|
<html> |
|
<title> - U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE COUNTERTERRORISM BUREAU: FY 2017 BUDGET</title> |
|
<body><pre> |
|
[House Hearing, 114 Congress] |
|
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE COUNTERTERRORISM BUREAU: FY 2017 BUDGET |
|
|
|
======================================================================= |
|
|
|
HEARING |
|
|
|
BEFORE THE |
|
|
|
SUBCOMMITTEE ON TERRORISM, NONPROLIFERATION, AND TRADE |
|
|
|
OF THE |
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS |
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
|
|
|
ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS |
|
|
|
SECOND SESSION |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
MAY 17, 2016 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Serial No. 114-161 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs |
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ |
|
or |
|
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ |
|
|
|
______ |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE |
|
|
|
20-173PDF WASHINGTON: 2016 |
|
_____________________________________________________________________________ |
|
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, |
|
Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov. Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 |
|
Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS |
|
|
|
EDWARD R. ROYCE, California, Chairman |
|
CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York |
|
ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida BRAD SHERMAN, California |
|
DANA ROHRABACHER, California GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York |
|
STEVE CHABOT, Ohio ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey |
|
JOE WILSON, South Carolina GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia |
|
MICHAEL T. McCAUL, Texas THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida |
|
TED POE, Texas BRIAN HIGGINS, New York |
|
MATT SALMON, Arizona KAREN BASS, California |
|
DARRELL E. ISSA, California WILLIAM KEATING, Massachusetts |
|
TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island |
|
JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina ALAN GRAYSON, Florida |
|
MO BROOKS, Alabama AMI BERA, California |
|
PAUL COOK, California ALAN S. LOWENTHAL, California |
|
RANDY K. WEBER SR., Texas GRACE MENG, New York |
|
SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania LOIS FRANKEL, Florida |
|
RON DeSANTIS, Florida TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii |
|
MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas |
|
TED S. YOHO, Florida ROBIN L. KELLY, Illinois |
|
CURT CLAWSON, Florida BRENDAN F. BOYLE, Pennsylvania |
|
SCOTT DesJARLAIS, Tennessee |
|
REID J. RIBBLE, Wisconsin |
|
DAVID A. TROTT, Michigan |
|
LEE M. ZELDIN, New York |
|
DANIEL DONOVAN, New York |
|
|
|
Amy Porter, Chief of Staff Thomas Sheehy, Staff Director |
|
|
|
Jason Steinbaum, Democratic Staff Director |
|
------ |
|
|
|
Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade |
|
|
|
TED POE, Texas, Chairman |
|
JOE WILSON, South Carolina WILLIAM KEATING, Massachusetts |
|
DARRELL E. ISSA, California BRAD SHERMAN, California |
|
PAUL COOK, California BRIAN HIGGINS, New York |
|
SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas |
|
REID J. RIBBLE, Wisconsin ROBIN L. KELLY, Illinois |
|
LEE M. ZELDIN, New York |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C O N T E N T S |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
Page |
|
|
|
WITNESS |
|
|
|
Mr. Justin Siberell, Acting Coordinator for Counterterrorism, |
|
Bureau of Counterterrorism, U.S. Department of State........... 3 |
|
|
|
LETTERS, STATEMENTS, ETC., SUBMITTED FOR THE HEARING |
|
|
|
Mr. Justin Siberell: Prepared statement.......................... 6 |
|
|
|
APPENDIX |
|
|
|
Hearing notice................................................... 24 |
|
Hearing minutes.................................................. 25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE COUNTERTERRORISM BUREAU: FY 2017 BUDGET |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
|
|
|
|
TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2016 |
|
|
|
House of Representatives, |
|
|
|
Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade, |
|
|
|
Committee on Foreign Affairs, |
|
|
|
Washington, DC. |
|
|
|
The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:03 p.m., in |
|
room 2172, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Ted Poe |
|
(chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. |
|
Mr. Poe. The subcommittee will come to order. |
|
Without objection, all members may have 5 days to submit |
|
statements, questions, and extraneous materials for the record, |
|
subject to the length limitation in the rules. |
|
The purpose of this hearing is to examine the budget for |
|
the Department of State Counterterrorism Bureau, Fiscal Year |
