Datasets:

hitachi-nlp

/

FLD.v2.reimpl

like 1

Follow

Hitachi, Ltd. 13

0.3

That this peewee does not vilipend interestedness and is not a sectioned is incorrect.

¬(¬{B}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa})

fact1: That granadillo is not a kind of a sectioned. fact2: If that seaplane is a kind of a melancholia the fact that it is a suds hold. fact3: If the fact that that Pan is not a kind of a sectioned and the thing does not vilipend interestedness does not hold that that slavey is not a sectioned is true. fact4: The fact that something does not vilipend interestedness and it is not a sectioned is incorrect if that it is not a suds is true. fact5: This peewee does not vilipend interestedness and it is not a sectioned if this peewee is not a sectioned.

fact1: ¬{A}{ed} fact2: {D}{b} -> {C}{b} fact3: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{cu} fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact5: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{B}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa})

That this peewee does not vilipend interestedness and is not a sectioned is incorrect.

¬(¬{B}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That granadillo is not a kind of a sectioned. fact2: If that seaplane is a kind of a melancholia the fact that it is a suds hold. fact3: If the fact that that Pan is not a kind of a sectioned and the thing does not vilipend interestedness does not hold that that slavey is not a sectioned is true. fact4: The fact that something does not vilipend interestedness and it is not a sectioned is incorrect if that it is not a suds is true. fact5: This peewee does not vilipend interestedness and it is not a sectioned if this peewee is not a sectioned. ; $hypothesis$ = That this peewee does not vilipend interestedness and is not a sectioned is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That audiocassette does not recognize mutuality.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: That audiocassette does recognize mutuality and the thing specialises Bokkos. fact2: Some person does not recognize mutuality if it does not specialise Bokkos.

fact1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{A}x

That audiocassette does not recognize mutuality.

¬{A}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That audiocassette does recognize mutuality and the thing specialises Bokkos. fact2: Some person does not recognize mutuality if it does not specialise Bokkos. ; $hypothesis$ = That audiocassette does not recognize mutuality. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that yodeller is not enzymatic is true.

¬{A}{aa}

fact1: If that something is epilithic and/or directed is incorrect it is a yack. fact2: If that the fact that either that yodeller is epilithic or this thing is directed or both is wrong is right this thing is a yack. fact3: The fact that that yodeller is not epilithic or it is directed or both does not hold. fact4: The millepede is epilithic. fact5: If something is enzymatic then it is a yack. fact6: Somebody that is not a kind of a yack and is not a kind of a Valparaiso is not enzymatic. fact7: That chrysanthemum does not chat quantic if that fitch does not chat quantic and is non-tactual. fact8: The Uuq is not epilithic. fact9: If that that chrysanthemum does not chat quantic is right then that that yodeller attains today and that person is an amble does not hold. fact10: That yodeller is a upturned. fact11: That yodeller is epilithic. fact12: If that the llano is not directed and/or is a kind of a backsheesh is false then it will USA. fact13: If that yodeller is a yack then that thing is enzymatic. fact14: If that someone attains today and he/she is an amble is incorrect he/she is not a Valparaiso. fact15: If Maurice is bathymetrical then the thing is not non-cytological. fact16: That yodeller does fry ethicism. fact17: If that some person is not epilithic or not non-directed or both is not true then that the one is a yack hold. fact18: That yodeller is unmodulated. fact19: If someone is non-serous and it is not anaphoric then it is not a yack.

fact1: (x): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x fact2: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) fact4: {AA}{ap} fact5: (x): {A}x -> {B}x fact6: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact7: (¬{H}{b} & ¬{J}{b}) -> ¬{H}{a} fact8: ¬{AA}{bk} fact9: ¬{H}{a} -> ¬({G}{aa} & {F}{aa}) fact10: {HI}{aa} fact11: {AA}{aa} fact12: ¬(¬{AB}{fo} v {BO}{fo}) -> {EA}{fo} fact13: {B}{aa} -> {A}{aa} fact14: (x): ¬({G}x & {F}x) -> ¬{C}x fact15: {FO}{ca} -> {CG}{ca} fact16: {FD}{aa} fact17: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x fact18: {CO}{aa} fact19: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{B}x

The fact that that yodeller is not enzymatic is true.

¬{A}{aa}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that something is epilithic and/or directed is incorrect it is a yack. fact2: If that the fact that either that yodeller is epilithic or this thing is directed or both is wrong is right this thing is a yack. fact3: The fact that that yodeller is not epilithic or it is directed or both does not hold. fact4: The millepede is epilithic. fact5: If something is enzymatic then it is a yack. fact6: Somebody that is not a kind of a yack and is not a kind of a Valparaiso is not enzymatic. fact7: That chrysanthemum does not chat quantic if that fitch does not chat quantic and is non-tactual. fact8: The Uuq is not epilithic. fact9: If that that chrysanthemum does not chat quantic is right then that that yodeller attains today and that person is an amble does not hold. fact10: That yodeller is a upturned. fact11: That yodeller is epilithic. fact12: If that the llano is not directed and/or is a kind of a backsheesh is false then it will USA. fact13: If that yodeller is a yack then that thing is enzymatic. fact14: If that someone attains today and he/she is an amble is incorrect he/she is not a Valparaiso. fact15: If Maurice is bathymetrical then the thing is not non-cytological. fact16: That yodeller does fry ethicism. fact17: If that some person is not epilithic or not non-directed or both is not true then that the one is a yack hold. fact18: That yodeller is unmodulated. fact19: If someone is non-serous and it is not anaphoric then it is not a yack. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that yodeller is not enzymatic is true. ; $proof$ =

fact17 -> int1: If that that yodeller is non-epilithic or that thing is directed or both is wrong then that thing is a yack.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: That yodeller is a kind of a yack.; int2 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that thunderhead is both a ditto and hydrophilic is false.

¬({A}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: That thunderhead deems bonheur and/or is hydrophilic if this Dilaudid is non-dim. fact2: That thunderhead is not non-hydrophilic. fact3: That thunderhead atones and is objective. fact4: That thunderhead is a ditto. fact5: This Dilaudid is not dim.

fact1: ¬{E}{b} -> ({D}{a} v {B}{a}) fact2: {B}{a} fact3: ({BA}{a} & {JB}{a}) fact4: {A}{a} fact5: ¬{E}{b}

That bumper groups heavyheartedness and is a ditto.

({EO}{er} & {A}{er})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That thunderhead deems bonheur and/or is hydrophilic if this Dilaudid is non-dim. fact2: That thunderhead is not non-hydrophilic. fact3: That thunderhead atones and is objective. fact4: That thunderhead is a ditto. fact5: This Dilaudid is not dim. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that thunderhead is both a ditto and hydrophilic is false. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this non-ethicalness and that farting occurs does not hold.

¬(¬{C} & {D})

fact1: That Nazareneness happens and this laparotomy happens. fact2: That notthis theorizing but that feeling trophobiosis happens is not right if that Nazareneness occurs.

fact1: ({A} & {B}) fact2: {A} -> ¬(¬{BA} & {DL})

The fact that this theorizing does not occurs and that feeling trophobiosis happens is incorrect.

¬(¬{BA} & {DL})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Nazareneness happens and this laparotomy happens. fact2: That notthis theorizing but that feeling trophobiosis happens is not right if that Nazareneness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That this non-ethicalness and that farting occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That babyminder horns certitude and it is a Uniate.

({B}{b} & {A}{b})

fact1: The fact that that babyminder is a kind of a Bignoniaceae and it is a Uniate hold. fact2: Some man does horn certitude and it is cleistogamous if it is not teratogenic. fact3: The fact that this acclimatisation is not a kind of a kinaesthesis does not hold. fact4: This woodworm is a kind of a Bignoniaceae. fact5: If that babyminder is a kind of a Basidiomycota it is non-teratogenic and/or it is not succinic. fact6: That that babyminder is a Bignoniaceae is right. fact7: If something is not cleistogamous or it is not a Bignoniaceae or both then it is not a Bignoniaceae. fact8: This linguica is not a kinaesthesis and is a Uniate. fact9: That that babyminder is a kinaesthesis hold. fact10: This Moor hopes tiled and is Moldovan. fact11: If this linguica is not a kind of a kinaesthesis and does hope tiled that babyminder horns certitude. fact12: This linguica is not a kinaesthesis and hopes tiled. fact13: That this linguica is not a Uniate and not a Bignoniaceae is not correct if she does horn certitude. fact14: This linguica is not a kinaesthesis. fact15: This linguica is a compact and the one incinerates. fact16: If this linguica is a kinaesthesis and the one hopes tiled then that babyminder horns certitude. fact17: This linguica is a Uniate. fact18: That babyminder is an opus. fact19: The fact that something does horn certitude and is a kind of a Uniate is false if it is not a Bignoniaceae. fact20: That babyminder formalises Pteridophyta and pulverizes ides.

fact1: ({C}{b} & {A}{b}) fact2: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x & {D}x) fact3: {AA}{ac} fact4: {C}{ci} fact5: {G}{b} -> (¬{E}{b} v ¬{F}{b}) fact6: {C}{b} fact7: (x): (¬{D}x v ¬{C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact8: (¬{AA}{a} & {A}{a}) fact9: {AA}{b} fact10: ({AB}{hf} & {CS}{hf}) fact11: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact12: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact13: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact14: ¬{AA}{a} fact15: ({HN}{a} & {AD}{a}) fact16: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact17: {A}{a} fact18: {GN}{b} fact19: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & {A}x) fact20: ({JF}{b} & {DU}{b})

The fact that that babyminder horns certitude and it is a Uniate is false.

¬({B}{b} & {A}{b})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that babyminder is a kind of a Bignoniaceae and it is a Uniate hold. fact2: Some man does horn certitude and it is cleistogamous if it is not teratogenic. fact3: The fact that this acclimatisation is not a kind of a kinaesthesis does not hold. fact4: This woodworm is a kind of a Bignoniaceae. fact5: If that babyminder is a kind of a Basidiomycota it is non-teratogenic and/or it is not succinic. fact6: That that babyminder is a Bignoniaceae is right. fact7: If something is not cleistogamous or it is not a Bignoniaceae or both then it is not a Bignoniaceae. fact8: This linguica is not a kinaesthesis and is a Uniate. fact9: That that babyminder is a kinaesthesis hold. fact10: This Moor hopes tiled and is Moldovan. fact11: If this linguica is not a kind of a kinaesthesis and does hope tiled that babyminder horns certitude. fact12: This linguica is not a kinaesthesis and hopes tiled. fact13: That this linguica is not a Uniate and not a Bignoniaceae is not correct if she does horn certitude. fact14: This linguica is not a kinaesthesis. fact15: This linguica is a compact and the one incinerates. fact16: If this linguica is a kinaesthesis and the one hopes tiled then that babyminder horns certitude. fact17: This linguica is a Uniate. fact18: That babyminder is an opus. fact19: The fact that something does horn certitude and is a kind of a Uniate is false if it is not a Bignoniaceae. fact20: That babyminder formalises Pteridophyta and pulverizes ides. ; $hypothesis$ = That babyminder horns certitude and it is a Uniate. ; $proof$ =

fact11 & fact12 -> int1: That babyminder does horn certitude.; fact1 -> int2: That babyminder is a Uniate.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That chaser is not a harelip.

¬{B}{c}

fact1: If that parquetry is a solidity then that this university does not cower Katharevusa but it is Hegelian hold. fact2: That chaser is a solidity. fact3: If that parquetry is a solidity this university is Hegelian. fact4: That chaser is Hegelian. fact5: This university is not a kind of a solidity if that parquetry does cower Katharevusa. fact6: This lorikeet cowers Katharevusa. fact7: If this university does not cower Katharevusa and is Hegelian then that chaser is a harelip.

fact1: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact2: {A}{c} fact3: {A}{a} -> {AB}{b} fact4: {AB}{c} fact5: {AA}{a} -> ¬{A}{b} fact6: {AA}{cd} fact7: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> {B}{c}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that parquetry is a solidity then that this university does not cower Katharevusa but it is Hegelian hold. fact2: That chaser is a solidity. fact3: If that parquetry is a solidity this university is Hegelian. fact4: That chaser is Hegelian. fact5: This university is not a kind of a solidity if that parquetry does cower Katharevusa. fact6: This lorikeet cowers Katharevusa. fact7: If this university does not cower Katharevusa and is Hegelian then that chaser is a harelip. ; $hypothesis$ = That chaser is not a harelip. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Let's assume that that starflower does not overhaul Arales.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: That starflower does not wire Cebuano. fact2: If the fact that somebody is not a Eucarya but it is a Monotropaceae is false it unlaces perverted. fact3: If that starflower does not wire Cebuano then that starflower does not idealize and does vault Typhon. fact4: That something does not overhaul Arales but it is a jaggedness does not hold if it wires Cebuano. fact5: the Cebuano does not wire starflower. fact6: If something unlaces perverted it wires Cebuano. fact7: That that starflower does not idealize and vaults Typhon is not correct if it does not overhaul Arales. fact8: If that chickeree is a Brinton then that that starflower is not a Eucarya and is a Monotropaceae is wrong.

fact1: ¬{B}{a} fact2: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) -> {C}x fact3: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {JK}x) fact5: ¬{AE}{ac} fact6: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact8: {F}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {E}{a})

That that starflower does not overhaul Arales and is a jaggedness does not hold.

¬(¬{A}{a} & {JK}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That starflower does not wire Cebuano. fact2: If the fact that somebody is not a Eucarya but it is a Monotropaceae is false it unlaces perverted. fact3: If that starflower does not wire Cebuano then that starflower does not idealize and does vault Typhon. fact4: That something does not overhaul Arales but it is a jaggedness does not hold if it wires Cebuano. fact5: the Cebuano does not wire starflower. fact6: If something unlaces perverted it wires Cebuano. fact7: That that starflower does not idealize and vaults Typhon is not correct if it does not overhaul Arales. fact8: If that chickeree is a Brinton then that that starflower is not a Eucarya and is a Monotropaceae is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that that starflower does not overhaul Arales. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that starflower does not overhaul Arales.; fact7 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that that starflower does not idealize but it does vault Typhon is incorrect.; fact3 & fact1 -> int2: That starflower does not idealize and vaults Typhon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that outskirt does not angle Scomberomorus and that one does not puncture Dublin is wrong.

¬(¬{C}{c} & ¬{B}{c})

fact1: Something donates if it vexes crispiness. fact2: That something does not angle Scomberomorus and this does not puncture Dublin is incorrect if this donates. fact3: If that outskirt is not a kind of a jesting then this blackheart is thinning and angles Scomberomorus. fact4: That caladium foredooms won and sportscasts. fact5: This roughneck does not puncture Dublin if that caladium foredooms won and sportscasts. fact6: That outskirt does not angle Scomberomorus and the person does not puncture Dublin if the fact that this roughneck does not puncture Dublin hold.

fact1: (x): {D}x -> {A}x fact2: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) fact3: ¬{E}{c} -> ({CB}{ct} & {C}{ct}) fact4: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact5: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact6: ¬{B}{b} -> (¬{C}{c} & ¬{B}{c})

This blackheart is a kind of thinning one that is chyliferous.

({CB}{ct} & {EK}{ct})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something donates if it vexes crispiness. fact2: That something does not angle Scomberomorus and this does not puncture Dublin is incorrect if this donates. fact3: If that outskirt is not a kind of a jesting then this blackheart is thinning and angles Scomberomorus. fact4: That caladium foredooms won and sportscasts. fact5: This roughneck does not puncture Dublin if that caladium foredooms won and sportscasts. fact6: That outskirt does not angle Scomberomorus and the person does not puncture Dublin if the fact that this roughneck does not puncture Dublin hold. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that outskirt does not angle Scomberomorus and that one does not puncture Dublin is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact4 -> int1: This roughneck does not puncture Dublin.; int1 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This inextensibleness and/or that parentlessness happens.

({A} v {B})

fact1: This inextensibleness happens.

fact1: {A}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This inextensibleness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This inextensibleness and/or that parentlessness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This medium is a kind of a Alouatta.

{B}{b}

fact1: That quick does not moderate. fact2: That teakwood does not specify if that court is billiard. fact3: This medium is a Alouatta if that that that teakwood is not a fathom but a breadth does not hold is correct. fact4: Something that frosts normothermia is billiard and/or not aortic. fact5: That if the fact that some man is a Dieffenbachia but it does not strain bucketful is incorrect it strain bucketful hold. fact6: If that quick does not moderate then the fact that that court either is not aesthetic or does not monetize excogitation or both is incorrect. fact7: That teakwood specifies. fact8: Something is a Tientsin if that thing is planar. fact9: This medium is not a Alouatta if the fact that that teakwood is not a Alouatta and/or it is not a polysemant is wrong. fact10: If that either someone is not aesthetic or it does not monetize excogitation or both does not hold then it is planar. fact11: Something does frost normothermia if that thing strains bucketful. fact12: If that someone does not specify is correct the fact that this one is not a Alouatta and/or this one is not a kind of a polysemant is incorrect. fact13: If that that teakwood specifies is right that this is not a fathom but a breadth is false. fact14: If this medium is a fathom then that teakwood is a breadth. fact15: That something is a Dieffenbachia but it does not strain bucketful does not hold if it is a Tientsin.

fact1: ¬{M}{d} fact2: {E}{c} -> ¬{A}{a} fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact4: (x): {F}x -> ({E}x v ¬{D}x) fact5: (x): ¬({I}x & ¬{G}x) -> {G}x fact6: ¬{M}{d} -> ¬(¬{L}{c} v ¬{K}{c}) fact7: {A}{a} fact8: (x): {J}x -> {H}x fact9: ¬(¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact10: (x): ¬(¬{L}x v ¬{K}x) -> {J}x fact11: (x): {G}x -> {F}x fact12: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x v ¬{C}x) fact13: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact14: {AA}{b} -> {AB}{a} fact15: (x): {H}x -> ¬({I}x & ¬{G}x)

This medium is not a Alouatta.

¬{B}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That quick does not moderate. fact2: That teakwood does not specify if that court is billiard. fact3: This medium is a Alouatta if that that that teakwood is not a fathom but a breadth does not hold is correct. fact4: Something that frosts normothermia is billiard and/or not aortic. fact5: That if the fact that some man is a Dieffenbachia but it does not strain bucketful is incorrect it strain bucketful hold. fact6: If that quick does not moderate then the fact that that court either is not aesthetic or does not monetize excogitation or both is incorrect. fact7: That teakwood specifies. fact8: Something is a Tientsin if that thing is planar. fact9: This medium is not a Alouatta if the fact that that teakwood is not a Alouatta and/or it is not a polysemant is wrong. fact10: If that either someone is not aesthetic or it does not monetize excogitation or both does not hold then it is planar. fact11: Something does frost normothermia if that thing strains bucketful. fact12: If that someone does not specify is correct the fact that this one is not a Alouatta and/or this one is not a kind of a polysemant is incorrect. fact13: If that that teakwood specifies is right that this is not a fathom but a breadth is false. fact14: If this medium is a fathom then that teakwood is a breadth. fact15: That something is a Dieffenbachia but it does not strain bucketful does not hold if it is a Tientsin. ; $hypothesis$ = This medium is a kind of a Alouatta. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact7 -> int1: That that teakwood is not a fathom but it is a breadth is false.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That the fictionalisation does not occurs but this Italianness happens hold.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: That unfavorableness happens but the unifilarness does not occurs if this blastosphericness does not occurs. fact2: The fictionalisation does not occurs if that unfavorableness does not happens. fact3: Notthe fictionalisation but this Italianness occurs if that unfavorableness does not happens. fact4: The slanting does not happens. fact5: The fact that notthe fictionalisation but this Italianness occurs does not hold if that unfavorableness occurs. fact6: That quadrisonicness does not happens. fact7: That opticalness does not occurs. fact8: Notthe blow but the bridge happens. fact9: That that crystallizing sealed does not occurs is caused by that this pitching and this unarming conjury happens. fact10: That this chafing occurs and the screed occurs is triggered by that that crystallizing sealed does not occurs. fact11: This chafing causes that this blastosphericness does not happens and this naming Pholis does not occurs. fact12: The fictionalisation does not happens. fact13: Notthat quadrisonicness but this session occurs. fact14: That Uruguayan does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{C} -> ({A} & ¬{B}) fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} fact3: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact4: ¬{BJ} fact5: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact6: ¬{AT} fact7: ¬{GK} fact8: (¬{HD} & {DU}) fact9: ({H} & {I}) -> ¬{G} fact10: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact11: {E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact12: ¬{AA} fact13: (¬{AT} & {HB}) fact14: ¬{ED}

That notthe fictionalisation but this Italianness happens is wrong.

¬(¬{AA} & {AB})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That unfavorableness happens but the unifilarness does not occurs if this blastosphericness does not occurs. fact2: The fictionalisation does not occurs if that unfavorableness does not happens. fact3: Notthe fictionalisation but this Italianness occurs if that unfavorableness does not happens. fact4: The slanting does not happens. fact5: The fact that notthe fictionalisation but this Italianness occurs does not hold if that unfavorableness occurs. fact6: That quadrisonicness does not happens. fact7: That opticalness does not occurs. fact8: Notthe blow but the bridge happens. fact9: That that crystallizing sealed does not occurs is caused by that this pitching and this unarming conjury happens. fact10: That this chafing occurs and the screed occurs is triggered by that that crystallizing sealed does not occurs. fact11: This chafing causes that this blastosphericness does not happens and this naming Pholis does not occurs. fact12: The fictionalisation does not happens. fact13: Notthat quadrisonicness but this session occurs. fact14: That Uruguayan does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That the fictionalisation does not occurs but this Italianness happens hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This capsid is lacustrine and that person is a squiggle.

({B}{b} & {A}{b})

fact1: If this shittim is both not ambitious and adenoidal this capsid is lacustrine. fact2: That the dipper is a kind of a polymyositis that is not non-lacustrine is correct. fact3: This shittim is both not a bilge and not non-meridional. fact4: This nosebag is lacustrine. fact5: That asserter is a kind of a squiggle. fact6: This capsid is ambitious. fact7: The orpiment is lacustrine. fact8: This shittim is a squiggle. fact9: This shittim is not a Megaptera and is adenoidal. fact10: This shittim is adenoidal. fact11: Someone that is not a squiggle is not a achlorhydria but adenoidal. fact12: If this capsid is non-adenoidal but it is ambitious then this shittim is a squiggle. fact13: This shittim is not ambitious but the thing is adenoidal. fact14: This capsid is a squiggle. fact15: The stonework is not electronic but this person despises logarithm. fact16: This blister is cognizant and habiteds spec. fact17: This capsid does barrack inherence. fact18: If this shittim is both not ambitious and lacustrine then this capsid is adenoidal.

fact1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact2: ({GU}{gf} & {B}{gf}) fact3: (¬{F}{a} & {K}{a}) fact4: {B}{eb} fact5: {A}{bb} fact6: {AA}{b} fact7: {B}{gg} fact8: {A}{a} fact9: (¬{M}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact10: {AB}{a} fact11: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{HS}x & {AB}x) fact12: (¬{AB}{b} & {AA}{b}) -> {A}{a} fact13: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact14: {A}{b} fact15: (¬{FO}{hu} & {IC}{hu}) fact16: ({BF}{it} & {EG}{it}) fact17: {CL}{b} fact18: (¬{AA}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {AB}{b}

That wand is not a achlorhydria but adenoidal.

(¬{HS}{bh} & {AB}{bh})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this shittim is both not ambitious and adenoidal this capsid is lacustrine. fact2: That the dipper is a kind of a polymyositis that is not non-lacustrine is correct. fact3: This shittim is both not a bilge and not non-meridional. fact4: This nosebag is lacustrine. fact5: That asserter is a kind of a squiggle. fact6: This capsid is ambitious. fact7: The orpiment is lacustrine. fact8: This shittim is a squiggle. fact9: This shittim is not a Megaptera and is adenoidal. fact10: This shittim is adenoidal. fact11: Someone that is not a squiggle is not a achlorhydria but adenoidal. fact12: If this capsid is non-adenoidal but it is ambitious then this shittim is a squiggle. fact13: This shittim is not ambitious but the thing is adenoidal. fact14: This capsid is a squiggle. fact15: The stonework is not electronic but this person despises logarithm. fact16: This blister is cognizant and habiteds spec. fact17: This capsid does barrack inherence. fact18: If this shittim is both not ambitious and lacustrine then this capsid is adenoidal. ; $hypothesis$ = This capsid is lacustrine and that person is a squiggle. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact13 -> int1: This capsid is lacustrine.; int1 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that ingrate is not an incantation but it is untrained is false.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

fact1: The fact that that ingrate is not thankful but it is untrained is wrong. fact2: The fact that that ingrate does not confirm Pterodactylidae and is untrained is incorrect. fact3: The fact that someone does not buffet charitableness but it is not trained is incorrect if it is not a basophilia. fact4: If the fact that someone is a kind of a wishing that is not non-axonal is true then the fact that it is not a basophilia is correct. fact5: That that ingrate is not an incantation but it is untrained is false. fact6: That that ingrate is a kind of uncolored a 26 does not hold. fact7: That the fact that that ingrate is not an incantation but a worst is not right hold. fact8: The fact that that ingrate is both an incantation and untrained is false. fact9: Something is both not an incantation and untrained if this is not a basophilia.

fact1: ¬(¬{BB}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: ¬(¬{GO}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{IJ}x & {AB}x) fact4: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact5: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact6: ¬(¬{CR}{a} & {AJ}{a}) fact7: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {FJ}{a}) fact8: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)

That Gianna does not buffet charitableness and is untrained is wrong.

¬(¬{IJ}{gi} & {AB}{gi})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that ingrate is not thankful but it is untrained is wrong. fact2: The fact that that ingrate does not confirm Pterodactylidae and is untrained is incorrect. fact3: The fact that someone does not buffet charitableness but it is not trained is incorrect if it is not a basophilia. fact4: If the fact that someone is a kind of a wishing that is not non-axonal is true then the fact that it is not a basophilia is correct. fact5: That that ingrate is not an incantation but it is untrained is false. fact6: That that ingrate is a kind of uncolored a 26 does not hold. fact7: That the fact that that ingrate is not an incantation but a worst is not right hold. fact8: The fact that that ingrate is both an incantation and untrained is false. fact9: Something is both not an incantation and untrained if this is not a basophilia. ; $hypothesis$ = That that ingrate is not an incantation but it is untrained is false. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This goading does not occurs.

¬{B}

fact1: If that cessation occurs then that notthe travelog but this confirmation happens is not correct. fact2: That watershed happens. fact3: If that poking occurs that egocentricness does not happens and the marketplace does not happens. fact4: The fact that notthe prep but this auditoriness occurs is false if this dumping occurs. fact5: If that that observing Periploca does not occurs but this strained happens is wrong that abusing does not occurs. fact6: That notthat observing Periploca but this strained happens does not hold if the fact that that porcineness does not happens is correct. fact7: That that abusing does not occurs causes that that cessation occurs and that burdening rimmed occurs. fact8: That this goading does not occurs and that watershed does not happens is triggered by that that wiseness does not happens. fact9: That this roughing overbite occurs and this dumping happens is brought about by that that egocentricness does not happens. fact10: If the fact that notthe prep but this auditoriness happens does not hold that porcineness does not happens. fact11: If the fact that notthe travelog but this confirmation occurs is false that that wiseness does not happens hold. fact12: That that poking does not occurs is prevented by that that winning happens and this blockbuster does not happens.

fact1: {F} -> ¬(¬{E} & {D}) fact2: {A} fact3: {R} -> (¬{P} & ¬{Q}) fact4: {N} -> ¬(¬{L} & {M}) fact5: ¬(¬{J} & {I}) -> ¬{H} fact6: ¬{K} -> ¬(¬{J} & {I}) fact7: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact8: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact9: ¬{P} -> ({O} & {N}) fact10: ¬(¬{L} & {M}) -> ¬{K} fact11: ¬(¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{C} fact12: ({S} & ¬{T}) -> {R}

This goading does not occurs.

¬{B}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that cessation occurs then that notthe travelog but this confirmation happens is not correct. fact2: That watershed happens. fact3: If that poking occurs that egocentricness does not happens and the marketplace does not happens. fact4: The fact that notthe prep but this auditoriness occurs is false if this dumping occurs. fact5: If that that observing Periploca does not occurs but this strained happens is wrong that abusing does not occurs. fact6: That notthat observing Periploca but this strained happens does not hold if the fact that that porcineness does not happens is correct. fact7: That that abusing does not occurs causes that that cessation occurs and that burdening rimmed occurs. fact8: That this goading does not occurs and that watershed does not happens is triggered by that that wiseness does not happens. fact9: That this roughing overbite occurs and this dumping happens is brought about by that that egocentricness does not happens. fact10: If the fact that notthe prep but this auditoriness happens does not hold that porcineness does not happens. fact11: If the fact that notthe travelog but this confirmation occurs is false that that wiseness does not happens hold. fact12: That that poking does not occurs is prevented by that that winning happens and this blockbuster does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This goading does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This comparableness does not occurs.

¬{A}

fact1: This comparableness happens. fact2: That sweating hyperacidity occurs. fact3: That scurrying triggers that that Opposition does not occurs and this comparableness does not happens. fact4: If that rushing excessiveness does not occurs that computationalness happens and this shagging occurs. fact5: The hypostatisation happens. fact6: The fact that notthe backgammon but this sinecure happens is incorrect if this shagging happens. fact7: The fact that that scurrying happens hold if the fact that the backgammon does not happens but this sinecure occurs does not hold.

fact1: {A} fact2: {DM} fact3: {C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact4: ¬{H} -> ({G} & {F}) fact5: {GN} fact6: {F} -> ¬(¬{E} & {D}) fact7: ¬(¬{E} & {D}) -> {C}

This comparableness does not occurs.

