|
<html> |
|
<title> - WHITE HOUSE PROPOSAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA</title> |
|
<body><pre> |
|
[House Hearing, 105 Congress] |
|
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHITE HOUSE PROPOSAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
|
|
|
======================================================================= |
|
|
|
HEARING |
|
|
|
before the |
|
|
|
SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE |
|
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
|
|
|
of the |
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON |
|
GOVERNMENT REFORM |
|
AND OVERSIGHT |
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
|
|
|
ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS |
|
|
|
FIRST SESSION |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
FEBRUARY 20, 1997 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Serial No. 105-4 |
|
|
|
__________ |
|
|
|
Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight |
|
|
|
|
|
39-564 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE |
|
WASHINGTON : 1997 |
|
____________________________________________________________________________ |
|
For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office |
|
Internet: bookstore.gpr.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; (202) 512�091800 |
|
Fax: (202) 512�092250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402�090001 |
|
|
|
COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT |
|
|
|
DAN BURTON, Indiana, Chairman |
|
BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York HENRY A. WAXMAN, California |
|
J. DENNIS HASTERT, Illinois TOM LANTOS, California |
|
CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland ROBERT E. WISE, Jr., West Virginia |
|
CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut MAJOR R. OWENS, New York |
|
STEVEN H. SCHIFF, New Mexico EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York |
|
CHRISTOPHER COX, California PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania |
|
ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida GARY A. CONDIT, California |
|
JOHN M. McHUGH, New York CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York |
|
STEPHEN HORN, California THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin |
|
JOHN L. MICA, Florida ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Washington, |
|
THOMAS M. DAVIS, Virginia DC |
|
DAVID M. McINTOSH, Indiana CHAKA FATTAH, Pennsylvania |
|
MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana TIM HOLDEN, Pennsylvania |
|
JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland |
|
JOHN SHADEGG, Arizona DENNIS KUCINICH, Ohio |
|
STEVEN C. LaTOURETTE, Ohio ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois |
|
MARSHALL ``MARK'' SANFORD, South DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois |
|
Carolina JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts |
|
JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire JIM TURNER, Texas |
|
PETE SESSIONS, Texas THOMAS H. ALLEN, Maine |
|
MIKE PAPPAS, New Jersey ------ |
|
VINCE SNOWBARGER, Kansas BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont |
|
BOB BARR, Georgia (Independent) |
|
------ ------ |
|
Kevin Binger, Staff Director |
|
Daniel R. Moll, Deputy Staff Director |
|
Judith McCoy, Chief Clerk |
|
Phil Schiliro, Minority Staff Director |
|
------ |
|
|
|
Subcommittee on the District of Columbia |
|
|
|
THOMAS M. DAVIS, Virginia, Chairman |
|
CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Washington, |
|
ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida DC |
|
STEPHEN HORN, California THOMAS H. ALLEN, Maine |
|
|
|
Ex Officio |
|
|
|
DAN BURTON, Indiana HENRY A. WAXMAN, California |
|
Ron Hamm, Staff Director |
|
Roland Gunn, Professional Staff Member |
|
Ellen Brown, Clerk |
|
Cedric Hendricks, Minority Professional Staff |
|
|
|
|
|
C O N T E N T S |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
Page |
|
Hearing held on February 20, 1997................................ 1 |
|
Statement of: |
|
DeSeve, G. Edward, Controller, Office of Management and |
|
Budget..................................................... 24 |
|
Raines, Frank, Director, Office of Management and Budget..... 7 |
|
Letters, statements, etc., submitted for the record by: |
|
Raines, Frank, Director, Office of Management and Budget, |
|
prepared statement of...................................... 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
WHITE HOUSE PROPOSAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
|
|
|
---------- |
|
|
|
|
|
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1997 |
|
|
|
House of Representatives, |
|
Subcommittee on the District of Columbia, |
|
Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, |
|
Washington, DC. |
|
The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:35 a.m., in |
|
room 2154, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Tom Davis |
|
(chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. |
|
Present: Representatives Davis, Morella, and Norton. |
|
Also present: Representative Wynn. |
|
Staff present: Ron Hamm, staff director; Howard Denis, |
|
counsel; Roland Gunn, professional staff member; Ellen Brown, |
|
clerk; Cedric Hendricks, minority professional staff; and Jean |
|
G. Gosa, minority administrative staff. |
|
Mr. Davis. Good morning and welcome to the first hearing of |
|
the 105th Congress of the District of Columbia Subcommittee. I |
|
would like to welcome back our ranking minority member, Eleanor |
|
Holmes Norton, the Delegate from the District of Columbia, as |
|
well as our new vice chairperson, Connie Morella of Maryland. |
|
Because of scheduling factors, this hearing is taking place |
|
during the President's Day recess. Therefore, the other members |
|
of the subcommittee are unable to join us today. However, I can |
|
assure everyone that Representative Steve Horn, who has had |
|
several generations from his family born in Washington, DC; |
|
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen; and Tom Allen are all highly committed to |
|
the goal of making Washington, DC, the world's finest Capital |
|
City. |
|
Two years ago, the Congress and the Clinton administration, |
|
acting together in a bipartisan effort, created the Financial |
|
Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority, more |
|
commonly referred to as the D.C. Financial Control Board. This |
|
board was created in direct response to the overwhelming |
|
financial difficulties that engulfed the District of Columbia. |
|
It was the first major step in a long road to recovery. |
|
During these past 2 years, the Control Board has |
|
accomplished many important things. Among these are canceling |
|
wasteful government contracts; stepping in to help the |
|
beleaguered school system; moving to reform the police |
|
department; and, most importantly, putting the city on a path |
|
toward a balanced budget. |
|
In addition to that, Congress has also acted to enable the |
|
construction of the new MCI Arena, a new state-of-the-art |
|
convention center, and created a new water and sewer authority, |
|
thereby safeguarding the metropolitan region's drinking supply |
|
and protecting taxpayers. |
|
Everyone agrees that there is still a lot to be done. To |
|
paraphrase Winston Churchill, we are only at the end of the |
|
beginning. I believe we all must work to the best of our |
|
ability this year to make Washington, DC, a shining example of |
|
the best America has to offer. Many of you have heard me say |
|
this before; this goal is not only in the best interest of the |
|
District but also of the region and, indeed, the entire |
|
country. |
|
I strongly believe that the economic health and quality of |
|
government in the District is of vital concern to the suburbs. |
|
In fact, Dr. Stephen Fuller of George Mason University, the |
|
leading regional economics expert, has just completed a new |
|
study that confirms the view that the District is vital and |
|
beneficial to the suburbs. Improving the economy and |
|
governmental performance of the District of Columbia is crucial |
|
to the continuing prosperity of the entire metropolitan region. |
|
Ladies and gentlemen, we are at a crossroads. In fact, we |
|
have reached a unique set of circumstances. Rarely do we face a |
|
situation where all the major political winds are aligned in |
|
one direction. The Clinton administration and the leadership of |
|
both Houses of Congress, Republicans and Democrats, all |
|
consider the situation in the District of Columbia one of our |
|
top five national priorities. We must take advantage of this |
|
positive environment. |
|
Mr. Raines, I think you deserve a lot of credit for the |
|
initiative that you have shown as the head of OMB. Our agenda |
|
is ambitious. It builds on our work and on the work of the |
|
Control Board that we created with the Clinton administration 2 |
|
years ago. I am encouraged that the President has put forth a |
|
broad-based proposal to realign the relationship between the |
|
District of Columbia and the Federal Government. The proposal |
|
seeks to enhance the prospects of home rule by more closely |
|
matching the District's resources and capabilities with its |
|
responsibilities. |
|
In other areas, however, the plan may not fully address the |
|
concerns of others, most notably tax relief and economic |
|
development for the city. I believe we should use the |
|
President's plan as our starting point. Therefore, it is my |
|
intent to work with this administration, the leadership in |
|
Congress, city officials, and the Control Board to fashion a |
|
bipartisan plan that will gain wide support. |
|
I am under no illusions. This will take months of hard |
|
work, patience, delicate negotiations, and many more committee |
|
hearings. In fact, I intend to follow today's hearing with |
|
testimony from the city and the Control Board and then from |
|
interested parties from the District and the region. |
|
After these hearings on this proposal, its key components, |
|
significant alternatives, and any other issues, we will work to |
|
design the best and most effective plan for the rebirth of our |
|
Nation's Capitol. Our challenge is great, but we have no other |
|
choice. If we fail to act now, Washington, DC, may never |
|
recover. In short, it is our duty, our mission, and our |
|
responsibility to give our collective best efforts for this |
|
city. |
|
In conclusion, I am pleased to have as our sole witness |
|
today Franklin Raines, Director of the Office of Management and |
|
Budget and the chief architect of the President's proposal for |
|
the District. I look forward to hearing Mr. Raines' testimony |
|
today and working with him and the President in the months |
|
ahead. |
|
At this point, I yield to my ranking member and ask if she |
|
would like to make an opening statement. |
|
Ms. Norton. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. |
|
I want to welcome OMB Director Franklin Raines to the first |
|
of several hearings on the National Capital Revitalization and |
|
Self-Government Improvement Plan, as it is called, for the |
|
District of Columbia. I also want to thank Chairman Tom Davis |
|
for skillfully laying out a series of hearings designed to |
|
explore the full details of the President's plan and the |
|
implications for the District. The President of the United |
|
States deserves the gratitude not only of District residents |
|
but of other Americans as well for bringing forward a workable |
|
and well-conceived plan that will help revive the Capital of |
|
the United States. |
|
Much of that gratitude belongs to Frank Raines, a |
|
Washingtonian whose understanding of the District's finances |
|
and operations is matched by the exceptional skill he is |
|
bringing to national and Federal financial and economic issues. |
|
Already his deft hand has been a major factor in steering us |
|
toward a bipartisan solution to the budget deficit and to other |
|
serious fiscal problems of the country. All the while he has |
|
been designing a plan to help eliminate the most vexing |
|
problems of the Nation's Capital. The plan's major strengths |
|
are, first, its careful and principled conceptualization, based |
|
on the Federal interest in certain State functions and in |
|
eliminating congressionally created pension liability, and, |
|
second, its recognition that the plan must address two |
|
audiences at once: District residents, and a Congress whose |
|
major focus this year is deficit reduction. |
|
The President's plan is not perfect, but it surpasses the |
|
expectations of most D.C. residents and analysts. It is the |
|
best document from which to work because it is the only plan |
|
for assistance to the D.C. government that stands any chance of |
|
being seriously considered or enacted by this Congress this |
|
year. |
|
If the President had not offered a plan, I had intended to |
|
offer a bill that created a quasi-State relationship between |
|
the District and the Federal Government for financial purposes. |
|
However, at every turn I encountered the same barrier that has |
|
made most thinking about the District conventional and |
|
unimaginative. That barrier is money. |
|
Any plan, whatever its merits--if I may paraphrase--that |
|
asks for $1 billion here and $1 billion there will soon end up |
|
sounding like real money of the kind that Congress has |
|
systematically denied to the District. This plan takes at least |
|
some of the District's State functions and, by placing them in |
|
larger appropriations, demonstrates how small a difference the |
|
District's portion really makes. |
|
For example, analysts tell us that the District may be only |
|
$25 million to $50 million ahead next year if the plan becomes |
|
law. The most controversial aspects of the plan need to be |
|
approached with a problem-solving attitude. Among the most |
|
troublesome are the elimination of the Federal payment, which, |
|
ironically, has both positive and negative consequences, and |
|
