it is not exact and it does cooccur. fact7: This incrustation is not a Truffaut if this colophony is not exact but the thing is a kind of a Truffaut. fact8: If something that is not a gross is an outgo then this colophony is a gross. fact9: The fact that this colophony is a palimpsest and does attend is incorrect. fact10: That this incrustation does attend and is a palimpsest is wrong if this colophony accoutreds Cronyn. fact11: If this colophony is a kind of a palimpsest then the fact that this incrustation accoutreds Cronyn but it does not attend does not hold. fact12: If this colophony attends that this incrustation does accoutred Cronyn and is a palimpsest is false. fact13: Something that does not accoutred Cronyn is a kind of a palimpsest and does not attend. fact14: this Cronyn accoutreds incrustation. fact15: If this incrustation is not a kind of a Truffaut this coffeeberry attends and accoutreds Cronyn. ; $hypothesis$ = That this colophony is a palimpsest but the thing does not attend does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This Madagascanness occurs.

{A}

fact1: Notthis Madagascanness but the sipping neurasthenia occurs if that misting starkness occurs. fact2: If this parochialness happens that misting starkness occurs.

fact1: {C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact2: {D} -> {C}

This Madagascanness does not occurs.

¬{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Notthis Madagascanness but the sipping neurasthenia occurs if that misting starkness occurs. fact2: If this parochialness happens that misting starkness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This Madagascanness occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This pitting Yamani occurs.

{C}

fact1: That winging happens and the calceolateness happens if the fact that that regeneration does not happens is not false. fact2: That that pachisi and that deprecation occurs prevents that that grubbing tested happens. fact3: If that grubbing tested does not happens the fact that both that indispensableness and this grammaticness occurs is incorrect. fact4: If this openingness does not happens both that burlesquing and that yodeling occurs. fact5: The fact that that winging results in this pitting Yamani is true. fact6: That regeneration does not occurs if this vacillating planeness does not occurs but this falsification occurs. fact7: That both the sorriness and the bathymetry occurs prevents the inframaxillariness. fact8: That indispensableness does not occurs if the fact that that indispensableness happens and this grammaticness occurs is wrong. fact9: If this physicochemicalness does not occurs and that trouncing Cakile occurs the fact that this soaking does not occurs hold. fact10: That trouncing Cakile happens. fact11: If that indispensableness does not occurs notthis vacillating planeness but this falsification happens. fact12: This openingness does not occurs and that baring abulia does not happens if this webbed occurs. fact13: That this pitting Yamani occurs is prevented by that that trouncing Cakile and this physicochemicalness occurs. fact14: If that this intraspecificness does not happens is true that pachisi occurs and that deprecation happens. fact15: That this physicochemicalness occurs is correct. fact16: Both that non-intraspecificness and that non-hemolyticness occurs if that burlesquing happens.

fact1: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact2: ({M} & {L}) -> ¬{K} fact3: ¬{K} -> ¬({I} & {J}) fact4: ¬{R} -> ({P} & {Q}) fact5: {D} -> {C} fact6: (¬{G} & {H}) -> ¬{F} fact7: ({EG} & {CM}) -> ¬{JH} fact8: ¬({I} & {J}) -> ¬{I} fact9: (¬{B} & {A}) -> ¬{AT} fact10: {A} fact11: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & {H}) fact12: {T} -> (¬{R} & ¬{S}) fact13: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact14: ¬{N} -> ({M} & {L}) fact15: {B} fact16: {P} -> (¬{N} & ¬{O})

This soaking does not occurs.

¬{AT}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That winging happens and the calceolateness happens if the fact that that regeneration does not happens is not false. fact2: That that pachisi and that deprecation occurs prevents that that grubbing tested happens. fact3: If that grubbing tested does not happens the fact that both that indispensableness and this grammaticness occurs is incorrect. fact4: If this openingness does not happens both that burlesquing and that yodeling occurs. fact5: The fact that that winging results in this pitting Yamani is true. fact6: That regeneration does not occurs if this vacillating planeness does not occurs but this falsification occurs. fact7: That both the sorriness and the bathymetry occurs prevents the inframaxillariness. fact8: That indispensableness does not occurs if the fact that that indispensableness happens and this grammaticness occurs is wrong. fact9: If this physicochemicalness does not occurs and that trouncing Cakile occurs the fact that this soaking does not occurs hold. fact10: That trouncing Cakile happens. fact11: If that indispensableness does not occurs notthis vacillating planeness but this falsification happens. fact12: This openingness does not occurs and that baring abulia does not happens if this webbed occurs. fact13: That this pitting Yamani occurs is prevented by that that trouncing Cakile and this physicochemicalness occurs. fact14: If that this intraspecificness does not happens is true that pachisi occurs and that deprecation happens. fact15: That this physicochemicalness occurs is correct. fact16: Both that non-intraspecificness and that non-hemolyticness occurs if that burlesquing happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This pitting Yamani occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact15 -> int1: That trouncing Cakile occurs and this physicochemicalness happens.; int1 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that Butch does not soar pricelessness and is a pressed is incorrect.

¬(¬{B}{c} & {D}{c})

fact1: This amatungulu soars pricelessness if that this erica is not sociolinguistic is not wrong. fact2: That this amatungulu is not sociolinguistic and soars pricelessness does not hold if this erica is sociolinguistic. fact3: Something that is sociolinguistic does not soar pricelessness and is a pressed. fact4: This erica is non-sociolinguistic. fact5: The fact that someone is toneless and he is sociolinguistic is right if he is not a Suisse. fact6: The fact that that Butch soars pricelessness and it is a pressed does not hold is not false. fact7: If Butch soars pricelessness then that this amatungulu does not soars pricelessness but it is a pressed does not hold. fact8: If this amatungulu soars pricelessness then the fact that Butch soars pricelessness and is a pressed does not hold. fact9: Either somebody is a kind of a Suisse or it synthesizes Mitchella or both if it is not a ichthyosis.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact2: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact3: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}x & {D}x) fact4: ¬{A}{a} fact5: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) fact6: ¬({B}{c} & {D}{c}) fact7: {B}{c} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) fact8: {B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & {D}{c}) fact9: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x v {G}x)

Butch does not soar pricelessness and is a pressed.

(¬{B}{c} & {D}{c})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This amatungulu soars pricelessness if that this erica is not sociolinguistic is not wrong. fact2: That this amatungulu is not sociolinguistic and soars pricelessness does not hold if this erica is sociolinguistic. fact3: Something that is sociolinguistic does not soar pricelessness and is a pressed. fact4: This erica is non-sociolinguistic. fact5: The fact that someone is toneless and he is sociolinguistic is right if he is not a Suisse. fact6: The fact that that Butch soars pricelessness and it is a pressed does not hold is not false. fact7: If Butch soars pricelessness then that this amatungulu does not soars pricelessness but it is a pressed does not hold. fact8: If this amatungulu soars pricelessness then the fact that Butch soars pricelessness and is a pressed does not hold. fact9: Either somebody is a kind of a Suisse or it synthesizes Mitchella or both if it is not a ichthyosis. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that Butch does not soar pricelessness and is a pressed is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Let's assume that the fact that this protectorate craunches paycheck is true.

{A}{a}

fact1: This protectorate is a mutter. fact2: That if the fact that this quipu craunches paycheck hold then that this protectorate craunches paycheck is correct hold. fact3: If something is not a Goidelic but this is a radian this is not a incredibility. fact4: This protectorate is not a finitude but it craunches paycheck if this protectorate is Javanese. fact5: If someone is not a incredibility the fact that she/he craunches paycheck and she/he is not a York is not right. fact6: The fact that this protectorate is not a Monophysite but he/she is a York does not hold if this protectorate is not a rifling. fact7: If this mescal is not a Galleria then the fact that this mescal is not a kind of a ketonuria but it is a insensitiveness is false. fact8: This protectorate is not a kind of a York. fact9: That the fact that this limbers is not inactive but it is a kind of a Taegu does not hold if this limbers does not unsexed FRG is correct. fact10: That that the fact that this protectorate does not unsexed FRG but it is a kind of a mutter hold is wrong hold if this protectorate is not a kind of a York. fact11: The fact that this protectorate is a mutter is right if it craunches paycheck. fact12: This protectorate is not a virginal. fact13: This protectorate does not unsexed FRG but it is a kind of a mutter if this protectorate craunches paycheck. fact14: If something is not a kind of a incredibility it craunches paycheck and it is a York.

fact1: {AB}{a} fact2: {A}{b} -> {A}{a} fact3: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact4: {GT}{a} -> (¬{CR}{a} & {A}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact6: ¬{AK}{a} -> ¬(¬{DB}{a} & {B}{a}) fact7: ¬{FB}{cj} -> ¬(¬{DQ}{cj} & {CH}{cj}) fact8: ¬{B}{a} fact9: ¬{AA}{gd} -> ¬(¬{EE}{gd} & {GK}{gd}) fact10: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact11: {A}{a} -> {AB}{a} fact12: ¬{CL}{a} fact13: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact14: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x)

This felid does not craunch paycheck.

¬{A}{hs}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This protectorate is a mutter. fact2: That if the fact that this quipu craunches paycheck hold then that this protectorate craunches paycheck is correct hold. fact3: If something is not a Goidelic but this is a radian this is not a incredibility. fact4: This protectorate is not a finitude but it craunches paycheck if this protectorate is Javanese. fact5: If someone is not a incredibility the fact that she/he craunches paycheck and she/he is not a York is not right. fact6: The fact that this protectorate is not a Monophysite but he/she is a York does not hold if this protectorate is not a rifling. fact7: If this mescal is not a Galleria then the fact that this mescal is not a kind of a ketonuria but it is a insensitiveness is false. fact8: This protectorate is not a kind of a York. fact9: That the fact that this limbers is not inactive but it is a kind of a Taegu does not hold if this limbers does not unsexed FRG is correct. fact10: That that the fact that this protectorate does not unsexed FRG but it is a kind of a mutter hold is wrong hold if this protectorate is not a kind of a York. fact11: The fact that this protectorate is a mutter is right if it craunches paycheck. fact12: This protectorate is not a virginal. fact13: This protectorate does not unsexed FRG but it is a kind of a mutter if this protectorate craunches paycheck. fact14: If something is not a kind of a incredibility it craunches paycheck and it is a York. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that the fact that this protectorate craunches paycheck is true. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that this protectorate craunches paycheck is true.; fact13 & assump1 -> int1: This protectorate does not unsexed FRG and is a kind of a mutter.; fact8 & fact10 -> int2: The fact that that this protectorate does not unsexed FRG and is a mutter is true does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that the fact that that outskirt is not a kind of a din and broods villainage does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

fact1: Somebody is not a din and does not socialise if that it demolishes Labiatae is not incorrect. fact2: This shoot does not bewilder entitlement if that this shoot does not accoutred Guthrie but this person socialises does not hold. fact3: Somebody is not biauricular if the fact that it is biauricular and is not unclimbable does not hold. fact4: If the fanatic is an inclined then this shellac demolishes Labiatae. fact5: This crampoon does demolish Labiatae if this shellac does demolish Labiatae. fact6: If this crampoon is not a kind of a din and it does not socialise that outskirt is not a din. fact7: If the fact that the fanatic is disobedient is correct then the fact that this shellac demolishes Labiatae is true. fact8: The fact that that outskirt does socialise is correct if that it is not a din and it broods villainage is wrong. fact9: That something is biauricular thing that is not unclimbable is wrong if that thing is not hyperbolic. fact10: If the fact that that outskirt does not greet Scarface and is standard is incorrect that outskirt does not socialise. fact11: The fanatic does not romance Petrocoptis. fact12: Something is not standard but it greets Scarface if it is not biauricular. fact13: If that outskirt is not a din and it is nonstandard then that broiler is not a din. fact14: Either the fanatic is not obedient or she/he is an inclined or both if the fact that she/he does not romance Petrocoptis is right. fact15: The fact that that outskirt does not greet Scarface but that one is standard is incorrect.

fact1: (x): {E}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{B}x) fact2: ¬(¬{EP}{ab} & {B}{ab}) -> ¬{BN}{ab} fact3: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact4: {I}{d} -> {E}{c} fact5: {E}{c} -> {E}{b} fact6: (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{AA}{a} fact7: {H}{d} -> {E}{c} fact8: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact9: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{F}x) fact10: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact11: ¬{K}{d} fact12: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{A}x & {C}x) fact13: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{jg} fact14: ¬{K}{d} -> ({H}{d} v {I}{d}) fact15: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {A}{a})

That broiler is not a din.

¬{AA}{jg}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Somebody is not a din and does not socialise if that it demolishes Labiatae is not incorrect. fact2: This shoot does not bewilder entitlement if that this shoot does not accoutred Guthrie but this person socialises does not hold. fact3: Somebody is not biauricular if the fact that it is biauricular and is not unclimbable does not hold. fact4: If the fanatic is an inclined then this shellac demolishes Labiatae. fact5: This crampoon does demolish Labiatae if this shellac does demolish Labiatae. fact6: If this crampoon is not a kind of a din and it does not socialise that outskirt is not a din. fact7: If the fact that the fanatic is disobedient is correct then the fact that this shellac demolishes Labiatae is true. fact8: The fact that that outskirt does socialise is correct if that it is not a din and it broods villainage is wrong. fact9: That something is biauricular thing that is not unclimbable is wrong if that thing is not hyperbolic. fact10: If the fact that that outskirt does not greet Scarface and is standard is incorrect that outskirt does not socialise. fact11: The fanatic does not romance Petrocoptis. fact12: Something is not standard but it greets Scarface if it is not biauricular. fact13: If that outskirt is not a din and it is nonstandard then that broiler is not a din. fact14: Either the fanatic is not obedient or she/he is an inclined or both if the fact that she/he does not romance Petrocoptis is right. fact15: The fact that that outskirt does not greet Scarface but that one is standard is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that the fact that that outskirt is not a kind of a din and broods villainage does not hold. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that outskirt is not a kind of a din and broods villainage does not hold.; fact8 & assump1 -> int1: That outskirt does socialise.; fact10 & fact15 -> int2: That outskirt does not socialise.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that there exists somebody such that it is a Aloeaceae is not true.

¬((Ex): {A}x)

fact1: There exists someone such that it is a Aloeaceae.

fact1: (Ex): {A}x

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There exists someone such that it is a Aloeaceae. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that there exists somebody such that it is a Aloeaceae is not true. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This existentialist is not non-diplomatical.

{A}{a}

fact1: Some man that is a Limenitis is a tested and is not a securer. fact2: This pandar does not attest costs if that this Seconal is nonpartisan but it does not keratinize does not hold. fact3: If the fact that some man is not a Orwell and he/she does not attest costs does not hold then he/she is diplomatical. fact4: This existentialist is non-diplomatical if that rabbi is non-diplomatical person that is not a Orwell. fact5: If this pandar does not attest costs that rabbi is not diplomatical and it is not a Orwell. fact6: If that calumet is cytokinetic that this Seconal is a kind of nonpartisan one that does not keratinize is false. fact7: The fact that this commissure is not a tested if that megaphone is a tested and is not a securer is correct. fact8: If the fact that some person is not campanular but camphoric does not hold it is not a eclogue. fact9: If some person is not a kind of a tested the fact that the one is not campanular and the one is camphoric is incorrect. fact10: That calumet is cytokinetic if this commissure sneers playschool. fact11: If something is not a eclogue then it does sneer playschool and it is not a mound.

fact1: (x): {M}x -> ({L}x & ¬{N}x) fact2: ¬({E}{d} & ¬{D}{d}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact3: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) -> {A}x fact4: (¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact5: ¬{B}{c} -> (¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact6: {F}{e} -> ¬({E}{d} & ¬{D}{d}) fact7: ({L}{g} & ¬{N}{g}) -> ¬{L}{f} fact8: (x): ¬(¬{K}x & {J}x) -> ¬{I}x fact9: (x): ¬{L}x -> ¬(¬{K}x & {J}x) fact10: {G}{f} -> {F}{e} fact11: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({G}x & ¬{H}x)

This existentialist is non-diplomatical.

¬{A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some man that is a Limenitis is a tested and is not a securer. fact2: This pandar does not attest costs if that this Seconal is nonpartisan but it does not keratinize does not hold. fact3: If the fact that some man is not a Orwell and he/she does not attest costs does not hold then he/she is diplomatical. fact4: This existentialist is non-diplomatical if that rabbi is non-diplomatical person that is not a Orwell. fact5: If this pandar does not attest costs that rabbi is not diplomatical and it is not a Orwell. fact6: If that calumet is cytokinetic that this Seconal is a kind of nonpartisan one that does not keratinize is false. fact7: The fact that this commissure is not a tested if that megaphone is a tested and is not a securer is correct. fact8: If the fact that some person is not campanular but camphoric does not hold it is not a eclogue. fact9: If some person is not a kind of a tested the fact that the one is not campanular and the one is camphoric is incorrect. fact10: That calumet is cytokinetic if this commissure sneers playschool. fact11: If something is not a eclogue then it does sneer playschool and it is not a mound. ; $hypothesis$ = This existentialist is not non-diplomatical. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this biomass is a bottle is true.

{B}{b}

fact1: The fact that this biomass is a interlanguage and does not pout Cronartium does not hold if that odometer is not a loquacity. fact2: That odometer is not a loquacity. fact3: This biomass is not a loquacity. fact4: This biomass is not a hypoglycaemia. fact5: If that something is a interlanguage and does not pout Cronartium is false then the fact that it is not a bottle is not wrong. fact6: That that odometer pouts Cronartium and this thing is a loquacity does not hold if this biomass is not a interlanguage. fact7: That this biomass is both a loquacity and not a interlanguage is incorrect.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} fact3: ¬{A}{b} fact4: ¬{BK}{b} fact5: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact6: ¬{AA}{b} -> ¬({AB}{a} & {A}{a}) fact7: ¬({A}{b} & ¬{AA}{b})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this biomass is a interlanguage and does not pout Cronartium does not hold if that odometer is not a loquacity. fact2: That odometer is not a loquacity. fact3: This biomass is not a loquacity. fact4: This biomass is not a hypoglycaemia. fact5: If that something is a interlanguage and does not pout Cronartium is false then the fact that it is not a bottle is not wrong. fact6: That that odometer pouts Cronartium and this thing is a loquacity does not hold if this biomass is not a interlanguage. fact7: That this biomass is both a loquacity and not a interlanguage is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this biomass is a bottle is true. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact2 -> int1: The fact that this biomass is a interlanguage but it does not pout Cronartium does not hold.; fact5 -> int2: If that this biomass is a kind of a interlanguage that does not pout Cronartium does not hold the fact that this biomass is not a bottle is correct.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that everything is not a Cajanus is not right.

¬((x): ¬{A}x)

fact1: Everyone is not a Cajanus. fact2: Something that is not a kind of a Nicaraguan is both not a Cajanus and not unprincipled.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x)

Every person does not eschew difficultness.

(x): ¬{CH}x

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everyone is not a Cajanus. fact2: Something that is not a kind of a Nicaraguan is both not a Cajanus and not unprincipled. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that everything is not a Cajanus is not right. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Becky is a kind of a cholera and is not blastoporal.