¬{A}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This comparableness happens. fact2: That sweating hyperacidity occurs. fact3: That scurrying triggers that that Opposition does not occurs and this comparableness does not happens. fact4: If that rushing excessiveness does not occurs that computationalness happens and this shagging occurs. fact5: The hypostatisation happens. fact6: The fact that notthe backgammon but this sinecure happens is incorrect if this shagging happens. fact7: The fact that that scurrying happens hold if the fact that the backgammon does not happens but this sinecure occurs does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This comparableness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this unifying Mahratti happens and this irritation does not occurs is false.

¬({E} & ¬{D})

fact1: This rehabilitation happens. fact2: That acroscopicness yields that either this HRT does not happens or the Kantianness does not happens or both. fact3: That ravening occurs. fact4: That that dictatorialness does not happens and this irritation does not occurs is brought about by that this unifying Mahratti does not occurs. fact5: The fact that that this unifying Mahratti occurs but this irritation does not happens does not hold hold if that dictatorialness does not happens. fact6: The snoring and this rehabilitation happens if that ravening does not happens. fact7: The fact that both this unifying Mahratti and this irritation happens does not hold. fact8: The fact that the suburbanness occurs but the freeing does not happens is wrong if this infantilism does not occurs. fact9: Both that dictatorialness and this unwatchfulness occurs if that this infantilism does not happens is not false. fact10: That the bentoniticness but notthe ictalness happens is incorrect if that kneeling does not happens. fact11: If that dictatorialness does not happens that this unifying Mahratti occurs and this irritation happens is false. fact12: That this unifying Mahratti occurs and this irritation does not happens is caused by that this rehabilitation does not happens. fact13: Both the whitening Spica and that tempering Fuentes happens. fact14: If that refreshment occurs then the fact that that disobedientness occurs is true. fact15: That that disobedientness occurs prevents that that acroscopicness does not occurs. fact16: That the amphitheatricalness and this non-electoralness happens is wrong.

fact1: {A} fact2: {J} -> (¬{H} v ¬{I}) fact3: {B} fact4: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact5: ¬{C} -> ¬({E} & ¬{D}) fact6: ¬{B} -> ({AR} & {A}) fact7: ¬({E} & {D}) fact8: ¬{G} -> ¬({IR} & ¬{IN}) fact9: ¬{G} -> ({C} & {F}) fact10: ¬{BS} -> ¬({FT} & ¬{EQ}) fact11: ¬{C} -> ¬({E} & {D}) fact12: ¬{A} -> ({E} & ¬{D}) fact13: ({DI} & {JI}) fact14: {L} -> {K} fact15: {K} -> {J} fact16: ¬({HO} & ¬{EI})

The snoring happens.

{AR}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This rehabilitation happens. fact2: That acroscopicness yields that either this HRT does not happens or the Kantianness does not happens or both. fact3: That ravening occurs. fact4: That that dictatorialness does not happens and this irritation does not occurs is brought about by that this unifying Mahratti does not occurs. fact5: The fact that that this unifying Mahratti occurs but this irritation does not happens does not hold hold if that dictatorialness does not happens. fact6: The snoring and this rehabilitation happens if that ravening does not happens. fact7: The fact that both this unifying Mahratti and this irritation happens does not hold. fact8: The fact that the suburbanness occurs but the freeing does not happens is wrong if this infantilism does not occurs. fact9: Both that dictatorialness and this unwatchfulness occurs if that this infantilism does not happens is not false. fact10: That the bentoniticness but notthe ictalness happens is incorrect if that kneeling does not happens. fact11: If that dictatorialness does not happens that this unifying Mahratti occurs and this irritation happens is false. fact12: That this unifying Mahratti occurs and this irritation does not happens is caused by that this rehabilitation does not happens. fact13: Both the whitening Spica and that tempering Fuentes happens. fact14: If that refreshment occurs then the fact that that disobedientness occurs is true. fact15: That that disobedientness occurs prevents that that acroscopicness does not occurs. fact16: That the amphitheatricalness and this non-electoralness happens is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = That this unifying Mahratti happens and this irritation does not occurs is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That protegee is a Philippine.

{C}{a}

fact1: If this fixing does not apologize then that it is not a kind of a SEC and/or is not a semester is incorrect. fact2: Some person does not diagnose Orthotomus if it is calculable. fact3: If somebody is a Reiter and/or the person is sensorineural then the person is not a Philippine. fact4: If the fact that this fixing grays centrism and does not image Trichechus is incorrect this fixing is a disfluency. fact5: If that harpooner does not perk sportiveness that harpooner is calculable and/or not non-Iberian. fact6: If something is a Reiter then this thing is not a Philippine. fact7: This fixing does not apologize if this fixing is a disfluency. fact8: That protegee is sensorineural. fact9: That protegee is enthusiastic if that harpooner is not ratlike. fact10: If something is not sensorineural it is a Khoikhoin and is not a kind of a Reiter. fact11: This neencephalon is not sensorineural if that protegee is both a SEC and not unenthusiastic. fact12: Something is not ratlike if it does not diagnose Orthotomus. fact13: That this fixing grays centrism but she does not image Trichechus does not hold. fact14: If there is someone such that the fact that it is not a kind of a SEC and/or it is not a semester is incorrect that protegee is a SEC. fact15: That harpooner does not perk sportiveness if that that fort is a kind of a Citellus that perk sportiveness is not right. fact16: The fact that that fort is a Citellus and it does perk sportiveness is incorrect.

fact1: ¬{L}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} v ¬{H}{c}) fact2: (x): {I}x -> ¬{G}x fact3: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact4: ¬({N}{c} & ¬{P}{c}) -> {M}{c} fact5: ¬{K}{b} -> ({I}{b} v {J}{b}) fact6: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x fact7: {M}{c} -> ¬{L}{c} fact8: {B}{a} fact9: ¬{F}{b} -> {E}{a} fact10: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({IK}x & ¬{A}x) fact11: ({D}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{B}{cr} fact12: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬{F}x fact13: ¬({N}{c} & ¬{P}{c}) fact14: (x): ¬(¬{D}x v ¬{H}x) -> {D}{a} fact15: ¬({O}{d} & {K}{d}) -> ¬{K}{b} fact16: ¬({O}{d} & {K}{d})

The fact that this neencephalon either is a Philippine or is a Khoikhoin or both is not false.

({C}{cr} v {IK}{cr})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this fixing does not apologize then that it is not a kind of a SEC and/or is not a semester is incorrect. fact2: Some person does not diagnose Orthotomus if it is calculable. fact3: If somebody is a Reiter and/or the person is sensorineural then the person is not a Philippine. fact4: If the fact that this fixing grays centrism and does not image Trichechus is incorrect this fixing is a disfluency. fact5: If that harpooner does not perk sportiveness that harpooner is calculable and/or not non-Iberian. fact6: If something is a Reiter then this thing is not a Philippine. fact7: This fixing does not apologize if this fixing is a disfluency. fact8: That protegee is sensorineural. fact9: That protegee is enthusiastic if that harpooner is not ratlike. fact10: If something is not sensorineural it is a Khoikhoin and is not a kind of a Reiter. fact11: This neencephalon is not sensorineural if that protegee is both a SEC and not unenthusiastic. fact12: Something is not ratlike if it does not diagnose Orthotomus. fact13: That this fixing grays centrism but she does not image Trichechus does not hold. fact14: If there is someone such that the fact that it is not a kind of a SEC and/or it is not a semester is incorrect that protegee is a SEC. fact15: That harpooner does not perk sportiveness if that that fort is a kind of a Citellus that perk sportiveness is not right. fact16: The fact that that fort is a Citellus and it does perk sportiveness is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = That protegee is a Philippine. ; $proof$ =

fact8 -> int1: That protegee is a Reiter or not non-sensorineural or both.; fact3 -> int2: That protegee is not a Philippine if this thing is a Reiter or this thing is sensorineural or both.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This vitalist is Mozartian.

{B}{b}

fact1: If something leaps EbN then it is Mozartian. fact2: If that greens is Judaical that mini is Mozartian. fact3: That greens is Judaical if the fact that that greens is a cardinality hold. fact4: If that greens is not ceric then this vitalist is a kind of a keeled that leaps EbN. fact5: If that greens is not ceric then this vitalist is a keeled. fact6: This vitalist is a keeled. fact7: That that greens is a kind of a keeled hold. fact8: Someone that is ceric is a keeled. fact9: That greens does not hear. fact10: If some man is Mozartian and she is ceric she is not a kind of a keeled.

fact1: (x): {AB}x -> {B}x fact2: {D}{a} -> {B}{ee} fact3: {F}{a} -> {D}{a} fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{b} fact6: {AA}{b} fact7: {AA}{a} fact8: (x): {A}x -> {AA}x fact9: ¬{CP}{a} fact10: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{AA}x

That mini is not a keeled.

¬{AA}{ee}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something leaps EbN then it is Mozartian. fact2: If that greens is Judaical that mini is Mozartian. fact3: That greens is Judaical if the fact that that greens is a cardinality hold. fact4: If that greens is not ceric then this vitalist is a kind of a keeled that leaps EbN. fact5: If that greens is not ceric then this vitalist is a keeled. fact6: This vitalist is a keeled. fact7: That that greens is a kind of a keeled hold. fact8: Someone that is ceric is a keeled. fact9: That greens does not hear. fact10: If some man is Mozartian and she is ceric she is not a kind of a keeled. ; $hypothesis$ = This vitalist is Mozartian. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that pyrogenousness does not happens but that dermabrasion occurs is incorrect.

¬(¬{A} & {B})

fact1: The dispute happens. fact2: That that dermabrasion happens hold. fact3: That caffeinicness does not happens. fact4: That skirting cybernetics does not happens. fact5: That pyrogenousness does not occurs.

fact1: {I} fact2: {B} fact3: ¬{FI} fact4: ¬{CA} fact5: ¬{A}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The dispute happens. fact2: That that dermabrasion happens hold. fact3: That caffeinicness does not happens. fact4: That skirting cybernetics does not happens. fact5: That pyrogenousness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That that pyrogenousness does not happens but that dermabrasion occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that this oracle is not a Camassia and it is not different is false.

¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

fact1: If this oracle does not plunder blocked then the fact that this oracle is a Camassia but not different does not hold. fact2: This oracle is not a Camassia and that person is not different if this backwash does not plunder blocked. fact3: That the shumac is not a Robeson and does not fasten abscess is incorrect. fact4: That some person is not a Camassia but this one is different is incorrect if this one does not plunder blocked. fact5: That this oracle is a kind of a Camassia but it is not different is not true. fact6: If this decalescence does Kid this backwash Kid. fact7: The cretin does not plunder blocked. fact8: If this oracle is not a kind of a fad then that she is not a kind of a Milanese and she does not thrust Jungermanniales is not correct. fact9: That the upcast does not plunder blocked hold. fact10: This oracle does not chisel. fact11: If somebody is not a Robeson that it does not plunder blocked and it is not different is not correct. fact12: This oracle is a Robeson. fact13: This oracle is both not a Mimosoideae and a Robeson. fact14: This backwash does not plunder blocked and it is not a Robeson if it does Kid. fact15: That this oracle is not a Camassia but this thing is different does not hold. fact16: That some man is a Camassia that is not different is not right if that one does not plunder blocked. fact17: The fact that something does not plunder blocked and it is not a kind of a Robeson does not hold if it is not different. fact18: The fact that this oracle is not geopolitical and not comprehendible is incorrect. fact19: If someone does not plunder blocked the fact that it is not a Camassia and not different does not hold. fact20: If this oracle does not plunder blocked the fact that this oracle is not a Camassia but it is different is wrong. fact21: If this oracle is not acinar that he does not settle sublet and is not different does not hold.

fact1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact3: ¬(¬{B}{du} & ¬{IR}{du}) fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact5: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact6: {C}{b} -> {C}{a} fact7: ¬{A}{eh} fact8: ¬{FI}{aa} -> ¬(¬{CO}{aa} & ¬{IM}{aa}) fact9: ¬{A}{bk} fact10: ¬{J}{aa} fact11: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{AB}x) fact12: {B}{aa} fact13: (¬{GL}{aa} & {B}{aa}) fact14: {C}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact15: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact16: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact17: (x): ¬{AB}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) fact18: ¬(¬{IC}{aa} & ¬{HT}{aa}) fact19: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact20: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact21: ¬{GQ}{aa} -> ¬(¬{BL}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

This oracle is both not a Camassia and non-different.

(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this oracle does not plunder blocked then the fact that this oracle is a Camassia but not different does not hold. fact2: This oracle is not a Camassia and that person is not different if this backwash does not plunder blocked. fact3: That the shumac is not a Robeson and does not fasten abscess is incorrect. fact4: That some person is not a Camassia but this one is different is incorrect if this one does not plunder blocked. fact5: That this oracle is a kind of a Camassia but it is not different is not true. fact6: If this decalescence does Kid this backwash Kid. fact7: The cretin does not plunder blocked. fact8: If this oracle is not a kind of a fad then that she is not a kind of a Milanese and she does not thrust Jungermanniales is not correct. fact9: That the upcast does not plunder blocked hold. fact10: This oracle does not chisel. fact11: If somebody is not a Robeson that it does not plunder blocked and it is not different is not correct. fact12: This oracle is a Robeson. fact13: This oracle is both not a Mimosoideae and a Robeson. fact14: This backwash does not plunder blocked and it is not a Robeson if it does Kid. fact15: That this oracle is not a Camassia but this thing is different does not hold. fact16: That some man is a Camassia that is not different is not right if that one does not plunder blocked. fact17: The fact that something does not plunder blocked and it is not a kind of a Robeson does not hold if it is not different. fact18: The fact that this oracle is not geopolitical and not comprehendible is incorrect. fact19: If someone does not plunder blocked the fact that it is not a Camassia and not different does not hold. fact20: If this oracle does not plunder blocked the fact that this oracle is not a Camassia but it is different is wrong. fact21: If this oracle is not acinar that he does not settle sublet and is not different does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this oracle is not a Camassia and it is not different is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This xenolith is non-vocal one that does spot sealed.

(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

fact1: That mesoblast does not tune Lagodon. fact2: Something tunes Lagodon if the thing is a revolutionary. fact3: the Lagodon does not tune mesoblast. fact4: If the fact that this xenolith is not vocal but he spots sealed is wrong that mesoblast is adjudicative. fact5: This poltergeist is a kind of a revolutionary if that this xenolith is not a revolutionary and ravishes is false. fact6: That that mesoblast is not adjudicative is right if that mesoblast does not tune Lagodon.

fact1: ¬{A}{b} fact2: (x): {C}x -> {A}x fact3: ¬{AC}{aa} fact4: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact5: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {E}{a}) -> {C}{hs} fact6: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬{B}{b}

This poltergeist is not adjudicative and swings detailed.

(¬{B}{hs} & {P}{hs})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That mesoblast does not tune Lagodon. fact2: Something tunes Lagodon if the thing is a revolutionary. fact3: the Lagodon does not tune mesoblast. fact4: If the fact that this xenolith is not vocal but he spots sealed is wrong that mesoblast is adjudicative. fact5: This poltergeist is a kind of a revolutionary if that this xenolith is not a revolutionary and ravishes is false. fact6: That that mesoblast is not adjudicative is right if that mesoblast does not tune Lagodon. ; $hypothesis$ = This xenolith is non-vocal one that does spot sealed. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this xenolith is not vocal but this person spots sealed is not right.; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: That mesoblast is adjudicative.; fact1 & fact6 -> int2: That mesoblast is non-adjudicative.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that this seltzer is a kind of a Tanzim that is not mucous does not hold.

¬({C}{b} & ¬{AA}{b})

fact1: If this seltzer does not chagrin Caesarea it is both not non-mucous and hydroxy. fact2: This seltzer is a Tanzim but the person is not mucous if that authoritarian is mucous. fact3: The fact that something is a Tanzim but it is not mucous does not hold if it is hydroxy. fact4: That authoritarian is not hydroxy. fact5: If something does not convince and this does not recognise Puebla then this bamboozles vocable. fact6: If some man does bamboozle vocable then the fact that it does not moot Sontag and specifies is not correct. fact7: If that authoritarian is not hydroxy that authoritarian is mucous and chagrins Caesarea. fact8: That authoritarian is a Tanzim if this seltzer is hydroxy. fact9: Somebody that is not satyrical or is a kind of a Osteichthyes or both is satyrical. fact10: That control elates haematocyturia. fact11: This extreme does not convince and does not recognise Puebla if that control is unalienable. fact12: This seltzer is not mucous. fact13: That authoritarian is a kind of mucous one that is not a kind of a Tanzim if this seltzer is a Tanzim. fact14: Some man is mucous and it is hydroxy if it is not satyrical. fact15: That that control is unalienable is right if that control does elate haematocyturia. fact16: This forefoot is mucous. fact17: If that authoritarian is not a kind of a Tanzim then this myxobacter is not satyrical and/or she is a Osteichthyes. fact18: The strumpet is not a Tanzim. fact19: If that this extreme does not moot Sontag but it does specify is wrong then that authoritarian is not a Osteichthyes.

fact1: ¬{AB}{b} -> ({AA}{b} & {A}{b}) fact2: {AA}{a} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) fact3: (x): {A}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{AA}x) fact4: ¬{A}{a} fact5: (x): (¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) -> {G}x fact6: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact8: {A}{b} -> {C}{a} fact9: (x): (¬{B}x v {D}x) -> ¬{B}x fact10: {K}{d} fact11: {J}{d} -> (¬{I}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) fact12: ¬{AA}{b} fact13: {C}{b} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact14: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({AA}x & {A}x) fact15: {K}{d} -> {J}{d} fact16: {AA}{em} fact17: ¬{C}{a} -> (¬{B}{fa} v {D}{fa}) fact18: ¬{C}{et} fact19: ¬(¬{F}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{D}{a}

The fact that this seltzer is a kind of a Tanzim that is not mucous does not hold.

¬({C}{b} & ¬{AA}{b})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this seltzer does not chagrin Caesarea it is both not non-mucous and hydroxy. fact2: This seltzer is a Tanzim but the person is not mucous if that authoritarian is mucous. fact3: The fact that something is a Tanzim but it is not mucous does not hold if it is hydroxy. fact4: That authoritarian is not hydroxy. fact5: If something does not convince and this does not recognise Puebla then this bamboozles vocable. fact6: If some man does bamboozle vocable then the fact that it does not moot Sontag and specifies is not correct. fact7: If that authoritarian is not hydroxy that authoritarian is mucous and chagrins Caesarea. fact8: That authoritarian is a Tanzim if this seltzer is hydroxy. fact9: Somebody that is not satyrical or is a kind of a Osteichthyes or both is satyrical. fact10: That control elates haematocyturia. fact11: This extreme does not convince and does not recognise Puebla if that control is unalienable. fact12: This seltzer is not mucous. fact13: That authoritarian is a kind of mucous one that is not a kind of a Tanzim if this seltzer is a Tanzim. fact14: Some man is mucous and it is hydroxy if it is not satyrical. fact15: That that control is unalienable is right if that control does elate haematocyturia. fact16: This forefoot is mucous. fact17: If that authoritarian is not a kind of a Tanzim then this myxobacter is not satyrical and/or she is a Osteichthyes. fact18: The strumpet is not a Tanzim. fact19: If that this extreme does not moot Sontag but it does specify is wrong then that authoritarian is not a Osteichthyes. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this seltzer is a kind of a Tanzim that is not mucous does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact4 -> int1: That authoritarian is mucous and the thing does chagrin Caesarea.; int1 -> int2: That authoritarian is mucous.; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Alexis is non-mesodermal thing that manages Paleolithic if this is not non-mesodermal.

¬{A}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: If there is something such that that thing does not manage Paleolithic then the cootie is mesodermal and that thing manage Paleolithic. fact2: Alexis is not impressible if that this is not weatherly and not repentant is wrong. fact3: Alexis is oleophobic. fact4: If Alexis is mesodermal then Alexis is not mesodermal and manages Paleolithic. fact5: If something is not non-oleophobic but a Crescentia it does not manage Paleolithic. fact6: Alexis manages Paleolithic. fact7: this Paleolithic manages Alexis. fact8: Something is trophic and is a Crescentia if that is not impressible.

fact1: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}{eb} & {B}{eb}) fact2: ¬(¬{G}{a} & ¬{H}{a}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact3: {C}{a} fact4: {A}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact5: (x): ({C}x & {D}x) -> ¬{B}x fact6: {B}{a} fact7: {AA}{aa} fact8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {D}x)

That the cootie is not non-mesodermal is true.

{A}{eb}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If there is something such that that thing does not manage Paleolithic then the cootie is mesodermal and that thing manage Paleolithic. fact2: Alexis is not impressible if that this is not weatherly and not repentant is wrong. fact3: Alexis is oleophobic. fact4: If Alexis is mesodermal then Alexis is not mesodermal and manages Paleolithic. fact5: If something is not non-oleophobic but a Crescentia it does not manage Paleolithic. fact6: Alexis manages Paleolithic. fact7: this Paleolithic manages Alexis. fact8: Something is trophic and is a Crescentia if that is not impressible. ; $hypothesis$ = Alexis is non-mesodermal thing that manages Paleolithic if this is not non-mesodermal. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that Alexis is not mesodermal.; assump1 & fact6 -> int1: Alexis is not mesodermal but this manages Paleolithic.; [assump1] & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This neoclassicistness happens.

{B}

fact1: That that both the non-wholesomeness and that tempering Copley happens is wrong is not false. fact2: If the fact that both the unwholesomeness and that tempering Copley happens is wrong this neoclassicistness does not happens. fact3: That both this neoclassicistness and this sulcateness happens is brought about by that that profession does not occurs.

fact1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact3: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A})

This neoclassicistness happens.

{B}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that both the non-wholesomeness and that tempering Copley happens is wrong is not false. fact2: If the fact that both the unwholesomeness and that tempering Copley happens is wrong this neoclassicistness does not happens. fact3: That both this neoclassicistness and this sulcateness happens is brought about by that that profession does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This neoclassicistness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That misdelivering enantiomorphism does not happens.

¬{A}

fact1: That misdelivering enantiomorphism occurs. fact2: If this incorruptness does not happens that this hotfooting does not occurs or that nonhierarchicalness does not happens or both does not hold. fact3: That languishing inattentiveness occurs. fact4: If this chop does not happens the fact that notthis edging annum but this incurableness occurs is false. fact5: This chop is prevented by that that requital does not occurs but that consolidating scansion occurs. fact6: If that nonhierarchicalness does not happens both that misdelivering enantiomorphism and that stirring occurs. fact7: If that this edging annum does not happens but this incurableness happens does not hold this incurableness does not occurs. fact8: That nonhierarchicalness does not occurs if this hotfooting but notthis incorruptness occurs. fact9: That this incurableness does not happens leads to that this hotfooting happens but this incorruptness does not happens. fact10: That misdelivering enantiomorphism does not occurs if the fact that the fact that this hotfooting does not occurs and/or that nonhierarchicalness does not occurs hold is not true.

fact1: {A} fact2: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{C} v ¬{B}) fact3: {FD} fact4: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{G} & {E}) fact5: (¬{I} & {H}) -> ¬{F} fact6: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {DC}) fact7: ¬(¬{G} & {E}) -> ¬{E} fact8: ({C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact9: ¬{E} -> ({C} & ¬{D}) fact10: ¬(¬{C} v ¬{B}) -> ¬{A}

That stirring occurs.

{DC}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That misdelivering enantiomorphism occurs. fact2: If this incorruptness does not happens that this hotfooting does not occurs or that nonhierarchicalness does not happens or both does not hold. fact3: That languishing inattentiveness occurs. fact4: If this chop does not happens the fact that notthis edging annum but this incurableness occurs is false. fact5: This chop is prevented by that that requital does not occurs but that consolidating scansion occurs. fact6: If that nonhierarchicalness does not happens both that misdelivering enantiomorphism and that stirring occurs. fact7: If that this edging annum does not happens but this incurableness happens does not hold this incurableness does not occurs. fact8: That nonhierarchicalness does not occurs if this hotfooting but notthis incorruptness occurs. fact9: That this incurableness does not happens leads to that this hotfooting happens but this incorruptness does not happens. fact10: That misdelivering enantiomorphism does not occurs if the fact that the fact that this hotfooting does not occurs and/or that nonhierarchicalness does not occurs hold is not true. ; $hypothesis$ = That misdelivering enantiomorphism does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

There is no man that is a Callisto and is not an adhesive.

(x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

fact1: There is no man that is a Callisto and is not an adhesive.

fact1: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There is no man that is a Callisto and is not an adhesive. ; $hypothesis$ = There is no man that is a Callisto and is not an adhesive. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This glass puns Chalcidae and is a kind of a Pentastomida.

({A}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: That this glass does pun Chalcidae is true. fact2: that that Chalcidae does pun glass is true. fact3: The heroin puns Chalcidae. fact4: The Fez is a Pentastomida. fact5: This glass is a Pentastomida. fact6: This glass is a kind of a technicolor.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {AA}{aa} fact3: {A}{ik} fact4: {B}{bd} fact5: {B}{a} fact6: {BG}{a}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That this glass does pun Chalcidae is true. fact2: that that Chalcidae does pun glass is true. fact3: The heroin puns Chalcidae. fact4: The Fez is a Pentastomida. fact5: This glass is a Pentastomida. fact6: This glass is a kind of a technicolor. ; $hypothesis$ = This glass puns Chalcidae and is a kind of a Pentastomida. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This markweed is bacteriostatic.

{A}{a}

fact1: The tagger is bacteriostatic. fact2: If something is not treeless then it is not bacteriostatic and it is a Calvatia. fact3: If that either something boobs Nuytsia or this incurs or both is wrong then the fact that this is not treeless hold. fact4: This markweed slims echoing. fact5: The scorpionweed is bacteriostatic.

fact1: {A}{it} fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) fact3: (x): ¬({E}x v {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact4: {CI}{a} fact5: {A}{jk}

This markweed is not bacteriostatic.

¬{A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The tagger is bacteriostatic. fact2: If something is not treeless then it is not bacteriostatic and it is a Calvatia. fact3: If that either something boobs Nuytsia or this incurs or both is wrong then the fact that this is not treeless hold. fact4: This markweed slims echoing. fact5: The scorpionweed is bacteriostatic. ; $hypothesis$ = This markweed is bacteriostatic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This rearwards is acervate.

{C}{a}

fact1: This rearwards is a lovingness. fact2: If this rearwards is a lovingness and it toadies Sittidae this rearwards is not acervate. fact3: The airway is not a lovingness if that it is not acervate and it is a lovingness is false. fact4: This rearwards is compounded. fact5: This rearwards is punic. fact6: The fact that this rearwards is not undiscriminating hold if this rearwards does father forwardness and she is a lovingness. fact7: That something is not acervate but it is a lovingness is false if it is a Aepyorniformes. fact8: The fact that this rearwards is both acervate and a lovingness if that this enchanter does not toady Sittidae hold is correct. fact9: This rearwards is not compounded if the one toadies Sittidae and is oligarchic. fact10: This rearwards does not boom if the fact that this rearwards deflates armamentarium and this is a Kurdish is right. fact11: That ovary is a kind of a lovingness. fact12: This rearwards hamstrings peseta. fact13: the fact that that Sittidae toadies rearwards hold. fact14: The palmyra does not toady Sittidae. fact15: The fact that this rearwards is anemometric is correct. fact16: The fact that this rearwards toadies Sittidae hold. fact17: The expectorator is acervate and it is a chondrodystrophy. fact18: The fact that that ethnic is not acervate is correct. fact19: That amiodarone is a lovingness.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact3: ¬(¬{C}{ae} & {A}{ae}) -> ¬{A}{ae} fact4: {CH}{a} fact5: {HP}{a} fact6: ({CL}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{DJ}{a} fact7: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) fact8: ¬{B}{b} -> ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) fact9: ({B}{a} & {IC}{a}) -> ¬{CH}{a} fact10: ({HE}{a} & {JB}{a}) -> ¬{T}{a} fact11: {A}{do} fact12: {JH}{a} fact13: {AA}{ab} fact14: ¬{B}{dn} fact15: {AO}{a} fact16: {B}{a} fact17: ({C}{hd} & {DB}{hd}) fact18: ¬{C}{aa} fact19: {A}{ah}

The airway is agrobiological thing that toadies Sittidae.

({AG}{ae} & {B}{ae})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This rearwards is a lovingness. fact2: If this rearwards is a lovingness and it toadies Sittidae this rearwards is not acervate. fact3: The airway is not a lovingness if that it is not acervate and it is a lovingness is false. fact4: This rearwards is compounded. fact5: This rearwards is punic. fact6: The fact that this rearwards is not undiscriminating hold if this rearwards does father forwardness and she is a lovingness. fact7: That something is not acervate but it is a lovingness is false if it is a Aepyorniformes. fact8: The fact that this rearwards is both acervate and a lovingness if that this enchanter does not toady Sittidae hold is correct. fact9: This rearwards is not compounded if the one toadies Sittidae and is oligarchic. fact10: This rearwards does not boom if the fact that this rearwards deflates armamentarium and this is a Kurdish is right. fact11: That ovary is a kind of a lovingness. fact12: This rearwards hamstrings peseta. fact13: the fact that that Sittidae toadies rearwards hold. fact14: The palmyra does not toady Sittidae. fact15: The fact that this rearwards is anemometric is correct. fact16: The fact that this rearwards toadies Sittidae hold. fact17: The expectorator is acervate and it is a chondrodystrophy. fact18: The fact that that ethnic is not acervate is correct. fact19: That amiodarone is a lovingness. ; $hypothesis$ = This rearwards is acervate. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact16 -> int1: This rearwards is a kind of a lovingness that toadies Sittidae.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This porphyriticness does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: This postexilicness does not occurs if this withdrawal occurs and this orb occurs. fact2: This withdrawal happens if the fact that that importunity occurs is true. fact3: That pissing patronymic prevents that this porphyriticness occurs. fact4: This orb occurs if the fact that the tattling happens hold. fact5: Both that swindle and that importunity occurs if this forfeiting clubfoot does not happens. fact6: That intimating does not happens but that deserting occurs. fact7: That this porphyriticness happens is triggered by that that pissing patronymic does not occurs. fact8: If that foundering misocainea happens the tattling happens. fact9: The leglessness occurs. fact10: That non-postexilicness results in that that pissing patronymic does not happens and the leglessness does not occurs. fact11: That that intimating does not happens and that deserting happens prevents this forfeiting clubfoot.

fact1: ({F} & {E}) -> ¬{D} fact2: {G} -> {F} fact3: {A} -> ¬{C} fact4: {I} -> {E} fact5: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {G}) fact6: (¬{M} & {L}) fact7: ¬{A} -> {C} fact8: {K} -> {I} fact9: {B} fact10: ¬{D} -> (¬{A} & ¬{B}) fact11: (¬{M} & {L}) -> ¬{J}

This porphyriticness happens.

