|
<html> |
|
<title> - CHALLENGES IN SBA'S STATE TRADE EXPANSION PROGRAM</title> |
|
<body><pre> |
|
[House Hearing, 116 Congress] |
|
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHALLENGES IN SBA'S STATE TRADE EXPANSION PROGRAM |
|
|
|
======================================================================= |
|
|
|
HEARING |
|
|
|
before the |
|
|
|
SUBCOMMITTEE ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT, AGRICULTURE, TRADE, AND |
|
ENTREPRENEURSHIP |
|
|
|
OF THE |
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
|
|
|
ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS |
|
|
|
FIRST SESSION |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
HEARING HELD |
|
MARCH 12, 2019 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
Small Business Committee Document Number 116-010 |
|
Available via the GPO Website: www.govinfo.gov |
|
|
|
|
|
_________ |
|
|
|
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE |
|
35-333 WASHINGTON : 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS |
|
|
|
NYDIA VELAZQUEZ, New York, Chairwoman |
|
ABBY FINKENAUER, Iowa |
|
JARED GOLDEN, Maine |
|
ANDY KIM, New Jersey |
|
JASON CROW, Colorado |
|
SHARICE DAVIDS, Kansas |
|
JUDY CHU, California |
|
MARC VEASEY, Texas |
|
DWIGHT EVANS, Pennsylvania |
|
BRAD SCHNEIDER, Illinois |
|
ADRIANO ESPAILLAT, New York |
|
ANTONIO DELGADO, New York |
|
CHRISSY HOULAHAN, Pennsylvania |
|
ANGIE CRAIG, Minnesota |
|
STEVE CHABOT, Ohio, Ranking Member |
|
AUMUA AMATA COLEMAN RADEWAGEN, American Samoa, Vice Ranking Member |
|
TRENT KELLY, Mississippi |
|
TROY BALDERSON, Ohio |
|
KEVIN HERN, Oklahoma |
|
JIM HAGEDORN, Minnesota |
|
PETE STAUBER, Minnesota |
|
TIM BURCHETT, Tennessee |
|
ROSS SPANO, Florida |
|
JOHN JOYCE, Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
Adam Minehardt, Majority Staff Director |
|
Melissa Jung, Majority Deputy Staff Director and Chief Counsel |
|
Kevin Fitzpatrick, Staff Director |
|
|
|
C O N T E N T S |
|
|
|
OPENING STATEMENTS |
|
|
|
Page |
|
Hon. Abby Finkenauer............................................. 1 |
|
Hon. John Joyce.................................................. 3 |
|
|
|
WITNESSES |
|
|
|
Ms. Kim Gianopoulos, Director of International Affairs and Trade, |
|
Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC............... 4 |
|
Mr. Hannibal ``Mike'' Ware, Inspector General, United States |
|
Small Business Administration, Washington, DC.................. 6 |
|
|
|
APPENDIX |
|
|
|
Prepared Statements: |
|
Hon. Jim Hagedorn, Minnesota................................. 15 |
|
Ms. Kim Gianopoulos, Director of International Affairs and |
|
Trade, Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.... 16 |
|
Mr. Hannibal ``Mike'' Ware, Inspector General, United States |
|
Small Business Administration, Washington, DC.............. 29 |
|
Questions and Answers for the Record: |
|
Questions from Hon. Nydia Velazquez to Mr. Hannibal ``Mike'' |
|
Ware and Responses from Mr. Hannibal ``Mike'' Ware......... 37 |
|
Additional Material for the Record: |
|
None. |
|
|
|
|
|
CHALLENGES IN SBA'S STATE TRADE EXPANSION PROGRAM |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
|
|
|
|
TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 2019 |
|
|
|
House of Representatives, |
|
Committee on Small Business, |
|
Subcommittee on Rural Development, Agriculture, |
|
Trade, and Entrepreneurship, |
|
Washington, DC. |
|
The Subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 10:11 a.m., in |
|
Room 2360, Rayburn House Office Building. Hon. Abby Finkenauer |
|
[chairwoman of the Subcommittee] presiding. |
|
Present: Representatives Finkenauer, Chabot, Hagedorn, and |
|
Joyce. |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Good morning. The Subcommittee will |
|
come to order. |
|
It is a pleasure to have our witnesses testifying before |
|
our Subcommittee this morning. I commend you for your |
|
commitment to public service. I also want to take a minute to |
|
thank Ranking Member Dr. John Joyce of Pennsylvania. He |
|
introduced himself to me very early on and expressed how |
|
important trade and rural development was to his district. I am |
|
glad we share that as a common priority, and I look forward to |
|
working with him in a bipartisan fashion on this Subcommittee. |
|
As someone who grew up in a small town in Iowa--as I like |
|
to say, in a town with more cows than people--I am thrilled to |
|
be leading this Subcommittee focused on rural development. We |
|
have an opportunity to give folks in districts like mine and |
|
Ranking Member Joyce's a seat at the table for important |
|
conversations like the one we are having today on helping |
|
farmers and small businesses export their products. |
|
It is no secret that for rural entrepreneurs and family |
|
farmers in states like Iowa, the ability to do business |
|
overseas is key to economic success here at home. Trade should |
|
help us export goods but also protect our workers and our |
|
communities. |
|
Despite the economic rewards that come with exporting |
|
products overseas, only 1 percent of our nation's 30 million |
|
small businesses are able to do so. |
|
With 95 percent of the world's consumers living outside of |
|
the United States, small businesses are missing out on |
|
opportunities to better support their families and communities, |
|
create jobs, and expand our economy. |
|
Today, we have a chance to hear from some of our nation's |
|
leading experts on a federal program that aims to help small |
|
businesses enter new markets around the globe. This initiative, |
|
the State Trade and Expansion Program (STEP), was initially |
|
created in 2010 as a 3-year pilot program. Five years later, |
|
Congress enacted the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement |
|
Act to make the STEP program permanent and authorize $30 |
|
million in funding through fiscal year 2020. |
|
STEP provides matching funds to states and territories to |
|
help small businesses enter new markets, access export |
|
financing, and go on trade missions. |
|
Since its inception, the Small Business Administration has |
|
awarded approximately $139 million in funding to almost every |
