Datasets:

hitachi-nlp

/

FLD.v2.reimpl

like 0

0.3

That kylie is non-longing.

¬{B}{c}

fact1: That amphitheatre is a Embiotocidae. fact2: If that that rectory is not an eyeball is correct that amphitheatre is longing and it is a kind of a salaam. fact3: That rectory is a kind of non-longing thing that is a Embiotocidae. fact4: That amphitheatre is not a salaam. fact5: If that rectory is non-pyretic thing that is a kind of a Embiotocidae that kylie is non-longing. fact6: If something is not an eyeball then that thing is longing and that thing is a salaam. fact7: If that amphitheatre is not a kind of a salaam then that rectory is a Embiotocidae. fact8: If that rectory is not a salaam then that amphitheatre is pyretic. fact9: That witness is not a Karelia and is cytogenetic. fact10: If that amphitheatre is not a salaam then that rectory is not pyretic but that person is a Embiotocidae. fact11: The fact that that rectory is a Embiotocidae is not wrong. fact12: That rectory is not a salaam if that kylie is not a Embiotocidae but it is longing. fact13: That amphitheatre is not longing. fact14: If somebody that does not brook Dumas is a kind of a Blastomyces then she is not an eyeball. fact15: If the fact that this galbulus does not brook Dumas but this is an eyeball does not hold that that rectory is not a kind of an eyeball is correct. fact16: That rectory is not a salaam and not non-longing if that kylie is not pyretic. fact17: That kylie is longing if that amphitheatre is longing. fact18: That rectory is not pyretic if that kylie is not longing but that is a Embiotocidae.

fact1: {AB}{a} fact2: ¬{C}{b} -> ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact3: (¬{B}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact4: ¬{A}{a} fact5: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact6: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{b} fact8: ¬{A}{b} -> {AA}{a} fact9: (¬{BN}{ih} & {FC}{ih}) fact10: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact11: {AB}{b} fact12: (¬{AB}{c} & {B}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact13: ¬{B}{a} fact14: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact15: ¬(¬{E}{d} & {C}{d}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact16: ¬{AA}{c} -> (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact17: {B}{a} -> {B}{c} fact18: (¬{B}{c} & {AB}{c}) -> ¬{AA}{b}

That kylie is longing.

{B}{c}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That amphitheatre is a Embiotocidae. fact2: If that that rectory is not an eyeball is correct that amphitheatre is longing and it is a kind of a salaam. fact3: That rectory is a kind of non-longing thing that is a Embiotocidae. fact4: That amphitheatre is not a salaam. fact5: If that rectory is non-pyretic thing that is a kind of a Embiotocidae that kylie is non-longing. fact6: If something is not an eyeball then that thing is longing and that thing is a salaam. fact7: If that amphitheatre is not a kind of a salaam then that rectory is a Embiotocidae. fact8: If that rectory is not a salaam then that amphitheatre is pyretic. fact9: That witness is not a Karelia and is cytogenetic. fact10: If that amphitheatre is not a salaam then that rectory is not pyretic but that person is a Embiotocidae. fact11: The fact that that rectory is a Embiotocidae is not wrong. fact12: That rectory is not a salaam if that kylie is not a Embiotocidae but it is longing. fact13: That amphitheatre is not longing. fact14: If somebody that does not brook Dumas is a kind of a Blastomyces then she is not an eyeball. fact15: If the fact that this galbulus does not brook Dumas but this is an eyeball does not hold that that rectory is not a kind of an eyeball is correct. fact16: That rectory is not a salaam and not non-longing if that kylie is not pyretic. fact17: That kylie is longing if that amphitheatre is longing. fact18: That rectory is not pyretic if that kylie is not longing but that is a Embiotocidae. ; $hypothesis$ = That kylie is non-longing. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact4 -> int1: That rectory is not pyretic but a Embiotocidae.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That catechismalness happens.

{C}

fact1: That this jilting continuity does not occurs is prevented by that the chiromanticness happens. fact2: That backedness occurs. fact3: If this specifying Tiresias does not happens that slaying Bryaceae does not occurs and this mitralness does not occurs. fact4: Both this study and that art happens. fact5: Both that art and the accoutring Orizaba occurs if that diachronicness does not happens. fact6: That this specifying Tiresias occurs is prevented by that this specifying Tiresias does not happens or the aftermath or both. fact7: If that the being does not occurs and the extramuralness does not happens is false then this echo does not occurs. fact8: That this predestinarianness occurs is triggered by the dimmerness. fact9: If this echo does not happens this specifying Tiresias does not happens or the aftermath happens or both. fact10: This disgruntleding copyhold occurs. fact11: This study prevents that that catechismalness does not happens. fact12: That art happens. fact13: If that that slaying Bryaceae does not occurs hold that diachronicness does not happens and this compromising Nice does not happens. fact14: That unmarredness happens. fact15: That this sweating osteoarthritis happens prevents that that waste does not happens. fact16: The squaring coastguard happens and the petalledness happens. fact17: That sending Tubulidentata happens. fact18: Both the vomiting and that Belling occurs. fact19: Both the accommodativeness and this train occurs.

fact1: {IC} -> {HU} fact2: {IG} fact3: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) fact4: ({A} & {B}) fact5: ¬{E} -> ({B} & {D}) fact6: (¬{I} v {J}) -> ¬{I} fact7: ¬(¬{L} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{K} fact8: {FG} -> {CQ} fact9: ¬{K} -> (¬{I} v {J}) fact10: {HP} fact11: {A} -> {C} fact12: {B} fact13: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) fact14: {FC} fact15: {T} -> {CL} fact16: ({IH} & {CN}) fact17: {BS} fact18: ({AJ} & {IJ}) fact19: ({DO} & {IT})

That catechismalness does not occurs.

¬{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this jilting continuity does not occurs is prevented by that the chiromanticness happens. fact2: That backedness occurs. fact3: If this specifying Tiresias does not happens that slaying Bryaceae does not occurs and this mitralness does not occurs. fact4: Both this study and that art happens. fact5: Both that art and the accoutring Orizaba occurs if that diachronicness does not happens. fact6: That this specifying Tiresias occurs is prevented by that this specifying Tiresias does not happens or the aftermath or both. fact7: If that the being does not occurs and the extramuralness does not happens is false then this echo does not occurs. fact8: That this predestinarianness occurs is triggered by the dimmerness. fact9: If this echo does not happens this specifying Tiresias does not happens or the aftermath happens or both. fact10: This disgruntleding copyhold occurs. fact11: This study prevents that that catechismalness does not happens. fact12: That art happens. fact13: If that that slaying Bryaceae does not occurs hold that diachronicness does not happens and this compromising Nice does not happens. fact14: That unmarredness happens. fact15: That this sweating osteoarthritis happens prevents that that waste does not happens. fact16: The squaring coastguard happens and the petalledness happens. fact17: That sending Tubulidentata happens. fact18: Both the vomiting and that Belling occurs. fact19: Both the accommodativeness and this train occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That catechismalness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> int1: The fact that this study occurs is correct.; int1 & fact11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That statics does not happens and that unrecordedness does not occurs.

(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: That statics does not occurs and that unrecordedness does not happens if this measuring does not happens. fact2: That statics does not occurs. fact3: If this measuring does not occurs then that statics does not occurs. fact4: This measuring does not happens.

fact1: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact2: ¬{AA} fact3: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} fact4: ¬{A}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That statics does not occurs and that unrecordedness does not happens if this measuring does not happens. fact2: That statics does not occurs. fact3: If this measuring does not occurs then that statics does not occurs. fact4: This measuring does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That statics does not happens and that unrecordedness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this peppermint spangles Aspleniaceae and is a noonday is wrong.

¬({B}{a} & {C}{a})

fact1: This peppermint spangles Aspleniaceae if this peppermint is a fetching. fact2: If something that is not a kind of a Sacagawea does paneling Lampyridae then this peppermint is not a bilgewater. fact3: The fact that this peppermint is a fetching is true. fact4: The jagua is a reciprocal if it is a aphasic. fact5: If this antapex is not inoffensive then this hakeem is a kind of a Brevicipitidae and it is a noonday. fact6: This antapex does overreach and is a fidelity if this deflector is not a bilgewater. fact7: If this deflector is not a Anisotremus and this one is dysphemistic then this antapex is not dysphemistic. fact8: If someone is not a bilgewater then the fact that it does not overreach and is a fidelity is incorrect. fact9: Some person is a fetching and spangles Aspleniaceae if the person does not overreach. fact10: This peppermint is a kind of a Sphaeriaceae. fact11: That nosewheel is restful. fact12: That this peppermint overreaches and is a noonday hold. fact13: That this peppermint spangles Aspleniaceae and it is a noonday is wrong if this antapex is not a fetching. fact14: This deflector is a kind of a Sjaelland. fact15: If that nosewheel is restful then Lesley is not a Sacagawea and panelings Lampyridae. fact16: The good spangles Aspleniaceae. fact17: If this deflector is a Sjaelland then this deflector is both not a Anisotremus and not inoffensive. fact18: The fact that this peppermint ravages Vega is true. fact19: That decrease is a kind of a noonday. fact20: This peppermint overreaches and that thing is a Algiers. fact21: Something uniforms flimsiness if this thing is a kind of a fetching. fact22: This hakeem does not overreach if the fact that this peppermint does not overreach and is a kind of a fidelity does not hold.

fact1: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact2: (x): (¬{I}x & {J}x) -> ¬{F}{a} fact3: {A}{a} fact4: {HU}{es} -> {CI}{es} fact5: ¬{G}{b} -> ({CA}{bf} & {C}{bf}) fact6: ¬{F}{c} -> ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) fact7: (¬{H}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{G}{b} fact8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) fact9: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact10: {IL}{a} fact11: {K}{e} fact12: ({D}{a} & {C}{a}) fact13: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact14: {L}{c} fact15: {K}{e} -> (¬{I}{d} & {J}{d}) fact16: {B}{gg} fact17: {L}{c} -> (¬{H}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) fact18: {DE}{a} fact19: {C}{gc} fact20: ({D}{a} & {R}{a}) fact21: (x): {A}x -> {AG}x fact22: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{D}{bf}

That this peppermint spangles Aspleniaceae and is a noonday is wrong.

¬({B}{a} & {C}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This peppermint spangles Aspleniaceae if this peppermint is a fetching. fact2: If something that is not a kind of a Sacagawea does paneling Lampyridae then this peppermint is not a bilgewater. fact3: The fact that this peppermint is a fetching is true. fact4: The jagua is a reciprocal if it is a aphasic. fact5: If this antapex is not inoffensive then this hakeem is a kind of a Brevicipitidae and it is a noonday. fact6: This antapex does overreach and is a fidelity if this deflector is not a bilgewater. fact7: If this deflector is not a Anisotremus and this one is dysphemistic then this antapex is not dysphemistic. fact8: If someone is not a bilgewater then the fact that it does not overreach and is a fidelity is incorrect. fact9: Some person is a fetching and spangles Aspleniaceae if the person does not overreach. fact10: This peppermint is a kind of a Sphaeriaceae. fact11: That nosewheel is restful. fact12: That this peppermint overreaches and is a noonday hold. fact13: That this peppermint spangles Aspleniaceae and it is a noonday is wrong if this antapex is not a fetching. fact14: This deflector is a kind of a Sjaelland. fact15: If that nosewheel is restful then Lesley is not a Sacagawea and panelings Lampyridae. fact16: The good spangles Aspleniaceae. fact17: If this deflector is a Sjaelland then this deflector is both not a Anisotremus and not inoffensive. fact18: The fact that this peppermint ravages Vega is true. fact19: That decrease is a kind of a noonday. fact20: This peppermint overreaches and that thing is a Algiers. fact21: Something uniforms flimsiness if this thing is a kind of a fetching. fact22: This hakeem does not overreach if the fact that this peppermint does not overreach and is a kind of a fidelity does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That this peppermint spangles Aspleniaceae and is a noonday is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> int1: This peppermint spangles Aspleniaceae.; fact12 -> int2: This peppermint is a noonday.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that this ember is not bungaloid.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: If the fact that the Butler sanctifies paleomammalogy and is a uncleanness is incorrect that czaritza is not a kind of a dalmatian. fact2: Somebody is a Astor if it is bungaloid. fact3: This surtout is not a abducent if this polariscope is not a kind of a abducent. fact4: The fact that that the Butler sanctifies paleomammalogy and it is a kind of a uncleanness does not hold is right. fact5: Either this ember abides or she/he is not a kind of a Astor or both. fact6: If this seabird is not a kind of a Corynebacteriaceae then that this seabird does not appall insentience and this is not bungaloid hold. fact7: Either this ember is a kind of a covertness or that thing is a kind of a Astor or both. fact8: If this ember is not bungaloid then the fact that it is a Astor is true. fact9: This anachronism is a covertness. fact10: This walkingstick is a covertness. fact11: If that somebody is a kind of a push and this person is a abducent does not hold then this person is not a kind of a abducent. fact12: Something is a perfecter but it is not a Corynebacteriaceae if it is a lordship. fact13: That this ember is a covertness hold. fact14: This ember is a kind of a Astor. fact15: That oarlock is a lordship and she/he is a Pipra if this surtout is not a abducent. fact16: That if that czaritza is not a kind of a dalmatian then that the fact that this polariscope is both a push and a abducent is correct is false hold. fact17: If the fact that some person appalls insentience and is bungaloid is false that one is not bungaloid. fact18: Some man appalls insentience and/or is bungaloid if this one is not a kind of a Corynebacteriaceae.

fact1: ¬({J}{f} & {K}{f}) -> ¬{H}{e} fact2: (x): {A}x -> {AB}x fact3: ¬{G}{d} -> ¬{G}{c} fact4: ¬({J}{f} & {K}{f}) fact5: ({FD}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact6: ¬{C}{it} -> (¬{B}{it} & ¬{A}{it}) fact7: ({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact8: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{a} fact9: {AA}{cs} fact10: {AA}{ib} fact11: (x): ¬({I}x & {G}x) -> ¬{G}x fact12: (x): {E}x -> ({D}x & ¬{C}x) fact13: {AA}{a} fact14: {AB}{a} fact15: ¬{G}{c} -> ({E}{b} & {F}{b}) fact16: ¬{H}{e} -> ¬({I}{d} & {G}{d}) fact17: (x): ¬({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}x fact18: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x v {A}x)

That omission is a kind of a Astor.

{AB}{p}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that the Butler sanctifies paleomammalogy and is a uncleanness is incorrect that czaritza is not a kind of a dalmatian. fact2: Somebody is a Astor if it is bungaloid. fact3: This surtout is not a abducent if this polariscope is not a kind of a abducent. fact4: The fact that that the Butler sanctifies paleomammalogy and it is a kind of a uncleanness does not hold is right. fact5: Either this ember abides or she/he is not a kind of a Astor or both. fact6: If this seabird is not a kind of a Corynebacteriaceae then that this seabird does not appall insentience and this is not bungaloid hold. fact7: Either this ember is a kind of a covertness or that thing is a kind of a Astor or both. fact8: If this ember is not bungaloid then the fact that it is a Astor is true. fact9: This anachronism is a covertness. fact10: This walkingstick is a covertness. fact11: If that somebody is a kind of a push and this person is a abducent does not hold then this person is not a kind of a abducent. fact12: Something is a perfecter but it is not a Corynebacteriaceae if it is a lordship. fact13: That this ember is a covertness hold. fact14: This ember is a kind of a Astor. fact15: That oarlock is a lordship and she/he is a Pipra if this surtout is not a abducent. fact16: That if that czaritza is not a kind of a dalmatian then that the fact that this polariscope is both a push and a abducent is correct is false hold. fact17: If the fact that some person appalls insentience and is bungaloid is false that one is not bungaloid. fact18: Some man appalls insentience and/or is bungaloid if this one is not a kind of a Corynebacteriaceae. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that this ember is not bungaloid. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That chlamydia does not pivot.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: The fact that this blackcap does not eject and is not a kind of an antiphon is false if that tranquillizer is not noninstitutionalised. fact2: If that this blackcap does not eject and is not an antiphon is not right the fact that that chlamydia does not eject is right. fact3: The fact that something is a Jong and a propaganda does not hold if it does not eject. fact4: If this blackcap is nonarboreal it does not dull foretaste and it does pivot. fact5: If something is not a Jong it pivots and dulls foretaste. fact6: If the inflorescence swats nonallele that she pivots is not false. fact7: That chlamydia is uniovular. fact8: Something is not noninstitutionalised and it does not blemish if it is not a soaked. fact9: Something is nonarboreal if it pivots. fact10: That something pounds harelip and the thing is a kind of a soaked is incorrect if the fact that the thing is not a trismus hold. fact11: The fact that that chlamydia indisposes Brickellia hold if that chlamydia junks Tyrannus. fact12: If some man is not aldermanic it is both not a trismus and unconvincing. fact13: That chlamydia does not pivot if this blackcap does not dull foretaste but this one pivot. fact14: Toby is not a Jong if the fact that the fact that that chlamydia is a Jong and is a propaganda is false is correct. fact15: If that cone is nonarboreal then it immerses chortle. fact16: If that the fact that some person pounds harelip and is a soaked is correct does not hold then she/he is not a kind of a soaked. fact17: That tranquillizer is not aldermanic. fact18: If that chlamydia is nonarboreal then that chlamydia pivots.

fact1: ¬{G}{c} -> ¬(¬{E}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) fact2: ¬(¬{E}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}x & {F}x) fact4: {A}{b} -> (¬{C}{b} & {B}{b}) fact5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact6: {FS}{co} -> {B}{co} fact7: {AO}{a} fact8: (x): ¬{J}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{I}x) fact9: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact10: (x): ¬{L}x -> ¬({K}x & {J}x) fact11: {HR}{a} -> {FE}{a} fact12: (x): ¬{N}x -> (¬{L}x & {M}x) fact13: (¬{C}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact14: ¬({D}{a} & {F}{a}) -> ¬{D}{de} fact15: {A}{bi} -> {DH}{bi} fact16: (x): ¬({K}x & {J}x) -> ¬{J}x fact17: ¬{N}{c} fact18: {A}{a} -> {B}{a}

That chlamydia does not pivot.

¬{B}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this blackcap does not eject and is not a kind of an antiphon is false if that tranquillizer is not noninstitutionalised. fact2: If that this blackcap does not eject and is not an antiphon is not right the fact that that chlamydia does not eject is right. fact3: The fact that something is a Jong and a propaganda does not hold if it does not eject. fact4: If this blackcap is nonarboreal it does not dull foretaste and it does pivot. fact5: If something is not a Jong it pivots and dulls foretaste. fact6: If the inflorescence swats nonallele that she pivots is not false. fact7: That chlamydia is uniovular. fact8: Something is not noninstitutionalised and it does not blemish if it is not a soaked. fact9: Something is nonarboreal if it pivots. fact10: That something pounds harelip and the thing is a kind of a soaked is incorrect if the fact that the thing is not a trismus hold. fact11: The fact that that chlamydia indisposes Brickellia hold if that chlamydia junks Tyrannus. fact12: If some man is not aldermanic it is both not a trismus and unconvincing. fact13: That chlamydia does not pivot if this blackcap does not dull foretaste but this one pivot. fact14: Toby is not a Jong if the fact that the fact that that chlamydia is a Jong and is a propaganda is false is correct. fact15: If that cone is nonarboreal then it immerses chortle. fact16: If that the fact that some person pounds harelip and is a soaked is correct does not hold then she/he is not a kind of a soaked. fact17: That tranquillizer is not aldermanic. fact18: If that chlamydia is nonarboreal then that chlamydia pivots. ; $hypothesis$ = That chlamydia does not pivot. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Let's assume that that lantana is a kind of a Godard.

{A}{a}

fact1: If that lantana is a Godard then the fact that this gracilariid does rusticate and it is unauthorised is wrong. fact2: Some person counsels capitation and is a Godard if this person does not distill pitilessness. fact3: The fact that something is a Midi and is not watchful is incorrect if that is a biometry. fact4: The fact that this gracilariid does rusticate and this thing is unauthorised does not hold. fact5: That somebody is not unauthorised but she is prime is wrong if she is a kind of a Godard. fact6: This gracilariid does not rusticate. fact7: That this gracilariid is postbiblical hold. fact8: The fact that this gracilariid does not rusticate but that thing is unauthorised does not hold if the fact that that lantana is a Godard is correct. fact9: This gracilariid is not a Pavo but a Godard. fact10: If that lantana is unauthorised the fact that this gracilariid does not rusticate but it is a kind of a Godard does not hold. fact11: If that lantana does not counsel capitation or does not distill pitilessness or both then that promulgator is a Godard. fact12: Everyone is a kind of a biometry. fact13: The matchet is unauthorised. fact14: That lantana does not rusticate and instruments Jacobi. fact15: If the fact that some person is a Midi that is non-watchful does not hold then he does not grapple percept. fact16: That lantana does not rusticate and is evangelical. fact17: The fact that this gracilariid does not moult and is Voltaic is wrong.

fact1: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact3: (x): {G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) fact4: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact5: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AB}x & {P}x) fact6: ¬{AA}{b} fact7: {EL}{b} fact8: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact9: (¬{R}{b} & {A}{b}) fact10: {AB}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {A}{b}) fact11: (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) -> {A}{ah} fact12: (x): {G}x fact13: {AB}{bl} fact14: (¬{AA}{a} & {DE}{a}) fact15: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact16: (¬{AA}{a} & {DN}{a}) fact17: ¬(¬{FB}{b} & {CF}{b})

Let's assume that that lantana is a kind of a Godard.

{A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that lantana is a Godard then the fact that this gracilariid does rusticate and it is unauthorised is wrong. fact2: Some person counsels capitation and is a Godard if this person does not distill pitilessness. fact3: The fact that something is a Midi and is not watchful is incorrect if that is a biometry. fact4: The fact that this gracilariid does rusticate and this thing is unauthorised does not hold. fact5: That somebody is not unauthorised but she is prime is wrong if she is a kind of a Godard. fact6: This gracilariid does not rusticate. fact7: That this gracilariid is postbiblical hold. fact8: The fact that this gracilariid does not rusticate but that thing is unauthorised does not hold if the fact that that lantana is a Godard is correct. fact9: This gracilariid is not a Pavo but a Godard. fact10: If that lantana is unauthorised the fact that this gracilariid does not rusticate but it is a kind of a Godard does not hold. fact11: If that lantana does not counsel capitation or does not distill pitilessness or both then that promulgator is a Godard. fact12: Everyone is a kind of a biometry. fact13: The matchet is unauthorised. fact14: That lantana does not rusticate and instruments Jacobi. fact15: If the fact that some person is a Midi that is non-watchful does not hold then he does not grapple percept. fact16: That lantana does not rusticate and is evangelical. fact17: The fact that this gracilariid does not moult and is Voltaic is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that that lantana is a kind of a Godard. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That gaslight is not variable.

¬{D}{a}

fact1: That gaslight is a bombing. fact2: That gaslight is both statistical and indehiscent. fact3: If this scilla is not recreational then that is not a potful. fact4: If something is not a bombing and it is not a Brummell then that it is not invariable is correct. fact5: This scilla is non-transatlantic one that mystifies handedness if it is an offensive. fact6: This suffragist is not variable if this suffragist is not indehiscent. fact7: That that gaslight is not dehiscent is correct. fact8: If that gaslight does not nock then that gaslight is both not a Brummell and not indehiscent. fact9: If this scilla is not a potful then that gaslight is not a bombing and not statistical. fact10: That gaslight is a typescript. fact11: The fact that something is not recreational if it is not transatlantic and mystifies handedness hold. fact12: Something that is statistical and is a Brummell is not variable. fact13: This maligner is statistical. fact14: Something is a bombing that is a Brummell if it is invariable.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: ({C}{a} & {E}{a}) fact3: ¬{G}{b} -> ¬{F}{b} fact4: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {D}x fact5: {K}{b} -> (¬{H}{b} & {I}{b}) fact6: ¬{E}{gl} -> ¬{D}{gl} fact7: {E}{a} fact8: ¬{J}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact9: ¬{F}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact10: {GL}{a} fact11: (x): (¬{H}x & {I}x) -> ¬{G}x fact12: (x): ({C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{D}x fact13: {C}{ai} fact14: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & {B}x)

That gaslight is variable.

{D}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That gaslight is a bombing. fact2: That gaslight is both statistical and indehiscent. fact3: If this scilla is not recreational then that is not a potful. fact4: If something is not a bombing and it is not a Brummell then that it is not invariable is correct. fact5: This scilla is non-transatlantic one that mystifies handedness if it is an offensive. fact6: This suffragist is not variable if this suffragist is not indehiscent. fact7: That that gaslight is not dehiscent is correct. fact8: If that gaslight does not nock then that gaslight is both not a Brummell and not indehiscent. fact9: If this scilla is not a potful then that gaslight is not a bombing and not statistical. fact10: That gaslight is a typescript. fact11: The fact that something is not recreational if it is not transatlantic and mystifies handedness hold. fact12: Something that is statistical and is a Brummell is not variable. fact13: This maligner is statistical. fact14: Something is a bombing that is a Brummell if it is invariable. ; $hypothesis$ = That gaslight is not variable. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This low thromboses.

{B}{b}

fact1: If someone that sudates Aladdin does tranquillize Naiadales then the person does not thrombose. fact2: Something sudates Aladdin and tranquillizes Naiadales if that is not a Raphus. fact3: Someone is not a Raphus if that person is teratogenic or does not dilapidated productivity or both. fact4: this Aladdin sudates updraft. fact5: That updraft sudates Aladdin. fact6: If that updraft thromboses then this low sudates Aladdin. fact7: If that some man thromboses and does sudate Aladdin is wrong the person does not thromboses. fact8: If the fact that that updraft sudates Aladdin is right this low does thrombose.

fact1: (x): ({A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & {C}x) fact3: (x): ({E}x v ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact4: {AA}{aa} fact5: {A}{a} fact6: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} fact7: (x): ¬({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{B}x fact8: {A}{a} -> {B}{b}

This low does not thrombose.

¬{B}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If someone that sudates Aladdin does tranquillize Naiadales then the person does not thrombose. fact2: Something sudates Aladdin and tranquillizes Naiadales if that is not a Raphus. fact3: Someone is not a Raphus if that person is teratogenic or does not dilapidated productivity or both. fact4: this Aladdin sudates updraft. fact5: That updraft sudates Aladdin. fact6: If that updraft thromboses then this low sudates Aladdin. fact7: If that some man thromboses and does sudate Aladdin is wrong the person does not thromboses. fact8: If the fact that that updraft sudates Aladdin is right this low does thrombose. ; $hypothesis$ = This low thromboses. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

If this nonretractileness does not occurs that fixation occurs.

¬{A} -> {AA}

fact1: If this nonretractileness does not occurs then that fixation occurs and that product happens. fact2: If this devilment does not occurs then this transudation occurs. fact3: The matureness occurs if the disuniting does not happens. fact4: That this nonretractileness occurs brings about that that fixation happens and that product happens.

fact1: ¬{A} -> ({AA} & {AB}) fact2: ¬{ES} -> {AS} fact3: ¬{IU} -> {AL} fact4: {A} -> ({AA} & {AB})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If this nonretractileness does not occurs then that fixation occurs and that product happens. fact2: If this devilment does not occurs then this transudation occurs. fact3: The matureness occurs if the disuniting does not happens. fact4: That this nonretractileness occurs brings about that that fixation happens and that product happens. ; $hypothesis$ = If this nonretractileness does not occurs that fixation occurs. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this nonretractileness does not occurs.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: Both that fixation and that product occurs.; int1 -> int2: That fixation happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This peduncle is a superego.

{B}{b}

fact1: That poseuse is not a superego if this peduncle is both cellulosid and not a physiography. fact2: That poseuse is not cellulosid. fact3: That poseuse is not a superego and that is not cellulosid. fact4: This peduncle is not atoxic if this peduncle is not a parry. fact5: If that someone does not sweep pictograph and it is not a State does not hold then it is not a parry. fact6: If that poseuse is not a physiography and it is not cellulosid this peduncle is not a superego. fact7: If that poseuse is not a physiography and not a superego this peduncle is not cellulosid. fact8: If that poseuse is not a Maniraptora then that corrosive is a superego and that thing is not non-cognizant. fact9: That blotter is not maximal and it is not a superego. fact10: This peduncle is not cellulosid if that poseuse is a kind of a superego that is not a kind of a physiography. fact11: That poseuse is not a kind of a Maniraptora but it is a fanned if there is some man such that it is non-atoxic. fact12: That poseuse is both not baccate and not a superego. fact13: That poseuse is not a physiography and the thing is not cellulosid. fact14: The exarchate is not cellulosid. fact15: This peduncle is not cellulosid. fact16: That this peduncle does not sweep pictograph and she/he is not a kind of a State is incorrect. fact17: Someone is both not a Araguaia and not a physiography if it is a superego.

fact1: ({AB}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: ¬{AB}{a} fact3: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: ¬{G}{b} -> ¬{F}{b} fact5: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{G}x fact6: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact7: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{b} fact8: ¬{D}{a} -> ({B}{as} & {C}{as}) fact9: (¬{GC}{et} & ¬{B}{et}) fact10: ({B}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{b} fact11: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{D}{a} & {E}{a}) fact12: (¬{IT}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact13: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact14: ¬{AB}{bc} fact15: ¬{AB}{b} fact16: ¬(¬{I}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) fact17: (x): {B}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{AA}x)

That corrosive is not a kind of a physiography.

¬{AA}{as}

DISPROVED

PROVED

DISPROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That poseuse is not a superego if this peduncle is both cellulosid and not a physiography. fact2: That poseuse is not cellulosid. fact3: That poseuse is not a superego and that is not cellulosid. fact4: This peduncle is not atoxic if this peduncle is not a parry. fact5: If that someone does not sweep pictograph and it is not a State does not hold then it is not a parry. fact6: If that poseuse is not a physiography and it is not cellulosid this peduncle is not a superego. fact7: If that poseuse is not a physiography and not a superego this peduncle is not cellulosid. fact8: If that poseuse is not a Maniraptora then that corrosive is a superego and that thing is not non-cognizant. fact9: That blotter is not maximal and it is not a superego. fact10: This peduncle is not cellulosid if that poseuse is a kind of a superego that is not a kind of a physiography. fact11: That poseuse is not a kind of a Maniraptora but it is a fanned if there is some man such that it is non-atoxic. fact12: That poseuse is both not baccate and not a superego. fact13: That poseuse is not a physiography and the thing is not cellulosid. fact14: The exarchate is not cellulosid. fact15: This peduncle is not cellulosid. fact16: That this peduncle does not sweep pictograph and she/he is not a kind of a State is incorrect. fact17: Someone is both not a Araguaia and not a physiography if it is a superego. ; $hypothesis$ = This peduncle is a superego. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that that this postilion is not a Strobilomyces and beats Secotiaceae hold does not hold is true.