({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b})

fact1: That that worm does not uplift Littre but this thing is aoristic does not hold. fact2: Becky is not a cholera if that worm is blastoporal. fact3: Something is non-inflectional thing that leaches Merida if this thing is not a kind of a natural. fact4: Becky is a cholera but that one is not blastoporal if that worm is a cholera. fact5: That worm is a cholera if it uplifts Littre. fact6: The fact that the fact that that worm uplifts Littre and it is aoristic is true does not hold. fact7: If that worm is a cholera Becky is a cholera. fact8: Everyone is not a kind of a natural. fact9: The fact that Becky does ooze Bombax and that uplifts Littre is not correct. fact10: Becky is a cholera. fact11: If something is both not blastoporal and a cholera the fact that the thing is Aramaic is not incorrect. fact12: That something is not a Asclepiadaceae and not non-aoristic does not hold if that thing is Aramaic. fact13: That worm envisions Arianism if it is broadnosed. fact14: That worm is a cholera if the fact that that worm does not uplift Littre and is aoristic is wrong. fact15: That the Smith does not calcine but it oozes Bombax is incorrect.

fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: {C}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact3: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{E}x & {D}x) fact4: {B}{a} -> ({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact5: {AA}{a} -> {B}{a} fact6: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact7: {B}{a} -> {B}{b} fact8: (x): ¬{F}x fact9: ¬({HS}{b} & {AA}{b}) fact10: {B}{b} fact11: (x): (¬{C}x & {B}x) -> {A}x fact12: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{BB}x & {AB}x) fact13: {M}{a} -> {R}{a} fact14: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact15: ¬(¬{FR}{go} & {HS}{go})

That that Moslem is not a Asclepiadaceae but the one is aoristic is incorrect.

¬(¬{BB}{eo} & {AB}{eo})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that worm does not uplift Littre but this thing is aoristic does not hold. fact2: Becky is not a cholera if that worm is blastoporal. fact3: Something is non-inflectional thing that leaches Merida if this thing is not a kind of a natural. fact4: Becky is a cholera but that one is not blastoporal if that worm is a cholera. fact5: That worm is a cholera if it uplifts Littre. fact6: The fact that the fact that that worm uplifts Littre and it is aoristic is true does not hold. fact7: If that worm is a cholera Becky is a cholera. fact8: Everyone is not a kind of a natural. fact9: The fact that Becky does ooze Bombax and that uplifts Littre is not correct. fact10: Becky is a cholera. fact11: If something is both not blastoporal and a cholera the fact that the thing is Aramaic is not incorrect. fact12: That something is not a Asclepiadaceae and not non-aoristic does not hold if that thing is Aramaic. fact13: That worm envisions Arianism if it is broadnosed. fact14: That worm is a cholera if the fact that that worm does not uplift Littre and is aoristic is wrong. fact15: That the Smith does not calcine but it oozes Bombax is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = Becky is a kind of a cholera and is not blastoporal. ; $proof$ =

fact14 & fact1 -> int1: That worm is a cholera.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that maturing carat and that pyrogenicness happens does not hold.

¬({B} & {C})

fact1: That this pargetinging does not occurs leads to that that pyrogenicness happens. fact2: That this flashing and this pargetinging occurs is caused by the non-antecedentness. fact3: This pargetinging does not occurs. fact4: If the fact that both the non-oneiricness and that interning Australasia happens is false that that interning Australasia does not occurs is true. fact5: Both that interning Australasia and that maturing carat happens. fact6: If that interning Australasia does not occurs that that that maturing carat happens and that pyrogenicness happens is not incorrect does not hold. fact7: The oneiricness does not happens. fact8: If the fact that this shrugging agiotage does not happens and that fossilizing occurs is false this antecedentness does not happens. fact9: That interning Australasia happens.

fact1: ¬{D} -> {C} fact2: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {D}) fact3: ¬{D} fact4: ¬(¬{E} & {A}) -> ¬{A} fact5: ({A} & {B}) fact6: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & {C}) fact7: ¬{E} fact8: ¬(¬{H} & {I}) -> ¬{G} fact9: {A}

Both this surveying Lemuroidea and this bodieding antilogarithm occurs.

({DF} & {IP})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this pargetinging does not occurs leads to that that pyrogenicness happens. fact2: That this flashing and this pargetinging occurs is caused by the non-antecedentness. fact3: This pargetinging does not occurs. fact4: If the fact that both the non-oneiricness and that interning Australasia happens is false that that interning Australasia does not occurs is true. fact5: Both that interning Australasia and that maturing carat happens. fact6: If that interning Australasia does not occurs that that that maturing carat happens and that pyrogenicness happens is not incorrect does not hold. fact7: The oneiricness does not happens. fact8: If the fact that this shrugging agiotage does not happens and that fossilizing occurs is false this antecedentness does not happens. fact9: That interning Australasia happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that maturing carat and that pyrogenicness happens does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> int1: That maturing carat occurs.; fact3 & fact1 -> int2: That pyrogenicness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That there is something such that it is breakable does not hold.

¬((Ex): {A}x)

fact1: There is something such that it is indirect. fact2: Something is not unbreakable and this thing is calcaneal if this thing is not a jocundity.

fact1: (Ex): {HK}x fact2: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}x & {GT}x)

Something is calcaneal.

(Ex): {GT}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: There is something such that it is indirect. fact2: Something is not unbreakable and this thing is calcaneal if this thing is not a jocundity. ; $hypothesis$ = That there is something such that it is breakable does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This driving Torquemada does not happens and that fantasising poppycock occurs.

(¬{C} & {B})

fact1: The Mycenaeanness happens. fact2: This driving Torquemada does not occurs and that lymphoidness does not occurs. fact3: That lymphoidness does not occurs. fact4: If the untwisting frightfulness happens that fantasising poppycock happens. fact5: The untwisting frightfulness occurs.

fact1: {HC} fact2: (¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact3: ¬{D} fact4: {A} -> {B} fact5: {A}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The Mycenaeanness happens. fact2: This driving Torquemada does not occurs and that lymphoidness does not occurs. fact3: That lymphoidness does not occurs. fact4: If the untwisting frightfulness happens that fantasising poppycock happens. fact5: The untwisting frightfulness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This driving Torquemada does not happens and that fantasising poppycock occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact5 -> int1: That fantasising poppycock happens.; fact2 -> int2: This driving Torquemada does not occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That balladeer is upmarket.

{C}{a}

fact1: The traitor is not a Grossulariaceae. fact2: That balladeer is not a Grossulariaceae. fact3: If that that Lao is not a kind of a Grossulariaceae is correct that balladeer is upmarket and she/he is a dysphasia. fact4: Somebody is not upmarket if that she is not a kind of a dysphasia and she is a Grossulariaceae is incorrect. fact5: If someone is a dysphasia this person is not upmarket.

fact1: ¬{B}{ha} fact2: ¬{B}{a} fact3: ¬{B}{b} -> ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact5: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x

That balladeer is upmarket.

{C}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The traitor is not a Grossulariaceae. fact2: That balladeer is not a Grossulariaceae. fact3: If that that Lao is not a kind of a Grossulariaceae is correct that balladeer is upmarket and she/he is a dysphasia. fact4: Somebody is not upmarket if that she is not a kind of a dysphasia and she is a Grossulariaceae is incorrect. fact5: If someone is a dysphasia this person is not upmarket. ; $hypothesis$ = That balladeer is upmarket. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that balladeer is both not a dysphasia and a Grossulariaceae.; assump1 -> int1: The fact that that balladeer is a Grossulariaceae hold.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That that that that balladeer is not a dysphasia but it is a Grossulariaceae is correct is wrong is true.; fact4 -> int4: The fact that that balladeer is not upmarket if that that balladeer is not a kind of a dysphasia but it is a kind of a Grossulariaceae does not hold is true.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That task occurs and that umbrella occurs.

({A} & {C})

fact1: The fact that that task does not occurs and/or the calcanealness does not occurs does not hold. fact2: The Celticness does not happens. fact3: That undocking Mollusca happens. fact4: Both that toroidalness and the revolutionariness occurs. fact5: That blinding bibliotics and that admitting occurs. fact6: This fraternisation occurs. fact7: That that umbrella and this fraternisation occurs is caused by the non-Celticness. fact8: This fraternisation happens if the Celticness does not occurs.

fact1: ¬(¬{A} v ¬{B}) fact2: ¬{E} fact3: {EO} fact4: ({FI} & {IU}) fact5: ({IH} & {U}) fact6: {D} fact7: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact8: ¬{E} -> {D}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that task does not occurs and/or the calcanealness does not occurs does not hold. fact2: The Celticness does not happens. fact3: That undocking Mollusca happens. fact4: Both that toroidalness and the revolutionariness occurs. fact5: That blinding bibliotics and that admitting occurs. fact6: This fraternisation occurs. fact7: That that umbrella and this fraternisation occurs is caused by the non-Celticness. fact8: This fraternisation happens if the Celticness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That task occurs and that umbrella occurs. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that task does not happens.; assump1 -> int1: Either that task does not happens or the calcanealness does not happens or both.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That task occurs.; fact2 & fact7 -> int4: That umbrella and this fraternisation occurs.; int4 -> int5: That umbrella occurs.; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that fantan does not occurs and this exogenicness does not happens does not hold.

¬(¬{E} & ¬{D})

fact1: This reflecting recentness occurs. fact2: That blooming flavourlessness happens. fact3: The fact that the unlacing sorriness does not happens and this betterment occurs is wrong if this unhealthfulness does not occurs. fact4: The tainted occurs and the potential occurs. fact5: This learning Andricus does not occurs and this faltering accent does not happens. fact6: If the pasteurization does not occurs the fact that the untrustworthiness occurs but that clipping does not happens is wrong. fact7: This betterment happens. fact8: That that diversion does not happens leads to that that fantan does not occurs and this exogenicness does not happens. fact9: That gastromy occurs and that Diaspora occurs. fact10: That both this motorlessness and the congregating Hottonia occurs prevents that that uninucleateness occurs. fact11: That that disseminating happens hold if that that diversion does not occurs and that disseminating does not happens does not hold. fact12: That this exogenicness does not happens is prevented by that this learning Andricus does not happens and this intensifying does not happens. fact13: This impetiginousness happens and that ventilatoriness occurs. fact14: This reflecting recentness does not happens if this exogenicness and this Sinning occurs. fact15: If this reflecting recentness does not happens the fact that that diversion does not happens and that disseminating does not occurs is incorrect. fact16: That foliaceousness happens. fact17: The fact that notthe stopgap but this betterment happens is wrong if that scoring does not happens. fact18: If both that diversion and this reflecting recentness happens then this Sinning does not happens. fact19: The fact that that fantan does not happens and this exogenicness does not occurs is wrong if this Sinning does not occurs. fact20: The fact that this unhealthfulness does not occurs and the played happens does not hold. fact21: The fact that the sailplaninging unreliableness does not happens hold. fact22: The fact that that fantan occurs but this exogenicness does not happens is incorrect.

fact1: {B} fact2: {FQ} fact3: ¬{DJ} -> ¬(¬{DN} & {T}) fact4: ({CE} & {ES}) fact5: (¬{H} & ¬{K}) fact6: ¬{EB} -> ¬({FO} & ¬{GS}) fact7: {T} fact8: ¬{A} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact9: ({FU} & {EI}) fact10: ({IN} & {CB}) -> ¬{BK} fact11: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{IO}) -> {IO} fact12: (¬{H} & ¬{G}) -> {D} fact13: ({R} & {JB}) fact14: ({D} & {C}) -> ¬{B} fact15: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{IO}) fact16: {BE} fact17: ¬{CA} -> ¬(¬{HB} & {T}) fact18: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact19: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact20: ¬(¬{DJ} & {IE}) fact21: ¬{AM} fact22: ¬({E} & ¬{D})

That fantan does not occurs and this exogenicness does not happens.

(¬{E} & ¬{D})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This reflecting recentness occurs. fact2: That blooming flavourlessness happens. fact3: The fact that the unlacing sorriness does not happens and this betterment occurs is wrong if this unhealthfulness does not occurs. fact4: The tainted occurs and the potential occurs. fact5: This learning Andricus does not occurs and this faltering accent does not happens. fact6: If the pasteurization does not occurs the fact that the untrustworthiness occurs but that clipping does not happens is wrong. fact7: This betterment happens. fact8: That that diversion does not happens leads to that that fantan does not occurs and this exogenicness does not happens. fact9: That gastromy occurs and that Diaspora occurs. fact10: That both this motorlessness and the congregating Hottonia occurs prevents that that uninucleateness occurs. fact11: That that disseminating happens hold if that that diversion does not occurs and that disseminating does not happens does not hold. fact12: That this exogenicness does not happens is prevented by that this learning Andricus does not happens and this intensifying does not happens. fact13: This impetiginousness happens and that ventilatoriness occurs. fact14: This reflecting recentness does not happens if this exogenicness and this Sinning occurs. fact15: If this reflecting recentness does not happens the fact that that diversion does not happens and that disseminating does not occurs is incorrect. fact16: That foliaceousness happens. fact17: The fact that notthe stopgap but this betterment happens is wrong if that scoring does not happens. fact18: If both that diversion and this reflecting recentness happens then this Sinning does not happens. fact19: The fact that that fantan does not happens and this exogenicness does not occurs is wrong if this Sinning does not occurs. fact20: The fact that this unhealthfulness does not occurs and the played happens does not hold. fact21: The fact that the sailplaninging unreliableness does not happens hold. fact22: The fact that that fantan occurs but this exogenicness does not happens is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = That that fantan does not occurs and this exogenicness does not happens does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that Sagitta is not cytoarchitectural and it is not genealogical does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: This trampoline does not disentangle if this mesoderm is not Judaic but it disentangle. fact2: That Sagitta is both not cytoarchitectural and not genealogical if this trampoline does not disentangle. fact3: If something is an overwork then that it is Judaic and it is not a plantigrade does not hold. fact4: The fact that that Sagitta is not cytoarchitectural and that is not genealogical is incorrect if that that does not disentangle is true. fact5: If that Sagitta does not disentangle that that that Sagitta is non-cytoarchitectural one that is genealogical hold is not true. fact6: This trampoline does not circulate Rhodesia if that this mesoderm circulate Rhodesia and is a Byrd is wrong. fact7: If that Sagitta does not disentangle the fact that that Sagitta is not a religion and is not toothed is incorrect. fact8: Everybody is not a Hymenanthera. fact9: If this trampoline does not circulate Rhodesia and/or rets Arachis that Sagitta is an overwork. fact10: If that that XX is not unturned is correct then that that one does veil and that one is not genealogical is wrong. fact11: The fact that the earthnut decompresses but that thing is not an infinite is wrong if that thing does not disentangle. fact12: That that Sagitta is cytoarchitectural but it is not genealogical is incorrect. fact13: If something is not a kind of a Hymenanthera then the fact that this thing circulates Rhodesia and this thing is a Byrd is incorrect. fact14: That Sagitta does not disentangle. fact15: If the fact that that Sagitta is Judaic but that one is not a plantigrade is incorrect then this longitude is not Judaic. fact16: If something is not Judaic it does not disentangle and it is not a kind of a Kechuan. fact17: The fact that that Sagitta is not a plantigrade and does not stripes Tuscaloosa does not hold.

fact1: (¬{C}{c} & {A}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact2: ¬{A}{b} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact3: (x): {D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{E}x) fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact6: ¬({F}{c} & {H}{c}) -> ¬{F}{b} fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{BO}{a} & ¬{AT}{a}) fact8: (x): ¬{I}x fact9: (¬{F}{b} v {G}{b}) -> {D}{a} fact10: ¬{DD}{cm} -> ¬({GU}{cm} & ¬{AB}{cm}) fact11: ¬{A}{ba} -> ¬({GO}{ba} & ¬{CQ}{ba}) fact12: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact13: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({F}x & {H}x) fact14: ¬{A}{a} fact15: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) -> ¬{C}{ar} fact16: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) fact17: ¬(¬{E}{a} & ¬{ER}{a})

That Sagitta is not cytoarchitectural and it is non-genealogical.

(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This trampoline does not disentangle if this mesoderm is not Judaic but it disentangle. fact2: That Sagitta is both not cytoarchitectural and not genealogical if this trampoline does not disentangle. fact3: If something is an overwork then that it is Judaic and it is not a plantigrade does not hold. fact4: The fact that that Sagitta is not cytoarchitectural and that is not genealogical is incorrect if that that does not disentangle is true. fact5: If that Sagitta does not disentangle that that that Sagitta is non-cytoarchitectural one that is genealogical hold is not true. fact6: This trampoline does not circulate Rhodesia if that this mesoderm circulate Rhodesia and is a Byrd is wrong. fact7: If that Sagitta does not disentangle the fact that that Sagitta is not a religion and is not toothed is incorrect. fact8: Everybody is not a Hymenanthera. fact9: If this trampoline does not circulate Rhodesia and/or rets Arachis that Sagitta is an overwork. fact10: If that that XX is not unturned is correct then that that one does veil and that one is not genealogical is wrong. fact11: The fact that the earthnut decompresses but that thing is not an infinite is wrong if that thing does not disentangle. fact12: That that Sagitta is cytoarchitectural but it is not genealogical is incorrect. fact13: If something is not a kind of a Hymenanthera then the fact that this thing circulates Rhodesia and this thing is a Byrd is incorrect. fact14: That Sagitta does not disentangle. fact15: If the fact that that Sagitta is Judaic but that one is not a plantigrade is incorrect then this longitude is not Judaic. fact16: If something is not Judaic it does not disentangle and it is not a kind of a Kechuan. fact17: The fact that that Sagitta is not a plantigrade and does not stripes Tuscaloosa does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That that Sagitta is not cytoarchitectural and it is not genealogical does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This tandem is not a Halictidae and/or is a Fallopio.

(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa})

fact1: That someone is a kind of dicarboxylic one that does not unbend surliness does not hold if it is not a categoreme. fact2: Something is apostolical if the fact that it is not non-dicarboxylic and it does not unbend surliness is not correct. fact3: If that fortuneteller is a Halictidae that fortuneteller is not a discontinuity or it is a Lausanne or both. fact4: Nancy is anaerobiotic and dicarboxylic. fact5: If the fact that something is unperplexed but it is not unfocused is incorrect then it is unperplexed. fact6: If the gayfeather is eremitic then this thing is nonperiodic or unbends surliness or both. fact7: That something is unperplexed but it is focused does not hold if it is unmourned. fact8: If some person is apostolical it is not a Halictidae and/or it is a Fallopio. fact9: Something is not a kind of a categoreme if that thing is not unperplexed. fact10: Either someone is not non-apostolical or it is a Halictidae or both if it unbends surliness. fact11: This tandem is a Halictidae and/or it is a kind of a Fallopio if it is apostolical. fact12: Nancy is apostolical if this boll is apostolical. fact13: That lagger is anaerobiotic if Nancy is anaerobiotic. fact14: The fact that this tandem either is not a Halictidae or is a Fallopio or both does not hold if Nancy is apostolical.

fact1: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) fact2: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) -> {A}x fact3: {AA}{eu} -> (¬{EL}{eu} v {AS}{eu}) fact4: ({H}{a} & {C}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{E}x fact6: {CK}{gq} -> ({HR}{gq} v {B}{gq}) fact7: (x): {F}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{G}x) fact8: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) fact9: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬{D}x fact10: (x): {B}x -> ({A}x v {AA}x) fact11: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) fact12: {A}{b} -> {A}{a} fact13: {H}{a} -> {H}{em} fact14: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa})

That lagger is anaerobiotic and that is a mobocracy.

({H}{em} & {EM}{em})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That someone is a kind of dicarboxylic one that does not unbend surliness does not hold if it is not a categoreme. fact2: Something is apostolical if the fact that it is not non-dicarboxylic and it does not unbend surliness is not correct. fact3: If that fortuneteller is a Halictidae that fortuneteller is not a discontinuity or it is a Lausanne or both. fact4: Nancy is anaerobiotic and dicarboxylic. fact5: If the fact that something is unperplexed but it is not unfocused is incorrect then it is unperplexed. fact6: If the gayfeather is eremitic then this thing is nonperiodic or unbends surliness or both. fact7: That something is unperplexed but it is focused does not hold if it is unmourned. fact8: If some person is apostolical it is not a Halictidae and/or it is a Fallopio. fact9: Something is not a kind of a categoreme if that thing is not unperplexed. fact10: Either someone is not non-apostolical or it is a Halictidae or both if it unbends surliness. fact11: This tandem is a Halictidae and/or it is a kind of a Fallopio if it is apostolical. fact12: Nancy is apostolical if this boll is apostolical. fact13: That lagger is anaerobiotic if Nancy is anaerobiotic. fact14: The fact that this tandem either is not a Halictidae or is a Fallopio or both does not hold if Nancy is apostolical. ; $hypothesis$ = This tandem is not a Halictidae and/or is a Fallopio. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

There exists someone such that if it is not a Maja then that it is a groundcover that is Hippocratic is not true.

(Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x)

fact1: If something is not a Maja that it is both a groundcover and not non-Hippocratic is wrong. fact2: Something obnubilates and funds Tammuz if it is non-angelic.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact2: (x): ¬{BB}x -> ({HD}x & {BE}x)

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If something is not a Maja that it is both a groundcover and not non-Hippocratic is wrong. fact2: Something obnubilates and funds Tammuz if it is non-angelic. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists someone such that if it is not a Maja then that it is a groundcover that is Hippocratic is not true. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> int1: The fact that that this BLT is a groundcover and Hippocratic does not hold if this BLT is not a Maja is not false.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This spam does not maculate unemployed.

¬{E}{b}

fact1: Someone does not maculate unemployed if he broods. fact2: That that polypropenonitrile is a kind of a hemiplegia and it is a kind of a moral is right. fact3: The fact that this spam does brood and is not biogenetic does not hold. fact4: That this spam does not brood and that is not biogenetic is not true if that polypropenonitrile is a hemiplegia. fact5: If the fact that somebody does not brood and this one is non-biogenetic is incorrect this one does not maculate unemployed.

fact1: (x): {D}x -> ¬{E}x fact2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact3: ¬({D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact4: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{E}x

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Someone does not maculate unemployed if he broods. fact2: That that polypropenonitrile is a kind of a hemiplegia and it is a kind of a moral is right. fact3: The fact that this spam does brood and is not biogenetic does not hold. fact4: That this spam does not brood and that is not biogenetic is not true if that polypropenonitrile is a hemiplegia. fact5: If the fact that somebody does not brood and this one is non-biogenetic is incorrect this one does not maculate unemployed. ; $hypothesis$ = This spam does not maculate unemployed. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> int1: That polypropenonitrile is a hemiplegia.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: The fact that this spam does not brood and it is not biogenetic does not hold.; fact5 -> int3: If that this spam does not brood and it is non-biogenetic is incorrect this spam does not maculate unemployed.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This spatula is not a Aiken but it is a kind of an anxiety.

(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a})

fact1: This spatula is not a kind of an epistemology. fact2: Some man that is not an epistemology does not close regrets and is not a kind of a Ufa. fact3: This spatula is a kind of an anxiety and it ingests.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{ID}x & ¬{JG}x) fact3: ({C}{a} & {D}{a})

This rutherfordium does not close regrets and is not a kind of a Ufa.

(¬{ID}{n} & ¬{JG}{n})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This spatula is not a kind of an epistemology. fact2: Some man that is not an epistemology does not close regrets and is not a kind of a Ufa. fact3: This spatula is a kind of an anxiety and it ingests. ; $hypothesis$ = This spatula is not a Aiken but it is a kind of an anxiety. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that the fact that both that honourableness and that butchering happens is incorrect is right.

¬({A} & {C})

fact1: That that apprenticeship occurs but that cleaving Herrick does not happens is incorrect if the approaching happens. fact2: If that conjugalness does not occurs then both this fast and this reclining USMC happens. fact3: If this fast occurs the approaching happens. fact4: The fact that this backingness does not occurs if that this gathering Hobbs does not happens and that extenuation happens is incorrect hold. fact5: That this regeneration does not happens and/or the unpacking does not happens is triggered by that that unsupervisedness happens. fact6: That Nepaleseness happens and/or that commerce occurs. fact7: The fact that that baffling occurs is correct if that luckiness happens. fact8: Both this dehumanisation and that luckiness happens if that apprenticeship does not occurs. fact9: That rightness results in that that unsupervisedness but notthis mot happens. fact10: That this gathering Hobbs does not occurs and that extenuation occurs is wrong if that baffling occurs. fact11: That butchering but notthis outgoing happens if this backingness does not happens. fact12: Both this fictileness and that honourableness occurs if this outgoing does not happens. fact13: This outgoing happens. fact14: If the fact that that apprenticeship occurs but that cleaving Herrick does not occurs does not hold then that apprenticeship does not occurs. fact15: Both this backingness and that butchering occurs. fact16: That protrusiveness does not occurs if that Nepaleseness happens or that commerce occurs or both. fact17: If this outgoing does not occurs then that that honourableness and that butchering happens does not hold. fact18: Both that honourableness and this outgoing occurs. fact19: This backingness occurs. fact20: That rightness is triggered by this pulsing. fact21: Either that this pulsing occurs or the claim or both is triggered by that that protrusiveness does not occurs.

fact1: {K} -> ¬({J} & ¬{L}) fact2: ¬{O} -> ({M} & {N}) fact3: {M} -> {K} fact4: ¬(¬{F} & {E}) -> ¬{D} fact5: {R} -> (¬{P} v ¬{Q}) fact6: ({AD} v {AC}) fact7: {H} -> {G} fact8: ¬{J} -> ({I} & {H}) fact9: {T} -> ({R} & ¬{S}) fact10: {G} -> ¬(¬{F} & {E}) fact11: ¬{D} -> ({C} & ¬{B}) fact12: ¬{B} -> ({GR} & {A}) fact13: {B} fact14: ¬({J} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{J} fact15: ({D} & {C}) fact16: ({AD} v {AC}) -> ¬{AB} fact17: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) fact18: ({A} & {B}) fact19: {D} fact20: {U} -> {T} fact21: ¬{AB} -> ({U} v {AA})

The fact that the fact that both that honourableness and that butchering happens is incorrect is right.

¬({A} & {C})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that apprenticeship occurs but that cleaving Herrick does not happens is incorrect if the approaching happens. fact2: If that conjugalness does not occurs then both this fast and this reclining USMC happens. fact3: If this fast occurs the approaching happens. fact4: The fact that this backingness does not occurs if that this gathering Hobbs does not happens and that extenuation happens is incorrect hold. fact5: That this regeneration does not happens and/or the unpacking does not happens is triggered by that that unsupervisedness happens. fact6: That Nepaleseness happens and/or that commerce occurs. fact7: The fact that that baffling occurs is correct if that luckiness happens. fact8: Both this dehumanisation and that luckiness happens if that apprenticeship does not occurs. fact9: That rightness results in that that unsupervisedness but notthis mot happens. fact10: That this gathering Hobbs does not occurs and that extenuation occurs is wrong if that baffling occurs. fact11: That butchering but notthis outgoing happens if this backingness does not happens. fact12: Both this fictileness and that honourableness occurs if this outgoing does not happens. fact13: This outgoing happens. fact14: If the fact that that apprenticeship occurs but that cleaving Herrick does not occurs does not hold then that apprenticeship does not occurs. fact15: Both this backingness and that butchering occurs. fact16: That protrusiveness does not occurs if that Nepaleseness happens or that commerce occurs or both. fact17: If this outgoing does not occurs then that that honourableness and that butchering happens does not hold. fact18: Both that honourableness and this outgoing occurs. fact19: This backingness occurs. fact20: That rightness is triggered by this pulsing. fact21: Either that this pulsing occurs or the claim or both is triggered by that that protrusiveness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that the fact that both that honourableness and that butchering happens is incorrect is right. ; $proof$ =

fact18 -> int1: That honourableness occurs.; fact15 -> int2: That butchering occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This poisonberry is not a kind of a Pyramid.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: Some man does not unbind Cordaites but it is a Trematoda if it is not a kind of a monotone. fact2: That some person is a Pyramid and/or does leer is correct if she does not unbind Cordaites. fact3: This luge leers if this poisonberry is a Pyramid. fact4: The fact that this luge does unbind Cordaites does not hold. fact5: The vibraharp leers. fact6: If that the phagocyte does not minstrel Beatitude and is a kind of a monotone does not hold then this luge is not a monotone. fact7: This luge does not leer and she/he does not unbind Cordaites.

fact1: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{C}x & {D}x) fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x v {B}x) fact3: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact4: ¬{C}{b} fact5: {B}{fc} fact6: ¬(¬{F}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} fact7: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{C}{b})

Let's assume that this poisonberry is a kind of a Pyramid.

{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some man does not unbind Cordaites but it is a Trematoda if it is not a kind of a monotone. fact2: That some person is a Pyramid and/or does leer is correct if she does not unbind Cordaites. fact3: This luge leers if this poisonberry is a Pyramid. fact4: The fact that this luge does unbind Cordaites does not hold. fact5: The vibraharp leers. fact6: If that the phagocyte does not minstrel Beatitude and is a kind of a monotone does not hold then this luge is not a monotone. fact7: This luge does not leer and she/he does not unbind Cordaites. ; $hypothesis$ = This poisonberry is not a kind of a Pyramid. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this poisonberry is a kind of a Pyramid.; fact3 & assump1 -> int1: This luge leers.; fact7 -> int2: This luge does not leer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that halal is not rupestral but it is arteriolar does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

fact1: That halal darns Varna. fact2: That halal is not rupestral. fact3: That contrapuntist is not juridic and does soap analgesia if this thing darns Varna. fact4: If that maquiladora does not darn Varna then that halal does not humiliate Brevicipitidae and congests. fact5: If that halal darns Varna that halal is not rupestral. fact6: the Varna darns halal.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: ¬{AA}{a} fact3: {A}{dh} -> (¬{JH}{dh} & {FH}{dh}) fact4: ¬{A}{b} -> (¬{HE}{a} & {HN}{a}) fact5: {A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{a} fact6: {AC}{aa}

That halal does not humiliate Brevicipitidae and congests.

(¬{HE}{a} & {HN}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That halal darns Varna. fact2: That halal is not rupestral. fact3: That contrapuntist is not juridic and does soap analgesia if this thing darns Varna. fact4: If that maquiladora does not darn Varna then that halal does not humiliate Brevicipitidae and congests. fact5: If that halal darns Varna that halal is not rupestral. fact6: the Varna darns halal. ; $hypothesis$ = That that halal is not rupestral but it is arteriolar does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This pinon does not add and is not a totaled.

(¬{B}{c} & ¬{C}{c})

fact1: This Assyrian does not add and does not flee sackful. fact2: If that slaveholder adds that collarbone is not a fatwah. fact3: That collarbone is not a kind of a totaled if this pinon does add. fact4: This pinon does not add and it is not a kind of a totaled if that collarbone add. fact5: That slaveholder is a totaled. fact6: That slaveholder is a fatwah. fact7: That collarbone does not blend and it does not premeditate. fact8: The fact that that slaveholder adds hold. fact9: If that collarbone adds this pinon is not a totaled. fact10: If that slaveholder is both a fatwah and not a totaled then that bootlace adds. fact11: If that slaveholder is a kind of a fatwah that collarbone does add. fact12: This pinon is not a totaled. fact13: That slaveholder is a totaled if this pinon is a fatwah. fact14: This pinon is not a fatwah and it is not a Higginson. fact15: This pinon is not a fatwah if that slaveholder is a totaled. fact16: That slaveholder is not an ejaculate. fact17: That that slaveholder can notnon is correct. fact18: If the fact that that collarbone is a totaled is right this pinon does not add. fact19: This pinon is not a kind of a fatwah.

fact1: (¬{B}{hg} & ¬{BT}{hg}) fact2: {B}{a} -> ¬{A}{b} fact3: {B}{c} -> ¬{C}{b} fact4: {B}{b} -> (¬{B}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) fact5: {C}{a} fact6: {A}{a} fact7: (¬{DE}{b} & ¬{CG}{b}) fact8: {B}{a} fact9: {B}{b} -> ¬{C}{c} fact10: ({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {B}{ea} fact11: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact12: ¬{C}{c} fact13: {A}{c} -> {C}{a} fact14: (¬{A}{c} & ¬{BR}{c}) fact15: {C}{a} -> ¬{A}{c} fact16: ¬{CL}{a} fact17: ¬{FA}{a} fact18: {C}{b} -> ¬{B}{c} fact19: ¬{A}{c}

That bootlace does add.

{B}{ea}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This Assyrian does not add and does not flee sackful. fact2: If that slaveholder adds that collarbone is not a fatwah. fact3: That collarbone is not a kind of a totaled if this pinon does add. fact4: This pinon does not add and it is not a kind of a totaled if that collarbone add. fact5: That slaveholder is a totaled. fact6: That slaveholder is a fatwah. fact7: That collarbone does not blend and it does not premeditate. fact8: The fact that that slaveholder adds hold. fact9: If that collarbone adds this pinon is not a totaled. fact10: If that slaveholder is both a fatwah and not a totaled then that bootlace adds. fact11: If that slaveholder is a kind of a fatwah that collarbone does add. fact12: This pinon is not a totaled. fact13: That slaveholder is a totaled if this pinon is a fatwah. fact14: This pinon is not a fatwah and it is not a Higginson. fact15: This pinon is not a fatwah if that slaveholder is a totaled. fact16: That slaveholder is not an ejaculate. fact17: That that slaveholder can notnon is correct. fact18: If the fact that that collarbone is a totaled is right this pinon does not add. fact19: This pinon is not a kind of a fatwah. ; $hypothesis$ = This pinon does not add and is not a totaled. ; $proof$ =

fact11 & fact6 -> int1: That collarbone adds.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

There is someone such that if it badges musicianship it is not constructive and it does spellbound.

(Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)

fact1: Somebody is not a feed and pulverises Diacalpa if he is a Pepin.

fact1: (x): {JJ}x -> (¬{M}x & {IG}x)

There exists something such that if it is a Pepin it is not a feed and pulverises Diacalpa.

(Ex): {JJ}x -> (¬{M}x & {IG}x)

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Somebody is not a feed and pulverises Diacalpa if he is a Pepin. ; $hypothesis$ = There is someone such that if it badges musicianship it is not constructive and it does spellbound. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This salvager is a kind of a Cleopatra.

{C}{a}

fact1: That this salvager dissimilates bulletin is true. fact2: This kitbag waters but it is not a kind of a tempo if this bedspring is a spiritual. fact3: If somebody is a patronymic this one is not a shouldered and is stemless. fact4: That downplay apostrophe and this is a patronymic if this colewort is non-molal. fact5: If something is lacustrine and it is urinary it does not scatter balagan. fact6: If someone that does dissimilate bulletin is urinary the fact that it is not a Cleopatra hold. fact7: This colewort is not molal if this thing is not autographic or this thing is a kind of a Lakeland or both. fact8: Something is a kind of a internationality and it supplements Picariae if it is not a kind of a Platyctenea. fact9: This TRH does not water if that this kitbag water and is not a kind of a tempo is true. fact10: The phylogenesis is a spiritual if this sublimate is a internationality. fact11: that this bulletin dissimilates salvager is true. fact12: Some man is non-urinary if that one tweaks Solenogastres and does assure tawdriness. fact13: If Natasha does not dissimilate bulletin and this is not urinary this salvager is a Cleopatra. fact14: This bedspring is a kind of a spiritual if the phylogenesis is a spiritual. fact15: This sublimate is not a Platyctenea if that this sublimate rations palatal and/or is not mnemotechnical does not hold. fact16: If something is not a shouldered then Natasha does not dissimilate bulletin. fact17: If someone bands Cinclidae and is a kind of a fatalist then this one is not a kind of a Stalingrad. fact18: The bumper is not a Cleopatra. fact19: If this TRH does not water Natasha tweaks Solenogastres and assures tawdriness. fact20: If some man is a hymeneal and does resect Brigid she/he is not cuneiform. fact21: This colewort is not autographic and/or it is a kind of a Lakeland. fact22: This bedspring is a Cleopatra. fact23: This salvager is urinary. fact24: If this Mt does not nurse Haemoproteidae the fact that either this sublimate rations palatal or that thing is not mnemotechnical or both is wrong.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {I}{f} -> ({G}{e} & ¬{H}{e}) fact3: (x): {M}x -> (¬{D}x & {K}x) fact4: ¬{S}{j} -> ({R}{d} & {M}{d}) fact5: (x): ({HJ}x & {B}x) -> ¬{JC}x fact6: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact7: (¬{T}{j} v {U}{j}) -> ¬{S}{j} fact8: (x): ¬{N}x -> ({J}x & {L}x) fact9: ({G}{e} & ¬{H}{e}) -> ¬{G}{c} fact10: {J}{h} -> {I}{g} fact11: {AA}{aa} fact12: (x): ({F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{B}x fact13: (¬{A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> {C}{a} fact14: {I}{g} -> {I}{f} fact15: ¬({O}{h} v ¬{P}{h}) -> ¬{N}{h} fact16: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{A}{b} fact17: (x): ({JA}x & {BC}x) -> ¬{HL}x fact18: ¬{C}{gc} fact19: ¬{G}{c} -> ({F}{b} & {E}{b}) fact20: (x): ({HB}x & {FI}x) -> ¬{GU}x fact21: (¬{T}{j} v {U}{j}) fact22: {C}{f} fact23: {B}{a} fact24: ¬{Q}{i} -> ¬({O}{h} v ¬{P}{h})

This salvager is a kind of a Cleopatra.

{C}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this salvager dissimilates bulletin is true. fact2: This kitbag waters but it is not a kind of a tempo if this bedspring is a spiritual. fact3: If somebody is a patronymic this one is not a shouldered and is stemless. fact4: That downplay apostrophe and this is a patronymic if this colewort is non-molal. fact5: If something is lacustrine and it is urinary it does not scatter balagan. fact6: If someone that does dissimilate bulletin is urinary the fact that it is not a Cleopatra hold. fact7: This colewort is not molal if this thing is not autographic or this thing is a kind of a Lakeland or both. fact8: Something is a kind of a internationality and it supplements Picariae if it is not a kind of a Platyctenea. fact9: This TRH does not water if that this kitbag water and is not a kind of a tempo is true. fact10: The phylogenesis is a spiritual if this sublimate is a internationality. fact11: that this bulletin dissimilates salvager is true. fact12: Some man is non-urinary if that one tweaks Solenogastres and does assure tawdriness. fact13: If Natasha does not dissimilate bulletin and this is not urinary this salvager is a Cleopatra. fact14: This bedspring is a kind of a spiritual if the phylogenesis is a spiritual. fact15: This sublimate is not a Platyctenea if that this sublimate rations palatal and/or is not mnemotechnical does not hold. fact16: If something is not a shouldered then Natasha does not dissimilate bulletin. fact17: If someone bands Cinclidae and is a kind of a fatalist then this one is not a kind of a Stalingrad. fact18: The bumper is not a Cleopatra. fact19: If this TRH does not water Natasha tweaks Solenogastres and assures tawdriness. fact20: If some man is a hymeneal and does resect Brigid she/he is not cuneiform. fact21: This colewort is not autographic and/or it is a kind of a Lakeland. fact22: This bedspring is a Cleopatra. fact23: This salvager is urinary. fact24: If this Mt does not nurse Haemoproteidae the fact that either this sublimate rations palatal or that thing is not mnemotechnical or both is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = This salvager is a kind of a Cleopatra. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact23 -> int1: This salvager does dissimilate bulletin and she is urinary.; fact6 -> int2: This salvager is not a Cleopatra if this salvager dissimilates bulletin and is urinary.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That Felicia is polyphase but it does not actualise is incorrect.

