|
<html> |
|
<title> - FOREST HEALTH CRITERIA</title> |
|
<body><pre> |
|
[House Hearing, 105 Congress] |
|
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOREST HEALTH CRITERIA |
|
|
|
======================================================================= |
|
|
|
OVERSIGHT HEARING |
|
|
|
before the |
|
|
|
SUBCOMMITTEE ON FOREST AND FOREST HEALTH |
|
|
|
of the |
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES |
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
|
|
|
ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS |
|
|
|
FIRST SESSION |
|
|
|
on |
|
|
|
CRITERIA TO DETERMINE IF A FOREST IS HEALTHY OR UNHEALTHY, AND HOW TO |
|
IMPROVE OR MAINTAIN FOREST HEALTH |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
MARCH 18, 1997--WASHINGTON, DC |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Serial No. 105-6 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Printed for the use of the Committee on Resources |
|
|
|
|
|
<snowflake> |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE |
|
40-351 cc WASHINGTON : 1997 |
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office |
|
Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES |
|
|
|
DON YOUNG, Alaska, Chairman |
|
W.J. (BILLY) TAUZIN, Louisiana GEORGE MILLER, California |
|
JAMES V. HANSEN, Utah EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts |
|
JIM SAXTON, New Jersey NICK J. RAHALL II, West Virginia |
|
ELTON GALLEGLY, California BRUCE F. VENTO, Minnesota |
|
JOHN J. DUNCAN, Jr., Tennessee DALE E. KILDEE, Michigan |
|
JOEL HEFLEY, Colorado PETER A. DeFAZIO, Oregon |
|
JOHN T. DOOLITTLE, California ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American |
|
WAYNE T. GILCHREST, Maryland Samoa |
|
KEN CALVERT, California NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Hawaii |
|
RICHARD W. POMBO, California SOLOMON P. ORTIZ, Texas |
|
BARBARA CUBIN, Wyoming OWEN B. PICKETT, Virginia |
|
HELEN CHENOWETH, Idaho FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey |
|
LINDA SMITH, Washington CALVIN M. DOOLEY, California |
|
GEORGE P. RADANOVICH, California CARLOS A. ROMERO-BARCELO, Puerto |
|
WALTER B. JONES, Jr., North Rico |
|
Carolina MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York |
|
WILLIAM M. (MAC) THORNBERRY, Texas ROBERT A. UNDERWOOD, Guam |
|
JOHN SHADEGG, Arizona SAM FARR, California |
|
JOHN E. ENSIGN, Nevada PATRICK J. KENNEDY, Rhode Island |
|
ROBERT F. SMITH, Oregon ADAM SMITH, Washington |
|
CHRIS CANNON, Utah WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts |
|
KEVIN BRADY, Texas CHRIS JOHN, Louisiana |
|
JOHN PETERSON, Pennsylvania DONNA CHRISTIAN-GREEN, Virgin |
|
RICK HILL, Montana Islands |
|
BOB SCHAFFER, Colorado NICK LAMPSON, Texas |
|
JIM GIBBONS, Nevada RON KIND, Wisconsin |
|
MICHAEL D. CRAPO, Idaho |
|
|
|
Lloyd A. Jones, Chief of Staff |
|
Elizabeth Megginson, Chief Counsel |
|
Christine Kennedy, Chief Clerk/Administrator |
|
John Lawrence, Democratic Staff Director |
|
------ |
|
|
|
Subcommittee on Forest and Forest Health |
|
|
|
HELEN CHENOWETH, Idaho, Chairman |
|
JAMES V. HANSEN, Utah MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York |
|
JOHN T. DOOLITTLE, California BRUCE F. VENTO, Minnesota |
|
GEORGE P. RADANOVICH, California DALE E. KILDEE, Michigan |
|
JOHN PETERSON, Pennsylvania ---------- ---------- |
|
RICK HILL, Montana ---------- ---------- |
|
BOB SCHAFFER, Colorado ---------- ---------- |
|
Bill Simmons, Staff Director |
|
Anne Heissenbuttel, Legislative Staff |
|
Liz Birnbaum, Democratic Counsel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C O N T E N T S |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
Page |
|
|
|
Hearing held March 18, 1997...................................... 1 |
|
|
|
Statements of Members: |
|
Chenoweth, Hon. Helen, a U.S. Representative from Idaho...... 1 |
|
Peterson, Hon. John, a U.S. Representative from Pennsylvania. 47 |
|
Radanovich, Hon. George, a U.S. Representative from |
|
California................................................. 48 |
|
|
|
Statements of witnesses: |
|
Dombeck, Michael, Chief, Forest Service, U.S. Department of |
|
Agriculture................................................ 3 |
|
Prepared statement....................................... 52 |
|
Holmer, Steve, Campaign Director, Western Ancient Forest |
|
Campaign, Washington, DC................................... 35 |
|
Prepared statement....................................... 55 |
|
Kane, Kenneth, Keith Horn, Inc., consulting foresters, Kane, |
|
PA......................................................... 33 |
|
Prepared statement....................................... 58 |
|
Lynch, Dr. Dennis L., Professor of Forest Sciences, Colorado |
|
State University, Fort Collins, CO......................... 18 |
|
Prepared statement....................................... 108 |
|
Moore, Martin, Director, Community Development and Planning, |
|
Apache County, AZ.......................................... 20 |
|
Prepared statement....................................... 96 |
|
Muckenfuss, Ed, Regional Manager, Westvaco Company, |
|
Summerville, SC............................................ 38 |
|
Prepared statement....................................... 63 |
|
Schoenholtz, Dr. Stephen H., Associate Professor of Forest |
|
Resources, Mississippi State University.................... 24 |
|
Prepared statement....................................... 50 |
|
Wall, Bill, Wildlife Biologist, Potlatch Corporation, |
|
Lewiston, ID............................................... 40 |
|
Wiant, Harry, President, Society of American Foresters, |
|
Morgantown, WV............................................. 23 |
|
Prepared statement....................................... 48 |
|
|
|
Additional material supplied: |
|
Little, Jane Braxton: Article on ``How to manage healthy |
|
forests''.................................................. 121 |
|
Society of American Foresters: A Framework for Considering |
|
Forest Health and Productivity Issues...................... 69 |
|
|
|
Communications received: |
|
Pfister, Professor Robert D. (Univ. of Montana): Letter of |
|
March 14, 1997, to Hon. Helen Chenoweth.................... 116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT OF OUR NATION'S FORESTS AND CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING HEALTHY |
|
FORESTS |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TUESDAY, MARCH 18, 1997 |
|
|
|
House of Representatives, |
|
Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health, |
|
Committee on Resources, |
|
Washington, DC. |
|
The Subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 2:05 p.m., in |
|
room 1324, Longworth House Office Building, Washington, D.C., |
|
Hon. Helen Chenoweth (Chair of the Subcommittee) presiding. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. The Subcommittee on Forests and Forest |
|
Health will come to order. The Subcommittee is meeting today to |
|
hear testimony on what criteria should be used to determine if |
|
a forest is healthy or unhealthy, and what management tools |
|
would be considered the most appropriate to maintain or improve |
|
forest health. |
|
Under Rule 4(g) of the committee rules, any oral opening |
|
Statee ments at hearings are limited to the Chairman and the |
|
ranking minority member. This will allow us to hear from our |
|
witnesses sooner and help members to keep their schedules. |
|
Therefore, if other members have statements, they can be |
|
included in the hearing record under unanimous consent. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF HON. HELEN CHENOWETH, A U.S. REPRESENTATIVE FROM |
|
IDAHO; AND CHAIRMAN, SUBCOMMITTEE ON FORESTS AND FORESTS HEALTH |
|
|
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. I am pleased to be conducting this hearing. |
|
The Subcommittee has invited a broad range of witnesses to |
|
testify on the criteria to determine if a forest is healthy or |
|
unhealthy, and how to improve or maintain forest health. |
|
It is my desire to use this forum as an education tool for |
|
the Subcommittee to listen to a broad range of interests as |
|
well as to substantiate and to form a hearing record. |
|
We are fortunate to have with us today the caliber of |
|
witnesses representing the Forest Service, academia, local |
|
government, industry, and the environmental community. The |
|
subject of forest health has become a matter of great concern |
|
to us all. Forest health has been defined in many different |
|
ways to express important values obtained from forests. |
|
Many attitudes and policies during the past century have |
|
contributed to the forests' present condition. The forests that |
|
seem to be at most serious risk today are those developed under |
|
a historic cycle of high-frequency, low-intensity wildfire. |
|
Nearly 100 years of fire exclusion following thousands of years |
|
of management of the same forests by the use of fire by Native |
|
Americans has led to many crowded and unhealthy forests. Rather |
|
than the high-frequency, low-intensity wildfires of those days, |
|
today's wildfires are larger, hotter, more lethal to |
|
vegetation, more damaging to topsoils, and exceptionally |
|
dangerous to human settlements and property. |
|
Although the majority of forest health problems and the |
|
resulting large, damaging fires are found on the public lands |
|
of the west, introduced non-native forest pests such as the |
|
gypsy moth and Dutch elm disease in the east have also created |
|
serious threats to forest health across the United States, |
|
including all of these criteria. |
|
It is my desire to obtain information from this hearing |
|
that will be helpful to the Subcommittee as we move forward |
|
with improving the health of our nation's forests. I would also |
|
like to point out that it was my desire to have as broad a |
|
range as possible of interests and expertise represented at |
|
today's hearing. Although as I pointed out, we have a highly |
|
qualified list of witnesses, I would like to note that I |
|
extended invitations to more members of the environmental |
|
community to testify, but because of reasons known to them |
|
only, only one representative could attend today, and we |
|
certainly welcome him. |
|
I look forward to the testimony and will recognize the |
|
ranking minority member when he does get back from New York. |
|
Representative Hinchey is on his way in from New York, and will |
|
be joining us when he arrives. |
|
At this time, I would like to recognize Mr. Kildee for any |
|
opening statement he may have. |
|
Mr. Kildee. Thank you, Madame Chairman, for recognizing me. |
|
I really have no opening statement, just look forward to |
|
learning what we can learn about the genuine health of our |
|
forests, part of our national patrimony, and thank you for |
|
having the hearing. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Mr. Kildee. I would like to |
|
introduce the new Chief of the Forest Service, Michael Dombeck, |
|
and his assistant, Director Ann Bartuska. As explained in our |
|
first hearing, it is the intention of the Chairman to place all |
|
outside witnesses under oath. |
|
This is a formality of the committee that is meant to |
|
assure open and honest discussion and should not affect the |
|
testimony given by witnesses. I believe all of the witnesses |
|
were informed of this before appearing here today, and they |
|
have each been provided a copy of the committee rules. |
|
Mr. Dombeck, if you will stand and raise your right hand, I |
|
will administer the oath. |
|
Do you solemnly swear or affirm under the penalty of |
|
perjury that you will tell the truth, the whole truth, and |
|
nothing but the truth, so help you God? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. I will. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you. Let me remind the witnesses that |
|
under our committee rules they must limit their oral statements |
|
to five minutes, but that their entire statement will appear in |
|
the record. We will also allow the entire panel to testify |
|
before questioning the witnesses. |
|
The Chairman now recognizes Mr. Dombeck, and, without |
|
regard to what the rules say, we are anxious to hear from you. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF MICHAEL DOMBECK, CHIEF, FOREST SERVICE, UNITED |
|
STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; ACCOMPANIED BY ANN BARTUSKA, |
|
DIRECTOR, FOREST HEALTH PROTECTION |
|
|
|
Mr. Dombeck. Thank you for that introduction, and I have to |
|
say I am pleased to appear before the Subcommittee for the |
|
first time as Chief of the Forest Service. I want you to know |
|
that Dr. Ann Bartuska here with me is here as an expert. She is |
|
our director of the forest health protection staff and knows |
|
all of the details. |
|
I would like to begin my testimony by giving three brief |
|
examples just to demonstrate that we do have tools and we know |
|
many of the things we have to do. I would like to start out |
|
with an example from the south. |
|
The southern pine, the longleaf pine, was considered |
|
probably the most valuable in terms of wood quality products, |
|
aesthetically pleasing, fire-resistant species, resistant to |
|
insect diseases and attacks. |
|
In pre-settlement times, we had something in the |
|
neighborhood of 60,000,000 acres of longleaf pine stands. By |
|
the early 1900's, that was reduced to about 3,000,000 acres due |
|
to fire exclusion and conversion of forest lands to agriculture |
|
uses. Because of the management technologies today, the Forest |
|
Service is making progress in restoring the longleaf pine |
|
ecosystems and it is a priority in that part of the country. We |
|
are establishing new stands that provide a wide array of social |
|
and economic benefits as well as just the beauty of the forest. |
|
The second example I would like to give has to do with |
|
white pine blister rust. From 1909 and 1910, white pine blister |
|
rust came to this country and contaminated nursery stocks. It |
|
first affected Idaho and was discovered around Coeur D'Alene in |
|
about 1923. Then it spread throughout the west, Washington, |
|
Oregon, Idaho, and Montana, and as you know, the white pine was |
|
often known as the tree that built America from the standpoint |
|
of its value. |
|
In the 1950's, we began a successful effort, a breeding |
|
program to develop blister rust-resistant stocks because many |
|
of the original stands have been decimated as a result of this |
|
disease. Today, we are restoring white pine stands and white |
|
pine ecosystems in many ares of the west, so this is another |
|
example of genetics and the importance of disease and those |
|
kinds of studies that are going on. |
|
The third example I would like to mention is an issue that |
|
you are so familiar with in your home State. Last week, I spent |
|
some time in the west looking firsthand at some of the forest |
|
health issues, and you have already described in your opening |
|
statement some of the problems associated with overstocked |
|
stands. |
|
In the Boise National Forest in your State, they are moving |
|
ahead with a wide variety of tools to get on top of the issue, |
|
and I would like to say that it is important that we use all of |
|
the tools at our disposal to deal with the forest health issues |
|
from salvage logging to thinning to fuel reduction to |
|
prescribed burning. |
|
I looked at examples of mowing when I was out in Deschutes |
|
National Forest, and one striking thing that I saw there that |
|
also applies to the entire west is the Skeleton Fire, on the |
|
outskirts of Bend where 19 homes burned in the wildland/fire |
|
interface. |
|
We spent some $1,600 an acre suppressing that fire, whereas |
|
many of the management practices we could have used to avoid |
|
that type of situation as we move forward are much less costly |
|
than that. |
|
For example, we can do prescribed burning in some cases for |
|
$20 to $50 an acre, so I just list those as examples to say |
|
that we do have the tools and we need to use all the tools and |
|
we need to work with communities in a positive way. |
|
I guess the message I would like to leave the Subcommittee |
|
with is that we can accelerate the healing of our forests, and |
|
we can do so in a balanced and measured way. Because the |
|
consequences of inaction far outweigh the fiscal costs of the |
|
needs for restoration, catastrophic events, fires, floods, |
|
landslides seem to be occurring at increasing frequencies with |
|
ever more devastating consequences. |
|
Noxious weeds are diminishing the productivity of hundreds |
|
of thousands of acres of public land. The devastating fires are |
|
increasingly encroaching on the urban/forest interface. Last |
|
year alone, over 6,000,000 acres of public land burned. |
|
Healthy forests provide the resiliency to minimize the |
|
severe consequences of these events, and without decisive |
|
actions, these problems will only get worse. I want to say that |
|
restoration will not be quick, and in fact will be expensive, |
|
but we must look to these sorts of activities as investments in |
|
the land, investments that will immediately reduce the cost of |
|
catastrophic fire and, in the long run, greatly enhance forest |
|
productivity, health, and diversity. |
|
It took many decades to get where we are today, and it will |
|
take years to get to where we need to go. With that, I would be |
|
happy to answer any questions you have. |
|
[Statement of Michael Dombeck may be found at end of |
|
hearing.] |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Chief Dombeck. I appreciate |
|
hearing from you. Dr. Bartuska, do you have any comments to |
|
make or are you here to assist in any questions that might need |
|
your expertise? |
|
Ms. Bartuska. I am primarily here to assist in any |
|
questions. I will make one comment as to the criteria with |
|
regard to understanding what the health of the forests are. |
|
We have programs in place to try to describe that so we |
|
know what the current condition is and where we are going in |
|
the future, and I think that is particularly critical in order |
|
to identify the areas of highest priority and highest risk, and |
|
part of our understanding on the national forests helps us do |
|
that, but also, we are trying to put that into national context |
|
using the Santiago Agreement which is a way internationally to |
|
define what the health of forests are and sustainability of |
|
communities. |
|
So part of our criteria for understanding where these |
|
forests are going is to identify current conditions and trends. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Can you tell me what the Santiago Agreement |
|
may list as far as criteria for healthy forests? |
|
Ms. Bartuska. It involves a whole combination of biological |
|
criteria such as productivity of the forest lands, extent of |
|
forest lands, whether or not you have high fire risk. |
|
It also speaks to the stability and sustainability of |
|
communities, so there are economic factors. The ability to |
|
sustain small communities and large communities, the |
|
contributions to the GNP would be included, so it is a whole |
|
array of criteria dealing with health of ecosystems but also |
|
health of communities. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Dr. Bartuska, when we think of actual |
|
forest health, which I think we have tried to confine our |
|
thinking in this committee to include community stability as it |
|
so very important to us, but in terms of restoring forest |
|
health to the forests, can you give me a little more detail |
|
with regard to the Santiago Agreement, if that is the criteria |
|
that you will be looking at? |
|
Ms. Bartuska. I don't have all the details of those |
|
criteria. We can send that to you. |
|
I will say that of seven main biological criteria, there is |
|
one specifically dealing with forest health, and the measures |
|
of that include extent and condition of the forest lands, |
|
mortality balanced against growth, conditions of soil |
|
productivity, so it would be fairly traditional within our own |
|
monitoring programs, traditional measures, but there are also |
|
some dealing with other criteria, other characteristics of the |
|
system, and I don't have all those details with me. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. In terms of having our own chief be able to |
|
make the decisions about the forests, what would the Santiago |
|
Agreement do with regard to his ability to make decisions on |
|
our forests in America? Chief Dombeck. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. I look at Ann as the expert on the Santiago |
|
Agreement, but I look at it as more of the umbrella concepts, |
|
sort of the macro approach that then we would build those or |
|
other concepts that we would apply to different geographic |
|
areas based upon differences in species composition, |
|
differences in precipitation, differences in elevation, and all |
|
those other types of things then become nested in those |
|
overall, overarching concepts that apply broad-scale. |
|
I see it as an umbrella that is as much a communication and |
|
education tool. We are, I believe, in the United States with |
|
the academic institutions, such as places like the University |
|
of Idaho--who I understand did the bulk of the research along |
|
with the Forest Service on the white pine blister rust issue |
|
that I used as an example, along with the Forest Service and |
|
industry and many others--we in this country are the experts on |
|
this issue, and many, many other countries look to us for |
|
technical expertise, for advice on these kinds of issues, and I |
|
have got to say one more thing about your home State where the |
|
national interagency fire is another example of, these are the |
|
experts from the standpoint of wildland fire fighting and |
|
incident command. We have this level of expertise in this |
|
country that is sought after by the international community, |
|
and it is something that we should be proud of. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. I think you can probably gather from the |
|
line of questioning that you are receiving that we want you to |
|
have authority and be unencumbered to make decisions about |
|
forest health in the future. I would be very interested in |
|
receiving more information with regard to the relationship |
|
there. |
|
We have a situation in northern Idaho right now that I |
|
might use as an example to see if it is something that could be |
|
moved ahead, and that is that on November 29, we had a very |
|
interesting phenomenon that occurred with regard to the |
|
weather. We had a very, very cold air inversion that settled in |
|
the northern part of Idaho and northeastern Washington, and |
|
then we had warm rain above, and the rain came through and |
|
rained ice for eight hours. We had ice buildup in the trees. |
|
By the time the ice buildup reached up to two and a half |
|
tons in the crowns of these trees, sometimes trees 175 to 200 |
|
years old, so they were native species, the trees would break |
|
right below the last green limb, and it also occurred in the |
|
trees averaging 30 to 50 years old. They all broke about 30 |
|
feet off the ground, and that presents an emergency situation |
|
with regard to forest health, because we don't just have the |
|
normal fuel load on the forest floor. We have 25 to 30 percent |
|
of the forest on the floor now from that ice damage spanning |
|
Mr. Nethercutt's district as well as mine and some moving into |
|
Montana. |
|
Are we in a situation where a decision can be made at your |
|
level or the level of Missoula, Montana, and Portland, Oregon, |
|
where we can get in and clean that up so we won't have a lot of |
|
fire damage and insect and disease moving in which would happen |
|
in this circumstance? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Let me say that actually, I saw some of that, |
|
not the damage in the area that you speak of, but damage |
|
similar to that when I was in eastern Oregon, and it is not |
|
unlike the hurricanes that hit the southeast that will take a |
|
swath through the forest. |
|
My hope is that our policies are such that our experts are |
|
on the land, that we have the ability and the flexibility, the |
|
processes to make these kind of decisions by the resource |
|
managers on the land working with the local people in that |
|
situation. |
|
Now, I assume that that would be in Regional Forester |
|
Salwasser's area and I will check with him, but I assume that |
|
he and the forest supervisors and rangers are taking a look at |
|
that situation as we speak. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you very much, and welcome to your |
|
new job. I have appreciated working with you and your staff |
|
very much. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Thank you. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. I would like to call on the gentleman from |
|
Colorado now. Mr. Schaffer. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Thank you, Madame Chairman. I have a couple |
|
questions and I would like to start out just on the whole topic |
|
of controlled burns, a big issue out in my State of Colorado, |
|
as you may well imagine. |
|
We have great concern over air quality, and there are many |
|
communities in the range of the State that are in any given |
|
year just one or two days away from being considered |
|
nonattainment areas, and when Secretary Babbitt had mentioned, |
|
for example, the increased effort on forest burns and a |
|
considerable portion of our State includes federally managed |
|
lands, and that affects that range. |
|
I would just like to find out first, your thoughts about |
|
that particular management practice in the first place, but |
|
secondly, what I need to hear is just some assurances that the |
|
air quality standards in our State are being considered, that |
|
there is a plan to accommodate those standards and help us |
|
maintain our attainment of those standards, and that there is a |
|
commitment to work with our State hand in hand just as these |
|
projects may be carried out. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Let me say that air quality has been a |
|
significant issue associated with prescribed fire, that has |
|
been broadly discussed, and the one reality is that in using a |
|
prescribed fire, we do have control over fires, oftentimes. |
|
They are planned with the particular wind direction in mind and |
|
to work within windows of opportunity based on whatever the |
|
local conditions are, whereas, if we deal with the disaster of |
|
the uncontrolled fire that we just have Mother Nature take its |
|
course, that leads us then into a situation where we have no |
|
control, no ability to manage the situation. |
|
What we have been doing is working with the Environmental |
|
Protection Agency. Our local folks are working with the State |
|
agencies to work with the windows of opportunity, to identify |
|
the windows of opportunity that they have so we make sure all |
|
of the situations, the air quality, the safety precautions, all |
|
of those kinds of things are taken into consideration. It is |
|
very important that we do that. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Colorado is in the process right now of |
|
passing State legislation that would give the State authority |
|
that was granted to States under the Clean Air Act to require |
|
Federal facilities to reduce emissions coming from Federal |
|
lands. |
|
Are you familiar with that legislation or that effort among |
|
affected States and do you see any reason that there would be |
|
any kind of controversy or conflict at all? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. I am not familiar with Colorado's specific |
|
legislation and much of the clean air issues, of course, fall |
|
under the jurisdiction of the EPA, but what I will say is that |
|
the direction that we are going in, and I believe fairly |
|
aggressively, and the State of Colorado has been in the lead in |
|
this issue, is the Federal agencies are working with the States |
|
and the counties from the standpoint of planning, of having |
|
fire management plans of knowing how they are going to respond |
|
to situations in advance based upon dialog and plans and the |
|
interaction of the Federal agencies, the BLM, the Forest |
|
Service, as well as the appropriate State agencies, the |
|
counties, and from the standpoint of not only fire planning, |
|
but also from the standpoint of how they are going to respond |
|
in the most efficient and effective manner. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. I would also like to ask just with respect to |
|
planning and plotting out these burns and how they occur, some |
|
of those forests are so dry right now that it is very easy to |
|
see how--in fact, I have heard some people in the Forest |
|
