Datasets:

haritzpuerto

/

the_pile_00_Enron_Emails

like 0

---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Homco/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 11:03 AM --------------------------- From: Corry Bentley 11/28/2000 11:02 AM To: Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: FW: > (See attached file: democrat.bmp) <<democrat.bmp>> - democrat.bmp

The report named: VaR and Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=22&report_name=VaR+and+Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=5&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/19/2001>, published as of 10/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website. (Revision: 3)

Dave: Per my voice mail message, this entity would like to sign the same amendment letter that kinder Morgan signed which I have attached. Please let me know if this is okay with you. Thanks.

? Sources report that SoCal Chairman, John Bryson, and Governor Davis were roommates together at Stanford in the early 60's. This longstanding relationship may provide some explanation for SoCal's willingness to negotiate with the governor and the governor's determination to reach a solution with SoCal. ? Voluntary bankruptcy reportedly is "not an option" for SoCal. However, the possibility remains that SoCal's creditors will take them into involuntary bankruptcy. If the state's purchase of the transmission assets is delayed, it appears that the possibility of this occurring will increase. ? However, the agreement by the state to purchase SoCal's transmission assets is actually a Memorandum of Understanding. The agreement reportedly was rushed for "political purposes," but the details still remain to be decided. It is possible, the 60-day deadline stated in the memorandum may have to be extended. ? PG&E reportedly refused to part with its transmission assets in its negotiations with the governor. PG&E makes more money on transmission than distribution of power, the opposite is true for SoCal.

534492 has been changed back to buy from williams through APB Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON 02/28/2001 02:37 PM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: 1/28 Checkout-update AMEREX WEST Chris Mallory I am missing the following deals: 1) Enron buys from Duke 25 mw of off-peak SP-15 for 3/2-3/31 at $150 with fee of .0075 2) Enron sells to Sempra 25 mw of off-peak SP-15 for 3/2-3/31 at $162 with fee of .0075 (our deal 534490...has NP-15...Amerex says Sp-15) PREBON WEST Tom Alonso I am missing the following deals: 1) Enron buys from Williams Bal of PV 25 mw at $230 2) Enron sells to Williams Bal of PV 25 mw at $229 (our deal 534494...has buy.....Prebon says Sell) ---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001 04:35 PM --------------------------- Evelyn Metoyer 02/28/2001 04:29 PM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: 1/28 Checkout AMEREX WEST Chris Mallory I am missing the following deals: 1) Enron buys from Duke 25 mw of off-peak SP-15 for 3/2-3/31 at $150 with fee of .0075 2) Enron sells to Sempra 25 mw of off-peak SP-15 for 3/2-3/31 at $162 with fee of .0075 PREBON WEST Tom Alonso I am missing the following deals: 1) Enron buys from Williams Bal of PV 25 mw at $230 2) Enron sells to Williams Bal of PV 25 mw at $229 Matt Motley I am missing the following deals: 1) Enron buys from Williams Q3 Mid-C 25 mw at $370 2) Deal 534382 Prebon shows location as SP-15 not NP-15 Tim Beldon I am missing the following deals: 1) Enron sells to Constellation 25 mw of Q4 SP-15 at $165 2) Enron sells to Constellation 25 mw of Q4 SP-15 at $169 BLOOMBERG All trades are good. Thanks!!

Attached is a listing of trades that Enron Credit did in the name of Enron North America and ECT Investments Inc. I had requested so that we have a listing when Bryan and Simon are no longer in London. Sheila -----Original Message----- From: Hemsley, Simon Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:40 AM To: Glover, Sheila Cc: Seyfried, Bryan Subject: As requested Sheila - this is sorted by company/counterparty

https://iso_si/iso/

Attached please find an updated power credit watchlist dated 11/27/00. Please direct any comments/questions to the credit hotline, (713) 853-1803 Veronica Gonzalez

Dave, Thanks. I shall join you there. Vince David Ikenberry <daveike@rice.edu> on 03/12/2001 10:17:48 AM To: George Kanatas <kanatas@rice.edu>, "vkamins@ennron.com" <vkamins@enron.com>, jfleming@ruf.rice.edu cc: ostdiek@rice.edu Subject: Karolyi dinner tonight I'm writing to confirm our dinner plans with Andrew Karolyi for this evening. We have reservations for 7 pm at Damian's, 3011 Smith St., 713.522.0439 Dave *********************************** Prof. David Ikenberry Jones Graduate School of Management Rice University 713-348-5385

RIGZONE DAILY NEWS -- FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2002 ------------------------------------------------------------ Daily News from the worldwide upstream oil & gas industry to view the complete version, please go to: http://www.rigzone.com/newsletter_show.asp?n_id=223 ------------------------------------------------------------

This is a resume of one guy I met in Houston a few months ago. He comes across as a very bright and qualified individual. He is interested in a position in London. Who is the best person in London to forward the resume to? Vince

I'm out thurs and friday this week. In next week, though. Let me know what might work say next tues/wed thanks

Salerno Swap Agreement
) Discussion Timeline Salerno deal: 6 months, Nov
,00
) Apr
,01, LLDPE swap sold at 39.5 cpp basis CMAI mid. Deal discussed Oct 2-6, verbal agreement was reached on the 5th. Faxed non-binding indication sheet initialed by Bob Lampo on Oct 5. 10/03, Tues: Salerno calls requesting quote, we quote verbally a couple hours later that same day. 10/05, Thur: Conversations during which Bob negotiates price and we hold firm. Also conversations during which I question him about whether or not he
, s back to backing the deal and what are his motivations for entering into the deal. He wouldn't elucidate on any of the questions. Finally discussions regarding the need for a credit check, and the likely requirement for an LC. He asked at that point how large an LC would be required, I informed that I didn
,t know but that it depended on credit
,s review of his business and of our forward view on the market. We agreed on price and all commercial terms. I informed that I would fax an indication sheet and that he should initial it then return it to me by fax to indicate his approval of the deal. He did so. 10/11, Wed: conversation regarding financial docs being sent to credit (details in tape transcript). 10/17, 19 or 20: messages from Bob asking for clarification on the confirm. Message from me roughly explaining the salient points of the confirm. Subsequent conversation sharing the good news that he
,d been granted a credit line of $250k and for exposure beyond that he
,d have to post an LC. No indication of any refusal of our terms at that point (details once tapes reviewed). 10/23-27: no conversations that I can recall 10/30, Mon: Received Salerno message communicating intention to renege (vacation day) 10/31, Tue: Legal advised. Bob
,s message forwarded 11/1, Wed: travelling..msg left with Bob Lampo at Salerno stating that our position was that a deal was in place as he faxed to us our term sheet with his initials and we had done a credit check giving him a line of credit. 11/2, Thu: Confirms sent to legal 11/3, Fri: Legal calls Salerno. Message left. 11/6-9, Mon to Thu: messages traded with legal 11/10, Fri: Legal recommends pulling the tapes. 11/14, Tues: Legal calls Salerno. Message left. Bob responds with his own message. Bob doesn
,t dispute price but does dispute credit terms and uses this as basis to drop the deal. Tapes received. Transcripts of Nov 11 conversation made. Additional tapes requested for 10-16, 19, 20. 11/16, Thur: Meeting with Richard, Sara, Jay, Doug and Alan. Message left with Bob Lampo informing that we were willing to work with him on addressing his credit issues. Call not yet returned.

Thanks very much Anita - that makes good sense to me. I'll coordinate through QD. Anita Fam 01/12/99 09:19 PM To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: QD Legal Hi Mark - Julia Deans from the QD Singapore office got in touch with me this morning. Apparently Warren is in Tokyo on a work assignment until February so it won't be so easy to meet up with him as we'd hoped. Warren offered to try and fly into Singapore this weekend to meet the 3 of us but I told Julia that I'd have to confer with you first when Houston opens today. However, following that conversation, Julia's note (see below) came in. Seeing that Warren will be in your 'vicinity' next month - it certainly makes far more sense for him to wend his way to Houston in February so I shall tell Julia to shelve Warren's initial offer to fly into Singapore this weekend. I will forward Warren's academic details to you upon receipt from Julia. Thanks, Anita ---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Fam/SIN/ECT on 13-01-99 11:08 AM --------------------------- "Julia Deans" <deansj@qdgroup.com.sg> on 13-01-99 11:04:31 AM To: "Anita Fam" <afam@enron.co.uk> cc: (bcc: Anita Fam/SIN/ECT) Subject: QD Legal Dear Anita, It was good to talk to you this morning and I hope we will meet in person soon. In the meantime, I wanted to let you know that Warren Simmons will be on vacation for two weeks beginning in early February. He is planning to go to New York City so could make himself available for a meeting in Houston relatively easily. I will forward Warren's academic information to you later today. If you need any other information in the meantime, please do not hesitate to let me know. Our contact details are below. Best Regards, Julia Deans QD Legal - Singapore 92 Amoy Street, #01-02 Singapore 069911 tel (65) 227-7628 fax: (65) 227-0801 email: deansj@qdgroup.com.sg - att1.htm

That's it! Thanks and I'll talk with you soon. Karen S. Way Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe 203 N. LaSalle Chicago, Illinois 60601 email: karen.way@piperrudnick.com (ph) 312-368-2152 (fax) 312-630-6347 > -----Original Message----- > From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [SMTP:Kay.Mann@enron.com] > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 1:04 PM > To: Way, Karen S. - CHI > Cc: 'kay.mann@enron.com'; 'fred.mitro@enron.com'; Gershon, Mark A. - CHI > Subject: Re: Yorkville Annexation Agreement > > > Hi Karen, > > I'm looking at a version which was faxed on Sept 13. If this the final > version? Expecting the answer to be "yes", I am reviewing it now. > > Kay ____________________________________________________________________________ The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1, 1999. Please update your records. The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. Thank you. For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at http://www.piperrudnick.com/ ____________________________________________________________________________

461487 461488 jeff broker has sp15 on these deals

Attached are the following drafts: 1. Amendment to Compressor Services Agreement (Bloomfield) 2. Amendment to Compressor Services Agreement (Bisti) 3. Amendment to Operation and Maintenance Agreement (Bloomfield) 4. Amendment to Operation and Maintenance Agreement (Bisti) These agreement will all be assigned (after amendment in accordance with the above) to the new LLC. Please review. We are trying to forward these drafts to the investors on Wednesday. If we could get your (Transwestern's) comments by tommorrow afternoon, it would be extremely helpful. Thanks for your attention to this matter