¬(¬{B}{d} & {C}{d})

fact1: If that cobblers demoralizes Maugham but it is not a kind of a scollop then that Rollerblade does not haul. fact2: If that Rollerblade does not haul this fishplate is a consanguinity but the person is not a tucked. fact3: If that cobblers is a Strobilomyces that this postilion is a Strobilomyces and it beats Secotiaceae is false. fact4: If someone does not beat Secotiaceae the one is not a Strobilomyces or the one is not a Athanasius or both. fact5: If that Rollerblade does react euro that cobblers is a Strobilomyces. fact6: This fishplate is not a Athanasius. fact7: If this postilion does not react euro then that Rollerblade is either a Strobilomyces or impersonal or both. fact8: If that either something is not oncological or it is a kind of a columniation or both is false then it is not a Athanasius. fact9: If something does not advance Amaranthus then it does demoralize Maugham and is not a scollop. fact10: The fact that this postilion is a Strobilomyces and she/he does beat Secotiaceae is wrong. fact11: If that something is not a Athanasius is true it is not a kind of a Strobilomyces and beats Secotiaceae. fact12: If that cobblers is a Strobilomyces that this postilion is not a Strobilomyces but he beats Secotiaceae is wrong. fact13: If the fact that someone is not a kind of a columniation and it is not oncological is wrong it does not beat Secotiaceae. fact14: That Rollerblade reacts euro and/or it is impersonal if this fishplate is not a Athanasius. fact15: That cobblers is a kind of a Athanasius. fact16: If that this headboard is not a kind of a disgraced and it is not correlational is not correct then that cobblers is correlational. fact17: Every person is not a columniation. fact18: If the fact that something does not demoralize Maugham or it advances Amaranthus or both is not true then the fact that it is not a scollop is true. fact19: If that this fishplate does not haul and it is not a consanguinity is wrong it is not a tucked. fact20: That this fishplate does not haul and is not a consanguinity is wrong if the one is not a scollop. fact21: If something is not a tucked then the fact that the thing is non-oncological and/or the thing is a columniation does not hold. fact22: That that cobblers is a Strobilomyces is true if that Rollerblade is impersonal. fact23: If something is not a tucked then the fact that it is not a columniation and it is not oncological is incorrect. fact24: That cobblers does not advance Amaranthus if that it is correlational is right.

fact1: ({J}{c} & ¬{I}{c}) -> ¬{G}{b} fact2: ¬{G}{b} -> ({H}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) fact3: {B}{c} -> ¬({B}{d} & {C}{d}) fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) fact5: {AA}{b} -> {B}{c} fact6: ¬{A}{a} fact7: ¬{AA}{d} -> ({B}{b} v {AB}{b}) fact8: (x): ¬(¬{D}x v {E}x) -> ¬{A}x fact9: (x): ¬{K}x -> ({J}x & ¬{I}x) fact10: ¬({B}{d} & {C}{d}) fact11: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}x & {C}x) fact12: {B}{c} -> ¬(¬{B}{d} & {C}{d}) fact13: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact14: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) fact15: {A}{c} fact16: ¬(¬{N}{e} & ¬{L}{e}) -> {L}{c} fact17: (x): ¬{E}x fact18: (x): ¬(¬{J}x v {K}x) -> ¬{I}x fact19: ¬(¬{G}{a} & ¬{H}{a}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact20: ¬{I}{a} -> ¬(¬{G}{a} & ¬{H}{a}) fact21: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x v {E}x) fact22: {AB}{b} -> {B}{c} fact23: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) fact24: {L}{c} -> ¬{K}{c}

This postilion is not a Strobilomyces and beats Secotiaceae.

(¬{B}{d} & {C}{d})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that cobblers demoralizes Maugham but it is not a kind of a scollop then that Rollerblade does not haul. fact2: If that Rollerblade does not haul this fishplate is a consanguinity but the person is not a tucked. fact3: If that cobblers is a Strobilomyces that this postilion is a Strobilomyces and it beats Secotiaceae is false. fact4: If someone does not beat Secotiaceae the one is not a Strobilomyces or the one is not a Athanasius or both. fact5: If that Rollerblade does react euro that cobblers is a Strobilomyces. fact6: This fishplate is not a Athanasius. fact7: If this postilion does not react euro then that Rollerblade is either a Strobilomyces or impersonal or both. fact8: If that either something is not oncological or it is a kind of a columniation or both is false then it is not a Athanasius. fact9: If something does not advance Amaranthus then it does demoralize Maugham and is not a scollop. fact10: The fact that this postilion is a Strobilomyces and she/he does beat Secotiaceae is wrong. fact11: If that something is not a Athanasius is true it is not a kind of a Strobilomyces and beats Secotiaceae. fact12: If that cobblers is a Strobilomyces that this postilion is not a Strobilomyces but he beats Secotiaceae is wrong. fact13: If the fact that someone is not a kind of a columniation and it is not oncological is wrong it does not beat Secotiaceae. fact14: That Rollerblade reacts euro and/or it is impersonal if this fishplate is not a Athanasius. fact15: That cobblers is a kind of a Athanasius. fact16: If that this headboard is not a kind of a disgraced and it is not correlational is not correct then that cobblers is correlational. fact17: Every person is not a columniation. fact18: If the fact that something does not demoralize Maugham or it advances Amaranthus or both is not true then the fact that it is not a scollop is true. fact19: If that this fishplate does not haul and it is not a consanguinity is wrong it is not a tucked. fact20: That this fishplate does not haul and is not a consanguinity is wrong if the one is not a scollop. fact21: If something is not a tucked then the fact that the thing is non-oncological and/or the thing is a columniation does not hold. fact22: That that cobblers is a Strobilomyces is true if that Rollerblade is impersonal. fact23: If something is not a tucked then the fact that it is not a columniation and it is not oncological is incorrect. fact24: That cobblers does not advance Amaranthus if that it is correlational is right. ; $hypothesis$ = That that that this postilion is not a Strobilomyces and beats Secotiaceae hold does not hold is true. ; $proof$ =

fact14 & fact6 -> int1: That Rollerblade reacts euro or it is impersonal or both.; int1 & fact5 & fact22 -> int2: That cobblers is a Strobilomyces.; int2 & fact12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that there is something such that if this is indiscriminate then this is not evidentiary and not satyrical is incorrect.

¬((Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x))

fact1: There exists something such that if it is a thereness it remunerates sloping and does not Bench obstetrics. fact2: There is somebody such that if it is a transiency then it ousts copyrighted and it does not dissolve Sahara. fact3: There is something such that if it is indiscriminate then it is not satyrical. fact4: Gabi is not indiscriminate and it is not passionless if Gabi is amoeboid. fact5: There exists something such that if that thing is a republican then that thing is not a past and that thing is not adsorptive. fact6: Someone is not indiscriminate and not a Spinacia if she is epigastric. fact7: There exists somebody such that if that one is indiscriminate then that one is evidentiary and not satyrical. fact8: There is some person such that if it Benches obstetrics then it does not decipher Avicennia and it does realise. fact9: There exists something such that if this thing ditches controlling then this thing accumulates and this thing is not a Hezbollah. fact10: There is something such that if it is indiscriminate then it is not evidentiary. fact11: If the fact that Joana is indiscriminate hold Joana is not evidentiary and it is not satyrical. fact12: Joana is not aquiferous and is not extinct if it is indiscriminate. fact13: Joana is not evidentiary if that Joana is indiscriminate is not incorrect. fact14: There is someone such that if that it is indiscriminate hold then it is not evidentiary but satyrical. fact15: If that biriani is a trussed that biriani is not a kind of a Spinacia. fact16: There exists someone such that if it does embrown it is not anaglyptic and it is not a patronymic. fact17: There exists someone such that if he/she insures then he/she is not Galwegian and he/she does not ensile Christmastide. fact18: There is something such that if it is a thundering then it is not a patronymic and it does not wind Genyonemus. fact19: Something that is a Farragut is both not mosaic and not zoological. fact20: There exists some man such that if the one is a ILO then the one is not a Luoyang. fact21: If Joana is indiscriminate Joana is not evidentiary but the person is satyrical.

fact1: (Ex): {N}x -> ({DA}x & ¬{GR}x) fact2: (Ex): {CM}x -> ({AM}x & ¬{GQ}x) fact3: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬{AB}x fact4: {F}{de} -> (¬{A}{de} & ¬{EN}{de}) fact5: (Ex): {JE}x -> (¬{IG}x & ¬{BF}x) fact6: (x): {FB}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{ID}x) fact7: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact8: (Ex): {GR}x -> (¬{CQ}x & {IH}x) fact9: (Ex): {IB}x -> ({HB}x & ¬{AO}x) fact10: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬{AA}x fact11: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact12: {A}{aa} -> (¬{BA}{aa} & ¬{FC}{aa}) fact13: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact14: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact15: {HU}{bc} -> ¬{ID}{bc} fact16: (Ex): {HD}x -> (¬{AN}x & ¬{BG}x) fact17: (Ex): {EA}x -> (¬{GG}x & ¬{FH}x) fact18: (Ex): {GE}x -> (¬{BG}x & ¬{DH}x) fact19: (x): {H}x -> (¬{T}x & ¬{HM}x) fact20: (Ex): {R}x -> ¬{CI}x fact21: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa})

The headboard is both not indiscriminate and not a Spinacia if the thing is epigastric.

{FB}{gb} -> (¬{A}{gb} & ¬{ID}{gb})

DISPROVED

PROVED

DISPROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There exists something such that if it is a thereness it remunerates sloping and does not Bench obstetrics. fact2: There is somebody such that if it is a transiency then it ousts copyrighted and it does not dissolve Sahara. fact3: There is something such that if it is indiscriminate then it is not satyrical. fact4: Gabi is not indiscriminate and it is not passionless if Gabi is amoeboid. fact5: There exists something such that if that thing is a republican then that thing is not a past and that thing is not adsorptive. fact6: Someone is not indiscriminate and not a Spinacia if she is epigastric. fact7: There exists somebody such that if that one is indiscriminate then that one is evidentiary and not satyrical. fact8: There is some person such that if it Benches obstetrics then it does not decipher Avicennia and it does realise. fact9: There exists something such that if this thing ditches controlling then this thing accumulates and this thing is not a Hezbollah. fact10: There is something such that if it is indiscriminate then it is not evidentiary. fact11: If the fact that Joana is indiscriminate hold Joana is not evidentiary and it is not satyrical. fact12: Joana is not aquiferous and is not extinct if it is indiscriminate. fact13: Joana is not evidentiary if that Joana is indiscriminate is not incorrect. fact14: There is someone such that if that it is indiscriminate hold then it is not evidentiary but satyrical. fact15: If that biriani is a trussed that biriani is not a kind of a Spinacia. fact16: There exists someone such that if it does embrown it is not anaglyptic and it is not a patronymic. fact17: There exists someone such that if he/she insures then he/she is not Galwegian and he/she does not ensile Christmastide. fact18: There is something such that if it is a thundering then it is not a patronymic and it does not wind Genyonemus. fact19: Something that is a Farragut is both not mosaic and not zoological. fact20: There exists some man such that if the one is a ILO then the one is not a Luoyang. fact21: If Joana is indiscriminate Joana is not evidentiary but the person is satyrical. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that there is something such that if this is indiscriminate then this is not evidentiary and not satyrical is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that attachment does not happens or the offshoreness does not occurs or both does not hold.

¬(¬{A} v ¬{B})

fact1: The fact that that attachment does not happens and/or the offshoreness does not happens is false if that plunking does not occurs. fact2: That this unmanfulness and the non-offshoreness occurs does not hold if that attachment happens. fact3: The fact that if that that immobilizing occurs and that vandalism occurs is false then that vandalism does not occurs is right. fact4: Either that attachment does not happens or the offshoreness occurs or both. fact5: That attachment occurs and/or the offshoreness does not happens. fact6: If this petroglyph does not happens then the fact that that immobilizing happens and that vandalism occurs is wrong. fact7: This unmanfulness does not occurs if that that this unmanfulness and the non-offshoreness occurs is false is not incorrect. fact8: That that vandalism does not occurs brings about that notthat plunking but this foregathering semasiology happens.

fact1: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{A} v ¬{B}) fact2: {A} -> ¬({BK} & ¬{B}) fact3: ¬({G} & {E}) -> ¬{E} fact4: (¬{A} v {B}) fact5: ({A} v ¬{B}) fact6: ¬{F} -> ¬({G} & {E}) fact7: ¬({BK} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{BK} fact8: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & {D})

The fact that that attachment does not happens or the offshoreness does not occurs or both does not hold.

¬(¬{A} v ¬{B})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that attachment does not happens and/or the offshoreness does not happens is false if that plunking does not occurs. fact2: That this unmanfulness and the non-offshoreness occurs does not hold if that attachment happens. fact3: The fact that if that that immobilizing occurs and that vandalism occurs is false then that vandalism does not occurs is right. fact4: Either that attachment does not happens or the offshoreness occurs or both. fact5: That attachment occurs and/or the offshoreness does not happens. fact6: If this petroglyph does not happens then the fact that that immobilizing happens and that vandalism occurs is wrong. fact7: This unmanfulness does not occurs if that that this unmanfulness and the non-offshoreness occurs is false is not incorrect. fact8: That that vandalism does not occurs brings about that notthat plunking but this foregathering semasiology happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that attachment does not happens or the offshoreness does not occurs or both does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This extinctness or this futurist or both occurs.

({A} v {B})

fact1: That this rockiness and the non-tenderness occurs is wrong if that perseverance does not occurs. fact2: The fact that that pacifying ozaena and/or that mousetrap occurs is wrong if this Ecuadorian does not occurs. fact3: If the establishing Tepic does not happens then that this spouting Antoninus occurs and this aeroembolism happens does not hold. fact4: This aeroembolism and/or the immersing tablature happens. fact5: If the fact that both this spouting Antoninus and this aeroembolism happens is incorrect then this spouting Antoninus does not occurs. fact6: The aftershock occurs. fact7: That the syncope does not happens triggers that notthat booze but this fit occurs. fact8: If that cubicness happens then that notthat boomeranging but that bunching materialism occurs is false. fact9: The syncope does not occurs if the fact that either that pacifying ozaena happens or that mousetrap occurs or both is wrong. fact10: The fact that that booze occurs and/or this futurist does not occurs hold if that this fit does not occurs is right. fact11: This rockiness does not happens if the fact that both this rockiness and the non-tenderness happens is incorrect. fact12: If the fact that that boomeranging does not happens but that bunching materialism happens is false the establishing Tepic does not occurs. fact13: This Ecuadorian does not occurs if that this Ecuadorian occurs and this secularising Lawton does not happens does not hold. fact14: This futurist happens. fact15: That that cubicness occurs is caused by that droning supertax. fact16: If that going and that auditioning achondroplasty happens that perseverance does not occurs. fact17: If this spouting Antoninus does not happens then that this Ecuadorian happens but this secularising Lawton does not happens does not hold. fact18: The fact that this extinctness and/or this futurist happens is wrong if that booze does not occurs. fact19: That this rockiness does not happens causes that both that droning supertax and that pulsing occurs. fact20: This specific occurs if this extinctness happens.

fact1: ¬{T} -> ¬({R} & ¬{S}) fact2: ¬{H} -> ¬({G} v {F}) fact3: ¬{L} -> ¬({I} & {K}) fact4: ({K} v {BB}) fact5: ¬({I} & {K}) -> ¬{I} fact6: {BN} fact7: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & {D}) fact8: {O} -> ¬(¬{N} & {M}) fact9: ¬({G} v {F}) -> ¬{E} fact10: ¬{D} -> ({C} v ¬{B}) fact11: ¬({R} & ¬{S}) -> ¬{R} fact12: ¬(¬{N} & {M}) -> ¬{L} fact13: ¬({H} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{H} fact14: {B} fact15: {P} -> {O} fact16: ({U} & {AA}) -> ¬{T} fact17: ¬{I} -> ¬({H} & ¬{J}) fact18: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} v {B}) fact19: ¬{R} -> ({P} & {Q}) fact20: {A} -> {HR}

The fact that this extinctness or this futurist or both occurs does not hold.

¬({A} v {B})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this rockiness and the non-tenderness occurs is wrong if that perseverance does not occurs. fact2: The fact that that pacifying ozaena and/or that mousetrap occurs is wrong if this Ecuadorian does not occurs. fact3: If the establishing Tepic does not happens then that this spouting Antoninus occurs and this aeroembolism happens does not hold. fact4: This aeroembolism and/or the immersing tablature happens. fact5: If the fact that both this spouting Antoninus and this aeroembolism happens is incorrect then this spouting Antoninus does not occurs. fact6: The aftershock occurs. fact7: That the syncope does not happens triggers that notthat booze but this fit occurs. fact8: If that cubicness happens then that notthat boomeranging but that bunching materialism occurs is false. fact9: The syncope does not occurs if the fact that either that pacifying ozaena happens or that mousetrap occurs or both is wrong. fact10: The fact that that booze occurs and/or this futurist does not occurs hold if that this fit does not occurs is right. fact11: This rockiness does not happens if the fact that both this rockiness and the non-tenderness happens is incorrect. fact12: If the fact that that boomeranging does not happens but that bunching materialism happens is false the establishing Tepic does not occurs. fact13: This Ecuadorian does not occurs if that this Ecuadorian occurs and this secularising Lawton does not happens does not hold. fact14: This futurist happens. fact15: That that cubicness occurs is caused by that droning supertax. fact16: If that going and that auditioning achondroplasty happens that perseverance does not occurs. fact17: If this spouting Antoninus does not happens then that this Ecuadorian happens but this secularising Lawton does not happens does not hold. fact18: The fact that this extinctness and/or this futurist happens is wrong if that booze does not occurs. fact19: That this rockiness does not happens causes that both that droning supertax and that pulsing occurs. fact20: This specific occurs if this extinctness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This extinctness or this futurist or both occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Byron does not rafter Cladrastis and is not a North.

(¬{B}{c} & ¬{D}{c})

fact1: That Byron does not rafter Cladrastis and is not a kind of a North is false if the fact that the finnan does not rafter Cladrastis is correct. fact2: If this airport subcontracts then the finnan does not rafter Cladrastis. fact3: This airport subcontracts.

fact1: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) fact2: {A}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact3: {A}{a}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That Byron does not rafter Cladrastis and is not a kind of a North is false if the fact that the finnan does not rafter Cladrastis is correct. fact2: If this airport subcontracts then the finnan does not rafter Cladrastis. fact3: This airport subcontracts. ; $hypothesis$ = Byron does not rafter Cladrastis and is not a North. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact3 -> int1: The finnan does not rafter Cladrastis.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Winston is not sulphurous.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: If that quay is not a kind of a reaffirmation the fact that it is associational a Lomariopsidaceae does not hold. fact2: That quay is not a reaffirmation. fact3: Some person is sulphurous and a reaffirmation if this person does not triangulate. fact4: If the fact that that quay is associational thing that is a Lomariopsidaceae is wrong then Winston is not sulphurous.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} fact3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact4: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b}

Winston is sulphurous.

{B}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that quay is not a kind of a reaffirmation the fact that it is associational a Lomariopsidaceae does not hold. fact2: That quay is not a reaffirmation. fact3: Some person is sulphurous and a reaffirmation if this person does not triangulate. fact4: If the fact that that quay is associational thing that is a Lomariopsidaceae is wrong then Winston is not sulphurous. ; $hypothesis$ = Winston is not sulphurous. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact2 -> int1: The fact that the fact that that quay is associational and is a kind of a Lomariopsidaceae is right does not hold.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Meredith is not stormy.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: Meredith is stormy if Meredith does cover apophthegm and it is apheretic. fact2: Meredith is a Menopon if that Aquarius is mechanical. fact3: Meredith covers apophthegm but it is not apheretic. fact4: That Aquarius is not a Midi. fact5: If that somebody is Mohammedan and/or it does not camphorate preface does not hold it is anticlinal. fact6: Something is a kind of a Menopon or this thing is mechanical or both if this thing is not a Midi. fact7: If this hideout is not a kind of a Dalian and it is not a future this slicer is a Dalian. fact8: This slicer is not Bogartian if someone that apostrophizes Oireachtas is a Menopon. fact9: Meredith apostrophizes Oireachtas and intrudes Loganiaceae if Johnson does not penalise Fri. fact10: If the fact that some man is both non-stormy and a SLE is false it is non-stormy. fact11: Johnson does not penalise Fri. fact12: The umbrella covers apophthegm and is not proportionate. fact13: The fact that that that something is not stormy but it is a kind of a SLE hold is incorrect if it is anticlinal is true. fact14: This hideout is not a phot and is a kind of a majuscule. fact15: Meredith is not apheretic. fact16: Some person is not a kind of a Dalian and is not a future if this one is a kind of a majuscule. fact17: The fact that this slicer is Mohammedan and/or it does not camphorate preface does not hold if it is a Dalian. fact18: Meredith is a Menopon if that that Aquarius is a Menopon is right.

fact1: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact2: {D}{b} -> {A}{a} fact3: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: ¬{H}{b} fact5: (x): ¬({K}x v ¬{J}x) -> {I}x fact6: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({A}x v {D}x) fact7: (¬{L}{d} & ¬{N}{d}) -> {L}{eq} fact8: (x): ({C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{EJ}{eq} fact9: ¬{G}{c} -> ({C}{a} & {F}{a}) fact10: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {E}x) -> {B}x fact11: ¬{G}{c} fact12: ({AA}{bs} & ¬{EM}{bs}) fact13: (x): {I}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {E}x) fact14: (¬{O}{d} & {M}{d}) fact15: ¬{AB}{a} fact16: (x): {M}x -> (¬{L}x & ¬{N}x) fact17: {L}{eq} -> ¬({K}{eq} v ¬{J}{eq}) fact18: {A}{b} -> {A}{a}

This slicer is stormy but it is not Bogartian.

({B}{eq} & ¬{EJ}{eq})

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Meredith is stormy if Meredith does cover apophthegm and it is apheretic. fact2: Meredith is a Menopon if that Aquarius is mechanical. fact3: Meredith covers apophthegm but it is not apheretic. fact4: That Aquarius is not a Midi. fact5: If that somebody is Mohammedan and/or it does not camphorate preface does not hold it is anticlinal. fact6: Something is a kind of a Menopon or this thing is mechanical or both if this thing is not a Midi. fact7: If this hideout is not a kind of a Dalian and it is not a future this slicer is a Dalian. fact8: This slicer is not Bogartian if someone that apostrophizes Oireachtas is a Menopon. fact9: Meredith apostrophizes Oireachtas and intrudes Loganiaceae if Johnson does not penalise Fri. fact10: If the fact that some man is both non-stormy and a SLE is false it is non-stormy. fact11: Johnson does not penalise Fri. fact12: The umbrella covers apophthegm and is not proportionate. fact13: The fact that that that something is not stormy but it is a kind of a SLE hold is incorrect if it is anticlinal is true. fact14: This hideout is not a phot and is a kind of a majuscule. fact15: Meredith is not apheretic. fact16: Some person is not a kind of a Dalian and is not a future if this one is a kind of a majuscule. fact17: The fact that this slicer is Mohammedan and/or it does not camphorate preface does not hold if it is a Dalian. fact18: Meredith is a Menopon if that that Aquarius is a Menopon is right. ; $hypothesis$ = Meredith is not stormy. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That process happens.

{AA}

fact1: This referendum does not occurs. fact2: If the fact that that cogitating Pyrocephalus and this circulating happens does not hold then this circulating does not happens. fact3: That this circulating does not happens results in that both this referendum and that process happens. fact4: This amenorrhoeicness happens if this referendum does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{A} fact2: ¬({C} & {B}) -> ¬{B} fact3: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {AA}) fact4: ¬{A} -> {AB}

That process happens.

{AA}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This referendum does not occurs. fact2: If the fact that that cogitating Pyrocephalus and this circulating happens does not hold then this circulating does not happens. fact3: That this circulating does not happens results in that both this referendum and that process happens. fact4: This amenorrhoeicness happens if this referendum does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That process happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That every man is not courteous and it is not a kind of a pension is false.

¬((x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x))

fact1: Somebody is not continual if that it is not adroit and it is not antiferromagnetic is false. fact2: If that something gluts unskillfulness and is not xenogeneic is incorrect the fact that this thing is not a lipaemia hold. fact3: Everything is not modest and it is non-catechistic. fact4: If something is not continual then that that gluts unskillfulness and is not xenogeneic is false. fact5: Something does not excel Iridaceae and is not a provability if it is not a lipaemia. fact6: Every person is not a kind of a Hemminge. fact7: There is no man that is not adroit and is not antiferromagnetic.

fact1: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact2: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{A}x fact3: (x): (¬{EP}x & ¬{DJ}x) fact4: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) fact5: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{IJ}x & ¬{GM}x) fact6: (x): ¬{GO}x fact7: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x)

Everything does not excel Iridaceae and is not a kind of a provability.

(x): (¬{IJ}x & ¬{GM}x)

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Somebody is not continual if that it is not adroit and it is not antiferromagnetic is false. fact2: If that something gluts unskillfulness and is not xenogeneic is incorrect the fact that this thing is not a lipaemia hold. fact3: Everything is not modest and it is non-catechistic. fact4: If something is not continual then that that gluts unskillfulness and is not xenogeneic is false. fact5: Something does not excel Iridaceae and is not a provability if it is not a lipaemia. fact6: Every person is not a kind of a Hemminge. fact7: There is no man that is not adroit and is not antiferromagnetic. ; $hypothesis$ = That every man is not courteous and it is not a kind of a pension is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That reliableness does not happens.

¬{A}

fact1: That this customs occurs brings about that this virga occurs but this canfield does not occurs. fact2: That reliableness happens and this exhaustion happens if that shedding astigmia does not happens. fact3: If this virga does not occurs then the fact that that symphonicness and this canfield occurs is not right. fact4: If this secretaryship occurs then the fact that both that bibliomaniacalness and that non-roundingness happens is incorrect. fact5: That shedding astigmia but notthe roundingness occurs if that bibliomaniacalness occurs. fact6: That both that bibliomaniacalness and this secretaryship occurs is brought about by that that symphonicness does not happens. fact7: That the postganglionicness occurs yields that that evanescence does not occurs and this jubilation happens. fact8: That symphonicness and this secretaryship occurs if this canfield does not occurs. fact9: That symphonicness does not happens if that that symphonicness and this canfield occurs does not hold. fact10: That non-Hindiness results in that this customs occurs. fact11: If that painlessness occurs then that non-auscultatoriness and this indivisibleness happens. fact12: That reliableness does not happens. fact13: That that painlessness occurs but this backlash does not occurs is triggered by that that evanescence does not happens. fact14: If this customs happens this virga does not happens. fact15: That this involvement occurs is prevented by that both that non-auscultatoriness and that non-divisibleness occurs. fact16: If this involvement does not happens both this customs and this Hindiness happens. fact17: That that reliableness happens but this exhaustion does not occurs does not hold if that shedding astigmia happens. fact18: If the fact that that reliableness but notthis exhaustion happens does not hold then this parching does not happens. fact19: That shedding astigmia does not happens if the fact that that bibliomaniacalness and that non-roundingness happens does not hold.

fact1: {J} -> ({I} & ¬{H}) fact2: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact3: ¬{I} -> ¬({G} & {H}) fact4: {F} -> ¬({E} & ¬{D}) fact5: {E} -> ({C} & ¬{D}) fact6: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact7: {S} -> (¬{Q} & {R}) fact8: ¬{H} -> ({G} & {F}) fact9: ¬({G} & {H}) -> ¬{G} fact10: ¬{K} -> {J} fact11: {O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{N}) fact12: ¬{A} fact13: ¬{Q} -> ({O} & ¬{P}) fact14: {J} -> ¬{I} fact15: (¬{M} & ¬{N}) -> ¬{L} fact16: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact17: {C} -> ¬({A} & ¬{B}) fact18: ¬({A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{DL} fact19: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C}

This parching does not happens.

¬{DL}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this customs occurs brings about that this virga occurs but this canfield does not occurs. fact2: That reliableness happens and this exhaustion happens if that shedding astigmia does not happens. fact3: If this virga does not occurs then the fact that that symphonicness and this canfield occurs is not right. fact4: If this secretaryship occurs then the fact that both that bibliomaniacalness and that non-roundingness happens is incorrect. fact5: That shedding astigmia but notthe roundingness occurs if that bibliomaniacalness occurs. fact6: That both that bibliomaniacalness and this secretaryship occurs is brought about by that that symphonicness does not happens. fact7: That the postganglionicness occurs yields that that evanescence does not occurs and this jubilation happens. fact8: That symphonicness and this secretaryship occurs if this canfield does not occurs. fact9: That symphonicness does not happens if that that symphonicness and this canfield occurs does not hold. fact10: That non-Hindiness results in that this customs occurs. fact11: If that painlessness occurs then that non-auscultatoriness and this indivisibleness happens. fact12: That reliableness does not happens. fact13: That that painlessness occurs but this backlash does not occurs is triggered by that that evanescence does not happens. fact14: If this customs happens this virga does not happens. fact15: That this involvement occurs is prevented by that both that non-auscultatoriness and that non-divisibleness occurs. fact16: If this involvement does not happens both this customs and this Hindiness happens. fact17: That that reliableness happens but this exhaustion does not occurs does not hold if that shedding astigmia happens. fact18: If the fact that that reliableness but notthis exhaustion happens does not hold then this parching does not happens. fact19: That shedding astigmia does not happens if the fact that that bibliomaniacalness and that non-roundingness happens does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That reliableness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That Shawnee actualises quadratics.

{D}{b}

fact1: That ejaculator is not a wealthiness. fact2: That ejaculator is a Gwyn that is a Audubon. fact3: If that some person does not study hieroglyph but it is a wealthiness does not hold it does not actualise quadratics. fact4: That Shawnee is not a kind of a wealthiness if that Shawnee is not a lit. fact5: That Shawnee does not buffet ailurophobia if that ejaculator is both a Gwyn and a Audubon. fact6: The fact that if something does not buffet ailurophobia that it does not study hieroglyph and is a wealthiness is wrong is right.

fact1: ¬{C}{a} fact2: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact3: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{D}x fact4: ¬{GG}{b} -> ¬{C}{b} fact5: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact6: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x)

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That ejaculator is not a wealthiness. fact2: That ejaculator is a Gwyn that is a Audubon. fact3: If that some person does not study hieroglyph but it is a wealthiness does not hold it does not actualise quadratics. fact4: That Shawnee is not a kind of a wealthiness if that Shawnee is not a lit. fact5: That Shawnee does not buffet ailurophobia if that ejaculator is both a Gwyn and a Audubon. fact6: The fact that if something does not buffet ailurophobia that it does not study hieroglyph and is a wealthiness is wrong is right. ; $hypothesis$ = That Shawnee actualises quadratics. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact2 -> int1: That Shawnee does not buffet ailurophobia.; fact6 -> int2: If that Shawnee does not buffet ailurophobia that that Shawnee does not study hieroglyph but that one is a wealthiness is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That that Shawnee does not study hieroglyph and is a wealthiness does not hold.; fact3 -> int4: That Shawnee does not actualise quadratics if the fact that that one does not study hieroglyph and that one is a wealthiness is incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this nymphet is neotenic but it is not a prospicience does not hold.

¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: The Fall shushes fluency but this is not a pants. fact2: This nymphet is a directivity and not unhearable. fact3: The speakerphone is a prospicience. fact4: This nymphet is neotenic but it is not a kind of a prospicience. fact5: This nymphet is a kind of a amenableness but it does not sniffle Mindoro. fact6: The tank is neotenic. fact7: This nymphet is both a Oaxaca and not a prospicience.

fact1: ({AH}{cc} & ¬{CT}{cc}) fact2: ({FO}{a} & ¬{CC}{a}) fact3: {AB}{dt} fact4: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact5: ({AJ}{a} & ¬{IM}{a}) fact6: {AA}{gt} fact7: ({ER}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The Fall shushes fluency but this is not a pants. fact2: This nymphet is a directivity and not unhearable. fact3: The speakerphone is a prospicience. fact4: This nymphet is neotenic but it is not a kind of a prospicience. fact5: This nymphet is a kind of a amenableness but it does not sniffle Mindoro. fact6: The tank is neotenic. fact7: This nymphet is both a Oaxaca and not a prospicience. ; $hypothesis$ = That this nymphet is neotenic but it is not a prospicience does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Raj is a doppelzentner.

{C}{a}

fact1: Raj is tuberculate. fact2: If something bayonets caucus and is tuberculate then that is not a doppelzentner. fact3: Raj does bayonet caucus. fact4: the caucus does bayonet Raj.

fact1: {B}{a} fact2: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact3: {A}{a} fact4: {AA}{aa}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Raj is tuberculate. fact2: If something bayonets caucus and is tuberculate then that is not a doppelzentner. fact3: Raj does bayonet caucus. fact4: the caucus does bayonet Raj. ; $hypothesis$ = Raj is a doppelzentner. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact1 -> int1: That Raj bayonets caucus and that is tuberculate hold.; fact2 -> int2: Raj is not a doppelzentner if Raj does bayonet caucus and is tuberculate.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This phenazopyridine is not metamorphous.

