Datasets:

haritzpuerto

/

the_pile_00_Enron_Emails

like 0

Dear Sara: It was a pleasure to speak with you this evening. I faxed my resume to your office just now. There are 2 versions...only the PROFILE section differs. One is marketing focused the other more business consulting or general business, please use which ever one you deem best. I really appreciate your interest in my job search and I am very grateful for any assistance you may offer. Best Regards, Kristina _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Yes, you can flow 100%. I confirmed that this was a part ot the rate case settlement. Chris.Germany@enron.com on 01/05/2001 09:50:36 AM To: Ora L. Ash/Clarksburg/CT/CNG@CNGNOTES cc: Subject: Re: Contract 571492 In the old days, you could only flow 7/12 of the MDQ from secondary points. That was when these contracts were good for the whole year. So you are telling me the "rules have changed"? I can now flow 100% from secondary points? Ora_L._Ash@dom.com on 01/05/2001 08:38:35 AM To: Chris.Germany@enron.com cc: Subject: Re: Contract 571492 You can use the full contract MDQ to move from and to secondary points. Of course, this would be subject to any secondary restrictions. Chris.Germany@enron.com on 01/04/2001 04:48:44 PM To: Ora L. Ash/Clarksburg/CT/CNG@CNGNOTES cc: Subject: Contract 571492 We have a FTGSS contract with a MDQ of 40,148 dts. The primary receipt point on this contract is storage. BUT, we can flow some of this gas from secondary points like Oakford or the Pools. How much gas can be sourced from Secondary receipt points?

I see you guys filed in opposition to Sempra's FERC filing. As you know, we filed in support, although we don't think FERC will really do anything. We're getting lots of pressure from the PUC to take a more active role in supporting them at the FERC these days. Just a heads up.

Sizable staff of 245 lawyers in merger limbo HOUSTON (AP) - The fate of Enron Corp.'s massive legal staff has been a subject of discussion amid talk of possible layoffs at the troubled energy trader. The company's legal staff size is larger than some law firms. "We've always regarded them as one of the big law firms in Houston," said Howard Ayers, managing partner of Andrews&Kurth, one of the city's largest with about 240 lawyers in Houston. Enron has about 245 lawyers worldwide, company spokesman Vance Meyer said. With about 145 lawyers in Houston, if it were a private firm it would have been the city's sixth-largest, according to the Chronicle. Enron's internal law office has grown along with the huge trading firm, now set to merge with smaller but stronger Dynegy. As Enron's stock plummeted further, Dynegy last week denied rumors it might drop out and leave Enron to face possible bankruptcy. Speculation in the legal community runs the gamut from rumors that dozens of lawyers could be laid off as early as this week to the idea that Enron will hold on tightly to its talent. "My guess is they'll need their lawyers while they get things in a more steady state. There's a lot of legal work to go through," said Joel Swanson, a senior partner at Baker&Botts, a law firm with about 265 lawyers in Houston. In addition to Enron's in-house legal staff, the company also has hired just about every large firm in Houston over the last few years.

Click on this link to view report -->

congratulations!! ---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 01/18/2000 03:03 PM --------------------------- Rick Causey@ENRON 01/17/2000 06:04 PM Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON To: All Enron Worldwide cc: Subject: Global Risk Management Operations Recognizing Enron
,s increasing worldwide presence in the wholesale energy business and the need to insure outstanding internal controls for all of our risk management activities, regardless of location, a global risk management operations function has been created under the direction of Sally W. Beck, Vice President. In this role, Sally will report to Rick Causey, Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Sally
,s responsibilities with regard to Global Risk Management Operations will mirror those of other recently created Enron global functions. In this role, Sally will work closely with all Enron geographic regions and wholesale companies to insure that each entity receives individualized regional support while also focusing on the following global responsibilities: 1. Enhance communication among risk management operations professionals. 2. Assure the proliferation of best operational practices around the globe. 3. Facilitate the allocation of human resources. 4. Provide training for risk management operations personnel. 5. Coordinate user requirements for shared operational systems. 6. Oversee the creation of a global internal control audit plan for risk management activities. 7. Establish procedures for opening new risk management operations offices and create key benchmarks for measuring on-going risk controls. Each regional operations team will continue its direct reporting relationship within its business unit, and will collaborate with Sally in the delivery of these critical items. The Houston-based risk management operations team under Sue Frusco
,s leadership, which currently supports risk management activities for South America and Australia, will also report directly to Sally. Sally retains her role as Vice President of Energy Operations for Enron North America, reporting to the ENA Office of the Chairman. She has been in her current role over Energy Operations since 1997, where she manages risk consolidation and reporting, risk management administration, physical product delivery, confirmations and cash management for ENA
,s physical commodity trading, energy derivatives trading and financial products trading. Sally has been with Enron since 1992, when she joined the company as a manager in Global Credit. Prior to joining Enron, Sally had four years experience as a commercial banker and spent seven years as a registered securities principal with a regional investment banking firm. She also owned and managed a retail business for several years. Please join me in supporting Sally in this additional coordination role for global risk management operations.

We have responded to the message you recently sent to Citibank Customer Care. To get your response, sign on to Account Online (http://www.accountonline.com) and take the following steps: Go to Help/Contact Us, find the heading 'Send a Secure Message' and choose 'View/Update Messages.' This email is generated automatically, and the address is not monitored for responses. If you try contacting us by using "reply," you will not receive an answer. Additionally, it is not a secure environment. Use the 'Send New Message' feature in the same section as noted above to write to us about your account.

Legal folks -- please let me know of any other legal people who should be added to interconnection issue emails. On May 16, FERC clarified its policy regarding credits for network upgrades associated with the interconnection of a generating facility -- all network upgrade costs (the cost of all facilities from the point where the generator connects to the grid), including those necessary to remedy short-circuit and stability problems, should be credited back to the customer that funded the upgrades once the delivery service begins. Once a customer signs up for transmission, then the transmission provider is limited to charging the higher of the expansion cost or an embedded cost rate. Generally, Enron has not procured transmission at the time of interconnection and therefore, may be required to pay the network upgrades at the time of interconnection; however, the order clarifies that a credit should be available to the interconnecting customer or a third party that contracts for transmission away from the generator. Kinder Morgan v. Consumers Energy (Docket No. ER01-1587-000)

[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Search Amazon.com for: We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit the Help page Updating Subscriptions and Communication Preferences and click the Customer Communication Preferences link. Please note that this e-mail was sent to the following address: lavorato@enron.com [IMAGE]

Several discussions have been circulating regarding current Enron phone numbers and the need for new toll-free numbers the UBS East Power Group. For the UBS Power Trading group (EAST): We can request new toll-free numbers (24 Hour, Fax and Scheduling) as per Kathy Link (UBS Houston 5-5418). a. Don Baughman and I have discussed a few options for these numbers, but would welcome any input or related requirements you may be aware of prior to us initiating this. b. We will establish these for East Power ASAP. David Steiner (503-464-3701) will be the contact to facilitate this effort for the West Desk Our current "853" numbers will probably be replaced by new "584" numbers(Kathy Link is working on this). If this occurs, new numbers will be assigned to us. Our Current "800" numbers for 24-Hour, "Fax, and Scheduling can be forwarded / transferred by the IT group to the Estate from our current phone turrets. Let's discuss these numbers tomorrow, Tuesday morning (February 4th). Thanks, Corry Bentley 3-0421

FYI, I have a database where I keep track of my online approvals/declines and reasons why (if there are any!). I don't know to what extent Frank ever looked at it, but you might find it helpful. It is called "ENA Legal Online Trading Agreements" database. If you're interested, I'll ask Mike Neves to get you access.

info on the inspection for draw # 19 i/a/o $289,056.53. By the way congratulations on your new position as CEO with Enron. -----Original Message----- From:?? Temica Lacy Sent:?? Wednesday, December 13, 2000 11:46 AM To:???? Fernando Parra Cc:???? Shelly Lambert Subject:??????? Jeffrey Skilling/#10386513 Have received the inspection back and the following has been noted: 1. Carpet (scheduled value $35,000.00) drawing $15,750.00.? Not completed.? No credit given. CO #21 1. Hardware (scheduled value $42,164.11) Just started to install. Please advise. Thanks, Temica Lacy ext.1695 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: ************************************************************************ The information contained in this ELECTRONIC MAIL transmission is confidential. It may also be privileged work product or proprietary information. This information is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution [other than to the addressee(s)], copying or taking of any action because of this information is strictly prohibited. ************************************************************************

I recall that we set up a warning flag approach with market services last year to make sure that Sempra never "goes physical" without us manning the battle stations and deciding what to do. Do you guys know who the noms would come in to in Market Services if Sempra ever decided to try to take their gas out of Cunningham and move it off system? Care to venture a guess as to what that person would do if a 100,000 nom by Sempra into an IT contract for a haul from the Cunningham storage point to Demarc hit their desk? Sempra couldn't nom the gas into a transport contract without first giving Kent/Sue/Morgan a physical delivery nom under the SF agreement, correct? At which point we would immediately nom the SBA, correct? These issues may be important to our closing this year's deal if TCEM can't come up with the corp. guarantee. I.e., if we can retain absolute control of the noms, do we really have any "go physical" risk??? We need to think this through. DF

I can' t thank you enough for organizing my business cards. I know it's a pain and I really appreciate it. Thank you so much. Also, I've got an entry in my bank account (EDI payment) for abou $5700. Do you have the paper for that? Do I have any other expense thing-ees coming? Thanks, Jeff

When: Thursday, March 01, 2001 1:30 PM-2:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Where: eb3270 *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Attendees: Sally Beck Kim Theriot Joe Hunter Bryce Baxter Bob Hall Mechelle Stevens Leslie Reeves James Scribner Mary Solmonson

chk email for demand-reduction details. thx, jeff

Please add to the list as number three. Mark ----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 05:25 PM ----- Peter Keohane Sent by: Sharon Crawford 10/26/2000 04:33 PM To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Top Legal Risks Mark, on reflection, I think that there is currently only one legal risk within Enron Canada that would warrant being added to the top legal risks for ENA, which is the Alberta Sundance "B" PPA acquired in the Alberta PPA auction in August, 2000. I would suggest the description attached. Regards, Peter Janette Elbertson 10/24/2000 08:47 AM To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Top Legal Risks Mark Haedicke requested I forward the attached document to you. Janette Elbertson Enron North America Corp. Legal Department - EB3326 Telephone: (713) 853-7906 Fax: (713) 646-2600 janette.elbertson@enron.com

Mark: Please review the attached Credit Schedule from Dow. Given that our trade flow with them has increased to date and is expected to further accelerate, I agree with you totally that we need to finalise the ISDA. Doug ---------------------- Forwarded by Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 04:14 AM --------------------------- "Corbett, Cheryl (CE)" <CECORBETT@dow.com> on 02/22/2001 07:11:13 AM To: "'Douglas.S.Friedman@enron.com'" <Douglas.S.Friedman@enron.com> cc: "Antuna, Luis (L)" <LAntuna@dow.com> Subject: FW: ISDA TDCC/Enron Doug, attached for your review and comment is the draft ISDA Schedule we recently forwarded to Adam Gross. Please forward any comments directly to Luis Antuna at lantuna@dow.com or by telephone at 517-638-6789. Regards, Cheryl Corbett > -----Original Message----- > From: Antuna, Luis (L) > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:59 AM > To: 'agross@enron.com' > Cc: Billings, Mike (ME); Corbett, Cheryl (CE) > Subject: ISDA TDCC/Enron > > Mike Billings has given us your name as the first contact person in Enron > to negotiate an ISDA agreement with The Dow Chemical Company (TDCC). Our > files show an ISDA between Enron Capital & Trade Resources and two Dow > entities (Dow Hydrocarbons & Resources, and Dow Chemical Canada). In > addition to this, my understanding is that TDCC (my predecessor in this > position) and Enron ( presumably a lawyer) had some discussions about an > ISDA, but for some reason they were not successful. Despite this, the > level of trading between the two companies have increased and TDCC has > never accepted and cannot accept the Terms and Conditions included in the > confirmations sent by Enron. For these reasons, we think we should agree > on an ISDA where conditions acceptable to both parties can apply to the > intense trading between the two companies. > > In order to speed up the process, I have enclosed to this message Dow's > template for the ISDA Schedule. We would appreciate if Enron could review > the attached draft and come back with any comments or issues for > discussion. Please forward this message to the responsible person asking > him to contact me for any discussion. Thanks. > > Regards > > <<Enron North America Corp.(draft) 2-9-01.doc>> > > > Luis Antuna > Attorney - Financial Law > The Dow Chemical Company > 2030 Dow Center > Midland, MI 48674 > Tel: (517) 638-6789 > Fax: (517) 636-0861 > lantuna@dow.com > - Enron North America Corp.(draft) 2-9-01.doc