AGA for 9/15/00 is 67

Enron North America Corp. Mary Cook 1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal Houston, Texas 77002-7361 (713) 345-7732 (phone) (713) 646-3490 (fax) mary.cook@enron.com ----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 09:13 AM ----- Barton Clark 09/11/2000 07:06 PM To: Lisa King/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Project Raptor - Private Hedge Candidates PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. I think I am one of the people who raised the issue about the Asset Description in my mark-up of the Raptor I Derivative Proposal Sheet that I received this am from Stuart and returned to him midday. As I read the memo below, I am instructed to advise you about the nature of the underlying asset. The asset is Series B Preferred Stock of Catalytica Combustion Systems, Inc., and an option to acquire same. Currently, pursuant to a Series B Stock Purchase Agreement among Catalytica Combustion Systems, Inc. ( CCSI), Catalytica, Inc. ( CCSI's parent and currently holder of Series A and common stock of CCSI representing approximately 83% of the ownership of CCSI ) and Enron Ventures Corp. ( predecessor in interest to Sundance Assets, L.P.), Sundance owns 1,339,286 shares of Series B Preferred Stock and an option to purchase 535,715 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. There are provisions calling for the adjustment of the number of option shares subject to the option but I am not aware that any transactions that would cause such adjustment provisions, other that the stock split referred to below, to apply. The Series B stock is convertible to CCSI common stock, is restricted stock, and the Stock Purchase Agreement provides for registration rights. Currently, Tom White and Jack Urquhart both serve on the CCSI Boards of Directors, and Jack serves on the Catalytica Inc. Board. Under an Omnibus Agreement entered into in September 2000, in connection with the restructuring of Enron's transactions with CCSI and in connection with the proposed acquisition of Catalytica, Inc, by a third party ( DSM, a Dutch pharmaceutical company) and the distribution of Catalytica's CCSI shares to Catalytica's stockholders immediately prior to that acquisition, we agreed to convert the Series B to CCSI common, agreed to vote for a 2 for 1 stock split, and negotiated a cashless exercise of the option after the effective date of the spin off. The effectiveness of these provisions is dependent upon the effectiveness of distribution and acquisition The option itself ( as amended by the Omnibus Agreement and otherwise ) expires January 14, 2001. The distribution is expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2000, but is subject to a variety of conditions. After the distribution and concurrent closing of the Catalyica acquisition transaction, CCSI ( which formerly looked to its parent for financing and much of its administrative and other support) will be a stand- alone public company listed on NASDAQ, with the uncertainties attendant thereto. The Omnibus Agreement also contains provisions amending Sundance's registration rights, the board representation provisions in the original Stock Purchase Agreement, and certain transfer restrictions ( to liberalize them and allow the Raptor transaction to take place). There are also agreements related to Enron North America's Xonon Technology Implementation Agreement with GE and West LB, which do not directly affect the Series B Preferred. These provisions instead go to the development program for CCSI's technology, to which ENA contributes funding, and conform that agreement to a change in CCSI's and GE's strategy for commercializing the technology. The funding obligation itself is interconnected with the turbine purchases for ENA's Pastoria project in California, but I don't believe that transaction needs analysis for these purposes, To comply with SEC rules in connection with the distribution, CCSI has filed an S-1 registration statement registering the CCSI common stock to be distributed to Catalytica's shareholders with the SEC, and Catalytica, Inc. has filed a merger proxy statement with the SEC in connection with its solicitation of Catalytica stockholder approval to the acquisition transaction. Comments are expected from the SEC in 4 to 6 weeks. Please give me a call if you wish to discuss this matter further, and I am instructed to request that you return the revised copy of the Raptor I Proposal Sheet to me and copy Mary Cook and Lisa Mellancamp thereon. The foregoing description may be more than you need for the summary, but it really is a very abbreviated snapshot of the transaction. All the documents related to the Preferred Stock and Option, including the executed Omnibus Agreement and the Stock Purchase Agreement, have been previously delivered to Sara Shackleton and Hope Vargas. ----- Forwarded by Barton Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 06:18 PM ----- Stuart Zisman 09/11/2000 05:15 PM To: James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Project Raptor - Private Hedge Candidates It has come to my attention that questions have been raised in reviewing the Raptor I Derivative Proposal Sheets regarding the type of information that should be set forth in the category entitled "ASSET DESCRIPTION". The Master Derivatives Agreement ("MDA") requires that the Proposal Sheets describe the "Assets" with respect to which the derivative transaction is to be executed. For purposes of the MDA, "Assets" is defined as "assets, including without limitation common stock, partnership interests, member interests. other ownership interests, and other financial and physical assets." Therefore, the description should include both the nature of the "Asset" (i.e. whether it is an equity interest, a loan, working interest, etc.) and a little bit about the company (the entity in which ENA holds the interest or has the loan or working interest). Any comments to the Proposal Sheets should be delivered ASAP to the "Enron person completing this form" (This is the 3rd line under the heading "GENERAL" on each of the Proposal Sheets) along with a request that a revised Proposal Sheet be returned to the lawyer providing comments with copies to both Mary Cook and Lisa Mellencamp. The pressure to complete these Raptor hedges remains high and therefore your immediate attention is greatly appreciated. Many thanks. Stuart

Rod, I should have forwarded this to you a couple of weeks ago when I prepared this for Jim Prentice. Kerry

Could you send me copies of the Excel reports you want us to modify. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Griffith, John Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 12:33 PM To: Wong, Jeremy Cc: Maggi, Mike; McLaughlin, Errol Subject: Predictive Greeks Jeremy, Each day, we receive a report that shows the movement of the position's gamma with a change in the underlying (a gamma slide). We would like to see how difficult it would be to see the same with vega (a vega slide). Also, there is a report that shows totals for all the greeks by month. Could you put a total line at the bottom of this report? Please let me know of the difficulty of these changes. Thanks. John x. 36247

In case you guys didn't receive anything from the house, Pig is on April 13 this year. They must have gotten around to scheduling it late though, because the actual dinner is at the Holiday Inn rather than the Ramada. However, there's a block of rooms reserved at both hotels. If you tell the Ramada you need a room reserved by the house you can get it for $68 per night, which is almost $20 less than their normal rip-off rate... or you're more than welcome to crash in my room and sleep next to Kalberg. (I'd go with your own room)

looks fine Eric Gillaspie 04/05/2001 07:24 AM To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karl E Atkins/NA/Enron@ENRON Subject: Easement encroachment demand letter Richard, We plan on sending this demand letter (and an identical one to the other co-owner) out today. Ann Elizabeth wanted me to run it by you before we send it out. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thanks, Eric Gillaspie 713-345-7667 Enron Building 3886

In our continuing effort to expand the Dashboard, the following items have been added: New Categories for your personalized portal window: New categories have been added for each group in ET&S Business Development and Marketing. This gives each group the ability to post/publish their information on the dashboard for viewing. These new categories are listed below: ? Storage Services ? Risk Mgmt & Report ? Pricing & Structuring ? North Power Bus Dev ? South Power Bus Dev ? Offshore Bus Dev ? North LDC Team ? Central LDC Team ? Marketing Analysis ? Information Services To add these new categories to your dashboard simply click on the personalize button, highlight the new available category in Pane 1 (left), Pane 2 (center), or Pane 3 (right) and click on the add button. This action will move this category from available to the bottom of the selected categories. If you would like to change the order within a pane you click on the selected category then move it up or down using the arrows to the right of the selected categories pane. You then click save to exit the personalize screen and return to the dashboard. If you have any problems or questions please contact Bobby Mason @ (713) 853-5196 or Martha Janousek @ (713) 853-7275.

I just wanted to say it was good to see you the other day, though brief =) Let's get together soon for lunch or something. I'm missing my Bob time!

Have you heard of this request yet? Seth said that he mentioned it to the EOL team but was not sure if they had mentioned it to you yet. ----- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/NA/Enron on 08/11/2000 07:33 AM ----- Seth Hurwitz 08/10/2000 04:54 PM To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Brent, we understand that Tempest, another Bermuda reinsurer, is also interested in getting EOL access. What's the timetable on Bermuda due diligence (I know we discussed this briefly earlier this week)?

hot damn. PL

Vince, You were a most gracious guest, and we were honored to have you in our home. I am happy that you are Tony's friend, and it was a great pleasure for me to get to know you also. And again, thank you very much for the lovely bouquet of roses. Elisabeth.

The Gas Trading Messaging System is ready for everyone to use. Here is the link to the site. Please let everyone know so they can start using it. http://gasmsgboard.dev.corp.enron.com For questions, contact the below: Brian T. Hoskins Enron Broadband Services 713-853-0380 (office) 713-412-3667 (mobile) 713-646-5745 (fax) Brian_Hoskins@enron.net

can you follow me to the car dealership at lunch tomorrow at lunch so i can drop off the tahoe to get fixed?

See below. Can we get some help on the IBM issues? ----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/12/2000 02:36 PM ----- Erin Rice 11/10/2000 11:08 AM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Courtney Votaw/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: BackWeb Steve: At this point, our IT contacts are backpedalling a bit and suggesting they can overcome the TIBCO and Terminal Server problems. There are still four important issues, however: IT still cannot commit to transferring messages across domains. This means that messages initiated at Corp and intended for the entire Enron organization will not reach any business units outside the Corp domain. No messages will reach the EES organization unless IBM agrees not to use their proprietary message delivery tool, WebSphere, and will use WebLogic instead. WebLogic is required by BackWeb, although it is designed by a separate company. HR, intended to be a key user of this tool, will not use BackWeb because survey responses cannot be made anonymous. HR has already purchased a tool called CONFIRMIT that can execute anonymous surveys. Messages will not be delivered simultaneously to all users in the same domain, nor will they be delivered for two to five hours after they are sent by the message administrator. Another thing to consider is that these messages will be set to expire and disappear within a set period of time, meaning users cannot retrieve them and read them later (as they can with e-mail). This means that I could be away from the office for several days and miss a message entirely, because it would have expired and disappeared by the time I returned. The plain fact is that a few members of IT are pushing this initiative, but they lack commercial sponsorship. They are hoping Corp will foot the bill for a pilot which will allow them to fully test this tool before implementing it company-wide. Please let us know if you have additional questions. - er ----- Forwarded by Courtney Votaw/NA/Enron on 11/09/2000 12:08 PM ----- Steven J Kean 11/09/2000 11:35 AM To: Courtney Votaw/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: BackWeb Do we have a sense for how many we can reach, how many we can't and where they are? Are whole offices (eg Tokyo) unreachable or is it only those who have home offices? Courtney Votaw 11/08/2000 11:02 AM To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Erin Rice/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: BackWeb Mark and Steve- Erin Rice and I would like to meet with you to discuss the issues concerning BackWeb before we proceed. As you can see from the Design Document, they are pretty significant. Thanks, Courtney

In the aftermath of RTO week and following up on Rick's successful pre-briefings, we should be out spinning on the back end as well. Perhaps Sarah, Meredith and I can come up with some thoughts on message points and send them around for comment. Sound OK?

This is to confirm the monthly Industrials meeting for Thursday June 22, 2000 at 1:00 pm. Date: June 22, 2000 Thursday Time: 1:00 pm Location: EB 3316 Topic: Industrials If you have any questions/conflicts, please feel to call me at 853-0643. Thanks, Kay

Attached is the i2 Board of Directors list. (See attached file: i2 Board of Directors.xls) Barbette Joy Watts Executive Assistant to David Becker One i2 Place, 3rd Floor 469-357-3460 (Direct) 469-357-6769 (Fax) barbette_watts@i2.com - i2 Board of Directors.xls

I spoke with Bonnie yesterday, and she told me that she also had a call to return from you. Just in case y'all didn't have the opportunity to discuss it, I did get names from her of those with whom she had previously worked. She was hired at Enron by Jim Hughes, and is currently working with Bruce Lundstrom. She has also worked with Anthony Duenner, who is now commercial, but who was at B&P and worked on the PGE acquisition. At Reboul, MacMurray she worked with John MacMurray and Isabelle Barzun, but all of the attorneys with whom she worked at Milbank have since left the firm. Hope this is what you needed... Molly

See, all along it's been the women who were trying to get the men drunk... I knew I had the wrong approach; I was always trying to get the women drunk. So now you're telling me if I had just sat back and let the women come to me, they would actually bring me beer? What a revelation! Gosh, if I had only known that in college... could of saved a lot of money... We obviously have too much time on our hands. Who's ready for another happy hour gathering of ex-account managers??? Let me know. Steve

Attached is the latest revision, incorporating comments from the Enron team. There were some comments which were either discussion points or not readily decipherable, so those will need to be addressed in the next version. There's still some harmonization/nit stuff which we will pick up then also. Hopefully, David Hunt (MDEA's lawyer) and I will hammer out the more legalistic (yet important) stuff while he is in our office tomorrow. Ed, maybe we can schedule a call with our local counsel to get some more comfort on the authority issue. In addition, we can ask for an authority/enforceability opinion from MDEA's counsel. We'll beef up the reps as well. Reagan/David, Ed's availability is best first thing tomorrow (Thurs) morning. See you soon, Kay

The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed or rejected. You can view the details of the request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000025843&Page= MyReq.

