Datasets:

hitachi-nlp

/

FLD.v2.reimpl

like 1

Follow

Hitachi, Ltd. 13

0.3

Notthe disjointing BTU but that waxiness happens.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: The fact that that sensing Amazona happens and this byplay occurs is wrong. fact2: If the fact that that that resolving and that beaner happens is true is wrong the disjointing BTU does not happens. fact3: That this terrorisation happens results in that notthis psychoanalysing Gutenberg but that medicining occurs. fact4: That notthe decomposition but the skinlessness happens is incorrect. fact5: If that this psychoanalysing Gutenberg does not occurs hold that that resolving occurs and that beaner occurs is false. fact6: That that this humorousness and the wriggling posturing happens is right does not hold.

fact1: ¬({JH} & {IT}) fact2: ¬({D} & {C}) -> ¬{AA} fact3: {G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) fact4: ¬(¬{HK} & {J}) fact5: ¬{E} -> ¬({D} & {C}) fact6: ¬(¬{BG} & {CR})

Notthe disjointing BTU but that waxiness happens.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that sensing Amazona happens and this byplay occurs is wrong. fact2: If the fact that that that resolving and that beaner happens is true is wrong the disjointing BTU does not happens. fact3: That this terrorisation happens results in that notthis psychoanalysing Gutenberg but that medicining occurs. fact4: That notthe decomposition but the skinlessness happens is incorrect. fact5: If that this psychoanalysing Gutenberg does not occurs hold that that resolving occurs and that beaner occurs is false. fact6: That that this humorousness and the wriggling posturing happens is right does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = Notthe disjointing BTU but that waxiness happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That plier is a stoplight and does not darn tendinitis.

({C}{c} & ¬{B}{c})

fact1: This deadeye does darn tendinitis if either this spirilla is not transcendental or it quadruples phalangitis or both. fact2: Somebody does not depopulate or the one is a Balance or both if that the one does disconnect Corydalidae is right. fact3: If that this spirilla is not a stoplight and disconnects Corydalidae does not hold then that linguine disconnects Corydalidae. fact4: The fact that that writer is not an indicative and/or quadruples phalangitis is not false. fact5: That plier is a kind of a stoplight if this deadeye darns tendinitis. fact6: The fact that that someone is not a stoplight but it disconnects Corydalidae is right is false if the fact that it does darn tendinitis hold. fact7: This spirilla darns tendinitis if this deadeye behaves cupid. fact8: That plier is a stoplight. fact9: If this spirilla quadruples phalangitis this deadeye darns tendinitis. fact10: If this deadeye darns tendinitis that plier is a stoplight and does not darns tendinitis. fact11: This spirilla is not transcendental and/or she does quadruple phalangitis.

fact1: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact2: (x): {A}x -> (¬{JJ}x v {EN}x) fact3: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {A}{n} fact4: (¬{DH}{gq} v {AB}{gq}) fact5: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact6: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) fact7: {D}{b} -> {B}{a} fact8: {C}{c} fact9: {AB}{a} -> {B}{b} fact10: {B}{b} -> ({C}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) fact11: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a})

That linguine does not depopulate and/or it is a Balance.

(¬{JJ}{n} v {EN}{n})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This deadeye does darn tendinitis if either this spirilla is not transcendental or it quadruples phalangitis or both. fact2: Somebody does not depopulate or the one is a Balance or both if that the one does disconnect Corydalidae is right. fact3: If that this spirilla is not a stoplight and disconnects Corydalidae does not hold then that linguine disconnects Corydalidae. fact4: The fact that that writer is not an indicative and/or quadruples phalangitis is not false. fact5: That plier is a kind of a stoplight if this deadeye darns tendinitis. fact6: The fact that that someone is not a stoplight but it disconnects Corydalidae is right is false if the fact that it does darn tendinitis hold. fact7: This spirilla darns tendinitis if this deadeye behaves cupid. fact8: That plier is a stoplight. fact9: If this spirilla quadruples phalangitis this deadeye darns tendinitis. fact10: If this deadeye darns tendinitis that plier is a stoplight and does not darns tendinitis. fact11: This spirilla is not transcendental and/or she does quadruple phalangitis. ; $hypothesis$ = That plier is a stoplight and does not darn tendinitis. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact11 -> int1: This deadeye does darn tendinitis.; int1 & fact10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That the fact that that putting Dimash happens but this exteriorization does not occurs is wrong is not wrong.

¬({AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: That that foolishness happens triggers that this regression does not happens but this sleepover occurs. fact2: That notthis regression but this sleepover happens prevents that this condensate does not occurs. fact3: If this refabrication occurs the fact that that putting Dimash but notthis exteriorization happens does not hold. fact4: That the popularization happens but the clutching Korea does not occurs is not right if the Coptic occurs. fact5: This refabrication occurs. fact6: This fusing dreadfulness does not happens and this refabrication does not happens if this condensate occurs. fact7: If this refabrication happens the fact that that that putting Dimash happens and this exteriorization happens does not hold is not wrong. fact8: The fact that both that putting Dimash and this exteriorization occurs is false. fact9: If this refabrication does not happens that putting Dimash but notthis exteriorization occurs. fact10: That slippage occurs. fact11: If the unreverberantness happens then the fact that the fact that the hypnogenesis happens and this condensate does not occurs is wrong hold.

fact1: {F} -> (¬{E} & {D}) fact2: (¬{E} & {D}) -> {C} fact3: {A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact4: {HR} -> ¬({HF} & ¬{BO}) fact5: {A} fact6: {C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact7: {A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact8: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact9: ¬{A} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact10: {IS} fact11: {DD} -> ¬({CR} & ¬{C})

That putting Dimash happens but this exteriorization does not occurs.

({AA} & ¬{AB})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that foolishness happens triggers that this regression does not happens but this sleepover occurs. fact2: That notthis regression but this sleepover happens prevents that this condensate does not occurs. fact3: If this refabrication occurs the fact that that putting Dimash but notthis exteriorization happens does not hold. fact4: That the popularization happens but the clutching Korea does not occurs is not right if the Coptic occurs. fact5: This refabrication occurs. fact6: This fusing dreadfulness does not happens and this refabrication does not happens if this condensate occurs. fact7: If this refabrication happens the fact that that that putting Dimash happens and this exteriorization happens does not hold is not wrong. fact8: The fact that both that putting Dimash and this exteriorization occurs is false. fact9: If this refabrication does not happens that putting Dimash but notthis exteriorization occurs. fact10: That slippage occurs. fact11: If the unreverberantness happens then the fact that the fact that the hypnogenesis happens and this condensate does not occurs is wrong hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That the fact that that putting Dimash happens but this exteriorization does not occurs is wrong is not wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that thrift is not a inexactness is correct.

¬{AB}{aa}

fact1: Some person is backing and it is a inexactness if it is not a kind of a gripping.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x)

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some person is backing and it is a inexactness if it is not a kind of a gripping. ; $hypothesis$ = That that thrift is not a inexactness is correct. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That pteridophyte is not mesoblastic.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: If something is mesoblastic then it does not Burr prickling. fact2: If this obstetrician is not a Maldives then that pteridophyte is not mesoblastic. fact3: this prickling Burrs obstetrician. fact4: This obstetrician Burrs prickling. fact5: If someone that maturates mm is nonlinear then it is not a keratitis. fact6: The hotshot does matriculate Svizzera. fact7: This obstetrician does not matriculate Svizzera and/or is not a Maldives if this obstetrician Burrs prickling. fact8: The fact that if that pteridophyte does not Burr prickling then this obstetrician is non-mesoblastic is true. fact9: If something is not a keratitis that thing is mesoblastic a Vanbrugh. fact10: The Kassite is a kind of a Maldives. fact11: If this obstetrician does not matriculate Svizzera then that pteridophyte is mesoblastic. fact12: If this drake is not a kind of a instancy then this drake maturates mm and it is nonlinear. fact13: If that pteridophyte is a kind of a Maldives that pteridophyte does not Burr prickling or is not mesoblastic or both. fact14: Somebody that is not a kind of a Vanbrugh and does not Burr prickling is non-mesoblastic. fact15: This obstetrician does not matriculate Svizzera if that that pteridophyte is not a Maldives is correct.

fact1: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}x fact2: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact3: {AC}{ab} fact4: {A}{a} fact5: (x): ({F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact6: {AA}{je} fact7: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact8: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact9: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact10: {AB}{in} fact11: ¬{AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact12: ¬{G}{aa} -> ({F}{aa} & {E}{aa}) fact13: {AB}{b} -> (¬{A}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) fact14: (x): (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) -> {B}x fact15: ¬{AB}{b} -> ¬{AA}{a}

That pteridophyte is mesoblastic.

{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something is mesoblastic then it does not Burr prickling. fact2: If this obstetrician is not a Maldives then that pteridophyte is not mesoblastic. fact3: this prickling Burrs obstetrician. fact4: This obstetrician Burrs prickling. fact5: If someone that maturates mm is nonlinear then it is not a keratitis. fact6: The hotshot does matriculate Svizzera. fact7: This obstetrician does not matriculate Svizzera and/or is not a Maldives if this obstetrician Burrs prickling. fact8: The fact that if that pteridophyte does not Burr prickling then this obstetrician is non-mesoblastic is true. fact9: If something is not a keratitis that thing is mesoblastic a Vanbrugh. fact10: The Kassite is a kind of a Maldives. fact11: If this obstetrician does not matriculate Svizzera then that pteridophyte is mesoblastic. fact12: If this drake is not a kind of a instancy then this drake maturates mm and it is nonlinear. fact13: If that pteridophyte is a kind of a Maldives that pteridophyte does not Burr prickling or is not mesoblastic or both. fact14: Somebody that is not a kind of a Vanbrugh and does not Burr prickling is non-mesoblastic. fact15: This obstetrician does not matriculate Svizzera if that that pteridophyte is not a Maldives is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = That pteridophyte is not mesoblastic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This draught occurs.

{A}

fact1: The malodourousness does not happens and/or that afferent happens. fact2: That thinking Arabis happens if that afferent occurs. fact3: Either that the angularness does not happens or that Singaporeanness or both leads to that the vagileness occurs. fact4: If that thinking Arabis happens then this draught happens. fact5: If this embrowning fundamentalism does not happens then either this draught does not happens or that thinking Arabis occurs or both. fact6: If the overextending nefariousness happens this deception occurs.

fact1: (¬{AA} v {AB}) fact2: {AB} -> {B} fact3: (¬{BT} v {EA}) -> {HC} fact4: {B} -> {A} fact5: ¬{C} -> (¬{A} v {B}) fact6: {GJ} -> {AG}

The fact that this draught does not happens is correct.

¬{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The malodourousness does not happens and/or that afferent happens. fact2: That thinking Arabis happens if that afferent occurs. fact3: Either that the angularness does not happens or that Singaporeanness or both leads to that the vagileness occurs. fact4: If that thinking Arabis happens then this draught happens. fact5: If this embrowning fundamentalism does not happens then either this draught does not happens or that thinking Arabis occurs or both. fact6: If the overextending nefariousness happens this deception occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This draught occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that sorghum is not a physicality hold.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: Something that does not phase retrospect is a physicality that does decrease Ashir. fact2: The fact that that sorghum does not rusticate and it is not prognathic is incorrect if that larboard is a physicality. fact3: That sorghum is trochaic and/or the thing does bleep myology. fact4: That sorghum does not bleep myology if that sorghum is a Dharma and/or is a bagful. fact5: That Polymox is not neuropsychological if this speeder represents undine but it is not maladroit. fact6: This speeder does represent undine if the fact that that theatergoer is not a kind of a Gymnophiona or this one does not represent undine or both does not hold. fact7: If that Polymox is not neuropsychological then this backslapper phases retrospect but it does not face Shintoism. fact8: That theatergoer is a tranche. fact9: That scalawag is either not non-trochaic or a strip or both. fact10: If that sorghum is trochaic or it bleeps myology or both then that that sorghum is not a physicality is true. fact11: If that theatergoer is a kind of a tranche the fact that it is not a Gymnophiona and/or does not represent undine is wrong. fact12: That larboard does not decrease Ashir and it does not phase retrospect if this backslapper faces Shintoism. fact13: If that sorghum is trochaic then this is not a physicality. fact14: If that that sorghum does not rusticate and this thing is not prognathic does not hold then this Mesantoin rusticate. fact15: That sorghum is both a physicality and prognathic if that larboard does not decrease Ashir.

fact1: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact2: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{FI}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact3: ({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact4: ({DN}{a} v {BC}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{a} fact5: ({G}{e} & ¬{H}{e}) -> ¬{F}{d} fact6: ¬(¬{I}{f} v ¬{G}{f}) -> {G}{e} fact7: ¬{F}{d} -> ({D}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) fact8: {J}{f} fact9: ({AA}{eh} v {IP}{eh}) fact10: ({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact11: {J}{f} -> ¬(¬{I}{f} v ¬{G}{f}) fact12: {E}{c} -> (¬{C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact13: {AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact14: ¬(¬{FI}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {FI}{ft} fact15: ¬{C}{b} -> ({B}{a} & {A}{a})

That sorghum is a physicality.

{B}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something that does not phase retrospect is a physicality that does decrease Ashir. fact2: The fact that that sorghum does not rusticate and it is not prognathic is incorrect if that larboard is a physicality. fact3: That sorghum is trochaic and/or the thing does bleep myology. fact4: That sorghum does not bleep myology if that sorghum is a Dharma and/or is a bagful. fact5: That Polymox is not neuropsychological if this speeder represents undine but it is not maladroit. fact6: This speeder does represent undine if the fact that that theatergoer is not a kind of a Gymnophiona or this one does not represent undine or both does not hold. fact7: If that Polymox is not neuropsychological then this backslapper phases retrospect but it does not face Shintoism. fact8: That theatergoer is a tranche. fact9: That scalawag is either not non-trochaic or a strip or both. fact10: If that sorghum is trochaic or it bleeps myology or both then that that sorghum is not a physicality is true. fact11: If that theatergoer is a kind of a tranche the fact that it is not a Gymnophiona and/or does not represent undine is wrong. fact12: That larboard does not decrease Ashir and it does not phase retrospect if this backslapper faces Shintoism. fact13: If that sorghum is trochaic then this is not a physicality. fact14: If that that sorghum does not rusticate and this thing is not prognathic does not hold then this Mesantoin rusticate. fact15: That sorghum is both a physicality and prognathic if that larboard does not decrease Ashir. ; $hypothesis$ = That that sorghum is not a physicality hold. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that this intramuscularness occurs hold.

{AA}

fact1: Both that vegetativeness and that bifilarness happens if this crystallising does not happens. fact2: If that bifilarness or this non-vegetativeness or both happens that noctambulation does not occurs. fact3: If that noctambulation does not occurs then that this wandering multiplicand does not happens but this dyspnoealness happens does not hold. fact4: That refunding does not occurs. fact5: Both this dyspnoealness and this wandering multiplicand happens if that noctambulation does not happens. fact6: This intramuscularness happens and that refunding does not happens if this mildewing Bacillariophyceae occurs. fact7: If this transitivizing antisemitism does not happens then that vegetativeness does not happens and this crystallising does not happens. fact8: This intramuscularness does not happens but this murdering hypervelocity happens if that refunding does not happens. fact9: If the fact that notthis wandering multiplicand but this dyspnoealness happens is incorrect this dyspnoealness does not happens. fact10: That noctambulation does not occurs if that bifilarness happens. fact11: If this dyspnoealness happens this mildewing Bacillariophyceae occurs.

fact1: ¬{H} -> ({G} & {F}) fact2: ({F} v ¬{G}) -> ¬{E} fact3: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & {C}) fact4: ¬{A} fact5: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact6: {B} -> ({AA} & ¬{A}) fact7: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) fact8: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact9: ¬(¬{D} & {C}) -> ¬{C} fact10: {F} -> ¬{E} fact11: {C} -> {B}

That government does not occurs.

¬{HM}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Both that vegetativeness and that bifilarness happens if this crystallising does not happens. fact2: If that bifilarness or this non-vegetativeness or both happens that noctambulation does not occurs. fact3: If that noctambulation does not occurs then that this wandering multiplicand does not happens but this dyspnoealness happens does not hold. fact4: That refunding does not occurs. fact5: Both this dyspnoealness and this wandering multiplicand happens if that noctambulation does not happens. fact6: This intramuscularness happens and that refunding does not happens if this mildewing Bacillariophyceae occurs. fact7: If this transitivizing antisemitism does not happens then that vegetativeness does not happens and this crystallising does not happens. fact8: This intramuscularness does not happens but this murdering hypervelocity happens if that refunding does not happens. fact9: If the fact that notthis wandering multiplicand but this dyspnoealness happens is incorrect this dyspnoealness does not happens. fact10: That noctambulation does not occurs if that bifilarness happens. fact11: If this dyspnoealness happens this mildewing Bacillariophyceae occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this intramuscularness occurs hold. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact4 -> int1: This non-intramuscularness and this murdering hypervelocity happens.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That link does not occurs.

¬{C}

fact1: This spillikins occurs. fact2: That that uplink occurs and the warmheartedness occurs does not hold. fact3: That that requisitioning fourteenth does not happens yields that that idealisticness and that chaffiness happens. fact4: Either this tracked or that the complaint occurs or both is caused by that the bestowment does not happens. fact5: This foreordaining mindset occurs and/or that dwarfing happens if this release does not occurs. fact6: If that that uplink happens and the warmheartedness happens is incorrect that swelling does not occurs. fact7: The Genoeseness and/or that swelling occurs. fact8: The bestowment does not occurs if that both this harassing Togo and this alluding happens does not hold. fact9: If the fact that notthe inscriptiveness but this release happens is false then this release does not happens. fact10: If that streptococcalness does not happens that requisitioning fourteenth does not happens and this subjugating Goldwyn does not occurs. fact11: That that this harassing Togo occurs and this alluding occurs is true is incorrect if the fact that that swelling does not occurs is correct. fact12: If this engendering Tabuk and/or that baying Durban happens then that link does not happens. fact13: That that link does not happens is brought about by that baying Durban. fact14: This engendering Tabuk happens. fact15: If that idealisticness happens then the fact that notthe inscriptiveness but this release happens is wrong.

fact1: {EI} fact2: ¬({T} & {S}) fact3: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact4: ¬{O} -> ({N} v {M}) fact5: ¬{F} -> ({D} v {E}) fact6: ¬({T} & {S}) -> ¬{R} fact7: ({DR} v {R}) fact8: ¬({Q} & {P}) -> ¬{O} fact9: ¬(¬{G} & {F}) -> ¬{F} fact10: ¬{L} -> (¬{J} & ¬{K}) fact11: ¬{R} -> ¬({Q} & {P}) fact12: ({A} v {B}) -> ¬{C} fact13: {B} -> ¬{C} fact14: {A} fact15: {H} -> ¬(¬{G} & {F})

That link happens.

{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This spillikins occurs. fact2: That that uplink occurs and the warmheartedness occurs does not hold. fact3: That that requisitioning fourteenth does not happens yields that that idealisticness and that chaffiness happens. fact4: Either this tracked or that the complaint occurs or both is caused by that the bestowment does not happens. fact5: This foreordaining mindset occurs and/or that dwarfing happens if this release does not occurs. fact6: If that that uplink happens and the warmheartedness happens is incorrect that swelling does not occurs. fact7: The Genoeseness and/or that swelling occurs. fact8: The bestowment does not occurs if that both this harassing Togo and this alluding happens does not hold. fact9: If the fact that notthe inscriptiveness but this release happens is false then this release does not happens. fact10: If that streptococcalness does not happens that requisitioning fourteenth does not happens and this subjugating Goldwyn does not occurs. fact11: That that this harassing Togo occurs and this alluding occurs is true is incorrect if the fact that that swelling does not occurs is correct. fact12: If this engendering Tabuk and/or that baying Durban happens then that link does not happens. fact13: That that link does not happens is brought about by that baying Durban. fact14: This engendering Tabuk happens. fact15: If that idealisticness happens then the fact that notthe inscriptiveness but this release happens is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = That link does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact14 -> int1: This engendering Tabuk and/or that baying Durban happens.; int1 & fact12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That numericalness occurs.

{A}

fact1: The yowling sereness happens. fact2: This forwarding Thamnophis happens if this approbating justness occurs. fact3: This rumpusing happens. fact4: This aggro does not occurs if notthe vandalism but this cooperation occurs. fact5: That this intrinsicalness does not occurs yields that the vandalism occurs and this cooperation occurs. fact6: That ceremoniousness occurs. fact7: This alkalineness does not occurs if the fact that this alkalineness happens and this parasiticness happens is incorrect. fact8: That the flexileness occurs hold. fact9: If that epikeratophakia does not happens then that notthis Islamicness but that haemophilicness happens does not hold. fact10: If the fact that this Islamicness does not happens but that haemophilicness happens is wrong this Islamicness occurs. fact11: That both this Islamicness and this forwarding Thamnophis occurs prevents that this intrinsicalness occurs. fact12: That that epikeratophakia does not happens is caused by that this grilling B.Th.U. does not occurs and this empiricness does not happens. fact13: That this approbating justness does not happens and that neutrality does not happens does not hold if this alkalineness does not occurs. fact14: This collegiateness happens and that numericalness occurs if this aggro does not happens. fact15: This grilling B.Th.U. happens. fact16: This axillariness occurs. fact17: If the vandalism happens then both this aggro and this non-numericalness occurs. fact18: This approbating justness happens if that this approbating justness does not occurs and that neutrality does not occurs is not correct. fact19: This empiricness does not happens. fact20: The tubeless occurs.

fact1: {FM} fact2: {H} -> {G} fact3: {EN} fact4: (¬{C} & {D}) -> ¬{B} fact5: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact6: {IJ} fact7: ¬({K} & {P}) -> ¬{K} fact8: {R} fact9: ¬{L} -> ¬(¬{F} & {I}) fact10: ¬(¬{F} & {I}) -> {F} fact11: ({F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact12: (¬{N} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{L} fact13: ¬{K} -> ¬(¬{H} & ¬{J}) fact14: ¬{B} -> ({EI} & {A}) fact15: {N} fact16: {DP} fact17: {C} -> ({B} & ¬{A}) fact18: ¬(¬{H} & ¬{J}) -> {H} fact19: ¬{M} fact20: {FD}

This collegiateness happens.

{EI}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The yowling sereness happens. fact2: This forwarding Thamnophis happens if this approbating justness occurs. fact3: This rumpusing happens. fact4: This aggro does not occurs if notthe vandalism but this cooperation occurs. fact5: That this intrinsicalness does not occurs yields that the vandalism occurs and this cooperation occurs. fact6: That ceremoniousness occurs. fact7: This alkalineness does not occurs if the fact that this alkalineness happens and this parasiticness happens is incorrect. fact8: That the flexileness occurs hold. fact9: If that epikeratophakia does not happens then that notthis Islamicness but that haemophilicness happens does not hold. fact10: If the fact that this Islamicness does not happens but that haemophilicness happens is wrong this Islamicness occurs. fact11: That both this Islamicness and this forwarding Thamnophis occurs prevents that this intrinsicalness occurs. fact12: That that epikeratophakia does not happens is caused by that this grilling B.Th.U. does not occurs and this empiricness does not happens. fact13: That this approbating justness does not happens and that neutrality does not happens does not hold if this alkalineness does not occurs. fact14: This collegiateness happens and that numericalness occurs if this aggro does not happens. fact15: This grilling B.Th.U. happens. fact16: This axillariness occurs. fact17: If the vandalism happens then both this aggro and this non-numericalness occurs. fact18: This approbating justness happens if that this approbating justness does not occurs and that neutrality does not occurs is not correct. fact19: This empiricness does not happens. fact20: The tubeless occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That numericalness occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That willow is not carpetbag.

¬{A}{aa}

fact1: That shirtmaker is bridgeable and does not substantiate angioma if there exists something such that that does not activate stateliness. fact2: Somebody that does not substantiate angioma is not synoptic and forwards sylvan. fact3: That some man is not kafkaesque but this person does forward sylvan is not incorrect if this person is synoptic. fact4: If something does not elope the fact that either it is not carpetbag or it does not breast Turdinae or both hold. fact5: The fact that the Doberman is not carpetbag is correct. fact6: That willow is not unsigned. fact7: That this grison does not activate stateliness hold if something does activate stateliness and is bimillenial. fact8: If that that Carolingian does not elope and it is not kafkaesque is incorrect then this Panadol does not elope. fact9: This greenmarket is an intent and is not a land. fact10: That someone does not breast Turdinae but he elopes does not hold if he is not kafkaesque. fact11: That willow is synoptic if that that willow does not substantiate angioma and is not synoptic does not hold. fact12: If there is somebody such that it is bridgeable and it does not substantiate angioma then that Carolingian does not substantiate angioma. fact13: If this Panadol is not carpetbag or he/she does not breast Turdinae or both then the garnish is not carpetbag. fact14: If something does forward sylvan then the fact that that thing does not elope and that thing is not kafkaesque does not hold. fact15: Something does activate stateliness and it is bimillenial if it is not a land. fact16: Every man is non-carpetbag and it does not elope.

fact1: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({I}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) fact2: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}x & {E}x) fact3: (x): {F}x -> (¬{D}x & {E}x) fact4: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{A}x v ¬{C}x) fact5: ¬{A}{aq} fact6: ¬{IJ}{aa} fact7: (x): ({H}x & {K}x) -> ¬{H}{d} fact8: ¬(¬{B}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact9: ({L}{e} & ¬{J}{e}) fact10: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x) fact11: ¬(¬{G}{aa} & ¬{F}{aa}) -> {F}{aa} fact12: (x): ({I}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{G}{b} fact13: (¬{A}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{gc} fact14: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{D}x) fact15: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({H}x & {K}x) fact16: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x)

That willow is carpetbag.

{A}{aa}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That shirtmaker is bridgeable and does not substantiate angioma if there exists something such that that does not activate stateliness. fact2: Somebody that does not substantiate angioma is not synoptic and forwards sylvan. fact3: That some man is not kafkaesque but this person does forward sylvan is not incorrect if this person is synoptic. fact4: If something does not elope the fact that either it is not carpetbag or it does not breast Turdinae or both hold. fact5: The fact that the Doberman is not carpetbag is correct. fact6: That willow is not unsigned. fact7: That this grison does not activate stateliness hold if something does activate stateliness and is bimillenial. fact8: If that that Carolingian does not elope and it is not kafkaesque is incorrect then this Panadol does not elope. fact9: This greenmarket is an intent and is not a land. fact10: That someone does not breast Turdinae but he elopes does not hold if he is not kafkaesque. fact11: That willow is synoptic if that that willow does not substantiate angioma and is not synoptic does not hold. fact12: If there is somebody such that it is bridgeable and it does not substantiate angioma then that Carolingian does not substantiate angioma. fact13: If this Panadol is not carpetbag or he/she does not breast Turdinae or both then the garnish is not carpetbag. fact14: If something does forward sylvan then the fact that that thing does not elope and that thing is not kafkaesque does not hold. fact15: Something does activate stateliness and it is bimillenial if it is not a land. fact16: Every man is non-carpetbag and it does not elope. ; $hypothesis$ = That willow is not carpetbag. ; $proof$ =

fact16 -> int1: That willow is non-carpetbag thing that does not elope.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This inclinometer is non-crustacean and is not a Vincetoxicum.

(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

fact1: That that that something does not implant septicemia and is an internationalism hold is wrong if it is not stubborn is true. fact2: If that something is not a looted and/or is not a kind of an internationalism is incorrect then the thing is not stubborn. fact3: If this inclinometer implants septicemia that Timorese is not a Vincetoxicum and this thing is not crustacean. fact4: The fact that that Timorese does not picture Hippodamia and is not a looted does not hold if this somnambulation normalises heterogeneousness. fact5: This inclinometer is an internationalism if the fact that that Timorese does not picture Hippodamia and is a kind of an internationalism is wrong. fact6: Somebody is crustacean one that does implant septicemia if the fact that it is not stubborn is true. fact7: If the fact that someone does not implant septicemia but it is an internationalism is wrong then it implant septicemia. fact8: The fact that that somebody is not crustacean and that person is not a Vincetoxicum is not wrong is not correct if that person implants septicemia. fact9: This inclinometer is not crustacean if that Timorese implants septicemia. fact10: This inclinometer is not crustacean. fact11: If that Timorese implants septicemia then this inclinometer is both not crustacean and not a Vincetoxicum. fact12: If this inclinometer implants septicemia that Timorese is non-crustacean and he is not a Vincetoxicum. fact13: That Timorese implants septicemia. fact14: If this inclinometer is crustacean then that Timorese is not a Vincetoxicum and it does not implant septicemia. fact15: This inclinometer does not implant septicemia if that that Timorese is crustacean hold. fact16: Something does not implant septicemia but it is stubborn if it is an internationalism. fact17: that septicemia implants Timorese. fact18: If the fact that that Timorese does not picture Hippodamia and it is not a looted is false then that this inclinometer is not stubborn is correct. fact19: That Timorese is not a Vincetoxicum.

fact1: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) fact2: (x): ¬(¬{D}x v ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact3: {A}{b} -> (¬{AB}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) fact4: {F}{c} -> ¬(¬{E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) fact5: ¬(¬{E}{a} & {C}{a}) -> {C}{b} fact6: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({AA}x & {A}x) fact7: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) -> {A}x fact8: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact9: {A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{b} fact10: ¬{AA}{b} fact11: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact12: {A}{b} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact13: {A}{a} fact14: {AA}{b} -> (¬{AB}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact15: {AA}{a} -> ¬{A}{b} fact16: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) fact17: {AC}{aa} fact18: ¬(¬{E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact19: ¬{AB}{a}

The fact that this inclinometer is non-crustacean thing that is not a Vincetoxicum is wrong.

¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that that something does not implant septicemia and is an internationalism hold is wrong if it is not stubborn is true. fact2: If that something is not a looted and/or is not a kind of an internationalism is incorrect then the thing is not stubborn. fact3: If this inclinometer implants septicemia that Timorese is not a Vincetoxicum and this thing is not crustacean. fact4: The fact that that Timorese does not picture Hippodamia and is not a looted does not hold if this somnambulation normalises heterogeneousness. fact5: This inclinometer is an internationalism if the fact that that Timorese does not picture Hippodamia and is a kind of an internationalism is wrong. fact6: Somebody is crustacean one that does implant septicemia if the fact that it is not stubborn is true. fact7: If the fact that someone does not implant septicemia but it is an internationalism is wrong then it implant septicemia. fact8: The fact that that somebody is not crustacean and that person is not a Vincetoxicum is not wrong is not correct if that person implants septicemia. fact9: This inclinometer is not crustacean if that Timorese implants septicemia. fact10: This inclinometer is not crustacean. fact11: If that Timorese implants septicemia then this inclinometer is both not crustacean and not a Vincetoxicum. fact12: If this inclinometer implants septicemia that Timorese is non-crustacean and he is not a Vincetoxicum. fact13: That Timorese implants septicemia. fact14: If this inclinometer is crustacean then that Timorese is not a Vincetoxicum and it does not implant septicemia. fact15: This inclinometer does not implant septicemia if that that Timorese is crustacean hold. fact16: Something does not implant septicemia but it is stubborn if it is an internationalism. fact17: that septicemia implants Timorese. fact18: If the fact that that Timorese does not picture Hippodamia and it is not a looted is false then that this inclinometer is not stubborn is correct. fact19: That Timorese is not a Vincetoxicum. ; $hypothesis$ = This inclinometer is non-crustacean and is not a Vincetoxicum. ; $proof$ =

fact11 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That tentacle does not graze.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: If that tentacle is dithyrambic that tentacle does not graze. fact2: Some person that is not a teleconference is dithyrambic and a Tilletiaceae. fact3: Something that is dithyrambic grazes. fact4: The Pullman is not a kind of a Tilletiaceae. fact5: That tentacle is a Tilletiaceae. fact6: If something is eucaryotic it is non-apostrophic and it is not a teleconference. fact7: That tentacle is not a Rochester. fact8: If either something stages Lepadidae or it is a tracing or both that it is not a Zoroastrian hold. fact9: This oscillation is not dithyrambic if that tentacle is not apostrophic and that thing is not a teleconference. fact10: That tentacle is a befoulment. fact11: That tentacle does not sponge salability. fact12: Something that is dithyrambic does not graze. fact13: The whacko grazes. fact14: The blow grazes.

fact1: {A}{a} -> ¬{C}{a} fact2: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact3: (x): {A}x -> {C}x fact4: ¬{B}{ir} fact5: {B}{a} fact6: (x): {F}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) fact7: ¬{BG}{a} fact8: (x): ({AG}x v {Q}x) -> ¬{BL}x fact9: (¬{E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{A}{ca} fact10: {FJ}{a} fact11: ¬{FL}{a} fact12: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x fact13: {C}{hd} fact14: {C}{m}

The fact that that tentacle grazes is correct.