the application of Federal criminal law to the District as the |
|
price for absorbing Lorton inmates into the Federal system. |
|
We have already made progress on both. For example, we can |
|
now say that D.C. criminal law, not Federal criminal law, will |
|
continue to apply in the District. There remain outstanding |
|
issues here and in a number of other areas on the proposal. The |
|
way to solve them is by methodically working them through. |
|
The plan also must be subjected to further financial |
|
analysis before I can fully embrace it. Will the District |
|
consistently come out ahead, especially when compared with the |
|
Federal payment, which has lost much of its value and is almost |
|
never increased? Structural changes such as the President's |
|
proposal should not be expected to endure more than a |
|
generation unrevised. I am seeking an analysis of the plan on a |
|
20-year time line to test its fiscal effectiveness and to |
|
ensure that the District will not be left with unintended cash |
|
shortfalls and other financial difficulties. |
|
The administration has several working groups perfecting |
|
the concept and the necessary legislation. I hope that they |
|
will form a close relationship with the subcommittee. The |
|
progress we have made on the criminal law matters is an |
|
indication that even unacceptable parts of the plan can be |
|
resolved. For example, I have met with Attorney General Janet |
|
Reno, Chief Judge Eugene Hamilton, U.S. Attorney Eric Holder, |
|
and Department of Corrections Director Margaret Moore. Mr. |
|
Holder is continuing to work with Justice Department and Bureau |
|
of Prison officials to resolve the remaining criminal law |
|
issues, among them parole and determinant sentencing. I have |
|
also met with Federal Highway Administration officials and |
|
believe we are making headway in helping to shape the component |
|
of the plan that would create a badly needed National Capital |
|
infrastructure fund. |
|
Chairman Davis has wisely found a way to keep the |
|
President's plan from becoming an uncontrollable octopus, |
|
spread across many committees, risking its necessary and useful |
|
coherence. |
|
The plan holds together like a well-wrought puzzle. This |
|
subcommittee must help keep it together or it cannot do the |
|
job. The first test for the Congress will be to facilitate |
|
prompt and rapid participation of other specialized committees |
|
without losing the plan's central purpose and functional |
|
utility. |
|
Chairman Davis is the impresario, but this is not the first |
|
time he has been called upon to help lead such a complicated |
|
task. The model for our work on the President's plan is the |
|
financial authority legislation, where we worked in a |
|
bipartisan and bicameral way to quickly put in place a control |
|
board. The urgency of this plan now is just as great as the |
|
financial authority statute was then. |
|
I especially appreciate the interest of the members of this |
|
subcommittee and of the region in this plan. Regional members |
|
may want to take note of the experience of the Detroit region |
|
as reported in yesterday's Washington Post. The article |
|
recounted the recent and significant progress the city of |
|
Detroit has made. Mayor Dennis Archer reported that the |
|
estrangement between the suburbs and the city had become so |
|
severe that there were often discussions among friends about |
|
the last time they had been in Detroit. According to the |
|
article, ``That began to change as Detroit area firms, even |
|
those in the suburbs, realized the city's dismal image was |
|
hurting their ability to attract employees from elsewhere. |
|
Suburban parents began seeing their grown children leave for |
|
jobs in other cities, and that became a pivotal issue for a lot |
|
of people. You can try to separate yourself with a different |
|
name, but Southeast Michigan, to most people in the world, is |
|
Detroit. So how people view Detroit will have an impact on |
|
economic development and investment elsewhere in the region.'' |
|
The President's plan is designed to help the District and |
|
to help the region before the District gets to the point of no |
|
return. As the Detroit suburbs have learned, the region can |
|
neither run nor hide from its core city. The District is |
|
prepared to pay a great price for the President's plan. The |
|
plan offers the District scant immediate relief yet requires |
|
the District to balance its budget a year earlier than the |
|
financial authority law requires. |
|
The city is already braced for more cuts in services on top |
|
of draconian cuts that have already taken place and have helped |
|
hasten the exit of middle-income taxpayers from the city at |
|
frightening rates. The word ``suffering'' is not too strong to |
|
indicate the effect of these cuts on residents. Yet the |
|
District continues the painful work of rebuilding its |
|
government first by cutting it, the President's plan is before |
|
us, and only the Congress is missing. |
|
Congress has left the city to revive alone, without the |
|
undergirding support that New York State gave to New York City, |
|
that Ohio gave to Cleveland, and that Pennsylvania gave to |
|
Philadelphia when each of those cities became insolvent. It is |
|
time for Congress, the last to step up to the plate, to now |
|
come forward. |
|
I welcome Mr. Raines, whose thoughtful work is designed to |
|
help this body meet its constitutional obligations to the |
|
Capital of the United States. |
|
Mr. Davis. Thank you, Ms. Norton. |
|
I yield now to the vice chairman of the committee and one |
|
of our new members, Mrs. Morella of Maryland. |
|
Mrs. Morella. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Although I have participated on this panel on several |
|
occasions during the 104th Congress, this is my first hearing |
|
as an official member of the District of Columbia Subcommittee, |
|
and I am delighted to serve under your leadership and with the |
|
ranking member. |
|
As a representative from Montgomery County, MD, I am deeply |
|
concerned about the future of the District of Columbia. The |
|
District does not exist in a vacuum. The economic health of the |
|
District is important to the economic health of Montgomery |
|
County, of the whole Washington metropolitan region. |
|
When I first came to Congress in the 1980's, the District |
|
government was already showing signs of the deficiencies that |
|
marked the beginning of a spiraling economic crisis. Services |
|
in the District were deteriorating, businesses were relocating, |
|
and middle-class residents were moving to the suburbs in search |
|
of lower taxes, safer streets, better schools. |
|
From 1990 to 1995, the District lost more than 22,000 |
|
households, most of them middle-class taxpayers. There has been |
|
a lack of employment growth and a decline in retail sales and |
|
the formation of small businesses. |
|
For the past few years there has been a good deal of debate |
|
here on Capitol Hill about how to resolve the District's |
|
financial crisis. During the last Congress, under your |
|
distinguished leadership, Mr. Chairman, on a bipartisan basis, |
|
we established the District of Columbia Financial |
|
Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority, commonly |
|
called the Control Board, which represents a temporary |
|
restructuring of the D.C. government and provides oversight and |
|
support to improve the District's financial situation. |
|
The President's plan would further restructure the District |
|
government by allowing the Federal Government to fund the |
|
District government, much in the same way as State governments |
|
support their cities. The White House proposal would eliminate |
|
the $660 million Federal payment to the District. |
|
Instead of the Federal payment, the Federal Government |
|
would relieve the District of certain expenses, among them the |
|
growing unfunded pension liability which was incurred by the |
|
Federal Government for District employees that were part of the |
|
Federal work force before home rule. The Federal Government |
|
also would assume a larger share of the Medicaid costs and take |
|
over the operation of the prison system. |
|
If the Federal Government assumes some of the District's |
|
administrative responsibilities, perhaps there will be more |
|
time for the District of Columbia officials to concentrate on |
|
the schools and services that have deteriorated to an alarming |
|
degree. |
|
It is the poor and vulnerable citizens of the District who |
|
have suffered the most from the insufficient services that have |
|
resulted from insufficient funds. The economic turmoil in the |
|
District must be reversed, and that is what this first meeting |
|
in the whole series is all about. |
|
The downward spiral of deteriorating services and middle |
|
class flight did not happen overnight. There is no quick and |
|
easy solution. Consideration of the White House proposal is, as |
|
you said, just a beginning. There will be many hours of debate. |
|
Hopefully we will choose compromise over confrontation. If we |
|
work hard, in the end we will take a large step toward creating |
|
a new and revitalized District of Columbia. |
|
I look forward to hearing more about the President's plan |
|
from our expert witness, the craftsman of the plan, Frank |
|
Raines, and look forward to working with members of this |
|
subcommittee and the OMB Director on a plan that will benefit |
|
the region and make the District a safe and thriving Capital |
|
City that is the source of pride for the entire Nation. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Davis. Thank you, Mrs. Morella. |
|
Before I swear in our witness and we hear from the man of |
|
the hour, Mr. Raines, I want to recognize a couple of members |
|
of the city council here today: Charlene Drew Jarvis, chairman |
|
pro tem of the city council. Charlene, thank you very much for |
|
being here. You will have a chance to testify at a later |
|
hearing, and we look forward to your comments on this and your |
|
being an important part of this. And also Carol Schwartz, an |
|
important and returning member of the city council. And Harold |
|
Brazil just walked in, too. Harold, perfect timing. You are |
|
here just in time to be introduced. He is also council member |
|
at large from the city. We appreciate your being here as well. |
|
Frank, at this point it is the committee's custom to swear |
|
in its witnesses. |
|
[Witness sworn.] |
|
Mr. Davis. Thank you very much for being here and making |
|
your time available. I just preface that you have been making |
|
the rounds on Capitol Hill, speaking with key members of both |
|
parties prior to this, and we are just very pleased to have you |
|
here today. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF FRANK RAINES, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND |
|
BUDGET |
|
|
|
Mr. Raines. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I thank the |
|
members of the committee for having me appear before you today. |
|
I am pleased to be here to discuss with you the President's |
|
plan to revitalize Washington, DC, as the Nation's Capital, and |
|
to improve the prospects for home rule to succeed. After I |
|
conclude my remarks, I would be happy to take any questions |
|
that the committee might have. |
|
The Nation's Capital, which should serve as a symbol of |
|
pride to all Americans, has fallen on hard times. It faces not |
|
only serious budget problems, but even serious obstacles to |
|
providing the most basic services to its residents. |
|
As the President said recently, the District of Columbia |
|
suffers from the ``not quite'' syndrome. That is, it is ``not |
|
quite a State, not quite a city, not quite independent, not |
|
quite dependent.'' |
|
The District is not like other cities, which receive |
|
assistance from their States. In fact, the District has broad |
|
responsibilities for what are--elsewhere in the Nation--State, |
|
county, and local functions. And while Congress has voted to |
|
give the city a lump sum annual payment in recent years, it has |
|
kept the payment basically flat while imposing strict limits on |
|
the District's budget and taxing powers. |
|
Clearly, the current relationship between the Federal and |
|
city governments does not work. As a result, the President has |
|
proposed a landmark plan to significantly re-order that |
|
relationship. |
|
In developing his plan, the President had two goals in |
|
mind--first, to revitalize Washington, DC, as the Nation's |
|
Capital and, second, to improve the prospects for home rule to |
|
succeed. |
|
Under the plan, the Federal Government will invest nearly |
|
$4 billion over the next 5 years in the Nation's Capital. In |
|
exchange, the plan will end the yearly Federal appropriation |
|
and other payments to the District, saving over $3.5 billion |
|
over 5 years. |
|
While net Federal costs come to nearly $400 million over 5 |
|
years, the plan will save the District over $800 million over |
|
the same period. The difference results, in part, because the |
|
Federal Government will assume responsibility for certain |
|
pension payments and assets of the current pension system. |
|
Congress will continue to perform oversight for the |
|
District, and the Appropriations Committee will determine the |
|
budgets for those functions that the Federal Government funds |
|
directly. But Congress would no longer appropriate every detail |
|
of the District's budget, which will, in the future, be funded |
|
solely with local funds. |
|
All Federal assistance will be conditioned on the District |
|
taking specific steps to improve its budget and management. The |
|
plan will require the District to submit a balanced budget for |
|
1998 and thereafter. A Memorandum of Understanding among the |
|
Federal and District governments and the Financial Authority |
|
will outline other improvements in performance that the |
|
District will have to meet. |
|
To achieve these goals, the President's plan proposes four |
|