Daren, Thanks--while I'm certain I should know, I must confess that i do not know what CPI stands for??? Sandi Daren J Farmer 10/16/2000 11:39 AM To: Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: Rate for Tenaska Deal Sandi, Sorry for just now getting back with you. I was out last week. The rate ($.04/mmbtu) will be charged on the greater of the volumes nominated on the supply contracts or the actual deliveries to the plant. The fee will be adjusted yearly based on CPI. Bob - I could not remember if we stated the type of settlement on the delivered volumes (actuals or nominations). I think we should use actuals due to possibility that the plant could over pull with out our knowledge on a daily basis. We would receive the estimates/actuals on a lag and may have to purchase gas to offset the imbalance, even though the plant kept the noms at the 45,000 base. I also think that if the plant does increase the nom, they are more likely to pull the additional volume rather than pulling less. Do you agree with this? D From: Sandi M Braband on 10/10/2000 03:41 PM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Rate for Tenaska Deal Daren, When we met regarding the rate for the Tenaska Gas Management Agreement, you guys mentioned that it would be tied to an index--could you restate for me how that is to work--it will start out 4 cents per MMBTU based on the greater of the volumes nominated through the supply contracts or the actual deliveries to the plant. Then the fee will vary month to month? year to year? based on what index? Thanks, Sandi

Greg, Looks good. The updated ICA for your further handling. Eric Gillaspie 713-345-7667 Enron Building 3886 Greg Brazaitis 01/29/2001 12:38 PM To: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Rio Nogales Schematic Eric, Recommended Exhibit "A" for Rio Nogales. Comments? Greg ---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 12:37 PM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: James R Haden 01/29/2001 11:14 AM To: Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Rio Nogales Schematic If this looks OK, please send it to Eric. If you need any changes or corrections, just let me know and I will make them.

I was at the All Employee meeting yesterday where you mentioned you had open positions in Monterrey, Mexico. I applied for the Plant Manager position on April 26. Since then, I have traded countless messages with Daniel Batista from Human Resources. His latest position (June 27) was that a hiring decision could not be made as the plant was likely to be sold. Based on your comments, I assume the plant was never sold. I am very interested in the position and would like to schedule a confidential meeting to discuss the position in further detail. I believe to be the right person for the job. I am including my resume for your review. If that position is not available I would like to explore others. I will enumerate some of the skills and experience that make me the person you need to hire for this job posting: Native Spanish Speaker (born in Mexico City) Chemical Engineer / MBA International Operating Experience under "Difficult Conditions" Proven builder of relationships in Latin American Business and Political arenas Ample Process Experience Environmental and Health and Safety Experience in Industrial Settings Proven multidisciplinary and multicultural team builder and leader Lives by Enron's principles and Code of Ethics Prepared to relocate internationally I spent the last two years in Argentina working for Azurix reporting directly to the COO. My official title was planning manager, however, as necessities surfaced, I took over a number of other roles including day to day operations, engineering, and public relations. Please expect a call from me on Monday to set up an appointment. Thanks Mariano Gomez

Telecommunications Reports presents . . . . . TR's State NewsWire February 1, 2001 A.M. Edition STATES MISSOURI -- PSC declines to support SW Bell's market-entry bid IDAHO -- Senate confirms nomination of Hansen to PUC ILLINOIS -- Ameritech says business market is becoming more competitive WYOMING -- Senate to examine bill requiring PSC to regulate directory assistance MINN. -- Bill would authorize placement of commercial equipment on state property GEORGIA -- BellSouth and IDS Telcom dispute interconnection agreement UTAH -- Legislators take a look at using mobile phones while driving LONG DISTANCE MISSOURI PSC declines to support SW Bell's market-entry bid The Public Service Commission yesterday decided against supporting Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.'s efforts to obtain FCC permission provide in-region interLATA (local access and transport area) service in Missouri at this time, Commissioner Kelvin Simmons told TR. But the application could be supported if SW Bell addresses the PSC's concerns, he said. The PSC plans to deliberate on the request again as early as Feb. 6, although a final decision won't be issued at that time, Simmons said. The PSC's concerns with SW Bell's request include pricing, interconnection agreements, access to network elements, unbundled local loops, and unbundled local transport. SW Bell intends to make changes in those areas, taking the PSC's concerns into consideration, and is confident that the PSC ultimately will approve the request, a SW Bell representative told TR. (Docket no. TO-99-227) STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT IDAHO Senate confirms nomination of Hansen to PUC The Senate unanimously has approved Gov. Dirk Kempthorne's (R.) nomination of Dennis S. Hansen (R.) to a second six-year term on the Public Utilities Commission. (1/17/01 a.m.) Hansen, who was first appointed to the commission by Gov. Phil Batt (R.), is also the PUC's president. Before appointment to the commission, Hansen was an accountant with Monsanto Co. of Soda Springs and served in the state Senate from 1987 to 1995. COMPETITIVE LOCAL ENTRY ILLINOIS Ameritech says business market is becoming more competitive Ameritech-Illinois has asked the state Commerce Commission to reopen a 1998 case to allow the company to present additional information that demonstrates the growth of competition for business customers. In the 1998 case, Ameritech sought competitive classification of its business rates throughout the state and residential rates for 19 exchanges. In 1999 the ICC denied Ameritech's request, citing a lack of genuine competition. Ameritech says the ICC should reopen the case's record because the company's total number of business lines in service has continued to decline in absolute numbers. Overall, Ameritech says, its total number of business lines in service has declined by about 7% in the last two years. Ameritech says its new evidence relates only to the business services classification. The company notes that the growth in residential service competition in the 19 downstate exchanges has been "less robust." An ICC spokesman noted that Ameritech holds 93% of all access lines in its Illinois service territory. (Docket no. 98-0860 - Illinois Commerce Commission vs. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., Investigation into specified competitive tariffs to determine proper classification of the tariffs and to determine whether refunds are appropriate) FUTURE OF REGULATION WYOMING Senate to examine bill requiring PSC to regulate directory assistance The Senate Corporations, Elections, and Political Subdivisions Committee has received a bill that would require the Public Service Commission to regulate directory assistance services under certain circumstances. HB 51 would authorize the commission to require local exchange carriers to make their listing information available to other directory service providers. The Joint Corporations, Elections, and Political Subdivisions Committee drafted the bill during the interim session. The legislative staff explained to TR that the measure was prompted by an incident in which a local company was unable to reach an agreement with Qwest Corp. over directory assistance rates. Because of the dispute between the companies, customers' names weren't included in the Qwest phone book, the staff said. The PSC has no authority to regulate directory assistance service, which was deregulated by the Wyoming Telecommunications Act of 1995. (10/16/00 a.m.) The legislative staff said the bill could be discussed Feb. 6, at the earliest. WIRELESS MINNESOTA Bill would authorize placement of commercial equipment on state property The House Governmental Operations and Veterans Affairs Policy Committee is considering a bill to allow commercial wireless equipment to be placed on state-owned lands, buildings, and other structures. State agencies either would have to (1) charge a site use fee for the value of the property or structure on which the equipment were placed or (2) accept improvements to state-owned communications system facilities or services provided by a commercial wireless service provider. Rep. Thomas Bakk (D., District 6A) introduced HF 429. SECTION 251/252 GEORGIA BellSouth and IDS Telcom dispute interconnection agreement BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., and IDS Telcom LLC are clashing over several issues as they shape their new interconnection agreement. IDS recently asked the Public Service Commission to arbitrate the agreement. One contentious issue is whether BellSouth should be permitted to use the interconnection agreement to restrict its liability for negligent acts and to require indemnification from IDS for negligence on BellSouth's part that damages IDS customers. BellSouth maintains that liability for both companies should be restricted to a credit covering the expense of the services or functions performed improperly. Meanwhile, IDS argues that no restrictions should exist on liability or indemnification. BellSouth has agreed to exceptions for gross negligence, fraudulent misrepresentation, and willful or wanton misconduct, but the company won't concede to IDS' proposed exceptions for negligence or negligent misrepresentation. BellSouth and IDS also are disputing the issue of whether BellSouth must offer combined network elements if the elements typically are combined in BellSouth's network but aren't combined already at the location requested by IDS. BellSouth says it will offer IDS combined network elements in accordance with the guidelines laid out in the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and other applicable rules. IDS argues that BellSouth should be required to provide IDS with combined network elements if those elements ordinarily are combined in BellSouth's network, regardless of whether the elements already are combined at the location in question. (Docket no. 13318-U, In the Matter of Petition for Arbitration of IDS Telcom, LLC, Pursuant to Section 252(B) of the Communications Act of 1934) WIRELESS UTAH Legislators take a look at using mobile phones while driving Rep. Kory Holdaway (R., District 34) has introduced HB 182 to ban drivers from using a telephone, computer, or fax machine while driving on a highway. The measure wouldn't apply to emergency and law enforcement personnel acting in their official capacity, any person during a medical emergency, or any person reporting a safety hazard. Violators would be guilty of an infraction. HB 182 awaits consideration by the House Transportation Committee. Federal law prohibits duplication in any form, including electronic, without permission of the publisher. TR's State NewsWire Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000 Telecommunications Reports International, Inc. (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted each business day at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m., except holidays. Telecommunications Reports International, Inc. 1333 H St. NW, Suite 100-E Washington, DC 20005-4707 Associate Editor for Online Publications: Jennifer Erschen, E-mail: jerschen@tr.com Senior Legislative & Regulatory Analyst: Gayle Kansagor, E-mail: gkansagor@tr.com Senior Research Analyst: Steve Arlowe, E-mail: sarlowe@tr.com Senior Analyst: Barney McManigal, E-mail: bmcmanigal@tr.com Senior Research Analyst: Brandi Kerns, E-mail: bkerns@tr.com Account Services: Eileen Callahan (202) 312-6116, (202) 842-3023 (fax) E-mail: ecallahan@tr.com

Debra Perlingiere Enron North America Corp. Legal Department 1400 Smith Street, EB 3885 Houston, Texas 77002 dperlin@enron.com Phone 713-853-7658 Fax 713-646-3490 ----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 10:20 AM ----- Jeff Worman <jworman@academyofhealth.com> 10/04/2000 02:54 PM Please respond to "jworman@academyofhealth.com" To: "'Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com'" <Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com> cc: Subject: RE: I do appriciate that not all is final and until it becomes completely final i will stay put. I have been looking at barn designs, I have ali the next couple of weekends, maybe one day when things are complete I will have you out for a tour. jeff -----Original Message----- From: Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com [SMTP:Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 1:36 PM To: jworman@academyofhealth.com Subject: Congratulations on the farm!!!!! I will be in the Woodlands Thursday and part of Friday at a Legal Conference. I would invite you to golf, but I know you are way busy. Let me know if I can help with the move. Debra Perlingiere Enron North America Corp. Legal Department 1400 Smith Street, EB 3885 Houston, Texas 77002 dperlin@enron.com Phone 713-853-7658 Fax 713-646-3490 __________________ HAVE A GOOD DAY !!!!!!! Debra Perlingiere Enron North America Corp. Legal Department 1400 Smith Street, EB 3885 Houston, Texas 77002 dperlin@enron.com Phone 713-853-7658 Fax 713-646-3490

Frank - What's the word from Enserco?? Have you had a chance to call Darrell yet about that penalty they took in the October netout? Let me know. Thanks, ...Chuck x.36275

We have folks coming from El Paso Electric to learn OATI, and you are welcome to sit in on the training. This training will be much more slow paced and thourough than the real time run through we had a while back. It will be held from 9 am to noon on Tuesday, Jan 9th in the Mt Hood conference room.

