Datasets:

hitachi-nlp

/

FLD.v2.reimpl

like 1

Follow

Hitachi, Ltd. 13

0.3

This metamorphism is not an excise.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: This leotard is a Uganda. fact2: The fact that this metamorphism is unenrgetic and it is an excise if this leotard is not autoradiographic hold. fact3: This bolster is an excise. fact4: This leotard is an excise. fact5: This leotard is not non-unenrgetic. fact6: This metamorphism is an excise if this leotard is unenrgetic. fact7: This leotard is an excise if this metamorphism is unenrgetic. fact8: This metamorphism is not an excise if this leotard is not autoradiographic and that is not unenrgetic.

fact1: {HL}{a} fact2: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact3: {B}{bi} fact4: {B}{a} fact5: {A}{a} fact6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact7: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} fact8: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b}

This metamorphism is not an excise.

¬{B}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This leotard is a Uganda. fact2: The fact that this metamorphism is unenrgetic and it is an excise if this leotard is not autoradiographic hold. fact3: This bolster is an excise. fact4: This leotard is an excise. fact5: This leotard is not non-unenrgetic. fact6: This metamorphism is an excise if this leotard is unenrgetic. fact7: This leotard is an excise if this metamorphism is unenrgetic. fact8: This metamorphism is not an excise if this leotard is not autoradiographic and that is not unenrgetic. ; $hypothesis$ = This metamorphism is not an excise. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That splitting occurs.

{AB}

fact1: Both that turps and this order occurs if this untruthfulness does not occurs. fact2: Notthe altercating but the circumnavigation happens. fact3: If the fact that this toasting Juncus and this untruthfulness happens does not hold then this untruthfulness does not happens. fact4: This dressage does not occurs if this order does not occurs. fact5: This order is caused by that polyphonicness. fact6: This theistness does not occurs if the fact that notthe anaphoricness but this simpleness occurs is false. fact7: That turps does not occurs if this untruthfulness does not occurs. fact8: If this segue does not happens then that that blaspheming but notthis dripping happens does not hold. fact9: The fact that the anaphoricness does not occurs and this simpleness occurs does not hold. fact10: If the fact that that blaspheming but notthis dripping occurs is false this completion occurs. fact11: Notthis dressage but that splitting occurs if this order does not occurs. fact12: That both this order and that polyphonicness happens prevents that that splitting occurs. fact13: If that going does not happens then that this toasting Juncus occurs and this untruthfulness occurs does not hold. fact14: If this Wassermann does not happens then that polyphonicness happens and that bestowing occurs. fact15: This order does not happens. fact16: That that non-theistness and this completion happens causes that that going does not happens. fact17: Notthe encrusting but that guying occurs if this order happens. fact18: If that turps does not occurs and that bestowing does not happens then that polyphonicness occurs. fact19: Notthe fictionalization but that damning schmear occurs.

fact1: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {A}) fact2: (¬{CF} & {BH}) fact3: ¬({H} & {F}) -> ¬{F} fact4: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} fact5: {B} -> {A} fact6: ¬(¬{Q} & {P}) -> ¬{I} fact7: ¬{F} -> ¬{D} fact8: ¬{R} -> ¬({O} & ¬{N}) fact9: ¬(¬{Q} & {P}) fact10: ¬({O} & ¬{N}) -> {J} fact11: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact12: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{AB} fact13: ¬{G} -> ¬({H} & {F}) fact14: ¬{E} -> ({B} & {C}) fact15: ¬{A} fact16: (¬{I} & {J}) -> ¬{G} fact17: {A} -> (¬{HU} & {DL}) fact18: (¬{D} & ¬{C}) -> {B} fact19: (¬{DN} & {JI})

That splitting does not occurs.

¬{AB}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Both that turps and this order occurs if this untruthfulness does not occurs. fact2: Notthe altercating but the circumnavigation happens. fact3: If the fact that this toasting Juncus and this untruthfulness happens does not hold then this untruthfulness does not happens. fact4: This dressage does not occurs if this order does not occurs. fact5: This order is caused by that polyphonicness. fact6: This theistness does not occurs if the fact that notthe anaphoricness but this simpleness occurs is false. fact7: That turps does not occurs if this untruthfulness does not occurs. fact8: If this segue does not happens then that that blaspheming but notthis dripping happens does not hold. fact9: The fact that the anaphoricness does not occurs and this simpleness occurs does not hold. fact10: If the fact that that blaspheming but notthis dripping occurs is false this completion occurs. fact11: Notthis dressage but that splitting occurs if this order does not occurs. fact12: That both this order and that polyphonicness happens prevents that that splitting occurs. fact13: If that going does not happens then that this toasting Juncus occurs and this untruthfulness occurs does not hold. fact14: If this Wassermann does not happens then that polyphonicness happens and that bestowing occurs. fact15: This order does not happens. fact16: That that non-theistness and this completion happens causes that that going does not happens. fact17: Notthe encrusting but that guying occurs if this order happens. fact18: If that turps does not occurs and that bestowing does not happens then that polyphonicness occurs. fact19: Notthe fictionalization but that damning schmear occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That splitting occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact11 & fact15 -> int1: This dressage does not happens and that splitting occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This agglutination does not recline talipes.

¬{AA}{b}

fact1: If that secondary does not recline talipes this agglutination chondrifies lymphopenia. fact2: That thyronine does not recline talipes. fact3: that lymphopenia does not chondrify secondary. fact4: If that secondary does not chondrify lymphopenia this agglutination does not recline talipes and is sufficient. fact5: The hybridoma is not sufficient. fact6: If the fact that somebody chondrifies lymphopenia but she/he is not nonconducting is false then she/he does not chondrifies lymphopenia. fact7: That secondary does not chondrify lymphopenia.

fact1: ¬{AA}{a} -> {A}{b} fact2: ¬{AA}{hr} fact3: ¬{AC}{aa} fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact5: ¬{AB}{eg} fact6: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact7: ¬{A}{a}

This galantine does not chondrify lymphopenia.

¬{A}{dt}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that secondary does not recline talipes this agglutination chondrifies lymphopenia. fact2: That thyronine does not recline talipes. fact3: that lymphopenia does not chondrify secondary. fact4: If that secondary does not chondrify lymphopenia this agglutination does not recline talipes and is sufficient. fact5: The hybridoma is not sufficient. fact6: If the fact that somebody chondrifies lymphopenia but she/he is not nonconducting is false then she/he does not chondrifies lymphopenia. fact7: That secondary does not chondrify lymphopenia. ; $hypothesis$ = This agglutination does not recline talipes. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact7 -> int1: This agglutination does not recline talipes but it is sufficient.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The histocompatibility does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: If that both this awakening Cepheus and that interpolation occurs does not hold then this awakening Cepheus does not occurs. fact2: That lexicostatisticness happens. fact3: If this characterization does not happens that this awakening Cepheus occurs and that interpolation occurs does not hold. fact4: The histocompatibility happens if this awakening Cepheus occurs. fact5: This serologicness happens. fact6: This serologicness happens and this steeping happens. fact7: This serologicness but notthe histocompatibility occurs if this steeping does not happens. fact8: The suckling Mastigomycota happens if the romaic happens.

fact1: ¬({C} & {F}) -> ¬{C} fact2: {GD} fact3: ¬{E} -> ¬({C} & {F}) fact4: {C} -> {D} fact5: {A} fact6: ({A} & {B}) fact7: ¬{B} -> ({A} & ¬{D}) fact8: {HP} -> {JA}

The histocompatibility does not occurs.

¬{D}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that both this awakening Cepheus and that interpolation occurs does not hold then this awakening Cepheus does not occurs. fact2: That lexicostatisticness happens. fact3: If this characterization does not happens that this awakening Cepheus occurs and that interpolation occurs does not hold. fact4: The histocompatibility happens if this awakening Cepheus occurs. fact5: This serologicness happens. fact6: This serologicness happens and this steeping happens. fact7: This serologicness but notthe histocompatibility occurs if this steeping does not happens. fact8: The suckling Mastigomycota happens if the romaic happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The histocompatibility does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That there exists somebody such that it is both a Centrarchidae and Nordic is incorrect.

¬((Ex): ({A}x & {B}x))

fact1: The adamant is Nordic. fact2: Something is a Hayek. fact3: Somebody is Aramaic if that the person is a kind of syncretical one that is not Aramaic does not hold. fact4: That coition is Aramaic if that vinyl is Aramaic. fact5: That brainworker is a Centrarchidae and it is a Verona. fact6: Somebody is Nordic. fact7: The fact that some man is both syncretical and non-Aramaic is wrong if it is bolographic. fact8: If that coition is barometrical but it does not teethe then this streptobacillus does not teethe. fact9: That coition is a Centrarchidae. fact10: There is something such that that thing is combinative and that thing is a Scrophulariaceae. fact11: That coition is a precociousness that is a Sparganiaceae. fact12: Some person that does not teethe is Nordic a Centrarchidae. fact13: There exists something such that that it is a Centrarchidae is true. fact14: If some person is Aramaic this one is barometrical and this one does not teethe.

fact1: {B}{au} fact2: (Ex): {GU}x fact3: (x): ¬({G}x & ¬{E}x) -> {E}x fact4: {E}{b} -> {E}{a} fact5: ({A}{dc} & {FR}{dc}) fact6: (Ex): {B}x fact7: (x): {F}x -> ¬({G}x & ¬{E}x) fact8: ({D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{jh} fact9: {A}{a} fact10: (Ex): ({O}x & {ES}x) fact11: ({AP}{a} & {CT}{a}) fact12: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact13: (Ex): {A}x fact14: (x): {E}x -> ({D}x & ¬{C}x)

This streptobacillus is Nordic.

{B}{jh}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The adamant is Nordic. fact2: Something is a Hayek. fact3: Somebody is Aramaic if that the person is a kind of syncretical one that is not Aramaic does not hold. fact4: That coition is Aramaic if that vinyl is Aramaic. fact5: That brainworker is a Centrarchidae and it is a Verona. fact6: Somebody is Nordic. fact7: The fact that some man is both syncretical and non-Aramaic is wrong if it is bolographic. fact8: If that coition is barometrical but it does not teethe then this streptobacillus does not teethe. fact9: That coition is a Centrarchidae. fact10: There is something such that that thing is combinative and that thing is a Scrophulariaceae. fact11: That coition is a precociousness that is a Sparganiaceae. fact12: Some person that does not teethe is Nordic a Centrarchidae. fact13: There exists something such that that it is a Centrarchidae is true. fact14: If some person is Aramaic this one is barometrical and this one does not teethe. ; $hypothesis$ = That there exists somebody such that it is both a Centrarchidae and Nordic is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that there is some man such that she/he is a shaven is not correct.

¬((Ex): {A}x)

fact1: There exists some person such that that person is Merovingian. fact2: There is something such that this is postmodern. fact3: There is something such that it does turtle Utopianism. fact4: There exists some person such that the person is toneless. fact5: Something is a kind of a light. fact6: There is something such that it discourses paternalism. fact7: Someone settles levity. fact8: There exists something such that this canes. fact9: There is something such that it is heathlike. fact10: There is someone such that she/he is a shaven. fact11: There exists some person such that it does hex conceivability. fact12: Some man is a Swaziland. fact13: There is something such that that traduces opalescence. fact14: There exists someone such that it is a spartan. fact15: There exists something such that it is a Taleban. fact16: There is some person such that this person vouches escaped. fact17: That somebody concludes moodiness is correct. fact18: There is something such that it is nonfinancial.

fact1: (Ex): {CC}x fact2: (Ex): {DF}x fact3: (Ex): {R}x fact4: (Ex): {DP}x fact5: (Ex): {HO}x fact6: (Ex): {DA}x fact7: (Ex): {FJ}x fact8: (Ex): {FM}x fact9: (Ex): {BD}x fact10: (Ex): {A}x fact11: (Ex): {HA}x fact12: (Ex): {FO}x fact13: (Ex): {GP}x fact14: (Ex): {JA}x fact15: (Ex): {HM}x fact16: (Ex): {IK}x fact17: (Ex): {ED}x fact18: (Ex): {CD}x

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There exists some person such that that person is Merovingian. fact2: There is something such that this is postmodern. fact3: There is something such that it does turtle Utopianism. fact4: There exists some person such that the person is toneless. fact5: Something is a kind of a light. fact6: There is something such that it discourses paternalism. fact7: Someone settles levity. fact8: There exists something such that this canes. fact9: There is something such that it is heathlike. fact10: There is someone such that she/he is a shaven. fact11: There exists some person such that it does hex conceivability. fact12: Some man is a Swaziland. fact13: There is something such that that traduces opalescence. fact14: There exists someone such that it is a spartan. fact15: There exists something such that it is a Taleban. fact16: There is some person such that this person vouches escaped. fact17: That somebody concludes moodiness is correct. fact18: There is something such that it is nonfinancial. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that there is some man such that she/he is a shaven is not correct. ; $proof$ =

fact10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This regressiveness occurs.

{B}

fact1: This regressiveness does not happens if the fact that that non-areolarness and that categorization happens is wrong. fact2: That both that non-areolarness and that categorization occurs is wrong.

fact1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact2: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This regressiveness does not happens if the fact that that non-areolarness and that categorization happens is wrong. fact2: That both that non-areolarness and that categorization occurs is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = This regressiveness occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That there is some person such that if it is a Kissimmee then either it is not anorthic or it is not granulomatous or both does not hold.

¬((Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x))

fact1: This atheist is either non-anorthic or non-granulomatous or both if this atheist is a Kissimmee. fact2: Something does not patent realpolitik or this is not a Papeete or both if this mitigates Arlington. fact3: Either this teeter is anorthic or it does not prorogue tepidness or both if this teeter is immunologic. fact4: There is somebody such that if that one confabs worriment that one is either not a posture or declarative or both. fact5: Either this atheist is not anorthic or it is granulomatous or both if it is a kind of a Kissimmee. fact6: There is something such that if this thing threatens Fuqra that this thing is radial or this thing is not a kind of a Hispanic or both is correct.

fact1: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) fact2: (x): {CI}x -> (¬{ER}x v ¬{BG}x) fact3: {CC}{ih} -> ({AA}{ih} v ¬{IH}{ih}) fact4: (Ex): {DF}x -> (¬{DI}x v {CE}x) fact5: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) fact6: (Ex): {P}x -> ({IM}x v ¬{R}x)

There exists something such that if it mitigates Arlington then it does not patent realpolitik and/or it is not a Papeete.

(Ex): {CI}x -> (¬{ER}x v ¬{BG}x)

DISPROVED

PROVED

DISPROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This atheist is either non-anorthic or non-granulomatous or both if this atheist is a Kissimmee. fact2: Something does not patent realpolitik or this is not a Papeete or both if this mitigates Arlington. fact3: Either this teeter is anorthic or it does not prorogue tepidness or both if this teeter is immunologic. fact4: There is somebody such that if that one confabs worriment that one is either not a posture or declarative or both. fact5: Either this atheist is not anorthic or it is granulomatous or both if it is a kind of a Kissimmee. fact6: There is something such that if this thing threatens Fuqra that this thing is radial or this thing is not a kind of a Hispanic or both is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = That there is some person such that if it is a Kissimmee then either it is not anorthic or it is not granulomatous or both does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This papisticness happens.

{C}

fact1: If that this racquetball does not occurs and that ripple happens is incorrect then this shutting Cebuano occurs. fact2: The regretting happens. fact3: The fact that notthis racquetball but that ripple occurs does not hold if the apostrophicness does not occurs. fact4: If the fact that both this non-polyphaseness and this appareling Magicicada happens is wrong then this homostylousness happens. fact5: The fact that the apostrophicness does not occurs and this shutting Cebuano happens is wrong if that masturbating stunted does not happens. fact6: That that masturbating stunted does not happens and the backing salmonellosis does not occurs is triggered by that that lapsing bioethics does not occurs. fact7: That the apostrophicness does not occurs hold. fact8: That that lapsing bioethics does not occurs is caused by that that pastime and this miffeding occurs. fact9: This papisticness does not occurs if that the fact that this non-apostrophicness and this shutting Cebuano occurs is incorrect hold. fact10: This detachableness and that pastime occurs. fact11: This shutting Cebuano is brought about by that that ripple does not occurs. fact12: If this shutting Cebuano occurs this papisticness occurs. fact13: That Audenesqueness happens. fact14: If the shrugging readiness occurs that amendment occurs. fact15: That this miffeding happens and that mutinying happens is triggered by that that amendment does not occurs.

fact1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact2: {FA} fact3: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact4: ¬(¬{EU} & {AE}) -> {IO} fact5: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} & {B}) fact6: ¬{F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) fact7: ¬{A} fact8: ({H} & {G}) -> ¬{F} fact9: ¬(¬{A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact10: ({J} & {H}) fact11: ¬{AB} -> {B} fact12: {B} -> {C} fact13: {AQ} fact14: {HS} -> {K} fact15: ¬{K} -> ({G} & {I})

This papisticness does not occurs.

¬{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that this racquetball does not occurs and that ripple happens is incorrect then this shutting Cebuano occurs. fact2: The regretting happens. fact3: The fact that notthis racquetball but that ripple occurs does not hold if the apostrophicness does not occurs. fact4: If the fact that both this non-polyphaseness and this appareling Magicicada happens is wrong then this homostylousness happens. fact5: The fact that the apostrophicness does not occurs and this shutting Cebuano happens is wrong if that masturbating stunted does not happens. fact6: That that masturbating stunted does not happens and the backing salmonellosis does not occurs is triggered by that that lapsing bioethics does not occurs. fact7: That the apostrophicness does not occurs hold. fact8: That that lapsing bioethics does not occurs is caused by that that pastime and this miffeding occurs. fact9: This papisticness does not occurs if that the fact that this non-apostrophicness and this shutting Cebuano occurs is incorrect hold. fact10: This detachableness and that pastime occurs. fact11: This shutting Cebuano is brought about by that that ripple does not occurs. fact12: If this shutting Cebuano occurs this papisticness occurs. fact13: That Audenesqueness happens. fact14: If the shrugging readiness occurs that amendment occurs. fact15: That this miffeding happens and that mutinying happens is triggered by that that amendment does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This papisticness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact7 -> int1: That notthis racquetball but that ripple happens does not hold.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: This shutting Cebuano occurs.; int2 & fact12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This adman is tentacular.

{B}{aa}

fact1: The fact that somebody is tentacular but that one is not a pressed is false if that one tinkers Jacquinia. fact2: This takeaway tinkers Jacquinia. fact3: That this adman is a pressed and/or is not lossless is incorrect if that this takeaway tinkers Jacquinia hold. fact4: the Jacquinia tinkers takeaway. fact5: If the fact that something is either a pressed or non-lossless or both is incorrect then this is tentacular.

fact1: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{AA}x) fact2: {A}{a} fact3: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) fact4: {AC}{ab} fact5: (x): ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x

This gravimeter is a kind of a pressed.

{AA}{io}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that somebody is tentacular but that one is not a pressed is false if that one tinkers Jacquinia. fact2: This takeaway tinkers Jacquinia. fact3: That this adman is a pressed and/or is not lossless is incorrect if that this takeaway tinkers Jacquinia hold. fact4: the Jacquinia tinkers takeaway. fact5: If the fact that something is either a pressed or non-lossless or both is incorrect then this is tentacular. ; $hypothesis$ = This adman is tentacular. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> int1: The fact that this adman is tentacular is true if that this adman either is a pressed or is not lossless or both does not hold.; fact2 & fact3 -> int2: The fact that either this adman is a pressed or it is not lossless or both is false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This sirrah is a kind of a affectionateness and it does satisfy ILO if Celina is not a ailurophobia.

¬{A}{a} -> ({C}{b} & {B}{b})

fact1: This daub is not a affectionateness. fact2: This sirrah is a affectionateness and this is a normal. fact3: Someone is non-rigid one that percusses if that one is a industrialism. fact4: Celina does not satisfy ILO if Celina is not rigid but that one soliloquizes Cybele. fact5: If the fact that Celina is not a bounciness and the person is not a normal is wrong Celina is a affectionateness. fact6: This sirrah does satisfy ILO if Celina is a ailurophobia. fact7: This sirrah satisfies ILO if Celina is not a ailurophobia. fact8: This sirrah is a Turgot. fact9: Celina is a affectionateness. fact10: The fact that this sirrah is not a canopied is right. fact11: If this sirrah is not a canopied then that Celina is not a kind of a bounciness and the thing is not a normal is incorrect. fact12: This sirrah is a affectionateness and satisfies ILO if Celina is a ailurophobia. fact13: This sirrah is a normal. fact14: This sirrah superposes airfare and is nonionized. fact15: If Celina does not satisfy ILO that thing is a ailurophobia that is a kind of a Bull. fact16: If this sirrah is not a kind of a ailurophobia Celina is a normal. fact17: Celina is allelic and he is a kind of a affectionateness.

fact1: ¬{C}{hf} fact2: ({C}{b} & {D}{b}) fact3: (x): {J}x -> (¬{H}x & {I}x) fact4: (¬{H}{a} & {G}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact5: ¬(¬{E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> {C}{a} fact6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact8: {CJ}{b} fact9: {C}{a} fact10: ¬{F}{b} fact11: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬(¬{E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) fact12: {A}{a} -> ({C}{b} & {B}{b}) fact13: {D}{b} fact14: ({DG}{b} & {CN}{b}) fact15: ¬{B}{a} -> ({A}{a} & {CU}{a}) fact16: ¬{A}{b} -> {D}{a} fact17: ({DT}{a} & {C}{a})

Celina is a kind of a affectionateness that is a Bull.

({C}{a} & {CU}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This daub is not a affectionateness. fact2: This sirrah is a affectionateness and this is a normal. fact3: Someone is non-rigid one that percusses if that one is a industrialism. fact4: Celina does not satisfy ILO if Celina is not rigid but that one soliloquizes Cybele. fact5: If the fact that Celina is not a bounciness and the person is not a normal is wrong Celina is a affectionateness. fact6: This sirrah does satisfy ILO if Celina is a ailurophobia. fact7: This sirrah satisfies ILO if Celina is not a ailurophobia. fact8: This sirrah is a Turgot. fact9: Celina is a affectionateness. fact10: The fact that this sirrah is not a canopied is right. fact11: If this sirrah is not a canopied then that Celina is not a kind of a bounciness and the thing is not a normal is incorrect. fact12: This sirrah is a affectionateness and satisfies ILO if Celina is a ailurophobia. fact13: This sirrah is a normal. fact14: This sirrah superposes airfare and is nonionized. fact15: If Celina does not satisfy ILO that thing is a ailurophobia that is a kind of a Bull. fact16: If this sirrah is not a kind of a ailurophobia Celina is a normal. fact17: Celina is allelic and he is a kind of a affectionateness. ; $hypothesis$ = This sirrah is a kind of a affectionateness and it does satisfy ILO if Celina is not a ailurophobia. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that Celina is not a ailurophobia.; fact7 & assump1 -> int1: This sirrah satisfies ILO.; fact2 -> int2: This sirrah is a affectionateness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This sirrah is a affectionateness and it satisfies ILO.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that butcherbird does not outperform Edaphosauridae and does not perforate emaciation is wrong.

¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{B}{a})

fact1: Something zips Castroism but it does not plead Bellarmino if the fact that it gangs Zeppelin is not false. fact2: This Dorking is not hypodermal and this is not a nonsteroidal. fact3: That butcherbird gluts tininess and the person is a kind of a Chironomus if the ashcake is not a kind of a standing. fact4: That butcherbird is not a kind of a Chironomus. fact5: If this doorlock is not hypodermal this one is a manliness and/or this one gangs Zeppelin. fact6: If something is a kind of a Chironomus that this thing does not outperform Edaphosauridae and this thing does not perforate emaciation is incorrect. fact7: That butcherbird does not perforate emaciation if that butcherbird is not a kind of a Chironomus. fact8: Some person is not a standing but this person is a Duluth if this person does not plead Bellarmino. fact9: The ashcake is not a standing if Carter is not a standing but a Duluth. fact10: Somebody is a kind of non-Levitical one that is not a Rhexia if he/she is not a Rhexia. fact11: If something does not perforate emaciation then it does not outperform Edaphosauridae and it does not perforate emaciation. fact12: If this Dorking is not hypodermal and it is not a nonsteroidal this doorlock is not hypodermal.

fact1: (x): {I}x -> ({H}x & ¬{F}x) fact2: (¬{J}{e} & ¬{M}{e}) fact3: ¬{E}{b} -> ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) fact4: ¬{A}{a} fact5: ¬{J}{d} -> ({K}{d} v {I}{d}) fact6: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{B}x) fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact8: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{E}x & {G}x) fact9: (¬{E}{c} & {G}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} fact10: (x): ¬{AM}x -> (¬{BL}x & ¬{AM}x) fact11: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{B}x) fact12: (¬{J}{e} & ¬{M}{e}) -> ¬{J}{d}

That that butcherbird does not outperform Edaphosauridae and does not perforate emaciation is wrong.

¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{B}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something zips Castroism but it does not plead Bellarmino if the fact that it gangs Zeppelin is not false. fact2: This Dorking is not hypodermal and this is not a nonsteroidal. fact3: That butcherbird gluts tininess and the person is a kind of a Chironomus if the ashcake is not a kind of a standing. fact4: That butcherbird is not a kind of a Chironomus. fact5: If this doorlock is not hypodermal this one is a manliness and/or this one gangs Zeppelin. fact6: If something is a kind of a Chironomus that this thing does not outperform Edaphosauridae and this thing does not perforate emaciation is incorrect. fact7: That butcherbird does not perforate emaciation if that butcherbird is not a kind of a Chironomus. fact8: Some person is not a standing but this person is a Duluth if this person does not plead Bellarmino. fact9: The ashcake is not a standing if Carter is not a standing but a Duluth. fact10: Somebody is a kind of non-Levitical one that is not a Rhexia if he/she is not a Rhexia. fact11: If something does not perforate emaciation then it does not outperform Edaphosauridae and it does not perforate emaciation. fact12: If this Dorking is not hypodermal and it is not a nonsteroidal this doorlock is not hypodermal. ; $hypothesis$ = That that butcherbird does not outperform Edaphosauridae and does not perforate emaciation is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact4 -> int1: That butcherbird does not perforate emaciation.; fact11 -> int2: That butcherbird does not outperform Edaphosauridae and does not perforate emaciation if it does not perforate emaciation.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This greengrocer is not an infernal.

¬{D}{c}

fact1: That thripid does not refuel reflexive. fact2: This greengrocer is not a facing and it is not a Buyi. fact3: If that thripid is not heroic and is not an infernal that does not expose Derrida. fact4: This greengrocer does not refuel reflexive. fact5: That thripid does not scald. fact6: If that birdbath does not expose Derrida but this one refuels reflexive that birdbath does not scald. fact7: If that birdbath does not scald that thripid is heroic. fact8: That this greengrocer is not a Crown hold. fact9: That thripid is heroic. fact10: That this greengrocer is an infernal if the fact that that birdbath is a Crown hold is correct. fact11: That birdbath does not refuel reflexive. fact12: The fact that that birdbath does not scald is correct if it does not expose Derrida and it does not refuel reflexive. fact13: This greengrocer is not a kind of an infernal if that thripid is a Crown that does not expose Derrida. fact14: If the fact that that thripid does not expose Derrida is not wrong then that birdbath is a Crown but it is not heroic. fact15: That birdbath does not expose Derrida and does not refuel reflexive. fact16: That that thripid is non-heroic and is not non-fascistic does not hold if it is not a Optez. fact17: Some man is heroic if that it is not heroic and is fascistic is wrong. fact18: That birdbath is heroic but that does not refuel reflexive. fact19: That thripid is heroic but it is not a Crown if that birdbath does not scald. fact20: This greengrocer is not an infernal if that thripid is heroic but it is not a Crown.

fact1: ¬{AB}{b} fact2: (¬{IS}{c} & ¬{FG}{c}) fact3: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{AA}{b} fact4: ¬{AB}{c} fact5: ¬{B}{b} fact6: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact7: ¬{B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact8: ¬{A}{c} fact9: {C}{b} fact10: {A}{a} -> {D}{c} fact11: ¬{AB}{a} fact12: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact13: ({A}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) -> ¬{D}{c} fact14: ¬{AA}{b} -> ({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact15: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact16: ¬{E}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & {F}{b}) fact17: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {F}x) -> {C}x fact18: ({C}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact19: ¬{B}{a} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact20: ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{D}{c}

The fact that this greengrocer is an infernal is correct.

{D}{c}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That thripid does not refuel reflexive. fact2: This greengrocer is not a facing and it is not a Buyi. fact3: If that thripid is not heroic and is not an infernal that does not expose Derrida. fact4: This greengrocer does not refuel reflexive. fact5: That thripid does not scald. fact6: If that birdbath does not expose Derrida but this one refuels reflexive that birdbath does not scald. fact7: If that birdbath does not scald that thripid is heroic. fact8: That this greengrocer is not a Crown hold. fact9: That thripid is heroic. fact10: That this greengrocer is an infernal if the fact that that birdbath is a Crown hold is correct. fact11: That birdbath does not refuel reflexive. fact12: The fact that that birdbath does not scald is correct if it does not expose Derrida and it does not refuel reflexive. fact13: This greengrocer is not a kind of an infernal if that thripid is a Crown that does not expose Derrida. fact14: If the fact that that thripid does not expose Derrida is not wrong then that birdbath is a Crown but it is not heroic. fact15: That birdbath does not expose Derrida and does not refuel reflexive. fact16: That that thripid is non-heroic and is not non-fascistic does not hold if it is not a Optez. fact17: Some man is heroic if that it is not heroic and is fascistic is wrong. fact18: That birdbath is heroic but that does not refuel reflexive. fact19: That thripid is heroic but it is not a Crown if that birdbath does not scald. fact20: This greengrocer is not an infernal if that thripid is heroic but it is not a Crown. ; $hypothesis$ = This greengrocer is not an infernal. ; $proof$ =

fact12 & fact15 -> int1: That birdbath does not scald.; int1 & fact19 -> int2: That thripid is heroic and not a Crown.; int2 & fact20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This denoting gladfulness does not occurs.

¬{B}

fact1: That the homileticalness and that hanging 1930s occurs is incorrect. fact2: That this harlequinade occurs and this aneuploidness happens is not correct. fact3: This postnatalness does not occurs if that this orthopticness does not occurs hold. fact4: If the fact that the gazumping hollowness and the equalizer occurs is not true this Iditarod does not happens. fact5: If that the gazumping hollowness happens and this low happens is not right the unorderedness does not happens. fact6: That the identicalness does not occurs is right if that the academicianship and this barbarizing happens is incorrect. fact7: That this orthopticness does not occurs is not wrong if the theophany does not happens. fact8: That that shifting Hammerstein does not happens results in that the Bengaliness does not occurs. fact9: If that that non-sacralness and this unnaturalness occurs does not hold that non-sacral happens. fact10: That noness does not happens. fact11: The fact that that notthat sacralness but this unnaturalness happens is incorrect if this tapping occurs hold. fact12: If the fact that this harlequinade and this aneuploidness happens is false this denoting gladfulness does not occurs. fact13: This ununderstoodness does not happens if that paleolithic does not occurs. fact14: The fact that that this denoting gladfulness happens and that insubordinateness does not occurs does not hold is correct if the fact that that sacralness occurs is not wrong. fact15: The fact that that upheaving occidentalism does not happens is correct if the fact that this denoting gladfulness occurs but that insubordinateness does not happens is incorrect. fact16: That both the lymphoidness and the autotomising Loki occurs is incorrect. fact17: If that insubordinateness occurs then that this denoting gladfulness happens is true. fact18: That insubordinateness happens if that sacralness occurs. fact19: That hanging 1930s does not happens if the fact that that Machiavellianness happens and this manualness occurs is incorrect.

fact1: ¬({FB} & {IK}) fact2: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact3: ¬{I} -> ¬{GM} fact4: ¬({BN} & {GB}) -> ¬{GN} fact5: ¬({BN} & {HQ}) -> ¬{BE} fact6: ¬({AJ} & {BK}) -> ¬{GU} fact7: ¬{AS} -> ¬{I} fact8: ¬{HP} -> ¬{FD} fact9: ¬(¬{C} & {D}) -> {C} fact10: ¬{CN} fact11: {E} -> ¬(¬{C} & {D}) fact12: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact13: ¬{BP} -> ¬{CF} fact14: {C} -> ¬({B} & ¬{A}) fact15: ¬({B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{DB} fact16: ¬({AC} & {R}) fact17: {A} -> {B} fact18: {C} -> {A} fact19: ¬({JJ} & {GR}) -> ¬{IK}

The fact that that upheaving occidentalism does not happens is correct.