Service refer to burns that exceed the plan. They are called |
|
bonus burns in the industry vernacular of sorts. |
|
I am curious as to how many of your staff are trained in |
|
fire suppression. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Let me first say that no, there isn't a burn |
|
that is not dangerous and shouldn't be taken very, very |
|
seriously whether it is a natural fire or a prescribed burn, |
|
and as a result of 1988, and the tragedies of '94 that I was |
|
personally involved in, we have enhanced training and safety to |
|
an all-time high, I believe, I was with the Bureau of Land |
|
Management at that time, but also within the Forest Service |
|
from the standpoint of the programs that we had with the Forest |
|
Service as they kicked off a program called Fire-21, which |
|
takes a look at the issues across the board associated with |
|
fire, the funding, the training, the safety, because we should |
|
never, ever let anyone believe that fire is not--can be a very |
|
dangerous situation, especially in extreme weather conditions |
|
as we have learned the hard way many, many times, so the |
|
standpoint of training, the standpoint of safety is I think at |
|
an all-time high. |
|
But our workforces are changing, and the numbers of |
|
employees that are perhaps in line positions that 30 or 40 |
|
years ago maybe a greater proportion of them would have been |
|
smoke jumpers, would have been trained specifically in fire, |
|
where now, I believe a lesser proportion of some of our people |
|
have that training. |
|
Therefore, the action that we have to take is to make sure |
|
that we provide it so that we don't have those gaps in skills |
|
and training. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. I thank the gentleman from Colorado, and we |
|
will have another round of questioning, if you have any other |
|
questions in mind. |
|
The chair now recognizes Mr. Kildee. |
|
Mr. Kildee. Thank you, Madame Chairman. What programs that |
|
would lead to forest health is the Administration seeking to |
|
give greater emphasis to in the 1997 budget? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. The following initiative would be--we are |
|
looking at timber stand improvement increases, I believe about |
|
an $11,000,000 increase in timber stand improvement. The acres |
|
treated would increase by about 30,000. |
|
We are looking at about $10,000,000 for insect disease |
|
prevention and suppression, and increased emphasis in fuel |
|
treatment, and increased emphasis in the watershed restoration. |
|
These are in addition to other activities that we are involve |
|
in, the training, the monitoring, the research and all these |
|
areas. |
|
I think the point that I want to make is that we realize |
|
that in many cases we have to make investments in watersheds |
|
and those investments include a wide variety of things. We have |
|
got roads sometimes that need to be put to bed, sometimes that |
|
need to be brought up to standard; noxious weed issues that we |
|
have to deal with; a whole variety of forest management |
|
practices that could include anything from salvage logging to |
|
thinning to a prescribed burning. |
|
When I was out in Deschutes National Forest last week, they |
|
showed me some mowing projects they were involved in, and one |
|
thing I would like to call your attention to is something that |
|
I have put in your folders just to give you a visual of some of |
|
the forest health situation. I think that it describes in |
|
pictures some of the things I am trying to describe. |
|
The first picture, and this is in Shasta County, |
|
California; the first picture shows about 1,500 stems per acre. |
|
It is a situation that is very dense, and in low humidity |
|
situations, very flashy from the standpoint of the historical |
|
situation would have been, these would have been probably |
|
Ponderosa pine, and because of fire suppression over the last |
|
100 years, you have had an encroachment of fir species, and a |
|
significant fire risk. |
|
The second picture shows work after some management has |
|
taken place there, and let me just describe the management that |
|
has occurred here, and that is about 2,000 to 3,000 board feet |
|
per acre of saw logs were removed, along with about 35 to 40 |
|
tons per acre of nonmerchantable material, and what we have |
|
done here now is reduce this to about 100 trees per acre |
|
compared to 1,500 on the previous photo. |
|
Now, here, we have a photo that is eight years later, and |
|
what we are ready to do there is, we are ready to go in with a |
|
prescribed burn, giving the right weather conditions, to |
|
further reduce some of the fuel loading that is there because |
|
of the suppression that has occurred there for about 80 years. |
|
I guess my point is again, it is important that we use |
|
every tool at our disposal when we deal with this issue that we |
|
have. On the national forest system, we are estimating |
|
somewhere in the neighborhood of 39,000,000 acres is at high |
|
risk to catastrophic fire. |
|
Mr. Kildee. At one time when I was growing up, fire was |
|
always the enemy in the forest. Now, you can use fire as a |
|
friend, as helpful? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. With great respect. Fire is a natural part of |
|
the ecosystem and depending on where you are, the typical |
|
situation in the intermountain west is that it burned every |
|
seven to 15 years in a low-intensity situation. |
|
The large, catastrophic fires may have occurred in the |
|
cycles in centuries rather than decades like the low-intensity |
|
fires, and these are the way these ecosystems evolved. Through |
|
extensive and overzealous, if you will, fire suppression, the |
|
stands have changed in composition, leaving us with a |
|
significant issue to deal with, a serious issue compounded by |
|
the urban/wildland interface. |
|
If you go around Lake Tahoe or the front range or the west |
|
slope or the Sierras where you have got lots of houses, and in |
|
many cases, very expensive houses, interspersed in these dense |
|
forests. The education issue that is facing us is, in some |
|
cases, you see cedar shake shingles on these houses. You see |
|
people that are used to a visual that is very dense, much like |
|
photo number one, when the historical situation would have been |
|
more like photo number three. |
|
So there is this education problem that goes along with the |
|
visual landscape, and the fact that over the last several |
|
decades, we have preached to put every fire out, and yet, we |
|
have got to be very respectful of fire, because we can never |
|
assume that it cannot be very, very dangerous. |
|
Mr. Kildee. Thank you very much. Thank you, Madame |
|
Chairman. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Mr. Kildee. The chair now |
|
recognizes Mr. Vento. |
|
Mr. Vento. Thanks, Madame Chairwoman, and I welcome our new |
|
chief. I really am looking forward to working with you and I |
|
appreciate your testimony today. This is a tough topic, but one |
|
I think that merits education and I hope that we can come down |
|
with policy that reflects the science rather than what actually |
|
favors our own interest. |
|
I appreciate your effort to come here and the Chairwoman's |
|
effort to put forth the hearing on an educational basis. |
|
What was the time lapse between these two photographs, |
|
photo number two and three? Ten years? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Eight years. |
|
Mr. Vento. Eight years. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. I believe. |
|
Mr. Vento. I was reminded--I was at a meeting on Saturday |
|
evening, and I was reminded by one of the foresters from the |
|
Superior National Forest in Minnesota. He said they had two |
|
fires up there this past year. One was a prescribed burn, and |
|
one was a natural fire that they tried to put out. |
|
Anyway, on the prescribed burn, they spent some $30,000 to |
|
$40,000, maybe even less than that. I don't remember. It might |
|
have been $18,000, but on the fire that they tried to put out, |
|
they spent $1,200,000. |
|
This is one of the problems that we have, Chief, in terms |
|
of when we get into firefighting, we are spending an awful lot |
|
of money. For the short-term, I suppose because of the urban |
|
interface and some other factors we have to deal with that. |
|
I don't know what they did to the air quality, but I guess |
|
they were obviously doing that in compliance with the laws that |
|
deal with air quality. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. From the standpoint of prescribed fire, |
|
oftentimes we can deal with somewhere in the neighborhood of |
|
$20 to $50 per acre in many situations; sometimes a little more |
|
than that, but when we get a catastrophic situation to deal |
|
with, it could go upwards to $4,000 an acres. |
|
The fire that I reviewed earlier, last week in the |
|
Deschutes National Forest that burned 19 homes in Bend at the |
|
urban/wildland interface there, we spent about $1,600 an acre. |
|
From the standpoint of management in advance, you can do a lot |
|
for $1,600 an acre. |
|
We need to start shifting our management practices so we |
|
can begin to make investments to prevent problems before they |
|
occur. It is sort of like watch our cholesterol before we have |
|
a heart attack. |
|
Mr. Vento. No one is suggesting that in life or limb. I |
|
think in Superior, that was not the case. I think it was just a |
|
regular fire that they were trying to put out. But I think that |
|
the urban interface, no one is suggesting that when those |
|
incidents arise that you don't try to deal with it in terms of |
|
life and personal property and as I said, health. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Let me just add that part of the importance of |
|
planning that we talked about associated with Colorado I think |
|
applies here, because it is important that we know in advance |
|
what we are going to do. |
|
It is just like having the closest force as the most |
|
efficient way to deal with a fire, it is also important that we |
|
know what we need to do. |
|
I was at a situation, and this one happened to be in |
|
Arizona where we had a trailer park of about 1,000 residents in |
|
a very remote area that has a serious fire almost every year, |
|
and the average expenditure is about $3,000,000 to $5,000,000 |
|
dealing with suppression of that fire. |
|
Now we have a management plan that actually creates a |
|
mosaic of vegetation types to dampen the effects of the fire as |
|
well as through a prescribed burn or natural fire depending on |
|
where the lightning strikes are to actually create a zone |
|
around the community so that we have protection from that. |
|
So planning in advance and knowing how to deal with these |
|
situations is the way to go versus having to react in the |
|
emergency role. |
|
Mr. Vento. It is a problem. I think that obviously it may |
|
not look as aesthetically pleasing if you happen to want to be |
|
in the middle of a dense forest, but that is part of the |
|
management that we have to advocate, I guess at the same time, |
|
and work with local communities to try to make certain they |
|
understand. |
|
Forest health is a very interesting issue. I have followed |
|
it in detail, but mostly there is an emphasis on salvage |
|
logging that tends to override everything else. There is a role |
|
for salvage, is there not? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Yes, and I think it is important that we use |
|
all the tools and logging is certainly a tool, but what do you |
|
do when you are in an area where the timber values are not |
|
there to carry the cost of management? |
|
Mr. Vento. Very often, these types of salvage logging |
|
efforts--because of the way receipts are divided--are actually |
|
below-cost sales. They are money losers unless we get extremely |
|
high costs. If you are going to do this right, you should be |
|
using some of the new forestry type of plans in these areas, |
|
shouldn't you? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Yes, and I hope--that is certainly the |
|
direction I would like to have again, as I emphasized using all |
|
the tools. |
|
It is important that we educate people to the fact that |
|
there is an appropriate place for salvage logging. There are |
|
timber companies that say to me, we would like to retool and |
|
use some of the lower value woods available, looking for new |
|
technologies. |
|
At our forest products laboratory in Madison, Wisconsin, we |
|
have probably 275 Ph.D.'s, some of the best minds in wood |
|
technology developing techniques to use lower value or poorer |
|
quality fiber for things in a wide variety of efficiencies. |
|
Mr. Vento. We are using all our aspen in Minnesota, let me |
|
tell you, for fiberboard and other products. I might also say, |
|
of course, the road restoration issue, mixed species types of |
|
reforestation, watershed management, road restoration, these |
|
are enormously important if you look at the damage that is |
|
occurring in terms of these forests. |
|
I think getting this on a cost basis is what the ultimate |
|
solution is. As I say, this is a good hearing. I am sorry I am |
|
going to be running back and forth, because we have another |
|
hearing on my Committee on Banking that Congressman Hansen is |
|
interested in. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Dombeck, Chief. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Thank you. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Mr. Vento. For a second round of |
|
questioning, I have just a couple of questions, Mr. Dombeck. |
|
I wonder, in your opinion, how would you describe modern- |
|
day timber harvest practices with regard to the overall health |
|
of the forest? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. I think there are, like in all areas, a wide |
|
variety of practices developed in everything from helicopter |
|
logging to techniques that are less soft on the land than that |
|
sort of thing. |
|
In fact, I was reading about not too long ago, some mom- |
|
and-pop operations, like those used when I was a kid in |
|
northern Wisconsin, where they were still skidding logs with |
|
horses. |
|
I am not the logging, the engineering expert, but I hope |
|
that in logging technologies, just like all of the things we |
|
have been talking about here where there is management that we |
|
continually strive for the best and most efficient technologies |
|
available to use. We are a society that the development of |
|
technology is something important. |
|
We encourage that and are solidly behind that, and there |
|
are lots of good, progressive timber operators out there. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. I assume from your answer that you really |
|
don't feel--I don't want to put words in your mouth. Do you |
|
feel that good, solid timber harvest practices could in any way |
|
be in conflict with ecosystem management plans? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. I think maybe they could in some situations, |
|
but I would venture to say that it is probably a social issue |
|
more than it is a technology issue. From the standpoint of the |
|
debate that I know that you are very familiar with whether we |
|
talk riparian zones, roadless areas, those kinds of things, and |
|
I think it is one of the most important things that the Forest |
|
Service can do. I would hope that the Subcommittee here and |
|
that all the interests would move to the areas first where |
|
there is the least controversy, and that as we begin to build |
|
credibility and build trust on these issues and confidence, |
|
because the things that we don't know when we end up in these |
|
protracted debates and end up in the court system, that money |
|
spent on litigation doesn't necessarily benefit the land or |
|
restore the ecosystem or restore the health of the forest. |
|
I see this in a sense as more of a social issue than it is |
|
a technology issue, but by that I don't mean to diminish the |
|
need to continue the search for new and better, more efficient |
|
and effective technologies. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. I am also very interested in knowing how |
|
you feel about grazing practices on the national forest, |
|
because you mentioned that over in the Deschutes Forest, they |
|
were mowing some of the meadows, which I think is something |
|
that can be dovetailed into the whole picture of fire |
|
suppression. |
|
I know Teddy Roosevelt envisioned using the livestock |
|
industry to help keep the fuel load on the forest floor down in |
|
terms of grazing practices. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Well, the specific situation that I looked at |
|
on Deschutes was in the coniferous forest and not a situation |
|
where it didn't appear that there were opportunities for |
|
grazing in that forest. |
|
But from the standpoint of reducing fuel loading and that |
|
sort of thing, grazing is also a tool, and yet some of the |
|
forest health issues associated with--again, like the long-term |
|
fire suppression where we have encroachment of rangelands by |
|
pinion and juniper, for example, there is already a shortage of |
|
water and the competition for water by the plants is there, and |
|
sometimes--these gradual changes over time based upon the way |
|
we have managed the |
|
|
|
ecosystems, we need to reverse through active management |
|
practices. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. I know it must have been just as |
|
fascinating for you as it was for me when I first went into the |
|
Deschutes National Forest to see how an emerging forest |
|
establishes itself with the pinion pine being a pioneer |
|
species, and then behind that, we see the graduated growth of |
|
the forest following. |
|
I see I still have just a minute left. I do want to ask |
|
you, how many of your staff are actually qualified in fire |
|
suppression activities, actually qualified as fire suppression |
|
trained technicians? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. I don't know the exact number. I don't know if |
|
Ann does, but we would be happy to provide that information to |
|
you. I am proud to say that I carried a red card at one time, |
|
and one of my goals this spring was to get qualified again, but |
|
with the pace of everything I have to do, I am not sure I am |
|
going to have the time to spend out jogging or in the gym to |
|
pass the tests. |
|
Again, as I said in the beginning, I am proud of the fact |
|
that we have among the best wildland firefighters in the world |
|
employed in the Forest Service, and I am real proud of the work |
|
that they do. They are very respected in the communities that |
|
they work, and it is an interesting group of people doing work |
|
that is very satisfying to them and at not very high pay. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Mr. Dombeck. The chair now |
|
recognizes Mr. Vento, if he wants a second round of questions. |
|
Mr. Vento. Thanks, Madam Chair. Just briefly. I note that |
|
an interagency task force or group was put together to examine |
|
the memorandum of understanding under which salvage logging |
|
took place, and there are a number key findings. |
|
Some of them, I think, in fairness are positive. The |
|
involvement of the Fish and Wildlife Service in the salvage |
|
logging plan added to rather than duplicated the efforts of the |
|
Forest Service and BLM regarding compliance with the ESA. |
|
That is a good one, but some of the others are not. They |
|
have a negative effect on pre-existing efforts to improve |
|
collaboration among agencies--a negative effect on pre-existing |
|
efforts because it overrode them, I take it, which is common |
|
sense. This was an emergency, and so the existing channels of |
|
communication that existed were suppressed. |
|
One of the concerns is that it destroyed the neutrality of |
|
dealing with forest health. I think I am saying this right in |
|
terms of this finding, Mr. Dombeck. I know that you |
|
participated in this or at least some of your associates did. |
|
It said current budget processes within BLM and Forest |
|
Services act as an incentive for field units to resort to |
|
salvage logging to generate money to pay for forest health |
|
projects, even when other projects may be more appropriate. |
|
I would assume that they are talking about forest health |
|
here, and that is to say that maybe road restoration would be |
|
more important than forest health, watershed restoration, |
|
diversified planting of mixed species, prescribed burns. |
|
Obviously, this law put in place specific quotas. I think it |
|
did mandate cuts, but others will argue that it didn't. |
|
Do you have any comment on these task force |
|
recommendations? I notice the final draft of an action plan was |
|
due in February. I don't know if it is out or not, but you |
|
might want to comment on that as well. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Let me say, I think we did learn several |
|
things from the exercise. Number one, I think it got a lot of |
|
our policy people from the Washington staff and the various |
|
agencies out on the ground to look at things firsthand, and I |
|
think that was a positive. |
|
I think from the standpoint of endangered species |
|
consultations and things like that, the whole exercise |
|
demonstrated that we could--by starting the processes up front, |
|
and rather than having the consultation processes in series, it |
|
was valuable to us knowing what the rules are and what data was |
|
required as soon as we started collecting it. |
|
We coordinated better than ever. There were a variety of |
|
positives, but from the standpoint, I think, of some of your |
|
latter comments, we have got to understand that sometimes, we |
|
need to make investments and that we shouldn't always rely on |
|
the value of the fiber that is there to carry the cost, because |
|
you have roads, sedimentation problems that you might have to |
|
deal with; noxious weeds issues you might have to deal with; |
|
stream restoration; high densities of low value or virtually no |
|
value wood, those kinds of things, and we need to look at it |
|
from the watershed approach versus the values of the |
|
merchantable timber that is there as the driver so that in the |
|
long haul, that will generate benefits. |
|
Mr. Vento. One of the problems, of course, is at the same |
|
time when timber revenues are down, the various funds that |
|
respond to conservation are also flat. So you are appealing to |
|
Congress for additional appropriations, modest as they may be, |
|
for prescribed burning, for watershed restoration, for road |
|
restoration, a host of things, the noxious weed issues that |
|
make up this forest health, is that correct? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Yes, and I think more and more we are |
|
learning, and if it is in agriculture or forest management or |
|
whatever, that there are all sorts of interactions, and the |
|
thing that we would like to be able to do is use the broadest |
|
variety of tools and technologies available in the best and |
|
most efficient combination for the long-term benefit of the |
|
land. |
|
Mr. Vento. One of the criticisms that often is raised, of |
|
course, is that there is a great controversy about the |
|
suppression of fire and whether or not that suppression is |
|
actually responsible for in fact the buildup of fuel loads in |
|
the forest. |
|
I know that someone is going to come through and say, well, |
|
this is what the forest looked like 120 years ago. It was |
|
barren and there was nothing there, and now this is what it |
|
looks like today. It is in much better condition, obviously |
|
under those circumstances. |
|
What is the scientific state of the majority of scientists |
|
with regards to forest health today versus what it was in the |
|
past? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Well, from the standpoint of the proportion of |
|
forests that are healthy versus those that are not is a really |
|
tough question, because then--what proportion of the tress and |
|
the condition of the trees and so on. |
|
But I might say from the standpoint of monitoring and |
|
technologies, the sooner that we can identify the problems, the |
|
better. Rather than waiting until we have a catastrophic fire |
|
situation or rather than waiting until we have got this insect |
|
infestation, the more that we can detect this coming, our early |
|
warning system is sort of, you know, keep your cholesterol down |
|
and get plenty of exercise to avoid the heart attack, and that |
|
is the direction that we really need to be heading in. |
|
Of course, from the standpoint of science and technology, |
|
we are learning more and more about the interactions of things |
|
and we just need to apply those and I hope we can do it in a |
|
good, balanced context, and one of the things that I am looking |
|
for is being able to move with a broad support base as we fix |
|
our forests, because we do know that inaction is not the |
|
solution. In fact, the costs will increase. |
|
Mr. Vento. My time has expired and I have to leave. Thank |
|
you. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Mr. Vento. The chair recognizes |
|
the gentleman from Colorado, Mr. Schaffer. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Thank you, Madame Chairman. Before I start, |
|
Dr. Bartuska, could you tell me where you came from before you |
|
ended up with the agency? Tell me about your background. |
|
Ms. Bartuska. I am originally from Pennsylvania and I got |
|
my degrees in Ohio and West Virginia, and spent nine years in |
|
North Carolina before I came up here working in research in the |
|
Forest Service and the university community and then most |
|
recently here with the forest health protection staff. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Thank you. Going back to this prescribed |
|
burning, on the forests where you know you want to do |
|
prescribed burning now, how soon would you start? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Well, let me say first that I am not the |
|
prescribed--the fire ecologist, but what we look for basically |
|
is the window of opportunity from the standpoint of fuel |
|
moisture levels. |
|
We always, and there are very strict guidelines that I |
|
would be happy to send you if you wish that our experts follow |
|
from the standpoint of weather conditions, relative humidity, |
|
fuel moisture, the time of the year, all of those kinds of |
|
things. |
|
I was again out west last week. They were telling me about |
|
a situation, where if they would burn that the direction of the |
|
smoke would go over the interstate, then they could not burn |
|
because of the air quality as well as the public reaction to |
|
that. |
|
So these are things that--every situation within a certain |
|
set of parameters is probably different. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. What percentage of these lands would you |
|
estimate have to have fuel removed ahead of time mechanically? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Before they would be burned? |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Yes. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. I would ask Ann to--I would just have to |
|
almost take a wild guess. I am not sure. |
|
Ms. Bartuska. It is highly variable obviously depending |
|
upon the geographic area. |
|
For example, in the south, they almost never are |
|
mechanically removing things, and it is a very active program, |
|
but in certain parts of the west, mechanical treatment is going |
|
to have to be a very high priority first, and it could be ten |
|
to twenty percent before you go in and actually do any |
|
prescribed burning. |
|
A lot of it is dependent on how much fuels there are, as we |
|
mentioned earlier with the urban/wildland interface, there will |
|
be conditions where we will not, even though prescribed burning |
|
might be the most desired approach because of the communities |
|
there will have do mechanical treatments primarily. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Let me ask a more general question. Some of |
|
the Forest Service personnel that I have met with in Colorado |
|
believe that they are insufficiently funded to accomplish |
|
forest health projects. |
|
Do you think they are right and how do you think we would |
|
deal with this? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. I think the answer is yes, and it is a matter |
|
of where we make--you know, as a society where we make--our |
|
investments and the priorities that you and the U.S. Congress |
|
in consultation with the Administration. |
|
Let me say that as I mentioned, in national forests, we |
|
assume now that about 39,000,000 acres are at significant |
|
threat of fire, and as I look at the management practices, and |