¬{AA}{a}

fact1: If this phenazopyridine is not a contested then it does not endure thrombophlebitis and is not indulgent. fact2: If the fact that something is a Hatiora but it is not a contested does not hold it is a contested. fact3: The sister is not a kind of a contested and that thing does not Polish Goteborg. fact4: If someone is parttime then she/he is not penal and she/he is not a Chaldee. fact5: This phenazopyridine is not a kind of a contested. fact6: This leptocephalus is parttime if this blackseed is not non-diagonalizable. fact7: Clyde is not a contested and he does not unclothe. fact8: That someone is a Hatiora but that person is not a kind of a contested is wrong if that person is not filar. fact9: If this leptocephalus is not a kind of a Chaldee then this phenazopyridine is not filar. fact10: This phenazopyridine does not deform workforce if the fact that this leptocephalus deform workforce and is a contested is false. fact11: This phenazopyridine is not metamorphous and the thing is not a Chelidonium if this phenazopyridine is not a contested. fact12: That this phenazopyridine is not a Chelidonium if the fact that this phenazopyridine is not a contested hold is true. fact13: Something is metamorphous if it is a kind of a contested.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{CA}{a} & ¬{IM}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{A}x) -> {A}x fact3: (¬{A}{ho} & ¬{T}{ho}) fact4: (x): {F}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) fact5: ¬{A}{a} fact6: {G}{c} -> {F}{b} fact7: (¬{A}{ch} & ¬{IH}{ch}) fact8: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{A}x) fact9: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact10: ¬({FL}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{FL}{a} fact11: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact12: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} fact13: (x): {A}x -> {AA}x

The fact that this phenazopyridine does not tessellated Sedalia and does not deform workforce is correct.

(¬{BI}{a} & ¬{FL}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this phenazopyridine is not a contested then it does not endure thrombophlebitis and is not indulgent. fact2: If the fact that something is a Hatiora but it is not a contested does not hold it is a contested. fact3: The sister is not a kind of a contested and that thing does not Polish Goteborg. fact4: If someone is parttime then she/he is not penal and she/he is not a Chaldee. fact5: This phenazopyridine is not a kind of a contested. fact6: This leptocephalus is parttime if this blackseed is not non-diagonalizable. fact7: Clyde is not a contested and he does not unclothe. fact8: That someone is a Hatiora but that person is not a kind of a contested is wrong if that person is not filar. fact9: If this leptocephalus is not a kind of a Chaldee then this phenazopyridine is not filar. fact10: This phenazopyridine does not deform workforce if the fact that this leptocephalus deform workforce and is a contested is false. fact11: This phenazopyridine is not metamorphous and the thing is not a Chelidonium if this phenazopyridine is not a contested. fact12: That this phenazopyridine is not a Chelidonium if the fact that this phenazopyridine is not a contested hold is true. fact13: Something is metamorphous if it is a kind of a contested. ; $hypothesis$ = This phenazopyridine is not metamorphous. ; $proof$ =

fact11 & fact5 -> int1: This phenazopyridine is not metamorphous and it is not a Chelidonium.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This atm is not actinomycetous.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: If this atm is opisthognathous and it is actinomycetous then this gut is not actinomycetous. fact2: Some man is not non-opisthognathous. fact3: This atm is not actinomycetous. fact4: This atm is not non-actinomycetous and does not bushed Bahrein if the Co does not batten straggling. fact5: A non-opisthognathous man is actinomycetous man that busheds Bahrein. fact6: This atm is not non-opisthognathous and the person does enchained Munchausen if there is some person such that the person is non-opisthognathous. fact7: The Rescriptor is not actinomycetous. fact8: If this atm does not batten straggling or it does not precooked Corixa or both it is not opisthognathous.

fact1: ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{g} fact2: (Ex): {C}x fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: ¬{D}{b} -> ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact6: (x): {C}x -> ({C}{a} & {G}{a}) fact7: ¬{A}{fs} fact8: (¬{D}{a} v ¬{E}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}

This gut is not actinomycetous.

¬{A}{g}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this atm is opisthognathous and it is actinomycetous then this gut is not actinomycetous. fact2: Some man is not non-opisthognathous. fact3: This atm is not actinomycetous. fact4: This atm is not non-actinomycetous and does not bushed Bahrein if the Co does not batten straggling. fact5: A non-opisthognathous man is actinomycetous man that busheds Bahrein. fact6: This atm is not non-opisthognathous and the person does enchained Munchausen if there is some person such that the person is non-opisthognathous. fact7: The Rescriptor is not actinomycetous. fact8: If this atm does not batten straggling or it does not precooked Corixa or both it is not opisthognathous. ; $hypothesis$ = This atm is not actinomycetous. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This GABA does not undergo Moody.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: This GABA controverts Bremerhaven. fact2: The scalawag is a distinctness. fact3: If that latitude is not a classical then that thing undergoes Moody and that thing is a distinctness. fact4: This GABA is both a greyness and a distinctness. fact5: This GABA is a distinctness and the person undergoes Moody. fact6: If that that latitude is an overcharge and is not a Tipuana is wrong that thing is not a classical.

fact1: {BA}{a} fact2: {A}{s} fact3: ¬{D}{cq} -> ({B}{cq} & {A}{cq}) fact4: ({CK}{a} & {A}{a}) fact5: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact6: ¬({E}{cq} & ¬{F}{cq}) -> ¬{D}{cq}

That latitude is a distinctness and Assaults DE.

({A}{cq} & {GF}{cq})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This GABA controverts Bremerhaven. fact2: The scalawag is a distinctness. fact3: If that latitude is not a classical then that thing undergoes Moody and that thing is a distinctness. fact4: This GABA is both a greyness and a distinctness. fact5: This GABA is a distinctness and the person undergoes Moody. fact6: If that that latitude is an overcharge and is not a Tipuana is wrong that thing is not a classical. ; $hypothesis$ = This GABA does not undergo Moody. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this valvedness happens and that easterly does not occurs is right.

({AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: That this thrust does not occurs brings about that that reciprocal happens and this forensics does not occurs. fact2: If that this flat does not occurs and this reassuring Dipus occurs is wrong then that easterly does not occurs. fact3: This thrust does not happens if that tragicness occurs. fact4: If this reassuring Dipus happens then that toll does not occurs. fact5: If this sympatricness occurs but this disengaging Saxicola does not happens that tragicness happens. fact6: Both this sophisticating Baudelaire and this heeling Kellogg occurs if this opposableness does not happens. fact7: If this reassuring Dipus does not occurs the fact that this valvedness happens but that easterly does not happens does not hold. fact8: If that this infectiousness does not happens hold that this misrule occurs and that capitulation does not happens does not hold. fact9: If that presumption does not happens the fact that that snowboarding and that dieting dentistry happens is incorrect. fact10: That presumption does not happens if that reciprocal but notthis forensics occurs. fact11: The accrual does not occurs. fact12: If that mooching germinal does not occurs then that this redeeming lewdness happens and this smoother occurs is wrong. fact13: If that spoilation occurs then notthat mooching germinal but the vituperating Neckar occurs. fact14: This valvedness and that coalescence happens if this redeeming lewdness does not happens. fact15: If this sophisticating Baudelaire occurs then that notthis flat but this reassuring Dipus occurs is incorrect. fact16: The fact that this valvedness and that easterly happens does not hold. fact17: If the fact that both this redeeming lewdness and this smoother happens does not hold then this redeeming lewdness does not occurs. fact18: This reassuring Dipus does not occurs. fact19: If this reassuring Dipus does not happens then that both this valvedness and that easterly happens is false. fact20: If the fact that both that snowboarding and that dieting dentistry happens does not hold then this opposableness does not happens.

fact1: ¬{O} -> ({K} & ¬{J}) fact2: ¬(¬{B} & {A}) -> ¬{AB} fact3: {R} -> ¬{O} fact4: {A} -> ¬{IB} fact5: ({T} & ¬{S}) -> {R} fact6: ¬{F} -> ({C} & {D}) fact7: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact8: ¬{ES} -> ¬({JC} & ¬{FR}) fact9: ¬{I} -> ¬({H} & {G}) fact10: ({K} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{I} fact11: ¬{GN} fact12: ¬{M} -> ¬({L} & {N}) fact13: {Q} -> (¬{M} & {P}) fact14: ¬{L} -> ({AA} & {E}) fact15: {C} -> ¬(¬{B} & {A}) fact16: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact17: ¬({L} & {N}) -> ¬{L} fact18: ¬{A} fact19: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact20: ¬({H} & {G}) -> ¬{F}

That this valvedness happens and that easterly does not occurs is right.

({AA} & ¬{AB})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this thrust does not occurs brings about that that reciprocal happens and this forensics does not occurs. fact2: If that this flat does not occurs and this reassuring Dipus occurs is wrong then that easterly does not occurs. fact3: This thrust does not happens if that tragicness occurs. fact4: If this reassuring Dipus happens then that toll does not occurs. fact5: If this sympatricness occurs but this disengaging Saxicola does not happens that tragicness happens. fact6: Both this sophisticating Baudelaire and this heeling Kellogg occurs if this opposableness does not happens. fact7: If this reassuring Dipus does not occurs the fact that this valvedness happens but that easterly does not happens does not hold. fact8: If that this infectiousness does not happens hold that this misrule occurs and that capitulation does not happens does not hold. fact9: If that presumption does not happens the fact that that snowboarding and that dieting dentistry happens is incorrect. fact10: That presumption does not happens if that reciprocal but notthis forensics occurs. fact11: The accrual does not occurs. fact12: If that mooching germinal does not occurs then that this redeeming lewdness happens and this smoother occurs is wrong. fact13: If that spoilation occurs then notthat mooching germinal but the vituperating Neckar occurs. fact14: This valvedness and that coalescence happens if this redeeming lewdness does not happens. fact15: If this sophisticating Baudelaire occurs then that notthis flat but this reassuring Dipus occurs is incorrect. fact16: The fact that this valvedness and that easterly happens does not hold. fact17: If the fact that both this redeeming lewdness and this smoother happens does not hold then this redeeming lewdness does not occurs. fact18: This reassuring Dipus does not occurs. fact19: If this reassuring Dipus does not happens then that both this valvedness and that easterly happens is false. fact20: If the fact that both that snowboarding and that dieting dentistry happens does not hold then this opposableness does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That this valvedness happens and that easterly does not occurs is right. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that schism does not occurs is right.

¬{D}

fact1: Both that schism and that collapsableness happens if this resoluteness does not occurs. fact2: If this antigenicness does not happens this accountantship does not happens and this resoluteness does not occurs. fact3: This snapping leads to that the non-antigenicness and this shattering Nicklaus happens. fact4: That that intending years does not happens results in that this snapping and this binomial occurs. fact5: If that xenotransplantation does not happens then that intending years does not occurs and that demagnetising schwa does not occurs. fact6: That schism is prevented by that collapsableness or this accountantship or both.

fact1: ¬{B} -> ({D} & {A}) fact2: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{B}) fact3: {G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) fact4: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact5: ¬{K} -> (¬{I} & ¬{J}) fact6: ({A} v {C}) -> ¬{D}

The fact that that schism happens hold.

{D}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Both that schism and that collapsableness happens if this resoluteness does not occurs. fact2: If this antigenicness does not happens this accountantship does not happens and this resoluteness does not occurs. fact3: This snapping leads to that the non-antigenicness and this shattering Nicklaus happens. fact4: That that intending years does not happens results in that this snapping and this binomial occurs. fact5: If that xenotransplantation does not happens then that intending years does not occurs and that demagnetising schwa does not occurs. fact6: That schism is prevented by that collapsableness or this accountantship or both. ; $hypothesis$ = That that schism does not occurs is right. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this promiscuity either coffins Chermidae or is not unscheduled or both is false.

¬({D}{a} v ¬{C}{a})

fact1: That some man does not disembroil Jotun and is an iota is incorrect if he/she is not a Rangifer. fact2: If that detent does not egg Kiev that detent is a foiled and is an inconsistency. fact3: This promiscuity intersperses Sabellian. fact4: The fact that something coffins Chermidae or that is not unscheduled or both is false if that does not intersperse Sabellian. fact5: this Sabellian intersperses promiscuity. fact6: If that the fact that this aspen does not disembroil Jotun and is an iota does not hold is not wrong then this invalidator disembroil Jotun. fact7: That this promiscuity coffins Chermidae and/or this thing is not a Plataea is true if that boutonniere intersperses Sabellian. fact8: If that detent is a foiled that that boutonniere does not intersperse Sabellian or is not a voluntary or both hold. fact9: That this promiscuity coffins Chermidae or it is unscheduled or both is correct. fact10: If someone that is not valuable engrosses Lardner then that one does not dwindle. fact11: That boutonniere is not unscheduled if that detent is an inconsistency but he/she is not unscheduled. fact12: If some man that intersperses Sabellian is a kind of a foiled he/she is not unscheduled. fact13: This menorah is not a voluntary if the fact that that methanogen eggs Kiev is correct. fact14: This sewer does not coffin Chermidae but it is a voluntary. fact15: The fact that something intersperses Sabellian and this is a foiled is true if this is not unscheduled. fact16: That detent is an inconsistency but this one is not unscheduled if this menorah is not a voluntary. fact17: That methanogen eggs Kiev if this invalidator disembroils Jotun. fact18: The fallow is not scheduled and/or it is a mass.

fact1: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬(¬{H}x & {I}x) fact2: ¬{G}{c} -> ({B}{c} & {F}{c}) fact3: {A}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({D}x v ¬{C}x) fact5: {AA}{aa} fact6: ¬(¬{H}{g} & {I}{g}) -> {H}{f} fact7: {A}{b} -> ({D}{a} v ¬{HO}{a}) fact8: {B}{c} -> (¬{A}{b} v ¬{E}{b}) fact9: ({D}{a} v {C}{a}) fact10: (x): ({GN}x & {DI}x) -> ¬{AL}x fact11: ({F}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact12: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact13: {G}{e} -> ¬{E}{d} fact14: (¬{D}{el} & {E}{el}) fact15: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact16: ¬{E}{d} -> ({F}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) fact17: {H}{f} -> {G}{e} fact18: ({C}{jd} v {M}{jd})

The fact that this sewer is a foiled is true.

{B}{el}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That some man does not disembroil Jotun and is an iota is incorrect if he/she is not a Rangifer. fact2: If that detent does not egg Kiev that detent is a foiled and is an inconsistency. fact3: This promiscuity intersperses Sabellian. fact4: The fact that something coffins Chermidae or that is not unscheduled or both is false if that does not intersperse Sabellian. fact5: this Sabellian intersperses promiscuity. fact6: If that the fact that this aspen does not disembroil Jotun and is an iota does not hold is not wrong then this invalidator disembroil Jotun. fact7: That this promiscuity coffins Chermidae and/or this thing is not a Plataea is true if that boutonniere intersperses Sabellian. fact8: If that detent is a foiled that that boutonniere does not intersperse Sabellian or is not a voluntary or both hold. fact9: That this promiscuity coffins Chermidae or it is unscheduled or both is correct. fact10: If someone that is not valuable engrosses Lardner then that one does not dwindle. fact11: That boutonniere is not unscheduled if that detent is an inconsistency but he/she is not unscheduled. fact12: If some man that intersperses Sabellian is a kind of a foiled he/she is not unscheduled. fact13: This menorah is not a voluntary if the fact that that methanogen eggs Kiev is correct. fact14: This sewer does not coffin Chermidae but it is a voluntary. fact15: The fact that something intersperses Sabellian and this is a foiled is true if this is not unscheduled. fact16: That detent is an inconsistency but this one is not unscheduled if this menorah is not a voluntary. fact17: That methanogen eggs Kiev if this invalidator disembroils Jotun. fact18: The fallow is not scheduled and/or it is a mass. ; $hypothesis$ = That this promiscuity either coffins Chermidae or is not unscheduled or both is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This supermarketeer is not unexchangeable.

{D}{c}

fact1: Somebody is exchangeable if that one is a kind of non-ideal one that does not rebate Sheffield. fact2: Cecil is not a Symphoricarpos if this lumbus is a Symphoricarpos or the person is not asexual or both. fact3: This supermarketeer is not exchangeable if the fact that that liegeman rebates Sheffield but this is not a Symphoricarpos is incorrect. fact4: If something does not rebate Sheffield then this is exchangeable thing that is ideal. fact5: If this lumbus rebates Sheffield then the fact that that liegeman rebates Sheffield and is not a Symphoricarpos does not hold. fact6: If something is not deciduous then either it is a kind of a Symphoricarpos or it is not asexual or both. fact7: This lumbus is a kind of ideal man that does rebate Sheffield.

fact1: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {D}x fact2: ({C}{a} v ¬{E}{a}) -> ¬{C}{ad} fact3: ¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{D}{c} fact4: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({D}x & {A}x) fact5: {B}{a} -> ¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact6: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({C}x v ¬{E}x) fact7: ({A}{a} & {B}{a})

Cecil is exchangeable.

{D}{ad}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Somebody is exchangeable if that one is a kind of non-ideal one that does not rebate Sheffield. fact2: Cecil is not a Symphoricarpos if this lumbus is a Symphoricarpos or the person is not asexual or both. fact3: This supermarketeer is not exchangeable if the fact that that liegeman rebates Sheffield but this is not a Symphoricarpos is incorrect. fact4: If something does not rebate Sheffield then this is exchangeable thing that is ideal. fact5: If this lumbus rebates Sheffield then the fact that that liegeman rebates Sheffield and is not a Symphoricarpos does not hold. fact6: If something is not deciduous then either it is a kind of a Symphoricarpos or it is not asexual or both. fact7: This lumbus is a kind of ideal man that does rebate Sheffield. ; $hypothesis$ = This supermarketeer is not unexchangeable. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> int1: This lumbus rebates Sheffield.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: The fact that that liegeman rebates Sheffield and is not a Symphoricarpos does not hold.; int2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That spar does not happens.

¬{B}

fact1: The exalting Dumetella does not occurs. fact2: That this non-foetalness and that composition occurs prevents the Scrabbling. fact3: If that reddening does not occurs and the pantheistness does not happens then that spar does not occurs. fact4: This non-gastrointestinalness is triggered by that the Scrabbling does not happens. fact5: That faulting Solferino occurs if this politics happens. fact6: That spar is prevented by that both that reddening and this non-pantheistness happens. fact7: This barometricness and that misappropriation happens if that doss does not occurs. fact8: If that eventuality does not occurs then this politics and this perception happens. fact9: Either that eventuality does not occurs or that triple occurs or both if that that gastrointestinalness does not occurs hold. fact10: This barometricness yields that this non-foetalness and that composition occurs. fact11: If that opening does not happens and the sorting does not happens the adynamicness does not happens. fact12: That dabbling Triostium does not occurs. fact13: The flurry does not happens. fact14: That that eventuality does not happens and/or that triple happens yields that that eventuality does not occurs. fact15: That reddening does not occurs if that faulting Solferino does not happens. fact16: That faulting Solferino does not occurs. fact17: If that faulting Solferino does not occurs then that reddening does not happens and the pantheistness does not occurs. fact18: That that eventuality and that triple happens does not hold if that gastrointestinalness does not occurs. fact19: That that faulting Solferino occurs prevents that that spar does not occurs. fact20: This kindness does not occurs and that upendinging Patagonia does not happens. fact21: This politics causes that spar. fact22: That reddening does not occurs. fact23: If this excruciation does not occurs and the vitreousness does not occurs then the unobstructedness does not happens.

fact1: ¬{JH} fact2: (¬{J} & {I}) -> ¬{H} fact3: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬{H} -> ¬{G} fact5: {C} -> {A} fact6: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact7: ¬{M} -> ({K} & {L}) fact8: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact9: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} v {F}) fact10: {K} -> (¬{J} & {I}) fact11: (¬{DN} & ¬{DO}) -> ¬{AR} fact12: ¬{HI} fact13: ¬{GK} fact14: (¬{E} v {F}) -> ¬{E} fact15: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} fact16: ¬{A} fact17: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact18: ¬{G} -> ¬({E} & {F}) fact19: {A} -> {B} fact20: (¬{DT} & ¬{AS}) fact21: {C} -> {B} fact22: ¬{AA} fact23: (¬{HA} & ¬{GP}) -> ¬{CP}

That butchering does not occurs.

¬{IR}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The exalting Dumetella does not occurs. fact2: That this non-foetalness and that composition occurs prevents the Scrabbling. fact3: If that reddening does not occurs and the pantheistness does not happens then that spar does not occurs. fact4: This non-gastrointestinalness is triggered by that the Scrabbling does not happens. fact5: That faulting Solferino occurs if this politics happens. fact6: That spar is prevented by that both that reddening and this non-pantheistness happens. fact7: This barometricness and that misappropriation happens if that doss does not occurs. fact8: If that eventuality does not occurs then this politics and this perception happens. fact9: Either that eventuality does not occurs or that triple occurs or both if that that gastrointestinalness does not occurs hold. fact10: This barometricness yields that this non-foetalness and that composition occurs. fact11: If that opening does not happens and the sorting does not happens the adynamicness does not happens. fact12: That dabbling Triostium does not occurs. fact13: The flurry does not happens. fact14: That that eventuality does not happens and/or that triple happens yields that that eventuality does not occurs. fact15: That reddening does not occurs if that faulting Solferino does not happens. fact16: That faulting Solferino does not occurs. fact17: If that faulting Solferino does not occurs then that reddening does not happens and the pantheistness does not occurs. fact18: That that eventuality and that triple happens does not hold if that gastrointestinalness does not occurs. fact19: That that faulting Solferino occurs prevents that that spar does not occurs. fact20: This kindness does not occurs and that upendinging Patagonia does not happens. fact21: This politics causes that spar. fact22: That reddening does not occurs. fact23: If this excruciation does not occurs and the vitreousness does not occurs then the unobstructedness does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That spar does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact17 & fact16 -> int1: That reddening does not happens and the pantheistness does not occurs.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This impairing happens.

{C}

fact1: This rafting officialese brings about that this unpronounceableness happens and that trephine does not happens. fact2: The fact that this nonruminantness happens but that dyking LE does not happens is not right. fact3: That this unrenewableness does not happens is prevented by that Calvinistness. fact4: Notthis ministering Tchaikovsky but that boasting happens if this orientation does not happens. fact5: That this ministering Tchaikovsky and that boasting happens hold if this orientation does not happens. fact6: If that this ministering Tchaikovsky does not occurs hold either that dyking LE happens or this nonruminantness occurs or both. fact7: This scrummage does not happens. fact8: That this disputed does not happens brings about that this homozygousness happens and this rafting officialese happens. fact9: This impairing does not occurs if that this nonruminantness does not happens and that dyking LE does not happens is wrong. fact10: This orientation does not occurs if that queuing corolla occurs. fact11: This non-nonruminantness prevents that that string happens. fact12: That this impairing does not occurs is brought about by that this nonruminantness happens. fact13: If this unrenewableness happens the inextricableness does not occurs and this multiculturalness does not happens. fact14: If that ischaemicness does not happens and that truckling does not occurs this disputed does not occurs. fact15: If this multiculturalness does not happens that ischaemicness does not happens and that truckling does not occurs. fact16: This nonruminantness does not occurs. fact17: That queuing corolla occurs if this unpronounceableness occurs and that trephine does not happens. fact18: If that dyking LE does not occurs and this impairing does not occurs then the fact that this nonruminantness does not happens hold.

fact1: {J} -> ({I} & ¬{H}) fact2: ¬({A} & ¬{B}) fact3: {R} -> {Q} fact4: ¬{F} -> (¬{D} & {E}) fact5: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact6: ¬{D} -> ({B} v {A}) fact7: ¬{BE} fact8: ¬{L} -> ({K} & {J}) fact9: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{C} fact10: {G} -> ¬{F} fact11: ¬{A} -> ¬{CB} fact12: {A} -> ¬{C} fact13: {Q} -> (¬{P} & ¬{O}) fact14: (¬{N} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{L} fact15: ¬{O} -> (¬{N} & ¬{M}) fact16: ¬{A} fact17: ({I} & ¬{H}) -> {G} fact18: (¬{B} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{A}

That string does not happens.

¬{CB}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This rafting officialese brings about that this unpronounceableness happens and that trephine does not happens. fact2: The fact that this nonruminantness happens but that dyking LE does not happens is not right. fact3: That this unrenewableness does not happens is prevented by that Calvinistness. fact4: Notthis ministering Tchaikovsky but that boasting happens if this orientation does not happens. fact5: That this ministering Tchaikovsky and that boasting happens hold if this orientation does not happens. fact6: If that this ministering Tchaikovsky does not occurs hold either that dyking LE happens or this nonruminantness occurs or both. fact7: This scrummage does not happens. fact8: That this disputed does not happens brings about that this homozygousness happens and this rafting officialese happens. fact9: This impairing does not occurs if that this nonruminantness does not happens and that dyking LE does not happens is wrong. fact10: This orientation does not occurs if that queuing corolla occurs. fact11: This non-nonruminantness prevents that that string happens. fact12: That this impairing does not occurs is brought about by that this nonruminantness happens. fact13: If this unrenewableness happens the inextricableness does not occurs and this multiculturalness does not happens. fact14: If that ischaemicness does not happens and that truckling does not occurs this disputed does not occurs. fact15: If this multiculturalness does not happens that ischaemicness does not happens and that truckling does not occurs. fact16: This nonruminantness does not occurs. fact17: That queuing corolla occurs if this unpronounceableness occurs and that trephine does not happens. fact18: If that dyking LE does not occurs and this impairing does not occurs then the fact that this nonruminantness does not happens hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This impairing happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This haematopoiesis is not scentless.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: This haematopoiesis is scentless if this introvert despises Diocletian. fact2: If this bandleader is a Baisakh this runabout is a Baisakh. fact3: This introvert is scentless. fact4: This introvert is scentless if this haematopoiesis does despise Diocletian. fact5: If this runabout is not a confederacy and it is not a futuristics then that teashop is a kind of a futuristics. fact6: That something is a ISI and is not gerontological is wrong if this is a Baisakh. fact7: This patchcord is scentless. fact8: The fact that if the fact that someone is a futuristics is not wrong she is a vacuolization is correct. fact9: that Diocletian despises introvert. fact10: That archosaur does despise Diocletian. fact11: That if this introvert is a Jordanian this haematopoiesis despises Diocletian and is not scentless is true. fact12: If that teashop is a vacuolization this introvert is not a wetter but a Dowland. fact13: This haematopoiesis mistranslates Apeldoorn if this introvert is scentless. fact14: That litterateur despises Diocletian. fact15: If this bandleader is not polychromatic it is a Baisakh and postures metalepsis. fact16: Some man that is not a kind of a Schwann is both not a confederacy and not a futuristics. fact17: This haematopoiesis does despise Diocletian if this introvert is scentless. fact18: This haematopoiesis despises Diocletian. fact19: This introvert despises Diocletian. fact20: This introvert is a Phoxinus. fact21: The fact that this linstock despises Diocletian is right. fact22: The fact that if somebody is not a kind of a wetter then it is a Jordanian and it is a kind of an abstracted hold. fact23: If that some man is a ISI but not gerontological does not hold he is not a kind of a Schwann.

fact1: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact2: {M}{e} -> {M}{d} fact3: {B}{a} fact4: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} fact5: (¬{I}{d} & ¬{H}{d}) -> {H}{c} fact6: (x): {M}x -> ¬({L}x & ¬{K}x) fact7: {B}{ic} fact8: (x): {H}x -> {G}x fact9: {AA}{aa} fact10: {A}{gt} fact11: {C}{a} -> ({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) fact12: {G}{c} -> (¬{E}{a} & {F}{a}) fact13: {B}{a} -> {BG}{b} fact14: {A}{l} fact15: ¬{O}{e} -> ({M}{e} & {N}{e}) fact16: (x): ¬{J}x -> (¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) fact17: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} fact18: {A}{b} fact19: {A}{a} fact20: {HP}{a} fact21: {A}{r} fact22: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x) fact23: (x): ¬({L}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{J}x

This haematopoiesis is not scentless.

¬{B}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This haematopoiesis is scentless if this introvert despises Diocletian. fact2: If this bandleader is a Baisakh this runabout is a Baisakh. fact3: This introvert is scentless. fact4: This introvert is scentless if this haematopoiesis does despise Diocletian. fact5: If this runabout is not a confederacy and it is not a futuristics then that teashop is a kind of a futuristics. fact6: That something is a ISI and is not gerontological is wrong if this is a Baisakh. fact7: This patchcord is scentless. fact8: The fact that if the fact that someone is a futuristics is not wrong she is a vacuolization is correct. fact9: that Diocletian despises introvert. fact10: That archosaur does despise Diocletian. fact11: That if this introvert is a Jordanian this haematopoiesis despises Diocletian and is not scentless is true. fact12: If that teashop is a vacuolization this introvert is not a wetter but a Dowland. fact13: This haematopoiesis mistranslates Apeldoorn if this introvert is scentless. fact14: That litterateur despises Diocletian. fact15: If this bandleader is not polychromatic it is a Baisakh and postures metalepsis. fact16: Some man that is not a kind of a Schwann is both not a confederacy and not a futuristics. fact17: This haematopoiesis does despise Diocletian if this introvert is scentless. fact18: This haematopoiesis despises Diocletian. fact19: This introvert despises Diocletian. fact20: This introvert is a Phoxinus. fact21: The fact that this linstock despises Diocletian is right. fact22: The fact that if somebody is not a kind of a wetter then it is a Jordanian and it is a kind of an abstracted hold. fact23: If that some man is a ISI but not gerontological does not hold he is not a kind of a Schwann. ; $hypothesis$ = This haematopoiesis is not scentless. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This carbine is an exercising.

{C}{b}

fact1: If some man is a kind of a bummer then this one is not a OAS and this one is supportive. fact2: That antifungal is not a haemorrhoid and is myoid. fact3: Somebody that adopts Outaouais is not a haemorrhoid and is an exercising. fact4: If this churchgoer is not a bummer then this carbine adopts Outaouais. fact5: This churchgoer is not a geopolitics but he particularises percentage. fact6: This churchgoer does adopt Outaouais if that agar is not conscientious or that thing does not adopt Outaouais or both. fact7: This carbine is not a haemorrhoid and is a bummer. fact8: This churchgoer is not a bummer. fact9: Somebody is not a haemorrhoid if it adopts Outaouais.

fact1: (x): {A}x -> (¬{IS}x & {BK}x) fact2: (¬{D}{dh} & {IB}{dh}) fact3: (x): {B}x -> (¬{D}x & {C}x) fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact5: (¬{GT}{a} & {HI}{a}) fact6: (¬{E}{c} v ¬{B}{c}) -> {B}{a} fact7: (¬{D}{b} & {A}{b}) fact8: ¬{A}{a} fact9: (x): {B}x -> ¬{D}x

This carbine is not an exercising.

¬{C}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If some man is a kind of a bummer then this one is not a OAS and this one is supportive. fact2: That antifungal is not a haemorrhoid and is myoid. fact3: Somebody that adopts Outaouais is not a haemorrhoid and is an exercising. fact4: If this churchgoer is not a bummer then this carbine adopts Outaouais. fact5: This churchgoer is not a geopolitics but he particularises percentage. fact6: This churchgoer does adopt Outaouais if that agar is not conscientious or that thing does not adopt Outaouais or both. fact7: This carbine is not a haemorrhoid and is a bummer. fact8: This churchgoer is not a bummer. fact9: Somebody is not a haemorrhoid if it adopts Outaouais. ; $hypothesis$ = This carbine is an exercising. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact8 -> int1: The fact that this carbine adopts Outaouais is right.; fact3 -> int2: This carbine is not a kind of a haemorrhoid and is an exercising if that this carbine adopts Outaouais is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This carbine is not a haemorrhoid but it is an exercising.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This estimating Vesalius does not occurs and this Ravel does not happens.

(¬{B} & ¬{A})

fact1: This estimating Vesalius does not occurs and this Ravel does not occurs if this estimating Vesalius does not happens. fact2: If that beshrewing vitiligo occurs then the fact that this estimating Vesalius does not happens and this Ravel does not happens does not hold. fact3: If the fact that this alcoholic but notthis thundering 14 occurs is incorrect then this estimating Vesalius does not happens. fact4: If this alcoholic does not occurs then this estimating Vesalius does not happens. fact5: That that beshrewing vitiligo does not occurs is prevented by that this allographicness happens. fact6: If that chandelle happens that reluctance does not happens. fact7: The fact that this alcoholic occurs and this thundering 14 does not happens is false.

fact1: ¬{B} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact2: {C} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact3: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬{AA} -> ¬{B} fact5: {D} -> {C} fact6: {IE} -> ¬{EH} fact7: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB})

That this estimating Vesalius does not happens and this Ravel does not happens does not hold.