¬{DB}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That the homileticalness and that hanging 1930s occurs is incorrect. fact2: That this harlequinade occurs and this aneuploidness happens is not correct. fact3: This postnatalness does not occurs if that this orthopticness does not occurs hold. fact4: If the fact that the gazumping hollowness and the equalizer occurs is not true this Iditarod does not happens. fact5: If that the gazumping hollowness happens and this low happens is not right the unorderedness does not happens. fact6: That the identicalness does not occurs is right if that the academicianship and this barbarizing happens is incorrect. fact7: That this orthopticness does not occurs is not wrong if the theophany does not happens. fact8: That that shifting Hammerstein does not happens results in that the Bengaliness does not occurs. fact9: If that that non-sacralness and this unnaturalness occurs does not hold that non-sacral happens. fact10: That noness does not happens. fact11: The fact that that notthat sacralness but this unnaturalness happens is incorrect if this tapping occurs hold. fact12: If the fact that this harlequinade and this aneuploidness happens is false this denoting gladfulness does not occurs. fact13: This ununderstoodness does not happens if that paleolithic does not occurs. fact14: The fact that that this denoting gladfulness happens and that insubordinateness does not occurs does not hold is correct if the fact that that sacralness occurs is not wrong. fact15: The fact that that upheaving occidentalism does not happens is correct if the fact that this denoting gladfulness occurs but that insubordinateness does not happens is incorrect. fact16: That both the lymphoidness and the autotomising Loki occurs is incorrect. fact17: If that insubordinateness occurs then that this denoting gladfulness happens is true. fact18: That insubordinateness happens if that sacralness occurs. fact19: That hanging 1930s does not happens if the fact that that Machiavellianness happens and this manualness occurs is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = This denoting gladfulness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact12 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This thyrotropin is acetylenic and the thing is a Benin.

({D}{d} & {B}{d})

fact1: That corkscrew is a kind of a Ahriman. fact2: That corkscrew is both Himalayan and not a Yerkes if this machinator is not a Ahriman. fact3: This machinator is not a Ahriman. fact4: This liverwurst is not a Benin if that corkscrew is Himalayan and is not a kind of a Yerkes. fact5: That corkscrew is not a hedging. fact6: This thyrotropin is a kind of a Benin. fact7: This copycat is a smooch and not a Benin. fact8: This thyrotropin is Himalayan but it does not repossess Micrococcus. fact9: That corkscrew is Himalayan and a Benin if this liverwurst is not a Benin. fact10: This thyrotropin is acetylenic person that is a Benin if the fact that this liverwurst is not a Benin hold. fact11: This machinator is a kind of a Benin. fact12: That corkscrew is acetylenic. fact13: This thyrotropin is a Ahriman. fact14: If that corkscrew is not a kind of a Ahriman this machinator is a Benin but it is not Himalayan. fact15: This liverwurst is not a kind of a Ahriman. fact16: That Balkan is both orphic and a lightheadedness. fact17: This machinator is Himalayan. fact18: If that corkscrew is a Yerkes but this person is not a Benin this thyrotropin is non-acetylenic. fact19: If this thyrotropin is not a kind of a Ahriman then that it is acetylenic and it is a Benin is not true.

fact1: {A}{b} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact5: ¬{GN}{b} fact6: {B}{d} fact7: ({M}{ff} & ¬{B}{ff}) fact8: ({AA}{d} & ¬{AL}{d}) fact9: ¬{B}{c} -> ({AA}{b} & {B}{b}) fact10: ¬{B}{c} -> ({D}{d} & {B}{d}) fact11: {B}{a} fact12: {D}{b} fact13: {A}{d} fact14: ¬{A}{b} -> ({B}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) fact15: ¬{A}{c} fact16: ({K}{dt} & {JC}{dt}) fact17: {AA}{a} fact18: ({AB}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{D}{d} fact19: ¬{A}{d} -> ¬({D}{d} & {B}{d})

That this thyrotropin is acetylenic and is a Benin is not correct.

¬({D}{d} & {B}{d})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That corkscrew is a kind of a Ahriman. fact2: That corkscrew is both Himalayan and not a Yerkes if this machinator is not a Ahriman. fact3: This machinator is not a Ahriman. fact4: This liverwurst is not a Benin if that corkscrew is Himalayan and is not a kind of a Yerkes. fact5: That corkscrew is not a hedging. fact6: This thyrotropin is a kind of a Benin. fact7: This copycat is a smooch and not a Benin. fact8: This thyrotropin is Himalayan but it does not repossess Micrococcus. fact9: That corkscrew is Himalayan and a Benin if this liverwurst is not a Benin. fact10: This thyrotropin is acetylenic person that is a Benin if the fact that this liverwurst is not a Benin hold. fact11: This machinator is a kind of a Benin. fact12: That corkscrew is acetylenic. fact13: This thyrotropin is a Ahriman. fact14: If that corkscrew is not a kind of a Ahriman this machinator is a Benin but it is not Himalayan. fact15: This liverwurst is not a kind of a Ahriman. fact16: That Balkan is both orphic and a lightheadedness. fact17: This machinator is Himalayan. fact18: If that corkscrew is a Yerkes but this person is not a Benin this thyrotropin is non-acetylenic. fact19: If this thyrotropin is not a kind of a Ahriman then that it is acetylenic and it is a Benin is not true. ; $hypothesis$ = This thyrotropin is acetylenic and the thing is a Benin. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact3 -> int1: That corkscrew is Himalayan but not a Yerkes.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: This liverwurst is not a kind of a Benin.; int2 & fact10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that saccharose is a kind of a Shabuoth and it points Iridoprocne is incorrect.

¬({B}{a} & {C}{a})

fact1: If that that quiaquia is not appealable and it does shave Procellariidae does not hold that this hypnotizer is not appealable is true. fact2: That saccharose is a Jenner. fact3: If something does not misguide multiversity that this thing is unappealable thing that shaves Procellariidae does not hold. fact4: That this hypnotizer is non-annunciatory is correct if that that quiaquia is non-annunciatory hold. fact5: the Iridoprocne points saccharose. fact6: That saccharose is a wane and is a kind of a presidium if there is some man such that that person is not a kind of a wane. fact7: If this hypnotizer is not annunciatory then the fact that that saccharose is a kind of a Shabuoth that points Iridoprocne does not hold. fact8: That saccharose is not annunciatory. fact9: If this pie is unappealable then this afterpiece does not point Iridoprocne and/or it is not conelike. fact10: This babu is annunciatory. fact11: Somebody does not misguide multiversity if that this one is a kind of non-collagenous one that does not meddle is wrong. fact12: That saccharose points Iridoprocne. fact13: Someone is non-conelike one that is not annunciatory if it is not unappealable. fact14: If something does not misguide multiversity then the thing is unappealable and shaves Procellariidae. fact15: That if this afterpiece does not point Iridoprocne or it is not conelike or both then that quiaquia is annunciatory hold.

fact1: ¬({E}{c} & {F}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} fact2: {CC}{a} fact3: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({E}x & {F}x) fact4: {A}{c} -> ¬{A}{b} fact5: {AA}{aa} fact6: (x): ¬{BL}x -> ({BL}{a} & {AG}{a}) fact7: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact8: ¬{A}{a} fact9: {E}{e} -> (¬{C}{d} v ¬{D}{d}) fact10: {A}{is} fact11: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & ¬{I}x) -> ¬{G}x fact12: {C}{a} fact13: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{A}x) fact14: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & {F}x) fact15: (¬{C}{d} v ¬{D}{d}) -> {A}{c}

The fact that that saccharose is a kind of a Shabuoth and it points Iridoprocne is incorrect.

¬({B}{a} & {C}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that that quiaquia is not appealable and it does shave Procellariidae does not hold that this hypnotizer is not appealable is true. fact2: That saccharose is a Jenner. fact3: If something does not misguide multiversity that this thing is unappealable thing that shaves Procellariidae does not hold. fact4: That this hypnotizer is non-annunciatory is correct if that that quiaquia is non-annunciatory hold. fact5: the Iridoprocne points saccharose. fact6: That saccharose is a wane and is a kind of a presidium if there is some man such that that person is not a kind of a wane. fact7: If this hypnotizer is not annunciatory then the fact that that saccharose is a kind of a Shabuoth that points Iridoprocne does not hold. fact8: That saccharose is not annunciatory. fact9: If this pie is unappealable then this afterpiece does not point Iridoprocne and/or it is not conelike. fact10: This babu is annunciatory. fact11: Somebody does not misguide multiversity if that this one is a kind of non-collagenous one that does not meddle is wrong. fact12: That saccharose points Iridoprocne. fact13: Someone is non-conelike one that is not annunciatory if it is not unappealable. fact14: If something does not misguide multiversity then the thing is unappealable and shaves Procellariidae. fact15: That if this afterpiece does not point Iridoprocne or it is not conelike or both then that quiaquia is annunciatory hold. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that saccharose is a kind of a Shabuoth and it points Iridoprocne is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That ordering isomorphy does not happens and this headshot does not happens.

(¬{C} & ¬{B})

fact1: That this nonmechanicalness but notthat operaticness happens leads to that this headshot does not happens. fact2: If that adolescent does not occurs then the fact that that ordering isomorphy does not occurs and this headshot does not happens is incorrect. fact3: If the fact that that horseplay does not happens is correct then the fact that that disadvantageousness and this punishing laryngotracheobronchitis occurs is wrong. fact4: If the fact that that disadvantageousness happens and this punishing laryngotracheobronchitis occurs is incorrect then the fact that that adolescent does not happens is right. fact5: If either this inconsiderableness happens or that roiling Optez does not happens or both this nonabsorptiveness does not occurs. fact6: That this headshot does not occurs is caused by that that both that mechanicalness and this non-operaticness happens hold. fact7: That that ordering isomorphy does not occurs and this headshot does not occurs is brought about by that this headshot does not happens. fact8: This nonmechanicalness does not occurs and that operaticness does not occurs. fact9: This devilry results in that that horseplay does not happens. fact10: If this nonabsorptiveness does not happens this devilry and this receipting deconstruction happens. fact11: If this nonmechanicalness does not occurs and that operaticness occurs this headshot does not happens.

fact1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{B}) fact3: ¬{F} -> ¬({E} & {D}) fact4: ¬({E} & {D}) -> ¬{A} fact5: ({J} v ¬{K}) -> ¬{I} fact6: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact7: ¬{B} -> (¬{C} & ¬{B}) fact8: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact9: {G} -> ¬{F} fact10: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact11: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B}

That that ordering isomorphy does not happens and this headshot does not occurs does not hold.

¬(¬{C} & ¬{B})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this nonmechanicalness but notthat operaticness happens leads to that this headshot does not happens. fact2: If that adolescent does not occurs then the fact that that ordering isomorphy does not occurs and this headshot does not happens is incorrect. fact3: If the fact that that horseplay does not happens is correct then the fact that that disadvantageousness and this punishing laryngotracheobronchitis occurs is wrong. fact4: If the fact that that disadvantageousness happens and this punishing laryngotracheobronchitis occurs is incorrect then the fact that that adolescent does not happens is right. fact5: If either this inconsiderableness happens or that roiling Optez does not happens or both this nonabsorptiveness does not occurs. fact6: That this headshot does not occurs is caused by that that both that mechanicalness and this non-operaticness happens hold. fact7: That that ordering isomorphy does not occurs and this headshot does not occurs is brought about by that this headshot does not happens. fact8: This nonmechanicalness does not occurs and that operaticness does not occurs. fact9: This devilry results in that that horseplay does not happens. fact10: If this nonabsorptiveness does not happens this devilry and this receipting deconstruction happens. fact11: If this nonmechanicalness does not occurs and that operaticness occurs this headshot does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That ordering isomorphy does not happens and this headshot does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact8 -> int1: This headshot does not occurs.; int1 & fact7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This wholesaling occurs.

{B}

fact1: Both this uncial and this wholesaling occurs. fact2: If this wholesaling does not occurs then this drowning happens and this uncial occurs.

fact1: ({A} & {B}) fact2: ¬{B} -> ({BF} & {A})

This drowning happens.

{BF}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Both this uncial and this wholesaling occurs. fact2: If this wholesaling does not occurs then this drowning happens and this uncial occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This wholesaling occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That everything is colored and this is not a kind of a groschen is wrong.

¬((x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x))

fact1: Some man is a kind of a flippancy and it jams Mysis if the fact that it does not sway Raoulia is not wrong. fact2: Everything is a tensed and this does not short struma. fact3: Everybody is both not non-fuller and non-negligent. fact4: Everything is intertidal and does not retell Poaceae. fact5: Everyone is osseous but not a figured. fact6: Everyone is not uncolored. fact7: The fact that everyone unsaddles mirth and does not slosh Aeonium is correct. fact8: Everybody is colored one that is not a kind of a groschen. fact9: Something is not advantageous but it is not nonmetal if it does jam Mysis. fact10: Everything taps Sclerodermataceae and is not a Otaria. fact11: Everybody is a kind of a Sarawakian. fact12: Everybody is disadvantageous and not untrained. fact13: Every person does becalm Psilotum and he/she is not insufficient. fact14: Every man is an explosive and it is not a shadow.

fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact2: (x): ({GA}x & ¬{AI}x) fact3: (x): ({BN}x & ¬{AK}x) fact4: (x): ({GE}x & ¬{IE}x) fact5: (x): ({DT}x & ¬{ER}x) fact6: (x): {AA}x fact7: (x): ({GJ}x & ¬{P}x) fact8: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact9: (x): {A}x -> ({AG}x & ¬{DG}x) fact10: (x): ({BS}x & ¬{DH}x) fact11: (x): {EU}x fact12: (x): ({AG}x & ¬{IF}x) fact13: (x): ({FK}x & ¬{AS}x) fact14: (x): ({IJ}x & ¬{EK}x)

Every man is both disadvantageous and not nonmetal.

(x): ({AG}x & ¬{DG}x)

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some man is a kind of a flippancy and it jams Mysis if the fact that it does not sway Raoulia is not wrong. fact2: Everything is a tensed and this does not short struma. fact3: Everybody is both not non-fuller and non-negligent. fact4: Everything is intertidal and does not retell Poaceae. fact5: Everyone is osseous but not a figured. fact6: Everyone is not uncolored. fact7: The fact that everyone unsaddles mirth and does not slosh Aeonium is correct. fact8: Everybody is colored one that is not a kind of a groschen. fact9: Something is not advantageous but it is not nonmetal if it does jam Mysis. fact10: Everything taps Sclerodermataceae and is not a Otaria. fact11: Everybody is a kind of a Sarawakian. fact12: Everybody is disadvantageous and not untrained. fact13: Every person does becalm Psilotum and he/she is not insufficient. fact14: Every man is an explosive and it is not a shadow. ; $hypothesis$ = That everything is colored and this is not a kind of a groschen is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That lucifer is not peptic but this is a implicitness.

(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

fact1: If somebody does not addict titer the fact that it is not peptic and it is a implicitness is wrong.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x)

The fact that that lucifer is not peptic but that thing is a implicitness does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If somebody does not addict titer the fact that it is not peptic and it is a implicitness is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = That lucifer is not peptic but this is a implicitness. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this sniff does not occurs and that antiness does not happens does not hold.

¬(¬{D} & ¬{C})

fact1: That gynecologicalness does not occurs. fact2: That storing leprosy does not occurs and that abranchiousness does not happens if the fact that that cricketing does not occurs hold. fact3: The purchasing does not occurs. fact4: The fact that both that non-autoeciousness and that non-historicalness happens hold. fact5: That this sniff does not occurs and that dishonourableness does not occurs is triggered by that the purchasing does not happens. fact6: The textualness does not happens. fact7: If this liquidity does not happens or the presentationalness does not happens or both then that nonunionness does not occurs. fact8: That that antiness happens is prevented by that that cricketing does not happens and/or that the myringotomy does not happens. fact9: That the portent does not happens brings about that the circulating Spillane does not occurs and the wharfing Webb does not occurs. fact10: Either that cricketing happens or the myringotomy does not happens or both. fact11: This sniff happens if that dishonourableness occurs. fact12: This decimalising cerebration does not happens. fact13: The myringotomy does not happens. fact14: That the trephination does not occurs is not incorrect. fact15: This waking Araujia occurs or the soiling Steller does not occurs or both.

fact1: ¬{BA} fact2: ¬{A} -> (¬{AI} & ¬{GR}) fact3: ¬{F} fact4: (¬{BB} & ¬{GS}) fact5: ¬{F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) fact6: ¬{IL} fact7: (¬{EQ} v ¬{EI}) -> ¬{AJ} fact8: (¬{A} v ¬{B}) -> ¬{C} fact9: ¬{GM} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{DH}) fact10: ({A} v ¬{B}) fact11: {E} -> {D} fact12: ¬{IF} fact13: ¬{B} fact14: ¬{CH} fact15: ({JI} v ¬{DE})

That storing leprosy does not happens and that abranchiousness does not happens.

(¬{AI} & ¬{GR})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That gynecologicalness does not occurs. fact2: That storing leprosy does not occurs and that abranchiousness does not happens if the fact that that cricketing does not occurs hold. fact3: The purchasing does not occurs. fact4: The fact that both that non-autoeciousness and that non-historicalness happens hold. fact5: That this sniff does not occurs and that dishonourableness does not occurs is triggered by that the purchasing does not happens. fact6: The textualness does not happens. fact7: If this liquidity does not happens or the presentationalness does not happens or both then that nonunionness does not occurs. fact8: That that antiness happens is prevented by that that cricketing does not happens and/or that the myringotomy does not happens. fact9: That the portent does not happens brings about that the circulating Spillane does not occurs and the wharfing Webb does not occurs. fact10: Either that cricketing happens or the myringotomy does not happens or both. fact11: This sniff happens if that dishonourableness occurs. fact12: This decimalising cerebration does not happens. fact13: The myringotomy does not happens. fact14: That the trephination does not occurs is not incorrect. fact15: This waking Araujia occurs or the soiling Steller does not occurs or both. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this sniff does not occurs and that antiness does not happens does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact13 -> int1: That cricketing does not occurs or the myringotomy does not happens or both.; int1 & fact8 -> int2: That antiness does not occurs.; fact3 & fact5 -> int3: This sniff does not happens and that dishonourableness does not happens.; int3 -> int4: This sniff does not happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that if Adriana is not convenient and/or it is an influence then Adriana is not a Equidae is incorrect.

¬((¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa})

fact1: This peasant does not excuse colpitis if that is not a Galician or that is dominant or both. fact2: Some man that either does not boast stableness or is an external or both is not a ARNG. fact3: If Adriana is not convenient and/or the person is a kind of an influence the person is a Equidae. fact4: Adriana is not a Equidae if Adriana is not convenient. fact5: Somebody is not mousey if it is not profane and/or it is a kind of a Aztecan. fact6: If either Adriana is not ecologic or it warms or both then it is inconvenient. fact7: Adriana is not a Equidae if Adriana does not extend and/or that person is asynergic. fact8: Something is not a kind of a Agnatha if it is not a kind of an unabridged and/or it boasts stableness. fact9: Adriana is not thoracic if he is not an influence and/or he is unlikable. fact10: Somebody is not a Equidae if that one either is not convenient or is an influence or both. fact11: If Adriana is inconvenient and/or consolidates Sakti it is not a phrenitis. fact12: If that katharometer either is not a kind of a Conradina or is not inconvenient or both then it is not a Triticum. fact13: Adriana is not olfactive if either the person is not a Perth or the person is subatomic or both. fact14: If that some person does not perambulate Hertha or it is adrenocortical or both hold then it is not a nanocephaly. fact15: Some person that is inconvenient is not a kind of a Equidae. fact16: Some man that is not a meander and/or is prelapsarian does not warm. fact17: Adriana is not a kind of a Equidae if either this does not bare or this splices Sequoiadendron or both. fact18: If some person does not consolidate Sakti and/or the person is archangelical then the person is not improbable. fact19: If either Adriana is not a Kennelly or that thing is omnivorous or both Adriana is not immaterial. fact20: If either somebody is not convenient or it is an influence or both it is a Equidae.

fact1: (¬{EB}{i} v {BF}{i}) -> ¬{R}{i} fact2: (x): (¬{HK}x v {HA}x) -> ¬{BD}x fact3: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact4: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} fact5: (x): (¬{AG}x v {HL}x) -> ¬{EG}x fact6: (¬{FI}{aa} v {EI}{aa}) -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact7: (¬{IP}{aa} v {GO}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact8: (x): (¬{HM}x v {HK}x) -> ¬{IB}x fact9: (¬{AB}{aa} v {DA}{aa}) -> ¬{IA}{aa} fact10: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact11: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AU}{aa}) -> ¬{JB}{aa} fact12: (¬{BP}{dn} v {AA}{dn}) -> ¬{AL}{dn} fact13: (¬{GR}{aa} v {FB}{aa}) -> ¬{FC}{aa} fact14: (x): (¬{CJ}x v {C}x) -> ¬{HN}x fact15: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬{B}x fact16: (x): (¬{N}x v {II}x) -> ¬{EI}x fact17: (¬{DQ}{aa} v {AM}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact18: (x): (¬{AU}x v {GE}x) -> ¬{IC}x fact19: (¬{DE}{aa} v {CU}{aa}) -> ¬{FE}{aa} fact20: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This peasant does not excuse colpitis if that is not a Galician or that is dominant or both. fact2: Some man that either does not boast stableness or is an external or both is not a ARNG. fact3: If Adriana is not convenient and/or the person is a kind of an influence the person is a Equidae. fact4: Adriana is not a Equidae if Adriana is not convenient. fact5: Somebody is not mousey if it is not profane and/or it is a kind of a Aztecan. fact6: If either Adriana is not ecologic or it warms or both then it is inconvenient. fact7: Adriana is not a Equidae if Adriana does not extend and/or that person is asynergic. fact8: Something is not a kind of a Agnatha if it is not a kind of an unabridged and/or it boasts stableness. fact9: Adriana is not thoracic if he is not an influence and/or he is unlikable. fact10: Somebody is not a Equidae if that one either is not convenient or is an influence or both. fact11: If Adriana is inconvenient and/or consolidates Sakti it is not a phrenitis. fact12: If that katharometer either is not a kind of a Conradina or is not inconvenient or both then it is not a Triticum. fact13: Adriana is not olfactive if either the person is not a Perth or the person is subatomic or both. fact14: If that some person does not perambulate Hertha or it is adrenocortical or both hold then it is not a nanocephaly. fact15: Some person that is inconvenient is not a kind of a Equidae. fact16: Some man that is not a meander and/or is prelapsarian does not warm. fact17: Adriana is not a kind of a Equidae if either this does not bare or this splices Sequoiadendron or both. fact18: If some person does not consolidate Sakti and/or the person is archangelical then the person is not improbable. fact19: If either Adriana is not a Kennelly or that thing is omnivorous or both Adriana is not immaterial. fact20: If either somebody is not convenient or it is an influence or both it is a Equidae. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that if Adriana is not convenient and/or it is an influence then Adriana is not a Equidae is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This insurmountableness does not occurs but this telepathising happens.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: That that disembowelment does not happens but that astonishing Ascaphidae happens does not hold. fact2: The fact that this streaming prosperity does not happens but this distantness occurs does not hold. fact3: That both this pining Belemnoidea and this lineation happens is wrong. fact4: The fact that that overrefineding chronology and the Demosthenicness happens is false. fact5: The fact that notthe offense but that clunking happens does not hold. fact6: That notthe skimping but the horning throes happens does not hold. fact7: That notthe honeyeding ontology but the reluctance happens is not right. fact8: That this insurmountableness occurs and this telepathising occurs is not correct. fact9: The fact that notthe thrashing achievability but this prosthodonticness occurs is wrong. fact10: That the defibrinating jugful does not occurs but the TKO occurs is not correct. fact11: If that this disorderliness happens hold the fact that this meagreness does not happens but that euphemizing polygon occurs does not hold. fact12: The fact that notthe wrong but the resurrecting Pristidae occurs is not right. fact13: If this disorderliness occurs this insurmountableness does not occurs and this telepathising happens.

fact1: ¬(¬{JI} & {HQ}) fact2: ¬(¬{EE} & {AM}) fact3: ¬({BR} & {GF}) fact4: ¬({IU} & {GN}) fact5: ¬(¬{GC} & {S}) fact6: ¬(¬{FL} & {DO}) fact7: ¬(¬{T} & {GO}) fact8: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact9: ¬(¬{EU} & {O}) fact10: ¬(¬{BG} & {HL}) fact11: {A} -> ¬(¬{IP} & {FF}) fact12: ¬(¬{FS} & {HB}) fact13: {A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB})

This insurmountableness does not occurs but this telepathising happens.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that disembowelment does not happens but that astonishing Ascaphidae happens does not hold. fact2: The fact that this streaming prosperity does not happens but this distantness occurs does not hold. fact3: That both this pining Belemnoidea and this lineation happens is wrong. fact4: The fact that that overrefineding chronology and the Demosthenicness happens is false. fact5: The fact that notthe offense but that clunking happens does not hold. fact6: That notthe skimping but the horning throes happens does not hold. fact7: That notthe honeyeding ontology but the reluctance happens is not right. fact8: That this insurmountableness occurs and this telepathising occurs is not correct. fact9: The fact that notthe thrashing achievability but this prosthodonticness occurs is wrong. fact10: That the defibrinating jugful does not occurs but the TKO occurs is not correct. fact11: If that this disorderliness happens hold the fact that this meagreness does not happens but that euphemizing polygon occurs does not hold. fact12: The fact that notthe wrong but the resurrecting Pristidae occurs is not right. fact13: If this disorderliness occurs this insurmountableness does not occurs and this telepathising happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This insurmountableness does not occurs but this telepathising happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This severalizing exogamy occurs.

{A}

fact1: If the fact that that pageant and this pneumaticness occurs is false then this pneumaticness does not happens. fact2: If that killing occurs then that this crib does not occurs and that inertialness does not occurs is incorrect. fact3: That this severalizing exogamy happens is prevented by that this answering and this non-inertialness occurs. fact4: That this crib occurs causes that both this answering and this non-inertialness happens. fact5: If this answering does not occurs then the Islamicness and this severalizing exogamy occurs. fact6: This troll happens. fact7: That pigmenting Klaproth happens. fact8: This evidence does not happens. fact9: This miniaturisation happens and/or this ferromagneticness occurs if that encircling does not happens. fact10: That this answering does not occurs is right if the fact that this crib does not happens and that inertialness does not happens does not hold. fact11: That bogging Mullus occurs. fact12: This riptide does not happens and this cryosurgery does not occurs if that front occurs. fact13: That that pageant happens and this pneumaticness occurs does not hold if this unaffectedness does not occurs. fact14: That that disapproval happens and this riptide happens is brought about by that this cryosurgery does not happens. fact15: That notthat killing but this crib happens is triggered by that that disapproval occurs. fact16: That this mooting unrestraint does not occurs and that encircling does not occurs is brought about by that this evidence does not happens. fact17: That this riptide does not happens brings about that that killing and that disapproval occurs. fact18: That that front does not happens is prevented by this pneumaticness.

fact1: ¬({K} & {J}) -> ¬{J} fact2: {E} -> ¬(¬{D} & ¬{C}) fact3: ({B} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{A} fact4: {D} -> ({B} & ¬{C}) fact5: ¬{B} -> ({CU} & {A}) fact6: {EO} fact7: {AN} fact8: ¬{Q} fact9: ¬{O} -> ({M} v {N}) fact10: ¬(¬{D} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact11: {BE} fact12: {I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) fact13: ¬{L} -> ¬({K} & {J}) fact14: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact15: {F} -> (¬{E} & {D}) fact16: ¬{Q} -> (¬{P} & ¬{O}) fact17: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact18: {J} -> {I}

This severalizing exogamy does not occurs.

¬{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that that pageant and this pneumaticness occurs is false then this pneumaticness does not happens. fact2: If that killing occurs then that this crib does not occurs and that inertialness does not occurs is incorrect. fact3: That this severalizing exogamy happens is prevented by that this answering and this non-inertialness occurs. fact4: That this crib occurs causes that both this answering and this non-inertialness happens. fact5: If this answering does not occurs then the Islamicness and this severalizing exogamy occurs. fact6: This troll happens. fact7: That pigmenting Klaproth happens. fact8: This evidence does not happens. fact9: This miniaturisation happens and/or this ferromagneticness occurs if that encircling does not happens. fact10: That this answering does not occurs is right if the fact that this crib does not happens and that inertialness does not happens does not hold. fact11: That bogging Mullus occurs. fact12: This riptide does not happens and this cryosurgery does not occurs if that front occurs. fact13: That that pageant happens and this pneumaticness occurs does not hold if this unaffectedness does not occurs. fact14: That that disapproval happens and this riptide happens is brought about by that this cryosurgery does not happens. fact15: That notthat killing but this crib happens is triggered by that that disapproval occurs. fact16: That this mooting unrestraint does not occurs and that encircling does not occurs is brought about by that this evidence does not happens. fact17: That this riptide does not happens brings about that that killing and that disapproval occurs. fact18: That that front does not happens is prevented by this pneumaticness. ; $hypothesis$ = This severalizing exogamy occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that tallgrass does not heist Arouet and does not niggle Varro is incorrect.

¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

fact1: If this Boche is not homocentric the fact that that tallgrass does not heist Arouet and niggles Varro is false. fact2: If something is homocentric this thing does not heist Arouet and does not niggle Varro. fact3: This Boche is not homocentric. fact4: The fact that the fact that that tallgrass heists Arouet and does not niggle Varro is wrong is right.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact2: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

That tallgrass does not heist Arouet and this person does not niggle Varro.

(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this Boche is not homocentric the fact that that tallgrass does not heist Arouet and niggles Varro is false. fact2: If something is homocentric this thing does not heist Arouet and does not niggle Varro. fact3: This Boche is not homocentric. fact4: The fact that the fact that that tallgrass heists Arouet and does not niggle Varro is wrong is right. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that tallgrass does not heist Arouet and does not niggle Varro is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That Cuprimine is not a kind of a congruence.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: If Carina is not a kind of a bivalve and this thing is not a kind of a cleverness then that Cuprimine is a cleverness. fact2: If the fact that someone coats Unitarianism and is a bivalve does not hold that one is not a bivalve. fact3: Someone is not a kind of a bivalve or this person does not coat Unitarianism or both if this person clads. fact4: That Cuprimine is a congruence. fact5: If that rose does not clad then that Carina coats Unitarianism and it is a bivalve is false. fact6: Something is not a congruence if this thing is a cleverness. fact7: If the fact that the fact that this Latvian is a kind of Achaean thing that is non-rationalist hold is wrong then that that rose does not clad is right. fact8: Someone that is not a kind of a bivalve and/or does not coat Unitarianism is not a bivalve. fact9: That ounce is a kind of a congruence. fact10: If Carina clads that Cuprimine clads. fact11: If that Cuprimine is not a bivalve this allosaurus is a congruence and it is a cleverness. fact12: This lepidopteron is a congruence. fact13: The fact that that Cuprimine wards paraphrase is correct.

fact1: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> {B}{a} fact2: (x): ¬({E}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact3: (x): {D}x -> (¬{C}x v ¬{E}x) fact4: {A}{a} fact5: ¬{D}{c} -> ¬({E}{b} & {C}{b}) fact6: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}x fact7: ¬({H}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) -> ¬{D}{c} fact8: (x): (¬{C}x v ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact9: {A}{in} fact10: {D}{b} -> {D}{a} fact11: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{at} & {B}{at}) fact12: {A}{bi} fact13: {IN}{a}

That Cuprimine is not a kind of a congruence.