|
I have the numbers here someplace, and I believe we are making |
|
process to the tune of about---- |
|
Mr. Schaffer. How many million acres a year? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. We would like to be at about 3,000,000 acres a |
|
year of treatment and management to get on top of the problem, |
|
and I guess--let me say I will respond in writing with the |
|
specifics, but I think we are somewhere in the neighborhood of |
|
700,000 acres treated per year is about where we are at now, |
|
and we would like to be at about 3,000,000. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. In your prepared comments, you mentioned the |
|
importance of gathering good data and giving us a good picture |
|
of our ecosystems and conditions and so on. |
|
I would like to find out what kind of information does the |
|
forest inventory and assessment program provide for our |
|
national forest lands? |
|
Ms. Bartuska. If you are speaking about the forest |
|
inventory analysis program, we have very good coverage in |
|
determining what the standing volume is as well as other |
|
structures of the forest. |
|
For most of the national forests in the east and throughout |
|
the west, that combined with forest monitoring gives us a |
|
really good handle on some of the trends going on with other |
|
components like soils, condition of the forest. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Thank you, Madame Chairman. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. I just found the numbers here, sir. The |
|
President's budget allows for treatment of between 800,000 and |
|
1,200,000 acres of high priorities for fiscal year 1998, and |
|
from the standpoint of planning and so on, we would like to be |
|
able to get up to about 3,000,000 or so per year to begin to |
|
gain on the issue. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Mr. Schaffer. The chair now |
|
recognizes Mr. Peterson. |
|
Mr. Peterson. Good afternoon and welcome to Washington. I |
|
was interested in knowing your familiarity with the Allegheny |
|
National Forest located in northwestern Pennsylvania. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Well, I have been there. I have never worked |
|
there, and I grew up in the Chequamegon National Forest in |
|
northern Wisconsin not far from Lake Superior, 25 miles from a |
|
town of 1,500, so I am somewhat familiar with the eastern |
|
forest landscape and species and so on. |
|
Mr. Peterson. You are the custodian of maybe the finest |
|
hardwood forest in North America? |
|
Mr. Dombeck. I have heard about it and this is--I am into |
|
my second month on the job, but I hope to get up there and see |
|
it. I want to get out on the ground as much as I can and not |
|
only talk to the employees but talk to the local people that |
|
are there and be able to solve as many of the problems that we |
|
have locally as well as celebrate the successes. |
|
Oftentimes, I think in the business of natural resource |
|
management, we don't spend nearly enough time celebrating the |
|
successes because the positive reinforcement and encouragement |
|
of employees and constituencies and so on is I think a very |
|
powerful educational tool that we can use and should be using a |
|
lot more. |
|
Mr. Peterson. I guess just to quickly familiarize you, it |
|
is a forest that I think contributes $12,000,000 to $15,000,000 |
|
a year to the treasury while only cutting about half of the |
|
recommended cut by the last forest plan, and I guess I would |
|
just like to ask you if you support the multi-use concept that |
|
has been there which I think has pretty successfully balanced |
|
recreation, water quality, hunting, timbering, and oil and gas |
|
exploration. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Yes. I believe that the multiple-use concepts |
|
are among the cornerstones that we have and the fact of the |
|
matter is, we know how to do these practices and we know how to |
|
do them right in many cases, and in virtually all cases, and |
|
from the standpoint of the wide variety of demands and uses of |
|
national forests. |
|
Recreation is in a tremendous growth phase today. Forest |
|
health is an issue that we have to deal with. The wildland fire |
|
issue is an issue we have to deal with. Some of the eastern |
|
pest and disease problems are issues that we have to deal with, |
|
but from the standpoint of overall balanced use, I believe that |
|
is where mainstream America is. |
|
Mr. Peterson. I just wanted to share with you that it is |
|
very much a part of our growing economy in that area. It is the |
|
finest hardwood forest in North America. |
|
It is a mature forest. We had a sense a few years ago that |
|
there was a move on the national level to really limit or stop |
|
cutting, which most people that you might hear later today |
|
think would be a mistake, because it is a mature forest that |
|
needs harvesting, much of it or a lot of it. It is not, as some |
|
would say, that we are cutting down the rain forest. That is |
|
just not the case, but it is a mature forest. It is a very |
|
important asset economically to the area, and I look forward to |
|
you coming up this summer, if that is possible. |
|
I would love to have the chance to spend some time with |
|
you, because it is not only a very valuable resource |
|
economically, it is a very beautiful forest, and it is just a |
|
nice place to visit and a pretty part of Pennsylvania, and we |
|
would look forward to your coming. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Thank you, I accept. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Mr. Dombeck, I thank you for being here in |
|
the committee with us. I saw a very interesting article in the |
|
Washington Times yesterday about timber harvest practices in |
|
Brazil. |
|
A representative from the World Bank was indicating that in |
|
Brazil, we need to realize that we don't need to set aside vast |
|
chunks of land exclusively for one use, that really, everyone |
|
is better off, including the communities, the logging industry, |
|
the environmentalists, everyone is better off when we can all |
|
work together using the same land, and actually, we achieve a |
|
higher standard. |
|
I share with you the fact, Chief, that we have quite a |
|
mountain to overcome socially, but together, I think that we |
|
can do that and welcome to your new job. |
|
Thank you very much. |
|
Mr. Dombeck. Thank you. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. The committee will recognize the second |
|
panel. On the second panel, we have Dr. Dennis Lynch, Professor |
|
of Forest Science, Colorado State University from Fort Collins, |
|
Colorado; Martin Moore, Director of Community Development and |
|
Planning from Apache County, Arizona; Harry Wiant, President, |
|
Society of American Foresters, Morgantown, West Virginia; and |
|
Dr. Stephen Schoenholtz, Associate Professor of Forest |
|
Resources, Mississippi State University, Mississippi. |
|
Before we get started, I want to ask you to stand and take |
|
the oath. Would you raise your right hand? |
|
Do you solemnly swear or affirm under the penalty of |
|
perjury that your statements and responses given will be the |
|
truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Thank you. |
|
Without objection, I will now recognize Mr. Schaffer from |
|
Colorado to introduce Dr. David Lynch. Mr. Schaffer, thank you |
|
very much for bringing Dr. Lynch to us. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Thank you, Madame Chairman, and I appreciate |
|
the opportunity to introduce a constituent, and a noted one |
|
within his industry and profession as well. In spite of the |
|
material in front of us, his name is Dennis Lynch. |
|
Dr. Dennis Lynch has been a professor of forestry and |
|
scientist at the Colorado State University in Fort Collins for |
|
the past 23 years. Previously, he spent 15 years with the U.S. |
|
Forest Service as a forester, district ranger, planning leader, |
|
and three years working at Colorado State Forest Service and |
|
Land Use Planning Commission. |
|
Dr. Lynch holds a Bachelor of Science in forestry, a |
|
Master's degree in business, and a Ph.D. in natural resources |
|
administration, all from Colorado State University, I might |
|
add. |
|
He has received numerous awards and honors over the years |
|
for his work in the area of forestry. I appreciate him coming |
|
here today and look forward to his testimony. Thank you. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Mr. Schaffer. Let me remind the |
|
witnesses that under our committee rules, they must limit their |
|
oral statements to five minutes, but that your entire statement |
|
will appear in the record. |
|
We will also allow the entire panel to testify before |
|
questioning of the witnesses, and now the Chairman recognizes |
|
Dr. Lynch for the first testimony. Dr. Lynch. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF DR. DENNIS L. LYNCH, PROFESSOR OF FOREST SCIENCES, |
|
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO |
|
|
|
Mr. Lynch. Thank you, Madame Chairman and members of the |
|
Subcommittee. I appreciate your inviting me here to present my |
|
views on forest health and management as these relate to the |
|
Central Rockies. |
|
At the outset, I want to say that I am attempting to |
|
present what I believe are points of consensus gained from |
|
discussions with a number of professional forestry colleagues |
|
in Colorado and Wyoming, so I am indebted to my fellow faculty |
|
members, to the Wyoming State Forester and the Colorado State |
|
Forester and his management staff and fire division staff. |
|
I am indebted to the Colorado Timber Association Director, |
|
the Wilderness Society forest ecologist, and the Chairman of |
|
the Colorado-Wyoming State Society of American Foresters. |
|
In discussing issues of forest health and management |
|
related to the Central Rockies, it is important to review the |
|
historical interaction of people and forests, as I do in my |
|
written testimony. |
|
There are several key points that I would like to draw from |
|
that summary. The first is that the forests that we have today |
|
in the Central Rockies are a result of a long history of human |
|
disturbance and use. |
|
Second, these previously disturbed areas of the past have |
|
grown up under protection into today's mature forests. |
|
Third, each time period from pre-history to the present has |
|
been accompanied in its own unique way with a society sense of |
|
forest health. In other words, definitions of forest health |
|
have subjective societal values interwoven with our ecological |
|
estimates. |
|
Fourth, this long period of custodial care and protection |
|
in Colorado and Wyoming appears to have allowed shifts in |
|
understory plant species, the buildup of forest fuels, |
|
increased numbers of trees, and less overall forest diversity. |
|
It is important to recognize that there are distinctly |
|
separate forest types in the Central Rockies, and that these |
|
vary uniquely from one another and from forests in the other |
|
parts of the United States. Therefore, generalizations about |
|
forest health may be of only limited application when |
|
addressing specific forest situations. Each forest should |
|
properly have its own specific criteria related to health and |
|
management, and as I will explain later, our approach to the |
|
restoration of these forests must change. |
|
In my invitation to testify, I was asked to respond to the |
|
question what criteria would you use to determine if a forest |
|
is healthy or unhealthy. From my previous testimony, I think |
|
you can see why that question is very difficult to answer. |
|
However, from my discussions with colleagues, I have |
|
attempted to find some areas of complete or general consensus |
|
about overall criteria. The first criteria that we agree upon |
|
is an unhealthy forest condition is outside the range of normal |
|
forest conditions. |
|
Second, an unhealthy forest does not have a diversity of |
|
age classes and successional stages over large areas. |
|
Third, an unhealthy forest does not have a diversity of |
|
plant and animal species. |
|
Fourth, natural disturbances are more severe and frequent |
|
in unhealthy forests. |
|
Fifth, dead trees and woody debris accumulations are much |
|
greater than decomposition rates and removals in an unhealthy |
|
forest. |
|
Sixth, an unhealthy forest does not provide a balanced flow |
|
of benefits to sustain our society. |
|
I have also been asked to respond to the question, what |
|
management tools would you consider most appropriate to |
|
maintain or improve forest health. |
|
There is always the option of doing nothing, but I would |
|
like to point out that doing nothing carries a price tag. |
|
Currently, fire suppression cost per acre in the Central |
|
Rockies greatly exceeds the cost we have experienced in |
|
demonstration forest restoration projects. |
|
The first management tool that seems appropriate to us is |
|
the use of prescribed fire. The results can be quite good in |
|
achieving desired changes or they can be quite variable. |
|
Prescribed fire is not a precise tool. |
|
Another management tool we believe is quite appropriate in |
|
achieving forest health is the use of mechanical equipment to |
|
prepare areas for prescribed fire, to thin forests to desired |
|
stocking levels, and to remove forest products for our use. |
|
Some critics would quickly point out that this is just |
|
traditional logging or timber harvesting. |
|
The key point I wish to make is that forest restoration is |
|
not traditional logging or timber harvesting. Mechanical |
|
removal can be more precise than the use of fire alone. It can |
|
achieve results in different forest types that prescribed fire |
|
cannot. |
|
I also wish to note that current Forest Service procedures |
|
related to timber sale layout, administration, and pricing do |
|
not work very well in forest restoration situations. |
|
Lastly, there are combinations of prescribed fire and |
|
mechanical restoration techniques that are especially |
|
appealing. Mechanical removal can extract materials for use |
|
while preparing the fuel bed for follow-up prescribed fire. It |
|
gives the manager options when air quality concerns, for |
|
example, preclude using fire to fully accomplish a project. |
|
The Forest Service needs some new authorities for changing |
|
the way it does business in dealing with forest restoration |
|
projects. We suggest that the Subcommittee look careful at the |
|
potential for stewardship contracting on national forest lands. |
|
This concludes my testimony. I will attempt to answer any |
|
questions the Subcommittee members may have. |
|
[Statement of Dennis Lynch may be found at end of hearing.] |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Dr. Lynch, thank you very much for that |
|
valuable testimony. The chair now recognizes Martin Moore for |
|
his testimony. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF MARTIN MOORE, DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND |
|
PLANNING, APACHE COUNTY, ARIZONA |
|
|
|
Mr. Moore. Thank you, Madame Chair, members of the |
|
committee. I come before you today in the capacity of director |
|
of environmental planning and research for Apache County, |
|
Arizona. I am also at the dissertation stage of a Ph.D. at |
|
Northern Arizona University, specializing in western forest |
|
resource policy and management. I also serve on the Arizona |
|
delegation to the Western Governors' Drought Task Force, and I |
|
have worked as a member of the interagency coordinating group |
|
on wildland fire with the western governors in tandem with the |
|
Wildland/Urban Interface Fire Policy Review Team. |
|
Currently, we are facing a serious forest health crisis |
|
throughout the western States, which threatens adverse |
|
ecological, safety, and economic impacts on an increasingly |
|
catastrophic scale. These concerns are centered around a |
|
definition of forest health that includes the vitality and |
|
balance of wildlife populations, health of the forest resource, |
|
balance of multiple uses, and levels of catastrophic fire. |
|
A number of scientists, including Dr. David Garrett and |
|
Drs. Wallace Covington and Margaret Moore have performed |
|
research showing alarming trends in forest resource health in |
|
Ponderosa Pine ecosystems. |
|
Drs. Covington and Moore, with comparisons from 1867 to |
|
1987, show a 994-percent decrease in herbage production, a 26- |
|
percent reduction in streamflow, and an increase from 24 to 843 |
|
trees per acre. |
|
Concerned about the implications of Dr. Covington's |
|
research, Apache, Greenlee, and Navajo Counties in Arizona |
|
commissioned an independent, scientific study by Dr. Garrett of |
|
the health of the Ponderosa Pine ecosystem in the Apache- |
|
Sitgreaves National Forest, with comparisons to other |
|
southwestern forests. |
|
This study includes a compendium of major scientific |
|
research with the full cooperation and assistance of the |
|
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest, utilizing the latest forest |
|
stand inventory data, and is watershed-based research. |
|
Dr. Garrett's conclusions, building on Covington and |
|
Moore's research, shows from 1911 to 1994, a 391 percent |
|
increase on the Apache-Sitgreaves Forest of trees per acre four |
|
inches or greater in diameter, with several stands exceeding |
|
more than 1,000 trees per acre. |
|
Average maximum stand density index forest-wide is |
|
approaching a high danger level with several areas exceeding |
|
the high danger threshold. |
|
Herbage biomass has plummeted to its low production levels, |
|
largely because of high tree densities. Water yields per acre |
|
will further decrease, resulting in continued stream flow |
|
reductions and water quality problems. |
|
Fuel loads will rise from the current 20 tons per acre to |
|
well over 30 tons, and fuel ladders will dominate the |
|
landscape, leading to increasing numbers and intensity of |
|
catastrophic wildfire. |
|
This continued downward spiral of forest ecosystems |
|
threatens the health and sustainability of recreation |
|
opportunities, wildlife and wildlife habitat, timber resources |
|
and water resources. |
|
Another forest health indicator is level of fire intensity. |
|
Apache County, alarmed about fuel load buildups identified by |
|
Dr. Garrett and the Forest Service, conducted a comprehensive |
|
study of wildfire hazards and potential impacts throughout |
|
Arizona and New Mexico. The results of the study show that more |
|
than 224,000 homes are at high to extreme risk, threatening the |
|
safety of over 600,000 citizens. |
|
Over 5,000,000 acres are at high to extreme risk of loss |
|
and potential costs of fire in relationship to timber |
|
resources, livestock, homes, and drains on the Federal treasury |
|
could exceed $35,000,000,000. |
|
Dr. Garrett's research shows that the number of |
|
catastrophic fires has doubled in 20 years and will continue to |
|
rise. |
|
Concerning the vitality and balance of wildlife |
|
populations, a third forest health indicator, Drs. Covington |
|
and Moore show that instead of wildlife geared toward open, |
|
park-like forest, types and numbers have shifted toward |
|
wildlife favoring closed canopy structures. This stresses |
|
wildlife adapted to open-space environments, threatening the |
|
survival of these species. |
|
In addition, ungulates such as elk have erupted in |
|
population, eating forest meadows down to the roots, creating |
|
erosion and forage reproduction problems, in turn, destroying |
|
the grazing resource base for other ungulates and competing |
|
wildlife. |
|
Another important indicator of forest health is the ability |
|
of the forest to provide for multiple uses. Current laws, |
|
regulations, court decisions, and most significantly, unhealthy |
|
forest resource conditions combine to form a serious threat to |
|
the continuation of human and natural multiple uses. |
|
Based on this testimony and a preponderance of research, it |
|
is our contention that every aspect of multiple use is placed |
|
in serious jeopardy over the next 50 years in southwestern |
|
forests unless the current forest condition is reversed. |
|
The overwhelming body of research shows a need to return |
|
forests to a healthy state for the sake of the total forest |
|
ecosystem, forest resources, public protection from wildfire, |
|
healthy wildlife populations, and every other aspect of forest |
|
health including multiple use and human survival. |
|
To accomplish this, Dr. Garrett provides a 50-year |
|
prescription which should dramatically improve forest |
|
conditions across the landscape. These improvements include |
|
increased water yield; doubling of herbage production; increase |
|
in average tree size from less than six to 16 inches in |
|
diameter; healthy maximum stand density index for healthier, |
|
more disease and insect-resistant trees; and a 50-percent |
|
reduction in fire fuel load with a return to healthy, low- |
|
intensity fires. |
|
This time line includes thinning, prescribed burning, and |
|
overstory harvest of high hazard, unhealthy, and overly dense |
|
trees of all diameter classes with emphasis on trees 20 inches |
|
and smaller, as this would not include healthy old-growth |
|
trees. Returning every ten years to treat and control burn is |
|
vital to this effort. |
|
Dr. Garrett shows that this prescription, in which |
|
mechanical harvest is an imperative player, would result in a |
|
per-acre net value of $155, nearly ten times the $16 net value |
|
if we continue on our present course. |
|
Added to this is the multi-billion dollar savings of |
|
treatment over destruction by catastrophic fire, tree-stand |
|
die-offs and drought. |
|
Currently in place, and I will wrap this up very briefly. |
|
Currently in place on the Apache-Sitgreaves and Tonto National |
|
Forest is an ecosystem demonstration project agreement which we |
|
are part of. This agreement, if funded, would help facilitate |
|
implementation of forest health projects on these forests. |
|
Madame Chair and members of the committee, the threat to |
|
our natural and human environments is real, and the solution is |
|
straightforward and affordable. To ignore them is |
|
unconscionable from either a scientific, ecological, social, |
|
ethical, or economic point of view. It is our plea that all |
|
sides will come together to make the tough choices and act to |
|
preserve this nation's forests for ourselves and our posterity. |
|
Thank you for this time, and I look forward to any |
|
questions. |
|
[Statement of Martin Moore may be found at end of hearing.] |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Mr. Moore, I thank you for your very |
|
interesting testimony. I have been in touch in conversations |
|
with Mr. Mark Killian as well as the dean of Northern Arizona |
|
University there at Flagstaff. |
|
It is fascinating, the work that has been done there, and I |
|
thank you for bringing that to the committee. Thank you very |
|
much. |
|
At this time, the chair recognizes Harry Wiant from the |
|
Society of American Foresters. Mr. Wiant. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF HARRY WIANT, PRESIDENT, SOCIETY OF AMERICAN |
|
FORESTERS, MORGANTOWN, WEST VIRGINIA |
|
|
|
Mr. Wiant. Thank you. I am President of the Society of |
|
American Foresters, which is the largest professional forestry |
|
organization in the world, over 18,000 members. |
|
It is a real honor to speak before this committee. I am |
|
serving on a related committee that is a scientific panel for |
|
Congressman Charles Taylor's forest health committee, and that |
|
has been a real pleasure also. |
|
I am going to speak with two hats on, first as president of |
|
the Society of American Foresters, and second, as a private |
|
citizen and forester. They will differ a little bit. |
|
The Society of American Foresters has studied the forest |
|
health issue for many years. You will find a written report in |
|
my testimony. |
|
We conclude that there are serious forest health and |
|
productivity problems in the U.S., but also, forest health is |
|
an informal and a very inexact term. |
|
An assessment of forest health has to consider not only the |
|
condition of the forest but what do you want out of the forest, |
|
the management objectives. Very importantly, forest health is a |
|
local issue. A single national prescription is inappropriate. |
|
Now, I am going to express my personal views which aren't |
|
too different, but perhaps stated a little different than some |
|
of these. Please note in the record that I am not speaking for |
|
the Society of American Foresters at this time. |
|
As humans, we experience, all of us, the joys of birth, the |
|
vigor of youth, the slowing down with age (and I have gone |
|
through several of those stages myself), and finally death. |
|
Very few of us would accept the idea that the hands-off |
|
approach is appropriate to maintain human health. |
|
Trees and forests are similar. I want to make two main |
|
points. A well-managed forest is the healthiest possible, |
|
number one, and number two, there is no opportunity to address |
|
declining health in an unmanaged forest. |
|
I want you just for a moment to picture a well-managed |
|
forest of 5,000 acres. The species are well adapted to the |
|
site, and we are going to grow trees until they are about 50 |
|
years old, and then we are going to cut them in what is called |
|
a final harvest. We call it the rotation age. |
|
If we had a forest like that and managed it for 50 years, |
|
what would it look like at the end of 50 years? You would have |
|
100 acres ready to plant or to regenerate naturally. These 100 |
|
acres might be scattered around in the forest, but you would |
|
have 100 acres like that. You would have 100 acres with one- |
|
year-old seedlings, 100 acres with two-year-old seedlings, |
|
etc., and you would have 100 acres with mature trees ready to |
|
harvest. |
|
You would have logging and access roads that are well- |
|
engineered; regeneration you want to be prompt; and soil |
|
productivity is maintained. You would have intermediate cuts-- |
|
we call them thinning to help other trees in the stand to grow |
|
to a greater size quicker. |
|
Biodiversity would be great because you would have a good |
|
distribution of age classes, and that has been mentioned |
|
before. Fires, insects, and diseases tend to be most damaging |
|
to trees of certain ages, so this will minimize the danger from |
|
fire, from insects and diseases. |
|
Thus, you have the good access roads, appropriate species, |
|
good age-class distribution, and good forest management. That |
|
is the criteria of a healthy forest. |
|
Likewise, the management tools necessary to have a healthy |
|
forest are obvious. One, you would have to have an adequate |
|
cadre of professionals. I am talking about foresters, |
|
engineers, wildlife managers, and others. |
|
Two, you would have to have the flexibility to manage the |
|
forest unhampered by poorly conceived environmental laws, by |
|
frivolous appeals, and by tax codes that discourage long-term |
|
management. |
|
Three, you need to have a strong forest research program in |
|
the Forest Service and universities and in the private sector. |
|
Four, forest management has to remain science-based with a |
|
complete tool kit, and that has been mentioned previously, but |
|
I want to mention some of the things we can't afford to lose. |
|
Prescribed fire, herbicides, selection cutting, clear cutting, |
|
seed-tree cutting, we need all those tools. |
|
To put it in a few words, the answer to the forest health |
|
problem is more and not less forest management, and the primary |
|
responsibility for managing our forests should be in the hands |
|
of those best qualified for the job, foresters. Thank you. |
|
[Statement of Harry Wiant may be found at end of hearing.] |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Mr. Wiant, thank you very much, and the |
|
chair recognizes Dr. Schoenholtz. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF DR. STEPHEN H. SCHOENHOLTZ, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF |
|
FOREST RESOURCES, MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY |
|
|
|
Mr. Schoenholtz. Madame Chairman, committee members, thank |
|
you for the opportunity to present my views on forest health |
|
this afternoon. |
|
Forest health means different things to different people |
|
depending on their forest management objectives and |
|
philosophies. |
|
There is general agreement that our well-being and the |
|
well-being of future generations depend on productive, healthy |
|
forests. However, some perceptions of forest health may vary |
|
depending on individual preferences for forest use. |
|
To maintain and manage our forests in an acceptable state |