|
2017. I have a lengthy opening statement, but without |
|
objection, I will make it a part of the record and make some |
|
brief comments. |
|
The purpose of this is to determine the Counterterrorism |
|
Bureau's budget. Terrorism is on the rise throughout the world |
|
in different places, especially with ISIS. In any event, the |
|
administration has asked for a reduction in the |
|
Counterterrorism Bureau budget even though that to me is |
|
counterproductive in the sense that terrorism is on the rise. |
|
On the other hand, my concern is about evaluations that |
|
have or have not been made by the success of what the |
|
Counterterrorism Bureau is doing or not doing. Personally, I am |
|
not satisfied that the evaluation of how the money is being |
|
spent and what we are doing is working. So the purpose of this |
|
hearing is to examine both of those, whether the budget should |
|
be cut or raised and whether the evaluations are being produced |
|
and what are the results of those evaluations. |
|
Without objection, I will allow now the former ranking |
|
member of the committee, Mr. Sherman, to make an opening |
|
statement from California. You are recognized. |
|
Mr. Sherman. Thank you. I will use my opening statement to |
|
renew the plea I have been making for the State Department for |
|
at least 5 years and that is that you employ a few individuals |
|
who are hired solely for their knowledge of Islamic |
|
jurisprudence, Islamic history, and Islamic law. To think that |
|
we can combat Islamic extremist terrorism without a single |
|
person at the State Department who has memorized the Quran |
|
means that we don't understand the mental world, the |
|
theological world that our potential adversaries live in. |
|
We have a State Department with people who think that you |
|
can show the evil of al-Baghdadi if you can show him personally |
|
executing a defenseless Yazidi. The fact is they will put that |
|
up on their Web page as a recruitment tool. We need people who |
|
understand that if you could just get a picture of him eating a |
|
ham sandwich, that would undermine ISIS and its recruiting |
|
ability. |
|
I remember the conflict between the United States and |
|
Indonesia over whether Indonesia would give us samples of avian |
|
flu and called an Islamic scholar who said, well, we would turn |
|
to the hadith about what the prophet said about rabies, which |
|
is, after all, just another virus that infects an animal. That |
|
is not the kind of knowledge that you can get at Princeton. |
|
Woodrow Wilson did a great job. He did not memorize the Quran. |
|
So we need State Department people to be able to have |
|
access onsite to that kind of scholarship and to an |
|
understanding of Islamic jurisprudence that is every bit as |
|
sophisticated as the knowledge we have on the Vienna Convention |
|
on the Law of Treaties and why the Habsburgs took this or that |
|
position in the negotiations in 18 whatever when that--we have |
|
a Eurocentric body of knowledge in a very smart State |
|
Department, and we are going to have to hire just a few people |
|
who would never pass the test because it is written by the |
|
Woodrow Wilson school and instead could pass the test to |
|
demonstrate a real knowledge of Islam. |
|
With that, I yield back. |
|
Mr. Poe. I thank the gentleman. |
|
The chair recognizes the ranking member and gentleman from |
|
Massachusetts for his opening statement. |
|
Mr. Keating. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for conducting this |
|
hearing. I would also like to thank our witness, Mr. Siberell, |
|
for being here to discuss the State Department's |
|
Counterterrorism Bureau. |
|
In our country's fight against terrorism, one indelible |
|
truth has been stated over and over, and it is in order to |
|
truly degrade and ultimately defeat foreign terrorists, |
|
organizations like ISIS and al-Qaeda, we need a whole |
|
government-effort approach. The capacity-building programs |
|
funded and coordinated by the State Department's |
|
Counterterrorism Bureau are the types of activities in which |
|
our Government must continue to engage if we are to be |
|
successful in achieving the Bureau's mission of forging |
|
partnerships with our partners at home and abroad in |
|
counterterrorism law enforcement, counter-threat financing, |
|
counter-radicalization efforts, border security, and restricted |
|
terrorist travel. |
|
Undoubtedly, the Bureau has worked to accomplish these |
|
critical objectives while the State Department has revamped its |
|
efforts to tackle one of the hardest aspects of |
|
counterterrorism, and that is combating violent extremism. |
|
The new Center for Global Engagement is attempting to |
|
effectively coordinate, integrate, and synchronize messaging to |
|
foreign audiences that undermines the disinformation espoused |
|