Hope you can make it -----Original Message----- From: qpinfo@quieropisco.com [mailto:qpinfo@quieropisco.com]On Behalf Of Jessica Rossman Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:20 PM To: info Subject: RaceCarClub 2001 Party - Friday October 5 - www.racecarclub.net Rev up your engines and prepare for an evening built for speed... The RaceCarClub and QUIERO PISCO invite you to the third annual RaceCarClub party co-hosted for the first time with the Texaco/Havoline Grand Prix, Friday, October 5, 2001, from 8:00 p.m. until 1:00 a.m. at the historic Rice Lofts. Celebrate Houston's 2001 Texaco/Havoline Grand Prix with the velocity for which the RaceCarClub is known, as QUIERO PISCO and a revved up roster of Houston's own social racing hosts steer the RaceCarClub fun at the Rice that evening. The Empire Room will feature Houston's own and 2001 Houston Press Best New Artist nominee Arthur Yoria (www.arthuryoria.com), along with the El Orbits on the balcony and a plethora of some of downtown's hottest DJ's in the Crystal Ballroom and five open bars with free flowing bottomless cocktails featuring Houston hottest new Latin import, QUIERO PISCO. Fashionable attire is a requisite, along with your all-inclusive entrance fee ($35 pre-sale on-line or Market Price as available at the door). To help those effected by the bearish economy, this year we are offering a reduced price of $25 for the first 500 tickets sold - so act fast and save a few bucks. A portion of the evening's proceeds will be donated to the Muscular Dystrophy Association. To make your evening and pocket stretch a little further, this year your RaceCarClub pass waives the cover charge at the following downtown bars the evening of the event: * Club 511 * Grasshopper * Prague * 410 Shot Bar * Mercury Room * Spy To buy your tickets or for more information, please visit our web site at www.racecarclub.net. If you have any questions and/or comments please feel free to contact Martin Productions, Inc. at info@martinproductions.com or 713-223-9500. Please forward this email along to others that might enjoy the evening. RaceCarClub is brought to you by QUIERO PISCO, Houston's newest spirit imported from Latin America for your partying pleasure. ----------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send an email to: requests@quieropisco.com with UNSUBSCRIBE QPINFO in the BODY of the message. The information contained in this communication is confidential and proprietary information intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, distribution, copying, or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately. If you believe this communication is inappropriate or offensive, please contact Ocean Energy`s Human Resources Department.

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001 07:43 AM --------------------------- Robert B Cass 02/21/2001 05:33 PM To: EOL North America Traders cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: NOTICE TO ALL ENRONONLINE TRADERS Before you begin trading your EnronOnline products on March 1st ... Review the dates on your products. We are in the process of converting "regular" products to "Tokenized Reference Period" Products. A Tokenized Reference period product is one which the system sees as "Day Ahead", "Month Ahead", "Month Ahead +1", etc - but this is not what you or your customers see. At midnight every night, the system checks the current date and then CHANGES the dates shown on the Product Description. For example, if Product #20451 is "Month+1", then on Feb. 28, the Short Description on the Website and in Stack Manager would show "April1-30". However, on March 1, the system will automatically change the date of Product #20451 to show "May1-31". Note that the Product number stays the same, but the date has automatically updated. When all of your Products use Tokenized Reference Periods, this works fine - your links all stay on the same relative date (links are between Product Numbers, not between Product Short Descriptions, so as the date changes, it might look like your links are changing, but in fact they have stayed on the same Product all the time - only the date changed). Believe it or not, changing to Tokenized Reference Periods will make your life easier in the long run - you will not have to continually create new Products and links. Links between Products which share the same dates should continue in effect as the dates of both the Parent and Child change together. The important thing to remember here is that for monthly Products which have Rolling Tokenized Reference Periods, the dates will continue to change automatically on the 1st day of each new month. For example: On Feb. 28, the "Prompt Month" product will be March; but on March 1, it will become April, etc. On Feb. 28, the "Prompt +1 Month" product will be April; but on March 1, it will become May. etc. To verify if your product has a Tokenized Reference Period or if it has a specific date, please review your product in Product Manager under the 1st tab marked "Product Details." Your product will be "Tokenized" if it has the following applications: There will be a check mark in the box after "Lifespan Tokenized?" The term "Prompt Month" or "Prompt Month +1" will be displayed in the next scroll-down box. If you have any questions about the set-up of your products, please contact the following members of the EnronOnline Product Control Group: Rob Cass x 35491 Kevin Meredith x 39555 Melba Lozano x 58986 Chris Walker x 37533

Jason: Per my voice mail message here are some of the Swiss Re documents in the event that you can join me at 2 tomorrow. Carol ----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000 05:31 PM ----- Brando Hayden 05/30/2000 02:10 PM To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Swiss Re agreement Carol, here are copies of the ELRIX Website Terms and Conditions and the ELRIX Weather Derivatives Privacy Policy. I will go ahead and set up a meeting. Thanks and take care, Brando

fyi - am speaking with an inhouse PUHCA lawyer -----Original Message----- From: "Sternberg, Michelle" <MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com>@ENRON Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:33 AM To: Shackleton, Sara Cc: Yaish, Yair Subject: FW: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA Sara - I spoke with Yair about your suggestion to have a "unilateral" approach to include Affiliates for yourselves but not for us since we are restricted by PUHCA (as explained by Anthony Wilson, our in house regulatory attorney) and he is inclined to not agree to your request (our approach is either if applied to both of us or neither of us). Let me know if you need to discuss this further - in which case we will get on a call (Yair, you and myself) to discuss. Regards, Michelle -----Original Message----- From: Sternberg, Michelle Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:18 PM To: 'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com' Cc: Yaish, Yair Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA Sara - I have spoken with our in-house regulatory specialist and she has informed me that we cannot agree to include our regulated or non-regulated Affiliates in Set Off under the Public Utility Holding Company Act without getting approval from the SEC. Please advise if we can proceed on the ISDA with carving out Affiliates in Set Off, as per our original request. Regards, Michelle Allegheny Energy Global Markets Office of General Counsel 909 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor New York, New York 10022 (T) 212-224-8718 (F) 212-224-8446/8711 -----Original Message----- From: Sternberg, Michelle Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 3:35 PM To: 'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com' Cc: Yaish, Yair Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA Sara - I am checking internally if we can agree to the below. I will get back to you in the beginning of next week. Regards, Michelle Allegheny Energy Global Markets Office of General Counsel 909 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor New York, New York 10022 (T) 212-224-8718 (F) 212-224-8446/8711 -----Original Message----- From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 7:38 PM To: MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com Cc: Marie.Heard@enron.com Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA Michelle: With respect to your setoff request, we cannot agree to eliminate setoff for your non-regulated affiliates. Perhaps you could provide us with the regulated affiliate(s) for a carve out. I look forward to hearing from you. Regards. Sara Shackleton Enron Wholesale Services 1400 Smith Street, EB3801a Houston, TX 77002 Ph: (713) 853-5620 Fax: (713) 646-3490 -----Original Message----- From: "Sternberg, Michelle" <MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sternberg+2C+20Michelle+22+20+3CMSternberg+40aeglobalm arkets+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:14 AM To: Shackleton, Sara Cc: Heard, Marie Subject: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA Sara - As per Marie's instructions, please find attached a blackline incorporating the changes that will be required to be made in the final form of ISDA (modifications to the Notice and Set-Off provisions). The attached is the last version that I have but if the changes are acceptable, I would suggest that you take the changes and incorporate it into your form of agreement since it is the final version. <<ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc>> Once reviewed, please let me know if the changes are acceptable - at which point you can forward to me a revised Schedule (without the signature page) via e-mail and I can have the agreement countersigned and replace the Schedule with your revised Schedule. Thank you for your patience. Regards, Michelle - ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc << File: ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc >> ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************

I received a call from the consultant who performed the archeology survey at stations 1 and 2. Based upon the plot plan provided by construction, the archeology discovery at station 1 does not occur within the area of proposed impact, even though part of the discovery is within the facility fence. The report recommendation to the SHPO by the archeologist will be that during construction activities in this area, an archeologist be onsite to monitor and ensure that the site is not impacted. They will also recommend that we fence the discovery area within our facility to ensure that future pipeline activities will not disrupt the site. I have asked that two reports be prepared for each site. One report for each station covering the construction areas and the other reports to include the entire 40 acres at each compressor station. All four reports will be submitted to Bret Fritch in Omaha on Monday, the 26th of March.

Change of mailing address: 49 bancroft mills unit 2J wilmington DE 19806 Thanks, Mike Mike Gioffre dgioffre@hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

That's so weird. Prentice left her car door ajar (when she went to go to school yesterday morning, it was dead and she had to get a jump). I was surprised that the phone was only 300 pesos. I thought they'd charge by the minute, but apparently, it's a flat 10 pesos for local (i.e., 800 calls), no matter how long one's one. Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com> 04/03/2001 04:00 PM To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com> cc: Subject: RE: Domaine I left the car light on - battery totally dead! Freezing cold in SF - no coats - landed at 9 pm - home at 12:30 am. ugh!!! 300 pesos is just the El Cid part of the bill - I think the rest will be on your card. Eldon actually got them to adjust some of that off as well cuz he said your connection kept going off. I say "If only life always gave us credits when our connections went off!" -----Original Message----- From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:50 PM To: Nancy Sellers Subject: RE: Domaine we got back ok. (i didn't know tulsa had such a neat airport.) Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" ndavi.com> <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com> cc: 04/03/2001 03:50 PM Subject: RE: Domaine you don't want to know -----Original Message----- From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:47 PM To: Nancy Sellers Subject: RE: Domaine The entire phone bill is 300 pesos??? Yes, please fax to me. And please email me rest of expenses when you get a chance so I can write you a check for everything (plane,phone, golf, etc., etc.) You guys get back OK?

Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) sara.shackleton@enron.com ----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001 12:57 PM ----- "Dautenhahn, Kimberly" <kdautenh@lehman.com> 04/16/2001 11:49 AM To: "'sara.shackleton@enron.com'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com> cc: Subject: ISDA Master Agreement Sara, I apologize for the delay in getting the signed Agreement back to you. We are waiting to receive it back from our Zurich office (unfortunately the person required to sign has been out). We should have faxed signature pages (which we can, in turn, fax to you) at some point tomorrow. In addition, we should be able to get you your original copy later this week. Regards, Kimberly Kimberly A. Dautenhahn Transaction Management Corporate Advisory Division Lehman Brothers (646) 836-2011/0609 (fax) kdautenh@lehman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers Inc. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice.

Steven has been asked to fly to Washington today.? Because of the conflict in meetings there, he has requested this conference call be cancelled until next week.? Once we have rescheduled, we will contact you with the information for dialing in.? Thank you for your patience and the changes we have had to make this week.? .? -----Original Message----- From: Steven Kelly [mailto:steven@iepa.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 2:53 PM To: Steven Kelly; William Hall; Ward Scobee; Tony Wetzel; Tom Heller; Ted Cortopassi; Sue Mara; Steve Ponder; Steve Iliff; Ross Ain; Roger Pelote; Robert Frees; Rob Lamkin; Rich Dyer; Pete Levitt; Paula Soos; Paul Wood; Nam Nguyen; Milton Schultz; Marty McFadden; Lucian Fox; Kent Palmerton; Ken Hoffman; Jonathan Weisgall; Joe Ronan; Joe Greco; Jeff Dasovich; Jack Pigott; Hap Boyd; Greg Blue; Frank Misseldine; Eric Eisenman; Ed Tomeo; Ed Maddox; Duane Nelsen; Doug Levitt; Doug Fernley; Dean Gosselin; Curt Hatton; Cody Carter; Carolyn Baker; Bob Escalante; Bill Woods; Bill Carlson; Mark Smith Cc: Jan Smutny-Jones; Katie Kaplan; Carol Hudson; Andy Brown Subject: Re: Conference Call Scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on Friday, Jan 12 To Discuss FERC Market Power Mitigation Technical Conference Oops.? Forgot attachment. ----- Original Message ----- From: Steven Kelly To: William Hall ; Ward Scobee ; Tony Wetzel ; Tom Heller ; Ted Cortopassi ; Sue Mara ; Steve Ponder ; Steve Iliff ; Ross Ain ; Roger Pelote ; Robert Frees ; Rob Lamkin ; Rich Dyer ; Pete Levitt ; Paula Soos ; Paul Wood ; Nam Nguyen ; Milton Schultz ; Marty McFadden ; Lucian Fox ; Kent Palmerton ; Ken Hoffman ; Jonathan Weisgall ; Joe Ronan ; Joe Greco ; Jeff Dasovich ; Jack Pigott ; Hap Boyd ; Greg Blue ; Frank Misseldine ; Eric Eisenman ; Ed Tomeo ; Ed Maddox ; Duane Nelsen ; Doug Levitt ; Doug Fernley ; Dean Gosselin ; Curt Hatton ; Cody Carter ; Carolyn Baker ; Bob Escalante ; Bill Woods ; Bill Carlson ; Mark Smith Cc: Jan Smutny-Jones ; Katie Kaplan ; Carol Hudson ; Steven Kelly ; Andy Brown Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 2:43 PM Subject: Conference Call Scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on Friday, Jan 12 To Discuss FERC Market Power Mitigation Technical Conference IEP has scheduled a conference call for 9:00 a.m. (PST) on Friday, Jan 12 .? The purpose of the conference call will be to brief/discuss this weeks events, including the Governor's State of the State speech delineating his new energy policy, and the discussions in Washington D.C./FERC on forward contracting, etc. ? In addition, we will discuss the?upcoming FERC Market Power Mitigation Technical Conference.? Attached is a "strawman" developed by EPSA for consideration. ? ? The Call-In Number is??? ??? ??? 888/271-0949 The Participant Code is??? ????? 111756

Per your request!