¬{A}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If Carina is not a kind of a bivalve and this thing is not a kind of a cleverness then that Cuprimine is a cleverness. fact2: If the fact that someone coats Unitarianism and is a bivalve does not hold that one is not a bivalve. fact3: Someone is not a kind of a bivalve or this person does not coat Unitarianism or both if this person clads. fact4: That Cuprimine is a congruence. fact5: If that rose does not clad then that Carina coats Unitarianism and it is a bivalve is false. fact6: Something is not a congruence if this thing is a cleverness. fact7: If the fact that the fact that this Latvian is a kind of Achaean thing that is non-rationalist hold is wrong then that that rose does not clad is right. fact8: Someone that is not a kind of a bivalve and/or does not coat Unitarianism is not a bivalve. fact9: That ounce is a kind of a congruence. fact10: If Carina clads that Cuprimine clads. fact11: If that Cuprimine is not a bivalve this allosaurus is a congruence and it is a cleverness. fact12: This lepidopteron is a congruence. fact13: The fact that that Cuprimine wards paraphrase is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = That Cuprimine is not a kind of a congruence. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That quarrel is undeveloped and it is a coronach.

({A}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: That quarrel is undeveloped. fact2: If this moor derequisitions preview and it is a complaisance this throttler does not derequisitions preview. fact3: That quarrel is a coronach. fact4: If this jadeite is a kind of a shear that this hostelry is not a shear is true. fact5: Something is a kind of a shear if the fact that it nitrogenizes efficaciousness is true. fact6: Something nitrogenizes efficaciousness if it is a kind of a Akhbari. fact7: If this asdic notices Tonga then this fenestella is alabastrine. fact8: If this throttler does not derequisition preview then this jadeite does reproduce Crinoidea and is a Akhbari. fact9: This fenestella is a complaisance if this fenestella is alabastrine. fact10: The fact that that quarrel is undeveloped and he/she is a coronach is wrong if this hostelry is not a kind of a shear. fact11: There is some person such that it pants Oceanid and does not notice Tonga. fact12: This instigant is undeveloped if it is not a coronach or is undeveloped or both.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: ({G}{e} & {H}{e}) -> ¬{G}{d} fact3: {B}{a} fact4: {C}{c} -> ¬{C}{b} fact5: (x): {D}x -> {C}x fact6: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact7: {J}{g} -> {I}{f} fact8: ¬{G}{d} -> ({F}{c} & {E}{c}) fact9: {I}{f} -> {H}{f} fact10: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact11: (Ex): ({L}x & ¬{J}x) fact12: (¬{B}{fi} v {A}{fi}) -> {A}{fi}

The fact that that quarrel is not exploited and it is a coronach is false.

¬({A}{a} & {B}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That quarrel is undeveloped. fact2: If this moor derequisitions preview and it is a complaisance this throttler does not derequisitions preview. fact3: That quarrel is a coronach. fact4: If this jadeite is a kind of a shear that this hostelry is not a shear is true. fact5: Something is a kind of a shear if the fact that it nitrogenizes efficaciousness is true. fact6: Something nitrogenizes efficaciousness if it is a kind of a Akhbari. fact7: If this asdic notices Tonga then this fenestella is alabastrine. fact8: If this throttler does not derequisition preview then this jadeite does reproduce Crinoidea and is a Akhbari. fact9: This fenestella is a complaisance if this fenestella is alabastrine. fact10: The fact that that quarrel is undeveloped and he/she is a coronach is wrong if this hostelry is not a kind of a shear. fact11: There is some person such that it pants Oceanid and does not notice Tonga. fact12: This instigant is undeveloped if it is not a coronach or is undeveloped or both. ; $hypothesis$ = That quarrel is undeveloped and it is a coronach. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This Osmitrol does not imbricated.

¬{C}{b}

fact1: The bestseller does imbricated. fact2: that that conversation lavishes bomblet hold. fact3: This bomblet is a kind of a selling. fact4: This Osmitrol imbricateds if this bomblet is a Myacidae. fact5: This Osmitrol lavishes conversation. fact6: This bomblet imbricateds if this Osmitrol is a Myacidae. fact7: This Osmitrol is a kind of a Myacidae. fact8: That vestry is a Myacidae. fact9: The fact that this bomblet imbricateds hold. fact10: If this bomblet imbricateds then this Osmitrol lavishes conversation. fact11: That this bomblet lavishes conversation hold.

fact1: {C}{o} fact2: {AA}{aa} fact3: {D}{a} fact4: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact5: {A}{b} fact6: {B}{b} -> {C}{a} fact7: {B}{b} fact8: {B}{ds} fact9: {C}{a} fact10: {C}{a} -> {A}{b} fact11: {A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The bestseller does imbricated. fact2: that that conversation lavishes bomblet hold. fact3: This bomblet is a kind of a selling. fact4: This Osmitrol imbricateds if this bomblet is a Myacidae. fact5: This Osmitrol lavishes conversation. fact6: This bomblet imbricateds if this Osmitrol is a Myacidae. fact7: This Osmitrol is a kind of a Myacidae. fact8: That vestry is a Myacidae. fact9: The fact that this bomblet imbricateds hold. fact10: If this bomblet imbricateds then this Osmitrol lavishes conversation. fact11: That this bomblet lavishes conversation hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This Osmitrol does not imbricated. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This spotting happens.

{C}

fact1: This ergoticness does not happens and this galling does not happens if that this rooting hm does not occurs is not wrong. fact2: That this spotting happens but that headmastership does not occurs is caused by that that higgling does not occurs. fact3: If that headmastership occurs then that this spotting does not happens hold. fact4: That higgling yields that headmastership. fact5: That this crutch does not happens but that maintaining occurs is wrong. fact6: The superbia does not happens. fact7: If that this ergoticness does not happens and the dimming does not occurs does not hold the donging aroma happens. fact8: If that that dakoity does not happens and that Mesozoic does not happens is not right that higgling happens. fact9: The fact that that dakoity does not happens and that Mesozoic occurs is false. fact10: The bibliolatry happens. fact11: The greeting Algol happens if the bacteremicness happens. fact12: That that dakoity does not happens and that Mesozoic does not happens is false. fact13: That that higgling does not occurs and this provocation does not happens is not false if this galling does not happens. fact14: That the drying ablaut does not happens and the transplant does not happens is false. fact15: This rooting hm does not happens if notthe growling but that unrecoverableness occurs. fact16: The emirate happens if the fact that the mnemotechnicness does not happens and that pounding does not happens is incorrect.

fact1: ¬{G} -> (¬{F} & ¬{E}) fact2: ¬{B} -> ({C} & ¬{A}) fact3: {A} -> ¬{C} fact4: {B} -> {A} fact5: ¬(¬{AI} & {AQ}) fact6: ¬{CM} fact7: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{DK}) -> {FI} fact8: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact9: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact10: {EJ} fact11: {IC} -> {DH} fact12: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact13: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & ¬{D}) fact14: ¬(¬{IO} & ¬{HS}) fact15: (¬{I} & {H}) -> ¬{G} fact16: ¬(¬{GK} & ¬{JK}) -> {BQ}

This spotting happens.

{C}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This ergoticness does not happens and this galling does not happens if that this rooting hm does not occurs is not wrong. fact2: That this spotting happens but that headmastership does not occurs is caused by that that higgling does not occurs. fact3: If that headmastership occurs then that this spotting does not happens hold. fact4: That higgling yields that headmastership. fact5: That this crutch does not happens but that maintaining occurs is wrong. fact6: The superbia does not happens. fact7: If that this ergoticness does not happens and the dimming does not occurs does not hold the donging aroma happens. fact8: If that that dakoity does not happens and that Mesozoic does not happens is not right that higgling happens. fact9: The fact that that dakoity does not happens and that Mesozoic occurs is false. fact10: The bibliolatry happens. fact11: The greeting Algol happens if the bacteremicness happens. fact12: That that dakoity does not happens and that Mesozoic does not happens is false. fact13: That that higgling does not occurs and this provocation does not happens is not false if this galling does not happens. fact14: That the drying ablaut does not happens and the transplant does not happens is false. fact15: This rooting hm does not happens if notthe growling but that unrecoverableness occurs. fact16: The emirate happens if the fact that the mnemotechnicness does not happens and that pounding does not happens is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = This spotting happens. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact12 -> int1: That higgling happens.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: That headmastership happens.; int2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That repulsion occurs.

{C}

fact1: That that wiring wedded does not occurs is brought about by that the nutation but notthe phototherapy occurs. fact2: That unwiring Karbala happens. fact3: If that the fact that notthis purchasing Cowper but this drugging occurs is not right is correct that this mastoidal does not occurs is correct. fact4: That the fact that notthat congesting but this auctioning occurs is incorrect is right. fact5: That that repulsion happens is prevented by that that relocating Cladorhyncus happens and this mastoidal does not happens. fact6: If both the parking desire and that non-lactealness happens the interlinking roc does not happens. fact7: That relocating Cladorhyncus and this choleraicness happens. fact8: The ticktocking does not occurs if that that non-herbivorousness and the aromaticness occurs does not hold. fact9: If the fact that that this pogrom does not occurs but that congesting occurs is wrong is true then that proteolyticness does not occurs. fact10: That this share occurs brings about that notthe ravaging but this choleraicness occurs. fact11: If this purchasing Cowper occurs this mastoidal does not happens. fact12: The fact that this purchasing Cowper and this drugging happens is not right. fact13: If the caramelising cadre occurs and the cacophonousness does not occurs then the rising Ionia does not happens. fact14: This Wittgensteinianness does not happens. fact15: That this mastoidal happens is triggered by that notthe ravaging but this choleraicness occurs. fact16: That this purchasing Cowper does not occurs but this drugging happens does not hold. fact17: That Eurocentricness occurs. fact18: That this tinker does not occurs is true. fact19: That that looping slashed occurs is correct. fact20: If this siliceousness occurs this share occurs.

fact1: ({BL} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{DF} fact2: {EE} fact3: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬(¬{CG} & {EA}) fact5: ({A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{C} fact6: ({GG} & ¬{FQ}) -> ¬{IT} fact7: ({A} & {D}) fact8: ¬(¬{CC} & {HR}) -> ¬{IN} fact9: ¬(¬{BD} & {CG}) -> ¬{HA} fact10: {F} -> (¬{E} & {D}) fact11: {AA} -> ¬{B} fact12: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact13: ({IK} & ¬{GL}) -> ¬{DR} fact14: ¬{FM} fact15: (¬{E} & {D}) -> {B} fact16: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact17: {ID} fact18: ¬{HC} fact19: {AF} fact20: {G} -> {F}

That repulsion occurs.

{C}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that wiring wedded does not occurs is brought about by that the nutation but notthe phototherapy occurs. fact2: That unwiring Karbala happens. fact3: If that the fact that notthis purchasing Cowper but this drugging occurs is not right is correct that this mastoidal does not occurs is correct. fact4: That the fact that notthat congesting but this auctioning occurs is incorrect is right. fact5: That that repulsion happens is prevented by that that relocating Cladorhyncus happens and this mastoidal does not happens. fact6: If both the parking desire and that non-lactealness happens the interlinking roc does not happens. fact7: That relocating Cladorhyncus and this choleraicness happens. fact8: The ticktocking does not occurs if that that non-herbivorousness and the aromaticness occurs does not hold. fact9: If the fact that that this pogrom does not occurs but that congesting occurs is wrong is true then that proteolyticness does not occurs. fact10: That this share occurs brings about that notthe ravaging but this choleraicness occurs. fact11: If this purchasing Cowper occurs this mastoidal does not happens. fact12: The fact that this purchasing Cowper and this drugging happens is not right. fact13: If the caramelising cadre occurs and the cacophonousness does not occurs then the rising Ionia does not happens. fact14: This Wittgensteinianness does not happens. fact15: That this mastoidal happens is triggered by that notthe ravaging but this choleraicness occurs. fact16: That this purchasing Cowper does not occurs but this drugging happens does not hold. fact17: That Eurocentricness occurs. fact18: That this tinker does not occurs is true. fact19: That that looping slashed occurs is correct. fact20: If this siliceousness occurs this share occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That repulsion occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact16 -> int1: This mastoidal does not happens.; fact7 -> int2: That relocating Cladorhyncus occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That relocating Cladorhyncus but notthis mastoidal occurs.; int3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This benzoin is a roost.

{B}{a}

fact1: The fact that that this stove is a resemblance is correct if that bobsled is not a resemblance hold. fact2: Everything is not a ESE and it is a Nissan. fact3: There exists nothing such that it is not a kind of a loveliness and it is not a kind of a roost. fact4: This benzoin is not a loveliness. fact5: That the fact that some man is both a roost and a loveliness is right is incorrect if this one is not convenient. fact6: This benzoin is not a varicosity. fact7: That someone is convenient but that person is not a kind of a roost is incorrect if that person is not a ESE. fact8: That this benzoin is not convenient but she is a loveliness is incorrect if this stove is a resemblance. fact9: That something is not a resemblance and it is not a hypercalciuria is wrong if it is a kind of a loveliness. fact10: This beau is a roost.

fact1: ¬{D}{c} -> {D}{b} fact2: (x): (¬{E}x & {F}x) fact3: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) fact4: ¬{A}{a} fact5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & {A}x) fact6: ¬{IL}{a} fact7: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) fact8: {D}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & {A}{a}) fact9: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{BT}x) fact10: {B}{ht}

Let's assume that this benzoin is not a roost.

¬{B}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that this stove is a resemblance is correct if that bobsled is not a resemblance hold. fact2: Everything is not a ESE and it is a Nissan. fact3: There exists nothing such that it is not a kind of a loveliness and it is not a kind of a roost. fact4: This benzoin is not a loveliness. fact5: That the fact that some man is both a roost and a loveliness is right is incorrect if this one is not convenient. fact6: This benzoin is not a varicosity. fact7: That someone is convenient but that person is not a kind of a roost is incorrect if that person is not a ESE. fact8: That this benzoin is not convenient but she is a loveliness is incorrect if this stove is a resemblance. fact9: That something is not a resemblance and it is not a hypercalciuria is wrong if it is a kind of a loveliness. fact10: This beau is a roost. ; $hypothesis$ = This benzoin is a roost. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this benzoin is not a roost.; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: This benzoin is not a loveliness and it is not a kind of a roost.; fact3 -> int2: That this benzoin is not a kind of a loveliness and he/she is not a roost is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this quislingism occurs or this preoccupying schistorrhachis happens or both does not hold.

¬({B} v {D})

fact1: The fact that either that aeromedicalness happens or that pleochroicness happens or both is wrong if that aeromedicalness does not happens. fact2: The fact that this quislingism or this preoccupying schistorrhachis or both happens does not hold if this quislingism does not happens. fact3: The palteringing Arianrod happens but the coalescing does not happens. fact4: The repayment happens. fact5: That this imbecility happens results in that both that counterposing ridiculousness and the non-oncologicness happens. fact6: The coalescing does not occurs. fact7: The quake occurs. fact8: That casualty does not occurs. fact9: This imbecility but notthis quislingism happens. fact10: That either this redistribution occurs or this horticulturalness occurs or both is incorrect.

fact1: ¬{P} -> ¬({P} v {ID}) fact2: ¬{B} -> ¬({B} v {D}) fact3: ({AK} & ¬{JJ}) fact4: {BA} fact5: {A} -> ({FI} & ¬{AU}) fact6: ¬{JJ} fact7: {BU} fact8: ¬{CU} fact9: ({A} & ¬{B}) fact10: ¬({AP} v {AA})

That counterposing ridiculousness but notthe oncologicness happens.

({FI} & ¬{AU})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that either that aeromedicalness happens or that pleochroicness happens or both is wrong if that aeromedicalness does not happens. fact2: The fact that this quislingism or this preoccupying schistorrhachis or both happens does not hold if this quislingism does not happens. fact3: The palteringing Arianrod happens but the coalescing does not happens. fact4: The repayment happens. fact5: That this imbecility happens results in that both that counterposing ridiculousness and the non-oncologicness happens. fact6: The coalescing does not occurs. fact7: The quake occurs. fact8: That casualty does not occurs. fact9: This imbecility but notthis quislingism happens. fact10: That either this redistribution occurs or this horticulturalness occurs or both is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = That this quislingism occurs or this preoccupying schistorrhachis happens or both does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact9 -> int1: The fact that this quislingism does not occurs hold.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That restroom is both felicitous and not electromechanical.

({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a})

fact1: This mandator is a peek or ambitious or both if it is not Jacksonian. fact2: The fact that that restroom is felicitous but this thing is non-electromechanical is false if this ski masculinizes epanaphora. fact3: If that this ski bawls Rommel and does not nauseate is false that restroom does not bawls Rommel. fact4: If that thurifer is a kind of a rational this ski does masculinize epanaphora. fact5: This ski is not electromechanical. fact6: Some man is not a rational and does not alter if she does not bawl Rommel. fact7: If that something is a creaminess but that thing is not a Halakah does not hold then that thing is valent. fact8: This mandator is not Jacksonian. fact9: If this mandator is ambitious that thurifer is a peek. fact10: That restroom is felicitous. fact11: If something is valent then that it bawls Rommel and does not nauseate does not hold. fact12: That that thurifer is a peek if this mandator is a peek hold. fact13: If that that restroom is not a kind of a rational is not wrong that cockney is electromechanical and/or masculinizes epanaphora. fact14: That restroom is not electromechanical. fact15: The fact that this ski is a creaminess and is not a Halakah does not hold if that thurifer is a peek.

fact1: ¬{L}{d} -> ({K}{d} v {M}{d}) fact2: {C}{b} -> ¬({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact3: ¬({F}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact4: {D}{c} -> {C}{b} fact5: ¬{B}{b} fact6: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact7: (x): ¬({J}x & ¬{I}x) -> {G}x fact8: ¬{L}{d} fact9: {M}{d} -> {K}{c} fact10: {A}{a} fact11: (x): {G}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{H}x) fact12: {K}{d} -> {K}{c} fact13: ¬{D}{a} -> ({B}{je} v {C}{je}) fact14: ¬{B}{a} fact15: {K}{c} -> ¬({J}{b} & ¬{I}{b})

That cockney is felicitous.

{A}{je}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This mandator is a peek or ambitious or both if it is not Jacksonian. fact2: The fact that that restroom is felicitous but this thing is non-electromechanical is false if this ski masculinizes epanaphora. fact3: If that this ski bawls Rommel and does not nauseate is false that restroom does not bawls Rommel. fact4: If that thurifer is a kind of a rational this ski does masculinize epanaphora. fact5: This ski is not electromechanical. fact6: Some man is not a rational and does not alter if she does not bawl Rommel. fact7: If that something is a creaminess but that thing is not a Halakah does not hold then that thing is valent. fact8: This mandator is not Jacksonian. fact9: If this mandator is ambitious that thurifer is a peek. fact10: That restroom is felicitous. fact11: If something is valent then that it bawls Rommel and does not nauseate does not hold. fact12: That that thurifer is a peek if this mandator is a peek hold. fact13: If that that restroom is not a kind of a rational is not wrong that cockney is electromechanical and/or masculinizes epanaphora. fact14: That restroom is not electromechanical. fact15: The fact that this ski is a creaminess and is not a Halakah does not hold if that thurifer is a peek. ; $hypothesis$ = That restroom is both felicitous and not electromechanical. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that this caldron is not horticultural is correct.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: This caldron is not a Eck if that this flatterer does farce electorate and it is horticultural is wrong. fact2: This flatterer does not suspend Helipterum and is not a kind of a Eck. fact3: That this caldron does not suspend Helipterum hold. fact4: If that something is ingenuous and writhes cashed does not hold then the thing is not ingenuous. fact5: If this flatterer does not suspend Helipterum and that thing is not a kind of a Eck this caldron is not horticultural. fact6: If this flatterer farces electorate then this caldron is horticultural.

fact1: ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{b} fact2: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact3: ¬{AA}{b} fact4: (x): ¬({C}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact5: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b}

This caldron is not a Eck.

¬{AB}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This caldron is not a Eck if that this flatterer does farce electorate and it is horticultural is wrong. fact2: This flatterer does not suspend Helipterum and is not a kind of a Eck. fact3: That this caldron does not suspend Helipterum hold. fact4: If that something is ingenuous and writhes cashed does not hold then the thing is not ingenuous. fact5: If this flatterer does not suspend Helipterum and that thing is not a kind of a Eck this caldron is not horticultural. fact6: If this flatterer farces electorate then this caldron is horticultural. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this caldron is not horticultural is correct. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This turtle is papal.

{C}{a}

fact1: That this turtle pitches incisura is correct. fact2: This turtle is a Cyprinus if it pitches incisura. fact3: that this incisura pitches turtle is correct.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact3: {AA}{aa}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this turtle pitches incisura is correct. fact2: This turtle is a Cyprinus if it pitches incisura. fact3: that this incisura pitches turtle is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = This turtle is papal. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This stalling does not happens and this gluttonousness does not happens.

(¬{A} & ¬{B})

fact1: That the Alar does not occurs and that unbarreledness does not occurs is incorrect. fact2: This gluttonousness does not occurs if that the Alar does not happens and that unbarreledness does not occurs does not hold. fact3: If this stalling does not happens the contemplation does not happens and the rummage does not happens. fact4: That this gluttonousness does not happens triggers that this stalling does not happens and this gluttonousness does not occurs. fact5: This trespassing does not happens.

fact1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact3: ¬{A} -> (¬{EG} & ¬{IN}) fact4: ¬{B} -> (¬{A} & ¬{B}) fact5: ¬{CU}

The contemplation does not occurs and the rummage does not happens.

(¬{EG} & ¬{IN})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That the Alar does not occurs and that unbarreledness does not occurs is incorrect. fact2: This gluttonousness does not occurs if that the Alar does not happens and that unbarreledness does not occurs does not hold. fact3: If this stalling does not happens the contemplation does not happens and the rummage does not happens. fact4: That this gluttonousness does not happens triggers that this stalling does not happens and this gluttonousness does not occurs. fact5: This trespassing does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This stalling does not happens and this gluttonousness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact1 -> int1: This gluttonousness does not happens.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that dobson does overwork Frisia or it is a Meir or both is incorrect.

¬({A}{a} v {C}{a})

fact1: That that dobson ails Genista is correct if the fact that this forage ails Genista but the one is not oracular is incorrect. fact2: Every person is a barramundi and/or that one is a Woolf. fact3: If something does ail Genista then this thing is a Haloragaceae. fact4: Some person does flutter outsize but that person does not overwork Frisia if that person is a Haloragaceae. fact5: That that shawm overworks Frisia is true. fact6: The fact that either somebody overworks Frisia or it is a Meir or both does not hold if it is not allomorphic. fact7: If someone does not overwork Frisia then either it is a Meir or it is allomorphic or both. fact8: The fact that the fact that something ails Genista but it is non-oracular is not correct if it is not a kind of a ready hold. fact9: If that dobson is a Meir then that soapweed is a Meir. fact10: This bully flutters outsize and it ails Genista. fact11: The precordium is a pretended and is allomorphic. fact12: If Nena is a kind of a barramundi then this bully is a kind of a scarlet. fact13: This bully is a scarlet if Nena is a Woolf. fact14: This bully is not a kind of a ready if that it is a morphophoneme and it buries corruptibility does not hold. fact15: That dobson seals Shiloh and/or it is juiceless. fact16: That dobson overworks Frisia and is not non-allomorphic. fact17: That dobson is allomorphic and is an unprofitability. fact18: Either Geo does guggle or it is a sailing or both. fact19: If this forage is a kind of a Haloragaceae but that thing does not flutter outsize that dobson flutter outsize. fact20: That dobson is allomorphic. fact21: If this bully is a scarlet but that person is not a ready then that this forage is not a ready is true.

fact1: ¬({F}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) -> {F}{a} fact2: (x): ({M}x v {L}x) fact3: (x): {F}x -> {E}x fact4: (x): {E}x -> ({D}x & ¬{A}x) fact5: {A}{ef} fact6: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x v {C}x) fact7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({C}x v {B}x) fact8: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{G}x) fact9: {C}{a} -> {C}{hs} fact10: ({D}{c} & {F}{c}) fact11: ({EF}{ch} & {B}{ch}) fact12: {M}{d} -> {J}{c} fact13: {L}{d} -> {J}{c} fact14: ¬({K}{c} & {I}{c}) -> ¬{H}{c} fact15: ({ET}{a} v {BC}{a}) fact16: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact17: ({B}{a} & {IL}{a}) fact18: ({EL}{hm} v {DH}{hm}) fact19: ({E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> {D}{a} fact20: {B}{a} fact21: ({J}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) -> ¬{H}{b}

The fact that that dobson does overwork Frisia or it is a Meir or both is incorrect.

¬({A}{a} v {C}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that dobson ails Genista is correct if the fact that this forage ails Genista but the one is not oracular is incorrect. fact2: Every person is a barramundi and/or that one is a Woolf. fact3: If something does ail Genista then this thing is a Haloragaceae. fact4: Some person does flutter outsize but that person does not overwork Frisia if that person is a Haloragaceae. fact5: That that shawm overworks Frisia is true. fact6: The fact that either somebody overworks Frisia or it is a Meir or both does not hold if it is not allomorphic. fact7: If someone does not overwork Frisia then either it is a Meir or it is allomorphic or both. fact8: The fact that the fact that something ails Genista but it is non-oracular is not correct if it is not a kind of a ready hold. fact9: If that dobson is a Meir then that soapweed is a Meir. fact10: This bully flutters outsize and it ails Genista. fact11: The precordium is a pretended and is allomorphic. fact12: If Nena is a kind of a barramundi then this bully is a kind of a scarlet. fact13: This bully is a scarlet if Nena is a Woolf. fact14: This bully is not a kind of a ready if that it is a morphophoneme and it buries corruptibility does not hold. fact15: That dobson seals Shiloh and/or it is juiceless. fact16: That dobson overworks Frisia and is not non-allomorphic. fact17: That dobson is allomorphic and is an unprofitability. fact18: Either Geo does guggle or it is a sailing or both. fact19: If this forage is a kind of a Haloragaceae but that thing does not flutter outsize that dobson flutter outsize. fact20: That dobson is allomorphic. fact21: If this bully is a scarlet but that person is not a ready then that this forage is not a ready is true. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that dobson does overwork Frisia or it is a Meir or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact16 -> int1: That dobson overworks Frisia.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that inflaming Vistula does not happens is triggered by this conservancy.

{B} -> ¬{C}

fact1: If this yachtinging happens that the fact that this ottoman but notthat Italic happens is not false does not hold. fact2: The jactitating Schistosomatidae occurs. fact3: That pitting Diaspididae occurs. fact4: That that inflaming Vistula happens is triggered by that this conservancy occurs. fact5: That non-unstagedness leads to that that inflaming Vistula does not happens and this conservancy does not occurs. fact6: This grubbiness happens. fact7: That Italic occurs if the fact that this ottoman but notthat Italic happens is wrong. fact8: If the baboonishness occurs and the suppression occurs then that exhaustion does not happens. fact9: That that pitting Diaspididae occurs and this conservancy occurs leads to that that inflaming Vistula occurs. fact10: That the transcending claque does not happens and this overspill does not happens is brought about by that that sphingineness happens. fact11: This aeromechanicness prevents that that sphingineness does not occurs. fact12: If the amelioration and the totaled happens then this yachtinging occurs. fact13: That inflaming Vistula happens. fact14: If that pitting Diaspididae occurs and this conservancy occurs then that inflaming Vistula does not occurs. fact15: If this unmodulatedness does not occurs and this guess does not occurs then this aeromechanicness occurs. fact16: If that Italic happens then this unmodulatedness does not occurs and this guess does not occurs. fact17: That imposing Pseudomonas does not happens and that unstagedness does not occurs if this overspill does not happens. fact18: That this alphamericness occurs triggers that that imposing Pseudomonas happens.

fact1: {M} -> ¬({N} & ¬{L}) fact2: {AM} fact3: {A} fact4: {B} -> {C} fact5: ¬{D} -> (¬{C} & ¬{B}) fact6: {GT} fact7: ¬({N} & ¬{L}) -> {L} fact8: ({BU} & {BI}) -> ¬{CC} fact9: ({A} & {B}) -> {C} fact10: {H} -> (¬{G} & ¬{F}) fact11: {I} -> {H} fact12: ({JJ} & {BG}) -> {M} fact13: {C} fact14: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact15: (¬{K} & ¬{J}) -> {I} fact16: {L} -> (¬{K} & ¬{J}) fact17: ¬{F} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact18: {DN} -> {E}

This immunocompetentness occurs.

{BN}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this yachtinging happens that the fact that this ottoman but notthat Italic happens is not false does not hold. fact2: The jactitating Schistosomatidae occurs. fact3: That pitting Diaspididae occurs. fact4: That that inflaming Vistula happens is triggered by that this conservancy occurs. fact5: That non-unstagedness leads to that that inflaming Vistula does not happens and this conservancy does not occurs. fact6: This grubbiness happens. fact7: That Italic occurs if the fact that this ottoman but notthat Italic happens is wrong. fact8: If the baboonishness occurs and the suppression occurs then that exhaustion does not happens. fact9: That that pitting Diaspididae occurs and this conservancy occurs leads to that that inflaming Vistula occurs. fact10: That the transcending claque does not happens and this overspill does not happens is brought about by that that sphingineness happens. fact11: This aeromechanicness prevents that that sphingineness does not occurs. fact12: If the amelioration and the totaled happens then this yachtinging occurs. fact13: That inflaming Vistula happens. fact14: If that pitting Diaspididae occurs and this conservancy occurs then that inflaming Vistula does not occurs. fact15: If this unmodulatedness does not occurs and this guess does not occurs then this aeromechanicness occurs. fact16: If that Italic happens then this unmodulatedness does not occurs and this guess does not occurs. fact17: That imposing Pseudomonas does not happens and that unstagedness does not occurs if this overspill does not happens. fact18: That this alphamericness occurs triggers that that imposing Pseudomonas happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That that inflaming Vistula does not happens is triggered by this conservancy. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this conservancy occurs.; fact3 & assump1 -> int1: That pitting Diaspididae occurs and this conservancy occurs.; int1 & fact14 -> int2: That inflaming Vistula does not occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That portulaca brays rancidity and is a byzant.

({C}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: That portulaca is not septal. fact2: If that portulaca is not catoptric then it is a byzant. fact3: That portulaca brays rancidity if it is a Poland. fact4: That portulaca is a byzant if that portulaca is not septal. fact5: That portulaca is not a kind of a Poland if this biennial is not a kind of a honeycombed. fact6: That portulaca is a Poland. fact7: If the fact that that something is a honeycombed and it is a Poland hold is wrong then it is not septal. fact8: This bullfight is septal and it brays rancidity if there is some man such that it is septal. fact9: That portulaca is nomothetic if that portulaca is a Poland. fact10: That that portulaca brays rancidity and she/he is a byzant does not hold if this biennial is not septal. fact11: If this platitudinarian does not reload the fact that this biennial is a honeycombed and the one is a Poland does not hold.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} fact2: ¬{CE}{a} -> {B}{a} fact3: {D}{a} -> {C}{a} fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact5: ¬{E}{b} -> ¬{D}{a} fact6: {D}{a} fact7: (x): ¬({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{A}x fact8: (x): {A}x -> ({A}{gq} & {C}{gq}) fact9: {D}{a} -> {BJ}{a} fact10: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({C}{a} & {B}{a}) fact11: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({E}{b} & {D}{b})

The fact that that portulaca brays rancidity and is a byzant does not hold.

¬({C}{a} & {B}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That portulaca is not septal. fact2: If that portulaca is not catoptric then it is a byzant. fact3: That portulaca brays rancidity if it is a Poland. fact4: That portulaca is a byzant if that portulaca is not septal. fact5: That portulaca is not a kind of a Poland if this biennial is not a kind of a honeycombed. fact6: That portulaca is a Poland. fact7: If the fact that that something is a honeycombed and it is a Poland hold is wrong then it is not septal. fact8: This bullfight is septal and it brays rancidity if there is some man such that it is septal. fact9: That portulaca is nomothetic if that portulaca is a Poland. fact10: That that portulaca brays rancidity and she/he is a byzant does not hold if this biennial is not septal. fact11: If this platitudinarian does not reload the fact that this biennial is a honeycombed and the one is a Poland does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That portulaca brays rancidity and is a byzant. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact1 -> int1: That portulaca is a kind of a byzant.; fact3 & fact6 -> int2: That portulaca brays rancidity.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

There exists no one that is a partisan and/or not a Rhizopogon.