by violent extremist groups. To be sure, this is not an easy |
|
task, and we will hear in detail from Mr. Siberell on the |
|
challenges facing the Bureau. |
|
I am particularly interested in hearing how leadership has |
|
addressed a Government Accountability Office report released |
|
last year on resources, performance, and coordination within |
|
the Bureau. |
|
Finally, it is vital that we ensure that funds |
|
appropriated, the Counterterrorism Bureau for these capacity- |
|
building programs are being used wisely, and the United States |
|
is getting a good return on its investment. |
|
As I stated at the beginning, the Counterterrorism Bureau |
|
plays a critical role in our fight against terrorism, |
|
particularly with regards to interagency and regional |
|
collaboration. I look forward to hearing from our witness today |
|
and to discuss the issues that will ensure. |
|
I yield back. |
|
Mr. Poe. I thank the gentleman. |
|
Without objection, the witness' prepared statement will be |
|
made part of the record. I ask that the witness keep the |
|
presentation to no more than 5 minutes. |
|
I will introduce the witness that we have. Mr. Justin |
|
Siberell is the acting coordinator for the Bureau of |
|
Counterterrorism at the State Department. He is a career member |
|
of the Senior Foreign Service and before joining the CT Bureau, |
|
he served as a principal officer in Dubai, and he has also |
|
worked in Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, and Panama. |
|
So thank you for being here, and you are recognized. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF MR. JUSTIN SIBERELL, ACTING COORDINATOR FOR |
|
COUNTERTERRORISM, BUREAU OF COUNTERTERRORISM, U.S. DEPARTMENT |
|
OF STATE |
|
|
|
Mr. Siberell. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Chairman Poe, |
|
Ranking Member Keating, members of the subcommittee, thank you |
|
for the opportunity to appear before you today. |
|
This afternoon, I would like to briefly highlight the |
|
Bureau of Counterterrorism's work to advance the foremost |
|
counterterrorism priorities of the United States. |
|
As you noted, Mr. Chairman, I have submitted a longer |
|
statement for the record. |
|
As you know, the United States faces a fluid and fast- |
|
changing terrorism threat environment. The international |
|
community has made progress in degrading terrorism safe havens, |
|
but terrorist groups, especially ISIL and al-Qaeda, remain |
|
resilient. |
|
Recent attacks in Bamako, Beirut, Brussels, Jakarta, and |
|
Paris have demonstrated the reach and continued determination |
|
of these groups to commit violence against civilians. These and |
|
other attacks have raised the urgency and political will of our |
|
partners to act against the evolving threat posed by ISIL, al- |
|
Qaeda, and their affiliates. |
|
President Obama has called for the United States to develop |
|
more effective partnerships around the world to confront, |
|
disrupt, and defeat the global threat from terrorism. The |
|
Bureau of Counterterrorism is playing a critical role in |
|
developing those partnerships. |
|
Success of U.S. counterterrorism efforts increasingly |
|
depends upon capable civilian partners, police, prosecutors, |
|
border and aviation security personnel, prison officials, and |
|
community leaders. As with our own domestic experience, these |
|
actors are on the frontlines in preventing and responding to |
|
terrorism in their communities. |
|
The Bureau is leading efforts to build capacity and |
|
cooperation among these various civilian actors. We appreciate |
|
the Congress' appropriation of $175 million for the |
|
Counterterrorism Partnership's Fund in Fiscal Year 2016. We ask |
|
for your continued support in Fiscal Year 2017. With these |
|
resources we will strengthen the ability of key law enforcement |
|
and criminal justice actors from the Sahel to Southeast Asia. |
|
We are focusing on supporting countries that can help prevent |
|
ISIL's global expansion while not losing sight of al-Qaeda and |
|
its affiliates. |
|
We are expanding our engagement with European partners to |
|
ensure they enhance capabilities to stem the flow of foreign |
|
terrorist fighters, improve information-sharing, and disrupt |
|
local terrorist recruitment networks. We believe these efforts |
|
are yielding results. Since 2014, 45 countries with which we |
|
have engaged have passed new laws or updated existing laws to |
|
address foreign terrorist fighters. |
|
Through the Bureau's diplomatic efforts, we now have |
|
enhanced information-sharing arrangements with 55 countries to |
|
assist efforts to identify, track, and deter the travel of |
|
known and suspected terrorists. We have also supported INTERPOL |
|
to enhance its ability to share critical foreign terrorist |
|
fighter identity data with countries around the world. Fifty- |
|
eight countries plus the United Nations now contribute foreign |
|