concrete steps. |
|
First, the plan will relieve the District government of |
|
major financial and managerial responsibilities--including |
|
certain pension obligations and parts of the criminal justice |
|
system--that are beyond its financial capacity, and help the |
|
city resolve its cash shortfall that stems from its accumulated |
|
deficit. |
|
Beginning in fiscal 1998, the Federal Government will |
|
assume both financial and administrative responsibility for the |
|
District's retirement programs for law enforcement officers and |
|
firefighters, teachers, and judges. Upon enactment of |
|
legislation providing for the transfer, the Federal Government |
|
will take responsibility for virtually all pension benefits |
|
accrued under the plans for all active and retired employees as |
|
of the date of transfer, contingent on the District |
|
establishing replacement plans as specified in the MOU. The |
|
Federal Government will pledge its full faith and credit to |
|
meet its responsibilities to these beneficiaries. This action |
|
will be conditioned on the District setting up new plans for |
|
its current and future employees and providing adequate |
|
employment records to a third-party trustee. |
|
The Federal Government also will take direct responsibility |
|
for funding the District Court system. The courts will remain |
|
self-managed, because the current court system is well run. |
|
But, court funding is a drain on the District's budget. |
|
Therefore, the Federal Government will take responsibility for |
|
it. The costs will total $129 million in the first year and |
|
$685 million over 5 years. |
|
Also the Federal Government will assume financial and |
|
administrative responsibility for the District's felony |
|
offenders, including substantial capital investment in |
|
providing appropriate prison facilities. The Federal Government |
|
will take responsibility for incarcerating the District's |
|
sentenced felons, a function usually borne by States. During |
|
the transition, the Federal Government will provide funds for |
|
incarcerating the District's felons to a trustee appointed by |
|
the Financial Authority. Funding will include capital for both |
|
constructing new facilities and renovating existing ones. The |
|
Bureau of Prisons will be responsible for determining how these |
|
capital funds will be used. The trustee will oversee the D.C. |
|
Department of Corrections operations related to the |
|
incarcerated D.C. felons for 3 to 5 years, after which the |
|
Bureau of Prisons will assume responsibility. The plan assumes |
|
that a portion of the existing Lorton complex will continue to |
|
serve as a prison facility. Necessary new construction will |
|
take place at Lorton, at other locations, or both. |
|
At the end of the transition period, the Federal Government |
|
will accept all existing prisoners, as well as those new |
|
prisoners sentenced in accordance with standards comparable to |
|
Federal sentencing guidelines. To manage the inmate population, |
|
the Bureau of Prisons will be able to transfer D.C. inmates |
|
elsewhere in the Federal Prison System. The current D.C. |
|
prisons staff will have to apply for positions with the Bureau |
|
of Prisons and meet Federal standards. After the transition |
|
period, the Federal Government will assume responsibility for |
|
D.C.'s parole system and a portion of the community corrections |
|
system. |
|
In another matter, the Federal Government will increase its |
|
share of the District's Medicaid payments from 50 to 70 |
|
percent. In essence, the Federal Government will pay both the |
|
Federal and State share of Medicaid costs, reducing the |
|
District's share to 30 percent--which is the most that |
|
localities can pay in States with a 50 percent Federal match. |
|
At the same time, the Department of Health and Human Services |
|
will provide more intensive technical assistance to help the |
|
District improve the management of its Medicaid program and |
|
ensure that Federal funds are not mismanaged. The increased |
|
Medicaid funding will be conditioned on the District following |
|
various HHS suggestions for programmatic improvements. |
|
Finally, the Federal Government will allow the District to |
|
borrow from the Treasury to finance all or part of the |
|
District's accumulated deficit of between $400 and $500 |
|
million. The terms and conditions for such loans are not yet |
|
determined, but will likely enable the Federal Government to |
|
offer Treasury-based interest rates for a maximum term of 15 |
|
years and enable the District to refinance the loan after the |
|
District's credit picture improves. |
|
Second, the Federal Government will invest considerable |
|
resources to improve the city's capital infrastructure. |
|
The Federal Government will establish a National Capital |
|
Infrastructure Authority (NCIA) to benefit District residents |
|
and commuters by funding the capital associated with repairing |
|
and constructing roads and mass transit facilities. To |
|
capitalize the fund in 1998, the administration will provide |
|
$125 million in seed money from the Federal Highway Trust Fund. |
|
Activities eligible for funds will include the construction of |
|
roads and bridges, the local match for Federal-aid road and |
|
bridge projects, and capital expenditures for the Washington |
|
Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. In addition, the NCIA will |
|
be able to accept contributions from other sources, such as |
|
voluntary payments in lieu of taxes from tax-exempt |
|
organizations, including universities and hospitals. |
|
Third, the plan proposes a number of mechanisms to |
|
strengthen the District's economic base. |
|
The plan will create an Economic Development Corporation |
|
(EDC) to revitalize the city's economy, with local planning and |
|
control that leverages Federal and private resources. The EDC |
|
will be capitalized with Federal funds. The program will be |
|
designed to encourage jobs for disadvantaged D.C. residents and |
|
revitalize District areas where development has been |
|
inadequate. The plan includes a 5-year, $260 million tax |
|
incentive program, with a series of targeted incentives to |
|
build on the administration's Empower-ment Zone and Enterprise |
|
Community programs. |
|
Fourth, the plan will draw on Federal technical expertise |
|
to help make the city government more effective in such areas |
|
as income tax collection, education and training, housing, |
|
transportation, and health care delivery. |
|
For instance, the Internal Revenue Service will be able to |
|
collect District income and payroll taxes. The plan will |
|
simplify District residents' tax filing, allowing one form for |
|
both District and Federal taxes, as well as improve enforcement |
|
and collections. Other Federal agencies will work with the |
|
District to identify other areas in which the Federal |
|
Government might provide technical assistance to help the |
|
District government improve the efficiency with which it |
|
delivers services. |
|
The President's plan is the most ambitious plan that any |
|
administration has ever proposed to deal with the problems of |
|
the Nation's Capital. It will benefit the city, the region, and |
|
the Nation. |
|
It benefits District residents by reducing their |
|
government's financial burdens, improving the delivery of city |
|
services, and investing in the criminal justice system, |
|
economic development, and transportation. |
|
It benefits the region because of the city's economic |
|
recovery; the financial support given to police, fire, |
|
teachers, and judges' pension funds; the rebuilding of the |
|
District prison system; and the improvement of a key component |
|
of the regional transportation infrastructure. |
|
It benefits the Nation, because it begins to create a |
|
Capital City that we can all be proud of, improves its |
|
transportation system, and helps ensure the safety of residents |
|
and visitors. |
|
Mr. Chairman, that concludes my testimony. I would be happy |
|
to answer any questions that the committee might have. |
|
[The prepared statement of Mr. Raines follows:] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9564.001 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9564.002 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9564.003 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9564.004 |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T9564.005 |
|
|
|
Mr. Davis. Mr. Raines, thank you very much. I think it |
|
shows the thoughtful preparation that has gone into that. We |
|
will have a number of questions for you. |
|
I am going to start the questioning with Mrs. Morella, who |
|
I know has to leave a little early to go represent the Congress |
|
reading George Washington's farewell address, as I understand |
|
it. Connie, I will start with you. |
|
Mrs. Morella. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I |
|
appreciate your giving me the opportunity to pose a few |
|
questions, since, as you mentioned, I will be in the Capital |
|
City laying the wreathe and giving the speech from Congress for |
|
George Washington's commemoration. |
|
Thanks, Mr. Raines, for the wonderful testimony that you |
|
gave. There is something I feel was rather omitted in the plan |
|
that you did not mention, either. Some questions have been |
|
asked about where does St. Elizabeth's fit into this picture. |
|
Do you see that as being something that the Federal Government |
|
has a responsibility to operate, and maintain? |
|
Mr. Raines. We do not see that as being an appropriate |
|
activity for the Federal Government, primarily because we do |
|
not have a lot of experience in running mental health |
|
facilities of that size and complexity, and would find it |
|
difficult to take over the operation of one such facility and |
|
create a whole capacity to do that. |
|
That is the distinction between--with the prisons and St. |
|
Elizabeth's. With the prisons, we run a prison system. We have |
|
experienced professionals who know how to do that. Therefore, |
|
we view prisons as something that could be included in the |
|
Federal operations. But St. Elizabeth's really would be in a |
|
different category. |
|
Mrs. Morella. But you do recognize there is a problem posed |
|
by the fiscal situation at St. Elizabeth's? |
|
Mr. Raines. Absolutely. Our plan we view as being one that |
|
gives the city more flexibility and more resources for the city |
|
to be able to deal directly with those areas that we are not |
|
taking over. |
|
Mrs. Morella. In your testimony, you note that the |
|
District's accumulated deficit is between $400 million and $500 |
|
million, right? |
|
Mr. Raines. Yes. |
|
Mrs. Morella. Would you like to comment or explain the |
|
impact of the District and its cash position from carrying this |
|
kind of deficit? |
|
Mr. Raines. As a result of the deficits run up by the city |
|
over the last 5 or so years, the city has developed an |
|
accumulated deficit. What that has meant is that the city has |
|
not been able to pay its bills in a timely way, and it has had |
|
to indirectly borrow from vendors by delaying payment of their |
|
bills. It means that the city has periods of time in which it |
|
is in a negative cash position, and therefore needs access to |
|
borrowing. |
|
Over the last year, the Treasury Department has been |
|
providing funds to assist the city in meeting its cash-flow |
|
needs. But as we go forward, there will be a need for a |
|
permanent solution so that the city's cash position is |
|
restored. That is why we are proposing to help the city by |
|
financing that deficit over a period of years, so that the city |
|
can recreate its cash balance and pay off that accumulated |
|
deficit over a period of time. |
|
Mrs. Morella. I wondered if you might explain why the |
|
initial Treasury provision to finance this debt in 1995 was |
|
dropped from the Control Board legislation? |
|
Mr. Raines. I am unaware of the background on that, so I am |
|
not sure what happened in that case. |
|
Mrs. Morella. It would be interesting to look into that. In |
|
your experience with cities in trouble, why is it important to |
|
finance the accumulated debt, for the reasons that you gave, |
|
and---- |
|
Mr. Raines. The primary need is for the city to be on a |
|
sound financial basis, where it is making its payments in a |
|
timely manner, so that it can attract the kind of vendors that |
|
the city would like to be able to have perform its services. |
|
The District, for example, had difficulty lining up |
|
contractors to serve as part of the force dealing with |
|
potential snowstorms because of a failure in the past to pay on |
|
a timely basis. The city would be paying extra if vendors did |
|
not believe they could be paid on a timely basis, so it is |
|
important in that respect. |
|
It is also important from a financial standpoint with |
|
regard to the city's bond ratings. Failure to be able to |
|
finance current operations with existing cash would be a major |
|
negative in the review of the city's credit standing. |
|
Mrs. Morella. If the Federal payment is done away with, |
|
what will the Treasury use for collateral, and what is the |
|
potential impact of that on outstanding bonds and/or new debt? |
|
Mr. Raines. The Treasury is in the middle of working on |
|
that very issue with the city and the Control Board at this |
|
point. They have not come to a conclusion yet as to what form |
|
of collateral they would be seeking, but we would be careful to |
|
ensure that these loans would not impair the security on the |
|
city's outstanding debt or future debt that the city issued for |
|
capital purposes. |
|
Mrs. Morella. I would like to also ask you, jumping to |
|
another topic, about whether or not this plan envisions the use |
|
of so-called empowerment zones or enterprise zones or whatever |
|
the current language is that is used for that in the District |
|
of Columbia. |
|
Mr. Raines. The city already qualifies as an enterprise |
|