|
for future generations requires us to define forest health |
|
broadly enough to encompass the many facets of forest |
|
ecosystems. |
|
What do we look for when we try to assess forest health? An |
|
assessment of forest health should consider key indicators that |
|
can be measured or described periodically to identify trends. |
|
We must remember that some key indicators of forest health may |
|
vary among different forest ecosystems. |
|
For example, in many forests of the West, water limits |
|
plant growth at least for part of the growing season, but |
|
excess water may be the limiting factor in southern forested |
|
wetlands. |
|
Key indicators may also vary among different management |
|
objectives. For example, I would argue that health indicators |
|
for intensively managed production forestry might differ from |
|
indicators used in managing for wilderness values. |
|
Often, the primary concern when assessing forest health is |
|
the vegetation itself. Forest ecosystem health must include a |
|
level of acceptable plant productivity and biological diversity |
|
which, in turn, depend on the ability of the soil to supply |
|
necessary nutrients and water. |
|
Forest vegetation indicators of productivity and diversity |
|
would include age, particularly of the overstory trees; |
|
structure, which is the vertical and horizontal arrangement of |
|
vegetation (a critical component of wildlife habitat); crown |
|
condition; foliar injury levels in the crown and the leaves; |
|
species composition which is very important for diversity and |
|
also for assessing forest product values; species diversity |
|
itself which translates into wildlife diversity by providing |
|
habitat diversity; growth rates; mortality rates; regeneration |
|
rates; species replacement patterns; presence of insects or |
|
disease; and presence of exotic species. This is just a partial |
|
list of some key indicators looking at the vegetation. |
|
There is also a large range of soil attributes such as |
|
chemical, physical, and biological properties that can be used |
|
as part of the assessment of forest health. Some of the basic |
|
soil indicators would include soil texture, which is the |
|
proportion of sand, silt, and clay (soil texture indirectly |
|
affects many other soil properties). |
|
We can look at maximum rooting depth where we have deeper |
|
soils producing more productive forests and more resilient |
|
forests. |
|
We can look at soil bulk density and water infiltration |
|
rate. These are related to water and air movement. We can look |
|
at plant available water capacity; total organic carbon and |
|
nitrogen, which are very importantly related to organic matter; |
|
also nitrogen is often a limiting factor in forest ecosystems. |
|
We can also look at pH, which indirectly controls many of |
|
the soil chemical reactions in the forest, and finally, we can |
|
look at soil strength, which indicates physical damage, |
|
particularly compaction-type damage from heavy machinery. |
|
We have a good understanding of expected changes in |
|
vegetation over time (and we mentioned the U.S. Forest |
|
Service's forest inventory process earlier today) in many of |
|
our forest ecosystem types. |
|
We also have a well developed data base of inherent soil |
|
properties from our Natural Resource Conservation Service. We |
|
have this for much of the country. |
|
If these vegetation and soil criteria indicate deviations |
|
from expected trends or levels, then management practices to |
|
maintain or enhance forest health should be considered. These |
|
management alternatives would include removal of undesirable |
|
species, thinning to appropriate tree density or appropriate |
|
number of trees per acre, supplemental plantings, use of |
|
controlled or prescribed burning, manipulating vegetation to |
|
create specific habitat, possibly imposing stricter air quality |
|
standards, and fertilization. |
|
Monitoring forest health will require manipulations of |
|
large volumes of spatial and time-dependent environmental data. |
|
This aspect of monitoring should be developed within a |
|
geographic-information-system environment that can accommodate |
|
incorporation of new variables and can be developed as an |
|
adaptive management tool. |
|
Avoiding degradation of forest health is achieved by |
|
accepting management techniques that do not adversely affect |
|
the forest or the quality of the environment in which the |
|
forest grows. The forest management decision process should be |
|
based on potential impacts to indicators of forest ecosystem |
|
health. |
|
It is essential that experience, feedback, and adaptability |
|
play prominent roles in any assessment of forest health and the |
|
management of forests. Thank you. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Dr. Schoenholtz. Now, we will |
|
proceed to questioning of the panelists. Each member will have |
|
five minutes for their questioning. |
|
I will open with a question to Martin Moore. You mentioned |
|
the effects on water resources caused by the high density of |
|
trees, and you also noted that more than 5,000,000 acres of |
|
forest lands are at high or extreme risk of loss to |
|
catastrophic fires. |
|
You mentioned 240,000 homes, perhaps 600,000 humans. That |
|
is startling. Could you explain further how fires on these |
|
lands will impact water sources and wildlife, and the second |
|
question is, what will the impact on the Mexican Spotted Owl be |
|
if nothing is done to mechanically remove some of the excessive |
|
fuels? |
|
Also, have they yet seen a Mexican Spotted Owl? |
|
Mr. Moore. Unfortunately, Apache County probably hosts most |
|
of the Mexican Spotted Owls in Arizona. There are approximately |
|
220-some-odd Mexican Spotted Owls in the Apache-Sitgreaves |
|
Forest in our area that we understand. Some are near interface |
|
communities, some are not. |
|
If you don't mind, I will answer the second question first. |
|
There was a fire called the HB fire over in New Mexico. It |
|
destroyed--they don't know, they are still inventorying, but it |
|
did destroy some Mexican Spotted Owl nesting sites. |
|
We had the huge 60,000-acre fire up in the Four Peaks |
|
Wilderness area that destroyed the entire Mexican Spotted Owl |
|
habitat on top of the Four Peaks Wilderness. |
|
We know of approximately four Mexican Spotted Owl habitat |
|
territories that were burned in the 1980's in what was called |
|
the Dude fire near Payson, Arizona. |
|
By the way, this is approximate--I believe it is 5,470,000 |
|
acres at risk, or something like that was arrived at from the |
|
data gathered by the Forest Service from their fire management |
|
and fire risk report, and their methodologies largely centered |
|
around interface areas that would include campgrounds, near |
|
roadways, and near communities. It may not be reflective of |
|
some areas of the interior forest that are away from these |
|
areas. |
|
As far as some of these numbers on impacts on streams and |
|
that type of thing, the basic process works like this. You get |
|
a catastrophic wildfire. A catastrophic wildfire, and I |
|
describe it in the written testimony a little bit, is the type |
|
of wildfire that burns large acreages, sterilizes soil, |
|
destroys land-based and aquatic wildlife, and threatens human |
|
life and destroys the regenerative capacity of the ecosystem. |
|
Basically what we have got is a situation where you get a |
|
waxy layer down under the soil. You get a heavy rain that comes |
|
along behind that and it just happened that those conditions |
|
happened just right, or wrong in this case, with the Dude fire. |
|
The Dude fire came. They had heavy monsoon rains right after |
|
that. There was a lot of tearing up of the riparian bottoms. A |
|
lot of soil was washed downstream, and there are a couple of |
|
communities downstream, actually out of the forest where a lot |
|
of this soil washed in and flattened out the stream beds, and |
|
they have had incidents of flooding where homes and bridges |
|
were destroyed and that kind of thing. |
|
That is basically what you would be looking at. Then it |
|
would destroy the long-term ability of the soil to regenerate. |
|
When you sterilize the soil like that, an ability for trees and |
|
that type of thing to regrow, especially Ponderosa Pine, is |
|
very difficult. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. We have some areas that were burned in |
|
Idaho in 1910, and they still don't have any regenerative |
|
ability. |
|
Mr. Moore. Yes. As a matter of fact, if anyone is in |
|
Flagstaff and takes a look at the hot fire that burned on I |
|
think it was the north side of Mount Eldon, you can see that |
|
they have tried time and again to replant trees up there and |
|
they just cannot get them to take hold. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Very interesting. Mr. Wiant, given the |
|
criteria you described, maintaining soil productivity, a whole |
|
list of very, very interesting, very good criteria, would you |
|
say that forest health conditions tend to vary by ownership |
|
types with regard to State forests, private forests? |
|
Mr. Wiant. Yes. I think they tend to vary by the amount of |
|
management that it is possible to do on them. Unfortunately, I |
|
think that some of our national forests are in terrible shape |
|
because we have been able to do very little management and able |
|
to do less every day, it seems. |
|
I think some of the lands that are in best shape are those |
|
held by corporations who have managed them intensively with |
|
good forest management, and then our private landowners still |
|
need a lot of education, so there are some in between those |
|
extremes, I suspect. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. You mentioned the importance of providing |
|
flexibility to use a variety of management tools. How do |
|
current Federal laws limit a landowner's flexibility to do what |
|
is necessary to maintain or improve forest health? |
|
Mr. Wiant. Certainly, our national forests are impacted by |
|
the amount of documentation that is necessary before they can |
|
do anything. It is extremely expensive to the taxpayers out |
|
there, and I happen to be one of them, and I kind of resent |
|
that. |
|
Certainly, some of the laws make it very difficult for |
|
people. There was a letter by Carl Winger, who was at one time |
|
a station director for the Forest Service, in the Journal of |
|
Forestry recently, and he was talking about one of the laws, |
|
and I think we all know it is very important. |
|
He describes what the country looked like at the turn of |
|
the century, and you have seen pictures at the time of the |
|
Civil War in the east at least. It looked like the battlefield, |
|
the French forests after the battles of the first World War. |
|
The lands were really desolate, hardly any timber left, and |
|
I won't read that part to you, but I want to read one part of |
|
this letter, the conclusion, and I think it is very important. |
|
He says that current land management practices are |
|
threatening or endangering 1,300 species of the survivors of |
|
that period, as claimed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, |
|
is simply not believable. How can we claim that the land |
|
management practices taking place, at least in the east today, |
|
can be threatening species that survived that catastrophic |
|
period at the turn of the century? It just doesn't make sense. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Mr. Wiant. It doesn't. How has |
|
the Society of American Foresters addressed the question of the |
|
legal entanglements that we find ourselves in? |
|
We talked about the socioeconomic problems that we must |
|
overcome. What about the legal entanglements that you see? Will |
|
any recommendations be forthcoming either from your |
|
organization as a whole or what do you recommend? |
|
Mr. Wiant. I think the Society of American Foresters is |
|
trying to stay apolitical, and that limits their ability to |
|
address some of these things, so my answer to that previous |
|
question was my answer not SAF's. I should label or maybe |
|
underline it somehow here verbally. |
|
But we have studied some of them, and I think that you |
|
would find that we have policy statements that indicate that |
|
none of these should limit our ability to practice good |
|
forestry, and that should always be kept in mind by policy- |
|
makers. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Mr. Wiant, how diverse is the membership of |
|
the Society of American Foresters? |
|
Mr. Wiant. It is very diverse. It ranges, I would say |
|
probably there are a few members that think you shouldn't cut |
|
any trees and a few members who think you can cut them all and |
|
not worry about the environmental consequences, but most |
|
members are somewhere toward the center of that distribution, |
|
so it is quite a varied organization. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you. For my final question, I would |
|
like to ask Dr. Schoenholtz. |
|
You noted that it is not possible nor is it necessary to |
|
consider all aspects of a forest ecosystem in order to assess |
|
its condition, yet the Forest Service decisions are frequently |
|
challenged because they are not based on the very latest and |
|
newest information. |
|
Is this a reasonable standard to hold the Forest Service |
|
to? What are your feelings and your thoughts on that one? |
|
Mr. Schoenholtz. My feelings are, if we try to assess or |
|
measure the health of all the components of an ecosystem, it |
|
would just be an impossible task if you consider air quality, |
|
water quality, soil quality, vegetation, wildlife habitat, |
|
soils, the various components and how they interact. |
|
My goal in presenting today was to try to pick indicators |
|
that integrate those various aspects, and in my opinion, the |
|
vegetation and the soil are two key general indicators that |
|
integrate a lot of the processes that go on in the system. |
|
I don't mean to state that any of them are less important |
|
than others. That is a value judgment, but we need to find |
|
indicators that integrate many of these processes, and in my |
|
opinion, vegetation, including growth rates, diversity, and |
|
structure of that vegetation, is an integrator of the soil, |
|
water, climate, atmospheric stress, et cetera. |
|
It also provides habitat for all the wildlife species that |
|
we are concerned with. So if you are going to spend limited |
|
funding, you have to pick key indicators that integrate many of |
|
the processes. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Dr. Schoenholtz. The chair now |
|
recognizes the gentleman from Colorado, Mr. Schaffer. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Thank you again, Madame Chairman. I have a |
|
first question for Mr. Wiant. You mentioned a number of |
|
restrictions and impediments that the Federal Government |
|
represents from time to time in purposes of private forestry, I |
|
presume. |
|
I would like you--you mentioned tax policy as well, just in |
|
general, but I would like you to be a little more specific if |
|
you could. |
|
What are some areas that we might consider within the |
|
context of tax policy that either promote or impede private |
|
forestry? |
|
Mr. Wiant. All of a sudden, I am having a slip of memory |
|
here. The tax that has been discussed so often that they are |
|
hoping is changed, the tax law right now that deals with |
|
investments, capital gains. |
|
The capital gains change was made several years ago and has |
|
had a great impact on private forestry. They are always very |
|
interested in seeing that change to be more favorable to them. |
|
That would be the main one I would think of. |
|
This is a long-term investment. You are talking about |
|
perhaps 50 years or so before you can recognize any return. An |
|
example of this is, I know of a case in California recently |
|
where they had 500 acres of forest land that had been managed |
|
by a landowner, and after he died, there was a disagreement |
|
about the value of the estate. So the Internal Revenue Service |
|
required that it be evaluated and a forester attorney, a man |
|
who has both qualifications, was able to show that in |
|
California because of all the restrictions on forest management |
|
and the necessary plans that had to be turned into the State |
|
before you could do anything, he was able to show that 500 |
|
acres of California forest land had a negative value. As I |
|
understand from his report to me, he was told by IRS that you |
|
can't show a negative value, but he did win when it got into |
|
court. |
|
That is showing kind of the extreme, but when you can show |
|
that 500 acres has a negative value because of regulation, |
|
there is something wrong with the system. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Dr. Lynch, I have a couple questions for you |
|
with regard to my local concerns that I bring here. |
|
Specifically, what forest conditions in the Central Rockies |
|
concern you the most? |
|
Mr. Lynch. I think from this consensus and discussion that |
|
I mentioned in my talk, the things that really are of concern |
|
to a number of us would be first the fuel buildup that we see |
|
in the forests because of protection and custodial care. |
|
We are concerned about the overstocking that exists in |
|
these stands. Currently, I believe that we are at a point where |
|
we may have more trees than we have ever had on the landscape |
|
and certainly, comparative photo studies by Thomas Veblen at |
|
the University of Colorado; Ric Laven, our own forest |
|
ecologist, pictures of the Manitou Forest, for example, |
|
indicate that we have tremendous numbers of trees now that we |
|
did not historically have. |
|
We are concerned about the shift in the age classes. Many |
|
of our stands are reaching an over-mature, old category and the |
|
concern of everyone, the general consensus, was that we need to |
|
have a diversity of forest types across landscape areas that |
|
would consist of a number of successional stages and certainly, |
|
a number of age classes, and we just don't have those. |
|
Another concern would be the species shifts where we see |
|
trees that are shade tolerant and understories that |
|
historically were not there, at least in our studies, and we |
|
are concerned about the presence of exotics. We have a number |
|
of exotic species that are in these forests, insect life |
|
particularly, that are of concern. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Could you comment on the prescribed burning |
|
proposal, how you think it may affect Colorado and other |
|
western States? |
|
Mr. Lynch. Yes. Prescribed burning is not a precise tool. I |
|
think that is the overall message to carry. It has some |
|
limitations. |
|
The manager of fires can control the amount of fuel and he |
|
can control the ignition time and type of ignition. He can't |
|
control fuel moisture. He cannot control wind. |
|
So there are limitations here to the use of this tool that |
|
are significant. If we are talking about forest restoration of |
|
the type that we believe needs to be done in the Central |
|
Rockies, we are talking about really burning thousands of acres |
|
of land, and we are talking about smoke management problems |
|
that are of significant concern, particularly air quality |
|
problems in our front range area where we have air quality |
|
concerns that are significant now. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Thank you, Madame Chairman. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Mr. Schaffer. The chair recognizes Mr. |
|
Peterson from Pennsylvania. |
|
Mr. Peterson. Thank you. I have a general question. Mr. |
|
Wiant raised the issue, but I think I kind of sensed it in all |
|
of your testimonies. |
|
You sort of rated who was managing the land the best, and I |
|
think you gave the best grades to the corporations and maybe |
|
lower grades to the Federal Government and private landowners, |
|
small private landowners. |
|
Is this the sort of common theme I have heard here from all |
|
of you that as the Federal owner of a lot of land in this |
|
country, we are custodian but we are not really managers; we |
|
are not really managing the resource? Did I sense anybody that |
|
wasn't saying that in some way or another? |
|
Does anybody want to say that is not what you said? |
|
Mr. Moore. To comment briefly, I think, at least from our |
|
perspective, our concern isn't so much about the ability and |
|
capability of the Federal land managers, the silviculturists |
|
and that to do their job. |
|
I think our concern is possibly more about the paperwork, |
|
need for paperwork requirements, other types of restrictions, |
|
endangered species consultations, court cases and other types |
|
of forest plan restrictions built by political processes that |
|
are tying the managers' hands, and that is the complaint that |
|
we have heard from a number of managers in our area. |
|
There are so many things that they see that they would like |
|
to have done on the ground. They would like to see a good |
|
streamlining of the processes, and we are certainly not |
|
advocating the total destruction of the processes, because |
|
there are important environmental considerations to take into |
|
concern, but at the same time, we are not only destroying the |
|
natural ecosystem. We are destroying the communities that are |
|
built up around these natural ecosystems because their |
|
economies are collapsing. |
|
We have a number of areas back in our part of the State |
|
that are having this difficulty, so I would say our answer is |
|
help the managers to be able to get out there and manage in the |
|
field. |
|
I think Mr. Dombeck's testimony was well taken. They see a |
|
number of things that they would like to do to help matters |
|
happen. We have seen, for example, we have a wildlife biologist |
|
under me on staff, and we see months and months and months of |
|
appeals on small timber sales, before you get on the ground and |
|
make something happen, so those are definite concerns that we |
|
see. |
|
Maybe private landowners or corporate entities may not be |
|
faced with nearly as much. |
|
Mr. Peterson. Anyone else? |
|
Mr. Lynch. Yes. I would like to comment because I was a |
|
Federal forest manager for a number of years, 15 years. I was a |
|
district ranger, and as I look at the responsibilities of the |
|
past now that relate to the bureaucratic process, and I really |
|
mean that, the bureaucratic processes that are in place, |
|
managers do not have the flexibility to confront the problems |
|
that they once did. |
|
In Colorado, we see private landowners that manage very |
|
intensively. We see landowners that have very little education |
|
and do virtually nothing and have unhealthy forests as a |
|
result. |
|
But when we look at State and Federal ownerships, for |
|
example, we have State forest side by side with Federal |
|
forests. The State people can address the problems, move |
|
quickly, have the opportunities and flexibility and policy to |
|
deal with those, where the Federal forest managers just cannot |
|
get out of the morass that they are bound with. |
|
These are competent people. I don't in any way wish to |
|
malign them. Many of them were my students, and what I see is |
|
that the processes have reached the point where they do not |
|
have the flexibility they once had. |
|
Mr. Wiant. I would like to second that. I think the Federal |
|
lands are suffering from unclear objectives. They really don't |
|
know exactly what they should be managing for, the products |
|
they need to be producing. |
|
The timber expertise in the Forest Service is decreasing |
|
all the time. They are hiring fewer and fewer foresters and |
|
they have been doing that for a number of years. So people that |
|
really know how to evaluate timber, to manage timber, are |
|
decreasing. |
|
The loss of production capacities is impacting us all. In |
|
the northwest, the mills haven't just shut down. Many of them |
|
have moved out, and once we lose those production capacities, |
|
even if we have use for smaller materials, it is going to be a |
|
terrific investment over a long time to ever recapture that |
|
loss. |
|
Mr. Moore. I would like to add one more thing briefly. We |
|
appreciated, we understood that Congressman Pombo had |
|
introduced a bill in relationship to flood control, because I |
|
guess California is having severe flooding problems, and to |
|
streamline environmental and particularly endangered species |
|
processes, to be able to get those projects moving and to get |
|
that happening. |
|
We wondered if a similar bill would be a possibility, |
|
especially in the extreme areas of wildland/urban interface |
|
hazard and possibly a drought situation, if that is something |
|
that couldn't be looked at also. |
|
Mr. Peterson. If I could just respond for a moment. I come |
|
from the east, but a lot of the managers in ANF have come from |
|
the west. |
|
I agree with you. They are highly skilled individuals and |
|
fine quality people, but I guess it appears that the political |
|
pressures from whoever have sort of veered us from what was |
|
normally a good management practice and a multi-use practice of |
|
the tremendous amount of land owned by the Federal Government. |
|
A lot of the rhetoric that has been out on the street is |
|
far from the fact, but somehow, we need to have a meaningful |
|
dialog so the general public understands the real issues, and |
|
when we deal with the real facts, we usually do the right |
|
things. |
|
I guess I would like to commend all of you for coming here |
|
today and sharing, but I guess somehow, we need to form a plan |
|
of getting away from the political pressures and back to |
|
allowing good, true managers to manage our national forests, |
|
part of our heritage, and one of our most renewable resources. |
|
I hope you will help us do that. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Mr. Peterson, thank you very much. |
|
Gentleman, I thank you very much for taking your time and |
|
coming out here, and sharing with us this most valuable and |
|
instructive information. |
|
I would invite you to stay for the third panel, if you |
|
possibly can, and you are now excused from the witness table, |
|
and we will call the third panel. |
|
I call to the witness table Kenneth Kane from Keith Horn, |
|
Incorporated, consulting foresters, from Kane, Pennsylvania; |
|
Steven Holmer, Campaign Director of the Western Ancient Forest |
|
Campaign, Washington, D.C.; Ed Muckenfuss, Regional Manager, |
|
Westvaco Company, Summerville, South Carolina; and Bill Wall, |
|
Wildlife Biologist, Potlatch Corporation, Lewiston, Idaho. |
|
I would like to call on the gentleman from Pennsylvania, |
|
Mr. Peterson, to introduce Kenneth Kane. |
|
Mr. Peterson. Thank you, Madame Chairman. First, I would |
|
like to submit for the record because I was not here when the |
|
hearing started, so I would like to submit this statement for |
|
the record. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. With no objection, so ordered. |
|
[Statement of Hon. John Peterson may be found at end of |
|
hearing.] |
|
Mr. Peterson. Secondly, Madame Chairman, I want to thank |
|
you for first holding this oversight hearing and for giving me |
|
the opportunity to introduce a constituent and friend of mine |
|
who we are very pleased to have travel here from Pennsylvania |
|
today. |
|
I want to commend you for holding this hearing so we can |
|
get advice in finding solutions to the threats on the nation's |
|
forests. It is an important issue to many of us. |
|
I have the good fortune of representing the Allegheny |
|
National Forest, the only national forest in the Commonwealth |
|
of Pennsylvania. |
|
For that reason, I am especially pleased to have with us a |
|
constituent from Pennsylvania's fifth congressional district, |
|
Mr. Kenneth Kane. Mr. Kane is vice president of Keith Horn, |
|
Incorporated, a small private forest consulting business in |
|
Kane, Pennsylvania. |
|
Mr. Kane brings to this hearing a professional background |
|
of 13 years as a private forest manager, coupled with an in- |
|
depth understanding of the health and management of the |
|
resources on and in the Allegheny National Forest. |
|
He is also chairman of the Pennsylvania Division of the |
|
Society of American Foresters. He is chairman of the |
|
Pennsylvania chapter of Association of Consulting Foresters in |
|
America. |
|
At this time, I would like to welcome Mr. Kane, and I want |
|
to thank you for making the journey down here. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Mr. Kane, excuse me. Before you begin your |
|
testimony, as a committee policy, we have all of our witnesses |
|
take the oath, so would you all stand, please, and raise your |
|