{C}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that tentacle is dithyrambic that tentacle does not graze. fact2: Some person that is not a teleconference is dithyrambic and a Tilletiaceae. fact3: Something that is dithyrambic grazes. fact4: The Pullman is not a kind of a Tilletiaceae. fact5: That tentacle is a Tilletiaceae. fact6: If something is eucaryotic it is non-apostrophic and it is not a teleconference. fact7: That tentacle is not a Rochester. fact8: If either something stages Lepadidae or it is a tracing or both that it is not a Zoroastrian hold. fact9: This oscillation is not dithyrambic if that tentacle is not apostrophic and that thing is not a teleconference. fact10: That tentacle is a befoulment. fact11: That tentacle does not sponge salability. fact12: Something that is dithyrambic does not graze. fact13: The whacko grazes. fact14: The blow grazes. ; $hypothesis$ = That tentacle does not graze. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This installing cylindricalness does not occurs.

¬{C}

fact1: If the fact that this freelancing quantic occurs and this Whiting predictability occurs is wrong then this installing cylindricalness does not occurs. fact2: This slicing hundredth does not occurs but this distracting Lauraceae happens if this insuring occurs. fact3: This installing cylindricalness occurs if this Whiting predictability happens. fact4: If that this slicing hundredth does not happens and this distracting Lauraceae happens is correct this microscopy does not occurs. fact5: Both this insuring and this spastic occurs if that supply does not happens. fact6: That that supply does not happens is brought about by that this palatoglossalness happens. fact7: If this microscopy does not occurs then the fact that both this freelancing quantic and this Whiting predictability occurs does not hold. fact8: This retaliating admirability occurs if the meshing occurs. fact9: That this freelancing quantic happens hold.

fact1: ¬({B} & {A}) -> ¬{C} fact2: {G} -> (¬{F} & {E}) fact3: {A} -> {C} fact4: (¬{F} & {E}) -> ¬{D} fact5: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact6: {J} -> ¬{I} fact7: ¬{D} -> ¬({B} & {A}) fact8: {FU} -> {HM} fact9: {B}

This installing cylindricalness does not occurs.

¬{C}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this freelancing quantic occurs and this Whiting predictability occurs is wrong then this installing cylindricalness does not occurs. fact2: This slicing hundredth does not occurs but this distracting Lauraceae happens if this insuring occurs. fact3: This installing cylindricalness occurs if this Whiting predictability happens. fact4: If that this slicing hundredth does not happens and this distracting Lauraceae happens is correct this microscopy does not occurs. fact5: Both this insuring and this spastic occurs if that supply does not happens. fact6: That that supply does not happens is brought about by that this palatoglossalness happens. fact7: If this microscopy does not occurs then the fact that both this freelancing quantic and this Whiting predictability occurs does not hold. fact8: This retaliating admirability occurs if the meshing occurs. fact9: That this freelancing quantic happens hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This installing cylindricalness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That there is something such that if it is not albinistic or it does not restrain aspect or both that it is a kind of a Eddington is true is false.

¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x)

fact1: There exists some person such that if that one is not a Runyon then that one is Piagetian. fact2: If something is not compatible and/or this thing is not a kind of a nick then the fact that this thing is a appositeness is true. fact3: This testa is a Eddington if the one is not albinistic or does not restrain aspect or both.

fact1: (Ex): ¬{FB}x -> {GS}x fact2: (x): (¬{FO}x v ¬{CH}x) -> {IO}x fact3: (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}

There is some person such that if it is not compatible and/or it is not a kind of a nick then it is a kind of a appositeness.

(Ex): (¬{FO}x v ¬{CH}x) -> {IO}x

DISPROVED

PROVED

DISPROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There exists some person such that if that one is not a Runyon then that one is Piagetian. fact2: If something is not compatible and/or this thing is not a kind of a nick then the fact that this thing is a appositeness is true. fact3: This testa is a Eddington if the one is not albinistic or does not restrain aspect or both. ; $hypothesis$ = That there is something such that if it is not albinistic or it does not restrain aspect or both that it is a kind of a Eddington is true is false. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that that Porter either is not a minstrel or switches copse or both hold is wrong.

¬(¬{B}{c} v {C}{c})

fact1: That Porter interns demonstrativeness if this acarid badgers Kahoolawe. fact2: If this minibar is not a kind of a petabit that Porter is a kind of a petabit. fact3: This minibar does not galumph. fact4: If something that is a kind of a petabit interns demonstrativeness it is non-most. fact5: If the fact that this minibar is a minstrel is not true the fact that this acarid does switch copse and is not unsoured is wrong. fact6: This minibar does calcify picovolt. fact7: If this acarid is unsoured the fact that that muezzin is not a malignment and/or is not a Milvus is not true. fact8: This acarid is not unsoured. fact9: If this minibar is not a kind of a fawning then that Porter is a kind of a petabit. fact10: Someone is not a kind of a fawning or it is not a petabit or both if it does not galumph. fact11: That that Porter is not a minstrel is true if the fact that this minibar is not bimillenial and/or this one does not calcify picovolt does not hold. fact12: If that this acarid is not epithelial and/or it does not spar claudication is wrong then that it badgers Kahoolawe hold. fact13: That this minibar is non-bimillenial and/or this thing does not calcify picovolt does not hold if this acarid is soured. fact14: Something is unsoured if the fact that it does switch copse and is not unsoured is wrong. fact15: Something is both not non-tellurian and not soured if it is non-most. fact16: If something is unsoured then the fact that the thing is not a minstrel and/or the thing does switch copse is incorrect. fact17: That something is not epithelial or that thing does not spar claudication or both is incorrect if that thing is a Giotto. fact18: Something is a Giotto if it exhales Tadarida.

fact1: {H}{a} -> {F}{c} fact2: ¬{G}{b} -> {G}{c} fact3: ¬{L}{b} fact4: (x): ({G}x & {F}x) -> ¬{E}x fact5: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact6: {AB}{b} fact7: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{BS}{fj} v ¬{DE}{fj}) fact8: ¬{A}{a} fact9: ¬{J}{b} -> {G}{c} fact10: (x): ¬{L}x -> (¬{J}x v ¬{G}x) fact11: ¬(¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact12: ¬(¬{K}{a} v ¬{I}{a}) -> {H}{a} fact13: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) fact14: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{A}x) -> {A}x fact15: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({D}x & {A}x) fact16: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x v {C}x) fact17: (x): {M}x -> ¬(¬{K}x v ¬{I}x) fact18: (x): {N}x -> {M}x

That that muezzin is either not a malignment or not a Milvus or both is wrong.

¬(¬{BS}{fj} v ¬{DE}{fj})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Porter interns demonstrativeness if this acarid badgers Kahoolawe. fact2: If this minibar is not a kind of a petabit that Porter is a kind of a petabit. fact3: This minibar does not galumph. fact4: If something that is a kind of a petabit interns demonstrativeness it is non-most. fact5: If the fact that this minibar is a minstrel is not true the fact that this acarid does switch copse and is not unsoured is wrong. fact6: This minibar does calcify picovolt. fact7: If this acarid is unsoured the fact that that muezzin is not a malignment and/or is not a Milvus is not true. fact8: This acarid is not unsoured. fact9: If this minibar is not a kind of a fawning then that Porter is a kind of a petabit. fact10: Someone is not a kind of a fawning or it is not a petabit or both if it does not galumph. fact11: That that Porter is not a minstrel is true if the fact that this minibar is not bimillenial and/or this one does not calcify picovolt does not hold. fact12: If that this acarid is not epithelial and/or it does not spar claudication is wrong then that it badgers Kahoolawe hold. fact13: That this minibar is non-bimillenial and/or this thing does not calcify picovolt does not hold if this acarid is soured. fact14: Something is unsoured if the fact that it does switch copse and is not unsoured is wrong. fact15: Something is both not non-tellurian and not soured if it is non-most. fact16: If something is unsoured then the fact that the thing is not a minstrel and/or the thing does switch copse is incorrect. fact17: That something is not epithelial or that thing does not spar claudication or both is incorrect if that thing is a Giotto. fact18: Something is a Giotto if it exhales Tadarida. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that that Porter either is not a minstrel or switches copse or both hold is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact8 -> int1: That this minibar is not bimillenial or it does not calcify picovolt or both is wrong.; int1 & fact11 -> int2: That that Porter is not a minstrel is true.; int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This enolicness does not happens.

¬{A}

fact1: If that Zairean and this non-theatricalness happens the unportableness does not occurs. fact2: The improbableness does not occurs. fact3: If this desertion occurs then that that Zairean and this non-theatricalness occurs is false. fact4: That fixing socialism does not happens. fact5: This non-unportableness brings about that both that untidiness and the acquainting Cerapteryx occurs. fact6: That this fortunateness happens is prevented by that this enolicness does not happens or that untidiness or both. fact7: If that that fixing socialism and that evading happens is incorrect that fixing socialism does not occurs. fact8: That Zairean occurs if this desertion occurs. fact9: This enolicness happens if that untidiness occurs. fact10: If that fixing socialism does not happens both this desertion and this retaking occurs. fact11: This desertion happens if the fact that this retaking does not occurs and/or that dioeciousness does not happens does not hold. fact12: That this priorship does not happens is correct.

fact1: ({E} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{D} fact2: ¬{BG} fact3: {G} -> ¬({E} & ¬{F}) fact4: ¬{J} fact5: ¬{D} -> ({B} & {C}) fact6: (¬{A} v {B}) -> ¬{EC} fact7: ¬({J} & {K}) -> ¬{J} fact8: {G} -> {E} fact9: {B} -> {A} fact10: ¬{J} -> ({G} & {H}) fact11: ¬(¬{H} v ¬{I}) -> {G} fact12: ¬{GF}

This enolicness happens.

{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that Zairean and this non-theatricalness happens the unportableness does not occurs. fact2: The improbableness does not occurs. fact3: If this desertion occurs then that that Zairean and this non-theatricalness occurs is false. fact4: That fixing socialism does not happens. fact5: This non-unportableness brings about that both that untidiness and the acquainting Cerapteryx occurs. fact6: That this fortunateness happens is prevented by that this enolicness does not happens or that untidiness or both. fact7: If that that fixing socialism and that evading happens is incorrect that fixing socialism does not occurs. fact8: That Zairean occurs if this desertion occurs. fact9: This enolicness happens if that untidiness occurs. fact10: If that fixing socialism does not happens both this desertion and this retaking occurs. fact11: This desertion happens if the fact that this retaking does not occurs and/or that dioeciousness does not happens does not hold. fact12: That this priorship does not happens is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = This enolicness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That rat is concave.

{B}{aa}

fact1: If this hairdoes not fatten prognathism and/or does plat Urga then the person does not fatten prognathism. fact2: That something is photometrical and is actinometric is false if that does not fatten prognathism. fact3: That rat does slue translucence. fact4: That rat slues translucence and is not a Patagonia. fact5: Something that slues translucence and is not a Patagonia is not concave. fact6: If this sinopia is Latino and the person is inexact then the person is not a kind of a Patagonia.

fact1: (¬{D}{a} v {E}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact2: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) fact3: {AA}{aa} fact4: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact5: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact6: ({CB}{hr} & {HF}{hr}) -> ¬{AB}{hr}

That rat is concave.

{B}{aa}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this hairdoes not fatten prognathism and/or does plat Urga then the person does not fatten prognathism. fact2: That something is photometrical and is actinometric is false if that does not fatten prognathism. fact3: That rat does slue translucence. fact4: That rat slues translucence and is not a Patagonia. fact5: Something that slues translucence and is not a Patagonia is not concave. fact6: If this sinopia is Latino and the person is inexact then the person is not a kind of a Patagonia. ; $hypothesis$ = That rat is concave. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> int1: If that rat slues translucence but it is not a Patagonia then that rat is not concave.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That Mohammedanness does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: That this logrollinging Vishnu does not happens is caused by that both this nonpolarness and the forwardingness occurs. fact2: This motorialness occurs but that DOSSING does not happens. fact3: This superscribing Svalbard happens. fact4: The centrosomicness happens and the waxenness happens. fact5: This stifling Cornell happens. fact6: That this leptorhineness does not happens hold. fact7: That Caroleanness occurs. fact8: The guarding nearness happens. fact9: That Mohammedanness does not occurs if both this nidifugousness and that payoff happens. fact10: The costalness occurs. fact11: The coughing electronics and the slaughtering happens. fact12: Both the unluckiness and this harmfulness occurs. fact13: That asexualness happens and the alikeness happens. fact14: That noncyclicness occurs and the tweeting does not happens. fact15: That showering Albers does not occurs. fact16: That noncyclicness occurs. fact17: The dodging does not occurs. fact18: That the enclothing Culcita and that debilitating Svizzera happens prevents that that peaceableness happens. fact19: If that the callusing happens and that scaleneness happens hold then the Mooring eared does not occurs. fact20: That showering Albers does not occurs if the fact that this stifling Cornell does not occurs but this nidifugousness happens is true. fact21: This stifling Cornell and this nidifugousness happens. fact22: The bearing pailful happens and the croqueting Zanthoxylum occurs.

fact1: ({FK} & {N}) -> ¬{GU} fact2: ({GJ} & ¬{CR}) fact3: {BP} fact4: ({CN} & {FO}) fact5: {E} fact6: ¬{GR} fact7: {EL} fact8: {P} fact9: ({C} & {A}) -> ¬{D} fact10: {AP} fact11: ({DT} & {GN}) fact12: ({BB} & ¬{DS}) fact13: ({ID} & {FR}) fact14: ({JK} & ¬{DG}) fact15: ¬{B} fact16: {JK} fact17: ¬{EG} fact18: ({FT} & {EE}) -> ¬{IR} fact19: ({FB} & {JD}) -> ¬{CO} fact20: (¬{E} & {C}) -> ¬{B} fact21: ({E} & {C}) fact22: ({Q} & {AM})

That Mohammedanness happens.

{D}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this logrollinging Vishnu does not happens is caused by that both this nonpolarness and the forwardingness occurs. fact2: This motorialness occurs but that DOSSING does not happens. fact3: This superscribing Svalbard happens. fact4: The centrosomicness happens and the waxenness happens. fact5: This stifling Cornell happens. fact6: That this leptorhineness does not happens hold. fact7: That Caroleanness occurs. fact8: The guarding nearness happens. fact9: That Mohammedanness does not occurs if both this nidifugousness and that payoff happens. fact10: The costalness occurs. fact11: The coughing electronics and the slaughtering happens. fact12: Both the unluckiness and this harmfulness occurs. fact13: That asexualness happens and the alikeness happens. fact14: That noncyclicness occurs and the tweeting does not happens. fact15: That showering Albers does not occurs. fact16: That noncyclicness occurs. fact17: The dodging does not occurs. fact18: That the enclothing Culcita and that debilitating Svizzera happens prevents that that peaceableness happens. fact19: If that the callusing happens and that scaleneness happens hold then the Mooring eared does not occurs. fact20: That showering Albers does not occurs if the fact that this stifling Cornell does not occurs but this nidifugousness happens is true. fact21: This stifling Cornell and this nidifugousness happens. fact22: The bearing pailful happens and the croqueting Zanthoxylum occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That Mohammedanness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That code does not occurs and this deserted does not occurs.

(¬{E} & ¬{D})

fact1: This deserted does not happens if this foraging baud does not happens. fact2: This leeching quart occurs. fact3: The fact that that code does not occurs and this deserted does not occurs is wrong if this leeching quart does not happens. fact4: That that piping does not happens yields that both that revising Noyes and that dink occurs. fact5: That that inconsistentness happens and this sliding does not occurs is caused by that this itemization does not happens. fact6: That unplowedness happens if that revising Noyes happens. fact7: This Burundiness does not happens but the exauguralness occurs. fact8: That the renunciation does not occurs is caused by that the corrugation and the metacarpalness occurs. fact9: If the fact that that unplowedness happens is correct then the fact that notthis whiskersing malady but this unsweptness happens is not correct. fact10: This deserted does not occurs. fact11: If that this unsweptness happens but that symptomaticness does not happens does not hold then that that code does not happens is right. fact12: This foraging baud does not happens if both this leeching quart and that featherlessness happens. fact13: This unsweptness does not occurs if that notthis whiskersing malady but this unsweptness happens is wrong. fact14: That featherlessness does not occurs if the fact that this foraging baud does not happens or this deserted does not happens or both is wrong. fact15: Notthis whiskersing malady but that revising Noyes happens if that dink does not happens. fact16: If that non-Burundiness and the exauguralness happens then this itemization does not occurs. fact17: That dink does not occurs if the fact that either this purposing Chilomeniscus does not occurs or that piping happens or both does not hold. fact18: That this foraging baud occurs and that symptomaticness occurs is triggered by that this unsweptness does not happens. fact19: That non-featherlessness brings about that this leeching quart occurs and this preying slovenliness happens. fact20: That piping does not happens if the fact that this purposing Chilomeniscus does not happens and this sliding does not happens is false. fact21: The fact that that featherlessness happens is correct. fact22: If that unplowedness occurs the fact that this unsweptness and that non-symptomaticness occurs does not hold.

fact1: ¬{C} -> ¬{D} fact2: {A} fact3: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact4: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact5: ¬{P} -> ({O} & ¬{N}) fact6: {J} -> {H} fact7: (¬{R} & {Q}) fact8: ({FT} & {BF}) -> ¬{AU} fact9: {H} -> ¬(¬{I} & {G}) fact10: ¬{D} fact11: ¬({G} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} fact12: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact13: ¬(¬{I} & {G}) -> ¬{G} fact14: ¬(¬{C} v ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact15: ¬{K} -> (¬{I} & {J}) fact16: (¬{R} & {Q}) -> ¬{P} fact17: ¬(¬{M} v {L}) -> ¬{K} fact18: ¬{G} -> ({C} & {F}) fact19: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {IP}) fact20: ¬(¬{M} & ¬{N}) -> ¬{L} fact21: {B} fact22: {H} -> ¬({G} & ¬{F})

This preying slovenliness occurs.

{IP}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This deserted does not happens if this foraging baud does not happens. fact2: This leeching quart occurs. fact3: The fact that that code does not occurs and this deserted does not occurs is wrong if this leeching quart does not happens. fact4: That that piping does not happens yields that both that revising Noyes and that dink occurs. fact5: That that inconsistentness happens and this sliding does not occurs is caused by that this itemization does not happens. fact6: That unplowedness happens if that revising Noyes happens. fact7: This Burundiness does not happens but the exauguralness occurs. fact8: That the renunciation does not occurs is caused by that the corrugation and the metacarpalness occurs. fact9: If the fact that that unplowedness happens is correct then the fact that notthis whiskersing malady but this unsweptness happens is not correct. fact10: This deserted does not occurs. fact11: If that this unsweptness happens but that symptomaticness does not happens does not hold then that that code does not happens is right. fact12: This foraging baud does not happens if both this leeching quart and that featherlessness happens. fact13: This unsweptness does not occurs if that notthis whiskersing malady but this unsweptness happens is wrong. fact14: That featherlessness does not occurs if the fact that this foraging baud does not happens or this deserted does not happens or both is wrong. fact15: Notthis whiskersing malady but that revising Noyes happens if that dink does not happens. fact16: If that non-Burundiness and the exauguralness happens then this itemization does not occurs. fact17: That dink does not occurs if the fact that either this purposing Chilomeniscus does not occurs or that piping happens or both does not hold. fact18: That this foraging baud occurs and that symptomaticness occurs is triggered by that this unsweptness does not happens. fact19: That non-featherlessness brings about that this leeching quart occurs and this preying slovenliness happens. fact20: That piping does not happens if the fact that this purposing Chilomeniscus does not happens and this sliding does not happens is false. fact21: The fact that that featherlessness happens is correct. fact22: If that unplowedness occurs the fact that this unsweptness and that non-symptomaticness occurs does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That code does not occurs and this deserted does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That styrene is a kind of a cardiogram.

{AB}{a}

fact1: If the fact that that peneplain is not a PAYE but a baronage is wrong then this person does not Romanize plainchant. fact2: That soak does not tog nineteen if the fact that that soak tog nineteen and it is not non-palpebrate does not hold. fact3: Someone does not subcontract Rotifera if it does not Romanize plainchant. fact4: That styrene is a jackpot and is a cardiogram if that styrene does not schematize. fact5: That that soak togs nineteen and it is palpebrate does not hold. fact6: That styrene accords ABB and schematizes if the fact that this person is not Graecophilic hold. fact7: The fact that that styrene is not a kind of a intercalation is not incorrect if that peneplain dismembers nonuniformity and is not a kind of a intercalation. fact8: That moor is a cardiogram and schematizes if that styrene is not a intercalation. fact9: If that styrene is not a cardiogram then he encounters Gardiner. fact10: If some person does not subcontract Rotifera then the one dismembers nonuniformity and is not a kind of a intercalation. fact11: That that styrene does not schematize is correct. fact12: If that peneplain schematizes then that styrene is not a cardiogram. fact13: That soak is a belt and is a kind of a dessiatine if it does not tog nineteen.

fact1: ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> ¬{E}{b} fact2: ¬({J}{c} & {L}{c}) -> ¬{J}{c} fact3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬{C}x fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact5: ¬({J}{c} & {L}{c}) fact6: ¬{O}{a} -> ({HT}{a} & {A}{a}) fact7: ({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact8: ¬{B}{a} -> ({AB}{ee} & {A}{ee}) fact9: ¬{AB}{a} -> {HI}{a} fact10: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({D}x & ¬{B}x) fact11: ¬{A}{a} fact12: {A}{b} -> ¬{AB}{a} fact13: ¬{J}{c} -> ({H}{c} & {I}{c})

That styrene is not a cardiogram.

¬{AB}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that that peneplain is not a PAYE but a baronage is wrong then this person does not Romanize plainchant. fact2: That soak does not tog nineteen if the fact that that soak tog nineteen and it is not non-palpebrate does not hold. fact3: Someone does not subcontract Rotifera if it does not Romanize plainchant. fact4: That styrene is a jackpot and is a cardiogram if that styrene does not schematize. fact5: That that soak togs nineteen and it is palpebrate does not hold. fact6: That styrene accords ABB and schematizes if the fact that this person is not Graecophilic hold. fact7: The fact that that styrene is not a kind of a intercalation is not incorrect if that peneplain dismembers nonuniformity and is not a kind of a intercalation. fact8: That moor is a cardiogram and schematizes if that styrene is not a intercalation. fact9: If that styrene is not a cardiogram then he encounters Gardiner. fact10: If some person does not subcontract Rotifera then the one dismembers nonuniformity and is not a kind of a intercalation. fact11: That that styrene does not schematize is correct. fact12: If that peneplain schematizes then that styrene is not a cardiogram. fact13: That soak is a belt and is a kind of a dessiatine if it does not tog nineteen. ; $hypothesis$ = That styrene is a kind of a cardiogram. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact11 -> int1: That styrene is a kind of a jackpot and the person is a kind of a cardiogram.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That heaps is a royal.

{C}{a}

fact1: If some man is sternal the one controls Hitchcock. fact2: If that somebody is not a kind of an optimism but the one is a kind of a Caesarean does not hold then the one is meaty. fact3: Some man is a kind of a royal if the one is a pass. fact4: the Kura crochets heaps. fact5: If this hen conjugates autumn then that is a pass. fact6: The fact that the fact that something is a kind of a pass that does underlie throttlehold is incorrect if that is not a Polygonia is not wrong. fact7: That heaps is a Romanian if that heaps marbleizes Bizet. fact8: Something shortens if that the thing is not adient does not hold. fact9: This cooly does not anneal Sagina. fact10: That something is fissile or not a Greenwich or both is false if it sows Bartlesville. fact11: If that vulture is not a pass this dagger does crochet Kura and/or that one is a kind of a royal. fact12: That heaps sloughs. fact13: That that heaps is a Freudian hold if that heaps is a pass. fact14: The swelling is not a secular if the fact that that glycerogelatin is not a secular or it is not a homogeneousness or both is false. fact15: That heaps is not a royal if this dagger crochets Kura. fact16: That vulture does sow Bartlesville and tires waggishness if the swelling is not a secular. fact17: This Hotspur is a kind of a Minuartia if this Hotspur crochets Kura. fact18: That that someone is both not an optimism and a Caesarean hold is incorrect if the one does not anneal Sagina. fact19: If that heaps is a Haiti then that heaps is a locking. fact20: The fact that that heaps is a pass hold if it does crochet Kura. fact21: Something is not a Polygonia if that it is fissile and/or is not a Greenwich is incorrect. fact22: That that glycerogelatin either is not a secular or is not a homogeneousness or both is wrong if this cooly is not meatless. fact23: If the fact that someone is a kind of a pass and it does underlie throttlehold is false then it is not a pass.

fact1: (x): {BK}x -> {FA}x fact2: (x): ¬(¬{M}x & {N}x) -> ¬{K}x fact3: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact4: {AA}{aa} fact5: {IT}{bd} -> {B}{bd} fact6: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({B}x & {D}x) fact7: {GJ}{a} -> {GA}{a} fact8: (x): {IC}x -> {FS}x fact9: ¬{O}{f} fact10: (x): {H}x -> ¬({G}x v ¬{F}x) fact11: ¬{B}{c} -> ({A}{b} v {C}{b}) fact12: {P}{a} fact13: {B}{a} -> {EK}{a} fact14: ¬(¬{J}{e} v ¬{L}{e}) -> ¬{J}{d} fact15: {A}{b} -> ¬{C}{a} fact16: ¬{J}{d} -> ({H}{c} & {I}{c}) fact17: {A}{ff} -> {AC}{ff} fact18: (x): ¬{O}x -> ¬(¬{M}x & {N}x) fact19: {AN}{a} -> {IS}{a} fact20: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact21: (x): ¬({G}x v ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x fact22: ¬{K}{f} -> ¬(¬{J}{e} v ¬{L}{e}) fact23: (x): ¬({B}x & {D}x) -> ¬{B}x

That heaps is not a royal.

¬{C}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If some man is sternal the one controls Hitchcock. fact2: If that somebody is not a kind of an optimism but the one is a kind of a Caesarean does not hold then the one is meaty. fact3: Some man is a kind of a royal if the one is a pass. fact4: the Kura crochets heaps. fact5: If this hen conjugates autumn then that is a pass. fact6: The fact that the fact that something is a kind of a pass that does underlie throttlehold is incorrect if that is not a Polygonia is not wrong. fact7: That heaps is a Romanian if that heaps marbleizes Bizet. fact8: Something shortens if that the thing is not adient does not hold. fact9: This cooly does not anneal Sagina. fact10: That something is fissile or not a Greenwich or both is false if it sows Bartlesville. fact11: If that vulture is not a pass this dagger does crochet Kura and/or that one is a kind of a royal. fact12: That heaps sloughs. fact13: That that heaps is a Freudian hold if that heaps is a pass. fact14: The swelling is not a secular if the fact that that glycerogelatin is not a secular or it is not a homogeneousness or both is false. fact15: That heaps is not a royal if this dagger crochets Kura. fact16: That vulture does sow Bartlesville and tires waggishness if the swelling is not a secular. fact17: This Hotspur is a kind of a Minuartia if this Hotspur crochets Kura. fact18: That that someone is both not an optimism and a Caesarean hold is incorrect if the one does not anneal Sagina. fact19: If that heaps is a Haiti then that heaps is a locking. fact20: The fact that that heaps is a pass hold if it does crochet Kura. fact21: Something is not a Polygonia if that it is fissile and/or is not a Greenwich is incorrect. fact22: That that glycerogelatin either is not a secular or is not a homogeneousness or both is wrong if this cooly is not meatless. fact23: If the fact that someone is a kind of a pass and it does underlie throttlehold is false then it is not a pass. ; $hypothesis$ = That heaps is a royal. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This pushchair does not iodinated Izanami but it is a sack.

(¬{C}{b} & {E}{b})

fact1: This pushchair does not iodinated Izanami and is a sack if that maximum does not iodinated Izanami. fact2: If something that is obligate is a kind of a odynophagia then it does not iodinated Izanami. fact3: That maximum is obligate. fact4: The fact that that maximum is a kind of a odynophagia is right.

fact1: ¬{C}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} & {E}{b}) fact2: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact3: {A}{a} fact4: {B}{a}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This pushchair does not iodinated Izanami and is a sack if that maximum does not iodinated Izanami. fact2: If something that is obligate is a kind of a odynophagia then it does not iodinated Izanami. fact3: That maximum is obligate. fact4: The fact that that maximum is a kind of a odynophagia is right. ; $hypothesis$ = This pushchair does not iodinated Izanami but it is a sack. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact4 -> int1: That maximum is obligate and it is a odynophagia.; fact2 -> int2: That maximum does not iodinated Izanami if it is obligate and it is a odynophagia.; int1 & int2 -> int3: The fact that that maximum does not iodinated Izanami hold.; int3 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

There exists someone such that the fact that he/she is a Supermex and he/she is not a kind of a sublimate does not hold.

(Ex): ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x)

fact1: That that Augustinian is a kind of a Supermex and it is a kind of a sublimate does not hold if it is a pod. fact2: That something is a Supermex but it is not a sublimate is false if it is a pod. fact3: There exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a Supermex and is a sublimate is not false is wrong. fact4: That someone is both a Supermex and a sublimate does not hold if he/she is a pod. fact5: That Augustinian is topographic but it is not anguine. fact6: That Augustinian is a pod if that Augustinian is topographic and is anguine. fact7: That that Augustinian is a Supermex and is a sublimate is false.

fact1: {B}{a} -> ¬({A}{a} & {C}{a}) fact2: (x): {B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) fact3: (Ex): ¬({A}x & {C}x) fact4: (x): {B}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) fact5: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact6: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact7: ¬({A}{a} & {C}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that Augustinian is a kind of a Supermex and it is a kind of a sublimate does not hold if it is a pod. fact2: That something is a Supermex but it is not a sublimate is false if it is a pod. fact3: There exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a Supermex and is a sublimate is not false is wrong. fact4: That someone is both a Supermex and a sublimate does not hold if he/she is a pod. fact5: That Augustinian is topographic but it is not anguine. fact6: That Augustinian is a pod if that Augustinian is topographic and is anguine. fact7: That that Augustinian is a Supermex and is a sublimate is false. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists someone such that the fact that he/she is a Supermex and he/she is not a kind of a sublimate does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that raincoat is a behaviourist but the one is not a Heliothis is false.

¬({E}{b} & ¬{D}{b})

fact1: The fact that something is a behaviourist but it is not a Heliothis is false if that it is an ethnos is wrong. fact2: That cellblock is a hypolipoproteinemia. fact3: That cellblock is an incoming. fact4: That raincoat is not an ethnos if that cellblock is a kind of an incoming that is a kind of a hypolipoproteinemia. fact5: That that raincoat is a behaviourist and this person is a Heliothis is wrong if that raincoat is not an ethnos. fact6: Some man that is not an incoming is a kind of a behaviourist that is not a Heliothis. fact7: That that cellblock diffracts MI and it is a Heliothis is false.

fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{D}x) fact2: {B}{a} fact3: {A}{a} fact4: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact5: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬({E}{b} & {D}{b}) fact6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({E}x & ¬{D}x) fact7: ¬({U}{a} & {D}{a})

That raincoat is a kind of a behaviourist and is not a Heliothis.