community, and has received certain benefits from that. But our |
|
plan goes further and proposes the creation of an Economic |
|
Development Corporation that has authority to operate in the |
|
downtown areas as well as in the low-income communities of the |
|
city, that will have additional powers that are similar to but |
|
different in some respects from what is included in the other |
|
programs that we believe can begin to provide the kinds of |
|
incentives necessary for increasing economic development in the |
|
city. |
|
Mrs. Morella. Can you see that there could be an increase |
|
in the Federal payment to the District, or there could be some |
|
amount in addition to this plan, or do you think that this |
|
totally handles it; in other words, total elimination of---- |
|
Mr. Davis. Would the gentlewoman yield? |
|
Mrs. Morella. Yes. |
|
Mr. Davis. Mr. Raines, I would also ask as part of that |
|
question, would the administration remain flexible if Congress, |
|
in looking at this, felt that the city still needed some cash |
|
to operate? Is this an area we are willing to look at together |
|
and move forward, or is it fixed? As Ms. Norton had said |
|
earlier, there are pluses and minuses to having this plan for |
|
the city. One is you get the annual appropriations process, and |
|
the baggage that comes with it. On the other hand, you are |
|
having that cash involved, and this is something that I know |
|
the Control Board has expressed some concern about. I just want |
|
to understand, I think as Mrs. Morella does, the flexibility we |
|
have in dealing with this. |
|
Mr. Raines. Sure. We put this plan together with the idea |
|
that the city had to come out ahead in any plan such as this, |
|
and that there had to be a net benefit to the city in the first |
|
year and an increasing benefit in future years. We believe that |
|
the plan meets that test, and therefore the city is better off |
|
under the plan than they are with the Federal payment alone. |
|
We also believe there are important benefits to the city in |
|
having the city have final authority over its own budget, and |
|
final responsibility for that budget. We thought that was an |
|
important improvement in home rule, but also one that would |
|
increase management responsibility. But we understand that the |
|
committee may have additional ideas that it would like to put |
|
forward, and we would be happy to talk to the committee about |
|
those in your deliberations. |
|
Mrs. Morella. I think the concept of the subcommittee is |
|
the fact that this is a beginning, and it is worth looking |
|
into, and we may come up with a package, I hope that we do, |
|
that is going to encompass all of the concerns we have. |
|
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I would like to also be |
|
able to submit questions for Mr. Raines. |
|
Mr. Davis. Without objection. |
|
Mr. Raines. I would be happy to answer them. |
|
Mr. Davis. Let me just ask, I don't think there is any |
|
question that the city is better off under the plan the |
|
administration has submitted than under the current situation. |
|
If we can add value to that, as we hope to do as it moves |
|
forward, I think you will join us in looking at ways we can do |
|
that. But when you add it up, one of the difficulties is the |
|
cash situation may not be improved on day one when you lose |
|
that payment. I think that is part of the concern. But that is |
|
why we are going to have this dialog and continue to work |
|
together and hear from everybody, because I think we all want |
|
the same result at the end of the day. |
|
This is just a great improvement. I think it has been given |
|
a lot of thought. |
|
I yield to my ranking member, Ms. Norton. |
|
Ms. Norton. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. To follow on the |
|
Federal payment concern, perhaps you can be as candid with us |
|
as you have been, why had you incorporated in your plan the |
|
necessity to forego the Federal payment in the first place? Why |
|
has it become a necessary element of your plan? |
|
Mr. Raines. There are several reasons. I think the most |
|
important one is that, as we looked forward over the next 5 |
|
years, it appeared to us that the likelihood of the Federal |
|
payment meeting the various purposes for which it has been |
|
created were small and maybe decreasing. The pressures on the |
|
budget would be very heavy, and it would be difficult to see |
|
increases in the Federal payment. If we looked back at the last |
|
5 years, we could see that the payment has been basically |
|
static during that period, so that when we came to the |
|
conclusion that the Federal payment was unlikely to be, in |
|
reality, a significant part of a new plan, because of those |
|
fiscal realities, we began to look to alternatives, and the |
|
alternatives we looked to were for the Federal Government to |
|
relieve the District of financial responsibilities that were |
|
burdening it, and that inherently involved increasing expenses |
|
for the city over time, so if we could not index the Federal |
|
payment, we could take over responsibilities which were |
|
inherently indexed because their costs were rising over time. |
|
So we think that we have managed to move from a situation |
|
of a static Federal role with regard to the city to one that is |
|
dynamic, and one that we have included in the President's |
|
balanced budget plan within the agencies that would be taking |
|
over these responsibilities. So that was our thinking in how we |
|
looked at the Federal payment and how we structured the plan, |
|
and as I mentioned before, the home rule aspects of not having |
|
the entire District budget appropriated by Congress we believe |
|
to be attractive as well. We do not believe that you get the |
|
best out of decisionmakers if they do not believe their |
|
decisions are final, and therefore, we think there is a real |
|
benefit in having the city be responsible for its own |
|
resources. |
|
There is a major benefit in not having the Federal payment |
|
in that all the city's resources would then be local, and the |
|
local officials would be responsible for those resources, and |
|
would not harbor in the back of their minds that somehow the |
|
Congress would relieve them of the need to make tough choices. |
|
Mr. Davis. Ms. Norton, will you yield? |
|
Ms. Norton. Yes. |
|
Mr. Davis. You make a good statement. We will ask if the |
|
city council agrees with this when they come here. But it seems |
|
to me one of the problems is that the decisions the Mayor and |
|
council make sometimes are not final decisions, and that allows |
|
you sometimes not to be quite as responsible in what you are |
|
doing because you are not firing real bullets, so to speak, |
|
because somebody else will make tougher decisions, and that is |
|
part of the difficulty when we build a strong civil service in |
|
government. |
|
There has been no tradition in making final decisions and |
|
being accountable for the final result, because Congress has |
|
always been there, to overturn inadequate policies. To me that |
|
ought not be. That is for somebody in local government. |
|
I am going to be interested in the reaction of the Mayor |
|
and council at the appropriate time. With that responsibility |
|
and accountability, I think there is a downside to that. But |
|
not having Congress looking over your shoulder on every |
|
decision has some advantages as well. We will be interested in |
|
how they react. I just think it is a very good point and |
|
something that the city has lacked, and maybe one of the |
|
reasons they have not developed the culture of accountability |
|
that most other jurisdictions have. |
|
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding. |
|
Ms. Norton. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The concern, of |
|
course, about the Federal payment is well placed, because the |
|
District is in such a precarious financial position. We have |
|
had some numbers run on the Federal payment, though, and I must |
|
say, I have very serious concerns about the Federal payment as |
|
it is. |
|
During my first term, we got a very large increase in the |
|
Federal payment. However, that was to make up for no increases |
|
for 5 previous years. Every year there is no increase there is |
|
a cut, and yet the District acts as though the Federal payment |
|
is something important. Well, it is important, but it is |
|
important for cash reasons. I want to move there. |
|
By the way, when we had the numbers run on the over $700 |
|
million Federal payment, it turned out it was worth today about |
|
half a billion dollars. And that may also contribute to the |
|
shortfall. |
|
I want to say for the record that it has been all that I |
|
could do to get the Federal payment out every year. Members do |
|
not enjoy voting for a payment for a single district, and what |
|
they have done instead is, over the past 5 years when we got |
|
the increase, we have had caps on the Federal payment. So the |
|
Federal payment has not only lost value in inflationary terms, |
|
but Congress has actually cut the Federal payment. It is a red |
|
flag. It is the one thing that people can cut or not vote for |
|
that does not harm them at home. |
|
One of the things that we are all going to have to do as we |
|
look at this plan is to try to think more deeply so that we get |
|
over some of the problems and don't simply build in the same |
|
problems that we have had all along. And the 5-year deficit |
|
reduction plan does not bode well for the Federal payment. |
|
I can say without fear of being contradicted that if I |
|
haven't been able to get increases before deficit reduction |
|
became the only issue for the Congress, I cannot imagine what |
|
it will take for me to hold on to the Federal payment in this |
|
body. |
|
The District's concern about cash is important. Any large |
|
entity has periods of shortfalls in revenue where borrowing is |
|
necessary. |
|
I guess I have two questions. One has to do with whether or |
|
not there are going to be cash shortfalls at all, and the other |
|
has to do with collateral and what kind of thinking about |
|
collateral has gone on given how borrowed-up the District is |
|
and the limits on its borrowing authority. |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, as you mentioned, most cities have |
|
periods of cash shortfalls and surpluses because certain taxes, |
|
such as property taxes, only are paid twice a year, whereas |
|
most expenditures are on a monthly basis. So the city is going |
|
to have to monitor its cash-flow after the plan is in effect to |
|
ensure that it can even out those periods. |
|
But we are aware that, from a cash standpoint, the city |
|
will start off in the hole. That is why we are proposing to |
|
assist the city in financing its accumulated deficit so it will |
|
have the cash on hand, and that will help the city meet its |
|
cash needs. |
|
Ms. Norton. Would you describe how having the cash from the |
|
accumulated deficit. Many people have overlooked altogether |
|
your proposal to fund the accumulated deficit, even the Control |
|
Board, in its strategic plan, left the accumulated deficit out |
|
altogether. Which would mean that we would arrive at year 4, |
|
when we are supposed to be balanced, still carrying half a |
|
billion dollars in deficit, which would mean that we have the |
|
Control Board here for a long time trying to get rid of that |
|
accumulated deficit. |
|
How would borrowing to fund the accumulated deficit help |
|
the District with its cash shortfall, and how long would that |
|
be available, in your judgment? |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, if the city--the exact amount of the |
|
accumulated deficit will depend on the financial operations of |
|
the city through this year. But let's assume that the city has |
|
a $400 million accumulated deficit. What that means is that |
|
they spent $400 million more than they brought in over prior |
|
years, and the way that they have been financing that is by not |
|
paying vendors. |
|
If you hold enough bills, it is like any of us if we don't |
|
have enough money in our paycheck to pay all of our bills that |
|
month, we let a couple of them ride over to the next month. And |
|
that caused a real crisis in the city for a lot of vendors, not |
|
just businesses, but also churches, nonprofit groups who had |
|
contracts with the city. |
|
By financing the deficit, the city would get $400 million |
|
that would permit them to pay its bills on a timely basis. But |
|
the city would have to then repay that, and we propose to give |
|
them up to 15 years to repay it. So every year--it would be as |
|
though the city were atoning for the prior deficits by now |
|
appropriating sufficient funds to repay the borrowing. So past |
|
deficits would be financed, and they would be repaid over a |
|
period of years. |
|
I believe that financing the deficit will go a long way |
|
toward, or will totally meet, the cash-flow needs of the city. |
|
But that is something we are going to have to work out with the |
|
Financial Authority to ensure that either--that deals totally |
|
with the cash-flow needs or we have an alternative vehicle |
|
available for the city to meet small, intra-year cash-flow |
|
shortfalls. |
|
Ms. Norton. Many residents point up that the Federal |
|
payment is, at least theoretically, to account for the fact |
|
that there is a Federal presence and a large Federal impact, |
|
because the District has a height limitation, it has more |
|
zoning strictures than any city in the United States, and of |
|
course the most expensive land it can't build on at all. |
|
What is your response to those who say that we are still |
|
left with this impact and with whatever services we provide the |
|
Federal Government? |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, the Federal payment over the years has |
|
been pointed to as the compensation for a wide variety of |
|
limitations on the city, and the value of those limitations has |
|