Dan, I talked to Brad. He said that he would prefer to go out in Red Deer. Chris

Kevin--Now that UBS is buying the gas and power business do you think that the gas and power groups will need someone (like me) to handle any physical or financial liquid fuel (resid and distillate) requirements for projects or daily business opportunities?

it will update tomorrow From: O'Neal D Winfree 10/24/2000 07:42 AM To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Thrill Kill vs Snake Pit Hey Commish, It appears as though I did not receive points for the Miami Defense (18) or Lamar Smith (36) due possibly to the late ending of the Monday night game... With the points, I should have 132 and a victory over the Snake Pit... As it stands now, I have only 78 points, and a loss in the system... Is there anything we can do??? thrill kill

Hi, Christian: Stuart has already called this week inquiring about his ability to continue negotiating with the PUDs. Have you had a chance to speak with Pat Boylston? Let me know if I can assist. Thanks (as usual) for all of your help. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) sara.shackleton@enron.com

Thanks Chica! Kate Symes @ ECT 11/16/2000 04:12 PM To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: El Paso Electric Company Deal # 460852 Thanks for checking. I entered this deal today and am still getting used to all the different variations of company names. You're right - it's El Paso Merchant. Thanks, Kate Kimberly Hundl@ENRON 11/16/2000 01:29 PM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: El Paso Electric Company Deal # 460852 Hi Kate! I just want to make sure that this is the correct counterparty name. Usually we trade with El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P. Is this name entered correctly? Kim

Shirley, Transmission is my 1st choice. Vince Shirley Crenshaw 05/01/2001 03:11 PM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: The Next Transmission Roundtable Vince: This will make 3 appointments for 11:30 on the 9th. #1 - V@R Lunch meeting, #2 - This is the day that David Hernandez has requested that you have lunch with him and the Roundtable makes #3. What do you want to do? Vince J Kaminski 05/01/2001 02:19 PM To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: The Next Transmission Roundtable Please, put on my schedule. Vince ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 02:19 PM --------------------------- Anita DuPont@ENRON 05/01/2001 12:51 PM To: Jean.Ryall@enron.com, Bill.Rust@enron.com, Steve.Walton@enron.com, Ron.Tapscott@enron.com, Sevil.Yaman@enron.com, Vasant.Shanbhogue@enron.com, Tom.Dutta@enron.com, Walter.Coffer@enron.com, vkamins@enron.com, Lloyd.Will@enron.com, martin.lin@enron.com, Christi.l.nicolay@enron.com, George.Hopley@enron.com, fred.mitro@enron.com, Patrick.Hanse@enron.com, Steve.Olinde@enron.com, Madhup.Kumar@enron.com, robert.kraszewski@enron.com, jeffrey_wilson@enron.net, john.moore@enron.com, Rmcnamar@enron.com cc: Lance.cunningham@enron.com, shirley.crenshaw@enron.com Subject: The Next Transmission Roundtable The next Transmission Roundtable will be on Wednesday, May 9, 2001, from 11:30 AM to 1:00 PM in EB 49C1. Please notify me if you CANNOT attend. I will send another email soon with the menu we will be serving. Thanks. Anita <Embedded StdOleLink>

NOTE: YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER. You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s). Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals. To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services. You may begin providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed by Friday, November 17, 2000. If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at: Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4 London: 44.207.783.4040, Option 4 Email: perfmgmt@enron.com Thank you for your participation in this important process. The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a status of "OPEN." Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list. Review Group: ENRON Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000 Employee Name Supervisor Name Date Selected ------------- --------------- ------------- ANDREWS, NAVEEN C RUDI C ZIPTER Oct 31, 2000 BAXTER, ASHLEY DAVID DAVIES Nov 02, 2000 CAMPOS, HECTOR O PEYTON S GIBNER Nov 06, 2000 CARSON, RICHARD L RICHARD B BUY Oct 30, 2000 CRENSHAW, SHIRLEY J WINCENTY J KAMINSKI Oct 26, 2000 GANDY, KRISTIN H CELESTE C ROBERTS Nov 01, 2000 GORNY, VLADIMIR THEODORE R MURPHY II Nov 02, 2000 KINDALL, KEVIN VASANT SHANBHOGUE Oct 30, 2000 LAMAS VIEIRA PINTO, RODRIGO DAVID PORT Oct 31, 2000 RAYMOND, MAUREEN J WINCENTY J KAMINSKI Nov 02, 2000 SUPATGIAT, CHONAWEE PEYTON S GIBNER Oct 27, 2000 TAMARCHENKO, TANYA V VASANT SHANBHOGUE Oct 26, 2000 VILLARREAL, NORMA E SHEILA H WALTON Oct 26, 2000 WALTON, SHEILA H DAVID OXLEY Oct 27, 2000 YAMAN, SEVIL VASANT SHANBHOGUE Oct 27, 2000 YUAN, DING RICHARD L CARSON Oct 31, 2000

I called Haedicke to check on the status of his Rappaport conversation, and he told me he hadn't had a chance to talk to him yet but to go ahead and fax in the ballots, which I have done (I got Kevin's too).

Could you forward the attachment referenced in your email? (we all do that)

Attached is a brief for you to forward on to the State Department. There have been numerous press articles on the transaction since it was announced and I will forward several for your reference. We will continue to let the British government take the lead on this (good to know that State agrees with this strategy). Call me to discuss the brief at 713/853-6973

Here you go Lawrence. Thanks again for the invitation. We would like to participate in hearings such as this. I may be at the hearing on Monday, but I'm not the FERC expert. Let me know if you have any questions. Mona (See attached file: skean FERC comments.doc) - skean FERC comments.doc

Can anyone give me an update on where things stand with our ability to enter into ISDA's with Brazilian counterparties? (i.e., can we do it? Are there any limitations?) Carol St. Clair EB 3889 713-853-3989 (Phone) 713-646-3393 (Fax) carol.st.clair@enron.com

What about the questions I asked about whether the new entity would comply with Order No. 2000 (especially if the state has the vertically integrated utilities operate the system)? See attached word version of my orginal E-mail. 02/21/2001 11:03 AM Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON 02/21/2001 11:03 AM 02/21/2001 11:03 AM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Scope of FERC Jurisdiction Over State-Owned Utility Attached is a memo that addreses the FERC's jurisdiction over the transfer/sales of utility assets to the state of California. At a minimum, FERC must approve the transfer. Call if you have questions. Joe ----- Forwarded by Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron on 02/21/2001 01:55 PM ----- "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> 02/21/2001 01:10 PM To: <jhartso@enron.com> cc: <jdwatkiss@aol.com>, "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com> Subject: Scope of FERC Jurisdiction Over State-Owned Utility Please see attached memorandum. We have also attached FERC's orders addressing LIPA's acquisition of LILCO's transmission assets and LIPA's open access tariff. Please call if you have any questions. - 0138443.01 - EC97-45.TXT - NJ98-4.TXT

we need a guess now. Stan wants a first pass by tomorrow afternoon - we should be able to ballpark this number. -----Original Message----- From: Centilli, James Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:13 AM To: Howard, Kevin A.; Hayslett, Rod; Thames, Davis; Geaccone, Tracy; Ratner, Michael; Donoho, Lindy Subject: RE: tw subscription rolloff template Facilty Planning personnel are out of office today, but will return in the morning. I have ask for their estimate no later than Monday morning. They may be able to give me something tommorrow. I will complete the project model when I get a description of facilities and cost estimates. James -----Original Message----- From: Howard, Kevin A. Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:59 AM To: Hayslett, Rod; Thames, Davis; Geaccone, Tracy; Ratner, Michael; Donoho, Lindy; Centilli, James Subject: RE: tw subscription rolloff template James: Can you roll each of the expansions that we discussed into Rod's project model? Michael Ratner will then link those into the TW financial model. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Hayslett, Rod Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:24 AM To: Howard, Kevin A.; Thames, Davis; Geaccone, Tracy; Ratner, Michael; Donoho, Lindy; Centilli, James Subject: RE: tw subscription rolloff template Project model -----Original Message----- From: Howard, Kevin A. Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:28 AM To: Thames, Davis; Geaccone, Tracy; Ratner, Michael; Donoho, Lindy; Centilli, James Cc: Hayslett, Rod Subject: RE: tw subscription rolloff template Attached is the actual contract roll off info by segment prepared by Shelley Corman for our bank due diligence. We need to use this and assume we re-subscribe the roll off capacity at an "average rate" - Lindy, we will need your assistance in developing this avg. rate by segment. For the expansions we discussed, Rod will circulate an expansion model that we can layer into the financial model. Tracy: call me when you get in and we can discuss. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Thames, Davis Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:49 PM To: Howard, Kevin A.; Geaccone, Tracy; Ratner, Michael; Donoho, Lindy; Centilli, James Subject: tw subscription rolloff template I have attached a template to use to summarize the capacity rolloff issue discussed today. I just filled in a bunch of numbers as an example - if they don't make any sense, you can guess why! Lindy, if you could use this to fill in the required data, then either Michael or I will incorporate it into the TW model. Thanks- Davis

Attached is a draft of the Declaration of Jeffery Fawcett. If you have comments, please let me know. Susan Scott Transwestern Pipeline Company susan.scott@enron.com (713) 853-0596

Congratulations. And count me in. We're off to the races. Best, Jeff And a very Happy Thanksgiving. Sue Nord 11/21/2000 10:01 AM To: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald_Lassere@enron.net, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Margo Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Xi_Xi@enron.net, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: The Answer Is: To CLEC! Hello Everyone, We've gotten word back from Jim Fallon to go forward with obtaining CLEC licenses. This brings us to the next set of questions: Which entity do we license? EBS or ETI? If we license ETI as a CLEC, can we transfer EBS' IXC licenses to ETI? Do we get CLEC licenses in all states, or some strategic subset of states? I'd like to put together a group to address these questions, working with legal, tax, and commercial people. Please let me know if you are interested in participating in this group. It most likely will involve a fairly intensive schedule of meetings in Houston during December. We should hold off on filing new IXC license applications until we have resolved the EBS vs. ETI issue. For states where an EBS IXC license application currently is pending, let's not be too aggressive in pushing those applications forward over the next month. Give me a call if this creates a problem in any of your states. Also, Scott, please let everyone know if there are any fiber-build states where you think the delay would be a problem. Feel free to give me a call if you have any questions. Sue

So, after last Wednseday's Espeak with Danny, what is the future of the pipelines? mcs

Computer Support: 713-348-8319 (help with computer connection) Suzanna Vazquez: 713-348-3736 (copies, etc.) Please let me know if you have any more questions or if I can help in any way. Pamela Castro MBA Program Associate Rice University 713-348-6223

Start Date: 2/28/01; HourAhead hour: 9; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001022809.txt

> -- > On April 15th, I sent the following e-mail about a series of SCE advice > filings. The one which I highlighted for potential concern was 1534-E > which starts the process of implementing the MOU with the governor and > DWR. On April 20th, SCE filed a supplement to 1534-E which it states > replaces 1534-E in its entirety. Accordingly the clock for protests was > reset and protests on the advice filing are now due on May 11th. The > changes made by SCE are not of a nature to drastically impact the summary > of the advice letter sent to you on April 15th. I will forward the > amended advice letter under separate cover. Please let me know as soon as > possible if we want to protest. > > -----Original Message----- > From: JBennett > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 12:32 PM > To: 'Leslie.Lawner@enron.com'; 'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'; > 'Susan.J.Mara@enron.com'; 'sstoness@enron.com'; 'dblack@enron.com'; > 'James.D.Steffes@enron.com'; 'Paul.Kaufman@enron.com'; > 'Robert.Neustaedter@enron.com'; 'tjohnso8@enron.com'; 'Harry Kingerski > (E-mail)' > Subject: SCE Advice Filings > > On Thursday, April 12th, I forwarded to you a series of Advice filings > which SCE made on April 11. The attached document summarizes those > filings. While two the three appear to be fairly innocuous, one (1534-E) > apparently starts the process of implementing the MOU with the governor. > Please pay careful attention to your review of that advice. If we are to > protest, such protest would be due on May 1. > > <<X23609.DOC>> > > Jeanne Bennett - X23609.DOC

Cesar is at Tractebel ........ Him and Jason Armenta together ,,,,,,, what a combo!