right hand. |
|
Do you solemnly swear or affirm under the penalty of |
|
perjury that you will tell the truth, the whole truth, and |
|
nothing but the truth, so help you God? |
|
Thank you. Mr. Kane, please proceed. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF KENNETH KANE, KEITH HORN, INC., CONSULTING |
|
FORESTERS, KANE, PENNSYLVANIA |
|
|
|
Mr. Kane. Thank you, Congressman Peterson, for the very |
|
nice introduction. |
|
Madame Chairman and members of the Subcommittee, I |
|
appreciate the opportunity to join you this afternoon to |
|
discuss forest health in the Allegheny region, which includes |
|
the Allegheny National Forest. |
|
Let me turn now to the two questions which you have asked |
|
us to reply to. |
|
Question one, what criteria determines if a forest is |
|
healthy? To answer this question for the Allegheny plateau, you |
|
must remember that essentially the entire forest in the region |
|
was clear-cut between 1880 and 1930. The vast clear-cutting of |
|
that era virtually eliminated the beech, hemlock old-growth |
|
forest of the region. The hardwood forest which emerged did so |
|
naturally without planting. |
|
So, within the forests of the Allegheny region and other |
|
second-growth forests in the eastern hardwoods, forest health |
|
is typically determined by answering some basic questions. |
|
One, what is the condition of the crown, stem, root, and |
|
leaf of the tree? |
|
Two, is there an adequate diversity of trees, shrubs, |
|
flowers, and other plant species present in the forest? |
|
Three, are there trees of various sizes? |
|
Four, are preferred tree and other plant species |
|
regenerating naturally, or are nonpreferred species becoming |
|
dominant? |
|
It is important to emphasize that forest health criteria |
|
are defined by the landowner. Public forestry issues are very |
|
dynamic, because the objectives of the public change |
|
constantly. That is not the case in the private sector, where |
|
most forest landowners have two primary objectives, production |
|
of wood products and continuity of ownership. |
|
So where do we stand? At present, forest health in the |
|
Allegheny region is threatened by native and exotic insects, |
|
disease, and mammals. |
|
In addition to those problems, the forests of the region |
|
are simply growing old. |
|
Hardwood forests change dramatically between 125 and 150 |
|
years of age. Specifically, species diversity drops from a wide |
|
variety of shade intolerant species to a handful of shade |
|
tolerant species. This decrease in tree species diversity is |
|
one measure of an unhealthy forest. |
|
The forests of the Allegheny region are recognized |
|
internationally for the high quality hardwood timber they |
|
produce. The unique unglaciated soils of the region produce the |
|
world's best quality black cherry in stands that reach economic |
|
maturity at 80 to 100 years of age. |
|
We have reached the point in time where the Allegheny |
|
plateau's biological and economic maturity coincide. Thus, we |
|
must address the needs to regenerate these forests for both |
|
financial and biological reasons. |
|
But in addition, the public generally prefers to hunt, |
|
camp, hike in maturing 70-year-old Allegheny hardwood forests |
|
rather than decadent 150-year-old forests. |
|
Having examined the criteria for a healthy forest in our |
|
region of the country, let me turn now to your second question, |
|
which is what management tools are most appropriate to maintain |
|
or improve forest health. |
|
As a practicing forester, I recommend that landowners take |
|
certain actions to maintain the health and vitality of the |
|
forests within the Allegheny region. |
|
One, employ sound silvicultural practices and professional |
|
forestry. |
|
Two, use modern silvicultural methods in timber harvesting |
|
scenarios. These practices are site-specific and model natural |
|
occurrences. |
|
Three, employ qualified resource managers to monitor forest |
|
conditions closely. This is necessary to follow insect |
|
populations and assess the effects of disease, drought, and |
|
other phenomena. |
|
Four, control large deer populations, increasing the use of |
|
silvicultural regeneration tools such as fence enclosures and |
|
herbicides. Promote sport hunting to reduce deer |
|
overpopulation. |
|
Five, use aerial application of natural pesticides. This is |
|
necessary to control exotic and abnormal native insect |
|
infestations. |
|
In addition to these tools that are available to the |
|
resource manager, I believe that Congress and the |
|
Administration have continuing roles to play, and given this |
|
opportunity, I offer two concluding suggestions for your |
|
consideration. |
|
First, you must continue to fund and promote forest |
|
research. Research at the Forest Service's Northeast Experiment |
|
Station in Warren, Pennsylvania, has provided the modern |
|
silvicultural methods used throughout the Allegheny region. |
|
Over 1,100 forest managers have attended the training sessions |
|
offered by the station. |
|
Second and finally, there is a pressing national need for |
|
education programs for forest landowners, professionals and the |
|
public. Professionals need to better understand the modern |
|
tools available to them. Landowners and the public need to |
|
better understand the forest ecosystem and the necessity of |
|
using sound science as the basis for management decisions. |
|
Thank you for the opportunity to present this statement. I |
|
will be happy to answer any questions. |
|
[Statement of Kenneth Kane may be found at end of hearing.] |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Mr. Kane, for your very |
|
interesting testimony, and I would like to now call on Steve |
|
Holmer for your testimony. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF STEVE HOLMER, CAMPAIGN DIRECTOR, WESTERN ANCIENT |
|
FOREST CAMPAIGN, WASHINGTON, DC |
|
|
|
Mr. Holmer. Thank you, Chairman Chenoweth. Thank you for |
|
this opportunity to testify. |
|
The Western Ancient Forest Campaign represents |
|
organizations and individuals nationwide who are dedicating to |
|
protecting forest and aquatic ecosystems on the national |
|
forests. |
|
I would like to begin by saying that I totally disagree |
|
with the statement that only managed forests are healthy |
|
forests. Our forests did just fine for millions of years before |
|
management was invented, and to put it plainly, the lack of |
|
humility before God's creation to make that kind of statement, |
|
I find rather astounding. |
|
There is increasing evidence that demonstrates that over |
|
the past three decades, our national forests have suffered too |
|
much logging, too much road building, and too much cattle |
|
grazing and fire suppression with little concern about the |
|
impact these activities have on our clean water supplies, fish |
|
and wildlife, recreational opportunities, and the ecological |
|
integrity of forest ecosystems. Too much management is the |
|
problem, not the solution. |
|
A recent mapping project by the World Wildlife Fund |
|
concluded that only two percent of the original forests remain |
|
in the lower 48 States. The Eastside Forests Scientific Society |
|
panel report concluded that the few remaining roadless areas in |
|
eastern Oregon and Washington are still threatened, and that |
|
very little of the old growth Ponderosa Pine ecosystem remains. |
|
The scientists' report recommends no logging of old-growth |
|
forests or trees of any species older than 150 years or greater |
|
than 20 inches in diameter; no logging in aquatic diversity |
|
areas; and to establish protected corridors along streams, |
|
rivers, wetlands, and lakes; no logging or road building in |
|
roadless areas. |
|
Both the PACFISH and INFISH Federal interim guidelines for |
|
protecting imperiled fish stocks concurred with the conclusion |
|
that we need to protect roadless areas in riparian zones to |
|
restore declining fisheries. |
|
These are the critical first steps toward proper management |
|
and rehabilitating faltering forests and aquatic systems in the |
|
inland west. The Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project report came to |
|
similar conclusions, and also stated that timber harvest |
|
through its effect on forest structure, local microclimate, and |
|
fuel accumulation has increased fire severity more than any |
|
other human activity. The notion that we can salvage-log the |
|
forest to reduce fire risk is not supported by any empirical |
|
scientific evidence. |
|
The State of Idaho has over 960 streams which are polluted |
|
and rated as water quality limited by the Environmental |
|
Protection Agency because of too much contamination in the |
|
streams. Over half these streams are being degraded by logging. |
|
Flooding, exacerbated by logging and road building in the Coeur |
|
D'Alene watershed is steadily sending millions of pounds of |
|
lead contaminated sediments into Lake Coeur D'Alene and |
|
ultimately, into the city of Spokane's watershed. |
|
In Oregon, seven people were killed this year as a result |
|
of mudslides. Numerous scientific studies have been published, |
|
including one by the U.S. Forest Service that conclude logging |
|
and road building increase the risk of severity of landslides |
|
and flooding. |
|
Across the west, fish stocks continue to decline, and many |
|
species, such as the Coho Salmon and Bull Trout are being |
|
considered for listing under the Endangered Species Act. |
|
The private and public forests of the southeast United |
|
States are threatened by unsustainable logging. There are now |
|
over 140 chip mills in the southeast, and according to industry |
|
and the Forest Service, the growth-to-harvest ratio of |
|
softwoods in the south went negative in 1991. Further, hardwood |
|
forests are expected to exceed growth within the next two to |
|
ten years. |
|
This is not only evidence that the industry is |
|
unsustainable, but that chip mills are depleting the forests, |
|
thereby impacting water quality, habitats, ecosystem health, |
|
and local forest-dependent businesses. |
|
These are the facts as presented by the scientific |
|
community, industry, and government agencies. These are the |
|
real forest ecosystem health problems which this committee has |
|
chosen to ignore in favor of arguments that all come to the |
|
same conclusion, more logging. |
|
Claiming to address the overstocking and fuel loading |
|
problems caused by fire suppression and grazing cattle, the |
|
104th Congress passed the Salvage Logging Rider which suspended |
|
environmental laws and the citizens' right to have those laws |
|
enforced and participate in how their own lands were being |
|
managed, but no effort was made to address the more fundamental |
|
problems of too much grazing and too much fire suppression. |
|
Under the rider, we witnessed the logging of ancient |
|
forests that have been protected by the courts. Under the |
|
rider, the guise of logging dead and dying trees was used by |
|
the Forest Service to log large, live green trees. |
|
Unroaded areas, which represent some of our nation's last |
|
unprotected wilderness were entered and logged. The |
|
government's own interagency report on the implementation of |
|
the rider confirmed these abuses. |
|
In the aftermath of the rider, several lessons are clear. |
|
Our environmental laws and public processes should never again |
|
be suspended. Ancient forests, roadless areas, and riparian |
|
zones need permanent protection, and the U.S. Forest Service |
|
needs to be reformed and made more accountable to the public. |
|
To address these threats to the health of our forest |
|
ecosystems, we would like to make several recommendations which |
|
we would urge the committee to adopt. |
|
Prohibit new road building on the national forests and |
|
prohibit the use of purchaser road credits to build new roads; |
|
prohibit logging and road building on unstable and potentially |
|
unstable national forest land; restore accountability by |
|
reforming or abolishing off-budget funds. |
|
As Representative Vento mentioned, the interagency report |
|
concluded that the salvage fund created an incentive for the |
|
agency to choose logging projects when other activities such as |
|
prescribed fire or stream restoration would have been more |
|
appropriate, and this is because they get to keep most of the |
|
receipts by choosing salvage operations. |
|
The next point is to end money-losing timber sales. The |
|
annual report of the White House Council of Economic Advisors |
|
shows that the Forest Service spent $234,000,000 administering |
|
the timber sale program than were returned in receipts. |
|
Generally, the Forest Service subsidizes timber extraction |
|
from public lands by collecting less revenues than it spends on |
|
timber program costs, the report says. We urge the committee to |
|
end subsidized logging in the national forests. |
|
At Senator Craig's recent forest management workshop, the |
|
GAO testified that during 1995, the Forest Service spent |
|
$215,000,000 of the taxpayers' money that they cannot account |
|
for. We urge the committee to use its oversight authority to |
|
find out what happened to the taxpayers' $215,000,000. |
|
Further, we urge the committee to look at the full range of |
|
values our forests provide, such as clean water, fish and |
|
wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities. |
|
According to the Forest Service's resource and planning |
|
assessment, by the year 2000, recreation in the national |
|
forests will produce over $1 billion for the economy while |
|
logging will only produce $3,500,000. The value of clean and |
|
stable water flows from our forests is estimated in the |
|
trillions. |
|
Recently, Chief Michael Dombeck testified, ``The |
|
unfortunate reality is that many people presently do not trust |
|
us to do the right thing. Until we rebuild that trust and |
|
strengthen those relationships, it is simply common sense that |
|
we avoid riparian, old growth, and roadless areas.'' |
|
We urge the committee to support Chief Dombeck's effort to |
|
reform the agency and restore the public's trust by adopting |
|
his common-sense recommendation and the other recommendations |
|
in this testimony including the restoration of eastern old |
|
growth, since there is almost no old growth left in the east. |
|
The idea that we need to cut down the eastern old-growth |
|
forests is simply absurd. We need to restore old growth |
|
ecosystems in the eastern United States. |
|
In closing, I would like to quote a Republican president |
|
who helped make this a great nation by protecting some of our |
|
national forests, Teddy Roosevelt, who said, ``The nation |
|
behaves well if it treats the natural resources as assets which |
|
it must turn over to the next generation increased and not |
|
impaired in value.'' |
|
I believe the United States is a great nation, but I feel |
|
that we are now risking that greatness by lacking the foresight |
|
and courage that made us great to begin with. We can choose to |
|
squander our remaining unprotected wild places, or we can be |
|
revered by future generations as Teddy Roosevelt is for having |
|
the vision and greatness to protect our nation's natural |
|
heritage. |
|
Thank you for this opportunity to testify. |
|
[Statement of Steve Holmer may be found at end of hearing.] |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Mr. Holmer. The chair would now |
|
recognize Ed Muckenfuss, a regional manager from Westvaco |
|
Company. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF ED MUCKENFUSS, REGIONAL MANAGER, WESTVACO COMPANY, |
|
SUMMERVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA |
|
|
|
Mr. Muckenfuss. Madame Chairman and members of the |
|
Subcommittee, thank you for this opportunity to contribute my |
|
ideas on what constitutes a health forest and what management |
|
practices contribute to establish and maintain them. |
|
My name is Ed Muckenfuss, and I am Southern Regional |
|
Manager of Westvaco Corporation's Forest Resources Division. In |
|
my Region in South Carolina, we manage nearly 500,000 acres of |
|
company forest and advise private landowners who own another |
|
400,000 acres. |
|
Westvaco owns forest land primarily to provide a |
|
sustainable source of wood fiber for its mills. We also manage |
|
them to provide habitat for wildlife and clean water for the |
|
lakes and streams that adjoin them. |
|
The key word here is manage. We firmly believe that in |
|
order for a forest to be healthy, it must be actively managed. |
|
Healthy forests are forests that are growing vigorously and |
|
that have a diversity of age classes and forest types which |
|
enables them to resist disease and insect epidemics and helps |
|
to reduce the intensity of wildfires when they occur. The |
|
diversity of forest ages and types also provides a range of |
|
habitats for wildlife. |
|
While some percentage of old-growth habitat is desirable, |
|
extensive areas of old-growth conditions or any single age |
|
class condition puts the entire forest at risk for catastrophic |
|
insect attacks and wildfires. |
|
The photograph you see here is an aerial view of some of |
|
our forest in Kentucky. This forest is actively managed to |
|
maintain healthy tree densities and various forest types |
|
interspersed across the landscape. |
|
We consider this a healthy forest that achieves our |
|
objectives of providing a sustainable supply of wood fiber for |
|
our mill, diversity of wildlife habitats, and protection of the |
|
lakes and streams adjacent to the forest. |
|
There are criteria that we use to determine the health of |
|
our forests. Number one, suitability of tree species to the |
|
site; two, the density of the trees relative to the ability of |
|
the site to support them; three, diversity of age classes |
|
across the landscape; four, the amount of fuel loading on the |
|
site; five, the condition of riparian areas for protecting |
|
lakes and streams; six, diversity of forest types across the |
|
landscape; seven, the relative abundance of noxious insects and |
|
the disease incidence rate; and eight, the availability of |
|
nutrients to sustain vigorous tree growth. |
|
As I have said, healthy forests are the result of good, |
|
active management. Older forests eventually become overcrowded |
|
and lose their vigor, making them susceptible to disease and |
|
insect epidemics. Without management, these conditions set the |
|
stage for catastrophic events like the fires in Yellowstone |
|
National Park. |
|
Here are the management practices that we use to improve or |
|
maintain forest health. Number one, good inventory information; |
|
two, landscape scale planning that provides for protection of |
|
riparian areas and diversity of age classes and forest types; |
|
three, provisions to regenerate with tree species appropriate |
|
to the site; four, intermediate stand treatments to control |
|
density and fuel conditions; five, careful inclusion and |
|
management of old growth or overmature stands; six, soil |
|
amendments as necessary to maintain productivity for intensive |
|
management; and seven, effective control of insect and disease |
|
epidemics. |
|
In many ways, forests are like people. When they are young |
|
and growing, they usually can withstand pathogens and parasites |
|
with their natural defenses. As they grow older, they become |
|
increasingly susceptible, and therefore, require more care. |
|
Inadequate management has put many forests in the United |
|
States at risk. In some forests, neglect has skewed forests |
|
toward stands of older age classes and allowed many stands to |
|
become overcrowded and overloaded with fuels. |
|
In other forests, poor management practices have removed |
|
most of the healthy and vigorously growing trees, leaving the |
|
old and weak. |
|
In either case, these forests are ripe for epidemic of |
|
disease and insects and the catastrophic wildfires that often |
|
follow. |
|
We believe that by applying the management practices I have |
|
outlined, these forests can be returned to healthy conditions |
|
and provide for the needs of many generations to come. Without |
|
adequate levels of management, however, they will increasingly |
|
fall victim to catastrophic events which will result in losses |
|
that will deprive our children of their benefits. |
|
Thank you again for this opportunity to express my views on |
|
this important subject. |
|
[Statement of G. Edward Muckenfuss may be found at end of |
|
hearing.] |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you very, very much. That is a very |
|
impressive picture, and I thank you for your testimony. |
|
The chair now recognizes Bill Wall, from my own district in |
|
Idaho, an outstanding wildlife biologist, and I thank you very |
|
much for being here with the committee this afternoon. |
|
Dr. Wall. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF BILL WALL, WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST, POTLATCH |
|
CORPORATION, LEWISTON, IDAHO |
|
|
|
Dr. Wall. Thank you, Madame Chairman and members of the |
|
Subcommittee. I currently serve as chair-elect of the AF&PA |
|
Wildlife Committee, and for the past five years, have worked to |
|
develop landscape management processes Potlatch Corporation in |
|
Idaho. |
|
I would like to share with you some thoughts, and I am |
|
going to share four key points up front, and then get into |
|
answering the two questions that were asked of the panel. |
|
First, I think we should consider that forest health should |
|
be equated with sustainable forest system health, not merely |
|
green trees. |
|
Second, the intermountain west is a forest system in a |
|
health crisis and is right now beyond acceptable biological |
|
risk. The application of active forest management including |
|
timber harvest and controlled fire or silvicultural tools for |
|
restoring forest system health, and analysis tools which are |
|
the new ones that we have been generating over the past ten |
|
years or so. Our capabilities have really expanded, such as |
|
ecological landscape classification systems, GIS-based |
|
landscape planning, watershed analysis are all tools that we |
|
can use to help guide our active forest management to restore |
|
health in our forests. |
|
Third, forest health criteria must be defined on the |
|
ecological capability where forested landscapes are located. |
|
Ecologists have described how physical land characteristics, |
|
weather disturbance factors interact to define different types |
|
of forest ecosystems across the country. |
|
Fourth, each region will have a different criteria which |
|
affects risks to various forest values, thus general health |
|
criteria must be applied specifically within the ecosystem one |
|
is addressing. |
|
Health and management criteria must also address several |
|
spacial scales from forest stands to watersheds to broader |
|
landscapes. We must not reach an either/or scenario of healthy |
|
trees or other forest values such as wildlife habitat. Rather, |
|
we should take an approach of both-and, healthy, diverse forest |
|
landscapes, healthy watersheds, as well as wildlife habitats. |
|
To answer the first question on some of the criteria for |
|
considering healthy systems, the appropriate ecological |
|
representation of all the floral composition and structure |
|
across landscapes is one key. Each forest system has a broad |
|
range of conditions which are necessary for healthy forest |
|
systems. A healthy system is one that has a full, diverse array |
|
of those forest structures and communities. |
|
Sustainable site productivity is the next key. Maintenance |
|
of soil characteristics which sustain the productive resilience |
|
of forest systems is critical. Sustainable and functional |
|
watersheds, quality stream conditions for salmon and fish, at |
|
least in our area, are dependent on functioning riparian |
|
habitats. |
|
A healthy forest is one that maintains a full complement of |
|
functional habitats for native species across broad landscapes |
|
which encompass a variety of ownerships and land management |
|
objectives, and finally, acceptable risk from catastrophic |
|
disturbance such as wildfire, disease, insect outbreaks, as |
|
well as flooding. |
|
Disturbance to forest systems, whether natural or manmade |
|
is necessary to maintain functioning and specific values of |
|
timber, water, and wildlife. |
|
Now, some suggestions on some of the analysis tools and |
|
management techniques which can be applied to achieve those |
|
sorts of goals. |
|
One, it has been interesting that industry has taken a lead |
|
role in the northwest in developing watershed analysis |
|
capabilities. These can be used to define risks to watershed |
|
functions from unhealthy forest conditions, to develop site- |
|
specific best management practices for the specific watersheds |
|
in which they are applied rather than a cookie-cutter approach |
|
which we have seen out of the Federal agencies, and define |
|
restoration and active forest management needs for reducing |
|
risks within those watersheds. |
|
Ecological landscape classification systems help us to |
|
define the ecological capability of the ecosystem in which we |
|
are working, to understand historical disturbance regimes |
|
resulting in stand and landscape conditions, and to help us |
|
define appropriate ecological representation accross |
|
landscapes. |
|
A GIS-based landscape planning process is the new tool that |
|
is allowing us to begin planning for those various conditions. |
|
Finally, timber harvest and silvicultural methods that |
|
recognize the needs within these ecosystems that help us create |
|
the right structure and composition of vegetation across the |
|
landscape in addition to providing for wildlife habitat, |
|
functioning watersheds, and the types of economic returns that |
|
we need to maintain our communities in the west. |
|
Finally, the thing that has really impressed me in the |
|
opportunities that exist relative to this issue and many other |
|
forest and natural resource management issues are the new |
|
partnerships that are beginning to develop, those that are |
|
being developed between public and private. |
|
I have participated in quite a few and have been very |
|
excited about the outcomes of those. Also, the ability of |
|
industry to work at times with the Forest Service to develop |
|
new types of information, new tools, and to apply those to |
|
reach the ecological as well as economic goals that we are |
|
attempting to across landscapes. Thank you. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Dr. Wall, very much, and I thank |
|
the panel for their testimony. |
|
We will now recognize the members for questions, and I want |
|
to remind the members we have five minutes for questioning, and |
|
I would like to first recognize the gentleman from Colorado, |
|
Mr. Schaffer. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Let me start by going back to a question that |
|
I had asked earlier with respect to prescribed burns. I would |
|
like to hear you all respond to this whole topic, the Babbitt |
|
proposal that has been announced and just where you see this |
|
fitting in in sound forest management practices, in particular, |
|
for Mr. Holmer's comment that no forest management would be |
|
preferable. |
|
What about this Babbitt proposal of management by |
|
prescribed burn? |
|
Mr. Holmer. Our concern has been that there has been an |
|
overemphasis on management. We support the idea of prescribed |
|
burning, and we will support thinning in the urban/wildland |
|
interface. |
|
We do feel that the old growth areas, the unroaded areas, |
|
the riparian zones need to be put off limits as the key first |
|
step to restoring the ecosystems, and I think that you will |
|
find that if those steps are taken, it will also do a great |
|
deal to help deal with the problem of polarization, because the |
|
most contentious timber sales that people deal with are in |
|
these critical areas, and so by realizing the ecological |
|
importance as well as the social conflict that is surrounding |
|
these areas, by resolving that, I think you will find that it |
|
is easier to come to grips with how to manage the rest of the |
|
landscape, and again, I think prescribed burning and |
|
restoration of national fire regimes is the only way that in |
|
the long run we are going to be able to accomplish that. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Any of the others? |
|
Dr. Wall. Fire in many of our forest systems has always |
|
been a natural disturbance factor, and there are many species |
|
that depend on fire being introduced, but fire can also be |
|
catastrophic and destroy wildlife habitat as well as the types |
|
of riparian zones that Steve is wanting us to protect and |
|
maintain. |
|
It is a judicious use of fire that we are looking for and |