Hello everyone: Well it is almost that time again! I am going to try something different. I am forwarding you the time sheet by email. Save the document to whatever drive you want to and then fill out any off duty time or overtime that you had and return to me by email. I will need this by the 15 and 30 (or 31st) of each month. This may work better than hand delivering. Let me know what you think.

John, Thanks. Stinson will be able to join us for dinner. He is opting out of the paper due to his big workload but we can get his perspective on the last 8 years he spent at Enron. Vince "John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 11/28/2000 09:44:17 AM To: vkamins@enron.com cc: Subject: 2001 FMA European Conference Here's the info on the European conference. Just for your files. John >Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 08:40:39 -0500 >From: Karen Wright <wright4u@earthlink.net> >Subject: 2001 FMA European Conference >To: kwright@fma.org >X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) >X-Accept-Language: en,pdf > >2001 FMA European Conference > >The Fifth Annual European Meeting of the Financial Management >Association International (FMA) will be held May 31 and June 1, 2001 at >the Hotel Sofitel (Rive Gauche) in Paris, France. FMA
,s European >Meeting brings together academicians and practitioners with interests in >financial decision-making. The meeting provides a forum for presenting >new research and discussing current issues in financial management, >investments, financial markets and institutions, and related topics. >Keynote addresses and other special presentations will be held in >addition to research paper presentations. > >Paper Submissions >Research Papers. The program includes traditional research paper >presentations. Criteria used to determine the suitability of these >papers for the program include the nature of the research problem, >implications of the proposed research, the quality of the research >design, and the expected contribution of the research to the >literature. Please note that the purpose of these sessions is to >present new and unpublished research. > >Submission Fee. There is no submission fee for the FMA European >Conference. > >Submissions. Please follow these steps: >Complete the Presentation Form that can be downloaded at >www.fma.org/paris.htm. Carefully select the subject code on the >Presentation Form that most closely describes your research. The code >number you select will be used to select reviewers for your proposal. > >Send six (6) copies of your completed paper, along with the completed >Presentation Form, to the FMA office (Financial Management Association, >University of South Florida, College of Business Administration, Tampa >FL 33620-5500, USA). >Please note that only completed papers will be accepted for the FMA >European Conference review process. > >The paper submission deadline is Friday, December 1, 2000. > >You will receive an electronic confirmation of your submission within >six weeks of its receipt by the FMA office, and you will be notified of >the results of the reviewing process by the middle of February, 2001. > >Competitive Paper Awards >The Financial Management Association International is pleased to >announce that four (4) $1,500 awards will be presented in conjunction >with the 2001 FMA European Conference. The "Young Scholars" award will >be presented to the best paper authored by a Ph.D. student (or >equivalent) or recent Ph.D. (or equivalent) graduate. Three additional >$1,500 awards will be presented to the papers deemed "Best of the Best" >by the members of the 2001 FMA European Conference Competitive Paper >Awards committee. Please note that these awards will be made only if, in >the opinion of the FMA Awards Committee, a paper warrants such a >decision. The decisions of the FMA Awards Committee are final. > >Accepted Papers. If your proposal is accepted, the version of the paper >you submit will be sent to its discussant as soon as he/she is >identified. You are obligated to send the final version of your paper to >the discussant and session chair by April 27, 2001. You also are >obligated to present your paper in a professional manner at the assigned >FMA program session. > >The collegiality of the meeting provides a very special opportunity for >participants to share their work and to hear about the work others are >doing. Thus, individuals whose papers are accepted for presentation at >the 2001 FMA European Conference will be expected to either chair a >session or discuss a paper. > >Program Co-Chairs > >Francois Degeorge >HEC Paris >1 rue de la Lib,ration >78351 Jouy en Josas Cedex >France >33-1-39-67-72-34 (ph) >33-1-39-67-94-34 (fax) >degeorge@hec.fr > >Kent Womack >Dartmouth College >Amos Tuck School >Hanover, NH 03755 >1 603 646 2806 (ph) >1 603 646 1308 (fax) >kent.womack@dartmouth.edu > >Additional Opportunities For Participation > >Session Chairperson or Discussant. If you wish to serve as the >chairperson of a session or paper discussant, but are not submitting a >paper, please complete the Participation Form which can be downloaded >from www.fma.org/paris.htm. Submit the completed form to the FMA office >by December 1, 2000. Session organization will take place in March, >2001. > >Deadline Summary > >Completed Papers: December 1, 2000 >Chairperson/Discussant Requests: December 1, 2000 > > > John D. Martin Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance Finance Department Baylor University PO Box 98004 Waco, TX 76798 254-710-4473 (Office) 254-710-1092 (Fax) J_Martin@Baylor.edu web: http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html

Currently, we do not confirm west deals that flow 6 days or less so we have not had to be real difficult about contact names in deal entry. However, starting February 1, we are going to confirm all next day deals in the west using the same criteria we do in the east - that is - deals 3 days or less are sent on a confirmation that does not require a signature and everthing else on a letter requiring a signature. Hourly deals will not be confirmed. So it is very important that the traders fill in a contact name when they are entering deals. The confirmation letter cannot be prepared without a contact name. It stops the whole process. We are not going to be able to put names in every time they do not. If they do not see the contact they want in the drop down list, put the correctly spelled first and last name in the comment section in deal entry and we will add this contact to the list and it should appear the next day. If you can help us out with this, maybe we won't have to keep asking you for contacts. Thanks!

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 02:48 PM --------------------------- Brian Hoskins 09/15/2000 12:51 PM To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, bthoskins@hotmail.com, Luis.Mena@enron.com, Amir_Ahanchian@enron.net, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lenine Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Flag Football Schedule (Again) The City League has once again revised our schedule. Hopefully, this will be the last time. In case you're wondering why we play the Jay Ballers, the team we beat last week, three times during the season and the Raiders only once, don't ask me. The Raiders, however, are a much better team, so that should work to our advantage. Have a good weekend, Brian All games are on Wednesday nights at Jaycee Park ballfield 9/6 Bye 9/13 8pm vs. Jay Ballers (W 13-7) 9/20 7pm vs. Organized Confusion 9/27 7pm vs. Raiders 10/4 7pm vs. Dawgs (Enron) 10/11 9pm vs. Jay Ballers 10/18 7pm vs. Jay Ballers 10/25 9pm vs. Organized Confusion 11/1 9pm vs. Dawgs (Enron) Directions to Jaycee Park ballfield (NW) 1300 Seamist @ Grovewood Go out the West Loop N (610) to W. 18th Street. Exit W. 18th Steet, go right Take right on Seamis, follow to the park

Final Report on Stakeholder meeting (created by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 5/19/99)

Mary: Please let me know what happens. All calculations should be made as of a specific date. Sara Mary Cook 08/02/2000 01:12 PM To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: ParPak See the attached proposed letter for ParPak. I need the rest of the calculations, the Value of the Posted Credit Support as of the Valuation Date and the difference. Do you normally have the trader review this type of letter prior to sending? I think we should in this instance. I expect ParPak to reply with a request for a Return Amount. As this occurs, please let me draft that letter as well. Thank you. I will finalize the letter for you when I get the calculations. Any questions, please call. Mary

We have length at PV all day on Sunday, and light load on Monday. That is HE 2-24 MST on Sunday, and HE1-6,23,24 on Monday. The energy is parked with PNM at PV. The cost is $125. We are long in position manager. Please route the sale to buy/resale #566175, and then make the sale under the ST-WBOM book. There is no HE 3 in Pacific time. This may require some creativity on your part. Please call me with any questions and good luck! Bill

We have received invoices from MAIN region for 2002 assessment. I do not know of any Enron positions that would warrant us making payment. However, let me know. Enron SE past due $3925.45 EPMI past due $13426.43

Rick and David, Also give me your analysis wherein the Counterparty receivable financing is more generic, without specific references to contracts but a global reference to receivables in connection with a product type, and assume representations by Counterparty to Bank that do not include setoff rights as any type of "permitted encumbrance or charge." Would the Bank still be put on reasonable inquiry vis a vis the Enron position? -----Original Message----- From: Cook, Mary Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 9:53 AM To: Taylor, Mark E (Legal); 'rantonof@cwt.com'; 'dmitchel@cwt.com' Cc: Shackleton, Sara Subject: Setoff and ISDA Section 7(b) Transfer Provision; Comments on New Draft of Master Netting Item 1. Please refer to Section 7, particularly 7(b), of the ISDA form regarding transfer of receivables and the following setoff language from our schedule. (g) Setoff. (A) Upon the designation or deemed designation of an Early Termination Date the Non-defaulting Party or the non-Affected Party (in either case, "X") may, at its option and in its discretion, setoff, against any amounts Owed to the Defaulting Party or Affected Party (in either case, "Y") in Dollars or any other currency by X or any Affiliate of X under this Agreement or under any other agreement(s), instrument(s) or undertaking(s), any amounts Owed in Dollars or any other currency by Y to X or any of X's Affiliates (irrespective of place of payment or booking office of the obligation) under this Agreement or under any other agreement(s), instrument(s) or undertaking(s). The obligations of Y and X under this Agreement in respect of such amounts shall be deemed satisfied and discharged to the extent of any such setoff exercised by X and/or X's Affiliates. X will give Y notice of any setoff effected under this Section as soon as practicable after the setoff is effected provided that failure to give such notice shall not affect the validity of the setoff. For purposes of this Section, "Owed" shall mean any amounts owed or otherwise accrued and payable (regardless of whether such amounts have been or could be invoiced) as of the Early Termination Date. Amounts subject to the setoff permitted in this Section may be converted by X into any currency in which any obligation Owed is denominated at the rate of exchange at which X, acting in a reasonable manner and in good faith, would be able to purchase the relevant amount of the currency being converted. If an obligation is unascertained, X may in good faith estimate that obligation and setoff in respect of the estimate, subject to the relevant party accounting to the other when the obligation is ascertained. Nothing in this Section shall be effective to create a charge or other security interest except as may be provided under applicable law. This setoff provision shall be without limitation and in addition to any right of setoff, netting, offset, combination of accounts, counterclaim, lien or other right to which X or any of X's Affiliates is at any time otherwise entitled (whether by operation of law, contract or otherwise). Each of the parties represents and acknowledges that the rights set forth in this Section are an integral part of this Agreement between the parties and that without such rights the parties would not be willing to enter into Transactions. Each of the parties further acknowledges that it is executing this Agreement on behalf of itself as principal and, with respect to this Section, as agent on behalf of its Affiliates, which Affiliates shall receive the benefits of this Section and otherwise be bound as if such Affiliates had directly signed this Agreement as it relates to this Section. (B) Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained in this Agreement, the Non-defaulting Party or non-Affected Party, as the case may be, shall not be required to pay to the Defaulting Party or Affected Party any amount under Section 6(e) until the Non-defaulting Party or non-Affected Party receives confirmation satisfactory to it in its reasonable discretion (which may include an opinion of its counsel) that all other obligations of any kind whatsoever (whether pursuant to Specified Indebtedness as defined herein or otherwise) of the Defaulting Party or Affected Party to make any payments to the Non-defaulting Party or non-Affected Party or any of its Affiliates under this Agreement or under any other agreement(s), instrument(s) or undertaking(s), which are Owed as of the Early Termination Date hereof have been fully and finally satisfied. The following are three areas of questions. A. Should a Counterparty effect an assignment of receivables under Section 7(b) for a financing to Bank, what is Enron's "priority" position (assuming Bank has filed a financing statement)? Is the analysis below correct? 1. Bank takes receivable assignment under contract subject to Enron setoff rights because Bank would be held to actual knowledge of the express setoff right in the contract under which it is taking the receivables. 2. Is there any method by which the Bank can prime Enron (assuming Enron has made no public filings) without Enron's written consent? B. Assume a master netting agreement is in place. I believe our assignment provisions protect us and are more prohibitive than the ISDA; however, we may want to expressly cite assignment of receivables rather than the master agreement and transactions "as security". Please review and advise of any particular language you think should be added. C. Do you have any suggested language that we might add to the form 7(b) provision via our schedule, or is it necessary? For example, adding at the end of 7(b), ";provided, any such assignment shall be made expressly subject [and subordinate] to this Agreement, including, without limitation, all rights of [ENA] under Section 6 and [reference setoff section]." Item 2. Can I get any other comments on the revised draft of master netting agreement? Cordially, Mary Cook Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal Houston, Texas 77002-7361 (713) 345-7732 (713) 646-3393 (fax) mary.cook@enron.com

Are you sure Lohitt is the right person to do this job. What about EOTT? No one at EOTT even knew that Steve was leaving before I told them last week. Communication skills are crucial in this job and I never thought that was one of Lohitt's strong skills,