(x): ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x)

fact1: Everything is not a rebus. fact2: There exists no person that detaches Balder or is not a kind of a Himalayish or both. fact3: Every person does not iterate disquieted. fact4: There is nobody such that it is a squish and/or it does not devise Portulacaceae. fact5: There exists no one that does surtax CJD and/or does not conjugate 10. fact6: Everything is not a kind of a Menander. fact7: Everything is tangible. fact8: There exists nothing such that it is a Stalinist and/or it is not a metacarpal. fact9: There is no person such that the person is a induration or the person is not amphiprotic or both. fact10: There exists nobody such that it is a Menander and/or it is not a metacarpal. fact11: There exists nobody such that that person is a Balarama and/or is not a replaceability. fact12: There exists nothing that is nonrenewable or does not seal Demavend or both. fact13: Everything empales memento and the thing is narial. fact14: There is nothing such that that is not non-connubial or that does not devise Portulacaceae or both. fact15: There is nothing such that that either surtaxes CJD or is non-prodromic or both. fact16: Everything is not a partisan. fact17: The fact that something is a clan but it does not cling ISI is wrong if it is narial. fact18: There is nothing that is a tipped and/or not pituitary. fact19: There exists nothing such that the thing is a kind of a ThD or the thing is not a Passover or both. fact20: Everything does not implant Thucydides.

fact1: (x): ¬{IO}x fact2: (x): ¬({A}x v ¬{CQ}x) fact3: (x): ¬{K}x fact4: (x): ¬({I}x v ¬{BL}x) fact5: (x): ¬({DQ}x v ¬{JI}x) fact6: (x): ¬{FD}x fact7: (x): ¬{BO}x fact8: (x): ¬({FH}x v ¬{JH}x) fact9: (x): ¬({CN}x v ¬{GP}x) fact10: (x): ¬({FD}x v ¬{JH}x) fact11: (x): ¬({FU}x v ¬{FP}x) fact12: (x): ¬({EG}x v ¬{HT}x) fact13: (x): ({E}x & {D}x) fact14: (x): ¬({IS}x v ¬{BL}x) fact15: (x): ¬({DQ}x v ¬{HN}x) fact16: (x): ¬{AA}x fact17: (x): {D}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) fact18: (x): ¬({HB}x v ¬{JK}x) fact19: (x): ¬({BQ}x v ¬{AE}x) fact20: (x): ¬{EF}x

There is no person that is a blasted or not a nazi or both.

(x): ¬({CD}x v ¬{FQ}x)

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is not a rebus. fact2: There exists no person that detaches Balder or is not a kind of a Himalayish or both. fact3: Every person does not iterate disquieted. fact4: There is nobody such that it is a squish and/or it does not devise Portulacaceae. fact5: There exists no one that does surtax CJD and/or does not conjugate 10. fact6: Everything is not a kind of a Menander. fact7: Everything is tangible. fact8: There exists nothing such that it is a Stalinist and/or it is not a metacarpal. fact9: There is no person such that the person is a induration or the person is not amphiprotic or both. fact10: There exists nobody such that it is a Menander and/or it is not a metacarpal. fact11: There exists nobody such that that person is a Balarama and/or is not a replaceability. fact12: There exists nothing that is nonrenewable or does not seal Demavend or both. fact13: Everything empales memento and the thing is narial. fact14: There is nothing such that that is not non-connubial or that does not devise Portulacaceae or both. fact15: There is nothing such that that either surtaxes CJD or is non-prodromic or both. fact16: Everything is not a partisan. fact17: The fact that something is a clan but it does not cling ISI is wrong if it is narial. fact18: There is nothing that is a tipped and/or not pituitary. fact19: There exists nothing such that the thing is a kind of a ThD or the thing is not a Passover or both. fact20: Everything does not implant Thucydides. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists no one that is a partisan and/or not a Rhizopogon. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That spyglass is intertidal and/or that is not a Appalachian.

({C}{b} v ¬{B}{b})

fact1: There is no man that is a Appalachian and not a Ninib. fact2: If this antiseptic is obedient then the fact that this clutch is a Ninib hold. fact3: That spyglass is intertidal and/or it is not a Appalachian if this clutch is a Ninib. fact4: If this clutch is a kind of a Ninib that spyglass is intertidal and/or a Appalachian. fact5: There exists no person such that this one is an artiodactyl and obedient. fact6: This clutch is a Ninib if the fact that this antiseptic is an artiodactyl but it is not obedient does not hold. fact7: This clutch is a kind of a Ninib and/or it is not obedient if this antiseptic is a Appalachian. fact8: That this antiseptic is an artiodactyl and this thing is obedient is incorrect. fact9: There exists nobody that is an artiodactyl and is not obedient.

fact1: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact2: {AB}{aa} -> {A}{a} fact3: {A}{a} -> ({C}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) fact4: {A}{a} -> ({C}{b} v {B}{b}) fact5: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact6: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {A}{a} fact7: {B}{aa} -> ({A}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact8: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact9: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There is no man that is a Appalachian and not a Ninib. fact2: If this antiseptic is obedient then the fact that this clutch is a Ninib hold. fact3: That spyglass is intertidal and/or it is not a Appalachian if this clutch is a Ninib. fact4: If this clutch is a kind of a Ninib that spyglass is intertidal and/or a Appalachian. fact5: There exists no person such that this one is an artiodactyl and obedient. fact6: This clutch is a Ninib if the fact that this antiseptic is an artiodactyl but it is not obedient does not hold. fact7: This clutch is a kind of a Ninib and/or it is not obedient if this antiseptic is a Appalachian. fact8: That this antiseptic is an artiodactyl and this thing is obedient is incorrect. fact9: There exists nobody that is an artiodactyl and is not obedient. ; $hypothesis$ = That spyglass is intertidal and/or that is not a Appalachian. ; $proof$ =

fact9 -> int1: That this antiseptic is an artiodactyl and is not obedient is incorrect.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: This clutch is a Ninib.; int2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This brontosaur outwears.

{D}{b}

fact1: This brontosaur does parse. fact2: That frieze is not a kind of a coverage. fact3: If that frieze is not a coverage this brontosaur centers Archiannelida. fact4: Some man does not outwear if this person centers Archiannelida and this person is plain. fact5: That this brontosaur outwears hold if the fact that that frieze outwears hold. fact6: If this brontosaur parses then this brontosaur is plain.

fact1: {E}{b} fact2: ¬{A}{a} fact3: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact4: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{D}x fact5: {D}{a} -> {D}{b} fact6: {E}{b} -> {C}{b}

This brontosaur outwears.

{D}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This brontosaur does parse. fact2: That frieze is not a kind of a coverage. fact3: If that frieze is not a coverage this brontosaur centers Archiannelida. fact4: Some man does not outwear if this person centers Archiannelida and this person is plain. fact5: That this brontosaur outwears hold if the fact that that frieze outwears hold. fact6: If this brontosaur parses then this brontosaur is plain. ; $hypothesis$ = This brontosaur outwears. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact2 -> int1: This brontosaur does center Archiannelida.; fact6 & fact1 -> int2: This brontosaur is plain.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This brontosaur centers Archiannelida and he/she is not non-plain.; fact4 -> int4: If this brontosaur does center Archiannelida and is plain then that this brontosaur does not outwear is true.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that chisel is not a Carew hold.

¬{D}{b}

fact1: If the fact that this shifter is not a common and is a kind of an institute is incorrect then this shifter is a shandy. fact2: The fact that some man is a kind of a Carew but it does not part is wrong if it is a kind of a shandy. fact3: Everything does not worry Clangula and is not an institute. fact4: If something disunites operand it is a switch. fact5: If the fact that some man is a twirl but the person does not part does not hold then the person is not a twirl. fact6: The fact that that chisel is a Malpighia hold. fact7: There is somebody such that the fact that this person is a kind of a breeze that is not a kind of a Apia is incorrect. fact8: That someone is both not a switch and a twirl does not hold if it is a Carew. fact9: This codling either is a kind of a switch or does not vest counseling or both. fact10: Something is a Carew and does not disunite operand if it is not a twirl. fact11: If the fact that this special is a Carew but the thing does not part is false that porcupinefish is a Carew. fact12: That chisel is not a Carew if this special is a Carew but that one does not disunite operand. fact13: If someone does not worry Clangula the fact that she is not a common and she is an institute is incorrect. fact14: This special is a twirl. fact15: Something is palmar if this thing warms. fact16: This millettia is not a twirl if the fact that this shifter is a shandy that is a switch is true. fact17: If this special is a switch that that chisel is a Carew is true. fact18: That succinylcholine is a switch. fact19: If that chisel is a switch that chisel is a Carew. fact20: Something is a shandy and is a common if it is not a kind of an institute. fact21: If the pyx is a Tillich then this one disunites operand. fact22: If there exists some man such that the fact that it is a breeze and is not a Apia is false then this shifter does not worry Clangula.

fact1: ¬(¬{G}{d} & {H}{d}) -> {F}{d} fact2: (x): {F}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact3: (x): (¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) fact4: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact5: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{A}x fact6: {EF}{b} fact7: (Ex): ¬({K}x & ¬{L}x) fact8: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) fact9: ({C}{e} v ¬{J}{e}) fact10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({D}x & ¬{B}x) fact11: ¬({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) -> {D}{cg} fact12: ({D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact13: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {H}x) fact14: {A}{a} fact15: (x): {BT}x -> {GM}x fact16: ({F}{d} & {C}{d}) -> ¬{A}{c} fact17: {C}{a} -> {D}{b} fact18: {C}{n} fact19: {C}{b} -> {D}{b} fact20: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {G}x) fact21: {AG}{ig} -> {B}{ig} fact22: (x): ¬({K}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{I}{d}

The fact that that chisel is not a Carew hold.

¬{D}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this shifter is not a common and is a kind of an institute is incorrect then this shifter is a shandy. fact2: The fact that some man is a kind of a Carew but it does not part is wrong if it is a kind of a shandy. fact3: Everything does not worry Clangula and is not an institute. fact4: If something disunites operand it is a switch. fact5: If the fact that some man is a twirl but the person does not part does not hold then the person is not a twirl. fact6: The fact that that chisel is a Malpighia hold. fact7: There is somebody such that the fact that this person is a kind of a breeze that is not a kind of a Apia is incorrect. fact8: That someone is both not a switch and a twirl does not hold if it is a Carew. fact9: This codling either is a kind of a switch or does not vest counseling or both. fact10: Something is a Carew and does not disunite operand if it is not a twirl. fact11: If the fact that this special is a Carew but the thing does not part is false that porcupinefish is a Carew. fact12: That chisel is not a Carew if this special is a Carew but that one does not disunite operand. fact13: If someone does not worry Clangula the fact that she is not a common and she is an institute is incorrect. fact14: This special is a twirl. fact15: Something is palmar if this thing warms. fact16: This millettia is not a twirl if the fact that this shifter is a shandy that is a switch is true. fact17: If this special is a switch that that chisel is a Carew is true. fact18: That succinylcholine is a switch. fact19: If that chisel is a switch that chisel is a Carew. fact20: Something is a shandy and is a common if it is not a kind of an institute. fact21: If the pyx is a Tillich then this one disunites operand. fact22: If there exists some man such that the fact that it is a breeze and is not a Apia is false then this shifter does not worry Clangula. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that chisel is not a Carew hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That psychoanalyzing Persea occurs.

{B}

fact1: This consideration occurs and that psychoanalyzing Persea occurs if that autacoidalness does not occurs. fact2: The fact that that crowing zebibyte happens or this necropsy does not occurs or both is not right. fact3: That moneyedness occurs. fact4: This passiveness occurs and this thudding happens if this Booleanness does not occurs. fact5: The executing Turin does not happens. fact6: The fact that that primiparousness occurs and/or that moneyedness does not happens does not hold if this consideration happens. fact7: If this standing does not occurs then that that autacoidalness does not happens and that habitation happens is true. fact8: That vicinalness happens. fact9: That the fact that this summeriness does not happens and that psychoanalyzing Persea does not happens does not hold is right if this consideration does not occurs. fact10: If the fact that either that primiparousness occurs or that moneyedness does not occurs or both is wrong then that psychoanalyzing Persea does not occurs. fact11: This summeriness occurs if that this summeriness does not occurs and that psychoanalyzing Persea does not occurs is not true. fact12: If the relocation happens that the vaulting occurs and/or that sweepstakes does not happens is wrong. fact13: If the indiscretion happens then the fact that either the Italianness occurs or this apocarpousness does not happens or both is not true. fact14: That that moneyedness does not occurs is prevented by that this consideration occurs. fact15: This consideration does not happens and that autacoidalness does not happens if that habitation occurs. fact16: That that psychoanalyzing Persea does not occurs is true if that that that that primiparousness or that moneyedness or both occurs is correct does not hold is correct. fact17: This cryptologicalness does not happens if that either the ablism occurs or this maneuvering does not happens or both is incorrect. fact18: The viceroyship does not occurs. fact19: The tarantelle does not occurs. fact20: That this requiting successiveness does not occurs yields that that habitation happens and this standing occurs. fact21: This thudding results in that this requiting successiveness happens but this standing does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact2: ¬({GJ} v ¬{DK}) fact3: {AB} fact4: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) fact5: ¬{GA} fact6: {A} -> ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) fact7: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & {D}) fact8: {FP} fact9: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{DH} & ¬{B}) fact10: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact11: ¬(¬{DH} & ¬{B}) -> {DH} fact12: {N} -> ¬({EN} v ¬{ED}) fact13: {AQ} -> ¬({EP} v ¬{HN}) fact14: {A} -> {AB} fact15: {D} -> (¬{A} & ¬{C}) fact16: ¬({AA} v {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact17: ¬({HH} v ¬{T}) -> ¬{AE} fact18: ¬{EJ} fact19: ¬{CF} fact20: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact21: {G} -> ({F} & ¬{E})

That psychoanalyzing Persea occurs.

{B}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This consideration occurs and that psychoanalyzing Persea occurs if that autacoidalness does not occurs. fact2: The fact that that crowing zebibyte happens or this necropsy does not occurs or both is not right. fact3: That moneyedness occurs. fact4: This passiveness occurs and this thudding happens if this Booleanness does not occurs. fact5: The executing Turin does not happens. fact6: The fact that that primiparousness occurs and/or that moneyedness does not happens does not hold if this consideration happens. fact7: If this standing does not occurs then that that autacoidalness does not happens and that habitation happens is true. fact8: That vicinalness happens. fact9: That the fact that this summeriness does not happens and that psychoanalyzing Persea does not happens does not hold is right if this consideration does not occurs. fact10: If the fact that either that primiparousness occurs or that moneyedness does not occurs or both is wrong then that psychoanalyzing Persea does not occurs. fact11: This summeriness occurs if that this summeriness does not occurs and that psychoanalyzing Persea does not occurs is not true. fact12: If the relocation happens that the vaulting occurs and/or that sweepstakes does not happens is wrong. fact13: If the indiscretion happens then the fact that either the Italianness occurs or this apocarpousness does not happens or both is not true. fact14: That that moneyedness does not occurs is prevented by that this consideration occurs. fact15: This consideration does not happens and that autacoidalness does not happens if that habitation occurs. fact16: That that psychoanalyzing Persea does not occurs is true if that that that that primiparousness or that moneyedness or both occurs is correct does not hold is correct. fact17: This cryptologicalness does not happens if that either the ablism occurs or this maneuvering does not happens or both is incorrect. fact18: The viceroyship does not occurs. fact19: The tarantelle does not occurs. fact20: That this requiting successiveness does not occurs yields that that habitation happens and this standing occurs. fact21: This thudding results in that this requiting successiveness happens but this standing does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That psychoanalyzing Persea occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That annexation does not happens.

¬{D}

fact1: The fact that that Malteseness does not happens hold if both the acidimetricness and the hydroponicness happens. fact2: That freighting Nanning does not occurs if that that that freighting Nanning happens but that confiscating Aulostomus does not occurs is correct is false. fact3: Both the competitoriness and this collagenicness happens. fact4: That enlistment is prevented by that this paperwork does not happens and that annexation does not occurs. fact5: That that deflationariness happens and that bidirectionalness occurs is brought about by that that freighting Nanning does not happens. fact6: The fact that that that freighting Nanning happens and that confiscating Aulostomus does not happens is true does not hold. fact7: That constitutionalness happens. fact8: That actinotherapy occurs. fact9: If that actinotherapy does not happens then this paperwork does not occurs and that annexation does not happens. fact10: If that enlistment and this paperwork occurs then that annexation does not occurs. fact11: That actinotherapy happens if that bidirectionalness occurs. fact12: If the fact that that enlistment occurs but that annexation does not happens is not correct that annexation happens. fact13: That constitutionalness triggers that that enlistment occurs. fact14: This overkill happens and this collagenicness occurs. fact15: That actinotherapy happens and this paperwork happens. fact16: The eluding and that unsoundness occurs. fact17: If that constitutionalness does not happens that that enlistment happens but that annexation does not happens is not right.

fact1: ({AU} & {EF}) -> ¬{EM} fact2: ¬({H} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{H} fact3: ({P} & {HF}) fact4: (¬{C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact5: ¬{H} -> ({G} & {F}) fact6: ¬({H} & ¬{J}) fact7: {A} fact8: {E} fact9: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact10: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact11: {F} -> {E} fact12: ¬({B} & ¬{D}) -> {D} fact13: {A} -> {B} fact14: ({AC} & {HF}) fact15: ({E} & {C}) fact16: ({HQ} & {IQ}) fact17: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & ¬{D})

That annexation occurs.

{D}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that Malteseness does not happens hold if both the acidimetricness and the hydroponicness happens. fact2: That freighting Nanning does not occurs if that that that freighting Nanning happens but that confiscating Aulostomus does not occurs is correct is false. fact3: Both the competitoriness and this collagenicness happens. fact4: That enlistment is prevented by that this paperwork does not happens and that annexation does not occurs. fact5: That that deflationariness happens and that bidirectionalness occurs is brought about by that that freighting Nanning does not happens. fact6: The fact that that that freighting Nanning happens and that confiscating Aulostomus does not happens is true does not hold. fact7: That constitutionalness happens. fact8: That actinotherapy occurs. fact9: If that actinotherapy does not happens then this paperwork does not occurs and that annexation does not happens. fact10: If that enlistment and this paperwork occurs then that annexation does not occurs. fact11: That actinotherapy happens if that bidirectionalness occurs. fact12: If the fact that that enlistment occurs but that annexation does not happens is not correct that annexation happens. fact13: That constitutionalness triggers that that enlistment occurs. fact14: This overkill happens and this collagenicness occurs. fact15: That actinotherapy happens and this paperwork happens. fact16: The eluding and that unsoundness occurs. fact17: If that constitutionalness does not happens that that enlistment happens but that annexation does not happens is not right. ; $hypothesis$ = That annexation does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact7 -> int1: That enlistment occurs.; fact15 -> int2: This paperwork happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Both that enlistment and this paperwork occurs.; int3 & fact10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That acetylicness does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: That weakening and this embedding Lysichitum occurs. fact2: Notthat miscounting but that weakening occurs if this embedding Lysichitum does not happens. fact3: If that theoreticness happens that miscounting happens. fact4: If this winning Urocystis does not occurs then the fact that this mouone obstruent does not occurs and that unmotorizedness does not happens does not hold. fact5: That acetylicness does not happens if that miscounting occurs and that weakening happens. fact6: Both that diffusedness and that ectodermalness happens if this sinking does not occurs. fact7: If that denigration occurs this embedding Lysichitum does not occurs. fact8: That this winning Urocystis does not occurs is not false if the fact that notthe oncologicalness but this winning Urocystis occurs does not hold. fact9: That that denigration does not occurs hold. fact10: That that denigration happens is caused by that ectodermalness. fact11: That that theoreticness happens hold. fact12: This sinking does not occurs if that that fraud does not occurs and the imperativeness does not occurs is incorrect. fact13: The fact that if that the mouthing obstruent does not happens and that unmotorizedness does not happens does not hold then the dirtiness occurs hold. fact14: If the dirtiness occurs then that that fraud does not happens and the imperativeness does not happens does not hold.

fact1: ({C} & {E}) fact2: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & {C}) fact3: {A} -> {B} fact4: ¬{O} -> ¬(¬{M} & ¬{N}) fact5: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact6: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) fact7: {F} -> ¬{E} fact8: ¬(¬{Q} & {O}) -> ¬{O} fact9: ¬{F} fact10: {G} -> {F} fact11: {A} fact12: ¬(¬{J} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{I} fact13: ¬(¬{M} & ¬{N}) -> {L} fact14: {L} -> ¬(¬{J} & ¬{K})

That nonrepresentationalness occurs.

{CB}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That weakening and this embedding Lysichitum occurs. fact2: Notthat miscounting but that weakening occurs if this embedding Lysichitum does not happens. fact3: If that theoreticness happens that miscounting happens. fact4: If this winning Urocystis does not occurs then the fact that this mouone obstruent does not occurs and that unmotorizedness does not happens does not hold. fact5: That acetylicness does not happens if that miscounting occurs and that weakening happens. fact6: Both that diffusedness and that ectodermalness happens if this sinking does not occurs. fact7: If that denigration occurs this embedding Lysichitum does not occurs. fact8: That this winning Urocystis does not occurs is not false if the fact that notthe oncologicalness but this winning Urocystis occurs does not hold. fact9: That that denigration does not occurs hold. fact10: That that denigration happens is caused by that ectodermalness. fact11: That that theoreticness happens hold. fact12: This sinking does not occurs if that that fraud does not occurs and the imperativeness does not occurs is incorrect. fact13: The fact that if that the mouthing obstruent does not happens and that unmotorizedness does not happens does not hold then the dirtiness occurs hold. fact14: If the dirtiness occurs then that that fraud does not happens and the imperativeness does not happens does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That acetylicness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact11 -> int1: That miscounting happens.; fact1 -> int2: That weakening occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That miscounting happens and that weakening occurs.; int3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This resin is not a agrobiology but that one is gynaecological.

(¬{D}{d} & {C}{d})

fact1: If this condensation extenuates epidemiology then that thing misconceives midnight. fact2: this midnight misconceives Pat. fact3: If Pat is predictable Pat does extenuate epidemiology and it rewrites. fact4: This resin is not a agrobiology but he is gynaecological if the collagen is gynaecological. fact5: Pat misconceives midnight. fact6: Something is a agrobiology if it misconceives midnight. fact7: Pat is not unpredictable if that either it is blastemic or it reinvigorateds dozens or both is not correct. fact8: If Pat extenuates epidemiology then this resin extenuates epidemiology. fact9: This hatch does extenuate epidemiology if Pat misconceives midnight. fact10: That somebody is not a agrobiology and not non-gynaecological does not hold if it misconceives midnight. fact11: If some man is gynaecological then he extenuates epidemiology. fact12: If this hatch extenuates epidemiology then the collagen is gynaecological.

fact1: {B}{ja} -> {A}{ja} fact2: {AA}{aa} fact3: ¬{F}{a} -> ({B}{a} & {E}{a}) fact4: {C}{c} -> (¬{D}{d} & {C}{d}) fact5: {A}{a} fact6: (x): {A}x -> {D}x fact7: ¬({H}{a} v {G}{a}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact8: {B}{a} -> {B}{d} fact9: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact10: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {C}x) fact11: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact12: {B}{b} -> {C}{c}

That this resin is both not a agrobiology and gynaecological does not hold.

¬(¬{D}{d} & {C}{d})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this condensation extenuates epidemiology then that thing misconceives midnight. fact2: this midnight misconceives Pat. fact3: If Pat is predictable Pat does extenuate epidemiology and it rewrites. fact4: This resin is not a agrobiology but he is gynaecological if the collagen is gynaecological. fact5: Pat misconceives midnight. fact6: Something is a agrobiology if it misconceives midnight. fact7: Pat is not unpredictable if that either it is blastemic or it reinvigorateds dozens or both is not correct. fact8: If Pat extenuates epidemiology then this resin extenuates epidemiology. fact9: This hatch does extenuate epidemiology if Pat misconceives midnight. fact10: That somebody is not a agrobiology and not non-gynaecological does not hold if it misconceives midnight. fact11: If some man is gynaecological then he extenuates epidemiology. fact12: If this hatch extenuates epidemiology then the collagen is gynaecological. ; $hypothesis$ = This resin is not a agrobiology but that one is gynaecological. ; $proof$ =

fact9 & fact5 -> int1: This hatch extenuates epidemiology.; int1 & fact12 -> int2: The collagen is gynaecological.; int2 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

There exists something such that it is a cryogeny and it is a euphemism.

(Ex): ({C}x & {B}x)

fact1: This mavis is a Bombycilla. fact2: This mavis is a kind of a cryogeny if it is a Bombycilla. fact3: This mavis is a dishonourableness and that thing is a euphemism.

fact1: {D}{a} fact2: {D}{a} -> {C}{a} fact3: ({A}{a} & {B}{a})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This mavis is a Bombycilla. fact2: This mavis is a kind of a cryogeny if it is a Bombycilla. fact3: This mavis is a dishonourableness and that thing is a euphemism. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists something such that it is a cryogeny and it is a euphemism. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> int1: This mavis is a kind of a euphemism.; fact2 & fact1 -> int2: This mavis is a cryogeny.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This mavis is a cryogeny and is a euphemism.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that there exists some man such that if he is not a NTIS and he is not a uselessness he is not austenitic is false.

¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x)

fact1: The tag does not channel Picea if it theologizes and it is not austenitic. fact2: If this polypropenonitrile is not a kind of a hereness and it is not a Madia then that this polypropenonitrile is not a NTIS hold. fact3: There is some person such that if this person is not a Astacus and not a gustation this person is not a vulcanology. fact4: There exists some person such that if he/she is not a NTIS and he/she is a uselessness then he/she is not austenitic.

fact1: ({DD}{fe} & ¬{B}{fe}) -> ¬{AO}{fe} fact2: (¬{IA}{aa} & ¬{HA}{aa}) -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact3: (Ex): (¬{FR}x & ¬{HM}x) -> ¬{BT}x fact4: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The tag does not channel Picea if it theologizes and it is not austenitic. fact2: If this polypropenonitrile is not a kind of a hereness and it is not a Madia then that this polypropenonitrile is not a NTIS hold. fact3: There is some person such that if this person is not a Astacus and not a gustation this person is not a vulcanology. fact4: There exists some person such that if he/she is not a NTIS and he/she is a uselessness then he/she is not austenitic. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that there exists some man such that if he is not a NTIS and he is not a uselessness he is not austenitic is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This steroidalness does not occurs.

¬{A}

fact1: If this steroidalness does not occurs both the banding mastered and this shoemaking happens. fact2: This Djiboutian occurs. fact3: This steroidalness happens and this Djiboutian occurs. fact4: This steroidalness does not occurs if this Djiboutian occurs and that doing does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{A} -> ({CG} & {EC}) fact2: {B} fact3: ({A} & {B}) fact4: ({B} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{A}

This steroidalness does not occurs.

¬{A}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this steroidalness does not occurs both the banding mastered and this shoemaking happens. fact2: This Djiboutian occurs. fact3: This steroidalness happens and this Djiboutian occurs. fact4: This steroidalness does not occurs if this Djiboutian occurs and that doing does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This steroidalness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That flutist does not sun Perciformes and it do notwnsize picturesqueness.

(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: That flutist do notwnsize picturesqueness. fact2: If that flutist downsize picturesqueness then this male is iritic. fact3: This shortgrass is a nakedness. fact4: This shortgrass is a nakedness and it is iritic. fact5: If that this shortgrass do notwnsize picturesqueness and it is not iritic is false that flutist is a kind of a nakedness. fact6: This male is not iritic if this shortgrass is a kind of a nakedness and is iritic. fact7: If some man does not certify Perissodactyla that person does not subcontract and that person is a genotype. fact8: Everything does not certify Perissodactyla. fact9: If that this shortgrass does not sun Perciformes and do notwnsize picturesqueness does not hold then the fact that that flutist is iritic hold. fact10: The fact that that flutist does not sun Perciformes but that person downsizes picturesqueness is false. fact11: If that flutist is a nakedness and downsizes picturesqueness this shortgrass do notwnsizes picturesqueness. fact12: This male is a Viminaria if this shortgrass is a Viminaria. fact13: This male is iritic if the fact that that flutist does not sun Perciformes and do notwnsize picturesqueness is not true. fact14: That flutist is reversionary and it is iritic. fact15: This male is both not a scarceness and not a Scythian.

fact1: ¬{AB}{a} fact2: {AB}{a} -> {B}{b} fact3: {C}{c} fact4: ({C}{c} & {B}{c}) fact5: ¬(¬{AB}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) -> {C}{a} fact6: ({C}{c} & {B}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact7: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{E}x & {F}x) fact8: (x): ¬{G}x fact9: ¬(¬{AA}{c} & ¬{AB}{c}) -> {B}{a} fact10: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact11: ({C}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{c} fact12: {A}{c} -> {A}{b} fact13: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact14: ({FL}{a} & {B}{a}) fact15: (¬{FS}{b} & ¬{HA}{b})

Let's assume that that that flutist does not sun Perciformes and this do notwnsize picturesqueness is false.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That flutist do notwnsize picturesqueness. fact2: If that flutist downsize picturesqueness then this male is iritic. fact3: This shortgrass is a nakedness. fact4: This shortgrass is a nakedness and it is iritic. fact5: If that this shortgrass do notwnsize picturesqueness and it is not iritic is false that flutist is a kind of a nakedness. fact6: This male is not iritic if this shortgrass is a kind of a nakedness and is iritic. fact7: If some man does not certify Perissodactyla that person does not subcontract and that person is a genotype. fact8: Everything does not certify Perissodactyla. fact9: If that this shortgrass does not sun Perciformes and do notwnsize picturesqueness does not hold then the fact that that flutist is iritic hold. fact10: The fact that that flutist does not sun Perciformes but that person downsizes picturesqueness is false. fact11: If that flutist is a nakedness and downsizes picturesqueness this shortgrass do notwnsizes picturesqueness. fact12: This male is a Viminaria if this shortgrass is a Viminaria. fact13: This male is iritic if the fact that that flutist does not sun Perciformes and do notwnsize picturesqueness is not true. fact14: That flutist is reversionary and it is iritic. fact15: This male is both not a scarceness and not a Scythian. ; $hypothesis$ = That flutist does not sun Perciformes and it do notwnsize picturesqueness. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that flutist does not sun Perciformes and this do notwnsize picturesqueness is false.; fact13 & assump1 -> int1: This male is iritic.; fact6 & fact4 -> int2: This male is not iritic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this brave is a slice but it is not a glittering does not hold.

¬({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a})

fact1: That this brave is a Lebanese and passes is not correct. fact2: That this brave fabricates Psalms and passes is incorrect. fact3: If the fact that something is organismal and is not precocial is wrong then that is not organismal. fact4: Everything jazzes. fact5: The fact that this brave is not reportable and passes is false. fact6: That some man is a kind of a slice that is not a glittering is not right if she is not organismal. fact7: If that that anchovy does pass and it is a Astor is false it does not expatiate discernment. fact8: If that micrometeorite does not pass it does not fabricate Psalms. fact9: That something is a kind of a slice and it is a glittering is wrong if it is not organismal. fact10: The fact that this brave is a slice and this is a glittering is incorrect.

fact1: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: ¬({CQ}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact3: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}x fact4: (x): {E}x fact5: ¬({HE}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact6: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) fact7: ¬({AB}{ag} & {AO}{ag}) -> ¬{CP}{ag} fact8: ¬{AB}{ef} -> ¬{CQ}{ef} fact9: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) fact10: ¬({A}{a} & {C}{a})

This brave is a kind of a slice and is not a glittering.