¬({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b})

fact1: If Felicia is civilized then the thing does not temporize Nyssa and the thing is not West. fact2: that Amun does not belittle Emmenthaler. fact3: Felicia is non-West. fact4: If somebody is dualistic then she does not actualise. fact5: If something that does not temporize Nyssa is not West it is polyphase. fact6: That Felicia is a kind of dualistic thing that does not slag retreated is incorrect. fact7: Felicia does not actualise if Felicia is dualistic. fact8: If something that does not temporize Nyssa is West then it is polyphase. fact9: That Felicia is not dualistic and does not slag retreated is false if that Emmenthaler does not belittle Amun. fact10: Some person does not actualise if the fact that it is not dualistic and does not slag retreated does not hold. fact11: That Emmenthaler does not belittle Amun. fact12: If something does not belittle Amun or is not dualistic or both then it is not dualistic. fact13: Felicia is not West if Felicia is not noncivilized. fact14: The fact that Felicia is dualistic but this person does not slag retreated does not hold if that Emmenthaler does not belittle Amun. fact15: That something is polyphase thing that does not actualise is false if the thing belittles Amun. fact16: The fact that that wagerer is not West is correct. fact17: Felicia is not noncivilized. fact18: Felicia is polyphase if Felicia does not temporize Nyssa but it is West.

fact1: ¬{F}{b} -> (¬{E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact2: ¬{AC}{aa} fact3: ¬{D}{b} fact4: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{B}x fact5: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> {C}x fact6: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact7: {AA}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} fact8: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) -> {C}x fact9: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact10: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact11: ¬{A}{a} fact12: (x): (¬{A}x v ¬{AA}x) -> ¬{AA}x fact13: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬{D}{b} fact14: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact15: (x): {A}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) fact16: ¬{D}{p} fact17: ¬{F}{b} fact18: (¬{E}{b} & {D}{b}) -> {C}{b}

That kinin is not dualistic.

¬{AA}{dh}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If Felicia is civilized then the thing does not temporize Nyssa and the thing is not West. fact2: that Amun does not belittle Emmenthaler. fact3: Felicia is non-West. fact4: If somebody is dualistic then she does not actualise. fact5: If something that does not temporize Nyssa is not West it is polyphase. fact6: That Felicia is a kind of dualistic thing that does not slag retreated is incorrect. fact7: Felicia does not actualise if Felicia is dualistic. fact8: If something that does not temporize Nyssa is West then it is polyphase. fact9: That Felicia is not dualistic and does not slag retreated is false if that Emmenthaler does not belittle Amun. fact10: Some person does not actualise if the fact that it is not dualistic and does not slag retreated does not hold. fact11: That Emmenthaler does not belittle Amun. fact12: If something does not belittle Amun or is not dualistic or both then it is not dualistic. fact13: Felicia is not West if Felicia is not noncivilized. fact14: The fact that Felicia is dualistic but this person does not slag retreated does not hold if that Emmenthaler does not belittle Amun. fact15: That something is polyphase thing that does not actualise is false if the thing belittles Amun. fact16: The fact that that wagerer is not West is correct. fact17: Felicia is not noncivilized. fact18: Felicia is polyphase if Felicia does not temporize Nyssa but it is West. ; $hypothesis$ = That Felicia is polyphase but it does not actualise is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact9 & fact11 -> int1: The fact that Felicia is non-dualistic thing that does not slag retreated does not hold.; fact10 -> int2: Felicia does not actualise if the fact that Felicia is non-dualistic and does not slag retreated is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Felicia does not actualise.; fact5 -> int4: Felicia is polyphase if Felicia does not temporize Nyssa and is not West.; fact17 & fact1 -> int5: Felicia does not temporize Nyssa and is not West.; int4 & int5 -> int6: Felicia is polyphase.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That autodidact is a connoisseurship and syllabic.

({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a})

fact1: That autodidact is a connoisseurship but it is syllabic if this safranin is not cosmogenic. fact2: If something is not a Lemaireocereus then the fact that it does pit and it is not a kind of a Telopea does not hold. fact3: A wanting that is a misconstrual is non-cosmogenic. fact4: That autodidact is not cosmogenic. fact5: That something is cupric but it does not whirl incurvature does not hold if it is not a synapse. fact6: That that that autodidact is a Alces but it is not cleaner hold does not hold if that autodidact is not cupric. fact7: If some person is not a kind of a misconstrual then the fact that it is both a connoisseurship and nonsyllabic is false. fact8: If something is not cosmogenic and is not a wanting it is not a kind of a misconstrual. fact9: That that autodidact is not a kind of a superior hold. fact10: That autodidact is not a wanting. fact11: That that autodidact is a Rhiptoglossa and is not cosmogenic is false. fact12: That newborn is not cosmogenic. fact13: If some man is not a misconstrual then the fact that it is a connoisseurship and not nonsyllabic does not hold. fact14: If that matrikin is both not a Protestant and not amebic then that matrikin is not a Chalcis. fact15: This safranin is a wanting. fact16: Something is not a keenness if it does not shrivel Kiswahili and is not a kind of a Rhiptoglossa.

fact1: ¬{A}{b} -> ({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬{BC}x -> ¬({AL}x & ¬{AG}x) fact3: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact4: ¬{A}{a} fact5: (x): ¬{GI}x -> ¬({FP}x & ¬{DQ}x) fact6: ¬{FP}{a} -> ¬({EH}{a} & ¬{DR}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({D}x & {E}x) fact8: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact9: ¬{BP}{a} fact10: ¬{B}{a} fact11: ¬({CS}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact12: ¬{A}{ep} fact13: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact14: (¬{CL}{hb} & ¬{AO}{hb}) -> ¬{EP}{hb} fact15: {B}{b} fact16: (x): (¬{H}x & ¬{CS}x) -> ¬{JC}x

That autodidact is a connoisseurship and syllabic.

({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That autodidact is a connoisseurship but it is syllabic if this safranin is not cosmogenic. fact2: If something is not a Lemaireocereus then the fact that it does pit and it is not a kind of a Telopea does not hold. fact3: A wanting that is a misconstrual is non-cosmogenic. fact4: That autodidact is not cosmogenic. fact5: That something is cupric but it does not whirl incurvature does not hold if it is not a synapse. fact6: That that that autodidact is a Alces but it is not cleaner hold does not hold if that autodidact is not cupric. fact7: If some person is not a kind of a misconstrual then the fact that it is both a connoisseurship and nonsyllabic is false. fact8: If something is not cosmogenic and is not a wanting it is not a kind of a misconstrual. fact9: That that autodidact is not a kind of a superior hold. fact10: That autodidact is not a wanting. fact11: That that autodidact is a Rhiptoglossa and is not cosmogenic is false. fact12: That newborn is not cosmogenic. fact13: If some man is not a misconstrual then the fact that it is a connoisseurship and not nonsyllabic does not hold. fact14: If that matrikin is both not a Protestant and not amebic then that matrikin is not a Chalcis. fact15: This safranin is a wanting. fact16: Something is not a keenness if it does not shrivel Kiswahili and is not a kind of a Rhiptoglossa. ; $hypothesis$ = That autodidact is a connoisseurship and syllabic. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact10 -> int1: That autodidact is not cosmogenic and the thing is not a wanting.; fact8 -> int2: If that autodidact is not cosmogenic and not a wanting it is not a misconstrual.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That autodidact is not a misconstrual.; fact13 -> int4: If that autodidact is not a misconstrual then that that autodidact is a connoisseurship but not nonsyllabic does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That minder does not delouse Herodotus.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: If that minder does not condescend then that thing is a Hassel. fact2: That minder either prosecutes cucurbit or condescends or both. fact3: If somebody delouses Herodotus then it is a Hassel. fact4: Either that minder prosecutes cucurbit or it does not condescend or both. fact5: That minder is a prescience if this sorghum does hone incipience. fact6: Some man hones incipience but it is not a talipes if it is a kind of a semicolon. fact7: Something delouses Herodotus if that thing is a Hassel. fact8: That minder is a Hassel if either it does prosecute cucurbit or it does not condescend or both. fact9: If something is a kind of a prescience then it does not delouse Herodotus and is not a Hassel.

fact1: ¬{AB}{a} -> {B}{a} fact2: ({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact3: (x): {A}x -> {B}x fact4: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact5: {D}{b} -> {C}{a} fact6: (x): {F}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact7: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact8: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact9: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x)

That minder does not delouse Herodotus.

¬{A}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that minder does not condescend then that thing is a Hassel. fact2: That minder either prosecutes cucurbit or condescends or both. fact3: If somebody delouses Herodotus then it is a Hassel. fact4: Either that minder prosecutes cucurbit or it does not condescend or both. fact5: That minder is a prescience if this sorghum does hone incipience. fact6: Some man hones incipience but it is not a talipes if it is a kind of a semicolon. fact7: Something delouses Herodotus if that thing is a Hassel. fact8: That minder is a Hassel if either it does prosecute cucurbit or it does not condescend or both. fact9: If something is a kind of a prescience then it does not delouse Herodotus and is not a Hassel. ; $hypothesis$ = That minder does not delouse Herodotus. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact4 -> int1: That minder is a Hassel.; fact7 -> int2: If that minder is a kind of a Hassel that that minder delouses Herodotus hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That colophony is not a gloom.

¬{F}{b}

fact1: This 4WD is not adnexal if this Flint engluts. fact2: That colophony is not unpasteurised. fact3: If this saddler is not a kind of a algolagnia this 4WD is not unpasteurised. fact4: This Flint is unpasteurised if the fact that that colophony is both not a gloom and unpasteurised is false. fact5: If that this Flint is a peripheral is right this 4WD is not adnexal. fact6: If someone that is not unpasteurised is a doped then it is a gloom. fact7: That colophony is not unpasteurised but it is a doped if this 4WD is not adnexal. fact8: The fact that that colophony is not unpasteurised if this 4WD is not adnexal is correct. fact9: If this Flint is not a peripheral this ultraconservative engluts and is adnexal. fact10: That this saddler does not raft is not false. fact11: If that colophony is not a kind of a Carpocapsa then that that that colophony is both not a gloom and unpasteurised hold is incorrect. fact12: The fact that somebody is not a kind of a peripheral and it does not englut is not true if it is adnexal. fact13: If this saddler is a Carpocapsa that this 4WD is not unpasteurised is true. fact14: This Flint is a kind of a gloom and/or engluts. fact15: Either something is a Carpocapsa or it is not a kind of a algolagnia or both if it does not raft. fact16: That colophony is a doped or adnexal or both. fact17: This Flint engluts or she/he is a peripheral or both. fact18: If that that colophony rafts and it is a algolagnia does not hold then it is not a kind of a Carpocapsa. fact19: That colophony is a kind of a peripheral. fact20: That colophony is a analphabetism.

fact1: {A}{a} -> ¬{C}{c} fact2: ¬{E}{b} fact3: ¬{H}{d} -> ¬{E}{c} fact4: ¬(¬{F}{b} & {E}{b}) -> {E}{a} fact5: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{c} fact6: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) -> {F}x fact7: ¬{C}{c} -> (¬{E}{b} & {D}{b}) fact8: ¬{C}{c} -> ¬{E}{b} fact9: ¬{B}{a} -> ({A}{co} & {C}{co}) fact10: ¬{I}{d} fact11: ¬{G}{b} -> ¬(¬{F}{b} & {E}{b}) fact12: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact13: {G}{d} -> ¬{E}{c} fact14: ({F}{a} v {A}{a}) fact15: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({G}x v ¬{H}x) fact16: ({D}{b} v {C}{b}) fact17: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact18: ¬({I}{b} & {H}{b}) -> ¬{G}{b} fact19: {B}{b} fact20: {FT}{b}

This ultraconservative is not non-adnexal.

{C}{co}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This 4WD is not adnexal if this Flint engluts. fact2: That colophony is not unpasteurised. fact3: If this saddler is not a kind of a algolagnia this 4WD is not unpasteurised. fact4: This Flint is unpasteurised if the fact that that colophony is both not a gloom and unpasteurised is false. fact5: If that this Flint is a peripheral is right this 4WD is not adnexal. fact6: If someone that is not unpasteurised is a doped then it is a gloom. fact7: That colophony is not unpasteurised but it is a doped if this 4WD is not adnexal. fact8: The fact that that colophony is not unpasteurised if this 4WD is not adnexal is correct. fact9: If this Flint is not a peripheral this ultraconservative engluts and is adnexal. fact10: That this saddler does not raft is not false. fact11: If that colophony is not a kind of a Carpocapsa then that that that colophony is both not a gloom and unpasteurised hold is incorrect. fact12: The fact that somebody is not a kind of a peripheral and it does not englut is not true if it is adnexal. fact13: If this saddler is a Carpocapsa that this 4WD is not unpasteurised is true. fact14: This Flint is a kind of a gloom and/or engluts. fact15: Either something is a Carpocapsa or it is not a kind of a algolagnia or both if it does not raft. fact16: That colophony is a doped or adnexal or both. fact17: This Flint engluts or she/he is a peripheral or both. fact18: If that that colophony rafts and it is a algolagnia does not hold then it is not a kind of a Carpocapsa. fact19: That colophony is a kind of a peripheral. fact20: That colophony is a analphabetism. ; $hypothesis$ = That colophony is not a gloom. ; $proof$ =

fact17 & fact1 & fact5 -> int1: This 4WD is not adnexal.; int1 & fact7 -> int2: That colophony is not unpasteurised but it is a doped.; fact6 -> int3: If that colophony is not unpasteurised but the person is a doped then the person is a kind of a gloom.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That tompion is corrigible.

{C}{b}

fact1: that that fuschia dissolves allotrope hold. fact2: If that allotrope dissolves fuschia and that one snubs Gathic then that tompion is not corrigible. fact3: That tompion Sullies allophone. fact4: That allotrope snubs Gathic. fact5: That that allotrope dissolves fuschia hold. fact6: Rosalia is not corrigible. fact7: that Gathic snubs allotrope. fact8: If that someone is a WTC but she does not Sully allophone is not correct then she Sully allophone. fact9: That allotrope does not discard savoriness. fact10: The fact that that tompion snubs Gathic is right. fact11: That that tompion does not dissolve fuschia is true. fact12: That that paloverde is a WTC that does not Sully allophone is false if this is a SSS. fact13: That paloverde is a kind of a sleigh and it is a SSS. fact14: Everybody does not root Alnus. fact15: Something that does not snub Gathic is corrigible thing that does dissolve fuschia. fact16: That allotrope is not a Periploca. fact17: That that allotrope is holophytic and does not root Alnus does not hold if that paloverde Sullies allophone.

fact1: {AA}{aa} fact2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact3: {F}{b} fact4: {B}{a} fact5: {A}{a} fact6: ¬{C}{k} fact7: {AB}{ab} fact8: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{F}x) -> {F}x fact9: ¬{N}{a} fact10: {B}{b} fact11: ¬{A}{b} fact12: {G}{c} -> ¬({H}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) fact13: ({I}{c} & {G}{c}) fact14: (x): ¬{D}x fact15: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) fact16: ¬{BS}{a} fact17: {F}{c} -> ¬({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a})

This mediator snubs Gathic.

{B}{hr}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: that that fuschia dissolves allotrope hold. fact2: If that allotrope dissolves fuschia and that one snubs Gathic then that tompion is not corrigible. fact3: That tompion Sullies allophone. fact4: That allotrope snubs Gathic. fact5: That that allotrope dissolves fuschia hold. fact6: Rosalia is not corrigible. fact7: that Gathic snubs allotrope. fact8: If that someone is a WTC but she does not Sully allophone is not correct then she Sully allophone. fact9: That allotrope does not discard savoriness. fact10: The fact that that tompion snubs Gathic is right. fact11: That that tompion does not dissolve fuschia is true. fact12: That that paloverde is a WTC that does not Sully allophone is false if this is a SSS. fact13: That paloverde is a kind of a sleigh and it is a SSS. fact14: Everybody does not root Alnus. fact15: Something that does not snub Gathic is corrigible thing that does dissolve fuschia. fact16: That allotrope is not a Periploca. fact17: That that allotrope is holophytic and does not root Alnus does not hold if that paloverde Sullies allophone. ; $hypothesis$ = That tompion is corrigible. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact4 -> int1: That allotrope dissolves fuschia and it snubs Gathic.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

There is some man such that if it safeguards vibrancy then the fact that it safeguards vibrancy and does not pit sensed is not wrong.

(Ex): {A}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x)

fact1: this sensed does not pit interrupt. fact2: Someone does chase Lichtenstein but this one is not scrimpy if this one does safeguard vibrancy. fact3: If this interrupt pits sensed then that cephalochordate safeguards vibrancy. fact4: This interrupt does not pit sensed. fact5: If this interrupt does safeguard vibrancy it safeguard vibrancy and pits sensed.

fact1: ¬{AB}{ab} fact2: (x): {A}x -> ({GQ}x & ¬{EG}x) fact3: {B}{a} -> {A}{ai} fact4: ¬{B}{a} fact5: {A}{a} -> ({A}{a} & {B}{a})

That cephalochordate chases Lichtenstein and is not scrimpy.

({GQ}{ai} & ¬{EG}{ai})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: this sensed does not pit interrupt. fact2: Someone does chase Lichtenstein but this one is not scrimpy if this one does safeguard vibrancy. fact3: If this interrupt pits sensed then that cephalochordate safeguards vibrancy. fact4: This interrupt does not pit sensed. fact5: If this interrupt does safeguard vibrancy it safeguard vibrancy and pits sensed. ; $hypothesis$ = There is some man such that if it safeguards vibrancy then the fact that it safeguards vibrancy and does not pit sensed is not wrong. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this interrupt safeguards vibrancy.; assump1 & fact4 -> int1: This interrupt safeguards vibrancy and does not pit sensed.; [assump1] & int1 -> int2: If this interrupt safeguards vibrancy the thing safeguards vibrancy and the thing does not pit sensed.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That rumoring does not occurs and that Hebrideanness happens.

(¬{A} & {C})

fact1: The fact that both that rehearsing and the sign occurs does not hold. fact2: That that furtherance occurs but this unbrandedness does not happens does not hold. fact3: If this fiasco does not happens the fact that both the non-cryonicness and that regency happens is false. fact4: The fact that both the non-piscatorialness and that reinsuring bunkum occurs is wrong. fact5: The fact that both this harnessing kleptomania and the fabricating satisfactoriness happens does not hold if that feline does not occurs. fact6: The fact that that regency and this wiring Balistes occurs is wrong if this meet does not happens. fact7: That this transuranicness does not occurs and that carnivorousness does not happens is false. fact8: If the fact that the fact that that threshing does not occurs and the inoperableness does not occurs is correct does not hold then the megaloblasticness does not occurs. fact9: That the fact that the autarchicalness but notthe unhallowing Bradypodidae occurs hold is false. fact10: That the necrosis occurs and this appeasing Spitsbergen occurs does not hold. fact11: That this lecturing thousand does not occurs and that shinning does not occurs is wrong. fact12: If that muff does not occurs the fact that that rumoring does not happens and that Hebrideanness occurs does not hold. fact13: That that muff does not occurs is not wrong if the fact that that elevating Pinter does not occurs and the mutating Gnathostomata does not occurs does not hold. fact14: That that elevating Pinter does not occurs and the mutating Gnathostomata does not occurs is wrong. fact15: If that rumoring happens then that notthis latestness but this scurfiness happens is false.

fact1: ¬({HU} & {BD}) fact2: ¬({ET} & ¬{IE}) fact3: ¬{FM} -> ¬(¬{DM} & {IB}) fact4: ¬(¬{JK} & {FQ}) fact5: ¬{IA} -> ¬({DN} & {Q}) fact6: ¬{BA} -> ¬({IB} & {BR}) fact7: ¬(¬{DC} & ¬{E}) fact8: ¬(¬{DU} & ¬{CQ}) -> ¬{S} fact9: ¬({HA} & ¬{GK}) fact10: ¬({AO} & {T}) fact11: ¬(¬{HB} & ¬{BP}) fact12: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{A} & {C}) fact13: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact14: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact15: {A} -> ¬(¬{FN} & {F})

That this latestness does not happens and this scurfiness happens does not hold.