|
one that we can control in most cases, not to say that on |
|
occasion, wildfires will occur, especially in wilderness areas, |
|
et cetera. |
|
To back up and say that we should exclude fire again I |
|
think would be a definite mistake. Fire is an integral tool, |
|
and as was suggested earlier in this panel, we need to have all |
|
the tools in our toolkit, and we need to be able to use those |
|
appropriately in the appropriate times. |
|
Mr. Muckenfuss. Fire is an absolutely essential tool in the |
|
southeast. It is a matter of timing and conditions. There is no |
|
question that fires will burn in the southeast sooner or later. |
|
Through the judicious use of prescribed fire, we are able |
|
to apply this very important management tool with proper timing |
|
and under conditions which create low-intensity fires that help |
|
reduce fuel loading as well as to create additional benefits |
|
from the standpoint of habitat for wildlife and so forth. |
|
Fire has traditionally been used in the southeast by |
|
Indians and early settlers to do the same things that we |
|
accomplish with fire, and should we lose fire, it will change |
|
the entire ecosystem of the east coast for the worse. |
|
There is not a tool that is more important to manage |
|
forests and that applies no matter what snapshot in time you |
|
would like to pick as to what kind of forest you would like to |
|
have. It is extremely important for longleaf, wire-grass |
|
ecosystems as it is for plantations. |
|
Mr. Kane. I would concur that the use of fire is a critical |
|
tool; however, in the east, it is not as widely used as it is |
|
in other parts of the country because in our area, we have |
|
approximately 11 fire days that would qualify for prescribed |
|
burning. |
|
However, it is going to be used to a limited extent in our |
|
area to reestablish some species that were lost because with |
|
the advent of science and the internal combustion engine, the |
|
wildfires that ran through the east during the steam years from |
|
the steam locomotives really allowed more species diversity and |
|
allowed the oak species to be more prevalent in the current |
|
forest than what we believe it can be in the future forest, |
|
because of just the nature of the species. |
|
We are going to use prescribed burning even in the east, so |
|
it is a critical tool. |
|
Mr. Schaffer. Madame Chairman, I don't have any more |
|
questions. Thank you. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Mr. Schaffer, thank you very much. The |
|
Chair now recognizes Mr. Peterson. |
|
Mr. Peterson. Mr. Holmer, if you were suddenly appointed by |
|
the President and confirmed by the Senate to be the czar over |
|
all of public land, when and where would we cut timber? |
|
Mr. Holmer. Excuse me? Would I support---- |
|
Mr. Peterson. If you were given the role of being in charge |
|
of our national forests, you were just absolutely in charge, |
|
where and when would we cut timber, or wouldn't we? |
|
Mr. Holmer. That is an interesting question. Our |
|
organization does not support any specific level of timber |
|
target. We have not taken a position on no logging, but what we |
|
do support is the use of conservation--biology, and the latest |
|
scientific information. |
|
They are a few examples of this being conducted on a |
|
limited scale such as the Northwest Forest Plan. There is a new |
|
report out on the Sierra Nevada ecosystem, another process |
|
underway in the inland west in Idaho, Montana, eastern Oregon |
|
and Washington. |
|
We would want to look at the whole ecosystem. In our view, |
|
our forests have been seriously overcut for the past three |
|
decades, so it could be quite possible that we are in a deficit |
|
situation right now, which would mean giving the forest time to |
|
heal. |
|
Another key problem is the lack of protection for critical |
|
components of the ecosystem, such as old growth, roadless |
|
areas, and riparian zones, so restoring those areas and |
|
protecting those areas would be my first priority. |
|
Mr. Peterson. What part of the country are you from and |
|
where have you spent most of your personal time in the forest? |
|
Mr. Holmer. Actually, mostly in the east. I went to high |
|
school in the suburbs outside of Philadelphia, and I went to |
|
college at Penn State, so I have spent a fair amount of time on |
|
the Allegheny, and as my resume there says, I have been to |
|
national forests in 14 different States, and I have also had |
|
extensive experience with overflights and having a chance to |
|
see our forests from the air. |
|
Mr. Peterson. Do you believe the Allegheny National Forest |
|
has been overcut? |
|
Mr. Holmer. I am not familiar enough with the situation in |
|
the Allegheny to say that. I would say from my personal |
|
experience there, I was shocked at how many roads I saw. You |
|
can travel down certain roads seemingly in the middle of |
|
nowhere, but it seemed like it was a suburb because there were |
|
so many spur roads going off to the side to drill pads or |
|
timber sales or one activity after another. |
|
I would have to say I was somewhat shocked at how |
|
industrialized that forest was. |
|
Mr. Peterson. Who do we own the forest for? |
|
Mr. Holmer. Well, the forests are owned by the American |
|
people, and the mandate is fairly clear, to protect the full |
|
range of values on public lands, and there is abundant evidence |
|
that not all the values are being protected right now. |
|
When you look at the problem of clean water, when you look |
|
at the problem of declining biodiversity, there is every |
|
indication that not all the values are currently being |
|
protected, and when you look at the root cause, things like |
|
road building, logging, and grazing repeatedly come to the |
|
front as the reasons why these other values are being |
|
diminished. |
|
Mr. Peterson. I guess having spent my entire life very |
|
close to the ANF and often in the ANF, I would take some |
|
exception to you. I am an avid hunter myself, love to hike and |
|
spend time in the woods, in the forest, and I guess I would |
|
like to ask you how many people will go five miles off a road |
|
today? |
|
When you talk about these huge blocks that are to be locked |
|
up, you are talking about a minute number, part of the society |
|
today that will travel a mile from their car because they are |
|
afraid. |
|
I believe in having some real diversity, having some old |
|
growth, but how much, how big, for whom? I want to tell you, it |
|
is a very small part of the population that get five miles from |
|
their car under any circumstance in any forest. |
|
Mr. Holmer. I understand what you are saying, but I think |
|
that one of the values that these forests provide are |
|
fundamental ecological services, so recreation isn't always the |
|
key factor to look at. |
|
We get a lot of clean water supplies off our national |
|
forest lands. This last year, the city of Salem, Oregon, had to |
|
close down their water treatment facility because there was so |
|
much sediment in their streams. |
|
When you look at the full range that the forests provide, |
|
roadless areas are the key refuges for our biodiversity and |
|
they help control our water flows and help prevent flooding by |
|
remaining intact. |
|
There is a lot of fundamental services that most people |
|
don't even think about, and most economists have been unable to |
|
quantify up to this date. |
|
Mr. Peterson. I guess I am here to say for the record that |
|
the Allegheny River and the Clarion River that flow from the |
|
ANF are the finest quality water-wise today than they have been |
|
in many, many years, and I think it is because of good |
|
practices, a lot of good environmental policy. |
|
We have made great progress, and I can't let you get away |
|
with saying that we are not going in the right direction, that |
|
we haven't improved water quality in that region, because we |
|
have. |
|
Mr. Holmer. I appreciate you saying that, and I do know |
|
that there are some very beautiful places on the Allegheny that |
|
I enjoy visiting very much. |
|
Mr. Peterson. A quick question for Mr. Kane. You mentioned |
|
about education for the private landowner. The largest part of |
|
timber, at least in the east--I don't know that it is true in |
|
the west, is still owned by private landowners and small plots. |
|
Is government playing an adequate role in helping people |
|
understand the value of their forests? |
|
I know of cases where somebody only owned 20 acres. They |
|
sold it for a pittance, but it was worth quite a lot of money |
|
if it would have been marketed properly and cut properly. |
|
Mr. Kane. That is exactly the case. The education is truly |
|
a moving target. In the computer age as information is doubling |
|
in less than a decade, there is so much for people to know out |
|
there, and they own a piece of property for income and to pass |
|
something on to their children and for many reasons, but they |
|
don't take the time to truly understand the ecosystem. |
|
I think the education process is not only for the |
|
landowner, but for the general public. Very few people in the |
|
general public truly understand the forest and what it provides |
|
to them and how, and how managing the resource is so much more |
|
important than just hands off, because there is no way with the |
|
population of our society and the impacts our society has had |
|
on the forest ecosystem that we can say hands off, because even |
|
by standing back, we have touched it. |
|
Mr. Peterson. I would like to thank you personally and all |
|
of you for coming today. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Mr. Peterson. Bill Wall, I have |
|
some questions for you. That doesn't surprise you, does it? |
|
Dr. Wall. Not at all. Thank you. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Among the criteria that you described, you |
|
mentioned the state-of-the-art forest management practices and |
|
controlled fire. What practices are you referring to |
|
specifically for the record, and do both public and private |
|
landowners have these practices available for their use? |
|
Dr. Wall. Yes, they do have them available for their use, |
|
but at this point, I think the timber industry has figured out, |
|
has taken the lead in figuring out some of the tools that we |
|
are applying to landscapes in understanding how to use computer |
|
technology and have the actual data in hand in order to apply |
|
those techniques. |
|
We have some historical mistakes to correct, and we are |
|
learning very rapidly with those, and I would also suggest that |
|
our abilities to gather data, process that information and |
|
develop an overall feedback and learning process as we apply |
|
these things, the buzzword is adaptive management, is there |
|
inside industry and they are taking those sorts of lead roles |
|
at this point. |
|
We have the opportunity to work with our neighbors on |
|
public lands to help generate the types of information that we |
|
need and to work to apply that information. |
|
The specific techniques on the ground that are beginning to |
|
be applied are a completely different way of road building as |
|
well as timber harvesting techniques that are far more |
|
sensitive, that take into consideration physical site |
|
characteristics, and then turn around and apply specific types |
|
of applications to specific types of land that historically, we |
|
were not able to quantify or classify in the past. |
|
Using those sorts of techniques has allowed us to |
|
understand much better how to manage our forest resource and to |
|
apply that, not only to the timber values that we are seeking, |
|
but also to maintenance of biodiversity of wildlife habitat as |
|
well as our functioning riparian and aquatic systems. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. You recommended using a coarse filter |
|
approach for landscape planning. Could you help me understand |
|
that better and also explain it for the record? |
|
Dr. Wall. Sure. There was a lot of discussion earlier from |
|
various folks on this panel about a diverse array of structures |
|
and composition across the landscape. |
|
A coarse filter approach is an approach to a broad scale |
|
landscape rather than a stand-by-stand approach, although we |
|
recognize the need to use the stand-by-stand approach, in |
|
taking the full complement of wildlife species that exist |
|
across that landscape, quantifying the types of habitats needed |
|
by those various species, and then through a planning process, |
|
making sure that we apply the appropriate techniques across |
|
space and through time to maintain the habitats necessary to |
|
maintain the species that we would find in any one location. |
|
Along with that is an understanding of the ecological |
|
background or capability in which you are working which can be |
|
completely different depending on where you are. Even in Idaho, |
|
the fact that we have on our land base specifically a range |
|
from 40 or about 35 inches of rainfall all the way up to 80 |
|
inches of rainfall means that we have to think through the |
|
application of maintaining habitats and the application of |
|
specific practices depending even on just rainfall conditions. |
|
What we are talking about is taking a broader scale |
|
approach to understanding how to maintain habitat through time |
|
and across space. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. And Dr. Wall, as you take that approach, |
|
are you considering the native species in the entire course of |
|
the forest? Are we moving back to replanting and reforesting to |
|
the native species so that they will be more resistant to |
|
attack, whether it be fire or insects or whatever it might be? |
|
Dr. Wall. Most definitely. In fact, we are depending again |
|
on our ability to classify the site. We are putting species and |
|
in some cases, five different species within one stand back on |
|
specific sites. |
|
Potlatch specifically has worked with the Forest Service |
|
through time to develop resistant strains of white pine, and in |
|
order to bring white pine back into the ecosystem which was |
|
native there, it is necessary to return to some early |
|
successional stages, because that species is not shade tolerant |
|
and does need sunlight. |
|
We are actively working to restore some of the white pine |
|
sites as well as maintaining all of the rest of the native |
|
species that exist in northern Idaho on our land base. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. I have one more question for you, Dr. Wall. |
|
Will the Forest Service's ecoregion assessments, such as the |
|
Columbia River Basin ecosystem management project, help address |
|
the issues that we are trying to address as far as healthy |
|
forests and necessary criteria? Will it help on the public |
|
lands? |
|
What is your feeling about that? |
|
Dr. Wall. Well, it has tremendous potential, but at the |
|
same time, potential and reality are two different things, and |
|
the ability to apply the understanding that is gained from |
|
broad scale assessments is, as we well recognize, a problem |
|
associated with the realities of regulations and the |
|
bureaucracy in which they work. |
|
The other thing that I would suggest is that broad scale |
|
looks help us set context for the large scale. Where we make |
|
the mistake, I think, is in learning how to apply ecosystem |
|
management is trying to take information from the broad scale |
|
and bringing it all the way down to a very fine scale or local |
|
situation. |
|
What, in my mind, has to happen after working in ecosystem |
|
management concepts for the past ten years is that we need to |
|
understand that broad scale context, but at the same time, we |
|
have to build site-specific strategies underneath that in order |
|
to achieve the specific goals, so we end up working from stands |
|
to watersheds, to landscapes, and then this broad scale |
|
context, so what we end up with is a simultaneous top-down |
|
approach which is a look at the broad scale, but building with |
|
good, fine information and capability at the fine scale and |
|
meeting somewhere in between in order to meet the objectives |
|
that we are setting for ourselves. |
|
Mrs. Chenoweth. Thank you, Dr. Wall. I appreciate all of |
|
your testimony very, very much. Mr. Holmer, I really appreciate |
|
your testimony today. We haven't always agreed, and most times, |
|
we don't, do we? But I am really surprised that no other |
|
environmental organizations wanted to take the opportunity to |
|
testify today. |
|
I appreciate your being here, I really do. I would like for |
|
you to tell your colleagues in the environmental community that |
|
the record will remain open for about ten days if they would |
|
like to submit testimony for the record. |
|
I also would like to invite you very sincerely to our |
|
forests out in the west. The dynamics out there are quite |
|
different than the forests in the east, and our fuel load in |
|
many areas in western forests are about 12 feet tall, and it |
|
really is a puzzle as to what to do. Because of our very strict |
|
ambient air quality standards, we can't even burn trash piles, |
|
so we really wonder about how far we can go in managing the |
|
forest by fire. |
|
I thank you very much for your testimony, gentlemen, all of |
|
you. Thank you very much. I wish we had more time, but I will |
|
study your testimony and be very open to hear from any of you |
|
any time. Thank you very much. |
|
[Whereupon, at 4:40 p.m., the Subcommittee was adjourned; |
|
and the following was submitted for the record:] |
|
|
|
2Statement of John E. Peterson, a U.S. Representative from Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
Madame Chairman, it's a pleasure to be here today to |
|
participate in this oversight hearing in the Forest and Forest |
|
Health Subcommittee. This hearing is especially important to me |
|
as I represent the only national forest in Pennsylvania, the |
|
Allegheny National Forest. I look forward to the dialogue we |
|
are about to open concerning the management of our nation's |
|
forests and criteria for determining healthy forests. |
|
The Allegheny National Forest (ANF), more than 500,000 |
|
acres, lies completely within my Congressional District (PA-5). |
|
The ANF is a unique and diverse asset that is enjoyed by |
|
residents of the Commonwealth and visitors from across the |
|
nation. |
|
Although my views about the beauty and diversity of the |
|
Forest are subjective, the ANF does indeed have a very long |
|
list of attributes. Nearing the top of that list is worldwide |
|
recognition of the hardwood timber that grows on the Forest, |
|
black cherry in particular. In fact, the ANF is the single- |
|
largest source of high-quality black cherry. |
|
While many of us are familiar with forest health problems |
|
as they relate to Western states, the forest health concerns of |
|
Eastern forests can be quite different. However, one common, |
|
pervasive problem is weather. On the ANF, it has been periodic |
|
drought that has caused notable damage. Specifically, in 1988 |
|
and 1989 almost 18,000 acres experienced significant oak |
|
mortality. Also, tornadoes and hail storm damage has been |
|
detrimental to health of the Forest. |
|
As an Eastern forest, the ANF experiences threats from |
|
exotic sources like the forest tent caterpillar, gypsy moth, |
|
and cherry scallop shell moth. In 1994 alone, cherry scallop |
|
shell moth severely defoliated cherry on close to 40 percent of |
|
the ANF as it was the primary tree pest. Given these problems |
|
of such complex nature, research becomes a prime tool in |
|
determining methods to treat and prevent repeated instances. |
|
Madame Chairman, I would be remiss if I did not mention how |
|
pleased I am to have with us here today a constituent from my |
|
District, Mr. Kenneth Kane. Mr. Kane is Vice President of Keith |
|
Horn, Incorporated, a small group of consulting foresters from |
|
Kane, PA. I believe Mr. Kane's expertise in the field of |
|
private forestry as a hands-on manager makes him uniquely |
|
qualified to testify about forest management tools and the |
|
criteria of determining a healthy forest. |
|
I look forward to hearing from all of our panelists today |
|
as this Subcommittee seeks answers to these very important |
|
questions concerning the health and longevity of our nation's |
|
resources. |
|
|
|
------ |
|
|
|
|
|
Statementby the Honorable George Radanovich, a U.S. Representative from |
|
California |
|
|
|
Thank you, Chairman Chenoweth, for providing this forum |
|
today to discuss the issue of forest health. No single issue is |
|
more important in this Subcommittee than addressing the long- |
|
term health of our federal forests. It is just that simple. |
|
Your decision to focus this hearing on ``what criteria |
|
should be used to determine if a forest is healthy or |
|
unhealthy, and what management tools are most appropriate for |
|
maintaining or improving forest health,'' is a sound one. In |
|
order to better address the needs of the forest, we must first |
|
understand both what has worked and what we have done wrong in |
|
our management of this valuable resource. |
|
Furthermore, we need to re-examine the role of the courts |
|
in our forest management plans. Today, the laws guiding federal |
|
forest lands are often made not by sound scientific evidence, |
|
but instead by the courts. Lawsuits filed by extreme |
|
environmental organizations have contributed to the substantial |
|
reduction in timber harvests in recent years--including the |
|
salvage of dead, dying and diseased timber necessary to reduce |
|
the fuel load that has built up in our national forests. As we |
|
move forward in this process, we must remember that lawyers and |
|
judges don't improve the health of our forests, forest managers |
|
do. |
|
Our national forests--I believe--are in critical condition. |
|
The volume of dead, dying and diseased trees has reached |
|
epidemic level in recent years. These severe conditions have |
|
produced a rash of wildfires in recent years, destroying |
|
wildlife and habitat and forcing a substantial reduction in |
|
timber harvest levels not only in my district, but also the |
|
entire nation. For the sake of our forests, we must reverse |
|
this disheartening trend. |
|
Sound science, education and a recognition that the forests |
|
provide both an ecological and economic role in society are |
|
necessary in order to move away from the conflict and |
|
controversy that has surrounded our forest debates and towards |
|
a locally-driven consensus-based forest management program. A |
|
forest is a sustainable resource. If properly managed, it can |
|
provide equally for both the environment and the economy. A |
|
healthy forest is a win-win for both the environment and the |
|
communities who depend on the forest for their livelihoods. |
|
That is why we must place forest health legislation at the top |
|
of our agenda in this Subcommittee. |
|
Again, thank you Chairman Chenoweth for putting this |
|
hearing together today. I look forward to the testimony of our |
|
witnesses today as we begin a very important dialogue on the |
|
management of our federal forests. |
|
|
|
------ |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Harry V. Wiant, Jr., President, Society of American |
|
Foresters, on behalf of myself as a professional forester |
|
|
|
Mrs. Chairman, my name is Harry V. Wiant, Jr., President |
|
of the Society of American Foresters (SAF). The over 18,600 |
|
members of the Society constitute the scientific and |
|
educational association representing the profession of forestry |
|
in the United States. SAF's primary objective is to advance the |
|
science, technology, education, and practice of professional |
|
forestry for the benefit of society. We are ethically bound to |
|
advocate and practice land management consistent with |
|
ecologically sound principles. I am especially pleased to be |
|
here today to discuss the subject of Forest Health and to thank |
|
the Subcommittee for its continued support of professional |
|
forestry. I thank the Chair for the opportunity. |
|
The public policy activities of SAF are grounded in |
|
scientific knowledge and professional judgment. From this |
|
perspective we review proposed forestry and related natural |
|
resource programs to determine their adequacy to meet stated |
|
objectives and public needs. |
|
I wish to point out that I speak here today in two distinct |
|
capacities. First, I will address the views of the elected |
|
Council of the Society of American Foresters as expressed in |
|
its recent report entitled A Framework for Considering Forest |
|
Health and Productivity Issues prepared by SAF's National Task |
|
Force on Forest Health and Productivity. I wish to submit the |
|
full report for the record. I will also speak as a forester and |
|
citizen independent of the Society of American Foresters who is |
|
concerned with forest health issues. |
|
SAF has been involved in maintaining the health and |
|
productivity of American forests since Gifford Pinchot, first |
|
chief of the Forest Service, founded the organization in 1900. |
|
As a diverse organization encompassing all facets of forest |
|
management, the concept of forest health is one we have |
|
struggled with in recent years. Our recent report comes to |
|
these conclusions: |
|
Professional foresters believe there are serious forest |
|
health and productivity questions in many parts of the country. |
|
Forest health is an informal and technically inexact term. |
|
Assessment of forest health and forest productivity |
|
requires an understanding of both the condition of the forest |
|
and the objectives for the management of that forest; |
|
recognizing that objectives are set by landowners be they |
|
private, public, tribal or trust, and also by society through |
|
policy and regulation. |
|
Forest health is determined at the local level; therefore, |
|
a single national prescription to achieve healthy forests is |
|
inappropriate. |
|
I will now express my personal views, once again pointing |
|
out that these are not necessarily the opinions of the Society |
|
of American Foresters, which I would like noted in the record. |
|
As humans, we experience the joys of birth, the vigor of |
|
youth, slowing down with age, and, finally, death. With proper |
|
attention to health, our productive years may be extended. Few |
|
of us believe a ``hands-off'' approach is appropriate to |
|
maintain human health. Trees, and forests, go through similar |
|
phases. Believing that a vigorously growing forest, within the |
|
limitations of site quality and age, that is not seriously |
|
threatened by insects, diseases, fire, or other hazards is |
|
healthy, my over 40 years of experience as a forester leads me |
|
to the firm convictions that: |
|
A well-managed forest (along a spectrum from intensive |
|
management to wilderness management), with management |
|
addressing landowner or societal objectives, is the healthiest |
|
possible. |
|
In an unmanaged forest, there is no opportunity to address |
|
declining health. |
|
Picture a well-managed 5,000-acre forest, comprised of |
|
trees well adapted to the site, and being managed with a |
|
rotation age (the age at which the final harvest of trees |
|
occurs) of 50 years. After 50 years of management, 100 acres |
|
(perhaps not in a single location on the forest) are being |
|
regenerated by natural or artificial means, 100 acres have 1- |
|
year-old seedlings, etc., with 100 acres ready for the final |
|
harvest. Logging and access roads are well engineered, |
|
regeneration is prompt, and the soil productivity is |
|
maintained. |
|
Hazards to forest health, such as fire, insects, and |
|
diseases, generally are most damaging to trees of given ages. |
|
The age-class distribution of the well-managed forest minimizes |
|
those risks. With proper intermediate cuts (cuts made to |
|
provide spacing for crop trees to maintain vigorous growth, to |
|
salvage diseased and damaged trees, etc.), productivity and |
|
biodiversity are generally maximized. |
|
The criteria to judge whether a forest is healthy becomes |
|
obvious: |
|
Soil productivity is protected and maintained with well- |
|
engineered logging and access roads and prompt regeneration. |
|
The forest is comprised of species well adapted to the |
|
site. |
|
There is an approximately balanced age-class distribution. |
|
Well-maintained logging and access roads facilitate forest |
|
management and protection. |
|
Fuel levels, diseases, insects, and other potential hazards |
|
(deer, for example) are at reasonable levels. |
|
The management tools necessary to maintain or improve |
|
forest health are evident also, including: |
|
An adequate cadre of professional foresters, wildlife |
|
managers, recreation specialists, engineers, hydrologists, and |