Another bit of background re Frankfurt (see below). I would be a little bit more insistent on German Consulate support than Herr Sturm suggests (otherwise this could become a black hole for your time). ---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/30/99 09:40 AM --------------------------- "Sturm, Michael" <ST@frankfurt-business.de> on 08/10/99 11:35:23 AM To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Schroeder <Mark_Schroeder@enron.com> cc: "Thomas Geisel (E-Mail)" <tgeisel@ect.enron.com>, "John Thompson (E-Mail)" <jthompson@ect.enron.com> Subject: AW: Houston-Frankfurt Dear Mr. Kean: I would like to thank you and Mark Schroeder very much for your time and outstanding hospitality in Houston. I very much enjoyed meeting with you and your message, that your Chairman Kenneth Lay confirmed for dinner with our Mayor Petra Roth was very well received and we are all very excited and looking forward to November 30. However it raises great interest in the question of organization of the dinner and the additional participating chairpeople of other companies. Will Enron now invite for that dinner, which I understand will be the gathering of 10-12 major decision makers in the energy field? If you could be so kind as to share with us the thoughts of Ken Lay
%s office with regards to that point, or give me a contact there, I would very much appreciate. An alternative we discussed or as an addition the next day (Lunch), would be that a business-group would host an event, which could include a wider audience of business people of Houston. After having spoken with the German Consulate in Houston and with the German American Chamber here, it unfortunately appears as if they will not be capable for s.th. we achieve. Everybody recommended to work with the reputative Greater Houston Partnership, whose President was on vacation last week. I would welcome any assistance in getting us in contact with them. Probably it would not take too many efforts for Enron, to have them consider supporting out idea of promoting our ideas. To help you pass them, I again include our plan for Houston (see attached doc). I will be in contact with your colleague Mark Palmer with regards to the press-coverage. Thank you for your response to your earliest possible convenience. Yours Sincerely Michael Sturm Wirtschaftsf"rderung Frankfurt- Frankfurt Economic Development GmbH Hanauer Landstr. 182d 60314 Frankfurt am Main Tel: +011 49 69 212-38764 Fax: +011 49 69 212-36230 E-Mail: st@frankfurt-business.de http://www.frankfurt-business.de -----Urspr_ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Steven J Kean [mailto:skean@enron.com] Gesendet am: Samstag, 7. August 1999 00:30 An: st@frankfurt-business.de Cc: Mark Schroeder Betreff: Ken Lay is confirmed for dinner with the mayor on the evening of November 30. - Houstonplan.doc

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 02:14 PM --------------------------- Outlook Migration Team@ENRON 04/27/2001 01:00 PM To: Allison Horton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Amir Baig/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brandon Bangerter/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Ellis/Corp/Enron@Enron, Charles Philpott/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris P Wood/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Tull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave June/NA/Enron@ENRON, Donald Sutton/NA/Enron@Enron, Felicia Buenrostro/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Johnna Morrison/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Dorn/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn Schultea/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leon McDowell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leticia Barrios/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Milton Brown/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Raj Perubhatla/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shekar Komatireddy/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angie O'Brian/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bonne Castellano/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gwynn Gorsuch/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jo Ann Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, LaQuitta Washington/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra Lighthill/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Valeria A Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlotte Brown/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Fain/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary Fitch/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Anna Harris/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith Jones/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kristi Monson/NA/Enron@Enron, Bobbie McNiel/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Stabler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Prince/NA/Enron@Enron, James Gramke/NA/Enron@ENRON, Blair Hicks/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Johnson/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jim Little/Enron@EnronXGate, Dale Lukert/NA/Enron@ENRON, Donald Martin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrew Mattei/NA/Enron@ENRON, Darvin Mitchell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Oldham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wesley Pearson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ramon Pizarro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Natalie Rau/NA/Enron@ENRON, William Redick/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark A Richardson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph Schnieders/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gary Simmons/NA/Enron@Enron, Delaney Trimble/NA/Enron@ENRON, David Upton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mike Boegler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lyndel Click/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gabriel Franco/NA/Enron@Enron, Randy Gross/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Arthur Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Danny Jones/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Ogden/Houston/Eott@Eott, Edgar Ponce/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy Pursifull/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lance Stanley/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monique Sanchez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeanne Wukasch/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Potter/NA/Enron@Enron, Natalie Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Calcagno/NA/Enron@Enron, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Collins/HOU/EES@EES, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Loocke/ENRON@enronXgate, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shanna Boudreaux/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tamara Carter/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Wood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gabriel Fuzat/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jack Netek/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Lam Nguyen/NA/Enron@Enron, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jessica Hangach/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Kathy Gagel/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Lisa Goulart/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Ruth Balladares/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Sid Strutt/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA cc: Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL Current Notes User: To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook, it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of migration. Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following survey. When you finish, simply click on the 'Reply' button then hit 'Send' Your survey will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox. Thank you. Outlook 2000 Migration Team -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Full Name: Login ID: Extension: Office Location: What type of computer do you have? (Desktop, Laptop, Both) Do you have a PDA? If yes, what type do you have: (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot, Jornada) Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar? If yes, who? Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar? If yes, who? Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book? If yes, who? Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book? If yes, who? Do you have access to a shared calendar? If yes, which shared calendar? Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for mass mailings)? If yes, please list here: Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use: In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will need to know: What are your normal work hours? From: To: Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc? If so, when? From (MM/DD/YY): To (MM/DD/YY):

Now I know I've missed seeing the boys play! But that problem is almost over, after a very relaxing holiday season 24BOM is back on stage. This time at Conan's, at 39th and Hawthorne. The show is Friday Jamuary 11th 9ish. We certainly hope to see you there. Check out <http://www.24bom.com> for more show dates and other fun crap. C-U-THER!

Louise, Imbedded in these allocations are several functions for which EIM receives 100% dedicated resources (legal, HR, PR, etc.). Every 100% dedicated resource should be presented in its own RC -- in that way it becomes "controllable" and measurable. Today it is buried in an indirect allocation. This approach will isolate the truly indirect allocations and allow us to better manage the amount and appropriateness of these expenses. We plan to push this topic with respect to all allocations which hit EIM from Enron Americas, Enron Networks, or Enron Corp. Kent Castleman (EIM CAO) is going to discuss this approach with Wes. Regards, Ray -----Original Message----- From: Kitchen, Louise Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:59 AM To: Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Fallon, Jim; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael - COO London; Beck, Sally; Leff, Dan; Garland, Kevin; Dodson, Keith; Schiesser, Heath Cc: Colwell, Wes Subject: Budget allocations for COOa As you know the budget planning cycle is upon us. Several of the support functions role up under Enron Americas and then are billed out to the other Business Units. I would encourage all of you to look at the initial allocations below you receive from each of these Support Functions in order to verify that you are satisfied with the planned charges to your accounts. Wes's group can provide you with this information. I will be meeting with the Support Groups over the next week and should you wish me to raise any issues on your behalf please let me know or please contact the group leaders directly. As you can see from the Enron Americas allocation, I am hoping to make substantial changes to our numbers which reflect a substantially large increase from last year. Regards Louise << File: plan estimates.xls >>

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 01:04 PM --------------------------- "Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 10/18/2000 04:28:20 AM Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com> To: <ekrapels@esaibos.com> cc: Subject: ESAI Gas/Power Alert on Impact of Gas Prices on Generation Investment Attached is an essay of the impact of gas prices on generation investment. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me. Ed ____________________ Edward N. Krapels, PhD Managing Director ESAI Power and Gas Services tel 781 245 2036 cell 617 899 4948 ekrapels@esaibos.com www.esai.com

Hesco is showing a price of $2.85 for tne 29 & 30 Daren J Farmer 11/15/2000 10:33 AM To: Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Another HESCO Issue Charlene, We should not have scheduled any volume for the 29-30th. No price was negotiated that I can find. However, since gas did flow, I rolled the last price on the deal to cover those days. What price is Hesco showing? D Charlene Richmond 11/09/2000 01:37 PM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Another HESCO Issue Daren would you look at the price for 29 and 30th of March 2000 . There are no prices for these days but volume was scheduled for these days. Thanks Charlene Daren J Farmer 11/02/2000 02:59 PM To: Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Another HESCO Issue Charlene, Deal #214948 already had volume and price for the 12th and 13th. You may need to have the volumes updated by Volume Management. I added the 15th and 16th to the deal ticket. D Charlene Richmond 11/01/2000 04:02 PM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Another HESCO Issue Help . Steve Mauch at Hesco is wanting an answer ASAP ---------------------- Forwarded by Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 03:29 PM --------------------------- Vance L Taylor 11/01/2000 02:45 PM To: Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Another HESCO Issue Charlene, This gas purchase is not a part of the wellhead portfolio but is being traded on the Texas desk. I would suggest you get with Darren Farmer or someone on the desk. Sorry I could not be of more assistance! vlt x3-6353 Charlene Richmond 11/01/2000 08:22 AM To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Another HESCO Issue Meter 986725 for March 2000. Per Hesco both traders are gone at (Hesco and Enron) and they (Hesco) were not paid the correct price in March on the days mentioned below. Hesco cannot find where the price for these days were recorded. Per Hesco they were underpaid by $32,101.57. Hesco is wanting to come to our office to have a meeting about clearing this up. It will be nice if we don't have to meet with them. Production dates are Volume price they are looking for 03/12 2,029 2.65 03/13 2,009 2.65 03/15 2,022 2.71 03/16 1,976 2.72