terrorist fighter profiles to INTERPOL. |
|
As part of our Fiscal Year 2017 request, we have also asked |
|
for additional funding for our Terrorist Interdiction Program. |
|
This program provides a highly valuable capability for |
|
countries to strengthen border controls through enhanced |
|
technology and training. |
|
Mr. Chairman, as part of our overall strategy, we believe |
|
that we must increase our focus on preventing the spread of |
|
violent extremism to stop the radicalization, recruitment, and |
|
mobilization of people, especially young people, to engage in |
|
terrorist activities. |
|
Secretary Kerry has directed the Bureau of Counterterrorism |
|
to play the lead role in a more strategic, integrated, and |
|
ultimately accountable approach to countering violent |
|
extremism. As notified to the Congress, the Department is |
|
increasing personnel resources in the Bureau to support this |
|
mission and renaming the Bureau as the Bureau of |
|
Counterterrorism and Countering Violent Extremism. We will be |
|
working very closely with the newly established interagency |
|
Global Engagement Center and USAID in this effort. |
|
The Department has also requested additional resources for |
|
CVE programming in Fiscal Year 2017, including as part of the |
|
Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund to expand programs to help |
|
counter violent extremist recruitment and messaging. |
|
Finally, Mr. Chairman, as documented in our statement for |
|
the record, we have made changes within the Bureau over the |
|
past year to foster a culture of strategic planning, learning, |
|
innovation, and collaboration. We have enhanced the monitoring |
|
and evaluation of our foreign assistance programming, |
|
especially our largest programs. Since I last testified before |
|
this committee, we have launched a comprehensive third-party |
|
evaluation of our Antiterrorism Assistance Program. That |
|
evaluation will be completed later this month. We have also |
|
awarded a new third-party evaluation of our CVE programs. We |
|
look forward to briefing you and your staff on the results of |
|
these evaluations. |
|
Mr. Chairman, there is much more work to do. The terrorism |
|
landscape is dynamic, and we must continue to enhance and adapt |
|
our efforts. I am proud of what we are accomplishing at the |
|
Bureau of Counterterrorism. We have a talented team of people |
|
who are committed to the work of countering terrorism and |
|
keeping the country safe. |
|
We greatly appreciate the interest of Congress and your |
|
committee in support of these efforts. I look forward to your |
|
questions and our discussion. Thank you. |
|
[The prepared statement of Mr. Siberell follows:] |
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
---------- |
|
|
|
Mr. Poe. I thank the gentleman. |
|
The House is in the midst of a series of votes, so the |
|
subcommittee will recess until 5 minutes after the last vote |
|
has ended. So the subcommittee is in recess. We will reconvene |
|
5 minutes after the last vote has ended. |
|
[Recess.] |
|
Mr. Poe. The subcommittee will come to order. |
|
I will recognize myself for 5 minutes for a few questions. |
|
I have three questions, and we have 5 minutes to get the |
|
questions and the answers. So my first question is the |
|
administration maintains that counterterrorism is a top |
|
priority, but why is the administration wanting a budget cut? |
|
Mr. Siberell. Mr. Chairman, I think if you look at the |
|
annual requests that go from Fiscal Year 2015, 2016, 2017, you |
|
will find a significant increase in the '17 request from our |
|
'15 budget. And the reason is that we received a significant |
|
increase in '16 out of the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund, |
|
an additional $175 million that we are working now to develop a |
|
sound process for stewardship of those additional funds. And we |
|
very much appreciate the Congress' support for that program. |
|
For '17 when we put together our request, we looked at what |
|
we believed would be required to sustain those efforts, those |
|
increased efforts in '16, and we determined that an $80 million |
|
request was adequate for that purpose, and bearing in mind that |
|
we want to ensure effective stewardship of those funds. So |
|
either 175 in '16 addition, and then we have asked for 80 |
|
additional in '17. So it may appear to be a decrease from the |
|
'16 request because we are asking for less under CTPF from '17 |
|
than we received in '16, but overall, it is a significant |
|
increase. I mean, we are talking about a comparison of our |
|
request in '17 from what our budget was in '15 is a more than |
|
$50 million increase in our counterterrorism capacity-building |
|
foreign assistance budget. |
|
Mr. Poe. Okay. We are not reading the same statistics, or |
|
at least I am not reading them the same way you are. The |
|