|
state in the country. |
|
In the 2018 annual report, SBA reported that the agency |
|
awarded 44 grants totaling $18.9 million in fiscal year 2016. |
|
The rate of return was 31 to 1 for every dollar invested, |
|
states reported $31 in sales. |
|
STEP has the potential to unlock opportunities in the |
|
global marketplace for small businesses in a town like |
|
Maquoketa in my district, whose owners may want to sell |
|
products overseas but could lack the staff capacity or even an |
|
idea of where to start. |
|
Having said that, the reports and audits conducted by our |
|
nation's watchdogs raise some concerns over the implementation |
|
of the STEP program and show areas for improvement as we look |
|
at the need for reauthorization in 2020. Work by the Government |
|
Accountability Office found that SBA lacks a strong process to |
|
ensure states are complying with the program's requirements. |
|
GAO also found states face serious and ongoing challenges in |
|
trying to utilize the funds with some even giving the funds |
|
back. Problems range from short application windows and |
|
difficult reporting requirements to a lack of timely |
|
communication from SBA. |
|
The Inspector General's audits uncovered similar problems |
|
and determined more work needs to be done to improve the |
|
program's performance measures and oversight. Moreover, the |
|
report showed that SBA is at risk of not fully realizing the |
|
potential of the program. |
|
My office had a chance last week to hear from the Iowa |
|
Economic Development Authority about problems in utilizing the |
|
funds. In one instance, Iowa was awarded a STEP grant on |
|
September 21st with a start date of September 29th, just 8 days |
|
later. |
|
In another instance, SBA announced a grant opportunity on |
|
April 2nd only to post a second announcement with new and more |
|
accurate information on April 18th. SBA did not respond to |
|
Iowa's questions about the application until April 27th, but |
|
the deadline for applying for the STEP grant was May 16th. That |
|
is a pretty tight turnaround. |
|
While this is frustrating, STEP is a needed initiative, and |
|
I look forward to hearing other states' ideas for improving it |
|
and hopefully getting some of our states on record in the |
|
future about how we can make STEP work better. |
|
In Congress, we ought to be making it easier for farmers |
|
and small businesses to succeed in the international |
|
marketplace-- not harder--while also protecting our workers. |
|
STEP has the potential to help Iowa's entrepreneurs and |
|
entrepreneurs around the country tap into new markets. |
|
If utilized properly, this program stands to provide small |
|
businesses with the tools they desperately need to expand, |
|
create jobs, and boost wages throughout America, especially in |
|
rural areas that quite frankly have been ignored for too long. |
|
Let me close by saying how grateful I am to have the |
|
opportunity to Chair this Subcommittee. I look forward to |
|
working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to |
|
harness the feedback we receive today to make much needed |
|
improvements to the STEP program for all of our communities, |
|
small businesses, and hard-working families. |
|
I want to thank our witnesses for being here for what I |
|
hope will be a productive discussion. |
|
I would like to now yield to the Ranking Member, Dr. Joyce, |
|
for his opening statement. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman Finkenauer. |
|
Small businesses eying international markets face daunting |
|
obstacles, such as insufficient manpower, lack of external |
|
resources, inadequate access to financing, and clearly, |
|
bureaucratic red tape. The Small Business Administration (SBA) |
|
is one of the six agencies that offer export promotion programs |
|
specifically for small businesses. |
|
The SBA Office of International Trade, often referred to as |
|
OIT, is responsible for a variety of programs that provide |
|
training, counseling, and export financing for small |
|
businesses. We are here today to review just one unique program |
|
within an exceptionally complex network of trade promotion |
|
programs. |
|
The statutes governing the State Trade Expansion Program, |
|
known as STEP, are very specific to ensure each dollar hits its |
|
target. Since its creation as a pilot program in 2010, SBA OIT |
|
has struggled to comply with STEP's strict legal requirements. |
|
One of Congress's most vital roles is not only to exercise |
|
fiscal responsibility when spending taxpayer dollars but also |
|
to ensure that the taxpayer dollars we allocate are being spent |
|
wisely and reaching their maximum impact. |
|
I appreciate the cooperation between all agencies and their |
|
commitment to seeing that SBA fulfills its goals relating to |
|
this program and maximizes every dollar received to help small |
|
businesses reach their potential in the international market. |
|
This hearing resumes the Committee's oversight of OIT and |
|
the STEP program. Our witnesses represent the Government |
|
Accountability Office (GAO) and SBA's Office of Inspector |
|
General (OIG). They are our eyes and our ears. They are here to |
|
present the issues plaguing the STEP program. I am encouraged |
|
by the dedication shown by all parties to expanding the |
|
opportunities for small businesses and farmers, and I look |
|
forward to working with you to achieve our common goal of |
|
reducing barriers to small businesses participating in global |
|
trade. |
|
Thank you again to our distinguished witnesses and I yield |
|
back. |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Thank you, Dr. Joyce. The gentleman |
|
yields back. |
|
If any Subcommittee members have an opening statement |
|
prepared, we ask that you submit it for the record. |
|
Now I would like to just take a minute to explain the |
|
timing rules. Each witness will have 5 minutes to testify and |
|
each member will have 5 minutes for questioning. There is a |
|
lighting system to assist you. The green light will be on when |
|
you begin and the yellow light will come on when you have one |
