|
<html> |
|
<title> - THE END OF RELATIONSHIP BANKING? EXAMINING THE CFB`S `SMALL BUSINESS LENDING DATA COLLECTION' RULE</title> |
|
<body><pre> |
|
[House Hearing, 118 Congress] |
|
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] |
|
|
|
|
|
THE END OF RELATIONSHIP BANKING? EXAMINING THE CFPB'S `SMALL BUSINESS |
|
LENDING DATA COLLECTION' RULE |
|
|
|
======================================================================= |
|
|
|
HEARING |
|
|
|
BEFORE THE |
|
|
|
SUBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC GROWTH, TAX, AND CAPITAL ACCESS |
|
|
|
OF THE |
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
|
|
|
ONE HUNDRED EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS |
|
|
|
FIRST SESSION |
|
__________ |
|
|
|
HEARING HELD |
|
MARCH 28, 2023 |
|
__________ |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
Small Business Committee Document Number 118-006 |
|
Available via the GPO Website: www.govinfo.gov |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE |
|
|
|
51-443 WASHINGTON : 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS |
|
|
|
ROGER WILLIAMS, Texas, Chairman |
|
BLAINE LUETKEMEYER, Missouri |
|
PETE STAUBER, Minnesota |
|
DAN MEUSER, Pennsylvania |
|
BETH VAN DUYNE, Texas |
|
MARIA SALAZAR, Florida |
|
TRACEY MANN, Kansas |
|
JAKE ELLZEY, Texas |
|
MARC MOLINARO, New York |
|
MARK ALFORD, Missouri |
|
ELI CRANE, Arizona |
|
AARON BEAN, Florida |
|
WESLEY HUNT, Texas |
|
NICK LALOTA, New York |
|
NYDIA VELAZQUEZ, New York, Ranking Member |
|
JARED GOLDEN, Maine |
|
KWEISI MFUME, Maryland |
|
DEAN PHILLIPS, Minnesota |
|
GREG LANDSMAN, Ohio |
|
MORGAN MCGARVEY, Kentucky |
|
MARIE GLUESENKAMP PEREZ, Washington |
|
HILLARY SCHOLTEN, Michigan |
|
SHRI THANEDAR, Michigan |
|
JUDY CHU, California |
|
SHARICE DAVIDS, Kansas |
|
CHRIS PAPPAS, New Hampshire |
|
|
|
Ben Johnson, Majority Staff Director |
|
Melissa Jung, Minority Staff Director |
|
|
|
C O N T E N T S |
|
|
|
OPENING STATEMENTS |
|
|
|
Page |
|
Hon. Dan Meuser.................................................. 1 |
|
Hon. Greg Landsman............................................... 2 |
|
|
|
WITNESSES |
|
|
|
Mr. Troy Peters, President and Chief Executive Officer, JBT, |
|
Jonestown, PA.................................................. 6 |
|
Mr. Lucas White, President, The Fountain Trust Company, |
|
Covington, IN.................................................. 8 |
|
Mr. Michael Wilson, Chief Experience Officer, Members 1st FCU, |
|
Enola, PA...................................................... 9 |
|
Ms. Luz Urrutia, Chief Executive Officer, Accion Opportunity |
|
Fund, San Jose, CA............................................. 11 |
|
|
|
APPENDIX |
|
|
|
Prepared Statements: |
|
Mr. Troy Peters, President and Chief Executive Officer, JBT, |
|
Jonestown, PA.............................................. 28 |
|
Mr. Lucas White, President, The Fountain Trust Company, |
|
Covington, IN.............................................. 31 |
|
Mr. Michael Wilson, Chief Experience Officer, Members 1st |
|
FCU, Enola, PA............................................. 38 |
|
Ms. Luz Urrutia, Chief Executive Officer, Accion Opportunity |
|
Fund, San Jose, CA......................................... 61 |
|
Questions for the Record: |
|
None. |
|
Answers for the Record: |
|
None. |
|
Additional Material for the Record: |
|
Center for Responsible Lending (CRL), the National |
|
Association for Latino Community Asset Builders (NALCAB), |
|
and the National Coalition for Asian Pacific American |
|
Community Development (National CAPACD).................... 65 |
|
Colt Energy, Inc............................................. 69 |
|
Consumer Bankers Association (CBA)........................... 70 |
|
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau......................... 75 |
|
Honorable Greg Landsman--CFPB Symposium Report............... 123 |
|
Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA).............. 131 |
|
National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions |
|
(NAFCU).................................................... 171 |
|
National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC)............. 186 |
|
NCRC Fact Sheet.............................................. 191 |
|
Responsible Business Lending Coalition (RBLC)................ 197 |
|
Testimony of Nick Powell, Chairman, Colt Energy.............. 201 |
|
|
|
|
|
THE END OF RELATIONSHIP BANKING? EXAMINING THE CFB`S `SMALL BUSINESS |
|
LENDING DATA COLLECTION' RULE |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
|
|
|
|
TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 2023 |
|
|
|
House of Representatives, |
|
Committee on Small Business, |
|
Subcommittee on Economic Growth, |
|
Tax, and Capital Access, |
|
Washington, DC. |
|
The Subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 10:01 a.m., in |
|
Room 2360, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Dan Meuser |
|
[chairman of the Subcommittee] presiding. |
|
Present: Representatives Meuser, Williams, Luetkemeyer, Van |
|
Duyne, Alford, LaLota, Landsman, Velazquez, Chu, and Davids. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. All right. This hearing will come to |
|
order. Thank you. Thank you. This is the Subcommittee on |
|
Economic Growth, Tax, and Capital Access. This meeting has now |
|
come to order. |
|
Without objection, the Chair is authorized to declare a |
|
recess of the Committee at any time. |
|
I will now recognize myself for my opening statements. The |
|
title of this hearing is ``The End of Relationship Banking: |
|
Examining the CFBP's Small Business Lending Data Collection |
|
Rule.'' |
|
Again, good morning, and welcome to this hearing, examining |
|
the Biden Administration's continued regulatory overreach and |
|
its very harmful impact on America's small business economy. |
|
First, I want to thank our witnesses very much for being |
|
here today. We appreciate you taking the time to join us and |
|
sharing all of your insights. |
|
Today's hearing addresses a vital part of our country's |
|
economy, small community lending institutions and the role they |
|
play in assisting our small businesses. As we meet here today, |
|
the financial institutions across the country are actively |
|
engaged as we know in lending to main street America and our |
|
nation's entrepreneurs who are in the process of starting their |
|
own businesses. |
|
As our witnesses will discuss with the Subcommittee, the |
|
relationships between local lenders and the businesses in their |
|
communities takes years to build and refine. These community |
|
lenders are also the ones best suited to determine the |
|
structure of the loans that provide to their customers personal |
|
touch, knowing the customer, that it is impossible for a large |
|
national institution to replicate. |
|
Unfortunately, President Biden's Consumer Financial |
|
Protection Bureau (CFPB) is poised to throw another wrench into |
|
this vital aspect of our economy. The CFPB is proposing to |
|
implement a new rule, the Small Business Lending Data |
|
Collection Rule, that will impose burdensome new reporting |
|
requirements that would harm small business lending. This rule |
|
will alter the behavior of small financial institutions and |
|
make them hesitant to continue lending to small businesses |
|
based on their long-established relationships with main street |
|
America. |
|
This rule was born out of an obscure provision in Dodd- |
|
Frank almost 13 years ago. Most Members of Congress were too |
|
busy debating too-big-to fail to even pay attention or realize |
|
it was in there. |
|
Making matters worse, this rule will add an even larger |
|
regulatory cost burden to these small financial institutions |
|
that are already struggling to keep up with the Biden |
|
administration's costly regulatory agenda. According to the |
|
SBA's Office of Advocacy, this rule, ``may be unnecessarily |
|
burdensome to small entities, may impact the cost of credit for |
|
small businesses, and may lead to a decrease in lending to |
|
small, minority- and women-owned businesses.'' This is from the |
|
Office of Advocacy. The Office of Advocacy also estimates that |
|
the rule will have an initial $126 million impact on small |
|
financial institutions, and then going forward, an annual |
|
impact of $153 million. Unlike mega-banks that can absorb such |
|
costs, these will crush smaller institutions that do not have |
|
the budget to absorb such new regulatory burdens. The Office of |
|
Advocacy also expressed concern that this rule failed to |
|
properly consider alternative, less burdensome alternatives to |
|
the rule. These alternatives should have included exempting the |
|
smallest lenders but were never seriously considered. |
|
The rule also creates racial profiling issues, privacy |
|
concerns, an unrealistic implementation window, and mandates |
|
excessive data collection of small business owners. In the |
|
digital age we live in, such personal information in the hands |
|
of so many different entities should give all of us, especially |
|
the CFPB, pause on such requirements. |
|
At a time when main street America is dealing with |
|
unprecedented levels of inflation, interest rates that are |
|
being raised at the fastest pace since the 1980s, supply chain |
|
disruptions, and a prolonged labor shortage, adding more |
|
burdens to our country's job creators, and our banks, is the |
|
last thing the CFPB should be doing, but that is exactly what |
|
the Bureau and the Biden administration seem determined to do. |
|
Our small businesses and local community lenders deserve so |
|
much better. |
|
Without objection, I would like to enter into the record |
|
letters detailing the impact this rule would have on small |
|
business lending from the National Association of Federal |
|
Credit Unions, International Community Bankers Association, the |
|
Consumer Bankers Association, and the American Bankers |
|
Association. It seems this rule has brought community banks and |
|
credit unions together. So I guess there is a silver lining |
|
here somewhere. |
|
With that I will yield to our Ranking Member from Ohio, Mr. |
|
Landsman. |
|
Mr. LANDSMAN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for holding this |
|
very important hearing and examining the CFPB's small business |
|
lending role and examining ways to create a much more fair and |
|
successful equitable lending system. For far too long, women- |
|
and minority-owned small businesses have experienced obstacles |
|
to accessing capital. Part of the reason is the lack of data |
|
and transparency related to small business lending. |
|
The scant data that exists continues to show that these |
|
businesses lack the same access to external financing when |
|
compared to traditionally owned firms. And during hard economic |
|
times, the barriers to access capital are even greater. |
|
According to the CFPB, minority- and women-owned small |
|
businesses were disproportionately hurt by the pandemic because |
|
they had fewer cash reserves and faced deeper hurdles to |
|
accessing capital. |
|
The Paycheck Protection Program highlighted the disparities |
|
between these white-owned businesses and businesses of color. |
|
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that the PPP loans |
|
only reached about 20 percent of the eligible firms in states |
|
with the highest densities of black-owned firms. The report |
|
confirmed what we already suspected, the presence of racial |
|
disparities in banking relationships and significant gap and |
|
credit access in underserved communities. |
|
Section 1071 of Dodd-Frank passed over a decade ago |
|
attempts to remedy this situation by requiring financial |
|
institutions to simply collect and report on the demographics |