{C}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This postexilicness does not occurs if this withdrawal occurs and this orb occurs. fact2: This withdrawal happens if the fact that that importunity occurs is true. fact3: That pissing patronymic prevents that this porphyriticness occurs. fact4: This orb occurs if the fact that the tattling happens hold. fact5: Both that swindle and that importunity occurs if this forfeiting clubfoot does not happens. fact6: That intimating does not happens but that deserting occurs. fact7: That this porphyriticness happens is triggered by that that pissing patronymic does not occurs. fact8: If that foundering misocainea happens the tattling happens. fact9: The leglessness occurs. fact10: That non-postexilicness results in that that pissing patronymic does not happens and the leglessness does not occurs. fact11: That that intimating does not happens and that deserting happens prevents this forfeiting clubfoot. ; $hypothesis$ = This porphyriticness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That jurywoman is not a Sterope.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: A Romberg is a kind of a Sterope. fact2: That jurywoman is a blossoming. fact3: That jurywoman naturalizes if that this thiamin naturalizes and does not undervalue is incorrect. fact4: That jurywoman is a blossoming and a Romberg. fact5: The fact that that jurywoman is not a blossoming and is a kind of a Romberg is false if this naturalizes.

fact1: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact2: {A}{a} fact3: ¬({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> {D}{a} fact4: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact5: {D}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{a} & {B}{a})

That jurywoman is not a Sterope.

¬{C}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: A Romberg is a kind of a Sterope. fact2: That jurywoman is a blossoming. fact3: That jurywoman naturalizes if that this thiamin naturalizes and does not undervalue is incorrect. fact4: That jurywoman is a blossoming and a Romberg. fact5: The fact that that jurywoman is not a blossoming and is a kind of a Romberg is false if this naturalizes. ; $hypothesis$ = That jurywoman is not a Sterope. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> int1: That jurywoman is a Romberg.; fact1 -> int2: If that jurywoman is a kind of a Romberg then that is a Sterope.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This packing occurs and that paralleling Phalaris happens.

({C} & {D})

fact1: This packing happens if this Sinhaleseness occurs. fact2: Both this Sinhaleseness and this laundering brunt happens. fact3: This laundering brunt happens. fact4: That this laundering brunt does not happens and the thermodynamicness does not occurs is caused by that that comploting NSF does not occurs. fact5: If the fact that this laundering brunt does not happens is right that gravimetry occurs and this Sinhaleseness occurs. fact6: Both this septateness and this packing happens if that paralleling Phalaris does not occurs. fact7: That paralleling Phalaris happens. fact8: That paralleling Phalaris does not occurs if the fact that that carboxyl occurs but that thoughtfulness does not occurs is wrong. fact9: That the cataphaticness happens is triggered by this vomiting. fact10: The tonguelessness occurs. fact11: That crazing extropy happens.

fact1: {A} -> {C} fact2: ({A} & {B}) fact3: {B} fact4: ¬{H} -> (¬{B} & ¬{E}) fact5: ¬{B} -> ({AH} & {A}) fact6: ¬{D} -> ({GA} & {C}) fact7: {D} fact8: ¬({F} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{D} fact9: {CS} -> {GE} fact10: {P} fact11: {CJ}

Both this septateness and that gravimetry occurs.

({GA} & {AH})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This packing happens if this Sinhaleseness occurs. fact2: Both this Sinhaleseness and this laundering brunt happens. fact3: This laundering brunt happens. fact4: That this laundering brunt does not happens and the thermodynamicness does not occurs is caused by that that comploting NSF does not occurs. fact5: If the fact that this laundering brunt does not happens is right that gravimetry occurs and this Sinhaleseness occurs. fact6: Both this septateness and this packing happens if that paralleling Phalaris does not occurs. fact7: That paralleling Phalaris happens. fact8: That paralleling Phalaris does not occurs if the fact that that carboxyl occurs but that thoughtfulness does not occurs is wrong. fact9: That the cataphaticness happens is triggered by this vomiting. fact10: The tonguelessness occurs. fact11: That crazing extropy happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This packing occurs and that paralleling Phalaris happens. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> int1: This Sinhaleseness happens.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: This packing happens.; int2 & fact7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That stairwell is tragic.

{D}{b}

fact1: That stairwell either is not raw or is not unimproved or both. fact2: That stairwell is a ligne. fact3: Something is a ligne or not a biotech or both if it is not a centimetre. fact4: If the fact that that cantala does not intercommunicate is true that stairwell is tragic. fact5: That stairwell is tragic if that cantala is not a ligne. fact6: If the fact that something is a spurring and it speaks Mazzini is incorrect it is not a centimetre. fact7: Someone that is a ligne and/or is not a kind of a biotech is not a biotech. fact8: That cantala is not tragic and/or it is not a ligne. fact9: Either that cantala does not intercommunicate or the thing is not a ligne or both if something is a biotech. fact10: That cantala is not tragic and/or that thing does not intercommunicate. fact11: There is something such that it is tragic. fact12: Either that stairwell is not a ligne or this person is not tragic or both if there is someone such that this person intercommunicates. fact13: Some man is a kind of a biotech. fact14: Some man is a ligne. fact15: If that cantala is not tragic then that stairwell is a kind of a ligne. fact16: That cockade is not a centimetre if the fact that that endocrine is not a kind of a centimetre is correct. fact17: If something that intercommunicates is not a biotech then it is a crenation. fact18: If that cantala is not tragic and does not intercommunicate that stairwell is not tragic.

fact1: (¬{EF}{b} v ¬{BE}{b}) fact2: {C}{b} fact3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x v ¬{A}x) fact4: ¬{B}{a} -> {D}{b} fact5: ¬{C}{a} -> {D}{b} fact6: (x): ¬({F}x & {G}x) -> ¬{E}x fact7: (x): ({C}x v ¬{A}x) -> ¬{A}x fact8: (¬{D}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) fact9: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) fact10: (¬{D}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) fact11: (Ex): {D}x fact12: (x): {B}x -> (¬{C}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) fact13: (Ex): {A}x fact14: (Ex): {C}x fact15: ¬{D}{a} -> {C}{b} fact16: ¬{E}{d} -> ¬{E}{c} fact17: (x): ({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {BO}x fact18: (¬{D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b}

The fact that that stairwell is not tragic is true.

¬{D}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That stairwell either is not raw or is not unimproved or both. fact2: That stairwell is a ligne. fact3: Something is a ligne or not a biotech or both if it is not a centimetre. fact4: If the fact that that cantala does not intercommunicate is true that stairwell is tragic. fact5: That stairwell is tragic if that cantala is not a ligne. fact6: If the fact that something is a spurring and it speaks Mazzini is incorrect it is not a centimetre. fact7: Someone that is a ligne and/or is not a kind of a biotech is not a biotech. fact8: That cantala is not tragic and/or it is not a ligne. fact9: Either that cantala does not intercommunicate or the thing is not a ligne or both if something is a biotech. fact10: That cantala is not tragic and/or that thing does not intercommunicate. fact11: There is something such that it is tragic. fact12: Either that stairwell is not a ligne or this person is not tragic or both if there is someone such that this person intercommunicates. fact13: Some man is a kind of a biotech. fact14: Some man is a ligne. fact15: If that cantala is not tragic then that stairwell is a kind of a ligne. fact16: That cockade is not a centimetre if the fact that that endocrine is not a kind of a centimetre is correct. fact17: If something that intercommunicates is not a biotech then it is a crenation. fact18: If that cantala is not tragic and does not intercommunicate that stairwell is not tragic. ; $hypothesis$ = That stairwell is tragic. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact9 -> int1: That cantala does not intercommunicate and/or it is not a ligne.; int1 & fact4 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That linearness occurs.

{B}

fact1: If that that shellfire occurs but that discrepancy does not occurs is wrong then that shellfire does not occurs. fact2: That Arameanness and that linearness occurs. fact3: The metarule and this dissimilarness happens. fact4: That that Arameanness does not occurs but that intruding occurs is not true if that shellfire happens. fact5: The basking occurs. fact6: The antenuptialness does not happens if this dairying happens and that discrepancy occurs. fact7: The bifilarness occurs. fact8: The replaceableness happens. fact9: That both that shellfire and this unsaddledness occurs is caused by that the antenuptialness does not happens. fact10: That Arameanness happens. fact11: If this dairying does not occurs then that that shellfire but notthat discrepancy occurs does not hold. fact12: That this unsaddledness happens and/or the antenuptialness does not occurs is caused by that this parousness does not happens. fact13: This airstream occurs. fact14: If that intruding does not happens then both this pocking and that Arameanness occurs. fact15: This dairying does not occurs if that that wedding occurs and that exegeticness does not occurs does not hold. fact16: The gladdening happens. fact17: That zizz occurs. fact18: That both that wedding and this non-exegeticness occurs does not hold if this malfunctioning occurs. fact19: Both the isotopicness and this evening happens. fact20: The blarneying bureaucracy and that linearness occurs if that shellfire does not happens. fact21: The adornedness and/or this non-circulatoriness prevents that this parousness happens.

fact1: ¬({D} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{D} fact2: ({A} & {B}) fact3: ({JH} & {FH}) fact4: {D} -> ¬(¬{A} & {C}) fact5: {DE} fact6: ({H} & {G}) -> ¬{F} fact7: {JK} fact8: {GE} fact9: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact10: {A} fact11: ¬{H} -> ¬({D} & ¬{G}) fact12: ¬{K} -> ({E} v ¬{F}) fact13: {BP} fact14: ¬{C} -> ({EG} & {A}) fact15: ¬({I} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{H} fact16: {BT} fact17: {ER} fact18: {N} -> ¬({I} & ¬{J}) fact19: ({GP} & {EK}) fact20: ¬{D} -> ({AG} & {B}) fact21: (¬{L} v ¬{M}) -> ¬{K}

Both the blarneying bureaucracy and this pocking happens.

({AG} & {EG})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that that shellfire occurs but that discrepancy does not occurs is wrong then that shellfire does not occurs. fact2: That Arameanness and that linearness occurs. fact3: The metarule and this dissimilarness happens. fact4: That that Arameanness does not occurs but that intruding occurs is not true if that shellfire happens. fact5: The basking occurs. fact6: The antenuptialness does not happens if this dairying happens and that discrepancy occurs. fact7: The bifilarness occurs. fact8: The replaceableness happens. fact9: That both that shellfire and this unsaddledness occurs is caused by that the antenuptialness does not happens. fact10: That Arameanness happens. fact11: If this dairying does not occurs then that that shellfire but notthat discrepancy occurs does not hold. fact12: That this unsaddledness happens and/or the antenuptialness does not occurs is caused by that this parousness does not happens. fact13: This airstream occurs. fact14: If that intruding does not happens then both this pocking and that Arameanness occurs. fact15: This dairying does not occurs if that that wedding occurs and that exegeticness does not occurs does not hold. fact16: The gladdening happens. fact17: That zizz occurs. fact18: That both that wedding and this non-exegeticness occurs does not hold if this malfunctioning occurs. fact19: Both the isotopicness and this evening happens. fact20: The blarneying bureaucracy and that linearness occurs if that shellfire does not happens. fact21: The adornedness and/or this non-circulatoriness prevents that this parousness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That linearness occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That polishing Rameau does not happens.

¬{D}

fact1: If that ablateding occurs then the uninterestedness happens. fact2: Both that ablateding and this Adonicness happens. fact3: That that polishing Rameau does not happens is prevented by the uninterestedness.

fact1: {A} -> {C} fact2: ({A} & {B}) fact3: {C} -> {D}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If that ablateding occurs then the uninterestedness happens. fact2: Both that ablateding and this Adonicness happens. fact3: That that polishing Rameau does not happens is prevented by the uninterestedness. ; $hypothesis$ = That polishing Rameau does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> int1: That ablateding happens.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: The uninterestedness occurs.; int2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Both this fandango and this pessimisticness happens.

({B} & {C})

fact1: That aphasic and this pessimisticness happens. fact2: The fact that that aphasic and this pessimisticness occurs is incorrect if that genicness does not occurs. fact3: If that spoliation happens then both that peripeteia and that non-genicness happens. fact4: That aphasic occurs. fact5: If that peripeteia does not occurs that aphasic and that genicness happens. fact6: That that exclusion does not occurs and that spoliation happens does not hold if that remaindering SAS happens. fact7: That both this modern and that bottomed happens hold. fact8: This hierarchicness does not happens. fact9: If the fact that that exclusion does not occurs and that spoliation occurs is incorrect that peripeteia does not occurs.

fact1: ({D} & {C}) fact2: ¬{E} -> ¬({D} & {C}) fact3: {G} -> ({F} & ¬{E}) fact4: {D} fact5: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact6: {I} -> ¬(¬{H} & {G}) fact7: ({DD} & {FG}) fact8: ¬{A} fact9: ¬(¬{H} & {G}) -> ¬{F}

This hieratic does not occurs.

¬{AA}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That aphasic and this pessimisticness happens. fact2: The fact that that aphasic and this pessimisticness occurs is incorrect if that genicness does not occurs. fact3: If that spoliation happens then both that peripeteia and that non-genicness happens. fact4: That aphasic occurs. fact5: If that peripeteia does not occurs that aphasic and that genicness happens. fact6: That that exclusion does not occurs and that spoliation happens does not hold if that remaindering SAS happens. fact7: That both this modern and that bottomed happens hold. fact8: This hierarchicness does not happens. fact9: If the fact that that exclusion does not occurs and that spoliation occurs is incorrect that peripeteia does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Both this fandango and this pessimisticness happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This limestone does not stave.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: This limestone staves if Roman does not pitch soapiness. fact2: This borage is restrictive if the fact that this borage is anthropic and is not restrictive is false. fact3: This limestone is despotic. fact4: There exists nobody that does not absorb and is a Hades. fact5: That Roman does pitch soapiness and is not despotic is incorrect. fact6: This limestone does not stave if Roman is not uncombined. fact7: This limestone staves if that Roman does pitch soapiness and is not despotic is false. fact8: If someone is not anarchistic then that she/he is anthropic and she/he is not restrictive is false. fact9: The fact that Roman is a kind of combined person that does not racket Limnodromus if that macrospore nauseates spreadsheet hold. fact10: Roman is apogamic. fact11: If this limestone is despotic that Roman staves is correct. fact12: Roman staves if that this limestone is despotic but it does not pitch soapiness is false. fact13: If that this limestone pitches soapiness is not false then Roman staves. fact14: If this limestone is uncombined then the fact that Roman is anagogical but it is non-catarrhinian does not hold. fact15: If the fact that this borage does not absorb but she/he is a kind of a Hades is wrong then this borage is not anarchistic. fact16: This limestone is despotic if that Roman staves but it does not pitch soapiness does not hold. fact17: If that someone does not nauseate spreadsheet and maunders thrilled does not hold the one does nauseate spreadsheet.

fact1: ¬{AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact2: ¬({G}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) -> {F}{d} fact3: {AB}{b} fact4: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & {J}x) fact5: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact7: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact8: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({G}x & ¬{F}x) fact9: {D}{c} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact10: {GJ}{a} fact11: {AB}{b} -> {B}{a} fact12: ¬({AB}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) -> {B}{a} fact13: {AA}{b} -> {B}{a} fact14: {A}{b} -> ¬({JC}{a} & ¬{CE}{a}) fact15: ¬(¬{I}{d} & {J}{d}) -> ¬{H}{d} fact16: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) -> {AB}{b} fact17: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) -> {D}x

This limestone does not stave.

¬{B}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This limestone staves if Roman does not pitch soapiness. fact2: This borage is restrictive if the fact that this borage is anthropic and is not restrictive is false. fact3: This limestone is despotic. fact4: There exists nobody that does not absorb and is a Hades. fact5: That Roman does pitch soapiness and is not despotic is incorrect. fact6: This limestone does not stave if Roman is not uncombined. fact7: This limestone staves if that Roman does pitch soapiness and is not despotic is false. fact8: If someone is not anarchistic then that she/he is anthropic and she/he is not restrictive is false. fact9: The fact that Roman is a kind of combined person that does not racket Limnodromus if that macrospore nauseates spreadsheet hold. fact10: Roman is apogamic. fact11: If this limestone is despotic that Roman staves is correct. fact12: Roman staves if that this limestone is despotic but it does not pitch soapiness is false. fact13: If that this limestone pitches soapiness is not false then Roman staves. fact14: If this limestone is uncombined then the fact that Roman is anagogical but it is non-catarrhinian does not hold. fact15: If the fact that this borage does not absorb but she/he is a kind of a Hades is wrong then this borage is not anarchistic. fact16: This limestone is despotic if that Roman staves but it does not pitch soapiness does not hold. fact17: If that someone does not nauseate spreadsheet and maunders thrilled does not hold the one does nauseate spreadsheet. ; $hypothesis$ = This limestone does not stave. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This abatement occurs.

{B}

fact1: Notthe unseasonedness but the Balkanising tormented occurs. fact2: The mintage does not happens and this abatement occurs. fact3: The serviceableness does not occurs and the unhappiness happens. fact4: Notthe moldering but this drumming footcandle happens. fact5: The fact that that encirclement occurs is not incorrect. fact6: This violation does not happens. fact7: That the progressing does not happens is right. fact8: The actuating Juarez does not happens and this gassing happens. fact9: Both the non-azoness and that delicateness happens. fact10: The mintage does not happens. fact11: The participating Leitneriaceae happens. fact12: The renting neoexpressionism does not happens. fact13: This severing syntax does not happens.

fact1: (¬{EO} & {HP}) fact2: (¬{A} & {B}) fact3: (¬{FA} & {FF}) fact4: (¬{IM} & {HJ}) fact5: {GN} fact6: ¬{BF} fact7: ¬{BH} fact8: (¬{GJ} & {JK}) fact9: (¬{FO} & {JF}) fact10: ¬{A} fact11: {EM} fact12: ¬{HK} fact13: ¬{EE}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Notthe unseasonedness but the Balkanising tormented occurs. fact2: The mintage does not happens and this abatement occurs. fact3: The serviceableness does not occurs and the unhappiness happens. fact4: Notthe moldering but this drumming footcandle happens. fact5: The fact that that encirclement occurs is not incorrect. fact6: This violation does not happens. fact7: That the progressing does not happens is right. fact8: The actuating Juarez does not happens and this gassing happens. fact9: Both the non-azoness and that delicateness happens. fact10: The mintage does not happens. fact11: The participating Leitneriaceae happens. fact12: The renting neoexpressionism does not happens. fact13: This severing syntax does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This abatement occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That watercolourist stammers colpocystitis.

{B}{aa}

fact1: That watercolourist does not stammer colpocystitis if that that nub does not emasculate orthopaedics but it does stammer colpocystitis is incorrect. fact2: If something that is not antenatal does not trap even this stammers colpocystitis. fact3: That watercolourist is non-antenatal thing that does not trap even. fact4: An absorbent person that is not an instantiation is not a Sorensen.

fact1: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact2: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact3: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact4: (x): (¬{FU}x & ¬{EL}x) -> {T}x

The fact that that watercolourist does not stammer colpocystitis is not false.

¬{B}{aa}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That watercolourist does not stammer colpocystitis if that that nub does not emasculate orthopaedics but it does stammer colpocystitis is incorrect. fact2: If something that is not antenatal does not trap even this stammers colpocystitis. fact3: That watercolourist is non-antenatal thing that does not trap even. fact4: An absorbent person that is not an instantiation is not a Sorensen. ; $hypothesis$ = That watercolourist stammers colpocystitis. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> int1: If the fact that that watercolourist is not antenatal and that does not trap even is correct that watercolourist stammers colpocystitis.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that either Josh is a aeromedicine or it is a tellurian or both is false.

¬({B}{c} v {C}{c})

fact1: This stripling is not uninquisitive. fact2: This revolutionist is not a aeromedicine if this stripling is not uninquisitive. fact3: Josh is a aeromedicine and/or is a tellurian if this revolutionist is not a kind of a aeromedicine. fact4: This revolutionist is uninquisitive and/or she/he is a aeromedicine.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact3: ¬{B}{b} -> ({B}{c} v {C}{c}) fact4: ({A}{b} v {B}{b})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This stripling is not uninquisitive. fact2: This revolutionist is not a aeromedicine if this stripling is not uninquisitive. fact3: Josh is a aeromedicine and/or is a tellurian if this revolutionist is not a kind of a aeromedicine. fact4: This revolutionist is uninquisitive and/or she/he is a aeromedicine. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that either Josh is a aeromedicine or it is a tellurian or both is false. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact1 -> int1: This revolutionist is not a kind of a aeromedicine.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This termination does not occurs.

¬{A}

fact1: This backblast happens. fact2: If that that Mesoamericanness occurs and this jingoism does not happens is wrong then that comforting elite does not happens. fact3: That both this tramontaneness and this noncontroversialness happens is wrong if the fact that that comforting elite does not occurs hold. fact4: That that condemning Vulcan occurs and that unsymbolicness happens is caused by that that praise does not happens. fact5: This noncontroversialness and that comforting elite happens if that Mesoamericanness does not occurs. fact6: If this tack does not happens then that vestmentalness and this termination occurs. fact7: If this pressing does not occurs and that sectional occurs then this uniform does not happens. fact8: The fact that that discharge occurs is correct if the fact that that phlegminess and/or this non-tramontaneness happens is incorrect. fact9: If that discharge happens then that this tack but notthis virtuousness occurs is incorrect. fact10: That phlegminess does not happens if the fact that this tramontaneness and this noncontroversialness happens is wrong. fact11: If this uniform does not occurs then that the fact that that Mesoamericanness happens and this jingoism does not happens is correct does not hold. fact12: If the fact that this virtuousness does not happens and that discharge does not occurs is wrong then this tack does not happens. fact13: That notthis pressing but that sectional occurs is caused by that that condemning Vulcan happens. fact14: This termination occurs. fact15: The fact that if that phlegminess does not happens then that this virtuousness does not happens and that discharge does not happens is incorrect hold. fact16: If that this tack occurs and this virtuousness does not occurs is false this termination does not happens.

fact1: {AR} fact2: ¬({I} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{H} fact3: ¬{H} -> ¬({F} & {G}) fact4: ¬{P} -> ({N} & {O}) fact5: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact6: ¬{B} -> ({JH} & {A}) fact7: (¬{L} & {M}) -> ¬{K} fact8: ¬({E} v ¬{F}) -> {D} fact9: {D} -> ¬({B} & ¬{C}) fact10: ¬({F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact11: ¬{K} -> ¬({I} & ¬{J}) fact12: ¬(¬{C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact13: {N} -> (¬{L} & {M}) fact14: {A} fact15: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact16: ¬({B} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{A}

That vestmentalness happens.

{JH}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This backblast happens. fact2: If that that Mesoamericanness occurs and this jingoism does not happens is wrong then that comforting elite does not happens. fact3: That both this tramontaneness and this noncontroversialness happens is wrong if the fact that that comforting elite does not occurs hold. fact4: That that condemning Vulcan occurs and that unsymbolicness happens is caused by that that praise does not happens. fact5: This noncontroversialness and that comforting elite happens if that Mesoamericanness does not occurs. fact6: If this tack does not happens then that vestmentalness and this termination occurs. fact7: If this pressing does not occurs and that sectional occurs then this uniform does not happens. fact8: The fact that that discharge occurs is correct if the fact that that phlegminess and/or this non-tramontaneness happens is incorrect. fact9: If that discharge happens then that this tack but notthis virtuousness occurs is incorrect. fact10: That phlegminess does not happens if the fact that this tramontaneness and this noncontroversialness happens is wrong. fact11: If this uniform does not occurs then that the fact that that Mesoamericanness happens and this jingoism does not happens is correct does not hold. fact12: If the fact that this virtuousness does not happens and that discharge does not occurs is wrong then this tack does not happens. fact13: That notthis pressing but that sectional occurs is caused by that that condemning Vulcan happens. fact14: This termination occurs. fact15: The fact that if that phlegminess does not happens then that this virtuousness does not happens and that discharge does not happens is incorrect hold. fact16: If that this tack occurs and this virtuousness does not occurs is false this termination does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This termination does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That weatherstrip helps Nigroporus.

{C}{b}

fact1: Somebody inspires pellagra and this person is unmodifiable if this person is not a kind of a Madagascan. fact2: This felafel is a rat if it is pachydermous. fact3: This snap does inspire pellagra if this felafel either does not help Nigroporus or does not inspire pellagra or both. fact4: That weatherstrip is a optative if this snap is not a optative. fact5: This snap is not a Nentsi. fact6: That something is a kind of a Fulgoridae that does not help Nigroporus is incorrect if this thing inspires pellagra. fact7: If this snap inspires pellagra or it is a kind of a Fulgoridae or both that weatherstrip does not help Nigroporus. fact8: That this snap is not a Madagascan if the fact that this felafel is a kind of a neuritis but this is not an indebtedness is incorrect is true. fact9: Something decides Plzen if the fact that it is a Sundacarpus and it does not decides Plzen is incorrect. fact10: That weatherstrip helps Nigroporus if the fact that this snap is a Fulgoridae but it does not helps Nigroporus is wrong. fact11: Something does not help Nigroporus and/or that thing does not inspire pellagra if that thing is a Fulgoridae. fact12: That something is a kind of a Sundacarpus and does not decide Plzen does not hold if the fact that this thing is a rat is true. fact13: This snap is a Fulgoridae. fact14: The leak inspires pellagra. fact15: That weatherstrip does not help Nigroporus if this snap inspires pellagra. fact16: If some person inspires pellagra the one is not a optative. fact17: That something is a neuritis but it is not an indebtedness does not hold if it does decide Plzen.

fact1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({A}x & {D}x) fact2: {K}{c} -> {J}{c} fact3: (¬{C}{c} v ¬{A}{c}) -> {A}{a} fact4: ¬{GS}{a} -> {GS}{b} fact5: ¬{BG}{a} fact6: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) fact7: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact8: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact9: (x): ¬({I}x & ¬{H}x) -> {H}x fact10: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {C}{b} fact11: (x): {B}x -> (¬{C}x v ¬{A}x) fact12: (x): {J}x -> ¬({I}x & ¬{H}x) fact13: {B}{a} fact14: {A}{q} fact15: {A}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} fact16: (x): {A}x -> ¬{GS}x fact17: (x): {H}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{G}x)

That weatherstrip is not non-ammoniated and/or it is a kind of a optative.

({HD}{b} v {GS}{b})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Somebody inspires pellagra and this person is unmodifiable if this person is not a kind of a Madagascan. fact2: This felafel is a rat if it is pachydermous. fact3: This snap does inspire pellagra if this felafel either does not help Nigroporus or does not inspire pellagra or both. fact4: That weatherstrip is a optative if this snap is not a optative. fact5: This snap is not a Nentsi. fact6: That something is a kind of a Fulgoridae that does not help Nigroporus is incorrect if this thing inspires pellagra. fact7: If this snap inspires pellagra or it is a kind of a Fulgoridae or both that weatherstrip does not help Nigroporus. fact8: That this snap is not a Madagascan if the fact that this felafel is a kind of a neuritis but this is not an indebtedness is incorrect is true. fact9: Something decides Plzen if the fact that it is a Sundacarpus and it does not decides Plzen is incorrect. fact10: That weatherstrip helps Nigroporus if the fact that this snap is a Fulgoridae but it does not helps Nigroporus is wrong. fact11: Something does not help Nigroporus and/or that thing does not inspire pellagra if that thing is a Fulgoridae. fact12: That something is a kind of a Sundacarpus and does not decide Plzen does not hold if the fact that this thing is a rat is true. fact13: This snap is a Fulgoridae. fact14: The leak inspires pellagra. fact15: That weatherstrip does not help Nigroporus if this snap inspires pellagra. fact16: If some person inspires pellagra the one is not a optative. fact17: That something is a neuritis but it is not an indebtedness does not hold if it does decide Plzen. ; $hypothesis$ = That weatherstrip helps Nigroporus. ; $proof$ =

fact13 -> int1: This snap inspires pellagra and/or it is a Fulgoridae.; int1 & fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

There is some person such that if that this person jilts readership is true then this person does not beshrew and is a kind of a fit.

(Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)

fact1: There is somebody such that if it jilts readership then it is a kind of a fit. fact2: If that serviceberry jilts readership that serviceberry does not beshrew. fact3: There is someone such that if it jilts readership then it does not beshrew. fact4: If that serviceberry is a despicableness that that serviceberry is not actinomycetous but it is a kind of a Manda hold. fact5: That serviceberry does not beshrew and is a kind of a fit if that thing does jilt readership. fact6: The swamphen is non-astringent thing that jilts readership if that is Hertzian. fact7: The Durham does not jilt readership and is a consortium if that is a Mustagh. fact8: There is something such that if this does jilt readership this beshrews and is a fit. fact9: That serviceberry does not sheathe Ostreidae but this one is untempered if this one is a fit.

fact1: (Ex): {A}x -> {AB}x fact2: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact3: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬{AA}x fact4: {JK}{aa} -> (¬{GQ}{aa} & {BJ}{aa}) fact5: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact6: {JF}{hc} -> (¬{ID}{hc} & {A}{hc}) fact7: {CP}{ab} -> (¬{A}{ab} & {AQ}{ab}) fact8: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) fact9: {AB}{aa} -> (¬{GM}{aa} & {DQ}{aa})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There is somebody such that if it jilts readership then it is a kind of a fit. fact2: If that serviceberry jilts readership that serviceberry does not beshrew. fact3: There is someone such that if it jilts readership then it does not beshrew. fact4: If that serviceberry is a despicableness that that serviceberry is not actinomycetous but it is a kind of a Manda hold. fact5: That serviceberry does not beshrew and is a kind of a fit if that thing does jilt readership. fact6: The swamphen is non-astringent thing that jilts readership if that is Hertzian. fact7: The Durham does not jilt readership and is a consortium if that is a Mustagh. fact8: There is something such that if this does jilt readership this beshrews and is a fit. fact9: That serviceberry does not sheathe Ostreidae but this one is untempered if this one is a fit. ; $hypothesis$ = There is some person such that if that this person jilts readership is true then this person does not beshrew and is a kind of a fit. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That forefront is not a Northumbria.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: This basileus does not overgrow bionics if that tailgate is a hoopla. fact2: If someone does not overgrow bionics it is a flagging that is diamagnetic. fact3: That something is a hoopla hold if that it does not demystify rosiness and it is not a hoopla is incorrect. fact4: Some man is not a kind of a Yafo if the fact that it is not an odor and it is a Yafo is wrong. fact5: If something is diamagnetic then it is a kind of a Northumbria. fact6: That forefront is not a Northumbria if this basileus is a kind of a flagging. fact7: If something is not a Yafo then the fact that it does not demystify rosiness and is not a hoopla does not hold. fact8: The fact that that forefront is a flagging is true. fact9: If that forefront is a flagging that forefront is not non-diamagnetic.

fact1: {E}{c} -> ¬{D}{b} fact2: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact3: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> {E}x fact4: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{G}x fact5: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact6: {A}{b} -> ¬{C}{a} fact7: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) fact8: {A}{a} fact9: {A}{a} -> {B}{a}

That forefront is not a Northumbria.

¬{C}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This basileus does not overgrow bionics if that tailgate is a hoopla. fact2: If someone does not overgrow bionics it is a flagging that is diamagnetic. fact3: That something is a hoopla hold if that it does not demystify rosiness and it is not a hoopla is incorrect. fact4: Some man is not a kind of a Yafo if the fact that it is not an odor and it is a Yafo is wrong. fact5: If something is diamagnetic then it is a kind of a Northumbria. fact6: That forefront is not a Northumbria if this basileus is a kind of a flagging. fact7: If something is not a Yafo then the fact that it does not demystify rosiness and is not a hoopla does not hold. fact8: The fact that that forefront is a flagging is true. fact9: If that forefront is a flagging that forefront is not non-diamagnetic. ; $hypothesis$ = That forefront is not a Northumbria. ; $proof$ =

fact9 & fact8 -> int1: That forefront is not non-diamagnetic.; fact5 -> int2: If that that forefront is diamagnetic is right that forefront is a Northumbria.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that this serial and/or that avocation occurs is wrong.

¬({A} v {B})

fact1: This degaussinging hymn does not occurs and that squatting does not occurs if that webbing LX occurs. fact2: That this humblingness does not happens hold if that this sadisticness and this humblingness occurs is false. fact3: If either that avocation does not occurs or this keeping occurs or both then the fact that that avocation does not happens is correct. fact4: If this degaussinging hymn occurs and that webbing LX does not happens that squatting does not happens. fact5: That reliving misinterpretation occurs and that descanting meagreness happens if that squatting does not occurs. fact6: That that avocation does not happens and/or this keeping occurs is brought about by that that descanting meagreness occurs. fact7: If that reliving misinterpretation happens that descanting meagreness does not occurs and this keeping does not occurs. fact8: If the fact that that anacoluthicness occurs but that webbing LX does not happens does not hold that webbing LX occurs. fact9: If this degaussinging hymn does not happens and that squatting does not happens the fact that that reliving misinterpretation occurs hold. fact10: The moonlessness occurs. fact11: If this humblingness does not happens that that anacoluthicness occurs but that webbing LX does not happens does not hold. fact12: If the fact that that anacoluthicness does not happens is right then this degaussinging hymn but notthat webbing LX occurs.

fact1: {H} -> (¬{G} & ¬{F}) fact2: ¬({K} & {J}) -> ¬{J} fact3: (¬{B} v {D}) -> ¬{B} fact4: ({G} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{F} fact5: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {C}) fact6: {C} -> (¬{B} v {D}) fact7: {E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact8: ¬({I} & ¬{H}) -> {H} fact9: (¬{G} & ¬{F}) -> {E} fact10: {AT} fact11: ¬{J} -> ¬({I} & ¬{H}) fact12: ¬{I} -> ({G} & ¬{H})

The fact that this serial and/or that avocation occurs is wrong.

¬({A} v {B})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This degaussinging hymn does not occurs and that squatting does not occurs if that webbing LX occurs. fact2: That this humblingness does not happens hold if that this sadisticness and this humblingness occurs is false. fact3: If either that avocation does not occurs or this keeping occurs or both then the fact that that avocation does not happens is correct. fact4: If this degaussinging hymn occurs and that webbing LX does not happens that squatting does not happens. fact5: That reliving misinterpretation occurs and that descanting meagreness happens if that squatting does not occurs. fact6: That that avocation does not happens and/or this keeping occurs is brought about by that that descanting meagreness occurs. fact7: If that reliving misinterpretation happens that descanting meagreness does not occurs and this keeping does not occurs. fact8: If the fact that that anacoluthicness occurs but that webbing LX does not happens does not hold that webbing LX occurs. fact9: If this degaussinging hymn does not happens and that squatting does not happens the fact that that reliving misinterpretation occurs hold. fact10: The moonlessness occurs. fact11: If this humblingness does not happens that that anacoluthicness occurs but that webbing LX does not happens does not hold. fact12: If the fact that that anacoluthicness does not happens is right then this degaussinging hymn but notthat webbing LX occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this serial and/or that avocation occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this folding Latimeridae does not happens and this pillaging Bombyx happens is incorrect.

¬(¬{A} & {B})

fact1: The advance occurs. fact2: If that renormalizing xvi occurs then that notthis folding Latimeridae but this pillaging Bombyx happens is incorrect. fact3: This megalithicness occurs. fact4: That gutsiness does not happens. fact5: That microsurgery does not occurs. fact6: The malting does not occurs. fact7: That wound does not happens. fact8: The statisticalness occurs. fact9: This folding Latimeridae does not occurs. fact10: This pillaging Bombyx occurs. fact11: The fact that that inducting happens hold. fact12: Both this non-surfaceness and this predating happens if this folding Latimeridae happens. fact13: Notthe reification but the patientness happens. fact14: The observing happens.

fact1: {FA} fact2: {C} -> ¬(¬{A} & {B}) fact3: {HQ} fact4: ¬{E} fact5: ¬{GR} fact6: ¬{HN} fact7: ¬{IJ} fact8: {ED} fact9: ¬{A} fact10: {B} fact11: {AN} fact12: {A} -> (¬{GE} & {BT}) fact13: (¬{HS} & {JD}) fact14: {BU}

That this folding Latimeridae does not happens and this pillaging Bombyx happens is incorrect.

¬(¬{A} & {B})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The advance occurs. fact2: If that renormalizing xvi occurs then that notthis folding Latimeridae but this pillaging Bombyx happens is incorrect. fact3: This megalithicness occurs. fact4: That gutsiness does not happens. fact5: That microsurgery does not occurs. fact6: The malting does not occurs. fact7: That wound does not happens. fact8: The statisticalness occurs. fact9: This folding Latimeridae does not occurs. fact10: This pillaging Bombyx occurs. fact11: The fact that that inducting happens hold. fact12: Both this non-surfaceness and this predating happens if this folding Latimeridae happens. fact13: Notthe reification but the patientness happens. fact14: The observing happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That this folding Latimeridae does not happens and this pillaging Bombyx happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact9 & fact10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This corkboard does not raid metrics.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: If that this microorganism is not a Aegean is true the fact that this microorganism is not evangelical and not a Bassariscus is false. fact2: The fact that if this diencephalon is either a perpendicular or not sugarless or both then this corkboard does not raid metrics is right. fact3: If this diencephalon is operatic this diencephalon either is a perpendicular or is sugarless or both. fact4: If the fact that this diencephalon is not operatic but it is not non-evangelical is incorrect then it is operatic. fact5: If this agueweed is not evangelical then that patient raids metrics and is operatic. fact6: If the fact that some man is not a corruptness and is not a Ghent is incorrect then it is not a kind of a Aegean. fact7: That this diencephalon does not raid metrics but it is evangelical is incorrect. fact8: The Greece is evangelical and/or the person is not a bug. fact9: This corkboard is a kind of a Omani and/or it is not a Gerreidae. fact10: That this microorganism is not a corruptness and this thing is not a Ghent does not hold if this microorganism is a crassitude. fact11: This corkboard is non-evangelical. fact12: This corkboard does not raid metrics if this diencephalon is not sugarless. fact13: The fact that this diencephalon does not raid metrics hold if either this corkboard is sugarless or this one is not operatic or both. fact14: The fact that this diencephalon is not operatic but it is evangelical does not hold. fact15: The fact that this diencephalon is operatic and it is evangelical does not hold. fact16: This diencephalon is a perpendicular or is sugarless or both. fact17: This diencephalon is evangelical and/or does not troll Pericallis. fact18: If that patient raids metrics then that adversary raids metrics. fact19: Something is a perpendicular and/or is sugarless if it is operatic. fact20: If that this microorganism is not evangelical and is not a kind of a Bassariscus is wrong then this agueweed is not evangelical. fact21: Something is a perpendicular or it is not sugarless or both if it is operatic. fact22: This corkboard is not a bug. fact23: The fact that this corkboard raids metrics hold if that adversary does raids metrics.

fact1: ¬{D}{e} -> ¬(¬{C}{e} & ¬{E}{e}) fact2: ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact3: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) fact4: ¬(¬{A}{aa} & {C}{aa}) -> {A}{aa} fact5: ¬{C}{d} -> ({B}{c} & {A}{c}) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{D}x fact7: ¬(¬{B}{aa} & {C}{aa}) fact8: ({C}{hu} v ¬{M}{hu}) fact9: ({ES}{a} v ¬{CO}{a}) fact10: {H}{e} -> ¬(¬{F}{e} & ¬{G}{e}) fact11: ¬{C}{a} fact12: ¬{AB}{aa} -> ¬{B}{a} fact13: ({AB}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact14: ¬(¬{A}{aa} & {C}{aa}) fact15: ¬({A}{aa} & {C}{aa}) fact16: ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) fact17: ({C}{aa} v ¬{CB}{aa}) fact18: {B}{c} -> {B}{b} fact19: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x v {AB}x) fact20: ¬(¬{C}{e} & ¬{E}{e}) -> ¬{C}{d} fact21: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) fact22: ¬{M}{a} fact23: {B}{b} -> {B}{a}

This corkboard raids metrics.

{B}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that this microorganism is not a Aegean is true the fact that this microorganism is not evangelical and not a Bassariscus is false. fact2: The fact that if this diencephalon is either a perpendicular or not sugarless or both then this corkboard does not raid metrics is right. fact3: If this diencephalon is operatic this diencephalon either is a perpendicular or is sugarless or both. fact4: If the fact that this diencephalon is not operatic but it is not non-evangelical is incorrect then it is operatic. fact5: If this agueweed is not evangelical then that patient raids metrics and is operatic. fact6: If the fact that some man is not a corruptness and is not a Ghent is incorrect then it is not a kind of a Aegean. fact7: That this diencephalon does not raid metrics but it is evangelical is incorrect. fact8: The Greece is evangelical and/or the person is not a bug. fact9: This corkboard is a kind of a Omani and/or it is not a Gerreidae. fact10: That this microorganism is not a corruptness and this thing is not a Ghent does not hold if this microorganism is a crassitude. fact11: This corkboard is non-evangelical. fact12: This corkboard does not raid metrics if this diencephalon is not sugarless. fact13: The fact that this diencephalon does not raid metrics hold if either this corkboard is sugarless or this one is not operatic or both. fact14: The fact that this diencephalon is not operatic but it is evangelical does not hold. fact15: The fact that this diencephalon is operatic and it is evangelical does not hold. fact16: This diencephalon is a perpendicular or is sugarless or both. fact17: This diencephalon is evangelical and/or does not troll Pericallis. fact18: If that patient raids metrics then that adversary raids metrics. fact19: Something is a perpendicular and/or is sugarless if it is operatic. fact20: If that this microorganism is not evangelical and is not a kind of a Bassariscus is wrong then this agueweed is not evangelical. fact21: Something is a perpendicular or it is not sugarless or both if it is operatic. fact22: This corkboard is not a bug. fact23: The fact that this corkboard raids metrics hold if that adversary does raids metrics. ; $hypothesis$ = This corkboard does not raid metrics. ; $proof$ =

fact21 -> int1: If this diencephalon is not non-operatic that is a perpendicular or is not sugarless or both.; fact14 & fact4 -> int2: This diencephalon is not non-operatic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This diencephalon is a perpendicular or not sugarless or both.; int3 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This tropopause is a Blattaria and is dyslexic.

({C}{a} & {D}{a})

fact1: If there is somebody such that it is extroversive then this tropopause is not a dutifulness. fact2: If that laminate dares disbelief then this tropopause is dyslexic. fact3: If something is dyslexic this mutisia is not a Blattaria and dares disbelief. fact4: If something that is not a dutifulness dares disbelief then it is not extroversive. fact5: This tropopause is not a Borneo and secedes if this tropopause coasts. fact6: Something is not a cooperativeness if this is not a kind of a Borneo and this does secede. fact7: This tropopause is not a dutifulness and is a Blattaria if there is some person such that it is extroversive. fact8: The symboliser clamours and that is a kind of a risklessness. fact9: That laminate is not a Blattaria but it is dyslexic if there exists something such that that it dares disbelief is correct. fact10: There is something such that it is extroversive. fact11: This mutisia dares disbelief. fact12: If this tropopause is unlikable then that this tropopause coasts is correct. fact13: This tropopause bootlickings. fact14: Some person that is not a kind of a cooperativeness is not a dutifulness and dares disbelief. fact15: If something is not extroversive the fact that that is a Blattaria and that is not non-dyslexic is incorrect. fact16: this disbelief dares mutisia. fact17: This tropopause is not a dutifulness.

fact1: (x): {A}x -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: {E}{b} -> {D}{a} fact3: (x): {D}x -> (¬{C}{c} & {E}{c}) fact4: (x): (¬{B}x & {E}x) -> ¬{A}x fact5: {I}{a} -> (¬{G}{a} & {H}{a}) fact6: (x): (¬{G}x & {H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact7: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact8: ({BN}{gb} & {BU}{gb}) fact9: (x): {E}x -> (¬{C}{b} & {D}{b}) fact10: (Ex): {A}x fact11: {E}{c} fact12: {J}{a} -> {I}{a} fact13: {GO}{a} fact14: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{B}x & {E}x) fact15: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & {D}x) fact16: {AB}{ab} fact17: ¬{B}{a}

The fact that this tropopause is a Blattaria and that is dyslexic is wrong.

¬({C}{a} & {D}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If there is somebody such that it is extroversive then this tropopause is not a dutifulness. fact2: If that laminate dares disbelief then this tropopause is dyslexic. fact3: If something is dyslexic this mutisia is not a Blattaria and dares disbelief. fact4: If something that is not a dutifulness dares disbelief then it is not extroversive. fact5: This tropopause is not a Borneo and secedes if this tropopause coasts. fact6: Something is not a cooperativeness if this is not a kind of a Borneo and this does secede. fact7: This tropopause is not a dutifulness and is a Blattaria if there is some person such that it is extroversive. fact8: The symboliser clamours and that is a kind of a risklessness. fact9: That laminate is not a Blattaria but it is dyslexic if there exists something such that that it dares disbelief is correct. fact10: There is something such that it is extroversive. fact11: This mutisia dares disbelief. fact12: If this tropopause is unlikable then that this tropopause coasts is correct. fact13: This tropopause bootlickings. fact14: Some person that is not a kind of a cooperativeness is not a dutifulness and dares disbelief. fact15: If something is not extroversive the fact that that is a Blattaria and that is not non-dyslexic is incorrect. fact16: this disbelief dares mutisia. fact17: This tropopause is not a dutifulness. ; $hypothesis$ = This tropopause is a Blattaria and is dyslexic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Let's assume that this radiography occurs but this procrastinating GMT does not occurs.

({AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: That this radiography happens but this procrastinating GMT does not happens triggers that that charging Casper does not happens. fact2: That this radiography and this procrastinating GMT occurs leads to that that charging Casper does not happens. fact3: That this weightlift does not occurs yields that both that Caesarian and this non-respectableness happens. fact4: That that bedeviling firedrake but notthe tagging blurriness happens leads to that the sailing does not occurs. fact5: That charging Casper but notthis weightlift happens. fact6: That this spinelessness but notthe fussing Paralipomenon occurs does not hold. fact7: This proration does not occurs. fact8: The romping but notthe centering Grappelli occurs. fact9: That that dictatorialness happens and this headroom does not happens is incorrect. fact10: This radiography and this weightlift occurs if that cytogeneticalness does not happens. fact11: This unfavorableness does not happens. fact12: This weightlift does not happens. fact13: That this radiography happens and this procrastinating GMT happens is wrong. fact14: That the transplanting but notthe ramification happens is true. fact15: The inconvertibleness happens and that penialness does not happens. fact16: That genuflection happens. fact17: That the collecting and this non-bisteredness occurs results in that the batting does not happens. fact18: This ticktock does not occurs. fact19: This procrastinating GMT does not occurs.

fact1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact2: ({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact3: ¬{A} -> ({U} & ¬{IB}) fact4: ({DH} & ¬{AF}) -> ¬{HR} fact5: ({B} & ¬{A}) fact6: ¬({BR} & ¬{CC}) fact7: ¬{EP} fact8: ({FS} & ¬{FT}) fact9: ¬({AI} & ¬{BM}) fact10: ¬{C} -> ({AA} & {A}) fact11: ¬{JF} fact12: ¬{A} fact13: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact14: ({HM} & ¬{ID}) fact15: ({AM} & ¬{IF}) fact16: {I} fact17: ({AO} & ¬{CQ}) -> ¬{DR} fact18: ¬{BA} fact19: ¬{AB}

Both that Caesarian and this non-respectableness happens.

({U} & ¬{IB})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this radiography happens but this procrastinating GMT does not happens triggers that that charging Casper does not happens. fact2: That this radiography and this procrastinating GMT occurs leads to that that charging Casper does not happens. fact3: That this weightlift does not occurs yields that both that Caesarian and this non-respectableness happens. fact4: That that bedeviling firedrake but notthe tagging blurriness happens leads to that the sailing does not occurs. fact5: That charging Casper but notthis weightlift happens. fact6: That this spinelessness but notthe fussing Paralipomenon occurs does not hold. fact7: This proration does not occurs. fact8: The romping but notthe centering Grappelli occurs. fact9: That that dictatorialness happens and this headroom does not happens is incorrect. fact10: This radiography and this weightlift occurs if that cytogeneticalness does not happens. fact11: This unfavorableness does not happens. fact12: This weightlift does not happens. fact13: That this radiography happens and this procrastinating GMT happens is wrong. fact14: That the transplanting but notthe ramification happens is true. fact15: The inconvertibleness happens and that penialness does not happens. fact16: That genuflection happens. fact17: That the collecting and this non-bisteredness occurs results in that the batting does not happens. fact18: This ticktock does not occurs. fact19: This procrastinating GMT does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that this radiography occurs but this procrastinating GMT does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this radiography occurs but this procrastinating GMT does not occurs.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: That charging Casper does not happens.; fact5 -> int2: That charging Casper occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That annealing does not occurs.

¬{C}

fact1: That fiasco happens. fact2: That horticulturalness occurs if that that fiasco happens is correct. fact3: This apsidalness happens. fact4: The tumbling occurs. fact5: The whiplikeness happens if the blastemicness occurs. fact6: That the centesis occurs prevents that the pigment does not happens. fact7: That that horticulturalness occurs yields that that annealing happens. fact8: That inexperiencedness happens. fact9: That the mandibulofacialness happens hold. fact10: The transfusion occurs. fact11: That collocation occurs if this chemisorbing impressiveness occurs. fact12: The generativeness occurs.

fact1: {A} fact2: {A} -> {B} fact3: {IH} fact4: {DP} fact5: {F} -> {BA} fact6: {DK} -> {EM} fact7: {B} -> {C} fact8: {ID} fact9: {DG} fact10: {AA} fact11: {AT} -> {R} fact12: {CE}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That fiasco happens. fact2: That horticulturalness occurs if that that fiasco happens is correct. fact3: This apsidalness happens. fact4: The tumbling occurs. fact5: The whiplikeness happens if the blastemicness occurs. fact6: That the centesis occurs prevents that the pigment does not happens. fact7: That that horticulturalness occurs yields that that annealing happens. fact8: That inexperiencedness happens. fact9: That the mandibulofacialness happens hold. fact10: The transfusion occurs. fact11: That collocation occurs if this chemisorbing impressiveness occurs. fact12: The generativeness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That annealing does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact1 -> int1: That horticulturalness occurs.; int1 & fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This magistracy occurs.

{D}

fact1: That casting grin happens if that characteristic happens. fact2: That rebutting Peziza occurs. fact3: That that unassertiveness does not happens results in that that non-Delphianness and that shunning Ellul happens. fact4: The LASEK does not occurs. fact5: Either that diapedesis happens or the dressing finished does not happens or both if that casting grin happens. fact6: That non-anteriorness causes that both that neotenousness and this Chaining Heyrovsky happens. fact7: That anteriorness does not occurs if that this bustle and that sadness occurs is not true. fact8: If the fact that that unassertiveness does not happens hold both this magistracy and that shunning Ellul occurs. fact9: That shunning Ellul and/or that stocking results in that this magistracy does not happens. fact10: If the wolfishness does not happens both this letting and the bickering dappled happens. fact11: That both that non-wolfishness and this anhydrousness happens is caused by that that neotenousness occurs. fact12: If that that nonstop happens hold that characteristic happens. fact13: That unassertiveness does not occurs and that stocking does not occurs if that propitiatoriness does not occurs. fact14: If this letting happens then that nonstop occurs. fact15: If that diapedesis happens and/or the dressing finished does not occurs then that propitiatoriness does not occurs.

fact1: {I} -> {H} fact2: {GN} fact3: ¬{B} -> (¬{CR} & {A}) fact4: ¬{AM} fact5: {H} -> ({F} v ¬{G}) fact6: ¬{Q} -> ({O} & {P}) fact7: ¬({R} & {S}) -> ¬{Q} fact8: ¬{B} -> ({D} & {A}) fact9: ({A} v {C}) -> ¬{D} fact10: ¬{M} -> ({K} & {L}) fact11: {O} -> (¬{M} & {N}) fact12: {J} -> {I} fact13: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact14: {K} -> {J} fact15: ({F} v ¬{G}) -> ¬{E}

This magistracy occurs.

{D}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That casting grin happens if that characteristic happens. fact2: That rebutting Peziza occurs. fact3: That that unassertiveness does not happens results in that that non-Delphianness and that shunning Ellul happens. fact4: The LASEK does not occurs. fact5: Either that diapedesis happens or the dressing finished does not happens or both if that casting grin happens. fact6: That non-anteriorness causes that both that neotenousness and this Chaining Heyrovsky happens. fact7: That anteriorness does not occurs if that this bustle and that sadness occurs is not true. fact8: If the fact that that unassertiveness does not happens hold both this magistracy and that shunning Ellul occurs. fact9: That shunning Ellul and/or that stocking results in that this magistracy does not happens. fact10: If the wolfishness does not happens both this letting and the bickering dappled happens. fact11: That both that non-wolfishness and this anhydrousness happens is caused by that that neotenousness occurs. fact12: If that that nonstop happens hold that characteristic happens. fact13: That unassertiveness does not occurs and that stocking does not occurs if that propitiatoriness does not occurs. fact14: If this letting happens then that nonstop occurs. fact15: If that diapedesis happens and/or the dressing finished does not occurs then that propitiatoriness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This magistracy occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that voltage does not happens is true.

¬{A}

fact1: If the sudating eisegesis happens the fact that the vocalising enthusiasm does not occurs and this dabbling does not occurs does not hold. fact2: This painting does not occurs and the reconciling Algerie does not occurs. fact3: This rheologicalness does not happens and this propaedeutics does not occurs. fact4: This rouging Hyperoglyphe does not occurs. fact5: This bordering Lear does not occurs and this aborticide does not occurs. fact6: This acrogenicness does not happens. fact7: The grassfire does not occurs. fact8: The pursuit does not happens and the spotting does not happens. fact9: That staleness happens. fact10: The furling Fuego does not happens. fact11: That execrating does not happens if that non-centromericness and this downdraft occurs. fact12: If that execrating does not occurs the fact that either this coupling or the impermanentness or both occurs is incorrect. fact13: If this propaedeutics occurs then that the anoestrousness does not happens and that quarantine does not happens is wrong. fact14: If that this coupling and/or the impermanentness occurs is incorrect this acrogenicness does not occurs. fact15: That Wolfing imbroglio does not happens. fact16: The typicalness does not occurs. fact17: This screeching does not happens. fact18: That comfortableness does not occurs. fact19: The fragmentation does not happens and the bionicness does not happens. fact20: This dabbling does not happens. fact21: That this propaedeutics does not occurs and the reassuring extraneousness does not occurs does not hold. fact22: That voltage is triggered by this discriminatoriness.

fact1: {CK} -> ¬(¬{GL} & ¬{IK}) fact2: (¬{GA} & ¬{CL}) fact3: (¬{BT} & ¬{GD}) fact4: ¬{AQ} fact5: (¬{U} & ¬{DM}) fact6: ¬{D} fact7: ¬{IM} fact8: (¬{AD} & ¬{J}) fact9: {AL} fact10: ¬{EE} fact11: (¬{H} & {I}) -> ¬{G} fact12: ¬{G} -> ¬({F} v ¬{E}) fact13: {GD} -> ¬(¬{BP} & ¬{DT}) fact14: ¬({F} v ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} fact15: ¬{HL} fact16: ¬{CF} fact17: ¬{AB} fact18: ¬{AA} fact19: (¬{ID} & ¬{DS}) fact20: ¬{IK} fact21: ¬(¬{GD} & ¬{EI}) fact22: {B} -> {A}

Let's assume that that voltage occurs.

{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the sudating eisegesis happens the fact that the vocalising enthusiasm does not occurs and this dabbling does not occurs does not hold. fact2: This painting does not occurs and the reconciling Algerie does not occurs. fact3: This rheologicalness does not happens and this propaedeutics does not occurs. fact4: This rouging Hyperoglyphe does not occurs. fact5: This bordering Lear does not occurs and this aborticide does not occurs. fact6: This acrogenicness does not happens. fact7: The grassfire does not occurs. fact8: The pursuit does not happens and the spotting does not happens. fact9: That staleness happens. fact10: The furling Fuego does not happens. fact11: That execrating does not happens if that non-centromericness and this downdraft occurs. fact12: If that execrating does not occurs the fact that either this coupling or the impermanentness or both occurs is incorrect. fact13: If this propaedeutics occurs then that the anoestrousness does not happens and that quarantine does not happens is wrong. fact14: If that this coupling and/or the impermanentness occurs is incorrect this acrogenicness does not occurs. fact15: That Wolfing imbroglio does not happens. fact16: The typicalness does not occurs. fact17: This screeching does not happens. fact18: That comfortableness does not occurs. fact19: The fragmentation does not happens and the bionicness does not happens. fact20: This dabbling does not happens. fact21: That this propaedeutics does not occurs and the reassuring extraneousness does not occurs does not hold. fact22: That voltage is triggered by this discriminatoriness. ; $hypothesis$ = That that voltage does not happens is true. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Wanda is a IJsselmeer and it does frequent.

({C}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: If this sparker is imbalanced then it is a Pietism. fact2: The cobnut frequents. fact3: That this brierwood does frequent is right. fact4: Wanda is a bowling and the one demotes ataraxia. fact5: If this basketball is critical then that Wanda is not unworthy and frequents does not hold. fact6: Somebody is both a Pietism and a IJsselmeer if that person does not frequent. fact7: Wanda foots Peziza and angles Eumops. fact8: The hollandaise is a Pietism. fact9: Wanda is a Pietism. fact10: If Wanda is not worthy it is a IJsselmeer. fact11: If Wanda is a kind of a ROTC that Wanda is a IJsselmeer is not incorrect. fact12: Wanda does beplaster Parkinsonism. fact13: Wanda is a chaw. fact14: Wanda is a Pietism and frequents. fact15: If Wanda is a kind of a nonmetal then it is a whit. fact16: Wanda is a Pietism and it throngs polio. fact17: That this supremo is femoral and he is unworthy hold. fact18: The ixodid is both a Alopius and unworthy. fact19: That kitten does not frequent if that Wanda is non-unworthy thing that frequent is false. fact20: That bathyscape is a IJsselmeer. fact21: Wanda is unworthy. fact22: The adumbration is a Pietism.

fact1: {EL}{bp} -> {A}{bp} fact2: {B}{hr} fact3: {B}{i} fact4: ({JJ}{a} & {FG}{a}) fact5: ¬{E}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {B}{a}) fact6: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}x & {C}x) fact7: ({GS}{a} & {JK}{a}) fact8: {A}{dl} fact9: {A}{a} fact10: {D}{a} -> {C}{a} fact11: {FA}{a} -> {C}{a} fact12: {IP}{a} fact13: {HL}{a} fact14: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact15: {BG}{a} -> {EN}{a} fact16: ({A}{a} & {DT}{a}) fact17: ({DB}{ep} & {D}{ep}) fact18: ({JB}{if} & {D}{if}) fact19: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{co} fact20: {C}{fg} fact21: {D}{a} fact22: {A}{cj}

That kitten is a kind of a IJsselmeer.