|
minute remaining. The red light will come on when you are out |
|
of time, and we ask that you stay within the timeframe to the |
|
best of your ability. |
|
I would now like to introduce the witnesses. |
|
Our first witness is Ms. Kimberly Gianopoulos. Ms. |
|
Gianopoulos serves as the director for international trade |
|
issues in the International Affairs and Trade Team at the |
|
Government Accountability Office (GAO). She has a distinguished |
|
career and has provided leadership in a number of efforts to |
|
improve government programs, including contributions to GAO's |
|
high-risk series. Ms. Gianopoulos has also received a number of |
|
awards, including a Meritorious Service Award, a Client Service |
|
Award, an Assistant Comptroller General's Award, and several |
|
Results through Teamwork Awards. Welcome, Ms. Gianopoulos. |
|
Our second witness is the Honorable Hannibal ``Mike'' Ware, |
|
the inspector general of the Small Business Administration. Mr. |
|
Ware was sworn in as the inspector general of the Small |
|
Business Administration in May 2018. He is responsible for |
|
independent oversight of SBA's programs and operations, which |
|
encompass more than $100 billion in guaranteed loans and nearly |
|
$100 billion in federal contracting dollars. Mr. Ware has 28 |
|
years of experience within the OIG community and has received |
|
numerous awards throughout his career, including several awards |
|
from the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and |
|
Efficiency in recognition of his significant work in the |
|
inspector general community. Welcome, Mr. Ware. |
|
Ms. Gianopoulos, you are recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF KIM GIANOPOULOS, DIRECTOR OF INTERNATIONAL |
|
AFFAIRS AND TRADE, GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE; HANNIBAL |
|
``MIKE'' WARE, INSPECTOR GENERAL, UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS |
|
ADMINISTRATION |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF KIM GIANOPOULOS |
|
|
|
Ms. GIANOPOULOS. Thank you. |
|
Chairwoman Finkenauer, Ranking Member Joyce, and members of |
|
the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to be here |
|
today to discuss our recent work on SBA's State Trade Expansion |
|
Program. |
|
As you know, Congress established STEP to help small |
|
businesses export. Many states report that STEP is important to |
|
their export promotion operations. However, concerns have been |
|
raised related to the management of the program, including |
|
SBA's processes for administering and monitoring grants, and |
|
the effectiveness of the program in reaching its goals. |
|
My testimony today is based on our report, which is being |
|
released at this hearing. Today, I will discuss two items: one, |
|
the extent to which SBA's STEP grants management process |
|
provides reasonable assurance of compliance with selected |
|
requirements of applicable law, and two, the extent to which |
|
SBA has responded to states' challenges in using grant funds. |
|
First, we found that SBA does not provide reasonable |
|
assurance that STEP grant recipients meet two of the three |
|
Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act requirements that |
|
we reviewed before the grant is closed out. |
|
The first requirement states that SBA must limit the amount |
|
given to the 10 states with the largest numbers of eligible |
|
small businesses. SBA demonstrated reasonable assurance that |
|
this first requirement was being met. |
|
The second requirement is that states must provide either a |
|
25 or 35 percent total match to the Federal grant amount. We |
|
identified four instances where according to SBA's |
|
documentation, states did not report sufficient total matches. |
|
Nevertheless, SBA closed these grants. |
|
The third requirement is that a state's match cannot be |
|
less than 50 percent cash. SBA collects information about the |
|
matching funds, including the proportion provided in cash. |
|
However, it does not monitor states' compliance with this |
|
requirement. Additionally, SBA considers the salaries of state |
|
trade office staff who work on administering the grant to be a |
|
form of cash and most states use staff salaries as their total |
|
match, including the required cash portion. |
|
SBA does not ensure that states that do this are not also |
|
using grant funds from STEP to pay for portions of these |
|
salaries. As a result, SBA cannot consistently determine |
|
whether states are meeting the cash match requirement. |
|
In our report, we recommend that SBA establish a process to |
|
ensure documentation of states' compliance with the total match |
|
requirement and develop a process to determine states' |
|
compliance with the cash match requirement. SBA agreed with |
|
these recommendations. |
|
Our second finding is related to the overall use of grant |
|
funds and the challenges that states report in using their |
|
allocations. We found that nearly 20 percent of grant funds go |
|
unused each year despite SBA officials stating that they seek |
|
100 percent use of these funds. For example, in 2016, across 41 |
|
of the 43 recipient states, combined grant use was about 82 |
|
percent, leaving nearly $3.2 million unused. This includes one |
|
state that left nearly 95 percent of its funds unused that |
|
year. |
|
SBA made some changes to the program that could improve |
|
states' abilities to use all their grant funds, such as |
|
extending the fund's usage period to 2 years; allowing certain |
|
flexibilities, including travel; and reducing the length of the |
|
technical proposal. |
|
The 12 states we interviewed cited numerous challenges, |
|
including timing of the application and award processes, |
|
administrative burden, and communication between the states and |
|
SBA. We heard about variable and short application timeframes, |
|
inflexible application requirements, a difficult process for |
|
repurposing funds, burdensome and changing reporting |
|
requirements, and delayed and inconsistent communication of |
|
requirements from SBA. SBA does not assess and address the risk |
|