|
of small business owners applying for financing. Doing so |
|
facilities the enforcement of fair lending laws and identifies |
|
business and community development needs for small businesses. |
|
I am encouraged that the CFPB will be issuing a final rule |
|
in the next few days. It has been a long 12 years to get to |
|
this point which included a lawsuit to prevent the previous |
|
administration from intentionally delaying this rule. The CFPB |
|
has conducted considerable outreach to small firms which |
|
included convening of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement |
|
and Fairness Act panel in October 2020 to hear suggestions and |
|
recommendations for small entity representatives. This, in |
|
addition to adhering to the required APA notice and comment |
|
process where the agency considered thousands of comments from |
|
the public. There are going to be discussions today that this |
|
rule discourages small financial institutions from making loans |
|
to small firms. I for one do not agree with that conclusion. |
|
Just like the data requirements for HMDA do not negatively |
|
impact the mortgage lending industry, this rule will not be |
|
detrimental to small businesses' lending market. It is my hope |
|
that this rule will actually increase lending to small |
|
businesses in general. |
|
With that said, Mr. Chairman, I would like to request to |
|
enter into the record a report titled ``Addressing the gap in |
|
consumer protection for small business consumer through |
|
multiple research program,'' which includes the data collected |
|
is essential to combat institutional systemic discrimination |
|
and the costs associated with the rule far outweighed by the |
|
need to create a more transparent system for small business |
|
lending in this marketplace. |
|
So this is a motion to enter this into the record. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Without objection. |
|
Mr. LANDSMAN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I yield back. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Thank you again. |
|
I now recognize Mr. Williams of Texas, the Chairman of the |
|
Full Committee for his remarks. |
|
Mr. WILLIAMS. Good morning. I want to thank all the |
|
witnesses for being here today. And I want to thank my |
|
colleague, Dan Meuser, my friend also, for holding today's |
|
Small Business Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Tax, Capital |
|
Access hearing on the CFPB's 1071 rule. |
|
Today's hearing is critical to examining the future of main |
|
street America. Banks are the lifeblood for small businesses |
|
looking to grow or expand their operations, and I can tell you |
|
as a small business owner for over 52 years, I can tell you |
|
there has not been a day in my life where I have not owed a |
|
community bank money. And I do not think there is another |
|
agency in Washington that brings and causes more anxiety and |
|
nervousness to small businesses than the CFPB. This agency is |
|
quick to issue fines and enforcement actions against businesses |
|
and financial institutions without ever telling them the rules |
|
of the road before they are penalized. This regulation by |
|
enforcement is detrimental to main street businesses that crave |
|
certainty. |
|
So this 1071 rule looks to make this problem even worse. |
|
Financial institutions are going to have to dedicate |
|
significant time and resources in order to comply with this |
|
overly burdensome new data reporting regime. We need more loan |
|
officers in our lending institutions and credit unions and not |
|
more compliance officers, and we are looking to get more money |
|
into the hands of job creators instead of needing to hire more |
|
compliance officers like I said that are nothing but a drain on |
|
our bottom lines. |
|
So with that, I am looking forward to today's discussion, |
|
and I hope we can shine a light on the most harmful aspects of |
|
this very harmful rule that will be finalized any day now. |
|
So Mr. Chairman, thank you, and I yield the time back. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. I |
|
appreciate you being here with us this morning. |
|
So I will now introduce our witnesses. |
|
Our first witness today is Mr. Troy Peters. He resides in |
|
my district. Mr. Peters is the president and CEO of Jonestown |
|
Bank and Trust, which is celebrating its 150th anniversary this |
|
year. Headquartered in Jonestown, Pennsylvania, which is in my |
|
district, the bank's primary focus is on lending to small |
|
businesses and retail banking. Mr. Peters knows firsthand how |
|
vital banks like his are to the local community and being |
|
readily able to provide a line of credit, and by extension, a |
|
line of opportunity for someone to pursue their dream of |
|
opening small businesses. And what will be a common theme in |
|
today's hearing, the CFPB's Small Business Lending Data |
|
Collection Rule will have a major adverse effect on both Mr. |
|
Peters' bank and the local communities he has dedicated himself |
|
to serving. With a career spanning over 30 years, Mr. Peters |
|
has indispensable knowledge of the community banking industry |
|
and will provide firsthand experience of how this rule will be |
|
another blow to our country's small banks and main street |
|
America. Mr. Peters, thank you for joining the Committee today. |
|
It is now also my honor today to introduce our next |
|
witness, Mr. Lucas White. Lucas White is a fourth generation |
|
community banker and an active Member of his community. He has |
|
served as president of The Fountain Trust Company since 2016, a |
|
$600 million community bank with five locations in Fountain |
|
County, Indiana. Mr. White is also Chairman-elect of the |
|
Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), a national |
|
trade association focused on advocating on behalf of more than |
|
5,000 community banks across the United States. At ICBA, Mr. |
|
White is a Member of the executive committee and a board of |
|
directors and is Chairman of the Federal Delegate Board. He is |
|
also a Member of the ICBA's Policy Development Nominating |
|
Committee. So thanks very much for being here with us. Also, |
|
while graduated from Indiana University with a bachelor's |
|
degree in philosophy and Indiana University-Bloomington, Morris |
|
School of Law years later, Mr. White still actively practices |
|
law in the family firm of White and White Attorneys today. |
|
Community banks channel local deposits into main street America |
|
and help spur job creation, foster innovation, and assist in |
|
fulfilling the American dream for many entrepreneurs. Mr. |
|
White's extensive career knowledge in community banking makes |
|
him well informed about the issues facing small businesses in |
|
main street communities today. Mr. White, again, thank you for |
|
making the trip and being with us. |
|
It is now my honor to introduce our next witness, Mr. Mike |
|
Wilson, to today's hearing. Mr. Wilson is the chief experience |
|
officer for Members First Federal Credit Union headquartered in |
|
Enola, Pennsylvania, just outside my district. Members 1st over |
|
a half million Members, 60 branch locations across 9 counties |
|
in Central Pennsylvania, including in the great 9th District of |
|
Pennsylvania. Mr. Wilson's role is crucial as he is responsible |
|
for ensuring exceptional Member experience on behalf of the |
|
entire credit union. He does this through providing leadership |
|
and direction for the credit union's retail operations, |
|
customer service areas, we well as public relations, marketing, |
|
community outreach, internal and external communications, and |
|
financial literacy. Mr. Wilson, you sound like you are kind of |
|
a busy guy. Mr. Wilson graduated from Central Penn College with |
|
a bachelor of science in business and went on to earn his MBA |
|
from Eastern University. Through his passion for people and |
|
entrepreneurial thinking, Mr. Wilson has been recognized for |
|
his professional accomplishments with numerous business awards, |
|
including Emerging Business Leader of the Year to the |
|
Harrisburg Regional Chamber and Capital Region Economic |
|
Development Corporation. Mr. Wilson's extensive career and |
|
dedication to his community through local banking makes him as |
|
well informed as anyone about the issues facing small |
|
businesses and main street communities today. Mr. Wilson, we |
|
thank you for joining the Committee today and we are looking |
|
forward to your testimony very much. |
|
I now recognize the distinguished Ranking Member, Mr. |
|
Landsman of Ohio, to introduce his witness for today's hearing. |
|
Mr. LANDSMAN. Thank you, Mr. Chair. |
|
Our final witness today is Ms. Luz Urrutia, CEO of the |
|
Accion Opportunity Fund, which is a nonprofit CDFI located in |
|
California focused on national microlending strategy to meet |
|
the needs of small businesses. She has spent her career in |
|
banking and financial services, particularly in underserved |
|
markets. Prior to joining Accion Opportunity Fund--I think it |
|
is Accion. Did I get that--sorry, my fault. She worked for |
|
Dollar Financial Group as CEO for the Americas. In this role |
|
she helped transform the organization into a responsible |
|
consumer finance business for underserved communities. She has |
|
served on the CFPB's Consumer Advisory Board, the Consumer |
|
Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve Bank, and the Board of |
|
the Financial Health Network. And on the SBREFA panel that |
|
examined the CFPB Small Business Lending rule which is the top |
|
of the hearing today. Recently, she received the Latino |
|
Leadership Award for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Ms. |
|
Urrutia received a bachelor of science in Business |
|
administration and finance and an MBA from Georgia State |
|
University. Thank you for joining us. We look forward to |
|
hearing your testimony. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Thank you, Ranking Member Landsman. Nice |
|
to have you with us. |
|
So before I recognize our first witness, I remind the |
|
witnesses that oral testimony is restricted to 5 minutes in |
|
length. When the light in front of you turns yellow you have 1 |
|
minute remaining. When the light turns red, you are over time |
|
and need to conclude your testimony as quickly as possible. |
|
I do now recognize Mr. Peters for his 5 minute opening |
|
remarks. Troy? |
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF TROY PETERS, PRESIDENT AND CEO, JBT; LUCAS WHITE, |
|
PRESIDENT, THE FOUNTAIN TRUST COMPANY; MICHAEL WILSON, CHIEF |
|
EXPERIENCE OFFICER, MEMBERS 1ST FCU; LUZ URRUTIA, CHIEF |
|
EXPERIENCE OFFICER, ACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF TROY PETERS |
|
|
|
Mr. PETERS. Chairman Meuser, Ranking Member Landsman, |
|
Chairman Williams, and Members of the Subcommittee, I am Troy |
|
Peters, President and CEO of Jonestown Bank and Trust Co. (JBT) |
|
headquartered in Jonestown, Pennsylvania. I testify today on |
|
behalf of the Pennsylvania Association of Community Bankers, |
|
and I also am a Member of ICBA. My bank is celebrating its |
|
150th anniversary this year. Our name has never changed. We |
|
have nearly $900 million in assets, 11 full-service branch |
|
locations, and 160 employees. Our focus is on small business |
|
and retail banking. We are also active in indirect auto |
|
lending, and we serve the legal cannabis related businesses |
|
throughout Pennsylvania and surrounding states. |
|
Community banks like mine provide the bulk of all small |
|
business loans in America. We are different than large banking |
|
institutions that operate under a contrasting business model |
|
that focuses on large companies and loan sizes. Main street |