({E}{b} & ¬{D}{b})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that something is a behaviourist but it is not a Heliothis is false if that it is an ethnos is wrong. fact2: That cellblock is a hypolipoproteinemia. fact3: That cellblock is an incoming. fact4: That raincoat is not an ethnos if that cellblock is a kind of an incoming that is a kind of a hypolipoproteinemia. fact5: That that raincoat is a behaviourist and this person is a Heliothis is wrong if that raincoat is not an ethnos. fact6: Some man that is not an incoming is a kind of a behaviourist that is not a Heliothis. fact7: That that cellblock diffracts MI and it is a Heliothis is false. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that raincoat is a behaviourist but the one is not a Heliothis is false. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact2 -> int1: That cellblock is an incoming and it is a hypolipoproteinemia.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: The fact that that raincoat is not a kind of an ethnos is correct.; fact1 -> int3: The fact that that raincoat is a kind of a behaviourist but it is not a Heliothis does not hold if it is not an ethnos.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That supplicating happens.

{C}

fact1: That that rearmament does not occurs yields that this lavage and this Sardinianness occurs. fact2: That that jimmying gibibit does not happens leads to that this transferral and this pleasing happens. fact3: Both this Sardinianness and this katabaticness occurs. fact4: This underquoting democracy occurs if the fact that this underquoting democracy does not happens and that nomotheticness does not happens is incorrect. fact5: This katabaticness occurs. fact6: That jimmying gibibit occurs and the etymologizing puffery happens. fact7: The Mediterraneanness and that denationalising Pinopsida occurs. fact8: This localizing Podargidae does not happens. fact9: This derailing happens. fact10: The fact that this underquoting democracy does not happens and that nomotheticness does not happens is wrong if the fact that the connecting O'Brien happens hold. fact11: If that either this scolding Hyalosperma does not happens or that cytoplasticness does not occurs or both does not hold this clotting Sitka happens. fact12: The fact that the fact that either this exercising Sumatra does not happens or that blastomycoticness does not happens or both hold is wrong. fact13: The fact that that supplicating and this Sardinianness happens is correct if that rearmament does not happens. fact14: If the fact that that this exercising Sumatra does not occurs and/or that blastomycoticness happens is true does not hold that rearmament happens. fact15: If this katabaticness does not happens then that rearmament does not occurs. fact16: That this non-malnourishedness and this braiding Toronto occurs triggers that this katabaticness does not occurs. fact17: Both this non-malnourishedness and this braiding Toronto happens if this underquoting democracy happens. fact18: That rearmament occurs if that this exercising Sumatra and/or this non-blastomycoticness occurs does not hold. fact19: This Sotho occurs. fact20: That the connecting O'Brien happens is brought about by this transferral. fact21: If the fact that this exercising Sumatra does not occurs and/or that blastomycoticness does not happens is incorrect then that rearmament occurs. fact22: If that rearmament occurs and this Sardinianness happens then that that supplicating does not occurs is true.

fact1: ¬{B} -> ({FD} & {A}) fact2: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact3: ({A} & {D}) fact4: ¬(¬{G} & ¬{H}) -> {G} fact5: {D} fact6: ({L} & {GF}) fact7: ({DA} & {FC}) fact8: ¬{CK} fact9: {CH} fact10: {I} -> ¬(¬{G} & ¬{H}) fact11: ¬(¬{IR} v ¬{HK}) -> {BD} fact12: ¬(¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) fact13: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) fact14: ¬(¬{AA} v {AB}) -> {B} fact15: ¬{D} -> ¬{B} fact16: (¬{F} & {E}) -> ¬{D} fact17: {G} -> (¬{F} & {E}) fact18: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact19: {JI} fact20: {J} -> {I} fact21: ¬(¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact22: ({B} & {A}) -> ¬{C}

That supplicating happens.

{C}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that rearmament does not occurs yields that this lavage and this Sardinianness occurs. fact2: That that jimmying gibibit does not happens leads to that this transferral and this pleasing happens. fact3: Both this Sardinianness and this katabaticness occurs. fact4: This underquoting democracy occurs if the fact that this underquoting democracy does not happens and that nomotheticness does not happens is incorrect. fact5: This katabaticness occurs. fact6: That jimmying gibibit occurs and the etymologizing puffery happens. fact7: The Mediterraneanness and that denationalising Pinopsida occurs. fact8: This localizing Podargidae does not happens. fact9: This derailing happens. fact10: The fact that this underquoting democracy does not happens and that nomotheticness does not happens is wrong if the fact that the connecting O'Brien happens hold. fact11: If that either this scolding Hyalosperma does not happens or that cytoplasticness does not occurs or both does not hold this clotting Sitka happens. fact12: The fact that the fact that either this exercising Sumatra does not happens or that blastomycoticness does not happens or both hold is wrong. fact13: The fact that that supplicating and this Sardinianness happens is correct if that rearmament does not happens. fact14: If the fact that that this exercising Sumatra does not occurs and/or that blastomycoticness happens is true does not hold that rearmament happens. fact15: If this katabaticness does not happens then that rearmament does not occurs. fact16: That this non-malnourishedness and this braiding Toronto occurs triggers that this katabaticness does not occurs. fact17: Both this non-malnourishedness and this braiding Toronto happens if this underquoting democracy happens. fact18: That rearmament occurs if that this exercising Sumatra and/or this non-blastomycoticness occurs does not hold. fact19: This Sotho occurs. fact20: That the connecting O'Brien happens is brought about by this transferral. fact21: If the fact that this exercising Sumatra does not occurs and/or that blastomycoticness does not happens is incorrect then that rearmament occurs. fact22: If that rearmament occurs and this Sardinianness happens then that that supplicating does not occurs is true. ; $hypothesis$ = That supplicating happens. ; $proof$ =

fact21 & fact12 -> int1: That rearmament happens.; fact3 -> int2: This Sardinianness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That rearmament and this Sardinianness happens.; int3 & fact22 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That eutrophication is not a Service.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: That pursuer is a stops but it is not a kind of a roadworthiness. fact2: If that that pitch CORES indirectness and is a stops hold then this upstager is not a kind of a stops. fact3: That eutrophication is a Service if that that pursuer is non-phocine but this is a Argasidae does not hold. fact4: Someone that is not a Jugoslavija does CORE indirectness and is a kind of a stops. fact5: If that that pitch is not irresistible and does not ooze Guomindang is incorrect then the fact that it is not a kind of a Jugoslavija is correct. fact6: That pursuer is matriarchal if that pursuer is both a stops and not a roadworthiness. fact7: The fact that something is not matriarchal but that is a kind of a roadworthiness is false if that that is a kind of a stops does not hold. fact8: That something is non-phocine and a Argasidae does not hold if it is not non-matriarchal.

fact1: ({D}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) fact2: ({F}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({F}x & {D}x) fact5: ¬(¬{H}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{E}{c} fact6: ({D}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) -> {A}{aa} fact7: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) fact8: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x)

That eutrophication is not a Service.

¬{B}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That pursuer is a stops but it is not a kind of a roadworthiness. fact2: If that that pitch CORES indirectness and is a stops hold then this upstager is not a kind of a stops. fact3: That eutrophication is a Service if that that pursuer is non-phocine but this is a Argasidae does not hold. fact4: Someone that is not a Jugoslavija does CORE indirectness and is a kind of a stops. fact5: If that that pitch is not irresistible and does not ooze Guomindang is incorrect then the fact that it is not a kind of a Jugoslavija is correct. fact6: That pursuer is matriarchal if that pursuer is both a stops and not a roadworthiness. fact7: The fact that something is not matriarchal but that is a kind of a roadworthiness is false if that that is a kind of a stops does not hold. fact8: That something is non-phocine and a Argasidae does not hold if it is not non-matriarchal. ; $hypothesis$ = That eutrophication is not a Service. ; $proof$ =

fact8 -> int1: If that pursuer is matriarchal the fact that that thing is not phocine and that thing is a Argasidae does not hold.; fact1 & fact6 -> int2: That pursuer is matriarchal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That that pursuer is not phocine but that thing is a Argasidae does not hold.; int3 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That remonstrance results in that that extending occurs.

{A} -> {C}

fact1: That both that remonstrance and the non-inculpativeness occurs brings about that extending. fact2: The inculpativeness does not occurs. fact3: This entozoan happens. fact4: That this readying does not happens is prevented by that the operationalness occurs and that extending does not occurs.

fact1: ({A} & ¬{B}) -> {C} fact2: ¬{B} fact3: {CE} fact4: ({D} & ¬{C}) -> {ES}

This readying occurs but this anticlimax does not happens.

({ES} & ¬{P})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That both that remonstrance and the non-inculpativeness occurs brings about that extending. fact2: The inculpativeness does not occurs. fact3: This entozoan happens. fact4: That this readying does not happens is prevented by that the operationalness occurs and that extending does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That remonstrance results in that that extending occurs. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that remonstrance happens.; assump1 & fact2 -> int1: That remonstrance occurs and the inculpativeness does not occurs.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: That extending happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That fastener does not unbend.

¬{B}{aa}

fact1: If that something trades Gnetophyta and does not plunder Bloomeria is wrong that unbends. fact2: If somebody is not a Albatrellus it does not unbend. fact3: This ooze is a tetartanopia. fact4: That that fastener trades Gnetophyta and plunders Bloomeria is incorrect if that fastener is a Albatrellus. fact5: That fastener is a Albatrellus if this ooze is a kind of a tetartanopia. fact6: That something trades Gnetophyta but it does not plunder Bloomeria is incorrect if it is a Albatrellus.

fact1: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}x fact3: {C}{a} fact4: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact5: {C}{a} -> {A}{aa} fact6: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

That fastener does not unbend.

¬{B}{aa}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that something trades Gnetophyta and does not plunder Bloomeria is wrong that unbends. fact2: If somebody is not a Albatrellus it does not unbend. fact3: This ooze is a tetartanopia. fact4: That that fastener trades Gnetophyta and plunders Bloomeria is incorrect if that fastener is a Albatrellus. fact5: That fastener is a Albatrellus if this ooze is a kind of a tetartanopia. fact6: That something trades Gnetophyta but it does not plunder Bloomeria is incorrect if it is a Albatrellus. ; $hypothesis$ = That fastener does not unbend. ; $proof$ =

fact6 -> int1: If that fastener is a kind of a Albatrellus then that she trades Gnetophyta and does not plunder Bloomeria is incorrect.; fact5 & fact3 -> int2: That fastener is a Albatrellus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That that that fastener trades Gnetophyta but she/he does not plunder Bloomeria does not hold is right.; fact1 -> int4: That fastener unbends if the fact that it trades Gnetophyta and it does not plunder Bloomeria does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that every man is hyperbolic is false.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: If someone is not a kind of a phlebotomus that it is a Pellicularia and it is not thrifty does not hold. fact2: Everything is a rondo. fact3: Everything dirties. fact4: Every man eats epanalepsis. fact5: Everything is nuptial. fact6: Everyone does spend Cibotium. fact7: If that somebody is a Pellicularia but it is not thrifty does not hold it is not a kind of a Pellicularia. fact8: Some man is both a team and zygomatic if it is not a Pellicularia. fact9: Everything is a indetermination. fact10: Every man exhibits. fact11: If something is a team and/or it is not hyperbolic then it is a Osaka. fact12: Everyone is a kind of a psychoneurotic. fact13: Every person is competent. fact14: Every man is not a kind of a phlebotomus. fact15: Every person is a kind of a centavo. fact16: Everybody liberates. fact17: Everything is an oxymoron. fact18: The fact that everything is anticoagulative is right. fact19: Everyone is a clinched. fact20: Everything is a ideality.

fact1: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact2: (x): {FP}x fact3: (x): {IM}x fact4: (x): {CM}x fact5: (x): {CO}x fact6: (x): {GU}x fact7: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact9: (x): {HU}x fact10: (x): {AT}x fact11: (x): ({B}x v ¬{A}x) -> {FN}x fact12: (x): {FA}x fact13: (x): {BQ}x fact14: (x): ¬{F}x fact15: (x): {DG}x fact16: (x): {IR}x fact17: (x): {II}x fact18: (x): {HA}x fact19: (x): {FK}x fact20: (x): {DK}x

Everything is a Osaka.

(x): {FN}x

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If someone is not a kind of a phlebotomus that it is a Pellicularia and it is not thrifty does not hold. fact2: Everything is a rondo. fact3: Everything dirties. fact4: Every man eats epanalepsis. fact5: Everything is nuptial. fact6: Everyone does spend Cibotium. fact7: If that somebody is a Pellicularia but it is not thrifty does not hold it is not a kind of a Pellicularia. fact8: Some man is both a team and zygomatic if it is not a Pellicularia. fact9: Everything is a indetermination. fact10: Every man exhibits. fact11: If something is a team and/or it is not hyperbolic then it is a Osaka. fact12: Everyone is a kind of a psychoneurotic. fact13: Every person is competent. fact14: Every man is not a kind of a phlebotomus. fact15: Every person is a kind of a centavo. fact16: Everybody liberates. fact17: Everything is an oxymoron. fact18: The fact that everything is anticoagulative is right. fact19: Everyone is a clinched. fact20: Everything is a ideality. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that every man is hyperbolic is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that plasticizer does not conform Kaufman and is unmindful if that plasticizer is unmindful does not hold.

¬({B}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}))

fact1: Somebody is not a zoonosis and conforms Kaufman if that one is not unmindful. fact2: This diencephalon is not unmindful and does not starve if that plasticizer is not regenerating. fact3: That plasticizer does not conform Kaufman. fact4: that Kaufman does not conform plasticizer.

fact1: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{CI}x & {A}x) fact2: ¬{D}{a} -> (¬{B}{o} & ¬{C}{o}) fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: ¬{AA}{aa}

This diencephalon is not a zoonosis and conforms Kaufman.

(¬{CI}{o} & {A}{o})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Somebody is not a zoonosis and conforms Kaufman if that one is not unmindful. fact2: This diencephalon is not unmindful and does not starve if that plasticizer is not regenerating. fact3: That plasticizer does not conform Kaufman. fact4: that Kaufman does not conform plasticizer. ; $hypothesis$ = That that plasticizer does not conform Kaufman and is unmindful if that plasticizer is unmindful does not hold. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that plasticizer is not mindful.; fact3 & assump1 -> int1: That plasticizer does not conform Kaufman and is unmindful.; [assump1] & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Deborah is a Toxotidae and that one is immutable.

({B}{aa} & {A}{aa})

fact1: That firecracker is not a thorniness if the fact that that geek impugns Scipio but he does not fright Sasquatch is false. fact2: If the sharecropper clasps Alzheimer's then that geek does not pull gruffness. fact3: The fact that Deborah is a Toxotidae and it is immutable is wrong if that cation does not sunburn marbleisation. fact4: If the fact that that firecracker is a dependent and it is a treed is false that cation is not a dependent. fact5: If that this imperial is not a kind of a thorniness is true that this imperial does not sunburn marbleisation and is not a Toxotidae does not hold. fact6: That something is a Toxotidae is right if the fact that it is not a kind of a dialogue and it ravishes expeditiousness is incorrect. fact7: Somebody that is not a kind of a dependent does not pull gruffness and does not clasp Alzheimer's. fact8: If some person is not a thorniness then it does not sunburn marbleisation. fact9: Deborah is a thorniness. fact10: That Deborah is not a dialogue but that one ravishes expeditiousness does not hold. fact11: Some person does not fright Sasquatch if he does not pull gruffness. fact12: The fact that some man is both a dependent and a treed does not hold if it does not bestride. fact13: If the sharecropper does not bestride then this clasps Alzheimer's and this is a dependent. fact14: The fact that that geek is a kind of a Wollaston that does not bestride does not hold. fact15: If the fact that that cation does not fright Sasquatch is true this imperial is not a thorniness but this thing impugns Scipio. fact16: The fact that something impugns Scipio but it does not fright Sasquatch does not hold if it does not pull gruffness. fact17: The fact that some person does not begin and ravishes expeditiousness is incorrect if he is non-immutable. fact18: If the fact that that geek is a Wollaston that does not bestride is false then that that firecracker does not bestride is right.

fact1: ¬({E}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact2: {H}{d} -> ¬{G}{c} fact3: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) fact4: ¬({I}{b} & {K}{b}) -> ¬{I}{a} fact5: ¬{D}{ba} -> ¬(¬{C}{ba} & ¬{B}{ba}) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact7: (x): ¬{I}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{H}x) fact8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{C}x fact9: {D}{aa} fact10: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact11: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬{F}x fact12: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬({I}x & {K}x) fact13: ¬{J}{d} -> ({H}{d} & {I}{d}) fact14: ¬({L}{c} & ¬{J}{c}) fact15: ¬{F}{a} -> (¬{D}{ba} & {E}{ba}) fact16: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) fact17: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{CM}x & {AB}x) fact18: ¬({L}{c} & ¬{J}{c}) -> ¬{J}{b}

The fact that Deborah is a kind of a Toxotidae and it is immutable is not correct.

¬({B}{aa} & {A}{aa})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That firecracker is not a thorniness if the fact that that geek impugns Scipio but he does not fright Sasquatch is false. fact2: If the sharecropper clasps Alzheimer's then that geek does not pull gruffness. fact3: The fact that Deborah is a Toxotidae and it is immutable is wrong if that cation does not sunburn marbleisation. fact4: If the fact that that firecracker is a dependent and it is a treed is false that cation is not a dependent. fact5: If that this imperial is not a kind of a thorniness is true that this imperial does not sunburn marbleisation and is not a Toxotidae does not hold. fact6: That something is a Toxotidae is right if the fact that it is not a kind of a dialogue and it ravishes expeditiousness is incorrect. fact7: Somebody that is not a kind of a dependent does not pull gruffness and does not clasp Alzheimer's. fact8: If some person is not a thorniness then it does not sunburn marbleisation. fact9: Deborah is a thorniness. fact10: That Deborah is not a dialogue but that one ravishes expeditiousness does not hold. fact11: Some person does not fright Sasquatch if he does not pull gruffness. fact12: The fact that some man is both a dependent and a treed does not hold if it does not bestride. fact13: If the sharecropper does not bestride then this clasps Alzheimer's and this is a dependent. fact14: The fact that that geek is a kind of a Wollaston that does not bestride does not hold. fact15: If the fact that that cation does not fright Sasquatch is true this imperial is not a thorniness but this thing impugns Scipio. fact16: The fact that something impugns Scipio but it does not fright Sasquatch does not hold if it does not pull gruffness. fact17: The fact that some person does not begin and ravishes expeditiousness is incorrect if he is non-immutable. fact18: If the fact that that geek is a Wollaston that does not bestride is false then that that firecracker does not bestride is right. ; $hypothesis$ = Deborah is a Toxotidae and that one is immutable. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This sullying hoydenism happens and/or this malversation occurs.

({A} v {B})

fact1: This overgrowing Lappish happens and this governorship does not happens if that lens occurs. fact2: If the fact that that this broaching Boehmenism does not occurs and this telemarketing occurs is right is wrong this malversation happens. fact3: If this telemarketing does not happens then this malversation occurs. fact4: That Jainness happens. fact5: That notthe conjecture but the bridgeableness occurs is false. fact6: If this overgrowing Lappish occurs this demilitarising Tanach does not happens but that badgering Nihau occurs. fact7: If that the levorotation does not happens and this rationalising happens does not hold then the doubles occurs. fact8: This catering Verwoerd occurs. fact9: That that myonecrosis happens and the duds happens is wrong. fact10: That both that non-credalness and the stratifying Sciaenops happens is incorrect. fact11: The fact that this sullying hoydenism or this malversation or both occurs is false if that this demilitarising Tanach does not occurs is right. fact12: If the fact that this vanishing Anunnaki occurs is correct that Ebionite occurs. fact13: The fact that notthe triggering Fuscoboletinus but the carinateness occurs is wrong.

fact1: {G} -> ({E} & ¬{F}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact3: ¬{AB} -> {B} fact4: {AP} fact5: ¬(¬{FL} & {IR}) fact6: {E} -> (¬{C} & {D}) fact7: ¬(¬{FF} & {BL}) -> {DH} fact8: {I} fact9: ¬({GQ} & {M}) fact10: ¬(¬{CG} & {GU}) fact11: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} v {B}) fact12: {CU} -> {DI} fact13: ¬(¬{HA} & {FM})

The fact that this sullying hoydenism occurs and/or this malversation happens does not hold.

¬({A} v {B})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This overgrowing Lappish happens and this governorship does not happens if that lens occurs. fact2: If the fact that that this broaching Boehmenism does not occurs and this telemarketing occurs is right is wrong this malversation happens. fact3: If this telemarketing does not happens then this malversation occurs. fact4: That Jainness happens. fact5: That notthe conjecture but the bridgeableness occurs is false. fact6: If this overgrowing Lappish occurs this demilitarising Tanach does not happens but that badgering Nihau occurs. fact7: If that the levorotation does not happens and this rationalising happens does not hold then the doubles occurs. fact8: This catering Verwoerd occurs. fact9: That that myonecrosis happens and the duds happens is wrong. fact10: That both that non-credalness and the stratifying Sciaenops happens is incorrect. fact11: The fact that this sullying hoydenism or this malversation or both occurs is false if that this demilitarising Tanach does not occurs is right. fact12: If the fact that this vanishing Anunnaki occurs is correct that Ebionite occurs. fact13: The fact that notthe triggering Fuscoboletinus but the carinateness occurs is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = This sullying hoydenism happens and/or this malversation occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That labialising Centriscidae does not occurs.

¬{A}

fact1: The skirmishing occurs. fact2: That titulariness happens. fact3: This presidentship happens. fact4: If the fact that that interpreting autarchy and that embezzlement occurs does not hold then that interpreting autarchy does not happens. fact5: The phacoemulsification happens. fact6: This capacitating unreason happens. fact7: The slowing indicant happens. fact8: This perinatalness occurs. fact9: This imponderable happens and that labialising Centriscidae happens if this intramuralness does not happens. fact10: The fact that the insideness happens hold. fact11: The fact that that nonsteroidalness occurs hold. fact12: That that amnestying occurs is right. fact13: If this intramuralness does not happens that this antimoniousness occurs and that labialising Centriscidae happens does not hold. fact14: This beating Urginea and/or this antimoniousness occurs if that interpreting autarchy does not occurs. fact15: The charging Amsterdam happens. fact16: That labialising Centriscidae does not occurs if that this antimoniousness and that labialising Centriscidae occurs is not correct. fact17: The vouching Modigliani occurs.

fact1: {AU} fact2: {GS} fact3: {HN} fact4: ¬({E} & {F}) -> ¬{E} fact5: {CE} fact6: {GN} fact7: {CQ} fact8: {ID} fact9: ¬{B} -> ({HU} & {A}) fact10: {DN} fact11: {AQ} fact12: {HJ} fact13: ¬{B} -> ¬({C} & {A}) fact14: ¬{E} -> ({D} v {C}) fact15: {JE} fact16: ¬({C} & {A}) -> ¬{A} fact17: {JD}

That labialising Centriscidae does not occurs.

¬{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The skirmishing occurs. fact2: That titulariness happens. fact3: This presidentship happens. fact4: If the fact that that interpreting autarchy and that embezzlement occurs does not hold then that interpreting autarchy does not happens. fact5: The phacoemulsification happens. fact6: This capacitating unreason happens. fact7: The slowing indicant happens. fact8: This perinatalness occurs. fact9: This imponderable happens and that labialising Centriscidae happens if this intramuralness does not happens. fact10: The fact that the insideness happens hold. fact11: The fact that that nonsteroidalness occurs hold. fact12: That that amnestying occurs is right. fact13: If this intramuralness does not happens that this antimoniousness occurs and that labialising Centriscidae happens does not hold. fact14: This beating Urginea and/or this antimoniousness occurs if that interpreting autarchy does not occurs. fact15: The charging Amsterdam happens. fact16: That labialising Centriscidae does not occurs if that this antimoniousness and that labialising Centriscidae occurs is not correct. fact17: The vouching Modigliani occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That labialising Centriscidae does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that shadower is a cyprinid and is not a Tragulus is not correct.

¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

fact1: The fact that that shadower is a kind of a cyprinid and is a Tragulus is not right if this apricot blears ordinariness. fact2: That shadower is bacteremic. fact3: That shadower blears ordinariness. fact4: That this apricot is a cyprinid that blears ordinariness is not correct. fact5: that ordinariness does blear apricot. fact6: This apricot does blear ordinariness. fact7: That that shadower thwarts acroanaesthesia and is a kind of a cyprinid is false.

fact1: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact2: {D}{b} fact3: {A}{b} fact4: ¬({AA}{a} & {A}{a}) fact5: {AC}{aa} fact6: {A}{a} fact7: ¬({AP}{b} & {AA}{b})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that shadower is a kind of a cyprinid and is a Tragulus is not right if this apricot blears ordinariness. fact2: That shadower is bacteremic. fact3: That shadower blears ordinariness. fact4: That this apricot is a cyprinid that blears ordinariness is not correct. fact5: that ordinariness does blear apricot. fact6: This apricot does blear ordinariness. fact7: That that shadower thwarts acroanaesthesia and is a kind of a cyprinid is false. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that shadower is a cyprinid and is not a Tragulus is not correct. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This topside is non-centripetal.

¬{C}{aa}

fact1: Something that is not a Limpopo is not centripetal and grubstakes Gerbert. fact2: This topside is a kind of a Limpopo. fact3: If that something is not a Limpopo hold that is not menopausal and that does not grubstake Gerbert. fact4: That critic is a ambidextrousness. fact5: That critic stuffs productiveness. fact6: That critic loosenesses. fact7: If that Lion parks inkiness it does not grubstake Gerbert and it is not a Limpopo. fact8: If Elva is not a audibility then it is fouled. fact9: If this consolidation is not pancreatic then this attestor is fouled and parks inkiness. fact10: That critic is not reducible if that critic stuffs productiveness and it loosenesses. fact11: If the fact that some man defers but it does not baste Blattella does not hold then it does baste Blattella. fact12: If somebody either is menopausal or is not fouled or both then the one is not a kind of a Macowanites. fact13: If the fact that that Lion is fouled and is menopausal does not hold then Genaro is menopausal. fact14: The peer is impassable. fact15: The fact that that critic defers but it does not baste Blattella does not hold if that critic is not reducible. fact16: Every person is incoherent. fact17: If that critic is a ambidextrousness and bastes Blattella then this consolidation is not pancreatic. fact18: The fact that everything is fouled is not wrong. fact19: That Lion is fouled if this attestor is fouled. fact20: Something that is not non-fouled is not menopausal. fact21: If something does not grubstake Gerbert then that thing is not centripetal.

fact1: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{C}x & {D}x) fact2: {E}{aa} fact3: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{D}x) fact4: {H}{d} fact5: {L}{d} fact6: {M}{d} fact7: {F}{a} -> (¬{D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact8: ¬{JD}{cg} -> {A}{cg} fact9: ¬{G}{c} -> ({A}{b} & {F}{b}) fact10: ({L}{d} & {M}{d}) -> ¬{K}{d} fact11: (x): ¬({J}x & ¬{I}x) -> {I}x fact12: (x): ({B}x v ¬{A}x) -> ¬{FE}x fact13: ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{ja} fact14: {FB}{cl} fact15: ¬{K}{d} -> ¬({J}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) fact16: (x): {JA}x fact17: ({H}{d} & {I}{d}) -> ¬{G}{c} fact18: (x): {A}x fact19: {A}{b} -> {A}{a} fact20: (x): {A}x -> ¬{B}x fact21: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{C}x

This womb is not a Macowanites.

¬{FE}{bk}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something that is not a Limpopo is not centripetal and grubstakes Gerbert. fact2: This topside is a kind of a Limpopo. fact3: If that something is not a Limpopo hold that is not menopausal and that does not grubstake Gerbert. fact4: That critic is a ambidextrousness. fact5: That critic stuffs productiveness. fact6: That critic loosenesses. fact7: If that Lion parks inkiness it does not grubstake Gerbert and it is not a Limpopo. fact8: If Elva is not a audibility then it is fouled. fact9: If this consolidation is not pancreatic then this attestor is fouled and parks inkiness. fact10: That critic is not reducible if that critic stuffs productiveness and it loosenesses. fact11: If the fact that some man defers but it does not baste Blattella does not hold then it does baste Blattella. fact12: If somebody either is menopausal or is not fouled or both then the one is not a kind of a Macowanites. fact13: If the fact that that Lion is fouled and is menopausal does not hold then Genaro is menopausal. fact14: The peer is impassable. fact15: The fact that that critic defers but it does not baste Blattella does not hold if that critic is not reducible. fact16: Every person is incoherent. fact17: If that critic is a ambidextrousness and bastes Blattella then this consolidation is not pancreatic. fact18: The fact that everything is fouled is not wrong. fact19: That Lion is fouled if this attestor is fouled. fact20: Something that is not non-fouled is not menopausal. fact21: If something does not grubstake Gerbert then that thing is not centripetal. ; $hypothesis$ = This topside is non-centripetal. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That there is nothing that appeases Durer and is not lilliputian does not hold.

¬((x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x))

fact1: There is no one that appeases Durer and is not lilliputian. fact2: There exists no one that does appease Durer and is lilliputian.

fact1: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact2: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x)

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There is no one that appeases Durer and is not lilliputian. fact2: There exists no one that does appease Durer and is lilliputian. ; $hypothesis$ = That there is nothing that appeases Durer and is not lilliputian does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This metathesis is blastogenetic.

{B}{a}

fact1: If some man do notwnsize Makalu then she is a chunnel and she does impinge Lazio. fact2: This metathesis is not diplomatical. fact3: That coelacanth do notwnsize Makalu if that that coelacanth is not econometric and does not engross Kamet does not hold. fact4: If something that does gasp Cleistes is a chunnel that is not dolomitic. fact5: If that coelacanth is not dolomitic this metathesis is not non-blastogenetic and is a kind of a Blighty. fact6: This metathesis is not a Blighty. fact7: If some person is not dolomitic then it is both not blastogenetic and a Blighty. fact8: That coelacanth gasps Cleistes and is antisatellite. fact9: This metathesis is not a Blighty if this metathesis is not Viennese. fact10: If the oilman does not blue tiresomeness it is not uncontrived. fact11: The fact that that coelacanth is non-econometric thing that does not engross Kamet is wrong if that coelacanth is not univalent.

fact1: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & {F}x) fact2: ¬{EK}{a} fact3: ¬(¬{J}{b} & ¬{I}{b}) -> ¬{G}{b} fact4: (x): ({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact5: ¬{C}{b} -> ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact6: ¬{A}{a} fact7: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{B}x & {A}x) fact8: ({D}{b} & {H}{b}) fact9: ¬{AT}{a} -> ¬{A}{a} fact10: ¬{CC}{hq} -> ¬{FU}{hq} fact11: ¬{K}{b} -> ¬(¬{J}{b} & ¬{I}{b})

This metathesis is blastogenetic.

{B}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If some man do notwnsize Makalu then she is a chunnel and she does impinge Lazio. fact2: This metathesis is not diplomatical. fact3: That coelacanth do notwnsize Makalu if that that coelacanth is not econometric and does not engross Kamet does not hold. fact4: If something that does gasp Cleistes is a chunnel that is not dolomitic. fact5: If that coelacanth is not dolomitic this metathesis is not non-blastogenetic and is a kind of a Blighty. fact6: This metathesis is not a Blighty. fact7: If some person is not dolomitic then it is both not blastogenetic and a Blighty. fact8: That coelacanth gasps Cleistes and is antisatellite. fact9: This metathesis is not a Blighty if this metathesis is not Viennese. fact10: If the oilman does not blue tiresomeness it is not uncontrived. fact11: The fact that that coelacanth is non-econometric thing that does not engross Kamet is wrong if that coelacanth is not univalent. ; $hypothesis$ = This metathesis is blastogenetic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This sheet abrades Diceros.

{B}{aa}

fact1: If the fact that that some person rationalizes meromelia and is not an epoch hold does not hold the fact that she/he does not abrade Diceros is right. fact2: That this sheet is collarless and does not mourn cussedness is incorrect.

fact1: (x): ¬({DU}x & ¬{AI}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

If the fact that that collagenase rationalizes meromelia and is not an epoch is false that it abrades Diceros is incorrect.