posed by some states' low use of funds. Also, SBA officials |
|
told us that while they informally collect feedback from |
|
states, there is no process to collect states' perspectives on |
|
challenges with the program. We recommended that SBA assess |
|
this risk to achieving program goals posed by some states' low |
|
grant fund use rates. We also recommended that SBA enhance |
|
collection and sharing of best practices among states. SBA |
|
agreed with these recommendations. |
|
Thank you again for the opportunity to testify. I am happy |
|
to answer any questions you may have. |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Thank you, Ms. Gianopoulos. |
|
Mr. Ware, you are now recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF HANNIBAL ``MIKE'' WARE |
|
|
|
Mr. WARE. Thank you, Chairwoman Finkenauer, Ranking Member |
|
Joyce, and distinguished members of the Subcommittee. Thank you |
|
for the opportunity to be here today and for your continued |
|
support of the Office of Inspector General. I am proud to |
|
represent the dedicated men and women of my office and speak to |
|
you about their important work. |
|
We have published three reports and written one management |
|
advisory regarding what is now known as the State Trade |
|
Expansion Program, or STEP. Across these three reports, we made |
|
22 recommendations, all of which are now considered closed. |
|
While the STEP program has benefitted from congressional |
|
scrutiny, OIG oversight, and most recently oversight by my |
|
colleagues at GAO, my office has identified systemic risks to |
|
SBA's grant management practices that are important in context |
|
of today's discussion. |
|
Our first STEP review was conducted pursuant to the Small |
|
Business Jobs Act of 2010, which authorized SBA to establish a |
|
STEP grant program as a 3-year pilot to increase the number of |
|
eligible small business concerns in states that export and to |
|
increase the export value of those eligible small businesses |
|
that already export. In 2015, Congress authorized STEP as a |
|
full-fledged program through the Trade Facilitation and Trade |
|
Enforcement Act of 2015. Our two most recent reports were |
|
mandated by the 2015 act. |
|
We conducted our 2012 audit of the pilot program to |
|
determine the extent to which the grant recipients were |
|
measuring program performance. To achieve our objectives, we |
|
reviewed the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 and the Fiscal |
|
Year 2011 STEP program announcement. We judgmentally selected |
|
all STEP grants exceeding $1 million to review. Six grant |
|
recipients met this threshold. We conducted site visits to |
|
California, Pennsylvania, Washington, Michigan, and Illinois. |
|
We found that STEP grant recipients did not implement adequate |
|
metrics to measure program performance and issued nine |
|
recommendations for corrective action. In addition, SBA granted |
|
more than $1 million to an ineligible applicant, the |
|
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, which was the |
|
subject of our advisory report. In response, Congress included |
|
an expanded definition of state in the 2015 act which resolved |
|
the issue in the advisory. |
|
Our second STEP review was performed to determine how STEP |
|
funds were used. We requested grant award and expenditure |
|
totals from SBA, queried STEP data from usaspending.gov, and |
|
selected 15 grant awards totaling $15.2 million. We found that |
|
SBA could not provide consistent STEP award and expenditure |
|
data and did not update usaspending.gov. We did, however, find |
|
that SBA implemented new reporting requirements for the fiscal |
|
year 2014 STEP program that significantly improved controls |
|
over the quality of the grant recipients' performance and |
|
financial reports. We issued three recommendations based on our |
|
review findings. |
|
Our final report we issued was also issued pursuant to the |
|
2015 act authorizing STEP. The objectives of the audit were to |
|
determine the extent to which STEP recipients measure program |
|
activity performance and the results of those measurements. It |
|
is noteworthy that Congress included certain performance |
|
measures within the 2015 authorization as a follow-on to our |
|
findings that SBA lacked adequate metrics in the pilot stage. |
|
We selected five cooperative agreement awards totaling $3.9 |
|
million, conducted site visits and obtained documentation from |
|
recipients in California, North Carolina, Washington, and |
|
Mississippi. We also interviewed and obtained documentation |
|
from cooperative agreement officials for Illinois. |
|
We found SBA has made significant progress in improving the |
|
overall management and effectiveness of STEP since our audit of |
|
the pilot program in 2012; however, SBA could utilize existing |
|
data to further improve its performance measures and program |
|
oversight. We issued six recommendations based on our review |
|
findings. |
|
It is safe to say the STEP program has evolved since its |
|
inception and has benefitted from oversight review from my |
|
office, GAO, and congressional scrutiny. Nonetheless, our |
|
reviews of SBA's grant programs continue to identify systemic |
|
issues with SBA's accuracy of grant data for both financial and |
|
performance reporting, ineffective oversight, and inadequate |
|
standard operating procedures. |
|
In our most recently published, most serious management and |
|
performance challenges facing SBA in fiscal year 2019, we |
|
identified grant management as an agency challenge for the |
|
first time. SBA officials acknowledge that there are systemic |
|
issues with its grant management processes and have documented |
|
plans to address them. That said, we will continue to perform |
|
reviews and make recommendations for corrective action to |
|
promote efficiencies and effectiveness within SBA's grant |
|
programs. |
|
Thank you for the opportunity to speak to you today. I look |
|
forward to your questions. |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Thank you, Mr. Ware. |
|
You guys are very good on time. Oh, my goodness. |
|