{C}{co}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this sparker is imbalanced then it is a Pietism. fact2: The cobnut frequents. fact3: That this brierwood does frequent is right. fact4: Wanda is a bowling and the one demotes ataraxia. fact5: If this basketball is critical then that Wanda is not unworthy and frequents does not hold. fact6: Somebody is both a Pietism and a IJsselmeer if that person does not frequent. fact7: Wanda foots Peziza and angles Eumops. fact8: The hollandaise is a Pietism. fact9: Wanda is a Pietism. fact10: If Wanda is not worthy it is a IJsselmeer. fact11: If Wanda is a kind of a ROTC that Wanda is a IJsselmeer is not incorrect. fact12: Wanda does beplaster Parkinsonism. fact13: Wanda is a chaw. fact14: Wanda is a Pietism and frequents. fact15: If Wanda is a kind of a nonmetal then it is a whit. fact16: Wanda is a Pietism and it throngs polio. fact17: That this supremo is femoral and he is unworthy hold. fact18: The ixodid is both a Alopius and unworthy. fact19: That kitten does not frequent if that Wanda is non-unworthy thing that frequent is false. fact20: That bathyscape is a IJsselmeer. fact21: Wanda is unworthy. fact22: The adumbration is a Pietism. ; $hypothesis$ = Wanda is a IJsselmeer and it does frequent. ; $proof$ =

fact14 -> int1: Wanda frequents.; fact10 & fact21 -> int2: That Wanda is a kind of a IJsselmeer is right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that rouge is ratlike and/or that thing fawns calendar does not hold.

¬({A}{a} v {B}{a})

fact1: Either that rouge is ratlike or it is a floor or both. fact2: That rouge is either a protanopia or a hectogram or both. fact3: The fact that something either is ratlike or fawns calendar or both does not hold if it is not a Apodemus. fact4: The sheldrake does unload Av or it slops Rous or both. fact5: The narcoleptic fawns calendar. fact6: That rouge is a commensalism and/or fawns calendar. fact7: That salver does fawn calendar. fact8: That rouge proctors or that is ratlike or both. fact9: Either that rouge manacles bugginess or the thing yaws or both.

fact1: ({A}{a} v {CG}{a}) fact2: ({FL}{a} v {HB}{a}) fact3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x v {B}x) fact4: ({GL}{gr} v {BJ}{gr}) fact5: {B}{ed} fact6: ({AH}{a} v {B}{a}) fact7: {B}{al} fact8: ({DJ}{a} v {A}{a}) fact9: ({FR}{a} v {GT}{a})

The fact that that rouge is ratlike and/or that thing fawns calendar does not hold.

¬({A}{a} v {B}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Either that rouge is ratlike or it is a floor or both. fact2: That rouge is either a protanopia or a hectogram or both. fact3: The fact that something either is ratlike or fawns calendar or both does not hold if it is not a Apodemus. fact4: The sheldrake does unload Av or it slops Rous or both. fact5: The narcoleptic fawns calendar. fact6: That rouge is a commensalism and/or fawns calendar. fact7: That salver does fawn calendar. fact8: That rouge proctors or that is ratlike or both. fact9: Either that rouge manacles bugginess or the thing yaws or both. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that rouge is ratlike and/or that thing fawns calendar does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That capsid is a Tunisia and/or the person rubifies.

({B}{b} v {C}{b})

fact1: If something does not blind twain that it is not a servo or is not nonreversible or both is wrong. fact2: Some person is not a Tunisia if that it is a Tunisia and it is not nonreversible does not hold. fact3: That aborticide is not hemal. fact4: If something is not a servo the fact that this is a kind of a Tunisia and is not nonreversible is wrong. fact5: If this LAN is a kind of an ethnocentrism then that it is not Low and it is not non-humified does not hold. fact6: If that aborticide does not blind twain and is not jawless then that systematizer is not a kind of a servo. fact7: If the fact that something is not orthotropous and the thing is not a kind of a Dugongidae does not hold the thing is a Chelonidae. fact8: That aborticide does not blind twain if it is not jawless. fact9: If that some man is a Lubitsch and it detracts daydream is not false that that biddy is a NWbW is right. fact10: That capsid is not non-hemal and/or is a kind of a Tunisia. fact11: If some person is a Chelonidae then that she is inelegant and she is not jawless does not hold. fact12: This LAN is Gaelic. fact13: Somebody that is not nebular is a Lubitsch and detracts daydream. fact14: If that that that biddy is a kind of inelegant thing that is not jawless is not wrong does not hold that aborticide is not jawless. fact15: That capsid is hemal and/or rubifies. fact16: Either that capsid unbends comedo or it is hemal or both. fact17: That something is a kind of a Tunisia and/or rubifies is incorrect if that thing is not hemal. fact18: This corsage is not a kind of a Tunisia. fact19: The fact that something is not orthotropous and it is not a kind of a Dugongidae is incorrect if it is a kind of a NWbW. fact20: If this LAN is Gaelic then that this LAN is an ethnocentrism hold. fact21: That something is not nebular is right if that the thing is non-Low and humified does not hold.

fact1: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x v ¬{E}x) fact2: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{B}x fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{E}x) fact5: {R}{d} -> ¬(¬{Q}{d} & {P}{d}) fact6: (¬{F}{a} & ¬{G}{a}) -> ¬{D}{i} fact7: (x): ¬(¬{J}x & ¬{K}x) -> {I}x fact8: ¬{G}{a} -> ¬{F}{a} fact9: (x): ({N}x & {M}x) -> {L}{c} fact10: ({A}{b} v {B}{b}) fact11: (x): {I}x -> ¬({H}x & ¬{G}x) fact12: {S}{d} fact13: (x): ¬{O}x -> ({N}x & {M}x) fact14: ¬({H}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{G}{a} fact15: ({A}{b} v {C}{b}) fact16: ({CH}{b} v {A}{b}) fact17: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x v {C}x) fact18: ¬{B}{bp} fact19: (x): {L}x -> ¬(¬{J}x & ¬{K}x) fact20: {S}{d} -> {R}{d} fact21: (x): ¬(¬{Q}x & {P}x) -> ¬{O}x

That systematizer does rubify.

{C}{i}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something does not blind twain that it is not a servo or is not nonreversible or both is wrong. fact2: Some person is not a Tunisia if that it is a Tunisia and it is not nonreversible does not hold. fact3: That aborticide is not hemal. fact4: If something is not a servo the fact that this is a kind of a Tunisia and is not nonreversible is wrong. fact5: If this LAN is a kind of an ethnocentrism then that it is not Low and it is not non-humified does not hold. fact6: If that aborticide does not blind twain and is not jawless then that systematizer is not a kind of a servo. fact7: If the fact that something is not orthotropous and the thing is not a kind of a Dugongidae does not hold the thing is a Chelonidae. fact8: That aborticide does not blind twain if it is not jawless. fact9: If that some man is a Lubitsch and it detracts daydream is not false that that biddy is a NWbW is right. fact10: That capsid is not non-hemal and/or is a kind of a Tunisia. fact11: If some person is a Chelonidae then that she is inelegant and she is not jawless does not hold. fact12: This LAN is Gaelic. fact13: Somebody that is not nebular is a Lubitsch and detracts daydream. fact14: If that that that biddy is a kind of inelegant thing that is not jawless is not wrong does not hold that aborticide is not jawless. fact15: That capsid is hemal and/or rubifies. fact16: Either that capsid unbends comedo or it is hemal or both. fact17: That something is a kind of a Tunisia and/or rubifies is incorrect if that thing is not hemal. fact18: This corsage is not a kind of a Tunisia. fact19: The fact that something is not orthotropous and it is not a kind of a Dugongidae is incorrect if it is a kind of a NWbW. fact20: If this LAN is Gaelic then that this LAN is an ethnocentrism hold. fact21: That something is not nebular is right if that the thing is non-Low and humified does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That capsid is a Tunisia and/or the person rubifies. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This covering REM does not happens.

¬{B}

fact1: The skulking and this covering REM happens. fact2: If the fact that notthat promissoriness but this neurophysiologicalness happens does not hold then this neurophysiologicalness does not happens. fact3: The demotion occurs and this phase happens if this neurophysiologicalness does not happens. fact4: If that that servomechanicalness but notthat requital occurs is wrong that requital happens. fact5: The fact that that servomechanicalness but notthat requital occurs is wrong if the fact that that ELISA does not happens is correct. fact6: The fact that if this sparkling does not happens then the fact that that profitableness but notthis unarmeding reign happens is wrong is correct. fact7: This birlinging happens. fact8: This seasoning and the skulking occurs if this covering REM does not happens. fact9: This circularisation occurs if this phase occurs. fact10: If that flickering judiciousness happens this noncommercialness does not happens and this orphicness happens. fact11: If this preachment does not happens then the fact that notthat promissoriness but this neurophysiologicalness happens is not correct. fact12: The reopening Gomel does not occurs. fact13: That orthopaedicness does not occurs if this minimalness happens. fact14: The fact that this covering REM does not occurs is true if that that requital occurs and this circularisation occurs is correct. fact15: This impressionableness triggers that this minimalness happens and this behavioristness happens. fact16: If the fact that that profitableness occurs and this unarmeding reign does not happens is wrong then that profitableness does not occurs. fact17: That the reopening Gomel does not happens causes that this acidimetry occurs and that flickering judiciousness happens. fact18: That this preachment does not happens is brought about by that this birlinging happens and this balleticness occurs. fact19: That that unimpressionableness does not occurs but that fielding occurs is triggered by that that profitableness does not happens. fact20: This sparkling does not happens if both that commercialness and this orphicness occurs. fact21: That that orthopaedicness does not happens causes that that ELISA does not happens.

fact1: ({A} & {B}) fact2: ¬(¬{P} & {N}) -> ¬{N} fact3: ¬{N} -> ({K} & {I}) fact4: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) -> {D} fact5: ¬{F} -> ¬({E} & ¬{D}) fact6: ¬{R} -> ¬({O} & ¬{Q}) fact7: {AA} fact8: ¬{B} -> ({BN} & {A}) fact9: {I} -> {C} fact10: {AC} -> (¬{T} & {U}) fact11: ¬{S} -> ¬(¬{P} & {N}) fact12: ¬{AE} fact13: {H} -> ¬{G} fact14: ({D} & {C}) -> ¬{B} fact15: ¬{L} -> ({H} & {J}) fact16: ¬({O} & ¬{Q}) -> ¬{O} fact17: ¬{AE} -> ({AD} & {AC}) fact18: ({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{S} fact19: ¬{O} -> (¬{L} & {M}) fact20: (¬{T} & {U}) -> ¬{R} fact21: ¬{G} -> ¬{F}

This seasoning occurs.

{BN}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The skulking and this covering REM happens. fact2: If the fact that notthat promissoriness but this neurophysiologicalness happens does not hold then this neurophysiologicalness does not happens. fact3: The demotion occurs and this phase happens if this neurophysiologicalness does not happens. fact4: If that that servomechanicalness but notthat requital occurs is wrong that requital happens. fact5: The fact that that servomechanicalness but notthat requital occurs is wrong if the fact that that ELISA does not happens is correct. fact6: The fact that if this sparkling does not happens then the fact that that profitableness but notthis unarmeding reign happens is wrong is correct. fact7: This birlinging happens. fact8: This seasoning and the skulking occurs if this covering REM does not happens. fact9: This circularisation occurs if this phase occurs. fact10: If that flickering judiciousness happens this noncommercialness does not happens and this orphicness happens. fact11: If this preachment does not happens then the fact that notthat promissoriness but this neurophysiologicalness happens is not correct. fact12: The reopening Gomel does not occurs. fact13: That orthopaedicness does not occurs if this minimalness happens. fact14: The fact that this covering REM does not occurs is true if that that requital occurs and this circularisation occurs is correct. fact15: This impressionableness triggers that this minimalness happens and this behavioristness happens. fact16: If the fact that that profitableness occurs and this unarmeding reign does not happens is wrong then that profitableness does not occurs. fact17: That the reopening Gomel does not happens causes that this acidimetry occurs and that flickering judiciousness happens. fact18: That this preachment does not happens is brought about by that this birlinging happens and this balleticness occurs. fact19: That that unimpressionableness does not occurs but that fielding occurs is triggered by that that profitableness does not happens. fact20: This sparkling does not happens if both that commercialness and this orphicness occurs. fact21: That that orthopaedicness does not happens causes that that ELISA does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This covering REM does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that that trepaning hyperadrenocorticism occurs.

{A}

fact1: That that unriggedness does not happens and this quadrupling does not occurs is correct. fact2: If this exodonticness occurs that earning fecundity but notthis quadrupling happens. fact3: This quadrupling does not occurs. fact4: The smokescreen does not happens. fact5: This elastance brings about the inflectionalness. fact6: That crackling Pyrophorus occurs if the vivisection occurs. fact7: That haematemesis does not happens. fact8: That stating tamponage occurs. fact9: If that officiating occurs this exodonticness happens.

fact1: (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact2: {E} -> ({D} & ¬{C}) fact3: ¬{C} fact4: ¬{DD} fact5: {GH} -> {IF} fact6: {DF} -> {EO} fact7: ¬{AJ} fact8: {GU} fact9: {F} -> {E}

Let's assume that that trepaning hyperadrenocorticism occurs.

{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that unriggedness does not happens and this quadrupling does not occurs is correct. fact2: If this exodonticness occurs that earning fecundity but notthis quadrupling happens. fact3: This quadrupling does not occurs. fact4: The smokescreen does not happens. fact5: This elastance brings about the inflectionalness. fact6: That crackling Pyrophorus occurs if the vivisection occurs. fact7: That haematemesis does not happens. fact8: That stating tamponage occurs. fact9: If that officiating occurs this exodonticness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that that trepaning hyperadrenocorticism occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that everything is not a Purana and it is a gram does not hold.

¬((x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x))

fact1: Everyone is not waxen and that person is stomachic. fact2: The fact that everyone is not Romanic and it is a kind of a Dorado is true. fact3: Something is not infectious if this is not Romanic and this is a Dorado. fact4: Everything is not a Purana. fact5: Something is unrevived if it is a Neel. fact6: Some person is a Neel and mobilizes Silverstein if it is not infectious. fact7: Some person is a toy and is not gastronomic if it is unrevived. fact8: That something that is not gastronomic is not laryngeal and is a rosacea hold.

fact1: (x): (¬{HS}x & {AR}x) fact2: (x): (¬{H}x & {G}x) fact3: (x): (¬{H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{F}x fact4: (x): ¬{AA}x fact5: (x): {D}x -> {C}x fact6: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) fact7: (x): {C}x -> ({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact8: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{Q}x & {IO}x)

Everything is not laryngeal and it is a rosacea.

(x): (¬{Q}x & {IO}x)

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Everyone is not waxen and that person is stomachic. fact2: The fact that everyone is not Romanic and it is a kind of a Dorado is true. fact3: Something is not infectious if this is not Romanic and this is a Dorado. fact4: Everything is not a Purana. fact5: Something is unrevived if it is a Neel. fact6: Some person is a Neel and mobilizes Silverstein if it is not infectious. fact7: Some person is a toy and is not gastronomic if it is unrevived. fact8: That something that is not gastronomic is not laryngeal and is a rosacea hold. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that everything is not a Purana and it is a gram does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That leaner does not occurs.

¬{A}

fact1: This receipts happens if the fact that this aegis does not occurs and this receipts does not happens is not true. fact2: That that pantomime does not occurs and that broiling does not happens is false if this receipts happens. fact3: That prospecting Telescopium does not happens if the inhaling gaseousness does not occurs but that expelling occurs. fact4: If this declassification occurs this tread occurs. fact5: If the fact that that pantomime does not occurs and that broiling does not occurs is incorrect then the tasting does not occurs. fact6: Notthe inhaling gaseousness but that expelling occurs if that pounding does not occurs. fact7: That pounding does not occurs if that that stopping does not occurs but that pounding occurs is false. fact8: This tread happens if that leaner happens. fact9: That that fogginess does not occurs causes that this separating Connecticut and the specialisticness happens. fact10: That that repose occurs and this nonprehensileness occurs is caused by that this inditing Cancun does not happens. fact11: That leaner occurs and this declassification occurs. fact12: This deteriorating Leitneriaceae happens. fact13: If the specialisticness occurs and this abolitionariness occurs then this inditing Cancun does not happens. fact14: That the fact that that stopping does not happens and that pounding happens hold is false if the tasting does not occurs. fact15: If that prospecting Telescopium does not happens either that leaner or this declassification or both happens. fact16: The fact that this aegis does not happens and this receipts does not occurs is wrong if that climaticalness happens. fact17: That climaticalness happens. fact18: This misdemeanour happens.

fact1: ¬(¬{Q} & ¬{L}) -> {L} fact2: {L} -> ¬(¬{J} & ¬{K}) fact3: (¬{F} & {E}) -> ¬{D} fact4: {B} -> {GF} fact5: ¬(¬{J} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{H} fact6: ¬{G} -> (¬{F} & {E}) fact7: ¬(¬{I} & {G}) -> ¬{G} fact8: {A} -> {GF} fact9: ¬{S} -> ({R} & {O}) fact10: ¬{M} -> ({GA} & {C}) fact11: ({A} & {B}) fact12: {IS} fact13: ({O} & {N}) -> ¬{M} fact14: ¬{H} -> ¬(¬{I} & {G}) fact15: ¬{D} -> ({A} v {B}) fact16: {AA} -> ¬(¬{Q} & ¬{L}) fact17: {AA} fact18: {GU}

This tread occurs and that repose happens.

({GF} & {GA})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This receipts happens if the fact that this aegis does not occurs and this receipts does not happens is not true. fact2: That that pantomime does not occurs and that broiling does not happens is false if this receipts happens. fact3: That prospecting Telescopium does not happens if the inhaling gaseousness does not occurs but that expelling occurs. fact4: If this declassification occurs this tread occurs. fact5: If the fact that that pantomime does not occurs and that broiling does not occurs is incorrect then the tasting does not occurs. fact6: Notthe inhaling gaseousness but that expelling occurs if that pounding does not occurs. fact7: That pounding does not occurs if that that stopping does not occurs but that pounding occurs is false. fact8: This tread happens if that leaner happens. fact9: That that fogginess does not occurs causes that this separating Connecticut and the specialisticness happens. fact10: That that repose occurs and this nonprehensileness occurs is caused by that this inditing Cancun does not happens. fact11: That leaner occurs and this declassification occurs. fact12: This deteriorating Leitneriaceae happens. fact13: If the specialisticness occurs and this abolitionariness occurs then this inditing Cancun does not happens. fact14: That the fact that that stopping does not happens and that pounding happens hold is false if the tasting does not occurs. fact15: If that prospecting Telescopium does not happens either that leaner or this declassification or both happens. fact16: The fact that this aegis does not happens and this receipts does not occurs is wrong if that climaticalness happens. fact17: That climaticalness happens. fact18: This misdemeanour happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That leaner does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that that surrounding occurs.

{A}

fact1: This residentialness is triggered by that surrounding. fact2: If that garnering centered happens this dieting occurs. fact3: This residentialness does not happens and this anglicising latest does not happens. fact4: If that bioattack does not occurs then both that unconstipatedness and this swinging happens. fact5: That the bacteroidalness happens is brought about by that that surrounding does not happens and this residentialness occurs. fact6: That garnering centered does not occurs and this rightfield does not occurs if this swinging occurs. fact7: That this anglicising latest happens and this residentialness does not occurs is wrong if the fact that this Bellow happens hold. fact8: If this dieting does not happens then this Bellow occurs and this anglicising latest happens. fact9: If that garnering centered does not occurs and that emboldening does not occurs this dieting does not happens. fact10: That surrounding does not occurs but this residentialness occurs if this anglicising latest occurs. fact11: This anglicising latest does not happens. fact12: The fact that if this dieting happens then this Bellow occurs is true. fact13: That bioattack does not happens and that unbending expeditiousness does not occurs. fact14: That surrender does not happens and this outlining Tracheophyta does not happens.

fact1: {A} -> {B} fact2: {F} -> {E} fact3: (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact4: ¬{K} -> ({J} & {I}) fact5: (¬{A} & {B}) -> {FC} fact6: {I} -> (¬{F} & ¬{H}) fact7: {D} -> ¬({C} & ¬{B}) fact8: ¬{E} -> ({D} & {C}) fact9: (¬{F} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{E} fact10: {C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact11: ¬{C} fact12: {E} -> {D} fact13: (¬{K} & ¬{L}) fact14: (¬{CD} & ¬{EH})

Let's assume that that surrounding occurs.

{A}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This residentialness is triggered by that surrounding. fact2: If that garnering centered happens this dieting occurs. fact3: This residentialness does not happens and this anglicising latest does not happens. fact4: If that bioattack does not occurs then both that unconstipatedness and this swinging happens. fact5: That the bacteroidalness happens is brought about by that that surrounding does not happens and this residentialness occurs. fact6: That garnering centered does not occurs and this rightfield does not occurs if this swinging occurs. fact7: That this anglicising latest happens and this residentialness does not occurs is wrong if the fact that this Bellow happens hold. fact8: If this dieting does not happens then this Bellow occurs and this anglicising latest happens. fact9: If that garnering centered does not occurs and that emboldening does not occurs this dieting does not happens. fact10: That surrounding does not occurs but this residentialness occurs if this anglicising latest occurs. fact11: This anglicising latest does not happens. fact12: The fact that if this dieting happens then this Bellow occurs is true. fact13: That bioattack does not happens and that unbending expeditiousness does not occurs. fact14: That surrender does not happens and this outlining Tracheophyta does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that that surrounding occurs. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that surrounding occurs.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: This residentialness occurs.; fact3 -> int2: This residentialness does not occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That there exists some person such that if it does not discourage Calvatia it is not a kind of a Comstock is incorrect.

¬((Ex): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}x)

fact1: That Penutian is not a kind of a Comstock if that that thing does not discourage Calvatia is true.

fact1: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That Penutian is not a kind of a Comstock if that that thing does not discourage Calvatia is true. ; $hypothesis$ = That there exists some person such that if it does not discourage Calvatia it is not a kind of a Comstock is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

There exists something such that if this thing is not a Medawar and/or this thing parenteds then this thing is a preschool.

(Ex): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x

fact1: If either that stop is not a Medawar or this person parenteds or both then that that stop is a preschool hold. fact2: This renegade kills Mosander if this renegade is not neuromuscular. fact3: If that stop is not a Medawar and/or is a anorchism then it is traceable. fact4: If that stop is not a kind of a Medawar and/or it singularizes lit it is a pacific. fact5: There is something such that if it is not a Medawar it is a preschool. fact6: There exists something such that if it parenteds it is a preschool. fact7: If the fact that that stop is not a Medawar is right the thing is a preschool. fact8: If that stop is not a Lilium and/or this blows tense that stop is a lowered. fact9: There is somebody such that if either the one is a Medawar or the one does parented or both that the one is a preschool is correct. fact10: Some man is cadaverous if it is not a preschool and/or it is a kind of a seated. fact11: There is something such that if it is not haptic and/or it is glial then it is a Woolley.

fact1: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact2: ¬{ID}{df} -> {JG}{df} fact3: (¬{AA}{aa} v {BR}{aa}) -> {HD}{aa} fact4: (¬{AA}{aa} v {J}{aa}) -> {EE}{aa} fact5: (Ex): ¬{AA}x -> {B}x fact6: (Ex): {AB}x -> {B}x fact7: ¬{AA}{aa} -> {B}{aa} fact8: (¬{HS}{aa} v {DT}{aa}) -> {FE}{aa} fact9: (Ex): ({AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x fact10: (x): (¬{B}x v {F}x) -> {DD}x fact11: (Ex): (¬{FT}x v {II}x) -> {P}x

This racoon is cadaverous if this racoon is not a kind of a preschool and/or is a seated.

(¬{B}{eu} v {F}{eu}) -> {DD}{eu}

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If either that stop is not a Medawar or this person parenteds or both then that that stop is a preschool hold. fact2: This renegade kills Mosander if this renegade is not neuromuscular. fact3: If that stop is not a Medawar and/or is a anorchism then it is traceable. fact4: If that stop is not a kind of a Medawar and/or it singularizes lit it is a pacific. fact5: There is something such that if it is not a Medawar it is a preschool. fact6: There exists something such that if it parenteds it is a preschool. fact7: If the fact that that stop is not a Medawar is right the thing is a preschool. fact8: If that stop is not a Lilium and/or this blows tense that stop is a lowered. fact9: There is somebody such that if either the one is a Medawar or the one does parented or both that the one is a preschool is correct. fact10: Some man is cadaverous if it is not a preschool and/or it is a kind of a seated. fact11: There is something such that if it is not haptic and/or it is glial then it is a Woolley. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists something such that if this thing is not a Medawar and/or this thing parenteds then this thing is a preschool. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that that wetback blitzkriegs erg and is a monochromatism is correct is incorrect.

¬({D}{c} & {E}{c})

fact1: Something does not dread countersignature if the fact that it does dread countersignature and is not a Sorbus does not hold. fact2: That wetback dreads countersignature. fact3: this countersignature does not dread balance. fact4: That this balance does not universalize Pulicaria is true. fact5: This balance does not dread countersignature. fact6: This snowbird is a kind of a monochromatism and this one does benumb burnish. fact7: Something does not plait Avalokitesvara and/or this thing is not virulent if this thing is unguiculated. fact8: That wetback is a monochromatism and benumbs burnish if this balance does not dread countersignature. fact9: If the fact that this snowbird dreads countersignature is true then that this snowbird does not game shapeliness and blitzkriegs erg is incorrect. fact10: This snowbird dreads countersignature. fact11: If this natator is a tinker this one benumbs burnish. fact12: This natator is a kind of unguiculated person that benumbs burnish if this natator does not dread countersignature. fact13: If the fact that something does not game shapeliness and does blitzkrieg erg is wrong that game shapeliness. fact14: That wetback is unguiculated if this natator plaits Avalokitesvara. fact15: Either this natator is virulent or it plaits Avalokitesvara or both. fact16: If that this balance does not dread countersignature is true that wetback benumbs burnish. fact17: If some man is not virulent the fact that she/he blitzkriegs erg and is a monochromatism is wrong. fact18: That wetback is unguiculated if this natator is virulent. fact19: Something sears 12 if the fact that it is not virulent and it does not plait Avalokitesvara does not hold. fact20: That wetback benumbs burnish. fact21: That something is not virulent and does not plait Avalokitesvara is wrong if it is unguiculated. fact22: If this balance blitzkriegs erg then the fact that that wetback dreads countersignature is right. fact23: If this natator is not non-Coptic then the fact that the thing dreads countersignature and the thing is not a Sorbus is false. fact24: If something is unguiculated that blitzkriegs erg. fact25: This balance is a Pluteus.

fact1: (x): ¬({G}x & ¬{I}x) -> ¬{G}x fact2: {G}{c} fact3: ¬{AB}{ab} fact4: ¬{FI}{b} fact5: ¬{G}{b} fact6: ({E}{jf} & {F}{jf}) fact7: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) fact8: ¬{G}{b} -> ({E}{c} & {F}{c}) fact9: {G}{jf} -> ¬(¬{ER}{jf} & {D}{jf}) fact10: {G}{jf} fact11: {AM}{a} -> {F}{a} fact12: ¬{G}{a} -> ({C}{a} & {F}{a}) fact13: (x): ¬(¬{ER}x & {D}x) -> {ER}x fact14: {B}{a} -> {C}{c} fact15: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact16: ¬{G}{b} -> {F}{c} fact17: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({D}x & {E}x) fact18: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} fact19: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {EK}x fact20: {F}{c} fact21: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) fact22: {D}{b} -> {G}{c} fact23: {H}{a} -> ¬({G}{a} & ¬{I}{a}) fact24: (x): {C}x -> {D}x fact25: {CF}{b}

The fact that that that wetback blitzkriegs erg and is a monochromatism is correct is incorrect.

¬({D}{c} & {E}{c})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something does not dread countersignature if the fact that it does dread countersignature and is not a Sorbus does not hold. fact2: That wetback dreads countersignature. fact3: this countersignature does not dread balance. fact4: That this balance does not universalize Pulicaria is true. fact5: This balance does not dread countersignature. fact6: This snowbird is a kind of a monochromatism and this one does benumb burnish. fact7: Something does not plait Avalokitesvara and/or this thing is not virulent if this thing is unguiculated. fact8: That wetback is a monochromatism and benumbs burnish if this balance does not dread countersignature. fact9: If the fact that this snowbird dreads countersignature is true then that this snowbird does not game shapeliness and blitzkriegs erg is incorrect. fact10: This snowbird dreads countersignature. fact11: If this natator is a tinker this one benumbs burnish. fact12: This natator is a kind of unguiculated person that benumbs burnish if this natator does not dread countersignature. fact13: If the fact that something does not game shapeliness and does blitzkrieg erg is wrong that game shapeliness. fact14: That wetback is unguiculated if this natator plaits Avalokitesvara. fact15: Either this natator is virulent or it plaits Avalokitesvara or both. fact16: If that this balance does not dread countersignature is true that wetback benumbs burnish. fact17: If some man is not virulent the fact that she/he blitzkriegs erg and is a monochromatism is wrong. fact18: That wetback is unguiculated if this natator is virulent. fact19: Something sears 12 if the fact that it is not virulent and it does not plait Avalokitesvara does not hold. fact20: That wetback benumbs burnish. fact21: That something is not virulent and does not plait Avalokitesvara is wrong if it is unguiculated. fact22: If this balance blitzkriegs erg then the fact that that wetback dreads countersignature is right. fact23: If this natator is not non-Coptic then the fact that the thing dreads countersignature and the thing is not a Sorbus is false. fact24: If something is unguiculated that blitzkriegs erg. fact25: This balance is a Pluteus. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that that wetback blitzkriegs erg and is a monochromatism is correct is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact15 & fact18 & fact14 -> int1: That wetback is unguiculated.; fact24 -> int2: That wetback blitzkriegs erg if it is unguiculated.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That wetback blitzkriegs erg.; fact8 & fact5 -> int4: That wetback is a monochromatism that benumbs burnish.; int4 -> int5: That wetback is a monochromatism.; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that boatyard does not fume eightvo is correct.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: If this benzoate does yank playlist and does not fume eightvo then that boatyard does not fume eightvo. fact2: that playlist does yank boatyard. fact3: If that boatyard yanks playlist that boatyard fumes eightvo.

fact1: ({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: {AA}{aa} fact3: {A}{a} -> {B}{a}

The fact that that boatyard does not fume eightvo is correct.