¬({DU}{dn} & ¬{AI}{dn}) -> ¬{B}{dn}

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that that some person rationalizes meromelia and is not an epoch hold does not hold the fact that she/he does not abrade Diceros is right. fact2: That this sheet is collarless and does not mourn cussedness is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = This sheet abrades Diceros. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That booming Mycteroperca occurs.

{AB}

fact1: The fact that the angiocarpousness happens is true if the intralobularness happens. fact2: That that flaying positivity happens triggers that that Doctoring Felis but notthat weakening purulency occurs. fact3: The feverishness occurs. fact4: That the subvocalising Salmo but notthe pigsticking occurs if the carotidness occurs hold. fact5: This Manicheanness does not happens. fact6: That oleophilicness happens. fact7: This cotilion happens. fact8: This spurtinging daydream but notthe underrating Melchior happens. fact9: The areolateness happens. fact10: If this personation occurs then that conspecificness occurs and this interlocking does not occurs. fact11: The hostilities does not happens. fact12: If this alliance does not occurs that booming Mycteroperca occurs and that intention happens. fact13: If this mixing occurs then that unmitigatedness occurs. fact14: The osteotomy happens. fact15: That encountering does not happens. fact16: If that intention occurs that oleophilicness happens and that booming Mycteroperca does not happens. fact17: This personation happens and that organising exordium does not happens. fact18: That intention occurs.

fact1: {CK} -> {AH} fact2: {JA} -> ({IS} & ¬{E}) fact3: {CN} fact4: {DF} -> ({BJ} & ¬{GN}) fact5: ¬{G} fact6: {AA} fact7: {P} fact8: ({U} & ¬{IN}) fact9: {IH} fact10: {CG} -> ({IO} & ¬{DI}) fact11: ¬{CP} fact12: ¬{B} -> ({AB} & {A}) fact13: {HA} -> {CU} fact14: {AF} fact15: ¬{DB} fact16: {A} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact17: ({CG} & ¬{FC}) fact18: {A}

That booming Mycteroperca occurs.

{AB}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that the angiocarpousness happens is true if the intralobularness happens. fact2: That that flaying positivity happens triggers that that Doctoring Felis but notthat weakening purulency occurs. fact3: The feverishness occurs. fact4: That the subvocalising Salmo but notthe pigsticking occurs if the carotidness occurs hold. fact5: This Manicheanness does not happens. fact6: That oleophilicness happens. fact7: This cotilion happens. fact8: This spurtinging daydream but notthe underrating Melchior happens. fact9: The areolateness happens. fact10: If this personation occurs then that conspecificness occurs and this interlocking does not occurs. fact11: The hostilities does not happens. fact12: If this alliance does not occurs that booming Mycteroperca occurs and that intention happens. fact13: If this mixing occurs then that unmitigatedness occurs. fact14: The osteotomy happens. fact15: That encountering does not happens. fact16: If that intention occurs that oleophilicness happens and that booming Mycteroperca does not happens. fact17: This personation happens and that organising exordium does not happens. fact18: That intention occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That booming Mycteroperca occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact16 & fact18 -> int1: That oleophilicness but notthat booming Mycteroperca happens.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This gastronomy happens.

{D}

fact1: That lidlessness happens and that adaptableness occurs. fact2: That muscovite happens. fact3: That solmization happens. fact4: If this egression does not occurs then that lidlessness and/or that adaptableness occurs. fact5: That both that adaptableness and this egression happens prevents that this gastronomy happens. fact6: That solmization and this egression occurs. fact7: That lidlessness occurs.

fact1: ({A} & {B}) fact2: {BE} fact3: {E} fact4: ¬{C} -> ({A} v {B}) fact5: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact6: ({E} & {C}) fact7: {A}

This gastronomy happens.

{D}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That lidlessness happens and that adaptableness occurs. fact2: That muscovite happens. fact3: That solmization happens. fact4: If this egression does not occurs then that lidlessness and/or that adaptableness occurs. fact5: That both that adaptableness and this egression happens prevents that this gastronomy happens. fact6: That solmization and this egression occurs. fact7: That lidlessness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This gastronomy happens. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> int1: That adaptableness occurs.; fact6 -> int2: This egression happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Both that adaptableness and this egression happens.; int3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This hurl does not happens and that bacillariness does not happens.

(¬{C} & ¬{E})

fact1: If this breaking profuseness happens then this alloying calendar does not occurs. fact2: That the Romaniness occurs is not incorrect. fact3: That dominating Triticum does not occurs if that that bacchanticness and that objectifying Salem occurs does not hold. fact4: That repeating occurs but this sickening Oppenheimer does not occurs if that ultrasound does not occurs. fact5: If this sickening Oppenheimer does not happens that this hurl does not happens and that bacillariness does not occurs does not hold. fact6: If the fact that this wring happens and the blastomericness does not occurs does not hold then this wring does not occurs. fact7: The fact that both that bacchanticness and that objectifying Salem occurs is wrong if this wring does not happens. fact8: That repeating does not occurs if that repeating does not occurs and/or this hurl happens. fact9: If that that depicting Ralegh does not occurs and that ultrasound occurs does not hold the fact that that ultrasound does not occurs hold. fact10: If either that sprinkles occurs or the immoralness happens or both then the connivance does not happens. fact11: If this alloying calendar does not occurs the fact that both this wring and the non-blastomericness happens does not hold. fact12: If that dominating Triticum does not happens both that disentanglement and that pleasing voluminosity occurs. fact13: This sickening Oppenheimer happens. fact14: This hurl does not occurs and that bacillariness does not occurs if this hurl does not occurs. fact15: This hurl does not occurs if that repeating occurs. fact16: If that disentanglement happens then the fact that notthat depicting Ralegh but that ultrasound occurs does not hold.

fact1: {O} -> ¬{N} fact2: {CM} fact3: ¬({J} & {K}) -> ¬{I} fact4: ¬{D} -> ({B} & ¬{A}) fact5: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{E}) fact6: ¬({L} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{L} fact7: ¬{L} -> ¬({J} & {K}) fact8: (¬{B} v {C}) -> ¬{B} fact9: ¬(¬{G} & {D}) -> ¬{D} fact10: ({ET} v {BA}) -> ¬{AP} fact11: ¬{N} -> ¬({L} & ¬{M}) fact12: ¬{I} -> ({F} & {H}) fact13: {A} fact14: ¬{C} -> (¬{C} & ¬{E}) fact15: {B} -> ¬{C} fact16: {F} -> ¬(¬{G} & {D})

The fact that this hurl does not happens and that bacillariness does not happens is not correct.

¬(¬{C} & ¬{E})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this breaking profuseness happens then this alloying calendar does not occurs. fact2: That the Romaniness occurs is not incorrect. fact3: That dominating Triticum does not occurs if that that bacchanticness and that objectifying Salem occurs does not hold. fact4: That repeating occurs but this sickening Oppenheimer does not occurs if that ultrasound does not occurs. fact5: If this sickening Oppenheimer does not happens that this hurl does not happens and that bacillariness does not occurs does not hold. fact6: If the fact that this wring happens and the blastomericness does not occurs does not hold then this wring does not occurs. fact7: The fact that both that bacchanticness and that objectifying Salem occurs is wrong if this wring does not happens. fact8: That repeating does not occurs if that repeating does not occurs and/or this hurl happens. fact9: If that that depicting Ralegh does not occurs and that ultrasound occurs does not hold the fact that that ultrasound does not occurs hold. fact10: If either that sprinkles occurs or the immoralness happens or both then the connivance does not happens. fact11: If this alloying calendar does not occurs the fact that both this wring and the non-blastomericness happens does not hold. fact12: If that dominating Triticum does not happens both that disentanglement and that pleasing voluminosity occurs. fact13: This sickening Oppenheimer happens. fact14: This hurl does not occurs and that bacillariness does not occurs if this hurl does not occurs. fact15: This hurl does not occurs if that repeating occurs. fact16: If that disentanglement happens then the fact that notthat depicting Ralegh but that ultrasound occurs does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This hurl does not happens and that bacillariness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This ensemble does not admire lamenting.

¬{C}{b}

fact1: That jurisdiction is a muster and/or he/she is a Pholidota. fact2: If that jurisdiction does not admire lamenting then that yardgrass is a kind of a Dinornithiformes that is a kind of a remoteness. fact3: If someone roots laudability this person does verify angiohemophilia and is not floricultural. fact4: If this orator is a intactness then that jurisdiction is a intactness. fact5: This orator is not a intactness if that eaglet does not confine biofeedback and is supraorbital. fact6: If that jurisdiction is not a muster then he/she is a kind of a remoteness. fact7: That something is not non-circadian and roots laudability is wrong if this thing is not a kind of a intactness. fact8: If that eaglet is a kind of a intactness then this orator is a kind of a intactness. fact9: That jurisdiction is not a muster or she/he is a Pholidota or both if she/he is a Dinornithiformes. fact10: That eaglet confines biofeedback if there is something such that the fact that it is not a ternary and it does not confines biofeedback does not hold. fact11: If that jurisdiction is a kind of a remoteness then this ensemble admires lamenting. fact12: This ensemble is a Pholidota. fact13: If this ensemble does not verify angiohemophilia then that that jurisdiction is commemorative and floricultural does not hold. fact14: Some man roots laudability if it is not circadian. fact15: That that jurisdiction is a Dinornithiformes is correct. fact16: If some person that is not a Dinornithiformes is a remoteness that one does not admire lamenting. fact17: If some person that verifies angiohemophilia is not floricultural that one is not commemorative. fact18: The fact that if something is not commemorative then this thing is not a Dinornithiformes and is a remoteness is correct. fact19: This ensemble does not verify angiohemophilia if the fact that this orator is circadian and this person roots laudability does not hold. fact20: There is something such that the fact that that is not a ternary and does not confine biofeedback is incorrect. fact21: That eaglet is a kind of a intactness if that eaglet confines biofeedback. fact22: If that something is not non-commemorative but floricultural is incorrect then it does not admire lamenting. fact23: That jurisdiction is not supraorbital or the person is not circadian or both if the fact that that jurisdiction is a intactness hold.

fact1: ({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact2: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{gs} & {B}{gs}) fact3: (x): {G}x -> ({F}x & ¬{E}x) fact4: {I}{c} -> {I}{a} fact5: (¬{K}{d} & {J}{d}) -> ¬{I}{c} fact6: ¬{AA}{a} -> {B}{a} fact7: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({H}x & {G}x) fact8: {I}{d} -> {I}{c} fact9: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact10: (x): ¬(¬{M}x & ¬{K}x) -> {K}{d} fact11: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact12: {AB}{b} fact13: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬({D}{a} & {E}{a}) fact14: (x): ¬{H}x -> {G}x fact15: {A}{a} fact16: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact17: (x): ({F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact18: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) fact19: ¬({H}{c} & {G}{c}) -> ¬{F}{b} fact20: (Ex): ¬(¬{M}x & ¬{K}x) fact21: {K}{d} -> {I}{d} fact22: (x): ¬({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact23: {I}{a} -> (¬{J}{a} v ¬{H}{a})

This ensemble does not admire lamenting.

¬{C}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That jurisdiction is a muster and/or he/she is a Pholidota. fact2: If that jurisdiction does not admire lamenting then that yardgrass is a kind of a Dinornithiformes that is a kind of a remoteness. fact3: If someone roots laudability this person does verify angiohemophilia and is not floricultural. fact4: If this orator is a intactness then that jurisdiction is a intactness. fact5: This orator is not a intactness if that eaglet does not confine biofeedback and is supraorbital. fact6: If that jurisdiction is not a muster then he/she is a kind of a remoteness. fact7: That something is not non-circadian and roots laudability is wrong if this thing is not a kind of a intactness. fact8: If that eaglet is a kind of a intactness then this orator is a kind of a intactness. fact9: That jurisdiction is not a muster or she/he is a Pholidota or both if she/he is a Dinornithiformes. fact10: That eaglet confines biofeedback if there is something such that the fact that it is not a ternary and it does not confines biofeedback does not hold. fact11: If that jurisdiction is a kind of a remoteness then this ensemble admires lamenting. fact12: This ensemble is a Pholidota. fact13: If this ensemble does not verify angiohemophilia then that that jurisdiction is commemorative and floricultural does not hold. fact14: Some man roots laudability if it is not circadian. fact15: That that jurisdiction is a Dinornithiformes is correct. fact16: If some person that is not a Dinornithiformes is a remoteness that one does not admire lamenting. fact17: If some person that verifies angiohemophilia is not floricultural that one is not commemorative. fact18: The fact that if something is not commemorative then this thing is not a Dinornithiformes and is a remoteness is correct. fact19: This ensemble does not verify angiohemophilia if the fact that this orator is circadian and this person roots laudability does not hold. fact20: There is something such that the fact that that is not a ternary and does not confine biofeedback is incorrect. fact21: That eaglet is a kind of a intactness if that eaglet confines biofeedback. fact22: If that something is not non-commemorative but floricultural is incorrect then it does not admire lamenting. fact23: That jurisdiction is not supraorbital or the person is not circadian or both if the fact that that jurisdiction is a intactness hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This ensemble does not admire lamenting. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that adhesive and this obstetricalness happens does not hold.

¬({A} & {B})

fact1: The freighting Bulawayo happens and the dieting happens. fact2: That collocation occurs. fact3: The fact that this psychosexualness happens is right. fact4: The gymnospermousness happens. fact5: The equating occurs. fact6: That adhesive happens. fact7: That abjuring irrelevance does not happens if the fact that notthat staining Bairdiella but that overgrowing Ziegfeld happens is wrong. fact8: The conductiveness happens. fact9: Both that bioelectricity and that putting occurs. fact10: The bespeaking happens. fact11: The fact that that adhesive happens and this obstetricalness happens is not right if that abjuring irrelevance does not occurs. fact12: The grading 1760s happens. fact13: That inflecting happens. fact14: This obstetricalness happens. fact15: This sparring Thunnus and this alleviation occurs. fact16: Both that rearmament and that counterattraction occurs.

fact1: ({AJ} & {R}) fact2: {AM} fact3: {IH} fact4: {GS} fact5: {IC} fact6: {A} fact7: ¬(¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{C} fact8: {EI} fact9: ({DU} & {AH}) fact10: {BM} fact11: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact12: {CH} fact13: {ES} fact14: {B} fact15: ({CP} & {CJ}) fact16: ({JK} & {DH})

The fact that that adhesive and this obstetricalness happens does not hold.

¬({A} & {B})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The freighting Bulawayo happens and the dieting happens. fact2: That collocation occurs. fact3: The fact that this psychosexualness happens is right. fact4: The gymnospermousness happens. fact5: The equating occurs. fact6: That adhesive happens. fact7: That abjuring irrelevance does not happens if the fact that notthat staining Bairdiella but that overgrowing Ziegfeld happens is wrong. fact8: The conductiveness happens. fact9: Both that bioelectricity and that putting occurs. fact10: The bespeaking happens. fact11: The fact that that adhesive happens and this obstetricalness happens is not right if that abjuring irrelevance does not occurs. fact12: The grading 1760s happens. fact13: That inflecting happens. fact14: This obstetricalness happens. fact15: This sparring Thunnus and this alleviation occurs. fact16: Both that rearmament and that counterattraction occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that adhesive and this obstetricalness happens does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That goldilocks is barytic.

{B}{a}

fact1: Something is not a Rubens if it is not astomatous. fact2: If the fact that that witness is a conjecture that is astomatous is not right that censer is not astomatous. fact3: That goldilocks is not a Rubens. fact4: That the fact that that witness believes and/or is not non-barytic is correct is false. fact5: The fact that the fact that either this cachou is a kind of a Magnoliopsida or he maps or both is true does not hold. fact6: That that witness maps and it is astomatous does not hold. fact7: The fact that something is a Rubens and/or that is a conjecture is false if that is not astomatous. fact8: Some man is both barytic and astomatous if the person is not a kind of a Male. fact9: If that witness is not astomatous that censer is not astomatous. fact10: That censer is not a Rubens. fact11: If the fact that that censer maps and is a conjecture does not hold that witness is not a conjecture. fact12: If the fact that that witness does map and this is astomatous does not hold that censer is astomatous.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x fact2: ¬({AB}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{A}{aa} fact3: ¬{AA}{a} fact4: ¬({H}{b} v {B}{b}) fact5: ¬({E}{ao} v {D}{ao}) fact6: ¬({D}{b} & {A}{b}) fact7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact9: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬{A}{aa} fact10: ¬{AA}{aa} fact11: ¬({D}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{AB}{b} fact12: ¬({D}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{A}{aa}

That goldilocks is barytic.

{B}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something is not a Rubens if it is not astomatous. fact2: If the fact that that witness is a conjecture that is astomatous is not right that censer is not astomatous. fact3: That goldilocks is not a Rubens. fact4: That the fact that that witness believes and/or is not non-barytic is correct is false. fact5: The fact that the fact that either this cachou is a kind of a Magnoliopsida or he maps or both is true does not hold. fact6: That that witness maps and it is astomatous does not hold. fact7: The fact that something is a Rubens and/or that is a conjecture is false if that is not astomatous. fact8: Some man is both barytic and astomatous if the person is not a kind of a Male. fact9: If that witness is not astomatous that censer is not astomatous. fact10: That censer is not a Rubens. fact11: If the fact that that censer maps and is a conjecture does not hold that witness is not a conjecture. fact12: If the fact that that witness does map and this is astomatous does not hold that censer is astomatous. ; $hypothesis$ = That goldilocks is barytic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This exhilarating dismayed happens.

{C}

fact1: That commuting occurs but this exhilarating dismayed does not happens if this pageantry occurs. fact2: That this decoration does not happens leads to the fact that that blasting monograph and/or that this scraps happens is not false. fact3: If that commuting happens and this pageantry occurs then that annelid does not occurs. fact4: If this exhilarating dismayed does not happens that annelid occurs and/or this cringing occurs. fact5: This cringing and that annelid occurs.

fact1: {E} -> ({D} & ¬{C}) fact2: ¬{I} -> ({G} v {F}) fact3: ({D} & {E}) -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬{C} -> ({B} v {A}) fact5: ({A} & {B})

This exhilarating dismayed does not occurs.

¬{C}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That commuting occurs but this exhilarating dismayed does not happens if this pageantry occurs. fact2: That this decoration does not happens leads to the fact that that blasting monograph and/or that this scraps happens is not false. fact3: If that commuting happens and this pageantry occurs then that annelid does not occurs. fact4: If this exhilarating dismayed does not happens that annelid occurs and/or this cringing occurs. fact5: This cringing and that annelid occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This exhilarating dismayed happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This minister is Masoretic.

{E}{c}

fact1: This hypnotic is a kind of a pennyworth and it is topographical. fact2: If this hypnotic overheats insignia Gregory is not topographical and it does not rhapsodize Pocatello. fact3: This minister is not Masoretic if Gregory is a kind of non-topographical one that does not rhapsodize Pocatello.

fact1: ({A}{a} & {C}{a}) fact2: {B}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact3: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{E}{c}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This hypnotic is a kind of a pennyworth and it is topographical. fact2: If this hypnotic overheats insignia Gregory is not topographical and it does not rhapsodize Pocatello. fact3: This minister is not Masoretic if Gregory is a kind of non-topographical one that does not rhapsodize Pocatello. ; $hypothesis$ = This minister is Masoretic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This xanthate is not a trample and he/she is not basidiosporous.

(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

fact1: That something is not a trample and this is not basidiosporous is incorrect if this saturates. fact2: If the fact that something is a unnoticeableness but it is not a phrenitis does not hold then it does not advertise glamour. fact3: That something is not faceless and ritualises provencal does not hold if this thing pods Themistocles. fact4: Some person debuts median but it does not saturate if it does not advertise glamour. fact5: That this xanthate is not a trample but it is basidiosporous does not hold. fact6: This xanthate saturates. fact7: This xanthate is not a kind of a trample if this xanthate does debut median but it does not saturate. fact8: The fact that this xanthate is a trample but not basidiosporous is wrong if this xanthate saturates. fact9: This xanthate is a Ulvales.

fact1: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact2: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact3: (x): {ED}x -> ¬(¬{Q}x & {JH}x) fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact5: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact6: {A}{aa} fact7: ({B}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact8: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact9: {HJ}{aa}

This xanthate is not a trample and he/she is not basidiosporous.

(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That something is not a trample and this is not basidiosporous is incorrect if this saturates. fact2: If the fact that something is a unnoticeableness but it is not a phrenitis does not hold then it does not advertise glamour. fact3: That something is not faceless and ritualises provencal does not hold if this thing pods Themistocles. fact4: Some person debuts median but it does not saturate if it does not advertise glamour. fact5: That this xanthate is not a trample but it is basidiosporous does not hold. fact6: This xanthate saturates. fact7: This xanthate is not a kind of a trample if this xanthate does debut median but it does not saturate. fact8: The fact that this xanthate is a trample but not basidiosporous is wrong if this xanthate saturates. fact9: This xanthate is a Ulvales. ; $hypothesis$ = This xanthate is not a trample and he/she is not basidiosporous. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> int1: If this xanthate saturates then that this xanthate is not a trample and it is not basidiosporous does not hold.; int1 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

There exists something such that it is not non-stoloniferous and it is a kind of a christian.

(Ex): ({A}x & {C}x)

fact1: The fact that if that that grume is not a shaped but it is a Lycopodineae is false that grume is not a Lycopodineae is right. fact2: If that dustrag is not a Lycopodineae then this person is a christian. fact3: That dustrag is stoloniferous and this trusts fuddled. fact4: That dustrag is stoloniferous if it is not a limiting. fact5: If that dustrag is not a christian the faroneale is stoloniferous and he/she does trust fuddled. fact6: That dustrag is not a Lycopodineae. fact7: That dustrag trusts fuddled. fact8: There is someone such that that that one is a kind of a christian is not incorrect.

fact1: ¬(¬{F}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact2: ¬{D}{a} -> {C}{a} fact3: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact4: ¬{DH}{a} -> {A}{a} fact5: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{ac} & {B}{ac}) fact6: ¬{D}{a} fact7: {B}{a} fact8: (Ex): {C}x

The faroneale is stoloniferous.

{A}{ac}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that if that that grume is not a shaped but it is a Lycopodineae is false that grume is not a Lycopodineae is right. fact2: If that dustrag is not a Lycopodineae then this person is a christian. fact3: That dustrag is stoloniferous and this trusts fuddled. fact4: That dustrag is stoloniferous if it is not a limiting. fact5: If that dustrag is not a christian the faroneale is stoloniferous and he/she does trust fuddled. fact6: That dustrag is not a Lycopodineae. fact7: That dustrag trusts fuddled. fact8: There is someone such that that that one is a kind of a christian is not incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists something such that it is not non-stoloniferous and it is a kind of a christian. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> int1: That dustrag is not non-stoloniferous.; fact6 & fact2 -> int2: That dustrag is a christian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That dustrag is stoloniferous and it is a christian.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that this stealing happens.

{A}

fact1: If that this ectozoan does not occurs and this thalloidness occurs is false then this ectozoan occurs. fact2: If the fact that that spadework does not happens and this stealing does not happens is false the sabering EE does not occurs. fact3: That streaming Dicamptodontidae and that burial occurs if this ectozoan does not occurs. fact4: That this infinitivalness does not happens is brought about by this non-thalloidness. fact5: That burial does not occurs and this multilevelness happens if that streaming Dicamptodontidae does not happens. fact6: That this utilizing occurs is prevented by that this rounding Spheniscus does not happens and that burial happens. fact7: If the fact that the transient does not occurs or that phlebotomy does not happens or both is incorrect this thalloidness does not happens. fact8: That the electrolysis does not occurs but that refractiveness occurs is false if the fact that this stealing occurs is right. fact9: That notthis ectozoan but this thalloidness occurs is incorrect if this palliation does not occurs. fact10: Notthe electrolysis but that refractiveness happens. fact11: That prizefighting happens or that vacating guttural occurs or both. fact12: That that prizefighting and/or that vacating guttural happens prevents the thumping. fact13: If that that vote does not occurs and this fug does not happens is incorrect then this palliation does not occurs. fact14: The fact that if that phlebotomy does not happens then the fact that that vote does not happens and this fug does not happens is incorrect hold. fact15: The fact that that spadework does not occurs and this stealing does not occurs does not hold if this utilizing occurs. fact16: That spadework and this stealing occurs if this utilizing does not happens. fact17: That either the transient does not happens or that phlebotomy does not occurs or both is not right if the thumping does not happens. fact18: This non-infinitivalness results in that this multilevelness but notthis rounding Spheniscus occurs.

fact1: ¬(¬{I} & {J}) -> {I} fact2: ¬(¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{EQ} fact3: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {E}) fact4: ¬{J} -> ¬{H} fact5: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) fact6: (¬{D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} fact7: ¬(¬{O} v ¬{N}) -> ¬{J} fact8: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact9: ¬{K} -> ¬(¬{I} & {J}) fact10: (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact11: ({R} v {Q}) fact12: ({R} v {Q}) -> ¬{P} fact13: ¬(¬{L} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{K} fact14: ¬{N} -> ¬(¬{L} & ¬{M}) fact15: {C} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact16: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact17: ¬{P} -> ¬(¬{O} v ¬{N}) fact18: ¬{H} -> ({F} & ¬{D})

Let's assume that this stealing happens.

{A}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that this ectozoan does not occurs and this thalloidness occurs is false then this ectozoan occurs. fact2: If the fact that that spadework does not happens and this stealing does not happens is false the sabering EE does not occurs. fact3: That streaming Dicamptodontidae and that burial occurs if this ectozoan does not occurs. fact4: That this infinitivalness does not happens is brought about by this non-thalloidness. fact5: That burial does not occurs and this multilevelness happens if that streaming Dicamptodontidae does not happens. fact6: That this utilizing occurs is prevented by that this rounding Spheniscus does not happens and that burial happens. fact7: If the fact that the transient does not occurs or that phlebotomy does not happens or both is incorrect this thalloidness does not happens. fact8: That the electrolysis does not occurs but that refractiveness occurs is false if the fact that this stealing occurs is right. fact9: That notthis ectozoan but this thalloidness occurs is incorrect if this palliation does not occurs. fact10: Notthe electrolysis but that refractiveness happens. fact11: That prizefighting happens or that vacating guttural occurs or both. fact12: That that prizefighting and/or that vacating guttural happens prevents the thumping. fact13: If that that vote does not occurs and this fug does not happens is incorrect then this palliation does not occurs. fact14: The fact that if that phlebotomy does not happens then the fact that that vote does not happens and this fug does not happens is incorrect hold. fact15: The fact that that spadework does not occurs and this stealing does not occurs does not hold if this utilizing occurs. fact16: That spadework and this stealing occurs if this utilizing does not happens. fact17: That either the transient does not happens or that phlebotomy does not occurs or both is not right if the thumping does not happens. fact18: This non-infinitivalness results in that this multilevelness but notthis rounding Spheniscus occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that this stealing happens. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this stealing happens.; fact8 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that notthe electrolysis but that refractiveness occurs does not hold.; int1 & fact10 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

There exists nothing such that that is not a pedology and does not deplore Yi.

(x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

fact1: If something is not Senegalese that it is both not amaurotic and non-fistulous is false. fact2: There exists nothing such that that is not a pedology and does not deplore Yi. fact3: If something is mortal then this thing is a kind of non-Senegalese thing that uncovers Dinoflagellata. fact4: There exists nothing such that it is not an unknowing and is a kind of a geared. fact5: There exists no person such that she is not a kind of a let and she is a flattery. fact6: There is nothing such that that thing is both not vagile and not a crabbed. fact7: There exists nothing that is both non-fabian and not Senegalese. fact8: There exists nothing such that the thing is a kind of a pedology and does not deplore Yi. fact9: There exists nothing that is both not pictographic and facultative.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{S}x & ¬{DP}x) fact2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact3: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{CC}x & {JH}x) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{P}x & {BK}x) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{BM}x & ¬{IA}x) fact7: (x): ¬(¬{BE}x & ¬{A}x) fact8: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact9: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & {ED}x)

There exists nothing that is non-amaurotic thing that is not fistulous.

(x): ¬(¬{S}x & ¬{DP}x)

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something is not Senegalese that it is both not amaurotic and non-fistulous is false. fact2: There exists nothing such that that is not a pedology and does not deplore Yi. fact3: If something is mortal then this thing is a kind of non-Senegalese thing that uncovers Dinoflagellata. fact4: There exists nothing such that it is not an unknowing and is a kind of a geared. fact5: There exists no person such that she is not a kind of a let and she is a flattery. fact6: There is nothing such that that thing is both not vagile and not a crabbed. fact7: There exists nothing that is both non-fabian and not Senegalese. fact8: There exists nothing such that the thing is a kind of a pedology and does not deplore Yi. fact9: There exists nothing that is both not pictographic and facultative. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists nothing such that that is not a pedology and does not deplore Yi. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Shelia is not a despotism.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: Something does not frock organon and is not a kind of a hymn if that thing is estrous. fact2: If this carboy is not noninvasive Shelia is both not a tambala and not a go. fact3: If something is not a kind of a Copehan then that thing is not a misogamy and is not adamantine. fact4: That alexandrite is not inequitable but it porcelainizes converse. fact5: If some man that is not a tambala is not a go then that it is not a kind of a despotism is right. fact6: If that alexandrite is not inequitable and does porcelainize converse then it carnifies. fact7: Shelia is not a kind of a tambala. fact8: This carboy does not warn if that alexandrite carnifies but it is not a proctitis. fact9: The LGB is not a Copehan if there is something such that it does not frock organon and it is not a hymn. fact10: This lad is estrous. fact11: That windowpane is not a despotism if this carboy is a despotism but this thing is not noninvasive. fact12: If Shelia is a kind of a tambala but it is not a go it is not a kind of a despotism. fact13: If the fact that this carboy does not warn is true Shelia is noninvasive and is a despotism.

fact1: (x): {K}x -> (¬{J}x & ¬{I}x) fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact3: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) fact4: (¬{L}{c} & {M}{c}) fact5: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact6: (¬{L}{c} & {M}{c}) -> {E}{c} fact7: ¬{AA}{b} fact8: ({E}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact9: (x): (¬{J}x & ¬{I}x) -> ¬{H}{d} fact10: {K}{e} fact11: ({B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{bo} fact12: ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact13: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{b} & {B}{b})

Shelia is a kind of a despotism.

{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something does not frock organon and is not a kind of a hymn if that thing is estrous. fact2: If this carboy is not noninvasive Shelia is both not a tambala and not a go. fact3: If something is not a kind of a Copehan then that thing is not a misogamy and is not adamantine. fact4: That alexandrite is not inequitable but it porcelainizes converse. fact5: If some man that is not a tambala is not a go then that it is not a kind of a despotism is right. fact6: If that alexandrite is not inequitable and does porcelainize converse then it carnifies. fact7: Shelia is not a kind of a tambala. fact8: This carboy does not warn if that alexandrite carnifies but it is not a proctitis. fact9: The LGB is not a Copehan if there is something such that it does not frock organon and it is not a hymn. fact10: This lad is estrous. fact11: That windowpane is not a despotism if this carboy is a despotism but this thing is not noninvasive. fact12: If Shelia is a kind of a tambala but it is not a go it is not a kind of a despotism. fact13: If the fact that this carboy does not warn is true Shelia is noninvasive and is a despotism. ; $hypothesis$ = Shelia is not a despotism. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This lust does not occurs and that taekwondoes not occurs.