Mr. WARE. Exactly on the 5 minute mark. |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Exactly. Thank you all. We really |
|
appreciate everything you have shared with us. |
|
I will begin the questioning by recognizing myself for 5 |
|
minutes. |
|
The first question is for Ms. Gianopoulos. Trade is |
|
obviously a priority for me and for the state of Iowa, which is |
|
why I am so pleased that our first hearing is on how small |
|
business trade assistance programs can work better for farmers |
|
and small businesses but also our states. Iowa is the number |
|
one export state for corn and pork, and number two for |
|
soybeans. Iowa is also number two in the country overall for |
|
commodities behind California. I am sure the administration |
|
shares the goal of improving small business trade assistance |
|
programs, as well, so I hope this is a bipartisan issue. |
|
For GAO's report, you interviewed 12 states that left at |
|
least 25 percent of their grant funds unused. Why do some |
|
states spend all their money while others are struggling to do |
|
so? |
|
Ms. GIANOPOULOS. When we spoke with the states, they gave |
|
us a variety of responses as far as the barriers and challenges |
|
that they experienced in trying to use some of the grant monies |
|
that they received from SBA. I touched on them a little bit in |
|
my oral testimony but they included everything from the, as you |
|
mentioned earlier in your opening statement, Chairwoman, the |
|
application deadline. It is not always the same day or the same |
|
week every year so some folks who have very small state trade |
|
offices cannot plan in advance when to dedicate their time to |
|
this application process. |
|
As you also noted, sometimes things change. The reporting |
|
requirements change. In other cases, the states have difficulty |
|
in repurposing funds. For example, we heard one story where a |
|
state was unable to attend a trade conference overseas because |
|
things had changed or certain companies had dropped out and |
|
they had a very difficult time getting those funds repurposed |
|
through SBA. So in some cases it is the timing that works |
|
against the states and in other cases it has to do with the |
|
management of the program itself. |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Got it. Thank you. |
|
My next question is for Mr. Ware. You also found that grant |
|
recipients did not expend all the funds awarded. In response to |
|
your findings, SBA enhanced its oversight procedures so that |
|
the program managers are monitoring states to ensure they are |
|
meeting their quarterly goals. What could SBA do to make it |
|
easier for recipients to use funds? Has the appropriations |
|
process impacted states' abilities to utilize the funds? |
|
Mr. WARE. I believe that the appropriations process has |
|
impacted the states' ability. I mean, the states are on record |
|
as my colleague stated of discussing the difficulties they have |
|
with the short timeframe, and it is compounded, of course, when |
|
the short timeframe is made even shorter. Relative to spending, |
|
I think one of the things that SBA did was after our last |
|
audit, they increased the period of performance time which |
|
should take some of the pressure off the states in terms of |
|
spending. But I caution that that does come with its own set of |
|
challenges that I could get into but I am sure that answers |
|
your question, or I hope it does. |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Great. Thank you. |
|
I thank both of you for being here. This is enlightening |
|
and there is clearly a lot that we need to be doing better. |
|
STEP is a great program and we need to make sure that it is |
|
implemented in a way that our states and our small businesses |
|
can get what they need to be able to grow. I really appreciate |
|
your time and look forward to ongoing discussions. |
|
With that, I am going to yield back my time. The Ranking |
|
Member, Dr. Joyce, is now recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. |
|
My first question is for Mr. Ware. The SBA's OIG identified |
|
what truly were systemic issues with the SBA's financial and |
|
performance oversight. These grant programs and the elevation |
|
of this by this review show that these issues into 2019 had |
|
management and performance challenges in the report. How do |
|
STEP's management issues compare to other SBA grant programs? |
|
Mr. WARE. Thank you. It goes hand in hand. The same type of |
|
problems we find in STEP, we find in the other programs. It is |
|
basically two things. So it is inaccurate data and it is not |
|
enough oversight or inadequate oversight. And when I say they |
|
go together it is that those problems are what we find |
|
systematically across just about every grant program that we |
|
look at, which was the reason why we elevated it to a top |
|
management challenge and notified the agency. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. Has the SBA Office of Grants Management made any |
|
changes based on the recommendations in the report, and how |
|
long will it take for this reform to take place? |
|
Mr. WARE. They have made changes. And I will give you some |
|
of the ways they did. They did the earlier detection in terms |
|
of a risk management process by which they visit states based |
|
on risk that are not spending on time based on the quarterly |
|
reviews of the performance data now. And they also came up with |
|
an agency-wide data quality plan that they are supposed to |
|
implement across the board on all their grant programs. They |
|
provided us with sufficient documentation to prove that they |
|
have put those things in place. We have not done the work yet |
|
to determine the impact of those changes. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. How can Congress monitor SBA implementation |
|
progress? |
|
Mr. WARE. One way Congress can monitor the implementation |
|
progress is by the work that both GAO and the Office of |
|
Inspector General does in terms of that. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. And finally, how will grant management reforms |