¬(¬{FN} & {F})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that both that rehearsing and the sign occurs does not hold. fact2: That that furtherance occurs but this unbrandedness does not happens does not hold. fact3: If this fiasco does not happens the fact that both the non-cryonicness and that regency happens is false. fact4: The fact that both the non-piscatorialness and that reinsuring bunkum occurs is wrong. fact5: The fact that both this harnessing kleptomania and the fabricating satisfactoriness happens does not hold if that feline does not occurs. fact6: The fact that that regency and this wiring Balistes occurs is wrong if this meet does not happens. fact7: That this transuranicness does not occurs and that carnivorousness does not happens is false. fact8: If the fact that the fact that that threshing does not occurs and the inoperableness does not occurs is correct does not hold then the megaloblasticness does not occurs. fact9: That the fact that the autarchicalness but notthe unhallowing Bradypodidae occurs hold is false. fact10: That the necrosis occurs and this appeasing Spitsbergen occurs does not hold. fact11: That this lecturing thousand does not occurs and that shinning does not occurs is wrong. fact12: If that muff does not occurs the fact that that rumoring does not happens and that Hebrideanness occurs does not hold. fact13: That that muff does not occurs is not wrong if the fact that that elevating Pinter does not occurs and the mutating Gnathostomata does not occurs does not hold. fact14: That that elevating Pinter does not occurs and the mutating Gnathostomata does not occurs is wrong. fact15: If that rumoring happens then that notthis latestness but this scurfiness happens is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That rumoring does not occurs and that Hebrideanness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact14 -> int1: That muff does not happens.; int1 & fact12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that this haymaker does not sweat Picumnus and/or this is not a brucellosis is false.

¬(¬{B}{aa} v ¬{A}{aa})

fact1: This haymaker is syntactical and is uncontested if that that Boulder does not exteriorise destructibility is true. fact2: If this haymaker is not syntactical then this haymaker is not a vocal and/or it is a Derrida. fact3: If this haymaker is not a vocal then this haymaker does not sweat Picumnus. fact4: If some man is syntactical the fact that she/he does not sweat Picumnus or she/he is not a brucellosis or both does not hold. fact5: This haymaker is non-syntactical.

fact1: ¬{E}{a} -> ({C}{aa} & {D}{aa}) fact2: ¬{C}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) fact3: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} fact4: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) fact5: ¬{C}{aa}

The fact that this haymaker does not sweat Picumnus and/or this is not a brucellosis is false.

¬(¬{B}{aa} v ¬{A}{aa})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This haymaker is syntactical and is uncontested if that that Boulder does not exteriorise destructibility is true. fact2: If this haymaker is not syntactical then this haymaker is not a vocal and/or it is a Derrida. fact3: If this haymaker is not a vocal then this haymaker does not sweat Picumnus. fact4: If some man is syntactical the fact that she/he does not sweat Picumnus or she/he is not a brucellosis or both does not hold. fact5: This haymaker is non-syntactical. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this haymaker does not sweat Picumnus and/or this is not a brucellosis is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this fluid is mercantile but it is not a schizoid is true.

({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

fact1: That that that cataphoresis is a kind of a inanimateness and it is a Mortimer is right does not hold if it does not soften Beograd. fact2: If this fluid is a kind of a Usneaceae then that it is mercantile and a schizoid is incorrect. fact3: If this liberal robes or does not spark Friuli or both this liberal does not spark Friuli. fact4: If Rafael is not a kind of a inanimateness then that cataphoresis is a kind of a Mortimer that is a kind of a clean. fact5: This fluid is not a Mortimer if that that cataphoresis is a inanimateness and it is a Mortimer is incorrect. fact6: If this fluid is not a Mortimer but that is a Prolog this fluid is not a Usneaceae. fact7: If something does not osculate Phthorimaea and it does not soften Beograd then it is not a inanimateness. fact8: This liberal either robes or does not spark Friuli or both if this liberal is not a kind of a haematocolpometra. fact9: If something is a Mortimer then it is a Prolog. fact10: That this liberal is not a haematocolpometra is true. fact11: If that cataphoresis is a kind of a Prolog then the fact that this pantograph preserves Gelsemium and is not a Usneaceae does not hold. fact12: This fluid is a kind of a Usneaceae. fact13: This dj either is not a Lytton or is a haemophilia or both. fact14: Rafael does not soften Beograd if the fact that the fact that this liberal does not soften Beograd but it is a cesarean is correct is incorrect. fact15: That something does not soften Beograd but that thing is a cesarean is incorrect if that thing is a kind of a Laney. fact16: The fact that this fluid is mercantile and is a schizoid is incorrect. fact17: If that somebody is a kind of a Usneaceae hold the fact that it is mercantile and is not a schizoid is false. fact18: If either this dj is not a Lytton or this thing is a haemophilia or both Rafael is not a Lytton. fact19: If something is not a Lytton then it does not osculate Phthorimaea. fact20: This liberal is a Laney and is irrevokable if this liberal does not spark Friuli. fact21: If some person is a Usneaceae then the fact that it is mercantile and it is a schizoid is incorrect. fact22: Somebody is mercantile but it is not a schizoid if it is not a Usneaceae.

fact1: ¬{G}{a} -> ¬({E}{a} & {C}{a}) fact2: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact3: ({O}{c} v ¬{L}{c}) -> ¬{L}{c} fact4: ¬{E}{b} -> ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) fact5: ¬({E}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{aa} fact6: (¬{C}{aa} & {B}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} fact7: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{E}x fact8: ¬{P}{c} -> ({O}{c} v ¬{L}{c}) fact9: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact10: ¬{P}{c} fact11: {B}{a} -> ¬({N}{ia} & ¬{A}{ia}) fact12: {A}{aa} fact13: (¬{J}{d} v {M}{d}) fact14: ¬(¬{G}{c} & {I}{c}) -> ¬{G}{b} fact15: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {I}x) fact16: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact17: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact18: (¬{J}{d} v {M}{d}) -> ¬{J}{b} fact19: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬{F}x fact20: ¬{L}{c} -> ({H}{c} & {K}{c}) fact21: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact22: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

The fact that this fluid is mercantile but it is not a schizoid is true.

({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that that cataphoresis is a kind of a inanimateness and it is a Mortimer is right does not hold if it does not soften Beograd. fact2: If this fluid is a kind of a Usneaceae then that it is mercantile and a schizoid is incorrect. fact3: If this liberal robes or does not spark Friuli or both this liberal does not spark Friuli. fact4: If Rafael is not a kind of a inanimateness then that cataphoresis is a kind of a Mortimer that is a kind of a clean. fact5: This fluid is not a Mortimer if that that cataphoresis is a inanimateness and it is a Mortimer is incorrect. fact6: If this fluid is not a Mortimer but that is a Prolog this fluid is not a Usneaceae. fact7: If something does not osculate Phthorimaea and it does not soften Beograd then it is not a inanimateness. fact8: This liberal either robes or does not spark Friuli or both if this liberal is not a kind of a haematocolpometra. fact9: If something is a Mortimer then it is a Prolog. fact10: That this liberal is not a haematocolpometra is true. fact11: If that cataphoresis is a kind of a Prolog then the fact that this pantograph preserves Gelsemium and is not a Usneaceae does not hold. fact12: This fluid is a kind of a Usneaceae. fact13: This dj either is not a Lytton or is a haemophilia or both. fact14: Rafael does not soften Beograd if the fact that the fact that this liberal does not soften Beograd but it is a cesarean is correct is incorrect. fact15: That something does not soften Beograd but that thing is a cesarean is incorrect if that thing is a kind of a Laney. fact16: The fact that this fluid is mercantile and is a schizoid is incorrect. fact17: If that somebody is a kind of a Usneaceae hold the fact that it is mercantile and is not a schizoid is false. fact18: If either this dj is not a Lytton or this thing is a haemophilia or both Rafael is not a Lytton. fact19: If something is not a Lytton then it does not osculate Phthorimaea. fact20: This liberal is a Laney and is irrevokable if this liberal does not spark Friuli. fact21: If some person is a Usneaceae then the fact that it is mercantile and it is a schizoid is incorrect. fact22: Somebody is mercantile but it is not a schizoid if it is not a Usneaceae. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this fluid is mercantile but it is not a schizoid is true. ; $proof$ =

fact17 -> int1: If this fluid is a Usneaceae that this fluid is mercantile but she is not a schizoid is false.; int1 & fact12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That restitution does not occurs and that unwovenness does not occurs.

(¬{B} & ¬{D})

fact1: If that that votelessness does not occurs is correct that that restitution does not happens and that unwovenness does not happens is not right. fact2: That this distributionalness does not happens causes that that retrofitting complexity does not happens but the gyralness occurs. fact3: That the selling does not occurs and that conglomeration does not occurs is caused by that votelessness. fact4: This blastoporalness does not happens. fact5: That votelessness happens and that restitution does not happens. fact6: If this blearing does not happens this fullbacking happens and this carbureting Aeolus occurs. fact7: Both that votelessness and that restitution happens if that tacticalness does not happens. fact8: The fact that this arbitraging does not happens and this distributionalness happens does not hold if this modernising bach does not happens. fact9: That that restitution does not happens yields that that restitution does not occurs and that unwovenness does not occurs. fact10: This untreatedness does not happens and that Mandeanness does not occurs. fact11: If that oxygenizing Guayaquil does not occurs then the fact that that tacticalness and that unwovenness happens does not hold. fact12: If that retrofitting complexity does not happens that this chiller and this sexing happens is true. fact13: That baccateness does not happens. fact14: That this smashing does not happens hold. fact15: That votelessness occurs. fact16: If that this arbitraging does not happens but this distributionalness happens is false then this distributionalness does not occurs. fact17: That this blearing occurs is prevented by that this smashing does not occurs and that baccateness does not happens. fact18: The fact that the skulking does not occurs and that burglariousness does not occurs is not wrong. fact19: That opening bugology happens but that atomization does not occurs. fact20: If this carbureting Aeolus occurs and this chiller occurs that oxygenizing Guayaquil does not occurs. fact21: That this carbureting Aeolus does not occurs brings about that that oxygenizing Guayaquil and this chiller occurs.

fact1: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{D}) fact2: ¬{K} -> (¬{I} & {J}) fact3: {A} -> (¬{JJ} & ¬{AE}) fact4: ¬{FH} fact5: ({A} & ¬{B}) fact6: ¬{M} -> ({L} & {G}) fact7: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact8: ¬{Q} -> ¬(¬{N} & {K}) fact9: ¬{B} -> (¬{B} & ¬{D}) fact10: (¬{U} & ¬{GM}) fact11: ¬{E} -> ¬({C} & {D}) fact12: ¬{I} -> ({F} & {H}) fact13: ¬{O} fact14: ¬{P} fact15: {A} fact16: ¬(¬{N} & {K}) -> ¬{K} fact17: (¬{P} & ¬{O}) -> ¬{M} fact18: (¬{FE} & ¬{BI}) fact19: ({CP} & ¬{JG}) fact20: ({G} & {F}) -> ¬{E} fact21: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F})

The fact that that restitution does not occurs and that unwovenness does not happens is false.

¬(¬{B} & ¬{D})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that that votelessness does not occurs is correct that that restitution does not happens and that unwovenness does not happens is not right. fact2: That this distributionalness does not happens causes that that retrofitting complexity does not happens but the gyralness occurs. fact3: That the selling does not occurs and that conglomeration does not occurs is caused by that votelessness. fact4: This blastoporalness does not happens. fact5: That votelessness happens and that restitution does not happens. fact6: If this blearing does not happens this fullbacking happens and this carbureting Aeolus occurs. fact7: Both that votelessness and that restitution happens if that tacticalness does not happens. fact8: The fact that this arbitraging does not happens and this distributionalness happens does not hold if this modernising bach does not happens. fact9: That that restitution does not happens yields that that restitution does not occurs and that unwovenness does not occurs. fact10: This untreatedness does not happens and that Mandeanness does not occurs. fact11: If that oxygenizing Guayaquil does not occurs then the fact that that tacticalness and that unwovenness happens does not hold. fact12: If that retrofitting complexity does not happens that this chiller and this sexing happens is true. fact13: That baccateness does not happens. fact14: That this smashing does not happens hold. fact15: That votelessness occurs. fact16: If that this arbitraging does not happens but this distributionalness happens is false then this distributionalness does not occurs. fact17: That this blearing occurs is prevented by that this smashing does not occurs and that baccateness does not happens. fact18: The fact that the skulking does not occurs and that burglariousness does not occurs is not wrong. fact19: That opening bugology happens but that atomization does not occurs. fact20: If this carbureting Aeolus occurs and this chiller occurs that oxygenizing Guayaquil does not occurs. fact21: That this carbureting Aeolus does not occurs brings about that that oxygenizing Guayaquil and this chiller occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That restitution does not occurs and that unwovenness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> int1: That restitution does not happens.; int1 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That Latino is not ropy.

¬{C}{aa}

fact1: The fact that that hobbler is not ropy is right. fact2: If that setoff does not overwinter Muraenidae then that sunshade is a traditionality and it is Shinto. fact3: If this hovel is ropy and it is a traditionality that fiefdom is not ropy. fact4: If somebody is not a sisterhood this one is not arbitrational. fact5: Every person does not muffle amenia. fact6: If that sunshade is a traditionality then the fact that that this hovel does not muffle amenia and he is not ropy does not hold is not wrong. fact7: Someone does not overwinter Muraenidae if that the person does not whack burke and is circulatory is false. fact8: If the fact that this hovel does not muffle amenia and that is not ropy is incorrect then that Latino is ropy. fact9: The rain is arbitrational. fact10: Something does not wind Sitophylus if that this thing is not arbitrational and this thing wind Sitophylus does not hold. fact11: Everything is not a skinful. fact12: Every man does not intervene scheduled. fact13: If something does not muffle amenia that this is not ropy is true. fact14: That Latino is not pregnant. fact15: If that Latino is not ropy then that thing does not net. fact16: If this hovel does not whack burke then this hovel is ropy thing that overwinters Muraenidae. fact17: That someone does not whack burke but that one is circulatory is incorrect if that one does not wind Sitophylus. fact18: That sunshade is not Shinto. fact19: That everything is not antiapartheid is correct. fact20: That Latino does not direct Brachyura. fact21: This hovel does not whack burke if that setoff is circulatory but he/she does not wind Sitophylus. fact22: That Latino does not muffle amenia if it is not a kind of a North.

fact1: ¬{C}{cm} fact2: ¬{E}{c} -> ({A}{b} & {D}{b}) fact3: ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{eu} fact4: (x): ¬{AI}x -> ¬{J}x fact5: (x): ¬{B}x fact6: {A}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {G}x) -> ¬{E}x fact8: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {C}{aa} fact9: {J}{d} fact10: (x): ¬(¬{J}x & {H}x) -> ¬{H}x fact11: (x): ¬{DD}x fact12: (x): ¬{BN}x fact13: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}x fact14: ¬{AT}{aa} fact15: ¬{C}{aa} -> ¬{IL}{aa} fact16: ¬{F}{a} -> ({C}{a} & {E}{a}) fact17: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {G}x) fact18: ¬{D}{b} fact19: (x): ¬{GH}x fact20: ¬{GP}{aa} fact21: ({G}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact22: ¬{HQ}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa}

That fiefdom is not ropy.

¬{C}{eu}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that hobbler is not ropy is right. fact2: If that setoff does not overwinter Muraenidae then that sunshade is a traditionality and it is Shinto. fact3: If this hovel is ropy and it is a traditionality that fiefdom is not ropy. fact4: If somebody is not a sisterhood this one is not arbitrational. fact5: Every person does not muffle amenia. fact6: If that sunshade is a traditionality then the fact that that this hovel does not muffle amenia and he is not ropy does not hold is not wrong. fact7: Someone does not overwinter Muraenidae if that the person does not whack burke and is circulatory is false. fact8: If the fact that this hovel does not muffle amenia and that is not ropy is incorrect then that Latino is ropy. fact9: The rain is arbitrational. fact10: Something does not wind Sitophylus if that this thing is not arbitrational and this thing wind Sitophylus does not hold. fact11: Everything is not a skinful. fact12: Every man does not intervene scheduled. fact13: If something does not muffle amenia that this is not ropy is true. fact14: That Latino is not pregnant. fact15: If that Latino is not ropy then that thing does not net. fact16: If this hovel does not whack burke then this hovel is ropy thing that overwinters Muraenidae. fact17: That someone does not whack burke but that one is circulatory is incorrect if that one does not wind Sitophylus. fact18: That sunshade is not Shinto. fact19: That everything is not antiapartheid is correct. fact20: That Latino does not direct Brachyura. fact21: This hovel does not whack burke if that setoff is circulatory but he/she does not wind Sitophylus. fact22: That Latino does not muffle amenia if it is not a kind of a North. ; $hypothesis$ = That Latino is not ropy. ; $proof$ =

fact13 -> int1: If that Latino does not muffle amenia that Latino is not ropy.; fact5 -> int2: That Latino does not muffle amenia.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This adjusting does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: This thudding IX does not occurs if that stringing pneumonia does not occurs but that scrolling happens. fact2: This metalworks happens if this adjusting happens. fact3: That that elevation does not happens is triggered by that that unfastidiousness and the rectifiableness occurs. fact4: Both that monte and this adjusting happens if this abdominalness does not occurs. fact5: That presuming occurs if that this pouched but notthat presuming happens is false. fact6: The carrying occurs. fact7: That unconcernedness happens if that that non-unconcernedness and that non-repetitiousness happens is incorrect. fact8: This pouched occurs and this adjusting occurs if that Rushing Wilkinson does not occurs. fact9: That cuticularness occurs. fact10: That stringing pneumonia does not occurs. fact11: If that unconcernedness occurs that this measuring exabyte does not happens and that earthquake does not occurs is incorrect. fact12: If the fact that this measuring exabyte does not happens and that earthquake does not occurs does not hold this abdominalness does not happens. fact13: That this conditionalness happens is prevented by that both the crossbreeding and the mating Cryptobranchus occurs. fact14: That this pouched occurs and that Rushing Wilkinson happens leads to that this adjusting does not happens. fact15: That Rushing Wilkinson occurs. fact16: The heroine does not occurs. fact17: That cuticularness does not happens if that nascence happens and the lunging tiled happens. fact18: That that unconcernedness does not occurs and that repetitiousness does not occurs is false if that this thudding IX does not happens is right.

fact1: (¬{M} & {N}) -> ¬{K} fact2: {C} -> {DM} fact3: ({DO} & {ID}) -> ¬{BL} fact4: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {C}) fact5: ¬({A} & ¬{DQ}) -> {DQ} fact6: {AF} fact7: ¬(¬{J} & ¬{L}) -> {J} fact8: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {C}) fact9: {DS} fact10: ¬{M} fact11: {J} -> ¬(¬{H} & ¬{I}) fact12: ¬(¬{H} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{G} fact13: ({FF} & {AN}) -> ¬{DT} fact14: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact15: {B} fact16: ¬{GA} fact17: ({HA} & {AR}) -> ¬{DS} fact18: ¬{K} -> ¬(¬{J} & ¬{L})

This metalworks and that presuming occurs.

({DM} & {DQ})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This thudding IX does not occurs if that stringing pneumonia does not occurs but that scrolling happens. fact2: This metalworks happens if this adjusting happens. fact3: That that elevation does not happens is triggered by that that unfastidiousness and the rectifiableness occurs. fact4: Both that monte and this adjusting happens if this abdominalness does not occurs. fact5: That presuming occurs if that this pouched but notthat presuming happens is false. fact6: The carrying occurs. fact7: That unconcernedness happens if that that non-unconcernedness and that non-repetitiousness happens is incorrect. fact8: This pouched occurs and this adjusting occurs if that Rushing Wilkinson does not occurs. fact9: That cuticularness occurs. fact10: That stringing pneumonia does not occurs. fact11: If that unconcernedness occurs that this measuring exabyte does not happens and that earthquake does not occurs is incorrect. fact12: If the fact that this measuring exabyte does not happens and that earthquake does not occurs does not hold this abdominalness does not happens. fact13: That this conditionalness happens is prevented by that both the crossbreeding and the mating Cryptobranchus occurs. fact14: That this pouched occurs and that Rushing Wilkinson happens leads to that this adjusting does not happens. fact15: That Rushing Wilkinson occurs. fact16: The heroine does not occurs. fact17: That cuticularness does not happens if that nascence happens and the lunging tiled happens. fact18: That that unconcernedness does not occurs and that repetitiousness does not occurs is false if that this thudding IX does not happens is right. ; $hypothesis$ = This adjusting does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That flying Chrysophyceae occurs.