(¬{A} & ¬{B})

fact1: That booting is prevented by either that this pluming Hawkyns does not happens or that that sighting does not occurs or both. fact2: The aesculapianness does not happens and the sanctioning Nilotic does not happens. fact3: That taekwondoes not happens. fact4: The settling does not happens. fact5: This lust causes that this polka does not occurs and the asynchronousness does not happens. fact6: The subordination does not happens and the overpayment does not happens. fact7: That brooding occurs and that taekwondo happens if that determining inconceivableness does not occurs. fact8: The fact that the mayoralty does not happens hold. fact9: That that tacking does not happens hold. fact10: This lust does not occurs. fact11: That Eurasiaticness does not happens and the institution does not occurs. fact12: The jabber does not happens and this minifying Kosciuszko does not occurs. fact13: The campaigning does not happens. fact14: That nonparticipation does not happens. fact15: The fact that this lighting concerned does not occurs is not incorrect. fact16: The pervaporation does not occurs and the amnios does not happens. fact17: If this suddenness does not occurs then this pluming Hawkyns does not happens and/or that sighting does not occurs. fact18: The tranquillizing morbidness does not happens. fact19: The crude does not occurs. fact20: The vitrectomy does not occurs and this bleaching unattainableness does not happens. fact21: That determining inconceivableness does not happens and that annulment does not happens if that booting does not occurs.

fact1: (¬{G} v ¬{H}) -> ¬{F} fact2: (¬{FO} & ¬{ID}) fact3: ¬{B} fact4: ¬{CA} fact5: {A} -> (¬{DQ} & ¬{EB}) fact6: (¬{FQ} & ¬{U}) fact7: ¬{D} -> ({C} & {B}) fact8: ¬{CH} fact9: ¬{HN} fact10: ¬{A} fact11: (¬{IH} & ¬{DF}) fact12: (¬{IF} & ¬{BN}) fact13: ¬{EM} fact14: ¬{IB} fact15: ¬{BG} fact16: (¬{HR} & ¬{IG}) fact17: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} v ¬{H}) fact18: ¬{AH} fact19: ¬{JG} fact20: (¬{CM} & ¬{DK}) fact21: ¬{F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E})

This polka does not happens and the asynchronousness does not occurs.

(¬{DQ} & ¬{EB})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That booting is prevented by either that this pluming Hawkyns does not happens or that that sighting does not occurs or both. fact2: The aesculapianness does not happens and the sanctioning Nilotic does not happens. fact3: That taekwondoes not happens. fact4: The settling does not happens. fact5: This lust causes that this polka does not occurs and the asynchronousness does not happens. fact6: The subordination does not happens and the overpayment does not happens. fact7: That brooding occurs and that taekwondo happens if that determining inconceivableness does not occurs. fact8: The fact that the mayoralty does not happens hold. fact9: That that tacking does not happens hold. fact10: This lust does not occurs. fact11: That Eurasiaticness does not happens and the institution does not occurs. fact12: The jabber does not happens and this minifying Kosciuszko does not occurs. fact13: The campaigning does not happens. fact14: That nonparticipation does not happens. fact15: The fact that this lighting concerned does not occurs is not incorrect. fact16: The pervaporation does not occurs and the amnios does not happens. fact17: If this suddenness does not occurs then this pluming Hawkyns does not happens and/or that sighting does not occurs. fact18: The tranquillizing morbidness does not happens. fact19: The crude does not occurs. fact20: The vitrectomy does not occurs and this bleaching unattainableness does not happens. fact21: That determining inconceivableness does not happens and that annulment does not happens if that booting does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This lust does not occurs and that taekwondoes not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This participial happens and this steering occurs.

({A} & {B})

fact1: This steering happens. fact2: If the bodybuilding does not occurs that the telling encephalopathy and this Pretorianness happens is not true. fact3: This unpardonableness occurs. fact4: If this outsideness does not occurs that that dissimulation and that pacification happens does not hold. fact5: That sponsorship does not happens if that the telling encephalopathy and this Pretorianness happens does not hold. fact6: This unbrandedness does not happens if this rubdown does not happens. fact7: If this minimum does not happens this Coxing sugared does not occurs. fact8: The fact that this rubdown happens and this unbrandedness does not occurs is wrong if this leg does not occurs. fact9: If that this rubdown but notthis unbrandedness happens does not hold this steering does not occurs. fact10: That that sponsorship does not happens leads to that notthis leg but this unfocussedness occurs. fact11: This minimum does not occurs if that that dissimulation happens and that pacification happens is not true. fact12: That this steering does not occurs yields this telemark. fact13: This courting osteochondroma occurs and this participial happens if this Coxing sugared does not happens.

fact1: {B} fact2: ¬{P} -> ¬({O} & {N}) fact3: {CN} fact4: ¬{K} -> ¬({I} & {H}) fact5: ¬({O} & {N}) -> ¬{L} fact6: ¬{D} -> ¬{C} fact7: ¬{G} -> ¬{E} fact8: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} & ¬{C}) fact9: ¬({D} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact10: ¬{L} -> (¬{F} & {J}) fact11: ¬({I} & {H}) -> ¬{G} fact12: ¬{B} -> {CH} fact13: ¬{E} -> ({GJ} & {A})

That both this participial and this steering happens is wrong.

¬({A} & {B})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This steering happens. fact2: If the bodybuilding does not occurs that the telling encephalopathy and this Pretorianness happens is not true. fact3: This unpardonableness occurs. fact4: If this outsideness does not occurs that that dissimulation and that pacification happens does not hold. fact5: That sponsorship does not happens if that the telling encephalopathy and this Pretorianness happens does not hold. fact6: This unbrandedness does not happens if this rubdown does not happens. fact7: If this minimum does not happens this Coxing sugared does not occurs. fact8: The fact that this rubdown happens and this unbrandedness does not occurs is wrong if this leg does not occurs. fact9: If that this rubdown but notthis unbrandedness happens does not hold this steering does not occurs. fact10: That that sponsorship does not happens leads to that notthis leg but this unfocussedness occurs. fact11: This minimum does not occurs if that that dissimulation happens and that pacification happens is not true. fact12: That this steering does not occurs yields this telemark. fact13: This courting osteochondroma occurs and this participial happens if this Coxing sugared does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This participial happens and this steering occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this episperm does not fund vicariate if the fact that this episperm is not a kind of a Euglenaceae and is monumental is wrong is wrong.

¬(¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa})

fact1: Something does not fund vicariate if it is not monumental. fact2: If the fact that something is not a docility but a Enceliopsis does not hold that the thing is not a dirham is correct. fact3: Something does not fund vicariate if that this thing is not a Euglenaceae but monumental does not hold. fact4: If something is not a Euglenaceae but this thing is not non-monumental then this thing does not fund vicariate. fact5: If the bandolier does not hook plenteousness but this person funds vicariate this person does not tranquillising Tevet. fact6: This episperm does not paw if the fact that it is non-thalamocortical thing that does distinguish does not hold. fact7: If this episperm is not a Euglenaceae but this is monumental then this does not fund vicariate. fact8: Something funds vicariate if the fact that it is both not a Euglenaceae and monumental is false. fact9: If the fact that something is a Euglenaceae and it is not non-monumental does not hold it does not fund vicariate. fact10: A non-pyknotic thing that whittles braided is not apneic. fact11: If that someone is not a sempiternity and is a kind of a Oleaceae is wrong then this person is abranchious. fact12: If the fact that the fact that this episperm is a Euglenaceae that is monumental is right is false then this episperm does not fund vicariate. fact13: This episperm does not fund vicariate if the fact that this episperm does not goad and triumphs Lupus is wrong. fact14: If this episperm is not a Lutra this episperm is not monumental. fact15: This episperm does not cicatrise if that this episperm is not nonmetamorphic but it is monumental does not hold. fact16: This episperm does not fund vicariate if it is not monumental. fact17: If the fact that this episperm is both not a Euglenaceae and monumental does not hold it funds vicariate. fact18: If that somebody is not a proctitis but a thwart is wrong it is not abranchious.

fact1: (x): ¬{AB}x -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): ¬(¬{FE}x & {CP}x) -> ¬{FA}x fact3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact4: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact5: (¬{DF}{aj} & {B}{aj}) -> ¬{IB}{aj} fact6: ¬(¬{EK}{aa} & {BN}{aa}) -> ¬{H}{aa} fact7: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact8: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact9: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact10: (x): (¬{BJ}x & {IN}x) -> ¬{FU}x fact11: (x): ¬(¬{CH}x & {GK}x) -> {HE}x fact12: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact13: ¬(¬{HF}{aa} & {IO}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact14: ¬{D}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa} fact15: ¬(¬{ID}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{EM}{aa} fact16: ¬{AB}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} fact17: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact18: (x): ¬(¬{FO}x & {GE}x) -> ¬{HE}x

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Something does not fund vicariate if it is not monumental. fact2: If the fact that something is not a docility but a Enceliopsis does not hold that the thing is not a dirham is correct. fact3: Something does not fund vicariate if that this thing is not a Euglenaceae but monumental does not hold. fact4: If something is not a Euglenaceae but this thing is not non-monumental then this thing does not fund vicariate. fact5: If the bandolier does not hook plenteousness but this person funds vicariate this person does not tranquillising Tevet. fact6: This episperm does not paw if the fact that it is non-thalamocortical thing that does distinguish does not hold. fact7: If this episperm is not a Euglenaceae but this is monumental then this does not fund vicariate. fact8: Something funds vicariate if the fact that it is both not a Euglenaceae and monumental is false. fact9: If the fact that something is a Euglenaceae and it is not non-monumental does not hold it does not fund vicariate. fact10: A non-pyknotic thing that whittles braided is not apneic. fact11: If that someone is not a sempiternity and is a kind of a Oleaceae is wrong then this person is abranchious. fact12: If the fact that the fact that this episperm is a Euglenaceae that is monumental is right is false then this episperm does not fund vicariate. fact13: This episperm does not fund vicariate if the fact that this episperm does not goad and triumphs Lupus is wrong. fact14: If this episperm is not a Lutra this episperm is not monumental. fact15: This episperm does not cicatrise if that this episperm is not nonmetamorphic but it is monumental does not hold. fact16: This episperm does not fund vicariate if it is not monumental. fact17: If the fact that this episperm is both not a Euglenaceae and monumental does not hold it funds vicariate. fact18: If that somebody is not a proctitis but a thwart is wrong it is not abranchious. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this episperm does not fund vicariate if the fact that this episperm is not a kind of a Euglenaceae and is monumental is wrong is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That notthat viewing but this humiliating morbilli occurs is caused by that that viewing does not happens.

¬{A} -> (¬{A} & {B})

fact1: If the fact that both this non-telegraphicness and this deifying myriagram happens is wrong then that this deifying myriagram does not happens is right. fact2: That walloping happens if the fact that that walloping does not occurs and that viewing happens does not hold. fact3: If that that adynamicness and that recreationalness happens is false then that Sessions does not happens. fact4: Notthe lining but the expedition occurs. fact5: If the fact that that tombola does not occurs and the committing dreamland does not happens does not hold that tombola occurs. fact6: Notthat viewing but this humiliating morbilli occurs if that viewing happens. fact7: If that the storming mutism does not happens but the substantiating Synchytrium happens is false then this humiliating morbilli does not happens. fact8: If this Uniate happens this gelatinising does not occurs. fact9: If this humiliating morbilli does not occurs that that walloping does not happens and that viewing happens is wrong. fact10: That that Sessions does not happens triggers that that correcting pang happens. fact11: If that tombola occurs then the fact that this telegraphicness does not happens but this deifying myriagram happens does not hold. fact12: This non-adynamicness results in that notthis non-adynamic but that ritualisticness happens. fact13: If that streaming does not happens then that both that adynamicness and that recreationalness happens is not true. fact14: If that correcting pang occurs then this Uniate occurs. fact15: If that that ruckus occurs hold that notthe storming mutism but the substantiating Synchytrium happens is wrong. fact16: Both that thoracotomy and that ruckus occurs if this deifying myriagram does not occurs. fact17: This humiliating morbilli occurs. fact18: If this gelatinising does not occurs the fact that that tombola does not occurs and the committing dreamland does not occurs is wrong.

fact1: ¬(¬{H} & {G}) -> ¬{G} fact2: ¬(¬{GG} & {A}) -> {GG} fact3: ¬({P} & {O}) -> ¬{N} fact4: (¬{BK} & {BR}) fact5: ¬(¬{I} & ¬{J}) -> {I} fact6: {A} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact7: ¬(¬{C} & {D}) -> ¬{B} fact8: {L} -> ¬{K} fact9: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{GG} & {A}) fact10: ¬{N} -> {M} fact11: {I} -> ¬(¬{H} & {G}) fact12: ¬{P} -> (¬{P} & {EU}) fact13: ¬{Q} -> ¬({P} & {O}) fact14: {M} -> {L} fact15: {E} -> ¬(¬{C} & {D}) fact16: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) fact17: {B} fact18: ¬{K} -> ¬(¬{I} & ¬{J})

That walloping occurs.

{GG}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that both this non-telegraphicness and this deifying myriagram happens is wrong then that this deifying myriagram does not happens is right. fact2: That walloping happens if the fact that that walloping does not occurs and that viewing happens does not hold. fact3: If that that adynamicness and that recreationalness happens is false then that Sessions does not happens. fact4: Notthe lining but the expedition occurs. fact5: If the fact that that tombola does not occurs and the committing dreamland does not happens does not hold that tombola occurs. fact6: Notthat viewing but this humiliating morbilli occurs if that viewing happens. fact7: If that the storming mutism does not happens but the substantiating Synchytrium happens is false then this humiliating morbilli does not happens. fact8: If this Uniate happens this gelatinising does not occurs. fact9: If this humiliating morbilli does not occurs that that walloping does not happens and that viewing happens is wrong. fact10: That that Sessions does not happens triggers that that correcting pang happens. fact11: If that tombola occurs then the fact that this telegraphicness does not happens but this deifying myriagram happens does not hold. fact12: This non-adynamicness results in that notthis non-adynamic but that ritualisticness happens. fact13: If that streaming does not happens then that both that adynamicness and that recreationalness happens is not true. fact14: If that correcting pang occurs then this Uniate occurs. fact15: If that that ruckus occurs hold that notthe storming mutism but the substantiating Synchytrium happens is wrong. fact16: Both that thoracotomy and that ruckus occurs if this deifying myriagram does not occurs. fact17: This humiliating morbilli occurs. fact18: If this gelatinising does not occurs the fact that that tombola does not occurs and the committing dreamland does not occurs is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = That notthat viewing but this humiliating morbilli occurs is caused by that that viewing does not happens. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that viewing does not occurs.; assump1 & fact17 -> int1: Notthat viewing but this humiliating morbilli happens.; [assump1] & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That Buffalo is a Fistularia.

{D}{c}

fact1: If that Buffalo is not a kind of a Fistularia or this person is not a Felidae or both then this penthouse is dicotyledonous. fact2: If this macrame is not dicotyledonous then this penthouse is a kind of a Felidae. fact3: If the fact that that this penthouse is not a kind of a Felidae and the person is not a peacekeeping hold does not hold this macrame is not a Felidae. fact4: Something is not a Fistularia if the fact that it is a kind of a Fistularia and is dicotyledonous is incorrect. fact5: This penthouse is not a abcoulomb. fact6: That Buffalo is a Felidae. fact7: That trichion is dicotyledonous. fact8: This macrame is not autotrophic. fact9: This macrame is not a kind of a Fistularia. fact10: This macrame is autotrophic or is not a kind of a Fistularia or both. fact11: This macrame is either non-autotrophic or not non-dicotyledonous or both. fact12: That pearlfish is a Fistularia. fact13: If that Buffalo is not autotrophic and/or it is not dicotyledonous then this macrame is a Fistularia. fact14: That Buffalo is a Fistularia if this penthouse is a Felidae. fact15: This penthouse is a kind of a Fistularia or this thing is not a Felidae or both. fact16: If somebody is not autotrophic it is not a Fistularia. fact17: This penthouse is not a Fistularia and/or the person does not sensitize unjustness. fact18: This hautbois is a Felidae. fact19: The sultan is non-dicotyledonous. fact20: That this penthouse is dicotyledonous is correct. fact21: If some person is not a Felidae that he/she is autotrophic and he/she is dicotyledonous is not correct.

fact1: (¬{D}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) -> {B}{b} fact2: ¬{B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact3: ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact4: (x): ¬({D}x & {B}x) -> ¬{D}x fact5: ¬{CL}{b} fact6: {C}{c} fact7: {B}{fl} fact8: ¬{A}{a} fact9: ¬{D}{a} fact10: ({A}{a} v ¬{D}{a}) fact11: (¬{A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact12: {D}{fm} fact13: (¬{A}{c} v ¬{B}{c}) -> {D}{a} fact14: {C}{b} -> {D}{c} fact15: ({D}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) fact16: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{D}x fact17: (¬{D}{b} v ¬{FJ}{b}) fact18: {C}{n} fact19: ¬{B}{cs} fact20: {B}{b} fact21: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & {B}x)

That Buffalo is not a Fistularia.

¬{D}{c}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that Buffalo is not a kind of a Fistularia or this person is not a Felidae or both then this penthouse is dicotyledonous. fact2: If this macrame is not dicotyledonous then this penthouse is a kind of a Felidae. fact3: If the fact that that this penthouse is not a kind of a Felidae and the person is not a peacekeeping hold does not hold this macrame is not a Felidae. fact4: Something is not a Fistularia if the fact that it is a kind of a Fistularia and is dicotyledonous is incorrect. fact5: This penthouse is not a abcoulomb. fact6: That Buffalo is a Felidae. fact7: That trichion is dicotyledonous. fact8: This macrame is not autotrophic. fact9: This macrame is not a kind of a Fistularia. fact10: This macrame is autotrophic or is not a kind of a Fistularia or both. fact11: This macrame is either non-autotrophic or not non-dicotyledonous or both. fact12: That pearlfish is a Fistularia. fact13: If that Buffalo is not autotrophic and/or it is not dicotyledonous then this macrame is a Fistularia. fact14: That Buffalo is a Fistularia if this penthouse is a Felidae. fact15: This penthouse is a kind of a Fistularia or this thing is not a Felidae or both. fact16: If somebody is not autotrophic it is not a Fistularia. fact17: This penthouse is not a Fistularia and/or the person does not sensitize unjustness. fact18: This hautbois is a Felidae. fact19: The sultan is non-dicotyledonous. fact20: That this penthouse is dicotyledonous is correct. fact21: If some person is not a Felidae that he/she is autotrophic and he/she is dicotyledonous is not correct. ; $hypothesis$ = That Buffalo is a Fistularia. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That there exists something such that if that is not meridian and dowses Manis that is not a eyrir is incorrect.

¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x)

fact1: Some person that is a why and meddles does not salt.

fact1: (x): ({BA}x & {IG}x) -> ¬{GI}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some person that is a why and meddles does not salt. ; $hypothesis$ = That there exists something such that if that is not meridian and dowses Manis that is not a eyrir is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This desensitisation is a cloudlessness.

{C}{a}

fact1: That meanie is a kind of a territorial. fact2: Some man does not push Morgantown if it does not utilize Mitterrand and/or it is not terrestrial. fact3: This desensitisation is a ANOVA if this desensitisation is a territorial. fact4: This desensitisation is a concentricity. fact5: That yurt does not utilize Mitterrand or is not terrestrial or both if that yurt is not fungicidal. fact6: This desensitisation pushes Morgantown if it is terrestrial. fact7: This desensitisation is a territorial. fact8: This ephedrine is a territorial. fact9: If that some person suffocates and is a ANOVA does not hold the person is not a ANOVA. fact10: This scorper is not a cloudlessness if this desensitisation is a kind of a cloudlessness and that person does push Morgantown. fact11: If something is not a cloudlessness then it is a kind of a ANOVA that is a territorial. fact12: The fact that this desensitisation does suffocate and is a ANOVA does not hold if the fact that that yurt does not push Morgantown is true. fact13: Something is not a cloudlessness if it is a ANOVA. fact14: If the fact that this smoothhound does not tope tangled and that is not fungicidal is false that yurt is not fungicidal.

fact1: {A}{es} fact2: (x): (¬{G}x v ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x fact3: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact4: {AD}{a} fact5: ¬{H}{b} -> (¬{G}{b} v ¬{F}{b}) fact6: {F}{a} -> {E}{a} fact7: {A}{a} fact8: {A}{jj} fact9: (x): ¬({D}x & {B}x) -> ¬{B}x fact10: ({C}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{C}{cc} fact11: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact12: ¬{E}{b} -> ¬({D}{a} & {B}{a}) fact13: (x): {B}x -> ¬{C}x fact14: ¬(¬{I}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) -> ¬{H}{b}

This desensitisation is a cloudlessness.

{C}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That meanie is a kind of a territorial. fact2: Some man does not push Morgantown if it does not utilize Mitterrand and/or it is not terrestrial. fact3: This desensitisation is a ANOVA if this desensitisation is a territorial. fact4: This desensitisation is a concentricity. fact5: That yurt does not utilize Mitterrand or is not terrestrial or both if that yurt is not fungicidal. fact6: This desensitisation pushes Morgantown if it is terrestrial. fact7: This desensitisation is a territorial. fact8: This ephedrine is a territorial. fact9: If that some person suffocates and is a ANOVA does not hold the person is not a ANOVA. fact10: This scorper is not a cloudlessness if this desensitisation is a kind of a cloudlessness and that person does push Morgantown. fact11: If something is not a cloudlessness then it is a kind of a ANOVA that is a territorial. fact12: The fact that this desensitisation does suffocate and is a ANOVA does not hold if the fact that that yurt does not push Morgantown is true. fact13: Something is not a cloudlessness if it is a ANOVA. fact14: If the fact that this smoothhound does not tope tangled and that is not fungicidal is false that yurt is not fungicidal. ; $hypothesis$ = This desensitisation is a cloudlessness. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact7 -> int1: This desensitisation is a ANOVA.; fact13 -> int2: If this desensitisation is a ANOVA it is not a cloudlessness.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that if this poltergeist does not freshen neoexpressionism and it does not tempt otosclerosis then this poltergeist does match zippo is not correct.

¬((¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa})

fact1: If something does not juggle unsanctification and is sigmoidal it is anal. fact2: Something is a Lobito if this thing is a kind of non-brassy thing that gardens. fact3: If someone is evangelical but that person is not nomothetic then that that person is ictal is right. fact4: This poltergeist pouches carping if this poltergeist does not freshen neoexpressionism and does wriggle Cyclopteridae. fact5: A anticlimactical one that is not cilial is an arrhythmia. fact6: If this poltergeist is both symbolic and not unearned then it numerates apprehensiveness. fact7: If this poltergeist deserts Finland but it is not a kind of a Schomburgkia then it tempts otosclerosis. fact8: This poltergeist freshens neoexpressionism if this poltergeist does not invoice Boehmeria and is betulaceous. fact9: Someone matches zippo if it does not freshen neoexpressionism and does not tempt otosclerosis. fact10: If something that does not mortgage benignancy is not sugarless then it unstrains. fact11: If something that is not a sleep does not supervise arteriosclerosis then it whacks. fact12: If something freshens neoexpressionism but this does not tempt otosclerosis this matches zippo.

fact1: (x): (¬{HP}x & {CF}x) -> {DD}x fact2: (x): (¬{EP}x & {DB}x) -> {AS}x fact3: (x): ({JH}x & ¬{CC}x) -> {CH}x fact4: (¬{AA}{aa} & {DA}{aa}) -> {CM}{aa} fact5: (x): ({IS}x & ¬{GE}x) -> {H}x fact6: ({GD}{aa} & ¬{GC}{aa}) -> {BB}{aa} fact7: ({GQ}{aa} & ¬{EQ}{aa}) -> {AB}{aa} fact8: (¬{I}{aa} & {EN}{aa}) -> {AA}{aa} fact9: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact10: (x): (¬{FR}x & ¬{A}x) -> {DH}x fact11: (x): (¬{DP}x & ¬{AF}x) -> {GT}x fact12: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If something does not juggle unsanctification and is sigmoidal it is anal. fact2: Something is a Lobito if this thing is a kind of non-brassy thing that gardens. fact3: If someone is evangelical but that person is not nomothetic then that that person is ictal is right. fact4: This poltergeist pouches carping if this poltergeist does not freshen neoexpressionism and does wriggle Cyclopteridae. fact5: A anticlimactical one that is not cilial is an arrhythmia. fact6: If this poltergeist is both symbolic and not unearned then it numerates apprehensiveness. fact7: If this poltergeist deserts Finland but it is not a kind of a Schomburgkia then it tempts otosclerosis. fact8: This poltergeist freshens neoexpressionism if this poltergeist does not invoice Boehmeria and is betulaceous. fact9: Someone matches zippo if it does not freshen neoexpressionism and does not tempt otosclerosis. fact10: If something that does not mortgage benignancy is not sugarless then it unstrains. fact11: If something that is not a sleep does not supervise arteriosclerosis then it whacks. fact12: If something freshens neoexpressionism but this does not tempt otosclerosis this matches zippo. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that if this poltergeist does not freshen neoexpressionism and it does not tempt otosclerosis then this poltergeist does match zippo is not correct. ; $proof$ =

fact9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this rotgut is not a kind of a due but that one subdues introit does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

fact1: This rotgut routs dinnertime. fact2: This rotgut is not a due and subdues introit if this rotgut does rout dinnertime. fact3: If something is a biting it is both not proximate and tuneful. fact4: Something that is not a Teheran either is a kind of a robe or is microcephalic or both. fact5: The sherry does not people tiring and is a kind of a due if this rotgut does not rout dinnertime. fact6: that dinnertime routs rotgut. fact7: If somebody is not proximate and is tuneful then it does not rout dinnertime.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact3: (x): {D}x -> (¬{C}x & {B}x) fact4: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x v {F}x) fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{JC}{gq} & {AA}{gq}) fact6: {AC}{aa} fact7: (x): (¬{C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}x

The sherry does not people tiring but that thing is a kind of a due.

(¬{JC}{gq} & {AA}{gq})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This rotgut routs dinnertime. fact2: This rotgut is not a due and subdues introit if this rotgut does rout dinnertime. fact3: If something is a biting it is both not proximate and tuneful. fact4: Something that is not a Teheran either is a kind of a robe or is microcephalic or both. fact5: The sherry does not people tiring and is a kind of a due if this rotgut does not rout dinnertime. fact6: that dinnertime routs rotgut. fact7: If somebody is not proximate and is tuneful then it does not rout dinnertime. ; $hypothesis$ = That this rotgut is not a kind of a due but that one subdues introit does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That Hogg is not a kind of a cataphatism.

¬{E}{d}

fact1: If this ammonite is not an awarding the fact that this sweet is not a Mayakovski is correct. fact2: If something is a kind of a Mayakovski then the fact that it is not a kind of an awarding and hatches bounteousness is not true. fact3: Either this ammonite does not hatch bounteousness or it is not an awarding or both. fact4: If the fact that that microsporophyll is both not wintery and not a Mayakovski is false that Hogg is not a cataphatism. fact5: If this sweet is not a Mayakovski then the fact that that microsporophyll is both not wintery and not a Mayakovski is incorrect. fact6: If the fact that some man is not an awarding but it hatches bounteousness is wrong then it is not wintery.

fact1: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{C}{c} fact2: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) fact3: (¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) fact4: ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{E}{d} fact5: ¬{C}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{D}x

That Hogg is not wintery.

¬{D}{d}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this ammonite is not an awarding the fact that this sweet is not a Mayakovski is correct. fact2: If something is a kind of a Mayakovski then the fact that it is not a kind of an awarding and hatches bounteousness is not true. fact3: Either this ammonite does not hatch bounteousness or it is not an awarding or both. fact4: If the fact that that microsporophyll is both not wintery and not a Mayakovski is false that Hogg is not a cataphatism. fact5: If this sweet is not a Mayakovski then the fact that that microsporophyll is both not wintery and not a Mayakovski is incorrect. fact6: If the fact that some man is not an awarding but it hatches bounteousness is wrong then it is not wintery. ; $hypothesis$ = That Hogg is not a kind of a cataphatism. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This beryl is not a Andira or a earone or both.

(¬{A}{a} v {B}{a})

fact1: If that someone is heterogenous but he does not reprobate kB is false he is non-Zolaesque. fact2: The fact that somebody is not a Andira or she is a earone or both is false if she is not Zolaesque. fact3: Somebody that is not a insecureness is not scentless and is a kind of a Halle. fact4: If this outcrop reprobates kB it is not Zolaesque and it is a kind of a Andira. fact5: That this outcrop does not twitch noticed and is a kind of a insecureness does not hold if this outcrop is not a GUI. fact6: If this outcrop is scented the fact that this beryl is heterogenous but the thing does not reprobate kB does not hold. fact7: This outcrop is not a kind of a insecureness if the fact that she/he does not twitch noticed and she/he is a insecureness does not hold.

fact1: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x v {B}x) fact3: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{F}x & {G}x) fact4: {D}{b} -> (¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) fact5: ¬{J}{b} -> ¬(¬{I}{b} & {H}{b}) fact6: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) fact7: ¬(¬{I}{b} & {H}{b}) -> ¬{H}{b}

This beryl either does not resemble commensalism or is a earthing or both.

(¬{IN}{a} v {B}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that someone is heterogenous but he does not reprobate kB is false he is non-Zolaesque. fact2: The fact that somebody is not a Andira or she is a earone or both is false if she is not Zolaesque. fact3: Somebody that is not a insecureness is not scentless and is a kind of a Halle. fact4: If this outcrop reprobates kB it is not Zolaesque and it is a kind of a Andira. fact5: That this outcrop does not twitch noticed and is a kind of a insecureness does not hold if this outcrop is not a GUI. fact6: If this outcrop is scented the fact that this beryl is heterogenous but the thing does not reprobate kB does not hold. fact7: This outcrop is not a kind of a insecureness if the fact that she/he does not twitch noticed and she/he is a insecureness does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This beryl is not a Andira or a earone or both. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this tamandu does heighten lightness and that one is totipotent is wrong.

¬({B}{a} & {A}{a})

fact1: That there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a participial and it is not non-conciliative is incorrect is correct. fact2: This tamandu does enlist Parrotiopsis. fact3: This tamandu heightens lightness if this person does not tire Precambrian and this person enlists Parrotiopsis. fact4: The mortgagor does rattle vulvovaginitis and is totipotent. fact5: This tamandu does not tire Precambrian but it enlists Parrotiopsis. fact6: This tamandu is totipotent a Stylomecon. fact7: If the fact that someone is a Stylomecon but that person is not conciliative is false then that person is not a Stylomecon. fact8: This tamandu is not conciliative if the fact that this assimilator is not conciliative is correct. fact9: If this tamandu is non-conciliative this tamandu does heighten lightness or enlists Parrotiopsis or both.

fact1: (Ex): ¬(¬{F}x & {D}x) fact2: {AB}{a} fact3: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact4: ({JE}{ie} & {A}{ie}) fact5: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact6: ({A}{a} & {C}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact8: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬{D}{a} fact9: ¬{D}{a} -> ({B}{a} v {AB}{a})

That salinometer enlists Parrotiopsis and that thing is a psychoneurosis.

({AB}{bo} & {GJ}{bo})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a participial and it is not non-conciliative is incorrect is correct. fact2: This tamandu does enlist Parrotiopsis. fact3: This tamandu heightens lightness if this person does not tire Precambrian and this person enlists Parrotiopsis. fact4: The mortgagor does rattle vulvovaginitis and is totipotent. fact5: This tamandu does not tire Precambrian but it enlists Parrotiopsis. fact6: This tamandu is totipotent a Stylomecon. fact7: If the fact that someone is a Stylomecon but that person is not conciliative is false then that person is not a Stylomecon. fact8: This tamandu is not conciliative if the fact that this assimilator is not conciliative is correct. fact9: If this tamandu is non-conciliative this tamandu does heighten lightness or enlists Parrotiopsis or both. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this tamandu does heighten lightness and that one is totipotent is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact5 -> int1: This tamandu heightens lightness.; fact6 -> int2: This tamandu is totipotent.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That lifeblood does not overwinter lanthanoid and it is not lacrimatory.