Vince, Stinson, looks like just me and Jim Irvine attending this one may suffice since this is a working group meeting. As the note describes below, there will be a separate trip for you guys and me to determine long-term involvement, etc... Let me now when to schedule. Vince and Stinson may want to wait until KC Claffy or I can visit Portland, or have several Enron reps visit San Diego for demos and related discussions. Ravi. ----- Forwarded by Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications on 02/29/00 01:28 PM ----- tmonk@caida.org 02/29/00 09:18 AM To: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications cc: amy@caida.org, tmonk@caida.org Subject: [amy@SDSC.EDU: Re: CAIDA 'Metrics' WG meeting, 2 Mar 00 (fwd)] Ravi, Hi, Amy forwarded me your note. Since Thursday is the kick off discussions for the new working group, it might not be the ideal venue for Enron to get acquainted with CAIDA. Vince and Stinson may want to wait until KC Claffy or I can visit Portland, or have several Enron reps visit San Diego for demos and related discussions. We have been talking to Stan Hanks for some time about Enron's interests in passive measurement and are in the process of implementing some of the performance features in CoralReef that he has described as relevant to Enron. Examples of existing CoralReef analyses on OC3/12 links can be found at: https://anala.caida.org/CoralReef/Demos/cerfnet/link/ (real-time) https://anala.caida.org/AIX/ (post-processed traces) We are also working to better tune the skitter tool for reachability analysis and for use by providers, an example of some existing analyses can be found at http://www.caida.org/Tools/Skitter/Summary/sjc.skitter.caida.org/20000227/ For end-to-end measurements, including those relating to service level guarantees, we are working to make skping and sktrace more useful to providers and their NOC personnel, see http://www.caida.org/Tools/Skitter/skping/ Another tool of relevance to providers is our cflowd which analyzes flow export data from Cisco routers, see http://www.caida.org/Tools/cflowd/. We would appreciate the opportunity to talk with Enron personnel about how to make these tools more relevant and useful to your needs, however, it is doubtful that we will have time to discuss specific tools on Thursday. We look forward to meeting you soon! Take care, Tracie Monk Director, CAIDA 858/822-0943 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- To: amy@sdsc.edu cc: Christine_Blair@enron.net, Kristy_Carnes@enron.net Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:52:00 -0600 Subject: Re: CAIDA 'Metrics' WG meeting, 2 Mar 00 (fwd) Hi Amy, Jim Irvine (EBS head of Network Planning) and I (Team Lead, EBS Research) will attend the meeting. We will have our assistances (Christine Blair & Kristy Carnes, respectively) arrange the trip. We will plan to come in the night before and return on March 2,00. Also, either Vince Kaminski (MD and Head of Enron Research) or Stinson Gibner (VP, Enron Research) may also attend. They will let me know shortly if they plan to attend. Regards, Ravi. P.S. Our company name has been changed to Enron Broadband Services Kristy, Christine please make the appropriate travel arrangements. The place, time, etc. are listed. |--------+-----------------------> | | amy@sdsc.edu | | | | | | 02/24/00 | | | 07:07 PM | | | | |--------+-----------------------> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications | | cc: | | Subject: CAIDA 'Metrics' WG meeting, 2 Mar 00 (fwd) | >----------------------------------------------------------------------------| Hi Ravi, I wanted to follow up directly with you and see if you or anyone at Enron had any interest in participating in the proposed CAIDA "Metrics" working group meeting? Please let me know. Amy E. Blanchard CAIDA %%%%%%%%%%%%% e-mail: amy@caida.org phone: (858) 534-8338 fax: (858) 534-5117 B. WG Charters, Meeting on 2 Mar 00 I believe that we should instead run a single CAIDA Working Group on 'Network Metrics,' rather than the two proposed earlier. My draft of its charter is appended below. It focuses on producing educational material about network measurement, and on developing new metrics - these were the two areas of greatest interest amongst the CAIDA members. The WG co-chairs are Sue Moon (SprintLabs) and Brett Watson (MFN/Abovenet) You are invited to attend the first WG meeting. The agenda is as follows .. Agenda for CAIDA WG meeting on: Thursday 2 Mar 00 ----------------- 10 am - 4 pm, AboveNet, Downtown SJC (see below for details) ------------ ------------ 1. Review WG Charter - Is it reasonable as set out in the draft? - What should be removed or added? 2. Work through revised charter in detail - Identify the work required for each part - Determine who's willing to work on it - Attempt to determine delivery times 3. Discussion of new metrics - First attempt at making a list of metrics to be considered 4. Anything else ? Location: AboveNet is located in the Knight-Ridder Building, attached to the Fairmont Hotel complex. The address is 50 W. San Fernando St. San Jose, CA 95113 RSVP: To help us with organising the meeting, please send email to nevil@caida.org telling us how many will attend from your organisation. Cheers, Nevil ------------------------------------------------------------- Nevil Brownlee Visiting Researcher Phone: (619) 822 0893 CAIDA, San Diego CAIDA Network Metrics Working Group: Draft Charter, Tue 23 Feb 00 Goals: 1 Education + FAQ on What does 'measuring the Internet actually mean?' - Why measure anyway? - What can be measured? How? Where? By whom? - Active vs passive, end-to-end vs provider network only, application vs transport layer - Rating schemes: provider 'net performance' pages, Internet 'Weather Map's, Keynote, etc. Publish as CAIDA web pages, or maybe as an Info RFC + Survey paper on metrics and Internet Measurement - Current measurement efforts (Surveyor, RIPE Test Traffic, AMP, IPERF, AT&T, Keynote,skitter, ...) - Current tools Publish as CAIDA web pages 2 Service Metrics + Define new metrics - Taxonomy of current metrics (IPPM, RTFM, ITU, ..) - Summary of metrics used for current services - Gather information/ideas about new/emerging services, especially DiffServ-based ones - Make list of new metrics, either to improve measurement of existing services or to support new ones [list of 'metrics' questions (Appendix A) goes here] + Organise experimental implementation/testing of tools for new metrics + Make recommendations on implementation - Define core set of 'really useful' metrics - recommend that CAIDA implement these as a 'Service Measurement Toolkit' + Publish new metric definitions through IPPM or RTFM + Produce document "measurement requirements for hardware/software vendors." Publish on CAIDA web pages ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appendix A: Questions from the earlier draft CAIDA WG charters a. What types of network- and transport-layer metrics are being used by ISPs in engineering and operating their networks? By Customers for verifying service guarantees? b. What new services are being (or are likely to be) offered, e.g. DIFFSERV? Is there a need for higher-layer metrics to better monitor and manage these services? c. Will these new differentiated transport- and application-layer services need new metrics? d. How can the service metrics be measured in a multi-ISP environment? e. How can customers verify these measurements? f. What requirements would service measurement introduce for equipment vendors? g. How relevant are specific techniques (e.g. which flow) and points of measurement to specific users (ISP, customer, etc.) requirements? h. How do these metrics relate to network behavior as perceived by users? How do they correlate with performance? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appendix B: Background on the IETF Working Groups * RTFM WG: Realtime traffic Flow Measurement RTFM is concerned with passive measurements of two-way traffic flows, specified in terms of their end-point attributes. Its primary goal was To produce an improved Traffic Flow Measurement Model considering at least the following needs: a. Wider range of measurable quantities, e.g. those relating to IPv6, and to class of service b. Simpler ways to specify flows of interest c. Better ways to control access to measured flow data d. Strong focus on data reduction capabilities e. Efficient hardware implementation * IPPM WG: IP Performance Measurement The IPPM WG charter is to develop a set of standard metrics that can be applied to the quality, performance, and reliability of Internet data delivery services. These metrics will be designed such that they can be performed by network operators, end users, or independent testing groups. It is important that the metrics not represent a value judgement (i.e. define "good" and "bad"), but rather provide unbiased quantitative measures of performance. RFCs Framework for IP Performance Metrics (RFC 2330) Metrics: Connectivity (RFC 2678), One-way Delay (RFC 2679), One-way Packet Loss (RFC 2680) Round-trip Delay (RFC 2681) I-Ds Bulk Transfer Capacity (2x) Instantaneous Packet Delay Variation One-way Loss Patterns * Other WGs The RMONMIB WG is thinking about 'Application Performance Measurement.' This is clearly a hard problem (e.g. does this just mean response-time measurement, can it be done by passive means, how should the measurements be presented, etc.). In short - RTFM provides a good distributed measuring system for traffic volumes - IPPM has concentrated on transport-layer behaviour of the current, best-effort Internet. - RMONMIB is beginning to consider application-layer measurement ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----End of forwarded message-----

pls print TW and NN docs only--not Border. Thanks. DF ---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/30/2000 05:38 PM --------------------------- Julia White 03/30/2000 10:22 AM To: Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sarabeth Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Tammy Jaquet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kristen Hand/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Mastio Survey Attached below are the Mastio Survey presentations for TW, NNG and NBPL which are to be reviewed with Stan and his direct reports on March 30. I want to thank everyone for their time and effort in reviewing the findings and recommendations for the Action Plans for each pipeline. The next steps will be to make sure we focus on addressing the areas stated in the Actions Plans. I also want to take the time to thank Tammy Lee-Jaquet for all her efforts in pulling this information together for TW & NNG. In addition, Kirsten Hand was instrumental in analyzing our information. We could not have done this project without them. GREAT JOB!! This is only the first phase of this project which means we now have the task to ensure we address the areas of the Action Plans. More to come!! Thanks again everyone. Julia ---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Coburn/NPNG/Enron on 03/30/2000 08:32 AM --------------------------- 03/30/2000 08:59 AM Scott Coburn To: rneppl@enron.com, bobhall01@sprynet.com, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donna Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Larry DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Mastio Survey Attached is Northern Border's Mastio presentation. sc From: Ricki Winters 03/29/2000 07:02 PM To: rneppl@enron.com, Scott Coburn/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, bobhall01@sprynet.com, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donna Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON cc: Virginia O'Neill/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White, Tammy Jaquet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Mastio Survey This is the latest version of the Mastio Presentation covering TW and NNG for the meeting tomorrow (3/30) for Stan and his Direct Reports. Thank you, Ricki

The anwser is no, we didn't respond to 637 nor did we respond to this- just see what FERc does with it- MK From: Drew Fossum 12/05/2000 05:18 PM To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: TW Should we respond to PNM's protest of the dollar valuation of imbalances prior to netting and trading? Did we already respond to this issue when they filed their protest of the 637 filing? DF

Attached is a newly revised Credit Watch listing. If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report. To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002. For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond at 5-7095, Brant Reves at x3-9897, or the Global Credit Hotline at x3-1803.

go ahead with your plans. The adoption table will be available on the 2nd floor of ECN on Tues - Fri this week 11:00 - 1 -----Original Message----- From: Smith, Chris A. Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:52 AM To: Hyatt, Kevin Subject: FW: Enron Kids Adopt A Child Program The ETS Solution Center was going to go pick out a child today at lunch. Please let us know if it's better to go through you, or go ahead with our plans. Thanks, Chris 33270 -----Original Message----- From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON On Behalf Of Kevin Hyatt.@ENRON Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:19 PM To: Enron Transportation Services Employees@ENRON Subject: Enron Kids Adopt A Child Program << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> For each of the last 15 years the Enron Kids Committee has chosen an under-privileged HISD elementary school and offered to "sponsor" every child in that school. What we mean by "sponsor" is that we outfit the child from head to toe plus give each of them a toy and book. The presents are then handed out to the children at their school Holiday Party in December. For most of these kids, it is their only Christmas present. I am once again coordinating the volunteer / adoption efforts for ETS. Some ETS departments and employees have already sponsored a child-- thanks for your support. But thus far, we have only adopted 216 of 468 children. We need more help!!!! If you would like to participate, I will coordinate collections and adoptions. Simply reply back to this email with the amount you would like to contribute. It costs about $100 to "sponsor" each child. Last year we were able to adopt 18 children. All the funds collected will be matched by the Enron Foundation. The matching funds will be used to buy books and computers for the school. I will also need volunteers for shopping. If you would like to shop for the kids we sponsor, please let me know. Thanks for your support!! Kevin Hyatt x35559 & The Enron Kids Committee

WHAT IS THE CROSS STREET ON RICHMOND??

---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2000 01:53 PM --------------------------- Carol St Clair 04/26/2000 02:05 PM To: "Cynthia Cuomo" <cuomo_cynthia@jpmorgan.com> @ ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Finally, the ECT Repo Agreement Cynthia: Thanks for sending this. Just 2 questions: 1. In Section 7 of Annex 1 could we please add the recording language? 2. I understand from our folks that most notices are provided over the phone and not necessarily followed up in writing and that this is the practice. Can we provide for that in Section 13 of the Agreement? Carol

Per Gas Control, this will be down until the 18th.

John, no we do not have an ISDA in place with Wah Chang. Do you want me to pass your request on to Credit? John Malowney 08/28/2000 06:21 PM To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Wah Chang Tana, can you answer this for me..... thanks, John ---------------------- Forwarded by John Malowney/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 06:27 PM --------------------------- Jan M King 08/28/2000 03:45 PM To: John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Wah Chang I don't believe we do, John. But you should check with Tana Jones in Houston. She handles ISDAs. John Malowney 08/28/2000 01:50 PM To: Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Wah Chang Jan, do we have an ISDA with Wah Chang ?? They are owned by Allegheny Technologies. Tracy, can you start looking at their credit/financials for me ?? Thanks, John

I would suggest that we start reporting Capital Deployed and Funds Flow numbers in these reports as well as the Wholesale Group will need to take the lead in managing both. John -----Original Message----- From: Moore, Mary Kay Sent: 11 June 2001 22:48 To: Aiken, Buddy; Allen, Melissa; Brown, Michael - COO London; Evans, Stephen; Hiersche, Rich; Neocleous, Katerina; O'regan, Niamh; Sherriff, John; Wood, Stephen Cc: Killen, Faith Subject: Frevert Report Published - June 11th Importance: High Sensitivity: Confidential

Looks good

The charts from these locations are not received in time to process for the 5th work day close, so these daily volumes are determined systematically based on the beginning and ending index readings. Even if they were, it is impossible to determine daily volume consumption from a 31day chart. Even decreasing the chart rotation is not a solution unless charts are received by the third work day to allow sufficient time for processing. The answer is to install EFM or possibly a Bullhorn unit to determine the actual daily index readings so that the daily quantities are accurately determined.. On these types of installations, how can we assess penalties on anything other than monthly quantities ? NNG has several locations where the existing equipment does not meet today's business needs, so we probably need to determine where these deficiencies exists, and identify the costs to resolve the problem. Thanks- Gary -----Original Message----- From: Zadow, Raetta Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:04 AM To: Anderson, Gary E.; Lachapelle, Donna; Stewart, Angeline; Farmington-Pipeline, Team; Rice, Tom Cc: Blair, Lynn; Dietz, Rick; Floyd, Jodie; Zadow, Raetta Subject: FW: Daily Volumes For Midwest Natural Gas Gary, was wondering if you could help us out. Scott has told me that they have 31 day charts for the stations listed below and he was wondering why we couldn't read those so as to get daily volumes rather than taking the total for the month and dividing it by the number of days in the month to get the daily volume. The reason for this is because, especially in the winter time, this can become very crucial when we calculate the penalty invoices which are done daily and are based on the differences between the daily physical volumes and the volumes that the shippers have scheduled on our pipe. If these charts cannot be read daily, what can we do to make it so that they can. Could you please check to find out what we need to do in order to have accurate daily volumes for these stations. Thanks, Raetta -----Original Message----- From: Farmington-Pipeline, Team Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 9:55 AM To: Zadow, Raetta Subject: Re: Daily Volumes For Midwest Natural Gas Raetta, here are the stations numbers. Thanks for your help. Scott 612-270-8501 Arcadia 747-051-01,02 Eleva 747-161 Independance 747-221 Mondovi 747-341-01,02 Strum 747-411 Whitehall #1 747-921 Whitehall #3 747-923 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> Team Farmington-Pipeline 06/22/2001 07:58 AM To: Raetta Zadow/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Tom Rice/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Stevens/ET&S/Enron, Angeline Stewart/GPGFIN/Enron, Diana Porter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jodie Floyd/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Raetta Zadow/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Daily Volumes For Midwest Natural Gas << OLE Object: StdOleLink >> Thanks for looking into this for me Raetta. I talked to Jim Banker this week and asked for him to check and see if they were charged for any penalty gas or not. He said that he would let me know if they had. He also stressed that we still need to see the actual daily volumes instead of average daily volumes on the volume statements. I'm not quit sure if this part of the problem has been addressed yet or not. Please let me know. Thanks Scott << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> Raetta Zadow 06/15/2001 04:43 PM To: Team Farmington-Pipeline/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Tom Rice/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Stevens/ET&S/Enron, Angeline Stewart/GPGFIN/Enron, Diana Porter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jodie Floyd/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Raetta Zadow/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Daily Volumes For Midwest Natural Gas << OLE Object: StdOleLink >> I have looked at the DDVC invoices for Midwest for March, 2001 which total $304.70. The SMS charges amount to $76.30 but the biggest part of the invoice is the negative DDVC charge which is for $228.40 - this occurred on March 26. I was wondering if the Midwest Natural Gas people could let us know what they think the volumes should be on those specific wells that they are concerned about for the 26th and then if necessary, we could make those corrections. Please let me know if there is anything else that I can do to help. Thanks, Raetta << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> Team Farmington-Pipeline 06/14/2001 03:04 PM To: Tom Rice/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Stevens/ET&S/Enron, Raetta Zadow/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Angeline Stewart/GPGFIN/Enron, Diana Porter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Daily Volumes For Midwest Natural Gas I recently met with Jim Banker with Midwest Natural Gas from Whitehall, Wi. He informed me that he had some concerns about whether or not he was being charged for penalty gas for daily volumes. He showed me some gas volume statements that he recieved from GMS. I believe it was the month of March Statement. What the statement showed is average daily volumes instead of the actual volumes per day. (Ex. At Eleva TBS Days 1 and 2 showed 122 MCF and Days 3-31 showed 118 MCF.) These are charted stations with 31 day charts. The stations that he is concerned about are Arcadia, Eleva, Independance, Mondovi, Strum, Whitehall #1,and Whitehall #3. Any assistance or knowledge that you can provide me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Scott 612-270-8501

https://www4.rsweb.com/61045/

This resource request has been rejected. You can view the details of the request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000070768&Page=MyReq. Request ID : 000000000070768 Approver Type : Data Signature : phillip.m.love@enron.com Comments : reject per Anne Bike Request Create Date : 10/24/01 2:27:37 PM Requested For : mike.grigsby@enron.com Resource Name : \\enehou\houston\common\ERMS\1intra - [Read/Write] Resource Type : Directory