|
impact the STEP program? |
|
Mr. WARE. It should impact it significantly, mainly because |
|
we want a transparent, well-functioning program that has the |
|
right level of oversight on it and that is providing the type |
|
of performance measures data that Congress can use to provide |
|
the type of oversight. And I think that based on our work, they |
|
have come a long way in terms of that. Like, for example, in |
|
the past they only did the rate of return on investment as the |
|
true measurement. They have since stepped that up based on our |
|
recommendations to provide measures more in line with what the |
|
authorizing language asks for. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. And will the better management help states use |
|
these funds, fully implement the access to these funds? |
|
Mr. WARE. I believe so, especially in regard to the early |
|
detection of states who are struggling to use their funds. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. Thank you very much. |
|
My next questions are for Ms. Gianopoulos. Your report |
|
found that the SBA does not have sufficient processes to ensure |
|
that states meet the total and cash match requirements mandated |
|
by the statute. Can you explain total and cash match |
|
requirements and why they are mandated? |
|
Ms. GIANOPOULOS. Sure. So the total matching requirement |
|
that a state has to meet is 25 percent of the total amount that |
|
they are going to receive. So, for example, if a state was |
|
going to spend $100 on export promotion, $75 of that could come |
|
from the STEP program and $25 would come from the state itself. |
|
And of that $25, $12.50 would have to be in cash and the other |
|
$12.50 could be either in cash or by some other way, either an |
|
indirect or an in-kind contribution, that sort of thing. So |
|
that is what TFTEA, the Trade Facilitation and Trade |
|
Enforcement Act requires when it updated the program and made |
|
it a permanent program. So what we found were there were some |
|
difficulties that SBA had in not only confirming that the match |
|
had been met, but also that the cash match was being met with |
|
actual cash. As I explained in my statement, there were some |
|
issues having to do with staff salaries being used as part of |
|
that or all of the cash match, and it was unclear to us whether |
|
that was actually following the guidance that was put forward |
|
in order to meet the requirements of TFTEA. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. Now, you mentioned indirect costs and in-kind |
|
contributions. Can you tell me more about that? Can you |
|
directly address what representation of that would be? |
|
Ms. GIANOPOULOS. Sure. So, indirect costs and in-kind |
|
contributions are the noncash options that a state can use to |
|
help provide its portion of the program. So they could offer a |
|
conference space for a meeting. They could use the utility of |
|
their travel offices to arrange overseas travel for some of |
|
these conferences. It is the different types of services that |
|
the state can provide that would not be something you would see |
|
on a balance sheet but could be valued in various ways by the |
|
states to meet their requirement. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. And how do you monitor the---- |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Thank you. The gentleman's time has |
|
expired but we will allow for more questions after this as |
|
well. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. I yield back. Thank you. |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Yes, thank you. |
|
The gentleman, Mr. Hagedorn, from Minnesota, is now |
|
recognized for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. HAGEDORN. I thank the Chair and the Ranking Member and |
|
the witnesses. Appreciate all the work done by staff, including |
|
my own. Thanks for putting this together. |
|
It is a timely hearing. This is National Agriculture Week, |
|
so anything we can do to help our farmers and agribusinesses, |
|
especially expand in area of trade, is very important. And as |
|
somebody who also sits on the Agriculture Committee, I have a |
|
vested interest in this in a number of ways. |
|
Our farmers and agribusinesses, not just in Southern |
|
Minnesota where I represent that district, but across the |
|
country, many of them have been in recession one way or another |
|
for the better part of 5 years. We have had low commodity |
|
prices, high input costs, and all this predates anything with |
|
the trade issue. |
|
And so what we try to do, at least my goals with |
|
agriculture and being here, three things for our farmers: Make |
|
sure that we can do everything possible to reform the Federal |
|
Government so we have good government policies in the areas of |
|
regulation, health care, taxes, energy, you know, work |
|
requirements for welfare, whatever, to make sure that we drive |
|
down the cost of farming as much as possible, and make sure |
|
that we have the workforce there for our farmers. Secondarily, |
|
we want to sustain our farmers when times are tough, and we do |
|
that with implementation of the 5-year Farm Bill, E-15 year- |
|
round, things of that nature. And third, and this is the |
|
critical part where we have an opportunity at the Federal |
|
Government, the Federal role, expand our exports. Drop down |
|
those barriers. Make sure that we have new markets around the |
|
world. |
|
In southern Minnesota, we have about 20,000 farms. It is a |
|
highly rural area. It happens to also have the urban spot of |
|
Rochester where we have the preeminent institution of medicine |
|
in all the world, the Mayo Clinic, but mostly farms. A lot of |
|
good crop and livestock producers. The second largest hog |
|
production congressional district in the whole country. And so |
|
each one of those farms, each one of those farmers is producing |
|
enough to feed about 165 people. And we see that that reach is |
|
not just across the country but the whole world. |
|
And so when we get into what is going on with these |
|
programs and how they can be better utilized, do you think we |