{C}

fact1: This ranting pertainym happens and this impact occurs. fact2: This halving idiopathy occurs and that accommodating shaven happens. fact3: This emigration brings about that this Sessions does not happens and this butterfly occurs. fact4: That urticating disaffection occurs. fact5: The comparative happens. fact6: That that flying Chrysophyceae does not occurs is triggered by that both that shortsness and this Sessions occurs. fact7: That metamorphosing happens. fact8: That this butterfly but notthat flying Chrysophyceae happens brings about that this Sessions does not happens. fact9: The squish happens. fact10: This Sessions occurs. fact11: That shortsness occurs.

fact1: ({BJ} & {DK}) fact2: ({IO} & {IB}) fact3: {E} -> (¬{B} & {D}) fact4: {IQ} fact5: {BL} fact6: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact7: {FE} fact8: ({D} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact9: {GE} fact10: {B} fact11: {A}

This lipsticking Acheron does not happens.

¬{DA}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This ranting pertainym happens and this impact occurs. fact2: This halving idiopathy occurs and that accommodating shaven happens. fact3: This emigration brings about that this Sessions does not happens and this butterfly occurs. fact4: That urticating disaffection occurs. fact5: The comparative happens. fact6: That that flying Chrysophyceae does not occurs is triggered by that both that shortsness and this Sessions occurs. fact7: That metamorphosing happens. fact8: That this butterfly but notthat flying Chrysophyceae happens brings about that this Sessions does not happens. fact9: The squish happens. fact10: This Sessions occurs. fact11: That shortsness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That flying Chrysophyceae occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact11 & fact10 -> int1: Both that shortsness and this Sessions occurs.; int1 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that that irrigation occurs.

{A}

fact1: If that irrigation happens then this jumpiness happens. fact2: That that aestivating does not happens brings about that both this muster and the duty happens. fact3: That that hydrometricness and that misnaming Ichthyosauria happens prevents that that aestivating happens. fact4: If that this muster occurs hold both the noninvasiveness and that disgorgement occurs. fact5: This homestead does not occurs if that colourfulness happens. fact6: If the fact that the etymologizinging occurs and that misnaming Ichthyosauria does not happens is false then that misnaming Ichthyosauria occurs. fact7: This buffeting occurs if that invasiveness does not happens. fact8: That that irrigation and this jumpiness happens is brought about by that that associativeness does not happens. fact9: This situation does not occurs and this certifying shekels does not occurs if this homestead does not happens. fact10: That that clerking occurs and this beguilement happens is not right. fact11: That colourfulness happens. fact12: That this delegating does not occurs prevents this unsurprisedness. fact13: If this unsurprisedness does not happens then that the etymologizinging occurs but that misnaming Ichthyosauria does not occurs is incorrect. fact14: If this situation does not happens then both that hydrometricness and this myringectomy happens. fact15: That this jumpiness happens and that grapple happens is wrong. fact16: That grapple but notthat associativeness occurs if this buffeting happens. fact17: That homestretch does not happens if that that irrigation does not happens and this jumpiness does not occurs does not hold. fact18: If that both this jumpiness and that grapple occurs is false then this jumpiness does not happens.

fact1: {A} -> {B} fact2: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact3: ({L} & {K}) -> ¬{J} fact4: {H} -> (¬{F} & {G}) fact5: {T} -> ¬{S} fact6: ¬({M} & ¬{K}) -> {K} fact7: ¬{F} -> {E} fact8: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact9: ¬{S} -> (¬{O} & ¬{P}) fact10: ¬({EJ} & {DO}) fact11: {T} fact12: ¬{R} -> ¬{Q} fact13: ¬{Q} -> ¬({M} & ¬{K}) fact14: ¬{O} -> ({L} & {N}) fact15: ¬({B} & {D}) fact16: {E} -> ({D} & ¬{C}) fact17: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{DS} fact18: ¬({B} & {D}) -> ¬{B}

That homestretch does not happens.

¬{DS}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that irrigation happens then this jumpiness happens. fact2: That that aestivating does not happens brings about that both this muster and the duty happens. fact3: That that hydrometricness and that misnaming Ichthyosauria happens prevents that that aestivating happens. fact4: If that this muster occurs hold both the noninvasiveness and that disgorgement occurs. fact5: This homestead does not occurs if that colourfulness happens. fact6: If the fact that the etymologizinging occurs and that misnaming Ichthyosauria does not happens is false then that misnaming Ichthyosauria occurs. fact7: This buffeting occurs if that invasiveness does not happens. fact8: That that irrigation and this jumpiness happens is brought about by that that associativeness does not happens. fact9: This situation does not occurs and this certifying shekels does not occurs if this homestead does not happens. fact10: That that clerking occurs and this beguilement happens is not right. fact11: That colourfulness happens. fact12: That this delegating does not occurs prevents this unsurprisedness. fact13: If this unsurprisedness does not happens then that the etymologizinging occurs but that misnaming Ichthyosauria does not occurs is incorrect. fact14: If this situation does not happens then both that hydrometricness and this myringectomy happens. fact15: That this jumpiness happens and that grapple happens is wrong. fact16: That grapple but notthat associativeness occurs if this buffeting happens. fact17: That homestretch does not happens if that that irrigation does not happens and this jumpiness does not occurs does not hold. fact18: If that both this jumpiness and that grapple occurs is false then this jumpiness does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that that irrigation occurs. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that irrigation occurs.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: This jumpiness happens.; fact18 & fact15 -> int2: This jumpiness does not occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this suede is unmodified is right.

{A}{a}

fact1: That if Scotty does not angle addicted but that person does kindle this suede is not chalky hold. fact2: This suede is unmodified and is a candor. fact3: If the fact that Bubba does not temporise combustibility or is not unmodified or both is wrong then this suede is not unmodified. fact4: The fact that the fact that someone does not temporise combustibility and/or is not unmodified is not false is wrong if she is apocryphal. fact5: This suede is both not uncompassionate and not a foaminess if she/he is not chalky. fact6: If somebody is compassionate one that is not a foaminess then it is a Aegean.

fact1: (¬{J}{c} & {I}{c}) -> ¬{H}{a} fact2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact3: ¬(¬{F}{b} v ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact4: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x v ¬{A}x) fact5: ¬{H}{a} -> (¬{D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact6: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {C}x

This centreboard is a candor.

{B}{h}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That if Scotty does not angle addicted but that person does kindle this suede is not chalky hold. fact2: This suede is unmodified and is a candor. fact3: If the fact that Bubba does not temporise combustibility or is not unmodified or both is wrong then this suede is not unmodified. fact4: The fact that the fact that someone does not temporise combustibility and/or is not unmodified is not false is wrong if she is apocryphal. fact5: This suede is both not uncompassionate and not a foaminess if she/he is not chalky. fact6: If somebody is compassionate one that is not a foaminess then it is a Aegean. ; $hypothesis$ = That this suede is unmodified is right. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that requirement is a Lindheimera and attic is false.

¬({D}{c} & {B}{c})

fact1: Either that amphioxus is not attic or it is not a Hecate or both if that invalid is conditional. fact2: If this syncarp is fastidious this depolarization is fastidious. fact3: This syncarp is fastidious if this thing is a Hibernia that does not dash Amor. fact4: That requirement is a Lindheimera. fact5: If this depolarization is fastidious it is not unconditional and it is not a Lindheimera. fact6: That amphioxus is not a Hecate. fact7: That requirement is both a Lindheimera and attic if that invalid is attic. fact8: That invalid is not attic if that amphioxus is not a Hecate.

fact1: ¬{C}{b} -> (¬{B}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) fact2: {E}{e} -> {E}{d} fact3: ({G}{e} & ¬{F}{e}) -> {E}{e} fact4: {D}{c} fact5: {E}{d} -> (¬{C}{d} & ¬{D}{d}) fact6: ¬{A}{a} fact7: ¬{B}{b} -> ({D}{c} & {B}{c}) fact8: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{b}

That requirement is not a Hecate.

¬{A}{c}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Either that amphioxus is not attic or it is not a Hecate or both if that invalid is conditional. fact2: If this syncarp is fastidious this depolarization is fastidious. fact3: This syncarp is fastidious if this thing is a Hibernia that does not dash Amor. fact4: That requirement is a Lindheimera. fact5: If this depolarization is fastidious it is not unconditional and it is not a Lindheimera. fact6: That amphioxus is not a Hecate. fact7: That requirement is both a Lindheimera and attic if that invalid is attic. fact8: That invalid is not attic if that amphioxus is not a Hecate. ; $hypothesis$ = That that requirement is a Lindheimera and attic is false. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact6 -> int1: The fact that that invalid is not attic is correct.; int1 & fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That hostel is enforceable and does uplift Wickliffe.

(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b})

fact1: That tamarind does uplift Wickliffe. fact2: If that tamarind is a kind of a radical then the fact that that hostel is not unenforceable but he/she uplifts Wickliffe is false. fact3: If that that tare is not a thankfulness and is a Anthocerotaceae does not hold that hostel is a thankfulness. fact4: That tamarind is a radical. fact5: The fact that this brink is not nigh but she/he is a Kulanapan is wrong. fact6: The fact that that hostel is a kind of unenforceable thing that uplifts Wickliffe does not hold if that tamarind is a radical. fact7: If that hostel uplifts Wickliffe then the fact that that tamarind is not a kind of a radical but it is unenforceable is false. fact8: The fact that that hostel is unenforceable and it uplifts Wickliffe is not right. fact9: Some man does not encourage if that he is not naturistic and he encourage does not hold. fact10: That this unknown does not shelve Protura but the thing is a morsel is wrong. fact11: If something does not encourage then that that that thing is not a thankfulness and that thing is a Anthocerotaceae is correct is wrong. fact12: If that hostel is a radical then it is not unenforceable and uplifts Wickliffe.

fact1: {AB}{a} fact2: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact3: ¬(¬{B}{c} & {D}{c}) -> {B}{b} fact4: {A}{a} fact5: ¬(¬{EL}{ir} & {DF}{ir}) fact6: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact7: {AB}{b} -> ¬(¬{A}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact8: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact9: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact10: ¬(¬{CS}{ec} & {EC}{ec}) fact11: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {D}x) fact12: {A}{b} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b})

The fact that that tamarind is not a superpatriotism but a radical does not hold.

¬(¬{CL}{a} & {A}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That tamarind does uplift Wickliffe. fact2: If that tamarind is a kind of a radical then the fact that that hostel is not unenforceable but he/she uplifts Wickliffe is false. fact3: If that that tare is not a thankfulness and is a Anthocerotaceae does not hold that hostel is a thankfulness. fact4: That tamarind is a radical. fact5: The fact that this brink is not nigh but she/he is a Kulanapan is wrong. fact6: The fact that that hostel is a kind of unenforceable thing that uplifts Wickliffe does not hold if that tamarind is a radical. fact7: If that hostel uplifts Wickliffe then the fact that that tamarind is not a kind of a radical but it is unenforceable is false. fact8: The fact that that hostel is unenforceable and it uplifts Wickliffe is not right. fact9: Some man does not encourage if that he is not naturistic and he encourage does not hold. fact10: That this unknown does not shelve Protura but the thing is a morsel is wrong. fact11: If something does not encourage then that that that thing is not a thankfulness and that thing is a Anthocerotaceae is correct is wrong. fact12: If that hostel is a radical then it is not unenforceable and uplifts Wickliffe. ; $hypothesis$ = That hostel is enforceable and does uplift Wickliffe. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That speckless does not happens.

¬{B}

fact1: That antiquating Bignoniaceae does not occurs. fact2: The fact that the wonder happens hold. fact3: That loping happens if that that that unsweptness but notthat loping happens is not wrong does not hold. fact4: The fact that the benching Caesar does not occurs and/or that antiquating Bignoniaceae happens is false. fact5: If the fact that this clip does not occurs and/or the ambuscade happens is false that parlaying happens. fact6: If that the fact that the benching Caesar does not occurs or that antiquating Bignoniaceae occurs or both does not hold hold then that speckless happens. fact7: That that magnetosphere and this clip happens is brought about by that this receiving does not happens. fact8: That speckless does not occurs if the fact that either this lowlandness does not happens or that downpour occurs or both is false. fact9: This armillariness occurs. fact10: If that either the cyclonicness does not happens or the backlogging twain happens or both is incorrect that parlaying occurs. fact11: If that loping occurs then that that this lowlandness does not happens or that downpour occurs or both does not hold hold. fact12: The subjection does not occurs. fact13: The fact that the enthusiasticness does not happens or that repulsing happens or both is not correct if that downpour does not occurs. fact14: That that unsweptness occurs and that loping does not occurs is false if that magnetosphere happens.

fact1: ¬{AB} fact2: {HN} fact3: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) -> {D} fact4: ¬(¬{AA} v {AB}) fact5: ¬(¬{G} v {JK}) -> {GQ} fact6: ¬(¬{AA} v {AB}) -> {B} fact7: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact8: ¬(¬{C} v {A}) -> ¬{B} fact9: {JA} fact10: ¬(¬{DP} v {HI}) -> {GQ} fact11: {D} -> ¬(¬{C} v {A}) fact12: ¬{GK} fact13: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{BB} v {IH}) fact14: {F} -> ¬({E} & ¬{D})

That speckless does not happens.

¬{B}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That antiquating Bignoniaceae does not occurs. fact2: The fact that the wonder happens hold. fact3: That loping happens if that that that unsweptness but notthat loping happens is not wrong does not hold. fact4: The fact that the benching Caesar does not occurs and/or that antiquating Bignoniaceae happens is false. fact5: If the fact that this clip does not occurs and/or the ambuscade happens is false that parlaying happens. fact6: If that the fact that the benching Caesar does not occurs or that antiquating Bignoniaceae occurs or both does not hold hold then that speckless happens. fact7: That that magnetosphere and this clip happens is brought about by that this receiving does not happens. fact8: That speckless does not occurs if the fact that either this lowlandness does not happens or that downpour occurs or both is false. fact9: This armillariness occurs. fact10: If that either the cyclonicness does not happens or the backlogging twain happens or both is incorrect that parlaying occurs. fact11: If that loping occurs then that that this lowlandness does not happens or that downpour occurs or both does not hold hold. fact12: The subjection does not occurs. fact13: The fact that the enthusiasticness does not happens or that repulsing happens or both is not correct if that downpour does not occurs. fact14: That that unsweptness occurs and that loping does not occurs is false if that magnetosphere happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That speckless does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This tux ranges holla.

{B}{a}

fact1: If this tux is not toothless then this tux is not pubic and she/he does not palatalised gam. fact2: If this tux is not pianistic this cleistothecium is not toothless but it ranges holla. fact3: This tux is not toothless. fact4: Something does not palatalised gam if it is non-toothless thing that ranges holla.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact2: ¬{C}{a} -> (¬{A}{de} & {B}{de}) fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{AB}x

This cleistothecium does not palatalised gam.

¬{AB}{de}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this tux is not toothless then this tux is not pubic and she/he does not palatalised gam. fact2: If this tux is not pianistic this cleistothecium is not toothless but it ranges holla. fact3: This tux is not toothless. fact4: Something does not palatalised gam if it is non-toothless thing that ranges holla. ; $hypothesis$ = This tux ranges holla. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This anatomy does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: That notthat glyptography but that streamlining musicology happens is incorrect. fact2: That glyptography happens if that that glyptography does not happens but that streamlining musicology occurs does not hold. fact3: The focusing incongruousness occurs if the fact that notthe focusing incongruousness but the exoneration happens is false. fact4: This ingloriousness does not happens. fact5: That this anatomy does not occurs is caused by that that national happens and that glyptography occurs. fact6: This shaking goofy occurs if that this writing Commelinales and/or that grammaticalness occurs is incorrect. fact7: If that the pompousness occurs or that stabilising opisthorchiasis happens or both is false that national occurs. fact8: The fact that that non-pompousness and/or that stabilising opisthorchiasis occurs is incorrect. fact9: The fact that that shaggeding Acanthurus happens is not false. fact10: The thenar does not happens if this demagogy and that barbarization occurs. fact11: That national occurs if the fact that either that non-pompousness or that stabilising opisthorchiasis or both occurs is wrong. fact12: The aeration happens. fact13: That both that glyptography and that streamlining musicology happens is false. fact14: If that national does not happens that glyptography and this anatomy happens. fact15: Both that warehousing adventurism and that betulaceousness occurs. fact16: This effecting myxoma does not happens. fact17: That that egoisticness occurs and that attaching horology occurs prevents this ingloriousness.

fact1: ¬(¬{A} & {E}) fact2: ¬(¬{A} & {E}) -> {A} fact3: ¬(¬{DP} & {S}) -> {DP} fact4: ¬{BF} fact5: ({B} & {A}) -> ¬{C} fact6: ¬({DS} v {F}) -> {JG} fact7: ¬({AA} v {AB}) -> {B} fact8: ¬(¬{AA} v {AB}) fact9: {HA} fact10: ({IK} & {GT}) -> ¬{GC} fact11: ¬(¬{AA} v {AB}) -> {B} fact12: {IJ} fact13: ¬({A} & {E}) fact14: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {C}) fact15: ({JE} & {BE}) fact16: ¬{FP} fact17: ({AC} & {IM}) -> ¬{BF}

This anatomy occurs.

{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That notthat glyptography but that streamlining musicology happens is incorrect. fact2: That glyptography happens if that that glyptography does not happens but that streamlining musicology occurs does not hold. fact3: The focusing incongruousness occurs if the fact that notthe focusing incongruousness but the exoneration happens is false. fact4: This ingloriousness does not happens. fact5: That this anatomy does not occurs is caused by that that national happens and that glyptography occurs. fact6: This shaking goofy occurs if that this writing Commelinales and/or that grammaticalness occurs is incorrect. fact7: If that the pompousness occurs or that stabilising opisthorchiasis happens or both is false that national occurs. fact8: The fact that that non-pompousness and/or that stabilising opisthorchiasis occurs is incorrect. fact9: The fact that that shaggeding Acanthurus happens is not false. fact10: The thenar does not happens if this demagogy and that barbarization occurs. fact11: That national occurs if the fact that either that non-pompousness or that stabilising opisthorchiasis or both occurs is wrong. fact12: The aeration happens. fact13: That both that glyptography and that streamlining musicology happens is false. fact14: If that national does not happens that glyptography and this anatomy happens. fact15: Both that warehousing adventurism and that betulaceousness occurs. fact16: This effecting myxoma does not happens. fact17: That that egoisticness occurs and that attaching horology occurs prevents this ingloriousness. ; $hypothesis$ = This anatomy does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact11 & fact8 -> int1: That national occurs.; fact2 & fact1 -> int2: That glyptography happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Both that national and that glyptography occurs.; int3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This Soma is protozoal.

{B}{b}

fact1: If this weakling does straddle and is not non-stannic that that this Soma is protozoal is correct is wrong. fact2: If this weakling does straddle but it is not stannic then this Soma is not protozoal. fact3: If that somebody is a karat and this person is a Beria is wrong this person is not a Beria. fact4: The fact that something is a kind of a karat and is a kind of a Beria does not hold if the thing does not Bayes Daguerre. fact5: Something that is not a suzerain is employable or is a diagonalisation or both. fact6: The fact that that squinter is a suzerain is true. fact7: The fact that this weakling straddles and is not stannic hold. fact8: If something is employable then it is not a Meloidae and it Bayeses Daguerre. fact9: This weakling is not stannic. fact10: If that squinter does awake dreg and it is a suzerain then this pounder is not a suzerain. fact11: If that squinter shucks Scartella then it awakes dreg. fact12: If that render is not a Meloidae but it Bayeses Daguerre this weakling does not Bayeses Daguerre. fact13: If some person is not a Beria that person is a aeon and that person is non-protozoal. fact14: This Soma is protozoal if this weakling is a kind of a aeon and is not protozoal. fact15: That squinter shucks Scartella.

fact1: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact2: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact3: (x): ¬({D}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}x fact4: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}x & {A}x) fact5: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({G}x v {I}x) fact6: {H}{e} fact7: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact8: (x): {G}x -> (¬{F}x & {E}x) fact9: ¬{AB}{a} fact10: ({K}{e} & {H}{e}) -> ¬{H}{d} fact11: {J}{e} -> {K}{e} fact12: (¬{F}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact13: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({C}x & ¬{B}x) fact14: ({C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact15: {J}{e}

This Soma is protozoal.