¬{B}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this benzoate does yank playlist and does not fume eightvo then that boatyard does not fume eightvo. fact2: that playlist does yank boatyard. fact3: If that boatyard yanks playlist that boatyard fumes eightvo. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that boatyard does not fume eightvo is correct. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that hatter is a dish and it is a wrangling does not hold.

¬({B}{aa} & {A}{aa})

fact1: That that hatter is not a Essen and it is not a revise is incorrect if that hatter does not Versed Muritaniya. fact2: this Hume snags hatter. fact3: If something is not anemographic then it is not a Skagerak. fact4: If somebody is both not a Psephurus and pulmonic it does not snag Hume. fact5: The fact that that hatter is non-Hindu and it is not a counteroffer is not true. fact6: If some man is not a Skagerak then the one is not a Psephurus and is not non-pulmonic. fact7: If that someone is non-Hindu one that is not a counteroffer is false he/she is a kind of a dish. fact8: Some person is not anemographic if the fact that it is not a Essen and not a revise is not true. fact9: If that this thyrocalcitonin is a Praha that does not bid betting is incorrect then that hatter does not Versed Muritaniya. fact10: That that hatter is Hindu person that is not a counteroffer is incorrect. fact11: Something is a kind of a sternutatory that is a counteroffer if it is not a kind of a wrangling. fact12: If the fact that this thyrocalcitonin is not a wrangling or does snag Hume or both is false then this blaster is not a kind of a wrangling. fact13: If something does not snag Hume then the fact that it is a dish and a wrangling is not true. fact14: That hatter snags Hume.

fact1: ¬{J}{aa} -> ¬(¬{I}{aa} & ¬{H}{aa}) fact2: {AC}{ab} fact3: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬{F}x fact4: (x): (¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact5: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact6: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{D}x & {E}x) fact7: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact8: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{G}x fact9: ¬({K}{a} & ¬{L}{a}) -> ¬{J}{aa} fact10: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({DD}x & {AB}x) fact12: ¬(¬{A}{a} v {C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{hg} fact13: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & {A}x) fact14: {C}{aa}

The fact that that hatter is a dish and it is a wrangling does not hold.

¬({B}{aa} & {A}{aa})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that hatter is not a Essen and it is not a revise is incorrect if that hatter does not Versed Muritaniya. fact2: this Hume snags hatter. fact3: If something is not anemographic then it is not a Skagerak. fact4: If somebody is both not a Psephurus and pulmonic it does not snag Hume. fact5: The fact that that hatter is non-Hindu and it is not a counteroffer is not true. fact6: If some man is not a Skagerak then the one is not a Psephurus and is not non-pulmonic. fact7: If that someone is non-Hindu one that is not a counteroffer is false he/she is a kind of a dish. fact8: Some person is not anemographic if the fact that it is not a Essen and not a revise is not true. fact9: If that this thyrocalcitonin is a Praha that does not bid betting is incorrect then that hatter does not Versed Muritaniya. fact10: That that hatter is Hindu person that is not a counteroffer is incorrect. fact11: Something is a kind of a sternutatory that is a counteroffer if it is not a kind of a wrangling. fact12: If the fact that this thyrocalcitonin is not a wrangling or does snag Hume or both is false then this blaster is not a kind of a wrangling. fact13: If something does not snag Hume then the fact that it is a dish and a wrangling is not true. fact14: That hatter snags Hume. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that hatter is a dish and it is a wrangling does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This heterozygote does not subscribe Zechariah.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: If this gasohol does decrease and this person is a hoot then this gasohol does not subscribe Zechariah. fact2: The fact that this heterozygote is not a nonuniformity is true. fact3: this concretism charters heterozygote. fact4: Someone does not charter concretism if the one is a kind of a strictness that calcifies. fact5: If somebody incapacitates abasia and is aground this person is not a Ochoa. fact6: If somebody is both not non-parttime and a carry the person does not roar hemorrhoid. fact7: This heterozygote does not foregather Ionesco if this heterozygote is a Hodr and the person does charter concretism. fact8: This Levitra is hydrographic if this heterozygote is a kind of a strictness. fact9: This heterozygote is a kind of a strictness. fact10: This gasohol does not charter concretism. fact11: The snail subscribes Zechariah. fact12: This agenesia does subscribe Zechariah. fact13: This heterozygote is hydrographic. fact14: If someone does deconstruct Auriculariales and he is plantar then he is not a Pasiphae. fact15: The floatation charters concretism. fact16: If something is not non-hydrographic and it charters concretism it does not subscribe Zechariah. fact17: This heterozygote is a kind of a Apia. fact18: Something that does not charter concretism does subscribe Zechariah and is hydrographic.

fact1: ({O}{ep} & {AG}{ep}) -> ¬{C}{ep} fact2: ¬{FD}{a} fact3: {AA}{aa} fact4: (x): ({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{B}x fact5: (x): ({CH}x & {FR}x) -> ¬{BS}x fact6: (x): ({AQ}x & {HN}x) -> ¬{CO}x fact7: ({CC}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{ET}{a} fact8: {D}{a} -> {A}{gj} fact9: {D}{a} fact10: ¬{B}{ep} fact11: {C}{dp} fact12: {C}{jg} fact13: {A}{a} fact14: (x): ({GA}x & {EF}x) -> ¬{DM}x fact15: {B}{em} fact16: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact17: {JK}{a} fact18: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & {A}x)

This Levitra does not charter concretism.

¬{B}{gj}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this gasohol does decrease and this person is a hoot then this gasohol does not subscribe Zechariah. fact2: The fact that this heterozygote is not a nonuniformity is true. fact3: this concretism charters heterozygote. fact4: Someone does not charter concretism if the one is a kind of a strictness that calcifies. fact5: If somebody incapacitates abasia and is aground this person is not a Ochoa. fact6: If somebody is both not non-parttime and a carry the person does not roar hemorrhoid. fact7: This heterozygote does not foregather Ionesco if this heterozygote is a Hodr and the person does charter concretism. fact8: This Levitra is hydrographic if this heterozygote is a kind of a strictness. fact9: This heterozygote is a kind of a strictness. fact10: This gasohol does not charter concretism. fact11: The snail subscribes Zechariah. fact12: This agenesia does subscribe Zechariah. fact13: This heterozygote is hydrographic. fact14: If someone does deconstruct Auriculariales and he is plantar then he is not a Pasiphae. fact15: The floatation charters concretism. fact16: If something is not non-hydrographic and it charters concretism it does not subscribe Zechariah. fact17: This heterozygote is a kind of a Apia. fact18: Something that does not charter concretism does subscribe Zechariah and is hydrographic. ; $hypothesis$ = This heterozygote does not subscribe Zechariah. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This cirrhus is non-sudden thing that does not jolt inexpensiveness if this cirrhus is psychoactive.

{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

fact1: Someone is lubricated one that is not a 14 if it captains megabyte. fact2: That the fact that some person is both opposed and not a quirkiness is right if that person does mismated desired hold. fact3: If that absorbate is a Burgoyne then that absorbate is both not a vocative and not psychoactive. fact4: This cirrhus is not psychoactive and this one is not a peck if this cirrhus is a Emile. fact5: Something is non-sudden and jolts inexpensiveness if it is psychoactive. fact6: Somebody does not lenify provincialism and does not provoke Manama if it is a Qing. fact7: This cirrhus is not sudden if it is not nonpsychoactive. fact8: This cirrhus is not sudden and jolts inexpensiveness if it is psychoactive. fact9: If this cirrhus is a medical then the thing is not lossy and the thing does not jolt inexpensiveness. fact10: That some man is not sudden is correct if it is psychoactive. fact11: A bacteriostatic thing does not confound sociableness and does not quarter. fact12: If this cirrhus is not nonpsychoactive then it is not a antitype and it does not mail invoice.

fact1: (x): {R}x -> (¬{CT}x & ¬{FJ}x) fact2: (x): {BM}x -> (¬{JA}x & ¬{CN}x) fact3: {FO}{dm} -> (¬{JI}{dm} & ¬{A}{dm}) fact4: {GG}{aa} -> (¬{A}{aa} & ¬{GR}{aa}) fact5: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact6: (x): {FF}x -> (¬{M}x & ¬{HJ}x) fact7: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact8: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact9: {E}{aa} -> (¬{AJ}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact10: (x): {A}x -> ¬{AA}x fact11: (x): {FQ}x -> (¬{BT}x & ¬{AH}x) fact12: {A}{aa} -> (¬{HP}{aa} & ¬{FL}{aa})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Someone is lubricated one that is not a 14 if it captains megabyte. fact2: That the fact that some person is both opposed and not a quirkiness is right if that person does mismated desired hold. fact3: If that absorbate is a Burgoyne then that absorbate is both not a vocative and not psychoactive. fact4: This cirrhus is not psychoactive and this one is not a peck if this cirrhus is a Emile. fact5: Something is non-sudden and jolts inexpensiveness if it is psychoactive. fact6: Somebody does not lenify provincialism and does not provoke Manama if it is a Qing. fact7: This cirrhus is not sudden if it is not nonpsychoactive. fact8: This cirrhus is not sudden and jolts inexpensiveness if it is psychoactive. fact9: If this cirrhus is a medical then the thing is not lossy and the thing does not jolt inexpensiveness. fact10: That some man is not sudden is correct if it is psychoactive. fact11: A bacteriostatic thing does not confound sociableness and does not quarter. fact12: If this cirrhus is not nonpsychoactive then it is not a antitype and it does not mail invoice. ; $hypothesis$ = This cirrhus is non-sudden thing that does not jolt inexpensiveness if this cirrhus is psychoactive. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This imbricating Tenebrionidae happens and that installing kobo does not happens.

({C} & ¬{D})

fact1: The Democraticness happens. fact2: This uncommittedness does not occurs. fact3: That pillaging Heterokontophyta happens. fact4: That charlatanism does not occurs but the gap occurs if that that protuberating juvenility does not happens hold. fact5: If that committing Zanzibar does not happens the fact that notthat beeswaxing sleep but this chancrousness occurs is wrong. fact6: The uncharteredness does not happens and the creasing does not happens if that pillaging Heterokontophyta occurs. fact7: That that contacting Soviet does not occurs leads to that this bucking but notthat humming happens. fact8: That that installing kobo happens is brought about by that this bucking happens but that humming does not happens. fact9: The zygodactylness does not occurs if the fact that notthe disarraying proterozoic but this shedding boyhood occurs is wrong. fact10: That committing Zanzibar does not happens if that agentialness does not happens. fact11: This bucking occurs. fact12: This longways occurs if this bucking happens. fact13: That contacting Soviet does not occurs if that that beeswaxing sleep does not occurs but this chancrousness occurs is incorrect. fact14: That protuberating juvenility does not occurs if that that reversion but notthat fumbling happens does not hold. fact15: That the disarraying proterozoic does not occurs and this shedding boyhood occurs does not hold if the uncharteredness does not occurs. fact16: This discerning happens and that pillaging Heterokontophyta occurs if that charlatanism does not occurs. fact17: That this longways happens and/or this imbricating Tenebrionidae does not happens is triggered by that installing kobo. fact18: That that reversion occurs but that fumbling does not happens is false if this uncommittedness does not occurs. fact19: Both that non-sulfuricness and the furore happens if this discourtesy does not occurs. fact20: This discourtesy occurs and that overcharge occurs. fact21: If the zygodactylness does not occurs then either that agentialness does not happens or this completing Belgium does not occurs or both. fact22: The fact that this bucking results in that notthat installing kobo but this longways happens hold.

fact1: {EN} fact2: ¬{AE} fact3: {S} fact4: ¬{AB} -> (¬{U} & {AA}) fact5: ¬{K} -> ¬(¬{I} & {J}) fact6: {S} -> (¬{Q} & ¬{R}) fact7: ¬{H} -> ({F} & ¬{G}) fact8: ({F} & ¬{G}) -> {D} fact9: ¬(¬{P} & {O}) -> ¬{N} fact10: ¬{M} -> ¬{K} fact11: {F} fact12: {F} -> {E} fact13: ¬(¬{I} & {J}) -> ¬{H} fact14: ¬({AC} & ¬{AD}) -> ¬{AB} fact15: ¬{Q} -> ¬(¬{P} & {O}) fact16: ¬{U} -> ({T} & {S}) fact17: {D} -> ({E} v ¬{C}) fact18: ¬{AE} -> ¬({AC} & ¬{AD}) fact19: ¬{A} -> (¬{DT} & {IU}) fact20: ({A} & {B}) fact21: ¬{N} -> (¬{M} v ¬{L}) fact22: {F} -> (¬{D} & {E})

Both that non-sulfuricness and the furore occurs.

(¬{DT} & {IU})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The Democraticness happens. fact2: This uncommittedness does not occurs. fact3: That pillaging Heterokontophyta happens. fact4: That charlatanism does not occurs but the gap occurs if that that protuberating juvenility does not happens hold. fact5: If that committing Zanzibar does not happens the fact that notthat beeswaxing sleep but this chancrousness occurs is wrong. fact6: The uncharteredness does not happens and the creasing does not happens if that pillaging Heterokontophyta occurs. fact7: That that contacting Soviet does not occurs leads to that this bucking but notthat humming happens. fact8: That that installing kobo happens is brought about by that this bucking happens but that humming does not happens. fact9: The zygodactylness does not occurs if the fact that notthe disarraying proterozoic but this shedding boyhood occurs is wrong. fact10: That committing Zanzibar does not happens if that agentialness does not happens. fact11: This bucking occurs. fact12: This longways occurs if this bucking happens. fact13: That contacting Soviet does not occurs if that that beeswaxing sleep does not occurs but this chancrousness occurs is incorrect. fact14: That protuberating juvenility does not occurs if that that reversion but notthat fumbling happens does not hold. fact15: That the disarraying proterozoic does not occurs and this shedding boyhood occurs does not hold if the uncharteredness does not occurs. fact16: This discerning happens and that pillaging Heterokontophyta occurs if that charlatanism does not occurs. fact17: That this longways happens and/or this imbricating Tenebrionidae does not happens is triggered by that installing kobo. fact18: That that reversion occurs but that fumbling does not happens is false if this uncommittedness does not occurs. fact19: Both that non-sulfuricness and the furore happens if this discourtesy does not occurs. fact20: This discourtesy occurs and that overcharge occurs. fact21: If the zygodactylness does not occurs then either that agentialness does not happens or this completing Belgium does not occurs or both. fact22: The fact that this bucking results in that notthat installing kobo but this longways happens hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This imbricating Tenebrionidae happens and that installing kobo does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This celebrator is upstream.

{B}{a}

fact1: This celebrator is not upstream if this Lithuanian is not a thespian and burbles. fact2: If Lindsey does towel expectation and is a kind of a Mogadishu this Lithuanian does not towel expectation. fact3: If the fact that something is a kind of non-unmoving thing that is a kind of a layer does not hold it is not a layer. fact4: This cloisonne is a kind of a lugubriousness but this one is not a Macleaya if that PDA is not a decimetre. fact5: If something does not towel expectation then it is not a thespian and it burbles. fact6: That venom is not upstream if that this celebrator is a Mogadishu that is upstream is incorrect. fact7: This celebrator is not a Mogadishu if this Lithuanian does not burble but it is upstream. fact8: That PDA is not a kind of a decimetre. fact9: Somebody that is not a lugubriousness is a Mogadishu and towels expectation. fact10: Something does not towel expectation and it is not a lugubriousness if it is antonymous. fact11: Lindsey is not a lugubriousness if this cloisonne is a lugubriousness and it is antonymous. fact12: This cloisonne is not non-antonymous if that this person is unmoving and this person is not non-antonymous is wrong. fact13: Lindsey towels expectation and it is a kind of a Mogadishu. fact14: The fact that this celebrator is not unmoving but that is a kind of a layer is false if that is a decimetre. fact15: If this celebrator is not a layer the fact that it is a Macleaya and it is antonymous hold. fact16: That some man is a Mogadishu and he/she is upstream does not hold if he/she does not towel expectation.

fact1: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: ({A}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{aa} fact3: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{G}x fact4: ¬{I}{d} -> ({D}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) fact5: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact6: ¬({C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{bs} fact7: (¬{AB}{aa} & {B}{aa}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact8: ¬{I}{d} fact9: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) fact10: (x): {E}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{D}x) fact11: ({D}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact12: ¬({H}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> {E}{c} fact13: ({A}{b} & {C}{b}) fact14: {I}{a} -> ¬(¬{H}{a} & {G}{a}) fact15: ¬{G}{a} -> ({F}{a} & {E}{a}) fact16: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x)

This celebrator is upstream.

{B}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This celebrator is not upstream if this Lithuanian is not a thespian and burbles. fact2: If Lindsey does towel expectation and is a kind of a Mogadishu this Lithuanian does not towel expectation. fact3: If the fact that something is a kind of non-unmoving thing that is a kind of a layer does not hold it is not a layer. fact4: This cloisonne is a kind of a lugubriousness but this one is not a Macleaya if that PDA is not a decimetre. fact5: If something does not towel expectation then it is not a thespian and it burbles. fact6: That venom is not upstream if that this celebrator is a Mogadishu that is upstream is incorrect. fact7: This celebrator is not a Mogadishu if this Lithuanian does not burble but it is upstream. fact8: That PDA is not a kind of a decimetre. fact9: Somebody that is not a lugubriousness is a Mogadishu and towels expectation. fact10: Something does not towel expectation and it is not a lugubriousness if it is antonymous. fact11: Lindsey is not a lugubriousness if this cloisonne is a lugubriousness and it is antonymous. fact12: This cloisonne is not non-antonymous if that this person is unmoving and this person is not non-antonymous is wrong. fact13: Lindsey towels expectation and it is a kind of a Mogadishu. fact14: The fact that this celebrator is not unmoving but that is a kind of a layer is false if that is a decimetre. fact15: If this celebrator is not a layer the fact that it is a Macleaya and it is antonymous hold. fact16: That some man is a Mogadishu and he/she is upstream does not hold if he/she does not towel expectation. ; $hypothesis$ = This celebrator is upstream. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> int1: If this Lithuanian does not towel expectation then this Lithuanian is not a thespian and burbles.; fact13 & fact2 -> int2: This Lithuanian does not towel expectation.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This Lithuanian is not a thespian but it burbles.; int3 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This nightspot does sophisticate immunocompetence.

{B}{b}

fact1: The bagger is unrhymed. fact2: If the bagger is unrhymed this nightspot is not larval but it is collagenic.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The bagger is unrhymed. fact2: If the bagger is unrhymed this nightspot is not larval but it is collagenic. ; $hypothesis$ = This nightspot does sophisticate immunocompetence. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That down is a jaggedness that is Jamesian.

({C}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: That that down does not bare insipidity and is Jamesian is not correct if that that down is not non-tartaric hold. fact2: If the fact that some man is not non-prelapsarian but he/she is not tartaric is false he/she is tartaric. fact3: If this internee rices preciseness that down is not prelapsarian. fact4: If some man is not tartaric then that it is a jaggedness and is Jamesian does not hold. fact5: If this internee is a fatigues and a spaced then that terpene is not a kind of a fatigues. fact6: Something rices preciseness if that thing is a fatigues. fact7: If this capybara is qualitative then this capybara is a biochemistry but it is not a flag. fact8: This capybara is qualitative. fact9: This pothead is a spaced and/or she/he is a Euripides if this capybara is not tegular. fact10: That some man is prelapsarian but this one is not tartaric is not correct if this one is not a Euripides. fact11: That terpene bares insipidity if that that down does not bares insipidity and is Jamesian is incorrect. fact12: Something is symmetrical if that this thing does rice preciseness and this thing is not a jaggedness is true. fact13: That down is tartaric and is Jamesian. fact14: Something is not tegular and this thing does not speckless itch if this thing buffets boyhood. fact15: If this capybara is a kind of a biochemistry but it is not a kind of a flag it buffets boyhood. fact16: The fact that this internee is a kind of a fatigues is true if this pothead is a spaced. fact17: This internee is a kind of a spaced. fact18: That that down is a jaggedness and bares insipidity hold. fact19: The fact that that down is not a kind of a Euripides is correct. fact20: If something is non-prelapsarian then this thing is not tartaric and this thing bares insipidity.

fact1: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{A}x) -> {A}x fact3: {F}{b} -> ¬{E}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) fact5: ({G}{b} & {I}{b}) -> ¬{G}{cn} fact6: (x): {G}x -> {F}x fact7: {O}{d} -> ({N}{d} & ¬{M}{d}) fact8: {O}{d} fact9: ¬{J}{d} -> ({I}{c} v {H}{c}) fact10: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{A}x) fact11: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {D}{cn} fact12: (x): ({F}x & ¬{C}x) -> {GQ}x fact13: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact14: (x): {L}x -> (¬{J}x & ¬{K}x) fact15: ({N}{d} & ¬{M}{d}) -> {L}{d} fact16: {I}{c} -> {G}{b} fact17: {I}{b} fact18: ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) fact19: ¬{H}{a} fact20: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{A}x & {D}x)

The fact that that down is both a jaggedness and Jamesian is not true.

¬({C}{a} & {B}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that down does not bare insipidity and is Jamesian is not correct if that that down is not non-tartaric hold. fact2: If the fact that some man is not non-prelapsarian but he/she is not tartaric is false he/she is tartaric. fact3: If this internee rices preciseness that down is not prelapsarian. fact4: If some man is not tartaric then that it is a jaggedness and is Jamesian does not hold. fact5: If this internee is a fatigues and a spaced then that terpene is not a kind of a fatigues. fact6: Something rices preciseness if that thing is a fatigues. fact7: If this capybara is qualitative then this capybara is a biochemistry but it is not a flag. fact8: This capybara is qualitative. fact9: This pothead is a spaced and/or she/he is a Euripides if this capybara is not tegular. fact10: That some man is prelapsarian but this one is not tartaric is not correct if this one is not a Euripides. fact11: That terpene bares insipidity if that that down does not bares insipidity and is Jamesian is incorrect. fact12: Something is symmetrical if that this thing does rice preciseness and this thing is not a jaggedness is true. fact13: That down is tartaric and is Jamesian. fact14: Something is not tegular and this thing does not speckless itch if this thing buffets boyhood. fact15: If this capybara is a kind of a biochemistry but it is not a kind of a flag it buffets boyhood. fact16: The fact that this internee is a kind of a fatigues is true if this pothead is a spaced. fact17: This internee is a kind of a spaced. fact18: That that down is a jaggedness and bares insipidity hold. fact19: The fact that that down is not a kind of a Euripides is correct. fact20: If something is non-prelapsarian then this thing is not tartaric and this thing bares insipidity. ; $hypothesis$ = That down is a jaggedness that is Jamesian. ; $proof$ =

fact13 -> int1: That down is Jamesian.; fact18 -> int2: The fact that that down is a kind of a jaggedness is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That malfeasance does not occurs.

¬{C}

fact1: That that derivation does not occurs and that malfeasance does not happens is triggered by that that shortsness does not occurs. fact2: If the nonreflectiveness happens and the encrusting happens then that controversy does not happens. fact3: If the fact that this squashing occurs and this mastectomy does not occurs is false then this squashing does not happens. fact4: If that Waterloo occurs that that this pursuing urticaria but notthe collation happens is true is incorrect. fact5: This emergency occurs if the fact that that synonymousness occurs is correct. fact6: That that synonymousness does not occurs is prevented by that that magnetising cruciality does not happens and this tensileness does not happens. fact7: This alluring workaholism occurs. fact8: If that deleting happens and that derivation occurs that malfeasance does not occurs. fact9: That deleting happens. fact10: That derivation occurs. fact11: That that shortsness does not occurs is not incorrect if the fact that the fact that this pursuing urticaria but notthe collation occurs is correct is wrong. fact12: If this apianness occurs that this squashing but notthis mastectomy occurs is false. fact13: That both this fluoridization and that Waterloo occurs is triggered by that the harmonising does not occurs. fact14: If that derivation does not happens that deleting happens and that derivationalness happens. fact15: The harmonising does not happens if both this emergency and this adaxialness happens. fact16: The waddling occurs. fact17: That this squashing does not occurs leads to that that magnetising cruciality does not occurs and this tensileness does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact2: ({GU} & {FS}) -> ¬{GF} fact3: ¬({O} & ¬{R}) -> ¬{O} fact4: {G} -> ¬({F} & ¬{E}) fact5: {L} -> {K} fact6: (¬{M} & ¬{N}) -> {L} fact7: {EK} fact8: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact9: {A} fact10: {B} fact11: ¬({F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} fact12: {Q} -> ¬({O} & ¬{R}) fact13: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) fact14: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {EQ}) fact15: ({K} & {J}) -> ¬{I} fact16: {CN} fact17: ¬{O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{N})

The fact that that derivationalness happens hold.

{EQ}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that derivation does not occurs and that malfeasance does not happens is triggered by that that shortsness does not occurs. fact2: If the nonreflectiveness happens and the encrusting happens then that controversy does not happens. fact3: If the fact that this squashing occurs and this mastectomy does not occurs is false then this squashing does not happens. fact4: If that Waterloo occurs that that this pursuing urticaria but notthe collation happens is true is incorrect. fact5: This emergency occurs if the fact that that synonymousness occurs is correct. fact6: That that synonymousness does not occurs is prevented by that that magnetising cruciality does not happens and this tensileness does not happens. fact7: This alluring workaholism occurs. fact8: If that deleting happens and that derivation occurs that malfeasance does not occurs. fact9: That deleting happens. fact10: That derivation occurs. fact11: That that shortsness does not occurs is not incorrect if the fact that the fact that this pursuing urticaria but notthe collation occurs is correct is wrong. fact12: If this apianness occurs that this squashing but notthis mastectomy occurs is false. fact13: That both this fluoridization and that Waterloo occurs is triggered by that the harmonising does not occurs. fact14: If that derivation does not happens that deleting happens and that derivationalness happens. fact15: The harmonising does not happens if both this emergency and this adaxialness happens. fact16: The waddling occurs. fact17: That this squashing does not occurs leads to that that magnetising cruciality does not occurs and this tensileness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That malfeasance does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact9 & fact10 -> int1: That deleting occurs and that derivation happens.; int1 & fact8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Margo is not a browning but it is unprotected.

(¬{D}{a} & {A}{a})

fact1: Someone that does not accelerate and does not arrange mainstreamed is not a unsatisfactoriness. fact2: That that cafeteria does cap schtikl is correct if the fact that that rhino is oleophobic is right. fact3: If the fact that some man does wait detestation and inspects is false then it does not wait detestation. fact4: Something does not chop MB and is participial if this caps schtikl. fact5: Margo engrosses drusen. fact6: That that some person waits detestation and inspects does not hold if this person is not a Arawakan hold. fact7: If that goblet does not wait detestation then Shari does not accelerate and does not arrange mainstreamed. fact8: If that cafeteria is not undemonstrative it is an m that inhales. fact9: If that rhino is a Stizostedion that cafeteria does cap schtikl. fact10: Margo is not a unsatisfactoriness but a Preussen if it is a Preussen. fact11: Margo is unprotected and a unsatisfactoriness. fact12: Something that does not chop MB and is not non-participial is not a Arawakan. fact13: That rhino is not non-oleophobic and/or that is a Stizostedion. fact14: Something is not a browning and is unprotected if it is unprotected. fact15: The fact that Margo is not a kind of a browning and is unprotected is wrong if Shari is a kind of a unsatisfactoriness. fact16: Margo is a kind of a unsatisfactoriness. fact17: If that cafeteria does not wait detestation and is an m that goblet does not wait detestation.

fact1: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{C}x) -> {B}x fact2: {P}{e} -> {M}{d} fact3: (x): ¬({F}x & {I}x) -> ¬{F}x fact4: (x): {M}x -> (¬{J}x & {K}x) fact5: {AE}{a} fact6: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({F}x & {I}x) fact7: ¬{F}{c} -> (¬{E}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact8: ¬{N}{d} -> ({G}{d} & {L}{d}) fact9: {O}{e} -> {M}{d} fact10: {CS}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & {CS}{a}) fact11: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact12: (x): (¬{J}x & {K}x) -> ¬{H}x fact13: ({P}{e} v {O}{e}) fact14: (x): {A}x -> (¬{D}x & {A}x) fact15: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {A}{a}) fact16: {B}{a} fact17: (¬{F}{d} & {G}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c}

The fact that Margo is not a browning but it is unprotected does not hold.

¬(¬{D}{a} & {A}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Someone that does not accelerate and does not arrange mainstreamed is not a unsatisfactoriness. fact2: That that cafeteria does cap schtikl is correct if the fact that that rhino is oleophobic is right. fact3: If the fact that some man does wait detestation and inspects is false then it does not wait detestation. fact4: Something does not chop MB and is participial if this caps schtikl. fact5: Margo engrosses drusen. fact6: That that some person waits detestation and inspects does not hold if this person is not a Arawakan hold. fact7: If that goblet does not wait detestation then Shari does not accelerate and does not arrange mainstreamed. fact8: If that cafeteria is not undemonstrative it is an m that inhales. fact9: If that rhino is a Stizostedion that cafeteria does cap schtikl. fact10: Margo is not a unsatisfactoriness but a Preussen if it is a Preussen. fact11: Margo is unprotected and a unsatisfactoriness. fact12: Something that does not chop MB and is not non-participial is not a Arawakan. fact13: That rhino is not non-oleophobic and/or that is a Stizostedion. fact14: Something is not a browning and is unprotected if it is unprotected. fact15: The fact that Margo is not a kind of a browning and is unprotected is wrong if Shari is a kind of a unsatisfactoriness. fact16: Margo is a kind of a unsatisfactoriness. fact17: If that cafeteria does not wait detestation and is an m that goblet does not wait detestation. ; $hypothesis$ = Margo is not a browning but it is unprotected. ; $proof$ =

fact11 -> int1: Margo is unprotected.; fact14 -> int2: If that Margo is unprotected hold then it is not a browning and is unprotected.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

There is something such that if that it is not a kind of an epicurean hold then the fact that it is a kind of a Hutton or is a slackness or both is false.

(Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x v {AB}x)

fact1: If this stomper is not an epicurean this one is not a Hutton. fact2: There is something such that if it is not an epicurean it is a kind of a Hutton or it is a slackness or both. fact3: There exists something such that if the fact that that is not a kind of an epicurean is not incorrect then that is not a kind of a Hutton. fact4: If this stomper is an epicurean that this stomper is a Hutton or it is a slackness or both is false. fact5: If something is not an epicurean then the fact that it is not a Hutton is not wrong.

fact1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact2: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x v {AB}x) fact3: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x fact4: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) fact5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this stomper is not an epicurean this one is not a Hutton. fact2: There is something such that if it is not an epicurean it is a kind of a Hutton or it is a slackness or both. fact3: There exists something such that if the fact that that is not a kind of an epicurean is not incorrect then that is not a kind of a Hutton. fact4: If this stomper is an epicurean that this stomper is a Hutton or it is a slackness or both is false. fact5: If something is not an epicurean then the fact that it is not a Hutton is not wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = There is something such that if that it is not a kind of an epicurean hold then the fact that it is a kind of a Hutton or is a slackness or both is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This anathematization does not occurs.

¬{E}

fact1: That that equilibrizing Harmsworth happens and/or the nattering hyperactivity does not occurs does not hold if the carboniferousness happens. fact2: The fact that the defrayment does not occurs is correct if that brahminicalness occurs. fact3: The roiling does not occurs. fact4: That marliness happens. fact5: That coccygealness does not happens. fact6: If this gynaeolatry does not occurs the fact that this mechanics happens and that iodinatingness happens does not hold. fact7: If that biocatalyticness does not occurs then that whiskersing angered occurs and that anointment happens. fact8: If this meaning Raphidae does not happens then this anathematization and that customs happens. fact9: That scleroticness does not occurs if the fact that this suffocating occurs and/or this contagion does not occurs does not hold. fact10: That the commiserating occurs or the requiring freewheeling does not happens or both is false. fact11: Both the inuncting dumpiness and this obscuring happens. fact12: The fact that either this corrigibleness occurs or the channelising Honshu does not happens or both is incorrect. fact13: The fact that that scleroticness and the upstart occurs is not incorrect. fact14: That anticing does not occurs. fact15: This anathematization does not occurs if the fact that the fact that either that iodinatingness occurs or this mechanics does not occurs or both hold does not hold. fact16: If that whiskersing angered occurs then the fact that that iodinatingness happens and/or this mechanics does not happens is wrong. fact17: Both that whiskersing angered and that biocatalyticness occurs. fact18: That this obscuring does not occurs and this meaning Raphidae does not occurs is brought about by that hemodialysis. fact19: The idealization happens. fact20: This analogousness happens.

fact1: {AJ} -> ¬({DL} v ¬{GI}) fact2: {EK} -> ¬{FK} fact3: ¬{GP} fact4: {EA} fact5: ¬{AF} fact6: ¬{H} -> ¬({D} & {C}) fact7: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {AP}) fact8: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {BM}) fact9: ¬({U} v ¬{JC}) -> ¬{GK} fact10: ¬({CF} v ¬{CG}) fact11: ({GT} & {G}) fact12: ¬({II} v ¬{FP}) fact13: ({GK} & {GS}) fact14: ¬{IJ} fact15: ¬({C} v ¬{D}) -> ¬{E} fact16: {A} -> ¬({C} v ¬{D}) fact17: ({A} & {B}) fact18: {I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{F}) fact19: {BS} fact20: {CL}

That customs and that anointment happens.

({BM} & {AP})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that equilibrizing Harmsworth happens and/or the nattering hyperactivity does not occurs does not hold if the carboniferousness happens. fact2: The fact that the defrayment does not occurs is correct if that brahminicalness occurs. fact3: The roiling does not occurs. fact4: That marliness happens. fact5: That coccygealness does not happens. fact6: If this gynaeolatry does not occurs the fact that this mechanics happens and that iodinatingness happens does not hold. fact7: If that biocatalyticness does not occurs then that whiskersing angered occurs and that anointment happens. fact8: If this meaning Raphidae does not happens then this anathematization and that customs happens. fact9: That scleroticness does not occurs if the fact that this suffocating occurs and/or this contagion does not occurs does not hold. fact10: That the commiserating occurs or the requiring freewheeling does not happens or both is false. fact11: Both the inuncting dumpiness and this obscuring happens. fact12: The fact that either this corrigibleness occurs or the channelising Honshu does not happens or both is incorrect. fact13: The fact that that scleroticness and the upstart occurs is not incorrect. fact14: That anticing does not occurs. fact15: This anathematization does not occurs if the fact that the fact that either that iodinatingness occurs or this mechanics does not occurs or both hold does not hold. fact16: If that whiskersing angered occurs then the fact that that iodinatingness happens and/or this mechanics does not happens is wrong. fact17: Both that whiskersing angered and that biocatalyticness occurs. fact18: That this obscuring does not occurs and this meaning Raphidae does not occurs is brought about by that hemodialysis. fact19: The idealization happens. fact20: This analogousness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This anathematization does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact17 -> int1: The fact that that whiskersing angered occurs is right.; int1 & fact16 -> int2: That that iodinatingness occurs and/or this mechanics does not occurs is wrong.; int2 & fact15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That staghound is a kind of a hematoma.

{B}{aa}

fact1: That if something is not a kind of a marooned it is nonspecific and not a loot is right. fact2: If somebody is a bivouacking that the one is curious and/or the one is non-esoteric hold. fact3: The fact that either something is not a Schubert or it is vocational or both does not hold if it suckles annuity. fact4: If something that is nonspecific is not a loot then it is not a Knesset. fact5: This copalite suckles annuity if this hindshank is not a kind of a Knesset and does suckles annuity. fact6: The fact that that that this collegian is esoteric is incorrect is correct if that bludgeoner is curious is not wrong. fact7: If that this copalite is not a Schubert or it is vocational or both does not hold that ostler is not a kind of a Asanga. fact8: That this dipterocarp is not a Cercidiphyllum and is a Lophophorus does not hold. fact9: This hindshank is not a kind of a marooned. fact10: If this collegian smears discant but this is not smart then this hindshank suckles annuity. fact11: That staghound is a hematoma and burrs Limpopo if that ostler is not a Asanga. fact12: The fact that the krigia retains and it is a kind of a XXVIII does not hold. fact13: If something is not esoteric that does smear discant and that is not smart. fact14: That ostler does not burr Limpopo. fact15: That bludgeoner is a kind of a bivouacking if that this dipterocarp is not a Cercidiphyllum but a Lophophorus does not hold. fact16: the Limpopo does not burr ostler. fact17: If the fact that something is intercellular but it is not a perfect is false then the fact that it is not a hematoma is right. fact18: The fact that that staghound is intercellular but it is not a kind of a perfect is wrong if that ostler does not burr Limpopo.

fact1: (x): ¬{Q}x -> ({K}x & ¬{J}x) fact2: (x): {N}x -> ({M}x v ¬{L}x) fact3: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{E}x v {D}x) fact4: (x): ({K}x & ¬{J}x) -> ¬{H}x fact5: (¬{H}{c} & {F}{c}) -> {F}{b} fact6: {M}{e} -> ¬{L}{d} fact7: ¬(¬{E}{b} v {D}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact8: ¬(¬{O}{f} & {P}{f}) fact9: ¬{Q}{c} fact10: ({G}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) -> {F}{c} fact11: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) fact12: ¬({AL}{fa} & {IR}{fa}) fact13: (x): ¬{L}x -> ({G}x & ¬{I}x) fact14: ¬{A}{a} fact15: ¬(¬{O}{f} & {P}{f}) -> {N}{e} fact16: ¬{AC}{ab} fact17: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact18: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

That staghound is a kind of a hematoma.

{B}{aa}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That if something is not a kind of a marooned it is nonspecific and not a loot is right. fact2: If somebody is a bivouacking that the one is curious and/or the one is non-esoteric hold. fact3: The fact that either something is not a Schubert or it is vocational or both does not hold if it suckles annuity. fact4: If something that is nonspecific is not a loot then it is not a Knesset. fact5: This copalite suckles annuity if this hindshank is not a kind of a Knesset and does suckles annuity. fact6: The fact that that that this collegian is esoteric is incorrect is correct if that bludgeoner is curious is not wrong. fact7: If that this copalite is not a Schubert or it is vocational or both does not hold that ostler is not a kind of a Asanga. fact8: That this dipterocarp is not a Cercidiphyllum and is a Lophophorus does not hold. fact9: This hindshank is not a kind of a marooned. fact10: If this collegian smears discant but this is not smart then this hindshank suckles annuity. fact11: That staghound is a hematoma and burrs Limpopo if that ostler is not a Asanga. fact12: The fact that the krigia retains and it is a kind of a XXVIII does not hold. fact13: If something is not esoteric that does smear discant and that is not smart. fact14: That ostler does not burr Limpopo. fact15: That bludgeoner is a kind of a bivouacking if that this dipterocarp is not a Cercidiphyllum but a Lophophorus does not hold. fact16: the Limpopo does not burr ostler. fact17: If the fact that something is intercellular but it is not a perfect is false then the fact that it is not a hematoma is right. fact18: The fact that that staghound is intercellular but it is not a kind of a perfect is wrong if that ostler does not burr Limpopo. ; $hypothesis$ = That staghound is a kind of a hematoma. ; $proof$ =

fact17 -> int1: If that that staghound is intercellular thing that is not a perfect is wrong it is not a kind of a hematoma.; fact14 & fact18 -> int2: That that staghound is intercellular but this is not a kind of a perfect is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That dovetailing Riemann happens.

{D}

fact1: If this employment and that trampling happens this superciliousness does not occurs. fact2: If that cardinalship does not happens then this arithmeticness and the scarceness occurs. fact3: If that this lasting happens or this favor does not occurs or both is wrong that disclosing encyclopaedism does not happens. fact4: The fact that that estrousness happens is right. fact5: That non-Monophysiteness and this pining rattled occurs. fact6: That dovetailing Riemann does not occurs if that disclosing encyclopaedism but notthat nonconcentricness occurs. fact7: That both that non-Monophysiteness and this pining rattled happens prevents that that recessionalness occurs. fact8: If the fact that the fact that that embroidery does not occurs and the tribulating unsteadiness does not happens is wrong hold that trampling occurs. fact9: If the fact that that estrousness occurs and/or that nonconcentricness does not occurs is false that dovetailing Riemann occurs. fact10: If this favor happens that disclosing encyclopaedism occurs. fact11: That leakage does not happens. fact12: If the fact that that estrousness and that nonconcentricness occurs does not hold then the downstreamness does not happens. fact13: If that the fact that this Iberianness happens and this lasting happens hold is incorrect then this favor does not occurs. fact14: The fact that both this Iberianness and this lasting occurs is false if this superciliousness does not occurs. fact15: If this arithmeticness occurs then that that embroidery does not happens and the tribulating unsteadiness does not occurs is false. fact16: If that both that non-evilness and that cardinalship happens is incorrect then that cardinalship does not happens. fact17: If that estrousness occurs then that nonconcentricness does not occurs. fact18: This favor occurs. fact19: The fact that that both this employment and the bit happens is triggered by that that recessionalness does not occurs hold. fact20: The fact that that estrousness occurs and that nonconcentricness occurs is wrong if that disclosing encyclopaedism does not happens.

fact1: ({I} & {J}) -> ¬{H} fact2: ¬{O} -> ({M} & {N}) fact3: ¬({F} v ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} fact4: {A} fact5: (¬{S} & {R}) fact6: ({C} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{D} fact7: (¬{S} & {R}) -> ¬{Q} fact8: ¬(¬{K} & ¬{L}) -> {J} fact9: ¬({A} v ¬{B}) -> {D} fact10: {E} -> {C} fact11: ¬{JI} fact12: ¬({A} & {B}) -> ¬{DL} fact13: ¬({G} & {F}) -> ¬{E} fact14: ¬{H} -> ¬({G} & {F}) fact15: {M} -> ¬(¬{K} & ¬{L}) fact16: ¬(¬{T} & {O}) -> ¬{O} fact17: {A} -> ¬{B} fact18: {E} fact19: ¬{Q} -> ({I} & {P}) fact20: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B})

That dovetailing Riemann happens.

{D}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this employment and that trampling happens this superciliousness does not occurs. fact2: If that cardinalship does not happens then this arithmeticness and the scarceness occurs. fact3: If that this lasting happens or this favor does not occurs or both is wrong that disclosing encyclopaedism does not happens. fact4: The fact that that estrousness happens is right. fact5: That non-Monophysiteness and this pining rattled occurs. fact6: That dovetailing Riemann does not occurs if that disclosing encyclopaedism but notthat nonconcentricness occurs. fact7: That both that non-Monophysiteness and this pining rattled happens prevents that that recessionalness occurs. fact8: If the fact that the fact that that embroidery does not occurs and the tribulating unsteadiness does not happens is wrong hold that trampling occurs. fact9: If the fact that that estrousness occurs and/or that nonconcentricness does not occurs is false that dovetailing Riemann occurs. fact10: If this favor happens that disclosing encyclopaedism occurs. fact11: That leakage does not happens. fact12: If the fact that that estrousness and that nonconcentricness occurs does not hold then the downstreamness does not happens. fact13: If that the fact that this Iberianness happens and this lasting happens hold is incorrect then this favor does not occurs. fact14: The fact that both this Iberianness and this lasting occurs is false if this superciliousness does not occurs. fact15: If this arithmeticness occurs then that that embroidery does not happens and the tribulating unsteadiness does not occurs is false. fact16: If that both that non-evilness and that cardinalship happens is incorrect then that cardinalship does not happens. fact17: If that estrousness occurs then that nonconcentricness does not occurs. fact18: This favor occurs. fact19: The fact that that both this employment and the bit happens is triggered by that that recessionalness does not occurs hold. fact20: The fact that that estrousness occurs and that nonconcentricness occurs is wrong if that disclosing encyclopaedism does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That dovetailing Riemann happens. ; $proof$ =

fact17 & fact4 -> int1: That that nonconcentricness does not happens hold.; fact10 & fact18 -> int2: That disclosing encyclopaedism occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That disclosing encyclopaedism but notthat nonconcentricness occurs.; int3 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Everything does not colour Odysseus and it respects Papilionaceae.

(x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)

fact1: Everything does not colour Odysseus and it respects Papilionaceae.

fact1: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Everything does not colour Odysseus and it respects Papilionaceae. ; $hypothesis$ = Everything does not colour Odysseus and it respects Papilionaceae. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Maxwell is mesodermal and that one is inframaxillary.

({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa})

fact1: Some person that is not a versatility is both mesodermal and not non-inframaxillary. fact2: Maxwell is a kind of a Ayurveda and this thing ebbs Annaba. fact3: There is something such that it is a defamation. fact4: If there exists some person such that it is a defamation then Maxwell is not a versatility.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) fact2: ({DG}{aa} & {IM}{aa}) fact3: (Ex): {B}x fact4: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}{aa}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Some person that is not a versatility is both mesodermal and not non-inframaxillary. fact2: Maxwell is a kind of a Ayurveda and this thing ebbs Annaba. fact3: There is something such that it is a defamation. fact4: If there exists some person such that it is a defamation then Maxwell is not a versatility. ; $hypothesis$ = Maxwell is mesodermal and that one is inframaxillary. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> int1: Maxwell is mesodermal and it is inframaxillary if Maxwell is not a kind of a versatility.; fact3 & fact4 -> int2: Maxwell is not a kind of a versatility.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This dislodgment does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: That this sexualness occurs is prevented by that the rattling occurs. fact2: That this diversification but notthis Bath occurs is brought about by that this sexualness does not occurs. fact3: The fact that if that this worsteding clan but notthe sensing octonary happens is false then that IOP does not happens is right. fact4: If that the rectorship does not happens and this flooding givenness does not happens is incorrect that rasp occurs. fact5: Either this reentry or this noninstitutionalizedness or both occurs if that IOP does not happens. fact6: Both this gantlet and that XT occurs. fact7: If that livery happens then the fact that this worsteding clan occurs and the sensing octonary does not occurs does not hold. fact8: That both this renting and this consuming Sanvitalia happens is caused by that that riding Crocodilia does not occurs. fact9: That that rasp happens prevents that that livery does not occurs. fact10: The fact that the rectorship does not happens and this flooding givenness does not occurs is false. fact11: If that wading occurs and that Genoese occurs then that circumvolving does not occurs. fact12: That generalcy and the surprise happens if that circumvolving does not occurs. fact13: If that XT does not happens this gantlet and this dislodgment happens. fact14: That wading and that Genoese happens if that privation does not occurs. fact15: That that XT happens and this naming Carassius happens prevents that this dislodgment happens. fact16: That the lifesaving does not happens is caused by that this hobby does not occurs and that liveliness does not occurs. fact17: That privation does not happens if this diversification occurs and this Bath does not happens. fact18: That this hobby does not occurs and that liveliness does not happens is triggered by that that generalcy occurs. fact19: That riding Crocodilia does not occurs if the lifesaving does not occurs. fact20: This renting happens and this naming Carassius occurs.

fact1: {T} -> ¬{S} fact2: ¬{S} -> ({R} & ¬{Q}) fact3: ¬({AD} & ¬{AC}) -> ¬{AB} fact4: ¬(¬{AG} & ¬{AH}) -> {AF} fact5: ¬{AB} -> ({AA} v {U}) fact6: ({A} & {B}) fact7: {AE} -> ¬({AD} & ¬{AC}) fact8: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact9: {AF} -> {AE} fact10: ¬(¬{AG} & ¬{AH}) fact11: ({O} & {N}) -> ¬{M} fact12: ¬{M} -> ({K} & {L}) fact13: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {D}) fact14: ¬{P} -> ({O} & {N}) fact15: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact16: (¬{I} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{H} fact17: ({R} & ¬{Q}) -> ¬{P} fact18: {K} -> (¬{I} & ¬{J}) fact19: ¬{H} -> ¬{G} fact20: ({E} & {C})

This dislodgment occurs.

{D}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this sexualness occurs is prevented by that the rattling occurs. fact2: That this diversification but notthis Bath occurs is brought about by that this sexualness does not occurs. fact3: The fact that if that this worsteding clan but notthe sensing octonary happens is false then that IOP does not happens is right. fact4: If that the rectorship does not happens and this flooding givenness does not happens is incorrect that rasp occurs. fact5: Either this reentry or this noninstitutionalizedness or both occurs if that IOP does not happens. fact6: Both this gantlet and that XT occurs. fact7: If that livery happens then the fact that this worsteding clan occurs and the sensing octonary does not occurs does not hold. fact8: That both this renting and this consuming Sanvitalia happens is caused by that that riding Crocodilia does not occurs. fact9: That that rasp happens prevents that that livery does not occurs. fact10: The fact that the rectorship does not happens and this flooding givenness does not occurs is false. fact11: If that wading occurs and that Genoese occurs then that circumvolving does not occurs. fact12: That generalcy and the surprise happens if that circumvolving does not occurs. fact13: If that XT does not happens this gantlet and this dislodgment happens. fact14: That wading and that Genoese happens if that privation does not occurs. fact15: That that XT happens and this naming Carassius happens prevents that this dislodgment happens. fact16: That the lifesaving does not happens is caused by that this hobby does not occurs and that liveliness does not occurs. fact17: That privation does not happens if this diversification occurs and this Bath does not happens. fact18: That this hobby does not occurs and that liveliness does not happens is triggered by that that generalcy occurs. fact19: That riding Crocodilia does not occurs if the lifesaving does not occurs. fact20: This renting happens and this naming Carassius occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This dislodgment does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact6 -> int1: That XT occurs.; fact20 -> int2: This naming Carassius happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Both that XT and this naming Carassius occurs.; int3 & fact15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This ethnocentricness does not occurs and that biking kilometer does not happens.

(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: If this shopping Halenia does not happens that pitting occurs and this belching homonymy occurs. fact2: If that pitting occurs then that this ethnocentricness does not happens and that biking kilometer does not occurs does not hold. fact3: This ethnocentricness does not happens and that biking kilometer does not occurs if that pitting does not occurs. fact4: This shopping Halenia does not happens if the fact that this clomping Capparidaceae does not happens but this shopping Halenia occurs is false. fact5: If that this assistance happens hold then that pitting but notthis belching homonymy occurs. fact6: That that pitting and this belching homonymy occurs yields that that Utopian does not occurs. fact7: Both this assistance and this playactinging occurs if this shopping Halenia does not occurs. fact8: That that biking kilometer does not occurs is true. fact9: That pitting does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{E} -> ({A} & {B}) fact2: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact3: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact4: ¬(¬{F} & {E}) -> ¬{E} fact5: {C} -> ({A} & ¬{B}) fact6: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{AK} fact7: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact8: ¬{AB} fact9: ¬{A}

That this ethnocentricness does not occurs and that biking kilometer does not happens is incorrect.

¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this shopping Halenia does not happens that pitting occurs and this belching homonymy occurs. fact2: If that pitting occurs then that this ethnocentricness does not happens and that biking kilometer does not occurs does not hold. fact3: This ethnocentricness does not happens and that biking kilometer does not occurs if that pitting does not occurs. fact4: This shopping Halenia does not happens if the fact that this clomping Capparidaceae does not happens but this shopping Halenia occurs is false. fact5: If that this assistance happens hold then that pitting but notthis belching homonymy occurs. fact6: That that pitting and this belching homonymy occurs yields that that Utopian does not occurs. fact7: Both this assistance and this playactinging occurs if this shopping Halenia does not occurs. fact8: That that biking kilometer does not occurs is true. fact9: That pitting does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This ethnocentricness does not occurs and that biking kilometer does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that this gainer does not occurs is correct.

¬{A}

fact1: The coloring occurs if that collection happens. fact2: That that concealing Calcutta does not occurs is correct if that concealing Calcutta does not occurs or this unrealisticness does not occurs or both. fact3: Either this banning deadness does not happens or that opposite does not occurs or both. fact4: If the fact that that non-intracutaneousness and that valse occurs is wrong then that plumbicness does not happens. fact5: The fact that the baronetage happens is right if that liner happens. fact6: That entr'acte occurs. fact7: That necropsy happens. fact8: The relating Lactuca happens if the intracutaneousness happens. fact9: That appeasement happens. fact10: The fact that the amnio does not occurs or the Hulling Corydalidae does not occurs or both is true. fact11: That rooting hallucinosis does not happens. fact12: That the idealisation does not occurs is brought about by that that the idealisation does not happens or that the laboring does not happens or both is not false. fact13: That ontologicalness happens. fact14: That that concealing Calcutta and the unintelligibleness occurs is wrong if that plumbicness does not happens. fact15: If the fact that that concealing Calcutta and the unintelligibleness occurs is false that apheresis does not occurs. fact16: If that overexploitation occurs that that non-intracutaneousness and that valse happens is wrong. fact17: That forgiving does not happens and/or that overcasting Gordimer does not happens. fact18: That that opposite does not happens yields that this gainer happens and this banning deadness happens. fact19: If that apheresis does not happens then that Bulgarianness does not occurs and that opposite does not occurs. fact20: If this gainer occurs this banning deadness happens. fact21: That that recuperating occurs triggers that overexploitation.

fact1: {BI} -> {CD} fact2: (¬{F} v ¬{GE}) -> ¬{F} fact3: (¬{B} v ¬{C}) fact4: ¬(¬{J} & {I}) -> ¬{H} fact5: {BN} -> {AK} fact6: {AF} fact7: {CJ} fact8: {J} -> {EF} fact9: {AB} fact10: (¬{JG} v ¬{FH}) fact11: ¬{AR} fact12: (¬{HF} v ¬{DA}) -> ¬{HF} fact13: {GC} fact14: ¬{H} -> ¬({F} & {G}) fact15: ¬({F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact16: {K} -> ¬(¬{J} & {I}) fact17: (¬{IK} v ¬{AA}) fact18: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact19: ¬{E} -> (¬{D} & ¬{C}) fact20: {A} -> {B} fact21: {L} -> {K}

Let's assume that this gainer happens.

{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The coloring occurs if that collection happens. fact2: That that concealing Calcutta does not occurs is correct if that concealing Calcutta does not occurs or this unrealisticness does not occurs or both. fact3: Either this banning deadness does not happens or that opposite does not occurs or both. fact4: If the fact that that non-intracutaneousness and that valse occurs is wrong then that plumbicness does not happens. fact5: The fact that the baronetage happens is right if that liner happens. fact6: That entr'acte occurs. fact7: That necropsy happens. fact8: The relating Lactuca happens if the intracutaneousness happens. fact9: That appeasement happens. fact10: The fact that the amnio does not occurs or the Hulling Corydalidae does not occurs or both is true. fact11: That rooting hallucinosis does not happens. fact12: That the idealisation does not occurs is brought about by that that the idealisation does not happens or that the laboring does not happens or both is not false. fact13: That ontologicalness happens. fact14: That that concealing Calcutta and the unintelligibleness occurs is wrong if that plumbicness does not happens. fact15: If the fact that that concealing Calcutta and the unintelligibleness occurs is false that apheresis does not occurs. fact16: If that overexploitation occurs that that non-intracutaneousness and that valse happens is wrong. fact17: That forgiving does not happens and/or that overcasting Gordimer does not happens. fact18: That that opposite does not happens yields that this gainer happens and this banning deadness happens. fact19: If that apheresis does not happens then that Bulgarianness does not occurs and that opposite does not occurs. fact20: If this gainer occurs this banning deadness happens. fact21: That that recuperating occurs triggers that overexploitation. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this gainer does not occurs is correct. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This guenon is a circular.

{D}{a}

fact1: The pulpwood is not an imported if this wagtail is non-away one that annoys. fact2: Somebody is not a kind of a Zoroastrian and it is not a Algonquian if it deifies mantissa. fact3: If this wagtail is a Balistes this wagtail is not conductive. fact4: That bombie is not carbonic if that either this one is a camouflaged or this one does not elect Gavidae or both does not hold. fact5: If this oceanographer is not a kind of a Zoroastrian and is not a kind of a Algonquian this optician is not a Chondrus. fact6: This wagtail is a Balistes. fact7: If either some man is not a camouflaged or it is not well or both then it is not a kind of a circular. fact8: Every person deifies mantissa. fact9: If something dries it is non-Swiss or it does not swell or both. fact10: This guenon is not calcifugous and it is not chartaceous. fact11: If the pulpwood is not an imported that motorcoach is well but it is not lacertilian. fact12: If somebody is well and the one projects Scrophulariaceae the one does not elect Gavidae. fact13: This guenon is not a Carmelite. fact14: Allyson does not elect Gavidae. fact15: Some man is a circular if that it is a camouflaged and it is not a circular does not hold. fact16: This guenon is not chartaceous. fact17: Somebody is not a camouflaged or it is not well or both if it elects Gavidae. fact18: If this guenon is a kind of non-calcifugous thing that is not chartaceous this guenon elects Gavidae. fact19: If this wagtail is not conductive then she/he is not away and she/he does annoy. fact20: If this guenon is not a kind of a camouflaged then this guenon is not a circular. fact21: If this optician is not a Chondrus that motorcoach does wing poetics and is unplanted. fact22: Some man projects Scrophulariaceae if this person wings poetics.

fact1: (¬{J}{d} & {I}{d}) -> ¬{G}{c} fact2: (x): {Q}x -> (¬{O}x & ¬{N}x) fact3: {P}{d} -> {L}{d} fact4: ¬({A}{ep} v ¬{B}{ep}) -> ¬{IM}{ep} fact5: (¬{O}{f} & ¬{N}{f}) -> ¬{M}{e} fact6: {P}{d} fact7: (x): (¬{A}x v ¬{C}x) -> ¬{D}x fact8: (x): {Q}x fact9: (x): {CK}x -> (¬{FE}x v ¬{GB}x) fact10: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact11: ¬{G}{c} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) fact12: (x): ({C}x & {E}x) -> ¬{B}x fact13: ¬{BQ}{a} fact14: ¬{B}{dh} fact15: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{D}x) -> {D}x fact16: ¬{AB}{a} fact17: (x): {B}x -> (¬{A}x v ¬{C}x) fact18: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact19: {L}{d} -> (¬{J}{d} & {I}{d}) fact20: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{D}{a} fact21: ¬{M}{e} -> ({H}{b} & {K}{b}) fact22: (x): {H}x -> {E}x

That bombie is not carbonic or not a Ezekiel or both.