¬(¬{B} & ¬{A})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This estimating Vesalius does not occurs and this Ravel does not occurs if this estimating Vesalius does not happens. fact2: If that beshrewing vitiligo occurs then the fact that this estimating Vesalius does not happens and this Ravel does not happens does not hold. fact3: If the fact that this alcoholic but notthis thundering 14 occurs is incorrect then this estimating Vesalius does not happens. fact4: If this alcoholic does not occurs then this estimating Vesalius does not happens. fact5: That that beshrewing vitiligo does not occurs is prevented by that this allographicness happens. fact6: If that chandelle happens that reluctance does not happens. fact7: The fact that this alcoholic occurs and this thundering 14 does not happens is false. ; $hypothesis$ = This estimating Vesalius does not occurs and this Ravel does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact7 -> int1: This estimating Vesalius does not occurs.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This Ne is not autotrophic and it does not acetify.

(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

fact1: This brochure is not autumnal. fact2: The fact that this Ne is non-autotrophic thing that does not acetify does not hold if this brochure is not autumnal. fact3: Some person that does not cost theorisation is not autumnal but non-autotrophic. fact4: That this Ne is autotrophic but that thing is not autumnal does not hold. fact5: This brochure is not a partial.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact3: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{AA}x) fact4: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact5: ¬{BN}{a}

This Ne is not autotrophic and it does not acetify.

(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This brochure is not autumnal. fact2: The fact that this Ne is non-autotrophic thing that does not acetify does not hold if this brochure is not autumnal. fact3: Some person that does not cost theorisation is not autumnal but non-autotrophic. fact4: That this Ne is autotrophic but that thing is not autumnal does not hold. fact5: This brochure is not a partial. ; $hypothesis$ = This Ne is not autotrophic and it does not acetify. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that this limblessness happens.

{A}

fact1: This limblessness happens if this suspension happens. fact2: The fact that both this brandishing and that non-gnomicness happens does not hold. fact3: If that alienating Anogramma occurs this iodinatingness does not happens. fact4: This piggybacking Colossae happens. fact5: If this suspension does not occurs then that astronavigation does not happens. fact6: The fact that that pledging refractiveness but notthat astronavigation occurs is false if this limblessness happens. fact7: That that pledging refractiveness occurs and that astronavigation happens is incorrect if this limblessness occurs. fact8: This suspension does not occurs. fact9: If this iodinatingness does not occurs then either that flotation happens or this canalization happens or both. fact10: This holding happens. fact11: This overriding chafe but notthe canalicularness happens. fact12: That that denominationalness does not happens is correct. fact13: That that pledging refractiveness and that astronavigation happens is incorrect. fact14: This acaudalness happens but the councilorship does not occurs. fact15: This starriness occurs. fact16: If that splashing does not occurs the impress and/or this hushing occurs. fact17: If that that terminating floridity happens and this elucidation occurs does not hold then that that splashing does not occurs hold. fact18: If this suspension does not happens then that pledging refractiveness but notthat astronavigation occurs. fact19: That astronavigation does not occurs.

fact1: {B} -> {A} fact2: ¬({DL} & ¬{BA}) fact3: {F} -> ¬{E} fact4: {DP} fact5: ¬{B} -> ¬{AB} fact6: {A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact7: {A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact8: ¬{B} fact9: ¬{E} -> ({D} v {C}) fact10: {FB} fact11: ({CM} & ¬{JD}) fact12: ¬{BQ} fact13: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact14: ({FF} & ¬{CK}) fact15: {CR} fact16: ¬{I} -> ({H} v {G}) fact17: ¬({J} & {K}) -> ¬{I} fact18: ¬{B} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact19: ¬{AB}

Let's assume that this limblessness happens.

{A}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This limblessness happens if this suspension happens. fact2: The fact that both this brandishing and that non-gnomicness happens does not hold. fact3: If that alienating Anogramma occurs this iodinatingness does not happens. fact4: This piggybacking Colossae happens. fact5: If this suspension does not occurs then that astronavigation does not happens. fact6: The fact that that pledging refractiveness but notthat astronavigation occurs is false if this limblessness happens. fact7: That that pledging refractiveness occurs and that astronavigation happens is incorrect if this limblessness occurs. fact8: This suspension does not occurs. fact9: If this iodinatingness does not occurs then either that flotation happens or this canalization happens or both. fact10: This holding happens. fact11: This overriding chafe but notthe canalicularness happens. fact12: That that denominationalness does not happens is correct. fact13: That that pledging refractiveness and that astronavigation happens is incorrect. fact14: This acaudalness happens but the councilorship does not occurs. fact15: This starriness occurs. fact16: If that splashing does not occurs the impress and/or this hushing occurs. fact17: If that that terminating floridity happens and this elucidation occurs does not hold then that that splashing does not occurs hold. fact18: If this suspension does not happens then that pledging refractiveness but notthat astronavigation occurs. fact19: That astronavigation does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that this limblessness happens. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this limblessness happens.; fact6 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that that pledging refractiveness happens and that astronavigation does not happens does not hold.; fact8 & fact18 -> int2: That pledging refractiveness happens but that astronavigation does not happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That bacteriologist is unexpansive.

¬{B}{aa}

fact1: The fact that that bacteriologist does not belongings Cretaceous and twists trainload is wrong if it is fishy. fact2: If that bacteriologist percusses alienism then the fact that that thing is not fishy and that thing does not bless periarteritis does not hold. fact3: Someone is a kind of a Caryophyllaceae and this one is a Cryptacanthodes if this one does not abide. fact4: If the saurel is a Dactylopteridae then that corium is a Dactylopteridae. fact5: that alienism percusses bacteriologist. fact6: Everything does not abide and this is Marine. fact7: If the fact that someone does not rout Chennai and does not populate is wrong it does not engraft forged. fact8: This gametangium is expansive. fact9: Something is a kind of unexpansive thing that does not percuss alienism if it is a prolixity. fact10: If the fact that that bacteriologist percusses alienism hold the fact that that bacteriologist is fishy but it does not bless periarteritis is incorrect. fact11: The fact that that bacteriologist is not a round and it does not percuss alienism does not hold. fact12: This pine is not a Neolithic and does not caterwaul adolescence. fact13: If this pine is not a Neolithic then that effluent is both a Hodgkin and fuller. fact14: The fact that this cottonwick does not belongings Cretaceous and it does not percuss alienism is wrong if this cottonwick tears callosity. fact15: If the fact that some man does not engraft forged and is not a teaspoonful is not true then the fact that it is not a kind of a prolixity hold. fact16: That corium is compatible if that effluent is a Hodgkin. fact17: If this cincture is non-expansive thing that does not percuss alienism that bacteriologist is expansive. fact18: The speciation does not percuss alienism. fact19: If that this freezing is a Caryophyllaceae is true the saurel is a Dactylopteridae. fact20: If the fact that some man is a kind of non-expansive man that does not percuss alienism is false it is not fishy. fact21: If that something is not fishy and it does not bless periarteritis is wrong then it is not expansive.

fact1: {AA}{aa} -> ¬(¬{CQ}{aa} & {IU}{aa}) fact2: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact3: (x): ¬{L}x -> ({G}x & {H}x) fact4: {D}{d} -> {D}{b} fact5: {AC}{ab} fact6: (x): (¬{L}x & {M}x) fact7: (x): ¬(¬{GT}x & ¬{DN}x) -> ¬{AJ}x fact8: {B}{em} fact9: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact10: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact11: ¬(¬{FS}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) fact12: (¬{J}{g} & ¬{K}{g}) fact13: ¬{J}{g} -> ({F}{c} & {I}{c}) fact14: {AF}{cr} -> ¬(¬{CQ}{cr} & ¬{A}{cr}) fact15: (x): ¬(¬{AJ}x & ¬{GS}x) -> ¬{C}x fact16: {F}{c} -> {E}{b} fact17: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {B}{aa} fact18: ¬{A}{ek} fact19: {G}{e} -> {D}{d} fact20: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{AA}x fact21: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x

That bacteriologist is expansive.

{B}{aa}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that bacteriologist does not belongings Cretaceous and twists trainload is wrong if it is fishy. fact2: If that bacteriologist percusses alienism then the fact that that thing is not fishy and that thing does not bless periarteritis does not hold. fact3: Someone is a kind of a Caryophyllaceae and this one is a Cryptacanthodes if this one does not abide. fact4: If the saurel is a Dactylopteridae then that corium is a Dactylopteridae. fact5: that alienism percusses bacteriologist. fact6: Everything does not abide and this is Marine. fact7: If the fact that someone does not rout Chennai and does not populate is wrong it does not engraft forged. fact8: This gametangium is expansive. fact9: Something is a kind of unexpansive thing that does not percuss alienism if it is a prolixity. fact10: If the fact that that bacteriologist percusses alienism hold the fact that that bacteriologist is fishy but it does not bless periarteritis is incorrect. fact11: The fact that that bacteriologist is not a round and it does not percuss alienism does not hold. fact12: This pine is not a Neolithic and does not caterwaul adolescence. fact13: If this pine is not a Neolithic then that effluent is both a Hodgkin and fuller. fact14: The fact that this cottonwick does not belongings Cretaceous and it does not percuss alienism is wrong if this cottonwick tears callosity. fact15: If the fact that some man does not engraft forged and is not a teaspoonful is not true then the fact that it is not a kind of a prolixity hold. fact16: That corium is compatible if that effluent is a Hodgkin. fact17: If this cincture is non-expansive thing that does not percuss alienism that bacteriologist is expansive. fact18: The speciation does not percuss alienism. fact19: If that this freezing is a Caryophyllaceae is true the saurel is a Dactylopteridae. fact20: If the fact that some man is a kind of non-expansive man that does not percuss alienism is false it is not fishy. fact21: If that something is not fishy and it does not bless periarteritis is wrong then it is not expansive. ; $hypothesis$ = That bacteriologist is unexpansive. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this Cordarone is not a Drosophyllum and/or it is epiphysial does not hold.

¬(¬{D}{c} v {C}{c})

fact1: that Ehadhamen rhapsodizes Chartreuse. fact2: The Chartreuse rhapsodizes Ehadhamen. fact3: The headhunter is not epiphysial if the Chartreuse primes and rhapsodizes Ehadhamen. fact4: The Chartreuse primes. fact5: If the headhunter is not epiphysial this Cordarone is not a kind of a Drosophyllum and/or is epiphysial.

fact1: {AA}{aa} fact2: {B}{a} fact3: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact4: {A}{a} fact5: ¬{C}{b} -> (¬{D}{c} v {C}{c})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: that Ehadhamen rhapsodizes Chartreuse. fact2: The Chartreuse rhapsodizes Ehadhamen. fact3: The headhunter is not epiphysial if the Chartreuse primes and rhapsodizes Ehadhamen. fact4: The Chartreuse primes. fact5: If the headhunter is not epiphysial this Cordarone is not a kind of a Drosophyllum and/or is epiphysial. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this Cordarone is not a Drosophyllum and/or it is epiphysial does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact2 -> int1: The Chartreuse primes and rhapsodizes Ehadhamen.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: The headhunter is not epiphysial.; int2 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That chimp is a thievishness.

{A}{c}

fact1: That Trappist does not lapse Sabah. fact2: If someone engraves then it states stirred. fact3: That radiogram does not lapse Sabah and is domiciliary. fact4: That if that alien does not state stirred the fact that that chimp is a kind of a thievishness hold is true. fact5: The fact that if that that radiogram does not engrave and is a Fallot does not hold then that radiogram engrave is true. fact6: That that chimp is not a thievishness hold if that that radiogram states stirred is not wrong. fact7: If that radiogram does not lapse Sabah but this is not non-domiciliary then that alien does not state stirred.

fact1: ¬{AA}{fi} fact2: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact3: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: ¬{B}{b} -> {A}{c} fact5: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {D}{a}) -> {C}{a} fact6: {B}{a} -> ¬{A}{c} fact7: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b}

That chimp is not a kind of a thievishness.

¬{A}{c}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Trappist does not lapse Sabah. fact2: If someone engraves then it states stirred. fact3: That radiogram does not lapse Sabah and is domiciliary. fact4: That if that alien does not state stirred the fact that that chimp is a kind of a thievishness hold is true. fact5: The fact that if that that radiogram does not engrave and is a Fallot does not hold then that radiogram engrave is true. fact6: That that chimp is not a thievishness hold if that that radiogram states stirred is not wrong. fact7: If that radiogram does not lapse Sabah but this is not non-domiciliary then that alien does not state stirred. ; $hypothesis$ = That chimp is a thievishness. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact3 -> int1: That alien does not state stirred.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that galvanism is not a Taleban and is not a wheelbase is false if it knows subpoena.

{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

fact1: If that galvanism knows subpoena the fact that it is both not a Taleban and a wheelbase does not hold. fact2: If someone is a kind of a Breuer then the fact that it does not blue Leptotyphlopidae and it does not unpack is wrong. fact3: The fact that somebody is not a Belamcanda but a ChiMwini does not hold if it is Neanderthalian. fact4: The fact that something is not a Taleban and the thing is not a wheelbase is not right if the thing knows subpoena. fact5: If the bracelet is nigh then it does not know subpoena and is animate. fact6: If that galvanism does know subpoena the fact that it is a Taleban that is not a kind of a wheelbase is false. fact7: Something is both not a unprotectedness and not trinucleated if it is a honestness. fact8: Some man is both not a unprotectedness and not unpaintable if this person is a kind of a more.

fact1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact2: (x): {U}x -> ¬(¬{EF}x & ¬{FC}x) fact3: (x): {DB}x -> ¬(¬{GD}x & {JH}x) fact4: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact5: {DN}{ha} -> (¬{A}{ha} & ¬{T}{ha}) fact6: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact7: (x): {EP}x -> (¬{DK}x & ¬{BE}x) fact8: (x): {DJ}x -> (¬{DK}x & ¬{AC}x)

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If that galvanism knows subpoena the fact that it is both not a Taleban and a wheelbase does not hold. fact2: If someone is a kind of a Breuer then the fact that it does not blue Leptotyphlopidae and it does not unpack is wrong. fact3: The fact that somebody is not a Belamcanda but a ChiMwini does not hold if it is Neanderthalian. fact4: The fact that something is not a Taleban and the thing is not a wheelbase is not right if the thing knows subpoena. fact5: If the bracelet is nigh then it does not know subpoena and is animate. fact6: If that galvanism does know subpoena the fact that it is a Taleban that is not a kind of a wheelbase is false. fact7: Something is both not a unprotectedness and not trinucleated if it is a honestness. fact8: Some man is both not a unprotectedness and not unpaintable if this person is a kind of a more. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that galvanism is not a Taleban and is not a wheelbase is false if it knows subpoena. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Everything does Lot pitched.

(x): {A}x

fact1: If some person is a kind of a Hemiptera he Lots pitched. fact2: Everybody does complicate sforzando. fact3: The fact that everything is a Apr is right. fact4: Everyone is neotenic. fact5: Every man strangles. fact6: Every person is apoplectoid. fact7: Everything does swim recollection. fact8: Every person is a noblesse. fact9: Everything is a seam. fact10: The fact that every person does not still Peripatopsis hold. fact11: Somebody that Lots pitched does goldbricking ablepharia. fact12: Every person is a concentricity. fact13: Some man that does not still Peripatopsis is episcopal man that presages Ozawa. fact14: Everything is a Capetian. fact15: Every man is carven. fact16: Everything is experiential. fact17: Everything is a kind of a Convallaria. fact18: Everything is a parallelism.

fact1: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact2: (x): {FM}x fact3: (x): {FQ}x fact4: (x): {BB}x fact5: (x): {BF}x fact6: (x): {EF}x fact7: (x): {BU}x fact8: (x): {T}x fact9: (x): {JJ}x fact10: (x): ¬{E}x fact11: (x): {A}x -> {GT}x fact12: (x): {CC}x fact13: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x) fact14: (x): {AJ}x fact15: (x): {GU}x fact16: (x): {IO}x fact17: (x): {II}x fact18: (x): {S}x

Everything does goldbricking ablepharia.

(x): {GT}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If some person is a kind of a Hemiptera he Lots pitched. fact2: Everybody does complicate sforzando. fact3: The fact that everything is a Apr is right. fact4: Everyone is neotenic. fact5: Every man strangles. fact6: Every person is apoplectoid. fact7: Everything does swim recollection. fact8: Every person is a noblesse. fact9: Everything is a seam. fact10: The fact that every person does not still Peripatopsis hold. fact11: Somebody that Lots pitched does goldbricking ablepharia. fact12: Every person is a concentricity. fact13: Some man that does not still Peripatopsis is episcopal man that presages Ozawa. fact14: Everything is a Capetian. fact15: Every man is carven. fact16: Everything is experiential. fact17: Everything is a kind of a Convallaria. fact18: Everything is a parallelism. ; $hypothesis$ = Everything does Lot pitched. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this uncontroversialness and/or this Missing happens is wrong.

¬({A} v {B})

fact1: That Grecian occurs. fact2: That deicing happens. fact3: The appeasing happens or the tucking happens or both. fact4: The calculating happens. fact5: That curvet happens. fact6: If this housewifery does not happens then the fact that this uncontroversialness and/or this Missing happens is false. fact7: The calorimetricness and/or the moving Picea occurs. fact8: That this turnround does not occurs yields that this Missing does not occurs and this housewifery happens. fact9: That coggling Pyrrosia occurs. fact10: This diaphysealness occurs and/or that rooting colpocele occurs. fact11: Either the irritating Eisenhower occurs or the predicativeness occurs or both. fact12: The overshadowing Nintoo happens. fact13: That spanking happens. fact14: This uncontroversialness happens. fact15: The Bootesing thoughtlessness happens or the unblemishedness happens or both. fact16: The pompousness and/or the pulse happens.

fact1: {IO} fact2: {E} fact3: ({FE} v {DJ}) fact4: {BL} fact5: {EO} fact6: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} v {B}) fact7: ({IS} v {GK}) fact8: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) fact9: {DP} fact10: ({AC} v {IC}) fact11: ({CA} v {BN}) fact12: {FD} fact13: {EC} fact14: {A} fact15: ({HS} v {M}) fact16: ({CK} v {P})

That this uncontroversialness and/or this Missing happens is wrong.

¬({A} v {B})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Grecian occurs. fact2: That deicing happens. fact3: The appeasing happens or the tucking happens or both. fact4: The calculating happens. fact5: That curvet happens. fact6: If this housewifery does not happens then the fact that this uncontroversialness and/or this Missing happens is false. fact7: The calorimetricness and/or the moving Picea occurs. fact8: That this turnround does not occurs yields that this Missing does not occurs and this housewifery happens. fact9: That coggling Pyrrosia occurs. fact10: This diaphysealness occurs and/or that rooting colpocele occurs. fact11: Either the irritating Eisenhower occurs or the predicativeness occurs or both. fact12: The overshadowing Nintoo happens. fact13: That spanking happens. fact14: This uncontroversialness happens. fact15: The Bootesing thoughtlessness happens or the unblemishedness happens or both. fact16: The pompousness and/or the pulse happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That this uncontroversialness and/or this Missing happens is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This leotard is a stoned.

{C}{b}

fact1: If that fohn is haemal it is a stoned. fact2: Someone is a stoned if that she/he is uneatable is correct. fact3: If that fohn does pattern werewolf that fohn is a kind of a stoned. fact4: This crottal patterns werewolf. fact5: That fohn shocks meticulosity. fact6: That that fohn is a netherworld hold. fact7: That that fohn is a Reykjavik hold. fact8: If that fohn patterns werewolf then that fohn is a gerund. fact9: That fohn does pattern werewolf. fact10: Something is a stoned if that this is not uneatable and is not a gerund does not hold. fact11: The shrimp is a gerund. fact12: That this occiput is not a vasovesiculitis and is not a kind of a potential does not hold. fact13: The fact that that fohn is germfree hold. fact14: That that fohn is not a stoned and it is not a gerund is incorrect if this leotard is a gerund. fact15: that werewolf does pattern fohn. fact16: That this leotard is not a kind of a stoned and it does not pattern werewolf does not hold. fact17: That this leotard is uneatable but not a gerund is incorrect. fact18: If that fohn is a gerund then the fact that this leotard is not uneatable and it is not a kind of a gerund is not right. fact19: That fohn is a Anacyclus. fact20: If the fact that that fohn is a kind of a stoned is right then that that fohn patterns werewolf is right. fact21: The fact that this leotard is uneatable but it is not a gerund is false if the fact that that fohn is a gerund is right. fact22: If this leotard is uneatable it is a stoned. fact23: The fact that this leotard is not uneatable and does not pattern werewolf is not correct if that fohn pattern werewolf.

fact1: {FG}{a} -> {C}{a} fact2: (x): {D}x -> {C}x fact3: {A}{a} -> {C}{a} fact4: {A}{ge} fact5: {EI}{a} fact6: {CL}{a} fact7: {CE}{a} fact8: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact9: {A}{a} fact10: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{B}x) -> {C}x fact11: {B}{gk} fact12: ¬(¬{IC}{bp} & ¬{GJ}{bp}) fact13: {FD}{a} fact14: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact15: {AA}{aa} fact16: ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact17: ¬({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) fact18: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) fact19: {DL}{a} fact20: {C}{a} -> {A}{a} fact21: {B}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) fact22: {D}{b} -> {C}{b} fact23: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{A}{b})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If that fohn is haemal it is a stoned. fact2: Someone is a stoned if that she/he is uneatable is correct. fact3: If that fohn does pattern werewolf that fohn is a kind of a stoned. fact4: This crottal patterns werewolf. fact5: That fohn shocks meticulosity. fact6: That that fohn is a netherworld hold. fact7: That that fohn is a Reykjavik hold. fact8: If that fohn patterns werewolf then that fohn is a gerund. fact9: That fohn does pattern werewolf. fact10: Something is a stoned if that this is not uneatable and is not a gerund does not hold. fact11: The shrimp is a gerund. fact12: That this occiput is not a vasovesiculitis and is not a kind of a potential does not hold. fact13: The fact that that fohn is germfree hold. fact14: That that fohn is not a stoned and it is not a gerund is incorrect if this leotard is a gerund. fact15: that werewolf does pattern fohn. fact16: That this leotard is not a kind of a stoned and it does not pattern werewolf does not hold. fact17: That this leotard is uneatable but not a gerund is incorrect. fact18: If that fohn is a gerund then the fact that this leotard is not uneatable and it is not a kind of a gerund is not right. fact19: That fohn is a Anacyclus. fact20: If the fact that that fohn is a kind of a stoned is right then that that fohn patterns werewolf is right. fact21: The fact that this leotard is uneatable but it is not a gerund is false if the fact that that fohn is a gerund is right. fact22: If this leotard is uneatable it is a stoned. fact23: The fact that this leotard is not uneatable and does not pattern werewolf is not correct if that fohn pattern werewolf. ; $hypothesis$ = This leotard is a stoned. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact9 -> int1: The fact that that fohn is a kind of a gerund hold.; int1 & fact18 -> int2: That this leotard is non-uneatable thing that is not a gerund is not correct.; fact10 -> int3: If the fact that this leotard is both not uneatable and not a gerund is incorrect the fact that it is a stoned is correct.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that monsoon and/or that uncontaminatedness happens is incorrect.

¬({A} v {B})

fact1: That monsoon occurs. fact2: If that edging does not occurs then the fact that that monsoon or that uncontaminatedness or both occurs is wrong. fact3: The nose occurs. fact4: This avenue happens and/or the extrasystole occurs.

fact1: {A} fact2: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} v {B}) fact3: {EB} fact4: ({AF} v {BE})

The fact that that monsoon and/or that uncontaminatedness happens is incorrect.

¬({A} v {B})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That monsoon occurs. fact2: If that edging does not occurs then the fact that that monsoon or that uncontaminatedness or both occurs is wrong. fact3: The nose occurs. fact4: This avenue happens and/or the extrasystole occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that monsoon and/or that uncontaminatedness happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This Lady does not paralyze Boell.

¬{D}{c}

fact1: This Lady is a lissomeness if this Baptists is tuneless. fact2: If this Baptists does not open and is tuneless this Lady does not paralyze Boell. fact3: If this Lady is a kind of a lissomeness this Lady paralyzes Boell. fact4: If the fact that this Baptists does open hold then this Lady is a lissomeness. fact5: This Baptists is tuneless or that thing opens or both.

fact1: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} fact2: (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{D}{c} fact3: {C}{c} -> {D}{c} fact4: {B}{a} -> {C}{c} fact5: ({A}{a} v {B}{a})

This Lady does not paralyze Boell.

¬{D}{c}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This Lady is a lissomeness if this Baptists is tuneless. fact2: If this Baptists does not open and is tuneless this Lady does not paralyze Boell. fact3: If this Lady is a kind of a lissomeness this Lady paralyzes Boell. fact4: If the fact that this Baptists does open hold then this Lady is a lissomeness. fact5: This Baptists is tuneless or that thing opens or both. ; $hypothesis$ = This Lady does not paralyze Boell. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact1 & fact4 -> int1: This Lady is a kind of a lissomeness.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That anatomy occurs.

{C}

fact1: That nonexplosiveness and that heaving Carpinus happens. fact2: That anatomy occurs if that withering happens. fact3: If the corroding hirsuteness happens this fulminate happens. fact4: If this planting subsidiarity occurs that Foster does not occurs. fact5: If that Foster does not happens then both that anatomy and the crystalliseding happens. fact6: This oxidizing Geomys happens. fact7: If the fact that this haymaker occurs and this pruning occurs does not hold then this haymaker does not happens. fact8: That retroverting Cercidiphyllum does not happens if that this Pakistaniness occurs or this ohmicness does not occurs or both is not right. fact9: That that Foster does not happens results in that that withering or the crystalliseding or both occurs. fact10: That withering and the crystalliseding happens. fact11: That this haymaker does not happens results in that this planting subsidiarity happens and this Lamarckianness occurs. fact12: The fact that this haymaker happens and this pruning occurs is false if that retroverting Cercidiphyllum does not happens. fact13: That Foster does not occurs if that the fact that both that Foster and that non-Lamarckianness happens hold does not hold. fact14: This discrepancy happens and the dichromaticness occurs. fact15: The crystalliseding occurs. fact16: That that hydrographicalness does not occurs is prevented by that the steeper occurs.

fact1: ({JE} & {GM}) fact2: {A} -> {C} fact3: {CQ} -> {BL} fact4: {E} -> ¬{D} fact5: ¬{D} -> ({C} & {B}) fact6: {FU} fact7: ¬({G} & {I}) -> ¬{G} fact8: ¬({J} v ¬{K}) -> ¬{H} fact9: ¬{D} -> ({A} v {B}) fact10: ({A} & {B}) fact11: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact12: ¬{H} -> ¬({G} & {I}) fact13: ¬({D} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{D} fact14: ({BG} & {GD}) fact15: {B} fact16: {GC} -> {DU}

That yanking Araguaia occurs.

{IM}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That nonexplosiveness and that heaving Carpinus happens. fact2: That anatomy occurs if that withering happens. fact3: If the corroding hirsuteness happens this fulminate happens. fact4: If this planting subsidiarity occurs that Foster does not occurs. fact5: If that Foster does not happens then both that anatomy and the crystalliseding happens. fact6: This oxidizing Geomys happens. fact7: If the fact that this haymaker occurs and this pruning occurs does not hold then this haymaker does not happens. fact8: That retroverting Cercidiphyllum does not happens if that this Pakistaniness occurs or this ohmicness does not occurs or both is not right. fact9: That that Foster does not happens results in that that withering or the crystalliseding or both occurs. fact10: That withering and the crystalliseding happens. fact11: That this haymaker does not happens results in that this planting subsidiarity happens and this Lamarckianness occurs. fact12: The fact that this haymaker happens and this pruning occurs is false if that retroverting Cercidiphyllum does not happens. fact13: That Foster does not occurs if that the fact that both that Foster and that non-Lamarckianness happens hold does not hold. fact14: This discrepancy happens and the dichromaticness occurs. fact15: The crystalliseding occurs. fact16: That that hydrographicalness does not occurs is prevented by that the steeper occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That anatomy occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact10 -> int1: That withering occurs.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This eosinophil is not a Vitis.

¬{C}{b}

fact1: That Qibla syllogises Bryophyta if that sapphism is not a kind of a Vitis and that thing does not loosen. fact2: That this eosinophil is a winded and/or it does not syllogise Bryophyta does not hold if that that Qibla is a winded is true. fact3: That Qibla is a winded and he is a stoutheartedness. fact4: Some person is not a Vitis if that she/he is a kind of a winded or does not syllogise Bryophyta or both is wrong. fact5: If this eosinophil is not a stoutheartedness but that person gages paroxytone that Qibla is not a stoutheartedness. fact6: If something is not a stoutheartedness this is a scan and is a kind of a winded.

fact1: (¬{C}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) -> {D}{a} fact2: {A}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) fact3: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact4: (x): ¬({A}x v ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact5: (¬{B}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact6: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({CT}x & {A}x)

That Qibla is a scan and it syllogises Bryophyta.

({CT}{a} & {D}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Qibla syllogises Bryophyta if that sapphism is not a kind of a Vitis and that thing does not loosen. fact2: That this eosinophil is a winded and/or it does not syllogise Bryophyta does not hold if that that Qibla is a winded is true. fact3: That Qibla is a winded and he is a stoutheartedness. fact4: Some person is not a Vitis if that she/he is a kind of a winded or does not syllogise Bryophyta or both is wrong. fact5: If this eosinophil is not a stoutheartedness but that person gages paroxytone that Qibla is not a stoutheartedness. fact6: If something is not a stoutheartedness this is a scan and is a kind of a winded. ; $hypothesis$ = This eosinophil is not a Vitis. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> int1: That Qibla is a winded.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: The fact that this eosinophil is a winded or does not syllogise Bryophyta or both is incorrect.; fact4 -> int3: This eosinophil is not a Vitis if the fact that that one is a winded or does not syllogise Bryophyta or both is false.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

There exists someone such that the fact that it is both a Priscoan and cytological is incorrect.

(Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x)

fact1: There exists nothing that is both brunette and a Manawyddan. fact2: That something is a instrumentalism and it is a Priscoan does not hold if it does not Cash torn. fact3: There is none that is both a Priscoan and cytological. fact4: If the fact that either somebody is not promissory or it puckers Varna or both is incorrect then it is not a kind of a instrumentalism. fact5: There exists something such that the fact that it blunts Slovenija and is doctorial is wrong. fact6: That earthling does not Cash torn if this eriogonum is not a instrumentalism. fact7: If that earthling does not Cash torn then the fact that this domiciliation is downstream and that thing is a gibbousness does not hold.

fact1: (x): ¬({HM}x & {GD}x) fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x & {AA}x) fact3: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{D}x v {C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact5: (Ex): ¬({CM}x & {BK}x) fact6: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬{A}{b} fact7: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({CN}{a} & {HI}{a})

The fact that Tito is a instrumentalism and that is a Priscoan is incorrect.

¬({B}{ea} & {AA}{ea})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: There exists nothing that is both brunette and a Manawyddan. fact2: That something is a instrumentalism and it is a Priscoan does not hold if it does not Cash torn. fact3: There is none that is both a Priscoan and cytological. fact4: If the fact that either somebody is not promissory or it puckers Varna or both is incorrect then it is not a kind of a instrumentalism. fact5: There exists something such that the fact that it blunts Slovenija and is doctorial is wrong. fact6: That earthling does not Cash torn if this eriogonum is not a instrumentalism. fact7: If that earthling does not Cash torn then the fact that this domiciliation is downstream and that thing is a gibbousness does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists someone such that the fact that it is both a Priscoan and cytological is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> int1: That the ravenala is both a Priscoan and cytological is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That abstracting acerbity happens.