Can we do a "See" dropdown like the Master Swap Agreement Database, so we can track name changes? Thanks!

Send me your e-mail address at home. I want to send you that fishing cartoon. Chris

I just spoke to the House Agriculture Committee Senior Staff who told me that the House will accept the Commerce Committee language. The Energy Group has been very active in support of the Commerce language because it includes both bilateral and multilateral exemptions for all non-agriculture commodities (including metals). This is a siginificant development because the CFTC and NYMEX have been opposed to the Commerce language especially as it applies to metals and electronic trading. The House leadership hopes to have the CEA Reauthorization bill on the floor later this week or early next under the suspension calendar (which means that the bill could be voice voted without amendment). Next to the Senate... where the CFTC and NYMEX will be equally vigilant and have good relations with Banking Committee Ranking member Harkin. We plan to meet with the interested parties sometime this week at which time we hope to debunk the myth that an unregulated OTC energy market could lead (or has led) to high oil prices. More to follow. Thanks - Chris

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 02:33 PM ----- "Dellacona, Dana (Commodities - NY)" <ddellacona@Hess.com> 03/28/2001 11:20 AM To: "'tana.jones@enron.com'" <tana.jones@enron.com> cc: "Lovvorn, Kelly" <klovvorn@Hess.com>, "Crespo, John" <jcrespo@Hess.com>, "Cerria, Chuck (Commodities - NY)" <ccerria@Hess.com> Subject: FW: Enron On-line-AHC Trading Tana, Per my voice mail to you this week, I have obtained the information which you requested regarding Amerada Hess Corporation's ability to trade on Enron On-Line. Amerada Hess Corporation would like to trade gas and power, financial and physical, in the United States and Canada. We would also like to trade options for gas and power. Could you run the necessary reports and contact me with our current ability to trade On-Line? Also, if we do not presently have the ability to trade the above, could you inform me as to the steps which need to be taken in order to trade? I look forward to hearing from you. Regards, Dana M. Dellacona 1185 Avenue of the Americas NY, NY 10036 Ph:212.536.8133 Fx:917.342.8810 ddellacona@hess.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Dellacona, Dana (Commodities - NY) > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 5:21 PM > To: 'tana.jones@enron.com' > Cc: Cerria, Chuck (Commodities - NY); Lovvorn, Kelly > Subject: Enron On-line-AHC Trading > > Tana, > > This confirms our conversation today regarding Amerada Hess Corporation's > ability to trade on Enron On-line. As discussed, I will check to see what > specific products we intend to trade with regard to Energy, Physicals, > and/or Derivatives. I will also check to see whether we intend to trade > in the US, Canada, and/or Europe. I do understand that you cannot give me > an accurate answer as to our ability to trade On-line until I provide this > to you. Thank you for getting back to me so quickly, I will try to do the > same. > > Regards, > > Dana M. Dellacona > 1185 Avenue of the Americas > NY, NY 10036 > Ph:212.536.8133 > Fx:917.342.8810 > ddellacona@hess.com > >

CALENDAR ENTRY: APPOINTMENT Description: EB8c1 - Finalization of next phase deliverables Date: 5/8/2001 Time: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM (Central Standard Time) Chairperson: Stacey W White Detailed Description:

Done DG Tricia Truong 12/20/2000 06:29 PM To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Enervest S# 27239 Hi Daron, Could you please change rate on the above Sitara to $4.15544 for Nov. 00 Production ? Thanks for your help, T 3-9852

Tom, Attached is pareto analysis you requested for Trent during the month of March. The chart covers the site for the top 26 status messages and all the status messages are provided on the 3 page table which follows. For more detailed information, each of the individual turbines is also provided so you can see where the faults originated. Please note this is a report of all the status messages, which include the faults. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Best Regards Hollis

Edna, I'm going to have to reschedule lunch. My mom is in the hospital and I'm going to work through lunch today so I can leave early and go see her. She is suppose to be getting out this week. Would you be free next Monday? Mary

Done! Stephanie Panus@ENRON 01/19/2001 09:17 AM To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Credit contact Tana - Can you add Aparna Rajaram as a credit contact in our financial trading database? Thanks.

This is to summarize our previous discussion: EPMI took an assignment of ALL EEMC's (an affiliate of EES) deals with PG&E Energy Trading - Power, L.P. (PGET) whereby EPMI is now buying all of the power from PGET. EPMI then acts as "sleeve" for EES and sells the power to EES with a $.05 sleeve fee With respect to the specific EEMC deal # ACW672, EEMC originally was buying 75MW from PGET at a price of $29.90. After taking over EEMC's portfolio, EPMI, PGET and Avista Energy entered into a 3-party assignment, assumption and settlement agreement whereby EPMI and AvistaEnergy "took out" PGET of the picture for 50MW of the 75MW piece. By doing so, EPMI thus is buying 50MW from Avista Energy and the remaining 25MW still from PGET The new 50MW piece from Avista Energy results in a purchase price of $29.80 and a sale price of $29.85 to EES. [the reason for the price decrease is because when we entered into the 3-party agreement, in order to "take out" PGET we had to pay them their profit in that deal stream ie monetizing their spread of $.10 per MW] The remaining 25MW piece from PGET kept the SAME PRICING of $29.90 since we left that 25MW block alone. If you have any additional questions, please call me. Tracy 503-464-8755

Alaska Airlines announces a Winter Web Sale. Sale fares must be purchased on Alaska
,s web site at www.Alaskaair.com and are valid for travel between November 28, 2000 and March 30, 2001. These fares require a 7-day advance purchase, a 1 night minimum and 30 day maximum stay. Fares start at $59 for travel on Tuesday, Wednesday and Saturday and at $74 for travel on Monday, Thursday, Friday and Sunday. Tickets must be purchased by December 1, 2000. Sample Markets: Portland - San Francisco $59 Portland - Los Angeles $99 Seattle - Oakland $69 Seattle - Orange County $99 Spokane - San Jose $69 Spokane - San Diego $99 See our web site www.Alaskaair.com for more destinations. Sale details: Valid on Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air only. Seats are limited and may not be available on all flights/dates. Offer is for a limited time and is subject to change without notice. Valid on new bookings only. Tickets must be purchased by December 1, 2000. Reservations must be made using the Alaska Airlines Web Site. Tickets require immediate purchase by credit card when reservations are made. Ticketing will be electronic, using Instant Ticket services. Tickets are non-refundable, non-changeable and are of no value after the last date of your planned travel. Fares quoted do not include Passenger Facilities Charges of up to $12 or segment fees of $2.75 per flight segment. A flight segment is defined as one takeoff and one landing. Other restrictions apply. For special value rates at Hilton Hotels in Alaska Airlines cities visit the Hilton Web site at: http://www.hilton.com/specials/values/akairvalues.html You are receiving this message today because you subscribed to our Email Notification Service. While we
,d be pleased to continue to tell you about our great products and prices, you can unsubscribe to our Email Notification Service by visiting our Web site at: http://www2.alaskaair.com/listserv/webmail.asp Please do not respond to this message. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered.

Mark, thanks for looking at the language. Deleting the concept is fine. If you need another copy of the draft, please let me know. Thanks, Steve Mark.Greenberg@enron.com wrote: > Steve - > > I looked at the below language. I guess I still have some concerns about > the concept. > > Why don't we go back to your original suggestion and delete the concept > entirely. I am sure if either party believes strongly enough that a breach > has occurred, it will pursue its available remedies. > > If this is acceptable, I will work off of the draft forwarded by Brenda and > see if we can finalize a document for signature by Enron. > > Please let me know if this will work. > > Thanks. > > Mark > Senior Counsel, ENA > Phone: 713-345-8897 > Facsimile: 713-646-3940 > E-Mail: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com > > > Steve.Barry@s > abre.com To: mark.greenberg@enron.com, Brenda Crabtree > <brenda.crabtree@sabre.com> > 04/05/2001 cc: > 10:34 AM Subject: RESIDUAL KNOWLEDGE PROVISION > Please > respond to > Steve.Barry > > > > Mark, attached please find the proposed Residual Knowledge > provision that we discussed. If acceptable, please advise > and I'll incorporate into the last version of the NDA. > > Thanks, > Steve > > -- > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > This communication is intended solely for use by the > addressee and may contain > information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from > disclosure under > applicable law. Unauthorized interception of this > communication violates the > Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. Any use, > dissemination or > copying of this communication other than by the addressee is > prohibited. If you > have received this communication in error, please > immediately notify the sender > and destroy the original and all copies of this > communication. > > (See attached file: 1_Residual knowledge clause.doc) > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Name: 1_Residual knowledge clause.doc > 1_Residual knowledge clause.doc Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword) > Encoding: base64 > Download Status: Not downloaded with message -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This communication is intended solely for use by the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Unauthorized interception of this communication violates the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. Any use, dissemination or copying of this communication other than by the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original and all copies of this communication. - Steve.Barry.vcf

For those of you who plan on taking vacation this week, please provide me with a number where you can be reached, just in case we need to reach you. Thanks! Laura

Please include pthompson@akllp.com and ccobb@akllp.com on the email with dial in instructions. thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/22/2000 04:59 PM --------------------------- From: Ben F Jacoby @ ECT 12/22/2000 04:22 PM Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT To: michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com @ ENRON, david.onuschek@us.abb.com, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelby Malkemes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lorie Leigh/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Wednesday, Dec 27 11AM CST Conference Call All: Please plan to participate in a conference call on Wednesday, Dec. 27 at 11AM CST to discuss the breakout contract for the transformers. Mike / Dave: It would be extremely helpful to have comments back on the proposed form of agreement provided to you earlier by Kay before this conference call. Please forward your comments to the e-mail group listed above. Shelby / Lorie: Please set up a call in number and distribute the call in info to the e-mail group listed above. Thanks much everybody. Have a happy and safe holiday. Aloha! Ben