|
others is available to provide the expertise needed to produce |
|
the commodity and non-commodity values desired. |
|
There is flexibility to manage the forest, unhampered by |
|
poorly conceived ``environmental'' laws, frivolous appeals, and |
|
tax codes which discourage long-term investments in timber |
|
management. |
|
There are strong forest research programs in the USDA |
|
Forest Service, universities, and the private sector. |
|
Forest management remains science based, and the |
|
``toolkit'' available to managers (prescribed fire, herbicides, |
|
selection method, clearcutting, etc.) is maintained. |
|
To put this in few words, the cure to our forest health |
|
problems is more and not less forest management! The primary |
|
responsibility for managing our nation's forests should be in |
|
the hands of those best qualified by training and experience, |
|
the foresters. |
|
Thank you. |
|
------ |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Hon. Stephen H. Schoenholtz, Associate Professor, Forest |
|
and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University |
|
|
|
Madam Chairman, Committee Members: |
|
Thank you for the opportunity to present my views on useful |
|
criteria to assess forest health, and management tools |
|
appropriate to maintain or improve forest health. Forest health |
|
means different things to different people depending on |
|
differences in forest management objectives and philosophies. |
|
Therefore, defining forest health is currently a topic of |
|
intense debate. There is general agreement that our well-being |
|
and the well-being of future generations depends on productive, |
|
sustainable, healthy forests. However, some perceptions of |
|
forest health vary depending on individual preferences for |
|
forest use. To manage and maintain our forests in an acceptable |
|
state for future generations, requires us to define forest |
|
health broadly enough to encompass the many facets of forest |
|
ecosystems. |
|
Evaluating forest health is a daunting task. Forest |
|
components such as plants, animals, soil, water, and air have |
|
many complex interactions that we may recognize, but do not |
|
fully understand. Evaluating and monitoring health of some |
|
components may be difficult and/or expensive. Forests are |
|
constantly changing. This must be recognized when assessing |
|
their health. Some indicators of forest health at one stage of |
|
forest development may not be important at other stages. |
|
Furthermore, separating human-induced change (e.g. increased |
|
ozone or acidic deposition, historic farming, tree harvesting, |
|
burning) from natural change (e.g. wildfire, insect outbreaks, |
|
severe storms) can be difficult. Finally, the question of scale |
|
must be addressed in the assessment of forest health; that is, |
|
forest health can be considered at the stand level (10's of |
|
acres) or at regional or national levels (millions of acres). |
|
What do we look for when we try to assess forest health? We |
|
must keep in mind that forests consist of components in |
|
addition to trees. These components include other vegetation, |
|
animals, soil, air, and water. An assessment of forest health, |
|
therefore, should consider key indicators that can be measured |
|
or described periodically to identify trends. Key indicators |
|
should also effectively integrate the status of all forest |
|
ecosystem components. It is neither possible nor is it |
|
necessary to consider all of the processes and components of a |
|
forest ecosystem in order to make useful assessments about |
|
forest health or the consequences of forest management for |
|
forest health. We must focus our efforts on identifying key |
|
indicators, the knowledge of which will permit acceptably |
|
accurate assessments of forest health. We must remember that |
|
some key indicators of forest health may vary among different |
|
forest ecosystems, among different spatial and temporal scales, |
|
and among different scientific and managerial objectives. |
|
There is great merit in trying to identify indicators of |
|
forest health in spite of the difficulties involved because |
|
these indicators are essential for understanding and predicting |
|
forest health. To be useful in society over a range of |
|
ecological and socioeconomic situations, key forest health |
|
indicators should meet the following suitability criteria |
|
(after Doran and Parkin 1994): integrate ecosystem properties |
|
and processes; be accessible to many users and applicable to |
|
field conditions; be sensitive to variations in management and |
|
climate; and where possible, be components of existing data |
|
bases. |
|
Measurements of forest vegetation meet these suitability |
|
criteria. Vegetation is often the component of primary concern |
|
when assessing forest health. However, it also provides habitat |
|
for animal communities and it interacts with other ecosystem |
|
components such as soil, air, and water. Forest ecosystem |
|
health must include a level of acceptable plant productivity. |
|
This productivity depends on development of efficient leaf area |
|
and on maintaining low stress levels in plants. This, in turn |
|
depends on the ability of the soil to supply necessary |
|
nutrients and water. |
|
A list of basic forest vegetation indicators includes: age; |
|
structure; crown condition; species composition; species |
|
diversity; growth rate; mortality rate; foliar injury; species |
|
replacement patterns; regeneration rate; presence of insects or |
|
disease; and presence of exotic species. |
|
We have a good understanding of expected temporal patterns |
|
in many forest ecosystem types. If these criteria indicate |
|
deviations from expected patterns, then management practices to |
|
maintain or enhance forest health should be considered. |
|
These management alternatives include: removal of |
|
undesirable species; thinning to appropriate tree density; |
|
supplemental planting; use of controlled burning; |
|
fertilization; manipulating vegetation to create specific |
|
habitat; and imposing stricter air quality standards. |
|
Soil is recognized as a critical component of forest |
|
ecosystems and, as such, quality of soil has a profound effect |
|
on the health and productivity of a given ecosystem. Soil is a |
|
dynamic, living, management-responsive resource whose condition |
|
is vital to both forest ecosystem function and to global |
|
balance. Health and quality of soils determine plant, animal, |
|
and human health. Criteria for indicators of soil quality and |
|
health relate mainly to their utility in defining ecosystem |
|
processes and integrating physical, chemical, and biological |
|
properties, their sensitivity to management and climatic |
|
variations, and their accessibility and utility to society. |
|
Ultimate choice of specific indicators for assessing soil |
|
quality and health will depend upon identification of |
|
strategies for sustainable management of our forest resources. |
|
There is a large range of soil attributes, such as |
|
chemical, physical, and biological properties and processes |
|
that can be used to indicate soil quality. Some of these |
|
attributes have wide utility and can serve a range of purposes. |
|
These basic soil indicators include (after Doran and Parkin |
|
1994): soil texture; maximum rooting depth; soil bulk density |
|
and infiltration; plant-available water capacity; total organic |
|
carbon and nitrogen; pH; electrical conductivity; and soil |
|
strength. |
|
Other measurements will probably be needed depending on |
|
management objectives, local conditions, and existing data |
|
bases. |
|
Our knowledge of factors affecting forest health is |
|
incomplete. To be acceptable evidence of change in forest |
|
health these conditions must be met: (1) changes in vegetation |
|
must be attributable to differences in environmental conditions |
|
(e.g. soil properties, air quality, climate); (2) changes must |
|
be evident for a sufficient time so that short-term, temporary |
|
differences are not mistaken; and (3) judgements should be |
|
based on adequate knowledge of forest factors affecting health. |
|
Monitoring forest health will require manipulations of |
|
large volumes of spatial and time-dependent environmental data. |
|
This aspect of monitoring should be developed within a |
|
Geographic Information System environment that can accommodate |
|
incorporation of new variables and can be developed into an |
|
adaptive management tool. |
|
Avoiding degradation of forest health is achieved by |
|
accepting management techniques that do not adversely affect |
|
the forest or the quality of the environment in which the |
|
forest grows. If a negative effect is an unavoidable |
|
consequence of the management goal, then future forest health |
|
problems need to be averted by incorporating the appropriate |
|
ameliorative techniques into management decisions for the |
|
forest. This requires an understanding of what has been changed |
|
in a negative way and the correct ameliorative practice needed |
|
to restore forest health. |
|
Although we lack empirical evidence for judging the degree |
|
to which some criteria can be altered without concomitant loss |
|
of forest health, we must harness what we know about forest |
|
ecosystem function in a form that is useful for managers and |
|
policy makers in order to help those responsible for making |
|
effective decisions about forest management and environmental |
|
regulations. The forest management decision process should be |
|
based on potential impacts to indicators of forest ecosystem |
|
health. Since our knowledge base is incomplete it is essential |
|
that experience, feedback, and adaptability play prominent |
|
roles in any assessment of forest health. |
|
Literature Cited: |
|
Doran, J.W., and T.B. Parkin. 1994. Defining and assessing |
|
soil quality. Chapter 1. In J.W. |
|
Doran, D.C. Coleman, D.F. Bezdicek, and B.A. Stewart |
|
(eds.), Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment, |
|
SSSA Special Publication Number 35, Am. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, |
|
WI. |
|
|
|
------ |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Mike Dombeck, Chief, Forest Service, U.S. Department of |
|
Agriculture |
|
|
|
Madam Chairman and members of the Subcommittee: |
|
I am pleased to appear before this subcommittee for the |
|
first time as Chief of the Forest Service. As some of you may |
|
know, I am no stranger to the Forest Service, having grown up |
|
25 miles from a town of 1,500 people in northern Wisconsin's |
|
beautiful lake country, in the Chequamegon National Forest. In |
|
my Forest Service career, I have worked at various levels of |
|
the organization in the West, Midwest, and Washington D.C., |
|
before going to the Department of the Interior. I am glad to be |
|
back. I am accompanied today by Dr. Ann Bartuska, Director of |
|
our Forest Health Protection Staff. |
|
|
|
Success Stories in Forest Ecosystem Restoration |
|
|
|
Today, I will begin my testimony with several concrete |
|
examples of efforts to restore the health of our nations |
|
forests. These examples demonstrate we can improve the |
|
conditions of forest ecosystems. |
|
|
|
Longleaf Pine in the Southeastern United States |
|
|
|
Of all the southern pines, many consider the longleaf pine |
|
the most valuable in terms of quality of wood products, the |
|
most aesthetically pleasing, and the most resistant to fire and |
|
to insect and disease attacks. In presettlement times, |
|
approximately 60 million acres of longleaf pine stands extended |
|
from East Texas through the lower coastal plain to Virginia. |
|
This ecosystem was maintained by frequent low-intensity fire |
|
from lightning strikes or human-caused ignition. By the early |
|
1900's, the area of longleaf pine forests had been reduced to |
|
about 3 million acres, mainly due to the exclusion of fire from |
|
the ecosystem and because of extensive conversion of forest |
|
lands to agricultural uses. |
|
We are now artificially regenerating longleaf pine on the |
|
most appropriate sites where it originally grew. We work with |
|
other federal agencies, state forestry organizations and |
|
private land owners in this effort. We are also involved in |
|
cooperative research on longleaf pine ecosystems with partners |
|
such as the Alabama Alliance with members representing Tall |
|
Timbers Research, Inc., universities, private landowners, and |
|
environmental organizations. The Forest Service is now making |
|
restoration of longleaf pine ecosystems a priority as the |
|
national forests revise their land and resource management |
|
plans. Through these efforts, we are establishing new stands of |
|
longleaf pine and are providing a wide array of ecological, |
|
social and economic benefits. |
|
|
|
Seedling Resistance to White Pine Blister Rust |
|
|
|
In 1909 and 1910, white pine blister rust was from |
|
contaminated nursery stock from Europe and was introduced to |
|
the east and west coasts. The first infection in Idaho was |
|
discovered on the Cour D'Alene National Forest in 1923. Since |
|
then, it has spread throughout the white forest pine type in |
|
Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and western Montana. In the west, |
|
blister rust has typically killed 90 percent or more of the |
|
western white pine. Stands where white pine formally dominated |
|
have been converted to grand fir, cedar, hemlock and Douglas- |
|
fir. Control efforts were largely successful in the east, but |
|
proved ineffective in the vast expanse of western wildlands. |
|
Disease-resistant white pines were observed in infected |
|
areas. In the 1950's and 1960's, we began a successful breeding |
|
program to develop resistant white pines. Today, we have saved |
|
the species from extinction and are reintroducing resistant |
|
white pine seedlings as fast as we can working toward the |
|
restoration of the western white pine ecosystem in our Northern |
|
Region. |
|
|
|
Prescribed Fire and Thinning on the Boise National Forest |
|
|
|
The past decade brought severe drought and fire to the |
|
Boise National Forest in south central Idaho. Catastrophic |
|
wildfires burned as never before and the damage to the forest |
|
ecosystem and dependent communities has been severe. The |
|
conditions that have made the Boise so susceptible to |
|
catastrophic fire are evident. Once fire resistant forests |
|
dominated by ponderosa pine have been replaced by far more |
|
dense stands of trees--including many of species that would be |
|
naturally limited--existing under conditions that cannot be |
|
sustained. These overstocked, highly stressed stands have |
|
resulted in fuel loads that, when ignited, experience very |
|
largestand-replacement fires far more often than historical |
|
conditions provided. |
|
The Boise National Forest has been a leader in identifying |
|
addressing forest health problems in ponderosa pine ecosystems. |
|
Using the latest technology to identify areas at highest risk |
|
to catastrophic fire, the Boise prepared over 16,000 acres for |
|
prescribed burning this year. Through the increased use of |
|
prescribed fire and landscape-wide thinnings, we are changing |
|
tree composition, stand structure, and tree density to restore |
|
ponderosa pine ecosystems. The value of this work is obvious. |
|
It costs $20 to $50 an acre for prescribed burning compared to |
|
$400 to $4,000 an acre to suppress wildfires. |
|
Before turning to the issue of forest health and how to |
|
measure it, I would like to talk about the broader issue of |
|
management of National Forest Systems (NFS) lands. |
|
|
|
Management of The National Forests |
|
|
|
There is an ongoing dialogue in this nation over how |
|
national forests and rangelands should be managed. This |
|
dialogue is healthy. Dialogue and information are the essence |
|
of democracy. The people we serve, all of the people, are now |
|
more fully engaged in defining our course. The task for the |
|
Forest Service is not to dictate the outcome. Rather, we need |
|
to be the facilitators, the suppliers of knowledge and |
|
expertise, the educators and communicators who help people |
|
search for solutions. |
|
Today, faced with competing demands, new pressures on the |
|
land and greater challenges than ever before, resource |
|
management has become more contentious and more heated. We in |
|
this room can help to change that. I believe that if we work |
|
together, we can usher in a new era of resource stewardship and |
|
a deeper commitment to conservation; a commitment marked by a |
|
willingness to hear all sides of the debate; a commitment to |
|
remain open and responsive to new ideas, new values, and new |
|
information; a commitment to leave our lands healthier and our |
|
waters cleaner. |
|
I call this commitment of working with people to maintain |
|
and restore the health of the land, collaborative stewardship. |
|
Collaborative stewardship rests on one very basic premise: We |
|
simply cannot meet the needs of people if we do not first |
|
secure the health of the land. |
|
|
|
Forest Health in the United States |
|
|
|
While our forests are generally healthy, past timber |
|
harvest practices such as selective removal of pine overstory |
|
in the Inland West with the subsequent ingrowth of fir |
|
understory and the elimination of fire from these fire- |
|
dependent ecosystems have increased the risk of catastrophic |
|
wildfires, and increased the severity of drought, insect |
|
infestation, and disease. Serious forest health problems do |
|
exist and forest management practices must be improved based on |
|
the best available science. |
|
Most people support the goal of sustaining healthy forest |
|
ecosystems. Yet, over the past year, the words ``forest |
|
health'' have become unnecessarily value laden and incorrectly |
|
characterized to imply ``log it to save it.'' If we are to move |
|
beyond the divisiveness associated with implementation of the |
|
salvage rider, we must begin a more productive and credible |
|
dialogue about ``forest health.'' To so do we must abide by |
|
three principles. |
|
First, unhealthy conditions in our forests developed over |
|
many decades--any solution will require time and commitment to |
|
implement. We must look at restoration of forest health as an |
|
investment: an investment in the land; an investment for our |
|
children's futures; an investment that will ensure productive, |
|
healthy and diverse national forests. |
|
Second, restoring forest health in not simply a forestry |
|
issue. A healthy forest is one that maintains the function, |
|
diversity, and resiliency of all its components, such as |
|
wildlife and fish habitat, riparian areas, soils, rangelands, |
|
and economic potential and will require active management. It |
|
will require road maintenance and obliteration; use of |
|
prescribed fire; grazing management; thinning of green trees; |
|
salvage; and, other forest management practices. We must use |
|
all available tools and continue our search for new ones. |
|
Third, we must more effectively communicate the many |
|
environmental and economic benefits of restoring forest health |
|
as well as the consequences of inaction. If people do not |
|
support restoration of forest health, then all of our best |
|
efforts will be wasted. |
|
I would like to concentrate my remarks today on how we can |
|
work together to develop a strong network of healthy forests. |
|
Forest ecosystems are dynamic and ever changing. We now |
|
know the futility of trying to maintain static and predictable |
|
forest conditions. We recognize that natural disturbances such |
|
as fire, flood, insects, disease, and hurricanes are not only |
|
inevitable, they are necessary to maintain the health, |
|
diversity, and productivity of a forest ecosystem. |
|
Understanding the role and function of natural disturbances and |
|
the effects of human-induced ones is prerequisite to restoring |
|
and sustaining healthy ecosystems. How we integrate these |
|
relatively straightforward concepts into our restoration |
|
efforts is the challenge. |
|
|
|
Inventory and Assessments |
|
|
|
Establishing priorities for restoration projects requires a |
|
clear understanding of forest ecosystem conditions and trends. |
|
Programs such as Forest Inventory and Analysis and Forest |
|
Health Monitoring provide information to assess national |
|
conditions and trends. These data assist us in the development |
|
of regional assessments such as the Interior Columbia River |
|
Basin Assessment, the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, and the |
|
Southern Appalachian Assessment. At this regional scale, all of |
|
the critical issues are described, alternative solutions |
|
proposed, and implementation considerations identified as |
|
background material for potential land management decisions. |
|
The point is that without good base-line data, we cannot make |
|
good management decisions. |
|
|
|
Actions |
|
|
|
The Forest Service has identified a series of management |
|
actions to address the critical issues of forest health |
|
mentioned. These include: |
|
<bullet>Increasing the role of prescribed fire and fuels |
|
treatment; |
|
<bullet>In partnership with the Animal and Plant Inspection |
|
Service, reducing the introduction, spread, impact and increase |
|
control of exotic pests--both plant and animal; |
|
<bullet>Accelerating restoration of riparian functions; |
|
<bullet>Increasing thinning in dense forests; |
|
<bullet>Increasing monitoring of forested and rangeland |
|
ecosystems; |
|
<bullet>Increasing use of science in resource-decision |
|
making; |
|
<bullet>Increasing technical and financial assistance to |
|
non-industrial private forest (NIPF) landowners. |
|
The Forest Service will work with its partners using these |
|
priority actions to address critical forest health issues. |
|
Specifically, the FY 1998 budget proposes a significant |
|
increase in fuels management under our wildland fire management |
|
proposal. The fact is we have less of a ``fire'' problem then |
|
we do a ``fuels'' problem. We must make fuels management a |
|
significant part of our overall fire management program and, |
|
ultimately, this investment in fuels reduction will result in |
|
long term savings in fire suppression costs. We have also |
|
proposed increases for timber stand improvement activities and |
|
forest vegetation management. We hope you will support the 1998 |
|
budget proposal. |
|
In addition, we will shortly share with you a legislative |
|
proposal to create a new permanent fund called the ``Forest |
|
Ecosystem Restoration and Maintenance Fund''. This fund would |
|
provide additional resources for reducing fire hazards and |
|
improving the structure and health of forests. |
|
Another specific action involves cooperative efforts |
|
encouraged by our State and Private Forestry programs. |
|
Increasingly, the nation is dependent on non-industrial private |
|
forest lands (NIPF), which comprise 50 percent of privately |
|
owned forest lands, to meet timber demands. Some NIPF lands are |
|
not as healthy or productive as the owners would like. The |
|
Forest Stewardship Program and the Stewardship Incentives |
|
Program provide technical and financial assistance to NIPF |
|
owners in meeting their objectives for good land stewardship. |
|
Other programs such as Economic Assistance and Agroforestry |
|
help develop the linkages between healthy wildland communities |
|
and healthy human communities. The Urban and Community Forestry |
|
program provides financial and technical assistance to |
|
communities in how to plant species of trees that are less |
|
likely to succumb to insects and diseases and other damaging |
|
agents. As you can see, forest health is not simply a salvage |
|
issue; it is an ecosystem restoration issue with broad |
|
opportunities and complex solutions. |
|
|
|
One Approach to Forest Ecosystem Restoration |
|
|
|
An outstanding example of the type of collaboration |
|
necessary to restore forest health is happening in the eastside |
|
forest ecosystems of Oregon. A blue ribbon panel of scientists |
|
convened by Governor Kitzhaber identified ways we could speed |
|
the healing of these ecosystems, methods which may be broadly |
|
applicable to all forested regions of the West. The Kitzhaber |
|
report embraces the full spectrum of forest and watershed |
|
management and restoration activities such as riparian |
|
restoration, noxious weed management, prescribed fire, grazing |
|
management, and thinning. It also contains a common sense |
|
recommendation that initial forest ecosystem restoration |
|
efforts focus on less controversial areas avoiding riparian, |
|
old growth, and roadless areas. |
|
I have asked Governor Kitzhaber, Congressman Bob Smith of |
|
Oregon, and a broad range of public interests--environmental |
|
and industry--how we can move forward and begin the restoration |
|
of the eastside forest ecosystems. Last week I spoke with the |
|
Governor and his collaborative citizen's council. I have |
|
already met with the heads of the Fish and Wildlife Service, |
|
National Marine Fisheries Service, the Environmental Protection |
|
Agency, and the Bureau of Land Management to discuss how we can |
|
constructively employ the approach outlined by Governor |
|
Kitzhaber. All parties have expressed strong interest in moving |
|
ahead with restoration of our forest ecosystems. I believe this |
|
is the sort of approach that will help rebuild trust and |
|
support for forest ecosystem restoration activities. |
|
|
|
Criteria and Indicators for Forest Health |
|
|
|
Because the issue of forest health transcends national |
|
boundaries, we have been working internationally to address |
|
forest health concerns. Building on our Forest Inventory and |
|
Analysis and Forest Health Monitoring programs, the United |
|
States, as one of 12 countries, was signatory in 1995 to the |
|
Santiago Declaration. Signatory countries contain more than 40 |
|
per cent of the world's temperate and boreal forest lands. This |
|
landmark document lists 7 criteria that characterize how we |
|
must manage for sustainable forestry along with indicators for |
|
measuring sustainability. The criteria include: conservation of |
|
biological diversity; maintenance of productive capacity of |
|
forest ecosystems; maintenance of ecosystem health and |
|
vitality; conservation and maintenance of soil and water |
|
resources; maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon |
|
cycles; maintenance and enhancement of long-term socioeconomic |
|
benefits to meet the needs of societies; and legal, |
|
institutional and economic framework for forest conservation |
|
and sustainable management. |
|
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
The message I wish to leave you with is that we can |
|
accelerate the healing of our forests. And we can do so in a |
|
balanced and measured approach. This is not about the ``cut it |
|
to save it'' misnomer that presently surrounds the words |
|
``forest health''. It is about sitting at the same table with |
|
the regulatory agencies, state, other land managers, and |
|
citizens and taking action before we are confronted with |
|
incredibly costly--both socially and environmentally-- |
|
conflagrations. |
|
The consequences of inaction far outweigh the fiscal costs |
|
of forest ecosystem restoration. Catastrophic events such as |
|
floods, fire and landslides, are occurring at increasing |
|
frequencies with ever more devastating consequences. Noxious |
|
weeds are diminishing the productivity of hundreds of thousands |
|
of acres of public land. Devastating fires are increasingly |
|
encroaching upon the urban-forest interface. Last year alone, |
|
over 6 million acres of public land burned. Healthy forests |
|
will provide the resiliency to minimize the severe consequences |
|
of these events. Without decisive action these problems will |
|
only worsen. |
|
Restoration will not be quick. And in fact, it will be very |
|
expensive. But we must look at these sorts of activities as |
|
investments in the land--investments that will immediately |
|
reduce the risk of catastrophic fire and, in the long run will |
|
greatly enhance forest productivity, health, and diversity. It |
|
took many decades for today's unhealthy forest conditions to |
|
develop; it will take many years to reverse them. |
|
Thanks for inviting me to be here today. I'd be pleased to |
|
answer any questions. |
|
|
|
------ |
|
|
|
|
|
Testimony of Steve Holmer, Campaign Coordinator, Western Ancient Forest |
|
Campaign |
|
|
|
Chairman Chenoweth, thank you for this opportunity to |
|
testify on the management of our National Forests. The Western |
|
Ancient Forest Campaign represents organizations and |
|
individuals nationwide who are dedicated to protecting forest |
|
and aquatic ecosystems on the National Forests. |