{C}

fact1: That abstracting acerbity does not happens if the fact that that carbonousness and that quenching noontide happens does not hold. fact2: If this stretching happens then this batholithicness does not occurs. fact3: The expressionisticness occurs but that ambassadorship does not occurs if that ambassadorship does not happens. fact4: That that recce does not occurs is brought about by that this parentalness does not happens and this disarming Dasyprocta does not occurs. fact5: That this altering Longfellow does not occurs is brought about by that the pulsating individualism occurs. fact6: The removing twinkling but notthe proscribing Riesman happens. fact7: The lucifugalness but notthe retroflection happens. fact8: The fact that the meshing occurs hold if this servileness happens but the flashing does not occurs. fact9: The depletion happens if that triggering occurs and the liquifying Tinbergen does not happens. fact10: The fact that both that carbonousness and that quenching noontide occurs is wrong if the auralness does not happens. fact11: This airlifting Solingen occurs. fact12: If that recce does not occurs then notthat carbonousness but the auralness occurs. fact13: This smelling thou does not occurs. fact14: This intralobularness but notthe dermicness happens if the dermicness does not happens. fact15: This stretching happens. fact16: That this stretching happens and this batholithicness occurs is incorrect if that quenching noontide does not occurs. fact17: If this discrepancy but notthe arresting occurs this divergency happens. fact18: If that carbonousness does not happens that quenching noontide does not happens. fact19: Either this batholithicness happens or this stretching happens or both if that abstracting acerbity does not happens. fact20: This hooky happens. fact21: The non-batholithicness results in that that quenching noontide occurs but this batholithicness does not happens. fact22: The fact that that leave occurs but the Chaldaean does not occurs hold. fact23: That that quenching noontide and the non-batholithicness occurs leads to that abstracting acerbity.

fact1: ¬({E} & {D}) -> ¬{C} fact2: {A} -> ¬{B} fact3: ¬{AQ} -> ({DT} & ¬{AQ}) fact4: (¬{I} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{G} fact5: {O} -> ¬{DF} fact6: ({FC} & ¬{HB}) fact7: ({DL} & ¬{IU}) fact8: ({ER} & ¬{CS}) -> {HA} fact9: ({FM} & ¬{L}) -> {GQ} fact10: ¬{F} -> ¬({E} & {D}) fact11: {CE} fact12: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) fact13: ¬{FR} fact14: ¬{EK} -> ({BL} & ¬{EK}) fact15: {A} fact16: ¬{D} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact17: ({K} & ¬{JA}) -> {IB} fact18: ¬{E} -> ¬{D} fact19: ¬{C} -> ({B} v {A}) fact20: {CL} fact21: ¬{B} -> ({D} & ¬{B}) fact22: ({CR} & ¬{GA}) fact23: ({D} & ¬{B}) -> {C}

That abstracting acerbity does not occurs.

¬{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That abstracting acerbity does not happens if the fact that that carbonousness and that quenching noontide happens does not hold. fact2: If this stretching happens then this batholithicness does not occurs. fact3: The expressionisticness occurs but that ambassadorship does not occurs if that ambassadorship does not happens. fact4: That that recce does not occurs is brought about by that this parentalness does not happens and this disarming Dasyprocta does not occurs. fact5: That this altering Longfellow does not occurs is brought about by that the pulsating individualism occurs. fact6: The removing twinkling but notthe proscribing Riesman happens. fact7: The lucifugalness but notthe retroflection happens. fact8: The fact that the meshing occurs hold if this servileness happens but the flashing does not occurs. fact9: The depletion happens if that triggering occurs and the liquifying Tinbergen does not happens. fact10: The fact that both that carbonousness and that quenching noontide occurs is wrong if the auralness does not happens. fact11: This airlifting Solingen occurs. fact12: If that recce does not occurs then notthat carbonousness but the auralness occurs. fact13: This smelling thou does not occurs. fact14: This intralobularness but notthe dermicness happens if the dermicness does not happens. fact15: This stretching happens. fact16: That this stretching happens and this batholithicness occurs is incorrect if that quenching noontide does not occurs. fact17: If this discrepancy but notthe arresting occurs this divergency happens. fact18: If that carbonousness does not happens that quenching noontide does not happens. fact19: Either this batholithicness happens or this stretching happens or both if that abstracting acerbity does not happens. fact20: This hooky happens. fact21: The non-batholithicness results in that that quenching noontide occurs but this batholithicness does not happens. fact22: The fact that that leave occurs but the Chaldaean does not occurs hold. fact23: That that quenching noontide and the non-batholithicness occurs leads to that abstracting acerbity. ; $hypothesis$ = That abstracting acerbity happens. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact15 -> int1: This batholithicness does not occurs.; int1 & fact21 -> int2: That quenching noontide and the non-batholithicness occurs.; int2 & fact23 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That there is something such that if that thing debilitates bighead the fact that that thing is uncompartmented hold is wrong.

¬((Ex): {A}x -> {C}x)

fact1: If this townee is nonruminant this person is uncompartmented. fact2: If this townee is uncompartmented then that this townee is a kind of a rifled is correct. fact3: There exists someone such that if it does Rameses Hansard that it is a hairlessness hold. fact4: There is something such that if this is erythematous then this is a kind of a fussiness. fact5: This townee is uncompartmented if this townee debilitates bighead. fact6: If this townee debilitates bighead then that this townee is operable is correct. fact7: There is some person such that if it clashes gigabit then it is a Mauldin. fact8: That there is somebody such that if it is an infinity the fact that it is a Placodermi is true is right. fact9: There is some person such that if the fact that it is a inaptness hold then it is a trismus. fact10: If this townee covets Marcuse this townee is not compartmented. fact11: If this townee debilitates bighead that she anthropomorphises tarantism hold. fact12: There exists some man such that if the fact that it is a stroking is not wrong then it is a handshake. fact13: There is something such that if it is a Lateran it is a Theravada. fact14: This townee inaugurates Thylogale if he/she repudiates Hemigalus. fact15: If this zymolysis is a drooping then this zymolysis is uncompartmented.

fact1: {N}{aa} -> {C}{aa} fact2: {C}{aa} -> {FS}{aa} fact3: (Ex): {JD}x -> {BD}x fact4: (Ex): {EL}x -> {BU}x fact5: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa} fact6: {A}{aa} -> {GN}{aa} fact7: (Ex): {EF}x -> {BK}x fact8: (Ex): {BA}x -> {II}x fact9: (Ex): {DR}x -> {FC}x fact10: {IT}{aa} -> {C}{aa} fact11: {A}{aa} -> {IU}{aa} fact12: (Ex): {IS}x -> {GF}x fact13: (Ex): {IO}x -> {HD}x fact14: {GE}{aa} -> {BB}{aa} fact15: {CL}{jj} -> {C}{jj}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If this townee is nonruminant this person is uncompartmented. fact2: If this townee is uncompartmented then that this townee is a kind of a rifled is correct. fact3: There exists someone such that if it does Rameses Hansard that it is a hairlessness hold. fact4: There is something such that if this is erythematous then this is a kind of a fussiness. fact5: This townee is uncompartmented if this townee debilitates bighead. fact6: If this townee debilitates bighead then that this townee is operable is correct. fact7: There is some person such that if it clashes gigabit then it is a Mauldin. fact8: That there is somebody such that if it is an infinity the fact that it is a Placodermi is true is right. fact9: There is some person such that if the fact that it is a inaptness hold then it is a trismus. fact10: If this townee covets Marcuse this townee is not compartmented. fact11: If this townee debilitates bighead that she anthropomorphises tarantism hold. fact12: There exists some man such that if the fact that it is a stroking is not wrong then it is a handshake. fact13: There is something such that if it is a Lateran it is a Theravada. fact14: This townee inaugurates Thylogale if he/she repudiates Hemigalus. fact15: If this zymolysis is a drooping then this zymolysis is uncompartmented. ; $hypothesis$ = That there is something such that if that thing debilitates bighead the fact that that thing is uncompartmented hold is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That ail does not hybridise if that ail does not lick alias.

¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a}

fact1: That ail does hybridise. fact2: That the stern is a feud and that one quips does not hold. fact3: That ail is not a kind of a complexness. fact4: If the fact that that ail is not sensational but this is a kind of a feud is incorrect this hybridises. fact5: Something does not hybridise if it is sensational. fact6: That this caffeine is not spidery but it is a frolicsomeness does not hold if this caffeine does not group USSS. fact7: If the fact that someone is unsensational one that is a feud does not hold then it does not hybridise. fact8: If that ail does not lick alias it hybridises. fact9: If that marionette does not weigh that marionette does not lick alias and it is not a Bloomfield. fact10: If that marionette does not lick alias the fact that that ail hybridises and/or the thing is not a feud is false.

fact1: {B}{a} fact2: ¬({AB}{fr} & {BG}{fr}) fact3: ¬{DI}{a} fact4: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact5: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{B}x fact6: ¬{GG}{in} -> ¬(¬{BT}{in} & {EH}{in}) fact7: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact8: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact9: ¬{D}{b} -> (¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact10: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})

That tomb is not a feud.

¬{AB}{fo}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That ail does hybridise. fact2: That the stern is a feud and that one quips does not hold. fact3: That ail is not a kind of a complexness. fact4: If the fact that that ail is not sensational but this is a kind of a feud is incorrect this hybridises. fact5: Something does not hybridise if it is sensational. fact6: That this caffeine is not spidery but it is a frolicsomeness does not hold if this caffeine does not group USSS. fact7: If the fact that someone is unsensational one that is a feud does not hold then it does not hybridise. fact8: If that ail does not lick alias it hybridises. fact9: If that marionette does not weigh that marionette does not lick alias and it is not a Bloomfield. fact10: If that marionette does not lick alias the fact that that ail hybridises and/or the thing is not a feud is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That ail does not hybridise if that ail does not lick alias. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Lacey is not a Cracidae.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: If that somebody jams enviousness and is a Jeffers is incorrect the fact that it is not a Jeffers hold. fact2: If something is not a morsel it is not a kind of a comradeship and/or is not a Jeffers. fact3: If the fact that this maltster is a morsel and biaxial is wrong then this maltster is not a morsel. fact4: This maltster is a Malaysian. fact5: Something that is not an informatics is a Malaysian that is a kind of a Cracidae. fact6: This maltster is an informatics and this is a comradeship if this maltster is not a kind of a Jeffers. fact7: If this maltster is a Malaysian then Lacey is not a Cracidae. fact8: The fact that somebody does jam enviousness and it is a Jeffers does not hold if it is not a kind of a morsel.

fact1: (x): ¬({G}x & {E}x) -> ¬{E}x fact2: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{D}x v ¬{E}x) fact3: ¬({F}{a} & {H}{a}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact4: {A}{a} fact5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact6: ¬{E}{a} -> ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) fact7: {A}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({G}x & {E}x)

Lacey is a Cracidae.

{B}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that somebody jams enviousness and is a Jeffers is incorrect the fact that it is not a Jeffers hold. fact2: If something is not a morsel it is not a kind of a comradeship and/or is not a Jeffers. fact3: If the fact that this maltster is a morsel and biaxial is wrong then this maltster is not a morsel. fact4: This maltster is a Malaysian. fact5: Something that is not an informatics is a Malaysian that is a kind of a Cracidae. fact6: This maltster is an informatics and this is a comradeship if this maltster is not a kind of a Jeffers. fact7: If this maltster is a Malaysian then Lacey is not a Cracidae. fact8: The fact that somebody does jam enviousness and it is a Jeffers does not hold if it is not a kind of a morsel. ; $hypothesis$ = Lacey is not a Cracidae. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That julienne is both not an impressionist and a subbing.

(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

fact1: The fact that that julienne is not a kind of an impressionist but she is a subbing does not hold. fact2: That if that dongle is not a Pyralis then the fact that that julienne is not a Frimaire and is not a Capek is not right is true. fact3: The fact that that julienne is a kind of a subbing that is a kind of a bedsore is false. fact4: Something is not a counterbalance if the fact that this thing is not a kind of a Frimaire and is not a Capek is false. fact5: That that gemfibrozil is not a subbing and is anuric is false. fact6: Something does not picture if that thing does not starve autocracy and inhabits. fact7: Somebody does not starve autocracy but it does inhabit if the fact that it is a counterbalance does not hold. fact8: The fact that the fact that that julienne is a kind of an impressionist and it is a kind of a subbing is incorrect is right. fact9: That julienne is not an impressionist if that either that dongle does not inhabit or it does not starve autocracy or both does not hold. fact10: That this fulminate is an impressionist and this thing is not unsinkable does not hold. fact11: If that dongle is a Frimaire the fact that that dongle does not inhabit or it does not starve autocracy or both is false. fact12: That this uintathere is not an impressionist but the thing fondles uncertainness does not hold if that julienne does not picture.

fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: ¬{G}{b} -> ¬(¬{F}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact3: ¬({AB}{a} & {BJ}{a}) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact5: ¬(¬{AB}{ar} & {R}{ar}) fact6: (x): (¬{C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}x fact7: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}x & {B}x) fact8: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: ¬(¬{B}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{AA}{a} fact10: ¬({AA}{bo} & {DG}{bo}) fact11: {F}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) fact12: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{be} & {BA}{be})

The fact that this uintathere is not an impressionist and fondles uncertainness does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{be} & {BA}{be})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that julienne is not a kind of an impressionist but she is a subbing does not hold. fact2: That if that dongle is not a Pyralis then the fact that that julienne is not a Frimaire and is not a Capek is not right is true. fact3: The fact that that julienne is a kind of a subbing that is a kind of a bedsore is false. fact4: Something is not a counterbalance if the fact that this thing is not a kind of a Frimaire and is not a Capek is false. fact5: That that gemfibrozil is not a subbing and is anuric is false. fact6: Something does not picture if that thing does not starve autocracy and inhabits. fact7: Somebody does not starve autocracy but it does inhabit if the fact that it is a counterbalance does not hold. fact8: The fact that the fact that that julienne is a kind of an impressionist and it is a kind of a subbing is incorrect is right. fact9: That julienne is not an impressionist if that either that dongle does not inhabit or it does not starve autocracy or both does not hold. fact10: That this fulminate is an impressionist and this thing is not unsinkable does not hold. fact11: If that dongle is a Frimaire the fact that that dongle does not inhabit or it does not starve autocracy or both is false. fact12: That this uintathere is not an impressionist but the thing fondles uncertainness does not hold if that julienne does not picture. ; $hypothesis$ = That julienne is both not an impressionist and a subbing. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that ectomorph commences is right.

{AB}{a}

fact1: The fact that if that tropic is a Citlaltepetl that tropic is extinct is correct. fact2: If the fact that this chalcedony is a kind of a gluiness that is a decimeter does not hold then that prothrombin is not a Citlaltepetl. fact3: If that tropic is extinct and is a decimeter this chalcedony is not extinct. fact4: That prothrombin does elect Greenville if this chalcedony does elect Greenville. fact5: The fact that that ectomorph is not an arcanum hold. fact6: The fact that somebody is a kind of a gluiness and it is a decimeter does not hold if that it is not a Limulus hold. fact7: Somebody is a kind of a Arendt that does not transmit wedded if it elects Greenville. fact8: If something is not extinct it either is not a kind of a Arendt or does not elect Greenville or both. fact9: If that prothrombin does not transmit wedded that ectomorph does not commence and this thing does not shy. fact10: This chalcedony is not a Limulus if this chalcedony does not razor imperfect but the one is Superior. fact11: If that ectomorph does not shy then that ectomorph is not a kind of an arcanum but it commences. fact12: If that prothrombin is not a kind of a Citlaltepetl then that ectomorph is not extinct. fact13: That ectomorph does not shy. fact14: That ectomorph is not isotonic. fact15: Something is not a kind of a Arendt if this is not a Arendt or this does not elect Greenville or both. fact16: Every person is a gluiness or he is a Citlaltepetl or both. fact17: Something is not incommodious but that thing is a Baphia if that that thing does shy is right. fact18: Someone elects Greenville if it is non-extinct. fact19: The oriole does shy. fact20: This sabra shies and transmits wedded if that ectomorph is not a Arendt. fact21: The fact that that tropic is a kind of a Citlaltepetl if this humans is a gluiness is correct.

fact1: {F}{d} -> {E}{d} fact2: ¬({H}{c} & {G}{c}) -> ¬{F}{b} fact3: ({E}{d} & {G}{d}) -> ¬{E}{c} fact4: {D}{c} -> {D}{b} fact5: ¬{AA}{a} fact6: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({H}x & {G}x) fact7: (x): {D}x -> ({C}x & ¬{B}x) fact8: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{C}x v ¬{D}x) fact9: ¬{B}{b} -> (¬{AB}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact10: (¬{J}{c} & {K}{c}) -> ¬{I}{c} fact11: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact12: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬{E}{a} fact13: ¬{A}{a} fact14: ¬{GP}{a} fact15: (x): (¬{C}x v ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact16: (x): ({H}x v {F}x) fact17: (x): {A}x -> (¬{EO}x & {HJ}x) fact18: (x): ¬{E}x -> {D}x fact19: {A}{hn} fact20: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{ik} & {B}{ik}) fact21: {H}{e} -> {F}{d}

This sabra is not incommodious but that thing is a Baphia.

(¬{EO}{ik} & {HJ}{ik})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that if that tropic is a Citlaltepetl that tropic is extinct is correct. fact2: If the fact that this chalcedony is a kind of a gluiness that is a decimeter does not hold then that prothrombin is not a Citlaltepetl. fact3: If that tropic is extinct and is a decimeter this chalcedony is not extinct. fact4: That prothrombin does elect Greenville if this chalcedony does elect Greenville. fact5: The fact that that ectomorph is not an arcanum hold. fact6: The fact that somebody is a kind of a gluiness and it is a decimeter does not hold if that it is not a Limulus hold. fact7: Somebody is a kind of a Arendt that does not transmit wedded if it elects Greenville. fact8: If something is not extinct it either is not a kind of a Arendt or does not elect Greenville or both. fact9: If that prothrombin does not transmit wedded that ectomorph does not commence and this thing does not shy. fact10: This chalcedony is not a Limulus if this chalcedony does not razor imperfect but the one is Superior. fact11: If that ectomorph does not shy then that ectomorph is not a kind of an arcanum but it commences. fact12: If that prothrombin is not a kind of a Citlaltepetl then that ectomorph is not extinct. fact13: That ectomorph does not shy. fact14: That ectomorph is not isotonic. fact15: Something is not a kind of a Arendt if this is not a Arendt or this does not elect Greenville or both. fact16: Every person is a gluiness or he is a Citlaltepetl or both. fact17: Something is not incommodious but that thing is a Baphia if that that thing does shy is right. fact18: Someone elects Greenville if it is non-extinct. fact19: The oriole does shy. fact20: This sabra shies and transmits wedded if that ectomorph is not a Arendt. fact21: The fact that that tropic is a kind of a Citlaltepetl if this humans is a gluiness is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that ectomorph commences is right. ; $proof$ =

fact11 & fact13 -> int1: That ectomorph is not a kind of an arcanum but he/she commences.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That transponder is not impersonal.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: If this monocot does not tap then that this monocot marbles Soweto and is a Conilurus is incorrect. fact2: That stream does not sit autograph. fact3: The hemosiderin is personal. fact4: that autograph sits transponder. fact5: That industrialist sits autograph. fact6: Something salts and does not tap if it is a kind of a Pediculati. fact7: If the fact that some person does not separate Kingstown is right he sits autograph and is impersonal. fact8: That transponder is nonprescription. fact9: That transponder sits autograph. fact10: If that Mithracin does not marble Soweto the fact that that Attilio is nonprescription thing that does separate Kingstown is incorrect. fact11: The fact that that transponder does not gild metacentre is not wrong. fact12: That transponder is a kind of a Nestorianism. fact13: If something does not marble Soweto then that thing does not separate Kingstown. fact14: If that transponder sits autograph then it is not impersonal. fact15: If that that Attilio is nonprescription and separates Kingstown does not hold then this desertification does not separates Kingstown. fact16: If this dropout salts and does not tap this monocot does not tap. fact17: If this desertification does not separate Kingstown that transponder is impersonal and it sits autograph.

fact1: ¬{G}{e} -> ¬({D}{e} & {F}{e}) fact2: ¬{A}{bo} fact3: ¬{B}{at} fact4: {AA}{aa} fact5: {A}{em} fact6: (x): {H}x -> ({I}x & ¬{G}x) fact7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact8: {E}{a} fact9: {A}{a} fact10: ¬{D}{d} -> ¬({E}{c} & {C}{c}) fact11: ¬{FN}{a} fact12: {EG}{a} fact13: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{C}x fact14: {A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact15: ¬({E}{c} & {C}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact16: ({I}{f} & ¬{G}{f}) -> ¬{G}{e} fact17: ¬{C}{b} -> ({B}{a} & {A}{a})

That chondrite is impersonal.

{B}{eg}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this monocot does not tap then that this monocot marbles Soweto and is a Conilurus is incorrect. fact2: That stream does not sit autograph. fact3: The hemosiderin is personal. fact4: that autograph sits transponder. fact5: That industrialist sits autograph. fact6: Something salts and does not tap if it is a kind of a Pediculati. fact7: If the fact that some person does not separate Kingstown is right he sits autograph and is impersonal. fact8: That transponder is nonprescription. fact9: That transponder sits autograph. fact10: If that Mithracin does not marble Soweto the fact that that Attilio is nonprescription thing that does separate Kingstown is incorrect. fact11: The fact that that transponder does not gild metacentre is not wrong. fact12: That transponder is a kind of a Nestorianism. fact13: If something does not marble Soweto then that thing does not separate Kingstown. fact14: If that transponder sits autograph then it is not impersonal. fact15: If that that Attilio is nonprescription and separates Kingstown does not hold then this desertification does not separates Kingstown. fact16: If this dropout salts and does not tap this monocot does not tap. fact17: If this desertification does not separate Kingstown that transponder is impersonal and it sits autograph. ; $hypothesis$ = That transponder is not impersonal. ; $proof$ =

fact14 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That travailing does not occurs.

¬{C}

fact1: That contrapuntalness does not occurs and that pyrolatry does not happens if that hornswoggling scurrying does not occurs. fact2: That that travailing happens is true if that alternating Ocimum happens. fact3: If that pyrolatry does not occurs then both this evangelisticness and that spasticness happens. fact4: That aviation occurs. fact5: Both that alternating Ocimum and that aviation occurs. fact6: If the fact that that alternating Ocimum does not occurs is true the fact that that travailing and that aviation occurs does not hold. fact7: If this evangelisticness occurs then that this antecedent does not occurs and that sportfishing does not happens is incorrect. fact8: Both that sportfishing and the radioscopy happens. fact9: That travailing does not happens if the fact that that travailing occurs and that aviation occurs does not hold. fact10: If that that hornswoggling scurrying but notthe voyaging happens is incorrect that hornswoggling scurrying does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{J} -> (¬{I} & ¬{H}) fact2: {A} -> {C} fact3: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact4: {B} fact5: ({A} & {B}) fact6: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & {B}) fact7: {F} -> ¬(¬{D} & ¬{E}) fact8: ({E} & {DI}) fact9: ¬({C} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact10: ¬({J} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{J}

That travailing does not occurs.

¬{C}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That contrapuntalness does not occurs and that pyrolatry does not happens if that hornswoggling scurrying does not occurs. fact2: That that travailing happens is true if that alternating Ocimum happens. fact3: If that pyrolatry does not occurs then both this evangelisticness and that spasticness happens. fact4: That aviation occurs. fact5: Both that alternating Ocimum and that aviation occurs. fact6: If the fact that that alternating Ocimum does not occurs is true the fact that that travailing and that aviation occurs does not hold. fact7: If this evangelisticness occurs then that this antecedent does not occurs and that sportfishing does not happens is incorrect. fact8: Both that sportfishing and the radioscopy happens. fact9: That travailing does not happens if the fact that that travailing occurs and that aviation occurs does not hold. fact10: If that that hornswoggling scurrying but notthe voyaging happens is incorrect that hornswoggling scurrying does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That travailing does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> int1: That alternating Ocimum happens.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this chincherinchee is not a Mahabharatam hold.

¬{C}{c}

fact1: This chincherinchee is a Malcolmia. fact2: This projectile is lidless. fact3: That cotinga is a Mahabharatam. fact4: The fact that that cotinga is lidless hold. fact5: If the fact that this projectile is not lidded is true that that cotinga is stinky is correct. fact6: If something is nonreturnable then it does not glance and it is landless. fact7: The fact that this chincherinchee is lidless is true. fact8: That that cotinga is a kind of a creativity hold. fact9: This THC is a kind of a Mahabharatam. fact10: This chincherinchee is a kind of a leering. fact11: This chincherinchee is stinky. fact12: That cotinga is not a Mahayanism if the fact that this projectile does not glance and is landless hold. fact13: This chincherinchee is a Mahabharatam if this projectile is stinky. fact14: This chincherinchee is lidless if that cotinga is a Mahabharatam. fact15: This aqualung is lidless. fact16: That something is both not lidless and not a Mahabharatam is not right if it is stinky. fact17: If that cotinga is lidless then this projectile is stinky. fact18: Some man that is not a kind of a Mahayanism is stinky and babbles Uranus.

fact1: {DB}{c} fact2: {A}{b} fact3: {C}{a} fact4: {A}{a} fact5: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} fact6: (x): {H}x -> (¬{G}x & {F}x) fact7: {A}{c} fact8: {BJ}{a} fact9: {C}{fi} fact10: {ET}{c} fact11: {B}{c} fact12: (¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact13: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact14: {C}{a} -> {A}{c} fact15: {A}{eq} fact16: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) fact17: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact18: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x & {D}x)

That this chincherinchee is not a Mahabharatam hold.

¬{C}{c}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This chincherinchee is a Malcolmia. fact2: This projectile is lidless. fact3: That cotinga is a Mahabharatam. fact4: The fact that that cotinga is lidless hold. fact5: If the fact that this projectile is not lidded is true that that cotinga is stinky is correct. fact6: If something is nonreturnable then it does not glance and it is landless. fact7: The fact that this chincherinchee is lidless is true. fact8: That that cotinga is a kind of a creativity hold. fact9: This THC is a kind of a Mahabharatam. fact10: This chincherinchee is a kind of a leering. fact11: This chincherinchee is stinky. fact12: That cotinga is not a Mahayanism if the fact that this projectile does not glance and is landless hold. fact13: This chincherinchee is a Mahabharatam if this projectile is stinky. fact14: This chincherinchee is lidless if that cotinga is a Mahabharatam. fact15: This aqualung is lidless. fact16: That something is both not lidless and not a Mahabharatam is not right if it is stinky. fact17: If that cotinga is lidless then this projectile is stinky. fact18: Some man that is not a kind of a Mahayanism is stinky and babbles Uranus. ; $hypothesis$ = That this chincherinchee is not a Mahabharatam hold. ; $proof$ =

fact17 & fact4 -> int1: This projectile is stinky.; int1 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That solvation touts utterance.

{A}{a}

fact1: That something touts utterance and is eukaryotic is incorrect if the fact that that thing is not a Edaphosauridae is correct. fact2: If that that solvation is a kind of a panchayat and/or it does not noise is incorrect that solvation is dishonourable. fact3: That solvation is a Edaphosauridae if the fact that that solvation disenchants boliviano and/or is not a panchayat is not true. fact4: Either something touts utterance or that thing is not a Edaphosauridae or both if that thing is not eukaryotic. fact5: That solvation does not disenchant boliviano. fact6: The fact that this colonial is an affirmative or it does not wreak NRO or both is false. fact7: If something is a Edaphosauridae it touts utterance. fact8: If that somebody touts utterance and this person is eukaryotic is false then this person does not touts utterance. fact9: The fact that either that solvation disenchants boliviano or it is not a panchayat or both is false.

fact1: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) fact2: ¬({AB}{a} v ¬{IF}{a}) -> {CC}{a} fact3: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x v ¬{B}x) fact5: ¬{AA}{a} fact6: ¬({JK}{jc} v ¬{IB}{jc}) fact7: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact8: (x): ¬({A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact9: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})

That the girder either is aphetic or does not relax Jarrell or both is incorrect.

¬({ID}{o} v ¬{FC}{o})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That something touts utterance and is eukaryotic is incorrect if the fact that that thing is not a Edaphosauridae is correct. fact2: If that that solvation is a kind of a panchayat and/or it does not noise is incorrect that solvation is dishonourable. fact3: That solvation is a Edaphosauridae if the fact that that solvation disenchants boliviano and/or is not a panchayat is not true. fact4: Either something touts utterance or that thing is not a Edaphosauridae or both if that thing is not eukaryotic. fact5: That solvation does not disenchant boliviano. fact6: The fact that this colonial is an affirmative or it does not wreak NRO or both is false. fact7: If something is a Edaphosauridae it touts utterance. fact8: If that somebody touts utterance and this person is eukaryotic is false then this person does not touts utterance. fact9: The fact that either that solvation disenchants boliviano or it is not a panchayat or both is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That solvation touts utterance. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact9 -> int1: That solvation is a Edaphosauridae.; fact7 -> int2: If that solvation is a Edaphosauridae then that that solvation touts utterance is right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

There is no one that either is not a crustacean or does not supervise Tautoga or both.

(x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x)

fact1: Everybody is a crustacean. fact2: There is no one that either is not a crustacean or does not supervise Tautoga or both.

fact1: (x): {AA}x fact2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x)

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Everybody is a crustacean. fact2: There is no one that either is not a crustacean or does not supervise Tautoga or both. ; $hypothesis$ = There is no one that either is not a crustacean or does not supervise Tautoga or both. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That shuffling does not occurs.

¬{C}

fact1: That Zolaesqueness occurs and the dystopianness occurs. fact2: That shuffling does not occurs if that Zolaesqueness does not happens. fact3: That that Zolaesqueness occurs prevents that that shuffling does not occurs. fact4: That this clearance happens and/or that agonadalness occurs is triggered by that this taunting does not occurs. fact5: If that tilling mummery happens then both that non-dystopianness and that non-Zolaesqueness happens. fact6: The dystopianness occurs.

fact1: ({A} & {B}) fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬{C} fact3: {A} -> {C} fact4: ¬{G} -> ({E} v {F}) fact5: {D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact6: {B}

That shuffling does not occurs.

¬{C}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Zolaesqueness occurs and the dystopianness occurs. fact2: That shuffling does not occurs if that Zolaesqueness does not happens. fact3: That that Zolaesqueness occurs prevents that that shuffling does not occurs. fact4: That this clearance happens and/or that agonadalness occurs is triggered by that this taunting does not occurs. fact5: If that tilling mummery happens then both that non-dystopianness and that non-Zolaesqueness happens. fact6: The dystopianness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That shuffling does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> int1: That Zolaesqueness happens.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that linnet is spiny but the one does not satisfice FDIC is wrong.

¬({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b})

fact1: That equatorial is a associationism. fact2: The fact that that equatorial does not cozen Helodermatidae and trephines wrangling is false. fact3: Something is a kind of a Ovid and that thing is neuropsychological if that thing does not center Stevens. fact4: If that linnet is not paleontological the fact that that equatorial satisfices FDIC and does not brand histiocytosis does not hold. fact5: There exists none that is a kind of apoplectoid one that centers Stevens. fact6: Something does not center Stevens if the fact that it is apoplectoid and it center Stevens is false. fact7: The fact that if that something does not cozen Helodermatidae and is non-paleontological does not hold then it does not brand histiocytosis is right. fact8: If the vanadinite is non-phenomenal then that arbutus is a associationism and the person is a innovativeness. fact9: The fact that that linnet is spiny and it satisfices FDIC is not true. fact10: If someone does not brand histiocytosis the fact that the person is not non-spiny and the person is a kind of a associationism is right. fact11: The vanadinite is not phenomenal. fact12: The fact that that equatorial does not satisfice FDIC but she cozens Helodermatidae is incorrect. fact13: The fact that that linnet is spiny but she/he does not satisfice FDIC is wrong if that equatorial does not brand histiocytosis. fact14: If that that equatorial brands histiocytosis is right that linnet is spiny. fact15: The fact that that equatorial is both not spiny and a associationism is false. fact16: That that equatorial does not cozen Helodermatidae and is not paleontological does not hold if it is a associationism.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {T}{a}) fact3: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({E}x & {H}x) fact4: ¬{AB}{b} -> ¬({D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬({J}x & {I}x) fact6: (x): ¬({J}x & {I}x) -> ¬{I}x fact7: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact8: ¬{G}{d} -> ({A}{c} & {F}{c}) fact9: ¬({C}{b} & {D}{b}) fact10: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) fact11: ¬{G}{d} fact12: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact13: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact14: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact15: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {A}{a}) fact16: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

That linnet is spiny but it does not satisfice FDIC.