|
businesses, like my customers, prefer to work with a local |
|
community bank because we are relationship lenders. We |
|
intimately know our markets and our customers. |
|
The CFPB's Small Business Lending Data Collection rule is |
|
unfortunately squarely aimed at smaller banks like mine. We are |
|
disproportionately disadvantaged to take on additional system |
|
and personnel costs associated with compliance to this rule. |
|
Now, although much of the costs would need to be passed on to |
|
the borrower, it continues to promote further bank |
|
consolidation, which means fewer local community banks to serve |
|
the small business segment. |
|
When my career began, this country had over 12,500 banks. |
|
Today there are just over 4,000. Now, due to consolidation, a |
|
small business's access to capital is being pushed into |
|
metropolitan markets where relationship banking just does not |
|
count for much. |
|
I also worry about the integrity of the data to be |
|
collected. In most cases, when a small business is seeking |
|
financing, they are looking for the best solution and talking |
|
to multiple lenders. Five banks could be collecting this data, |
|
but only one will fund the loan. Each bank would be reporting |
|
the data, which would make drawing any meaningful conclusion |
|
difficult at best. |
|
Small business loans are tailored to the specific |
|
business's needs and it would be very difficult or impossible |
|
to collect the exact data points to tell the entire story of |
|
the structure, pricing, or counteroffers. There are just too |
|
many variables to these loans. They are not as homogeneous as, |
|
say, car loans. Making application and loan data public would |
|
certainly be objectionable to my clients and it is quite |
|
concerning. Publicly displaying sensitive information, like how |
|
much money they applied for, what the purpose of the loan is, |
|
and their revenue number is not the kind of information they |
|
want or expect to be made public from a private transaction. |
|
This disclosure could also create a competitive |
|
disadvantage for them, such as revealing a planned business |
|
investment. Even worse, publishing information that a sole |
|
proprietor's loan request was denied in a small community like |
|
ours, is akin the posting a bounced check to the wall behind |
|
the store cash register. The public humiliation shouts, ``Do |
|
not do business with this person; they are a deadbeat!'' My |
|
customers adamantly do not want this. |
|
I have customers like Jay. Jay came to our country seeking |
|
opportunity, and after years of hard work and savings, he was |
|
able to open his own small business near our town of 1,900 |
|
people where my bank is headquartered. A few years ago, when |
|
the qualified mortgage (QM) rule was implemented, Jay was ready |
|
to build his modest dream home. As a long-time customer, I |
|
would have loved to help him achieve this dream, but his |
|
mortgage request did not comply with the QM rules. And without |
|
access to the traditional banking system, Jay turned to an |
|
unregulated, hard money lender. His interest rate was higher |
|
the loan did not come with complete disclosure, flexible terms, |
|
or collection practices. |
|
I feel like this rule will cause similar unintended |
|
consequences and will not be in the best interest of my clients |
|
and the communities that we serve. My hope is that the CFPB |
|
will not go beyond the statutory requirements intended for this |
|
rule. They should not add additional data points. They should |
|
exempt smaller banks like mine, reduce the revenue thresholds, |
|
and not breach the privacy of my customers. |
|
I love the community banking industry and I love helping my |
|
customers, and I thank you for convening today's hearing and |
|
the opportunity to offer the community bank perspective. Thank |
|
you. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Thank you, Mr. Peters. |
|
I now recognize Mr. White for his 5 minute opening remarks. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF LUCAS WHITE |
|
|
|
Mr. WHITE. Chairman Meuser, Ranking Member Landsman, and |
|
Members of the Subcommittee, I am Lucas White, President of The |
|
Fountain Trust Company in Covington, Indiana. I testify today |
|
on behalf of the Independent Community Bankers of America |
|
(ICBA) where I am Chairman-elect. Thank you for this |
|
opportunity. |
|
Community banks are committed to meeting the credit needs |
|
of all small businesses in compliance with fair lending laws. |
|
However, we believe the CFPB's forthcoming rule under Section |
|
1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act will have serious, unintended |
|
consequences. If finalized without significant changes, the |
|
rule will have a chilling effect on customized lending, |
|
compromise borrower privacy in the rural and small-town markets |
|
I serve, and reduce access to credit for certain borrowers. |
|
As described in my written statement, ICBA is urging the |
|
CFPB to stay the effective date until the Supreme Court has |
|
ruled on the constitutionality of the agency. |
|
Is this rule ``the end of relationship banking,'' as the |
|
hearing title suggests? I absolutely believe that it puts |
|
relationship banking at risk and should be amended by the |
|
Bureau or by Congress at the earliest opportunity. Relationship |
|
banking is the key value proposition that community banks like |
|
mine offer. |
|
Relationship banking is our competitive advantage against |
|
the larger financial institutions and nonbank lenders. |
|
The Fountain Trust Company has served markets in West |
|
Central Indiana since 1903 with small business, agricultural, |
|
and consumer lending. Relationship banking is the foundation of |
|
our success. It explains our resilience through numerous |
|
economic and agricultural crises. |
|
When it comes to serving small business, we form |
|
partnerships that go well beyond lending. Community banks |
|
provide practical, real world business counseling that is |
|
especially important to small businesses. Customized lending is |
|
key to these relationships. |
|
Small business lending is not and should not be a |
|
commodity. Underwriting is based on numerous borrower |
|
characteristics and market variables. Loans are typically |
|
customized to suit borrowers' needs and preferences and give |
|
them the best chance of success. The data collected under 1071 |
|
will not reflect the full scope of underwriting and may suggest |
|
discrimination where none exists. |
|
Fortunately, our examiners are best positioned to make this |
|
judgment and application of fair lending laws. |
|
Section 1071 is simply the wrong tool for the job. Lenders |
|
will respond by standardizing loan features to protect |
|
themselves from charges of discrimination. As a result, small |
|
business customers will not have access to credit that is |
|
customized to their needs. Importantly, minority and women |
|
borrowers whom this rule is supposed to help often benefit from |
|
customized lending. |
|
This was the outcome of the qualified mortgage rule which |
|
was also a provision of the Dodd-Frank Act. It effectively |
|
forced residential mortgages into a box. |
|
As I discuss in my written statement, QM effectively |
|
undermined our mortgage lending. Section 1071 without needed |
|
accommodations threatens to do the same to our small business |
|
lending. |
|
A recent loan will illustrate my point. We worked with a |
|
local farmer who wanted to open a butcher shop, a vertical |
|
integration that made good business sense. We offered him two |
|
customized loan options, a fixed rate and a variable rate. I |
|
personally walked him through the benefits and drawbacks of |
|
each and how future interest rates could affect his loan |
|
payments and cash flows. This personalized customer service is |
|
what community banks do best and what sets us apart from the |
|
competition. |
|
Unfortunately, Section 1071 would make customized multiple |
|
option lending difficult. It is impossible to compare loan data |
|
across customers who have chosen different options and |
|
demonstrate that lending is not discriminatory. Thus, Section |
|
1071 will limit the scope of loan choices available to small |
|
businesses. |
|
On top of that, the publication of my borrower's loan data |
|
under 1071 would surely compromise his financial privacy. He is |
|
the only butcher in town. In the small communities I serve, |
|
businesses are readily identifiable. Loan offers contain |
|
critical business information and reflect the business owner's |
|
personal financial position as a guarantor of the loan. |
|
I discuss additional objections to 1071 in my written |
|
statement, but the effect on customization and the compromise |
|
of borrower privacy are our primary concerns. The rule could be |
|
greatly improved by recommendations described in my written |
|
testimony that would exempt more banks and borrowers from the |
|
rule. ICBA thanks the Members of this Subcommittee and |
|
Committee who have introduced legislation to make the rule more |
|
workable. |
|
Thank you again for the opportunity to testify. I look |
|
forward to your questions. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Thank you, Mr. White. |
|
I now recognize Mr. Wilson for his 5 minute opening |
|
remarks. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF MICHAEL WILSON |
|
|
|
Mr. WILSON. Good morning, Chairman Meuser, Ranking Member |
|
Landsman, and Members of the Subcommittee. My name is Michael |
|
Wilson, and I am testifying today on behalf of the National |
|
Association of Federally Insured Credit Unions (NAFCU). I |
|
currently serve as Chief Experience Officer of Members 1st |
|
Federal Credit Union, headquartered in Enola, Pennsylvania. |
|
While small businesses only make up 4 percent of our total |
|
membership, we are very proud of our work in the community as a |
|
small business lender over the last 20 years in 9 counties |
|
across Central Pennsylvania where relationships mean |
|
everything. |
|
We appreciate the opportunity to participate in this |
|
discussion regarding the 1071 rulemaking process at the CFPB. |
|
Section 1071 requires financial institutions to report data |
|
about small businesses and their owners in order to facilitate |
|
enforcement of fair lending laws. While NAFCU lauds this goal, |
|
there is widespread concern about how the CFPB is proposing to |
|
carry out its authority in this area. We outline our concerns |
|
with the proposed rule in detail in our written statement but |
|
would like to highlight a few of our major points here. |
|
The definition of a covered financial institution. |
|
Establishing a 25 loan threshold for reporting is a lower level |
|
than even well-established home mortgage disclosure act or HMDA |
|
limits. Such a low threshold could drive smaller lenders out of |
|
small business lending all together due to the compliance |
|
costs, a fact that the Bureau acknowledges in the proposed |
|
rule. |
|
The small business definition. While the CFPB has a |
|
proposed $5 million threshold, NAFCU believes it should be |
|
consistent with the SBA's $1 million standard. |
|
Covered credit transactions. NAFCU recommends that the |
|
Bureau establish a de minimis threshold consistent with the |
|
NCUA's $50,000 call report threshold. Congress has excluded |
|
Member business loans under $50,000 from the credit union |
|
business loan cap and the NCUA has recognized this and excluded |
|
such loans from call reports. We believe the CFPB is vastly |
|
underestimating the number of credit unions that would be |
|
impacted by the new burdens of this rule because it used the |
|
call report data that excludes these loans in its analysis but |
|