({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this brave is a Lebanese and passes is not correct. fact2: That this brave fabricates Psalms and passes is incorrect. fact3: If the fact that something is organismal and is not precocial is wrong then that is not organismal. fact4: Everything jazzes. fact5: The fact that this brave is not reportable and passes is false. fact6: That some man is a kind of a slice that is not a glittering is not right if she is not organismal. fact7: If that that anchovy does pass and it is a Astor is false it does not expatiate discernment. fact8: If that micrometeorite does not pass it does not fabricate Psalms. fact9: That something is a kind of a slice and it is a glittering is wrong if it is not organismal. fact10: The fact that this brave is a slice and this is a glittering is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = That this brave is a slice but it is not a glittering does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That unpolishedness does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: That cannonading does not happens if the fact that this excursion does not happens but that parachuting averment happens is incorrect. fact2: Both the parting and the testamentariness happens. fact3: If this excursion does not occurs then that unpolishedness and that parachuting averment happens. fact4: If that serialisation does not happens then that priming and that unpolishedness happens. fact5: The portent is prevented by that both the judging divorced and the evolutionariness happens. fact6: This oropharyngealness occurs. fact7: This excursion happens. fact8: That parachuting averment occurs. fact9: The ungualness happens. fact10: If the fact that that perfuming cyclopia does not occurs and this elementalness does not occurs does not hold that serialisation does not occurs. fact11: That legibleness does not occurs. fact12: That incommutableness and this cryptogamousness happens. fact13: That that beholdening does not happens and this departmentalness does not happens is triggered by that that earthing poor happens. fact14: That advancement and the judging divorced occurs. fact15: That that unpolishedness happens is prevented by that that that parachuting averment and this excursion occurs is true. fact16: The fact that that suborbitalness does not occurs is right if that beholdening does not happens. fact17: That that earperson poor does not occurs is prevented by that this amassing happens. fact18: That this diverting Pickeringia happens and the flavouring happens prevents the declaring Trifolium. fact19: The stopping is prevented by that that legibleness happens and this vivification happens. fact20: The fact that that that perfuming cyclopia does not happens and this elementalness does not occurs hold is wrong if that suborbitalness does not occurs. fact21: Both the equalization and the decampment happens. fact22: The fact that the lachrymalness does not happens hold.

fact1: ¬(¬{B} & {A}) -> ¬{FI} fact2: ({CG} & {HR}) fact3: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) fact4: ¬{E} -> ({D} & {C}) fact5: ({DB} & {Q}) -> ¬{DO} fact6: {GQ} fact7: {B} fact8: {A} fact9: {IP} fact10: ¬(¬{G} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} fact11: ¬{CF} fact12: ({BE} & {AN}) fact13: {K} -> (¬{I} & ¬{J}) fact14: ({AU} & {DB}) fact15: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact16: ¬{I} -> ¬{H} fact17: {L} -> {K} fact18: ({EP} & {DS}) -> ¬{CU} fact19: ({CF} & {EH}) -> ¬{CO} fact20: ¬{H} -> ¬(¬{G} & ¬{F}) fact21: ({GC} & {ES}) fact22: ¬{BN}

That unpolishedness occurs.

{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That cannonading does not happens if the fact that this excursion does not happens but that parachuting averment happens is incorrect. fact2: Both the parting and the testamentariness happens. fact3: If this excursion does not occurs then that unpolishedness and that parachuting averment happens. fact4: If that serialisation does not happens then that priming and that unpolishedness happens. fact5: The portent is prevented by that both the judging divorced and the evolutionariness happens. fact6: This oropharyngealness occurs. fact7: This excursion happens. fact8: That parachuting averment occurs. fact9: The ungualness happens. fact10: If the fact that that perfuming cyclopia does not occurs and this elementalness does not occurs does not hold that serialisation does not occurs. fact11: That legibleness does not occurs. fact12: That incommutableness and this cryptogamousness happens. fact13: That that beholdening does not happens and this departmentalness does not happens is triggered by that that earthing poor happens. fact14: That advancement and the judging divorced occurs. fact15: That that unpolishedness happens is prevented by that that that parachuting averment and this excursion occurs is true. fact16: The fact that that suborbitalness does not occurs is right if that beholdening does not happens. fact17: That that earperson poor does not occurs is prevented by that this amassing happens. fact18: That this diverting Pickeringia happens and the flavouring happens prevents the declaring Trifolium. fact19: The stopping is prevented by that that legibleness happens and this vivification happens. fact20: The fact that that that perfuming cyclopia does not happens and this elementalness does not occurs hold is wrong if that suborbitalness does not occurs. fact21: Both the equalization and the decampment happens. fact22: The fact that the lachrymalness does not happens hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That unpolishedness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact7 -> int1: That parachuting averment and this excursion occurs.; int1 & fact15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that pacha is a Baeda but it is not a mutualism does not hold.

¬({A}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa})

fact1: Everything does not embalm Salicornia and this antiquates.

fact1: (x): (¬{C}x & {D}x)

Everyone omens merriness and does not front berceuse.

(x): ({EK}x & ¬{BL}x)

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everything does not embalm Salicornia and this antiquates. ; $hypothesis$ = That that pacha is a Baeda but it is not a mutualism does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this cozy stagnates flashiness and unfrozens does not hold.

¬({B}{a} & {C}{a})

fact1: That this sarcomere is not a Lythraceae but it is a partitive is wrong if this sarcomere does not unfrozen. fact2: That this cozy does not unfrozen and it is not micropylar does not hold if this rouser does not anglicize Thalassoma. fact3: This cozy is a brazenness if that that is not a brazenness and does not anglicize Thalassoma does not hold. fact4: The fact that this rouser does not stagnate flashiness but that thing anglicizes Thalassoma is false. fact5: If the fact that some man does not unfrozen and he/she is not micropylar is wrong he/she unfrozen. fact6: That this rouser does not anglicize Thalassoma and does not unfrozen is incorrect if this cozy does not frisk surname. fact7: If the fact that this rouser does not rebuff parentage and is not micropylar is wrong this rouser is intertidal. fact8: This rouser frisks surname. fact9: This rouser does not befriend Confucianism. fact10: If the fact that some person is not uninquiring and it does not chirp Carlina does not hold that it stagnates flashiness is right. fact11: That pepsin is not uninquiring. fact12: That this cozy is non-uninquiring one that does not chirp Carlina is incorrect if the person does not frisk surname. fact13: That if that something is not intertidal and this thing does not whisper gestation does not hold then this thing is intertidal hold. fact14: the Thalassoma does not anglicize rouser. fact15: This rouser does not anglicize Thalassoma. fact16: If this rouser is not micropylar then that this cozy does not anglicize Thalassoma and does not frisk surname does not hold. fact17: that surname does not frisk cozy. fact18: The motorcar is not micropylar. fact19: If that some person does not frisk surname and is not uninquiring does not hold then he frisk surname.

fact1: ¬{C}{ad} -> ¬(¬{EF}{ad} & {DD}{ad}) fact2: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact3: ¬(¬{FC}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> {FC}{a} fact4: ¬(¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{E}x) -> {C}x fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact7: ¬(¬{FU}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> {GE}{b} fact8: {A}{b} fact9: ¬{HJ}{b} fact10: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact11: ¬{AA}{j} fact12: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact13: (x): ¬(¬{GE}x & ¬{IH}x) -> {GE}x fact14: ¬{AE}{ac} fact15: ¬{D}{b} fact16: ¬{E}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact17: ¬{AC}{aa} fact18: ¬{E}{o} fact19: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{AA}x) -> {A}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this sarcomere is not a Lythraceae but it is a partitive is wrong if this sarcomere does not unfrozen. fact2: That this cozy does not unfrozen and it is not micropylar does not hold if this rouser does not anglicize Thalassoma. fact3: This cozy is a brazenness if that that is not a brazenness and does not anglicize Thalassoma does not hold. fact4: The fact that this rouser does not stagnate flashiness but that thing anglicizes Thalassoma is false. fact5: If the fact that some man does not unfrozen and he/she is not micropylar is wrong he/she unfrozen. fact6: That this rouser does not anglicize Thalassoma and does not unfrozen is incorrect if this cozy does not frisk surname. fact7: If the fact that this rouser does not rebuff parentage and is not micropylar is wrong this rouser is intertidal. fact8: This rouser frisks surname. fact9: This rouser does not befriend Confucianism. fact10: If the fact that some person is not uninquiring and it does not chirp Carlina does not hold that it stagnates flashiness is right. fact11: That pepsin is not uninquiring. fact12: That this cozy is non-uninquiring one that does not chirp Carlina is incorrect if the person does not frisk surname. fact13: That if that something is not intertidal and this thing does not whisper gestation does not hold then this thing is intertidal hold. fact14: the Thalassoma does not anglicize rouser. fact15: This rouser does not anglicize Thalassoma. fact16: If this rouser is not micropylar then that this cozy does not anglicize Thalassoma and does not frisk surname does not hold. fact17: that surname does not frisk cozy. fact18: The motorcar is not micropylar. fact19: If that some person does not frisk surname and is not uninquiring does not hold then he frisk surname. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this cozy stagnates flashiness and unfrozens does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Let's assume that this type is a comestible and/or this is not cometary.

({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: This type is a kind of a Erethizontidae that harmonises. fact2: This type is a comestible if that an is not a Fahrenheit and/or that is azonal. fact3: This tope is rheologic and/or does not defraud Gujerat. fact4: The fact that that bagpipe is a Fahrenheit and is azonal is not false if this type is not pachydermic. fact5: This type is not same. fact6: This silex is not a Fahrenheit. fact7: This ependyma is not azonal. fact8: This type is not non-azonal and is a Fahrenheit. fact9: This type is a Athrotaxis. fact10: This type is not a comestible. fact11: That taconite is not anguine if that taconite supposes and/or is not a comestible. fact12: This pseudopod is not azonal. fact13: If this type is a comestible and/or it is not cometary then this type is not azonal. fact14: This type is unweaned. fact15: If the fact that that an either is same or is pachydermic or both is wrong this type is not pachydermic. fact16: This mod is a Fahrenheit. fact17: That the cinnamon spams Cystophora and/or it is not just does not hold.

fact1: ({HL}{a} & {FG}{a}) fact2: (¬{A}{b} v {B}{b}) -> {AA}{a} fact3: ({GL}{ic} v ¬{JB}{ic}) fact4: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) fact5: ¬{D}{a} fact6: ¬{A}{bi} fact7: ¬{B}{i} fact8: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact9: {DI}{a} fact10: ¬{AA}{a} fact11: ({AO}{he} v ¬{AA}{he}) -> ¬{EC}{he} fact12: ¬{B}{bb} fact13: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact14: {DM}{a} fact15: ¬({D}{b} v {C}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact16: {A}{ag} fact17: ¬({CG}{bm} v ¬{CH}{bm})

Let's assume that this type is a comestible and/or this is not cometary.

({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This type is a kind of a Erethizontidae that harmonises. fact2: This type is a comestible if that an is not a Fahrenheit and/or that is azonal. fact3: This tope is rheologic and/or does not defraud Gujerat. fact4: The fact that that bagpipe is a Fahrenheit and is azonal is not false if this type is not pachydermic. fact5: This type is not same. fact6: This silex is not a Fahrenheit. fact7: This ependyma is not azonal. fact8: This type is not non-azonal and is a Fahrenheit. fact9: This type is a Athrotaxis. fact10: This type is not a comestible. fact11: That taconite is not anguine if that taconite supposes and/or is not a comestible. fact12: This pseudopod is not azonal. fact13: If this type is a comestible and/or it is not cometary then this type is not azonal. fact14: This type is unweaned. fact15: If the fact that that an either is same or is pachydermic or both is wrong this type is not pachydermic. fact16: This mod is a Fahrenheit. fact17: That the cinnamon spams Cystophora and/or it is not just does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that this type is a comestible and/or this is not cometary. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this type is a comestible and/or this is not cometary.; fact13 & assump1 -> int1: This type is not azonal.; fact8 -> int2: This type is azonal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Isabelle is not a Plovdiv and does not act compounded.

(¬{C}{b} & ¬{D}{b})

fact1: Isabelle does not thud fasciolopsiasis if it is both non-hypertonic and a hr. fact2: This gleba is not a Plovdiv. fact3: If Isabelle is not a hr the fact that Isabelle is not a Plovdiv and does not act compounded does not hold. fact4: If that Reef is a hr that thuds fasciolopsiasis Isabelle is not a Plovdiv. fact5: If something does not fancify Canetti and is hypertonic then it does not act compounded. fact6: That Reef is not a ECOSOC and not a Truth. fact7: That Reef is a Plovdiv. fact8: That Reef is not hypertonic. fact9: This clearing does not fancify Canetti. fact10: That Reef is a hr. fact11: If something fancifies Canetti then that it does thud fasciolopsiasis hold. fact12: that fasciolopsiasis does thud Reef. fact13: that Canetti does not fancify Isabelle. fact14: Isabelle is hypertonic. fact15: Isabelle does not fancify Canetti. fact16: That Reef does thud fasciolopsiasis. fact17: Isabelle is neuronic.

fact1: (¬{E}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact2: ¬{C}{m} fact3: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact4: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact5: (x): (¬{F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact6: (¬{DP}{a} & ¬{HB}{a}) fact7: {C}{a} fact8: ¬{E}{a} fact9: ¬{F}{u} fact10: {A}{a} fact11: (x): {F}x -> {B}x fact12: {AA}{aa} fact13: ¬{AC}{ac} fact14: {E}{b} fact15: ¬{F}{b} fact16: {B}{a} fact17: {BD}{b}

The fact that Isabelle is not a Plovdiv and does not act compounded is not correct.

¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{D}{b})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Isabelle does not thud fasciolopsiasis if it is both non-hypertonic and a hr. fact2: This gleba is not a Plovdiv. fact3: If Isabelle is not a hr the fact that Isabelle is not a Plovdiv and does not act compounded does not hold. fact4: If that Reef is a hr that thuds fasciolopsiasis Isabelle is not a Plovdiv. fact5: If something does not fancify Canetti and is hypertonic then it does not act compounded. fact6: That Reef is not a ECOSOC and not a Truth. fact7: That Reef is a Plovdiv. fact8: That Reef is not hypertonic. fact9: This clearing does not fancify Canetti. fact10: That Reef is a hr. fact11: If something fancifies Canetti then that it does thud fasciolopsiasis hold. fact12: that fasciolopsiasis does thud Reef. fact13: that Canetti does not fancify Isabelle. fact14: Isabelle is hypertonic. fact15: Isabelle does not fancify Canetti. fact16: That Reef does thud fasciolopsiasis. fact17: Isabelle is neuronic. ; $hypothesis$ = Isabelle is not a Plovdiv and does not act compounded. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact16 -> int1: That Reef is a hr and it thuds fasciolopsiasis.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: Isabelle is not a Plovdiv.; fact5 -> int3: Isabelle does not act compounded if the thing does not fancify Canetti and is hypertonic.; fact15 & fact14 -> int4: Isabelle does not fancify Canetti but it is hypertonic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: Isabelle does not act compounded.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that Micah is not a Anglia and/or the one is not hipless does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: The fact that Micah is not hipless and/or this person is not unostentatious does not hold. fact2: If that dryer is a diacritic Micah is not a diacritic. fact3: Micah is hipless. fact4: That unau compels dialectics. fact5: that dialectics does not compel Micah. fact6: If something bawls then that dryer is either a diacritic or a pining or both. fact7: If Micah does not compel dialectics then that either it is not a Anglia or it is not hipless or both is wrong. fact8: This sandbox is estrous if it does exasperate sarcoidosis. fact9: Some person that is not a caesarian does compel dialectics and angers flooded. fact10: This sandbox exasperates sarcoidosis. fact11: Someone that is not a diacritic is not a polio and is not a kind of a Stokesia. fact12: That dryer is not a kind of a caesarian and/or this one is a kind of a Stokesia if this protester is not a polio. fact13: Micah is a Laurus. fact14: Someone is not a kind of a caesarian if the person is not a polio and the person is not a Stokesia. fact15: This protester bawls if this sandbox is not non-estrous. fact16: That Micah is hipless hold if the fact that it does not compel dialectics is right. fact17: Something is not a caesarian if it is not a caesarian and/or it is a Stokesia. fact18: Micah does not compel dialectics. fact19: Something that does compel dialectics either is not a Anglia or is not hipless or both.

fact1: ¬(¬{AB}{a} v ¬{DK}{a}) fact2: {F}{b} -> ¬{F}{a} fact3: {AB}{a} fact4: {A}{de} fact5: ¬{AC}{aa} fact6: (x): {H}x -> ({F}{b} v {G}{b}) fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact8: {J}{d} -> {I}{d} fact9: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact10: {J}{d} fact11: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact12: ¬{D}{c} -> (¬{C}{b} v {E}{b}) fact13: {BJ}{a} fact14: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact15: {I}{d} -> {H}{c} fact16: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{a} fact17: (x): (¬{C}x v {E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact18: ¬{A}{a} fact19: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x)

Either Micah is not a Anglia or it is not hipless or both.

(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that Micah is not hipless and/or this person is not unostentatious does not hold. fact2: If that dryer is a diacritic Micah is not a diacritic. fact3: Micah is hipless. fact4: That unau compels dialectics. fact5: that dialectics does not compel Micah. fact6: If something bawls then that dryer is either a diacritic or a pining or both. fact7: If Micah does not compel dialectics then that either it is not a Anglia or it is not hipless or both is wrong. fact8: This sandbox is estrous if it does exasperate sarcoidosis. fact9: Some person that is not a caesarian does compel dialectics and angers flooded. fact10: This sandbox exasperates sarcoidosis. fact11: Someone that is not a diacritic is not a polio and is not a kind of a Stokesia. fact12: That dryer is not a kind of a caesarian and/or this one is a kind of a Stokesia if this protester is not a polio. fact13: Micah is a Laurus. fact14: Someone is not a kind of a caesarian if the person is not a polio and the person is not a Stokesia. fact15: This protester bawls if this sandbox is not non-estrous. fact16: That Micah is hipless hold if the fact that it does not compel dialectics is right. fact17: Something is not a caesarian if it is not a caesarian and/or it is a Stokesia. fact18: Micah does not compel dialectics. fact19: Something that does compel dialectics either is not a Anglia or is not hipless or both. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that Micah is not a Anglia and/or the one is not hipless does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that sapphire does not uncluttered if that sapphire does respond Antidorcas is incorrect.

¬({A}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa})

fact1: That sapphire does not respond Antidorcas if that reconverts sootiness. fact2: That sapphire does not exempt if that sapphire responds Antidorcas. fact3: If the fact that that sapphire does uncluttered hold then it does not conserve prying. fact4: If something does kneel then this is not dishonourable. fact5: Something does not shorten if the thing is not non-ferial. fact6: If something is ametabolous this thing is not tasteless. fact7: That sapphire does not respond Antidorcas if that sapphire is able. fact8: The fact that that shipmate does not respond Antidorcas hold if it is a disgrace. fact9: That sapphire uncluttereds if that sapphire responds Antidorcas. fact10: If that sapphire uncluttereds that sapphire is not a kind of a Sambucus. fact11: Something uncluttereds if it responds Antidorcas. fact12: If some person is actinomorphic then it does not titillate. fact13: Someone that is a Sachsen is not a tic. fact14: If something tolls Houyhnhnm it is not a Anatidae. fact15: If that sapphire does respond Antidorcas then that sapphire is not a Sambucus. fact16: That sapphire does not uncluttered if that sapphire devalues Rothschild. fact17: If the fact that that sapphire responds Antidorcas is correct that sapphire is not a moderate. fact18: If some person subjects it is not ulcerative. fact19: This hardheads is not a kind of a drugging if the fact that this is a wash is true. fact20: Somebody does not instill megalomania if that person enervates Euglenophyceae.

fact1: {FC}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} fact2: {A}{aa} -> ¬{FL}{aa} fact3: {C}{aa} -> ¬{BP}{aa} fact4: (x): {BH}x -> ¬{IQ}x fact5: (x): {ID}x -> ¬{DI}x fact6: (x): {HJ}x -> ¬{FQ}x fact7: {HH}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} fact8: {DK}{m} -> ¬{A}{m} fact9: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa} fact10: {C}{aa} -> ¬{CD}{aa} fact11: (x): {A}x -> {C}x fact12: (x): {AF}x -> ¬{BJ}x fact13: (x): {DT}x -> ¬{BG}x fact14: (x): {HM}x -> ¬{CM}x fact15: {A}{aa} -> ¬{CD}{aa} fact16: {IR}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa} fact17: {A}{aa} -> ¬{D}{aa} fact18: (x): {IO}x -> ¬{AC}x fact19: {FS}{ha} -> ¬{AT}{ha} fact20: (x): {GC}x -> ¬{DG}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That sapphire does not respond Antidorcas if that reconverts sootiness. fact2: That sapphire does not exempt if that sapphire responds Antidorcas. fact3: If the fact that that sapphire does uncluttered hold then it does not conserve prying. fact4: If something does kneel then this is not dishonourable. fact5: Something does not shorten if the thing is not non-ferial. fact6: If something is ametabolous this thing is not tasteless. fact7: That sapphire does not respond Antidorcas if that sapphire is able. fact8: The fact that that shipmate does not respond Antidorcas hold if it is a disgrace. fact9: That sapphire uncluttereds if that sapphire responds Antidorcas. fact10: If that sapphire uncluttereds that sapphire is not a kind of a Sambucus. fact11: Something uncluttereds if it responds Antidorcas. fact12: If some person is actinomorphic then it does not titillate. fact13: Someone that is a Sachsen is not a tic. fact14: If something tolls Houyhnhnm it is not a Anatidae. fact15: If that sapphire does respond Antidorcas then that sapphire is not a Sambucus. fact16: That sapphire does not uncluttered if that sapphire devalues Rothschild. fact17: If the fact that that sapphire responds Antidorcas is correct that sapphire is not a moderate. fact18: If some person subjects it is not ulcerative. fact19: This hardheads is not a kind of a drugging if the fact that this is a wash is true. fact20: Somebody does not instill megalomania if that person enervates Euglenophyceae. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that sapphire does not uncluttered if that sapphire does respond Antidorcas is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Either Sheryl shuns Xyris or she maligns or both.

({B}{b} v {C}{b})

fact1: This in subdues CNPZ but it is not a Liliuokalani. fact2: Sheryl is a matched if this in dragoons Endamoeba. fact3: This in does not shun Xyris if it subdues CNPZ and it is not a Liliuokalani. fact4: Something dragoons Endamoeba if that the thing is not homocercal and the thing does not dragoons Endamoeba is false. fact5: Some person shuns Xyris if that it does not shuns Xyris and recalcitrates pittance is wrong. fact6: If this in does not shun Xyris the fact that Sheryl shun Xyris and/or it maligns is incorrect. fact7: If someone is a matched the fact that the person does not shun Xyris and recalcitrates pittance is wrong.

fact1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact2: {E}{a} -> {D}{b} fact3: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact4: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> {E}x fact5: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) -> {B}x fact6: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({B}{b} v {C}{b}) fact7: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x)

Either Sheryl shuns Xyris or she maligns or both.

({B}{b} v {C}{b})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This in subdues CNPZ but it is not a Liliuokalani. fact2: Sheryl is a matched if this in dragoons Endamoeba. fact3: This in does not shun Xyris if it subdues CNPZ and it is not a Liliuokalani. fact4: Something dragoons Endamoeba if that the thing is not homocercal and the thing does not dragoons Endamoeba is false. fact5: Some person shuns Xyris if that it does not shuns Xyris and recalcitrates pittance is wrong. fact6: If this in does not shun Xyris the fact that Sheryl shun Xyris and/or it maligns is incorrect. fact7: If someone is a matched the fact that the person does not shun Xyris and recalcitrates pittance is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = Either Sheryl shuns Xyris or she maligns or both. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact1 -> int1: This in does not shun Xyris.; int1 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This exegeticalness occurs.

{C}

fact1: This unpatrioticness and that Monophysiticness occurs. fact2: That disadvantageousness does not happens if that boustrophedonicness and this dodge happens. fact3: That grieving yottabyte does not occurs if this unpatrioticness and that rustlessness happens. fact4: That that grieving yottabyte does not occurs is prevented by that this ictalness does not occurs and that Keying parametritis occurs. fact5: If the fact that that grieving yottabyte occurs and that Monophysiticness occurs hold then this exegeticalness does not occurs. fact6: This planting Themistocles does not occurs if the crystallising legalism and that hemopoieticness happens. fact7: That the permutation occurs is triggered by that notthe royalness but that ranging diffuseness occurs. fact8: If that grieving yottabyte does not occurs this exegeticalness happens and that Monophysiticness occurs. fact9: That this Bushing Finnish and this dressmaking occurs is triggered by that that Education does not occurs. fact10: Notthis ictalness but that Keying parametritis occurs. fact11: That this unpatrioticness occurs is brought about by that this dressmaking occurs. fact12: This ictalness does not happens. fact13: If the fact that the lacing sapidity does not happens and/or that disadvantageousness occurs is incorrect that Education does not occurs.

fact1: ({D} & {A}) fact2: ({GH} & {IE}) -> ¬{K} fact3: ({D} & {E}) -> ¬{B} fact4: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact5: ({B} & {A}) -> ¬{C} fact6: ({DI} & {AO}) -> ¬{CP} fact7: (¬{EQ} & {HN}) -> {CL} fact8: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) fact9: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {F}) fact10: (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact11: {F} -> {D} fact12: ¬{AA} fact13: ¬(¬{L} v {K}) -> ¬{I}

This exegeticalness occurs.

{C}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This unpatrioticness and that Monophysiticness occurs. fact2: That disadvantageousness does not happens if that boustrophedonicness and this dodge happens. fact3: That grieving yottabyte does not occurs if this unpatrioticness and that rustlessness happens. fact4: That that grieving yottabyte does not occurs is prevented by that this ictalness does not occurs and that Keying parametritis occurs. fact5: If the fact that that grieving yottabyte occurs and that Monophysiticness occurs hold then this exegeticalness does not occurs. fact6: This planting Themistocles does not occurs if the crystallising legalism and that hemopoieticness happens. fact7: That the permutation occurs is triggered by that notthe royalness but that ranging diffuseness occurs. fact8: If that grieving yottabyte does not occurs this exegeticalness happens and that Monophysiticness occurs. fact9: That this Bushing Finnish and this dressmaking occurs is triggered by that that Education does not occurs. fact10: Notthis ictalness but that Keying parametritis occurs. fact11: That this unpatrioticness occurs is brought about by that this dressmaking occurs. fact12: This ictalness does not happens. fact13: If the fact that the lacing sapidity does not happens and/or that disadvantageousness occurs is incorrect that Education does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This exegeticalness occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact10 -> int1: That grieving yottabyte occurs.; fact1 -> int2: That Monophysiticness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That both that grieving yottabyte and that Monophysiticness occurs is correct.; int3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That sandglass is a cloistered.

{D}{a}

fact1: The fact that that sandglass is a cloistered is right if that waterfall is not a wanted but it is a kind of a cloistered. fact2: That sandglass is a macroeconomics and is a tot. fact3: Something that is non-erecting is radial and unties. fact4: That sandglass unties. fact5: That waterfall is not erecting if that that waterfall is not Kurdish but it is a Lincolnshire does not hold. fact6: That sandglass is not radial if that that waterfall is erecting and/or it is a cloistered is false. fact7: If the fact that some person is a Deuteromycota is true then the fact that it is non-Kurdish person that is a Lincolnshire does not hold. fact8: If something is not Kurdish and is not a Deuteromycota the fact that it is not a Lincolnshire is true. fact9: The fact that the oligodendrocyte is a kind of a bakshis if the oligodendrocyte is surgical hold. fact10: That sandglass is a wanted. fact11: If that sandglass is a kind of a cloistered and is surgical that sandglass is not a Qum. fact12: That sandglass is both not non-italic and not nonsurgical. fact13: That coelacanth does untie and this one auctioneers ESE. fact14: That sandglass is not a kind of a cloistered if she is radial and she unties. fact15: That some person is erecting or is a cloistered or both is wrong if it is not a kind of a Lincolnshire. fact16: That sandglass is a wings. fact17: That sandglass does not glorify oiliness. fact18: If there exists something such that the thing is a wanted and does not untie then that cardiologist is not a kind of a wanted. fact19: That sandglass is not a twinge if this gurgles exabyte and is not non-inertial. fact20: That barong settles teased and is a namelessness.

fact1: (¬{A}{b} & {D}{b}) -> {D}{a} fact2: ({EM}{a} & {GK}{a}) fact3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact4: {C}{a} fact5: ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> ¬{E}{b} fact6: ¬({E}{b} v {D}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact7: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {F}x) fact8: (x): (¬{G}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact9: {IS}{e} -> {O}{e} fact10: {A}{a} fact11: ({D}{a} & {IS}{a}) -> ¬{JK}{a} fact12: ({FD}{a} & {IS}{a}) fact13: ({C}{fd} & {II}{fd}) fact14: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact15: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({E}x v {D}x) fact16: {GE}{a} fact17: ¬{IC}{a} fact18: (x): ({A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}{go} fact19: ({GR}{a} & {GG}{a}) -> ¬{BH}{a} fact20: ({CM}{bf} & {AH}{bf})

That cardiologist is not a wanted.

¬{A}{go}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that sandglass is a cloistered is right if that waterfall is not a wanted but it is a kind of a cloistered. fact2: That sandglass is a macroeconomics and is a tot. fact3: Something that is non-erecting is radial and unties. fact4: That sandglass unties. fact5: That waterfall is not erecting if that that waterfall is not Kurdish but it is a Lincolnshire does not hold. fact6: That sandglass is not radial if that that waterfall is erecting and/or it is a cloistered is false. fact7: If the fact that some person is a Deuteromycota is true then the fact that it is non-Kurdish person that is a Lincolnshire does not hold. fact8: If something is not Kurdish and is not a Deuteromycota the fact that it is not a Lincolnshire is true. fact9: The fact that the oligodendrocyte is a kind of a bakshis if the oligodendrocyte is surgical hold. fact10: That sandglass is a wanted. fact11: If that sandglass is a kind of a cloistered and is surgical that sandglass is not a Qum. fact12: That sandglass is both not non-italic and not nonsurgical. fact13: That coelacanth does untie and this one auctioneers ESE. fact14: That sandglass is not a kind of a cloistered if she is radial and she unties. fact15: That some person is erecting or is a cloistered or both is wrong if it is not a kind of a Lincolnshire. fact16: That sandglass is a wings. fact17: That sandglass does not glorify oiliness. fact18: If there exists something such that the thing is a wanted and does not untie then that cardiologist is not a kind of a wanted. fact19: That sandglass is not a twinge if this gurgles exabyte and is not non-inertial. fact20: That barong settles teased and is a namelessness. ; $hypothesis$ = That sandglass is a cloistered. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Ej rushes Apiaceae.

{C}{c}

fact1: The fact that some person rushes Apiaceae but it does not protrude is incorrect if it is undependable. fact2: If Ej does not configure voraciousness Ej is benzoic. fact3: Something is a Proterozoic if this thing is benzoic. fact4: If that riboflavin is a Proterozoic then that erythrocytolysin is not a Pentecost. fact5: That if that that erythrocytolysin is a Hutchins but the thing is not a kind of a geyser is wrong that riboflavin is a kind of a Irena is right. fact6: If that riboflavin is a Irena then Ej does rush Apiaceae. fact7: If that erythrocytolysin is undependable the fact that the thing is a Hutchins and the thing is not a geyser is false. fact8: Somebody does not disqualify ascription if the person is not a Pentecost. fact9: If there exists some man such that it does not disqualify ascription then the fact that that oxidizer is a Irena and is a kind of a Harlow is right. fact10: If Ej is benzoic then that riboflavin is benzoic. fact11: Ej is not undiluted and this is not a kind of a Whitsun. fact12: That erythrocytolysin is undependable. fact13: If Ej is a kind of non-undiluted thing that is not a Whitsun then the fact that it does not configure voraciousness is correct. fact14: A Irena is undependable.

fact1: (x): {A}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{O}x) fact2: ¬{I}{c} -> {H}{c} fact3: (x): {H}x -> {G}x fact4: {G}{b} -> ¬{F}{a} fact5: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact6: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact7: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬{E}x fact9: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}{fm} & {D}{fm}) fact10: {H}{c} -> {H}{b} fact11: (¬{J}{c} & ¬{K}{c}) fact12: {A}{a} fact13: (¬{J}{c} & ¬{K}{c}) -> ¬{I}{c} fact14: (x): {B}x -> {A}x

That that oxidizer rushes Apiaceae but it does not protrude is false.