|
should track closer as to how much of this money it spent on |
|
direct work trying to promote farmers and agribusinesses and |
|
our commodities? And secondarily, and I will ask both of you, |
|
do you work closely with USDA to try to implement these things? |
|
Are there measures that we should take to make sure that we are |
|
not duplicating costs but we are using our monies as |
|
efficiently and effectively as possible? |
|
Mr. WARE. I believe your first question was should we track |
|
what goes to the farms differently? |
|
Mr. HAGEDORN. Well, just how do you track the money? For |
|
instance, in Minnesota, we spent, I think it was like $150,000, |
|
something like that. Do we track exactly what we are trying to |
|
do with those monies or do you get to that level in your |
|
reports? |
|
Mr. WARE. In my reports, we stay programmatic in line with |
|
the mandate for us. We did not go into exactly what the states |
|
were using the money for. |
|
Mr. HAGEDORN. Should we do more in that area of tracking |
|
the money? What would that require? How would we get that done? |
|
Mr. WARE. Well, it is a different scope for us if we were |
|
to do that. The act says that we are supposed to look at XYZ. |
|
In order for us to do something like that it would just be a |
|
different focus, a different scope. And if the member wanted to |
|
request of my office that we did something like that, we are |
|
definitely open to it. |
|
Mr. HAGEDORN. Okay. |
|
Ms. GIANOPOULOS. So when we started our work, as you know, |
|
we looked at the 12 states that used less than 75 percent of |
|
their allocation in 2015. And I am just looking now at my |
|
statistics. Your home state Minnesota was actually the one that |
|
used only 23.3 percent of its 2015 STEP allocation. We did |
|
pursue possibly looking into the kinds of things that each STEP |
|
grant was used for, but because the IG identified the issues |
|
with the reliability of the data that SBA had, we were unable |
|
to do that. Now, anecdotally, when we spoke with the 12 |
|
different states, we did hear a number of different industries |
|
that were benefitting from the STEP program, such as heavy |
|
manufacturing, medical equipment, food and beverage, consumer |
|
appliances, that sort of thing, but that is purely anecdotal |
|
and cannot be generalized. So we do not have specific |
|
information but I did want to share that with you that your |
|
state was one of the ones that we spoke with about the low use |
|
rate. |
|
Mr. HAGEDORN. Well, that is very useful, and we will follow |
|
up on that. I appreciate your testimony. I yield back. |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Thank you. Now we will go into a |
|
second round of questions. There is a lot to talk about here |
|
today. I will begin by recognizing myself for another 5 |
|
minutes. My first question, again, will be for Ms. Gianopoulos. |
|
According to your report, SBA told you that it does not |
|
formally facilitate the sharing of best practices between |
|
states. You recommend that SBA enhance its identification and |
|
sharing of best practices. How might this improve the program? |
|
And do you have any thoughts on how this can be achieved? |
|
Ms. GIANOPOULOS. Well, we did not specifically tell SBA how |
|
it should be achieved because we wanted them to work within the |
|
parameters and the resources that they had available to them. |
|
But there are a number of ways, and we have noted in other |
|
reports some suggestions of how not only states but also |
|
agencies can share best practices and information. What the SBA |
|
officials told us is that they perhaps informally-- |
|
anecdotally--speak with a particular state regarding the |
|
difficulty it might be having in using its grant funds but |
|
there is no systematic way. And when we spoke with the 12 |
|
states they told us there is no systematic way that they can |
|
learn from each other--other than through outside organizations |
|
such as State International Development Office (SIDO) and that |
|
sort of thing--to learn from each other what it is that is |
|
working and not working for a particular state. And we realize |
|
that every state's situation is a little bit different, but |
|
because the 12 states we talked to were so variable, they were |
|
small states, large states, urban and rural, all different in |
|
and of themselves, there should be some way that SBA could |
|
facilitate that sharing of information in order to better use |
|
the money and better achieve the program goals. |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Absolutely. Thank you. |
|
Mr. Ware, metrics are obviously a very valuable tool in |
|
measuring the success of a program, but they also let us know |
|
where to make improvements. How can we better measure the |
|
success of the program in terms of increasing exports and the |
|
number of small businesses that export? |
|
Mr. WARE. Right. That is a good question. And I think it is |
|
a question that we asked based on our recommendations for SBA |
|
to do. And we believe that they have now done that in terms of |
|
addressing what the mandate was, which was to increase the |
|
small businesses that do exports. As I think I said earlier, |
|
they were focused so much on the return on investment that was |
|
being reported, and as a matter of fact, that is what was |
|
mandated to be reported. What the body could possibly do is in |
|
the new version is to make some of those measurements, the ones |
|
that they are now doing as a result of our recommendations, |
|
perhaps make those mandatory as well. And on top of that there |
|
is a lot of room out there for outcome-based recommendations |
|
and there are other, like someone said, six other places that |
|
are doing this. So there should be best practices, like we were |
|
just discussing, out there on how best to measure this program |
|
if you are really focused on determining the true impact of the |
|
program in the states. |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Great. Thank you. |
|
I will yield back the rest of my time. |
|