the Bureau did not account for the de minimis threshold by |
|
proposing its own in the rule. By not recognizing this |
|
distinction, the CFPB threatens to compound the compliance |
|
burdens of this rule for credit unions. |
|
Protected demographic information and visual observation. |
|
Under the proposed rule, an employee could be forced to |
|
determine the ethnicity and race of a small business applicant |
|
via visual observation. NAFCU unequivocally opposes any |
|
requirement that an employee of a credit union make visual |
|
observations concerning the race, gender, or other sensitive |
|
data about a small business owner. Not only is this an |
|
unconscionable idea but it also threatens the integrity of any |
|
Section 1071 data collected. |
|
One-time and ongoing compliance costs. NAFCU is |
|
significantly concerned that the Bureau, as happened with its |
|
HMDA proposal, has materially underestimated the one-time and |
|
ongoing costs credit unions are likely to face under the rule. |
|
Mandatory compliance schedule. The proposed rule's 18-month |
|
mandatory compliance schedule will be aggressive, even for the |
|
largest, most tech-savvy credit unions. The vast majority of |
|
credit unions will be forced to rely on multiple IT vendors to |
|
come into compliance. Past experience with the Bureau's |
|
implementation of HMDA suggests that the Bureau is likely |
|
underestimating the time required for IT venders to adapt their |
|
products to comply with major rulemaking. NAFCU has encouraged |
|
the Bureau to adopt a phased, mandatory compliance schedule |
|
based on loan volumes that begins no sooner than 3 years |
|
following the Bureau's adoption of a final rule. We are |
|
supportive of efforts to address concerns about the compliance |
|
deadline, such as the Small Lender Act offered by |
|
Representative French Hill. |
|
In conclusion, with the final Section 1071 rule set to be |
|
released, NAFCU urges the CFPB to exercise its discretionary |
|
authority to exempt smaller institutions from this rule as the |
|
compliance costs outweigh any benefit. If such an exemption is |
|
not granted under the CFPB Section 1022 authority, we would |
|
hope to see significant changes to the proposed rule as |
|
outlined above. Even though small businesses make up a small |
|
percentage of our membership, the cost associated with |
|
complying would have a negative impact on our Members and their |
|
access to credit. Should the bureau not address our concerns, |
|
we urge Congress to step in with your oversight authority and |
|
to consider statutory changes such as enacting the small lender |
|
act. Failure to do so will threaten access to credit for many |
|
of our nation's main street small businesses who rely on |
|
community lenders like credit unions to meet their capital |
|
needs. |
|
I thank you for the opportunity to testify today and look |
|
forward to answering your questions. Thank you. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Thank you for your compelling testimony, |
|
Mr. Wilson. |
|
I now recognize Ms. Urrutia for her 5 minute opening |
|
remarks. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF LUZ URRUTIA |
|
|
|
Ms. URRUTIA. Good morning, Chairman Meuser, Ranking Member |
|
Landsman, and Members of the Committee. Thank you for the |
|
opportunity to testify and discuss CFPB Section 1071. |
|
My name is Luz Urrutia and I am the CEO of Accion |
|
Opportunity Fund, the leading CDFI nonprofit providing access |
|
to loans, business advising, and networks to underinvested |
|
entrepreneurs. |
|
I spent my entire career in for-profit financial services |
|
which included nearly two decades at Wachovia, then as co- |
|
founder and CEO of a community bank and a CEO of a payday |
|
lending company where I helped to ensure that they provide |
|
responsible financial services to their customers. I joined AOF |
|
as its CEO because of my experience as a lifelong for-profit |
|
banker and my passion for providing responsible financial |
|
services to underinvested communities. I know for a fact that |
|
business and lenders can generate profit and do the right thing |
|
investing in all communities. |
|
As CEO, I am very proud of the impactful work AOF has done |
|
to provide capital to entrepreneurs that are often left behind |
|
by our financial mainstream system. Today, we have deployed |
|
over $700 million to more than 25,000 entrepreneurs, and 80 |
|
percent of our borrowers are people of color, women, and |
|
immigrants. In fact, women make up one out of every three |
|
clients we serve. It is because of the entrepreneurs we serve |
|
that I have advocated for rules like 1071 which will allow our |
|
entire financial services system to fully see and better serve |
|
all of our entrepreneurs. |
|
And this transparency is not just about fairness. It is |
|
also about strengthening the economy. A recent study shows that |
|
minority- and women-owned small businesses employ nearly 20 |
|
million people and generate over $2 trillion in economic |
|
activity. |
|
I know this to be true, personally and as the CEO of AOF, |
|
because I think about clients such as Reign Free from Oakland, |
|
who started and scaled her catering business after repeatedly |
|
being told that she did not qualify for a loan. We were her |
|
first lender to say yes. I also think about Alicia Villanueva |
|
from Hayward, who took $5,000, bought her first van, and now |
|
she has the most burgeoning tamale business nationwide. |
|
I am proud that we provide loans to everyone--Black, White, |
|
Latino, Asian, and low-income, but I am especially proud of our |
|
investment in Black and Latina women who are starting up more |
|
businesses in this country than any other group. I am proud |
|
that AOF supports these entrepreneurs and the businesses that |
|
they found, the employees they hire and train, and the economic |
|
activity they generate. |
|
However, for decades, entrepreneurs like these women have |
|
not been seen by our financial system. While I am on here to |
|
defend or promote every letter of Section 1071, I recognize |
|
that this rule will accomplish three important things: It will |
|
help small business lenders. It will help entrepreneurs that |
|
desperately need access to capital, and help policymakers that |
|
want to invest in our economy without creating new direct |
|
entitlement programs. |
|
First, this rule would help the market to better address |
|
both the lack of access to affordable capital, and the rise of |
|
irresponsible lending. For the first time, everyone in |
|
financial services would be able to see which business models |
|
are successful at reaching minority-owned, women-owned, and |
|
other small businesses. This transparency would attract |
|
investment capital and partnerships into models that really |
|
work. We can have a market-based model and pro-innovation |
|
approach to regulation, one that will actually help lenders |
|
expand customer acquisition, something that all community banks |
|
and lenders really want and need to do. But we need clarity on |
|
who the businesses are, who is serving them, and what capital |
|
are they getting, because we cannot manage what we do not |
|
measure. |
|
Second, as lenders, the better we understand these |
|
businesses, it will help tailor products and services to meet |
|
their needs. The more knowledge we gain about our markets, our |
|
customers, and their needs, the better equipped we are to |
|
building long-term profitable relationships. |
|
Finally, this rule helps spur additional investments in |
|
small businesses, which is the best way to reduce inequities |
|
without having to create new government programs. Instead, it |
|
will allow all of us to do what our organizations have |
|
successfully done for years--expand access to capital for |
|
underserved entrepreneurs by leveraging existing public and |
|
private sector partnerships. |
|
For these reasons, I am very pleased to testify on how we |
|
can ensure that Section 1071 accomplishes its goals of spurring |
|
additional investment in all our entrepreneurs. |
|
I will conclude by saying that access to capital for small |
|
businesses is a bipartisan priority. There are Mom and Pop |
|
stores in communities that are rural and urban; red and blue; |
|
Black and White, Hispanic, and Asian, and they are all powering |
|
our economy. But we cannot do that without Section 1071 to |
|
shine light on these small businesses' credit applications. |
|
Because as I said before, we cannot manage what we do not |
|
measure, and sunlight is the best disinfectant. As we implement |
|
this rule well, we will finally will be able to increase access |
|
to capital for small businesses and create a more transparent, |
|
bipartisan, and successful financial system. |
|
Thank you, and I look forward to your questions. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Thank you, Ms. Urrutia, I appreciate that. |
|
We will now move to the Member questions under the 5-minute |
|
rule. And I recognize myself for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. White, I will start with you. And really, to all of our |
|
witnesses. The CFPB's mission statement is as follows. I am |
|
going to summarize. |
|
We aim to make consumer financial markets work for |
|
consumers, responsible providers, and the economy as a whole. |
|
We protect consumers from unfair, deceptive, or abusive |
|
practices and take action against companies that break the law. |
|
We arm people with the information, steps, and tools that they |
|
need to make smart financial decisions. |
|
Mr. White, do you think that this rule will help the CFPB |
|
to accomplish this mission? |
|
Mr. WHITE. Mr. Chairman, thank you. |
|
I do not believe this rule will help CFPB achieve its |
|
mission. The first part of the mission statement was something |
|
along the line of having markets help consumers. And I would |
|
reference the QM rule that came into effect as part of Dodd- |
|
Frank. As I said in my testimony, customized lending is |
|
absolutely key to small business lending. We had that type of |
|
lending with consumer mortgages prior to the QM rule. As a |
|
result of the QM rule, we now have all of our consumer |
|
mortgages in a matrix. We had a customer prior to QM. Her name |
|
is Mae. She owns a local Chinese restaurant. We had a consumer |
|
mortgage with her. After QM, we could not verify enough income |
|
and we had to turn her down when she wanted to buy a new house. |
|
And so that is an example of where a rule like this can |
|
undermine what the CFPB's mission is. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Sure. So, will the CFPB's 1071 reporting |
|
rule in any way improve your lending practices and make them |
|
fair? Will you have more businesses in some way because this |
|
rule is in effect? And I will also ask, and I am going to ask |
|
Mr. Peters this and as well Mr. Wilson, is it fair to compare a |
|
mortgage loan to a business loan? |
|
Go ahead, Mr. White. You go first. |
|
Mr. WHITE. they are completely different. Each business is |
|
different. Their cash flows are different. Their needs are |
|
different. And that is the reason we tailor our loan products |
|
specifically to what that customer needs. And so you cannot |
|
compare consumer lending at all to small business lending in my |
|
eyes. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Mr. Peters? |
|
Mr. PETERS. Yeah, I would agree. They are two different |
|
situations. I mean, small businesses are unique. They are at |
|
different stages in their lifecycle. Oftentimes you are |
|
counting on pro forma income or projections, whereas in |
|
consumer lending it is documented past. So I think it is two |
|
different types of lending. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. And continuing, Mr. Peters, will this have |