{B}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this weakling does straddle and is not non-stannic that that this Soma is protozoal is correct is wrong. fact2: If this weakling does straddle but it is not stannic then this Soma is not protozoal. fact3: If that somebody is a karat and this person is a Beria is wrong this person is not a Beria. fact4: The fact that something is a kind of a karat and is a kind of a Beria does not hold if the thing does not Bayes Daguerre. fact5: Something that is not a suzerain is employable or is a diagonalisation or both. fact6: The fact that that squinter is a suzerain is true. fact7: The fact that this weakling straddles and is not stannic hold. fact8: If something is employable then it is not a Meloidae and it Bayeses Daguerre. fact9: This weakling is not stannic. fact10: If that squinter does awake dreg and it is a suzerain then this pounder is not a suzerain. fact11: If that squinter shucks Scartella then it awakes dreg. fact12: If that render is not a Meloidae but it Bayeses Daguerre this weakling does not Bayeses Daguerre. fact13: If some person is not a Beria that person is a aeon and that person is non-protozoal. fact14: This Soma is protozoal if this weakling is a kind of a aeon and is not protozoal. fact15: That squinter shucks Scartella. ; $hypothesis$ = This Soma is protozoal. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This hypha is not gustative but it gnarls quattrocento.

(¬{C}{b} & {D}{b})

fact1: If someone that does not relive does not gnarl quattrocento she is not a Brahms. fact2: If this splice is not a southwestward and nominates it does not relive. fact3: This hypha is a 8vo. fact4: This hypha is not a Ganesha if she/he is not a kind of a moroseness and she/he is not autocatalytic. fact5: If this hypha is a 8vo then this hypha is not a moroseness and not autocatalytic. fact6: The fact that this splice relives is not false if this hypha relives. fact7: This splice is not a southwestward and it does not nominate if the fact that this splice is not a Brahms is not incorrect. fact8: The fact that the fact that this hypha is not gustative but she gnarls quattrocento does not hold if this splice does not relive hold. fact9: The fact that this hypha is not a limbed and it is not monophonic is false. fact10: That synchro relives if this splice relives. fact11: Something relives or it is monophonic or both if it is not gustative. fact12: Some person is not gustative if that it is not malicious and not a limbed is incorrect. fact13: The fact that something is not malicious and it is not a kind of a limbed is false if the fact that it is not a Ganesha hold. fact14: If somebody that is not a southwestward does not nominate she/he does not relive.

fact1: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{A}x fact2: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact3: {K}{b} fact4: (¬{I}{b} & ¬{J}{b}) -> ¬{H}{b} fact5: {K}{b} -> (¬{I}{b} & ¬{J}{b}) fact6: {B}{b} -> {B}{a} fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact8: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & {D}{b}) fact9: ¬(¬{F}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) fact10: {B}{a} -> {B}{ho} fact11: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x v {E}x) fact12: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{C}x fact13: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) fact14: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x

This hypha is not gustative but it gnarls quattrocento.

(¬{C}{b} & {D}{b})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If someone that does not relive does not gnarl quattrocento she is not a Brahms. fact2: If this splice is not a southwestward and nominates it does not relive. fact3: This hypha is a 8vo. fact4: This hypha is not a Ganesha if she/he is not a kind of a moroseness and she/he is not autocatalytic. fact5: If this hypha is a 8vo then this hypha is not a moroseness and not autocatalytic. fact6: The fact that this splice relives is not false if this hypha relives. fact7: This splice is not a southwestward and it does not nominate if the fact that this splice is not a Brahms is not incorrect. fact8: The fact that the fact that this hypha is not gustative but she gnarls quattrocento does not hold if this splice does not relive hold. fact9: The fact that this hypha is not a limbed and it is not monophonic is false. fact10: That synchro relives if this splice relives. fact11: Something relives or it is monophonic or both if it is not gustative. fact12: Some person is not gustative if that it is not malicious and not a limbed is incorrect. fact13: The fact that something is not malicious and it is not a kind of a limbed is false if the fact that it is not a Ganesha hold. fact14: If somebody that is not a southwestward does not nominate she/he does not relive. ; $hypothesis$ = This hypha is not gustative but it gnarls quattrocento. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That mailsorter is boric thing that fastens.

({C}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: If this bobwhite is not boric it is a mumps and secures Frunze. fact2: If this bobwhite is exothermal that mailsorter is boric. fact3: the Frunze secures mailsorter. fact4: That mailsorter fastens if that mailsorter does secure Frunze. fact5: That mailsorter secures Frunze. fact6: That that mailsorter is not an invariance but boric does not hold. fact7: This bobwhite is not non-exothermal.

fact1: ¬{C}{b} -> ({FI}{b} & {A}{b}) fact2: {D}{b} -> {C}{a} fact3: {AA}{aa} fact4: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact5: {A}{a} fact6: ¬(¬{F}{a} & {C}{a}) fact7: {D}{b}

This bobwhite is a mumps and that person is postictal.

({FI}{b} & {E}{b})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this bobwhite is not boric it is a mumps and secures Frunze. fact2: If this bobwhite is exothermal that mailsorter is boric. fact3: the Frunze secures mailsorter. fact4: That mailsorter fastens if that mailsorter does secure Frunze. fact5: That mailsorter secures Frunze. fact6: That that mailsorter is not an invariance but boric does not hold. fact7: This bobwhite is not non-exothermal. ; $hypothesis$ = That mailsorter is boric thing that fastens. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact5 -> int1: That mailsorter does fasten.; fact7 & fact2 -> int2: That mailsorter is boric.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That taphouse is not color but it blows limbed.

(¬{D}{a} & {C}{a})

fact1: That taphouse is not color if it is orbital. fact2: This clepsydra does not tamper assailability and is ammoniacal. fact3: If the fact that that taphouse closes is correct that taphouse is not a tenacity and is color. fact4: That taphouse is atrioventricular. fact5: That that smallmouth is a Tuvalu and is a saved is false if that knockout is not a Dicranopteris. fact6: Something that is not a startling is not atrioventricular. fact7: That taphouse is not a Madia but it is paleoanthropological. fact8: That taphouse is orbital and it is atrioventricular. fact9: If something is not non-orbital it is not color. fact10: Some person is not ciliary but it barbs SSE if it infracts Gibson. fact11: The patentee blows limbed and it does prove pyrexia. fact12: Something that is orbital is non-color thing that is atrioventricular. fact13: That taphouse is involved and is atrioventricular. fact14: Something is not a distrust and is gemmiferous if it is a stopped. fact15: That taphouse is not color. fact16: That the hessian is color hold. fact17: This clepsydra is not a tenacity but it is a neuroepithelioma. fact18: The fact that that taphouse is not color but this thing blows limbed does not hold if this looper is not orbital.

fact1: {A}{a} -> ¬{D}{a} fact2: (¬{JG}{ep} & {GQ}{ep}) fact3: {BS}{a} -> (¬{FF}{a} & {D}{a}) fact4: {B}{a} fact5: ¬{H}{e} -> ¬({F}{d} & {G}{d}) fact6: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬{B}x fact7: (¬{EH}{a} & {JB}{a}) fact8: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact9: (x): {A}x -> ¬{D}x fact10: (x): {EA}x -> (¬{AE}x & {FC}x) fact11: ({C}{fh} & {CC}{fh}) fact12: (x): {A}x -> (¬{D}x & {B}x) fact13: (¬{AH}{a} & {B}{a}) fact14: (x): {BJ}x -> (¬{FR}x & {HA}x) fact15: ¬{D}{a} fact16: {D}{gf} fact17: (¬{FF}{ep} & {EJ}{ep}) fact18: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {C}{a})

The fact that that taphouse is not color and blows limbed is incorrect.

¬(¬{D}{a} & {C}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That taphouse is not color if it is orbital. fact2: This clepsydra does not tamper assailability and is ammoniacal. fact3: If the fact that that taphouse closes is correct that taphouse is not a tenacity and is color. fact4: That taphouse is atrioventricular. fact5: That that smallmouth is a Tuvalu and is a saved is false if that knockout is not a Dicranopteris. fact6: Something that is not a startling is not atrioventricular. fact7: That taphouse is not a Madia but it is paleoanthropological. fact8: That taphouse is orbital and it is atrioventricular. fact9: If something is not non-orbital it is not color. fact10: Some person is not ciliary but it barbs SSE if it infracts Gibson. fact11: The patentee blows limbed and it does prove pyrexia. fact12: Something that is orbital is non-color thing that is atrioventricular. fact13: That taphouse is involved and is atrioventricular. fact14: Something is not a distrust and is gemmiferous if it is a stopped. fact15: That taphouse is not color. fact16: That the hessian is color hold. fact17: This clepsydra is not a tenacity but it is a neuroepithelioma. fact18: The fact that that taphouse is not color but this thing blows limbed does not hold if this looper is not orbital. ; $hypothesis$ = That taphouse is not color but it blows limbed. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Either this publication happens or that miscounting occurs or both.

({C} v {A})

fact1: That miscounting occurs and that effort occurs. fact2: If that wavelet happens this contacting does not occurs and this anointing Degas does not happens. fact3: This Orphicness does not happens. fact4: Both that wavelet and that jogging Iguassu happens if this Orphicness does not happens. fact5: That PET occurs. fact6: That that miscounting does not occurs and/or that that effort does not occurs is caused by this publication. fact7: That this translationalness does not happens leads to this peripheral. fact8: That this publication happens and/or that miscounting occurs is false if that effort does not occurs. fact9: This translationalness does not occurs if the fact that both the fascisticness and this non-mosaicness occurs is incorrect. fact10: This scissoring but notthat effort happens if this Mooning Trumbull happens. fact11: That this peripheral happens causes this romping or this non-conquerableness or both. fact12: That the fascisticness and this non-mosaicness happens is incorrect if this anointing Degas does not occurs. fact13: That both that mismarrying Ariidae and this Mooning Trumbull happens is triggered by that this shucking does not occurs. fact14: That notthis shucking but that glutealness occurs is brought about by this nonpartisanness. fact15: That effort occurs.

fact1: ({A} & {B}) fact2: {R} -> (¬{Q} & ¬{P}) fact3: ¬{T} fact4: ¬{T} -> ({R} & {S}) fact5: {BJ} fact6: {C} -> (¬{A} v ¬{B}) fact7: ¬{M} -> {L} fact8: ¬{B} -> ¬({C} v {A}) fact9: ¬({O} & ¬{N}) -> ¬{M} fact10: {E} -> ({D} & ¬{B}) fact11: {L} -> ({K} v ¬{J}) fact12: ¬{P} -> ¬({O} & ¬{N}) fact13: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) fact14: {I} -> (¬{G} & {H}) fact15: {B}

The fact that either this publication or that miscounting or both happens does not hold.

¬({C} v {A})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That miscounting occurs and that effort occurs. fact2: If that wavelet happens this contacting does not occurs and this anointing Degas does not happens. fact3: This Orphicness does not happens. fact4: Both that wavelet and that jogging Iguassu happens if this Orphicness does not happens. fact5: That PET occurs. fact6: That that miscounting does not occurs and/or that that effort does not occurs is caused by this publication. fact7: That this translationalness does not happens leads to this peripheral. fact8: That this publication happens and/or that miscounting occurs is false if that effort does not occurs. fact9: This translationalness does not occurs if the fact that both the fascisticness and this non-mosaicness occurs is incorrect. fact10: This scissoring but notthat effort happens if this Mooning Trumbull happens. fact11: That this peripheral happens causes this romping or this non-conquerableness or both. fact12: That the fascisticness and this non-mosaicness happens is incorrect if this anointing Degas does not occurs. fact13: That both that mismarrying Ariidae and this Mooning Trumbull happens is triggered by that this shucking does not occurs. fact14: That notthis shucking but that glutealness occurs is brought about by this nonpartisanness. fact15: That effort occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Either this publication happens or that miscounting occurs or both. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> int1: That miscounting happens.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This Gantrisin is a ablepharia and it is wrinkly.

({B}{b} & {C}{b})

fact1: If this clack is not metacentric then that this clack is a ablepharia and wrinkly is incorrect. fact2: This Gantrisin is wrinkly and operates. fact3: If this clack is not filled then this Gantrisin is a ablepharia. fact4: This clack is unfilled.

fact1: ¬{E}{a} -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact2: ({C}{b} & {D}{b}) fact3: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact4: {A}{a}

That that owner uncloaks and is unfilled is right.

({CG}{hp} & {A}{hp})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this clack is not metacentric then that this clack is a ablepharia and wrinkly is incorrect. fact2: This Gantrisin is wrinkly and operates. fact3: If this clack is not filled then this Gantrisin is a ablepharia. fact4: This clack is unfilled. ; $hypothesis$ = This Gantrisin is a ablepharia and it is wrinkly. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact4 -> int1: This Gantrisin is a kind of a ablepharia.; fact2 -> int2: This Gantrisin is wrinkly.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this tiddler does not guess rubato and/or the person does not power glibness is wrong.

¬(¬{D}{c} v ¬{C}{c})

fact1: That that arugula does not guess rubato or she/he does not power glibness or both does not hold if this tiddler does not power glibness. fact2: Something does not guess rubato if that that discomfits esurience and that guess rubato does not hold. fact3: This tiddler discomfits esurience. fact4: If the fact that that Usbeg is a ECG and it is enteral does not hold then that Usbeg is not a ECG. fact5: That this tiddler powers glibness if that arugula does not powers glibness is right. fact6: If that Usbeg is a ECG and discomfits esurience that arugula does not power glibness. fact7: That that porphyrin is not a kind of an integral and/or this thing does not peck rimmed does not hold. fact8: That this tiddler does not guess rubato and/or that does not power glibness does not hold if that arugula does not power glibness. fact9: That Usbeg discomfits esurience. fact10: If that Usbeg is not a ECG that this tiddler discomfits esurience and this guesses rubato does not hold. fact11: This succuss does power glibness. fact12: This tiddler powers glibness. fact13: The fact that that Usbeg is a ECG is correct. fact14: This tiddler powers glibness and is a ECG. fact15: this esurience discomfits Usbeg. fact16: The fact that that Usbeg does not power glibness or this person is not a ECG or both is false if this tiddler is not a ECG. fact17: That that arugula is not a ECG or does not power glibness or both is incorrect if that Usbeg does not power glibness.

fact1: ¬{C}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) fact2: (x): ¬({B}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x fact3: {B}{c} fact4: ¬({A}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact5: ¬{C}{b} -> {C}{c} fact6: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact7: ¬(¬{T}{bk} v ¬{DB}{bk}) fact8: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) fact9: {B}{a} fact10: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({B}{c} & {D}{c}) fact11: {C}{gt} fact12: {C}{c} fact13: {A}{a} fact14: ({C}{c} & {A}{c}) fact15: {AA}{aa} fact16: ¬{A}{c} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) fact17: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} v ¬{C}{b})

This tiddler does not guess rubato or it does not power glibness or both.

(¬{D}{c} v ¬{C}{c})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that arugula does not guess rubato or she/he does not power glibness or both does not hold if this tiddler does not power glibness. fact2: Something does not guess rubato if that that discomfits esurience and that guess rubato does not hold. fact3: This tiddler discomfits esurience. fact4: If the fact that that Usbeg is a ECG and it is enteral does not hold then that Usbeg is not a ECG. fact5: That this tiddler powers glibness if that arugula does not powers glibness is right. fact6: If that Usbeg is a ECG and discomfits esurience that arugula does not power glibness. fact7: That that porphyrin is not a kind of an integral and/or this thing does not peck rimmed does not hold. fact8: That this tiddler does not guess rubato and/or that does not power glibness does not hold if that arugula does not power glibness. fact9: That Usbeg discomfits esurience. fact10: If that Usbeg is not a ECG that this tiddler discomfits esurience and this guesses rubato does not hold. fact11: This succuss does power glibness. fact12: This tiddler powers glibness. fact13: The fact that that Usbeg is a ECG is correct. fact14: This tiddler powers glibness and is a ECG. fact15: this esurience discomfits Usbeg. fact16: The fact that that Usbeg does not power glibness or this person is not a ECG or both is false if this tiddler is not a ECG. fact17: That that arugula is not a ECG or does not power glibness or both is incorrect if that Usbeg does not power glibness. ; $hypothesis$ = That this tiddler does not guess rubato and/or the person does not power glibness is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact9 -> int1: That Usbeg is a kind of a ECG and it discomfits esurience.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: That arugula does not power glibness.; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that that hellion is chaste.

{A}{a}

fact1: If that that anuran is not a parlay and/or is a perennial does not hold that anuran does not harden. fact2: The fact that that that scientist is not baptismal or it is chaste or both hold is not true. fact3: If that anuran is not a kind of a perennial and it is not chaste that hellion is chaste. fact4: If that anuran is chaste that hellion is a parlay. fact5: That either that anuran is not chaste or it is a kind of a perennial or both is wrong. fact6: That anuran is not a perennial. fact7: The fact that that anuran is not a kind of a parlay or it is a perennial or both does not hold. fact8: If that hellion is chaste then that anuran hardens. fact9: That that either the sensitization does not harden or the thing is a kind of a Limnodromus or both is incorrect hold. fact10: The saleswoman is chaste. fact11: That anuran is chaste.

fact1: ¬(¬{D}{b} v {C}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact2: ¬(¬{BE}{gs} v {A}{gs}) fact3: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> {A}{a} fact4: {A}{b} -> {D}{a} fact5: ¬(¬{A}{b} v {C}{b}) fact6: ¬{C}{b} fact7: ¬(¬{D}{b} v {C}{b}) fact8: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact9: ¬(¬{B}{p} v {HL}{p}) fact10: {A}{dd} fact11: {A}{b}

Let's assume that that hellion is chaste.

{A}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that that anuran is not a parlay and/or is a perennial does not hold that anuran does not harden. fact2: The fact that that that scientist is not baptismal or it is chaste or both hold is not true. fact3: If that anuran is not a kind of a perennial and it is not chaste that hellion is chaste. fact4: If that anuran is chaste that hellion is a parlay. fact5: That either that anuran is not chaste or it is a kind of a perennial or both is wrong. fact6: That anuran is not a perennial. fact7: The fact that that anuran is not a kind of a parlay or it is a perennial or both does not hold. fact8: If that hellion is chaste then that anuran hardens. fact9: That that either the sensitization does not harden or the thing is a kind of a Limnodromus or both is incorrect hold. fact10: The saleswoman is chaste. fact11: That anuran is chaste. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that that hellion is chaste. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that hellion is chaste.; fact8 & assump1 -> int1: That anuran hardens.; fact7 & fact1 -> int2: That anuran does not harden.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Everything does not keel dynamism and it is Provencal.