(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

fact1: This ministry overwinters lanthanoid if that lifeblood overwinters lanthanoid. fact2: That this ministry does not overwinter lanthanoid and is not proprietary is wrong. fact3: The fact that that lifeblood does not overwinter lanthanoid but it is lacrimatory is false. fact4: The fact that that lifeblood overwinters lanthanoid but it is not lacrimatory is false. fact5: The denial is not a kind of a inflexibleness and/or the thing is a kind of a recentness. fact6: The fact that that that lifeblood does not overwinter lanthanoid and she/he is not lacrimatory does not hold if this ministry is not nonproprietary hold. fact7: The fact that that lifeblood overwinters lanthanoid but this one is not lacrimatory is wrong if this ministry is proprietary. fact8: That lifeblood is proprietary. fact9: If this ministry is proprietary the fact that that lifeblood does not overwinter lanthanoid and is lacrimatory is incorrect. fact10: If this ministry is nonproprietary then that lifeblood does not overwinter lanthanoid and this person is not lacrimatory. fact11: The fact that this ministry is not proprietary is right if that clast is not a kind of a inflexibleness and is proprietary.

fact1: {AA}{b} -> {AA}{a} fact2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact4: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact5: (¬{B}{f} v {G}{f}) fact6: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact7: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact8: {A}{b} fact9: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact10: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact11: (¬{B}{c} & {A}{c}) -> ¬{A}{a}

That lifeblood does not overwinter lanthanoid and it is not lacrimatory.

(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This ministry overwinters lanthanoid if that lifeblood overwinters lanthanoid. fact2: That this ministry does not overwinter lanthanoid and is not proprietary is wrong. fact3: The fact that that lifeblood does not overwinter lanthanoid but it is lacrimatory is false. fact4: The fact that that lifeblood overwinters lanthanoid but it is not lacrimatory is false. fact5: The denial is not a kind of a inflexibleness and/or the thing is a kind of a recentness. fact6: The fact that that that lifeblood does not overwinter lanthanoid and she/he is not lacrimatory does not hold if this ministry is not nonproprietary hold. fact7: The fact that that lifeblood overwinters lanthanoid but this one is not lacrimatory is wrong if this ministry is proprietary. fact8: That lifeblood is proprietary. fact9: If this ministry is proprietary the fact that that lifeblood does not overwinter lanthanoid and is lacrimatory is incorrect. fact10: If this ministry is nonproprietary then that lifeblood does not overwinter lanthanoid and this person is not lacrimatory. fact11: The fact that this ministry is not proprietary is right if that clast is not a kind of a inflexibleness and is proprietary. ; $hypothesis$ = That lifeblood does not overwinter lanthanoid and it is not lacrimatory. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that backbencher is not monotonic is right.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: That backbencher is not monotonic if that that reef is monotonic but it is not a pseudohallucination is false. fact2: That boor is monotonic. fact3: That backbencher caricatures phalacrosis. fact4: The fact that someone is monotonic but it is not a pseudohallucination is wrong if it does not buoy mention. fact5: That backbencher is neuronic. fact6: The fact that the vapours is monotonic is right. fact7: The crownbeard is monotonic. fact8: That backbencher is monotonic.

fact1: ¬({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact2: {A}{cp} fact3: {CD}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) fact5: {EB}{a} fact6: {A}{ab} fact7: {A}{fn} fact8: {A}{a}

The fact that that backbencher is not monotonic is right.

¬{A}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That backbencher is not monotonic if that that reef is monotonic but it is not a pseudohallucination is false. fact2: That boor is monotonic. fact3: That backbencher caricatures phalacrosis. fact4: The fact that someone is monotonic but it is not a pseudohallucination is wrong if it does not buoy mention. fact5: That backbencher is neuronic. fact6: The fact that the vapours is monotonic is right. fact7: The crownbeard is monotonic. fact8: That backbencher is monotonic. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that backbencher is not monotonic is right. ; $proof$ =

fact8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That dalo is not a dappled.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: This benzyl is not a kind of a dappled if the fact that that dalo does not suggest and is a Beta is false. fact2: A non-expansionist and non-antisatellite person does not bill. fact3: If the fact that that dalo does not suggest but this person is a dappled does not hold this benzyl is not a Beta. fact4: If something is not unrecoverable this thing either does not bill or is not a dappled or both. fact5: There is nobody such that that person is not a Beta and that person does suggest. fact6: If that dalo does not cube 1920s then that dalo is not a kind of a convertibility. fact7: That Freon is not unrecoverable if the fact that that ascocarp is not expansionist is false. fact8: If that this benzyl is not a kind of a Beta and suggests does not hold that dalo is not a dappled. fact9: That this benzyl is a Beta that suggests is false. fact10: That dalo does not suggest. fact11: Something that does not bill and/or is not a dappled is not a dappled. fact12: Something is a dappled if it is unrecoverable. fact13: Something is associative and this thing is unrecoverable if this thing does not bill. fact14: There is nothing such that it is not a kind of a Beta and it is a dappled. fact15: If that dalo is not a kink he/she does not cube 1920s. fact16: If this benzyl is a dappled that dalo is not a Beta. fact17: If something is not a convertibility then that thing is not expansionist and that thing is not antisatellite. fact18: There is nothing such that this thing is unscientific and this thing is cytoarchitectural. fact19: That that dalo is not a Beta but it is associative does not hold if that Freon is not a dappled. fact20: This benzyl is not a kind of a dappled if that that dalo is not a Beta but it suggests does not hold.

fact1: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {AA}{a}) -> ¬{A}{aa} fact2: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact3: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact4: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{D}x v ¬{A}x) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact6: ¬{H}{a} -> ¬{G}{a} fact7: {E}{c} -> ¬{B}{b} fact8: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact9: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact10: ¬{AB}{a} fact11: (x): (¬{D}x v ¬{A}x) -> ¬{A}x fact12: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact13: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({C}x & {B}x) fact14: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {A}x) fact15: ¬{I}{a} -> ¬{H}{a} fact16: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{a} fact17: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) fact18: (x): ¬({EG}x & {AI}x) fact19: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {C}{a}) fact20: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{A}{aa}

That dalo is a dappled.

{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This benzyl is not a kind of a dappled if the fact that that dalo does not suggest and is a Beta is false. fact2: A non-expansionist and non-antisatellite person does not bill. fact3: If the fact that that dalo does not suggest but this person is a dappled does not hold this benzyl is not a Beta. fact4: If something is not unrecoverable this thing either does not bill or is not a dappled or both. fact5: There is nobody such that that person is not a Beta and that person does suggest. fact6: If that dalo does not cube 1920s then that dalo is not a kind of a convertibility. fact7: That Freon is not unrecoverable if the fact that that ascocarp is not expansionist is false. fact8: If that this benzyl is not a kind of a Beta and suggests does not hold that dalo is not a dappled. fact9: That this benzyl is a Beta that suggests is false. fact10: That dalo does not suggest. fact11: Something that does not bill and/or is not a dappled is not a dappled. fact12: Something is a dappled if it is unrecoverable. fact13: Something is associative and this thing is unrecoverable if this thing does not bill. fact14: There is nothing such that it is not a kind of a Beta and it is a dappled. fact15: If that dalo is not a kink he/she does not cube 1920s. fact16: If this benzyl is a dappled that dalo is not a Beta. fact17: If something is not a convertibility then that thing is not expansionist and that thing is not antisatellite. fact18: There is nothing such that this thing is unscientific and this thing is cytoarchitectural. fact19: That that dalo is not a Beta but it is associative does not hold if that Freon is not a dappled. fact20: This benzyl is not a kind of a dappled if that that dalo is not a Beta but it suggests does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That dalo is not a dappled. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> int1: That this benzyl is not a kind of a Beta but this one suggests is incorrect.; int1 & fact8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That loading intrepidity happens.

{B}

fact1: That that coating occurs and the melted happens is incorrect. fact2: If the fact that the non-unpropitiousness and that unmotorizedness happens does not hold the ophiolatry happens. fact3: If this clustering does not occurs then that the miss does not happens and this disconcerting screenplay occurs is incorrect. fact4: That notthat unbalconiedness but that implementation happens does not hold. fact5: That this boundsness happens causes that that loading intrepidity does not happens and this clustering does not occurs. fact6: If either this growing cedilla happens or that pretending Helotium does not happens or both then the fact that this boundsness happens is correct. fact7: This enucleation occurs. fact8: If the fact that notthe spellbinding but this cheep occurs does not hold then the hyperalimentation happens. fact9: This clustering occurs. fact10: The sketching occurs. fact11: The fact that that both that advancing Rocroi and that pretending Helotium occurs hold is incorrect. fact12: That loading intrepidity happens if the fact that that unbalconiedness does not happens and that implementation occurs is not correct.

fact1: ¬({DD} & {AQ}) fact2: ¬(¬{DI} & {GF}) -> {CU} fact3: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{N} & {GD}) fact4: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact5: {C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact6: ({E} v ¬{D}) -> {C} fact7: {BJ} fact8: ¬(¬{GK} & {AI}) -> {IQ} fact9: {A} fact10: {EN} fact11: ¬({BT} & {D}) fact12: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B}

That the miss does not happens but this disconcerting screenplay occurs is incorrect.

¬(¬{N} & {GD})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that coating occurs and the melted happens is incorrect. fact2: If the fact that the non-unpropitiousness and that unmotorizedness happens does not hold the ophiolatry happens. fact3: If this clustering does not occurs then that the miss does not happens and this disconcerting screenplay occurs is incorrect. fact4: That notthat unbalconiedness but that implementation happens does not hold. fact5: That this boundsness happens causes that that loading intrepidity does not happens and this clustering does not occurs. fact6: If either this growing cedilla happens or that pretending Helotium does not happens or both then the fact that this boundsness happens is correct. fact7: This enucleation occurs. fact8: If the fact that notthe spellbinding but this cheep occurs does not hold then the hyperalimentation happens. fact9: This clustering occurs. fact10: The sketching occurs. fact11: The fact that that both that advancing Rocroi and that pretending Helotium occurs hold is incorrect. fact12: That loading intrepidity happens if the fact that that unbalconiedness does not happens and that implementation occurs is not correct. ; $hypothesis$ = That loading intrepidity happens. ; $proof$ =

fact12 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That jodhpur is not a domestic and/or this thing does not ablated contiguity.

(¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b})

fact1: That boat is photovoltaic. fact2: If that boat is photovoltaic then that that jodhpur is not a domestic and/or does not ablated contiguity does not hold.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That boat is photovoltaic. fact2: If that boat is photovoltaic then that that jodhpur is not a domestic and/or does not ablated contiguity does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That jodhpur is not a domestic and/or this thing does not ablated contiguity. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This camphoratedness occurs.

{B}

fact1: That this transforming Doha occurs and that hegira occurs is wrong. fact2: If the rationalisation does not happens then the fact that that saltiness and this chafflikeness occurs is wrong. fact3: That that hegira does not occurs is triggered by that that somersaulting does not happens. fact4: The fact that both this non-unswornness and that destructiveness happens does not hold if the fact that this metarule does not happens is true. fact5: The fact that that sacculateness happens and the tailoring sunup happens is incorrect. fact6: That this traveling and this dismissing Staphylea occurs is wrong if that destructiveness does not occurs. fact7: If the baccarat does not happens but this speculating pharma occurs then this unoriginalness happens. fact8: That that instalment and that somersaulting occurs is incorrect. fact9: This non-camphoratedness is brought about by that this dismissing Staphylea does not occurs. fact10: That this metarule does not happens and that hire occurs is triggered by that this unoriginalness happens. fact11: Notthe baccarat but this speculating pharma happens if that hegira does not happens. fact12: The business does not happens. fact13: That destructiveness does not occurs. fact14: This camphoratedness does not happens if the fact that this traveling occurs and this dismissing Staphylea happens is wrong.

fact1: ¬({IA} & {I}) fact2: ¬{CB} -> ¬({BM} & {JH}) fact3: ¬{J} -> ¬{I} fact4: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{C} & {A}) fact5: ¬({GA} & {II}) fact6: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact7: (¬{H} & {G}) -> {F} fact8: ¬({AG} & {J}) fact9: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} fact10: {F} -> (¬{D} & {E}) fact11: ¬{I} -> (¬{H} & {G}) fact12: ¬{HP} fact13: ¬{A} fact14: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B}

This camphoratedness occurs.

{B}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this transforming Doha occurs and that hegira occurs is wrong. fact2: If the rationalisation does not happens then the fact that that saltiness and this chafflikeness occurs is wrong. fact3: That that hegira does not occurs is triggered by that that somersaulting does not happens. fact4: The fact that both this non-unswornness and that destructiveness happens does not hold if the fact that this metarule does not happens is true. fact5: The fact that that sacculateness happens and the tailoring sunup happens is incorrect. fact6: That this traveling and this dismissing Staphylea occurs is wrong if that destructiveness does not occurs. fact7: If the baccarat does not happens but this speculating pharma occurs then this unoriginalness happens. fact8: That that instalment and that somersaulting occurs is incorrect. fact9: This non-camphoratedness is brought about by that this dismissing Staphylea does not occurs. fact10: That this metarule does not happens and that hire occurs is triggered by that this unoriginalness happens. fact11: Notthe baccarat but this speculating pharma happens if that hegira does not happens. fact12: The business does not happens. fact13: That destructiveness does not occurs. fact14: This camphoratedness does not happens if the fact that this traveling occurs and this dismissing Staphylea happens is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = This camphoratedness occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact13 -> int1: That this traveling occurs and this dismissing Staphylea happens does not hold.; int1 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this fractionation is a Syzygium if that this fractionation is not Uruguayan and not epilithic is wrong is false.

¬(¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa})

fact1: If that tyrannosaur is a kind of a Syzygium then she is intrastate. fact2: This fractionation is a kind of a differential if the person is not a megawatt and the person is not arundinaceous. fact3: If the fact that someone is a kind of non-Uruguayan one that is not epilithic is wrong then that one is a Syzygium. fact4: If that that whistle is not a kind of a smugness and does not facsimile consanguinity does not hold then that whistle does writhe. fact5: If the fact that the fact that this fractionation is non-arundinaceous and is epilithic is not true hold then it is postictal. fact6: The fact that some person is a funnel hold if the fact that he/she is not a differential and he/she does not paralyse Shiah is false. fact7: If the fact that this violist is both non-Uruguayan and nonretractable does not hold then this violist flaunts megaflop. fact8: This fractionation is burlesque if it does not griddle kraurosis and is not Uruguayan. fact9: If something is epilithic then it is a Syzygium. fact10: If the fact that this violist is not Uruguayan and not a hamartia does not hold that the thing is extensile is incorrect. fact11: If that this fractionation is Uruguayan and not epilithic is wrong this fractionation is a Syzygium. fact12: This dingle is Uruguayan if this thing is landless. fact13: If the Spode is a rancor then it is epilithic. fact14: Someone that is Rhodesian is elfin. fact15: If that this fractionation is not vocal and the one is not a kotow is wrong then the one is glorious. fact16: Some person is saponified if the fact that it is a kind of rhythmical person that is not a allusiveness is correct. fact17: Something is a kind of a cooler if this thing is a kind of a mothball. fact18: This fractionation is arundinaceous if that that one does not answer enzymology and that one is a Waller does not hold. fact19: If the fact that this fractionation does not fine Cetorhinidae but it facsimiles consanguinity is incorrect then this fractionation birdies AHPCRC. fact20: The fact that someone is a Syzygium if that it is a kind of Uruguayan one that is not epilithic is incorrect is right.

fact1: {B}{is} -> {ED}{is} fact2: (¬{IP}{aa} & ¬{EA}{aa}) -> {AK}{aa} fact3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact4: ¬(¬{CJ}{ea} & ¬{EG}{ea}) -> {DH}{ea} fact5: ¬(¬{EA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {BK}{aa} fact6: (x): ¬(¬{AK}x & ¬{GS}x) -> {DU}x fact7: ¬(¬{AA}{e} & {U}{e}) -> {C}{e} fact8: (¬{AQ}{aa} & ¬{AA}{aa}) -> {AP}{aa} fact9: (x): {AB}x -> {B}x fact10: ¬(¬{AA}{e} & ¬{HL}{e}) -> {ER}{e} fact11: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact12: {EF}{cc} -> {AA}{cc} fact13: {EC}{s} -> {AB}{s} fact14: (x): {GI}x -> {AG}x fact15: ¬(¬{HU}{aa} & ¬{AU}{aa}) -> {EQ}{aa} fact16: (x): (¬{DO}x & ¬{HB}x) -> {DL}x fact17: (x): {IT}x -> {FI}x fact18: ¬(¬{HT}{aa} & {HQ}{aa}) -> {EA}{aa} fact19: ¬(¬{O}{aa} & {EG}{aa}) -> {GD}{aa} fact20: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If that tyrannosaur is a kind of a Syzygium then she is intrastate. fact2: This fractionation is a kind of a differential if the person is not a megawatt and the person is not arundinaceous. fact3: If the fact that someone is a kind of non-Uruguayan one that is not epilithic is wrong then that one is a Syzygium. fact4: If that that whistle is not a kind of a smugness and does not facsimile consanguinity does not hold then that whistle does writhe. fact5: If the fact that the fact that this fractionation is non-arundinaceous and is epilithic is not true hold then it is postictal. fact6: The fact that some person is a funnel hold if the fact that he/she is not a differential and he/she does not paralyse Shiah is false. fact7: If the fact that this violist is both non-Uruguayan and nonretractable does not hold then this violist flaunts megaflop. fact8: This fractionation is burlesque if it does not griddle kraurosis and is not Uruguayan. fact9: If something is epilithic then it is a Syzygium. fact10: If the fact that this violist is not Uruguayan and not a hamartia does not hold that the thing is extensile is incorrect. fact11: If that this fractionation is Uruguayan and not epilithic is wrong this fractionation is a Syzygium. fact12: This dingle is Uruguayan if this thing is landless. fact13: If the Spode is a rancor then it is epilithic. fact14: Someone that is Rhodesian is elfin. fact15: If that this fractionation is not vocal and the one is not a kotow is wrong then the one is glorious. fact16: Some person is saponified if the fact that it is a kind of rhythmical person that is not a allusiveness is correct. fact17: Something is a kind of a cooler if this thing is a kind of a mothball. fact18: This fractionation is arundinaceous if that that one does not answer enzymology and that one is a Waller does not hold. fact19: If the fact that this fractionation does not fine Cetorhinidae but it facsimiles consanguinity is incorrect then this fractionation birdies AHPCRC. fact20: The fact that someone is a Syzygium if that it is a kind of Uruguayan one that is not epilithic is incorrect is right. ; $hypothesis$ = That this fractionation is a Syzygium if that this fractionation is not Uruguayan and not epilithic is wrong is false. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that this DC is not a Rockford but a counterrevolutionary is correct.

(¬{D}{c} & {B}{c})

fact1: If this Chaldaean is not a kind of a spangled the fact that this DC does not decapitate tined and it is not a kind of a counterrevolutionary is false. fact2: That if this Chaldaean is not a kind of a spangled then that that barite is a Munro that does not decapitate tined is not true hold. fact3: The fact that that barite is a Munro and does not decapitate tined is not true. fact4: This DC does not broker if she is consular and/or she is not Argive. fact5: If this Chaldaean is not a spangled that that that barite is not a Munro and it does not decapitate tined is true is incorrect. fact6: If that barite is a kind of a Munro that barite is a counterrevolutionary. fact7: The fact that this DC is not a kind of a Rockford and is a counterrevolutionary does not hold if that barite is a counterrevolutionary. fact8: Someone is not a Rockford and is a counterrevolutionary if this person is a kind of a spangled. fact9: The fact that this DC is a Rockford that is a kind of a counterrevolutionary is false. fact10: That barite is not a spangled. fact11: Something is a Umbundu and a spangled if it does not broker. fact12: The fact that this Chaldaean is not a counterrevolutionary and the one is not a spangled is not right. fact13: This Chaldaean is not a kind of a spangled. fact14: If that barite is a counterrevolutionary that this DC is a Rockford and is a counterrevolutionary is not true. fact15: That this Chaldaean is a spangled if that this Chaldaean is not a Munro and it does not decapitate tined is incorrect hold. fact16: If this DC is not a Italia then it is consular and/or not Argive. fact17: That barite is a counterrevolutionary if that that barite is not a Munro and it does not decapitate tined does not hold.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AB}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact3: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact4: ({G}{c} v ¬{F}{c}) -> ¬{E}{c} fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact6: {AA}{b} -> {B}{b} fact7: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} & {B}{c}) fact8: (x): {A}x -> (¬{D}x & {B}x) fact9: ¬({D}{c} & {B}{c}) fact10: ¬{A}{b} fact11: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) fact12: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact13: ¬{A}{a} fact14: {B}{b} -> ¬({D}{c} & {B}{c}) fact15: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {A}{a} fact16: ¬{H}{c} -> ({G}{c} v ¬{F}{c}) fact17: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{b}

The fact that this DC is not a Rockford but a counterrevolutionary is correct.

(¬{D}{c} & {B}{c})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this Chaldaean is not a kind of a spangled the fact that this DC does not decapitate tined and it is not a kind of a counterrevolutionary is false. fact2: That if this Chaldaean is not a kind of a spangled then that that barite is a Munro that does not decapitate tined is not true hold. fact3: The fact that that barite is a Munro and does not decapitate tined is not true. fact4: This DC does not broker if she is consular and/or she is not Argive. fact5: If this Chaldaean is not a spangled that that that barite is not a Munro and it does not decapitate tined is true is incorrect. fact6: If that barite is a kind of a Munro that barite is a counterrevolutionary. fact7: The fact that this DC is not a kind of a Rockford and is a counterrevolutionary does not hold if that barite is a counterrevolutionary. fact8: Someone is not a Rockford and is a counterrevolutionary if this person is a kind of a spangled. fact9: The fact that this DC is a Rockford that is a kind of a counterrevolutionary is false. fact10: That barite is not a spangled. fact11: Something is a Umbundu and a spangled if it does not broker. fact12: The fact that this Chaldaean is not a counterrevolutionary and the one is not a spangled is not right. fact13: This Chaldaean is not a kind of a spangled. fact14: If that barite is a counterrevolutionary that this DC is a Rockford and is a counterrevolutionary is not true. fact15: That this Chaldaean is a spangled if that this Chaldaean is not a Munro and it does not decapitate tined is incorrect hold. fact16: If this DC is not a Italia then it is consular and/or not Argive. fact17: That barite is a counterrevolutionary if that that barite is not a Munro and it does not decapitate tined does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this DC is not a Rockford but a counterrevolutionary is correct. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact13 -> int1: That that barite is not a Munro and this does not decapitate tined does not hold.; int1 & fact17 -> int2: That barite is a counterrevolutionary.; int2 & fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This delaying Mephistopheles does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: The fact that this delaying Mephistopheles does not occurs but that dyeing Balfour occurs does not hold if this looting occurs. fact2: That this delaying Mephistopheles does not happens is triggered by this looting. fact3: This wandering happens. fact4: Either the nascentness or the behavioristicness or both happens. fact5: The fact that this Montserratianness does not occurs is correct. fact6: That dyeing Balfour does not occurs if this looting happens and that engaging Sappho occurs. fact7: That notthe lapidating menacing but the suppression occurs is brought about by that this patinising does not occurs. fact8: The stroll occurs. fact9: This Concording and/or this non-bladedness happens if that degradation happens. fact10: This looting happens if that maelstrom happens. fact11: That the bridalness occurs is right. fact12: If that broadcast happens and this tightening does not occurs this starlessness does not happens. fact13: That this side happens brings about that that dyeing Balfour happens. fact14: The ebbing happens. fact15: The fact that this side occurs is right. fact16: That narrowedness happens and/or that meshing occurs. fact17: This delaying Mephistopheles does not happens if that dyeing Balfour or this looting or both occurs. fact18: That this puffing occurs is correct. fact19: This Concording happens if this Concording or this non-bladedness or both occurs. fact20: That maelstrom occurs if notthe lapidating menacing but the suppression happens. fact21: That notthis starlessness but this forgettableness occurs brings about that that engaging Sappho happens. fact22: If this Concording occurs then this patinising does not occurs but this genotypicness happens.

fact1: {C} -> ¬(¬{D} & {B}) fact2: {C} -> ¬{D} fact3: {DQ} fact4: ({DJ} v {HS}) fact5: ¬{IT} fact6: ({C} & {E}) -> ¬{B} fact7: ¬{K} -> (¬{H} & {G}) fact8: {CQ} fact9: {N} -> ({M} v ¬{O}) fact10: {F} -> {C} fact11: {FP} fact12: ({P} & ¬{Q}) -> ¬{J} fact13: {A} -> {B} fact14: {EF} fact15: {A} fact16: ({GC} v {JB}) fact17: ({B} v {C}) -> ¬{D} fact18: {EE} fact19: ({M} v ¬{O}) -> {M} fact20: (¬{H} & {G}) -> {F} fact21: (¬{J} & {I}) -> {E} fact22: {M} -> (¬{K} & {L})

This Austronesianness and/or this multinucleateness occurs.

({HU} v {HB})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this delaying Mephistopheles does not occurs but that dyeing Balfour occurs does not hold if this looting occurs. fact2: That this delaying Mephistopheles does not happens is triggered by this looting. fact3: This wandering happens. fact4: Either the nascentness or the behavioristicness or both happens. fact5: The fact that this Montserratianness does not occurs is correct. fact6: That dyeing Balfour does not occurs if this looting happens and that engaging Sappho occurs. fact7: That notthe lapidating menacing but the suppression occurs is brought about by that this patinising does not occurs. fact8: The stroll occurs. fact9: This Concording and/or this non-bladedness happens if that degradation happens. fact10: This looting happens if that maelstrom happens. fact11: That the bridalness occurs is right. fact12: If that broadcast happens and this tightening does not occurs this starlessness does not happens. fact13: That this side happens brings about that that dyeing Balfour happens. fact14: The ebbing happens. fact15: The fact that this side occurs is right. fact16: That narrowedness happens and/or that meshing occurs. fact17: This delaying Mephistopheles does not happens if that dyeing Balfour or this looting or both occurs. fact18: That this puffing occurs is correct. fact19: This Concording happens if this Concording or this non-bladedness or both occurs. fact20: That maelstrom occurs if notthe lapidating menacing but the suppression happens. fact21: That notthis starlessness but this forgettableness occurs brings about that that engaging Sappho happens. fact22: If this Concording occurs then this patinising does not occurs but this genotypicness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This delaying Mephistopheles does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact15 -> int1: That dyeing Balfour occurs.; int1 -> int2: That dyeing Balfour or this looting or both happens.; int2 & fact17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that kiddy is both Monophysitic and not humane is not right.

¬({B}{c} & ¬{A}{c})

fact1: The fact that that kiddy is Monophysitic but it is not humane does not hold if that polymastigote is not Monophysitic. fact2: The fact that the fact that this gimlet does not belt Styx but it is a Vulcan is wrong is correct. fact3: That polymastigote is not Monophysitic if that this gimlet does not belt Styx and is a Vulcan is incorrect.

fact1: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & ¬{A}{c}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that kiddy is Monophysitic but it is not humane does not hold if that polymastigote is not Monophysitic. fact2: The fact that the fact that this gimlet does not belt Styx but it is a Vulcan is wrong is correct. fact3: That polymastigote is not Monophysitic if that this gimlet does not belt Styx and is a Vulcan is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = That that kiddy is both Monophysitic and not humane is not right. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact2 -> int1: That polymastigote is non-Monophysitic.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This Kiwi arcs Chiwere.

{A}{a}

fact1: This Kiwi is inexplicable if that this Kiwi is monoclinous is right. fact2: If something sprints Paeonia then it is a omphalocele. fact3: If this metastasis is a kind of a omphalocele then that Castor gibbets mil but it is not practical. fact4: Something that does not subtilise overshot gibbets mil and arcs Chiwere. fact5: This glossina sprints Paeonia and this one is a Tuscan. fact6: If something that subtilises overshot is not a Zygophyllum then that ratafia does not subtilises overshot. fact7: This gimbal arcs Chiwere. fact8: The fact that somebody that is inexplicable is not practical and not a omphalocele hold. fact9: This metastasis either sprints Paeonia or is a Tuscan or both. fact10: The darkroom arcs Chiwere. fact11: This Kiwi is not non-monoclinous. fact12: This virgin arcs Chiwere. fact13: This glossina gibbets mil if that Castor gibbets mil but the one is not practical. fact14: This Kiwi is a intrepidity. fact15: This Kiwi arcs Chiwere. fact16: this Chiwere arcs Kiwi. fact17: This Kiwi beguiles. fact18: This Kiwi concentrates psalm. fact19: Some man subtilises overshot if it is not practical and not a omphalocele. fact20: This spectrogram arcs Chiwere. fact21: This Kiwi is forester. fact22: This Kiwi is not a Zygophyllum if somebody that sprints Paeonia is a Tuscan.

fact1: {J}{a} -> {I}{a} fact2: (x): {H}x -> {F}x fact3: {F}{d} -> ({B}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact5: ({H}{b} & {G}{b}) fact6: (x): ({C}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}{bf} fact7: {A}{dp} fact8: (x): {I}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) fact9: ({H}{d} v {G}{d}) fact10: {A}{gf} fact11: {J}{a} fact12: {A}{co} fact13: ({B}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> {B}{b} fact14: {GD}{a} fact15: {A}{a} fact16: {AA}{aa} fact17: {CO}{a} fact18: {EJ}{a} fact19: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) -> {C}x fact20: {A}{ep} fact21: {JB}{a} fact22: (x): ({H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{D}{a}

That ratafia arcs Chiwere.

{A}{bf}

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This Kiwi is inexplicable if that this Kiwi is monoclinous is right. fact2: If something sprints Paeonia then it is a omphalocele. fact3: If this metastasis is a kind of a omphalocele then that Castor gibbets mil but it is not practical. fact4: Something that does not subtilise overshot gibbets mil and arcs Chiwere. fact5: This glossina sprints Paeonia and this one is a Tuscan. fact6: If something that subtilises overshot is not a Zygophyllum then that ratafia does not subtilises overshot. fact7: This gimbal arcs Chiwere. fact8: The fact that somebody that is inexplicable is not practical and not a omphalocele hold. fact9: This metastasis either sprints Paeonia or is a Tuscan or both. fact10: The darkroom arcs Chiwere. fact11: This Kiwi is not non-monoclinous. fact12: This virgin arcs Chiwere. fact13: This glossina gibbets mil if that Castor gibbets mil but the one is not practical. fact14: This Kiwi is a intrepidity. fact15: This Kiwi arcs Chiwere. fact16: this Chiwere arcs Kiwi. fact17: This Kiwi beguiles. fact18: This Kiwi concentrates psalm. fact19: Some man subtilises overshot if it is not practical and not a omphalocele. fact20: This spectrogram arcs Chiwere. fact21: This Kiwi is forester. fact22: This Kiwi is not a Zygophyllum if somebody that sprints Paeonia is a Tuscan. ; $hypothesis$ = This Kiwi arcs Chiwere. ; $proof$ =

fact15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That sedative is not non-butyric and it makes Deneb.

({AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

fact1: If this boxthorn is not a Walhalla then that that sedative is butyric and it makes Deneb does not hold. fact2: If the fact that something is a Acalypha that is not kinesthetic does not hold then the thing is not kinesthetic. fact3: This boxthorn is a Walhalla. fact4: That sedative does not predestinate subservience. fact5: That sedative is not non-butyric. fact6: That sedative is not a Walhalla. fact7: If that sedative is not a Walhalla then that sedative is butyric and makes Deneb. fact8: The fact that that lodestone is both a Acalypha and not kinesthetic is false. fact9: If that sedative is not a Walhalla then that is not non-butyric. fact10: Some person is a Walhalla and this person is a Albers if this person is not daisylike.

fact1: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{IR}x) -> {IR}x fact3: {A}{b} fact4: ¬{II}{a} fact5: {AA}{a} fact6: ¬{A}{a} fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact8: ¬({C}{m} & ¬{IR}{m}) fact9: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{a} fact10: (x): ¬{DS}x -> ({A}x & {HK}x)

That lodestone is kinesthetic thing that makes Deneb.

({IR}{m} & {AB}{m})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this boxthorn is not a Walhalla then that that sedative is butyric and it makes Deneb does not hold. fact2: If the fact that something is a Acalypha that is not kinesthetic does not hold then the thing is not kinesthetic. fact3: This boxthorn is a Walhalla. fact4: That sedative does not predestinate subservience. fact5: That sedative is not non-butyric. fact6: That sedative is not a Walhalla. fact7: If that sedative is not a Walhalla then that sedative is butyric and makes Deneb. fact8: The fact that that lodestone is both a Acalypha and not kinesthetic is false. fact9: If that sedative is not a Walhalla then that is not non-butyric. fact10: Some person is a Walhalla and this person is a Albers if this person is not daisylike. ; $hypothesis$ = That sedative is not non-butyric and it makes Deneb. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That both that quackery and this event occurs is not true.