Counterterrorism Bureau wants 31 percent less money than last |
|
year, is that correct or not? |
|
Mr. Siberell. Well, I would characterize it as our effort |
|
to sustain this significant increase we received in '16, and I |
|
will put it that way. |
|
Mr. Poe. I mean is it--no, put it this way. Is it 31 |
|
percent less than last year or not? I don't want to be |
|
argumentative, but I need or yes or no? |
|
Mr. Siberell. Yes. The $80 million we requested is less |
|
than the $175 we received in '16 under the CTPF, yes. |
|
Mr. Poe. The administration promised in 2011 that they |
|
would have a strategy to combat terrorists' use of social |
|
media, 2011. When is that strategy going to be produced because |
|
it hasn't been produced? Do you know? |
|
Mr. Siberell. The administration is working very closely |
|
internally in the United States Government with the domestic |
|
agencies, the FBI, Department of Justice, others---- |
|
Mr. Poe. Excuse me again. |
|
Mr. Siberell. Yes. |
|
Mr. Poe. Do you know when that is going to be done? |
|
Mr. Siberell. Is this the strategy you are referring to |
|
from the State Department? I missed the beginning of your |
|
question. |
|
Mr. Poe. Yes, online radicalization by the terrorists' use |
|
of social media, and we were going to have a strategy to combat |
|
that, and the President--the administration promised this in |
|
2011. We don't have it. |
|
Mr. Siberell. Okay. |
|
Mr. Poe. When is it going to happen? |
|
Mr. Siberell. Right. So we have a strategy on countering |
|
violent extremism that we are just preparing to release with |
|
the State Department and USAID that does, as one of its |
|
objectives, address the need for effective counter-messaging |
|
and counter-narratives, and that is one of the five objectives |
|
in that strategy that is to be released within the coming week. |
|
Mr. Poe. Within a week? |
|
Mr. Siberell. That is the State Department, USAID |
|
countering violent extremism strategy, joint strategy. |
|
Mr. Poe. All right. And the last question is GAO reported |
|
that the CT Bureau has not evaluated its Countering Violent |
|
Extremism program despite the Bureau saying since 2012 it would |
|
evaluate the program. When is that going to happen? |
|
Mr. Siberell. Mr. Chairman, thank you for that question. In |
|
our hearing last year we discussed the importance of evaluation |
|
of CTE Bureau-funded Foreign Assistance Programs, and you |
|
emphasized the importance of this, and we have taken that very |
|
seriously. We have undertaken a number of evaluations, |
|
including we have put out a notice of funding for a |
|
comprehensive third-party evaluation of our Countering Violent |
|
Extremism programs in three countries: Indonesia, Kenya, and |
|
Bangladesh. That has been out for funding. It is being awarded |
|
now, and we expect that that evaluation will be completed by |
|
the end of this year. |
|
Mr. Poe. So the GAO, their answer would--I mean, it hasn't |
|
happened yet, and your answer is that it will be done by the |
|
end of the year, there will be an evaluation? |
|
Mr. Siberell. Yes. |
|
Mr. Poe. Combating terrorism, I think we can all agree to |
|
the fact that it is important because terrorism is on the rise. |
|
Tell me why we should justify the CT Bureau? Why should |
|
Congress justify its existence? Try to keep it simple if you |
|
would. |
|
Mr. Siberell. Sure. I think it is a very good question, and |
|
I appreciate the opportunity to answer. |
|
People often think of counterterrorism as a mission for law |
|
enforcement agencies in the domestic realm or for the military |
|
or intelligence agencies in the international realm. In fact, |
|
diplomacy plays a key role in bringing together partnerships |
|
and nations to address our primary counterterrorism objectives. |
|
We see that in the coalitions that we build to defeat terrorist |
|
groups on a regional, sub-regional basis, or even a global |
|
basis. So the global coalition to fight ISIL is an example. The |
|
coalition of African partners we have developed to fight Boko |
|
Haram in West Africa, the coalition of nations we have helped |
|
to develop to fight Al-Shabaab in East Africa. |
|
Those are just examples of where diplomacy plays a key |
|
role, and the Bureau of Counterterrorism leads in a number of |
|
those efforts to build international will, political will and |
|
partnership and cooperation against these common threats. |
|
The other piece of what we do--and we appreciate, again, |
|
the funding we receive from Congress for this purpose--is to |
|
help build capacity in our primary counterterrorism partners. |
|
In line with the President's policy of developing strong |
|
partnerships, I know the Counterterrorism Partnership Fund we |
|
are helping to build capacity among our partners across the |
|
civilian agencies so not just in--and our DOD colleagues handle |
|