|
any effect in extending relationships with small businesses in |
|
your community? I mean, let's face it. We are talking about |
|
expanding lending here, not what occurred with the PPP where |
|
fraud came into play. Now, we all know that knowing the |
|
customer within the PPP reduced potentiality of fraud |
|
immensely; right? I mean, it did not happen with knowing the |
|
customer. But would this help you accentuate and enhance your |
|
business base in any way in your view and change your proactive |
|
practices to outreach to your community? |
|
Mr. PETERS. I do not believe so. I think we are only as |
|
strong as our communities as a community bank. And we want to |
|
build stronger communities. So, I do not think that it would |
|
help that or change the outlook at all. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Well, it is certainly your reputation. |
|
Mr. Wilson, let me ask you, can you explain how your |
|
employees are going to feel about having to potentially guess |
|
the racial information of customers based upon appearance, |
|
surname, when it is not self-reported by the small business |
|
which is their right and as this rule would require? |
|
Mr. WILSON. I would imagine that would put our associates |
|
in a very uncomfortable situation. I think about the 19- or 20- |
|
year-old teller who is in their entry-level role and being, you |
|
know, put in a very awkward situation like that would be very |
|
difficult for them. In addition to that, it could really |
|
compromise the data which could undermine exactly what the |
|
attempt is here to help. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. All right. Thanks. |
|
And I am going to go back to you, Mr. Peters. Would this |
|
rule require you to increase employees, increase your costs for |
|
compliance, add additional burdens to your ability to be a |
|
thriving lender in your community? |
|
Mr. PETERS. Yes, it would. I mean, you are talking about |
|
systems and when systems are put into place what a lot of |
|
people do not think about is there needs to be somebody to run |
|
that system. The care and feeding of it, in addition to |
|
compliance, to the checking, the double checking, the software, |
|
to gather and report it. I would say something like this would |
|
touch at least 15 different people in our bank and probably add |
|
in the neighborhood of $500 to $800 per loan in the startup |
|
year. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Thank you. My time has expired. Thank you |
|
for your testimony. |
|
I now recognize the Ranking Member for 5 minutes for |
|
questions. |
|
Mr. LANDSMAN. Thank you, Chairman. |
|
So I appreciate everyone being here. The fact that we have |
|
a community bank and a credit union, a CDFI, part of this |
|
hearing is to better understand what is a proposed rule. Right? |
|
You know, the rule is still being finalized, input is being |
|
gathered, information from everybody is collected. And so it |
|
will be important for us to, I think, wait to see what this |
|
proposed rule is, though it does seem to me that this is a very |
|
straightforward thing. And Mr. Wilson touched on this which is |
|
although it may have been Ms. Urrutia, sorry, who said it but |
|
this is about collecting data and trying to better understand |
|
who does this best. And not an entitlement program which is I |
|
think a really important thing to keep in mind. And you know, |
|
to do it in a way that does not overburden folks obviously is |
|
important and clearly the testimony today suggests that, you |
|
know, for some of our banks it does. I will just way of |
|
background and then I will ask my question, I represent a |
|
district with a large number of smaller businesses, women-owned |
|
businesses, Black-owned businesses. We have a lot of childcare |
|
providers, most of whom are run by Black women, owned by Black |
|
women. And their ability to access capital has been tough. And |
|
you know, post-pandemic it has been even tougher because of the |
|
cost of capital; right? So accessing affordable capital. And so |
|
it does seem to me very straightforwardly that, you know, the |
|
more data that we are able to collect, the better it is that we |
|
will be able to understand what is working and what is not. And |
|
I think the question is how you do that in a way that is not |
|
overly burdensome and does not lead to this situation where |
|
folks are being left out or you cannot provide loans. |
|
So I guess my question first Ms. Urrutia, sorry, I am |
|
struggling with that one, is do you believe that this will |
|
undermine, you know, small banks, their ability to provide |
|
these loans? |
|
Ms. URRUTIA. I think it would be the opposite. I think |
|
that, this rule is going to lead actually to more small |
|
business lenders wanting to get into the market because |
|
everyone is going to become more aware, more knowledgeable, and |
|
more informed about the scope and scale of small businesses and |
|
the impact that they have on our economy. And frankly, how much |
|
they are growing and how profitable they are for institutions |
|
that want to serve them responsibly. You know, we saw this |
|
development with HMDA. It did not pull lenders away. In fact, |
|
as more data was reported, more competition emerged, better |
|
products were developed, and everybody won, the consumer and |
|
the lenders. |
|
The CFPB issued a lender survey and developed cost |
|
estimates that were then reviewed by lenders, and many smaller |
|
financial institutions were asked this question during the |
|
rulemaking process and responded to say that it would not force |
|
them out of the market. The Bureau also estimated the cost per |
|
application would range anywhere between $7 for the larger |
|
banks with more technological capabilities to $28 for the |
|
smaller banks. And so, you know, for the first time I think |
|
everyone in financial services would really have access to see |
|
what the market is made up of and to be able to reach |
|
successfully more minority-owned, women-owned, and other small |
|
businesses. And I think once again, the transparency is going |
|
to attract quality responsible business models to want to serve |
|
a very burgeoning, growing, and profitable market which is the |
|
small business lending community. |
|
Mr. LANDSMAN. You have been able to do a lot and this has |
|
helped you better understand the impact. What is your |
|
recommendation or suggestion, advice in terms of managing the |
|
data collection and pursing the intent of the rule which is to |
|
increase lending to folks that have struggled to get lending, |
|
to get the capital? |
|
Ms. URRUTIA. Yeah. So just, our own perspective, last year |
|
we did about 3,000 loans to small business entrepreneurs. That |
|
is an enormous amount of lending. And you know, like every |
|
other CDFI, we are required to collect and report data on a |
|
variety of data points--interest rates, fees, origination cost, |
|
race, gender, ethnicity. And CDFIs do that. |
|
Mr. LANDSMAN. I have run out of time and I apologize. I |
|
spoke a lot. But as the hearing continues I think just getting |
|
that sense as to what advice, recommendations would be great. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chair. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. Thank you. The Ranking Member's time has |
|
expired. |
|
The Chair now recognizes Mr. Luetkemeyer from Missouri for |
|
5 minutes. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. White, when Congress passed Dodd-Frank 12 years ago it |
|
included Section 1071, which requires companies to inquire |
|
whether customers are a small business, woman-owned business, |
|
or minority-owned business at the credit application stage. |
|
However, in the 1970s, Congress passed the Equal Credit |
|
Opportunity Act which prohibits race as part of lending |
|
criteria. If the CFPB's proposed rulemaking would make |
|
financial institutions essentially guess the applicant's |
|
ethnicity if an applicant does not want to provide such |
|
information it would appear to me that would be racial |
|
profiling if I am not mistaken. |
|
Mr. Wilson, does that proposed rule go against the Equal |
|
Credit Opportunity Act which has been in law since the 1970s? |
|
Mr. White, I am sorry. |
|
Mr. WHITE. As Mr. Wilson actually said earlier, we are |
|
concerned with having to guess the race of our customers. We |
|
have to do that under HMDA currently but through PPP we learned |
|
that a substantially higher number of small businesses declined |
|
to provide that information than homeowners. And so as a result |
|
of that, our employees are going to be guessing that |
|
information a lot more than what they do under HMDA. And that |
|
will eventually kind of erode the data. As we say in the |
|
banking industry, ``garbage in, garbage out.'' With models, it |
|
will be very hard to analyze the data. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. Okay. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act is |
|
a law though, is it not? |
|
Mr. WHITE. Yes. We cannot discriminate, period. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. This is a rule by the CFPB; right? |
|
Mr. WHITE. Yes. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. Does a law overrule a rule? |
|
Mr. WHITE. No. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. No? |
|
Mr. WHITE. The statute rules. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. They are equal in substance? Equal in |
|
importance? One does not overrule the other? |
|
Mr. WHITE. Statute technically I think overrides a rule but |
|
we have to follow both. And as long as they do not conflict---- |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. Well, does this not conflict here because |
|
you are basically racially profiling with the way the new rule |
|
is proposed versus the Equal Credit Opportunity Act that says |
|
you cannot do that? |
|
Mr. WHITE. It certainly opens up the risk to that. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. So, okay, as an attorney, would you not be |
|
concerned by your officers opening yourself up to a lawsuit in |
|
this situation? If you comply with one rule here, are you |
|
against, are you doing something in contradiction to the law? |
|
Mr. WHITE. It certainly increases our risk of opening |
|
ourselves up to litigation. That is correct. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. How would you advise your customers, your |
|
clients in this situation? If you were a bank attorney--not the |
|
CEO now. If you are a bank attorney for a group of banks, what |
|
would you advise them to do here? |
|
Mr. WHITE. When the rule requires our employees to guess, |
|
there is not much more we can do than say give it your best |
|
guess. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. So as long as you are guessing according |
|
to what the rule tells you to do you are going to be okay? |
|
Mr. WHITE. Well, hopefully. I will say as a community bank |
|
we know our customers. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. Is that away to do business, Mr. White? |
|
Mr. WHITE. No, it is not. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. To guess what is going to happen? |
|
Mr. WHITE. We do not prefer to guess when it comes to doing |
|
business. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. Okay. Thank you for that. |
|
Mr. Peters, you made a statement a minute ago that each |
|
bank has to collect the data and report it even if you do not |
|
make the loan. It would seem to me that is going to skew your |
|
data if you are going to have to continue to report it. |
|
Somebody who is not a worthwhile individual, he goes to seven |
|