¬({C} & {D})

fact1: The fact that the fact that that quackery happens and this event occurs does not hold hold if the fact that that jolting does not happens is right. fact2: That jolting happens and this proconsulate happens. fact3: That piling Halifax occurs. fact4: This event occurs and that piling Halifax happens if that that sexualness does not happens hold. fact5: If that sexualness does not happens then that piling Halifax happens. fact6: This taping occurs. fact7: That jolting occurs. fact8: This proconsulate does not occurs and that jolting does not occurs if that piling Halifax does not occurs. fact9: That the dispatch occurs is triggered by that non-abranchialness. fact10: This boondoggle happens if this proconsulate does not occurs and that jolting does not happens. fact11: Both this invalidation and the withdrawal occurs. fact12: That republican and that anemophilousness occurs. fact13: That quackery is caused by that this proconsulate happens. fact14: That sexualness does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & {D}) fact2: ({A} & {B}) fact3: {E} fact4: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact5: ¬{F} -> {E} fact6: {CP} fact7: {A} fact8: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact9: ¬{GQ} -> {HE} fact10: (¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> {EO} fact11: ({G} & {AS}) fact12: ({EC} & {GK}) fact13: {B} -> {C} fact14: ¬{F}

This boondoggle occurs.

{EO}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that the fact that that quackery happens and this event occurs does not hold hold if the fact that that jolting does not happens is right. fact2: That jolting happens and this proconsulate happens. fact3: That piling Halifax occurs. fact4: This event occurs and that piling Halifax happens if that that sexualness does not happens hold. fact5: If that sexualness does not happens then that piling Halifax happens. fact6: This taping occurs. fact7: That jolting occurs. fact8: This proconsulate does not occurs and that jolting does not occurs if that piling Halifax does not occurs. fact9: That the dispatch occurs is triggered by that non-abranchialness. fact10: This boondoggle happens if this proconsulate does not occurs and that jolting does not happens. fact11: Both this invalidation and the withdrawal occurs. fact12: That republican and that anemophilousness occurs. fact13: That quackery is caused by that this proconsulate happens. fact14: That sexualness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That both that quackery and this event occurs is not true. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> int1: This proconsulate occurs.; int1 & fact13 -> int2: That quackery happens.; fact4 & fact14 -> int3: This event occurs and that piling Halifax occurs.; int3 -> int4: This event occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This educating conciseness does not occurs.

¬{B}

fact1: That this hitting praenomen does not occurs is prevented by the outcrying Sarasvati or that the requirement does not happens or both. fact2: That that joyousness and/or that non-inguinalness occurs prevents that this educating conciseness does not occurs. fact3: That uninflectedness does not occurs if the fact that that happenstance does not happens but that uninflectedness happens is false. fact4: This educating conciseness does not happens if the fact that that Monopoly does not happens and this educating conciseness happens does not hold. fact5: Either that joyousness occurs or that inguinalness does not occurs or both. fact6: That notthat complimenting disgracefulness but this palavering occurs does not hold if this educating conciseness does not occurs. fact7: This demurral and/or this divalentness occurs. fact8: The dwarf occurs. fact9: The backhandedness occurs and/or that hydroplaning does not occurs. fact10: This debilitating millicurie and/or that this Continentalness does not occurs prevents that this soaking does not occurs. fact11: That Monopoly does not occurs if that this Continentalness does not occurs and that mysticalness happens is incorrect. fact12: If that that complimenting disgracefulness does not happens and this palavering occurs does not hold then that that complimenting disgracefulness happens is true. fact13: That that non-Continentalness and that mysticalness happens is incorrect if that uninflectedness does not occurs. fact14: That mysticalness does not occurs and this Continentalness does not happens if that uninflectedness does not occurs. fact15: If that joyousness happens then this educating conciseness occurs. fact16: The fact that the fact that that Monopoly does not occurs and this educating conciseness occurs is wrong if that mysticalness does not occurs hold. fact17: If the fact that notthis palavering but this educating conciseness happens is incorrect then this educating conciseness does not happens. fact18: If the pauperizing guiltlessness does not happens then the Sudanese happens.

fact1: ({R} v ¬{GA}) -> {AT} fact2: ({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact3: ¬(¬{G} & {F}) -> ¬{F} fact4: ¬(¬{C} & {B}) -> ¬{B} fact5: ({AA} v ¬{AB}) fact6: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{EC} & {A}) fact7: ({BE} v {CK}) fact8: {BG} fact9: ({FK} v ¬{BO}) fact10: ({FH} v ¬{E}) -> {EQ} fact11: ¬(¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{C} fact12: ¬(¬{EC} & {A}) -> {EC} fact13: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{E} & {D}) fact14: ¬{F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) fact15: {AA} -> {B} fact16: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{C} & {B}) fact17: ¬(¬{A} & {B}) -> ¬{B} fact18: ¬{EA} -> {CA}

This educating conciseness does not occurs.

¬{B}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this hitting praenomen does not occurs is prevented by the outcrying Sarasvati or that the requirement does not happens or both. fact2: That that joyousness and/or that non-inguinalness occurs prevents that this educating conciseness does not occurs. fact3: That uninflectedness does not occurs if the fact that that happenstance does not happens but that uninflectedness happens is false. fact4: This educating conciseness does not happens if the fact that that Monopoly does not happens and this educating conciseness happens does not hold. fact5: Either that joyousness occurs or that inguinalness does not occurs or both. fact6: That notthat complimenting disgracefulness but this palavering occurs does not hold if this educating conciseness does not occurs. fact7: This demurral and/or this divalentness occurs. fact8: The dwarf occurs. fact9: The backhandedness occurs and/or that hydroplaning does not occurs. fact10: This debilitating millicurie and/or that this Continentalness does not occurs prevents that this soaking does not occurs. fact11: That Monopoly does not occurs if that this Continentalness does not occurs and that mysticalness happens is incorrect. fact12: If that that complimenting disgracefulness does not happens and this palavering occurs does not hold then that that complimenting disgracefulness happens is true. fact13: That that non-Continentalness and that mysticalness happens is incorrect if that uninflectedness does not occurs. fact14: That mysticalness does not occurs and this Continentalness does not happens if that uninflectedness does not occurs. fact15: If that joyousness happens then this educating conciseness occurs. fact16: The fact that the fact that that Monopoly does not occurs and this educating conciseness occurs is wrong if that mysticalness does not occurs hold. fact17: If the fact that notthis palavering but this educating conciseness happens is incorrect then this educating conciseness does not happens. fact18: If the pauperizing guiltlessness does not happens then the Sudanese happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This educating conciseness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Everybody stratifies and is not an insomnia.

(x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

fact1: Every person loops immutability. fact2: Everything is a presentism and is not Latvian. fact3: Everything is a orthoepy but not unready. fact4: Every man squishes logomachy and that one does not cluster Pirandello. fact5: Everything is daisylike and does not climax astereognosis. fact6: Every man does farm Izanagi. fact7: Every man lingers Bannockburn and she does not refresh greensickness. fact8: The fact that everything is a sympathy and it does not iron Utrecht is correct. fact9: Everything is a clot but not millenary. fact10: Everybody signs commensalism and does not outweigh Luo. fact11: Everything lingers Bannockburn and does not cobble. fact12: Somebody stings wonderment and is not a tag if it is appointive. fact13: Everyone slants isostasy and is not unservile. fact14: Everything jaundiceds Cynocephalidae and that is not a plait. fact15: Everybody stratifies and is not an insomnia.

fact1: (x): {CM}x fact2: (x): ({FE}x & ¬{C}x) fact3: (x): ({CG}x & ¬{JG}x) fact4: (x): ({O}x & ¬{DT}x) fact5: (x): ({EU}x & ¬{CP}x) fact6: (x): {BL}x fact7: (x): ({JB}x & ¬{HD}x) fact8: (x): ({S}x & ¬{AC}x) fact9: (x): ({BN}x & ¬{BG}x) fact10: (x): ({AT}x & ¬{CN}x) fact11: (x): ({JB}x & ¬{GA}x) fact12: (x): {A}x -> ({ES}x & ¬{DU}x) fact13: (x): ({FH}x & ¬{EP}x) fact14: (x): ({BC}x & ¬{FN}x) fact15: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

Everything stings wonderment and it is not a tag.

(x): ({ES}x & ¬{DU}x)

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Every person loops immutability. fact2: Everything is a presentism and is not Latvian. fact3: Everything is a orthoepy but not unready. fact4: Every man squishes logomachy and that one does not cluster Pirandello. fact5: Everything is daisylike and does not climax astereognosis. fact6: Every man does farm Izanagi. fact7: Every man lingers Bannockburn and she does not refresh greensickness. fact8: The fact that everything is a sympathy and it does not iron Utrecht is correct. fact9: Everything is a clot but not millenary. fact10: Everybody signs commensalism and does not outweigh Luo. fact11: Everything lingers Bannockburn and does not cobble. fact12: Somebody stings wonderment and is not a tag if it is appointive. fact13: Everyone slants isostasy and is not unservile. fact14: Everything jaundiceds Cynocephalidae and that is not a plait. fact15: Everybody stratifies and is not an insomnia. ; $hypothesis$ = Everybody stratifies and is not an insomnia. ; $proof$ =

fact15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Every man nurses parametritis.

(x): {A}x

fact1: Everyone is a kind of a Slovakia. fact2: Everybody optimises. fact3: Everything is a Wb. fact4: Everyone is a sightedness. fact5: Everybody gambols Trichophyton. fact6: Everybody curves cheerfulness. fact7: Every man nurses parametritis. fact8: Everyone is electrochemical. fact9: Everything is humanist. fact10: The fact that everything is discriminate hold. fact11: Every person is noncausal. fact12: Everything is a Bantu. fact13: Everything scorches mystique. fact14: Every man is ecclesiastical. fact15: Every man is shapely.

fact1: (x): {B}x fact2: (x): {DT}x fact3: (x): {DG}x fact4: (x): {GU}x fact5: (x): {CD}x fact6: (x): {IR}x fact7: (x): {A}x fact8: (x): {FG}x fact9: (x): {BB}x fact10: (x): {AA}x fact11: (x): {GO}x fact12: (x): {BC}x fact13: (x): {CK}x fact14: (x): {BJ}x fact15: (x): {BF}x

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Everyone is a kind of a Slovakia. fact2: Everybody optimises. fact3: Everything is a Wb. fact4: Everyone is a sightedness. fact5: Everybody gambols Trichophyton. fact6: Everybody curves cheerfulness. fact7: Every man nurses parametritis. fact8: Everyone is electrochemical. fact9: Everything is humanist. fact10: The fact that everything is discriminate hold. fact11: Every person is noncausal. fact12: Everything is a Bantu. fact13: Everything scorches mystique. fact14: Every man is ecclesiastical. fact15: Every man is shapely. ; $hypothesis$ = Every man nurses parametritis. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that ergocalciferol is exegetic and it is a ectozoan is wrong.

¬({D}{b} & {C}{b})

fact1: If someone is non-exegetic then the fact that he is a ectozoan and he is a varna does not hold. fact2: The fact that something depresses Caryocaraceae and it is a varna is wrong if it is not a ectozoan. fact3: Some man depresses Caryocaraceae if that person Chins. fact4: That ergocalciferol does not Chin. fact5: That scattergun is not a kind of a barnful if that ergocalciferol inspects Lancashire. fact6: If some man is not a Saturnia then that she is a Pallas that effeminizes is wrong. fact7: That scattergun does Chin if that scattergun deprecates declaration or it is not a kind of a Mullidae or both. fact8: That scattergun deprecates declaration or is not a kind of a Mullidae or both if the thing is a Millikan. fact9: If some man is not exegetic the fact that it is a varna and is a ectozoan is wrong. fact10: That something is exegetic and is a ectozoan is incorrect if it does not depress Caryocaraceae. fact11: If that scattergun is not a lagniappe and it does not guillotine Rothko then that scattergun is a Millikan. fact12: Some person is exegetic if she is a varna. fact13: That that scattergun is a Archosargus and it climbs Gliridae is incorrect. fact14: If the sclera depresses Caryocaraceae then that ergocalciferol is not a varna. fact15: If that scattergun is nonmusical then that scattergun is not a lagniappe and it does not guillotine Rothko. fact16: If that scattergun does paddle flaw then that scattergun is not a flushed and/or it is a kind of a Wodehouse. fact17: That ergocalciferol is both a varna and not a Lappish. fact18: That scattergun is nonmusical. fact19: Something is a kind of a ectozoan if it is not a flushed or a Wodehouse or both. fact20: That the fact that that scattergun is a barnful and is nonmusical is wrong is correct. fact21: That scattergun does paddle flaw. fact22: That scattergun is a kind of a varna.

fact1: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & {A}x) fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & {A}x) fact3: (x): {I}x -> {B}x fact4: ¬{I}{b} fact5: {CI}{b} -> ¬{CA}{a} fact6: (x): ¬{DI}x -> ¬({FG}x & {EL}x) fact7: ({K}{a} v ¬{J}{a}) -> {I}{a} fact8: {L}{a} -> ({K}{a} v ¬{J}{a}) fact9: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) fact10: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({D}x & {C}x) fact11: (¬{N}{a} & ¬{M}{a}) -> {L}{a} fact12: (x): {A}x -> {D}x fact13: ¬({ER}{a} & {DO}{a}) fact14: {B}{gu} -> ¬{A}{b} fact15: {O}{a} -> (¬{N}{a} & ¬{M}{a}) fact16: {H}{a} -> (¬{E}{a} v {F}{a}) fact17: ({A}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) fact18: {O}{a} fact19: (x): (¬{E}x v {F}x) -> {C}x fact20: ¬({CA}{a} & {O}{a}) fact21: {H}{a} fact22: {A}{a}

That ergocalciferol is not non-exegetic and the person is a ectozoan.

({D}{b} & {C}{b})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If someone is non-exegetic then the fact that he is a ectozoan and he is a varna does not hold. fact2: The fact that something depresses Caryocaraceae and it is a varna is wrong if it is not a ectozoan. fact3: Some man depresses Caryocaraceae if that person Chins. fact4: That ergocalciferol does not Chin. fact5: That scattergun is not a kind of a barnful if that ergocalciferol inspects Lancashire. fact6: If some man is not a Saturnia then that she is a Pallas that effeminizes is wrong. fact7: That scattergun does Chin if that scattergun deprecates declaration or it is not a kind of a Mullidae or both. fact8: That scattergun deprecates declaration or is not a kind of a Mullidae or both if the thing is a Millikan. fact9: If some man is not exegetic the fact that it is a varna and is a ectozoan is wrong. fact10: That something is exegetic and is a ectozoan is incorrect if it does not depress Caryocaraceae. fact11: If that scattergun is not a lagniappe and it does not guillotine Rothko then that scattergun is a Millikan. fact12: Some person is exegetic if she is a varna. fact13: That that scattergun is a Archosargus and it climbs Gliridae is incorrect. fact14: If the sclera depresses Caryocaraceae then that ergocalciferol is not a varna. fact15: If that scattergun is nonmusical then that scattergun is not a lagniappe and it does not guillotine Rothko. fact16: If that scattergun does paddle flaw then that scattergun is not a flushed and/or it is a kind of a Wodehouse. fact17: That ergocalciferol is both a varna and not a Lappish. fact18: That scattergun is nonmusical. fact19: Something is a kind of a ectozoan if it is not a flushed or a Wodehouse or both. fact20: That the fact that that scattergun is a barnful and is nonmusical is wrong is correct. fact21: That scattergun does paddle flaw. fact22: That scattergun is a kind of a varna. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that ergocalciferol is exegetic and it is a ectozoan is wrong. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That decapod does not observe Lufengpithecus.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: If something is transeunt but it is not an impatience it observes Lufengpithecus. fact2: The pointillist is balletic. fact3: That decapod is balletic. fact4: That decapod is an impatience if that murine is not sulfurized and it is not an impatience. fact5: This poke is transeunt but not an impatience if this poke is non-sulfurized. fact6: If some man is not transeunt then it does not observe Lufengpithecus and is not balletic. fact7: That decapod observes Lufengpithecus and is balletic. fact8: If that murine is not a kind of a Karttikeya that murine is not sulfurized and that person is not a kind of an impatience.

fact1: (x): ({C}x & ¬{D}x) -> {A}x fact2: {B}{fg} fact3: {B}{a} fact4: (¬{F}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> {D}{a} fact5: ¬{F}{fi} -> ({C}{fi} & ¬{D}{fi}) fact6: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) fact7: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact8: ¬{E}{b} -> (¬{F}{b} & ¬{D}{b})

This poke observes Lufengpithecus and this one does unite impoliteness.

({A}{fi} & {EH}{fi})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something is transeunt but it is not an impatience it observes Lufengpithecus. fact2: The pointillist is balletic. fact3: That decapod is balletic. fact4: That decapod is an impatience if that murine is not sulfurized and it is not an impatience. fact5: This poke is transeunt but not an impatience if this poke is non-sulfurized. fact6: If some man is not transeunt then it does not observe Lufengpithecus and is not balletic. fact7: That decapod observes Lufengpithecus and is balletic. fact8: If that murine is not a kind of a Karttikeya that murine is not sulfurized and that person is not a kind of an impatience. ; $hypothesis$ = That decapod does not observe Lufengpithecus. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That twins is autotrophic.

{B}{c}

fact1: Some person is autotrophic if it is not lentic or does not overcome or both. fact2: The fact that that birdcage is a THz and/or it is a kind of an epidemic is false if that desipramine does not overcome. fact3: That twins is not lentic if that desipramine is servile thing that is unswept. fact4: If that either that desipramine is a THz or it overcomes or both does not hold that birdcage is not a kind of an epidemic. fact5: That birdcage is not an epidemic. fact6: That twins is not autotrophic if that either that birdcage is a THz or it is an epidemic or both does not hold. fact7: That twins is autotrophic and overcomes if it is not lentic. fact8: That desipramine does not overcome. fact9: Something is not autotrophic if that this is not unsubmissive and this is autotrophic is incorrect. fact10: If that twins is not an epidemic the fact that that birdcage is a THz and/or the one is autotrophic is incorrect. fact11: That either Consuelo thickens megabucks or the thing is autotrophic or both is not right. fact12: That twins is not a kind of a McGraw. fact13: If that desipramine does not overcome then that birdcage is not an epidemic.

fact1: (x): (¬{C}x v ¬{A}x) -> {B}x fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) fact3: (¬{D}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{C}{c} fact4: ¬({AA}{a} v {A}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{b} fact5: ¬{AB}{b} fact6: ¬({AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact7: ¬{C}{c} -> ({B}{c} & {A}{c}) fact8: ¬{A}{a} fact9: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {B}x) -> ¬{B}x fact10: ¬{AB}{c} -> ¬({AA}{b} v {B}{b}) fact11: ¬({CE}{e} v {B}{e}) fact12: ¬{HO}{c} fact13: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b}

That that Kahlua overcomes and/or it is a question is wrong.

¬({A}{aj} v {JC}{aj})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some person is autotrophic if it is not lentic or does not overcome or both. fact2: The fact that that birdcage is a THz and/or it is a kind of an epidemic is false if that desipramine does not overcome. fact3: That twins is not lentic if that desipramine is servile thing that is unswept. fact4: If that either that desipramine is a THz or it overcomes or both does not hold that birdcage is not a kind of an epidemic. fact5: That birdcage is not an epidemic. fact6: That twins is not autotrophic if that either that birdcage is a THz or it is an epidemic or both does not hold. fact7: That twins is autotrophic and overcomes if it is not lentic. fact8: That desipramine does not overcome. fact9: Something is not autotrophic if that this is not unsubmissive and this is autotrophic is incorrect. fact10: If that twins is not an epidemic the fact that that birdcage is a THz and/or the one is autotrophic is incorrect. fact11: That either Consuelo thickens megabucks or the thing is autotrophic or both is not right. fact12: That twins is not a kind of a McGraw. fact13: If that desipramine does not overcome then that birdcage is not an epidemic. ; $hypothesis$ = That twins is autotrophic. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact8 -> int1: The fact that the fact that that birdcage is either a THz or an epidemic or both hold is wrong.; int1 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that landlessness does not occurs and this parroting Changjiang does not happens does not hold.

¬(¬{C} & ¬{D})

fact1: This dint does not occurs if the clayeiness occurs. fact2: The ransacking and that stinginess occurs. fact3: This refit does not occurs. fact4: The landedness is triggered by that that cosmolatry occurs. fact5: Both that Western and that cosmolatry occurs. fact6: Both the holy and this terminal happens. fact7: That the fact that that raising does not happens and that blinking quire does not occurs hold is not true if that primateship does not happens. fact8: That saccharifying Labridae happens. fact9: If the fact that that primateship occurs and this parking downstroke occurs is incorrect that primateship does not occurs. fact10: That landlessness does not occurs. fact11: That that landlessness does not occurs and this parroting Changjiang does not happens is caused by that cosmolatry. fact12: That bonelessness happens and the pining Renoir happens. fact13: If that the fact that that cosmolatry but notthat Western happens does not hold hold then that Western happens. fact14: That the rounder does not occurs is caused by that that catholicising happens. fact15: If that polymorphism happens that the fun does not occurs hold. fact16: That flaming obligato does not happens if the fact that that raising does not happens and that blinking quire does not happens does not hold. fact17: This redemptiveness does not happens. fact18: If that flaming obligato does not occurs then that that cosmolatry happens but that Western does not occurs does not hold. fact19: The fact that this reaching does not occurs and that cataclysm does not happens is right. fact20: That Western occurs.

fact1: {CP} -> ¬{IH} fact2: ({AT} & {IJ}) fact3: ¬{EG} fact4: {B} -> ¬{C} fact5: ({A} & {B}) fact6: ({FC} & {HI}) fact7: ¬{H} -> ¬(¬{G} & ¬{F}) fact8: {IO} fact9: ¬({H} & {J}) -> ¬{H} fact10: ¬{C} fact11: {B} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact12: ({GM} & {JA}) fact13: ¬({B} & ¬{A}) -> {A} fact14: {FB} -> ¬{DP} fact15: {EJ} -> ¬{HR} fact16: ¬(¬{G} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} fact17: ¬{EQ} fact18: ¬{E} -> ¬({B} & ¬{A}) fact19: (¬{CA} & ¬{IL}) fact20: {A}

The fact that that landlessness does not occurs and this parroting Changjiang does not happens does not hold.

¬(¬{C} & ¬{D})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This dint does not occurs if the clayeiness occurs. fact2: The ransacking and that stinginess occurs. fact3: This refit does not occurs. fact4: The landedness is triggered by that that cosmolatry occurs. fact5: Both that Western and that cosmolatry occurs. fact6: Both the holy and this terminal happens. fact7: That the fact that that raising does not happens and that blinking quire does not occurs hold is not true if that primateship does not happens. fact8: That saccharifying Labridae happens. fact9: If the fact that that primateship occurs and this parking downstroke occurs is incorrect that primateship does not occurs. fact10: That landlessness does not occurs. fact11: That that landlessness does not occurs and this parroting Changjiang does not happens is caused by that cosmolatry. fact12: That bonelessness happens and the pining Renoir happens. fact13: If that the fact that that cosmolatry but notthat Western happens does not hold hold then that Western happens. fact14: That the rounder does not occurs is caused by that that catholicising happens. fact15: If that polymorphism happens that the fun does not occurs hold. fact16: That flaming obligato does not happens if the fact that that raising does not happens and that blinking quire does not happens does not hold. fact17: This redemptiveness does not happens. fact18: If that flaming obligato does not occurs then that that cosmolatry happens but that Western does not occurs does not hold. fact19: The fact that this reaching does not occurs and that cataclysm does not happens is right. fact20: That Western occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that landlessness does not occurs and this parroting Changjiang does not happens does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> int1: That cosmolatry occurs.; int1 & fact11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That toothbrush roasts.

{B}{aa}

fact1: That that toothbrush is a kind of a equatability and is not a kind of a Pseudomonadales is incorrect. fact2: If some person is hypoglycemic then that it is not a kind of a PKD is not false. fact3: If that hulk is not a feasibleness that threadfin is a feasibleness. fact4: That that thunderhead roasts and this person is a erethism is false. fact5: This maravilla does not study dearness and/or it is not araceous if that threadfin is a feasibleness. fact6: If that stripling is not a kind of a Hosea but the one ripens prurience that compositor does not roast. fact7: Something does not roast if the fact that the thing is a equatability and the thing is not a kind of a Pseudomonadales does not hold. fact8: Andi does not adduce Schadenfreude if he/she is a inattentiveness. fact9: If this maravilla does not study dearness that stripling is a kind of a Diceros and ripens prurience. fact10: Something that does not study dearness and/or is not araceous does not study dearness. fact11: If that the fact that something does not feelings copse and/or does not fall supersymmetry hold does not hold that it does not pouch lepidophobia is right. fact12: If that hulk is saxicolous the fact that it does not feelings copse or it does not fall supersymmetry or both is incorrect. fact13: That hulk is saxicolous. fact14: If that that hulk does not pouch lepidophobia hold then that hulk is not a feasibleness or this one does not monopolise Arabic or both. fact15: Something does not roast if that it is a equatability is false.

fact1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact2: (x): {DC}x -> ¬{BL}x fact3: ¬{G}{d} -> {G}{c} fact4: ¬({B}{ir} & {AR}{ir}) fact5: {G}{c} -> (¬{E}{b} v ¬{F}{b}) fact6: (¬{A}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{B}{gr} fact7: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact8: {GT}{aj} -> ¬{AH}{aj} fact9: ¬{E}{b} -> ({D}{a} & {C}{a}) fact10: (x): (¬{E}x v ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x fact11: (x): ¬(¬{K}x v ¬{J}x) -> ¬{I}x fact12: {L}{d} -> ¬(¬{K}{d} v ¬{J}{d}) fact13: {L}{d} fact14: ¬{I}{d} -> (¬{G}{d} v ¬{H}{d}) fact15: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬{B}x

That compositor does not roast.

¬{B}{gr}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that toothbrush is a kind of a equatability and is not a kind of a Pseudomonadales is incorrect. fact2: If some person is hypoglycemic then that it is not a kind of a PKD is not false. fact3: If that hulk is not a feasibleness that threadfin is a feasibleness. fact4: That that thunderhead roasts and this person is a erethism is false. fact5: This maravilla does not study dearness and/or it is not araceous if that threadfin is a feasibleness. fact6: If that stripling is not a kind of a Hosea but the one ripens prurience that compositor does not roast. fact7: Something does not roast if the fact that the thing is a equatability and the thing is not a kind of a Pseudomonadales does not hold. fact8: Andi does not adduce Schadenfreude if he/she is a inattentiveness. fact9: If this maravilla does not study dearness that stripling is a kind of a Diceros and ripens prurience. fact10: Something that does not study dearness and/or is not araceous does not study dearness. fact11: If that the fact that something does not feelings copse and/or does not fall supersymmetry hold does not hold that it does not pouch lepidophobia is right. fact12: If that hulk is saxicolous the fact that it does not feelings copse or it does not fall supersymmetry or both is incorrect. fact13: That hulk is saxicolous. fact14: If that that hulk does not pouch lepidophobia hold then that hulk is not a feasibleness or this one does not monopolise Arabic or both. fact15: Something does not roast if that it is a equatability is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That toothbrush roasts. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> int1: That toothbrush does not roast if that he/she is a kind of a equatability and he/she is not a Pseudomonadales is not correct.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

If this Courtelle glances that this Courtelle is not a Placodermi and it is not a genie does not hold.

{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

fact1: If this Courtelle glances the fact that this Courtelle is a Placodermi but it is not a genie does not hold. fact2: If someone is a overage the fact that the one is a Tachypleus that does not conventionalise Telopea is wrong. fact3: The fact that this Courtelle is not credal and that one is not a Washington does not hold if this Courtelle is a genie. fact4: If this Courtelle glances that it is both not a Placodermi and a genie is wrong. fact5: If this Courtelle is a kind of a maximum that this Courtelle is not a kind of a Lobipes and it does not glance does not hold. fact6: That something outwears Annaba but this thing does not stay is wrong if this thing is a kind of a Mosan. fact7: That somebody is both not a Placodermi and not a genie is incorrect if he glances. fact8: That something is a Placodermi and is not a genie is false if it glances. fact9: If this Courtelle ends Wilmington it does not delve and is not a genie. fact10: If this Courtelle is a kind of a Radhakrishnan then the fact that it is a kind of non-orthographic thing that is not a maximum is wrong. fact11: Something is both not a Placodermi and not a genie if it glances. fact12: The fact that something is both not a Placodermi and a genie is false if this thing glances. fact13: If something is a Mylitta then that it is not a cancroid and is not a syllogism is incorrect. fact14: If something varies frailness that it is not exculpatory and it is not a Serinus is false. fact15: The fact that somebody is both a Parascalops and not a tuppence is false if this one is cervical. fact16: That something is not monotypic and that does not rescue is incorrect if that is ratty.

fact1: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact2: (x): {CO}x -> ¬({BO}x & ¬{DL}x) fact3: {AB}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AO}{aa} & ¬{JH}{aa}) fact4: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact5: {BU}{aa} -> ¬(¬{EC}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) fact6: (x): {CR}x -> ¬({FA}x & ¬{O}x) fact7: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact8: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact9: {GI}{aa} -> (¬{DU}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact10: {BR}{aa} -> ¬(¬{GN}{aa} & ¬{BU}{aa}) fact11: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact12: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact13: (x): {IM}x -> ¬(¬{GS}x & ¬{ES}x) fact14: (x): {AH}x -> ¬(¬{Q}x & ¬{J}x) fact15: (x): {CH}x -> ¬({IF}x & ¬{JC}x) fact16: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{CB}x & ¬{DS}x)

If this Courtelle varies frailness then that this Courtelle is not exculpatory and it is not a Serinus is incorrect.

{AH}{aa} -> ¬(¬{Q}{aa} & ¬{J}{aa})

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If this Courtelle glances the fact that this Courtelle is a Placodermi but it is not a genie does not hold. fact2: If someone is a overage the fact that the one is a Tachypleus that does not conventionalise Telopea is wrong. fact3: The fact that this Courtelle is not credal and that one is not a Washington does not hold if this Courtelle is a genie. fact4: If this Courtelle glances that it is both not a Placodermi and a genie is wrong. fact5: If this Courtelle is a kind of a maximum that this Courtelle is not a kind of a Lobipes and it does not glance does not hold. fact6: That something outwears Annaba but this thing does not stay is wrong if this thing is a kind of a Mosan. fact7: That somebody is both not a Placodermi and not a genie is incorrect if he glances. fact8: That something is a Placodermi and is not a genie is false if it glances. fact9: If this Courtelle ends Wilmington it does not delve and is not a genie. fact10: If this Courtelle is a kind of a Radhakrishnan then the fact that it is a kind of non-orthographic thing that is not a maximum is wrong. fact11: Something is both not a Placodermi and not a genie if it glances. fact12: The fact that something is both not a Placodermi and a genie is false if this thing glances. fact13: If something is a Mylitta then that it is not a cancroid and is not a syllogism is incorrect. fact14: If something varies frailness that it is not exculpatory and it is not a Serinus is false. fact15: The fact that somebody is both a Parascalops and not a tuppence is false if this one is cervical. fact16: That something is not monotypic and that does not rescue is incorrect if that is ratty. ; $hypothesis$ = If this Courtelle glances that this Courtelle is not a Placodermi and it is not a genie does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This transcription is not a Jesuit.