Serge: Sorry to take so long to respond. A few things: (1) What is the correct legal name of the entity you are inquiring about? Is it the unregulated marketing arm of the regulated utility? (2) There has not been a commercial push from the ENA perspective to set up a new agreement with FPL which explains why I cannot get our credit goup to react. I'll broach the topic again when I hear from you. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) sara.shackleton@enron.com

We went into the FERC proceeding believing that the Chief ALJ was not likely to give us a good decision. During the course of the proceeding, we convinced ourselves that he would rule our way due to the vast evidence in our favor and the relatively inept presentation of El Paso and El Paso Merchant Energy. Well, despite the voluminous record in support of our position, the judge ruled that it was "not at all clear" that El Paso exercised market power. The good news for your affiliates is that, if the Commission does not find the exercise of market power in this case, it never will. We hope when the Commission reviews the entire record, including the "protected material", they will change the ALJ's finding. On some level we believe that the ALJ just does not like California. He is the judge, after all, who told Harold Ray in the electric generation settlement discussions that he was "an asshole". The ironic part of the decision is that we felt that a determination by the ALJ that defined the market in such a way as to preclude EPME having market power would be difficult to overcome at the Commission level. Instead, he defined the market as we suggested and found that El Paso had market power; he simply failed to be convinced that they were withholding capacity despite the fact that they utilized their capacity 54% of the time when everyone else was utilizing their own capacity at a capacity factor of between 85% and 90%. Go figure. I am still less than enchanted with the NGS settlement after SoCalGas tailored it to their interests but am glad that the Commission is at least considering opening up the system ala PG&E. I think that they are reasonably aware that SoCalGas was not blameless in the runup in gas prices that took place last December. Having said that we are having a hell of a time in the GCIM simply trying to investigate what really happened. SoCalGas latest excuse for not giving us info is that we will "competitors" with them (as a result of the filed rate litigation) for gas hedges. I must have misunderstood; I did not realize there was a limited supply of hedges available and that there was competition for those "available" hedges. Anytime Enron wants to help on these GCIM issues, we would welcome it--might make you look less like a Texas robber baron. Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney Southern California Edison Company (626)302-3964 (626)302-3990(fax) douglas.porter@sce.com "Dasovich, Jeff" To: <porterdk@sce.com> <Jeff.Dasovich@ cc: enron.com> Subject: 10/12/01 03:18 PM Hi Doug: Hope all is well. Congratulations to you folks on your agreement with the PUC. Must be a relief. I was writing to get your reaction to the judge's proposed order in the El Paso case. You think the Commission is likely to adopt it? Change it? Judge's proposal fatally flawed on the market power issue? Appreciate your insights. AND did you hear Bilas issued the our gas settlement as his proposed decision for adoption by the Commission at its 10.25.01 meeting!?!?! What next? Best, Jeff ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************

000 WTNT32 KNHC 252030 TCPAT2 BULLETIN SUBTROPICAL STORM TWO ADVISORY NUMBER 5 NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL 5 PM AST SUN NOV 25 2001 AT 5 PM AST...2100Z...THE CENTER OF SUBTROPICAL STORM TWO WAS LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 30.7 NORTH...LONGITUDE 55.7 WEST OR ABOUT 550 MILES...885 KM...EAST OF BERMUDA. THE STORM IS MOVING TOWARD THE WEST SOUTHWEST NEAR 16 MPH...26 KM/HR ...AND A MOSTLY WESTWARD MOTION WITH A DECREASE IN FORWARD SPEED IS EXPECTED DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS. MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS ARE ESTIMATED NEAR 70 MPH...110 KM/HR ...WITH HIGHER GUSTS. THERE IS A POSSIBILITY OF SOME ADDITIONAL STRENGTHENING DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS. WINDS OF 40 MPH EXTEND OUTWARD UP TO 690 MILES...1080 KM MAINLY TO THE NORTH OF THE CENTER. THIS IS A HUGE STORM AND IT IS EXPECTED TO GENERATE SWELLS THAT WILL AFFECT PORTIONS OF THE EAST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA AND OF THE NORTH-FACING BEACHES OF THE BAHAMAS AND GREATER ANTILLES DURING THE NEXT FEW DAYS. THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE IS 987 MB...29.15 INCHES. REPEATING THE 5 PM AST POSITION...30.7 N... 55.7 W. MOVEMENT TOWARD...WEST SOUTHWEST NEAR 16 MPH. MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS... 70 MPH. MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE... 987 MB. THE NEXT ADVISORY WILL BE ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER AT 11 PM AST. FORECASTER LAWRENCE Make GoPBI.com's Storm Warning Center your No. 1 resource for hurricane and tropical storm updates: http://GoPBI.com/storm To subscribe or unsubcribe from this list, visit our Web site: http://GoPBI.com/storm/email DO NOT REPLY to this email. If you have questions or comments, send them to storm@cimedia.com Brought to you by GoPBI.com: http://GoPBI.com You can contact us by mail or telephone at: GoPBI.com 2751 South Dixie Highway West Palm Beach FL 33405 (561) 820-3700 Copyright 2001 Cox Interactive Media

The purpose of this e.mail is just to advise you that we will start the process of completing two DASH's for two large projects totaling about $1.6 billion. The customer is Panda Energy/TECO. Subject to Board approval, we would like to sign a contract sometime between 15 - 20 December. We have just recently agreed to a price and are now entering into contract negotiations. We will immediately apply the "Risk Book Model" to these two projects; and we will begin working a DASH with the RAC group. Because each of these contracts will total about $800MM, I wanted to give you a heads-up. If we can achieve a contractual agreement with TECO and receive Enron Corporate approval, these could prove to be outstanding projects for NEPCO, because the two contracts are really the duplication of eight similar projects and doing them repetitively, should prove very profitable for NEPCO. LI52100

_________________________________________________________________ WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY FOR 1/4/2002 5:00:00 PM through 1/7/2002 12:00:00 AM _________________________________________________________________ SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES: ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: Impact: Corp Time: Sat 1/5/2002 2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM CT Sat 1/5/2002 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 1:00:00 PM PT Sat 1/5/2002 8:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 PM London Outage: SysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Split for Netco/Estate Environments Impacted: The outage the sysAdmiral Application will be brief and should not directly affect any applications. Purpose: We are Splitting the sysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Databases and Master Services on NAHOU-BPMS01P and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P. NAHOU-BPMS01P Database/Master will be used for Estate Scheduling needs and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P will be used for Netco Scheduling Needs. After the environments are split their will be no more replication between the two servers or Fault Tolerance. Backout: ReEnable Fault Tolernace. Contact(s): Brennan, Ryan 713-853-4545 Lindsay, Brian 713-853-6225 Impact: Corp Time: Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:30:00 AM CT Sat 1/5/2002 7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 7:30:00 AM PT Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:30:00 PM London Outage: Hardware swap for DFS NAHOU Environments Impacted: All Purpose: Existing DFS cluster NAHOU hardware has been marked for Netco Deployment. Therefore it is necessary to de-commission NAHOU and bring up another instance of NAHOU dfs for estate. Backout: Revert DFS cluster back to NAHOU. Contact(s): Cheng, John 7138531672 McNair, Darren 7138537955 AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages. EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages. EDI: No Scheduled Outages EES: No Scheduled Outages ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS: No Scheduled Outages FIELD SERVICES: No Scheduled Outages. INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages. MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages. MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages. NT: No Scheduled Outages. OS/2: No Scheduled Outages. OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages. SITARA: No Scheduled Outages. SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages. TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages TERMINAL SERVER: No Scheduled Outages. UNIFY: No Scheduled Outages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR ASSISTANCE (713) 853-1411 Enron Resolution Center Specific Help: Information Risk Management (713) 853-5536 SAP/ISC (713) 345-4727 Unify On-Call (713) 284-3757 [Pager] Sitara On-Call (713) 288-0101 [Pager] RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS (713) 639-9726 [Pager] OSS/UA4/TARP (713) 285-3165 [Pager] CPR (713) 284-4175 [Pager] EDI Support (713) 327-3893 [Pager] EES Help Desk (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797 TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call (713) 327-6032 [Pager]

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or affiliates. , 2001 Carr Futures The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s) contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts to you as attachments. Nat Gas Summer Strip http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/summerstrip44.pdf Nat Gas Winter Strip http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/winterstrip44.pdf Nat Gas Calendar Strip http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/calendarstrip44.pdf Carr Futures 150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500 Chicago, IL 60606 USA Tel: 312-368-6149 Fax: 312-368-2281 soblander@carrfut.com http://www.carrfut.com

Jane, As the lead on both the tariff issues as well as mega status, please provide me with the list of regulatory issues for discussion at this meeting. Since I am in Houston, I may want to personally discuss these with you in early January. Vrinda/Kelly, Please do the same with respect to the PR issues. Perhaps, early Jan maybe a good time for me to get this list, so that I can discuss the same. I will need the same to prepare the agenda and have the team prepare for the meeting. Ranabir/Rahul, Mohan will be the lead on the finance side on the mega status, and my team is already involving him in our discussions. Would you like to have him prepare a small list of finance issues ? Sandeep (Katwala), Please let me know of key things on the legal side for discussion. You can update the group on the CERC forming Act. Please jot me a small note on the legal issues list when you get the message. Also, I need to know who is likely to be on the ground from the regulatory side. Terry & Steven - Are you both going to be in town ? Regards, Sandeep. Jane Wilson 12/27/99 10:46 PM To: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vrinda Walavalkar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Anshuman Srivastav/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rajeesh Sivaraman, Rahul Basu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ranabir Dutt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep Katwala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Neil McGregor@ECT, Kelly Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Steven J Kean@EES Subject: Dabhol Strategy Meeting Please calendar a Dabhol strategy meeting on January 12, beginning at 9:00 a.m. to discuss, as a team/working group the strategy to attain megaproject status and strategy with regard to the Dabhol tariff. Details as to the location of the meeting will be sent to you later (but it'll probably be the Oberoi).

missing deal for mark f sell el paso 25-30 285.00 25 mw pv on peak

We have received an executed First Amendment to the ISDA Master Agreement dated effective May 9, 2001 between ARM and ENA, which provides for an amendment to ARM's collateral threshold. Copies will be distributed Cordially, Susan S. Bailey Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A Houston, Texas 77002 Phone: (713) 853-4737 Fax: (713) 646-3490 E:mail: Susan.Bailey@enron.com

--

Chris - Here are the vitals: EB3248C 2 PC's 1PC w/ 2 screens, 1 PC w/ 1 screen 1 Sun machine Wed or Th before 1pm Thanks, Errol, X5-8274 From: Chris Austin/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/30/2001 09:51 AM To: Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy Cavazos/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Alexia Gonzales/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Huan/ENRON@enronXgate, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sean Riordan/ENRON@enronXgate, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joey Taylor/NA/Enron@ENRON, Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Windows 2000 Migration for the RM-Finance and Administration Business Unit I wanted to take a few minutes to not only introduce myself, but also to inform you that ProjectGEM - the Windows2000 Global Enron Migration - is well underway and is now approaching your group to begin the initial steps of upgrading to this newer operating system. Currently Jeff Gossett is our pilot for this business unit and is testing out all applications associated with your business unit. We expect to migrate Finance and Administration Wednesday or Thursday of next week (4/4 - 4/5) As a former member of T.S.G. (TradeFloor Support Group - EB31/32) - I'm well aware of the time constraints and schedules you all must work with. Therefore, I would like to start the migration process first with visiting with each of you, going thru a 'profile process' that should last no more than 10-15min. Profiling can begin as early as today- so here is what I ask of you: *** Please reply to this e-mail with your current location, the number of PC's you have and the number of screens/displays you have attached to each PC, as well a date/time that I can stop by. Being that most of you sit in the same, general location - I'm hoping this profiling process should take no more than a few days. *** Feel free to e-mail/call me should you have any questions or any specific concerns with this process, as we strive to ensure the migration from WinNT to Win2K is a smooth, efficient one. Chris Austin GEM Project, MCSE, CCNA Enron Corp 713-345-6002 Work 281-830-6092 Cell 877-482-0926 Pager chris.austin@enron.com