And I would like to again recognize the Ranking Member, Dr. |
|
Joyce, for 5 minutes. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. |
|
This is for Mr. Ware. We heard earlier that the |
|
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands was awarded a STEP |
|
grant and they were actually an ineligible recipient at that |
|
time. Testimony says that OIT personnel did not have the |
|
experience or training required to manage and administer such a |
|
complex grant program. What has SBA OIT done to ensure its |
|
staff now fully understands STEP's statutory requirements? |
|
Mr. WARE. At the time that happened, it was still in the |
|
pilot. So it was very much in the beginning. As a result of our |
|
recommendations, they did implement a training program and |
|
trained all the grant managers across the board. Now, that |
|
being said, keep in mind that it is not like contracting |
|
officers where they have a requirement to do annual training or |
|
anything like that. They did training at that time and they |
|
have implemented steps to make sure that they provide the |
|
training going forward. And that is something that they are |
|
doing across the board for all the grant programs right now. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. So along that same line, how are the states made |
|
aware and held accountable for the STEP's legal requirements? |
|
Is that training extended to individual states? |
|
Mr. WARE. We did not look at the training to the individual |
|
states. However, the grant managers from a systematic |
|
standpoint of SBA's oversight of the program, that was covered |
|
in the training. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. This question is for Ms. Gianopoulos. |
|
Several states claim that STEP reporting requirements were |
|
much more detailed and burdensome than grants from the |
|
Department of Commerce and other agencies. Can you provide me |
|
with more details on this, please? |
|
Ms. GIANOPOULOS. Well, what we heard from the 12 states |
|
that we interviewed is that some of the difficulties in using |
|
all of their funds had to do with the level of detail with |
|
which they had to report back the use of those funds or to ask |
|
for reimbursement. So, for example, one of the states told us |
|
that when a group of trade folks were traveling say to a |
|
conference, in order to request reimbursement of that money, if |
|
they were all in a cab together they had to divide the cost of |
|
the cab and claim it individually by person, which made for-- |
|
and that was only one example--a great deal of administrative |
|
burden for them and made it very difficult. And in some cases |
|
they were even having second thoughts about applying for the |
|
grant the next year because of the amount of burden it was on |
|
them--to request that money back. And in some cases that money |
|
is such a small amount, even though it is important to them, |
|
they had to do a cost-benefit analysis as to whether it was |
|
worth their time in order to get that money back as part of the |
|
STEP grant. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. Do find that then states apply for less |
|
burdensome application processes? Are they reaching out in |
|
other directions when facing such obstacles? |
|
Ms. GIANOPOULOS. We did not really get into a lot of detail |
|
with where they put their efforts, but because the size of the |
|
state trade offices varies so widely, the very small state |
|
trade offices have to make choices as to where they are going |
|
to put their time. And as I mentioned earlier, because this |
|
program does not follow a set standard routine every year, it |
|
is not available on the same day every year, it is not the same |
|
amount of time every year, they have to make those types of |
|
choices state by state by state as to what they are going to |
|
apply for and how they are going to use their resources. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. Would you presume that they do reach out to less |
|
burdensome application processes? |
|
Ms. GIANOPOULOS. I have not talked with them about that, |
|
but if I were making a decision as far as what I was going to |
|
do with my resources and my time, I would want the most bang |
|
for my buck. |
|
Mr. JOYCE. That makes sense. |
|
Thank you both for your concise answers. I yield back my |
|
time. |
|
Chairwoman FINKENAUER. Thank you. Thank you very much to |
|
both of you for being here today, for your public service, and |
|
for taking out so much time out of your schedule. It really |
|
means a lot, and this was a very informative day. Ms. |
|
Gianopoulos and Mr. Ware, we are very grateful. |
|
As we have heard today, STEP offers many promising |
|
opportunities for entrepreneurs and farmers in Iowa and across |
|
the country to succeed. Over the past decade, STEP has grown |
|
from a 3-year pilot program to a permanent, successful program |
|
in SBA that with some improvements will be a critical piece of |
|
a trade assistance portfolio. I appreciate your work in |
|
identifying some of the systemic issues that we need to |
|
resolve. It has led to significant improvements in the |
|
implementation of the law. More work, obviously, needs to be |
|
done. In my role as the Chairwoman of the Subcommittee on Rural |
|
Development, Agriculture, Trade, and Entrepreneurship, I look |
|
forward to working with my colleagues on both sides of the |
|
aisle to make much-needed improvements in STEP. I am committed |
|
to making life easier for small business owners in Iowa and |
|
across rural America so that they can grow their small |
|
businesses and better support their families and our rural |
|
communities. |
|
I would ask unanimous consent that members have 5 |
|
legislative days to submit statements and supporting materials |
|
for the record. |
|
Without objection, so ordered. |
|
If there is no further business to come before the |
|
Committee, we are adjourned. Thank you. |
|
[Whereupon, at 11:58 a.m., the subcommittee was adjourned.] |
|
|
|
A P P E N D I X |
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<all> |
|
</pre></body></html> |
|
|