FYI ---------------------- Forwarded by Inja Chun/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 03:14 PM --------------------------- Enron Technology From: Inja Chun 09/25/2000 12:52 PM To: Dan Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: EnFORM Proposal and Resumes Dan and Tom, As we discussed, I am aggressively seeking well qualified top talent permanent and contract personnel for both Commodity Logic and Deal Bench. We have specified our requirement for specialized technical experience (WebLogic, Java, JSP, HTML) and we are receiving many promising resumes in response. We talked with Andersen Consulting, PriceWarterhouse, Enform, Valtech, Common Vision, Delinea, etc. and we made it clear that we want them to augment our permanent staff rather than doing a turn-key operation to which they have all agreed. Attached are some of the preliminary resumes and fee schedules from EnFORM, we expect many others to be in approximately same range of rates. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks, Inja PROPOSAL- summary Technical BUSINESS MODEL DEVELOPMENTJava Support Offer Expires on October 30, 2000 Page 2 of 2 Category Resource Level Availability Date Billable Rate Technical Mgr Bryan, Curt Senior Manager October 3 $180 (65% Std) Sr. Architect Zhou, Xiaodong Senior Manager October 3 $180 (65% Std) Andrews, Jim Senior Manager Now $180 (65% Std) Architect Kounthapanya, Sam Lead Senior Now $125 (70% Std) Tran, Tommy Lead Senior October 16 $125 (70% Std) Moore, Paula Senior Consultant Now $110 (70% Std) Kefi, Omar Senior Consultant October 16 $110 (70% Std) Data Architect Smith, Maria Manager Now $145 (60% Std) Sr. Developer Chung, Brandon Senior Consultant October 3 $110 (70% Std) Hamilton, Matthew Senior Consultant October 30 $110 (70% Std) Moore, Eric Senior Consultant October 30 $110 (70% Std) Yeager, Nathan Senior Consultant October 30 $110 (70% Std) Jr. Developer Cherry, Travis Staff Consultant Now $55 (60% Std) Dauphin, Doug Staff Consultant Now $55 (60% Std) Olson, Sara Experienced Consultant October 9 $80 (60% Std) Sample, Matt Experienced Consultant October 30 $80 (60% Std) ---------------------- Forwarded by Inja Chun/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 11:00 AM --------------------------- "Martin, Dan" <Dan.Martin@enform.com> on 09/22/2000 05:38:30 PM To: inja.chun@enron.com, john.spitz@enron.com cc: "Wendler, Doug" <Doug.Wendler@enform.com>, "Rodriguez, Melody" <Melody.Rodriguez@enform.com> Subject: EnFORM Proposal and Resumes Inja and John, Again, it was a pleasure meeting with you yesterday. As promised, I am sending the resumes of candidate architects and developers along with a short proposal for your review. I also included the resumes of a few very capable Junior Developers in case you see a need for additional horsepower at a very low rate. If possible, I would like to stop by for a short 10-15 minute meeting with you on Monday so I can deliver a hard copy and then walk you through our proposal. As you can imagine, we are very interested in working with Enron so we have given you the selection of our best folks and we have priced these individuals very aggressively. I look forward to working with you in the near future. Regards, Dan Martin Director, Java Technology (713)350-1829 <<Introducing EnFORM to Prospects.ppt>> <<Enron_Proposal_1.doc>> <<Enron Java Resumes.zip>> - Introducing EnFORM to Prospects.ppt - Enron_Proposal_1.doc - Enron Java Resumes.zip

George, Below is a list of questions that Keith and I had regarding the Westgate project: Ownership Structure What will be the ownership structure? Limited partnership? General partner? What are all the legal entities that will be involved and in what capacity(regarding ownership and liabilities)? Who owns the land? improvements? Who holds the various loans? Is the land collateral? Investment What happens to initial investment? Is it used to purchase land for cash?Secure future loans? Why is the land cost spread out on the cash flow statement? When is the 700,000 actually needed? Now or for the land closing? Investment schedule? Investment Return Is Equity Repayment the return of the original investment? Is the plan to wait until the last unit is sold and closed before profits are distributed? Debt Which entity is the borrower for each loan and what recourse or collateral is associated with each loan? Improvement Construction Are these the only two loans? Looks like it from the cash flow statement. Terms of each loan? Uses of Funds How will disbursements be made? By whom? What type of bank account? Controls on max disbursement? Internet viewing for investors? Reports to track expenses vs plan? Bookkeeping procedures to record actual expenses? What is the relationship of Creekside Builders to the project? Do you get paid a markup on subcontractors as a general contractor and paid gain out of profits? Do you or Larry receive any money in the form of salary or personal expenses before the ultimate payout of profits? Design and Construction When will design be complete? What input will investors have in selecting design and materials for units? What level of investor involvement will be possible during construction planning and permitting? Does Creekside have specific procedures for dealing with subcontractors, vendors, and other professionals? Such as always getting 3 bids, payment schedules, or reference checking? Are there any specific companies or individuals that you already plan to use? Names? These questions are probably very basic to you, but as a first time investor in a project like this it is new to me. Also, I want to learn as much as possible from the process. Phillip

FYI; please take any action you deem appropriate. Jim ---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 12/01/2000 11:59 AM --------------------------- Pat Brandt <pbrandt@lrci.com> on 11/30/2000 04:55:52 PM To: "'james.derrick@enron.com'" <james.derrick@enron.com> cc: Subject: online compliance training Hi James: My name is Pat Brandt and I work for the Legal Research Center ("LRC") in Minneapolis. As you may know, we are the nation's leading provider of outsourced legal research and writing services. Recently, we have entered into a strategic business alliance with Integrity Interactive Corporation ("IIC"), to offer industry-leading, online compliance training - training that could help Enron save millions in the event of a DOJ prosecution. LRC's role in this alliance is to provide the legal research content for the compliance courses and assist in the marketing and selling of the IIC product. You can view our compliance modules at work or home, as long as you have access to the internet and a personal access code. To receive an access code or more information, please call (800-776-9377) or send me a reply email. Thank you for your time and have a great day! Sincerely, Patrick C. Brandt, Esq. e-Compliance Sales Director Legal Research Center 700 Midland Square 331 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55401 pbrandt@lrci.com

Not necessary yet, Karen, but thanks. Fitz is out of the office until Monday, so there won't be any action taken until then. Thanks again, SRS Karen Marshall@ECT 03/29/2000 03:44 PM To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Franz Edward Alphonse Thanks Sherri. Franz Alphonse did not interview with Enron. He may be interested in a business venture related to his company?? I can pull his resume for you if you like. Just let me know. Thanks, Karen Marshall Enron North America Corp. From: Jeff Skilling @ ENRON 03/29/2000 11:47 AM Sent by: Sherri Sera@ENRON To: Jay Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Karen Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Franz Edward Alphonse Jay, Jeff received a call yesterday from a 2nd year HBS student and co-founder of a B2B commerce company - Franz Edward Alphonse - who wanted to speak to Jeff (for the ever-popular "5 minutes") about his company. Jeff has asked that you follow up with this gentleman. His phone number is 617.493.5597. (Karen, I'm copying you in the event you have any information on Mr. Alphonse - i.e., did he interview w/Enron and if so, how did he do). Thanks, Jay. Please send Jeff a note with any update once you have spoken to Franz. SRS PS - I'm back from Italy and ready to have that drink whenever it works for you and Greg. I understand he's out for a few weeks now while he moves his family to Houston...

I would like to come to discuss several issues that I have outlined in the accompanying attachment.

Trang, Thanks. Vince From: Trang Dinh 01/10/2000 06:30 PM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Congratulations! You did again! I just read about your most recent accomplishment. Congratulations on your promotion! Go Vince....go Vince... go Vince..! Sending warmest regards, Trang

Good Morning, Over the last couple of weeks, we've made several recent additions to the Portland IT applications team. We hope that with this new influx of talent we will continue to "raise the bar" for IT support of Enron's trading activities in Portland. Richard Schweiger is our new Senior Applications Specialist. He comes to Enron through RHI Consulting where he contracted at Enron for the last 2 months and has now converted to full-time. Richard has several years of Visual Basic and C++ programming experience. He has been living in the Portland, Oregon area for the past 4 years and is originally from California. His current projects include migration of the California Pre-Trade application to the intranet as well as building strong middle tier architecture to support the new CAL-Web development. Michael Tully is our new lead Trading Floor Support analyst. He recently moved from Oklahoma where he was the Lead Help Desk Support for Electronic Storage Corporation. Mike's wife is due with their second baby in January. Outside of work, Mike love's to scuba dive. Mike is currently working for Comsys and hopes to eventually convert to full-time. Mike is replacing Wendella Rhoads who recently moved back to Eugene to be closer to family. Dan Maxwell is a new contract developer from Maxim consulting working on the California Pre-Trading application. Dan currently lives in Boise, Idaho and commutes to Portland during the week. Dan spent the previous year commuting to Washington DC developing software for GEICO insurance company. He is originally from Miami, Florida where the beach is the place to be but counting is a lost art. Paul Kane has recently transferred from the IT infrastructure group to the IT applications group to work on SQL support and development. On a sadder note, we will be losing Winston Goodbody on December 18th to a six month cross-country skiing trek across Wyoming. Winston has been contracting at Enron for the last year and a half and will be sorely missed. Thanks, David Poston