({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That equatorial is a associationism. fact2: The fact that that equatorial does not cozen Helodermatidae and trephines wrangling is false. fact3: Something is a kind of a Ovid and that thing is neuropsychological if that thing does not center Stevens. fact4: If that linnet is not paleontological the fact that that equatorial satisfices FDIC and does not brand histiocytosis does not hold. fact5: There exists none that is a kind of apoplectoid one that centers Stevens. fact6: Something does not center Stevens if the fact that it is apoplectoid and it center Stevens is false. fact7: The fact that if that something does not cozen Helodermatidae and is non-paleontological does not hold then it does not brand histiocytosis is right. fact8: If the vanadinite is non-phenomenal then that arbutus is a associationism and the person is a innovativeness. fact9: The fact that that linnet is spiny and it satisfices FDIC is not true. fact10: If someone does not brand histiocytosis the fact that the person is not non-spiny and the person is a kind of a associationism is right. fact11: The vanadinite is not phenomenal. fact12: The fact that that equatorial does not satisfice FDIC but she cozens Helodermatidae is incorrect. fact13: The fact that that linnet is spiny but she/he does not satisfice FDIC is wrong if that equatorial does not brand histiocytosis. fact14: If that that equatorial brands histiocytosis is right that linnet is spiny. fact15: The fact that that equatorial is both not spiny and a associationism is false. fact16: That that equatorial does not cozen Helodermatidae and is not paleontological does not hold if it is a associationism. ; $hypothesis$ = That that linnet is spiny but the one does not satisfice FDIC is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact16 & fact1 -> int1: The fact that that equatorial does not cozen Helodermatidae and is non-paleontological is not true.; fact7 -> int2: If that that equatorial does not cozen Helodermatidae and it is not paleontological does not hold it does not brand histiocytosis.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That equatorial does not brand histiocytosis.; int3 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That gyration happens.

{C}

fact1: That highlife happens. fact2: That gyration does not occurs if that highlife and that intercommunication occurs. fact3: That intercommunication occurs. fact4: That doctoralness does not occurs and this nebula does not happens if that that nonexplorativeness does not happens hold. fact5: The fact that that non-pragmaticness and that gyration occurs is not correct if that subsonicness does not happens. fact6: That that pragmaticness does not happens prevents that intercommunication. fact7: That that doctoralness does not happens and this nebula does not occurs prevents that that pinball occurs. fact8: The business happens. fact9: That that unplantedness happens is caused by that that highlife happens or that intercommunication does not happens or both. fact10: This gastrointestinalness and the Tyroleanness occurs. fact11: That unclotheding predominance happens. fact12: If the fact that that subsonicness but notthat rectalness happens is incorrect then that subsonicness does not happens. fact13: If the fact that this corvee does not occurs is true then that that subsonicness and that non-rectalness occurs is incorrect. fact14: Notthis corvee but this fluorescing occurs if that pinball does not happens.

fact1: {A} fact2: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact3: {B} fact4: ¬{L} -> (¬{K} & ¬{J}) fact5: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & {C}) fact6: ¬{D} -> ¬{B} fact7: (¬{K} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{I} fact8: {GD} fact9: ({A} v ¬{B}) -> {FI} fact10: ({BH} & {BJ}) fact11: {DO} fact12: ¬({E} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} fact13: ¬{G} -> ¬({E} & ¬{F}) fact14: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & {H})

That unplantedness happens.

{FI}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That highlife happens. fact2: That gyration does not occurs if that highlife and that intercommunication occurs. fact3: That intercommunication occurs. fact4: That doctoralness does not occurs and this nebula does not happens if that that nonexplorativeness does not happens hold. fact5: The fact that that non-pragmaticness and that gyration occurs is not correct if that subsonicness does not happens. fact6: That that pragmaticness does not happens prevents that intercommunication. fact7: That that doctoralness does not happens and this nebula does not occurs prevents that that pinball occurs. fact8: The business happens. fact9: That that unplantedness happens is caused by that that highlife happens or that intercommunication does not happens or both. fact10: This gastrointestinalness and the Tyroleanness occurs. fact11: That unclotheding predominance happens. fact12: If the fact that that subsonicness but notthat rectalness happens is incorrect then that subsonicness does not happens. fact13: If the fact that this corvee does not occurs is true then that that subsonicness and that non-rectalness occurs is incorrect. fact14: Notthis corvee but this fluorescing occurs if that pinball does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That gyration happens. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> int1: That highlife and that intercommunication happens.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That mustard does not order Scincidae.

¬{B}{aa}

fact1: That something is not philosophic and is aquicultural does not hold if it does qualify Asurbanipal. fact2: If that mustard is not a kind of a sanitariness then that that mustard is a kind of aquicultural thing that is a parenthetical does not hold. fact3: If this Lowlands is not a Illimani that this Lowlands is a kind of a hyperaemia that is aquicultural is wrong. fact4: That that mustard is a Clemenceau and it obtains diminutive does not hold. fact5: Roni is a latticed if that Roni orders Scincidae and is not indefeasible does not hold. fact6: If that common does not debilitate milium that that common is an offer and he is a kind of a Cepphus is incorrect. fact7: The fact that that mustard is a allelomorph and does not order Scincidae is false. fact8: If the fact that this potential is both not philosophic and not non-aquicultural is false then that mustard does not order Scincidae. fact9: That that mustard is a meaning and a victorian is wrong. fact10: The fact that some person is both not non-intravenous and a victorian is wrong if it does not order Scincidae. fact11: The fact that the fact that some man is a Orpheus and does not ring Theodosius is right is wrong if the person is not a ambidextrousness. fact12: The fact that that mustard does order Scincidae is correct if the fact that it is intravenous and not a victorian is not right. fact13: That that mustard does order Scincidae but the person is not a freckled does not hold. fact14: That mustard is irrecoverable. fact15: If that mustard is not aquicultural that it is a Silenus but not unplanned does not hold. fact16: The fact that something is a kind of intravenous thing that is not a kind of a victorian does not hold if it is not aquicultural. fact17: If that blizzard does not gild Copenhagen then that that blizzard is a kind of a victorian that is breakable does not hold.

fact1: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) fact2: ¬{EL}{aa} -> ¬({A}{aa} & {EG}{aa}) fact3: ¬{CP}{au} -> ¬({HJ}{au} & {A}{au}) fact4: ¬({I}{aa} & {CT}{aa}) fact5: ¬({B}{bq} & ¬{EN}{bq}) -> {BT}{bq} fact6: ¬{O}{bh} -> ¬({FN}{bh} & {DD}{bh}) fact7: ¬({FO}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) fact8: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact9: ¬({IO}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact10: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact11: (x): ¬{DR}x -> ¬({AE}x & ¬{GM}x) fact12: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact13: ¬({B}{aa} & ¬{IU}{aa}) fact14: {JE}{aa} fact15: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({GD}{aa} & ¬{S}{aa}) fact16: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact17: ¬{IS}{de} -> ¬({AB}{de} & ¬{JG}{de})

That mustard does not order Scincidae.

¬{B}{aa}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That something is not philosophic and is aquicultural does not hold if it does qualify Asurbanipal. fact2: If that mustard is not a kind of a sanitariness then that that mustard is a kind of aquicultural thing that is a parenthetical does not hold. fact3: If this Lowlands is not a Illimani that this Lowlands is a kind of a hyperaemia that is aquicultural is wrong. fact4: That that mustard is a Clemenceau and it obtains diminutive does not hold. fact5: Roni is a latticed if that Roni orders Scincidae and is not indefeasible does not hold. fact6: If that common does not debilitate milium that that common is an offer and he is a kind of a Cepphus is incorrect. fact7: The fact that that mustard is a allelomorph and does not order Scincidae is false. fact8: If the fact that this potential is both not philosophic and not non-aquicultural is false then that mustard does not order Scincidae. fact9: That that mustard is a meaning and a victorian is wrong. fact10: The fact that some person is both not non-intravenous and a victorian is wrong if it does not order Scincidae. fact11: The fact that the fact that some man is a Orpheus and does not ring Theodosius is right is wrong if the person is not a ambidextrousness. fact12: The fact that that mustard does order Scincidae is correct if the fact that it is intravenous and not a victorian is not right. fact13: That that mustard does order Scincidae but the person is not a freckled does not hold. fact14: That mustard is irrecoverable. fact15: If that mustard is not aquicultural that it is a Silenus but not unplanned does not hold. fact16: The fact that something is a kind of intravenous thing that is not a kind of a victorian does not hold if it is not aquicultural. fact17: If that blizzard does not gild Copenhagen then that that blizzard is a kind of a victorian that is breakable does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That mustard does not order Scincidae. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that there exists some man such that if this person is a kind of a Abyla and this person is a kind of a bloc then this person does not signify Baghdad does not hold.

¬((Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x)

fact1: If the nummulite signifies Baghdad and is nonmodern that it is not a hypoxia is right. fact2: If that tarantula is a kind of a Abyla that is a bloc the one signifies Baghdad. fact3: If that tarantula lazes razzle and is uncontrived it signifies Baghdad. fact4: That tarantula does not signify Baghdad if it is a Abyla and is a kind of a bloc. fact5: There is something such that if the thing is a kind of a Lapland and the thing is unappealable then the thing is a kind of a hype. fact6: If some man is a hype that is a kind of a Tenerife then that one is not a kind of a semitrance.

fact1: ({B}{e} & {CK}{e}) -> ¬{IE}{e} fact2: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact3: ({M}{aa} & {CI}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact4: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact5: (Ex): ({ES}x & {HA}x) -> {EK}x fact6: (x): ({EK}x & {IM}x) -> ¬{GM}x

There is something such that if that thing is a kind of a hype that is a Tenerife that thing is not a semitrance.

(Ex): ({EK}x & {IM}x) -> ¬{GM}x

DISPROVED

PROVED

DISPROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If the nummulite signifies Baghdad and is nonmodern that it is not a hypoxia is right. fact2: If that tarantula is a kind of a Abyla that is a bloc the one signifies Baghdad. fact3: If that tarantula lazes razzle and is uncontrived it signifies Baghdad. fact4: That tarantula does not signify Baghdad if it is a Abyla and is a kind of a bloc. fact5: There is something such that if the thing is a kind of a Lapland and the thing is unappealable then the thing is a kind of a hype. fact6: If some man is a hype that is a kind of a Tenerife then that one is not a kind of a semitrance. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that there exists some man such that if this person is a kind of a Abyla and this person is a kind of a bloc then this person does not signify Baghdad does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This echinocactus does not scuffle Halifax.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: That someone is not carnivorous but the person softens cushioned is false if the person does not husk paleology. fact2: This echinocactus is not unhealthful. fact3: If this perchloride is not unhealthful then it is not a misgiving and it is not mithraic. fact4: The Mormon is a misgiving. fact5: Some person does not husk paleology if this one is not a kind of a Engels. fact6: The scorpaenoid is not unhealthful. fact7: Every person is not a Engels. fact8: This echinocactus is a kind of a misgiving. fact9: The fact that this echinocactus does not scuffle Halifax hold if this perchloride is unhealthful but the person does not scuffle Halifax. fact10: If this perchloride is sanitary this echinocactus is mithraic. fact11: This echinocactus is not an alcoholism if that this echinocactus is not a Sarcocystis but a mismatched does not hold. fact12: This perchloride does not scuffle Halifax if this priest is carnivorous but the thing does not scuffle Halifax. fact13: This presence is not mithraic. fact14: If the fact that this perchloride is not a misgiving is true then this perchloride does not scuffle Halifax and is not unhealthful. fact15: This echinocactus scuffles Halifax if the fact that this perchloride is not a misgiving hold. fact16: This perchloride is not unhealthful. fact17: This echinocactus is not a Ledbetter. fact18: Something is unhealthful but this does not scuffle Halifax if this is not an alcoholism. fact19: If this echinocactus is not unhealthful this echinocactus is not nonhierarchical. fact20: If that somebody is non-carnivorous one that does soften cushioned is wrong it is not unsuccessful. fact21: If the fact that this perchloride is not a misgiving is right then it does not scuffle Halifax. fact22: If this perchloride is not a kind of a misgiving then this perchloride is not a Sinbad. fact23: If that this echinocactus is unhealthful but it does not scuffle Halifax is right this perchloride does not attest Cameroun.

fact1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {C}x) fact2: ¬{A}{b} fact3: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: {AA}{ck} fact5: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬{E}x fact6: ¬{A}{ic} fact7: (x): ¬{F}x fact8: {AA}{b} fact9: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact10: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{b} fact11: ¬(¬{I}{b} & {H}{b}) -> ¬{G}{b} fact12: ({D}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact13: ¬{AB}{gc} fact14: ¬{AA}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact15: ¬{AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact16: ¬{A}{a} fact17: ¬{O}{b} fact18: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact19: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬{FK}{b} fact20: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{DN}x fact21: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact22: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{DA}{a} fact23: ({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{HE}{a}

This perchloride does not attest Cameroun and is not unsuccessful.

(¬{HE}{a} & ¬{DN}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That someone is not carnivorous but the person softens cushioned is false if the person does not husk paleology. fact2: This echinocactus is not unhealthful. fact3: If this perchloride is not unhealthful then it is not a misgiving and it is not mithraic. fact4: The Mormon is a misgiving. fact5: Some person does not husk paleology if this one is not a kind of a Engels. fact6: The scorpaenoid is not unhealthful. fact7: Every person is not a Engels. fact8: This echinocactus is a kind of a misgiving. fact9: The fact that this echinocactus does not scuffle Halifax hold if this perchloride is unhealthful but the person does not scuffle Halifax. fact10: If this perchloride is sanitary this echinocactus is mithraic. fact11: This echinocactus is not an alcoholism if that this echinocactus is not a Sarcocystis but a mismatched does not hold. fact12: This perchloride does not scuffle Halifax if this priest is carnivorous but the thing does not scuffle Halifax. fact13: This presence is not mithraic. fact14: If the fact that this perchloride is not a misgiving is true then this perchloride does not scuffle Halifax and is not unhealthful. fact15: This echinocactus scuffles Halifax if the fact that this perchloride is not a misgiving hold. fact16: This perchloride is not unhealthful. fact17: This echinocactus is not a Ledbetter. fact18: Something is unhealthful but this does not scuffle Halifax if this is not an alcoholism. fact19: If this echinocactus is not unhealthful this echinocactus is not nonhierarchical. fact20: If that somebody is non-carnivorous one that does soften cushioned is wrong it is not unsuccessful. fact21: If the fact that this perchloride is not a misgiving is right then it does not scuffle Halifax. fact22: If this perchloride is not a kind of a misgiving then this perchloride is not a Sinbad. fact23: If that this echinocactus is unhealthful but it does not scuffle Halifax is right this perchloride does not attest Cameroun. ; $hypothesis$ = This echinocactus does not scuffle Halifax. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact16 -> int1: This perchloride is not a kind of a misgiving and it is not mithraic.; int1 -> int2: That this perchloride is not a misgiving is correct.; int2 & fact15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that everything is a Concepcion does not hold.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Some person that does backpacking Jewison and is not postmenopausal is not a difficultness. fact2: Every man diddle pulpiness. fact3: Somebody is advective if the fact that it is both not a Concepcion and a difficultness is false. fact4: Everyone dissolves Zeomorphi. fact5: Everything does tail Roumania. fact6: Somebody does not insinuate topos if it does not overreach. fact7: Everything is a touchline and the thing is a conspicuousness. fact8: Everyone is a Concepcion. fact9: If some man is a touchline and this one does dissolve Zeomorphi this one does not light. fact10: The fact that some person does not overreach is right if it does not light. fact11: The fact that some man is not a Concepcion but it is a difficultness is incorrect if that it is not postmenopausal is wrong. fact12: Somebody that does not insinuate topos backpackings Jewison and is non-postmenopausal. fact13: Everything is a kind of an antipodal.

fact1: (x): ({D}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): {CF}x fact3: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) -> {GK}x fact4: (x): {H}x fact5: (x): {EM}x fact6: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬{E}x fact7: (x): ({I}x & {J}x) fact8: (x): {A}x fact9: (x): ({I}x & {H}x) -> ¬{G}x fact10: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬{F}x fact11: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) fact12: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({D}x & ¬{C}x) fact13: (x): {GH}x

Every man is Britannic.

(x): {AM}x

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some person that does backpacking Jewison and is not postmenopausal is not a difficultness. fact2: Every man diddle pulpiness. fact3: Somebody is advective if the fact that it is both not a Concepcion and a difficultness is false. fact4: Everyone dissolves Zeomorphi. fact5: Everything does tail Roumania. fact6: Somebody does not insinuate topos if it does not overreach. fact7: Everything is a touchline and the thing is a conspicuousness. fact8: Everyone is a Concepcion. fact9: If some man is a touchline and this one does dissolve Zeomorphi this one does not light. fact10: The fact that some person does not overreach is right if it does not light. fact11: The fact that some man is not a Concepcion but it is a difficultness is incorrect if that it is not postmenopausal is wrong. fact12: Somebody that does not insinuate topos backpackings Jewison and is non-postmenopausal. fact13: Everything is a kind of an antipodal. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that everything is a Concepcion does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that either that nonsteroidal or that arsenical or both occurs hold is false.

¬({D} v {C})

fact1: Either that amalgamating Chemulpo or the adventure or both happens. fact2: This unpatronisedness or this chastisement or both happens. fact3: This chastisement does not happens if that that breathing does not happens and that biovularness does not occurs is wrong. fact4: If the fact that this chastisement happens is correct then this unpatronisedness does not occurs. fact5: Either this dynasticness occurs or the telefilm happens or both. fact6: The pavage happens. fact7: If this chastisement happens that arsenical happens. fact8: That buffing occurs or that giveaway occurs or both. fact9: The fact that the breaperson does not occurs and that biovularness does not happens is incorrect if that nutritionalness does not happens. fact10: If that that nutritionalness does not occurs is right the fact that that biovularness does not happens and/or that breaman does not happens is incorrect. fact11: That that nonsteroidal or that arsenical or both occurs does not hold if this unpatronisedness does not occurs. fact12: The antisemiticness and/or the cosmogonicness occurs. fact13: The thenalness or that this administration occurs or both is caused by that this unpatronisedness does not occurs. fact14: That recycling Korzybski occurs if that Cabalism occurs. fact15: That the forbearance and/or that connubialness occurs is correct. fact16: If that either that biovularness does not happens or this breaone does not occurs or both is false then this chastisement happens. fact17: If that catabolising happens and/or that saturnalia does not happens that nutritionalness does not occurs. fact18: That catabolising happens or that saturnalia does not occurs or both if this psychotherapeuticness occurs. fact19: That candlelight and/or the unworldliness occurs. fact20: The striding happens and/or the louring falsetto occurs. fact21: The beclouding happens. fact22: That that biovularness occurs is prevented by that that nutritionalness does not happens and the breaperson does not occurs.

fact1: ({BR} v {EQ}) fact2: ({A} v {B}) fact3: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{B} fact4: {B} -> ¬{A} fact5: ({CF} v {JC}) fact6: {CJ} fact7: {B} -> {C} fact8: ({HR} v {EH}) fact9: ¬{G} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{E}) fact10: ¬{G} -> ¬(¬{E} v ¬{F}) fact11: ¬{A} -> ¬({D} v {C}) fact12: ({BK} v {BE}) fact13: ¬{A} -> ({FK} v {HU}) fact14: {EP} -> {FG} fact15: ({IO} v {GM}) fact16: ¬(¬{E} v ¬{F}) -> {B} fact17: ({I} v ¬{H}) -> ¬{G} fact18: {J} -> ({I} v ¬{H}) fact19: ({EG} v {HG}) fact20: ({BA} v {IN}) fact21: {IA} fact22: (¬{G} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E}

The fact that that either that nonsteroidal or that arsenical or both occurs hold is false.

¬({D} v {C})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Either that amalgamating Chemulpo or the adventure or both happens. fact2: This unpatronisedness or this chastisement or both happens. fact3: This chastisement does not happens if that that breathing does not happens and that biovularness does not occurs is wrong. fact4: If the fact that this chastisement happens is correct then this unpatronisedness does not occurs. fact5: Either this dynasticness occurs or the telefilm happens or both. fact6: The pavage happens. fact7: If this chastisement happens that arsenical happens. fact8: That buffing occurs or that giveaway occurs or both. fact9: The fact that the breaperson does not occurs and that biovularness does not happens is incorrect if that nutritionalness does not happens. fact10: If that that nutritionalness does not occurs is right the fact that that biovularness does not happens and/or that breaman does not happens is incorrect. fact11: That that nonsteroidal or that arsenical or both occurs does not hold if this unpatronisedness does not occurs. fact12: The antisemiticness and/or the cosmogonicness occurs. fact13: The thenalness or that this administration occurs or both is caused by that this unpatronisedness does not occurs. fact14: That recycling Korzybski occurs if that Cabalism occurs. fact15: That the forbearance and/or that connubialness occurs is correct. fact16: If that either that biovularness does not happens or this breaone does not occurs or both is false then this chastisement happens. fact17: If that catabolising happens and/or that saturnalia does not happens that nutritionalness does not occurs. fact18: That catabolising happens or that saturnalia does not occurs or both if this psychotherapeuticness occurs. fact19: That candlelight and/or the unworldliness occurs. fact20: The striding happens and/or the louring falsetto occurs. fact21: The beclouding happens. fact22: That that biovularness occurs is prevented by that that nutritionalness does not happens and the breaperson does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that either that nonsteroidal or that arsenical or both occurs hold is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Something is a schizophrenia.

(Ex): {A}x

fact1: There exists something such that it does supercharge Chandi. fact2: If that something is a Calluna and it is a kind of a manoeuvre is not correct it is not a kind of a Calluna. fact3: That magnetron does not telephone and steams if that magnetron is not a Calluna. fact4: If some man does not telephone then it is a schizophrenia and is unleaded. fact5: Something is a schizophrenia.

fact1: (Ex): {F}x fact2: (x): ¬({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact3: ¬{D}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact4: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}x & {JJ}x) fact5: (Ex): {A}x

Something is unleaded.

(Ex): {JJ}x

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: There exists something such that it does supercharge Chandi. fact2: If that something is a Calluna and it is a kind of a manoeuvre is not correct it is not a kind of a Calluna. fact3: That magnetron does not telephone and steams if that magnetron is not a Calluna. fact4: If some man does not telephone then it is a schizophrenia and is unleaded. fact5: Something is a schizophrenia. ; $hypothesis$ = Something is a schizophrenia. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This slag is a kind of a mince.

{B}{b}

fact1: That myosin is continental. fact2: If that myosin does bud Espana it is not a mince and/or it is not continental. fact3: This slag is continental. fact4: The zoo is not a Asin. fact5: The beachball is not rhinal or that one does not wing neuralgy or both if the beachball is a nephology. fact6: The fact that the chalaza is not a mince and/or it is non-zygomorphic is right. fact7: This slag is not a mince if the fact that that myosin does not bud Espana hold. fact8: That myosin is not a kind of a mince if this slag is not a Asin. fact9: That myosin is not a mince if this slag is not continental. fact10: Somebody is not a Onopordon if that it is a kind of a sublimated that is a kind of a Onopordon is incorrect. fact11: Either this slag is not a mince or he/she does not bud Espana or both if the fact that he/she is continental is true. fact12: If this slag is non-continental that myosin buds Espana. fact13: The fact that some man is not continental but it is neuroanatomic does not hold if it is not a kind of a Onopordon. fact14: That pearlite does not bud Espana and/or is not hydrographic. fact15: If this fundament is unlimited this fundament is not a mince and/or is not ungrateful. fact16: The fact that this slag is not a mince is right if that myosin is not a Asin. fact17: This slag does not bud Espana. fact18: Something is continental and/or it is a kind of a Onopordon if it is not neuroanatomic. fact19: If that myosin does not bud Espana this slag is a mince. fact20: If that myosin is not non-continental that myosin does not bud Espana or it is not a mince or both. fact21: That myosin is a daleth. fact22: This slag is not a Asin and/or is not neuroanatomic. fact23: If that myosin is not a mince then this slag is not a kind of a Asin. fact24: Either that myosin is not a Asin or this does not bud Espana or both if that myosin is continental.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {AB}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) fact3: {A}{b} fact4: ¬{AA}{an} fact5: {FF}{it} -> (¬{G}{it} v ¬{ID}{it}) fact6: (¬{B}{cs} v ¬{GK}{cs}) fact7: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact8: ¬{AA}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact9: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact10: (x): ¬({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x fact11: {A}{b} -> (¬{B}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) fact12: ¬{A}{b} -> {AB}{a} fact13: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) fact14: (¬{AB}{bf} v ¬{GU}{bf}) fact15: {FR}{at} -> (¬{B}{at} v ¬{HB}{at}) fact16: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact17: ¬{AB}{b} fact18: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x v {D}x) fact19: ¬{AB}{a} -> {B}{b} fact20: {A}{a} -> (¬{AB}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) fact21: {GB}{a} fact22: (¬{AA}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) fact23: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{AA}{b} fact24: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})

This slag is a kind of a mince.

{B}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That myosin is continental. fact2: If that myosin does bud Espana it is not a mince and/or it is not continental. fact3: This slag is continental. fact4: The zoo is not a Asin. fact5: The beachball is not rhinal or that one does not wing neuralgy or both if the beachball is a nephology. fact6: The fact that the chalaza is not a mince and/or it is non-zygomorphic is right. fact7: This slag is not a mince if the fact that that myosin does not bud Espana hold. fact8: That myosin is not a kind of a mince if this slag is not a Asin. fact9: That myosin is not a mince if this slag is not continental. fact10: Somebody is not a Onopordon if that it is a kind of a sublimated that is a kind of a Onopordon is incorrect. fact11: Either this slag is not a mince or he/she does not bud Espana or both if the fact that he/she is continental is true. fact12: If this slag is non-continental that myosin buds Espana. fact13: The fact that some man is not continental but it is neuroanatomic does not hold if it is not a kind of a Onopordon. fact14: That pearlite does not bud Espana and/or is not hydrographic. fact15: If this fundament is unlimited this fundament is not a mince and/or is not ungrateful. fact16: The fact that this slag is not a mince is right if that myosin is not a Asin. fact17: This slag does not bud Espana. fact18: Something is continental and/or it is a kind of a Onopordon if it is not neuroanatomic. fact19: If that myosin does not bud Espana this slag is a mince. fact20: If that myosin is not non-continental that myosin does not bud Espana or it is not a mince or both. fact21: That myosin is a daleth. fact22: This slag is not a Asin and/or is not neuroanatomic. fact23: If that myosin is not a mince then this slag is not a kind of a Asin. fact24: Either that myosin is not a Asin or this does not bud Espana or both if that myosin is continental. ; $hypothesis$ = This slag is a kind of a mince. ; $proof$ =

fact24 & fact1 -> int1: That myosin is not a Asin or does not bud Espana or both.; int1 & fact16 & fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That opopanax is not a refrain.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: Somebody is not a Vatican if that this person is a Vatican and this person is not a Hylocereus is not right. fact2: If that snowman does scuffle Sardinops that snowman is passionate and not a Hylocereus. fact3: The sinker is a refrain. fact4: If that granddaddy is not a refrain then the fact that that opopanax is not a refrain is true. fact5: Something is a refrain and passionate if this thing is not a Vatican. fact6: The Saviour is a refrain. fact7: If that snowman is passionate then that granddaddy is passionate. fact8: Something is a Vatican or that is not a refrain or both if that is passionate. fact9: That opopanax is intralobular.

fact1: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact2: {E}{c} -> ({B}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) fact3: {A}{fa} fact4: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬{A}{a} fact5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact6: {A}{gg} fact7: {B}{c} -> {B}{b} fact8: (x): {B}x -> ({C}x v ¬{A}x) fact9: {AL}{a}

That opopanax is not a refrain.

¬{A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Somebody is not a Vatican if that this person is a Vatican and this person is not a Hylocereus is not right. fact2: If that snowman does scuffle Sardinops that snowman is passionate and not a Hylocereus. fact3: The sinker is a refrain. fact4: If that granddaddy is not a refrain then the fact that that opopanax is not a refrain is true. fact5: Something is a refrain and passionate if this thing is not a Vatican. fact6: The Saviour is a refrain. fact7: If that snowman is passionate then that granddaddy is passionate. fact8: Something is a Vatican or that is not a refrain or both if that is passionate. fact9: That opopanax is intralobular. ; $hypothesis$ = That opopanax is not a refrain. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That Liam is a Akmola and is a sabin does not hold.

¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b})

fact1: Liam is a Romanal if something is both a Romanal and not a Dresden. fact2: Somebody is a Akmola if the fact that it is not unreproducible and it is not optimistic is wrong. fact3: If this caricaturist is not a kind of a ABC's Liam is a kind of responsible one that Sparks bigram. fact4: That lepidopteran does dazzle Idun if this febrifuge is not a kind of a interconnectedness. fact5: Liam does not dish Manipur. fact6: A responsible thing is a kind of a sabin. fact7: This stopwatch is not a Dresden if that that lepidopteran is not a hugging and that one is not a kind of a Murrow is wrong. fact8: This febrifuge furcates arpeggio and/or is not a interconnectedness. fact9: That Liam is a sabin that is responsible does not hold. fact10: The fact that Liam is a kind of adjectival one that is responsible does not hold. fact11: That something is reproducible and is not optimistic is wrong if it is a Romanal. fact12: There exists some man such that she is a kind of a Romanal. fact13: The fact that this python is not a sabin is correct. fact14: This stopwatch is a Romanal and it is a kind of a Mohria if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Romanal. fact15: That that chromogen is both incomplete and responsible is incorrect. fact16: If that this febrifuge does furcate arpeggio is right that lepidopteran dazzles Idun. fact17: The fact that the fact that that lepidopteran is not a hugging and it is not a kind of a Murrow is false is right if that lepidopteran dazzles Idun. fact18: If this caricaturist is not responsible that Liam is a Akmola and that thing is a sabin is not correct.

fact1: (x): ({F}x & ¬{G}x) -> {F}{b} fact2: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {AA}x fact3: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact4: ¬{L}{e} -> {K}{d} fact5: ¬{GD}{b} fact6: (x): {A}x -> {AB}x fact7: ¬(¬{J}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) -> ¬{G}{c} fact8: ({M}{e} v ¬{L}{e}) fact9: ¬({AB}{b} & {A}{b}) fact10: ¬({IJ}{b} & {A}{b}) fact11: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact12: (Ex): {F}x fact13: ¬{AB}{s} fact14: (x): {F}x -> ({F}{c} & {H}{c}) fact15: ¬({JB}{ae} & {A}{ae}) fact16: {M}{e} -> {K}{d} fact17: {K}{d} -> ¬(¬{J}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) fact18: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b})

Liam is a Akmola and this one is a sabin.

({AA}{b} & {AB}{b})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Liam is a Romanal if something is both a Romanal and not a Dresden. fact2: Somebody is a Akmola if the fact that it is not unreproducible and it is not optimistic is wrong. fact3: If this caricaturist is not a kind of a ABC's Liam is a kind of responsible one that Sparks bigram. fact4: That lepidopteran does dazzle Idun if this febrifuge is not a kind of a interconnectedness. fact5: Liam does not dish Manipur. fact6: A responsible thing is a kind of a sabin. fact7: This stopwatch is not a Dresden if that that lepidopteran is not a hugging and that one is not a kind of a Murrow is wrong. fact8: This febrifuge furcates arpeggio and/or is not a interconnectedness. fact9: That Liam is a sabin that is responsible does not hold. fact10: The fact that Liam is a kind of adjectival one that is responsible does not hold. fact11: That something is reproducible and is not optimistic is wrong if it is a Romanal. fact12: There exists some man such that she is a kind of a Romanal. fact13: The fact that this python is not a sabin is correct. fact14: This stopwatch is a Romanal and it is a kind of a Mohria if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Romanal. fact15: That that chromogen is both incomplete and responsible is incorrect. fact16: If that this febrifuge does furcate arpeggio is right that lepidopteran dazzles Idun. fact17: The fact that the fact that that lepidopteran is not a hugging and it is not a kind of a Murrow is false is right if that lepidopteran dazzles Idun. fact18: If this caricaturist is not responsible that Liam is a Akmola and that thing is a sabin is not correct. ; $hypothesis$ = That Liam is a Akmola and is a sabin does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that both that dinging and this propheticness happens does not hold.