always greatly exceeded the amount of the Federal payment. |
|
What we have tried to do is change the paradigm. What we |
|
tried to say is that this Federal payment can't carry all of |
|
that weight and what we need to do is, instead of compensating |
|
the city by giving an annual lump sum payment, we should |
|
compensate the city by taking over some of its expenses, and if |
|
we take over more expenses than the value of the Federal |
|
payment, then this is a better deal for the city. |
|
But it will take a while, I think, before people |
|
reconceptualize the Federal payment and see that what we are |
|
proposing is a new deal. It is not a preservation of the deal |
|
cut in home rule, but it is a new deal that says that the |
|
Federal payment is inherently going to be an inadequate measure |
|
over time of compensating the city for restrictions. We need |
|
another method of balancing the responsibilities of the city |
|
and the limitation on the resources that the city has. |
|
So our approach is just an alternative way of doing it and, |
|
we believe, one that is better for the city. But I can |
|
understand why people who have grown up with thinking that the |
|
Federal payment was the compensation for a variety of things |
|
would have difficulty moving to a new paradigm, but that is |
|
what we are hoping that they will do. |
|
Ms. Norton. Mr. Raines, I appreciate that you came and |
|
spoke patiently and heard all the questions at my town meeting |
|
on the President's plan. Perhaps you would like to respond here |
|
as well, for the record, to the fact that many residents came |
|
forward to ask why there was not direct assistance to the two |
|
issues of which--or the two functions which many residents |
|
regard as paramount today: Public safety and education. |
|
Mr. Raines. The structure of our plan is to relieve the |
|
District budget of certain of its very extensive |
|
responsibilities and thereby provide more room in that budget |
|
for the city to tackle those responsibilities that are |
|
inherently local. Education and police protection are |
|
inherently local responsibilities. We believe that by relieving |
|
the city of the other financial burdens that they face, that |
|
the city officials now will have more room in which to deal |
|
with the issues of education and police within their own |
|
resources. |
|
We believe it is very important for the future of the city |
|
that the city leadership take dramatic action with regard to |
|
public safety and education. There is no prospect of a |
|
financial revitalization and an economic revitalization of the |
|
city unless citizens and visitors feel safe and unless the |
|
young people in the city are trained to join the work force of |
|
the 21st century. |
|
And so there is no higher important issues for the city |
|
government than dealing with those. But we believe they are |
|
inherently local, and we believe we are providing additional |
|
resources for them to deal with those issues by removing |
|
certain other expenses from their budget. |
|
Ms. Norton. During this round--I have just one more |
|
question during this round for you, Mr. Raines. Your plan would |
|
have the District government come into balance a year earlier |
|
than the financial authority statute. And you, of course, have |
|
watched the District go through excruciating pain just getting |
|
to balance year by year and then retread itself just to keep |
|
from overspending each year. |
|
Why did you think it was important for the District to |
|
balance its budget this year, in fiscal year 1998, rather than |
|
in fiscal year 1999 as the original authority statute |
|
indicated? |
|
Mr. Raines. There are several reasons for our view on that. |
|
First, any additional deficit that is run up is more money that |
|
the District is going to have to borrow and repay with interest |
|
going forward, and it adds to the cash problem that the city |
|
has. |
|
Second, it has been my experience that taking decisive |
|
action to balance a budget in as short a time as possible is |
|
more likely to lead to an enduring balance than struggling each |
|
year and doing only what is necessary to move toward a balanced |
|
budget without actually balancing. |
|
Third, I think it is an important symbol and signal to |
|
Congress that the city is taking decisive action, moving ahead |
|
of schedule to deal with the city's financial problems, and I |
|
believe it puts the city in the position of taking aggressive |
|
action on its own that I think is--I know is certainly |
|
appreciated within the administration, and I would think would |
|
be appreciated by the Members here, that the city is doing |
|
everything it can to bring its affairs in order as quickly as |
|
possible. |
|
Ms. Norton. Mr. Chairman, before I relinquish the |
|
microphone, in response to what Mr. Raines has just said, there |
|
is a thought here in the Congress, the notion that this is a |
|
bailout. |
|
You indicated that one reason for wanting us to come into |
|
balance early is to show that the District has stepped forward |
|
to do something that is equally painful as the Congress will |
|
find it painful to come up with any additional money. How would |
|
you respond to Congress when it says that this is a bailout? |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, I think that this is definitely not a |
|
bailout in this sense. First, the Federal Government has an |
|
interest in the Nation's Capital, and the services that we have |
|
targeted for the Federal Government to finance are services and |
|
government programs that directly relate to that Federal |
|
interest, and therefore our first step is in protecting the |
|
Federal interest. That we need to do for ourselves and for the |
|
Nation and not simply for the citizens of the District. |
|
Second, we do provide some additional room for the city by |
|
relieving it of some of these responsibilities, but by no means |
|
are we obviating the need for the city to make very difficult |
|
financial choices. The city is going to have to significantly |
|
rethink everything it does in order to reach structural |
|
balance. This is not just a matter of not spending certain |
|
dollars in a year, it is not a problem that will be solved by |
|
furloughs or deferrals, the city will need to fundamentally |
|
rethink what it does, and therefore I don't think anyone in the |
|
city will view this as a bailout, as keeping them from having |
|
to make tough choices. Indeed, it merely highlights the need |
|
for those tough choices. |
|
So it is anything but a bailout, it is an opportunity for |
|
the city, but I believe it is a necessity for the national |
|
government that we have to have a well-functioning Nation's |
|
Capital. So the national interest requires us to act, and our |
|
concern about home rule and the well-being of the residents of |
|
the District requires us to do it in the way that increases |
|
their chances of success. |
|
Ms. Norton. Thank you. |
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Davis. Thank you. |
|
I have a few questions I want to go through with you as |
|
well. First of all, I don't think there is any question--I will |
|
just say this again--that the city is much better off with this |
|
proposal than they are today, whether you have a Federal |
|
payment or not; the city is much better off financially under |
|
this proposal. It is not even a close call. |
|
In addition to that, you have taken some of the fastest |
|
growing elements of the budget that will increase the deficit |
|
in later years and helped the city by providing a better |
|
percent on Medicaid; taking over corrections where there is |
|
huge cost avoidance built into the city that they have not |
|
invested; and on the unfunded pension liability, that stops in |
|
the year 2004. If something is not done, it is going to be 15 |
|
percent of the city budget. So this not only helps the city |
|
today, but over the long term. I think this is critical to the |
|
city's success. |
|
You have clearly given this a lot of thought. You have even |
|
thought of some of the cultural changes and incentives and |
|
disincentives as you have worked through this. And I even |
|
understand it better now sitting here. I think we are going to |
|
be adding some and moving the plan around a little bit, as it |
|
often happens when it comes here, but you have clearly given |
|
this a lot of thought. I think it hangs together fairly clearly |
|
at this point, and we will be hearing from other perspectives |
|
as we proceed. I want to congratulate you on your efforts. |
|
I also want to recognize our colleague from Prince |
|
Georges's County. Congressman Wynn has just come in, and we |
|
will give him an opportunity to ask questions later. |
|
Let me move to a couple of issues. Mrs. Morella had asked |
|
why the initial Treasury provision to finance the debt in 1995 |
|
was dropped from the Control Board legislation. Mr. DeSeve, who |
|
is sitting behind you, has been so helpful in that and other |
|
matters, can answer that more clearly. But as I recollect, that |
|
was a scoring problem as to how that would be scored under the |
|
Budget Act. I would ask Mr. DeSeve if he might want to, just |
|
for the record, answer that more fully. |
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF G. EDWARD DeSEVE, CONTROLLER, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT |
|
AND BUDGET |
|
|
|
Mr. DeSeve. During the process of creating the financial |
|
responsibility and management assistance authority legislation, |
|
Treasury and the committee staff proposed the terming out of |
|
the deficit over a period of time, a 15-year period of time. |
|
There were two concerns raised at that point. |
|
No. 1, without the existence of the Financial |
|
Responsibility Authority, people were concerned that the city, |
|
having the ability before the Authority had a chance to work |
|
and demonstrate what real fiscal restraint was like, might be |
|
inappropriate. |
|
Second, there was and there remains today the likelihood |
|
that under the Credit Reform Act that a loan of that length, 15 |
|
years, would have scoring implications. There are other similar |
|
kinds of loans that are made by various agencies to State and |
|
local governments that have that same characteristic. So let |
|
the Authority work was concern No. 1. Concern two was that |
|
there was and will be a scoring component to that particular |
|
loan. And for those reasons it was agreed by the administration |
|
and the Congress to allow those provisions not to be included |
|
in the Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Act. |
|
Ms. Norton. Will the gentleman yield? |
|
Mr. Davis. Happy to yield. |
|
Ms. Norton. This plan is paid for. Is that not the case at |
|
this time with all of its provisions? |
|
Mr. Davis. It is in the President's budget. Now Congress |
|
has to adopt its own resolutions. But it is. |
|
Mr. Raines. Yes. |
|
Mr. Davis. Thank you very much. |
|
I would like to, if I could, spend this part of my |
|
questions on the corrections issues, which have not only the |
|
interest of the Virginia delegation but for all of us because |
|
of the crime issues in the city. The proposal is going to |
|
affect crime in the city and the region. |
|
What do you mean by comparable sentences to Federal |
|
sentencing guidelines? Does the President's proposal |
|
contemplate the straight imposition of Federal sentencing |
|
guidelines on the District courts? |
|
Mr. Raines. We have been meeting extensively with District |
|
officials, and there have been meetings within the Justice |
|
Department to further define our call for sentencing guidelines |
|
that meet Federal standards. We are proposing the creation of a |
|
set of standards that reflect Federal policies with regard to |
|
determinant sentences. We also are proposing that they be |
|
enacted by the D.C. council as a part of D.C. law. |
|
They need not be the same as Federal sentencing guidelines, |
|
but they need to reflect a difference in philosophy about |
|
sentencing, which primarily involves determinant sentences, so |
|
that if someone is sentenced for 2 years, they serve for 2 |
|
years. There also need to be a much more restrictive use of |
|
parole in the sentencing process. |
|
We think it is important for prisons to serve their |
|
purposes. It is also important to have some consistency with |
|
the procedures that affect Federal prisoners, because it is |
|
clear that some District prisoners will need to be in |
|
facilities other than those in the local area, and therefore we |
|
are concerned that there be some consistency in sentences. But |
|
there is not a requirement that they be identical to the |
|
Federal sentencing guidelines. |
|
Mr. Davis. Thank you very much. |
|
There are many District crimes that fit into the municipal |
|
or State category and have no comparable Federal statute. Would |
|
you envision the Federal Sentencing Commission determining new |
|
guidelines for each of these crimes, or how would this---- |
|
Mr. Raines. We envision setting up a Federal/District |
|
process to recommend new sentencing guidelines that would be |
|
included in law by the D.C. council. So these would be |
|
sentences that were created to be applicable to the District of |
|
Columbia, and that would fill in any gaps that may exist as |
|
between how the Federal Government has conceived of sentencing |
|
and how the local government has. But we view these would be a |
|
unique set of guidelines affecting the District of Columbia. |
|
Mr. Davis. What is the timeframe for that? Would we be |
|
doing that as part of this legislation as we move through, or |
|
would that come after? |
|
Mr. Raines. What we will be asking is an authorization for |
|
us to begin that process. We would see it being completed |
|
during that 3- to 5-year transition period with the prisons, so |
|
that it would be completed prior to the Bureau of Prisons |
|
taking control of the facilities. |
|
Mr. Davis. Thanks. I couldn't help but notice that the |