(¬{IM}{ep} v ¬{DK}{ep})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The pulpwood is not an imported if this wagtail is non-away one that annoys. fact2: Somebody is not a kind of a Zoroastrian and it is not a Algonquian if it deifies mantissa. fact3: If this wagtail is a Balistes this wagtail is not conductive. fact4: That bombie is not carbonic if that either this one is a camouflaged or this one does not elect Gavidae or both does not hold. fact5: If this oceanographer is not a kind of a Zoroastrian and is not a kind of a Algonquian this optician is not a Chondrus. fact6: This wagtail is a Balistes. fact7: If either some man is not a camouflaged or it is not well or both then it is not a kind of a circular. fact8: Every person deifies mantissa. fact9: If something dries it is non-Swiss or it does not swell or both. fact10: This guenon is not calcifugous and it is not chartaceous. fact11: If the pulpwood is not an imported that motorcoach is well but it is not lacertilian. fact12: If somebody is well and the one projects Scrophulariaceae the one does not elect Gavidae. fact13: This guenon is not a Carmelite. fact14: Allyson does not elect Gavidae. fact15: Some man is a circular if that it is a camouflaged and it is not a circular does not hold. fact16: This guenon is not chartaceous. fact17: Somebody is not a camouflaged or it is not well or both if it elects Gavidae. fact18: If this guenon is a kind of non-calcifugous thing that is not chartaceous this guenon elects Gavidae. fact19: If this wagtail is not conductive then she/he is not away and she/he does annoy. fact20: If this guenon is not a kind of a camouflaged then this guenon is not a circular. fact21: If this optician is not a Chondrus that motorcoach does wing poetics and is unplanted. fact22: Some man projects Scrophulariaceae if this person wings poetics. ; $hypothesis$ = This guenon is a circular. ; $proof$ =

fact18 & fact10 -> int1: This guenon elects Gavidae.; fact17 -> int2: If this guenon does elect Gavidae that either it is not a camouflaged or it is not well or both is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This guenon is not a camouflaged and/or it is non-well.; fact7 -> int4: If either this guenon is not a kind of a camouflaged or that person is not well or both then this guenon is not a circular.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That Theobid is not visceral.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: That Theobid is a kind of a scared. fact2: That Theobid is a kind of sporadic a halcyon. fact3: That process is visceral. fact4: That Theobid configures overflowing and is cursorial. fact5: That Theobid is both a Photius and beautiful. fact6: The estazolam is a kind of a Hindustani and the person is visceral. fact7: That Theobid is calyceal. fact8: That wave is visceral and this thing is a halcyon. fact9: That Theobid is a kind of a Suva. fact10: If that wave is visceral then it is a Suva. fact11: The fact that that Theobid obeys Bujumbura is right. fact12: That Theobid is a halcyon. fact13: The coulisse mythicises Bissau and it is lacustrine. fact14: That Theobid is a kind of a halcyon and this is a expensiveness. fact15: That Theobid is both not non-Bahai and a Scholastic. fact16: That Theobid is unneurotic and he/she does rage Hydrophyllum. fact17: That tub is a halcyon. fact18: The shear is a kind of a halcyon. fact19: That devilfish pits DPhil and is a halcyon. fact20: If that that Theobid is both a halcyon and visceral is wrong then the one is not visceral. fact21: That Theobid is visceral and is a kind of a halcyon.

fact1: {M}{a} fact2: ({EK}{a} & {B}{a}) fact3: {A}{gs} fact4: ({GG}{a} & {EP}{a}) fact5: ({BN}{a} & {JK}{a}) fact6: ({CQ}{jd} & {A}{jd}) fact7: {IE}{a} fact8: ({A}{dq} & {B}{dq}) fact9: {EH}{a} fact10: {A}{dq} -> {EH}{dq} fact11: {CH}{a} fact12: {B}{a} fact13: ({GL}{gq} & {L}{gq}) fact14: ({B}{a} & {DI}{a}) fact15: ({DO}{a} & {GQ}{a}) fact16: ({GF}{a} & {IS}{a}) fact17: {B}{cu} fact18: {B}{em} fact19: ({HN}{db} & {B}{db}) fact20: ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact21: ({A}{a} & {B}{a})

That wave is a Suva and it is a JEM.

({EH}{dq} & {IA}{dq})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Theobid is a kind of a scared. fact2: That Theobid is a kind of sporadic a halcyon. fact3: That process is visceral. fact4: That Theobid configures overflowing and is cursorial. fact5: That Theobid is both a Photius and beautiful. fact6: The estazolam is a kind of a Hindustani and the person is visceral. fact7: That Theobid is calyceal. fact8: That wave is visceral and this thing is a halcyon. fact9: That Theobid is a kind of a Suva. fact10: If that wave is visceral then it is a Suva. fact11: The fact that that Theobid obeys Bujumbura is right. fact12: That Theobid is a halcyon. fact13: The coulisse mythicises Bissau and it is lacustrine. fact14: That Theobid is a kind of a halcyon and this is a expensiveness. fact15: That Theobid is both not non-Bahai and a Scholastic. fact16: That Theobid is unneurotic and he/she does rage Hydrophyllum. fact17: That tub is a halcyon. fact18: The shear is a kind of a halcyon. fact19: That devilfish pits DPhil and is a halcyon. fact20: If that that Theobid is both a halcyon and visceral is wrong then the one is not visceral. fact21: That Theobid is visceral and is a kind of a halcyon. ; $hypothesis$ = That Theobid is not visceral. ; $proof$ =

fact21 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This spotlight kennels Marginocephalia.

{B}{b}

fact1: the repetitiousness does stigmatize place. fact2: That place does stigmatize repetitiousness. fact3: This spotlight stigmatizes repetitiousness if that place kennels Marginocephalia. fact4: That place kennels Marginocephalia if this spotlight stigmatizes repetitiousness. fact5: This spotlight is a Devanagari if that place is sincere. fact6: If this spotlight does not bide that that kennels Marginocephalia and that stigmatizes repetitiousness is false. fact7: If that place stigmatizes repetitiousness this spotlight does kennel Marginocephalia. fact8: If something is not a kind of a Stalin and is not penile then that does not bide. fact9: That place kennels Marginocephalia. fact10: That place kennels Marginocephalia if the fedora stigmatizes repetitiousness.

fact1: {AA}{aa} fact2: {A}{a} fact3: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} fact4: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} fact5: {BB}{a} -> {FB}{b} fact6: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬({B}{b} & {A}{b}) fact7: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact8: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact9: {B}{a} fact10: {A}{c} -> {B}{a}

This spotlight does not kennel Marginocephalia.

¬{B}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: the repetitiousness does stigmatize place. fact2: That place does stigmatize repetitiousness. fact3: This spotlight stigmatizes repetitiousness if that place kennels Marginocephalia. fact4: That place kennels Marginocephalia if this spotlight stigmatizes repetitiousness. fact5: This spotlight is a Devanagari if that place is sincere. fact6: If this spotlight does not bide that that kennels Marginocephalia and that stigmatizes repetitiousness is false. fact7: If that place stigmatizes repetitiousness this spotlight does kennel Marginocephalia. fact8: If something is not a kind of a Stalin and is not penile then that does not bide. fact9: That place kennels Marginocephalia. fact10: That place kennels Marginocephalia if the fedora stigmatizes repetitiousness. ; $hypothesis$ = This spotlight kennels Marginocephalia. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Everybody is a Polygala.

(x): {A}x

fact1: Everyone is a Aberdare. fact2: Everyone is an incurable. fact3: Everybody is a kind of a MBD and it does fade Elaeis. fact4: Everything is untagged. fact5: Everything does fade Elaeis. fact6: Everybody is a Hibernia. fact7: Everything is big. fact8: Everybody forks Indra. fact9: Everything is a kind of a MiB. fact10: Everyone maps ARDA. fact11: Everything is not archdiocesan. fact12: Somebody is both not archdiocesan and a ripeness if she is a MBD. fact13: Everybody is unsupervised.

fact1: (x): {Q}x fact2: (x): {AS}x fact3: (x): ({D}x & {E}x) fact4: (x): {CC}x fact5: (x): {E}x fact6: (x): {JD}x fact7: (x): {JF}x fact8: (x): {IG}x fact9: (x): {DD}x fact10: (x): {FE}x fact11: (x): ¬{B}x fact12: (x): {D}x -> (¬{B}x & {C}x) fact13: (x): {EM}x

Everyone is a neglected.

(x): {BF}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everyone is a Aberdare. fact2: Everyone is an incurable. fact3: Everybody is a kind of a MBD and it does fade Elaeis. fact4: Everything is untagged. fact5: Everything does fade Elaeis. fact6: Everybody is a Hibernia. fact7: Everything is big. fact8: Everybody forks Indra. fact9: Everything is a kind of a MiB. fact10: Everyone maps ARDA. fact11: Everything is not archdiocesan. fact12: Somebody is both not archdiocesan and a ripeness if she is a MBD. fact13: Everybody is unsupervised. ; $hypothesis$ = Everybody is a Polygala. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Notthe caprioling weekend but this translationalness happens.

(¬{D} & {C})

fact1: If this choreographicness happens that unharnessing Fatihah occurs. fact2: Notthe caprioling weekend but this translationalness happens if that unharnessing Fatihah occurs. fact3: This choreographicness happens.

fact1: {A} -> {B} fact2: {B} -> (¬{D} & {C}) fact3: {A}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If this choreographicness happens that unharnessing Fatihah occurs. fact2: Notthe caprioling weekend but this translationalness happens if that unharnessing Fatihah occurs. fact3: This choreographicness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Notthe caprioling weekend but this translationalness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> int1: That unharnessing Fatihah happens.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That Onondaga does not misconstrue Muntingia.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: Some person is not a misuse if that she/he is a kind of an automatic and she/he is not a amphigory is wrong. fact2: Every person is not dumpy. fact3: If something is not dumpy the fact that it is an automatic and is not a amphigory is not true. fact4: If someone is not a misuse and is not a amphigory then this one does not misconstrue Muntingia. fact5: this Muntingia misconstrues Onondaga. fact6: That Onondaga is photomechanical. fact7: The disc misconstrues Muntingia.

fact1: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): ¬{E}x fact3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{C}x) fact4: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact5: {AA}{aa} fact6: {FF}{a} fact7: {A}{hh}

That phytohormone misconstrues Muntingia.

{A}{ab}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some person is not a misuse if that she/he is a kind of an automatic and she/he is not a amphigory is wrong. fact2: Every person is not dumpy. fact3: If something is not dumpy the fact that it is an automatic and is not a amphigory is not true. fact4: If someone is not a misuse and is not a amphigory then this one does not misconstrue Muntingia. fact5: this Muntingia misconstrues Onondaga. fact6: That Onondaga is photomechanical. fact7: The disc misconstrues Muntingia. ; $hypothesis$ = That Onondaga does not misconstrue Muntingia. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Let's assume that the fact that this undifferentiatedness does not happens hold.

¬{A}

fact1: That the soaking Trogonidae does not occurs is right. fact2: That dramatisation does not happens. fact3: The verbolatry does not occurs. fact4: That that pedagogicalness happens if the manliness does not occurs is true. fact5: This ossicularness happens. fact6: The accident occurs. fact7: Both this ossicularness and this non-Calvinistness occurs. fact8: The Eastness occurs.

fact1: ¬{FS} fact2: ¬{EU} fact3: ¬{HD} fact4: ¬{CQ} -> {CC} fact5: {C} fact6: {FP} fact7: ({C} & ¬{B}) fact8: {GD}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That the soaking Trogonidae does not occurs is right. fact2: That dramatisation does not happens. fact3: The verbolatry does not occurs. fact4: That that pedagogicalness happens if the manliness does not occurs is true. fact5: This ossicularness happens. fact6: The accident occurs. fact7: Both this ossicularness and this non-Calvinistness occurs. fact8: The Eastness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that the fact that this undifferentiatedness does not happens hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That photocell is plausible but that one leaps Polypedatidae.

(¬{C}{c} & {B}{c})

fact1: If this hematoidin is a kind of a Hsian William leaps Polypedatidae. fact2: This hematoidin is a kind of a Hsian. fact3: If William leaps Polypedatidae that photocell is a kind of plausible one that leaps Polypedatidae.

fact1: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact2: {A}{a} fact3: {B}{b} -> (¬{C}{c} & {B}{c})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If this hematoidin is a kind of a Hsian William leaps Polypedatidae. fact2: This hematoidin is a kind of a Hsian. fact3: If William leaps Polypedatidae that photocell is a kind of plausible one that leaps Polypedatidae. ; $hypothesis$ = That photocell is plausible but that one leaps Polypedatidae. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact2 -> int1: William leaps Polypedatidae.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The solving Suillus occurs.

{C}

fact1: The solving Suillus occurs if this Aleutian happens. fact2: Both that bicker and this whacking paid happens. fact3: This printing cognomen does not happens but that splicing chemoimmunology occurs if that bicker happens. fact4: That liaison does not occurs if the fact that that liaison happens but this quavering does not happens does not hold. fact5: This stopping but notthe dispatching happens if that sobbing briefness does not happens. fact6: If this nestling does not happens then that this disobliging exordium happens and this starving flavorlessness occurs is incorrect. fact7: If that this disobliging exordium happens and this starving flavorlessness occurs is incorrect this Aleutian does not occurs. fact8: That that backness does not occurs and the twisting happens is incorrect if this ruddlesing Tulostomataceae does not occurs. fact9: That that both that non-ammoniticness and that unknown happens hold is incorrect if that liaison does not happens. fact10: This Lithuanianness does not happens if that that non-ammoniticness and that unknown happens is wrong. fact11: That this stopping but notthe dispatching occurs causes that this winnow occurs. fact12: That this quartering Caligula does not occurs and/or that this cricket does not happens is caused by this clash. fact13: If this winnow occurs then the fact that that liaison occurs and this quavering does not occurs is incorrect. fact14: That the solving Suillus does not occurs and this latinateness occurs is caused by that this Aleutian does not occurs. fact15: If the fact that that non-backness and the twisting occurs is incorrect then this nestling does not happens. fact16: That non-Lithuanianness causes that this creeping placed happens and this chugging wiseness happens. fact17: If this chugging wiseness occurs then this clash but notthe divulging mysticism occurs. fact18: That sobbing briefness is prevented by that both this impalpableness and that Thanksgiving happens. fact19: If this printing cognomen does not happens the palpableness does not happens but that Thanksgiving occurs. fact20: If that this dimming thudding happens is right then that this succeeding Chisinau happens hold. fact21: This latinateness and this Aleutian occurs.

fact1: {B} -> {C} fact2: ({AH} & {AI}) fact3: {AH} -> (¬{AF} & {AG}) fact4: ¬({S} & ¬{U}) -> ¬{S} fact5: ¬{AC} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact6: ¬{F} -> ¬({E} & {D}) fact7: ¬({E} & {D}) -> ¬{B} fact8: ¬{I} -> ¬(¬{G} & {H}) fact9: ¬{S} -> ¬(¬{Q} & {R}) fact10: ¬(¬{Q} & {R}) -> ¬{P} fact11: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {T} fact12: {L} -> (¬{K} v ¬{J}) fact13: {T} -> ¬({S} & ¬{U}) fact14: ¬{B} -> (¬{C} & {A}) fact15: ¬(¬{G} & {H}) -> ¬{F} fact16: ¬{P} -> ({O} & {N}) fact17: {N} -> ({L} & ¬{M}) fact18: (¬{AD} & {AE}) -> ¬{AC} fact19: ¬{AF} -> (¬{AD} & {AE}) fact20: {AU} -> {ET} fact21: ({A} & {B})

The solving Suillus does not happens.

¬{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The solving Suillus occurs if this Aleutian happens. fact2: Both that bicker and this whacking paid happens. fact3: This printing cognomen does not happens but that splicing chemoimmunology occurs if that bicker happens. fact4: That liaison does not occurs if the fact that that liaison happens but this quavering does not happens does not hold. fact5: This stopping but notthe dispatching happens if that sobbing briefness does not happens. fact6: If this nestling does not happens then that this disobliging exordium happens and this starving flavorlessness occurs is incorrect. fact7: If that this disobliging exordium happens and this starving flavorlessness occurs is incorrect this Aleutian does not occurs. fact8: That that backness does not occurs and the twisting happens is incorrect if this ruddlesing Tulostomataceae does not occurs. fact9: That that both that non-ammoniticness and that unknown happens hold is incorrect if that liaison does not happens. fact10: This Lithuanianness does not happens if that that non-ammoniticness and that unknown happens is wrong. fact11: That this stopping but notthe dispatching occurs causes that this winnow occurs. fact12: That this quartering Caligula does not occurs and/or that this cricket does not happens is caused by this clash. fact13: If this winnow occurs then the fact that that liaison occurs and this quavering does not occurs is incorrect. fact14: That the solving Suillus does not occurs and this latinateness occurs is caused by that this Aleutian does not occurs. fact15: If the fact that that non-backness and the twisting occurs is incorrect then this nestling does not happens. fact16: That non-Lithuanianness causes that this creeping placed happens and this chugging wiseness happens. fact17: If this chugging wiseness occurs then this clash but notthe divulging mysticism occurs. fact18: That sobbing briefness is prevented by that both this impalpableness and that Thanksgiving happens. fact19: If this printing cognomen does not happens the palpableness does not happens but that Thanksgiving occurs. fact20: If that this dimming thudding happens is right then that this succeeding Chisinau happens hold. fact21: This latinateness and this Aleutian occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The solving Suillus occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact21 -> int1: This Aleutian occurs.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this plastic is pneumatic but it is not a plonk does not hold.

¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: If this plastic is a trailing then that this plastic is pneumatic but she is not a plonk is wrong. fact2: If some man is a trailing he/she is pneumatic. fact3: This plastic is a kind of a trailing. fact4: The fact that this plastic is not fraternal hold if that malingerer is a kind of a Catostomidae and/or bares. fact5: This sip is a trailing and the one is unarticulate if the fact that this plastic is not fraternal hold.

fact1: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact2: (x): {A}x -> {AA}x fact3: {A}{a} fact4: ({E}{b} v {D}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact5: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{cf} & {B}{cf})

This sip is pneumatic.

{AA}{cf}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this plastic is a trailing then that this plastic is pneumatic but she is not a plonk is wrong. fact2: If some man is a trailing he/she is pneumatic. fact3: This plastic is a kind of a trailing. fact4: The fact that this plastic is not fraternal hold if that malingerer is a kind of a Catostomidae and/or bares. fact5: This sip is a trailing and the one is unarticulate if the fact that this plastic is not fraternal hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That this plastic is pneumatic but it is not a plonk does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That glazing occurs.

{C}

fact1: This intensifying xanthopsia occurs. fact2: That both this carpetbagness and that granulation happens is caused by that this Salvadoreanness does not happens. fact3: If this carpetbagness occurs then that pollarding happens. fact4: Notthe disregarding thriller but that compatibleness happens. fact5: That Frisianness happens. fact6: This deposit does not occurs and/or that cerousness occurs if that pollarding happens. fact7: That glazing does not occurs if that lexicographicness occurs and that Frisianness occurs. fact8: Notthe molesting Paeonia but this intensifying xanthopsia happens. fact9: That glazing happens and that cerousness occurs if this deposit does not happens. fact10: Both the recall and the counterplay happens. fact11: If the fact that that tantalizing Magicicada does not occurs and this mechanization happens does not hold then this Salvadoreanness does not happens. fact12: That this aroid does not occurs is prevented by that this begging Atlantic does not happens and the publishing Plautus occurs. fact13: This quincentennial happens if notthe humorlessness but that granulation happens. fact14: That this deposit does not happens or that that cerousness occurs or both prevents that lexicographicness. fact15: This animatingness occurs if this waiving otorhinolaryngology does not occurs but that gibber happens. fact16: The travelogue happens. fact17: This aroid and this cocooning happens. fact18: That Frisianness and that glazing happens if that lexicographicness does not occurs.

fact1: {AB} fact2: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact3: {G} -> {F} fact4: (¬{JI} & {BH}) fact5: {A} fact6: {F} -> (¬{E} v {D}) fact7: ({B} & {A}) -> ¬{C} fact8: (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact9: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact10: ({CG} & {DK}) fact11: ¬(¬{J} & {K}) -> ¬{I} fact12: (¬{FA} & {EC}) -> {JB} fact13: (¬{DS} & {H}) -> {IL} fact14: (¬{E} v {D}) -> ¬{B} fact15: (¬{FG} & {HU}) -> {JC} fact16: {O} fact17: ({JB} & {BB}) fact18: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {C})

That tantalizing Magicicada does not happens.

¬{J}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This intensifying xanthopsia occurs. fact2: That both this carpetbagness and that granulation happens is caused by that this Salvadoreanness does not happens. fact3: If this carpetbagness occurs then that pollarding happens. fact4: Notthe disregarding thriller but that compatibleness happens. fact5: That Frisianness happens. fact6: This deposit does not occurs and/or that cerousness occurs if that pollarding happens. fact7: That glazing does not occurs if that lexicographicness occurs and that Frisianness occurs. fact8: Notthe molesting Paeonia but this intensifying xanthopsia happens. fact9: That glazing happens and that cerousness occurs if this deposit does not happens. fact10: Both the recall and the counterplay happens. fact11: If the fact that that tantalizing Magicicada does not occurs and this mechanization happens does not hold then this Salvadoreanness does not happens. fact12: That this aroid does not occurs is prevented by that this begging Atlantic does not happens and the publishing Plautus occurs. fact13: This quincentennial happens if notthe humorlessness but that granulation happens. fact14: That this deposit does not happens or that that cerousness occurs or both prevents that lexicographicness. fact15: This animatingness occurs if this waiving otorhinolaryngology does not occurs but that gibber happens. fact16: The travelogue happens. fact17: This aroid and this cocooning happens. fact18: That Frisianness and that glazing happens if that lexicographicness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That glazing occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that localization does not happens and that myringectomy does not occurs does not hold.

¬(¬{B} & ¬{A})

fact1: The anointing alienism does not happens. fact2: If this visceralness happens then that this frightening kwashiorkor does not happens and that evolving does not occurs does not hold. fact3: If both that sloshing Chamaeleo and that diverting Moniliales happens this secularizing Curcuma does not occurs. fact4: If that this solving happens and this Wolfing Bolbitis does not happens does not hold that localization does not occurs. fact5: That that tinseleding Scythia does not occurs and this Cubanness does not occurs is caused by that that myringectomy happens. fact6: The fact that that bacterioidalness but notthe procaryoticness happens is incorrect if that absorbing Sudbury does not happens. fact7: That this secularizing Curcuma does not happens brings about that this crouching happens and the railing steatocystoma happens. fact8: The fact that this solving but notthis Wolfing Bolbitis happens is not correct. fact9: If this crouching occurs then that glinting Plectrophenax does not occurs. fact10: If that that Revering Antidorcas does not happens hold that diverting Moniliales and this cornealness occurs. fact11: The fact that this solving and this Wolfing Bolbitis occurs does not hold. fact12: That chylousness does not happens if the fact that this frightening kwashiorkor does not happens and that evolving does not happens does not hold. fact13: That absorbing Sudbury does not happens if that that both that absorbing Sudbury and that non-amphiproticness happens is incorrect hold. fact14: This Wolfing Bolbitis does not happens. fact15: This visceralness occurs if that clucking Physalia occurs. fact16: If that chylousness does not occurs that that localization does not occurs and that myringectomy does not occurs is not true. fact17: If that glinting Plectrophenax does not happens then the fact that the fact that that absorbing Sudbury and that non-amphiproticness occurs does not hold hold. fact18: If this recreation does not happens both that sloshing Chamaeleo and this factoring happens. fact19: If the fact that that bacterioidalness and that non-procaryoticness happens is wrong then that clucking Physalia occurs.

fact1: ¬{DB} fact2: {F} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact3: ({P} & {Q}) -> ¬{O} fact4: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact5: {A} -> (¬{FQ} & ¬{FI}) fact6: ¬{J} -> ¬({I} & ¬{H}) fact7: ¬{O} -> ({M} & {N}) fact8: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact9: {M} -> ¬{K} fact10: ¬{U} -> ({Q} & {R}) fact11: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact12: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact13: ¬({J} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{J} fact14: ¬{AB} fact15: {G} -> {F} fact16: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact17: ¬{K} -> ¬({J} & ¬{L}) fact18: ¬{T} -> ({P} & {S}) fact19: ¬({I} & ¬{H}) -> {G}

That tinseleding Scythia does not occurs and this Cubanness does not happens.

(¬{FQ} & ¬{FI})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The anointing alienism does not happens. fact2: If this visceralness happens then that this frightening kwashiorkor does not happens and that evolving does not occurs does not hold. fact3: If both that sloshing Chamaeleo and that diverting Moniliales happens this secularizing Curcuma does not occurs. fact4: If that this solving happens and this Wolfing Bolbitis does not happens does not hold that localization does not occurs. fact5: That that tinseleding Scythia does not occurs and this Cubanness does not occurs is caused by that that myringectomy happens. fact6: The fact that that bacterioidalness but notthe procaryoticness happens is incorrect if that absorbing Sudbury does not happens. fact7: That this secularizing Curcuma does not happens brings about that this crouching happens and the railing steatocystoma happens. fact8: The fact that this solving but notthis Wolfing Bolbitis happens is not correct. fact9: If this crouching occurs then that glinting Plectrophenax does not occurs. fact10: If that that Revering Antidorcas does not happens hold that diverting Moniliales and this cornealness occurs. fact11: The fact that this solving and this Wolfing Bolbitis occurs does not hold. fact12: That chylousness does not happens if the fact that this frightening kwashiorkor does not happens and that evolving does not happens does not hold. fact13: That absorbing Sudbury does not happens if that that both that absorbing Sudbury and that non-amphiproticness happens is incorrect hold. fact14: This Wolfing Bolbitis does not happens. fact15: This visceralness occurs if that clucking Physalia occurs. fact16: If that chylousness does not occurs that that localization does not occurs and that myringectomy does not occurs is not true. fact17: If that glinting Plectrophenax does not happens then the fact that the fact that that absorbing Sudbury and that non-amphiproticness occurs does not hold hold. fact18: If this recreation does not happens both that sloshing Chamaeleo and this factoring happens. fact19: If the fact that that bacterioidalness and that non-procaryoticness happens is wrong then that clucking Physalia occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that localization does not happens and that myringectomy does not occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this pilus schools Christendom hold.

{A}{a}

fact1: That this pilus schools Christendom hold. fact2: that that Christendom schools pilus hold. fact3: This pilus does not school Christendom if that she/he cadges colpocele and she/he is not a kind of a raphe is incorrect.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {AA}{aa} fact3: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a}

This pilus does not school Christendom.

¬{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this pilus schools Christendom hold. fact2: that that Christendom schools pilus hold. fact3: This pilus does not school Christendom if that she/he cadges colpocele and she/he is not a kind of a raphe is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = That this pilus schools Christendom hold. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This picturing occurs.

{B}

fact1: If that this picturing does not occurs and the cannulation does not occurs is not correct then this picturing happens. fact2: The coupling occurs. fact3: Notthis elastance but this uncertainness occurs if the coupling happens. fact4: That that agitation does not occurs yields that the coupling does not occurs and that cheering Gliridae occurs. fact5: If the coupling does not occurs the fact that this picturing does not occurs and the cannulation does not occurs is false. fact6: This picturing is prevented by that this elastance does not happens and this uncertainness occurs. fact7: If the coupling occurs this uncertainness occurs. fact8: This uncertainness occurs.

fact1: ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) -> {B} fact2: {A} fact3: {A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact4: ¬{E} -> (¬{A} & {D}) fact5: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact6: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact7: {A} -> {AB} fact8: {AB}

This picturing occurs.

{B}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that this picturing does not occurs and the cannulation does not occurs is not correct then this picturing happens. fact2: The coupling occurs. fact3: Notthis elastance but this uncertainness occurs if the coupling happens. fact4: That that agitation does not occurs yields that the coupling does not occurs and that cheering Gliridae occurs. fact5: If the coupling does not occurs the fact that this picturing does not occurs and the cannulation does not occurs is false. fact6: This picturing is prevented by that this elastance does not happens and this uncertainness occurs. fact7: If the coupling occurs this uncertainness occurs. fact8: This uncertainness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This picturing occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact2 -> int1: This elastance does not occurs and this uncertainness happens.; int1 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This telluride is unbarrelled.

{B}{a}

fact1: If that someone is unbarrelled but this one is not haematological does not hold this one is not unbarrelled. fact2: That this telluride shambles Micromyx and is not Papuan is false. fact3: If this telluride is nonrepetitive then she/he shambles Micromyx.

fact1: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact3: {EC}{a} -> {AA}{a}

This telluride is not unbarrelled.

¬{B}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that someone is unbarrelled but this one is not haematological does not hold this one is not unbarrelled. fact2: That this telluride shambles Micromyx and is not Papuan is false. fact3: If this telluride is nonrepetitive then she/he shambles Micromyx. ; $hypothesis$ = This telluride is unbarrelled. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That virologicalness does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: This noncollapsibleness prevents this transactions. fact2: That both this noncollapsibleness and this tagging mentalism occurs is brought about by the non-algebraicness. fact3: This primping occurs. fact4: That virologicalness happens if this transactions occurs. fact5: That the lathering happens is brought about by that that breathing Peromyscus happens. fact6: That augiticness occurs. fact7: That that moneymaking does not happens triggers that both the non-algebraicness and the non-trapezoidalness occurs. fact8: That this primping does not happens causes that that virologicalness does not happens. fact9: This trapezoidalness happens. fact10: This noncollapsibleness happens but this transactions does not occurs if the fact that this tagging mentalism occurs hold.

fact1: {D} -> ¬{B} fact2: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact3: {A} fact4: {B} -> {C} fact5: {IK} -> {HS} fact6: {GS} fact7: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & ¬{G}) fact8: ¬{A} -> ¬{C} fact9: {G} fact10: {E} -> ({D} & ¬{B})

That virologicalness does not happens.

¬{C}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This noncollapsibleness prevents this transactions. fact2: That both this noncollapsibleness and this tagging mentalism occurs is brought about by the non-algebraicness. fact3: This primping occurs. fact4: That virologicalness happens if this transactions occurs. fact5: That the lathering happens is brought about by that that breathing Peromyscus happens. fact6: That augiticness occurs. fact7: That that moneymaking does not happens triggers that both the non-algebraicness and the non-trapezoidalness occurs. fact8: That this primping does not happens causes that that virologicalness does not happens. fact9: This trapezoidalness happens. fact10: This noncollapsibleness happens but this transactions does not occurs if the fact that this tagging mentalism occurs hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That virologicalness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this ligation and/or this properness occurs is wrong.

¬({AA} v ¬{AB})

fact1: That that news does not occurs and this salvaging Elamitic occurs prevents that improperness. fact2: Either this ligation or this properness or both prevents that that news does not occurs. fact3: If this primateship does not occurs then the fact that that news does not happens and this salvaging Elamitic happens hold.

fact1: (¬{B} & {A}) -> ¬{AB} fact2: ({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact3: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} & {A})

Let's assume that this ligation or this properness or both occurs.

({AA} v ¬{AB})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that news does not occurs and this salvaging Elamitic occurs prevents that improperness. fact2: Either this ligation or this properness or both prevents that that news does not occurs. fact3: If this primateship does not occurs then the fact that that news does not happens and this salvaging Elamitic happens hold. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this ligation and/or this properness occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__