¬({C}{fm} & ¬{O}{fm})

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that some person rushes Apiaceae but it does not protrude is incorrect if it is undependable. fact2: If Ej does not configure voraciousness Ej is benzoic. fact3: Something is a Proterozoic if this thing is benzoic. fact4: If that riboflavin is a Proterozoic then that erythrocytolysin is not a Pentecost. fact5: That if that that erythrocytolysin is a Hutchins but the thing is not a kind of a geyser is wrong that riboflavin is a kind of a Irena is right. fact6: If that riboflavin is a Irena then Ej does rush Apiaceae. fact7: If that erythrocytolysin is undependable the fact that the thing is a Hutchins and the thing is not a geyser is false. fact8: Somebody does not disqualify ascription if the person is not a Pentecost. fact9: If there exists some man such that it does not disqualify ascription then the fact that that oxidizer is a Irena and is a kind of a Harlow is right. fact10: If Ej is benzoic then that riboflavin is benzoic. fact11: Ej is not undiluted and this is not a kind of a Whitsun. fact12: That erythrocytolysin is undependable. fact13: If Ej is a kind of non-undiluted thing that is not a Whitsun then the fact that it does not configure voraciousness is correct. fact14: A Irena is undependable. ; $hypothesis$ = Ej rushes Apiaceae. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact12 -> int1: The fact that that erythrocytolysin is a Hutchins but it is not a geyser is false.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: That riboflavin is a Irena.; int2 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That oiler does not curtail.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: That oiler is a vox. fact2: That oiler is a kind of a Liliidae if that antitoxin is a vox. fact3: That something incommodes Dominicus but that is not a Hegelian is incorrect if that is a birth. fact4: Something is not a Hegelian if the fact that this thing is interstitial and this thing is a troops does not hold. fact5: Someone curtails and it is a vox if the fact that it does not incommode Dominicus hold. fact6: If that bromoform is a Elsass then this olm is not a kind of a troops and is not rhinal. fact7: A interstitial thing is a birth. fact8: This poacher is a vox. fact9: Something is interstitial if it is not a troops and is not rhinal. fact10: That that antitoxin curtails is true if that oiler is a kind of a vox. fact11: That oiler is a vox if that antitoxin curtails. fact12: That oiler is a kind of a Hadrian. fact13: If that this olm does incommode Dominicus and is not a Hegelian is incorrect then that antitoxin does not incommode Dominicus. fact14: That oiler is a vox if Rebecca does curtail. fact15: That something is a vox that does not curtail does not hold if it does not incommode Dominicus. fact16: This pliers curtails. fact17: That antitoxin curtails. fact18: That antitoxin is a vox. fact19: If that someone is a vox but that person does not curtail does not hold then that person curtail. fact20: If that antitoxin is a vox that oiler curtails. fact21: If that thriftshop is not a Hegelian that that thriftshop is a kind of a birth and it incommodes Dominicus does not hold.

fact1: {A}{b} fact2: {A}{a} -> {FO}{b} fact3: (x): {D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{E}x) fact4: (x): ¬({F}x & {G}x) -> ¬{E}x fact5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact6: {I}{d} -> (¬{G}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) fact7: (x): {F}x -> {D}x fact8: {A}{fe} fact9: (x): (¬{G}x & ¬{H}x) -> {F}x fact10: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} fact11: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} fact12: {DQ}{b} fact13: ¬({C}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact14: {B}{eq} -> {A}{b} fact15: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact16: {B}{co} fact17: {B}{a} fact18: {A}{a} fact19: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {B}x fact20: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact21: ¬{E}{gm} -> ¬({D}{gm} & {C}{gm})

That thriftshop curtails.

{B}{gm}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That oiler is a vox. fact2: That oiler is a kind of a Liliidae if that antitoxin is a vox. fact3: That something incommodes Dominicus but that is not a Hegelian is incorrect if that is a birth. fact4: Something is not a Hegelian if the fact that this thing is interstitial and this thing is a troops does not hold. fact5: Someone curtails and it is a vox if the fact that it does not incommode Dominicus hold. fact6: If that bromoform is a Elsass then this olm is not a kind of a troops and is not rhinal. fact7: A interstitial thing is a birth. fact8: This poacher is a vox. fact9: Something is interstitial if it is not a troops and is not rhinal. fact10: That that antitoxin curtails is true if that oiler is a kind of a vox. fact11: That oiler is a vox if that antitoxin curtails. fact12: That oiler is a kind of a Hadrian. fact13: If that this olm does incommode Dominicus and is not a Hegelian is incorrect then that antitoxin does not incommode Dominicus. fact14: That oiler is a vox if Rebecca does curtail. fact15: That something is a vox that does not curtail does not hold if it does not incommode Dominicus. fact16: This pliers curtails. fact17: That antitoxin curtails. fact18: That antitoxin is a vox. fact19: If that someone is a vox but that person does not curtail does not hold then that person curtail. fact20: If that antitoxin is a vox that oiler curtails. fact21: If that thriftshop is not a Hegelian that that thriftshop is a kind of a birth and it incommodes Dominicus does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That oiler does not curtail. ; $proof$ =

fact20 & fact18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That there is something such that the fact that it is mentholated and it is not a Galatia is false does not hold.

¬((Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x))

fact1: That this stoic is a kind of a Galatia and this is a nominative does not hold. fact2: That hypoblast is a nominative. fact3: There exists some person such that the fact that it is a kind of a Galatia that is not a nominative is wrong. fact4: Everything is both not a Yukawa and a pragmatic. fact5: Something that is not a kind of a Yukawa palliates penny and/or loans. fact6: That HQ loans if this sequin palliates penny. fact7: If someone loans then that it does not reinforce holonym and withers Chemakuan is incorrect. fact8: That hypoblast is both conjunct and not a current if this stoic does not wither Chemakuan. fact9: The fact that if that that HQ does not reinforce holonym and withers Chemakuan is incorrect this stoic does not withers Chemakuan is true. fact10: That HQ loans if this sequin does loans.

fact1: ¬({AB}{b} & {A}{b}) fact2: {A}{a} fact3: (Ex): ¬({AB}x & ¬{A}x) fact4: (x): (¬{H}x & {I}x) fact5: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({G}x v {E}x) fact6: {G}{d} -> {E}{c} fact7: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {D}x) fact8: ¬{D}{b} -> ({C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact9: ¬(¬{F}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact10: {E}{d} -> {E}{c}

There exists something such that that the thing is both a buxomness and not balconied does not hold.

(Ex): ¬({FS}x & ¬{IF}x)

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this stoic is a kind of a Galatia and this is a nominative does not hold. fact2: That hypoblast is a nominative. fact3: There exists some person such that the fact that it is a kind of a Galatia that is not a nominative is wrong. fact4: Everything is both not a Yukawa and a pragmatic. fact5: Something that is not a kind of a Yukawa palliates penny and/or loans. fact6: That HQ loans if this sequin palliates penny. fact7: If someone loans then that it does not reinforce holonym and withers Chemakuan is incorrect. fact8: That hypoblast is both conjunct and not a current if this stoic does not wither Chemakuan. fact9: The fact that if that that HQ does not reinforce holonym and withers Chemakuan is incorrect this stoic does not withers Chemakuan is true. fact10: That HQ loans if this sequin does loans. ; $hypothesis$ = That there is something such that the fact that it is mentholated and it is not a Galatia is false does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The Scottishness does not happens and that angularness happens.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: The fact that notthe revising ketonuria but this quote occurs is false. fact2: If this snuffling immotility happens that both the registration and that bowls happens is wrong. fact3: That the maneuvering occurs and the jabber happens does not hold. fact4: The fact that notthe curving Pyrenees but that scanning happens is wrong if the fact that the writing rateability happens is true. fact5: That notthe despoliation but this mistaking occurs does not hold. fact6: That notthe cracklingsing but the concentricalness happens is wrong. fact7: If the inhalant happens the fact that notthe bezique but that plumbaginaceousness occurs does not hold. fact8: If that intermiting happens that both that Incarnation and the guying committedness happens is wrong. fact9: The hallowing ovation happens. fact10: That notthe parchesi but the deducting rambling occurs does not hold if that the sliming gawkiness occurs hold. fact11: The constitutional happens. fact12: That Gallicness occurs. fact13: That the assaulting manifest does not occurs and the victimizing jejunoileitis happens does not hold. fact14: The fact that both this contents and this snuffling immotility happens is incorrect. fact15: If the confederating occurs the fact that both that rack and that bodieding Sunday happens does not hold. fact16: That the maneuvering does not occurs but the tempering Amaryllidaceae happens is not right. fact17: The fact that the histologicalness and this collagenousness occurs is incorrect if this rheologicalness occurs. fact18: That the Scottishness does not occurs but that angularness happens is incorrect if that Gallicness occurs. fact19: That the suckling does not occurs and the formality happens does not hold. fact20: If that Gallicness happens that the Scottishness and that angularness occurs does not hold. fact21: The fact that this doubling occurs is right. fact22: If the aboralness happens then that this mistaking does not happens and the assembling happens is false.

fact1: ¬(¬{HU} & {AP}) fact2: {JK} -> ¬({FI} & {AL}) fact3: ¬({CC} & {CA}) fact4: {DT} -> ¬(¬{IK} & {IR}) fact5: ¬(¬{N} & {IG}) fact6: ¬(¬{C} & {GN}) fact7: {EM} -> ¬(¬{FO} & {CG}) fact8: {HE} -> ¬({BJ} & {FC}) fact9: {JG} fact10: {E} -> ¬(¬{CI} & {GD}) fact11: {CK} fact12: {A} fact13: ¬(¬{FR} & {IB}) fact14: ¬({IC} & {JK}) fact15: {U} -> ¬({AU} & {IM}) fact16: ¬(¬{CC} & {J}) fact17: {AF} -> ¬({BQ} & {AK}) fact18: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact19: ¬(¬{EH} & {ES}) fact20: {A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact21: {GU} fact22: {IF} -> ¬(¬{IG} & {CM})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that notthe revising ketonuria but this quote occurs is false. fact2: If this snuffling immotility happens that both the registration and that bowls happens is wrong. fact3: That the maneuvering occurs and the jabber happens does not hold. fact4: The fact that notthe curving Pyrenees but that scanning happens is wrong if the fact that the writing rateability happens is true. fact5: That notthe despoliation but this mistaking occurs does not hold. fact6: That notthe cracklingsing but the concentricalness happens is wrong. fact7: If the inhalant happens the fact that notthe bezique but that plumbaginaceousness occurs does not hold. fact8: If that intermiting happens that both that Incarnation and the guying committedness happens is wrong. fact9: The hallowing ovation happens. fact10: That notthe parchesi but the deducting rambling occurs does not hold if that the sliming gawkiness occurs hold. fact11: The constitutional happens. fact12: That Gallicness occurs. fact13: That the assaulting manifest does not occurs and the victimizing jejunoileitis happens does not hold. fact14: The fact that both this contents and this snuffling immotility happens is incorrect. fact15: If the confederating occurs the fact that both that rack and that bodieding Sunday happens does not hold. fact16: That the maneuvering does not occurs but the tempering Amaryllidaceae happens is not right. fact17: The fact that the histologicalness and this collagenousness occurs is incorrect if this rheologicalness occurs. fact18: That the Scottishness does not occurs but that angularness happens is incorrect if that Gallicness occurs. fact19: That the suckling does not occurs and the formality happens does not hold. fact20: If that Gallicness happens that the Scottishness and that angularness occurs does not hold. fact21: The fact that this doubling occurs is right. fact22: If the aboralness happens then that this mistaking does not happens and the assembling happens is false. ; $hypothesis$ = The Scottishness does not happens and that angularness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact18 & fact12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That ergonomicness occurs but this Monegasqueness does not occurs.

({A} & ¬{C})

fact1: If that ergonomicness does not occurs the fact that this gentrifying Petroselinum but notthe retentiveness happens is incorrect. fact2: The fact that that stalk happens and this gentrifying Petroselinum does not occurs does not hold. fact3: This twit does not occurs and this deregulation happens. fact4: That this parade happens but that premiership does not occurs does not hold. fact5: This sprinkles and/or that this indexing stoppered does not occurs is brought about by that that fatality does not happens. fact6: If this sprinkles does not happens the fact that this energising avionics happens and this winteriness does not happens is false. fact7: This dawdling Ephemeroptera does not occurs. fact8: That that that permeation and this non-kineticness occurs is incorrect hold. fact9: If that this energising avionics happens but this winteriness does not happens is wrong then this Monegasqueness does not happens. fact10: The fact that if that follies does not occurs the fact that that ergonomicness but notthis Monegasqueness occurs is wrong is true. fact11: That that ordination does not occurs yields that that fatality occurs and this Britishism occurs. fact12: That that ergonomicness and this Monegasqueness occurs is false. fact13: If that ossiferousness happens then the fact that that vivisection but notthat samsara occurs is not correct. fact14: That that follies occurs yields that that ergonomicness and this non-Monegasqueness happens. fact15: The fact that that ordination does not occurs if that that vivisection occurs but that samsara does not happens is incorrect is not incorrect. fact16: The fact that the stooge happens and this intermolecularness happens does not hold. fact17: This deregulation occurs. fact18: The fact that this nonexplosiveness happens does not hold. fact19: That this energising avionics does not occurs brings about that that follies occurs and this winteriness occurs. fact20: Notthis sprinkles but this indexing stoppered occurs if that fatality occurs.

fact1: ¬{A} -> ¬({AC} & ¬{CP}) fact2: ¬({EL} & ¬{AC}) fact3: (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact4: ¬({DI} & ¬{DA}) fact5: ¬{H} -> ({F} v ¬{G}) fact6: ¬{F} -> ¬({E} & ¬{D}) fact7: ¬{GP} fact8: ¬({EF} & ¬{IC}) fact9: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact10: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & ¬{C}) fact11: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact12: ¬({A} & {C}) fact13: {M} -> ¬({K} & ¬{L}) fact14: {B} -> ({A} & ¬{C}) fact15: ¬({K} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{J} fact16: ¬({AR} & {BO}) fact17: {AB} fact18: ¬{HE} fact19: ¬{E} -> ({B} & {D}) fact20: {H} -> (¬{F} & {G})

That ergonomicness occurs but this Monegasqueness does not occurs.

({A} & ¬{C})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that ergonomicness does not occurs the fact that this gentrifying Petroselinum but notthe retentiveness happens is incorrect. fact2: The fact that that stalk happens and this gentrifying Petroselinum does not occurs does not hold. fact3: This twit does not occurs and this deregulation happens. fact4: That this parade happens but that premiership does not occurs does not hold. fact5: This sprinkles and/or that this indexing stoppered does not occurs is brought about by that that fatality does not happens. fact6: If this sprinkles does not happens the fact that this energising avionics happens and this winteriness does not happens is false. fact7: This dawdling Ephemeroptera does not occurs. fact8: That that that permeation and this non-kineticness occurs is incorrect hold. fact9: If that this energising avionics happens but this winteriness does not happens is wrong then this Monegasqueness does not happens. fact10: The fact that if that follies does not occurs the fact that that ergonomicness but notthis Monegasqueness occurs is wrong is true. fact11: That that ordination does not occurs yields that that fatality occurs and this Britishism occurs. fact12: That that ergonomicness and this Monegasqueness occurs is false. fact13: If that ossiferousness happens then the fact that that vivisection but notthat samsara occurs is not correct. fact14: That that follies occurs yields that that ergonomicness and this non-Monegasqueness happens. fact15: The fact that that ordination does not occurs if that that vivisection occurs but that samsara does not happens is incorrect is not incorrect. fact16: The fact that the stooge happens and this intermolecularness happens does not hold. fact17: This deregulation occurs. fact18: The fact that this nonexplosiveness happens does not hold. fact19: That this energising avionics does not occurs brings about that that follies occurs and this winteriness occurs. fact20: Notthis sprinkles but this indexing stoppered occurs if that fatality occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That ergonomicness occurs but this Monegasqueness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That Nikki does not solve frozen is true.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: That ax does solve frozen if Nikki does clothe. fact2: That ax does clothe.

fact1: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} fact2: {A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That ax does solve frozen if Nikki does clothe. fact2: That ax does clothe. ; $hypothesis$ = That Nikki does not solve frozen is true. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This declinometer shoots.

{C}{b}

fact1: This declinometer shoos Geraint if that comedienne does invalidate insidiousness. fact2: Some man excuses but this one does not shoo Geraint if this one is non-coastal. fact3: If some person does not shoo Geraint that it does not invalidate insidiousness and it shoots is wrong. fact4: Something does not shoot if that it does not invalidate insidiousness and does shoot is not right. fact5: that insidiousness does invalidate comedienne. fact6: That comedienne does invalidate insidiousness.

fact1: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact2: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({D}x & ¬{B}x) fact3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact5: {AA}{aa} fact6: {A}{a}

This declinometer does not shoot.

¬{C}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This declinometer shoos Geraint if that comedienne does invalidate insidiousness. fact2: Some man excuses but this one does not shoo Geraint if this one is non-coastal. fact3: If some person does not shoo Geraint that it does not invalidate insidiousness and it shoots is wrong. fact4: Something does not shoot if that it does not invalidate insidiousness and does shoot is not right. fact5: that insidiousness does invalidate comedienne. fact6: That comedienne does invalidate insidiousness. ; $hypothesis$ = This declinometer shoots. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That rationalization does not happens.

¬{D}

fact1: If the Quechuanness does not happens that this premiership does not happens and this orchidectomy does not occurs does not hold. fact2: If this prefiguring does not happens then the fact that that this bonding Cestum happens and that allergicness happens hold is not right. fact3: That rationalization does not happens if that articulatoriness happens and this orchidectomy happens. fact4: The persona happens. fact5: The parceling occurs. fact6: This prefiguring does not happens if that either that docudrama happens or this cerousness occurs or both is incorrect. fact7: If that this bonding Cestum and that allergicness occurs is wrong then the Quechuanness does not occurs. fact8: If that seminiferousness does not happens that rationalization and that articulatoriness occurs. fact9: That that articulatoriness and that seminiferousness occurs is correct. fact10: That the Quechuanness does not happens but this premiership occurs does not hold.

fact1: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{C}) fact2: ¬{I} -> ¬({H} & {G}) fact3: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact4: {DH} fact5: {FG} fact6: ¬({J} v {K}) -> ¬{I} fact7: ¬({H} & {G}) -> ¬{F} fact8: ¬{B} -> ({D} & {A}) fact9: ({A} & {B}) fact10: ¬(¬{F} & {E})

That rationalization happens.

{D}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the Quechuanness does not happens that this premiership does not happens and this orchidectomy does not occurs does not hold. fact2: If this prefiguring does not happens then the fact that that this bonding Cestum happens and that allergicness happens hold is not right. fact3: That rationalization does not happens if that articulatoriness happens and this orchidectomy happens. fact4: The persona happens. fact5: The parceling occurs. fact6: This prefiguring does not happens if that either that docudrama happens or this cerousness occurs or both is incorrect. fact7: If that this bonding Cestum and that allergicness occurs is wrong then the Quechuanness does not occurs. fact8: If that seminiferousness does not happens that rationalization and that articulatoriness occurs. fact9: That that articulatoriness and that seminiferousness occurs is correct. fact10: That the Quechuanness does not happens but this premiership occurs does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That rationalization does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this antiserum is both not haemolytic and not splintery is false.

¬(¬{E}{b} & ¬{D}{b})

fact1: the Cypraeidae flings aphelion. fact2: If either this antiserum is nosohusial or it flings Cypraeidae or both it is not splintery. fact3: This aphelion flings Cypraeidae. fact4: If something flings Cypraeidae then it is not warmed. fact5: Emilio is splintery. fact6: That some man is a kind of nosohusial man that is not a kind of a Cetorhinidae is false if the person is a contraindication. fact7: That isoleucine is not a Munchausen if the fact that Virginia does not floodlight keratoconjunctivitis and is not a kind of a Munchausen is incorrect. fact8: That something is both not haemolytic and not splintery is false if it is not warmed. fact9: Something that is either warmed or haemolytic or both is not nosohusial. fact10: If that isoleucine is not a Munchausen then that listeria is anaglyptical and this person informs fallaciousness. fact11: This antiserum is non-haemolytic and this is not splintery if this aphelion is not nosohusial. fact12: Someone that is warmed and/or flings Cypraeidae is not nosohusial. fact13: This antiserum does not fling Cypraeidae if this antiserum is not non-splintery and/or the person is nosohusial. fact14: If someone does fling Cypraeidae or is splintery or both then it is not haemolytic. fact15: If that this aphelion do not and amerces drachm does not hold then this antiserum is a contraindication. fact16: This antiserum is not haemolytic and does not rebroadcast feoff. fact17: That Virginia does not floodlight keratoconjunctivitis and it is not a Munchausen is false if the actinomyces is not a sensibility. fact18: If that listeria informs fallaciousness that this aphelion do not and amerces drachm does not hold.

fact1: {AA}{aa} fact2: ({C}{b} v {B}{b}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact3: {B}{a} fact4: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}x fact5: {D}{hn} fact6: (x): {G}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{F}x) fact7: ¬(¬{M}{e} & ¬{L}{e}) -> ¬{L}{d} fact8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) fact9: (x): ({A}x v {E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact10: ¬{L}{d} -> ({K}{c} & {J}{c}) fact11: ¬{C}{a} -> (¬{E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact12: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact13: ({D}{b} v {C}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact14: (x): ({B}x v {D}x) -> ¬{E}x fact15: ¬(¬{H}{a} & {I}{a}) -> {G}{b} fact16: (¬{E}{b} & ¬{DM}{b}) fact17: ¬{N}{f} -> ¬(¬{M}{e} & ¬{L}{e}) fact18: {J}{c} -> ¬(¬{H}{a} & {I}{a})

The fact that this antiserum is both not haemolytic and not splintery is false.

¬(¬{E}{b} & ¬{D}{b})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: the Cypraeidae flings aphelion. fact2: If either this antiserum is nosohusial or it flings Cypraeidae or both it is not splintery. fact3: This aphelion flings Cypraeidae. fact4: If something flings Cypraeidae then it is not warmed. fact5: Emilio is splintery. fact6: That some man is a kind of nosohusial man that is not a kind of a Cetorhinidae is false if the person is a contraindication. fact7: That isoleucine is not a Munchausen if the fact that Virginia does not floodlight keratoconjunctivitis and is not a kind of a Munchausen is incorrect. fact8: That something is both not haemolytic and not splintery is false if it is not warmed. fact9: Something that is either warmed or haemolytic or both is not nosohusial. fact10: If that isoleucine is not a Munchausen then that listeria is anaglyptical and this person informs fallaciousness. fact11: This antiserum is non-haemolytic and this is not splintery if this aphelion is not nosohusial. fact12: Someone that is warmed and/or flings Cypraeidae is not nosohusial. fact13: This antiserum does not fling Cypraeidae if this antiserum is not non-splintery and/or the person is nosohusial. fact14: If someone does fling Cypraeidae or is splintery or both then it is not haemolytic. fact15: If that this aphelion do not and amerces drachm does not hold then this antiserum is a contraindication. fact16: This antiserum is not haemolytic and does not rebroadcast feoff. fact17: That Virginia does not floodlight keratoconjunctivitis and it is not a Munchausen is false if the actinomyces is not a sensibility. fact18: If that listeria informs fallaciousness that this aphelion do not and amerces drachm does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this antiserum is both not haemolytic and not splintery is false. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> int1: Either this aphelion is warmed or it flings Cypraeidae or both.; fact12 -> int2: If either this aphelion is not non-warmed or that does fling Cypraeidae or both that is not nosohusial.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This aphelion is not nosohusial.; int3 & fact11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This adaptation is not gabled and does squish Sternotherus.

(¬{C}{c} & {A}{c})

fact1: If this inheritor is gabled this adaptation is not a discomfort. fact2: This inheritor is a discomfort if that subjectivist is a kind of a slurred and does not optimise. fact3: If this adaptation optimises then that subjectivist is not gabled. fact4: That subjectivist is a slurred but the person does not optimise. fact5: That autofocus is not a destitution but that thing is a bark if that subjectivist squishes Sternotherus. fact6: This inheritor is gabled if the fact that it is a EPA that is not a availableness is false. fact7: This inheritor does not optimise. fact8: If this inheritor is a discomfort then this adaptation is not gabled and squishes Sternotherus. fact9: If this inheritor is gabled the thing squishes Sternotherus. fact10: The fact that that subjectivist annuls is true.

fact1: {C}{b} -> ¬{B}{c} fact2: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact3: {AB}{c} -> ¬{C}{a} fact4: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact5: {A}{a} -> (¬{CS}{au} & {CN}{au}) fact6: ¬({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> {C}{b} fact7: ¬{AB}{b} fact8: {B}{b} -> (¬{C}{c} & {A}{c}) fact9: {C}{b} -> {A}{b} fact10: {F}{a}

That autofocus is not a kind of a destitution but this thing is a bark.

(¬{CS}{au} & {CN}{au})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this inheritor is gabled this adaptation is not a discomfort. fact2: This inheritor is a discomfort if that subjectivist is a kind of a slurred and does not optimise. fact3: If this adaptation optimises then that subjectivist is not gabled. fact4: That subjectivist is a slurred but the person does not optimise. fact5: That autofocus is not a destitution but that thing is a bark if that subjectivist squishes Sternotherus. fact6: This inheritor is gabled if the fact that it is a EPA that is not a availableness is false. fact7: This inheritor does not optimise. fact8: If this inheritor is a discomfort then this adaptation is not gabled and squishes Sternotherus. fact9: If this inheritor is gabled the thing squishes Sternotherus. fact10: The fact that that subjectivist annuls is true. ; $hypothesis$ = This adaptation is not gabled and does squish Sternotherus. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact4 -> int1: This inheritor is a kind of a discomfort.; int1 & fact8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that anemometry happens and this bender occurs does not hold.

¬({B} & {C})

fact1: If that inactivation happens that the acarpelousness occurs is right. fact2: If the fact that notthis public but that cliquishness happens does not hold then that anemometry happens. fact3: If this combing does not occurs that abidance occurs. fact4: The fact that this public does not happens and that cliquishness happens does not hold if that overheating Heyerdahl happens. fact5: If that abidance does not occurs then the fact that both this bender and that anemometry happens is not true. fact6: If that overheating Heyerdahl occurs then that both this public and that cliquishness occurs does not hold. fact7: The fact that that anemometry and this bender occurs does not hold if that overheating Heyerdahl does not happens. fact8: That that abidance happens hold. fact9: If that benzylicness does not happens then both this combing and this gapping analecta happens. fact10: That anemometry happens if this public occurs. fact11: If that spillage happens that benzylicness does not happens and the medevac happens. fact12: That this public occurs and that cliquishness occurs does not hold. fact13: This combing does not happens. fact14: That this non-petaledness and this chauvinisticness happens is wrong if the cladding occurs. fact15: That that spillage does not occurs is prevented by the acarpelousness. fact16: This bender and that abidance happens if this combing does not occurs.

fact1: {K} -> {J} fact2: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact3: ¬{E} -> {D} fact4: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact5: ¬{D} -> ¬({C} & {B}) fact6: {A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact7: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & {C}) fact8: {D} fact9: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact10: {AA} -> {B} fact11: {I} -> (¬{G} & {H}) fact12: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact13: ¬{E} fact14: {AO} -> ¬(¬{AR} & {FB}) fact15: {J} -> {I} fact16: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D})

That that anemometry happens and this bender occurs does not hold.

¬({B} & {C})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that inactivation happens that the acarpelousness occurs is right. fact2: If the fact that notthis public but that cliquishness happens does not hold then that anemometry happens. fact3: If this combing does not occurs that abidance occurs. fact4: The fact that this public does not happens and that cliquishness happens does not hold if that overheating Heyerdahl happens. fact5: If that abidance does not occurs then the fact that both this bender and that anemometry happens is not true. fact6: If that overheating Heyerdahl occurs then that both this public and that cliquishness occurs does not hold. fact7: The fact that that anemometry and this bender occurs does not hold if that overheating Heyerdahl does not happens. fact8: That that abidance happens hold. fact9: If that benzylicness does not happens then both this combing and this gapping analecta happens. fact10: That anemometry happens if this public occurs. fact11: If that spillage happens that benzylicness does not happens and the medevac happens. fact12: That this public occurs and that cliquishness occurs does not hold. fact13: This combing does not happens. fact14: That this non-petaledness and this chauvinisticness happens is wrong if the cladding occurs. fact15: That that spillage does not occurs is prevented by the acarpelousness. fact16: This bender and that abidance happens if this combing does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That that anemometry happens and this bender occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This sisham is not a Waldenses and is a kind of a turned.

(¬{C}{b} & {E}{b})

fact1: If that postbox unlaces Goncourt that handsaw is not a Zaar but this one is a kind of a Baldr. fact2: The fact that if somebody is a turned then it does not gift December is true. fact3: If that necessary is not a kind of a Waldenses then this sisham is a Zaar. fact4: If someone gifts December then it is not a Waldenses. fact5: The fact that this jaeger is a turned is true. fact6: This sisham is both not a Waldenses and a turned if that necessary is not a Waldenses. fact7: That necessary is not a turned but a Zaar if this sisham is not a turned. fact8: This sisham is not a Nintu and does not gift December. fact9: If that postbox is not a kind of a Monophysite then that postbox incorporates Lepisosteidae and it unlaces Goncourt. fact10: The fact that that necessary is a Zaar is true. fact11: If that postbox is not a Fortunella or it is non-autogenetic or both that it is not a Monophysite hold. fact12: If this sisham is a Waldenses this sisham does not gift December. fact13: If something does not gift December then it is a featured and/or it does snow pyramid. fact14: That necessary is not a kind of a yardage. fact15: This sisham is not a Zaar but it is a turned if that necessary is not a kind of a Zaar. fact16: If that necessary is not a kind of a Waldenses then this sisham is not a Waldenses. fact17: If that handsaw is not a Zaar then that necessary gifts December and is a Waldenses. fact18: Something does not gift December if the thing is a Baldr and the thing is not a Zaar. fact19: If something is a profoundness or it is unbaptised or both then it does not last. fact20: The fact that that necessary is not a kind of a Waldenses if that necessary does gift December is true. fact21: If this sisham is not a Zaar that necessary is a Waldenses. fact22: If something festers then it is not a Hypodermatidae.

fact1: {F}{d} -> (¬{B}{c} & {D}{c}) fact2: (x): {E}x -> ¬{A}x fact3: ¬{C}{a} -> {B}{b} fact4: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x fact5: {E}{eq} fact6: ¬{C}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} & {E}{b}) fact7: ¬{E}{b} -> (¬{E}{a} & {B}{a}) fact8: (¬{FM}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact9: ¬{H}{d} -> ({G}{d} & {F}{d}) fact10: {B}{a} fact11: (¬{J}{d} v ¬{I}{d}) -> ¬{H}{d} fact12: {C}{b} -> ¬{A}{b} fact13: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({HU}x v {JD}x) fact14: ¬{DC}{a} fact15: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{B}{b} & {E}{b}) fact16: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} fact17: ¬{B}{c} -> ({A}{a} & {C}{a}) fact18: (x): ({D}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{A}x fact19: (x): ({FR}x v {IB}x) -> ¬{BC}x fact20: {A}{a} -> ¬{C}{a} fact21: ¬{B}{b} -> {C}{a} fact22: (x): {GJ}x -> ¬{DL}x

That diabolist is not a Nintu but a Waldenses.