|
Increasing evidence demonstrates that over the past three |
|
decades, our National Forests have suffered too much logging, |
|
too much roadbuilding, and too much cattle grazing and fire |
|
suppression with little concern about the impact these |
|
activities have on our clean water supplies, fish and wildlife, |
|
recreational opportunities and the ecological integrity of |
|
forest ecosystems. |
|
|
|
The Facts: Our National Forests Imperiled |
|
|
|
A recent mapping project by the World Wildlife Fund |
|
concluded that only 2% of the original forests remain in the |
|
lower forty eight states. The Eastside Forests Scientific |
|
Society Panel report concluded that the few remaining roadless |
|
areas are threatened and that very little of the old growth |
|
Ponderosa pine forest remains. The report recommends: no |
|
logging of old growth forests or trees of any species older |
|
than 150 years or greater than 20 inches in diameter; no |
|
logging in aquatic diversity areas and to establish protected |
|
corridors along streams, rivers, lakes and wetlands; no logging |
|
or roadbuilding in roadless areas. |
|
Both the PACFISH and INFISH federal interim guidelines for |
|
protecting imperiled fish stocks concurred with the conclusion |
|
that we need to protect roadless areas and riparian zones to |
|
restore declining fisheries. These are critical first steps |
|
towards proper management and rehabilitating faltering forest |
|
and aquatic ecosystems in the Inland West. |
|
The Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project report came to similar |
|
conclusions and also stated that, ``Timber harvest, through its |
|
effects on forest structure, local microclimate, and fuel |
|
accumulation, has increased fire severity more than any other |
|
recent human activity. `` The notion that we can salvage log |
|
the forests to reduce fire risk is not supported by any |
|
empirical scientific data. |
|
In the state of Idaho, over 960 streams are polluted and |
|
rated as ``water quality limited'' by the Environmental |
|
Protection Agency because of too much contamination in the |
|
streams. Over half of these streams are being degraded by |
|
logging. Flooding, exacerbated by logging and roadbuilding in |
|
the Couer d'Alene watershed is steadily sending millions of |
|
pounds of lead contaminated sediments into Lake Couer d'Alene |
|
and ultimately into the city of Spokane's watershed. In Oregon, |
|
seven people were killed this year as a result of mudslides. |
|
Numerous scientific studies have been published, including by |
|
the U.S. Forest Service that conclude that logging and |
|
roadbuilding increase the risk and severity of landslides and |
|
flooding. |
|
Across the West, fish stocks continue to decline and many |
|
species such as the coho and bull trout are being considered |
|
for listing under the Endangered Species Act. Over 70,000 jobs |
|
of a once booming commercial fishing industry have been lost |
|
because the fish are gone. Clean drinking water for millions of |
|
Americans originates on the National Forests and yet there is |
|
no protection for this resource. Last year, the city of Salem, |
|
Oregon was forced to close down its water treatment system |
|
because of the huge amount of sediments filling the river. The |
|
City of Portland estimated that it would have cost $200 million |
|
to build water treatment facilities if the Bull Run watershed |
|
that provides their water was not protected from logging and |
|
roadbuilding. |
|
The private and public forests of the Southeast are |
|
threatened by unsustainable logging. There are now over 140 |
|
chip mills in the Southeast that average over 300,000 tons of |
|
chips a year, 100 of these were sited within the last ten |
|
years. At 300,000 metric tons of chips per mill per year, |
|
nearly one million acres--1,562 square miles--of southeast |
|
forest are being fed annually to the chip mills. And because |
|
chip mills grind up trees of any size, clearcutting is the most |
|
common method of logging used to feed the mills. According to |
|
industry and USFS, the growth to harvest ratio for softwoods in |
|
the South went negative in 1991. Hardwood harvests are expected |
|
to exceed growth within the next 2-10 years. This is not only |
|
evidence that the industry is unsustainable, but that chip |
|
mills are depleting the forests, thereby impacting water |
|
quality, habitats, ecosystem health and local forest-dependent |
|
businesses. In addition, chip mills employ very few workers. A |
|
typical chip mill has a sourcing radius of 75 miles yet only |
|
employs from 4 to 10 people and the hardwood consumed by a |
|
single chip mill in one month could run an average size sawmill |
|
for an entire year. Hardwood chip exports increased 500% from |
|
1989 to 1995. |
|
These are the facts as presented by the scientific |
|
community, industry and government agencies. These are the real |
|
forest ecosystem health problems which this Committee chooses |
|
to ignore in favor of arguments that all come to the same |
|
conclusion: more logging. |
|
|
|
The Lessons of the Logging Rider |
|
|
|
Claiming to address the overstocking and fuel loading |
|
problems caused by fire suppression and grazing cattle, the |
|
104th Congress passed the Salvage Logging Rider which suspended |
|
environmental laws and a citizen's right to have those laws |
|
enforced and participate in how their own lands were being |
|
managed. But no effort was made to address the fundamental |
|
problems of too much grazing and too much fire suppression. |
|
Under the rider we witnessed the logging of Ancient Forests |
|
that had been protected by the courts. Under the rider, the |
|
guise of logging dead and dying trees was used by the Forest |
|
Service to log large, green trees. Unroaded areas, which |
|
represent some our nation's last unprotected wilderness were |
|
entered and logged. The government's own Interagency Report on |
|
the Implementation of the Rider confirmed these abuses. |
|
The logging rider ignored science by suspending procedural |
|
laws such as the National Environmental Policy Act that |
|
requires the best available information be applied before the |
|
government takes a proposed action. The logging rider allowed |
|
the agency to ignore economics and offer timber sales that they |
|
knew would lose money. The agreement implementing the rider |
|
reinstituted timber targets. This kind of discredited mandate |
|
forces the agency to ``get-the-cut-out'' by making bad |
|
management decisions that ignore scientific evidence and |
|
economic common sense, and that have devastating consequences |
|
for the environment. |
|
The logging rider overturned the fundamental notions of |
|
democracy by banning citizen appeals and the system of checks |
|
and balances that has made our system work by allowing the |
|
Forest Service to ignore the objections of other federal |
|
agencies. Eliminating citizen appeals and meaningful judicial |
|
review has no place in the American system which is based on |
|
the right of every citizen to participate and ensure that the |
|
government is not acting above the law. |
|
To their credit, Clinton Administration officials admitted |
|
that signing the rider was the worst mistake of their first |
|
term and they issued the Glickman Directive which halted some |
|
but not all of these abuses. |
|
In the aftermath of the rider, several lessons are clear. |
|
Our environmental laws and public processes should never again |
|
be suspended. Ancient Forests, roadless areas and riparian |
|
zones need permanent protection. And the U.S. Forest Service |
|
needs to be reformed and made more accountable to the public. |
|
|
|
Restoring Accountability |
|
|
|
To address these threats to the health of our forest |
|
ecosystems we would like to make several recommendations which |
|
we urge the Committee to adopt. |
|
Working in conjunction with over forty other organizations, |
|
we have developed a Grassroots Forest Initiative to identify |
|
some specific ideas to help restore accountability to the |
|
agency and help stop the abuses that continue to threaten our |
|
forest heritage. Here are the four points in the initiative: |
|
1. Prohibit new roadbuilding on the National Forests by |
|
ending any appropriation for new roads and by prohibiting the |
|
use of purchaser road credits to build new roads. Given the |
|
ecological importance of roadless areas and with over 370,000 |
|
miles of logging roads, eight times the length of the |
|
Interstate Highway, and a massive backlog of roads in need of |
|
maintenance, it does not make sense to build new roads. |
|
2. Prohibit logging and road-building on unstable and |
|
potentially unstable national forest land. Recent landslides in |
|
the West have demonstrated some of the ``hidden costs'' to |
|
public safety and the environment of subsidized logging and |
|
road building on steep, unstable slopes. |
|
3. Restore accountability by reforming or abolishing off- |
|
budget funds. There is a growing consensus that the various |
|
off-budget funds--the Knutson-Vandenberg (KV), Brush Disposal |
|
and Salvage Funds--which total nearly a billion dollars a year, |
|
must be either reformed or abolished. The Interagency Report on |
|
Implementation of the Rider concluded that the salvage fund |
|
created an incentive for the agency to choose logging projects |
|
when other activities (such as prescribed fire or stream |
|
restoration) were more appropriate, because the agency could |
|
keep most of the receipts for the salvage logging operations. |
|
We strongly oppose tying restoration projects to timber sale |
|
receipts. |
|
4. End money-losing timber sales. The annual report of the |
|
White House Council of Economic Advisors shows that the Forest |
|
Service spent $234 million more than it collected in timber |
|
receipts in 1995. ``Generally, the Forest Service subsidizes |
|
timber extraction from public lands by collecting less timber |
|
sale revenues than it spends on timber program costs,'' the |
|
report says. According to the Government Accounting Office |
|
(GAO) the timber sale program lost nearly $1 billion from 1992- |
|
1994. For the sake of both the environment and the taxpayer, it |
|
is time to end subsidized logging on the National Forests. |
|
This initiative has been signed by over one hundred groups |
|
including the Sierra Club, The Wilderness Society, California |
|
Wilderness Coalition, Inland Empire Public Lands Council, |
|
Oregon Natural Resources Council, Northeast Ohio Sierra Club, |
|
Northwest Ecosystem Alliance, and the Western North Carolina |
|
Alliance. |
|
At Sen. Craig's recent forest management workshop the |
|
Government Accounting Office testified that during 1995, the |
|
Forest Service spent $215 million dollars of the taxpayer's |
|
money, that they cannot account for. We urge the Committee to |
|
use its oversight authority to find out what happened to the |
|
taxpayer's $215 million, determine why the agency can't account |
|
for it and document how they will ensure this abuse of the |
|
public's trust will not occur again. |
|
We urge the committee to look at the full range of values |
|
our forests provide such as clean water, fish and wildlife |
|
habitat, and recreational opportunities. According to the |
|
Forest Service Resources and Planning Assessment, by the year |
|
2000, recreation on the National Forests will produce over $100 |
|
billion dollars for the economy while logging will only produce |
|
$3.5 billion. The value of clean and stable water flows from |
|
our forests is estimated in the trillions. |
|
|
|
Old Growth, Roadless Areas and Riparian Zones Need |
|
Protection |
|
|
|
In testimony before the Senate Energy Committee on February |
|
25, 1997, Chief of the Forest Service Michael Dombeck |
|
testified, ``The unfortunate reality is that many people |
|
presently do not trust us to do the right thing. Until we |
|
rebuild that trust and strengthen those relationships, it is |
|
simply common sense that we avoid riparian, old growth and |
|
roadless areas.'' We urge the Committee to support Chief |
|
Dombeck's effort to reform the agency and restore the public's |
|
trust by adopting his common sense recommendation and the other |
|
recommendations in this testimony. |
|
In closing, I would like to quote a Republican President |
|
who helped make this a great nation by protecting some of our |
|
National Forests, Teddy Roosevelt, who said, ``The Nation |
|
behaves well if it treats the natural resources as assets which |
|
it must turn over to the next generation increased and not |
|
impaired in value.'' |
|
I believe the United States is a great nation, but I feel |
|
that we are now risking that greatness by lacking the foresight |
|
and courage that made us great to begin with. We can choose to |
|
squander our remaining unprotected wild places, or we can be |
|
revered by future generations as Teddy Roosevelt is, for having |
|
the vision and the greatness to protect this nation's natural |
|
heritage. |
|
Thank you for this opportunity to testify. |
|
|
|
------ |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Kenneth C. Kane, Keith Horn, Inc., Consulting Foresters, |
|
Kane, Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
Madame Chairman and members of the Subcommittee, I |
|
appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today to |
|
discuss forest health on the Allegheny region which includes |
|
the Allegheny National Forest (ANF). You have asked those |
|
testifying before the Subcommittee to address two specific |
|
issues: |
|
1. What criteria determine if a forest is healthy or |
|
unhealthy? and |
|
2. What management tools are most appropriate to maintain |
|
or improve forest health? |
|
I will address both of your questions directly. However, |
|
let me first provide some background information which will |
|
help set the stage for my presentation. |
|
My name is Kenneth C. Kane. I am Vice President of Keith |
|
Horn, Inc. consulting foresters in Kane, Pennsylvania. I am a |
|
graduate of Penn State's School of Forest Resources where I |
|
received a Bachelor of Science degree in 1982. I have lived in |
|
the Allegheny region my entire life and have studied and worked |
|
with the forests of this region for over 20 years. For the last |
|
13 years, I have been a full-time, hands-on manager of private |
|
forest land. I am Chairman of the Pennsylvania Division of the |
|
Society of American Foresters and also Chairman of Penn Chapter |
|
of the Association of Consulting Foresters of America. I am |
|
also president of the Kane Area School Board and active in |
|
other community and industrial organizations, including the |
|
Allegheny Forest Alliance. I am testifying on my own behalf. |
|
|
|
The Allegheny National Forest |
|
|
|
For many years, the Allegheny National Forest has been the |
|
single largest source of high-quality black cherry, a species |
|
of wood in great demand here in the United States and around |
|
the world. Continued harvest and regeneration of the ANF's |
|
black cherry trees is a top priority for hardwood lumber |
|
producers located near the ANF and for veneer manufacturers |
|
throughout North America. |
|
It is fair to say that the ANF is the flagship national |
|
forest in the Northeast. In the last seven years (fiscal years |
|
'90-'96) the ANF produced $132.6 million in timber sale |
|
revenues. The Forest Service estimates that costs attributable |
|
to the ANF timber program during that period were $29.1 |
|
million. Thus, the net profit to the United States was $103.5 |
|
million. Of that amount, $33.8 million was returned to the |
|
counties through the Twenty-Five Percent Fund. [Attached is a |
|
chart (Fig. 1) which illustrates the ANF's profitability.] |
|
Fortunately, Madame Chairman, the ANF has no widespread |
|
threatened or endangered species listings or other over arching |
|
legal/political issues driving its timber program into a tail |
|
spin of oblivion. However, there are other challenges ahead, |
|
and we must act now to protect the enormous values of this |
|
national forest. |
|
|
|
The ANF: A Forest at Ever-increasing Risk |
|
|
|
Like other national forests in the Eastern US, the |
|
Allegheny National Forest is a second-growth forest with mostly |
|
even-aged timber stands. In general, these stands were created |
|
50-90 years ago and are now extremely well-stocked with black |
|
cherry and other valuable hardwood trees. Black cherry is a |
|
shallow rooted tree species; mature trees are highly |
|
susceptible to wind-throw damage. Thus, the stands on the ANF |
|
that are heavy with mature black cherry trees are at ever |
|
increasing risk. |
|
Attached to this statement are two charts that illustrate |
|
my point. The first (Fig. 2) shows the distribution of timber |
|
stands by 20-year age classes. As you can see, nearly all of |
|
the timber stands on this 503,000 acre national forest are |
|
either 51-70 or 71-90 years old. The second chart (Fig. 3) |
|
illustrates the fact that the ANF is an incredibly productive |
|
timber-growing forest. More than four-fifths of this forest is |
|
highly suited for the production of black cherry, oak, and |
|
other species. |
|
As mentioned earlier, the ANF is the single most important |
|
source of high quality black cherry logs. Given the importance |
|
of this species to the domestic furniture business and to |
|
America's veneer and lumber exports, we need to do everything |
|
possible to ensure that the ANF will always be a source of |
|
black cherry. That's why we have to maintain and improve the |
|
health of this and other national forests. |
|
|
|
Question One: What Criteria Determine If a Forest Is |
|
Healthy? |
|
|
|
To answer this question for the Allegheny Plateau, you must |
|
remember that essentially the entire forest in the region was |
|
clear-cut between 1880 and 1930. [Such clear-cutting was very |
|
common throughout the East. In fact, nearly all eastern |
|
hardwood forests are the result of the clear-cuts which |
|
occurred at or near the turn of the century.] The vast clear- |
|
cutting of that era virtually eliminated the beech-hemlock, |
|
old-growth (climax) forests of the region. The hardwood forests |
|
which emerged did so naturally (without planting). |
|
So, within the forests of the Allegheny region and other |
|
``second-growth'' eastern hardwood forests, forest health is |
|
typically determined by answering some basic questions: |
|
<bullet>Individual Tree Vigor. What is the condition of the |
|
crown, stem, root, and leaf of the tree? |
|
<bullet>Species Diversity. Is there an adequate diversity |
|
of trees, shrubs, flowers, and other plant species present in |
|
the forest? |
|
<bullet>Size Class Diversity. Since not all trees grow at |
|
the same rate, are there trees of various sizes? |
|
<bullet>Presence of Desired Natural Regeneration. Are |
|
preferred tree and other plant species regenerating naturally |
|
or are non-preferred species becoming dominant? |
|
It is important to emphasize, however, that forest health |
|
criteria--like other forest management parameters--are defined |
|
by the landowner. One of the reasons why national forest health |
|
seems to be a moving target is that public forestry issues are |
|
very dynamic. In other words, the objectives of the landowner |
|
(the public) changes constantly. That is not the case in the |
|
private sector, where most forest landowners have two primary |
|
objectives: (1) production of wood products; and (2) continuity |
|
of ownership. [Some forest lands in our region have been held |
|
by the same family since 1855.] |
|
So, where do we stand? At present, forest health in the |
|
Allegheny region is threatened by native and exotic insects, |
|
disease, and mammals. The Gypsy Moth and Beech Scale Nectria |
|
complex are two examples of exotic threats and over-browsing by |
|
white tailed deer (which reduces desired vegetation such as |
|
hardwood seedlings and thus species diversity) is an example of |
|
a native mammal threat. |
|
In addition to these problems, the forests of the region |
|
are simply growing old. Typically, forest professionals find |
|
that forests in the Allegheny region that are 50 years of age |
|
are generally healthier than forests which are 75 years old, |
|
which are healthier than forests that are 100 years old, etc. |
|
This is attributed to the fact that hardwood forests--like |
|
humans--experience reduced resilience as they approach the end |
|
of their natural life span (which is about 125 years for the |
|
forests and a bit less for humans). Hardwood forests change |
|
dramatically between 125 and 150 years of age. Specifically, |
|
species diversity drops from a wide variety of shade intolerant |
|
species (including black cherry, ash, tulip poplar, etc.) to a |
|
handful of shade tolerant species (mostly sugar maple, hemlock, |
|
and beech). This decrease in tree species diversity is one |
|
measure of an unhealthy forest. |
|
As mentioned earlier, the forests of the Allegheny region |
|
(especially the ANF) are recognized internationally for the |
|
high-quality hardwood timber that they produce. The unique |
|
unglaciated soils of the region produce the world's best |
|
quality black cherry in stands that reach economic maturity at |
|
80 to 100 years of age. We have reached the point in time on |
|
the Allegheny Plateau where biological and economic maturity |
|
coincide. Thus, we must address the needs to regenerate these |
|
forests for both financial and biological reasons. |
|
But, in addition, the public generally prefers to hunt, |
|
camp, hike, etc. in maturing 70 year old Allegheny hardwood |
|
forests rather than decadent 150 year old forests. This is |
|
attributed to reduced diversity in the oldest forests and the |
|
presence of dense underbrush (e.g. beech brush, striped maple, |
|
and fern) which result from deer over-browsing. Also, the 150 |
|
year old forests are generally less ``scenic'' because they are |
|
more likely to have a higher percentage of beech infested with |
|
the Beech Scale Nectria complex (an exotic disease which causes |
|
the trees to snap off at mid-stem). |
|
|
|
Question Two: What Management Tools Are Most Appropriate? |
|
|
|
Having examined the criteria for a ``healthy'' forest in |
|
our region of the country, let me turn now to your second |
|
question which is: What management tools are most appropriate |
|
to maintain or improve forest health? As a practicing forester, |
|
I recommend that landowners take certain actions to maintain |
|
the health and vitality of the forests within the Allegheny |
|
region: |
|
<bullet>Employ Sound Silvicultural Practices and |
|
Professional Forestry. [This is self-explanatory.] |
|
<bullet>Use Modern Silvicultural Methods and Timber |
|
Harvesting Scenarios. These practices are site specific and |
|
model natural occurrences. |
|
<bullet>Employ Qualified Resource Managers to Monitor |
|
Forest Conditions Closely. This is necessary to follow insect |
|
populations and assess the effects of disease, drought, and |
|
other phenomena. |
|
<bullet>Control Large Deer Populations. Increase the use of |
|
silvicultural regeneration tools such as fence enclosures and |
|
herbicides. Promote sport hunting to reduce deer over- |
|
population. |
|
<bullet>Use Aerial Application of Natural Pesticides. This |
|
is necessary to control exotic and abnormal native insect |
|
infestations. [This was done with great success in 1994 |
|
cooperatively on both private and public land in Northwestern |
|
Pennsylvania and Southwestern New York against an unprecedented |
|
population of the Elm Spanworm and Forest Tent Caterpillar. |
|
Similar efforts have also worked effectively against the Gypsy |
|
Moth.] |
|
In addition to these tools that are available to the |
|
resource manager, I believe that Congress and the |
|
Administration have continuing roles to play. And, given this |
|
opportunity, I offer the following thoughts for your |
|
consideration: |
|
<bullet>Continue to Fund and Promote Forest Research. |
|
Research at the US Forest Service's Northeast Experiment |
|
Station in Warren, PA has provided the modern silvicultural |
|
methods used throughout the Allegheny region. Significantly, |
|
over 1,100 forest managers have attended the training sessions |
|
offered by the Station. |
|
<bullet>Enact Tax Incentives. The Internal Revenue Code |
|
needs to be changed to provide tax incentives for private, non- |
|
industrial landowners to follow sound forest management |
|
practices. Particular emphasis should be given to changes to |
|
the capital gains and estate taxes. |
|
<bullet>Increase Forest Education. Finally, there is a |
|
pressing national need for education programs for forest |
|
landowners, professionals, and the public. Professionals need |
|
to better understand the modern tools available to them. |
|
Landowners and the public need to better understand the forest |
|
ecosystem and the necessity of using sound science as the basis |
|
for management decisions. |
|
Thank you, Madame Chairman, for the opportunity to present |
|
this statement. |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.001 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.002 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.003 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.004 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.005 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.006 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.007 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.008 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.009 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.010 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.011 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.012 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.013 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.014 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.015 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.016 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.017 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.018 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.019 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.020 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.021 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.022 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.023 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.024 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.025 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.026 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.027 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.028 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.029 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.030 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.031 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.032 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.033 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.034 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.035 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.036 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.037 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.038 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.039 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.040 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.041 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.042 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.043 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.044 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.045 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.046 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.047 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.048 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.049 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.050 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.051 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.052 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.053 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.054 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.055 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.056 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.057 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.058 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.059 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.060 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.061 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.062 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.063 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.064 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T0351.065 |
|
|
|
<all> |
|
</pre></body></html> |
|
|