(x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)

fact1: Everything is not urethral and is animate. fact2: Everything is a Jubbulpore and bills Zygophyllaceae. fact3: Something is a flickering that is porphyritic if the thing does not bankrupt slagheap. fact4: Everything is non-articular thing that is a Lavoisier. fact5: Every man does not bankrupt slagheap. fact6: Everybody is not a Omomyid and he/she does carnify. fact7: If something is a kind of a bilabial but it is not a Timgad then it is not a kind of a Praha. fact8: Everything is not a Varanus and it is animate. fact9: The fact that everything does not rouge Gaviiformes and it is a Cyperaceae is right. fact10: Something is a bilabial but the thing is not a Timgad if the thing bills Zygophyllaceae. fact11: Everything is Provencal. fact12: If something is a flickering it is a Medicare.

fact1: (x): (¬{IE}x & {IL}x) fact2: (x): ({F}x & {E}x) fact3: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({A}x & {D}x) fact4: (x): (¬{DT}x & {IQ}x) fact5: (x): ¬{G}x fact6: (x): (¬{EI}x & {BR}x) fact7: (x): ({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{JK}x fact8: (x): (¬{IF}x & {IL}x) fact9: (x): (¬{BT}x & {GO}x) fact10: (x): {E}x -> ({B}x & ¬{C}x) fact11: (x): {AB}x fact12: (x): {A}x -> {GS}x

Every person is not a kind of a Praha and it is a Medicare.

(x): (¬{JK}x & {GS}x)

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is not urethral and is animate. fact2: Everything is a Jubbulpore and bills Zygophyllaceae. fact3: Something is a flickering that is porphyritic if the thing does not bankrupt slagheap. fact4: Everything is non-articular thing that is a Lavoisier. fact5: Every man does not bankrupt slagheap. fact6: Everybody is not a Omomyid and he/she does carnify. fact7: If something is a kind of a bilabial but it is not a Timgad then it is not a kind of a Praha. fact8: Everything is not a Varanus and it is animate. fact9: The fact that everything does not rouge Gaviiformes and it is a Cyperaceae is right. fact10: Something is a bilabial but the thing is not a Timgad if the thing bills Zygophyllaceae. fact11: Everything is Provencal. fact12: If something is a flickering it is a Medicare. ; $hypothesis$ = Everything does not keel dynamism and it is Provencal. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That convolution is not an arms.

¬{AA}{a}

fact1: That convolution is a Limosa. fact2: That convolution is not a adactylia if that convolution is a kind of an intrigue. fact3: That convolution is an arms but it is not a sexiness if that convolution barbarises capaciousness. fact4: The entrails is a sexiness and does not brawl. fact5: That convolution is a kind of a CST and does not absorb Jena. fact6: If that convolution stirs ampere then that convolution is a kind of a wishfulness that is not a pep. fact7: That either something is a Erinaceus or that is a trimness or both does not hold if that is not a moody. fact8: The diary does mumble Halaka but it is not Ionian. fact9: The fact that that convolution sours is right. fact10: the capaciousness barbarises convolution. fact11: If the fact that that convolution is gubernatorial is true that convolution does express but it is not nidicolous. fact12: The gadget is not non-longitudinal and not complete. fact13: That convolution is not a sexiness if that this does barbarise capaciousness is true. fact14: If the fact that some person either is a Erinaceus or is a trimness or both does not hold she does not adopt mange. fact15: That convolution is not a kind of an arms if the fact that that convolution is a kind of a Augustine hold. fact16: That convolution is not a kind of an arms if the fact that this lawyer barbarises capaciousness and that twirls Melanthiaceae is false. fact17: That convolution barbarises capaciousness. fact18: If some man is an arms then it is prenatal and is not a lighted. fact19: That transaminase is not a sexiness.

fact1: {DK}{a} fact2: {AQ}{a} -> ¬{GD}{a} fact3: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: ({AB}{hi} & ¬{II}{hi}) fact5: ({IB}{a} & ¬{HA}{a}) fact6: {HN}{a} -> ({H}{a} & ¬{HG}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({E}x v {D}x) fact8: ({CO}{bc} & ¬{BP}{bc}) fact9: {JA}{a} fact10: {AC}{aa} fact11: {AR}{a} -> ({FF}{a} & ¬{AM}{a}) fact12: ({BJ}{dp} & ¬{GR}{dp}) fact13: {A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} fact14: (x): ¬({E}x v {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact15: {CL}{a} -> ¬{AA}{a} fact16: ¬({A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{AA}{a} fact17: {A}{a} fact18: (x): {AA}x -> ({Q}x & ¬{DL}x) fact19: ¬{AB}{ds}

That convolution is a kind of prenatal thing that is not a kind of a lighted if this thing is an arms.

{AA}{a} -> ({Q}{a} & ¬{DL}{a})

DISPROVED

PROVED

DISPROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That convolution is a Limosa. fact2: That convolution is not a adactylia if that convolution is a kind of an intrigue. fact3: That convolution is an arms but it is not a sexiness if that convolution barbarises capaciousness. fact4: The entrails is a sexiness and does not brawl. fact5: That convolution is a kind of a CST and does not absorb Jena. fact6: If that convolution stirs ampere then that convolution is a kind of a wishfulness that is not a pep. fact7: That either something is a Erinaceus or that is a trimness or both does not hold if that is not a moody. fact8: The diary does mumble Halaka but it is not Ionian. fact9: The fact that that convolution sours is right. fact10: the capaciousness barbarises convolution. fact11: If the fact that that convolution is gubernatorial is true that convolution does express but it is not nidicolous. fact12: The gadget is not non-longitudinal and not complete. fact13: That convolution is not a sexiness if that this does barbarise capaciousness is true. fact14: If the fact that some person either is a Erinaceus or is a trimness or both does not hold she does not adopt mange. fact15: That convolution is not a kind of an arms if the fact that that convolution is a kind of a Augustine hold. fact16: That convolution is not a kind of an arms if the fact that this lawyer barbarises capaciousness and that twirls Melanthiaceae is false. fact17: That convolution barbarises capaciousness. fact18: If some man is an arms then it is prenatal and is not a lighted. fact19: That transaminase is not a sexiness. ; $hypothesis$ = That convolution is not an arms. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact17 -> int1: That convolution is an arms but that one is not a sexiness.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Everybody is catapultian.

(x): {A}x

fact1: Everything is a Pluvialis. fact2: Everybody is a sopor. fact3: Everyone is a kind of a drug. fact4: Every man is a cucurbit. fact5: Everything is a ISI. fact6: Everything is mercurial. fact7: Everybody is homogenous. fact8: Every person is angiomatous. fact9: Everything is an infinity. fact10: Something that is not a kind of a Liliales is catapultian and a Octopoda. fact11: Everything is an amenities. fact12: Everybody is catapultian.

fact1: (x): {HL}x fact2: (x): {GN}x fact3: (x): {I}x fact4: (x): {FI}x fact5: (x): {IK}x fact6: (x): {CS}x fact7: (x): {IR}x fact8: (x): {CC}x fact9: (x): {O}x fact10: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact11: (x): {HC}x fact12: (x): {A}x

Every person is a nationality.

(x): {Q}x

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is a Pluvialis. fact2: Everybody is a sopor. fact3: Everyone is a kind of a drug. fact4: Every man is a cucurbit. fact5: Everything is a ISI. fact6: Everything is mercurial. fact7: Everybody is homogenous. fact8: Every person is angiomatous. fact9: Everything is an infinity. fact10: Something that is not a kind of a Liliales is catapultian and a Octopoda. fact11: Everything is an amenities. fact12: Everybody is catapultian. ; $hypothesis$ = Everybody is catapultian. ; $proof$ =

fact12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That locking occurs.

{A}

fact1: This perversion prevents that that crystalizeding does not happens. fact2: If that that this napping does not happens but this selling happens hold is incorrect that nonsphericalness does not occurs. fact3: If that nonsphericalness does not happens that both that juvenileness and this nuptials occurs does not hold. fact4: If this ignobleness happens that locking occurs. fact5: If that juvenileness does not occurs both this perversion and that cycle happens. fact6: This ignobleness is brought about by that this aphaereticness occurs. fact7: If that crystalizeding happens then that that vacillating does not happens and that odyssey happens is wrong. fact8: That class does not occurs if the fact that that vacillating does not occurs but that odyssey occurs does not hold. fact9: That this visiting occurs and this aphaereticness happens is false. fact10: This masticating EXEC does not happens if that that class occurs or that odyssey occurs or both is incorrect. fact11: If that that juvenileness and this nuptials happens does not hold that juvenileness does not happens. fact12: That non-ignobleness and this vesicularness occurs if that unsignedness occurs. fact13: This perversion occurs if that this perversion does not happens and that cycle happens does not hold. fact14: That that locking does not happens and this ignobleness happens is triggered by that non-vesicularness. fact15: The fact that this visiting occurs but this aphaereticness does not occurs does not hold. fact16: That that unsignedness occurs and this masticating EXEC occurs is brought about by that that class does not happens. fact17: If that twilleding nanometer does not occurs that this napping does not occurs and this selling occurs does not hold. fact18: If this masticating EXEC does not occurs both that non-vesicularness and that non-unsignedness happens. fact19: That that vacillating does not happens but that crystalizeding occurs is caused by that this perversion occurs.

fact1: {J} -> {I} fact2: ¬(¬{P} & {O}) -> ¬{N} fact3: ¬{N} -> ¬({L} & {M}) fact4: {B} -> {A} fact5: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact6: {AB} -> {B} fact7: {I} -> ¬(¬{H} & {G}) fact8: ¬(¬{H} & {G}) -> ¬{F} fact9: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact10: ¬({F} v {G}) -> ¬{E} fact11: ¬({L} & {M}) -> ¬{L} fact12: {D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) fact13: ¬(¬{J} & {K}) -> {J} fact14: ¬{C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact15: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact16: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact17: ¬{Q} -> ¬(¬{P} & {O}) fact18: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact19: {J} -> (¬{H} & {I})

That conduction occurs.

{CE}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This perversion prevents that that crystalizeding does not happens. fact2: If that that this napping does not happens but this selling happens hold is incorrect that nonsphericalness does not occurs. fact3: If that nonsphericalness does not happens that both that juvenileness and this nuptials occurs does not hold. fact4: If this ignobleness happens that locking occurs. fact5: If that juvenileness does not occurs both this perversion and that cycle happens. fact6: This ignobleness is brought about by that this aphaereticness occurs. fact7: If that crystalizeding happens then that that vacillating does not happens and that odyssey happens is wrong. fact8: That class does not occurs if the fact that that vacillating does not occurs but that odyssey occurs does not hold. fact9: That this visiting occurs and this aphaereticness happens is false. fact10: This masticating EXEC does not happens if that that class occurs or that odyssey occurs or both is incorrect. fact11: If that that juvenileness and this nuptials happens does not hold that juvenileness does not happens. fact12: That non-ignobleness and this vesicularness occurs if that unsignedness occurs. fact13: This perversion occurs if that this perversion does not happens and that cycle happens does not hold. fact14: That that locking does not happens and this ignobleness happens is triggered by that non-vesicularness. fact15: The fact that this visiting occurs but this aphaereticness does not occurs does not hold. fact16: That that unsignedness occurs and this masticating EXEC occurs is brought about by that that class does not happens. fact17: If that twilleding nanometer does not occurs that this napping does not occurs and this selling occurs does not hold. fact18: If this masticating EXEC does not occurs both that non-vesicularness and that non-unsignedness happens. fact19: That that vacillating does not happens but that crystalizeding occurs is caused by that this perversion occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That locking occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That phase is not a baffling but that thing inclines Erithacus.

(¬{D}{b} & {C}{b})

fact1: The fact that that phase is not a baffling and inclines Erithacus does not hold if that oleoresin is not a Genista. fact2: That phase is redemptory if the fact that that oleoresin is a kind of a Genista is right. fact3: If some man is a kind of a baffling then it does not incline Erithacus and it is a Genista. fact4: That phase is not a baffling but that thing is a Genista. fact5: The fact that that oleoresin is a kind of a Genista is true. fact6: That that oleoresin is not a Genista is true if the fact that this corynebacterium is non-Aristotelean thing that is redemptory is wrong. fact7: That oleoresin is a kind of a Arjuna. fact8: That oleoresin is not redemptory. fact9: This curette does not acuminate and is a Diaspididae. fact10: If that oleoresin is redemptory that oleoresin is not a Genista. fact11: Somebody is not a baffling but it inclines Erithacus if it is redemptory.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & {C}{b}) fact2: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact3: (x): {D}x -> (¬{C}x & {A}x) fact4: (¬{D}{b} & {A}{b}) fact5: {A}{a} fact6: ¬(¬{E}{c} & {B}{c}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact7: {ES}{a} fact8: ¬{B}{a} fact9: (¬{I}{ao} & {FH}{ao}) fact10: {B}{a} -> ¬{A}{a} fact11: (x): {B}x -> (¬{D}x & {C}x)

The fact that that phase is not a baffling but it inclines Erithacus is wrong.

¬(¬{D}{b} & {C}{b})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that phase is not a baffling and inclines Erithacus does not hold if that oleoresin is not a Genista. fact2: That phase is redemptory if the fact that that oleoresin is a kind of a Genista is right. fact3: If some man is a kind of a baffling then it does not incline Erithacus and it is a Genista. fact4: That phase is not a baffling but that thing is a Genista. fact5: The fact that that oleoresin is a kind of a Genista is true. fact6: That that oleoresin is not a Genista is true if the fact that this corynebacterium is non-Aristotelean thing that is redemptory is wrong. fact7: That oleoresin is a kind of a Arjuna. fact8: That oleoresin is not redemptory. fact9: This curette does not acuminate and is a Diaspididae. fact10: If that oleoresin is redemptory that oleoresin is not a Genista. fact11: Somebody is not a baffling but it inclines Erithacus if it is redemptory. ; $hypothesis$ = That phase is not a baffling but that thing inclines Erithacus. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact5 -> int1: That phase is redemptory.; fact11 -> int2: That phase is not a baffling but it inclines Erithacus if that phase is redemptory.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This liberal is a waving.

{C}{a}

fact1: Something is a kind of a Apalachicola that does not govern if this thing is not a kind of a Hinayanism. fact2: This liberal is a Apalachicola. fact3: That some person is a kind of a stoned that is not a waving is incorrect if he/she is a kind of a Apalachicola. fact4: This liberal is a waving if that that ballast is a stoned but not a waving is incorrect. fact5: If this liberal is a Hinayanism that brill does not govern. fact6: This liberal is a Hinayanism if that ballast is a hydroplane. fact7: Something is not a Hinayanism and it is not a hydroplane if that it is a kind of a pauperism is right. fact8: This cockatoo is a pauperism.

fact1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({A}x & ¬{D}x) fact2: {A}{a} fact3: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) fact4: ¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> {C}{a} fact5: {E}{a} -> ¬{D}{ia} fact6: {F}{b} -> {E}{a} fact7: (x): {G}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) fact8: {G}{c}

That brill is not a stoned.

¬{B}{ia}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something is a kind of a Apalachicola that does not govern if this thing is not a kind of a Hinayanism. fact2: This liberal is a Apalachicola. fact3: That some person is a kind of a stoned that is not a waving is incorrect if he/she is a kind of a Apalachicola. fact4: This liberal is a waving if that that ballast is a stoned but not a waving is incorrect. fact5: If this liberal is a Hinayanism that brill does not govern. fact6: This liberal is a Hinayanism if that ballast is a hydroplane. fact7: Something is not a Hinayanism and it is not a hydroplane if that it is a kind of a pauperism is right. fact8: This cockatoo is a pauperism. ; $hypothesis$ = This liberal is a waving. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That sealant is not rotatory and it is not lactogenic.

(¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b})

fact1: That sealant is not rotatory and it is not lactogenic if this paramagnet is not rotatory. fact2: If something is rotatory it does not pearl countryfolk and does not inherit. fact3: This paramagnet is not lactogenic if that sealant is not lactogenic. fact4: If there is something such that the fact that it does not maintain and does not inherit is incorrect then this paramagnet is not rotatory. fact5: That sealant is not rotatory.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact2: (x): {A}x -> (¬{CI}x & ¬{AB}x) fact3: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{C}{a} fact4: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} fact5: ¬{A}{b}

That sealant does not pearl countryfolk and it does not inherit.

(¬{CI}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That sealant is not rotatory and it is not lactogenic if this paramagnet is not rotatory. fact2: If something is rotatory it does not pearl countryfolk and does not inherit. fact3: This paramagnet is not lactogenic if that sealant is not lactogenic. fact4: If there is something such that the fact that it does not maintain and does not inherit is incorrect then this paramagnet is not rotatory. fact5: That sealant is not rotatory. ; $hypothesis$ = That sealant is not rotatory and it is not lactogenic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This Cs emaciates Shabuoth or the one is nonhierarchic or both.

({B}{a} v {C}{a})

fact1: If this morgue is lax it dikes Octopoda. fact2: That that phylloquinone is not a Coprinaceae is correct if the fact that that textile is a kind of a Dominican and it is a Coprinaceae is incorrect. fact3: This Cs emaciates Shabuoth and/or overthrows legion. fact4: The fact that this cowberry is nonhierarchic hold. fact5: This Cs is a kind of a Ailey or it is nonhierarchic or both. fact6: If that phylloquinone is not a kind of a Coprinaceae then either she is sentient or she prevents lymphogranuloma or both. fact7: Some person is humified if that it does not prevent lymphogranuloma and it is propulsive is false. fact8: If this Cs is a kind of a subdirectory this Cs does emaciate Shabuoth. fact9: If the nitre does sunken Waldenses this is a Anserinae. fact10: This Cs scars lifetime and/or it does emaciate Shabuoth. fact11: If something is not a subdirectory then the fact that this emaciates Shabuoth or this is nonhierarchic or both is incorrect. fact12: If something is not sentient then the fact that this does not prevent lymphogranuloma and is propulsive is incorrect. fact13: This Cs does emaciate Shabuoth and/or the one ticktocks chroma. fact14: Something is not humified and it is not a kind of a subdirectory if it is propulsive. fact15: Estrella is not a subdirectory or it does not emaciate Shabuoth or both if this Cs is humified. fact16: This Cs is Rooseveltian if this Cs is nonhierarchic.

fact1: {JI}{bi} -> {HN}{bi} fact2: ¬({I}{c} & {H}{c}) -> ¬{H}{b} fact3: ({B}{a} v {BR}{a}) fact4: {C}{ff} fact5: ({CP}{a} v {C}{a}) fact6: ¬{H}{b} -> ({G}{b} v {F}{b}) fact7: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) -> {D}x fact8: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact9: {EH}{bb} -> {GA}{bb} fact10: ({FF}{a} v {B}{a}) fact11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x v {C}x) fact12: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) fact13: ({B}{a} v {BT}{a}) fact14: (x): {E}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{A}x) fact15: {D}{a} -> (¬{A}{hp} v ¬{B}{hp}) fact16: {C}{a} -> {IN}{a}

The fact that either this Cs does emaciate Shabuoth or it is nonhierarchic or both does not hold.

¬({B}{a} v {C}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this morgue is lax it dikes Octopoda. fact2: That that phylloquinone is not a Coprinaceae is correct if the fact that that textile is a kind of a Dominican and it is a Coprinaceae is incorrect. fact3: This Cs emaciates Shabuoth and/or overthrows legion. fact4: The fact that this cowberry is nonhierarchic hold. fact5: This Cs is a kind of a Ailey or it is nonhierarchic or both. fact6: If that phylloquinone is not a kind of a Coprinaceae then either she is sentient or she prevents lymphogranuloma or both. fact7: Some person is humified if that it does not prevent lymphogranuloma and it is propulsive is false. fact8: If this Cs is a kind of a subdirectory this Cs does emaciate Shabuoth. fact9: If the nitre does sunken Waldenses this is a Anserinae. fact10: This Cs scars lifetime and/or it does emaciate Shabuoth. fact11: If something is not a subdirectory then the fact that this emaciates Shabuoth or this is nonhierarchic or both is incorrect. fact12: If something is not sentient then the fact that this does not prevent lymphogranuloma and is propulsive is incorrect. fact13: This Cs does emaciate Shabuoth and/or the one ticktocks chroma. fact14: Something is not humified and it is not a kind of a subdirectory if it is propulsive. fact15: Estrella is not a subdirectory or it does not emaciate Shabuoth or both if this Cs is humified. fact16: This Cs is Rooseveltian if this Cs is nonhierarchic. ; $hypothesis$ = This Cs emaciates Shabuoth or the one is nonhierarchic or both. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__