¬{B}{aa}

fact1: This mutilator does not SOP eubstance. fact2: This redcap does not accoutred histoincompatibility if the thing is both not an awarding and a flourish. fact3: This transcription is not a toilsomeness and is a decease. fact4: This transcription is a siderosis. fact5: Something that does not Whittle gummed and is a decease is not a kind of a Jesuit. fact6: If this mutilator does not SOP eubstance and is not fetal this thing is non-irrevocable.

fact1: ¬{F}{im} fact2: (¬{AM}{bi} & {GN}{bi}) -> ¬{DI}{bi} fact3: (¬{AR}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact4: {A}{aa} fact5: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact6: (¬{F}{im} & ¬{E}{im}) -> ¬{GI}{im}

The fact that this mutilator is non-irrevocable but he/she is not non-haematic hold.

(¬{GI}{im} & {BB}{im})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This mutilator does not SOP eubstance. fact2: This redcap does not accoutred histoincompatibility if the thing is both not an awarding and a flourish. fact3: This transcription is not a toilsomeness and is a decease. fact4: This transcription is a siderosis. fact5: Something that does not Whittle gummed and is a decease is not a kind of a Jesuit. fact6: If this mutilator does not SOP eubstance and is not fetal this thing is non-irrevocable. ; $hypothesis$ = This transcription is not a Jesuit. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that Rwandan is not a kind of a naif is correct.

¬{C}{b}

fact1: That Curl is not a budge. fact2: That Curl is angiospermous. fact3: If that something is not a budge and is not a kind of a naif is wrong then it is not angiospermous. fact4: If something is matriarchal then it is socioeconomic. fact5: That Rwandan is not a naif if the fact that that Curl is not a budge and not angiospermous is not true. fact6: If that that Curl is socioeconomic is correct then the fact that that Rwandan is both not a budge and not a naif is incorrect. fact7: If that Curl is not a services then that Curl is matriarchal and the thing is a kind of a simple. fact8: The fact that that Curl is a budge but that thing is not angiospermous is incorrect. fact9: Something is not a kind of a services and it is not cryptogamic if it is not a labeled.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} fact2: {B}{a} fact3: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact4: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact5: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact6: {D}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact7: ¬{G}{a} -> ({E}{a} & {F}{a}) fact8: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact9: (x): ¬{I}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{H}x)

That Rwandan is not angiospermous.

¬{B}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Curl is not a budge. fact2: That Curl is angiospermous. fact3: If that something is not a budge and is not a kind of a naif is wrong then it is not angiospermous. fact4: If something is matriarchal then it is socioeconomic. fact5: That Rwandan is not a naif if the fact that that Curl is not a budge and not angiospermous is not true. fact6: If that that Curl is socioeconomic is correct then the fact that that Rwandan is both not a budge and not a naif is incorrect. fact7: If that Curl is not a services then that Curl is matriarchal and the thing is a kind of a simple. fact8: The fact that that Curl is a budge but that thing is not angiospermous is incorrect. fact9: Something is not a kind of a services and it is not cryptogamic if it is not a labeled. ; $hypothesis$ = That that Rwandan is not a kind of a naif is correct. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that Curl is both not a budge and not angiospermous.; assump1 -> int1: That Curl is not angiospermous.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That that Curl is not a budge and is not angiospermous is incorrect.; int3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Gerson rats.

{B}{c}

fact1: Some person that does not venerate Limnos is not unmalted. fact2: If Gerson is not a custom then that that mandibula is not a speciousness and does not rat does not hold. fact3: Gerson is a custom if that nightgown is not unmalted. fact4: If that nightgown is not a custom that that mandibula is not non-vaginal but this is not a speciousness does not hold. fact5: The fact that Gerson is vaginal but it is not a Ovalipes is wrong. fact6: Gerson does not rat if that mandibula is vaginal. fact7: If the fact that that that nightgown is a custom does not hold is true then that that mandibula is not vaginal and is not a kind of a speciousness is wrong. fact8: That nightgown is not a custom. fact9: That nightgown does not rat.

fact1: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{C}x fact2: ¬{A}{c} -> ¬(¬{AB}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) fact3: ¬{C}{a} -> {A}{c} fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact5: ¬({AA}{c} & ¬{HG}{c}) fact6: {AA}{b} -> ¬{B}{c} fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact8: ¬{A}{a} fact9: ¬{B}{a}

Gerson rats.

{B}{c}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some person that does not venerate Limnos is not unmalted. fact2: If Gerson is not a custom then that that mandibula is not a speciousness and does not rat does not hold. fact3: Gerson is a custom if that nightgown is not unmalted. fact4: If that nightgown is not a custom that that mandibula is not non-vaginal but this is not a speciousness does not hold. fact5: The fact that Gerson is vaginal but it is not a Ovalipes is wrong. fact6: Gerson does not rat if that mandibula is vaginal. fact7: If the fact that that that nightgown is a custom does not hold is true then that that mandibula is not vaginal and is not a kind of a speciousness is wrong. fact8: That nightgown is not a custom. fact9: That nightgown does not rat. ; $hypothesis$ = Gerson rats. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This Europocentricness does not occurs.

¬{A}

fact1: The fusion does not occurs if this pogrom does not occurs. fact2: That libidinalness does not happens if that notthis specialism but that libidinalness happens is false. fact3: That notthat libidinalness but this foreknowing Chytridiomycetes happens results in that this pharmacologicness does not occurs. fact4: That exploratoriness does not happens if this bacillariness does not occurs. fact5: This pogrom does not happens. fact6: If the fusion does not happens that notthis specialism but that libidinalness happens is false. fact7: This non-Europocentricness and that exploratoriness occurs if this bacillariness happens. fact8: That that adventuring Zonotrichia happens and this bacillariness occurs is triggered by that this pharmacologicness does not occurs. fact9: That that timid occurs and this Europocentricness happens is triggered by that that exploratoriness does not occurs. fact10: That that pyrotechnics does not occurs brings about that that accountancy and this tempestuousness happens. fact11: This foreknowing Chytridiomycetes happens if this tempestuousness happens. fact12: If that this disowning unruliness does not happens is correct that uppercaseness occurs or that isosmoticness happens or both.

fact1: ¬{L} -> ¬{K} fact2: ¬(¬{I} & {F}) -> ¬{F} fact3: (¬{F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact4: ¬{C} -> ¬{B} fact5: ¬{L} fact6: ¬{K} -> ¬(¬{I} & {F}) fact7: {C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact8: ¬{E} -> ({D} & {C}) fact9: ¬{B} -> ({AL} & {A}) fact10: ¬{M} -> ({J} & {H}) fact11: {H} -> {G} fact12: ¬{P} -> ({N} v {O})

That timid occurs.

{AL}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fusion does not occurs if this pogrom does not occurs. fact2: That libidinalness does not happens if that notthis specialism but that libidinalness happens is false. fact3: That notthat libidinalness but this foreknowing Chytridiomycetes happens results in that this pharmacologicness does not occurs. fact4: That exploratoriness does not happens if this bacillariness does not occurs. fact5: This pogrom does not happens. fact6: If the fusion does not happens that notthis specialism but that libidinalness happens is false. fact7: This non-Europocentricness and that exploratoriness occurs if this bacillariness happens. fact8: That that adventuring Zonotrichia happens and this bacillariness occurs is triggered by that this pharmacologicness does not occurs. fact9: That that timid occurs and this Europocentricness happens is triggered by that that exploratoriness does not occurs. fact10: That that pyrotechnics does not occurs brings about that that accountancy and this tempestuousness happens. fact11: This foreknowing Chytridiomycetes happens if this tempestuousness happens. fact12: If that this disowning unruliness does not happens is correct that uppercaseness occurs or that isosmoticness happens or both. ; $hypothesis$ = This Europocentricness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Let's assume that that that honoring does not occurs and this appealing does not occurs does not hold.

¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: That this logrolling occidentalism and that acousticness happens is wrong. fact2: If that both this logrolling occidentalism and that acousticness happens is wrong that acousticness does not happens. fact3: That that acousticness occurs hold if the fact that that honoring does not happens and this appealing does not happens does not hold.

fact1: ¬({A} & {B}) fact2: ¬({A} & {B}) -> ¬{B} fact3: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That this logrolling occidentalism and that acousticness happens is wrong. fact2: If that both this logrolling occidentalism and that acousticness happens is wrong that acousticness does not happens. fact3: That that acousticness occurs hold if the fact that that honoring does not happens and this appealing does not happens does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that that that honoring does not occurs and this appealing does not occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that honoring does not occurs and this appealing does not occurs does not hold.; fact3 & assump1 -> int1: That that acousticness happens is correct.; fact2 & fact1 -> int2: That acousticness does not happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This brainstem is unvigilant and it is accordant.

({B}{b} & {C}{b})

fact1: If there exists something such that it is impolite then the fact that that this inundation is not a perennial is false is correct. fact2: This brainstem is not neurogenic. fact3: This inundation is a perennial if there exists some man such that that he is not a Atlantic and is not impolite is wrong. fact4: If something that is not important does not spellbound then it is not a kind of a perennial. fact5: Some person is accordant if the person is important. fact6: This brainstem is unvigilant if this inundation is a kind of a perennial. fact7: That something is not alert and not non-accordant does not hold if it is not a kind of a perennial. fact8: If the fact that this brainstem is not neurogenic is true then she/he is important and/or spellbounds. fact9: There is somebody such that that it is not a Atlantic and it is not impolite is incorrect. fact10: There exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Atlantic and it is impolite is not correct. fact11: There is something such that that it is a kind of a Atlantic and it is not impolite is incorrect. fact12: Someone is accordant if it spellbounds.

fact1: (x): {AB}x -> {A}{a} fact2: ¬{F}{b} fact3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} fact4: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{A}x fact5: (x): {E}x -> {C}x fact6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x & {C}x) fact8: ¬{F}{b} -> ({E}{b} v {D}{b}) fact9: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact10: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact11: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact12: (x): {D}x -> {C}x

That this brainstem is unvigilant and the one is accordant is incorrect.

¬({B}{b} & {C}{b})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If there exists something such that it is impolite then the fact that that this inundation is not a perennial is false is correct. fact2: This brainstem is not neurogenic. fact3: This inundation is a perennial if there exists some man such that that he is not a Atlantic and is not impolite is wrong. fact4: If something that is not important does not spellbound then it is not a kind of a perennial. fact5: Some person is accordant if the person is important. fact6: This brainstem is unvigilant if this inundation is a kind of a perennial. fact7: That something is not alert and not non-accordant does not hold if it is not a kind of a perennial. fact8: If the fact that this brainstem is not neurogenic is true then she/he is important and/or spellbounds. fact9: There is somebody such that that it is not a Atlantic and it is not impolite is incorrect. fact10: There exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Atlantic and it is impolite is not correct. fact11: There is something such that that it is a kind of a Atlantic and it is not impolite is incorrect. fact12: Someone is accordant if it spellbounds. ; $hypothesis$ = This brainstem is unvigilant and it is accordant. ; $proof$ =

fact9 & fact3 -> int1: This inundation is a perennial.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: This brainstem is unvigilant.; fact12 -> int3: This brainstem is accordant if the fact that it spellbounds hold.; fact5 -> int4: This brainstem is accordant if that thing is not unimportant.; fact8 & fact2 -> int5: This brainstem is important and/or does spellbound.; int3 & int4 & int5 -> int6: This brainstem is accordant.; int2 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That oophorectomy happens.

{B}

fact1: That this indissolubleness does not occurs hold. fact2: If this depilation occurs this postnatalness happens. fact3: The Burmeseness happens. fact4: If this postnatalness happens the refilling Melpomene occurs. fact5: The fact that this Dionysianness happens is true if this enfeeblement and that non-clockwiseness happens. fact6: The adversity does not happens. fact7: The allocation but notthe tampering happens. fact8: The fact that both that non-cementitiousness and that non-unattachedness happens does not hold if the refilling Melpomene occurs. fact9: That the hooking but notthe bacterialness occurs is true. fact10: This syncope does not occurs. fact11: That this calcifugousness and this flies happens results in this enfeeblement. fact12: This rescinding occurs if the fact that both that unregisteredness and the unsupportiveness happens is right. fact13: That stylizing Gulo does not happens if the fact that that cementitiousness does not occurs and the unattachedness does not happens is not right. fact14: The stalinising Tully does not occurs. fact15: If that this restituting Suharto but notthis anesthetizing Pseudaletia occurs is wrong then this depilation happens. fact16: That both that negligence and this wonder occurs brings about that this plumbaginaceousness happens. fact17: That leniency occurs. fact18: That oophorectomy does not occurs and this gaming Freya occurs if the fact that that stylizing Gulo occurs is incorrect. fact19: If the allocation but notthe tampering happens then that oophorectomy occurs.

fact1: ¬{IT} fact2: {H} -> {G} fact3: {GK} fact4: {G} -> {F} fact5: ({GC} & ¬{FR}) -> {CL} fact6: ¬{ET} fact7: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact8: {F} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact9: ({IQ} & ¬{DT}) fact10: ¬{GI} fact11: ({HM} & {FB}) -> {GC} fact12: ({GG} & {EJ}) -> {JB} fact13: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact14: ¬{IK} fact15: ¬({J} & ¬{I}) -> {H} fact16: ({N} & {O}) -> {JD} fact17: {CH} fact18: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} & {A}) fact19: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B}

That oophorectomy does not happens.

¬{B}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this indissolubleness does not occurs hold. fact2: If this depilation occurs this postnatalness happens. fact3: The Burmeseness happens. fact4: If this postnatalness happens the refilling Melpomene occurs. fact5: The fact that this Dionysianness happens is true if this enfeeblement and that non-clockwiseness happens. fact6: The adversity does not happens. fact7: The allocation but notthe tampering happens. fact8: The fact that both that non-cementitiousness and that non-unattachedness happens does not hold if the refilling Melpomene occurs. fact9: That the hooking but notthe bacterialness occurs is true. fact10: This syncope does not occurs. fact11: That this calcifugousness and this flies happens results in this enfeeblement. fact12: This rescinding occurs if the fact that both that unregisteredness and the unsupportiveness happens is right. fact13: That stylizing Gulo does not happens if the fact that that cementitiousness does not occurs and the unattachedness does not happens is not right. fact14: The stalinising Tully does not occurs. fact15: If that this restituting Suharto but notthis anesthetizing Pseudaletia occurs is wrong then this depilation happens. fact16: That both that negligence and this wonder occurs brings about that this plumbaginaceousness happens. fact17: That leniency occurs. fact18: That oophorectomy does not occurs and this gaming Freya occurs if the fact that that stylizing Gulo occurs is incorrect. fact19: If the allocation but notthe tampering happens then that oophorectomy occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That oophorectomy happens. ; $proof$ =

fact19 & fact7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This harness is a kind of a legislature.

{B}{b}

fact1: That the fact that this harness is a Reduviidae but it is not Wilder hold does not hold if that snakeberry is a legislature. fact2: This harness jabbers opportuneness. fact3: The fact that this harness is a Beninese and it is Wilder does not hold if that snakeberry is a Reduviidae. fact4: Something is not a kind of a legislature if the fact that this is a kind of a Beninese that is not Wilder is not true. fact5: Something is not a legislature if it is not non-Wilder. fact6: If that snakeberry is a Reduviidae that this harness is a Beninese but he is not Wilder is incorrect. fact7: The fact that this harness is not a kind of a legislature is true if the fact that this harness is not non-Wilder hold. fact8: Some man is a legislature and is a kind of a Reduviidae if that person is not a commonness. fact9: That this harness is a Beninese and Wilder is false.

fact1: {B}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact2: {GP}{b} fact3: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact4: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact5: (x): {AB}x -> ¬{B}x fact6: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact7: {AB}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact9: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b})

This harness is a kind of a legislature.

{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That the fact that this harness is a Reduviidae but it is not Wilder hold does not hold if that snakeberry is a legislature. fact2: This harness jabbers opportuneness. fact3: The fact that this harness is a Beninese and it is Wilder does not hold if that snakeberry is a Reduviidae. fact4: Something is not a kind of a legislature if the fact that this is a kind of a Beninese that is not Wilder is not true. fact5: Something is not a legislature if it is not non-Wilder. fact6: If that snakeberry is a Reduviidae that this harness is a Beninese but he is not Wilder is incorrect. fact7: The fact that this harness is not a kind of a legislature is true if the fact that this harness is not non-Wilder hold. fact8: Some man is a legislature and is a kind of a Reduviidae if that person is not a commonness. fact9: That this harness is a Beninese and Wilder is false. ; $hypothesis$ = This harness is a kind of a legislature. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This cheeseflower is a swob or it is not a wisdom or both.

({C}{a} v ¬{B}{a})

fact1: Something is not a kind of a Saxon if it dimensions Aix. fact2: That something either is a kind of a swob or is not a wisdom or both is false if this is a wisdom. fact3: If Lynda makes Synchytrium then Lynda is not a Sarcochilus. fact4: A wisdom is a Saxon. fact5: Lynda makes Synchytrium if that glycogenesis makes Synchytrium. fact6: If some man is not a kind of a Sarcochilus then he/she is not unassisted. fact7: This cheeseflower is a Saxon and is a wisdom. fact8: That something is a swob and/or is not a kind of a wisdom is correct if that is not a Saxon. fact9: The fact that someone dimensions Aix and it distributes Luce is right if it is not a epanalepsis. fact10: If Lynda is not unassisted this shelver is a epanalepsis and is not a Konakri. fact11: Someone is a kind of a wisdom if it is not a swob and/or it dimensions Aix. fact12: The fact that either something is a Bhadon or it is not a Sarcochilus or both does not hold if it is a Sarcochilus. fact13: If this shelver is a epanalepsis but this is not a Konakri then that this cheeseflower is not a epanalepsis hold.

fact1: (x): {D}x -> ¬{A}x fact2: (x): {B}x -> ¬({C}x v ¬{B}x) fact3: {J}{c} -> ¬{I}{c} fact4: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact5: {J}{d} -> {J}{c} fact6: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬{G}x fact7: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({C}x v ¬{B}x) fact9: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) fact10: ¬{G}{c} -> ({F}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) fact11: (x): (¬{C}x v {D}x) -> {B}x fact12: (x): {I}x -> ¬({BK}x v ¬{I}x) fact13: ({F}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) -> ¬{F}{a}

This cheeseflower is a swob or it is not a wisdom or both.

({C}{a} v ¬{B}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something is not a kind of a Saxon if it dimensions Aix. fact2: That something either is a kind of a swob or is not a wisdom or both is false if this is a wisdom. fact3: If Lynda makes Synchytrium then Lynda is not a Sarcochilus. fact4: A wisdom is a Saxon. fact5: Lynda makes Synchytrium if that glycogenesis makes Synchytrium. fact6: If some man is not a kind of a Sarcochilus then he/she is not unassisted. fact7: This cheeseflower is a Saxon and is a wisdom. fact8: That something is a swob and/or is not a kind of a wisdom is correct if that is not a Saxon. fact9: The fact that someone dimensions Aix and it distributes Luce is right if it is not a epanalepsis. fact10: If Lynda is not unassisted this shelver is a epanalepsis and is not a Konakri. fact11: Someone is a kind of a wisdom if it is not a swob and/or it dimensions Aix. fact12: The fact that either something is a Bhadon or it is not a Sarcochilus or both does not hold if it is a Sarcochilus. fact13: If this shelver is a epanalepsis but this is not a Konakri then that this cheeseflower is not a epanalepsis hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This cheeseflower is a swob or it is not a wisdom or both. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> int1: This cheeseflower is a kind of a wisdom.; fact2 -> int2: If this cheeseflower is a wisdom the fact that either it is a swob or it is not a wisdom or both is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that this drywall is artesian but it is not a summary is wrong.

¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: This drywall does not awake if the fact that this Friesian either is a natural or is not identifiable or both is incorrect. fact2: If something does not awake that it is artesian and is not a kind of a summary does not hold. fact3: This drywall is not a summary. fact4: This drywall is artesian but it is not a summary. fact5: That something is a natural and/or that thing is not identifiable is incorrect if that thing is not Chasidic. fact6: The heartseed is a Styracaceae but this is not artesian.

fact1: ¬({C}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact3: ¬{AB}{a} fact4: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x v ¬{B}x) fact6: ({DQ}{am} & ¬{AA}{am})

The fact that this drywall is artesian but it is not a summary is wrong.

¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This drywall does not awake if the fact that this Friesian either is a natural or is not identifiable or both is incorrect. fact2: If something does not awake that it is artesian and is not a kind of a summary does not hold. fact3: This drywall is not a summary. fact4: This drywall is artesian but it is not a summary. fact5: That something is a natural and/or that thing is not identifiable is incorrect if that thing is not Chasidic. fact6: The heartseed is a Styracaceae but this is not artesian. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this drywall is artesian but it is not a summary is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that shredding and that spill happens does not hold.

¬({A} & {C})

fact1: Both the Advent and that luginging occurs. fact2: If that concentricness occurs this hydropathicness occurs. fact3: That spill happens. fact4: If this warp does not occurs then the fact that notthat togging Gaborone but that lightness happens does not hold. fact5: That that shredding occurs and that spill happens is not correct if that lightness does not happens. fact6: That shredding happens and that lightness occurs. fact7: That concentricness occurs if that follicularness occurs. fact8: That lightness occurs. fact9: The candoes not occurs and this insinuating paleolithic does not occurs if this hydropathicness happens. fact10: That that eusporangiateness and that follicularness occurs is correct if this peopling appetence does not occurs. fact11: That concording happens and this galvanizing happens if the thump does not occurs. fact12: The thump does not happens if the candoes not occurs and this insinuating paleolithic does not occurs. fact13: That lightness happens or that shredding happens or both if the fact that this warp does not occurs is correct. fact14: If that concording happens then notthis warp but this homogenousness occurs. fact15: That lightness does not happens if the fact that that togging Gaborone does not happens and that lightness occurs is wrong.

fact1: ({EG} & {FN}) fact2: {M} -> {L} fact3: {C} fact4: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & {B}) fact5: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) fact6: ({A} & {B}) fact7: {N} -> {M} fact8: {B} fact9: {L} -> (¬{K} & ¬{J}) fact10: ¬{P} -> ({O} & {N}) fact11: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact12: (¬{K} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{I} fact13: ¬{E} -> ({B} v {A}) fact14: {G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) fact15: ¬(¬{D} & {B}) -> ¬{B}

Both that entrepreneurialness and that peaching Citrullus happens.

({IA} & {EK})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Both the Advent and that luginging occurs. fact2: If that concentricness occurs this hydropathicness occurs. fact3: That spill happens. fact4: If this warp does not occurs then the fact that notthat togging Gaborone but that lightness happens does not hold. fact5: That that shredding occurs and that spill happens is not correct if that lightness does not happens. fact6: That shredding happens and that lightness occurs. fact7: That concentricness occurs if that follicularness occurs. fact8: That lightness occurs. fact9: The candoes not occurs and this insinuating paleolithic does not occurs if this hydropathicness happens. fact10: That that eusporangiateness and that follicularness occurs is correct if this peopling appetence does not occurs. fact11: That concording happens and this galvanizing happens if the thump does not occurs. fact12: The thump does not happens if the candoes not occurs and this insinuating paleolithic does not occurs. fact13: That lightness happens or that shredding happens or both if the fact that this warp does not occurs is correct. fact14: If that concording happens then notthis warp but this homogenousness occurs. fact15: That lightness does not happens if the fact that that togging Gaborone does not happens and that lightness occurs is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = That that shredding and that spill happens does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact6 -> int1: That shredding happens.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That liquidising does not happens but this routing WbN occurs.

(¬{B} & {A})

fact1: This popping Bligh does not happens but this luxuriating SD happens. fact2: If the miracle does not happens then the fact that that synergisticness happens and/or this luxuriating SD happens is true. fact3: This luminescence does not happens and this blanking blamelessness does not occurs if this popping Bligh happens. fact4: That resolution does not occurs. fact5: This routing WbN occurs. fact6: That this foreignness does not occurs and this spangling does not happens is false if this luminescence does not occurs. fact7: That hardship does not occurs and/or that repositinging pct does not occurs. fact8: That gala does not happens but that wattage occurs. fact9: The modernising drusen does not happens. fact10: The flouring rhinorrhea occurs. fact11: The owing Nagoya happens and/or this nonprotractileness does not occurs. fact12: This progressiveness does not happens. fact13: The licking winded does not happens or this nonprotractileness happens or both. fact14: If the atrophying does not happens then the miracle does not occurs. fact15: This spangling occurs if the fact that this foreignness does not happens and this spangling does not occurs is false. fact16: That that liquidising does not happens is triggered by either that that hardship does not happens or that that repositinging pct does not occurs or both. fact17: If this routing WbN does not occurs then notthe uneasiness but this pileup happens. fact18: If this spangling happens that notthat liquidising but this routing WbN occurs is incorrect. fact19: That orthodoxness does not occurs if the challenging happens. fact20: That the atrophying happens is prevented by that notthat orthodoxness but that gratefulness occurs. fact21: This blanking blamelessness does not occurs and this foreignness does not occurs if this popping Bligh does not happens.

fact1: (¬{G} & {H}) fact2: ¬{J} -> ({I} v {H}) fact3: {G} -> (¬{D} & ¬{F}) fact4: ¬{FE} fact5: {A} fact6: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{C}) fact7: (¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) fact8: (¬{FQ} & {GP}) fact9: ¬{HH} fact10: {T} fact11: ({HN} v ¬{U}) fact12: ¬{HS} fact13: (¬{EM} v {U}) fact14: ¬{K} -> ¬{J} fact15: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{C}) -> {C} fact16: (¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact17: ¬{A} -> (¬{EQ} & {CK}) fact18: {C} -> ¬(¬{B} & {A}) fact19: {N} -> ¬{L} fact20: (¬{L} & {M}) -> ¬{K} fact21: ¬{G} -> (¬{F} & ¬{E})

The fact that notthat liquidising but this routing WbN happens does not hold.

¬(¬{B} & {A})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This popping Bligh does not happens but this luxuriating SD happens. fact2: If the miracle does not happens then the fact that that synergisticness happens and/or this luxuriating SD happens is true. fact3: This luminescence does not happens and this blanking blamelessness does not occurs if this popping Bligh happens. fact4: That resolution does not occurs. fact5: This routing WbN occurs. fact6: That this foreignness does not occurs and this spangling does not happens is false if this luminescence does not occurs. fact7: That hardship does not occurs and/or that repositinging pct does not occurs. fact8: That gala does not happens but that wattage occurs. fact9: The modernising drusen does not happens. fact10: The flouring rhinorrhea occurs. fact11: The owing Nagoya happens and/or this nonprotractileness does not occurs. fact12: This progressiveness does not happens. fact13: The licking winded does not happens or this nonprotractileness happens or both. fact14: If the atrophying does not happens then the miracle does not occurs. fact15: This spangling occurs if the fact that this foreignness does not happens and this spangling does not occurs is false. fact16: That that liquidising does not happens is triggered by either that that hardship does not happens or that that repositinging pct does not occurs or both. fact17: If this routing WbN does not occurs then notthe uneasiness but this pileup happens. fact18: If this spangling happens that notthat liquidising but this routing WbN occurs is incorrect. fact19: That orthodoxness does not occurs if the challenging happens. fact20: That the atrophying happens is prevented by that notthat orthodoxness but that gratefulness occurs. fact21: This blanking blamelessness does not occurs and this foreignness does not occurs if this popping Bligh does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That liquidising does not happens but this routing WbN occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact16 & fact7 -> int1: That liquidising does not happens.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This jugular happens.

{C}

fact1: If this collapsibleness does not occurs then both this kicking and that completing Ginsberg happens. fact2: If this overexploitation does not occurs that fettering sanctitude happens and that punning thought happens. fact3: That punning thought happens. fact4: That this dangerousness occurs results in that that ease does not happens and that nocking modishness does not occurs. fact5: That the fact that this overexploitation does not happens or that punning thought does not happens or both is true is not correct if this misdemeanour does not occurs. fact6: This collapsibleness does not happens if either that Orphicness occurs or that ease does not occurs or both. fact7: If that both that non-dangerousness and that non-archangelicness occurs does not hold this dangerousness happens. fact8: This featuring happens. fact9: If this kicking happens this misdemeanour does not occurs. fact10: If that completing Ginsberg does not occurs this kicking and that charades occurs. fact11: That both this jugular and this misdemeanour occurs is wrong if that ease does not occurs. fact12: If this featuring does not happens then that this dangerousness does not happens and the archangelicness does not happens does not hold. fact13: That punning thought and this overexploitation occurs.

fact1: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact2: ¬{B} -> ({S} & {A}) fact3: {A} fact4: {K} -> (¬{H} & ¬{J}) fact5: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{B} v ¬{A}) fact6: ({I} v ¬{H}) -> ¬{G} fact7: ¬(¬{K} & ¬{L}) -> {K} fact8: {M} fact9: {E} -> ¬{D} fact10: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {FQ}) fact11: ¬{H} -> ¬({C} & {D}) fact12: ¬{M} -> ¬(¬{K} & ¬{L}) fact13: ({A} & {B})

That fettering sanctitude and that charades happens.

({S} & {FQ})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this collapsibleness does not occurs then both this kicking and that completing Ginsberg happens. fact2: If this overexploitation does not occurs that fettering sanctitude happens and that punning thought happens. fact3: That punning thought happens. fact4: That this dangerousness occurs results in that that ease does not happens and that nocking modishness does not occurs. fact5: That the fact that this overexploitation does not happens or that punning thought does not happens or both is true is not correct if this misdemeanour does not occurs. fact6: This collapsibleness does not happens if either that Orphicness occurs or that ease does not occurs or both. fact7: If that both that non-dangerousness and that non-archangelicness occurs does not hold this dangerousness happens. fact8: This featuring happens. fact9: If this kicking happens this misdemeanour does not occurs. fact10: If that completing Ginsberg does not occurs this kicking and that charades occurs. fact11: That both this jugular and this misdemeanour occurs is wrong if that ease does not occurs. fact12: If this featuring does not happens then that this dangerousness does not happens and the archangelicness does not happens does not hold. fact13: That punning thought and this overexploitation occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This jugular happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that sedimentation does not happens and this alphamericalness occurs is incorrect.

¬(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: If this alluding does not happens then the rustication occurs and that cryosurgery happens. fact2: That that sedimentation does not occurs but this alphamericalness occurs is incorrect if that cryosurgery happens. fact3: That that cryosurgery does not happens hold if the fact that this apomicticness but notthis alluding occurs does not hold. fact4: The fact that that counselorship occurs and that credulousness does not occurs is false if that microcephalousness does not occurs. fact5: If this celiocentesis occurs then both that non-perpendicularness and that non-heterotrophicness happens. fact6: If this perpendicularness does not occurs then the fact that this apomicticness but notthis alluding occurs does not hold. fact7: This celiocentesis occurs if the fact that that counselorship but notthat credulousness happens is false. fact8: That notthat sedimentation but this alphamericalness happens is triggered by that that cryosurgery does not happens. fact9: The fact that the acculturationalness and the snicking occurs does not hold. fact10: The driving occurs.

fact1: ¬{B} -> ({P} & {A}) fact2: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact3: ¬({C} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{A} fact4: ¬{I} -> ¬({H} & ¬{G}) fact5: {F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) fact6: ¬{D} -> ¬({C} & ¬{B}) fact7: ¬({H} & ¬{G}) -> {F} fact8: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact9: ¬({CH} & {CG}) fact10: {EC}

The rustication occurs.

{P}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this alluding does not happens then the rustication occurs and that cryosurgery happens. fact2: That that sedimentation does not occurs but this alphamericalness occurs is incorrect if that cryosurgery happens. fact3: That that cryosurgery does not happens hold if the fact that this apomicticness but notthis alluding occurs does not hold. fact4: The fact that that counselorship occurs and that credulousness does not occurs is false if that microcephalousness does not occurs. fact5: If this celiocentesis occurs then both that non-perpendicularness and that non-heterotrophicness happens. fact6: If this perpendicularness does not occurs then the fact that this apomicticness but notthis alluding occurs does not hold. fact7: This celiocentesis occurs if the fact that that counselorship but notthat credulousness happens is false. fact8: That notthat sedimentation but this alphamericalness happens is triggered by that that cryosurgery does not happens. fact9: The fact that the acculturationalness and the snicking occurs does not hold. fact10: The driving occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That that sedimentation does not happens and this alphamericalness occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__