different institutions and gets turned down, that is going to |
|
skew the data, is it not? |
|
Mr. PETERS. Yeah. I think definitely so. You know, most |
|
times a small business is not going to just go to the first |
|
lender. They are going to shop their deal and try to talk to a |
|
number of banks about it. The banks are also going to help them |
|
put together the structure of that loan. So it may look |
|
different in different applications in different spots and only |
|
one bank will fund the loan but they will all be reporting the |
|
data and I think it would be very difficult to find meaning in |
|
that kind of data. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. Mr. White, CFPB wants to collect a series |
|
of personal and detailed data from small businesses but refuses |
|
to release which information they will publicize or share how |
|
they plan to make that determination. My bill, the Business |
|
Loan Privacy Act will require the CFPB to do a separate notice |
|
and comment rulemaking to determine what information will be |
|
published by the Bureau. |
|
Mr. White, do you believe the CFPB should have a separate |
|
rulemaking for this, allowing small businesses and lenders to |
|
be part of the conversation? |
|
Mr. WHITE. Absolutely. And on behalf of ICBA, I would like |
|
to thank you for that legislation that you have introduced. |
|
Small businesses and community banks should have a voice in |
|
what data is made public because that is where our privacy |
|
concerns come up for our customers. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. Well, it looks to me like your clients', |
|
your customers' information is going to be much more public |
|
than what it is now if this goes through. Do you have concerns |
|
about that information being made public and having some |
|
ramifications of that to your customers? |
|
Mr. WHITE. We do. Small businesses prefer their information |
|
to remain confidential. And when our customers realize that |
|
their data is being made public it provides an incentive to go |
|
to a larger bank where their information can basically be |
|
hidden in the data. And if they come to our bank like that |
|
butcher I talked about, everybody is going to know who it is |
|
but if he goes to a big bank he may not. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. So what you are saying is instead of being |
|
able to do business with your local community bank, if you |
|
prefer not to have everybody in the community know what you are |
|
doing and what your business is you may go down the road to |
|
some bigger bank or some other community and as a result you |
|
are not doing business with your own community bank any longer. |
|
Mr. WHITE. That is exactly right. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. And so it will hurt the community banks by |
|
doing this. |
|
Mr. WHITE. Highly likely. Yes. |
|
Mr. LEUTKEMEYER. Okay. Thank you very much for your |
|
testimony today. Mr. Chairman, I yield back. |
|
Chairman MEUSER. The gentleman yields. |
|
The Chair now recognizes the Ranking Member of the Full |
|
Committee, Ms. Velazquez from New York for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Thank you very much. And thank you to all |
|
the panelists for your insightful information. |
|
Ms. Urrutia, you said, you stated that we cannot fix what |
|
we cannot measure. And so when we were going through the |
|
pandemic and we issued the first tranche of money to provide |
|
relief to small businesses, anecdotal data was telling us that |
|
the smallest of the small businesses and Black and Latino and |
|
Asian businesses were left behind no matter how hard they try. |
|
Do you know why? Because the banks did not proactively help |
|
anyone but their customers. So I requested when I was consulted |
|
by the leader in the House to sign onto another tranche of |
|
money I said, no, I want to see the data. I want to see if |
|
everyone, every small business that is in need of help has been |
|
provided by the banks. And the Secretary of the Treasury |
|
Mnuchin refused. And then when he saw that definitely we will |
|
not be part of providing more relief unless we saw the data, |
|
what the data told us was exactly what the anecdotal data was |
|
telling us, anecdotal stories was telling us. And so, we added |
|
money for nation lenders to be able to provide relief to small |
|
businesses. |
|
Ms. Urrutia, you were a Member of the CFPB and the notice |
|
of the proposed rulemaking provides that the applicants |
|
themselves do not have to provide their information. But, if |
|
the applicants do not provide the information, the financial |
|
institution must provide it based on visual observation or |
|
surname. In fact, those SBREFA panels were conducted by former |
|
Director Kraninger, who was appointed by President Trump. Is |
|
that not correct, Ms. Urrutia? And so it is also fair to say |
|
that the CFPB under both the Trump and the Biden administration |
|
thought that crafting and finalizing this rule was necessary to |
|
protect small businesses. |
|
Ms. Urrutia, can you explain why the data collection |
|
requirements being proposed by the CFPB are not overly |
|
burdensome on small depository and non-depository institutions? |
|
Ms. URRUTIA. Yeah. So as I explained earlier, you know, my |
|
previous experience as a banker and my current experience as |
|
the CEO of the largest nonprofit CDFI, I do not believe that |
|
the data collection being proposed under 1071 is overly |
|
burdensome. As I was stating earlier, we do on average 3,000 |
|
loans, small business loans a year. And like every other CDFI, |
|
we are required to collect and report comparable data to |
|
Section 1071 on small businesses on an annual basis and report |
|
that data to the CDFI fund. Many of the CDFIs that report with |
|
us are also small, community-based organizations and the |
|
information reported includes transaction-level data, such as |
|
interest rate, origination fee, points, terms, amounts, |
|
payments, race, ethnicity, age, and gender. |
|
Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Thank you for that answer. |
|
Can you expand on why you believe the work done by the CFPB |
|
is necessary to small businesses as consumer? |
|
Ms. URRUTIA. Well, if you look at the small businesses, you |
|
know, they are often called Mom and Pop businesses. And that is |
|
because they are small and they are run by the same consumers |
|
that the CFPB is trying to protect. These businesses do not |
|
have CPAs or CFOs making financial decisions for the family-run |
|
businesses and they have the same level of sophistication as |
|
the average American household. And these Mom and Pop stores |
|
are in rural and urban communities and are powering our |
|
economy. And their success is our success but they need capital |
|
to grow. And unfortunately---- |
|
Ms. VELAZQUEZ. But are you not concerned about the |
|
potential upfront or ongoing compliance costs? |
|
Ms. URRUTIA. I can tell you that our compliance cost up |
|
front was $35,000 and annually it is $10,000, regardless of |
|
number of loans that we are doing. And so I think that the |
|
costs are manageable compared to the benefits of having access |
|
to data that is going to help all of us better serve small |
|
businesses in America. |
|
Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Thank you. I yield back. |
|
Mr. LALOTA. Thank you. |
|
The Chair recognizes himself for 5 minutes. |
|
I am Nick LaLota. I represent a Long Island district, the |
|
1st District of New York. We are about a couple hours east of |
|
Manhattan. We are a suburban district with many Mom and Pop |
|
businesses. They are struggling under the high inflation, high |
|
interest rates, excessive regulations, and labor shortages just |
|
to name a few. Members of this Committee from both sides of the |
|
aisle agree that these challenges are real and persistent |
|
throughout the country. And with that in mind, it is troubling |
|
to me and other Members on the Committee that the Consumer |
|
Financial Protection Bureau is using resources at its disposal |
|
to create rules to add to these very real pressures instead of |
|
mitigating them. Hopefully at a future hearing we can have a |
|
representative from the CFPB to explain to us the timeliness of |
|
this rule. Thankfully, you, as today's witnesses, have beyond a |
|
doubt demonstrated that these new regulations would have |
|
duplicative measures and would cost millions per year to comply |
|
with and would irreparably harm our relationship banking. |
|
My first question is to you, Mr. White. Sir, thank you so |
|
much for being here. |
|
As you stated in your testimony, you have 130 employees |
|
across many locations. How difficult would it be for your |
|
business to create a firewall as has been described today? |
|
Mr. WHITE. Any time when you have a bank our size with our |
|
number of employees, any new regulation is hard to figure out |
|
how are we going to do this with the employees we have. And I |
|
will explain what we do on HMDA because it is fairly similar to |
|
what will happen with 1071. Our loan processor enters the data. |
|
We then have three separate people review that data before we |
|
file it or report it. And we still have the random mistake |
|
after three levels of review. And so when you consider last |
|
year we did approximately 770 loans that would be subject to |
|
1071, you are looking at HMDA on steroids basically in terms of |
|
the amount of manpower and time that it would take. |
|
Mr. LALOTA. Thank you. And following up on that, you also |
|
illustrated problems with the scope of the data collection. For |
|
example, the 25 loan threshold is far too low and the borrower |
|
gross annual revenue threshold is too high, meaning the data |
|
collection requirements would apply to a majority of community |
|
banks. In your opinion, what should the threshold be? |
|
Mr. WHITE. ICBA is advocating for a $1 billion asset |
|
threshold. Banks below $1 billion would be exempt. If the CFPB |
|
or the government stays with a number of loans we would support |
|
French Hill's bill which has a 500 loan limit. Twenty-five |
|
loans a year is so low it is honestly a little bit offensive |
|
that that is considered an exemption. |
|
Mr. LALOTA. Thank you so much. |
|
And Mr. Peters, in your testimony you talked about the |
|
decline of community banks and the resulting consolidation. And |
|
I share these concerns, sir. How do you think small businesses |
|
like the ones in my district on Long Island and throughout the |
|
country will fare if there are fewer choices when it comes to |
|
lenders? |
|
Mr. PETERS. Well, I think we have the best financial system |
|
in the world, and I think part of that is having choices as |
|
businesses and consumers in competition. And I think in this |
|
case if you are concerned about the privacy of the data you may |
|
want to go to a larger lender where your data could be harder |
|
to find by the public. If I was denied the loan, I do not want |
|
my community to know that so I think it does not play in favor |
|
of our small business clients and communities. |
|
Mr. LALOTA. Thank you, Mr. Peters. And following up with |
|
that, you discussed that making application loan data public |
|
will be opposed by your clients for a variety of legitimate |
|
reasons. Do you think that this will make your clients less |
|
likely to apply for those loans? |
|
Mr. PETERS. I think in some cases it could push them to |
|
other lenders that will not follow those rules such as I |
|
mentioned in my testimony with hard money lenders that fall |
|
under these thresholds and can ensure privacy of data. And that |
|
is something that is very important to my clients. |
|