that on the military side, but we helped to build improved CT |
|
legislation, improved judicial capability to prosecute |
|
terrorist suspects, improved border security measures, improved |
|
civilian security agencies. |
|
All of those programs are funded through the support you |
|
provide to our bureau, and that is what we execute in our |
|
foreign assistance. So on the one level we are working |
|
diplomatically to build coalitions to address our terrorism |
|
challenges, and then we are trying to build capacity in our |
|
partners to address those in the regions from which these |
|
threats emanate. |
|
Mr. Poe. Thank you. The chair recognizes the ranking |
|
member, the gentleman from Massachusetts, Mr. Keating. |
|
Mr. Keating. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Last week, I was in Tunisia, and the situation there was |
|
described in terms of dealing with terrorist issues there by |
|
the President himself as fragile, a term he used in our |
|
conversation at least 10 times by my count. And you are looking |
|
at a country like that that is struggling to do so many things, |
|
and he kept impressing on us, too, and I have seen it in other |
|
countries, particularly in that region, where they are getting |
|
stressed, leaders are, particularly leaders that are trying to |
|
move forward in a way that improves democracy. |
|
The economic issue is just squeezing them on one end in |
|
terms of support. Some of the other changes that languish, too, |
|
are a problem. |
|
How is the Bureau working, you know, to coordinate not only |
|
counterterrorism but also rule-of-law issues? How do they |
|
factor that in, economic issues? Because I don't think there |
|
will be a lasting effort with this without a strong |
|
collaboration on all of those issues. |
|
Mr. Siberell. Thank you for the question, Congressman. |
|
With Tunisia, I agree entirely that that is a country that |
|
is passing through a very important political transition but |
|
that has caused significant fragility within the government |
|
system. And you can absolutely correlate the rise of terrorist |
|
groups to failures in governance in certain parts of the world |
|
and certainly in North Africa and the Middle East. And we see |
|
that in Libya, obviously, and Yemen and other places where the |
|
government has collapsed and the terrorist groups rise. |
|
So it is absolutely important that we help the Tunisian |
|
Government through this transition, and that absolutely |
|
includes economic support to assist the government to ensure |
|
that their economy produces the jobs and hopes and |
|
opportunities for young people that have high expectations from |
|
this political transition. |
|
Our counterterrorism assistance is also robust with the |
|
Tunisian Government and has grown. They face a significant |
|
threat from regional groups like al-Qaeda and the Islamic |
|
Maghreb who have come out of Algeria and have brought threats |
|
into Tunisia. Of course, we have seen the attacks on the museum |
|
and the tourist site in Sousse. Those were planned by |
|
individuals---- |
|
Mr. Keating. I was there. |
|
Mr. Siberell. Yes. So this is a country under assault |
|
effectively from these terrorist groups, and it does require a |
|
comprehensive response from us---- |
|
Mr. Keating. Yes. I think they deserve great credit for |
|
what they are trying to do, but they are definitely in a very |
|
tenuous situation doing it. |
|
Let me just shift quickly. Twitter requested last week as |
|
well, one of its partners Dataminr, a service that offers |
|
advanced social media analytics and early detection of major |
|
events like terrorist attacks, to stop providing intelligence |
|
agencies with their tools and their content. Does this affect |
|
the relationship with the CT or with the Bureau of Global |
|
Engagement at all, these kind of actions? |
|
Mr. Siberell. I am sorry, sir. The action is to restrict |
|
the sharing of information with---- |
|
Mr. Keating. Yes, with law enforcement---- |
|
Mr. Siberell [continuing]. Law enforcement---- |
|
Mr. Keating [continuing]. Agencies. |
|
Mr. Siberell. Well, I think we rely upon a cooperative |
|
relationship with the social media companies, and that is |
|
primarily the work domestically of the FBI, Department of |
|
Justice. A cooperative relationship is important because those |
|
companies, through their terms of service, are in the best |
|
position to identify content which can be helpful to those |
|
groups in radicalization and---- |
|
Mr. Keating. In terms of content, do you ever use |
|
testimonials from foreign fighters who have come back |
|
disillusioned? |
|
Mr. Siberell. Yes, indeed, indeed. The Global Engagement |
|
Center to which you just referred has launched several thematic |
|
campaigns to amplify messaging, including they ran a campaign |
|
of formers or defectors. Those who had gone off to Iraq and |
|