On sunday we had a problem with PSCO, they tried to back out of a purchase from El Paso since they claimed they were picking up the power at the FC 230 bus instead of the 345 bus. Also there is an issue with the schedule being until further. This once again highlights our need to be as clear as possible on ALL aspects of the deals that we do. All new people should have a discussion with myself or another senior member as to the differences between the FC's busses, N. Gila vs. Devers and other points on the grid that you are unsure of. thanks, ryan

Attached please find two new Notices of Filing in Docket Nos. EL01-33 and EL01-34. One is a request for a cease and desist order, the other a request for suspension of the underscheduling penalty. The filings are also attached in a zip file. Please let me know if you are unable to open the zip file and I will fax (or overnight if you prefer) the documents to you. - EL01-34.1 - EL01-33.1 - california.zip

[IMAGE] [IMAGE] PLEASE VISIT OUR SPONSORS: 3'x5' Outdoor Flag $9.95. SAVE $25.00! When you buy a flag,we will donate 10% of total Flag Sales to the American Red Cross designated to the relief efforts in New York. CLICK HERE. Dear Jane Tholt, NFL ODDS Saturday FAVORITE OPEN TODAY O/U UNDERDOG at New England 3 3 (37) Miami at San Francisco 3 3 (40 1/2 ) Philadelphia at Oakland 6 1/2 5 (46) Tennessee Sunday at Tampa Bay 3 3 (38) New Orleans St. Louis 12 1/2 12 (47) at Carolina at Kansas City 3 3 (40 1/2 ) San Diego at N.Y. Giants 4 3 1/2 (35) Seattle at Atlanta 4 4 (40 1/2 ) Buffalo Chicago 2 1/2 2 (33) at Washington at Baltimore 10 11 (33 1/2 ) Cincinnati at Green Bay 8 1/2 8 (38) Cleveland at Pittsburgh 9 10 (36 1/2 ) Detroit at Arizona 3 1/2 3 1/2 (37 1/2 ) Dallas at Minnesota 3 1/2 OFF (OFF) Jacksonville at Indianapolis 2 1 (47) N.Y. Jets ---COOL NEW REMINDERS---Great Quotes of the DayTravel DigestPet Tips ---FAVORITE REMINDERS---Entertainment NewsChildren's Product RecallsU.S. Market Indicies Get helpful ideas and insights from other small business owners and entrepreneurs. Sign up for Advice for Small Business. CLICK HERE. To unsubscribe from this Reminder topic, click here. To unsubscribe from SmartReminders altogether, click here. [IMAGE]

I would like to schedule an appointment for a flu shot. Stephanie Panus Senior Legal Specialist Enron Wholesale Services 1400 Smith Street, EB3803C Houston, Texas 77002 ph: 713.345.3249 fax: 713.646.3490 email: stephanie.panus@enron.com

IntercontinentalExchange Firm Power Price Bulletin For Power Delivered on Monday, October 29, 2001 (Trade Date of Friday, October 26, 2001) Click here to access index history . * volume represents sell-side only * Hub High Low Wtd Avg Index Change ($) Vol (Mwh) Cinergy $32.65 $31.05 $32.03 + .93 132,800 Comed $29.00 $27.50 $27.88 + .61 6,400 Entergy $28.00 $25.85 $26.50 + .31 16,000 Nepool $40.25 $39.75 $39.98 + .92 6,400 Palo Verde $35.50 $33.00 $34.07 + .93 10,000 PJM-West $32.50 $32.00 $32.25 + 1.86 32,800 SP-15 $36.50 $32.50 $33.78 + 1.32 6,000 TVA $34.50 $30.00 $33.11 + 2.08 8,800 Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified. IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals. Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals. Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options. In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange. Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange. This data is provided to you free of charge. IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all. You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data. To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com . To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe . ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.

My assistant Taffy Milligan is tracking these down for you. Her direct no is 57373. Brad Lawson 10/18/2000 07:57 AM To: Tana.Jones@enron.com cc: Subject: Prepaid contracts Tana, Sorry to bug you again regarding these contracts. Any idea when we can expect them? Tom Myers is asking me for a spreadsheet, but I can't complete it until I have some information from those documents. If you've already sent them, thank you very much. If not, any idea when it will be? Brad X5-3919

Vince, The previous time I sent this it appeared not to be delivered by your system. I am resending. I apologize if you get more than one of these emails. We are looking forward to you presenting at the conference. In regards to your topic for the conference, the theme of the 2001 Electric Market Forecasting Conference market volatility and risks regional markets. Several of the presenters will explore the underlying drivers in the respective markets that will effect market price and value of positions. Others will be exploring Electric and Gas Forward Markets and Gas and Oil Hedging Strategies. Please consider one of the following topics: * Western U.S. Markets: Issues and Understanding Western Markets * Key Principles (and Strategies) for Managing Positions in Volatile Energy Markets The intent of the presentations is to get to the heart of emerging electric market issues and increase awareness of the big issues and principles that will give the attendees insights. However, as Warren indicated, please feel free to select your own topic related to the conference theme. Listed below are the topics by the other presenters. Just let me know the topic you would like to address. I am very willing to discuss this with you over the phone if that would be helpful. Regards, Lee Lee A. Barney EPIS, Inc. 1800 Blankenship Road, Suite 350 West Linn, OR 97068 (503) 722-2023 x203 (503) 722-7130 FAX www.epis.com Other Presenters on the Market Forum Session of the Conference: U.S. Electric and Gas Forward Markets Brad Leach, Senior Director of Research New York Mercantile Exchange Western Canadian Markets Paul Blaha, Manager, Power Marketing ATCO Eastern U.S. Markets Brian Skinner, Director, Market Analysis Williams Energy Market & Trade ERCOT Market Beth Garza, Director, Market Intelligence FPL Energy Midwestern U.S. Markets Chester Bolling, Director, Regulatory Strategies DTE Energy Gas and Oil Hedging and Electric Markets William Foley, Director, Global Commodities Deutsche Bank (New York) > -----Original Message----- > From: Warren H. Winter > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 7:56 AM > To: 'vkamins@ect.enron.com' > Cc: Lee A. Barney > Subject: RE: Market Forecasting Conference > > Vince, > > That's great! We really appreciate your attendance. I will have Lee > Barney (our Vice President handling the conference agenda) contact you > on the topic. If you have something you are particularly interested > in addressing, please don't hesitate to let Lee know. We want you to > have a topic that fits with your interests. > > Thanks again and I look forward to seeing you in September. > > Warren > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kaminski, Vince J. [mailto:Vince.Kaminski@ENRON.com] > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 6:44 AM > To: Warren H. Winter > Cc: Kaminski, Vince J. > Subject: RE: Market Forecasting Conference > > Warren, > > I shall be very glad to attend the conference. > Please, let me know what is the topic you would like me to > address. > > Vince Kaminski > >

Assuming that this relates to a request from one of the online trading sites (Buy Side Direct, Trading Edge or LIMITrader), Sara is correct that we intend to use Morgan Stanley as our prime broker to clear our trades through the site's clearing broker. Mike x39990 ---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Fowler/Corp/Enron on 10/05/2000 10:15 AM --------------------------- From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 10/05/2000 10:13 AM To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Mike Fowler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: I'd stick with Anthony. I didn't think that Prudential was one of our clearing brokers (remember, the letter must come from our clearing broker). Please keep Mike Fowler and Paul Radous informed. Thanks. Sara Samantha Boyd@ENRON 10/05/2000 09:32 AM To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Sara, I have Kevin Enright at Prudential Securities, Incorporated and Anthony Capolongo at Morgan Stanley researching the "Prime Broker Letter". Samantha M. Boyd Sr. Legal Specialist Enron North America, Corp. 1400 Smith, EB3802A Houston, TX 77002 Phone: (713) 853-9188 Fax: (713) 646-3490 email: samantha.boyd@enron.com Sara Shackleton@ECT 10/03/2000 06:53 PM To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Paul Radous has requested that we seek a "Prime Broker letter" to send to the CP. Click on this link to view the document in the Financial Trading Agreements database-->

John, We finished the Version 2 of the simulation model which deals with the open-close trading versus the continuous trading in the previous version. I added the cummulative P/L as an output. There are a few apparent trading strategies from this model: 1) Higher bid/offer spread, more profit 2) More Daily # of trades, more profit 3) Smaller net open positions allowed, more profit 1) and 2) are obvious, but 3) is more interesting. It means that we are better off if we do not allowed net open positions at end of the day. In a trending market, this makes an intuitive sense, for example, in the case of bull market we are short as a market maker and we can avoid the loss at the higher openning price by keeping zero or small net short positions. I have attached the model with this mail, and I'll be happy to discuss the model in more details with you. Zimin

---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/01/2001 04:20 PM --------------------------- From: Dan Fancler 01/26/2001 10:34 AM To: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Vernon Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Sutton/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Debbie Moseley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lee Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron Subject: Risk Management Caminus David Port, ETS is purchasing a trading system from Caminus to track their transactions. Included in this system are position reports which the Accounting Department will be using to report and determine compliance with the attached policy and procedures, including open positions, VAR, MTM, approval limits, Greeks, credit risk, stress testing, basis positions, confirmations and invoicing. The ETS Risk Management policy requires that our reporting conform to the corporate standards, accordingly your name was given to me as the person who could help direct some of the more technical reporting standards. Caminus is doing an introduction to their system today from 12:00 am to 3 pm in 49c2, however I know you will not be back in town until next week. Vernon Mercaldo is coordinating the installation of the system and will be needing your input relating to Corporate reporting standards. As the project progresses he will be contacting you. Attached are drafts of the ETS Policy and Procedures.

Chris - Do you know the status of the VNG October 2000 confirm sheet that I am supposed to sign?

Good Morning, Any GCP Adjustments will be highlighted in blue. Please feel free to give me a call, if you have any questions. Amber N Ebow x5-8331 Global Counterparty_Enron Net Works -----Original Message----- From: Lebrocq, Wendi Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:02 PM To: Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Lebeau, Maria; Escamilla, Albert; Curry, Ken Subject: EOL and Clickpaper Approvals for 10-15-01 Please see attached. << File: EOL 10-15-01.xls >> Regards, Wendi LeBrocq 3-3835

fyi ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2001 08:50 AM --------------------------- From: Chip Schneider/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/29/2001 07:28 PM To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/ENRON@enronXgate, David Gorte/ENRON@enronXgate, Cris Sherman/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Catherine Clark/ENRON@enronXgate cc: Subject: Draft of LV Cogen Turbine Swap DASH. Final will be circulated on Friday for signature. Please send comments ASAP. Regards, Chip Schneider 713-853-1789 EB 2852

The SRRS indicates there are no requests awaiting my approval. Information Risk Management 01/14/2000 05:03 PM To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Your approval is requested Please be informed that you have one or more SRRS requests that are outstanding due to a pending action to approve or reject decision on your part. Please go to the SRRS (Lotus Notes desktop icon) and select the "Requests Awaiting my Approval" option and complete the necessary action. More SRRS request information can be seen within the request by clicking on "Resource Display". Your response will enable the SRRS process to continue for eventual closure. Thank you, Information Risk Management