Mr. LALOTA. Thank you. And thank you for all the witnesses |
|
being here. I yield back the balance of my time. |
|
I now recognize Ms. Chu from California for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. CHU. Thank you. |
|
Ms. Urrutia, we know that women- and minority-owned small |
|
businesses still face significant barriers in access to |
|
capital. These gaps were particularly clear during the Paycheck |
|
Protection Program and the initial PPP application did not ask |
|
for demographic information. And so there were shocking |
|
results. In fact, because the SBA was not gathering this data, |
|
investigators at the LA Times in my area published a report in |
|
2021 and they have to use census track data in order to look at |
|
majority ethnic census tracks. And they determined that |
|
businesses in majority White neighborhoods received loans at |
|
twice the rate that majority Latino census tracks received the |
|
loans, 1.5 times the rate of businesses in majority Black |
|
areas, and 1.2 times the rate in Asian areas. And so we clearly |
|
need it, that data transparency. What happened with PPP shows |
|
us why we have to have this information. And as a result, we |
|
did this $60 billion set aside for the mission-based lenders to |
|
provide loans to those in minority and women-owned areas. And |
|
this problem was ameliorated tremendously and now the loans |
|
were shown to be given to those in those underserved areas. |
|
So Ms. Urrutia, can you speak to the lessons of the PPP and |
|
why the data transparency like this required by Section 1071 is |
|
needed to both understand and address discrimination and |
|
disparities in small business lending? |
|
Ms. URRUTIA. Sure. I can share my own personal experience |
|
about discrimination in the financial system. When I started |
|
working for a bank, I was turned down because I did not have |
|
credit. And so the fact that I was an immigrant and I had |
|
limited credit history made me invisible and unbankable. Fast |
|
forward 18 years, that experience led me to find a community |
|
bank and then I wanted to raise capital. And I kept on hearing |
|
no, no, no at every turn of the way until I show up with a |
|
couple of male board Members and then the capital to form the |
|
bank started flowing. Twenty-one years later things have not |
|
changed. Two percent of venture capital goes to women. Four |
|
percent of commercial loans goes to women. In the meantime, it |
|
is women that today are building small businesses at a higher |
|
rate than any other demographic in this country. So the |
|
problems persist, and unless we put sunshine in this problem we |
|
are never going to solve the problem that women and communities |
|
of color face accessing capital from financial institutions. |
|
Ms. CHU. Thank you for that. |
|
And Ms. Urrutia, well, for one thing we do know that the |
|
CFPB Home Mortgage Disclosure Act rule has been in place for |
|
more than 40 years and has been instrumental in giving the CFPB |
|
the data they need to identify and root out discriminatory |
|
lending practices. And even more importantly, mortgage lending |
|
activity has not decreased or been otherwise negatively |
|
impacted due to compliance costs. |
|
Now, there was some discussion earlier about, well, |
|
mortgage loans are different from business loans and so that is |
|
why with business loans you should not look at demographic |
|
data. How do you answer that? |
|
Ms. URRUTIA. You know, I think this can be very much |
|
compared to HMDA. There was anecdotal evidence that underbanked |
|
populations were not being served and that capital flows were |
|
falling short when reaching certain communities. But without |
|
the data there was no proof and HMDA was that data. The result |
|
really was real access to capital for those communities, and |
|
really great benefits were achieved for both the individuals |
|
and the institutions that were providing the capital. As a |
|
result, lenders got into mortgage lending because they thought |
|
it was profitable, it was growing, and they could really do |
|
great work. There is plenty of evidence following the HMDA data |
|
expansion between 1993 and 1999, the number of home purchases |
|
made. For Latino consumers, it increased over 120 percent. For |
|
Native Americans, 119 percent. For African Americans, by 91 |
|
percent. And plenty of more statistics that show that increase |
|
in the flow of capital happened to underserved communities. |
|
There were certainly other factors that contributed to this but |
|
HMDA was a key part of that expansion. So it has been done |
|
before. |
|
Now, we do have some recommendations. Having a national |
|
database, and one thing I want to focus is on privacy. If you |
|
look at 40 years of HMDA's existence, not a single home loan |
|
has been identified. And the CFPB also contends that the |
|
publication of HMDA, which has similar data points to Section |
|
1071, has not resulted in any measurable increase in fraud or |
|
identity theft. |
|
Ms. CHU. Thank you. |
|
Mr. LALOTA. The gentlelady's time has expired. |
|
I now recognize the gentlelady from Texas, Ms. Van Duyne, |
|
for 5 minutes. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. thank you |
|
for holding this important hearing on a very concerning rule |
|
coming from the Biden administration which once again will |
|
hamper growth and create additional regulatory burden in an |
|
already difficult environment. |
|
As we have already talked about in this hearing multiple |
|
times, the inflationary environment created by this |
|
administration has led to the rise of interest rates, which has |
|
limited the access to capital for small businesses. This rule |
|
is confusing to interpret, and it will be confusing to |
|
implement, which will lead to higher compliance costs from what |
|
we have understood today and will once again be passed along to |
|
small business owners further increasing the cost of capital. |
|
We have heard a couple of strange statements today. |
|
Mr. Peters, I am going to ask you, do you have any clients |
|
who you have given loans to that are women? |
|
Mr. PETERS. Absolutely. Quite a few. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. Do you have any minority clients? |
|
Mr. PETERS. I do. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. Mr. White, do you have female and minority |
|
clients that you have actually given loans to as well? |
|
Mr. PETERS. Yes. Absolutely. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. I am going to ask you, Mr. Wilson? |
|
Mr. WILSON. Absolutely. In fact, we were the ninth largest |
|
provider of small dollar PPP loans in the credit union space in |
|
the country. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. That included women and minorities? |
|
Mr. WILSON. Absolutely. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. And then I am going to ask you as well, you |
|
have women and minority clients as well? |
|
Ms. URRUTIA. Absolutely. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. Mr. Peters, does every small business who |
|
applies for a loan qualify? |
|
Mr. PETERS. No. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. Why? |
|
Mr. PETERS. We are relationship lenders so we are not just |
|
looking at a scorecard or a matrix. You know, the foundation of |
|
relationship lending is the five Cs of credit. We are looking |
|
at character. We are looking at capacity, collateral, capital, |
|
and conditions. You need to find the story behind the applicant |
|
and you cannot do that with a check box. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. Okay. I am going to ask you, Mr. White, the |
|
same question. |
|
Mr. WHITE. I agree with Mr. Peters. One thing I will add is |
|
that I mentioned the relationship banking and counseling our |
|
business customers and giving them real-world business advice |
|
is part of what a community bank does. When we have small |
|
business owners that do not qualify for one reason or another |
|
we work with them to show them what they need to do to qualify |
|
in the future, whether that is improve their cash flow, improve |
|
their collateral or whatever it may be, we work with our |
|
customers to get them to a point where they can qualify. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. Mr. Wilson, does every single small |
|
business, even if they need the capital that comes to your |
|
bank, are they able to qualify? |
|
Mr. WILSON. Well, in addition to following a similar |
|
process to Mr. Peters and Mr. White, we also take it a step |
|
further and assign every small business their own personal |
|
concierge. So even if they cannot qualify, we would provide |
|
them with a continuum of services, and even individuals who may |
|
be able to help them down the road. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. Are you required to do that by law? |
|
Mr. WILSON. Absolutely not. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. So why do you do it? |
|
Mr. WILSON. Because it is the right thing to do in our |
|
communities that we serve. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Peters, you had mentioned that per cost of loans if |
|
this regulation were to go through, it would possibly increase |
|
between $500 and $800 per loan. Can you define what you think |
|
would be adding to that increase? |
|
Mr. PETERS. Well, there is a number of systems costs. One, |
|
banks are relying on their core vendor. So there would have to |
|
be that integration to the core. There would have to be |
|
additional software to capture and report the data. There would |
|
be somebody that runs that system. There would be audit of that |
|
system. There would be compliance. There would be training the |
|
lenders on how to tactfully try to gather that information |
|
accurately. So it is going to affect at least 15 people and a |
|
number of systems. And as my IT group continually reminds me, |
|
systems do not run on their own. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. So is your company, is your bank going to |
|
just go ahead and take those costs or will those be reflected |
|
in the costs that you charge your small businesses? |
|
Mr. PETERS. I think it would have to be reflected into the |
|
rate and fees that are charged to the small businesses. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. And Mr. White, I am going to ask you the |
|
same question. Do you see that happening? |
|
Mr. WHITE. Yes, I do. When the examiners come in and |
|
examine us, one of the things they look at are our earnings. |
|
And so banks have to be profitable to get good ratings. If we |
|
do not make money at some point we will go out of existence. |
|
And so at some point as the regulations get added onto and |
|
added onto, those costs do have to be passed on to the |
|
customers. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. Thank you. |
|
And Mr. Wilson, do you think that this additional |
|
regulation will make loans cheaper for your small businesses or |
|
do you think it is going to make it more expensive? |
|
Mr. WILSON. It would certainly be an adverse impact. We |
|
have 60 branches in the communities that we serve so think of |
|
that as 60 individuals that then have to be completely |
|
retrained. All of those systems that go into place, much like |
|
Mr. Peters was saying, the domino effect of all of these things |
|
is extensive. Just by comparison, we have been working on CECL |
|
for nearly 5 years so it is no small undertaking. It is not |
|
like simply flipping a switch and wallah, there is the data. |
|
Ms. VAN DUYNE. Thank you. I really appreciate all of your |
|
input today and I think it is pretty clear that this additional |
|
regulation is bad for small businesses, will increase the |
|