Syria had a disillusioning experience and then were putting |
|
their testimonials on social media as a way to push back and |
|
counter the narrative that ISIL has put out about its |
|
caliphates. |
|
Mr. Keating. And again on messaging, and it is too bad I |
|
can't--we are limited with time, but on messaging, are you |
|
using women and community-based projects? Well, Denmark just |
|
advanced a program where it is concentrating on a network of |
|
mothers to identify early signs. Are you engaged in that, and |
|
how successful has that been? |
|
Mr. Siberell. Well, there are two things I can point to. |
|
One is another one of the thematic campaigns that the GEC ran, |
|
which was centered around families and the impact upon families |
|
of those who have gone off to fight for these terrorist groups. |
|
And that was a very effective campaign, and it did focus in |
|
large part on mothers and the role in the family. |
|
The second is we have undertaken in a number of our |
|
Countering Violent Extremism programs to focus on women |
|
because, as you noted, women are in a unique position in most |
|
communities to identify the signs of radicalization or the |
|
infiltration of ideas and ideology of the terrorist groups. So |
|
they are a primary recipient of our Countering Violent |
|
Extremism programming effort. |
|
I will also say, however, that they are difficult to reach |
|
because this is at the community level, and we have to get our |
|
programming down to that level. And that is why we work with |
|
partners like USAID who have the connections in many cases |
|
through their development work to reach women and build |
|
networks of women, which they have a history also of doing in |
|
many parts of the world successfully. |
|
Mr. Keating. Just lastly, I will give you a chance--the GAO |
|
reported recently that there were staffing positions that |
|
weren't filled and recommended that they be filled. What is the |
|
status of that right now? |
|
Mr. Siberell. Well, we have 102 authorized full-time |
|
employment positions in the Bureau of Counterterrorism, 93 of |
|
which are filled. That leaves nine vacancies, and of those nine |
|
vacancies, eight are in the process of being filled or being |
|
advertised. So I think we are doing a pretty good job in |
|
addressing what the GAO had found in the last several years. |
|
The Bureau was established as a result of the 2011 QDDR. It |
|
really became a bureau in 2012. We were allotted a surge of new |
|
positions, and it did take some time for the Bureau to process |
|
through those, but we have done that and now we are in fairly |
|
good shape and are hiring. |
|
Mr. Keating. I yield back, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Siberell. Thank you, sir. |
|
Mr. Poe. I thank the gentleman from Massachusetts. |
|
The chair will recognize the gentleman from California, |
|
Colonel Cook, for his questioning. |
|
Mr. Cook. Thank you very much, sir. |
|
I wanted to ask you about Libya and the decisions that are |
|
going to be made about our arming certain individuals. And of |
|
course the fear is here we go again. Are we giving this to |
|
ISIS, ISIL, Daesh, whatever acronym you want to use or whatever |
|
you call them? And my fear with the State Department or any is |
|
that the right hand does not talk to the left hand in terms of |
|
coordinating this information so we make an informed choice and |
|
then we regret it afterwards. Can you briefly comment on that? |
|
Mr. Siberell. Thank you, Congressman. In Libya it is a very |
|
difficult, fluid situation, as you have noted, basically |
|
chaotic, and you have militias that are squaring off against |
|
Daesh principally in the area around Sirte in the center of the |
|
country. Those militias are not yet integrated into a Libyan |
|
national force, so sharing arms or assisting those groups on |
|
the ground would be a complicated and difficult endeavor. In |
|
some cases, however, there are those sub-state actors who are |
|
in the best position to confront ISIL, so navigating that |
|
landscape while ensuring that those arms would no transfer over |
|
to ISIL would be a significant task and a very difficult one. |
|
Mr. Cook. I want to shift gears a little bit. Maybe this is |
|
out of the realm a little bit, but I am from San Bernardino |
|
County. And obviously, we had a very difficult and horrific |
|
situation involving a terrorist there. And the coordination of |
|
Federal agencies with--and by the way, I was very, very happy |
|
with the way the FBI and the sheriff and the police chief, they |
|
all worked together. |
|
But in terms of--and then we had some problems with getting |
|
the data from the cell phone of one of the individuals, you |
|
know, Apple and you have heard all that drama. Now, if you have |
|
information of something that would actually affect us in the |
|
country here, how is that coordinated? |
|