|
proposal recommends that the Lorton complex be renovated where |
|
possible and even expanded. That was called to my attention by |
|
interested constituents. Is this something that the President |
|
intends to insist on, or are we willing to negotiate on whether |
|
Lorton should be retained or moved to a new location? |
|
I know that you have some new cost data coming your way |
|
with the NCCD report that is in your office at this point. Is |
|
the administration going to be flexible on this, in working |
|
with this committee and with Congress? |
|
Mr. Raines. Mr. Chairman, we will certainly be flexible in |
|
working with the committee on the specifics of how the plan is |
|
implemented. Our major concern is to ensure that adequate |
|
facilities will exist for the prison and, as far as possible, |
|
that these facilities are as close to the District of Columbia |
|
as possible. |
|
It is our preference to have these facilities renovated and |
|
constructed on the Lorton property, because that exists. But we |
|
will be happy to work with the committee on any ideas that the |
|
committee might have. |
|
Mr. Davis. Thank you. Lorton is there. The land is there. |
|
You don't have to find new land, and for that reason it is very |
|
convenient. And I understand that, and I think that the burden |
|
on us is to go and find that we can do this in a cost-effective |
|
manner and still meet the guidelines that we all want to meet, |
|
because Lorton, as currently constituted, has failed, and I |
|
think we all recognize that. |
|
The numbers that I have seen point to almost $1 billion for |
|
replacement of that facility where it is now, but as we get new |
|
cost estimates we want to continue this dialog with you as |
|
well. We appreciate the administration's being willing to take |
|
a flexible view as long as we can meet the final goal that I |
|
think we share with you. |
|
In one of the briefings I received on the proposal, I heard |
|
a figure of 10,000 inmates used as a basis of a cost estimate |
|
of $850 million in capital costs. Now my understanding is that |
|
there is a new study currently under final review in OMB that |
|
concludes that in the year 2006 there will be 7,400 felons |
|
sentenced from the District. I don't know how you conclude what |
|
you will have in 2006, but they have people that do that. |
|
Do you know what the rationale is for a 33 percent increase |
|
in population estimate that was concomitant cost increases over |
|
the NCCD estimates that were consensus estimates? Have you |
|
gotten that far in looking at this? |
|
Mr. Raines. Yes, the study you referred to assumes that |
|
there is no change in sentencing practice. Our estimate of |
|
10,000 assumes that there is a change and that there will |
|
therefore be more inmates who are actually in the facilities. |
|
Now, there was a lot of ups and downs in this because there |
|
may be more prisoners but they may be serving, in some cases, |
|
shorter sentences, and therefore it is not clear all of the |
|
details of that. But we think that the 10,000 estimate is a |
|
good planning estimate at this point, given the changes in |
|
sentencing. |
|
Mr. Davis. What about the prison privatization issue? The |
|
Federal Bureau of Prisons generally does not get into that, it |
|
is my understanding. As you know, the District is already |
|
moving toward privatizing at least a large portion of its |
|
inmate population control, and it has a long-range plan to do |
|
more in that direction. Does that remain a viable alternative? |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, the Bureau of Prisons has spent a lot of |
|
time studying the issue of privatization, and particularly in |
|
the context of a couple of facilities in California. The |
|
Department of Justice has some serious concerns about |
|
privatizing prison facilities, given the extraordinary powers |
|
that prison guards and officials have over the lives of the |
|
prisoners and the need to take and to use the police power to |
|
maintain order in prisons. |
|
But we did not rule out privatization of some parts of the |
|
system should the Bureau of Prisons believe that that is the |
|
most effective way to go and that it is consistent with the |
|
need for the maintenance of order. |
|
Mr. Davis. So as we look at these numbers and deal with |
|
them, we could find that it could make sense for the Federal |
|
Government to take over D.C. Corrections and perhaps privatize |
|
them ourselves rather than incur higher BOP costs. We need to |
|
work through those issues? |
|
Mr. Raines. We need to work through it. I am not sure that |
|
there is going to be a major cost difference here, but again, |
|
the Bureau of Prisons has done quite a bit of work on this and |
|
has some fairly strong feelings about the concerns about what |
|
happens, for example, in the case of prisoner disorders and the |
|
need for the guards on the premises to exercise police powers. |
|
If it is a purely private facility, questions arise as to the |
|
appropriateness of the use of force and other measures that |
|
have caused them some concern as they look at the issue. |
|
But I am sure that the representatives from the Bureau of |
|
Prisons would be happy to meet with the committee and go over |
|
their concerns as well as provide the committee with the |
|
benefit of the work they have done. |
|
Mr. Davis. Just a couple of other questions before I yield |
|
to the gentleman from Maryland. Who would administer the courts |
|
under your proposal, and who administers them now? |
|
Mr. Raines. The courts are essentially self-administered |
|
now, although financed by the city government. The city |
|
government provides a lump sum to the courts, and the courts |
|
then utilize those funds to finance themselves. |
|
Under our plan, the management of the courts would remain |
|
the same. We would simply have the funds come from the Federal |
|
Government through the Administrative Office of the Courts--of |
|
the Federal Courts, and then to the local court system. So |
|
there would not be a substantial change in how the courts are |
|
managed. |
|
Mr. Davis. Are there real policy or principal reasons that |
|
the Administrative Office of the Courts couldn't and shouldn't |
|
oversee the District courts? |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, we have had a number of discussions with |
|
them. They are quite busy. They have a full plate in |
|
administering the Federal courts, but we believe they are the |
|
most appropriate administrative agent for funds for the D.C. |
|
courts. |
|
It would be difficult to do it through the Justice |
|
Department because the Justice Department appears before the |
|
courts so extensively that some might believe that there was a |
|
conflict of interest if the Justice Department also controlled |
|
the funding for the courts. |
|
Mr. Davis. Thank you very much. |
|
Well, before I yield to the gentleman from Maryland, I just |
|
want to note that we have had some suburban Members here. I |
|
think the great thing about what you have proposed and the way |
|
we hope to conduct this is that we no longer have suburbs |
|
versus city in these conflicts. We are going to try to move out |
|
of this and move to the fact that our destinies are intertwined |
|
and we are one region and we all have a strong investment in |
|
making the central city work. And I know that Mr. Wynn shares |
|
that with me, and in that regard I am happy to recognize the |
|
gentleman from Maryland. |
|
Mr. Wynn. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And I concur with your |
|
sentiments about the interdependence of our region. And I thank |
|
Mr. Raines for appearing today. |
|
I apologize for not being here for the beginning of your |
|
presentation. I have a couple of questions that I hope have not |
|
been covered or explained. |
|
One of the fundamental issues of concern to me has to do |
|
with law enforcement. I understand and heard your comments with |
|
regard to the takeover of the court system. My first question |
|
is: Is there any direct assistance for the District of Columbia |
|
Police Department? Is there any aid going to the D.C. Police |
|
Department under this proposal? |
|
Mr. Raines. Under our plan, we are taking over certain |
|
functions that will provide additional budget room within the |
|
District's budget, that the local officials can choose to |
|
invest in the police department. |
|
But we are also quite interested in working with the |
|
Financial Authority on their efforts to try to improve |
|
management in the police department, and we will be working |
|
with them and providing whatever technical assistance we can |
|
from any of the Federal law enforcement agencies to help |
|
improve the functioning of the police department. |
|
And so the benefits for the police department come from |
|
expanded room in the District budget and technical assistance |
|
that we have offered to make available. |
|
Ms. Norton. Will the gentleman yield on the police |
|
department question? |
|
Mr. Wynn. Certainly. |
|
Ms. Norton. I just want to indicate to the gentleman that |
|
the Congress negotiated a plan for an additional $42 million |
|
for the police department last year. Working with Senator |
|
Hatch, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee in the Senate we |
|
were able to get $15 million. The needs of the police |
|
department are immediate. I believe that the Federal Government |
|
now owes us $27 million and that we cannot wait for this plan |
|
or any plan to get that money. And I intend to use the next few |
|
weeks to get the additional $27 million that I think we have |
|
coming to us. |
|
Mr. Wynn. Well, I certainly share your concern, and have a |
|
similar sense of urgency with respect to funds for the police |
|
department, which actually led to my next question. I |
|
understand that basically by assuming certain pension liability |
|
for the police department, that that would be the basis on |
|
which these additional funds, additional space if you will, |
|
would be created to provide. How much money approximately would |
|
be available to the D.C. government as a result of the takeover |
|
of the pension liability that could be used in whole or in part |
|
for the police department? |
|
Mr. Raines. We have not divided the dollars by the |
|
components of the plan, but I believe we begin, in the first |
|
year, in the range of $60 or $70 million and that rises over |
|
time. That is the net value of what we are taking over minus |
|
the Federal payment. |
|
Mr. Wynn. Sixty million? OK. And you mentioned that there |
|
were certain management improvements with respect to the police |
|
department that you thought were necessary. Could you comment |
|
briefly on that? |
|
Mr. Raines. Our plan does not have extensive detail on |
|
that, but let me just say this. The experience in a number of |
|
other cities has been that using information technology, |
|
changing patrol practices, and maximizing the number of |
|
officers on the street have a significant impact on crime. And |
|
these kinds of changes have been introduced in part in the |
|
District, but not as aggressively as in other cities. We |
|
strongly encourage the city to use the most advanced thinking |
|
on deployment of police resources as they deal with the issues |
|
of crime. |
|
The Control Board has just received a study that I have not |
|
yet seen, but I have read the press reports, and I think it |
|
begins to address some of these issues. I look forward to |
|
working with the Control Board to see what additional help the |
|
Federal Government might provide to assist the police |
|
department in becoming one of the best in the Nation, and in |
|
using the most modern techniques to have a very direct impact |
|
on crime. |
|
Mr. Wynn. Well, I agree. I noted in recent reports that New |
|
York City had had significant success by dramatically |
|
increasing the number of officers on the street and that would |
|
be something that I think could work in this area as well. |
|
Let me ask briefly in the area of economic development, I |
|
understand that there is some consideration or proposal for a |
|
tax incentive program to spur economic development. Could you |
|
comment a little bit about the specifics of what would be |
|
envisioned in terms of the tax incentives? |
|
Mr. Raines. We have proposed the creation of an Economic |
|
Development Corporation that would have certain powers. Among |
|
those, the ability to provide tax incentives to businesses. The |
|
actual details of that are not yet available. I hope that they |
|
will be in the next week or so we will be able to give you the |
|
specific items and what the tax advantages are, how they would |
|
work, and who would qualify. But I think we are still about a |
|
week away on that. |
|
Mr. Wynn. Would capital gains relief be included? |
|
Mr. Raines. It is not our current plan to include any |
|
capital gains provision in the proposal. |
|
Mr. Wynn. All right. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. At this time, |
|
I wouldn't have any further questions. I would like the |
|
opportunity to perhaps submit some written questions at a later |
|
date. |
|
Mr. Davis. Happy to. Thank you. |
|
Ms. Norton. |
|
Ms. Norton. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Raines, |
|
as you know, when District employees were Federal employees, |
|
Congress saw fit never to set up a trust fund for pensions. |
|
When pensions were finally transferred in 1980, the Congress |
|
set up--the Congress required the District to set up a trust |
|
fund and to contribute amounts such that now our pensions since |
|
home rule are significantly overfunded. |
|
In that regard, would you indicate why transferring that |
|
entire amount--why it is that your plan calls for transferring |
|
that entire amount to the Federal Government? |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, our plan involves taking over virtually |
|
all of the unfunded liability of the District pension plans, |