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/01/2000 01:34 PM --------------------------- "Karen Edson" <kedson@ns.net> on 09/01/2000 12:16:17 PM To: "Baker Carolyn (E-mail)" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bill Carlson (E-mail)" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Bill Woods (E-mail)" <billw@calpine.com>, "Curt Hatton (E-mail)" <curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Curtis Kebler (E-mail)" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "David Keane (E-mail)" <dnke@dynegy.com>, "David Parquet (E-mail)" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Duane Nelsen (E-mail)" <duanenelsen@msn.com>, "Ed Tomeo (E-mail)" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Edward Maddox (E-mail)" <emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "Eileen Kock (E-mail)" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "Ellery Bob (E-mail)" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Escalante Bob (E-mail)" <riobravogm@aol.com>, "Frank DeRosa (E-mail)" <fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Greg Blue (E-mail)" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Hap Boyd (E-mail)" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott (E-mail)" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jan Smunty-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Jim Willey (E-mail)" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Joe Greco (E-mail)" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Joe Ronan (E-mail)" <joer@calpine.com>, "John Stout (E-mail)" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "Katie Kaplan (E-mail)" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Kent Fickett (E-mail)" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marty McFadden (E-mail)" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Paula Soos (E-mail)" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Robert Lamkin (E-mail)" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Roger Pelote (E-mail)" <rpelote@energy.twc.com>, "Steve Ponder (E-mail)" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steven Kelly (E-mail)" <steven@iepa.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)" <smara@enron.com>, "Tony Wetzel (E-mail)" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Trond Aschehoug (E-mail)" <taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>, "William Hall (E-mail)" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Richard Hyde (E-mail)" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Sandi McCubbin (E-mail)" <smccubbi@ees.enron.com>, "Stephanie Newell (E-mail)" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com> cc: "Ann Kelly (E-mail)" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Bev Hansen (E-mail)" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Bob Judd (E-mail)" <caltech@ns.net>, "Govenar Scott (E-mail)" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Hedy Govenar (E-mail)" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Levake Barbara (E-mail)" <blevake@syix.com>, "Monagan Mike (E-mail)" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Rob Ross (E-mail)" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Ron Tom (E-mail)" <rtom@govadv.com>, "Rudman Cary (E-mail)" <cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Susan McCabe (E-mail)" <sfmccabe@mindspring.com>, "Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)" <jmball@ns.net> Subject: Legislative Update I will send out a real legislative report next week. In the meantime, I thought you might appreciate a quick run-down of what actually happened in the final hours of this year's wild legislative session. The good news is that the public benefit charge bill passed easily with a 10-year term and no statutory harm was done. The bad news is that utilities captured the deregulation debate and successfully painted generators as villains and the wholesale market as "broken." Major legislative actions on energy matters follow. If you have any questions or would like a copy of final legislation, please call. AB 995 (Wright) and SB 1194 (Sher), which extend public benefit charges for energy conservation, renewable energy development, and RD&D, passed the State Legislature by large margins. Recent indications are that the Governor will sign the bills, although interested companies should join IEP in sending letters urging him to do so. Power plant siting was front and center the last week of the session. As recently as Wednesday of this week, the bill was so bad for new power plant development that IEP opposed the expedited siting provisions. They were rewritten by Republican staff and CEC attorneys to provide a 6-month process for a mitigated negative declaration of environmental impacts that might help those few entities that can start the process in full compliance with local rules. This provision is available for both combined cycle facilities and peaking facilities. The bill also includes a provision for four-month approval of amendments to pending applications providing for the installation of temporary peaking generation on sites that will be developed into combined cycle facilities within three years. The CEC expects this to apply so a single pending application. Finally, the bill includes language directing the CPUC and the EOB to be helpful on ISO issues that affect the willingness self-generators to remain interconnected with the grid. Utility efforts to craft legislation assuring them of collection of large negative balances in their Transition Revenue Accounts failed when they could not reach agreement with representatives of large customer groups. In its place, the Legislature passed a non-binding resolution directing the CPUC to investigate the issue and including highly offensive language on $100 price caps and retroactive recalculation of market clearing prices. Legislation establishing a retroactive cap on SDG&E rates and providing no assurance of cost recovery to Sempra passed the Legislature. Companion legislation that most observers expect the Governor to veto provides $150 million of General Fund money to SDG&E. A draft of so-called "sunshine" legislation surfaced late in the process. The draft empowered the Electricity Oversight Board to collect anything it might be interested in from the ISO, PX, utilities, generators, and marketers and to treat the information confidentially. The draft faced unified opposition and did not make its way into any legislation. AB 1002 (Wright) establishing public benefit charges on the natural gas system passed the Legislature. It continues to include language exempting electricity generation from the charges. Karen Edson kedson@ns.net 916/552-7070

Attached is the preliminary injunction entered by Judge Moreno today. As noted previously, this injunction supersedes all prior Orders in the related market participant cases. Received: from ntfs1.we-law.com (w011.z208037042.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net [208.37.42.11]) by mail.qeuo.com; Mon, 05 Mar 2001 09:40:24 -0800 Received: by NTFS1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <ZFS6NAVL>; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 09:29:46 -0800 Message-ID: <5126567AA3A3D411B76900508BE70CAE01DCD3@NTFS1> From: "Jeffrey M. Tanzer" <JTanzer@we-law.com> To: "Alan Z. Yudkowsky (E-mail)" <ayudkowsky@stroock.com>, "Anne Hayes Hartman (E-mail)" <ahartman@gmssr.com>, "Brian S. Currey (E-mail)" <bcurrey@omm.com>, "Diane E. Pritchard (E-mail)" <dpritchard@mofo.com>, "Douglas L. Thorpe (E-mail)" <thord@perkinscoie.com>, "Douglas M. Butz (E-mail)" <dmbutz@butzdunn.com>, "Frederick Yanney (E-mail)" <fyanney@fulbright.com>, "Gary S. Fergus (E-mail)" <gfergus@brobeck.com>, "Gordon P. Erspamer (E-mail)" <gerspamer@mofo.com>, "Harry A. Olivar Jr. (E-mail)" <hao@quinnemanuel.com>, "James Crossen (E-mail)" <jcrossen@apx.com>, "Jennifer Baldocchi (E-mail)" <jenniferbaldocchi@paulhastings.com>, "Jennifer Roth (E-mail)" <jroth@mofo.com>, "John C. Morrissey (E-mail)" <jmorrissey@mdbe.com>, "Lawrence P. Ebiner (E-mail)" <lebiner@mofo.com>, "Marc Williams (E-mail)" <mawilliams@omm.com>, "Mark A. Collins (E-mail)" <macollins@mwe.com>, "Michael Lifrak (E-mail)" <mtl@quinnemanuel.com>, "Nora Cregan (E-mail)" <ncregan@mdbe.com>, "Paul Pantano (E-mail)" <ppantano@mwe.com>, "Per A. Ramfjord (E-mail)" <paramfjord@stoel.com>, "Peter Jazayeri (E-mail)" <pjazayeri@stroock.com>, "Robert E. Kohn (E-mail)" <rkohn@mwe.com>, "Thomas A. Freiberg Jr. (E-mail)" <tfreiberg@fulbright.com> Cc: "Ben D. Whitwell" <BWhitwell@we-law.com> Subject: Preliminary injunction Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 09:29:45 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0A599.DF178014" Dear Counsel: Attached is a scanned copy of the preliminary injunction, which we received by fax from the court this morning. As you will see, the preliminary injunction was signed by the court on March 5. <<preliminj-scanned.tif>> Jeffrey M. Tanzer Whitwell & Emhoff LLP 202 N. Canon Drive, 2d Floor Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Tel: (310) 887-4421 Fax: (310) 274-9910 e-mail: jtanzer@we-law.com - preliminj-scanned.tif

I heard you got information on Monica. Could you forward it to me? Thanks, Stacey

Your mailbox has exceeded one or more size limits set by your administrator. Your mailbox size is 112696 KB. Mailbox size limits: You will receive a warning when your mailbox reaches 75000 KB. You cannot send mail when your mailbox reaches 100000 KB.You may not be able to send or receive new mail until you reduce your mailbox size. To make more space available, delete any items that you are no longer using or move them to your personal folder file (.pst). Items in all of your mailbox folders including the Deleted Items and Sent Items folders count against your size limit. You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed. See client Help for more information.

Done! ----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 04:21 PM ----- Bob Shults 01/24/2001 04:17 PM To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: your the best. make sure mark knows that From: Tana Jones on 01/24/2001 03:58 PM To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: For you, anything! Bob Shults 01/24/2001 04:00 PM To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Tana, can you send a loi to GFI with terms identical to the Prebon LOI. The email should go to Tom Padrone at GFI. His email is thomas.padrone@gfinet.com

Jeff-please add me back to your distribution list for CA updates. Thanks--and keep up the tireless work. MDS

> DELL & ENRON ClickAtHome ORDER CONFIRMATION > > Thank you for your Enron ClickAtHome order! Please read and retain this > e-mail for your records. It contains important information relating to > your order that should be used in any future communications with Dell. > > Your Dell customer number is: 12831599 > > Your order number is: 504703075 > > Your total "Out of Pocket" amount: $1422.21 > The total "Out of Pocket" amount includes upgrade costs, shipping and > taxes. > > > Your Online Sales Point of Contact: > We are here to assist you with your order if needed. Our office hours are > Monday- Friday, 8am-7pm Central Standard Time. You can reach our office > by calling 1-866-220-3355 or through e-mail at: > US_EPP_Clickathome@dell.com . > > Estimated Ship Date: > We estimate that your order should be shipped on or before 01/26/01. > Although we do not anticipate a delay in your order, we cannot guarantee > the shipping date as we occasionally run into unexpected delays in > manufacturing. Your order is being shipped to you under Dell's terms and > conditions of sale found at: www.dell.com. > > Total Satisfaction Policy: > If you wish to cancel your order for any reason within 30 days, we'll > refund amounts paid by you, minus shipping costs, no questions asked. You > are responsible for the cost of shipping your system back to us. > EPP Customer Care contact options: 1-866-220-3355, option 4 or use the > e-mail box US Relationship EPP@dell.com . > > How to Check Order Status: > If you would like to check the status of your order, please call Dell's > automated order status inquiry system at: 1-800-433-9014, or visit Dell's > Order Status Page at: http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/index.asp. > > You can also register to have Dell e-mail you when your order is shipped, > by going to: http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/watchreg.asp?ordnum. > > How to reach a Technical Support Representative: > Once you have received your equipment, if you need to contact a Dell > technical support representative, please call 1-866-220-3355, option 3. > You will be asked to give your "Service Tag Number". The "Service Tag > Number" is a five digit alphanumeric number written on the white bar code > label on the back of the system. Please have this number ready before you > contact the technical support representative. > > > Thank you for participating in the Dell/ Enron ClickAtHome program. It is > my pleasure to work with you. > > Sincerely, > Michelle Dorsett > EPP On-Line > Dell Computer Corporation > <mailto:michelle_dorsett@dell.com> > 1.877.692.2638 X 49794 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Sally: Here is the number for the Montriand #2680. Tori

I cannot get into the system---please send me a paper approval sheet ARSystem@mailman.enron.com 11/03/2000 07:01 PM To: richard.b.sanders@enron.com cc: Subject: Your Approval is Overdue: Access Request for linda.r.guinn@enron.com This request has been pending your approval for 9 days. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000005452&Page= Approval to review and act upon this request. Request ID : 000000000005452 Request Create Date : 10/23/00 11:15:18 AM Requested For : linda.r.guinn@enron.com Resource Name : MS Project Resource Type : Applications

done at 9:30. can you pick me up. i'd love it. check your voicemail, too. i left a message there. Prentice Sellers <psellers@Haas.Berkeley.EDU> on 09/05/2000 05:42:28 PM To: jdasovic@enron.com cc: Subject: Tonight Are you there? I'll be online for the next half hour or so. Did you get my message? Dinner is at 8. What time are you done with class?

Skilling will be speaking at the National Press Club next week. He'll give an overview of Enron's business, talk about what's going on in power markets, and what should be done to fix the current problems. California will get covered as well. Other than what we have already discussed, is there anything Jeff should know or address in his remarks?

Apparently you can't open the link so here's a print screen of the website.

Yes, once I complete, I will send over. BT -----Original Message----- From: Calger, Christopher F. Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:05 PM To: Tycholiz, Barry Subject: Gas Pitch Barry, You mentioned a gas outsourcing presentation. Could I get a copy of that? I am looking for examples of good ideas that can be applied to power - we have a current lapse in creativity! Chris Calger 503-464-3735

Tell him we are sending his note on to the appropriate person. MARY CLARK 04/03/2001 03:23 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Computers Steve, I need your help in responding to this question. Mary ---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Clark/Corp/Enron on 04/03/2001 03:22 PM --------------------------- From: Sherri Sera 04/03/2001 02:45 PM To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Computers ---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 04/03/2001 02:46 PM --------------------------- Anonymous From: Anonymous on 04/03/2001 02:32 PM To: cc: Subject: Computers Since Enron and EBS are trying to cut costs and be more cost effective, why would a vice president need an executive computer setup at home? Especially if they already have a laptop (provided by Enron) they take home every night and have taken advantage of the Click at Home program as well. Since Enron has gone through the expense of giving each and every employee the opportunity of the Click at Home program, it seems to be a somewhat redundant expense of which I might add is unnecessary in my opinion. I feel it would behoove ALL EMPLOYEES, including executives, to be more conscientious of costs and expenses to improve Enron's and EBS' bottom-line. How can we ("Enron") be a world leading company if we don't have leading world leaders that spend Enron's money as if it were there own. I think it would be in Enron's best interest to set some guidelines regarding expenses such as these. Just because a person is an executive of the company why should be allowed to have anything they want just because they can? Thank you for your time and the opportunity to express myself. Especially since I am a shareholder also and care where the money goes.

Carol: Peter del Vecchio is looking for Canadian counsel in connection with a paper acquisition and inquired about Stikeman. Have you worked with any of their lawyers (perhaps on the Canadian cash collateralization issue)?

Broker is correct. Chris entered the wrong price. I'll change it to 370 when Risk is done calcing. Kate Kerri Thompson@ENRON 12/21/2000 01:35 PM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: apb 483948 broker has 370.00

When: Monday, November 05, 2001 1:00 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Where: TBD *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Please make sure to accept this invitation if you are interested in the class. Thank You Rika