And I know that is a very difficult question, but I get the |
|
feeling that we don't always have the best of coordination with |
|
Federal agencies because everybody works in their own |
|
functional area or functional silo and the word is not |
|
disseminated, and what happens is boom, something like this |
|
happens even though we might have had advanced warning. But if |
|
you could comment on that, I would appreciate it. |
|
Mr. Siberell. Well, sir, if you are speaking about |
|
coordination of the domestic level among the national security |
|
agencies or the law enforcement agencies, I may not be the best |
|
place to---- |
|
Mr. Cook. Well, I meant somebody that had ties to a |
|
terrorist country that---- |
|
Mr. Siberell. Yes. |
|
Mr. Cook [continuing]. But eventually, the terrorist |
|
incident actually happens. You know, we had this a few years |
|
ago when we were talking about the bombings in Boston and |
|
Chechnya and we had talked about this previously. But---- |
|
Mr. Siberell. I would say that in my own experience, the |
|
counterterrorism community and the U.S. Government is extremely |
|
well coordinated and integrated in so far as when there is an |
|
incident like the Boston Marathon bombers and the need to |
|
understand the linkages that might exist in a different |
|
country. |
|
Same thing with the San Bernardino attack. There is very |
|
close cooperation between the FBI, the principal investigative |
|
arm of the U.S. Government, and FBI agents who might be posted |
|
at our Embassies abroad or representatives of the intelligence |
|
agencies who can help to pull back the threads on any |
|
connections. And that is always one of the very first |
|
questions, of course, that arises in a domestic terrorism |
|
incident: Is there a connection to an international |
|
organization or is this directed by a group outside the United |
|
States? |
|
And particularly for these attacks like the one in San |
|
Bernardino, we see ISIL trying to inspire attacks, and those |
|
questions are always asked and then referred to the host |
|
country where we work with the intelligence agencies, the law |
|
enforcement agencies in those countries to develop those |
|
threats. |
|
Mr. Cook. Thank you. And I am jumping around a little bit, |
|
but I always go back to Turkey. And it is not even |
|
Thanksgiving. Anyway, bad joke. Really concerned about |
|
The PKK, the Erdogan, and it is like who is the terrorist |
|
and whether somebody is being falsely accused of being a |
|
terrorist. And obviously, this affects the politics of that |
|
particular country where you can use the counterterrorist |
|
threat to carry out a political agenda. Would you want to |
|
comment on that or is that too politically sensitive? Or is |
|
that something that would fall under counterterrorism? |
|
Mr. Siberell. Well, I can say, sir, in general terms on a |
|
global basis we are quite concerned about how governments |
|
undertake their own counterterrorism efforts domestically. And |
|
those governments that might use counterterrorism as a |
|
justification for acts that transgressed human rights or that |
|
are heavy-handed, let's say, in their security approach might |
|
actually drive the grievances that are leading to the terrorism |
|
in the first place. So that is a conversation we have globally |
|
with many, many partners around the world, and it is something |
|
that we watch very closely. |
|
Mr. Poe. I thank the gentleman. |
|
The committee may ask you to appear before the committee in |
|
a classified setting. Colonel Cook and the ranking member and |
|
others have raised some questions that we may want to get to |
|
the bottom of it to understand the situation in the classified |
|
setting where some of these questions can be answered so we get |
|
to the bottom line of what is taking place. So thank you for |
|
being here today. You have got a lot of work to do. You have a |
|
got a mess on your hands as far as all these bad guys all over |
|
the world, you know, causing mischief and taking the lives of |
|
innocents. So it is a tough assignment. |
|
So, anyway, there may be some other questions that we have |
|
for you that we will put in writing and we will send to you, in |
|
addition to the possible classified setting. |
|
So without objection, all the witnesses' prepared |
|
statements will be part of the record. Members will have 5 days |
|
to submit statements, questions, and extraneous materials for |
|
the record subject to the length limitation and the rules. |
|
And the subcommittee is adjourned. |
|
Mr. Siberell. Thank you. Thank you. |
|
[Whereupon, at 3:18 p.m., the subcommittee was adjourned.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A P P E N D I X |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
|
|
Material Submitted for the Record |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<all> |
|
</pre></body></html> |
|
|