|
and that unfunded liability is considerable. It is in excess of |
|
$4 billion. The total liability is in excess of $7 billion. And |
|
so that the funding that has been generated since 1979 has kept |
|
the unfunded liability from growing totally out of control, but |
|
the liability is still quite large. |
|
Rather than trying to find a methodology of sharing that |
|
unfunded liability, or of coming up with new Federal dollars to |
|
go into the pension plan, it struck us that it was more |
|
consistent with our overall approach to simply relieve the city |
|
of the full responsibility. And if we are going to relieve them |
|
of the responsibility for those benefits, we need, as well, to |
|
acquire the assets that are now offsetting part of that |
|
liability. And that is what we propose to do. |
|
You should recall that the assets are an estimate of what |
|
will be available to fund the liability. But if for any reason |
|
the performance of the economy and the performance of the stock |
|
market doesn't meet the estimates, then the unfunded liability |
|
would be larger. If we take it over, the pensioners will be |
|
assured with the full faith and credit of the United States |
|
that they will receive their benefits, regardless of the |
|
performance of the stock market. So that from the standpoint of |
|
beneficiaries we believe this is a very--it is very important, |
|
and from the standpoint of the city, removing this entire |
|
liability and giving the city a fresh start, we think, is |
|
important to the long-term financial health of the city and to |
|
its credit ratings. |
|
Ms. Norton. You propose that the present pension plan would |
|
be closed with no further accruals to that plan, and that a new |
|
plan would be instituted for the very same employees who are |
|
here and so they would be subject to two plans. Do you envision |
|
that an employee would risk final receipts of pensions in the |
|
amount that she would have had had there been only one pension |
|
plan? In other words, will going to two pension plans in and of |
|
itself diminish the pension of individual employees? |
|
Mr. Raines. No, it should have no impact on the individual |
|
employee. They will receive credit for their time served under |
|
the existing plan. They will receive a benefit that is |
|
calculated based on looking at their terminal pay, just as they |
|
would under the current plan. So there is nothing in our plan |
|
that by itself would result in any diminished benefits to |
|
employees. |
|
And as I mentioned, there is an added improvement in that |
|
the payments would no longer be subject to the vagaries, at |
|
least on the older plan, or whether or not the District would, |
|
in fact, be able to meet that unfunded liability. |
|
One of the issues, I think, that has not been addressed by |
|
many, but Chairman Davis mentioned, the increase in the |
|
requirement for the city contributions to the pension plan in |
|
2004 are enormous. And I don't believe anyone has identified a |
|
plan whereby the city would actually be able to make those |
|
payments. We think that our plan forestalls that issue and does |
|
so before pensioners and others would become concerned about |
|
the fact that the city does not have the financial wherewithal |
|
to increase its payments by the amount now required in law. |
|
Ms. Norton. I can certainly tell you that having worked |
|
very hard on a pension bill last year that I grow very nervous |
|
if anyone in the District thinks that the Congress has any |
|
interest in stepping up on this issue. It is frightening. It |
|
has been frightening to see how little response I get when I |
|
talk about what would really be the biggest catastrophe of the |
|
city and that is either not doing it or waiting so long to do |
|
it that you have untold repercussions on our bond and on |
|
everything else that the District has. |
|
This is a very, very troublesome issue because the Congress |
|
is 100 percent responsible and has shown not the slightest |
|
interest in doing anything about it. This is a 100 percent |
|
congressionally created liability. |
|
May I ask one more question, and that is about the notion |
|
that the Internal Revenue Service collect taxes for the |
|
District, including local taxes. First, how would this occur? |
|
What are the mechanics of how this would occur, especially for |
|
the ordinary taxpayer? |
|
Second, what efficiency does this build in for the District |
|
government? And third, if this is already available to the |
|
States, why do other States not also do it at this point? |
|
Mr. Raines. From the efficiency standpoint for taxpayers, |
|
this would be a major breakthrough. They would no longer have |
|
to file separate returns with the city, but they could |
|
calculate their city income taxes as well as their Federal |
|
income taxes on the same form. And that would be a major |
|
efficiency for the city. |
|
Also, the city, being a small part of a larger region, has |
|
some unique enforcement problems and that is that it is not |
|
able to determine what jurisdiction people may be living in and |
|
has not been able to take advantage of some of the matching |
|
programs that the States use in working with the Internal |
|
Revenue Service ensuring enforcement of their tax laws. |
|
Third, I believe that the economic incentives that we will |
|
be suggesting as part of the Economic Development Corporation |
|
will depend greatly on residence of employees. And one of the |
|
ways of ensuring that the city gets the benefit from these |
|
incentives in its tax system is to ensure that those new |
|
employees are, in fact, paying District taxes. |
|
The experience elsewhere with this option has been, at |
|
least my experience in the couple of States that I am aware of |
|
who have looked at this question, has been that those States |
|
were large enough in general and sufficiently isolated in |
|
particular from surrounding jurisdictions that they didn't have |
|
these cross-border problems that were of concern and they are |
|
large enough to afford the kind of system that you need to |
|
enforce an income tax jurisdiction. |
|
The District is a relatively small jurisdiction and does |
|
not have access to a lot of the tax tools that other agencies |
|
have, and therefore I think the city would uniquely benefit |
|
here. Both that the citizens would have a more simplified tax |
|
return, but also the Internal Revenue Service enforcement |
|
mechanisms would be available and we believe it could have a |
|
salutary impact on the total amount of taxes actually paid to |
|
the city. |
|
Ms. Norton. The District has a reputation for inefficiency. |
|
No inefficiency, though, is greater in the District than the |
|
notorious inability to collect the taxes that it enacts into |
|
law and apparently doesn't see. To the extent this would help |
|
this, I would be interested in exploring it further. Thank you, |
|
Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Davis. Frank, I just have a few more questions on the |
|
Economic Development Corporation. Two things to flush out on |
|
that and I am sure that will have the option of a lot of give |
|
and take as we move through it. I want to make sure I |
|
understand what you have in mind. |
|
Could you explain what would the geographical area of |
|
operation be for the Economic Development Corporation? Would it |
|
be the whole city; what authorities it is intended to have and |
|
what is the funding source and the level? |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, the primary area of activity of the |
|
corporation will be the central business district and those |
|
communities outside of the central business district that have |
|
a large percentage of low-income people. It is not our current |
|
thinking that it would be active in the higher income areas |
|
where there is substantial amount of economic activity |
|
currently taking place. |
|
We intend to fund the corporation with up-front money to |
|
capitalize it, but also making available tax credits that could |
|
be part of its program. We also think that the corporation |
|
should have an extensive involvement with the private sector, |
|
since economic development in this city as well as any other |
|
city, has to be really driven by private investment, private |
|
job creation, and so that there will be a close tie to private |
|
economic activity. |
|
And it is our desire to attract private capital as well to |
|
the corporation to supplement the funds made available by the |
|
Federal Government in the initial capitalization so that |
|
activities ranging from major development projects to job |
|
training and job creation would be effective under the |
|
corporation. |
|
Mr. Davis. OK. Is this at all similar to the Pennsylvania |
|
Avenue Development Corporation and the proposed New York Avenue |
|
Development Corporation? |
|
Mr. Raines. It is really not as geographically focused. |
|
They may well decide to have a focus on a particular area, but |
|
it would not be the entire focus on any one particular area. |
|
Second, there would be more reliance on the tax system and tax |
|
incentives as opposed to direct Federal appropriations. |
|
Mr. Davis. What about the redevelopment land authority? |
|
Would this corporation assume or be capable of assuming some or |
|
all of that responsibility? |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, that is one issue that we have had some |
|
discussions on and really don't have a conclusion. I could see |
|
the city deciding, or this committee deciding, that combining |
|
certain other economic development activities as part of the |
|
corporation might be beneficial. We really haven't come to a |
|
conclusion there. But the more that we can have a coordinated |
|
effort, I think, the better. |
|
Mr. Davis. What about the corporation assuming control over |
|
existing District-owned land that is determined to be surplus? |
|
For example, you could have a number of school sites perhaps |
|
coming available with General Becton looking at some school |
|
closings. That could be a good catalyst if it is put under some |
|
central authority. |
|
Mr. Raines. We think it would be beneficial for the |
|
corporation to have access to land that it could include in its |
|
development plans. Indeed, it would be our hope to make |
|
available where we could Federal lands that had been declared |
|
surplus that might be available for economic development and |
|
the extent to which the city could do the same thing, I think |
|
that it might be helpful. |
|
The private sector orientation of the corporation, I think, |
|
would be important. There is something of a history of land |
|
being allocated for certain developments and those developments |
|
not happening for many, many years. And I think it would be |
|
necessary to ensure that development projects could move |
|
expeditiously as the result of the corporation's activities. |
|
Mr. Davis. OK. Do you think it would be helpful for the |
|
city to have one agency authorized and responsible for all |
|
surplus district properties so that it could put together |
|
adequate parcels for development? Is that not a determination |
|
that this proposal makes? |
|
Mr. Raines. We have made no determination on that as part |
|
of this plan. |
|
Mr. Davis. Many District government buildings, public |
|
housing, schools, police stations, are built on federally owned |
|
land. Would the administration support transferring these |
|
parcels, most of which were acquired for District-only purposes |
|
over the years, to District ownership? |
|
Mr. Raines. We would be happy to work with the committee in |
|
looking at the particulars to see the extent to which that |
|
would make a difference in the success of the plan. |
|
Mr. Davis. Finally, how would this corporation be governed? |
|
Is it intended to have District participation but not |
|
domination? Would it be charged with protecting Federal |
|
interests as well as District interests? Any conclusion on that |
|
yet? |
|
Mr. Raines. Our view is that the corporation ought to be |
|
primarily made up of private sector individuals appointed by |
|
some combination of the Federal Government and the local |
|
government. |
|
Mr. Davis. OK. And moving to the last topic. As you know, |
|
all of the District's general obligation debt carries a proviso |
|
that if other funds are not available, the Federal payment can |
|
be used as security for the debt. We ran into considerable |
|
discomfort from the existing bondholders on this issue 2 years |
|
ago when we allowed the Federal Treasury to use the Federal |
|
payment as collateral for short-term loans. |
|
How do you expect the elimination of the Federal payment to |
|
affect the value and liquidity of outstanding District debt and |
|
on the District's future bond rating? I don't know if you want |
|
to answer that or Mr. DeSeve. He doesn't want to take it. |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, Mr. Chairman, I actually wrote the bond |
|
indenture for the District of Columbia many years ago, and I |
|
believe it is a very strong indenture. As I recall, the actual |
|
reference is that the Federal payment, if any, is available for |
|
support of the bonds. |
|
I think the most important thing we can do in supporting |
|
the value of the District's bonds is to remove the financial |
|
cloud over the city, particularly by eliminating the concerns |
|
about the pension liability. So if you take the plan as a |
|
whole, I believe it would be a very strong net positive for the |
|
bonds, far more than the prospect of using the Federal payment |
|
to meet the payments. Currently, the bonds have a very strong |
|
security in the property tax and, as long as that security is |
|
respected and enforced by the courts, I think it should be |
|
adequate security for bondholders. |
|
Mr. Davis. Thank you very much. Mr. Wynn, do you have any |
|
additional questions? |
|
Mr. Wynn. Thank you, yes, just one. Going back to the issue |
|