<http://www.expedia.com/default.asp?rfrr=-1410> home <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=HOME&rfrr=-1410>flights <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=FLIGHTLAUNCH&rfrr=-1410>hotels <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=HOTLAUNCH&rfrr=-1410>cars <http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=carw&rfrr=-1410>vacations <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=PKGLAUNCH&rfrr=-1410>cruises <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=CRUISELAUNCH&rfrr=-1410>deals <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=DEALS&rfrr=-1410>guides <http://www.expedia.com/daily/guides/default.asp?rfrr=-1410>maps <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=MAPS&rfrr=-1410>business <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=BIZWIZ&rfrr=-1410> site map <Http://www.expedia.com/daily/sitetour/default.asp?rfrr=-1410> my trips <Http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=litn&rfrr=-1410> my profile <Http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=info&rfrr=-1410> customer support <Http://www.expedia.com/daily/service/default.asp?rfrr=-1410> CONTENTS <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif> Deals & News <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif> Your Fares <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif> Special Deals <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=000016477000092d1> <Http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/spaceit.gif> Dear Kevin, <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000164d9000092d1&qscr=cmsh&rfrr=-1410> If you're ready to get away, Expedia Vacations <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000164d9000092d1&qscr=cmsh&rfrr=-1410> can save you up to 30% on your trip. We'll help you create your perfect customized vacation -- and save you money at the same time. Choose the exact flight, hotel, and rental car you want, then add activities like passes to Universal Orlando, a rafting expedition, or a sunset dinner cruise. It's everything you want in a vacation, and nothing you don't. Plus, booking is easy and hassle-free. <http://expedia.com/daily/common/spaceit.gif> <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif>Book your ultimate vacation -- and save up to 30% -- now <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000164d9000092d1&qscr=cmsh&rfrr=-1410> <http://expedia.com/daily/common/spaceit.gif> <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif>Learn more about Expedia Vacations <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000164be000092d1&rfrr=-1410> <http://expedia.com/daily/faretracker/images/gold_rule3.gif>DEALS & NEWS <http://expedia.com/daily/common/spaceit.gif> Find a flight deal now! Airlines have lowered their fares to hundreds of destinations, so if you want to travel, use our Flight Wizard <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000164d9000092d1&qscr=fltw&rfrr=-1410> to find a deal. Chances are good that we've got a fare you'll love! Save 10% on British Airways flights to Europe If you've been thinking of visiting Europe, Expedia.com and British Airways have a deal to help: 10% off flights <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000164ef000092d1&rfrr=-1410> from 21 U.S. cities to over 30 European cities. Book by November 12. Hot hotel deals -- wherever you're traveling Hotel rates continue to be amazingly low, so you're bound to find a bargain wherever you're headed. Need a little inspiration? See our hotel deals in New York <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000168d0000092d1&rfrr=-1410>, San Francisco <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000168b2000092d1&rfrr=-1410>, Hawaii <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=000016871000092d1&rfrr=-1410>, and Las Vegas <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000168e9000092d1&rfrr=-1410>, or for more cities, visit our Hot Hotel Deals <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=000016871000092d1&rfrr=-1410> page. See Travel News <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000168ba000092d1&rfrr=-1410>. <http://expedia.com/daily/faretracker/images/gold_rule3.gif>SELECT FARE TRACKER ROUTES <http://expedia.com/daily/common/spaceit.gif> Select your routes We've noticed that you don't have Fare Tracker routes selected. Put Fare Tracker to work for you today, and we'll keep you updated on the best fares, every week! Here's how it works: You choose your three favorite routes (example: Chicago to New York). We search the airlines to find the lowest published fares for your routes, and give you the range of fares found recently by other Expedia.com travelers. We send the results right to your inbox! Just click the link below, sign in with your member ID and password, and select virtually any airport in the world. Select Fare Tracker routes now <https://www.expedia.com/pub/userinfo.dll?qscr=logi&uurl=qscr%3Dsubs%26rfrr%3D%2D14 10&ussl> Need more information? <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif>Want to change your Fare Tracker routes? <http://www.expedia.com/pubspec/scripts/eap.asp?GOTO=FARETRCK&rfrr=-1410> <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif>What does Airlines' Lowest Published Fare mean? <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif>Why are fares found by other shoppers included? <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif>Check out all your route and fare options with our Flight Wizard <http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=fexp&flag=f&rfrr=-1410&EAPid=8510-1>. <http://www.expedia.com/daily/common/images/dot2.gif>Visit <http://www.expedia.com/pub/eta.dll?qscr=fpfl&rfrr=-1410&EAPid=8512-1>Airline Fare List to check out the airlines' published fares on any route. <http://expedia.com/daily/faretracker/images/gold_rule3.gif> SPECIAL DEALS <http://expedia.com/daily/common/spaceit.gif> Expedia Vacations: All-inclusive Cozumel deal -- four nights from $633 <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000168d2000092d1&GOTO=PKGDEALDETAILS&DispSection=37&DestId=180033&rfrr=-1410> Stay at the four-star Allegro Resort, near great diving on the Palancar Reef. Expedia Special Rates: Orlando's Portofino Bay Hotel from $159 <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000168d2000092d1&GOTO=HotDetails&HotelID=201033&numadult=1&merchtext=Special+Deal!+Enjoy+rates+from+$159+per+night+for+stays+between+now+and+November+20%2E+Book+today+and+save!&rfrr=-1410> A beautiful, four-star resort inside Universal Orlando. Come and play! Expedia Ski Vacations: Three nights in Whistler, B.C. from $339 <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000168d2000092d1&GOTO=PKGDEALDETAILS&DispSection=88&DestId=180071&rfrr=-1410> Stay at the Aspens at Blackcomb -- plus, earn a free ski ticket! Expedia Cruises: Three-day Bahamas cruise from $179 <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000168ed000092d1&d=10/25/2001&d2=12/31/2001&i=760789&c=1&v=36&> Get away ... relax ... enjoy the sun and sand of Nassau. <http://expedia.com/daily/common/spaceit.gif> <http://expedia.com/daily/faretracker/images/gold_rule3.gif> Thank you for traveling with Expedia.com. Expedia.com Travel Team Don't just travel. Travel Right.TM <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=000016877000092d1&rfrr=-1410>Expedia.com <http://expedia.com/daily/faretracker/images/gold_rule3.gif> Ski for FREE, with Expedia Ski Vacations! <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=000016477000092d1> Planning a snowy getaway with Expedia Ski Vacations <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000168ef000092d1> is like cutting to the front of the lift line -- it's fast and easy to book everything you need, from your flight to your equipment rental to your lift tickets. Plus, if you book before November 19, you can get a free lift ticket <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=000016477000092d1>! <http://expedia.com/daily/common/spaceit.gif> <http://expedia.com/daily/faretracker/images/gold_rule3.gif> The airlines' lowest published fares are the lowest roundtrip fares published by the airlines for your routes. These fares may not be available on the days you wish to travel. Our Fare Calendar <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000164d9000092d1&qscr=ftap&zz=973022164458&rfrr=-1410> shows you when these fares are available. The range of recent fare prices found by Expedia.com customers--the lowest and highest fares found for your routes--can help you determine the ideal price for your route. Photo: Darryl Torckler/Stone Prices are subject to change without notice. Questions? Visit the Expedia.com Customer Support Center <http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000168d3000092d1&rfrr=-1410>. If you do not wish to receive any further Fare Tracker e-mails from us, please reply to this mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject line. If you'd like to give us feedback, please click here. <https://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll?qscr=fbak&rfrr=-1410> ?2001 Expedia, Inc. All rights reserved. Universal Orlando (R) Universal Studios (C) 2001 Universal Orlando. All rights reserved. This email was sent to: kruscit@ect.enron.com

You 'da best. Kay Mann 12/11/2000 09:04 AM To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas on, et.al. I know how to get LJM's signature. Enron North America Corp. From: Mitch Robinson 12/11/2000 08:58 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas on, et.al. Thanks again Kay. Now we need to wrap up the fun process of signatures. I hate to suggest this, but perhaps John Normand is a good starting point for EE&CC/NEPCO sigs. MItch Kay Mann 12/11/2000 08:44 AM To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas on, et.al. Mitch, The language in the draft I sent out yesterday reflects our agreement during the conference call. They requested something along the lines of what is in the email you forwarded, but I believe they accepted the following language: SWPC agrees that the Gleason and Wheatland contracts and associated warranties may be assigned to limited liability companies owned in whole or in part by an Enron entity pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Gleason and Wheatland contracts, and that Enron will not be required to maintain an equity position in either of these companies. SWPC further acknowledges that the assignment of the contracts and the transfer of equity will not impact any warranties or other provisions of the assigned contracts. How does this sound? Kay Enron North America Corp. From: Mitch Robinson 12/11/2000 08:09 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES Subject: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas on, et.al. Kay - No way. My reading of the contract indicates that they can't withhold approval anyway. Did they bring this up in Friday's conference call? Mitch ---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 08:07 AM --------------------------- DeKrey Lynn <Lynn.DeKrey@swpc.siemens.com> on 12/08/2000 12:07:47 PM To: "Mitch Robinson (E-mail)" <Mitch.Robinson@enron.com> cc: Monahan Bill <Bill.Monahan@swpc.siemens.com>, Saugstad Kathryn <Kathryn.Saugstad@swpc.siemens.com> Subject: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas on, et.al. Mitch SWPC requests that revision below be incorporated Lynn DeKrey > -----Original Message----- > From: Saugstad Kathryn > Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 11:47 AM > To: DeKrey Lynn > Cc: Monahan Bill > Subject: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re > Gleason, et.al. > > > Lynn: > > I have compared the latest version of the settlement agreement provided by > Enron . . . . . . . . . We do want to have approval on the assignments. > Granted, SWPC will not unreasonably withhold the approval but, we need to > keep this ability. > > Thus, Paragraph 5 should read: > > SWPC agrees that the Gleason and Wheatland contracts and associated > warranties may be assigned to limited liability companies owned in whole > or in part by an Enron entity pursuant to the terms and conditions of the > Gleason and Wheatland contracts, and that SWPC's consent to such > assignments will not be unreasonably withheld. SWPC will honor warranty > claims currently outstanding or asserted in the future by the contract > assignee, assuming such assignment is in accordance with the terms and > conditions of the Gleason and Wheatland contracts. > > >

<<hallmark.gif>> - hallmark.gif

T. Would you please send runner to get this? Thanks mhc -------------------------- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net) -----Original Message----- From: Patel, Tania <Tania.Patel@ENRON.com> To: Berry, Lara <Lara.Marie.Berry@ENRON.com>; Booth, Khymberly <Khymberly.Booth@ENRON.com>; Broadfoot, Mark <Mark.Broadfoot@ENRON.com>; Buckley, Karen <Karen.Buckley@ENRON.com>; Butcher, Sharon <Sharon.Butcher@ENRON.com>; Cash, Michelle <Michelle.Cash@ENRON.com>; Clyatt, Julie <Julie.Clyatt@ENRON.com>; Cronin, Jennifer <Jennifer.Cronin@ENRON.com>; Davis, Sarah A. <Sarah.A.Davis@ENRON.com>; Divelbiss, Sasha <Sasha.Divelbiss@ENRON.com>; Duncan, Josh <Joshua.Duncan@ENRON.com>; Engler, Adrianne <adrianne.engler@ENRON.com>; Fincher, Wendy <Wendy_Fincher@ENRON.net>; Foster, David <David.Foster@ENRON.com>; Gonzalez, Cynthia <Cynthia.Gonzalez@ENRON.com>; Hargrave, Michelle <Michelle.Hargrave@ENRON.com>; Joyner, Tamera <Tamera.Joyner@ENRON.com>; Kerr, Vanessa <Vanessa.Kerr@ENRON.com>; Klicker, Karl <Karl.Klicker@ENRON.com>; Labbe, Anne <Anne.Labbe@ENRON.com>; Lane, Jonathan <Jonathan.Lane@ENRON.com>; Lewis, Simone <Simone.Lewis@ENRON.com>; Lorenz, Michael <michael.lorenz@ENRON.com>; McGarr, Rebecca <Rebecca.McGarr@ENRON.com>; McLoughlin, Hector <Hector.McLoughlin@ENRON.com>; Melodick, Kim <Kim.Melodick@ENRON.com>; O'rourke, Tim <Tim.O'Rourke@ENRON.com>; Oxley, David <David.Oxley@ENRON.com>; Palmer, Lizzette <Lizzette.Palmer@ENRON.com>; Peng, Terry <Terry.Peng@ENRON.com>; Quintana, Becky <Becky.Quintana@ENRON.com>; Russi, Estalee <Estalee.Russi@ENRON.com>; Slone, Jeanie <Jeanie.Slone@ENRON.com>; Solis, Felicia <Felicia_Solis@ENRON.net>; Sprock, Angela <Angela.Sprock@ENRON.com>; Sullivan, Kriste <Kriste.Sullivan@ENRON.com>; Tessandori, Bobbi <Bobbi.Tessandori@ENRON.com>; Wilbeck, Tom <Tom.Wilbeck@ENRON.com>; Worrell, Perrin <Perrin.Worrell@ENRON.com>; Yeverino, Norma <Norma.Yeverino@ENRON.com>; Zarkowsky, Sarah <Sarah.Zarkowsky@ENRON.com>; Brown, Cole <MeCole.Brown@ENRON.com>; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec <robert.w.jones@enron.com>; Curless, Amanda <Amanda.Curless@ENRON.com> Sent: Tue Nov 13 08:34:14 2001 Subject: Book Club - come and get'em OK - The books have arrived and I have ordered a limited amount. Please come by my desk - 1669A to pick these up. I would drop them off, but it is a long story!! See you all soon and happy reading!! (You may send someone else to pick up your book) Tania Patel HR Analyst Enron Executive Compensation 713-345-4990