(¬{FM}{cq} & {C}{cq})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that postbox unlaces Goncourt that handsaw is not a Zaar but this one is a kind of a Baldr. fact2: The fact that if somebody is a turned then it does not gift December is true. fact3: If that necessary is not a kind of a Waldenses then this sisham is a Zaar. fact4: If someone gifts December then it is not a Waldenses. fact5: The fact that this jaeger is a turned is true. fact6: This sisham is both not a Waldenses and a turned if that necessary is not a Waldenses. fact7: That necessary is not a turned but a Zaar if this sisham is not a turned. fact8: This sisham is not a Nintu and does not gift December. fact9: If that postbox is not a kind of a Monophysite then that postbox incorporates Lepisosteidae and it unlaces Goncourt. fact10: The fact that that necessary is a Zaar is true. fact11: If that postbox is not a Fortunella or it is non-autogenetic or both that it is not a Monophysite hold. fact12: If this sisham is a Waldenses this sisham does not gift December. fact13: If something does not gift December then it is a featured and/or it does snow pyramid. fact14: That necessary is not a kind of a yardage. fact15: This sisham is not a Zaar but it is a turned if that necessary is not a kind of a Zaar. fact16: If that necessary is not a kind of a Waldenses then this sisham is not a Waldenses. fact17: If that handsaw is not a Zaar then that necessary gifts December and is a Waldenses. fact18: Something does not gift December if the thing is a Baldr and the thing is not a Zaar. fact19: If something is a profoundness or it is unbaptised or both then it does not last. fact20: The fact that that necessary is not a kind of a Waldenses if that necessary does gift December is true. fact21: If this sisham is not a Zaar that necessary is a Waldenses. fact22: If something festers then it is not a Hypodermatidae. ; $hypothesis$ = This sisham is not a Waldenses and is a kind of a turned. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That paediatricness happens.

{C}

fact1: That both that unfurrowedness and that billow occurs is triggered by that this sacredness does not occurs. fact2: The fact that the fact that that non-paediatricness and that non-beneficentness happens hold is false if that unfathomableness does not occurs. fact3: If that unfathomableness happens and this beneficentness occurs then that paediatricness does not happens. fact4: If this beneficentness does not occurs then both this contesting and that unfathomableness happens. fact5: This beneficentness occurs. fact6: That that billow occurs results in that that begetting Browne and that non-unfathomableness happens. fact7: That unfathomableness happens.

fact1: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{B}) fact3: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact4: ¬{B} -> ({EI} & {A}) fact5: {B} fact6: {E} -> ({D} & ¬{A}) fact7: {A}

This contesting happens.

{EI}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That both that unfurrowedness and that billow occurs is triggered by that this sacredness does not occurs. fact2: The fact that the fact that that non-paediatricness and that non-beneficentness happens hold is false if that unfathomableness does not occurs. fact3: If that unfathomableness happens and this beneficentness occurs then that paediatricness does not happens. fact4: If this beneficentness does not occurs then both this contesting and that unfathomableness happens. fact5: This beneficentness occurs. fact6: That that billow occurs results in that that begetting Browne and that non-unfathomableness happens. fact7: That unfathomableness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That paediatricness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact5 -> int1: That unfathomableness and this beneficentness happens.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This mensalness does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: The Iraqi triggers this mensalness. fact2: The fatty happens. fact3: The Iraqi and/or that sprint occurs. fact4: That that sprint happens yields that this mensalness happens.

fact1: {A} -> {C} fact2: {AJ} fact3: ({A} v {B}) fact4: {B} -> {C}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The Iraqi triggers this mensalness. fact2: The fatty happens. fact3: The Iraqi and/or that sprint occurs. fact4: That that sprint happens yields that this mensalness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This mensalness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That either this airflow or this vitiation or both occurs is wrong.

¬({C} v {D})

fact1: That non-possessiveness is prevented by this aegir. fact2: That jeopardizing Siphonaptera occurs and/or the immobileness occurs. fact3: The fact that either this airflow or this vitiation or both occurs is false if this aegir does not happens. fact4: That this airflow occurs is right if this possessiveness happens. fact5: This aegir occurs.

fact1: {A} -> {B} fact2: ({DC} v {IT}) fact3: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} v {D}) fact4: {B} -> {C} fact5: {A}

That either this airflow or this vitiation or both occurs is wrong.

¬({C} v {D})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That non-possessiveness is prevented by this aegir. fact2: That jeopardizing Siphonaptera occurs and/or the immobileness occurs. fact3: The fact that either this airflow or this vitiation or both occurs is false if this aegir does not happens. fact4: That this airflow occurs is right if this possessiveness happens. fact5: This aegir occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That either this airflow or this vitiation or both occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact5 -> int1: That that this possessiveness does not happens is true does not hold.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: This airflow happens.; int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This deserted occurs.

{D}

fact1: This deception occurs. fact2: The floralness occurs and the principledness occurs. fact3: If both this leadeding towering and that telling Njorth occurs then the polyphonicness does not happens. fact4: The fact that that recourse occurs hold. fact5: That this interest occurs and the guessing prothalamium happens prevents the plateletpheresis. fact6: The fact that this mastering happens is right. fact7: If that calendricness happens and that frothing Wulfila occurs then the restlessness does not happens. fact8: That that recourse and this jacks occurs is caused by that this deception does not occurs. fact9: This deserted happens if this empiricness does not occurs. fact10: The froone Wulfila happens and the residing checklist occurs. fact11: If that recourse occurs and this deception happens this empiricness does not happens. fact12: This mastering does not occurs if both the sudsiness and this mamboing happens.

fact1: {B} fact2: ({HP} & {JK}) fact3: ({DN} & {GM}) -> ¬{CQ} fact4: {A} fact5: ({GF} & {CD}) -> ¬{IE} fact6: {K} fact7: ({BO} & {AM}) -> ¬{S} fact8: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {H}) fact9: ¬{C} -> {D} fact10: ({AM} & {HA}) fact11: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact12: ({AQ} & {HL}) -> ¬{K}

This jacks occurs.

{H}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This deception occurs. fact2: The floralness occurs and the principledness occurs. fact3: If both this leadeding towering and that telling Njorth occurs then the polyphonicness does not happens. fact4: The fact that that recourse occurs hold. fact5: That this interest occurs and the guessing prothalamium happens prevents the plateletpheresis. fact6: The fact that this mastering happens is right. fact7: If that calendricness happens and that frothing Wulfila occurs then the restlessness does not happens. fact8: That that recourse and this jacks occurs is caused by that this deception does not occurs. fact9: This deserted happens if this empiricness does not occurs. fact10: The froone Wulfila happens and the residing checklist occurs. fact11: If that recourse occurs and this deception happens this empiricness does not happens. fact12: This mastering does not occurs if both the sudsiness and this mamboing happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This deserted occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact1 -> int1: Both that recourse and this deception happens.; int1 & fact11 -> int2: This empiricness does not happens.; int2 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that pic is not nonwashable is true.

¬{A}{aa}

fact1: If this soybean is a kind of a possessive then Hortencia is a kind of a possessive. fact2: Everything is a kind of a prying. fact3: Everything implicates Jed'dah and this thing foregathers refractiveness. fact4: That pic is incoherent. fact5: Everyone is Taoist. fact6: The fact that everything is a sapphirine and it is a confederacy hold.

fact1: {BK}{b} -> {BK}{be} fact2: (x): {DQ}x fact3: (x): ({DT}x & {GI}x) fact4: {B}{aa} fact5: (x): {HM}x fact6: (x): ({CA}x & {AS}x)

Hortencia is both a possessive and a fish.

({BK}{be} & {AK}{be})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this soybean is a kind of a possessive then Hortencia is a kind of a possessive. fact2: Everything is a kind of a prying. fact3: Everything implicates Jed'dah and this thing foregathers refractiveness. fact4: That pic is incoherent. fact5: Everyone is Taoist. fact6: The fact that everything is a sapphirine and it is a confederacy hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That that pic is not nonwashable is true. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that sulphurettedness does not occurs and that volarness happens is wrong.

¬(¬{B} & {C})

fact1: That recycling abeyance does not happens. fact2: If that interning Akhenaten and that non-divalentness happens this backhanderness does not happens. fact3: The restlessness occurs. fact4: This chasing does not happens. fact5: This interlacing unhelpfulness happens. fact6: That this interlacing unhelpfulness happens and that tempering ductility occurs causes that this superhumanness does not occurs. fact7: That nitricness happens. fact8: This superhumanness occurs. fact9: That the fact that both that sulphurettedness and this superhumanness occurs does not hold is true if this living discredited does not happens. fact10: The fact that that sulphurettedness does not occurs but that volarness occurs is wrong if that this superhumanness does not occurs hold. fact11: That that pectinealness does not happens is caused by that the eructation does not occurs and/or the neurotoxicness happens. fact12: That followup occurs. fact13: That both that interning Akhenaten and that non-divalentness occurs is brought about by that that pectinealness does not occurs. fact14: That that significantness does not occurs triggers that that tempering ductility does not occurs and this ones does not happens. fact15: The earman does not occurs if that that sulphurettedness and this superhumanness happens is wrong. fact16: That this backhanderness does not happens leads to that notthis living discredited but that followup occurs. fact17: The Haitian happens. fact18: If this interlacing unhelpfulness does not happens then this backwardness occurs and that volarness occurs. fact19: Both that modernising and the magneticness occurs. fact20: If this catabolicness happens then that modernising does not happens. fact21: If this superhumanness occurs that sulphurettedness does not happens. fact22: That this interlacing unhelpfulness does not happens is caused by that that tempering ductility does not occurs and this people does not happens.

fact1: ¬{S} fact2: ({K} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{J} fact3: {IE} fact4: ¬{HB} fact5: {D} fact6: ({D} & {E}) -> ¬{A} fact7: {ET} fact8: {A} fact9: ¬{H} -> ¬({B} & {A}) fact10: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{B} & {C}) fact11: (¬{O} v {N}) -> ¬{M} fact12: {I} fact13: ¬{M} -> ({K} & ¬{L}) fact14: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) fact15: ¬({B} & {A}) -> ¬{DB} fact16: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & {I}) fact17: {CQ} fact18: ¬{D} -> ({BL} & {C}) fact19: ({AC} & {JB}) fact20: {DH} -> ¬{AC} fact21: {A} -> ¬{B} fact22: (¬{E} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{D}

That earone does not happens but this backwardness occurs.

(¬{DB} & {BL})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That recycling abeyance does not happens. fact2: If that interning Akhenaten and that non-divalentness happens this backhanderness does not happens. fact3: The restlessness occurs. fact4: This chasing does not happens. fact5: This interlacing unhelpfulness happens. fact6: That this interlacing unhelpfulness happens and that tempering ductility occurs causes that this superhumanness does not occurs. fact7: That nitricness happens. fact8: This superhumanness occurs. fact9: That the fact that both that sulphurettedness and this superhumanness occurs does not hold is true if this living discredited does not happens. fact10: The fact that that sulphurettedness does not occurs but that volarness occurs is wrong if that this superhumanness does not occurs hold. fact11: That that pectinealness does not happens is caused by that the eructation does not occurs and/or the neurotoxicness happens. fact12: That followup occurs. fact13: That both that interning Akhenaten and that non-divalentness occurs is brought about by that that pectinealness does not occurs. fact14: That that significantness does not occurs triggers that that tempering ductility does not occurs and this ones does not happens. fact15: The earman does not occurs if that that sulphurettedness and this superhumanness happens is wrong. fact16: That this backhanderness does not happens leads to that notthis living discredited but that followup occurs. fact17: The Haitian happens. fact18: If this interlacing unhelpfulness does not happens then this backwardness occurs and that volarness occurs. fact19: Both that modernising and the magneticness occurs. fact20: If this catabolicness happens then that modernising does not happens. fact21: If this superhumanness occurs that sulphurettedness does not happens. fact22: That this interlacing unhelpfulness does not happens is caused by that that tempering ductility does not occurs and this people does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that sulphurettedness does not occurs and that volarness happens is wrong. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that every man is autologous does not hold.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Everything is a Congregationalism. fact2: Everything is ossicular. fact3: If some man is not autologous the person is a companionability. fact4: If something dismisses Sarcodes or the thing is anginous or both the thing does not examine. fact5: Every man condemns Leucanthemum. fact6: If some man is a everydayness that person is a kind of non-bibliothecal man that is not autologous. fact7: Everyone is nonaligned. fact8: Everything unclasps. fact9: Everyone is unemotional. fact10: Every man dismisses Sarcodes and/or is anginous. fact11: That everyone is not a kind of a radical and does not examine hold. fact12: Everyone is innate. fact13: Everything is schismatical. fact14: Everything is due. fact15: Everything is autologous.

fact1: (x): {HU}x fact2: (x): {AS}x fact3: (x): ¬{A}x -> {S}x fact4: (x): ({G}x v {F}x) -> ¬{E}x fact5: (x): {FO}x fact6: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact7: (x): {GQ}x fact8: (x): {CF}x fact9: (x): {CO}x fact10: (x): ({G}x v {F}x) fact11: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact12: (x): {AG}x fact13: (x): {IU}x fact14: (x): {IR}x fact15: (x): {A}x

Everything does overawe acapnia.

(x): {BM}x

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is a Congregationalism. fact2: Everything is ossicular. fact3: If some man is not autologous the person is a companionability. fact4: If something dismisses Sarcodes or the thing is anginous or both the thing does not examine. fact5: Every man condemns Leucanthemum. fact6: If some man is a everydayness that person is a kind of non-bibliothecal man that is not autologous. fact7: Everyone is nonaligned. fact8: Everything unclasps. fact9: Everyone is unemotional. fact10: Every man dismisses Sarcodes and/or is anginous. fact11: That everyone is not a kind of a radical and does not examine hold. fact12: Everyone is innate. fact13: Everything is schismatical. fact14: Everything is due. fact15: Everything is autologous. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that every man is autologous does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

There is something such that if it is not jolty then the fact that it is grammatic and it is not joyous is not true.

(Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

fact1: If this gum is not jolty that this gum is grammatic and not joyous does not hold. fact2: That some person nabs buy but it is not a Heliamphora does not hold if it is not joyous.

fact1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact2: (x): ¬{AB}x -> ¬({AT}x & ¬{CH}x)

That that Confucianist nabs buy and is not a Heliamphora is incorrect if this thing is not joyous.

¬{AB}{ak} -> ¬({AT}{ak} & ¬{CH}{ak})

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If this gum is not jolty that this gum is grammatic and not joyous does not hold. fact2: That some person nabs buy but it is not a Heliamphora does not hold if it is not joyous. ; $hypothesis$ = There is something such that if it is not jolty then the fact that it is grammatic and it is not joyous is not true. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That quitting Kannada does not occurs.

¬{AB}

fact1: The people does not occurs. fact2: That taper does not occurs but the adenocarcinomatousness occurs if this subordinativeness occurs. fact3: If this quartering happens then notthat things but that quitting Kannada occurs. fact4: That that husking does not occurs but that swipe occurs is caused by this racialism. fact5: The fact that notthe eating Huston but the alliterating happens hold. fact6: Notthe botryoidness but this apiarianness happens if the therapy happens. fact7: That that things does not occurs is triggered by that this quartering occurs.

fact1: ¬{AA} fact2: {DN} -> (¬{DO} & {DG}) fact3: {A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact4: {IQ} -> (¬{IN} & {FE}) fact5: (¬{EO} & {ET}) fact6: {BT} -> (¬{BQ} & {JA}) fact7: {A} -> ¬{AA}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The people does not occurs. fact2: That taper does not occurs but the adenocarcinomatousness occurs if this subordinativeness occurs. fact3: If this quartering happens then notthat things but that quitting Kannada occurs. fact4: That that husking does not occurs but that swipe occurs is caused by this racialism. fact5: The fact that notthe eating Huston but the alliterating happens hold. fact6: Notthe botryoidness but this apiarianness happens if the therapy happens. fact7: That that things does not occurs is triggered by that this quartering occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That quitting Kannada does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That ladening does not occurs and this Palestinian does not happens.

(¬{C} & ¬{B})

fact1: If that Bestness occurs then that ladening does not occurs. fact2: If that legalization does not occurs that that ladening does not occurs and this Palestinian does not happens is wrong. fact3: That the acapnicness and this non-heliacness occurs is false. fact4: That shlep does not occurs if the fact that this overwearying happens but the Frenching does not happens is not right. fact5: That ladening does not occurs if the fact that that subjacentness and this non-Bestness occurs is not right. fact6: That the jibbing undependability happens but this intramuscularness does not occurs is not true. fact7: The fact that this caressing conference and the appellativeness happens is wrong. fact8: That the monoatomicness does not happens is true. fact9: The fact that that legalization occurs hold. fact10: That the Demotic happens and that overhearing does not happens does not hold. fact11: That both that Bestness and that subjacentness occurs brings about that that legalization does not happens. fact12: That this wobbling occurs triggers that the ticking does not occurs. fact13: That both that subjacentness and that Bestness happens is false. fact14: The menacing Bolshevism happens. fact15: That this Palestinian does not occurs and/or that legalization occurs prevents this overwearying. fact16: The fact that both that subjacentness and this non-Bestness occurs does not hold. fact17: The streptococcicness does not happens and that tilling Beantown does not occurs. fact18: This non-subjacentness is brought about by that this pluralising occurs. fact19: The heliacness does not occurs and the ESR does not occurs. fact20: If this viscometry occurs then that this pulsation does not occurs is true. fact21: This concession happens.

fact1: {D} -> ¬{C} fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{B}) fact3: ¬({FT} & ¬{IJ}) fact4: ¬({U} & ¬{BS}) -> ¬{AL} fact5: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact6: ¬({BU} & ¬{H}) fact7: ¬({AO} & {DS}) fact8: ¬{IM} fact9: {A} fact10: ¬({AE} & ¬{JG}) fact11: ({D} & {E}) -> ¬{A} fact12: {HL} -> ¬{GR} fact13: ¬({E} & {D}) fact14: {BQ} fact15: (¬{B} v {A}) -> ¬{U} fact16: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) fact17: (¬{FH} & ¬{GF}) fact18: {F} -> ¬{E} fact19: (¬{IJ} & ¬{DR}) fact20: {GM} -> ¬{DA} fact21: {DD}

That that that ladening does not occurs and this Palestinian does not occurs is right does not hold.

¬(¬{C} & ¬{B})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that Bestness occurs then that ladening does not occurs. fact2: If that legalization does not occurs that that ladening does not occurs and this Palestinian does not happens is wrong. fact3: That the acapnicness and this non-heliacness occurs is false. fact4: That shlep does not occurs if the fact that this overwearying happens but the Frenching does not happens is not right. fact5: That ladening does not occurs if the fact that that subjacentness and this non-Bestness occurs is not right. fact6: That the jibbing undependability happens but this intramuscularness does not occurs is not true. fact7: The fact that this caressing conference and the appellativeness happens is wrong. fact8: That the monoatomicness does not happens is true. fact9: The fact that that legalization occurs hold. fact10: That the Demotic happens and that overhearing does not happens does not hold. fact11: That both that Bestness and that subjacentness occurs brings about that that legalization does not happens. fact12: That this wobbling occurs triggers that the ticking does not occurs. fact13: That both that subjacentness and that Bestness happens is false. fact14: The menacing Bolshevism happens. fact15: That this Palestinian does not occurs and/or that legalization occurs prevents this overwearying. fact16: The fact that both that subjacentness and this non-Bestness occurs does not hold. fact17: The streptococcicness does not happens and that tilling Beantown does not occurs. fact18: This non-subjacentness is brought about by that this pluralising occurs. fact19: The heliacness does not occurs and the ESR does not occurs. fact20: If this viscometry occurs then that this pulsation does not occurs is true. fact21: This concession happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That ladening does not occurs and this Palestinian does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that someone accrues rearguard and does discontinue Sparta is false.

¬((Ex): ({A}x & {B}x))

fact1: this Sparta discontinues culotte. fact2: Some man is a Elephantopus. fact3: That culotte discontinues Sparta. fact4: That culotte accrues rearguard. fact5: The vermiculation pursues loan. fact6: The tayra discontinues Sparta and it does perforate millihenry. fact7: That culotte is a kind of a Catacala. fact8: There exists someone such that it accrues rearguard. fact9: Something does delay and it is a kind of a Housman. fact10: this rearguard accrues culotte. fact11: That stencil does discontinue Sparta. fact12: Somebody is a Lutheranism. fact13: If the assess pursues loan then that culotte pursues loan. fact14: If the fact that this pigboat does not accrue rearguard and does not discontinue Sparta does not hold then that culotte is a impenitency. fact15: Something is a kind of a clatter if this thing pursues loan. fact16: That rudderfish accrues rearguard. fact17: The assess pursues loan if the vermiculation pursues loan.

fact1: {AB}{ab} fact2: (Ex): {FC}x fact3: {B}{a} fact4: {A}{a} fact5: {C}{d} fact6: ({B}{ig} & {EL}{ig}) fact7: {AJ}{a} fact8: (Ex): {A}x fact9: (Ex): ({CD}x & {IU}x) fact10: {AA}{aa} fact11: {B}{ck} fact12: (Ex): {GH}x fact13: {C}{c} -> {C}{a} fact14: ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> {HF}{a} fact15: (x): {C}x -> {AR}x fact16: {A}{hl} fact17: {C}{d} -> {C}{c}

Someone is a clatter and a impenitency.

(Ex): ({AR}x & {HF}x)

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: this Sparta discontinues culotte. fact2: Some man is a Elephantopus. fact3: That culotte discontinues Sparta. fact4: That culotte accrues rearguard. fact5: The vermiculation pursues loan. fact6: The tayra discontinues Sparta and it does perforate millihenry. fact7: That culotte is a kind of a Catacala. fact8: There exists someone such that it accrues rearguard. fact9: Something does delay and it is a kind of a Housman. fact10: this rearguard accrues culotte. fact11: That stencil does discontinue Sparta. fact12: Somebody is a Lutheranism. fact13: If the assess pursues loan then that culotte pursues loan. fact14: If the fact that this pigboat does not accrue rearguard and does not discontinue Sparta does not hold then that culotte is a impenitency. fact15: Something is a kind of a clatter if this thing pursues loan. fact16: That rudderfish accrues rearguard. fact17: The assess pursues loan if the vermiculation pursues loan. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that someone accrues rearguard and does discontinue Sparta is false. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact3 -> int1: The fact that that culotte accrues rearguard and it does discontinue Sparta is right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That advancer is not a kind of a brachiopod.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: That advancer does not machinate clenched. fact2: If the fact that that dietary is not non-hematic is right that dietary is stannic. fact3: Something is stannic if the fact that it overfeeds tiresomeness hold. fact4: The fact that some person is axillary and does not machinate clenched is false if this one is not non-stannic. fact5: If that advancer does not machinate clenched then that advancer flocculates and is a kind of a cynicism. fact6: Someone that is a cynicism is a kind of a brachiopod. fact7: If that advancer does not machinate clenched that it flocculates hold. fact8: that clenched does not machinate advancer. fact9: That dietary overfeeds tiresomeness and/or it is hematic.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} fact2: {E}{an} -> {D}{an} fact3: (x): {F}x -> {D}x fact4: (x): {D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{A}x) fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact6: (x): {AB}x -> {B}x fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{a} fact8: ¬{AC}{aa} fact9: ({F}{an} v {E}{an})

That that dietary is not a kind of a cynicism hold.

¬{AB}{an}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That advancer does not machinate clenched. fact2: If the fact that that dietary is not non-hematic is right that dietary is stannic. fact3: Something is stannic if the fact that it overfeeds tiresomeness hold. fact4: The fact that some person is axillary and does not machinate clenched is false if this one is not non-stannic. fact5: If that advancer does not machinate clenched then that advancer flocculates and is a kind of a cynicism. fact6: Someone that is a cynicism is a kind of a brachiopod. fact7: If that advancer does not machinate clenched that it flocculates hold. fact8: that clenched does not machinate advancer. fact9: That dietary overfeeds tiresomeness and/or it is hematic. ; $hypothesis$ = That advancer is not a kind of a brachiopod. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact1 -> int1: That advancer flocculates and is a cynicism.; int1 -> int2: The fact that that advancer is a kind of a cynicism hold.; fact6 -> int3: That advancer is a kind of a brachiopod if it is a cynicism.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This drool happens.

{B}

fact1: If that massing myiasis does not occurs this drool occurs and the skittles happens. fact2: That this anastigmaticness occurs or this non-ventralness or both prevents that that massing myiasis occurs. fact3: That ebonising hematocytopenia does not happens. fact4: The billeting combativeness does not happens if the osculation does not occurs and the anticancerness does not occurs. fact5: The batting Cryptogrammataceae does not happens. fact6: That this drool occurs is prevented by that notthe stepping but that ebonising hematocytopenia occurs. fact7: If the acidimetricness happens then either this anastigmaticness happens or this ventralness does not happens or both. fact8: The stepping does not happens and that ebonising hematocytopenia does not happens.

fact1: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact2: ({D} v ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} fact3: ¬{AB} fact4: (¬{GN} & ¬{JH}) -> ¬{GL} fact5: ¬{CN} fact6: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact7: {F} -> ({D} v ¬{E}) fact8: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

This drool happens.

{B}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that massing myiasis does not occurs this drool occurs and the skittles happens. fact2: That this anastigmaticness occurs or this non-ventralness or both prevents that that massing myiasis occurs. fact3: That ebonising hematocytopenia does not happens. fact4: The billeting combativeness does not happens if the osculation does not occurs and the anticancerness does not occurs. fact5: The batting Cryptogrammataceae does not happens. fact6: That this drool occurs is prevented by that notthe stepping but that ebonising hematocytopenia occurs. fact7: If the acidimetricness happens then either this anastigmaticness happens or this ventralness does not happens or both. fact8: The stepping does not happens and that ebonising hematocytopenia does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This drool happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This grumbling happens.

{C}

fact1: That briskening occurs. fact2: That the sparkling Ornithorhynchus and that briskening happens is brought about by that that rubberising oceanography does not occurs. fact3: That rubberising oceanography happens. fact4: If that rubberising oceanography does not happens then both this grumbling and that briskening occurs. fact5: That this grumbling occurs and that quantalness occurs prevents that rubberising oceanography. fact6: That that briskening and that rubberising oceanography occurs results in that this grumbling does not happens.

fact1: {A} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({GG} & {A}) fact3: {B} fact4: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) fact5: ({C} & {D}) -> ¬{B} fact6: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C}

The sparkling Ornithorhynchus occurs.

{GG}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That briskening occurs. fact2: That the sparkling Ornithorhynchus and that briskening happens is brought about by that that rubberising oceanography does not occurs. fact3: That rubberising oceanography happens. fact4: If that rubberising oceanography does not happens then both this grumbling and that briskening occurs. fact5: That this grumbling occurs and that quantalness occurs prevents that rubberising oceanography. fact6: That that briskening and that rubberising oceanography occurs results in that this grumbling does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This grumbling happens. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> int1: Both that briskening and that rubberising oceanography occurs.; int1 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that there is some person such that the fact that that one countermands Taurotragus or that one is undemonstrative or both does not hold is false.

¬((Ex): ¬({D}x v {B}x))

fact1: The fact that this orthomyxovirus is undemonstrative and/or it is an argentine does not hold if the fact that this orthomyxovirus is not a kind of an argentine hold. fact2: This orthomyxovirus is demonstrative if this orthomyxovirus is not a unprotectedness. fact3: This orthomyxovirus is not a unprotectedness. fact4: That something either countermands Taurotragus or is undemonstrative or both is false if it is not undemonstrative. fact5: If the fact that this scraps does fester AARP and that is undemonstrative is incorrect then this scraps does not fester AARP. fact6: There is some man such that that it is a palaeolithic and/or it is atheromatous does not hold. fact7: Something countermands Taurotragus or is undemonstrative or both. fact8: There exists something such that that either it tongues legalese or it kayaks beauteousness or both does not hold. fact9: That photometer does not countermand Taurotragus.

fact1: ¬{EQ}{a} -> ¬({B}{a} v {EQ}{a}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({D}x v {B}x) fact5: ¬({GJ}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{GJ}{b} fact6: (Ex): ¬({AG}x v {AR}x) fact7: (Ex): ({D}x v {B}x) fact8: (Ex): ¬({CH}x v {FG}x) fact9: ¬{D}{be}

There is somebody such that that that person either broadcasts babble or festers AARP or both is incorrect.

(Ex): ¬({GB}x v {GJ}x)

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this orthomyxovirus is undemonstrative and/or it is an argentine does not hold if the fact that this orthomyxovirus is not a kind of an argentine hold. fact2: This orthomyxovirus is demonstrative if this orthomyxovirus is not a unprotectedness. fact3: This orthomyxovirus is not a unprotectedness. fact4: That something either countermands Taurotragus or is undemonstrative or both is false if it is not undemonstrative. fact5: If the fact that this scraps does fester AARP and that is undemonstrative is incorrect then this scraps does not fester AARP. fact6: There is some man such that that it is a palaeolithic and/or it is atheromatous does not hold. fact7: Something countermands Taurotragus or is undemonstrative or both. fact8: There exists something such that that either it tongues legalese or it kayaks beauteousness or both does not hold. fact9: That photometer does not countermand Taurotragus. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that there is some person such that the fact that that one countermands Taurotragus or that one is undemonstrative or both does not hold is false. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact3 -> int1: This orthomyxovirus is not undemonstrative.; fact4 -> int2: If this orthomyxovirus is not undemonstrative the fact that this orthomyxovirus countermands Taurotragus or it is undemonstrative or both does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That this orthomyxovirus countermands Taurotragus or it is undemonstrative or both is wrong.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This applesauce is a Manannan and the person is a lagniappe.

({E}{c} & {D}{c})

fact1: The smallmouth is a mineral and this one is dramatic. fact2: The fact that this Shona is a Camelina is right. fact3: That bayberry is a kind of a Manannan. fact4: This backgrounding is a mineral. fact5: This applesauce spays Talinum. fact6: If that hornblende is a mineral and it is a Camelina then this backgrounding is not dermic. fact7: This applesauce is a lagniappe if this backgrounding is not dermic. fact8: This backgrounding is not non-cytophotometric and it is a uprightness. fact9: This applesauce is a Fechner and it is dermic. fact10: This applesauce is a lagniappe. fact11: This applesauce is a mineral and it is a lagniappe. fact12: That hornblende is deconstructionist. fact13: If that hornblende is a lagniappe then that hornblende is not a mineral and not dermic. fact14: Something is not a mineral if it is dermic and it is not a kind of a Camelina. fact15: If some person is not a trusting then he is not a Camelina but peaceful. fact16: That narrow is not a kind of a Camelina. fact17: This applesauce is not a Camelina if that hornblende is both a mineral and a Manannan. fact18: This applesauce is a Camelina. fact19: That hornblende is a kind of a Camelina. fact20: If this backgrounding is not dermic then this applesauce is a Manannan that is a lagniappe. fact21: That some person is a Manannan and she is a lagniappe is incorrect if she is not a kind of a mineral. fact22: This applesauce is a mineral and this is untactful. fact23: This backgrounding is a Manannan. fact24: That that hornblende is a mineral is true.

fact1: ({A}{ho} & {BK}{ho}) fact2: {B}{bd} fact3: {E}{ei} fact4: {A}{b} fact5: {HP}{c} fact6: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact7: ¬{C}{b} -> {D}{c} fact8: ({EG}{b} & {IM}{b}) fact9: ({H}{c} & {C}{c}) fact10: {D}{c} fact11: ({A}{c} & {D}{c}) fact12: {DA}{a} fact13: {D}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact14: (x): ({C}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{A}x fact15: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{B}x & {F}x) fact16: ¬{B}{hj} fact17: ({A}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact18: {B}{c} fact19: {B}{a} fact20: ¬{C}{b} -> ({E}{c} & {D}{c}) fact21: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({E}x & {D}x) fact22: ({A}{c} & {II}{c}) fact23: {E}{b} fact24: {A}{a}

That this applesauce is a kind of a Manannan and is a lagniappe is false.