of the Federal Government assuming responsibility for prisons, |
|
I note that prison staff would not be automatically integrated |
|
into the Federal Government system, but would have to reapply |
|
based on their ability to meet Federal standards. That gives me |
|
some concern. What exactly is the difference between the |
|
current Federal standards and the District of Columbia's |
|
standards now? |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, they were developed separately, and I |
|
think the Bureau of Prisons wants to ensure that all of their |
|
employees have met the standards, have had similar training, |
|
and will be able to be successful. |
|
I think there would be a reluctance, as I think there is a |
|
reluctance in any of these cases, to simply have a blanket |
|
promise that everyone will be hired who is currently employed. |
|
It is one of the things that will have to be worked out during |
|
this transition period, is what is the necessary employment |
|
levels; is the structure of the work force that is currently in |
|
the prison system the same as the one that the Bureau of |
|
Prisons would like to operate? What is the level of supervision |
|
and the number of supervisory personnel? |
|
So there are a lot of issues that are going to have to be |
|
worked out, but I think the Bureau would be very reluctant to |
|
give a blanket promise that everyone who is currently employed |
|
would have a job under the new system. |
|
Mr. Wynn. Would it make sense to provide for a transition |
|
period so that if the issue was training and a number of hours |
|
of training or something like that, that existing personnel |
|
could obtain that training without being immediately discharged |
|
purely because they lack this specific training component that |
|
the Bureau of Prisons personnel had that they had never been |
|
offered? |
|
Mr. Davis. Will the gentleman yield? We would be very happy |
|
to work with the administration on those kinds of things to |
|
bring people up to the required hours and so on on this. I |
|
would think that would be a possibility and would be very |
|
helpful. You could retrain people instead of hiring new people |
|
with a proven record. |
|
Mr. Raines. Absolutely. And we provide for a 3 to 5-year |
|
transition period and during that period it would be my hope |
|
that not only would the physical facilities be improved, but |
|
also any training necessary that would be comparable to that |
|
provided to the Bureau of Prisons would also be provided so |
|
that the vast majority of employees would know on the first day |
|
that they had been retained once the Bureau of Prisons takes |
|
control. So we don't view there would be an abrupt moment. We |
|
view this 3 to 5-year period as not only dealing with physical |
|
capital, but also human capital in the system. |
|
Mr. Wynn. It sounds like between your comments and those of |
|
Chairman Davis that this issue could be resolved without the |
|
loss of prison personnel that could otherwise be qualified to |
|
be employed by the Bureau of Prisons. |
|
Mr. Davis. I would think that the prison employees who have |
|
the experience and would accept the training would be a great |
|
asset, obviously. These are issues that we need to think and |
|
work through together. You have a number of affected |
|
constituents, but on the other hand, the Bureau of Prisons has |
|
to ultimately make this determination or they are not going to |
|
want to be involved. But I would think there would be room for |
|
most of the people. |
|
Ms. Norton. |
|
Ms. Norton. To my good friend from Maryland, I should say |
|
for the record that the nature of his questions say all that |
|
needs to be said about where District employees live. |
|
Mr. Wynn. Throughout the region, it is my understanding. |
|
Mr. Davis. Is that your question? |
|
Ms. Norton. No, it is not, and I appreciate his help on |
|
that issue because at least a few of them live in the District. |
|
I have only one question, and that is about an element of |
|
the proposal that your working group is having some difficulty |
|
with, and they are trying very hard and working very well, and |
|
that is the National Capital Infrastructure Fund. Anybody who |
|
goes outside now, even after the District has been struggling |
|
on the streets, finds that the potholes have reappeared. |
|
I mean, this is one of the reasons why the morale of |
|
citizens cannot be raised. It is what you see and feel and |
|
touch. There has just not been enough of what you see and feel |
|
and touch that has changed in this city to keep people here and |
|
to keep their morale up so they believe something is going to |
|
happen. |
|
So, though this amount is small, it is very welcomed |
|
because it is an acknowledgment that the care of roads is also |
|
a State function or of many roads is also a State function. |
|
The problem here, and I understand the amount, but the |
|
problem here is that we are talking about only $125 million, |
|
and with the thought and forethought and careful craftsmanship |
|
that have you given every part of this proposal, you see this |
|
as seed money, not as money just to be spent on some roads |
|
during the next 5 years. |
|
The problem is that it has to be seed money for something, |
|
and you indicate something that the city council could do right |
|
now, and I still don't understand why it has not been done. You |
|
indicate one thing that could be done that was. It would be |
|
payment in lieu of taxes that right now the city council and |
|
the Mayor could, in fact, be negotiating with the multitude of |
|
nonprofits that are in the city. I know that the National |
|
Education Association stepped forward itself and said here we |
|
are, negotiate with us. And I still don't know if their offer |
|
to pay 40 percent of the tax that they would otherwise pay has |
|
been accepted. All I know is that they have offered it. |
|
You put that in your proposal, except of course it is not |
|
directly related to roads. So it is seed money and perhaps |
|
would mean that that fund would grow because that amount would, |
|
I take it, would come into that fund over time. |
|
Now, if we were a city of another type, the amount could |
|
grow because of a revenue function that might be connected to |
|
roads and bridges themselves, such as tolls for example. That, |
|
of course, is not going to be possible, certainly within the |
|
city. And I wonder whether or not you believe that an amount of |
|
this kind can, in fact, be leveraged sufficiently to help us |
|
with local roads and with capital funds as your proposal says, |
|
with capital funding so much less, or whether the amount is |
|
simply too small to ultimately be leveraged for a purpose |
|
beyond, for example, the 5 years. |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, we would be very desirous of working with |
|
the committee on this issue. It is--in our view it is very |
|
important for the Nation's Capital and for the region and for |
|
the city that the city's transportation infrastructure be first |
|
rate. And the investment in that transportation infrastructure |
|
has lagged over a number of years to the extent that we now |
|
have had to waive the local match for highway funds because the |
|
city otherwise would not be able to move forward on very |
|
important projects that affect the whole region. And we view |
|
this National Capital Infrastructure Fund as a first step in |
|
dealing with transportation issues in the city, but also ones |
|
that intimately affect the region. |
|
So many of the employees in the city come from outside the |
|
city that there is a tremendous reliance on this system, on the |
|
Federal Government for its own employees relying on it |
|
substantially. Metro is the heart of our regional |
|
transportation system and we believe we have to find ways to |
|
increase the investment in that infrastructure. So we believe |
|
that this fund is a first step in that direction. |
|
We have suggested that others may be interested in |
|
contributing to this fund because of the regional impact. There |
|
has been some reluctance by entities to provide funds to the |
|
city because they were concerned as to whether or not the funds |
|
would be used for anything that was relevant to their own |
|
interest. But because the roads and bridges and Metro are so |
|
clearly of interest to the employers in the city, whether they |
|
are for-profit or nonprofit, because it is of such importance |
|
to the region because if the city is unable to pay its share of |
|
these costs, then the Metro and other facilities would |
|
deteriorate to the detriment of the region as a whole, that we |
|
are encouraging as many thoughts as possible about how can we |
|
attract other funds to this fund. And how can we deal with |
|
regional transportation issues generally through a mechanism |
|
such as this and starting with the District of Columbia? |
|
Ms. Norton. So consistent with your plan might be a |
|
regional fund that would be dedicated solely to regional |
|
transportation issues without prejudice to one or another |
|
aspect of those issues? For example, when you say there should |
|
be a gas tax and then people say, ``No, I want it for Metro,'' |
|
and when you say, ``It is for Metro,'' people in other parts of |
|
the region say, ``I can't use Metro because of where I live, |
|
no, I still need roads.'' |
|
Do you envision that this fund could be the beginning of a |
|
larger regional fund that could be a win-win for the entire |
|
region contributing to transportation needs wherever they may |
|
be, whether in rapid transportation or in roads? |
|
Mr. Raines. Well, as you know, in my role as the Budget |
|
Director, I have the opportunity to visit with people in the |
|
region about special regional needs, and the Federal Government |
|
has had a special relationship with this region. The most |
|
notable example is Metro, which has its own stream of funding |
|
from the Federal Government quite separate from the funding |
|
that is made available through the national programs. And so I, |
|
from time to time, hear about special regional needs, and I |
|
think it would be highly desirable if the region were to find a |
|
mechanism to deal with regional transportation concerns that |
|
provided capital funds on a continuing basis for these |
|
endeavors. |
|
The region has more in common than in some cases the |
|
suburbs in the region have with other parts of the State that |
|
they are in. |
|
So it strikes me that if the local leadership in the region |
|
could conceive of a means of financing capital for |
|
transportation, it would be indebted to the region, and, as the |
|
Federal budget director, I could well see how there is a |
|
national interest in ensuring that that mechanism worked well |
|
enough because of the impact on the Nation's Capital and the |
|
National Capital region. |
|
We have employees throughout the region; we have facilities |
|
throughout the region. If the transportation system does not |
|
work, then that is a problem for the Federal Government. |
|
Ms. Norton. This may be a very important opportunity for |
|
the region to get hold of some of the issues that were raised |
|
at the recent metro conference, where the bus system, for |
|
example, has broken off to such an extent that there is very |
|
serious concern about the future of Metro. |
|
I hope that the kind of imaginative thinking you have |
|
brought to District matters will encourage the region to bring |
|
the same to its own transportation matters. |
|
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. |
|
Mr. Davis. Thank you very much. |
|
Do you want to add anything in summarization of anything |
|
you have missed or something you would like to respond to? |
|
Mr. Raines. Mr. Chairman, I would just like to thank the |
|
committee for your interest in this proposal, your moving |
|
expeditiously with hearings, and the opportunity to have worked |
|
with the Members as we developed and presented the proposal. |
|
I think it bodes well for the future of the District that |
|
Congress has taken up this issue in such a forthright manner, |
|
and I look forward to working with you to see if we can get |
|
legislation as expeditiously as possible, so all the work that |
|
will be needed to move this plan into actuality in the next |
|
fiscal year, which begins October 1, can begin as soon as |
|
possible. |
|
Mr. Davis. I think we should be able to meet that deadline |
|
in working together. Today you have acquitted yourself and have |
|
shown that the administration has planned very well; I think, |
|
as is appropriate in the legislative process where we need to |
|
do that. I am personally energized by the attitude and |
|
initiative from the White House and from congressional leaders. |
|
We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to make things |
|
happen. We have the Republicans and Democrats, Congress and the |
|
administration, city and suburbs, working together, recognizing |
|
we have some structural tasks ahead of us. |
|
I think the Control Board, who we did not talk about today, |
|
have brought about a lot of the changes. Although we read about |
|
bad news, a lot of this has been uncovered by the work they are |
|
doing. The Control Board should be working with the Mayor and |
|
council on the day-to-day functions. Congress should not be |
|
doing that. I think you have correctly focused on the larger |
|
structural issues that have to be addressed if the city is |
|
going to be successful. |
|
I also would just note the newly emboldened city council, |
|
and the fact that they are showing some initiative on this |
|
cannot help but make this a very satisfactory answer at the end |
|
of our journey. I will look forward to hearing from the Mayor |
|
and council in the near future, and I thank my colleagues for |
|
being with us today. |
|
The hearing is adjourned. Thank you very much. |
|
[Whereupon, at 11:35 a.m., the subcommittee was adjourned.] |
|
|
|
|
|
</pre></body></html> |
|
|