SDG&E filed a Complaint with the FERC that requests an "emergency order capping at $250 per MWh the prices" for all parties selling into the Calif ISO and the Calif PX. SDG&E claims that the Calif ISO and the Calif PX are "fundamentally flawed and inherently incapable of producing workable competition". EPMI is directly impacted by this Complaint. Even though FERC has approved EPMI's Market-Based Rate certificate after a finding that we had no market power, this Complaint would restrict us from selling at above $250 per MWh into the Calif ISO and Calif PX. Government Affairs is responding in two ways -- 1. A direct response from EPMI to FERC responding that there has been no finding that EPMI has market power and therefore we should not lose our market-based rate authority. 2. A response through WPTF (Western Power Trading Forum) and EPSA to argue more broadly the facts of what is going on in California (bad hedging by SDG&E) and poor market structure rules. The fundamental problem is that the FERC is running scared about price spikes and may, without any real thinking, approve such a Complaint. SDG&E has asked for expedited treatment and a decision could be out as early as mid August. This issue again highlights how important the on-going FERC Investigation in Market Issues is for Enron. We are putting together a detailed plan of how Enron will present our recommendations to FERC in this Investigation and will discuss this with you. Call with questions. Thanks, Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000 02:30 PM --------------------------- Hunter S Shively 08/30/2000 11:38 AM To: Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject:

Here is the information I received back from IT in Houston regarding the Forward Obligation Report. It looks like, for our purposes, the most accurate way to run the report is showing only term deals. The "Schedule" and "Liquidate" versions of the report do not capture desk-to-desk deals, and therefore will not show our traders' positions in relation to each other, which I believe is what we're looking for. Am I right? Or totally crazy? Let me know what you think. Thanks, Kate ---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/04/2001 11:33 AM --------------------------- From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/04/2001 01:34 PM CDT To: Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Brett Pate/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: RE: Forward Obligation Report Hi Diana & Kate, You are not wasting our time, you make our time valuable. You should be able to see ver 3.0.0.36 in production and ver 3.0.0.38 in stage, if not phone David Poston for support. Ver 3.0.0.38 is newer and includes insignifficant changes on the form for selection desks, which Corry Bentley requested here. They don't allow us to promote now things like that to production the last five days and the first day of the month. Now the report is able to show both the term and schedule (liquidation) data. The term data are the way the deal was entered with Deal Entry, Deal Blotter or EOL bridge, signed and confirmed. The schedule data should be very much the same with all the changes in Deal Scheduling. There is no difference between schedule and liquidation data, schedule data is a subset of liquidation one in time and it is about 2-3 weeks. At the moment the schedule strips for WEST contain data from 3/22/2001 to 4/5/2001, and the liquidation the same data from 4/2/1996. Because we don't schedule normally desk-to-desk deals (I think we schedule between EAST and WEST only) we don't have schedule (liquidation) data for desk-to-desk. I hided the check box to avoid confusions. The option Show Desk is very simple, changes the format of the header for Region, nothing else. Kroum -----Original Message----- From: Scholtes, Diana Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:34 PM To: Kroumov, Kroum Subject: Forward Obligation Report Kroum, I was running the new version of the Obligation Report. I was not included in the testing phase of the new version and apparently the report is still not doing what the "fix" was initiated for. Originally, my discussions with Doung Luu was for the Obligation report to capture: 1. All deals with any changes made in Deal Scheduling and 2. All Desk to Desk deals. Number (2), I believe was the difficult one. When selecting the option on "Show Deals" in order to capture schedule changes you must select "Liquidate". This does work, but it does not give you the option to select "Show Desk to Desk", which like I said before, was the intent of the changes. Please contact me for further discussion. I apologize for not participating and wasting your time. Sincerely, Diana Scholtes (503) 464-3807 -----Original Message----- From: Symes, Kate Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:06 PM To: Pate, Brett; Kroumov, Kroum Cc: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ENRON Subject: Forward Obligation Report Question Good afternoon, IT Wizards - I'm curious about a feature on the new Forward Obligation Report. It is now possible to run the report showing term, scheduled, or liquidated deals. In the past I've always run the report showing term deals, then entered my desk-to-desk deals from those numbers. Now I believe the report is designed to pull data from our scheduling database, so I'm wondering what the difference is between the term deal report and the scheduled deal report. Each produce completely different numbers! Please let me know when you get a chance. Thanks, Kate Symes Trading Support 503-464-7486

[IMAGE] June 12, 2001 Can't read this email? Click here Issue#: e10806 PROVANTAGE Customer: jeff_dasovich@enron.com To unsubscribe from the? Original Advantage Click here (Do Not Reply to this email) Products that give you the Professional Advantage! [IMAGE] Crystal Reports v8.5 Developer Edition By Crystal Decisions $25 Instant Rebate through June 29, 2001! ORDER NOW! ??$364.53 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] PhotoSmart 618xi Digital Camera 2.11MP By Hewlett Packard 2.11 Megapixel resolution with HP Imaging Technology; Pentax 3x optical zoom lens, 2x digital zoom; Manual controls: aperture and shutter priority, picture ...More ??$366.94 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 128MB Smart Media Card 3.3v By Viking Receive a $25 rebate direct from Viking Components when you purchase Viking Part# SSFDC3/128 128MB Smart Media Card between June 1, 2001 and June 30, 2001. ...More ??$125.62 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] GoPrint/XL Printer Adapter By AeroComm Inc. Wireless printer-sharing system that allows up to 64 PCs to share up to 6 printers. Print from up to 125 feet; eliminates the need for networking ...More ??$143.56 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] PYRO CardBus 1394DV for Notebooks By ADS Technologies Add 2 IEEE1394 ports to your Notebook Capture and Edit Digital Video Transfer data at 400 Mb/Sec. Connect to Hard Drives, Printers, Scanners, ...More ??$78.95 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] New! PhotoPC 3100Z Digital Camera 4.8Megapixel 6x Zoom By Epson Whatever you create, from snapshots to enlargements to web-ready video clips, this digital camera has the tools you need to succeed. This high-value camera ...More ??$684.65 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] HipZip MP3 Player Kit USB w/2 40MB Disk, Head Phones By Iomega Get a $50 Rebate direct from Iomega from February 17, 2001 through June 30, 2001. ...More ??$172.94 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] IntelliFlash USB Flash Memory Reader By Viking Compact Flash is currently the world's smallest removable data storage system based on flash technology. Compact Flash cards are about one third the size ...More ??$72.98 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Pocket CD98 24X Max USB (with USB Cable) By Addonics PocketCD98 is the "go anywhere" CD-ROM Drive that connects to any PC through the PC Card (PCMCIA) slot or USB port. It's compact enough for any briefcase ...More ??$135.27 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stylus Color 777 Ink Jet 2880x720 12ppm USB By Epson The EPSON Stylus Color 777 ink jet printer delivers remarkable print speed, superb output and outstanding value. Ideal for home and home office, this feature-rich ...More ??$74.94 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] PDC 640 Plus Digital Camera 640X480 VGA 8MB By Polaroid A mid-level digital camera with an LCD color display, multiple flash modes, self-timer and a removable 8MB memory card. ??$149.30 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] New! ZyWALL 10 Internet Security Gateway By ZyXEL The broadband network boom has changed how people use the Internet. Many computers are wired to Internet 24 hours a day, and most of them are exposed to ...More ??$264.94 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Que! Fire DVD-RAM 9.4 GB External FireWire 1394 Dr By QPS Inc. The Que! DVD-RAM Fire Drive is ideal for desktop publishing, archiving and presentations. With the Que! DVD-RAM Fire Drive, DVD movies and MPEG-2 can be ...More ??$505.64 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] ML591 24-Pin 120V 360CPS Wide Parallel By Okidata Microline 590 and 591 OKISMART Paper Handling for hassle-free, reliable switching between different media. This 24-pin dot matrix printer adjusts to ...More ??$596.99 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] OmniCube 4-Port KVM Switch By Belkin The Belkin OmniCube 4 Port KVM Switch is the most economical solution for controlling four PS/2 computers from one keyboard, mouse and monitor. It support ...More ??$99.55 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Caviar 40.0GB 7200RPM EIDE Ultra-ATA/100 By Western Digital Western Digital's WD Caviar 7200 RPM EIDE hard drives are the performance champions for advanced desktop personal computers. The latest drives achieve ...More ??$144.55 [IMAGE] ? ? Web Address: www.PROVANTAGE.com? ?Toll Free: 800-336-1166???? Fax: 330-494-5260???? email: sales@provantage.com Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | FREE Catalog ,2001 PROVANTAGE Corporation, 7249 Whipple Ave. NW, North Canton, OH 44720 Products, prices, terms, conditions, or offers may change at any time. Company and/or product names are generally trademarks, or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Some promotional text may be copyrighted by the product's manufacturer.? The Original Advantage promotional email is delivered only to customers of PROVANTAGE Corporation. PROVANTAGE customers have purchased products in the past and submitted their email address as part of the checkout process. Or, customers have entered their name in the "Add to Email List" box on the PROVANTAGE.com home page. Any customer may unsubscribe from the list at any time by going to http://www.provantage.com/unsubscribe.htm. The email address is permanently removed from additional promotional electronic mailings, and will not be reactivated unless requested by the customer.?? [IMAGE] BizRate Customer Certified (GOLD) Site

I don't think I have this information. Do you? Lets talk. Thanks. DF Eric Benson 02/08/2000 03:42 PM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@Enron, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@Enron cc: Michael Moran/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron Subject: RC Reports - Salary Allocations to Work Orders To: Distribution From: Eric Benson In doing some research for Dorothy regarding salaries charged to work orders, I was advised by Judy Lin and James Weitekamp with accounting, that we need to provide Judy Lin with a payroll fixed percentage distribution by employee. For example: RC - 0237 Eric Benson .10 Navajo Work Order (work order number) .90 salary charged to RC The report to Judy should be for each employee within your respective RC's. I have the allocation or percentages for Lou's RC but do not have the percentages for Drew and Dorothy. If you like, please provide this information to me and I will be happy to send the request on to Judy Lin in accounting who will make all necessary corrections for January and February payroll. Eric

Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 23; No ancillary schedules awarded. Variances detected. Variances detected in SC Trades schedule. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001041023.txt ---- SC Trades Schedule ---- +++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO. TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: EPMI MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/10/01 TRADING_SC: PGAE PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15 SCHED_TYPE: ENGY PURCH_SALE: 2 DEAL_NO: 1

Sometimes I have brilliant ideas and this may not be one of them. Also, it would be nice if Jennifer had a singing role but I know how kids can be so don't you worry. I'm not implying that Zachary shouldn't sing (or take on an acting role as well) because that would be even better. Or we could do a quartet. Whatever. But you ,dahling, are the centerpiece here because Mother and Daddy like you best. So here are my preliminary thoughts for an Irving Houston off-Broadway play. Naturally this is based on an Ada & Mike premise. (1) This old suitcase (Daddy packed the Louis Vuitton without wheels a WEEK early but Mother wouldn't let him close it and then it wouldn't close) (2) Lovely Linda (you remember Linda, don't you?) (3) Hi Debba, Hi Sara (what's the story, morning glory, etc. and of course this is the information hot-line and Mother's source of e-mail) I'm sure I'll have many more brilliant ideas over the weekend but I wanted you to be the first to share these ideas with me. Sas Hope Phoenix was facializing and massaging (and fun to boot)

Version 2.0 of the ClickAtHome Portal is now available! Log into www.clickathome.net now, from work or home! Access the PEP System through the portal! Choose your reviewers and fill out your evaluations in the comfort and privacy of your home! Outlook Web Access and eHRonline will be available SOON! The ClickAtHome portal is fully customizable for you! YOU choose the content on each page, as well as the look and feel! Note: the ClickAtHome portal must be launched through an Internet Explorer browser, 5.0 or higher.

John Anderson PTC/NERC Brad Petzold Power Nav -- John Henry (202) 466-0547