¬({C} & {B})

fact1: Both that phlebothrombosis and that speeding masculinity happens if this propheticness does not happens. fact2: That colouration and this clampdown occurs. fact3: Both that speeding masculinity and this propheticness happens. fact4: The fact that that this catastrophe and that autosexing happens is triggered by this non-Samoanness is right. fact5: This shifting hydraulics happens if that that that designating does not happens and this shifting hydraulics does not happens is incorrect hold. fact6: That dinging and this catastrophe happens. fact7: The caloricness occurs and the involucrateness happens. fact8: This undifferentiatedness happens and the forebodinging happens. fact9: If that junketing Bothrops does not happens this clampdown occurs and/or this proselytism occurs. fact10: That Samoanness happens. fact11: This catastrophe occurs. fact12: The fact that the fact that both that dinging and this propheticness occurs is incorrect hold if that speeding masculinity does not happens. fact13: The fact that that reincarnation does not occurs and that Huxleianness does not occurs is not correct if this shifting hydraulics happens. fact14: That speeding masculinity happens. fact15: If that that reincarnation does not happens and that Huxleianness does not happens is not correct then that junketing Bothrops does not occurs. fact16: The fact that this propheticness does not happens if that both this propheticness and this catastrophe happens is wrong is right.

fact1: ¬{B} -> ({U} & {A}) fact2: ({FE} & {H}) fact3: ({A} & {B}) fact4: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact5: ¬(¬{N} & ¬{L}) -> {L} fact6: ({C} & {D}) fact7: ({IH} & {EI}) fact8: ({FJ} & {HF}) fact9: ¬{I} -> ({H} v {G}) fact10: {F} fact11: {D} fact12: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & {B}) fact13: {L} -> ¬(¬{J} & ¬{K}) fact14: {A} fact15: ¬(¬{J} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{I} fact16: ¬({B} & {D}) -> ¬{B}

The fact that both that dinging and this propheticness happens does not hold.

¬({C} & {B})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Both that phlebothrombosis and that speeding masculinity happens if this propheticness does not happens. fact2: That colouration and this clampdown occurs. fact3: Both that speeding masculinity and this propheticness happens. fact4: The fact that that this catastrophe and that autosexing happens is triggered by this non-Samoanness is right. fact5: This shifting hydraulics happens if that that that designating does not happens and this shifting hydraulics does not happens is incorrect hold. fact6: That dinging and this catastrophe happens. fact7: The caloricness occurs and the involucrateness happens. fact8: This undifferentiatedness happens and the forebodinging happens. fact9: If that junketing Bothrops does not happens this clampdown occurs and/or this proselytism occurs. fact10: That Samoanness happens. fact11: This catastrophe occurs. fact12: The fact that the fact that both that dinging and this propheticness occurs is incorrect hold if that speeding masculinity does not happens. fact13: The fact that that reincarnation does not occurs and that Huxleianness does not occurs is not correct if this shifting hydraulics happens. fact14: That speeding masculinity happens. fact15: If that that reincarnation does not happens and that Huxleianness does not happens is not correct then that junketing Bothrops does not occurs. fact16: The fact that this propheticness does not happens if that both this propheticness and this catastrophe happens is wrong is right. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that both that dinging and this propheticness happens does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> int1: This propheticness occurs.; fact6 -> int2: That dinging occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that the fact that this euphonicalness occurs hold.

{A}

fact1: If the fact that notthis misinforming Bowery but that demarche occurs is wrong this tug does not happens. fact2: If this tug does not happens then this buyback does not happens and this slopping does not occurs. fact3: This recovering uptime does not occurs. fact4: The fact that this recovering uptime happens and this chapter does not occurs is incorrect if this buyback happens. fact5: The fact that notthis misinforming Bowery but that demarche happens is false if this epitaxy occurs. fact6: That this buyback does not occurs triggers that this chapter happens and this recovering uptime occurs. fact7: This chapter occurs. fact8: If this tug does not occurs then this buyback happens and this slopping occurs.

fact1: ¬(¬{H} & {G}) -> ¬{F} fact2: ¬{F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) fact3: ¬{B} fact4: {D} -> ¬({B} & ¬{C}) fact5: {I} -> ¬(¬{H} & {G}) fact6: ¬{D} -> ({C} & {B}) fact7: {C} fact8: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E})

Let's assume that the fact that this euphonicalness occurs hold.

{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that notthis misinforming Bowery but that demarche occurs is wrong this tug does not happens. fact2: If this tug does not happens then this buyback does not happens and this slopping does not occurs. fact3: This recovering uptime does not occurs. fact4: The fact that this recovering uptime happens and this chapter does not occurs is incorrect if this buyback happens. fact5: The fact that notthis misinforming Bowery but that demarche happens is false if this epitaxy occurs. fact6: That this buyback does not occurs triggers that this chapter happens and this recovering uptime occurs. fact7: This chapter occurs. fact8: If this tug does not occurs then this buyback happens and this slopping occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that the fact that this euphonicalness occurs hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The neuroblast is not a release.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: The neuroblast is a kind of a release if that Hutu facsimiles phimosis. fact2: this phimosis facsimiles Hutu.

fact1: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact2: {AA}{aa}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The neuroblast is a kind of a release if that Hutu facsimiles phimosis. fact2: this phimosis facsimiles Hutu. ; $hypothesis$ = The neuroblast is not a release. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That colonial is a backhander.

{B}{b}

fact1: That bandleader is a collective. fact2: That that colonial is not non-anoestrous if that colonial is not a myriametre hold. fact3: This sunbonnet is a Lermontov. fact4: If that bandleader is not a Higginson then the porter is both a backhander and a collective. fact5: Something is not a Higginson if this thing is anoestrous. fact6: That colonial is not a kind of a backhander if that that bandleader is not a collective or is not a backhander or both does not hold. fact7: If this sunbonnet is a Lermontov then the fact that it is not a Higginson and is not a myriametre is incorrect. fact8: That something is not a collective or not a backhander or both is wrong if this thing is a kind of a Higginson. fact9: If that bandleader is a collective then that colonial is a backhander. fact10: If that bandleader is a backhander then that colonial is a collective.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: ¬{E}{b} -> {D}{b} fact3: {F}{d} fact4: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{fn} & {A}{fn}) fact5: (x): {D}x -> ¬{C}x fact6: ¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact7: {F}{d} -> ¬(¬{C}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) fact8: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) fact9: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact10: {B}{a} -> {A}{b}

The porter is a backhander.

{B}{fn}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That bandleader is a collective. fact2: That that colonial is not non-anoestrous if that colonial is not a myriametre hold. fact3: This sunbonnet is a Lermontov. fact4: If that bandleader is not a Higginson then the porter is both a backhander and a collective. fact5: Something is not a Higginson if this thing is anoestrous. fact6: That colonial is not a kind of a backhander if that that bandleader is not a collective or is not a backhander or both does not hold. fact7: If this sunbonnet is a Lermontov then the fact that it is not a Higginson and is not a myriametre is incorrect. fact8: That something is not a collective or not a backhander or both is wrong if this thing is a kind of a Higginson. fact9: If that bandleader is a collective then that colonial is a backhander. fact10: If that bandleader is a backhander then that colonial is a collective. ; $hypothesis$ = That colonial is a backhander. ; $proof$ =

fact9 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Miguel Angel is a kind of a Schoenberg.

{A}{a}

fact1: If some man does not orb Dermatobia then the one is both a Schoenberg and seaworthy.

fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x)

That masquer is a Schoenberg.

{A}{jc}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If some man does not orb Dermatobia then the one is both a Schoenberg and seaworthy. ; $hypothesis$ = Miguel Angel is a kind of a Schoenberg. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That polluter is a kind of an antifungal.

{A}{a}

fact1: That polluter is thrifty and the one is a pronunciamento. fact2: There is no man such that it golfs and it is a pastness. fact3: This cheat is an antifungal. fact4: If that Teller is not ischaemic then that polluter defers but the thing is not morphemic. fact5: If somebody does not hamstring Jonesboro then that she does not participate Ochotona and she does not hill Paget is incorrect. fact6: That polluter is an antifungal that defers. fact7: That this minimalist is Jewish is right if there is somebody such that he/she is an antifungal. fact8: If that some person golfs and the person is a pastness is incorrect then the person does not hamstring Jonesboro. fact9: That polluter defers. fact10: The Lipizzan is cardiac and defers. fact11: If somebody does not defer then that he/she is morphemic and he/she is a kind of an antifungal is not right. fact12: Something is not ischaemic if that it does not participate Ochotona and it does not hill Paget is incorrect.

fact1: ({DB}{a} & {IH}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬({H}x & {I}x) fact3: {A}{eb} fact4: ¬{D}{b} -> ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) fact6: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact7: (x): {A}x -> {FE}{bj} fact8: (x): ¬({H}x & {I}x) -> ¬{G}x fact9: {B}{a} fact10: ({EO}{ha} & {B}{ha}) fact11: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x & {A}x) fact12: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{D}x

That polluter is not an antifungal.

¬{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That polluter is thrifty and the one is a pronunciamento. fact2: There is no man such that it golfs and it is a pastness. fact3: This cheat is an antifungal. fact4: If that Teller is not ischaemic then that polluter defers but the thing is not morphemic. fact5: If somebody does not hamstring Jonesboro then that she does not participate Ochotona and she does not hill Paget is incorrect. fact6: That polluter is an antifungal that defers. fact7: That this minimalist is Jewish is right if there is somebody such that he/she is an antifungal. fact8: If that some person golfs and the person is a pastness is incorrect then the person does not hamstring Jonesboro. fact9: That polluter defers. fact10: The Lipizzan is cardiac and defers. fact11: If somebody does not defer then that he/she is morphemic and he/she is a kind of an antifungal is not right. fact12: Something is not ischaemic if that it does not participate Ochotona and it does not hill Paget is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = That polluter is a kind of an antifungal. ; $proof$ =

fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That Stalinist occurs.

{A}

fact1: That Stalinist occurs and this transference occurs. fact2: That aspiring Kettering happens and that Bolshevikness happens if that postmillennialness does not occurs. fact3: The gumming diploma happens. fact4: That sooperson localism occurs and this weighting jolted occurs if this Eolithicness does not occurs. fact5: That that this transference does not occurs triggers that both that squeak and that Stalinist occurs is right. fact6: That aspiring Kettering triggers that appendicectomy. fact7: This transference does not happens if that this ptyalizing but notthat mutating Tampa happens does not hold. fact8: If that that mutating Tampa does not occurs but this transference happens does not hold then that Stalinist does not happens. fact9: That this transference happens is right. fact10: That gravure does not occurs if this weighting jolted and this soothing localism happens. fact11: That gravure does not occurs and this ptyalizing does not happens if this sooman localism happens. fact12: Both that fallout and this amoeboidness occurs. fact13: This Eolithicness is prevented by that appendicectomy. fact14: If that gravure does not happens then the fact that that this ptyalizing but notthat mutating Tampa happens does not hold is correct. fact15: If this ptyalizing does not occurs then the fact that notthat mutating Tampa but this transference occurs does not hold.

fact1: ({A} & {B}) fact2: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact3: {FQ} fact4: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact5: ¬{B} -> ({CC} & {A}) fact6: {J} -> {I} fact7: ¬({D} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact8: ¬(¬{C} & {B}) -> ¬{A} fact9: {B} fact10: ({G} & {F}) -> ¬{E} fact11: {F} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact12: ({JC} & {DP}) fact13: {I} -> ¬{H} fact14: ¬{E} -> ¬({D} & ¬{C}) fact15: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{C} & {B})

That Stalinist does not occurs.

¬{A}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Stalinist occurs and this transference occurs. fact2: That aspiring Kettering happens and that Bolshevikness happens if that postmillennialness does not occurs. fact3: The gumming diploma happens. fact4: That sooperson localism occurs and this weighting jolted occurs if this Eolithicness does not occurs. fact5: That that this transference does not occurs triggers that both that squeak and that Stalinist occurs is right. fact6: That aspiring Kettering triggers that appendicectomy. fact7: This transference does not happens if that this ptyalizing but notthat mutating Tampa happens does not hold. fact8: If that that mutating Tampa does not occurs but this transference happens does not hold then that Stalinist does not happens. fact9: That this transference happens is right. fact10: That gravure does not occurs if this weighting jolted and this soothing localism happens. fact11: That gravure does not occurs and this ptyalizing does not happens if this sooman localism happens. fact12: Both that fallout and this amoeboidness occurs. fact13: This Eolithicness is prevented by that appendicectomy. fact14: If that gravure does not happens then the fact that that this ptyalizing but notthat mutating Tampa happens does not hold is correct. fact15: If this ptyalizing does not occurs then the fact that notthat mutating Tampa but this transference occurs does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That Stalinist occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This musical does not occurs.

¬{B}

fact1: That hygienizing Solomons occurs. fact2: If the fact that that Bantoidness or the non-dirtiness or both occurs is incorrect this musical does not happens. fact3: If this coalescing occurs then that the battening transcript but notthis catalecticness occurs is wrong. fact4: The quarterfinal occurs if this catalecticness happens. fact5: This catalecticness occurs if that the fact that the battening transcript but notthis catalecticness happens is right is false. fact6: This verbalisation occurs. fact7: That this musical does not happens brings about that the stealing and this hell happens. fact8: That that Bantoidness happens or this dirtiness does not occurs or both is wrong if the quarterfinal occurs. fact9: That rectifiableness happens. fact10: That Bantoidness occurs.

fact1: {ID} fact2: ¬({D} v ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact3: {G} -> ¬({H} & ¬{F}) fact4: {F} -> {E} fact5: ¬({H} & ¬{F}) -> {F} fact6: {HO} fact7: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {DM}) fact8: {E} -> ¬({D} v ¬{C}) fact9: {JE} fact10: {D}

This hell happens.

{DM}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That hygienizing Solomons occurs. fact2: If the fact that that Bantoidness or the non-dirtiness or both occurs is incorrect this musical does not happens. fact3: If this coalescing occurs then that the battening transcript but notthis catalecticness occurs is wrong. fact4: The quarterfinal occurs if this catalecticness happens. fact5: This catalecticness occurs if that the fact that the battening transcript but notthis catalecticness happens is right is false. fact6: This verbalisation occurs. fact7: That this musical does not happens brings about that the stealing and this hell happens. fact8: That that Bantoidness happens or this dirtiness does not occurs or both is wrong if the quarterfinal occurs. fact9: That rectifiableness happens. fact10: That Bantoidness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This musical does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That correctness occurs.

{A}

fact1: That this auspice does not occurs and that indelicateness does not occurs is brought about by that that commitment does not occurs. fact2: That uninquisitiveness occurs. fact3: If the fact that either that joining occurs or this settlement does not occurs or both is wrong then that this conclusion occurs hold. fact4: The solidifying obliqueness does not happens and that SNP does not happens. fact5: That both this conclusion and that non-Carboniferousness happens prevents that that horizontalness does not occurs. fact6: That commitment does not occurs if that both that combined and this suburbanness occurs is false. fact7: That this spoiling Choriotis occurs and that marking amyotonia happens is brought about by that non-mobileness. fact8: If that twit does not occurs then both this artifactualness and the incorrectness happens. fact9: That that twit occurs is prevented by that that overdosing bluetongue happens. fact10: This spoiling Choriotis causes that this presbyopicness does not occurs. fact11: If the fact that both this transgressing Savitar and that Carboniferousness occurs is wrong then that that Carboniferousness does not occurs is not incorrect. fact12: That non-horizontalness and this conclusion happens if this settlement does not happens. fact13: This mobileness is prevented by that the solidifying obliqueness does not happens and that SNP does not occurs. fact14: If that indelicateness does not occurs then that both this transgressing Savitar and that Carboniferousness happens does not hold. fact15: If that horizontalness does not happens then the fact that that overdosing bluetongue does not happens and that Carboniferousness does not happens is not true. fact16: That if that washableness does not happens the fact that that combined and this suburbanness occurs is incorrect hold. fact17: If that overdosing bluetongue happens then that correctness does not occurs and that twit happens. fact18: If this presbyopicness does not happens the fact that either that joining occurs or this settlement does not happens or both is false. fact19: That horizontalness results in that overdosing bluetongue. fact20: That cantonalness occurs.

fact1: ¬{N} -> (¬{M} & ¬{K}) fact2: {HU} fact3: ¬({H} v ¬{G}) -> {F} fact4: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact5: ({F} & ¬{E}) -> {D} fact6: ¬({P} & {O}) -> ¬{N} fact7: ¬{T} -> ({L} & {Q}) fact8: ¬{B} -> ({GH} & ¬{A}) fact9: {C} -> ¬{B} fact10: {L} -> ¬{J} fact11: ¬({I} & {E}) -> ¬{E} fact12: ¬{G} -> (¬{D} & {F}) fact13: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{T} fact14: ¬{K} -> ¬({I} & {E}) fact15: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{E}) fact16: ¬{R} -> ¬({P} & {O}) fact17: {C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact18: ¬{J} -> ¬({H} v ¬{G}) fact19: {D} -> {C} fact20: {FE}

That correctness does not occurs.

¬{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this auspice does not occurs and that indelicateness does not occurs is brought about by that that commitment does not occurs. fact2: That uninquisitiveness occurs. fact3: If the fact that either that joining occurs or this settlement does not occurs or both is wrong then that this conclusion occurs hold. fact4: The solidifying obliqueness does not happens and that SNP does not happens. fact5: That both this conclusion and that non-Carboniferousness happens prevents that that horizontalness does not occurs. fact6: That commitment does not occurs if that both that combined and this suburbanness occurs is false. fact7: That this spoiling Choriotis occurs and that marking amyotonia happens is brought about by that non-mobileness. fact8: If that twit does not occurs then both this artifactualness and the incorrectness happens. fact9: That that twit occurs is prevented by that that overdosing bluetongue happens. fact10: This spoiling Choriotis causes that this presbyopicness does not occurs. fact11: If the fact that both this transgressing Savitar and that Carboniferousness occurs is wrong then that that Carboniferousness does not occurs is not incorrect. fact12: That non-horizontalness and this conclusion happens if this settlement does not happens. fact13: This mobileness is prevented by that the solidifying obliqueness does not happens and that SNP does not occurs. fact14: If that indelicateness does not occurs then that both this transgressing Savitar and that Carboniferousness happens does not hold. fact15: If that horizontalness does not happens then the fact that that overdosing bluetongue does not happens and that Carboniferousness does not happens is not true. fact16: That if that washableness does not happens the fact that that combined and this suburbanness occurs is incorrect hold. fact17: If that overdosing bluetongue happens then that correctness does not occurs and that twit happens. fact18: If this presbyopicness does not happens the fact that either that joining occurs or this settlement does not happens or both is false. fact19: That horizontalness results in that overdosing bluetongue. fact20: That cantonalness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That correctness occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That sinoper is a kind of a Yibit if that this oxlip agrees Rhinobatidae hold.

{A}{a} -> {B}{c}

fact1: This oxlip is egoistic. fact2: This barrelfish is a kind of a Yibit. fact3: That this oxlip is a kind of a Yibit is correct if that sinoper agrees Rhinobatidae. fact4: The fact that that Nardoes not agree Rhinobatidae and/or it is a logion is wrong. fact5: The fact that this oxlip does not agree Rhinobatidae and/or is a Carphophis is false if this barrelfish thromboses hoofprint. fact6: If the fact that this barrelfish does not thrombose hoofprint and/or is a kind of a Carphophis is incorrect then that sinoper is a Yibit. fact7: The fact that that that that sinoper does not agree Rhinobatidae or it is a kind of a excitability or both hold is incorrect is correct. fact8: If some person is not a kind of a switch then it is not a Yibit and/or does not agree Rhinobatidae. fact9: If that this barrelfish either does thrombose hoofprint or is a kind of a Carphophis or both does not hold then that sinoper is a kind of a Yibit. fact10: This barrelfish conforms Tuberculariaceae. fact11: If this oxlip is not a kind of a Yibit and/or it does not agree Rhinobatidae that sinoper agree Rhinobatidae. fact12: The chinkapin is a Carphophis. fact13: This panelling is a kind of a Yibit. fact14: If this barrelfish is a kind of a Yibit then that sinoper is a Carphophis. fact15: If this barrelfish agrees Rhinobatidae then this oxlip is a Carphophis. fact16: That sinoper thromboses hoofprint. fact17: This barrelfish thromboses hoofprint. fact18: The fact that either this oxlip does not agree Rhinobatidae or this one is a Carphophis or both is incorrect. fact19: This barrelfish thromboses hoofprint if this oxlip agrees Rhinobatidae. fact20: That this barrelfish does not thrombose hoofprint or is a Carphophis or both is wrong if that this oxlip agrees Rhinobatidae hold. fact21: If this oxlip is a kind of a Yibit that sinoper does agree Rhinobatidae.

fact1: {AO}{a} fact2: {B}{b} fact3: {A}{c} -> {B}{a} fact4: ¬(¬{A}{dp} v {U}{dp}) fact5: {AA}{b} -> ¬(¬{A}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact6: ¬(¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} fact7: ¬(¬{A}{c} v {GB}{c}) fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) fact9: ¬({AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} fact10: {DS}{b} fact11: (¬{B}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) -> {A}{c} fact12: {AB}{dq} fact13: {B}{ct} fact14: {B}{b} -> {AB}{c} fact15: {A}{b} -> {AB}{a} fact16: {AA}{c} fact17: {AA}{b} fact18: ¬(¬{A}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact19: {A}{a} -> {AA}{b} fact20: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) fact21: {B}{a} -> {A}{c}

That sinoper thromboses hoofprint.

{AA}{c}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This oxlip is egoistic. fact2: This barrelfish is a kind of a Yibit. fact3: That this oxlip is a kind of a Yibit is correct if that sinoper agrees Rhinobatidae. fact4: The fact that that Nardoes not agree Rhinobatidae and/or it is a logion is wrong. fact5: The fact that this oxlip does not agree Rhinobatidae and/or is a Carphophis is false if this barrelfish thromboses hoofprint. fact6: If the fact that this barrelfish does not thrombose hoofprint and/or is a kind of a Carphophis is incorrect then that sinoper is a Yibit. fact7: The fact that that that that sinoper does not agree Rhinobatidae or it is a kind of a excitability or both hold is incorrect is correct. fact8: If some person is not a kind of a switch then it is not a Yibit and/or does not agree Rhinobatidae. fact9: If that this barrelfish either does thrombose hoofprint or is a kind of a Carphophis or both does not hold then that sinoper is a kind of a Yibit. fact10: This barrelfish conforms Tuberculariaceae. fact11: If this oxlip is not a kind of a Yibit and/or it does not agree Rhinobatidae that sinoper agree Rhinobatidae. fact12: The chinkapin is a Carphophis. fact13: This panelling is a kind of a Yibit. fact14: If this barrelfish is a kind of a Yibit then that sinoper is a Carphophis. fact15: If this barrelfish agrees Rhinobatidae then this oxlip is a Carphophis. fact16: That sinoper thromboses hoofprint. fact17: This barrelfish thromboses hoofprint. fact18: The fact that either this oxlip does not agree Rhinobatidae or this one is a Carphophis or both is incorrect. fact19: This barrelfish thromboses hoofprint if this oxlip agrees Rhinobatidae. fact20: That this barrelfish does not thrombose hoofprint or is a Carphophis or both is wrong if that this oxlip agrees Rhinobatidae hold. fact21: If this oxlip is a kind of a Yibit that sinoper does agree Rhinobatidae. ; $hypothesis$ = That sinoper is a kind of a Yibit if that this oxlip agrees Rhinobatidae hold. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this oxlip agrees Rhinobatidae.; fact20 & assump1 -> int1: That this barrelfish does not thrombose hoofprint or is a Carphophis or both is false.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: The fact that that sinoper is a Yibit is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This tweezing absorbance does not occurs.

¬{E}

fact1: If the fact that that prompting does not occurs is correct both this bromicness and this onymousness happens. fact2: That this tweezing absorbance and that prompting occurs is triggered by that this take does not occurs. fact3: That this bromicness does not happens is brought about by that this spying SIRC does not occurs or this bromicnessness or both. fact4: If this Edwardianness occurs that monoclinousness happens. fact5: That this tweezing absorbance occurs is prevented by that that monoclinousness occurs or that this onymousness occurs or both. fact6: This stonewalling kW happens. fact7: That this tweezing absorbance does not happens is not incorrect if this onymousness occurs. fact8: That this Cyprian does not happens is right if the fact that that biosystematicness does not happens but this Cyprian happens does not hold. fact9: This Edwardianness and/or that biosystematicness happens. fact10: Notthis forfeiture but that profaning ALGOL occurs if that Polynesian does not happens. fact11: If the spectroscopy occurs then that reacting occurs. fact12: This disabusing seawards occurs if this generalness happens. fact13: If that biosystematicness occurs then that monoclinousness happens. fact14: That non-Edwardianness prevents that this tweezing absorbance does not occurs. fact15: If both that non-bromicness and this tweezing absorbance occurs then this onymousness does not happens. fact16: If that notthis spying SIRC but this take occurs is wrong then that prompting does not happens. fact17: If this onymousness occurs that either that non-biosystematicness or that non-monoclinousness or both occurs is false. fact18: This wedding happens. fact19: This spying SIRC does not occurs or this bromicness does not happens or both if that profaning ALGOL occurs. fact20: If that notthat airting done but this discerning Cordylidae occurs is false then this take does not happens. fact21: That Polynesian does not happens and that platyrrhinicness occurs if this stonewalling kW occurs. fact22: That that that airting done does not occurs but this discerning Cordylidae happens is wrong if this communization does not occurs is correct. fact23: If the fact that that biosystematicness does not occurs and/or that monoclinousness does not occurs is not true the fact that this Edwardianness does not happens hold. fact24: If this Edwardianness happens then the fact that that non-biosystematicness and this Cyprian happens does not hold.

fact1: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {D}) fact2: ¬{H} -> ({E} & {G}) fact3: (¬{I} v ¬{F}) -> ¬{F} fact4: {A} -> {C} fact5: ({C} v {D}) -> ¬{E} fact6: {Q} fact7: {D} -> ¬{E} fact8: ¬(¬{B} & {CI}) -> ¬{CI} fact9: ({A} v {B}) fact10: ¬{O} -> (¬{K} & {J}) fact11: {AE} -> {HM} fact12: {JA} -> {EO} fact13: {B} -> {C} fact14: ¬{A} -> {E} fact15: (¬{F} & {E}) -> ¬{D} fact16: ¬(¬{I} & {H}) -> ¬{G} fact17: {D} -> ¬(¬{B} v ¬{C}) fact18: {HS} fact19: {J} -> (¬{I} v ¬{F}) fact20: ¬(¬{L} & {M}) -> ¬{H} fact21: {Q} -> (¬{O} & {P}) fact22: ¬{N} -> ¬(¬{L} & {M}) fact23: ¬(¬{B} v ¬{C}) -> ¬{A} fact24: {A} -> ¬(¬{B} & {CI})

This Cyprian does not happens.

¬{CI}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that that prompting does not occurs is correct both this bromicness and this onymousness happens. fact2: That this tweezing absorbance and that prompting occurs is triggered by that this take does not occurs. fact3: That this bromicness does not happens is brought about by that this spying SIRC does not occurs or this bromicnessness or both. fact4: If this Edwardianness occurs that monoclinousness happens. fact5: That this tweezing absorbance occurs is prevented by that that monoclinousness occurs or that this onymousness occurs or both. fact6: This stonewalling kW happens. fact7: That this tweezing absorbance does not happens is not incorrect if this onymousness occurs. fact8: That this Cyprian does not happens is right if the fact that that biosystematicness does not happens but this Cyprian happens does not hold. fact9: This Edwardianness and/or that biosystematicness happens. fact10: Notthis forfeiture but that profaning ALGOL occurs if that Polynesian does not happens. fact11: If the spectroscopy occurs then that reacting occurs. fact12: This disabusing seawards occurs if this generalness happens. fact13: If that biosystematicness occurs then that monoclinousness happens. fact14: That non-Edwardianness prevents that this tweezing absorbance does not occurs. fact15: If both that non-bromicness and this tweezing absorbance occurs then this onymousness does not happens. fact16: If that notthis spying SIRC but this take occurs is wrong then that prompting does not happens. fact17: If this onymousness occurs that either that non-biosystematicness or that non-monoclinousness or both occurs is false. fact18: This wedding happens. fact19: This spying SIRC does not occurs or this bromicness does not happens or both if that profaning ALGOL occurs. fact20: If that notthat airting done but this discerning Cordylidae occurs is false then this take does not happens. fact21: That Polynesian does not happens and that platyrrhinicness occurs if this stonewalling kW occurs. fact22: That that that airting done does not occurs but this discerning Cordylidae happens is wrong if this communization does not occurs is correct. fact23: If the fact that that biosystematicness does not occurs and/or that monoclinousness does not occurs is not true the fact that this Edwardianness does not happens hold. fact24: If this Edwardianness happens then the fact that that non-biosystematicness and this Cyprian happens does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This tweezing absorbance does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact9 & fact4 & fact13 -> int1: That monoclinousness occurs.; int1 -> int2: That monoclinousness and/or this onymousness happens.; int2 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Both this non-unpropheticness and this lucubrating occurs.

(¬{E} & {D})

fact1: This haughtiness occurs. fact2: The fact that this unpropheticness happens and this lucubrating happens is incorrect if this bronchialness happens. fact3: This determining Haphtorah happens. fact4: This gallinaceousness but notthis blare happens if this determining Haphtorah occurs. fact5: If this bronchialness occurs then that this unpropheticness does not occurs and this lucubrating occurs does not hold. fact6: This intercommunicating Zygophyllum and that oddness occurs if this bronchialness does not happens. fact7: That dominos occurs or this uncontaminatingness does not occurs or both. fact8: This unpropheticness is prevented by that this gallinaceousness occurs but this blare does not occurs. fact9: This lucubrating occurs and this intercommunicating Zygophyllum happens if the fact that this bronchialness occurs does not hold. fact10: That that propheticness and this pyrrhicness happens is caused by that this determining Haphtorah does not happens. fact11: The fact that notthe catoptricalness but that shudder occurs does not hold. fact12: That bulbarness and this pyrrhicness happens if this uncontaminatingness does not occurs. fact13: That this bronchialness does not happens is prevented by this pyrrhicness. fact14: This pyrrhicness occurs and this intercommunicating Zygophyllum occurs. fact15: This intercommunicating Zygophyllum occurs. fact16: That both this unpropheticness and this lucubrating happens is false. fact17: That this uncontaminatingness does not happens leads to that this determining Haphtorah does not happens. fact18: That notthe phase but that Bogartianness occurs does not hold.

fact1: {DR} fact2: {C} -> ¬({E} & {D}) fact3: {H} fact4: {H} -> ({G} & ¬{F}) fact5: {C} -> ¬(¬{E} & {D}) fact6: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {CK}) fact7: ({J} v ¬{I}) fact8: ({G} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} fact9: ¬{C} -> ({D} & {B}) fact10: ¬{H} -> (¬{E} & {A}) fact11: ¬(¬{FO} & {EK}) fact12: ¬{I} -> ({DO} & {A}) fact13: {A} -> {C} fact14: ({A} & {B}) fact15: {B} fact16: ¬({E} & {D}) fact17: ¬{I} -> ¬{H} fact18: ¬(¬{DM} & {AJ})

Both this non-unpropheticness and this lucubrating occurs.

(¬{E} & {D})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This haughtiness occurs. fact2: The fact that this unpropheticness happens and this lucubrating happens is incorrect if this bronchialness happens. fact3: This determining Haphtorah happens. fact4: This gallinaceousness but notthis blare happens if this determining Haphtorah occurs. fact5: If this bronchialness occurs then that this unpropheticness does not occurs and this lucubrating occurs does not hold. fact6: This intercommunicating Zygophyllum and that oddness occurs if this bronchialness does not happens. fact7: That dominos occurs or this uncontaminatingness does not occurs or both. fact8: This unpropheticness is prevented by that this gallinaceousness occurs but this blare does not occurs. fact9: This lucubrating occurs and this intercommunicating Zygophyllum happens if the fact that this bronchialness occurs does not hold. fact10: That that propheticness and this pyrrhicness happens is caused by that this determining Haphtorah does not happens. fact11: The fact that notthe catoptricalness but that shudder occurs does not hold. fact12: That bulbarness and this pyrrhicness happens if this uncontaminatingness does not occurs. fact13: That this bronchialness does not happens is prevented by this pyrrhicness. fact14: This pyrrhicness occurs and this intercommunicating Zygophyllum occurs. fact15: This intercommunicating Zygophyllum occurs. fact16: That both this unpropheticness and this lucubrating happens is false. fact17: That this uncontaminatingness does not happens leads to that this determining Haphtorah does not happens. fact18: That notthe phase but that Bogartianness occurs does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = Both this non-unpropheticness and this lucubrating occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact14 -> int1: This pyrrhicness happens.; int1 & fact13 -> int2: The fact that this bronchialness occurs is true.; int2 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that agriculturalist is a morality and is not mensurable is right if the one is a uncial.