costs, and it takes the personal touch that you offer all of |
|
your small businesses. So thank you for your testimony here |
|
today and I yield back. |
|
Mr. LALOTA. Thank you. |
|
The Chair now recognizes the gentleman from Missouri, Mr. |
|
Alford, for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. ALFORD. Thank you, Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member for |
|
holding this important hearing. And thank you to our witnesses |
|
for being here today. |
|
Small businesses are supported by community banks and |
|
credit unions for their day-to-day business needs. And we have |
|
seen a lot on the news lately about our financial system. But |
|
what we really do not see in the news cycle and the headlines |
|
is how strong our community banks are and our credit unions and |
|
how they are still a fortress for our communities. |
|
Since the onset of the bank collapses earlier this month, |
|
my team and I have been in touch with a lot of community |
|
bankers and credit unions around the district and around the |
|
state. Since day one, it has been crystal clear to me that our |
|
financial institutions and Missouri stand ready to serve |
|
customers' needs just as they have been doing for decades. What |
|
they truly do is relationship banking. And I want to give you a |
|
personal example. |
|
Just today, I have several accounts, one at a very large |
|
national bank that you would recognize the name, and several |
|
community banks. And I have a mortgage with a community bank |
|
and I did not have enough money in my checking account to cover |
|
the mortgage payment due today. My banker, who I had a |
|
relationship with before I even thought about running for |
|
office texted me this morning and said, hey, Mark, we need to |
|
move some money over from one of your accounts to cover your |
|
mortgage. Large banks will not do that, folks. Large banks will |
|
not do this. It is this Committee's job to allow small |
|
businesses to thrive. To do that we have to make sure that |
|
community banks and credit unions that serve small businesses |
|
and individuals are not overburdened by needless regulation |
|
from the unconstitutional Consumer Protection Bureau simply to |
|
appease the Biden's far left agenda. |
|
So I want to get in with my question with you, Mr. Peters, |
|
Mr. White, and Mr. Wilson. Community banks and credit unions do |
|
not have large legal and compliance departments. |
|
Mr. Peters, will the 1071 rule put you at a competitive |
|
disadvantage compared to institutions that have larger |
|
departments to handle such needs? |
|
Mr. PETERS. Certainly, it would be a heavier lift for us. |
|
We do not have the robust systems or the program capabilities |
|
internally to build this, report this data as a much larger |
|
organization would have. |
|
Mr. ALFORD. Mr. White? |
|
Mr. WHITE. We do not have thousands of employees like the |
|
mega banks. We do not have dozens or hundreds of people in our |
|
compliance department. Up until just 8 or 10 years ago it was |
|
actually the Dodd-Frank Act that required my bank to hire a |
|
chief compliance officer. Prior to that, my dad and my brother, |
|
who are also with the bank, they were primarily responsible for |
|
compliance. So we do not have the people or the means to spread |
|
this over. |
|
Mr. ALFORD. Mr. Wilson, I feel you would probably say |
|
pretty much the same thing. You are going to have to pick up |
|
the slack from somewhere else. How is that going to affect your |
|
customers in general? |
|
Mr. WILSON. Sure. Similar to what I said previously, we |
|
would have to make this up in infrastructure, staffing costs, |
|
retraining. These things have to be passed along somewhere. |
|
That is bad for the consumer. And if it makes it too burdensome |
|
for small institutions that means less competition which |
|
ironically is bad for the consumer. So think about that for a |
|
minute. |
|
Mr. ALFORD. Mr. Wilson, my friend from Missouri, Mr. |
|
Luetkemeyer touched on this a little bit earlier. I want to |
|
delve a little bit deeper into it. The rule that calls for the |
|
collection of all sorts of data including race, if race is not |
|
evident, is it true that a teller has to assume or I guess, I |
|
know Mr. Peters you said that they are going to be tactfully |
|
gathering the information. It seems it could be rather |
|
sensitive. How do you go about this, Mr. Wilson? |
|
Mr. WILSON. I mean, the thought of putting our entry level |
|
folks in this situation is extremely uncomfortable. We have |
|
made so much progress socially, you know, and such a focus on |
|
diversity, equity, inclusion, belonging, programming, but to do |
|
something like this would quite frankly set us backwards and it |
|
is not something that we would want to put our entry level |
|
associates in that situation of having to guess whether it is |
|
in person or over the phone, it is just not right. In addition |
|
to that, it could seriously compromise the data if they are |
|
wrong based on assumptions. |
|
Mr. ALFORD. Thank you so much again for being here today. |
|
This is very important and, you know, we do not need more |
|
regulation. We need community banks to support our businesses |
|
and our individuals to make us successful in America. |
|
Thank you, and I yield back. |
|
Mr. LALOTA. The gentleman yields. |
|
The Chair now recognizes the Chairman of the Small Business |
|
Committee, the gentleman from Texas, Mr. Williams for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
Mr. WILLIAMS. Thank you, Chairman. And I want to, in full |
|
disclosure, before I get started, I am a car dealer. That is |
|
what I do. When I am not here I own car dealerships in Texas so |
|
it makes me kind of a halfway banker. And I have seen a lot of |
|
this through a lot of years and we seem to be going back to |
|
where ewe were back in the 1960s, and it is not good. And I |
|
want to thank all of you again, our witnesses for being here |
|
today. And before I ask them more specific questions about this |
|
rule I want to take advantage of having some experts in our |
|
community banking system in this room. |
|
So Mr. Peters, you being an expert, okay, I want to get |
|
your opinion on how small businesses have been adjusting to |
|
this high interest rate environment we now are in, something |
|
that did not have to happen, and the general health of small |
|
businesses looking to access capital. |
|
Mr. PETERS. Well, certainly, the cost of capital, the cost |
|
of loans on a variable rate basis is increasing which puts |
|
strain on cash flow and reduces the ability to expand and to |
|
hire. And I think the sentiment in many areas where I bank and |
|
in the market is that this could lead to recession and that we |
|
had better prepare for that and reduce our spending. |
|
Mr. WILLIAMS. Well, and small businesses, you know, |
|
interest, again, I am a car dealer, interest in my business |
|
tears everything apart from margins to so forth. And when you |
|
have a situation like this you are going to have businesses lay |
|
off people, are you not? They are going to try to cut costs and |
|
people are the highest expense in most businesses. And then the |
|
idea that they can raise prices to cover that cost is |
|
ridiculous because we have got inflation now so we are going to |
|
raise prices. So, this high interest rates we are in is causing |
|
just a lot of problems. I tis going to be hard for small |
|
businesses to recover. We know that. That is why I am a big tax |
|
cutter. |
|
I think everyone in this room shares the objective of |
|
making it easier for viable small businesses to get a loan and |
|
start working towards the American dream. I believe if we want |
|
to make this a reality, imposing a significant new regulatory |
|
cost is not the way to do it. We talked about that. Most of the |
|
time these people we are hiring, they add no value to our |
|
business as far as what they sell. They are an expense. And |
|
these new costs will have to be passed along to consumers. |
|
There is a point that you cannot do that any longer; right? You |
|
just cannot keep passing costs on. And small business loans |
|
will get more expensive. All of you have said that. They are |
|
already now. So instead we should be examining the regulatory |
|
hurdles that are disproportionately harming community banks and |
|
credit unions. And not by imposing an expensive new government |
|
mandate is going to fix it because once you get the mandate it |
|
is hard to back it off. |
|
So Mr. White, can you give this Committee some suggestions |
|
of things we should be examining to make it easier for your |
|
institutions to get money into your community? So what should |
|
we be doing to help you and in the end we help you, you help |
|
your borrower? |
|
Mr. WHITE. In general, I would say let us do what we do |
|
best, which is help our customers. Do not dictate how we have |
|
to do business to help our small businesses. In particular, on |
|
1071, I would say we talked some about the exemption for banks |
|
under $1 billion in assets. We would also encourage the revenue |
|
threshold to be reduced from $5 million to $1 million. That is |
|
still going to cover the vast majority of small businesses in |
|
the country. We would also support a mission-based exemption |
|
for NDIs and CDFIs as well. But fundamentally, community banks, |
|
we know how to help our customers. We have done it for |
|
generations. We are stable and successful at doing that. And we |
|
just need to be allowed to do it. |
|
Mr. WILLIAMS. Yeah. If the government would get out of your |
|
life it would be pretty good, would it not? And maybe we could |
|
insert the customer to tell you if you are doing a good job or |
|
not and let you compete. |
|
Mr. WHITE. As I said earlier in my testimony, we often, to |
|
small business customers and our ag customers, give them an |
|
option, whether it is an ag line of credit, do you want a fixed |
|
rate for a year, do you want a variable rate based off of |
|
prime? We walk them through the differences and we let them |
|
pick and they appreciate that. |
|
Mr. WILLIAMS. I have some time left. Mr. Wilson, do you |
|
want to add to that? What can we do to help you? |
|
Mr. WILSON. Well, our whole philosophy is built around |
|
people helping people. We started 73 years ago when nine people |
|
put money into a pot to lend each other money for appliances |
|
during the war. So we are very good at what we do. We want to |
|
continue to serve our Members. We want to continue to make our |
|
associates happy because then they serve our Members well and |
|
that in turn makes our communities a thriving place. I think it |
|
is critical to mention that it is not 1071 or nothing. There |
|
are already incredibly extensive rules, data collection, things |
|
that are being provided on a quarterly and annual basis. So at |
|
a minimum what NAFCU is asking for is consistency. You have |
|
three different definitions. You have what the NCUA has. You |
|
have what the SBA has. You have what the CFPB has. That makes |
|
it incredibly burdensome for institutions. |
|
Mr. WILLIAMS. My time is up, Mr. Chairman. I yield back. |
|
Mr. LALOTA. I would like to thank all of the witnesses for |
|
participating today, to the Members for their thoughtful |
|
questions. |
|
And without objection, Members have 5 legislative days to |
|
submit additional materials and written questions for the |
|
witnesses to the Chair which will be forwarded to the |
|
witnesses. |
|
If there is no further business, without objection, the |
|
Committee is adjourned. |
|
[Whereupon, at 11:26 a.m., the subcommittee was adjourned.] |
|
A P P E N D I X |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
[all] |
|
</pre></body></html> |
|
|