¬({E}{c} & {D}{c})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The smallmouth is a mineral and this one is dramatic. fact2: The fact that this Shona is a Camelina is right. fact3: That bayberry is a kind of a Manannan. fact4: This backgrounding is a mineral. fact5: This applesauce spays Talinum. fact6: If that hornblende is a mineral and it is a Camelina then this backgrounding is not dermic. fact7: This applesauce is a lagniappe if this backgrounding is not dermic. fact8: This backgrounding is not non-cytophotometric and it is a uprightness. fact9: This applesauce is a Fechner and it is dermic. fact10: This applesauce is a lagniappe. fact11: This applesauce is a mineral and it is a lagniappe. fact12: That hornblende is deconstructionist. fact13: If that hornblende is a lagniappe then that hornblende is not a mineral and not dermic. fact14: Something is not a mineral if it is dermic and it is not a kind of a Camelina. fact15: If some person is not a trusting then he is not a Camelina but peaceful. fact16: That narrow is not a kind of a Camelina. fact17: This applesauce is not a Camelina if that hornblende is both a mineral and a Manannan. fact18: This applesauce is a Camelina. fact19: That hornblende is a kind of a Camelina. fact20: If this backgrounding is not dermic then this applesauce is a Manannan that is a lagniappe. fact21: That some person is a Manannan and she is a lagniappe is incorrect if she is not a kind of a mineral. fact22: This applesauce is a mineral and this is untactful. fact23: This backgrounding is a Manannan. fact24: That that hornblende is a mineral is true. ; $hypothesis$ = This applesauce is a Manannan and the person is a lagniappe. ; $proof$ =

fact24 & fact19 -> int1: That hornblende is a mineral and it is a Camelina.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: This backgrounding is not dermic.; int2 & fact20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This bluefish is not Lincolnian.

¬{C}{c}

fact1: If this Dardanian is both a greyed and non-anamnestic then this bluefish is not a literal. fact2: This bluefish is Lincolnian if this Dardanian is not a greyed. fact3: If this Dardanian is not Lincolnian then this bluefish is a literal. fact4: If that this Dardanian is a literal is correct then the harrow is a kind of a greyed. fact5: If the fact that someone is not a literal hold then it is non-Lincolnian. fact6: The fact that this bluefish is Lincolnian is correct if this Dardanian is not a literal.

fact1: ({B}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{A}{c} fact2: ¬{B}{a} -> {C}{c} fact3: ¬{C}{a} -> {A}{c} fact4: {A}{a} -> {B}{di} fact5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}x fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> {C}{c}

This bluefish is not Lincolnian.

¬{C}{c}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this Dardanian is both a greyed and non-anamnestic then this bluefish is not a literal. fact2: This bluefish is Lincolnian if this Dardanian is not a greyed. fact3: If this Dardanian is not Lincolnian then this bluefish is a literal. fact4: If that this Dardanian is a literal is correct then the harrow is a kind of a greyed. fact5: If the fact that someone is not a literal hold then it is non-Lincolnian. fact6: The fact that this bluefish is Lincolnian is correct if this Dardanian is not a literal. ; $hypothesis$ = This bluefish is not Lincolnian. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That HRT does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: This fading Latvia occurs. fact2: The linebacker and that sloping uncongeniality happens. fact3: Both this specking malfunctioning and that absolutistness occurs. fact4: That that HRT happens is prevented by that both that coronation and this fading Latvia happens. fact5: That unsweptness occurs. fact6: That that ogling Gongorism happens and that conception happens prevents that this embolectomy happens. fact7: The Communion and the trucking occurs. fact8: This extrasensoriness occurs. fact9: The uprisinging profundity happens. fact10: That the autumnalness and the horticulturalness happens results in that the nurture does not happens. fact11: The autumnalness does not happens if both this destabilisation and that Siniticness occurs. fact12: That the summation does not occurs is caused by that the injustice occurs and the pompousness happens. fact13: If this searing occurs and the smearing happens then the parceling does not happens. fact14: If both this runaway and the enticing Afghanistan happens then the laving Mauritania does not occurs. fact15: That coronation happens. fact16: Both the stablingness and this embolectomy happens. fact17: That that HRT occurs and that coronation occurs is triggered by that this fading Latvia does not happens. fact18: The merchandising happens.

fact1: {B} fact2: ({CL} & {U}) fact3: ({IK} & {AC}) fact4: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact5: {ET} fact6: ({HJ} & {FJ}) -> ¬{DD} fact7: ({CA} & {GD}) fact8: {DE} fact9: {AA} fact10: ({FD} & {DB}) -> ¬{BH} fact11: ({EU} & {IP}) -> ¬{FD} fact12: ({J} & {IU}) -> ¬{EA} fact13: ({GE} & {EJ}) -> ¬{HL} fact14: ({CN} & {N}) -> ¬{IJ} fact15: {A} fact16: ({IF} & {DD}) fact17: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) fact18: {BO}

That HRT happens.

{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This fading Latvia occurs. fact2: The linebacker and that sloping uncongeniality happens. fact3: Both this specking malfunctioning and that absolutistness occurs. fact4: That that HRT happens is prevented by that both that coronation and this fading Latvia happens. fact5: That unsweptness occurs. fact6: That that ogling Gongorism happens and that conception happens prevents that this embolectomy happens. fact7: The Communion and the trucking occurs. fact8: This extrasensoriness occurs. fact9: The uprisinging profundity happens. fact10: That the autumnalness and the horticulturalness happens results in that the nurture does not happens. fact11: The autumnalness does not happens if both this destabilisation and that Siniticness occurs. fact12: That the summation does not occurs is caused by that the injustice occurs and the pompousness happens. fact13: If this searing occurs and the smearing happens then the parceling does not happens. fact14: If both this runaway and the enticing Afghanistan happens then the laving Mauritania does not occurs. fact15: That coronation happens. fact16: Both the stablingness and this embolectomy happens. fact17: That that HRT occurs and that coronation occurs is triggered by that this fading Latvia does not happens. fact18: The merchandising happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That HRT does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact15 & fact1 -> int1: That coronation occurs and this fading Latvia happens.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This freaking status happens.

{E}

fact1: This unseductiveness prevents that that Dipylon does not happens. fact2: This unseductiveness happens. fact3: If that notthe misrepresenting purity but this papism occurs is wrong this freaking status occurs. fact4: If that Dipylon occurs the fact that the misrepresenting purity does not occurs but this papism occurs is not right.

fact1: {A} -> {B} fact2: {A} fact3: ¬(¬{D} & {C}) -> {E} fact4: {B} -> ¬(¬{D} & {C})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This unseductiveness prevents that that Dipylon does not happens. fact2: This unseductiveness happens. fact3: If that notthe misrepresenting purity but this papism occurs is wrong this freaking status occurs. fact4: If that Dipylon occurs the fact that the misrepresenting purity does not occurs but this papism occurs is not right. ; $hypothesis$ = This freaking status happens. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact2 -> int1: That Dipylon occurs.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: The fact that notthe misrepresenting purity but this papism occurs is false.; int2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that pirogi is both subtractive and not a Dactylopius is incorrect.

¬({C}{a} & ¬{A}{a})

fact1: That pirogi is subtractive if that gynandromorph is not a kind of a Lebanese. fact2: That pirogi is a kind of a Lebanese or it is not subtractive or both. fact3: That pirogi is not a myasthenia if that gynandromorph is not a kind of a Dactylopius. fact4: Somebody is subtractive if it is not associative. fact5: That cragsman is not perineal and/or does not butterfly Agalinis. fact6: Something is not concessive if the fact that it is both not a Lebanese and concessive does not hold. fact7: That pirogi is perineal and/or he/she is not a kind of a Dactylopius. fact8: The roughcast is not a Lebanese. fact9: That some man is not a Lebanese and is concessive does not hold if he/she is a Dactylopius. fact10: If that gynandromorph is not subtractive that pirogi is a myasthenia but it is not perineal. fact11: If that gynandromorph is not a Lebanese that pirogi is subtractive but this thing is not a Dactylopius. fact12: If that gynandromorph is not subtractive that pirogi is not a myasthenia. fact13: That pirogi is not scholarly or it is not perineal or both. fact14: That pirogi is not perineal if it is not subtractive. fact15: If some man is not a myasthenia and/or it is not perineal then the fact that it is not a Lebanese is true. fact16: That gynandromorph is not perineal. fact17: That ox is not a Lebanese. fact18: If that this rabbiteye is associative but it is not a insalubriousness is not correct it is not associative. fact19: If this rabbiteye is subtractive then that pirogi is a Dactylopius. fact20: If that gynandromorph is not subtractive that pirogi is not a Lebanese.

fact1: ¬{B}{aa} -> {C}{a} fact2: ({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) fact3: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{D}x -> {C}x fact5: (¬{AB}{m} v ¬{AL}{m}) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {BN}x) -> ¬{BN}x fact7: ({AB}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) fact8: ¬{B}{fp} fact9: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {BN}x) fact10: ¬{C}{aa} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact11: ¬{B}{aa} -> ({C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact12: ¬{C}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{a} fact13: (¬{FM}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact14: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} fact15: (x): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact16: ¬{AB}{aa} fact17: ¬{B}{ja} fact18: ¬({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact19: {C}{b} -> {A}{a} fact20: ¬{C}{aa} -> ¬{B}{a}

That pirogi is not concessive.

¬{BN}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That pirogi is subtractive if that gynandromorph is not a kind of a Lebanese. fact2: That pirogi is a kind of a Lebanese or it is not subtractive or both. fact3: That pirogi is not a myasthenia if that gynandromorph is not a kind of a Dactylopius. fact4: Somebody is subtractive if it is not associative. fact5: That cragsman is not perineal and/or does not butterfly Agalinis. fact6: Something is not concessive if the fact that it is both not a Lebanese and concessive does not hold. fact7: That pirogi is perineal and/or he/she is not a kind of a Dactylopius. fact8: The roughcast is not a Lebanese. fact9: That some man is not a Lebanese and is concessive does not hold if he/she is a Dactylopius. fact10: If that gynandromorph is not subtractive that pirogi is a myasthenia but it is not perineal. fact11: If that gynandromorph is not a Lebanese that pirogi is subtractive but this thing is not a Dactylopius. fact12: If that gynandromorph is not subtractive that pirogi is not a myasthenia. fact13: That pirogi is not scholarly or it is not perineal or both. fact14: That pirogi is not perineal if it is not subtractive. fact15: If some man is not a myasthenia and/or it is not perineal then the fact that it is not a Lebanese is true. fact16: That gynandromorph is not perineal. fact17: That ox is not a Lebanese. fact18: If that this rabbiteye is associative but it is not a insalubriousness is not correct it is not associative. fact19: If this rabbiteye is subtractive then that pirogi is a Dactylopius. fact20: If that gynandromorph is not subtractive that pirogi is not a Lebanese. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that pirogi is both subtractive and not a Dactylopius is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact15 -> int1: That gynandromorph is not a Lebanese if that gynandromorph is not a kind of a myasthenia or is not perineal or both.; fact16 -> int2: That gynandromorph is not a myasthenia or it is not perineal or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That gynandromorph is not a Lebanese.; int3 & fact11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Everybody is not a kind of a qabala and it is non-vicennial.

(x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

fact1: Someone is shockable if he/she invites Nervi. fact2: Everything is not a Lamium and the thing does not oxidise spyware. fact3: Everything is not a qabala. fact4: Somebody does not bob ammoniuria and does not joke taphephobia if it is unshockable. fact5: Everybody is not a kind of a qabala and it is non-vicennial. fact6: There exists nothing such that it is not explicable and gradates Embiodea. fact7: Everybody is not a Chlorophyceae and does not leaded homophobia. fact8: There is nothing such that it gradates Embiodea and/or is not explicable. fact9: That everything does not clomp midplane and this does not fixate Sisyphus hold. fact10: Every man is sold and that one does not steady imbalance. fact11: Everything is both not a weal and not ascitic. fact12: Every man does not dulcorate and does not thicken faculty. fact13: Something does not gradate Embiodea if that it is not explicable and it gradate Embiodea is false. fact14: Everything does not outrival hoariness and this is not a MRD. fact15: Everything is not a fore and it is not unaccommodating. fact16: Everybody is both not a Windaus and not phyllodial. fact17: Every man is not a kind of a black and it does not reduce warble. fact18: If the fact that something gradates Embiodea and/or that is not explicable is incorrect then that does not muddy Heinlein. fact19: Everything is a kind of non-metamorphic thing that does not push lateralisation. fact20: Everything is undescriptive and it is not a Austrian. fact21: Every man does not stud tebibyte.

fact1: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact2: (x): (¬{DB}x & ¬{FU}x) fact3: (x): ¬{AA}x fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{CE}x & ¬{HK}x) fact5: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {D}x) fact7: (x): (¬{EM}x & ¬{GQ}x) fact8: (x): ¬({D}x v ¬{E}x) fact9: (x): (¬{DE}x & ¬{AM}x) fact10: (x): (¬{J}x & ¬{BF}x) fact11: (x): (¬{AR}x & ¬{AD}x) fact12: (x): (¬{FS}x & ¬{HF}x) fact13: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x fact14: (x): (¬{GH}x & ¬{CP}x) fact15: (x): (¬{JK}x & ¬{IT}x) fact16: (x): (¬{CU}x & ¬{EJ}x) fact17: (x): (¬{HH}x & ¬{GR}x) fact18: (x): ¬({D}x v ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact19: (x): (¬{S}x & ¬{AH}x) fact20: (x): (¬{AG}x & ¬{JI}x) fact21: (x): ¬{HN}x

Everything is not a palatability and is not a statistic.

(x): (¬{G}x & ¬{BN}x)

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Someone is shockable if he/she invites Nervi. fact2: Everything is not a Lamium and the thing does not oxidise spyware. fact3: Everything is not a qabala. fact4: Somebody does not bob ammoniuria and does not joke taphephobia if it is unshockable. fact5: Everybody is not a kind of a qabala and it is non-vicennial. fact6: There exists nothing such that it is not explicable and gradates Embiodea. fact7: Everybody is not a Chlorophyceae and does not leaded homophobia. fact8: There is nothing such that it gradates Embiodea and/or is not explicable. fact9: That everything does not clomp midplane and this does not fixate Sisyphus hold. fact10: Every man is sold and that one does not steady imbalance. fact11: Everything is both not a weal and not ascitic. fact12: Every man does not dulcorate and does not thicken faculty. fact13: Something does not gradate Embiodea if that it is not explicable and it gradate Embiodea is false. fact14: Everything does not outrival hoariness and this is not a MRD. fact15: Everything is not a fore and it is not unaccommodating. fact16: Everybody is both not a Windaus and not phyllodial. fact17: Every man is not a kind of a black and it does not reduce warble. fact18: If the fact that something gradates Embiodea and/or that is not explicable is incorrect then that does not muddy Heinlein. fact19: Everything is a kind of non-metamorphic thing that does not push lateralisation. fact20: Everything is undescriptive and it is not a Austrian. fact21: Every man does not stud tebibyte. ; $hypothesis$ = Everybody is not a kind of a qabala and it is non-vicennial. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That dustmop does cheer.

{A}{a}

fact1: The peon cheers. fact2: If that this sunray does not o.d. and she/he does not inure Holbein is incorrect that dustmop o.d. fact3: That something is not non-gyroscopic and does not plunge Hyalophora does not hold if the fact that the thing retroverts Benchley is not wrong. fact4: The giblets cheers. fact5: Something wrangles Mandrillus and cheers if it is not anoxic. fact6: If some person is a conceivableness then that it retroverts Benchley is true. fact7: The playactor does cheer. fact8: A non-voltaic man wrangles Mandrillus and is not anoxic. fact9: The fact that this Aztec cheers is correct. fact10: If somebody wrangles Mandrillus and is not anoxic then the fact that she does not cheer hold. fact11: That dustmop is a kind of a Icelandic. fact12: If that some person is gyroscopic and does not plunge Hyalophora does not hold then that one is not voltaic. fact13: That dustmop chips Liopelmidae. fact14: That dustmop is a rakishness. fact15: That this empty cheers is right. fact16: This stereophony cheers. fact17: That dustmop is a lateralization. fact18: That dustmop is a kind of a Bronte. fact19: That dustmop is a kind of a conceivableness if that dustmop o.d.s. fact20: That dustmop snowballs analphabetism.

fact1: {A}{ag} fact2: ¬(¬{I}{b} & ¬{K}{b}) -> {I}{a} fact3: (x): {G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) fact4: {A}{jd} fact5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact6: (x): {H}x -> {G}x fact7: {A}{jb} fact8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & ¬{C}x) fact9: {A}{ad} fact10: (x): ({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact11: {AB}{a} fact12: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact13: {R}{a} fact14: {CA}{a} fact15: {A}{aq} fact16: {A}{co} fact17: {HF}{a} fact18: {GU}{a} fact19: {I}{a} -> {H}{a} fact20: {HJ}{a}

That dustmop does not cheer.

¬{A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The peon cheers. fact2: If that this sunray does not o.d. and she/he does not inure Holbein is incorrect that dustmop o.d. fact3: That something is not non-gyroscopic and does not plunge Hyalophora does not hold if the fact that the thing retroverts Benchley is not wrong. fact4: The giblets cheers. fact5: Something wrangles Mandrillus and cheers if it is not anoxic. fact6: If some person is a conceivableness then that it retroverts Benchley is true. fact7: The playactor does cheer. fact8: A non-voltaic man wrangles Mandrillus and is not anoxic. fact9: The fact that this Aztec cheers is correct. fact10: If somebody wrangles Mandrillus and is not anoxic then the fact that she does not cheer hold. fact11: That dustmop is a kind of a Icelandic. fact12: If that some person is gyroscopic and does not plunge Hyalophora does not hold then that one is not voltaic. fact13: That dustmop chips Liopelmidae. fact14: That dustmop is a rakishness. fact15: That this empty cheers is right. fact16: This stereophony cheers. fact17: That dustmop is a lateralization. fact18: That dustmop is a kind of a Bronte. fact19: That dustmop is a kind of a conceivableness if that dustmop o.d.s. fact20: That dustmop snowballs analphabetism. ; $hypothesis$ = That dustmop does cheer. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That coloring handy does not happens.

¬{B}

fact1: That that domesticity does not happens yields that that coloring handy does not occurs and that respecting Hexapoda does not occurs. fact2: If the malodourousness does not occurs then the fact that that vagueness does not happens and this unhooking Equetus does not happens does not hold. fact3: The fact that this stops occurs and that shambling does not occurs is false. fact4: This shading occurs if the fact that that unsharedness does not occurs and this discordantness does not occurs is incorrect. fact5: If that both this despite and that domesticity occurs does not hold then that domesticity does not occurs. fact6: That coloring handy occurs if the fact that that this stops does not happens and that shambling does not occurs is right is not right. fact7: The fact that notthe gyrating but the unvoluntariness happens does not hold if the fudging Qum does not occurs. fact8: That hydroelectricness occurs. fact9: That hygienising peag happens. fact10: The fact that this stops does not occurs and that shambling does not happens does not hold if that respecting Hexapoda does not occurs. fact11: The fact that notthis stops but that shambling occurs is not true. fact12: The fact that this booking does not happens and this Carthaginianness occurs does not hold. fact13: The fact that this moldering Choloepus does not occurs is right. fact14: The fact that both this despite and that incident happens hold if this chondrifying Ichthyosauridae does not happens. fact15: That respecting Hexapoda does not occurs. fact16: The fact that both that non-nonslipperiness and this approximating monocracy occurs is false. fact17: The fact that the fact that that hygienising peag does not happens and this rounding praesidium does not occurs hold is false. fact18: That the modulation does not happens and the bloomer does not occurs is incorrect. fact19: That this rounding praesidium does not happens but the deserving Sciadopitys happens is false if the plus does not occurs. fact20: If that respecting Hexapoda does not happens the fact that this stops but notthat shambling occurs is incorrect. fact21: That notthe overbearingness but this swilling occurs does not hold. fact22: The fact that notthis stops but that shambling occurs is false if that respecting Hexapoda does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact2: ¬{BT} -> ¬(¬{AG} & ¬{EL}) fact3: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact4: ¬(¬{GI} & ¬{HD}) -> {HH} fact5: ¬({D} & {C}) -> ¬{C} fact6: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact7: ¬{IG} -> ¬(¬{HJ} & {BB}) fact8: {HK} fact9: {IE} fact10: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact11: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact12: ¬(¬{DS} & {FC}) fact13: ¬{AN} fact14: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact15: ¬{A} fact16: ¬(¬{HL} & {EF}) fact17: ¬(¬{IE} & ¬{GU}) fact18: ¬(¬{HR} & ¬{DM}) fact19: ¬{FO} -> ¬(¬{GU} & {CP}) fact20: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact21: ¬(¬{IP} & {AI}) fact22: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB})

That umpiring id occurs.

{CE}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that domesticity does not happens yields that that coloring handy does not occurs and that respecting Hexapoda does not occurs. fact2: If the malodourousness does not occurs then the fact that that vagueness does not happens and this unhooking Equetus does not happens does not hold. fact3: The fact that this stops occurs and that shambling does not occurs is false. fact4: This shading occurs if the fact that that unsharedness does not occurs and this discordantness does not occurs is incorrect. fact5: If that both this despite and that domesticity occurs does not hold then that domesticity does not occurs. fact6: That coloring handy occurs if the fact that that this stops does not happens and that shambling does not occurs is right is not right. fact7: The fact that notthe gyrating but the unvoluntariness happens does not hold if the fudging Qum does not occurs. fact8: That hydroelectricness occurs. fact9: That hygienising peag happens. fact10: The fact that this stops does not occurs and that shambling does not happens does not hold if that respecting Hexapoda does not occurs. fact11: The fact that notthis stops but that shambling occurs is not true. fact12: The fact that this booking does not happens and this Carthaginianness occurs does not hold. fact13: The fact that this moldering Choloepus does not occurs is right. fact14: The fact that both this despite and that incident happens hold if this chondrifying Ichthyosauridae does not happens. fact15: That respecting Hexapoda does not occurs. fact16: The fact that both that non-nonslipperiness and this approximating monocracy occurs is false. fact17: The fact that the fact that that hygienising peag does not happens and this rounding praesidium does not occurs hold is false. fact18: That the modulation does not happens and the bloomer does not occurs is incorrect. fact19: That this rounding praesidium does not happens but the deserving Sciadopitys happens is false if the plus does not occurs. fact20: If that respecting Hexapoda does not happens the fact that this stops but notthat shambling occurs is incorrect. fact21: That notthe overbearingness but this swilling occurs does not hold. fact22: The fact that notthis stops but that shambling occurs is false if that respecting Hexapoda does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That coloring handy does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact15 -> int1: That this stops does not occurs and that shambling does not occurs is false.; int1 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That needs does not garment dadaism.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: That some man is a mortal that is not uptown is true if it is not a kind of a pusillanimousness. fact2: If the fact that this pirate is a pusillanimousness and it is a Bhaga does not hold then it is not uptown. fact3: If some man does not maltreat Graz that it curves hold. fact4: If some person does not maltreat Graz the fact that this one does curve and this one is not dogmatic does not hold. fact5: If something is not uptown then the fact that it is a mortal and it is not dogmatic does not hold. fact6: That needs is not flakey. fact7: Something does not maltreat Graz if that it is a kind of a mortal and it is not dogmatic is false. fact8: If either this pirate is not moony or this one is not a diabetic or both then this pirate is not a diabetic. fact9: The colonial is not a Ganoidei. fact10: If the fact that this pirate is a Bhaga that is a kind of a diabetic does not hold then the fact that this pirate is not a kind of a pusillanimousness hold. fact11: If this pirate is a Ganoidei this headmistress is a kind of a Ganoidei. fact12: That that needs does not fasten is correct. fact13: That needs is not a kind of a Ganoidei. fact14: If somebody curves that person is a Ganoidei. fact15: This barretter is not a kind of a Ganoidei. fact16: Somebody garments dadaism if the person is a Ganoidei. fact17: If that this headmistress curves and is not dogmatic does not hold then that needs does not curves. fact18: That needs does not garment dadaism if that needs is not a Ganoidei. fact19: If this pirate is a mortal and is not uptown then this headmistress does not maltreat Graz. fact20: That that needs is a kind of a Ganoidei hold if this headmistress is a Ganoidei. fact21: That that featheredge is not a kind of a Ganoidei is true if the fact that that needs garments dadaism and is not a Ganoidei is wrong. fact22: The fact that something is a kind of a pusillanimousness and it is a Bhaga is wrong if it is not a kind of a diabetic.

fact1: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & ¬{G}x) fact2: ¬({H}{c} & {I}{c}) -> ¬{G}{c} fact3: (x): ¬{D}x -> {C}x fact4: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{E}x) fact5: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{E}x) fact6: ¬{T}{a} fact7: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact8: (¬{K}{c} v ¬{J}{c}) -> ¬{J}{c} fact9: ¬{A}{dn} fact10: ¬({I}{c} & {J}{c}) -> ¬{H}{c} fact11: {A}{c} -> {A}{b} fact12: ¬{FI}{a} fact13: ¬{A}{a} fact14: (x): {C}x -> {A}x fact15: ¬{A}{t} fact16: (x): {A}x -> {B}x fact17: ¬({C}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact18: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact19: ({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact20: {A}{b} -> {A}{a} fact21: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{h} fact22: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬({H}x & {I}x)

That needs does garment dadaism.

{B}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That some man is a mortal that is not uptown is true if it is not a kind of a pusillanimousness. fact2: If the fact that this pirate is a pusillanimousness and it is a Bhaga does not hold then it is not uptown. fact3: If some man does not maltreat Graz that it curves hold. fact4: If some person does not maltreat Graz the fact that this one does curve and this one is not dogmatic does not hold. fact5: If something is not uptown then the fact that it is a mortal and it is not dogmatic does not hold. fact6: That needs is not flakey. fact7: Something does not maltreat Graz if that it is a kind of a mortal and it is not dogmatic is false. fact8: If either this pirate is not moony or this one is not a diabetic or both then this pirate is not a diabetic. fact9: The colonial is not a Ganoidei. fact10: If the fact that this pirate is a Bhaga that is a kind of a diabetic does not hold then the fact that this pirate is not a kind of a pusillanimousness hold. fact11: If this pirate is a Ganoidei this headmistress is a kind of a Ganoidei. fact12: That that needs does not fasten is correct. fact13: That needs is not a kind of a Ganoidei. fact14: If somebody curves that person is a Ganoidei. fact15: This barretter is not a kind of a Ganoidei. fact16: Somebody garments dadaism if the person is a Ganoidei. fact17: If that this headmistress curves and is not dogmatic does not hold then that needs does not curves. fact18: That needs does not garment dadaism if that needs is not a Ganoidei. fact19: If this pirate is a mortal and is not uptown then this headmistress does not maltreat Graz. fact20: That that needs is a kind of a Ganoidei hold if this headmistress is a Ganoidei. fact21: That that featheredge is not a kind of a Ganoidei is true if the fact that that needs garments dadaism and is not a Ganoidei is wrong. fact22: The fact that something is a kind of a pusillanimousness and it is a Bhaga is wrong if it is not a kind of a diabetic. ; $hypothesis$ = That needs does not garment dadaism. ; $proof$ =

fact18 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Estela is an indictment.

{B}{aa}

fact1: Everyone is physicochemical. fact2: Estela is not mercurial if Estela is valedictory and she is extrusive. fact3: The fact that Estela is mercurial is not incorrect. fact4: If some person is a Bramidae the person is an indictment. fact5: Estela is a mange and is a fretfulness. fact6: Estela is a spininess. fact7: This paraplegic is mercurial. fact8: If a spininess is a Orleans then this thing is non-physicochemical. fact9: The flaps is mercurial.

fact1: (x): {D}x fact2: ({GT}{aa} & {CM}{aa}) -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact3: {AA}{aa} fact4: (x): {A}x -> {B}x fact5: ({AK}{aa} & {FO}{aa}) fact6: {AB}{aa} fact7: {AA}{co} fact8: (x): ({AB}x & {HJ}x) -> ¬{D}x fact9: {AA}{he}

Estela is an indictment.

{B}{aa}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everyone is physicochemical. fact2: Estela is not mercurial if Estela is valedictory and she is extrusive. fact3: The fact that Estela is mercurial is not incorrect. fact4: If some person is a Bramidae the person is an indictment. fact5: Estela is a mange and is a fretfulness. fact6: Estela is a spininess. fact7: This paraplegic is mercurial. fact8: If a spininess is a Orleans then this thing is non-physicochemical. fact9: The flaps is mercurial. ; $hypothesis$ = Estela is an indictment. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That seismologicness happens.

{B}

fact1: If that bacterioidalness does not occurs then either that measurement occurs or this striating Isoetaceae occurs or both. fact2: That seismologicness does not occurs if that that adoration happens and that rhythm does not occurs is false. fact3: If the fact that that measurement happens hold then this preaching unchangingness occurs. fact4: If the sleuone colpocystitis occurs but that greenness does not occurs then this arbitrament does not happens. fact5: The butyricness happens. fact6: If the butyricness happens then that the cantering does not happens and this experiencing happens is wrong. fact7: That that adoration happens triggers that notthat teaching but the googly occurs. fact8: That reenforcement happens. fact9: That this condescension does not happens but this preaching unchangingness occurs prevents that this Concording happens. fact10: That greenness does not happens if the fact that notthe cantering but this experiencing occurs is incorrect. fact11: This collision happens. fact12: That this sleuman colpocystitis occurs is true if that bioattack occurs. fact13: The fact that the emplacement occurs is right. fact14: That this spattering but notthe sustaining happens does not hold. fact15: This preaching unchangingness is triggered by this striating Isoetaceae. fact16: The fact that that seismologicness does not occurs hold if that adoration does not occurs. fact17: That that adoration happens but that rhythm does not occurs does not hold if the fact that this collision occurs is right. fact18: This condescension does not happens if that teaching does not happens and this arbitrament does not happens. fact19: That bioattack and this inedibleness happens. fact20: That that seismologicness happens and this pains happens is brought about by that this Concording does not occurs. fact21: If that this pains does not occurs is true that seismologicness occurs and this collision occurs. fact22: That the emplacement and that reenforcement happens results in that that bacterioidalness does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{K} -> ({H} v {G}) fact2: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact3: {H} -> {F} fact4: ({O} & ¬{P}) -> ¬{I} fact5: {T} fact6: {T} -> ¬(¬{R} & {Q}) fact7: {AA} -> (¬{J} & {L}) fact8: {N} fact9: (¬{E} & {F}) -> ¬{D} fact10: ¬(¬{R} & {Q}) -> ¬{P} fact11: {A} fact12: {S} -> {O} fact13: {M} fact14: ¬({IU} & ¬{DN}) fact15: {G} -> {F} fact16: ¬{AA} -> ¬{B} fact17: {A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact18: (¬{J} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{E} fact19: ({S} & {U}) fact20: ¬{D} -> ({B} & {C}) fact21: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact22: ({M} & {N}) -> ¬{K}

That seismologicness happens.

{B}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that bacterioidalness does not occurs then either that measurement occurs or this striating Isoetaceae occurs or both. fact2: That seismologicness does not occurs if that that adoration happens and that rhythm does not occurs is false. fact3: If the fact that that measurement happens hold then this preaching unchangingness occurs. fact4: If the sleuone colpocystitis occurs but that greenness does not occurs then this arbitrament does not happens. fact5: The butyricness happens. fact6: If the butyricness happens then that the cantering does not happens and this experiencing happens is wrong. fact7: That that adoration happens triggers that notthat teaching but the googly occurs. fact8: That reenforcement happens. fact9: That this condescension does not happens but this preaching unchangingness occurs prevents that this Concording happens. fact10: That greenness does not happens if the fact that notthe cantering but this experiencing occurs is incorrect. fact11: This collision happens. fact12: That this sleuman colpocystitis occurs is true if that bioattack occurs. fact13: The fact that the emplacement occurs is right. fact14: That this spattering but notthe sustaining happens does not hold. fact15: This preaching unchangingness is triggered by this striating Isoetaceae. fact16: The fact that that seismologicness does not occurs hold if that adoration does not occurs. fact17: That that adoration happens but that rhythm does not occurs does not hold if the fact that this collision occurs is right. fact18: This condescension does not happens if that teaching does not happens and this arbitrament does not happens. fact19: That bioattack and this inedibleness happens. fact20: That that seismologicness happens and this pains happens is brought about by that this Concording does not occurs. fact21: If that this pains does not occurs is true that seismologicness occurs and this collision occurs. fact22: That the emplacement and that reenforcement happens results in that that bacterioidalness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That seismologicness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact17 & fact11 -> int1: The fact that that adoration occurs and that rhythm does not happens does not hold.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__