{A}{a} -> ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a})

fact1: If somebody is not a dissenting she either is a morality or is a hector or both. fact2: That louvar is not synesthetic and risks Platycephalidae if this thing is not a Azeri. fact3: That agriculturalist is a ELN. fact4: If that agriculturalist is a kind of a morality that Arabist is not a kind of a uncial. fact5: The televangelist is not a morality. fact6: If the fact that that agriculturalist is a uncial hold that agriculturalist is a morality. fact7: If that some man is a Kroto and/or that one is not an undressed is wrong that one is not blastomycotic. fact8: If something is not a uncial this is neurotropic and this is not mensurable. fact9: If that agriculturalist is not blastomycotic it is not a dissenting and does refrigerate QED. fact10: The fact that that clear is not mensurable is true. fact11: If the At stalinizes Anabaptism then it is a morality and it is not integumental. fact12: That that agriculturalist is a Kroto and/or this is not an undressed is false if this stern is not underage. fact13: That agriculturalist is illogical. fact14: If some person that is ovular is not a kind of a Azeri that louvar is not a kind of a Azeri. fact15: The fact that that agriculturalist is mensurable and is a dissenting is false. fact16: There is someone such that that person is both ovular and not a Azeri.

fact1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x v {D}x) fact2: ¬{M}{c} -> (¬{L}{c} & {K}{c}) fact3: {HM}{a} fact4: {B}{a} -> ¬{A}{r} fact5: ¬{B}{fi} fact6: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact7: (x): ¬({H}x v ¬{I}x) -> ¬{G}x fact8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({HB}x & ¬{C}x) fact9: ¬{G}{a} -> (¬{E}{a} & {F}{a}) fact10: ¬{C}{ba} fact11: {FR}{df} -> ({B}{df} & ¬{CG}{df}) fact12: ¬{J}{b} -> ¬({H}{a} v ¬{I}{a}) fact13: {GI}{a} fact14: (x): ({N}x & ¬{M}x) -> ¬{M}{c} fact15: ¬({C}{a} & {E}{a}) fact16: (Ex): ({N}x & ¬{M}x)

That Arabist is neurotropic and is not mensurable.

({HB}{r} & ¬{C}{r})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If somebody is not a dissenting she either is a morality or is a hector or both. fact2: That louvar is not synesthetic and risks Platycephalidae if this thing is not a Azeri. fact3: That agriculturalist is a ELN. fact4: If that agriculturalist is a kind of a morality that Arabist is not a kind of a uncial. fact5: The televangelist is not a morality. fact6: If the fact that that agriculturalist is a uncial hold that agriculturalist is a morality. fact7: If that some man is a Kroto and/or that one is not an undressed is wrong that one is not blastomycotic. fact8: If something is not a uncial this is neurotropic and this is not mensurable. fact9: If that agriculturalist is not blastomycotic it is not a dissenting and does refrigerate QED. fact10: The fact that that clear is not mensurable is true. fact11: If the At stalinizes Anabaptism then it is a morality and it is not integumental. fact12: That that agriculturalist is a Kroto and/or this is not an undressed is false if this stern is not underage. fact13: That agriculturalist is illogical. fact14: If some person that is ovular is not a kind of a Azeri that louvar is not a kind of a Azeri. fact15: The fact that that agriculturalist is mensurable and is a dissenting is false. fact16: There is someone such that that person is both ovular and not a Azeri. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that agriculturalist is a morality and is not mensurable is right if the one is a uncial. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This symposiast is a Nepenthes.

{B}{b}

fact1: That hypobasidium is a kind of a Nepenthes if this symposiast is not harmless. fact2: This symposiast is a Nepenthes if that hypobasidium is not harmless. fact3: This symposiast is a kind of a Nepenthes if that hypobasidium either is not harmless or is a Cichlidae or both. fact4: That hypobasidium is not harmless and/or is a Cichlidae.

fact1: ¬{AA}{b} -> {B}{a} fact2: ¬{AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact3: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact4: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That hypobasidium is a kind of a Nepenthes if this symposiast is not harmless. fact2: This symposiast is a Nepenthes if that hypobasidium is not harmless. fact3: This symposiast is a kind of a Nepenthes if that hypobasidium either is not harmless or is a Cichlidae or both. fact4: That hypobasidium is not harmless and/or is a Cichlidae. ; $hypothesis$ = This symposiast is a Nepenthes. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This scilla is a kind of a pityriasis.

{B}{b}

fact1: If some man is not a Rhenish it is an individual that is a pityriasis. fact2: Something is not a Rhenish if it is non-calligraphical and/or it is canonical. fact3: If that this caramel is a Rhenish and is not a pityriasis hold then this scilla is not an individual. fact4: Something is not a kind of a scamper if it is not an individual. fact5: If that this caramel is a kind of a scamper that is not a feminine is false this scilla is not a pityriasis. fact6: Something that is not an ordering is not calligraphical or is canonical or both.

fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact2: (x): (¬{E}x v {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact3: ({C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x fact5: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact6: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{E}x v {D}x)

This scilla is a kind of a pityriasis.

{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If some man is not a Rhenish it is an individual that is a pityriasis. fact2: Something is not a Rhenish if it is non-calligraphical and/or it is canonical. fact3: If that this caramel is a Rhenish and is not a pityriasis hold then this scilla is not an individual. fact4: Something is not a kind of a scamper if it is not an individual. fact5: If that this caramel is a kind of a scamper that is not a feminine is false this scilla is not a pityriasis. fact6: Something that is not an ordering is not calligraphical or is canonical or both. ; $hypothesis$ = This scilla is a kind of a pityriasis. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That aurifying does not happens.

¬{D}

fact1: The fact that this mouldering and that aurifying happens does not hold if that karma does not happens. fact2: The rainfall happens. fact3: This premeditating EdD prevents that this fornicating does not occurs. fact4: That breast occurs. fact5: If that this fornicating does not happens and this premeditating EdD does not happens does not hold then that picketing happens. fact6: If this mouldering happens then that aurifying happens. fact7: That this inhumation happens is triggered by that that depreciation happens. fact8: That that quake does not occurs triggers that that karma does not happens but the ascent happens. fact9: This mouldering happens if this fornicating happens. fact10: This premeditating EdD happens. fact11: The fact that this impiousness happens hold. fact12: That karma and the ascent occurs if that quake does not happens.

fact1: ¬{E} -> ¬({C} & {D}) fact2: {BL} fact3: {A} -> {B} fact4: {BP} fact5: ¬(¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> {GA} fact6: {C} -> {D} fact7: {FH} -> {Q} fact8: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) fact9: {B} -> {C} fact10: {A} fact11: {JG} fact12: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F})

That picketing occurs.

{GA}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this mouldering and that aurifying happens does not hold if that karma does not happens. fact2: The rainfall happens. fact3: This premeditating EdD prevents that this fornicating does not occurs. fact4: That breast occurs. fact5: If that this fornicating does not happens and this premeditating EdD does not happens does not hold then that picketing happens. fact6: If this mouldering happens then that aurifying happens. fact7: That this inhumation happens is triggered by that that depreciation happens. fact8: That that quake does not occurs triggers that that karma does not happens but the ascent happens. fact9: This mouldering happens if this fornicating happens. fact10: This premeditating EdD happens. fact11: The fact that this impiousness happens hold. fact12: That karma and the ascent occurs if that quake does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That aurifying does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact10 -> int1: This fornicating occurs.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: This mouldering happens.; int2 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That screenwriter divulges atopognosis.

{B}{aa}

fact1: Something divulges atopognosis if it does procreate. fact2: If that tillage is dramatic that tillage is a familiarisation. fact3: Something is non-suburban thing that divulges atopognosis if it is not unmotorised. fact4: If some person is not avifaunistic the fact that it does not apprise Buceros and it is not a Brahmaputra does not hold. fact5: If something does not apprise Buceros then it visits and it is not a vindictiveness. fact6: There is no man that is a scaled and does not procreate. fact7: If that chromite is a kind of non-suburban thing that divulges atopognosis that screenwriter does not divulges atopognosis. fact8: There exists nothing that apprises Buceros and is not a IP. fact9: That screenwriter divulges atopognosis if that screenwriter procreates. fact10: If the fact that something is a Lachesis and not sudsy is incorrect it speaks chiropody. fact11: That screenwriter affects alkalosis if that that that screenwriter sensitises Fiedler but it is not a kind of a scaled is true is incorrect. fact12: That chromite does not apprise Buceros if the fact that that tillage does not apprise Buceros and is not a Brahmaputra is incorrect. fact13: Something does divulge atopognosis if that that thing is a scaled that does not procreate does not hold. fact14: The fact that that screenwriter is a kind of a scaled and does procreate is incorrect. fact15: If something is both a familiarisation and volumetrical then it is non-avifaunistic. fact16: That tillage is dramatic. fact17: That screenwriter nonpluseds Omiya if the fact that that thing is homiletic and that thing does not procreate is wrong. fact18: There exists none that is a scaled and procreates. fact19: Some person is motorized if it visits and it is not a vindictiveness. fact20: Something is a hyperpyrexia if it is not a kind of a clamour.

fact1: (x): {AB}x -> {B}x fact2: ¬{K}{b} -> {J}{b} fact3: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) fact4: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) fact5: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact6: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact7: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact8: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{DS}x) fact9: {AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} fact10: (x): ¬({DA}x & ¬{CB}x) -> {HS}x fact11: ¬({ED}{aa} & ¬{AA}{aa}) -> {EC}{aa} fact12: ¬(¬{F}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact13: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact14: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact15: (x): ({J}x & {I}x) -> ¬{H}x fact16: ¬{K}{b} fact17: ¬({HM}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {EM}{aa} fact18: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact19: (x): ({D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact20: (x): ¬{FN}x -> {FA}x

That screenwriter does not divulge atopognosis.

¬{B}{aa}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something divulges atopognosis if it does procreate. fact2: If that tillage is dramatic that tillage is a familiarisation. fact3: Something is non-suburban thing that divulges atopognosis if it is not unmotorised. fact4: If some person is not avifaunistic the fact that it does not apprise Buceros and it is not a Brahmaputra does not hold. fact5: If something does not apprise Buceros then it visits and it is not a vindictiveness. fact6: There is no man that is a scaled and does not procreate. fact7: If that chromite is a kind of non-suburban thing that divulges atopognosis that screenwriter does not divulges atopognosis. fact8: There exists nothing that apprises Buceros and is not a IP. fact9: That screenwriter divulges atopognosis if that screenwriter procreates. fact10: If the fact that something is a Lachesis and not sudsy is incorrect it speaks chiropody. fact11: That screenwriter affects alkalosis if that that that screenwriter sensitises Fiedler but it is not a kind of a scaled is true is incorrect. fact12: That chromite does not apprise Buceros if the fact that that tillage does not apprise Buceros and is not a Brahmaputra is incorrect. fact13: Something does divulge atopognosis if that that thing is a scaled that does not procreate does not hold. fact14: The fact that that screenwriter is a kind of a scaled and does procreate is incorrect. fact15: If something is both a familiarisation and volumetrical then it is non-avifaunistic. fact16: That tillage is dramatic. fact17: That screenwriter nonpluseds Omiya if the fact that that thing is homiletic and that thing does not procreate is wrong. fact18: There exists none that is a scaled and procreates. fact19: Some person is motorized if it visits and it is not a vindictiveness. fact20: Something is a hyperpyrexia if it is not a kind of a clamour. ; $hypothesis$ = That screenwriter divulges atopognosis. ; $proof$ =

fact13 -> int1: That screenwriter divulges atopognosis if that that that screenwriter is a scaled and does not procreate does not hold is true.; fact6 -> int2: That that screenwriter is a scaled but the thing does not procreate is not true.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That Neolithic does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: That appreciating happens and the nonmagneticness happens. fact2: If that canasta occurs that jobbing relentlessness happens. fact3: That canasta occurs. fact4: That that jobbing relentlessness happens and that appreciating happens prevents that that Neolithic happens.

fact1: ({C} & {E}) fact2: {A} -> {B} fact3: {A} fact4: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That appreciating happens and the nonmagneticness happens. fact2: If that canasta occurs that jobbing relentlessness happens. fact3: That canasta occurs. fact4: That that jobbing relentlessness happens and that appreciating happens prevents that that Neolithic happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That Neolithic does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact3 -> int1: That jobbing relentlessness occurs.; fact1 -> int2: That appreciating occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That that jobbing relentlessness happens and that appreciating happens is true.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This imaum is not a Sarawak and the person is not a signifier.

(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

fact1: Something does not exalt Meitner if the fact that it is a Cyrillic and a hush is incorrect. fact2: That that tompion is not a kind of a signifier but the thing is a Salientia does not hold. fact3: The fact that that tompion is not a Salientia but a signifier is not right. fact4: If someone is not a kind of a telescopy then the fact that she/he is a Cyrillic that is a hush is wrong. fact5: This imaum is not non-patellar. fact6: This imaum suborns canted. fact7: That tompion is a kind of a Salientia. fact8: That tompion is a Sarawak. fact9: That this imaum is not a kind of a signifier but it is a kind of a Salientia is false if that tompion is a Sarawak. fact10: If that tompion does not exalt Meitner that molar is unlighted and the thing is a Salientia.

fact1: (x): ¬({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact2: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {A}{a}) fact3: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({E}x & {D}x) fact5: {JG}{b} fact6: {H}{b} fact7: {A}{a} fact8: {AA}{a} fact9: {AA}{a} -> ¬(¬{AB}{b} & {A}{b}) fact10: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{gp} & {A}{gp})

That molar is a Salientia.

{A}{gp}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something does not exalt Meitner if the fact that it is a Cyrillic and a hush is incorrect. fact2: That that tompion is not a kind of a signifier but the thing is a Salientia does not hold. fact3: The fact that that tompion is not a Salientia but a signifier is not right. fact4: If someone is not a kind of a telescopy then the fact that she/he is a Cyrillic that is a hush is wrong. fact5: This imaum is not non-patellar. fact6: This imaum suborns canted. fact7: That tompion is a kind of a Salientia. fact8: That tompion is a Sarawak. fact9: That this imaum is not a kind of a signifier but it is a kind of a Salientia is false if that tompion is a Sarawak. fact10: If that tompion does not exalt Meitner that molar is unlighted and the thing is a Salientia. ; $hypothesis$ = This imaum is not a Sarawak and the person is not a signifier. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That the fact that that gaslight does not occurs and that dishwashing does not happens hold is false.

¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: That that gaslight does not occurs and that dishwashing does not happens does not hold if this congratulations occurs. fact2: If notthis funrun but this snorting Eutheria happens then this congratulations occurs. fact3: If this congratulations does not occurs then that gaslight does not occurs and that dishwashing does not occurs.

fact1: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact2: (¬{B} & {C}) -> {A} fact3: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

That the fact that that gaslight does not occurs and that dishwashing does not happens hold is false.

¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that gaslight does not occurs and that dishwashing does not happens does not hold if this congratulations occurs. fact2: If notthis funrun but this snorting Eutheria happens then this congratulations occurs. fact3: If this congratulations does not occurs then that gaslight does not occurs and that dishwashing does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That the fact that that gaslight does not occurs and that dishwashing does not happens hold is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That traducing ingenuity does not happens.

¬{A}

fact1: That notthe unfruitfulness but this Vietnamese happens does not hold if that traducing ingenuity occurs. fact2: That invalidation does not happens. fact3: This lancers does not occurs if the fact that this non-salientianness and this lancers happens is false. fact4: That pilosebaceousness does not happens. fact5: If the fact that this untangling occurs does not hold then the fact that the fact that that traducing ingenuity does not occurs but that anointing Araujia happens does not hold hold. fact6: That anointing Araujia does not happens if that that traducing ingenuity does not occurs but that anointing Araujia occurs is false. fact7: This fetishizing Yi does not happens. fact8: That this salientianness does not occurs is not wrong if the fact that that spotting does not occurs and this aerating physicalism does not happens is incorrect. fact9: That both that traducing ingenuity and this untangling occurs is caused by that this lancers does not happens. fact10: This Vietnamese happens.

fact1: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact2: ¬{IT} fact3: ¬(¬{D} & {C}) -> ¬{C} fact4: ¬{IO} fact5: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{A} & {F}) fact6: ¬(¬{A} & {F}) -> ¬{F} fact7: ¬{GI} fact8: ¬(¬{G} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} fact9: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact10: {AB}

That anointing Araujia does not happens.

¬{F}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That notthe unfruitfulness but this Vietnamese happens does not hold if that traducing ingenuity occurs. fact2: That invalidation does not happens. fact3: This lancers does not occurs if the fact that this non-salientianness and this lancers happens is false. fact4: That pilosebaceousness does not happens. fact5: If the fact that this untangling occurs does not hold then the fact that the fact that that traducing ingenuity does not occurs but that anointing Araujia happens does not hold hold. fact6: That anointing Araujia does not happens if that that traducing ingenuity does not occurs but that anointing Araujia occurs is false. fact7: This fetishizing Yi does not happens. fact8: That this salientianness does not occurs is not wrong if the fact that that spotting does not occurs and this aerating physicalism does not happens is incorrect. fact9: That both that traducing ingenuity and this untangling occurs is caused by that this lancers does not happens. fact10: This Vietnamese happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That traducing ingenuity does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That every man aids Karlfeldt does not hold.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: If the fact that some man is not a patency and does not aid Karlfeldt is not correct then it is phosphoric.

fact1: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {BT}x

Everything is phosphoric.

(x): {BT}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that some man is not a patency and does not aid Karlfeldt is not correct then it is phosphoric. ; $hypothesis$ = That every man aids Karlfeldt does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That aquamarine is not a thanatophobia.

¬{C}{b}

fact1: This elements is a watch. fact2: Jenna does not neuter but the thing is a kind of a thanatophobia. fact3: If this elements is a kind of a watch she is a straying. fact4: Someone does misconstrue Bennington if it is a kind of a Telopea. fact5: If this elements is not a straying then that aquamarine is a thanatophobia and a watch. fact6: That aquamarine is a watch. fact7: If this lemniscus misconstrues Bennington the fact that this elements is not a Gerridae and not a Ratitae is incorrect. fact8: If some person does not prize Corregidor that it is both innumerate and not a Telopea does not hold. fact9: If the fact that somebody is not numerate and is not a Telopea does not hold then it is a Telopea. fact10: If this elements is a straying then that aquamarine is not a thanatophobia but it is a Gerridae. fact11: If this elements is a straying then this elements is a thanatophobia. fact12: If that some man is not a kind of a Gerridae and she/he is not a Ratitae does not hold she/he is not a straying.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: (¬{DU}{s} & {C}{s}) fact3: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact4: (x): {G}x -> {F}x fact5: ¬{B}{a} -> ({C}{b} & {A}{b}) fact6: {A}{b} fact7: {F}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact8: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{I}x & ¬{G}x) fact9: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & ¬{G}x) -> {G}x fact10: {B}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} & {D}{b}) fact11: {B}{a} -> {C}{a} fact12: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{B}x

That aquamarine is a thanatophobia.

{C}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This elements is a watch. fact2: Jenna does not neuter but the thing is a kind of a thanatophobia. fact3: If this elements is a kind of a watch she is a straying. fact4: Someone does misconstrue Bennington if it is a kind of a Telopea. fact5: If this elements is not a straying then that aquamarine is a thanatophobia and a watch. fact6: That aquamarine is a watch. fact7: If this lemniscus misconstrues Bennington the fact that this elements is not a Gerridae and not a Ratitae is incorrect. fact8: If some person does not prize Corregidor that it is both innumerate and not a Telopea does not hold. fact9: If the fact that somebody is not numerate and is not a Telopea does not hold then it is a Telopea. fact10: If this elements is a straying then that aquamarine is not a thanatophobia but it is a Gerridae. fact11: If this elements is a straying then this elements is a thanatophobia. fact12: If that some man is not a kind of a Gerridae and she/he is not a Ratitae does not hold she/he is not a straying. ; $hypothesis$ = That aquamarine is not a thanatophobia. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact1 -> int1: That this elements is a straying hold.; int1 & fact10 -> int2: That aquamarine is not a thanatophobia but a Gerridae.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Gianna is a throw.

{C}{c}

fact1: If someone embrangles the fact that that person is a Shostakovich and that person is not a Brahminism is false. fact2: Some man is not a throw if it salts 1890s and is a kind of a Brahminism. fact3: If Gianna is both not an escaped and not licit this thing is not a Berra. fact4: Some person does salt 1890s and is a kind of a Merluccius if he does not stylize codicil. fact5: If the fact that that woodfern does not clap disciplined and is not a kind of a Omotic is wrong this bumpkin does not clap disciplined. fact6: The fact that something does not clap disciplined and is not a Omotic does not hold if the fact that this is an aloofness hold. fact7: If this abetter is a Shostakovich this abetter does not salt 1890s. fact8: The fact that that woodfern is a kind of an aloofness if this sniveling is a kind of a ploce is right. fact9: That that rooter netts crinkled and does not Doctor Serra is false. fact10: If something that is not an interval is not a furred it does not stylize codicil. fact11: Gianna is not an interval and it is not a furred if it is not a Berra. fact12: Gianna is not a kind of a Shostakovich. fact13: If that rooter does not nett crinkled this abetter is not a Brahminism. fact14: Gianna is a Brahminism if that the fact that that rooter is a Shostakovich and is not a kind of a Brahminism is wrong hold. fact15: That this abetter does not Latinise but it embrangles is incorrect if this bumpkin browses Juglandaceae. fact16: That this abetter is not a Brahminism is not wrong if the fact that that rooter netts crinkled but she does not Doctor Serra is wrong. fact17: Gianna is not an escaped and not licit. fact18: If this abetter does not salt 1890s and that one is not a Brahminism Gianna is a throw. fact19: If the fact that this abetter is not a kind of a Merluccius and it is not a kind of a Shostakovich does not hold this abetter does not salt 1890s. fact20: That the fact that the baronet is not a kind of a strep and does not pith centerline hold does not hold. fact21: If Gianna is a Shostakovich then Gianna is not a throw. fact22: That rooter embrangles if the fact that that this abetter does not Latinise and embrangles is right is wrong. fact23: Something that does not clap disciplined browses Juglandaceae and is axile.

fact1: (x): {F}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{B}x) fact2: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact3: (¬{R}{c} & ¬{Q}{c}) -> ¬{N}{c} fact4: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({A}x & {D}x) fact5: ¬(¬{M}{e} & ¬{O}{e}) -> ¬{M}{d} fact6: (x): {P}x -> ¬(¬{M}x & ¬{O}x) fact7: {E}{b} -> ¬{A}{b} fact8: {S}{f} -> {P}{e} fact9: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact10: (x): (¬{L}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{G}x fact11: ¬{N}{c} -> (¬{L}{c} & ¬{K}{c}) fact12: ¬{E}{c} fact13: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact14: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {B}{c} fact15: {I}{d} -> ¬(¬{H}{b} & {F}{b}) fact16: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact17: (¬{R}{c} & ¬{Q}{c}) fact18: (¬{A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> {C}{c} fact19: ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact20: ¬(¬{EQ}{is} & ¬{GJ}{is}) fact21: {E}{c} -> ¬{C}{c} fact22: ¬(¬{H}{b} & {F}{b}) -> {F}{a} fact23: (x): ¬{M}x -> ({I}x & {J}x)

Gianna is not a kind of a throw.

¬{C}{c}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If someone embrangles the fact that that person is a Shostakovich and that person is not a Brahminism is false. fact2: Some man is not a throw if it salts 1890s and is a kind of a Brahminism. fact3: If Gianna is both not an escaped and not licit this thing is not a Berra. fact4: Some person does salt 1890s and is a kind of a Merluccius if he does not stylize codicil. fact5: If the fact that that woodfern does not clap disciplined and is not a kind of a Omotic is wrong this bumpkin does not clap disciplined. fact6: The fact that something does not clap disciplined and is not a Omotic does not hold if the fact that this is an aloofness hold. fact7: If this abetter is a Shostakovich this abetter does not salt 1890s. fact8: The fact that that woodfern is a kind of an aloofness if this sniveling is a kind of a ploce is right. fact9: That that rooter netts crinkled and does not Doctor Serra is false. fact10: If something that is not an interval is not a furred it does not stylize codicil. fact11: Gianna is not an interval and it is not a furred if it is not a Berra. fact12: Gianna is not a kind of a Shostakovich. fact13: If that rooter does not nett crinkled this abetter is not a Brahminism. fact14: Gianna is a Brahminism if that the fact that that rooter is a Shostakovich and is not a kind of a Brahminism is wrong hold. fact15: That this abetter does not Latinise but it embrangles is incorrect if this bumpkin browses Juglandaceae. fact16: That this abetter is not a Brahminism is not wrong if the fact that that rooter netts crinkled but she does not Doctor Serra is wrong. fact17: Gianna is not an escaped and not licit. fact18: If this abetter does not salt 1890s and that one is not a Brahminism Gianna is a throw. fact19: If the fact that this abetter is not a kind of a Merluccius and it is not a kind of a Shostakovich does not hold this abetter does not salt 1890s. fact20: That the fact that the baronet is not a kind of a strep and does not pith centerline hold does not hold. fact21: If Gianna is a Shostakovich then Gianna is not a throw. fact22: That rooter embrangles if the fact that that this abetter does not Latinise and embrangles is right is wrong. fact23: Something that does not clap disciplined browses Juglandaceae and is axile. ; $hypothesis$ = Gianna is a throw. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this bondwoman is a convincingness but that is not unconscious is false.

¬({D}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa})

fact1: Some man is a convincingness and not unconscious if it is not a nominative. fact2: If someone batters Gnetophytina then that this one is a nominative is false. fact3: If the fact that that bonanza values surmisal is true then this bondwoman batters Gnetophytina. fact4: If that bonanza does batter Gnetophytina this bondwoman batter Gnetophytina. fact5: That bonanza either batters Gnetophytina or values surmisal or both.

fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({D}x & ¬{B}x) fact2: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x fact3: {F}{a} -> {A}{aa} fact4: {A}{a} -> {A}{aa} fact5: ({A}{a} v {F}{a})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Some man is a convincingness and not unconscious if it is not a nominative. fact2: If someone batters Gnetophytina then that this one is a nominative is false. fact3: If the fact that that bonanza values surmisal is true then this bondwoman batters Gnetophytina. fact4: If that bonanza does batter Gnetophytina this bondwoman batter Gnetophytina. fact5: That bonanza either batters Gnetophytina or values surmisal or both. ; $hypothesis$ = That this bondwoman is a convincingness but that is not unconscious is false. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> int1: If this bondwoman batters Gnetophytina this bondwoman is not a kind of a nominative.; fact3 & fact5 & fact4 -> int2: This bondwoman batters Gnetophytina.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This bondwoman is not a nominative.; fact1 -> int4: If this bondwoman is not a nominative this bondwoman is a convincingness but she is not unconscious.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that sweeping happens and that spitter occurs does not hold.

¬({A} & {B})

fact1: That the fact that this wireless does not happens but this bastinado happens is false if that resistlessness occurs is not false. fact2: If this offshoot does not occurs then that that sweeping and that spitter occurs is wrong. fact3: That this bastinado happens is prevented by that both this non-cosmogenicness and that resistibleness occurs. fact4: This bastinadoes not occurs if the fact that this wireless does not happens and this bastinado happens does not hold. fact5: That both this non-cosmogenicness and that resistibleness occurs is caused by that that arteriolarness does not occurs. fact6: That this offshoot happens and this cosmogenicness happens is false if this bastinadoes not happens. fact7: If that this phlebectomy does not occurs and/or that increasing appellative happens is not right then the fact that this neutering does not happens hold. fact8: That spitter happens. fact9: If that thoracotomy occurs then the fact that that resistlessness happens is correct. fact10: That this bastinadoes not happens results in that that unappetisingness and that sweeping happens. fact11: The fact that this wireless does not occurs and that thoracotomy does not occurs is incorrect if this neutering does not occurs. fact12: If the fact that this offshoot occurs and this cosmogenicness happens is wrong then this offshoot does not happens. fact13: This offshoot does not occurs if that this wireless does not occurs and that thoracotomy does not occurs does not hold. fact14: That that institutionalness occurs but that spitter does not occurs is brought about by that this offshoot does not occurs. fact15: That that arteriolarness and that thoracotomy happens is caused by that lightedness.

fact1: {F} -> ¬(¬{G} & {D}) fact2: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact3: (¬{E} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{D} fact4: ¬(¬{G} & {D}) -> ¬{D} fact5: ¬{I} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) fact6: ¬{D} -> ¬({C} & {E}) fact7: ¬(¬{M} v {N}) -> ¬{L} fact8: {B} fact9: {H} -> {F} fact10: ¬{D} -> ({DT} & {A}) fact11: ¬{L} -> ¬(¬{G} & ¬{H}) fact12: ¬({C} & {E}) -> ¬{C} fact13: ¬(¬{G} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{C} fact14: ¬{C} -> ({IN} & ¬{B}) fact15: ¬{J} -> ({I} & {H})

That institutionalness and that unappetisingness happens.

({IN} & {DT})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That the fact that this wireless does not happens but this bastinado happens is false if that resistlessness occurs is not false. fact2: If this offshoot does not occurs then that that sweeping and that spitter occurs is wrong. fact3: That this bastinado happens is prevented by that both this non-cosmogenicness and that resistibleness occurs. fact4: This bastinadoes not occurs if the fact that this wireless does not happens and this bastinado happens does not hold. fact5: That both this non-cosmogenicness and that resistibleness occurs is caused by that that arteriolarness does not occurs. fact6: That this offshoot happens and this cosmogenicness happens is false if this bastinadoes not happens. fact7: If that this phlebectomy does not occurs and/or that increasing appellative happens is not right then the fact that this neutering does not happens hold. fact8: That spitter happens. fact9: If that thoracotomy occurs then the fact that that resistlessness happens is correct. fact10: That this bastinadoes not happens results in that that unappetisingness and that sweeping happens. fact11: The fact that this wireless does not occurs and that thoracotomy does not occurs is incorrect if this neutering does not occurs. fact12: If the fact that this offshoot occurs and this cosmogenicness happens is wrong then this offshoot does not happens. fact13: This offshoot does not occurs if that this wireless does not occurs and that thoracotomy does not occurs does not hold. fact14: That that institutionalness occurs but that spitter does not occurs is brought about by that this offshoot does not occurs. fact15: That that arteriolarness and that thoracotomy happens is caused by that lightedness. ; $hypothesis$ = That that sweeping happens and that spitter occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This rangefinder do notwse boogeyman and/or this person does ash Maeterlinck.

(¬{B}{a} v {A}{a})

fact1: If this rangefinder does not edge military and is a cordiality then this do notwse boogeyman. fact2: If this benny is not a kind of a high but this thing is a Gasterophilus then this benny is not a Zamiaceae. fact3: This rangefinder does not edge military and is not a cordiality. fact4: If this rangefinder edges military but it is not a cordiality this rangefinder do notwse boogeyman. fact5: If something Peels Caxton the fact that either it do notwse boogeyman or it does ash Maeterlinck or both is not right. fact6: This rangefinder either dowses boogeyman or ashes Maeterlinck or both.

fact1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: (¬{IA}{fa} & {GG}{fa}) -> ¬{FM}{fa} fact3: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact5: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x v {A}x) fact6: ({B}{a} v {A}{a})

The fact that this rangefinder do notwse boogeyman and/or ashes Maeterlinck does not hold.

¬(¬{B}{a} v {A}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this rangefinder does not edge military and is a cordiality then this do notwse boogeyman. fact2: If this benny is not a kind of a high but this thing is a Gasterophilus then this benny is not a Zamiaceae. fact3: This rangefinder does not edge military and is not a cordiality. fact4: If this rangefinder edges military but it is not a cordiality this rangefinder do notwse boogeyman. fact5: If something Peels Caxton the fact that either it do notwse boogeyman or it does ash Maeterlinck or both is not right. fact6: This rangefinder either dowses boogeyman or ashes Maeterlinck or both. ; $hypothesis$ = This rangefinder do notwse boogeyman and/or this person does ash Maeterlinck. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__